Showing posts sorted by date for query ORGAN HARVESTING. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query ORGAN HARVESTING. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

 

Clues to longevity may reside in the genomes of long-lived bats



Scientists are finding that bat genes involved in viral interactions also play a role in longevity



University of California - Berkeley

Longeared bat 

image: 

This longeared bat, Myotis evotis, was captured in Arizona by researchers from UC Berkeley and the University of Arizona. The scientists took tissue samples from the wings before releasing it and used the samples to sequence the bat's genome and to establish cell cultures for study.

view more 

Credit: Elise Lauterbur





The secret to a long life may lie in the genomes of the longest-lived mammals for their size: bats.

That idea captivated Juan Manuel Vazquez when he was a graduate student at the University of Chicago, but at the time he couldn’t find any good, published information on bat genomes to provide clues. Once he became a UC Berkeley postdoctoral fellow in 2020, however, he unleashed his passion and began scouring the Western U.S. for bat species that could provide tissue samples and DNA to sequence.

Enlisting the help of Berkeley undergraduates, he traveled around the West erecting mist nets over streams, ponds and rivers at night to capture, biopsy and release as many species of bats as he could. He focused on those in the genus Myotis, which contains the bat with the longest lifetime — a Brandt’s myotis, Myotis brandtii. One individual was banded in Europe and recaptured 50 years later.

In a new paper appearing this week in the journal Nature, Vazquez and colleagues report the first analysis of eight Myotis genomes and the discovery of a close link between the animal’s longevity and its immune system — longer-lived bats had higher levels of cancer-fighting genes.

The findings suggest that an immune system able to mount an overwhelming attack against infectious organisms and cancer may be integral to a long lifespan. The overlap between genes involved in aging and those involved in fighting disease also means that understanding one will help scientists understand the other.

“Bats evolved to live for a long time without getting diseases, which suggests that we don't necessarily need to look at diseases of aging and diseases of infection as completely separate fields,” Vazquez said. “We can look at these bats and try to understand how, in the same way you can improve your immune system to fight off viruses, maybe you can improve your immune system so it doesn't decline in old age. Or maybe bats can help us find ways to fight off tumors so our immune system doesn’t get tired, and that can also help us deal with other stresses of life and not exhaust our immunity.”

For the study, Vazquez cultured cells he biopsied from the wings of the bats. (He currently has cell cultures from 259 individuals representing 32 species.) When he treated cultured bat cells with toxic chemicals, he found an unusual response: for the longest-lived bat in his sample, the widespread little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus), the toxin didn’t trigger activation of genes for DNA repair proteins, but rather up-regulated genes promoting cell death.

“We found the literal opposite of what we expected if you treat the bats with a lethal dose of this chemical,” he said. “The longest-lived bat in North America decides ‘I can't save this ship’ and immediately switches gears to prioritize killing off the cells that are damaged. The elephant, another cancer-resistant species that is long-lived, has the exact same strategy — if you can't save the cell, kill the cell.”

The discovery is a heads-up that clues to longevity can be gleaned from understanding the different ways animals deal with disease, said Peter Sudmant, a Berkeley associate professor of integrative biology who studies the genes involved in aging and longevity.

“By looking across the diversity of life and the remarkable longevities of different species, we hope we can better understand the interplay between DNA damage and the immune system to enable us to have full and healthy life spans,” he said.

“If you start looking at long-lived species like elephants, whales and bats, you start finding ways that nature has actually already resolved a lot of these problems in human health,” Vazquez added.

Longevity, an active lifestyle and an immune system on high alert

The bat lifestyle has been a big success since the group arose about 60 million years ago. Bats now comprise 20% of all mammalian species, live on all continents except Antarctica and occupy a wide range of ecological niches. Of the known 1,511 species, about 139 are in the Myotis genus, which is known for bats exhibiting an extreme range of lifespans. While Brandt’s myotis bats can live half a century, the black Myotis — Myotis nigricans, of South and Central America — lives a mere seven years. This is as if our close relative, Homo neanderthalensis, lived nine times longer than modern Homo sapiens, Vazquez said.

Despite bats’ evolutionary success, scientists were surprised to find that their immune systems are hyperactive, working overtime to suppress damaging inflammation from constant viral infections without actually becoming sick. As a result, healthy bats can host an amazing variety of viruses, some of which, like the cause of COVID-19, can spill over into human populations.

Some researchers have linked bats’ robust immune systems to their very active lifestyle. Vazquez likens bats’ nighttime patrols for bugs to running several ultramarathons every day.

“Bats have evolved this incredible fitness capacity, this incredible ability to deal with disease and this incredible ability to be able to prevent cancer,” he said. “That means that, by understanding how bats have evolved to do all these things that other mammals haven't, we can find completely new and unexpected ways of dealing with the normal things that cause human diseases.”

The new study provides tantalizing clues. Vazquez found that whenever he identified a bat gene linked to lifespan, his collaborator, Elise Lauterbur, then at the University of Arizona, had identified the same gene as one involved in the bat’s interaction with viruses.

“There is way more overlap than you would expect just by random chance between the genes that are associated with longevity and genes that are associated with viral interactions,” he said.

Another surprise was that Myotis bats have an enhanced abundance of genes that make proteins that interact with DNA viruses — viruses, like herpes, that encode their genes using DNA. These proteins can either promote infection or protect against it, such as by boosting expression of the antiviral hormone interferon.

“DNA viral interacting proteins were strongly enriched for selection in bats in contrast to most other mammals, where there is a very strong enrichment for selection for both DNA and RNA viral interacting proteins,” Sudmant said. Humans and other primates, on the other hand, tend to have more genes for proteins that interact with RNA viruses, like COVID and HIV, than DNA viruses.

This mismatch between bats and humans may be why viruses spilling over from bats into humans and causing zoonotic disease have wreaked such havoc in recent years.

“Humans and bats are badly suited to each other,” Vazquez said. “That is one of the reasons why we have to be careful working with bats — it's a two-way street for zoonoses. We don't want to give the bat something and we don't want to get something from the bat. That mismatch is definitely something we should look into more.”

While Vazquez continues to investigate the genetic control of longevity in cell culture in his new faculty position at Pennsylvania State University, Sudmant is more interested in the immune responses of these cells.

“One thing that I'm really excited about is the trade-off between how a bat protects itself by producing proteins that attack the genomes of viruses but also protects its own genome from being attacked by those proteins,” he said.

He currently has cell cultures from many species of primate in which he is studying the genetic basis of longevity and how that’s related to DNA repair genes.

In addition to Vazquez, Sudmant and Lauterbur, now at the University of Vermont, other co-authors of the paper include Lucie Etienne of the École Normale Supérieure in Lyon, France, and David Enard of the University of Arizona in Tucson. The work was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation.

Saturday, July 11, 2026

Extreme Heat Takes Farming to the Brink

July 10, 2026

Image by Gozha Net.

Ever since the landmark Paris ’15 UN climate agreement wherein 195 nations agreed to cut fossil fuel CO2 emissions via NDCs 30% to 60% by 2030, the opposite has happened.

It’s now ten (10) years since Paris ’15, and according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels have reached an all-time high, peaking at an average of 432.3 ppm in May 2026. This is the opposite of what the parties agreed to do and based upon current and proposed cuts, Paris ’15 is dead. The nations of the world have failed.

Their failure is now showing up in climate change, meaning: There can be no excuses for extreme heat. They inadvertently asked for it, and they got it. But it’s problematic for farmers. They cannot pick up stakes and move when heat bakes the land.

As a result of the collective failure of 195 nations, fossil fuel CO2 blankets the atmosphere more so than anytime in human history, and it turns up the heat that’s the primary force of a lurking danger: UN agencies have warned that “extreme heat is pushing global food and farming systems to the brink,” UN News d/d April 22, 2026 and WMO warning.

Apparently, global warming has entered “the red zone,” signifying dangerous thresholds where climate instability accelerates, leading to extreme weather and severe disruptions to ecosystems.

Extreme Heat as a Risk Multiplier

Across farming systems, the impact is already visible. For most major crops, yields begin to decline with temperatures above 30°C (86°F). This leads to weakened plant structures and reduced productivity. Livestock experience stress at even lower temperatures, especially pigs and poultry. They cannot cool themselves efficiently, resulting in reduced growth and risks of organ failure.

All food sources are negatively impacted. Regarding ocean life, rising temperatures lower oxygen levels putting marine life under strain, e. g., The Australian Marine Conservation Society d/d January 29, 2025: Marine Heatwave Kills 30,000 Fish on WA Coast, Highlighting Impacts of Climate Change. Reports indicated ocean waters 3°-5°C above normal,

Overall, the global ocean complex has recently experienced never-seen-before massive marine heatwaves lasting 500 days. Some scientists have expressed alarm, saying the situation is “scary.” See – Massive Ocean Regime Shift, Alarming.

Additionally, the above-mentioned UN report claims extreme heat in parts of South Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and Latin America ramps up the number of “too hot to work days” going up to 250 days per year, over time. Can AI handle planting and harvesting of crops?

France “the EU Breadbasket” Slammed

According to Le Monde d/d July 3, 2026: “Early heatwaves are devastating French agriculture and leaving farmers helpless.” French farmers fear double-digit production losses and fear “the worst is yet to come.” According to Agriculture Minister Annie Genevard, agriculture is in a “crisis mode.” Even tree leaves are “burned”, crop growth that survives is “stunted “and poultry farms “decimated.”

Bloomberg News, July 2, 2026:

+A heat wave in western Europe may have damaged almost a third of French corn, according to preliminary estimates from the country’s Agriculture Ministry.

+The extreme weather also scorched about half of carrot production, 60% of hops and a large swath of orchards, and killed hundreds of thousands of poultry.

+Corn output was already expected to fall after growers reduced plantings due to higher fertilizer and fuel costs resulting from the Iran war.

French crop research institute ARVALIS says potato growth is optimal at around 18°C, slows at higher temperatures, and can stop at around 28°C to 30°C.. France recently endured a record-shattering national heatwave that pushed temperatures into the 40°C (104°F) range and well above 28°C for a consecutive 14-day period from June 17 to June 30.

Extreme Heat Hits Global Farming

“From ​India’s grain-producing northwestern plains to Australia’s eastern wheat belt, and from Thailand’s rice fields to Indonesia’s vast palm oil plantations, hot weather and below-normal rains are hurting crops ‌and forcing farmers to reduce planting.” (Hot Weather Hurts Asian Crops as Powerful El Nino Takes Shape, Reuters, June 3, 2026)

“El Nino-driven dryness is a double blow for farmers already grappling with fertilizer and diesel shortages caused by the Iran war,” Ibid.

“About 50% of ice-free land mass is used for feeding humans, basically for agriculture. But deteriorating environment conditions such as more droughts, more floods, more wildfires have very significant implications on how we feed ourselves in the future. Climate change is affecting agriculture in ways no longer in line with practices of the past. So, past performance is no longer a good predictor of future production. This is a big deal.” (Source: Climate Extremes: Agriculture, Oos Pictures, June 2026)

Moreover, “globally, crops lose about 40% to diseases and pest every year. About 15 years ago that number was 25%. We’re not doing better, we’re doing worse and the reason is climate change…” Ibid, Shely Aronov, Co-founder Innerplant, San Francisco.

“We are now at an inflection point where we are no longer able to adapt to climate change in ways generations before were able to do it,” Ibid, Berninger, Bayer Global.

Climate Change has been sending signals of danger for some time. It doesn’t happen all at once, but by the time it does, it’s too late. Grist publication recently itemized early warning signals: The World is Getting too hot to Feed Itself d/d April 27, 2026.

“The authors cite how, in Chile, warming seas in 2016 prompted massive algae blooms that killed off an estimated 100,000 metric tons of farmed salmon and trout, creating the largest aquaculture mortality event in history. In the U.S.’s Pacific Northwest, when one of the strongest heat waves ever recorded struck in 2021, entire raspberry and blackberry harvests were lost, Christmas tree farms saw 70 percent timber volume declines, and the intersection of extreme heat, vegetative drying, and wildfires led to an increase of between 21 and 24 percent of forest area burned in North America that year. After a record heatwave hit India in 2022, wheat in over a third of Indian states fell anywhere between 9 and 34 percent, dairy animals afflicted with heat stress produced up to 15 percent less milk, and some cabbage and cauliflower yields were halved. And last spring in Kyrgyzstan’s Fergana mountain range, a region known for its year-round snow, spring temperatures rose 50 degrees Fahrenheit higher than the seasonal average — a bout of weather so unusual that it contributed to a locust outbreak and dramatic declines in cereal harvests.” (Grist)

The Food/Fuel/Human Paradox

Burning fossil fuels powers the food-producing revolution that powers human population overshoot altogether powering a massive heat-generation complex. Ipso facto, human civilization is a heat machine without a turn-off switch.

According to Earth Overshoot Day: “Fossil fuels are everywhere, and they are one of the main reasons that humanity is in ecological overshoot. In industrial agriculture, crops are dependent on large amounts of nitrogen fertilizers, petroleum-based agricultural chemicals, pumps that run irrigation, diesel for machinery, and oil for food distribution across the world. The green revolution focused on creating exponentially higher crop yields with decreased dependency on human labor, but it also boosted our food system’s dependence on fossil fuels.” This inescapable paradox has created the biggest heat machine in human history.

“Food is now more dependent than ever on finite resources and inexpensive fossil fuel energy. It is no wonder that, in many cases, our food is embedded with more “fossil fuel calories” than nutritional calories. For example, in Slovenia it takes 7 calorie-equivalents of fossil fuel to provide every 1 calorie of meat consumed. The number of calories of fossil fuel required varies by food group and among countries,” Ibid. In general, a seven-to-one calorie ratio needed to feed billions is not sustainable on an overheated planet. Something has to give to live.

The World Economic Forum (WEF), which is the hotbed of “Stakeholder Capitalism,” on the heels of Paris ’15, claimed that “most of the world’s countries could run on 100% renewable energy.” This did not sink in with WEF elites, aka: “Extreme Heatheads.”

The Renewables/Fossil Fuel Interchange

“Across all the energy the world uses, not just electricity but transport, heat, and industry too fossil fuels still supply about 80%. And that share has barely moved in 60 years.” (Forbes, aka: “the Capitalist Tool,” June 7, 2026)

You can cover the planet with renewables until you’re blue in the face and it won’t make a damn bit of difference to extreme heat if burning fossil fuels that emit CO2 remains at high levels, like ~80%. Heat thrives on CO2.

The outlook for Extreme Heat has never been so strong.

Robert Hunziker lives in Los Angeles and can be reached at rlhunziker@gmail.com


This Deadly Heat Wave Has a Culprit


July 10, 2026

Temperatures have soared globally this summer. And far from simply being uncomfortable, it’s killing people.

This past July 4th was one of the hottest in U.S. history. While Americans gathered to celebrate the country’s 250th birthday, dozens died from extreme heat — and the toll may still rise. In Europe, which has seen its own devastating heat wave, some 3,700 people have died. And the heat has become so extreme in Pakistan that people’s teeth are literally dissolving in their mouths. 

This is only the beginning of extreme heat this summer — and if we don’t stop the climate crisis, for the rest of time. Scientists are warning that this marks “uncharted territory” in rising temperatures.

The good news? We know the solution. To build a better world, with cheaper and cleaner energy, we have to phase out fossil fuels and transition to green energy. This process is easier and cheaper than ever. Some 90 percent of renewable energy is now cheaper than fossil fuels, and renewables don’t heat our planet the way that fossil fuels do.

The bad news? Fossil fuel companies, and the politicians who support them, are trying to block this transition. Companies like Exxon have known for over 50 years that fossil fuels cause climate change — and that rising temperatures would cost lives. But they’ve tried to bury this information, stall the transition, and deceive the public that fossil fuels aren’t responsible.

I’ve seen this play out firsthand.

When I was 17, I spent a sunny week in Dubai at the 28th United Nations annual climate conference (COP28). I was so excited to attend the conference. I met other activists passionate about renewable energy and taking down the fossil fuel industry. I even attended lobbying meetings with the lead U.S. negotiators, Trigg Talley and Sue Biniaz.

Everything in Dubai felt larger than life — from the Burj Khalifa to the massive dome in the middle of the conference center. But over the week, the conference began to feel more and more dystopian. The fossil fuel industry had sent 2,456 lobbyists to that COP — and despite the loud cries of activists and scientists, their voices drowned ours out.

At the end of the conference, we had a small win — fossil fuels were mentioned in a COP text for the first time ever. But the language was so weak that the statement felt almost meaningless. The text did nothing to change the trajectory of the climate crisis.

The fossil fuel industry has propagated lies about climate change for years. They’ve tried to convince us that climate change is our fault instead of theirs, with campaigns around “carbon footprints” — a concept created by BP — and recycling, which was popularized by the plastics industry but has never managed to efficiently recycle plastics themselves.

They have also spent hundreds of millions of dollars on influencing climate decision making spaces — from United Nations conferences to Washington, D.C. Big Oil spent $445 million during the 2024 elections — and in return has gotten $40 billion in fossil fuel subsidies from the Trump administration.

The time has come for us to rise up against this deceptive and powerful industry, to finally kick them out of spaces with influence. It is high time for us to stop being manipulated by fossil fuel companies that are only out to make a profit and harm us.

As temperatures rise, we are now in a battle of people vs. fossil fuels. We must win — it’s a matter of life and death.

Emma Buretta is a Henry A. Wallace Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.