Showing posts sorted by date for query MODI. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query MODI. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Friday, November 13, 2026

 African push to triple climate adaptation finance left off Cop31 agenda


African countries’ proposal to triple finance for adaptation to the effects of climate change has been left off the agenda at the United Nations climate summit Cop31, currently under way in Antalya, Turkey. Wealthy nations pushed back against efforts to make it a formal, binding agenda item.


Issued on: 12/11/2026 - RFI

Climate activists protesting against use of fossil fuels at Cop31 in Antalya, Turkey. © Farai Shawn Matiashe/RFI


By: Farai Shawn Matiashe

The first day of talks at the summit saw friction between the two sides, as the African Group of Negotiators (AGN) sought a dedicated slot on the issue. The group has been pressing for this since the climate talks held in Bonn, Germany, in June.

The proposal failed to reach consensus at Monday’s opening session, and Cop31 president Murat Kurum ruled that it could instead be discussed under existing agenda items.

The European Union had signalled before the summit that it would not accept a separate agenda item on the issue, according to Agence Europe. After the African Group’s request, the EU and the United Kingdom took the floor to restate the climate finance commitments they had already made.

As a result, there will be no formal negotiating track to define, monitor and enforce the pledge to at least triple adaptation finance by 2035. That pledge was made at Cop30 in Belém, Brazil, under the Global Mutirão decision, the main outcome of the Belém talks.

Dr Antwi-Boasiako Amoah, chair of the AGN, said tripling adaptation finance was one of the group’s core demands at Cop31.

“It is important to set the better structures right for better implementation of the tripling of adaptation finance,” he told a press conference in Antalya on 10 November.

“Where are we starting from? Are we starting from the doubling? Which numbers are we starting from? If you do not know the baseline, you cannot measure how much has come in. That is important.”

He added that a clear timeline for reaching the target was just as important.

“Without a trajectory, you will not be able to track progress being made,” Amoah said.

Pacific nations await climate billions, as fossil fuel divide looms over Cop31
African Group's position

The African Group is now pushing for the target to be given priority in the cover text, the non-binding political declaration adopted by consensus at the end of the summit.

It remains unclear which figure is to be tripled. If the baseline is the one set by the Glasgow Climate Pact, international adaptation finance would rise to between $85 billion and $120 billion a year by 2035.

Adjusted for inflation, however, that would cover just 20 to 29 percent of developing countries’ adaptation needs in 2035, according to the UN Environment Programme’s Adaptation Gap Report 2026.

International public adaptation finance from developed to developing countries reached between $28.2 billion and $31.7 billion in 2024, up $1 billion on the previous year.

Climate adaptation aid must rise tenfold: UN

Amos Wemanya, senior climate adviser at Kenyan research group Power Shift Africa, said the negotiations gave priority to mitigation over adaptation. But with climate change devastating communities, he argued, countries must put adaptation first.

“Africa is spending much of its own budgets, trying to adapt. We cannot allow a continent that has contributed the least to the climate crisis to be spending its own resources to adapt,” he told RFI.

“We need support. But this is not the end. We will find every room to discuss adaptation finance.”

For the tripling to succeed, Wemanya said, it must come with the means to deliver it.

Southern African farmers prepare for powerful El Nino with agroecology

Africa accounts for around 4 percent of the global greenhouse gas emissions that drive climate change. Yet the continent suffers some of its harshest effects, from drought and floods to food insecurity.

Southern Africa is now bracing for El Niño, which is forecast to bring dry conditions from the end of 2026 until February 2027.



UN chief urges world leaders to tackle 'dinosaur' fossil fuels at Cop31

United Nations secretary-general Antonio Guterres railed against the oil and gas lobby on Wednesday, telling world leaders fossil fuels "must go the way of the dinosaurs" at a climate summit that is missing several prominent figures.


Issued on: 11/11/2026 - RFI

UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres urged world leaders to tax the windfall profits of fossil fuel companies at Cop31. © OZAN KOSE / AFP

The two-week Cop31 talks kicked off in Turkey this week with governments under pressure to tackle climate change, after a year of searing heatwaves and wildfires in Europe and deadly floods in Nepal.

"The brutal truth is that the climate crisis is outrunning us," Guterres told dozens of world leaders assembled in the Mediterranean city of Antalya for two days of speeches by heads of state and government.

But few major breakthroughs are anticipated at the Cop31 negotiations, which run until 20 November, as countries grapple with an oil price shock and geopolitical tensions fuelled by the United States' war with Iran and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Since agreeing in 2023 for the first time to transition away from fossil fuels – the main driver of climate change – nations have struggled to advance that goal at the annual UN conferences.

"Fossil fuels must go the way of the dinosaurs, but that won't happen on its own. The dinosaurs did not have a lobby, but fossil fuels do," Guterres said, urging governments to tax the windfall profits of oil companies.

"Their strategy is simple: Distort the science. Delay the policy. Delay the action. Delay the accountability. It's time to kick the habit, and end the fossil fuel addiction," he said to sustained applause.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told COP31 that 'climate change has disappeared' from global leadership. © Ozan KOSE / AFP


Leaders missing

Guterres, who has made the climate change fight a central issue since taking office in 2017, is attending his last Cop before his term ends in December.

Some big names are missing at Cop31, with British Prime Minister Andy Burnham the only leader from a G7 country scheduled to address the summit.

"Since the start of this year, climate change has disappeared from speeches and documents from our global leadership," recently re-elected Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told fellow leaders.

"We've turned to talking more about arms and tariffs than the survival of future generations," he said.

Climate campaigners breathed a huge sigh of relief when Lula, who has overseen a dramatic drop in deforestation in the Amazon, defeated right-wing rival Flavio Bolsonaro in last month's presidential election.

"Brazil is back to defend the continuity of a healthy planet," Lula said.

While European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen is coming to Antalya, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni are staying away. Cop31 coincides with an EU leaders' summit in Ireland on Thursday.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Japanese counterpart Sanae Takaichi are also absent from the most recent list.

Cop31 opens in Turkey as climate funding and fossil fuels divide nations

Unsurprisingly, President Donald Trump, who pulled the United States out of the Paris Agreement and has not sent officials to climate talks since his re-election in 2024, is not attending the summit.


Chinese President Xi Jinping, who rarely attends Cop summits, will be represented by Vice President Han Zheng. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is also absent.

The United States and China are the world's top economies and biggest emitters of planet-heating emissions.

Low expectations

"It is a shame that some of the bigger European leaders aren't coming. We need Europe to be showing up strongly at this Cop," Cosima Cassel, a climate diplomacy expert at think-tank E3G, told French news agency AFP.

Wopke Hoekstra, the EU's top climate official, said the absences were "not completely atypical" as leaders may have "practical" reasons for not being able to attend a summit.

But he also told reporters in Brussels that "expectations are not necessarily high" for this climate conference.

Cop31 host Turkey is championing a voluntary initiative to accelerate the electrification of transport, buildings and industry, with a target of raising electricity's share of global energy consumption to 35 percent by 2035.

The EU has stressed that electrification must be "clean", which could spark debate over the role of oil, gas and coal in the Turkish proposal.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said the world needs a "fair" energy transition that "takes into account the energy security and different development needs of different countries".



'Everything we love is at stake': Greta Thunberg blasts COP climate summits as being full of lobbyists


By Ruth Wright with AP, AFP
Published on


Swedish activist Greta Thunberg and UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres blasted fossil fuel companies for "killing our planet".

Climate activist Greta Thunberg has blasted the annual COP climate summit as being hypocritical and "full of lobbyists".

Attending the talks for the first time since 2021, she urged leaders to put people and the planet ahead of profits and power.

The two-week COP31 talks kicked off in Turkey earlier this week with governments under pressure to tackle climate change after a year of searing heatwaves and wildfires in Europe, and deadly floods in Nepal.

“It’s a hypocrisy every year that the host countries are given an opportunity to whitewash themselves and we know that these negotiations are filled with lobbyists, paid by the very destructive industries which are benefiting from our extremely violent status quo,” Thunberg said as she arrived. “Our political and economic systems that have become incompatible with human nature.”

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres also spoke about these "very destructive industries" while addressing the conference: "Fossil fuel interests keep making a killing, while killing our planet," Guterres said, urging governments to tax the windfall profits of oil companies.

"Fossil fuels must go the way of the dinosaurs, but that won't happen on its own. The dinosaurs did not have a lobby, but fossil fuels do," he said.

'Fossil fuels must go the way of the dinosaurs'

"The brutal truth is that the climate crisis is outrunning us," Guterres told dozens of world leaders assembled at a sprawling expo centre in the Mediterranean city of Antalya.

But few major breakthroughs are anticipated at the COP31 negotiations, which run until 20 November, as countries grapple with an oil price shock and geopolitical tensions fuelled by the US war with Iran and Russia's war in Ukraine.

Since agreeing in 2023 for the first time to transition away from fossil fuels - the main driver of climate change - nations have struggled to advance that goal at the annual COP conferences.

"Fossil fuel interests keep making a killing, while killing our planet," Guterres said, urging governments to tax the windfall profits of oil companies.

"Fossil fuels must go the way of the dinosaurs, but that won't happen on its own. The dinosaurs did not have a lobby, but fossil fuels do," he said.

"Their strategy is simple: Distort the science. Delay the policy. Delay the action. Delay the accountability. It's time to kick the habit – and end the fossil fuel addiction," he said to applause.

Guterres, who has made the fight against climate change a central issue since taking office in 2017, is attending his last COP before his term ends in December.

Greta Thunberg: 'Everything and everyone we love is at stake'

Electrification and waste reduction are set to be key focus points of this year's negotiations, which run until 20 November. Many EU countries are expected to advocate for the role of renewables and the transition away from fossil fuels, however the leaders of France, Germany, Italy and Spain have all been criticised for not attending the Leaders' Summit which runs today and tomorrow.

COP31 co-hosts Turkey and Australia are promoting renewable energy and rooftop solar installations, but both still rely heavily on fossil fuels, especially coal, to generate electricity. Previous hosts, including Brazil, the United Arab Emirates and Azerbaijan, are major oil producers.

Climate change is “threatening everything,” Thunberg said, warning that “everything and everyone we love is at stake.”

“We should act to protect and benefit people rather than constantly sacrificing the global majority and the very planet we are all living on, for a fortunate few to keep making unimaginable profits and maintaining geopolitical power,” she said.

Thunberg blasts annual climate talks

This is the first climate summit Thunberg has attended since the 2021 talks in Glasgow, Scotland, where she dismissed world leaders’ promises as “blah, blah, blah.”

She rose to prominence in 2018 when, aged 15, she began a solitary 'School Strike for Climate' outside the Swedish Parliament. In 2022, she published 'The Climate Book', outlining actions to address the climate crisis.

She has won multiple awards and advocated for other causes, including the Free Palestine movement. Last year, she was arrested in London while supporting hunger-striking pro-Palestinian activists. More recently, she supported French students protesting for more school resources.

In 2024, she joined a protest in Georgia against Azerbaijan’s hosting of COP29.

A key goal for Turkey is global electrification: shifting sectors such as transportation, buildings and heavy industry away from fossil fuels and toward electricity. Turkey wants electricity, preferably generated from renewable sources such as solar and wind, to account for 35 per cent of global energy consumption by 2035, up from 23 per cent today.

“We have to take the victories we have, of course, because we are so desperate in this situation that we have to take all the positive signs we can get to save as much as we can still save,” said Thunberg, who is expected to spend several days at COP31.

Youth activists rally around Thunberg

Thunberg's arrival at the conference created excitement among many youth climate activists


“In this time of heightened geopolitical tensions, I hope that Greta’s presence here reminds us of why we started this work in the first place: to push for meaningful change, hold decision-makers accountable, and work towards a better future for all of humanity,” said Amber Turner, a 26-year-old fellow with the Alliance of Small Island States.

“Worsening climate change impacts make it challenging for young people to be sure of a safe and thriving future,” Turner added.

Protests at COP31 demanded more climate finance and criticised growing interest in nuclear energy.

“The presence of such a headline climate activist at one of the world’s biggest conferences on climate is symbolic, and I hope that it will put pressure on the COP itself to deliver real action and implementation,” said Kamori Osthananda, a youth negotiator with Thailand’s COP delegation.

Qiyun Woo, a youth environmentalist from Singapore, said Thunberg's “powerful” presence "adds to calls from a generation that inherits the consequences of these negotiations.”

“Besides her, there are many youth activists from around the world who are also on the ground who are actively fighting for their communities, home and collective future,” she said.

Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Global powers head to Asia with trade, AI, security in focus

Manila (AFP) – Global leaders are set to descend on Asia for a series of high-stakes meetings that will tackle everything from AI to trade to, potentially, nuclear disarmament.

Issued on: 12/11/2026 - RFI

People walk past an advertisement for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) China 2026 summit that will take place in Shenzhen from November 18 to 19, at the Shenzhen-Bao'an International Airport in Shenzhen © Hector RETAMAL / AFP/Fil


AFP looks at a few of the key issues to watch for in the days ahead:

Three summits, five days

The 11-nation Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) opens its final leaders' summit of the year on Sunday in Manila, while French President Emmanuel Macron attends a Francophonie summit in Phnom Penh.

Focus then shifts north for the annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) conference in Shenzhen.




Russian President Vladimir Putin is expected to be a key figure at APEC, while India's Narendra Modi will be attending the ASEAN meet.

US President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will travel to both.

Analysts told AFP that the bruising midterm election defeat Trump recently suffered will not appreciably change how the US president is perceived.

"I don't think the region will see him as a lame duck," Siew Mun Tang, former head of the ASEAN Studies Centre at Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, told AFP.

"He has two more years. He can do a lot of things."
Xi-Trump-Putin meet

The agenda for a proposed sit-down between China's Xi Jinping, Trump and Putin may remain a mystery, but no meeting at the APEC conference will attract more attention.

President Trump Hosts Chinese Premier Xi Jinping For A State Visit © CHIP SOMODEVILLA / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP/File

While Putin has pushed for talks on Ukraine, Trump this week suggested the focus would be on denuclearisation and ending his faltering war in Iran.

Analysts who spoke to AFP cautioned expectations should be kept to a minimum.

"The symbolism... will account for a good portion of its substance," the Brookings Institution's Ryan Hass told AFP.

While he expects Xi and Putin to give Trump "a respectful hearing" on arms control, Hass said they will likely only "agree on broad principles without committing to any follow-on actions".

Wang Wen, dean of Renmin University's Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, agreed major outcomes were unlikely, calling it "a high probability that talks could end without a breakthrough".

Separately, a meeting Trump once hoped for with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un appears dead in the water, with Pyongyang rejecting repeated overtures.


Eyeing AI safeguards


Artificial intelligence will be a hot topic at APEC, after Xi and Trump agreed in September to set up a "communication channel" for AI incidents.

Trump has repeatedly dismissed fears that AI could pose a threat to humanity. But despite the countries' fierce tech rivalry, calls for cooperation are growing due to shared concerns regarding bioweapons and infrastructure hacking.

Xi in September said Washington and Beijing have a responsibility to "develop and manage AI for good and ensure that the development of AI is always under human control".

APEC talks could build on the pair's previous communication channel agreement, Stephen Wu, founder of Carthage Capital, told AFP.

"Both sides need an outcome, and a hotline is diplomacy's cheapest: free to announce, free to ignore," he said.

Meanwhile, a spying scandal enveloping Nvidia boss Jensen Huang, who was once widely expected to accompany Trump to APEC, threatens to cast a pall on AI discussions. US officials have accused him of sleeping with a woman they claim was working for Beijing.
ASEAN's murky waters

In Manila, the Philippines' year in the ASEAN chair looks set to come and go without fulfilling one of its top objectives: signing a South China Sea Code of Conduct (COC) with China.

The ongoing dispute over the waterway has cast a shadow over the bloc's events all year. Philippine and Chinese sailors clashed a day before the start of a July summit, and a diplomatic row erupted at an October defence meeting.

One Southeast Asian diplomat involved in summit preparations told AFP he did not see any agreement being reached in Manila.

Tang, the former ASEAN Studies Centre chief, said the code may have outlived its usefulness.

"If a COC was signed 10 years ago, 15 years ago, it's meaningful. The COC today, I think, has lost its purpose... because the effects on the ground have changed," he said, noting the militarisation of islands by both China and Vietnam.
Tariff relief? Not likely

Trade will be a major topic at both ASEAN and APEC, but the prospect of advancing regional free-trade frameworks remains complicated by China-US tensions and Trump's tariff war.

A pause in the China-US trade war was extended through January 10 during Xi's September visit to the White House. But friction remains over the level of Chinese rare-earth exports.

For the rest of the APEC and ASEAN nations, no major changes to US trade policy are expected for the time being.

Existing tariff "mechanisms rest with the president and executive branch rather than Congress... reversing them would require legislation the president could veto", Harry Murphy Cruise, an economist from Oxford Economics, warned in a note.

burs-cwl/lga/abs

© 2026 AFP
World leaders begin talks at Cop31 climate conference but big names missing

World leaders take the stage at Cop31 in Turkey on Wednesday but despite global warming intensifying some prominent names, including the French president, are missing from this year's annual UN climate summit.


Issued on: 11/11/2026 - RFI

High level talks continue at the COP31 climate summit in Antalya, but without the leaders of some of the world's biggest polluting nations. REUTERS - Murad Sezer

The two-week conference kicked off earlier this week in the Mediterranean resort city of Antalya, with governments under pressure to tackle the climate crisis after a year of heatwaves in Europe, deadly floods in Nepal and major wildfires in Indonesia.

Dozens of leaders will speak during the "high-level segment" taking place on Wednesday and Thursday, including Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Iran's Masoud Pezeshkian.

But some big names are missing – British Prime Minister Andy Burnham is the only leader from a G7 country scheduled to address the summit.

While European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen is attending, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni are skipping the event.

The French government said Macron would be absent because November 11 is World War I Armistice Day and the president will attend an EU summit in Ireland on Thursday.

The prime ministers of both Canada and Japan are also absent from the most recent list.

'Expectations not necessarily high'


"It is a shame that some of the bigger European leaders aren't coming. We need Europe to be showing up strongly at this COP," Cosima Cassel, a climate diplomacy expert at think-tank E3G, told AFP.

"If top leaders want influence over where the global (energy) transition is going, showing up is a pretty good place to start," said Chiara Martinelli, director of Climate Action Network Europe.

"I am afraid that Ursula von der Leyen will be lonely on the stage while the leaders of the biggest EU economies are a no-show," Martinelli said.

Wopke Hoekstra, the EU's top climate official, said the absences were "not completely atypical" as leaders may have "practical" reasons for not being able to attend a summit.

But he also told reporters in Brussels that "expectations are not necessarily high" for this climate conference.

Iran's Pezeshkian said he would use the event as an opportunity to express Tehran's position on environmental destruction in war.

"At this conference, we will speak about the actions of the United States and Israel in destroying the environment," he said before departing for Turkey, according to Iranian state television.

Push for electrification

US President Donald Trump, who pulled the United States out of the Paris Agreement in 2017 and has not sent officials to climate talks since his re-election in 2024, is not attending the summit.

Chinese President Xi Jinping, who rarely attends COPs, will be represented by Vice President Han Zheng.

The United States and China are the world's top economies and biggest emitters of planet-heating emissions, making their presence at climate talks crucial to the process.

Climate campaigner Cassel said she took heart in the presence of Lula – a defender of cutting deforestation rates and who defeated right-wing rival Flavio Bolsonaro in last month's Brazilian presidential election.

COP31 host Turkey is championing a voluntary initiative to accelerate the electrification of transport, buildings and industry, with a target of raising electricity's share of global energy consumption to 35 percent by 2035.

The EU has stressed that electrification must be "clean", which could spark debate over the role of oil, gas and coal in the Turkish proposal.

Since agreeing in 2023 for the first time to transition away from fossil fuels – the main driver of climate change – nations have struggled to advance that goal at the annual COP conferences.

(with newswires)


UN chief urges world leaders to tackle fossil fuels at COP31

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres railed against the oil and gas lobby on Wednesday, telling world leaders fossil fuels "must go the way of the dinosaurs" at a climate summit missing several prominent figures.


Issued on: 11/11/2026 - RFI

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres urged world leaders to tax the windfall profits of fossil fuel companies at COP31. © OZAN KOSE / AFP


The two-week COP31 talks kicked off in Turkey this week with governments under pressure to tackle climate change after a year of searing heatwaves and wildfires in Europe, and deadly floods in Nepal.

"The brutal truth is that the climate crisis is outrunning us," Guterres told dozens of world leaders assembled in the Mediterranean city of Antalya for two days of speeches by heads of state and government.

But few major breakthroughs are anticipated at the COP31 negotiations, which run until November 20, as countries grapple with an oil price shock and geopolitical tensions fuelled by the US war with Iran and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Since agreeing in 2023 for the first time to transition away from fossil fuels -- the main driver of climate change -- nations have struggled to advance that goal at the annual UN conferences.

"Fossil fuels must go the way of the dinosaurs, but that won't happen on its own. The dinosaurs did not have a lobby, but fossil fuels do," Guterres said, urging governments to tax the windfall profits of oil companies.

"Their strategy is simple: Distort the science. Delay the policy. Delay the action. Delay the accountability. It's time to kick the habit - and end the fossil fuel addiction," he said to sustained applause.
Leaders missing

Guterres, who has made the climate change fight a central issue since taking office in 2017, is attending his last COP before his term ends in December.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told COP31 that 'climate change has disappeared' from global leadership. © Ozan KOSE / AFP

Some big names are missing at COP31, with British Prime Minister Andy Burnham the only leader from a G7 country scheduled to address the summit.

"Since the start of this year, climate change has disappeared from speeches and documents from our global leadership," recently re-elected Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva told fellow leaders.

"We've turned to talking more about arms and tariffs than the survival of future generations," he said.

Climate campaigners breathed a huge sigh of relief when Lula, who has overseen a dramatic drop in deforestation in the Amazon, defeated right-wing rival Flavio Bolsonaro in last month's presidential election.

"Brazil is back to defend the continuity of a healthy planet," Lula said.

While European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen is coming to Antalya, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni are staying away. COP31 coincides with an EU leaders' summit in Ireland on Thursday.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Japanese counterpart Sanae Takaichi are also absent from the most recent list.

Cop31 opens in Turkey as climate funding and fossil fuels divide nations

Unsurprisingly, President Donald Trump, who pulled the United States out of the Paris Agreement and has not sent officials to climate talks since his re-election in 2024, is not attending the summit.

Chinese President Xi Jinping, who rarely attends COPs, will be represented by Vice President Han Zheng. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is also absent.

The United States and China are the world's top economies and biggest emitters of planet-heating emissions.
Low expectations

"It is a shame that some of the bigger European leaders aren't coming. We need Europe to be showing up strongly at this COP," Cosima Cassel, a climate diplomacy expert at think-tank E3G, told AFP.

Wopke Hoekstra, the EU's top climate official, said the absences were "not completely atypical" as leaders may have "practical" reasons for not being able to attend a summit.

But he also told reporters in Brussels that "expectations are not necessarily high" for this climate conference.

COP31 host Turkey is championing a voluntary initiative to accelerate the electrification of transport, buildings and industry, with a target of raising electricity's share of global energy consumption to 35 percent by 2035.

The EU has stressed that electrification must be "clean", which could spark debate over the role of oil, gas and coal in the Turkish proposal.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said the world needs a "fair" energy transition that "takes into account the energy security and different development needs of different countries".

Tuesday, November 03, 2026

Thousands join Indian opposition protest



Issued on: 01/11/2026 - FRANCE24


India’s opposition parties staged major protests in New Delhi on Sunday against Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government and a nationwide voter list review that has fuelled demonstrations since the summer, led by the youth movement Cockroach Janta Party.

 Eliza Herbert reports.


Thursday, October 29, 2026

Indian Media’s Anxieties Add To Modi’s Mounting Woes – Analysis

Prime Minister Modi faces simultaneous pressures from Gen-Z mobilization against exam and electoral-roll fraud, rising Congress opposition, unrest in Manipur, Chinese incursions in Arunachal Pradesh, and strained ties with the United States.

On 6 October a coalition of 21 news publishers, including groups owned by Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani, petitioned the Supreme Court to strike down key provisions of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, arguing that consent and erasure rules would destroy investigative journalism and expose sources.

The challenge coincides with India’s drop to 157th in the World Press Freedom Index, amid concentrated media ownership, limited access to the prime minister, and concerns that the privacy law could further deter whistleblowers and curtail reporting.



With the Gen Z relentlessly tormenting him, the opposition Congress rising like a Sphinx from the ashes to challenge him, Manipur continuing to be restive, Arunachal Pradesh complaining of a serious Chinese threat, and the US showing scant regard for his status, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is watching the iron-clad support structure he had raised over 12 years develop multiple cracks.

Each of these developments has been unanticipated. For years it was an article of faith that Modi was the Messiah of the Indian middle-class youth, called the “aspirational generation” that will not rise against him as the youth Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal did. But a chance remark by the Chief Justice of India about the youth being cockroaches set alight a movement against examination and electoral roll frauds.

An attempt to make up with China as a riposte to bullying the US only resulted in China supporting Pakistan during the May 2025 war and China sending the PLA deep into Arunachal Pradesh in 2026. An attempt to normalize relations with the US was snubbed when the US began to negotiate an oil deal directly with oil baron Mukesh Ambani, sidelining New Delhi.


Even the servile “lapdog” media which had been a strong pillar of support for more than a decade, showed signs of disaffection when the Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA), with the Ambanis and Adani as members, went to the Supreme Court challenging the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) or the Privacy Act.

A group of 21 Indian news publishers, including mega companies owned by Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani, challenged India’s “privacy law” in the Supreme Court on October 6, pointing out that it would trample investigative journalism and let the government of India find out journalists’ sources.

Reports said that the law would force a journalist to get “prior consent” from a person he wants to investigate and force publishers to erase stories. The filing in the Supreme Court also said that the powers granted by the law to demand information could expose reporters’ sources.

It was in 2023 that the controversial DPDPA was mooted. It was designed to be the basis for India’s personal data regulatory regime and protection. It stayed in the incubator for two years until its regulators and rules were made known to news publishers in September 2025. The DPDPA replaces the previous IT (Information Technology) Rules, 2011 under the IT Act 2000


Through the DPDP Act, the government has imposed some compliance requirements for platforms like Meta and Google. But the new publishers pointed out that since media outlets were not exempted, the law was an invasion of press freedom.

Media companies received assurances in an August meeting ‌with the government that the law would protect press freedom. But there was no written assurance for journalists, unlike what exists in the European Union, Singapore and Britain. The news publishers (DNPA), pleaded that the court quash most of the law’s contentious provisions.

The law would “render investigative journalism a benign and neutered recorder of events,” the DNPA’s 698-page filing said according to Reuters. The cited provisions “constitute pre-censorship which is anathema to any democracy worth its name,” the filing said.

The litigants included Ambani’s Network18, which has seven digital news platforms, Adani’s NDTV and other marquee media groups including the Indian Express and Times Internet, which is part of the Times of India group.
Requirement for Consent

A key concern in the privacy law is the “requirement of consent”, the group’s filing says. The litigants have argued that requiring a journalist to notify the subject of an investigation and seek his or her consent “would allow that subject to destroy evidence and intimidate witnesses”.

The law also lets people withdraw consent at any time and demand that their data be erased, without any public-interest safeguards.

Fines and Blocking Access

News publishers are concerned that a Central government authority created under the said law, can impose fines for non-compliance and grants powers to the government to block access to any information in the “interests of the general public. But that would curtail press freedom, the publishers said.

In a letter to the government written in August, which was attached to the lawsuit, the publishers said that India “has chosen to grant broad exemptions to the State, while failing to extend any corresponding protection to the press”.

From next year, the law will also let New Delhi order any organisation handling personal data “to furnish such information as it may call for”, putting newsrooms at risk of having to divulge sources, the filing said.

If reporters cannot promise confidentiality, fewer people will come forward with information about wrongdoing. That would hurt the public, not just the media. The law needs a clear exemption for journalism, written in a way that protects sources without opening a door for misuse. Until that happens, the fear that privacy rules will become a tool for surveillance of the press is real, the publishers said.
Deterrence to Whistleblowers

The Privacy Law can also deter whistleblowers from sharing information on corruption, corporate wrongdoing or electoral malpractice with reporters, the litigants pointed out. The State’s power “can also extend to privileged communications in possession of a reporter or the informant.” These provisions must be quashed, they demanded.


Silencing RTI Activists

A particularly controversial aspect of the Privacy Act is its direct impact on the Right to Information (RTI) Act. According to the RTI Act, citizens could seek out access to records that public authorities hold if their disclosure was in the larger interest of the public.

The challenge against the Act in the Supreme Court brings together the Adanis and Ambanis, said to be rivals. The new found unity signals how seriously the industry views the law’s impact on reporting.


Declining Media Freedom

The lawsuit comes amidst accusations of sharply declining press freedom in India since Narendra Modi took office in 2014. Critics say many mainstream media outlets have not done enough to scrutinise Modi’s government. India’s ranking in the “Reporters Without Borders” World Press Freedom Index fell to 157th out of 180 countries this ‌year, from 140th in 2014.


“India has fallen further in global press freedom rankings, slipping below countries such as Pakistan and Palestine,” says the 2026 World Press Freedom Index released April 30 by Reporters Without Borders. India is behind most of its South Asian neighbours. Pakistan ranks 153rd, Bangladesh 152nd, Bhutan 150th, Sri Lanka 134th, and Nepal significantly higher at 87th. China remains among the lowest-ranked at 178th.

In its country assessment, “Reporters Without Borders” points to multiple factors affecting India’s ranking, including rising violence against journalists, concentrated media ownership and increasing political alignment within the media landscape.

It notes that major business groups have expanded their influence in the sector, with the Ambanis, close to the Modi government, owning 70% of the outlet and Adani now owning NDTV and reshaping the mainstream media environment.

The report also raises concerns about access to information and the relationship between the government and the press. It states that India’s prime minister Narendra Modi never holds press conferences and instead gives interviews to YouTubers and outlets friendly to him.

Economic pressures are also cited as a key factor. With media organizations heavily reliant on advertising revenue, including significant government spending, the report says authorities are in a position to influence editorial content.

On safety, the index notes that India remains a challenging environment for journalists, with an average of two to three reporters killed each year in connection with their work.


About P. K. Balachandran
P. K. Balachandran is a senior Indian journalist working in Sri Lanka for local and international media and has been writing on South Asian issues for the past 21 years.
View all posts by P. K. Balachandran →

Wednesday, October 28, 2026

 

India, China hold talks over border standoff

India, China hold talks over border standoff
/ Unexplored Northeast - UnsplashFacebook
By IntelliNews - Chennai Bureau October 28, 2026

India is holding military and diplomatic talks with China after Chinese troops set up tents on land New Delhi regards as its own in its eastern state of Arunachal Pradesh which China claims as its Zangnan or South Tibet province.

According to remarks by Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal during a press briefing, the discussions followed disturbances that arose when Chinese forces departed from their established patrol patterns, the BBC reported.

The standoff puts at risk a thaw between the two nuclear-armed neighbours that was barely beginning to settle in the public eye. Relations collapsed most catastrophically in June 2020, when hand-to-hand fighting in the Galwan Valley of Ladakh killed 20 Indian and four Chinese soldiers according to each side’s official figures.

While the deaths caused a major public uproar in India, it also caused deep diplomatic and economic strain between the two biggest economies in Asia. Preliminary agreements reached in 2024 eased tensions on the frontier and led to the return of direct flights and looser visa rules.

In September 2026, Chinese President Xi Jinping travelled to India for the BRICS summit, his first visit to the country in seven years.

While it is unclear if similar incidents between 2024 and 2026 involved any significant violence, the incursion again came to the fore on October 22, 2026, when Shatrujeet Singh Kapur, chief of India’s border constabulary force, the Indo-Tibetan Border Police revealed that Chinese troops had entered Indian territory in Arunachal Pradesh and pitched tents.

India’s opposition leaders belonging to the Indian National Congress party, Mallikarjun Kharge and Jairam Ramesh responded by attacking Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government, accusing it of keeping quiet and giving up territory.

Tuesday, October 27, 2026

 

COMMENT: Lula’s comeback shows the far right can be beaten

COMMENT: Lula’s comeback shows the far right can be beaten
For Europe and the wider world, Brazil is a potent reminder that the right-wing tide is not necessarily the wave of the future. / XFacebook
By Ricardo Martins in Utrecht October 26, 2026

In one of the most pivotal elections of the year, Brazil has sent a message that resonates far beyond its borders. On October 25, President Lula da Silva of the left-wing Workers’ Party (PT) defeated far-right senator Flávio Bolsonaro in the presidential run-off, winning 51.8% of valid votes to 48.2%. At 80, Lula has been re-elected for a fourth, non-consecutive term.

Having trailed after the first round, he turned the race around, something no candidate had achieved before in Brazil’s democratic history. The unexpected result also broke a string of right-wing and far-right victories across Latin America.

Yet the significance of this victory cannot be measured in percentages alone. The contest was a battle over the political and social direction of Latin America’s largest nation. At stake was whether Brazil would continue to stand for democratic institutions, social protection, environmental responsibility and an independent foreign policy, or move towards a more authoritarian, socially exclusionary model aligned with the US’s political project.

Lula’s win was a stinging defeat for the Bolsonaro family and their political allies, and a blow to the international far right more broadly. It also made it harder for US President Donald Trump to complete the construction of a conservative, Washington-led bloc across the Americas. The election showed that the region’s shift to the right is not necessarily a one-way street. In his victory speech, Lula sent an immediate message to Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio: “Brazil is no one’s backyard.”

Trump, who had quietly backed Bolsonaro’s campaign, has made no public comment on the result, though his son Donald Trump Jr took aim at it in a post on X.

Europe, by contrast, has warmly welcomed the outcome. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen declared that “democracy and multilateralism have won in Brazil”, while other European leaders stressed the importance of continuing to work with Brazil on trade, climate and every other area of international co-operation. It was a clear acknowledgement that Brazil remains a vital partner at a time when the multilateral system, international co-operation and the rules-based order are under sustained pressure.

The relief is palpable. Across Europe, democratic forces are confronting populist parties that play on cultural anxieties, hostility to immigration, distrust of institutions and a general sense of economic insecurity.

Brazil has shown that such movements can be defeated at the polls, even when they command significant resources and a devoted base, operate in a deeply polarised society and enjoy US support.

But the big lesson is not that Lula has beaten the far right once and for all. It is that the future remains open, and that organised citizens can shape it.

The people returned to the streets and to the political debate

One of the most remarkable features of Lula’s victory was the high level of popular mobilisation in the run-up to the second round. This was not simply a matter of the PT’s campaign machine, established political alliances or the president’s personal popularity. Indeed, Lula openly complained about his campaign’s (dis)organisation after the first round. As the prospect of a Flávio Bolsonaro victory became ever more tangible, a wider movement took shape, particularly among young people and progressive social groups, amplified by more intensive use of social media.

Students, artists, activists and citizens of all kinds helped bring the campaign back into the public sphere. Social media became another battleground. Deputy André Janones played a central, pioneering role in mobilising online supporters through the “Exército de Lula” (Lula’s Army) WhatsApp network, which, according to Agência Brasil, had 10.8mn members. Its communication with voters was far more direct and informal in tone.

This mobilisation mattered because the election was not just about Lula. Above all, it was a choice between two very different visions of Brazil. Many feared that a new Bolsonaro government would erode democratic safeguards, weaken the social safety net and further polarise Brazilian society along the lines that became clear in 2018, when Flávio’s father, convicted former president Jair Bolsonaro, was elected.

The campaign thus became a defence of much more than one candidate, uniting people concerned about public healthcare, social assistance, workers’ rights, the environment, religious pluralism and, above all, the future of democracy itself. Brazilians who voted for Lula in the second round did not necessarily agree on every political issue. What they did agree on was that Brazil should not throw away the social and democratic gains it has painstakingly built over the years.

Lula alluded to this in his post-election speech, thanking voters and stressing that no one can win an election without the people. It was also a clear warning for the future: a movement should not come together only when an election looms. The energy that brought Lula back from behind must be sustained through his next term, keeping the government on its toes and demanding real improvements in people’s lives.

Brazilian democracy has survived authoritarianism, political crises and deep social divisions. Its strength has always lain in its citizens’ capacity to organise, protest and defend their rights. The historic mobilisation ahead of the run-off built on exactly that tradition.

The election also exposed the dangers of the digital public sphere. Campaigns increasingly depend on platforms whose algorithms determine what voters see, share and believe. During the campaign, multiple allegations surfaced of unequal treatment and political bias by social media companies such as Meta, owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp.

Leaks from Meta staff confirmed that the company was biased towards Bolsonaro, as did its own council and a UN expert panel. Meta officially blamed the shortcomings on technical problems. However, the disruptions were consistently one-sided, hampering the left’s efforts to amplify its messaging and leading to messages and accounts being blocked.

These allegations raise a wider democratic question. Private technology companies, most of them US-based, should not be able to wield political power through opaque algorithms without transparency, accountability and appropriate safeguards. In his victory speech, Lula renewed his commitment to further regulating digital platforms.

Democracy must deliver social justice

Brazil’s choice was also a defence of a particular conception of the state, one in which public institutions have a duty to reduce poverty, protect the vulnerable and ensure basic services are available to all.

Social policy was at the heart of the run-off. Welfare programmes such as Bolsa Família, Lula’s flagship cash-transfer scheme for the poor, are not simply handouts. They enable families to put food on the table, keep their children in school and tackle the structural inequalities that persist in Brazilian society. Universal public healthcare, real increases in the minimum wage, employment and access to education are equally part of this social contract.

The World Bank has linked Brazil’s recent poverty reduction to a combination of real increases in the minimum wage, the expansion of Bolsa Família and better labour market conditions. These include a recently legislated maximum five-day working week, while free public transport for all at weekends (Saturday and Sunday) is due to be discussed soon.

Such progress does not mean Brazil has solved inequality for good, but it does show that public policy can raise living standards when growth is combined with measures that effectively reach the poor.

The right’s alternative, in fact, was not simply a pledge to scrap existing programmes. Later in the campaign, Flávio Bolsonaro and his allies went some way towards assuring voters that social benefits would remain. But that made the core argument of their campaign inconsistent: slash spending with Argentina’s Milei-style chainsaw while keeping Lula’s outlays. The numbers did not add up, and both market participants and his own voters questioned Bolsonaro’s credibility. As a result, the right’s message became far less convincing.

Brazil has a long and painful history of slavery, racial inequality, regional disparities and concentrated wealth. Brazilians expect democracy to mean more than the right to vote. It must also mean the ability to live with dignity. Lula’s record provides grounds for defending this model, but there is still a long way to go.

The environmental dimension is just as important. According to INPE, Brazil’s National Institute for Space Research, deforestation in the Amazon fell by 41.8% between August 2025 and July 2026 compared with the previous year, the lowest level in the 38-year monitoring series that began in 1988. Deforestation in the Cerrado also declined. This does not mean the country’s ecosystems are no longer under threat, but it does underline the value of enforcement and the need for continued policy and monitoring.

Voters’ choice, then, was never simply an abstract one between left and right. It was about the kind of society Brazil wants to build.

Sovereignty, multilateralism and a different international order

Lula’s victory carries enormous geopolitical significance. Brazil is a major economy, set to climb from 10th to 8th in the global rankings in 2027, as well as a continental power, a leading agricultural producer and a significant diplomatic player. Its position has implications for Latin America, the Global South and the future of multilateralism.

Sovereignty was the defining issue of the campaign when it came to Brazil’s international posture. Lula has been unequivocal that Brazil has the right to maintain relations with the US, China, the EU and all its other partners without accepting that Washington can dictate the terms of Brazilian foreign policy. His ironclad commitment to BRICS, south-south co-operation and a more multipolar world order is central to that stance.

For Lula, however, strategic autonomy does not mean hostility towards the US. The leftist leader maintains good personal relations with Trump and instead blames Secretary of State Marco Rubio, whom he sometimes calls “the frustrated Latino”. Lula also prides himself on his strong relations with Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, Narendra Modi, Emmanuel Macron, and practically the rest of the world, though less so with Latin America’s hard-right governments. A former union negotiator, he is skilled at working with all kinds of partners.

This matters all the more as competition intensifies over energy, critical minerals, advanced technology, trade and supply chains. In his victory speech, Lula said Brazil’s resources should underpin industrial development, scientific research and well-paid jobs at home, rather than leaving the country as just another exporter of raw materials and importer of processed goods. Sovereignty must have economic and social substance, he said. That means the capacity to generate value, develop technology and improve the lives of the Brazilian people.

Lula’s victory also matters for the defence of multilateralism. Brazil has long championed diplomacy, supported international institutions and promoted co-operation across political divides. Its continued participation in BRICS and other international forums gives it the opportunity to act as a bridge between countries whose interests do not always align. However, Brazil’s natural leadership in South America has been damaged by the recent election of a large number of far-right governments that prefer direct alignment with Trump’s Latin America policy.

For Europe, the stakes are particularly high. A democratic Brazil that supports open trade, notably the EU-Mercosur trade agreement, as well as climate action and multilateralism, is a very useful partner in an increasingly uncertain geopolitical landscape. The relationship should not be seen as a simple contest between Brussels, Washington and Beijing. It should rest on mutual interest, mutual respect for national sovereignty and a shared desire to work together on common problems.

The sovereignty agenda has not gained the same traction in Europe as in Brazil, where voters’ choice was rooted in the country’s own history, inequalities, institutions and political struggles. Even so, the outcome offers a lesson: democratic states need not accept that international politics must be structured around authoritarian nationalism, perpetual confrontation and the subordination of the weak to the strong.

Brazil now has the opportunity to show that sovereignty and international engagement are not mutually exclusive, and can in fact reinforce each other.

The road ahead

Brazil’s message is a positive one, but it by no means marks the end of the far-right threat. Flávio Bolsonaro took 48.2% of valid votes, and the right emerged from the legislative elections with considerable strength. Lula now faces a hostile conservative Congress and a very difficult road to getting his programme through.

These realities demand political intelligence from Lula, not triumphalism. He must govern well beyond his own electorate, negotiate with the legislature without losing sight of his core principles, and show that a democratic government can in fact get things done. He will have to tackle soaring crime, the cost of living, employment and the state of public services while managing significant fiscal constraints. And he must do all this in a way that revitalises the progressive movement, so that its future does not depend entirely on one elderly man, particularly as this is his last election.

The final point is the most important. Lula’s political career has been built on bringing broad coalitions together. For his fourth administration to be viable and democratic, it must involve the Brazilian people in decision-making, as he promised in his victory speech. The spontaneous mobilisation of young people in the run-off should be seen not as a mere electoral tool, but as a demand for a genuine role in shaping the country’s future.

Europe, likewise, will defeat the far right only if it stays in touch with its people. Holding elections is not enough to make a democracy if governments do not serve the people. Geopolitical pressures close to home have led European leaders to relegate their own citizens to second or third place. We have even heard remarks such as: “I do not care what my voters think.” The far right cannot be kept at bay simply by telling people what a threat it poses.

Brazil has not solved all these problems. Society remains deeply divided, the defeated candidate is questioning the result, institutions are under pressure, especially the Supreme Court, and the next government faces a very difficult set of challenges.

The election has nonetheless shown something very significant: the populist conservative forces can be challenged, electoral momentum can be reversed, and popular mobilisation can make a real difference. That offers grounds for hope to democrats around the world. But defeating the far right at the ballot box is only the beginning. Lasting victory comes when democracy proves it can deliver a better life.

Ricardo Martins is based in Utrecht, the Netherlands, and has a PhD in Sociology specialising in European politics, geopolitics and international relations.