Showing posts sorted by date for query SEX POSITIVE. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query SEX POSITIVE. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, December 04, 2025

Conditions Are Ripe for a Resistance Counter-Offensive



It’s been over ten long months that the forces of democracy have been on the defensive, doing our best to withstand the many and various assaults on us on issue after issue, but the tide is turning:

-Trump’s polling numbers keep going down, at 36% positive and 60% negative in the latest Gallup Poll;

-Four weeks after Democratic Party electoral victories all over the country on November 4, it’s possible as I write that, today, a Democrat running for Congress in a special election in Tennessee could win despite, in the 2024 election, the Republican candidate winning by a 22% margin of victory;

-Long-time MAGA leader Margaret Taylor Green is resigning from Congress and publicly criticizing Trump on health care, the Epstein issue and more, with the likelihood that other Republican House members will follow her lead;

-The Epstein sex trafficking crisis is not going away!

-Trump’s “Justice” Department’s indictments against James Comey and Letitia James have been thrown out by a US District Court judge;

-Congressional Republicans are on the defensive over what to do about the health care crisis, overall, with the specific problem of huge increases in premiums, doubling, tripling or more, for millions of people by the end of the year; this was one of the main reasons for Green’s resignation;

-And now comes the Caribbean motorboat revelations about Pete Hegseth giving the illegal order to “kill everybody” on those boats even if a boat has been destroyed and there are survivors. True to form, exposed as they have been, rats like Hegseth are deserting a sinking ship by trying to shift the blame to a career military admiral.

Remember that it was Joe McCarthy in the 1950’s attacking the US military that was the beginning of the end for his McCarthyite repressive campaign.

There are probably some on the political Left who would counsel that we allow all of this to keep unfolding and not “rock the sinking boat,” just let it take its course, but I don’t agree at all.

We should do just the opposite, consciously up our game, keep broadening out our resistance movement and make plans for 2026 to be the year that Trump and the MAGA’s are decisively defeated and the House and the Senate come under Democratic and progressive independent (Bernie, others) control. Like it or not, that has to be our north star for the next 11 months, as we keep up the resistance to ICE and Border Control raids and take action on all of the many other issues our peoples are dealing with.

That issue-oriented activity will strengthen the electoral campaigns of genuine progressives in the Democratic primaries running against corporatists or anti-Left centrists, as well as serious, tactically smart, progressive independent campaigns.

It will be essential that we do what we did so effectively over this past year as far as taking it to the streets. We need national days of coordinated local actions, which began in 2025 on February 5 with the 50501 actions in just about every state capitol. Those actions kept building throughout the year up to the seven million of us coming out in 2,600 local actions in every state on the second No Kings day October 18.

January 19, 2026, one year after Trump took office and the federal Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday, would be a very good day to initiate this continuing campaign of nationally coordinated street action.

2026 will be the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, which offers us lots of possibilities.

We do need to be up front about the mixed reality of that historic revolution against British colonialism, the reality of European-American enslavement of Africans and violent theft of land lived on by indigenous nations for thousands of years. But it is a fact that the American Revolution helped to inspire anti-colonial and anti-monarchy revolutions in France, Haiti, South America and elsewhere. Indeed, when the Vietnamese revolutionaries in 1946 put forward their call for independence from French colonialism, they quoted the US Declaration of Independence.

We should have no illusions that the MAGA’s as a whole are going to see the light and stop with their repressive and regressive efforts, though there’s no question that some of them already are moving away from Trump and there are major internal rifts. This is another important fact about the crisis the Republicans and fascists are in.

As bad as 2025 has been, 2026 can be very different, if we all stay strong and keep consciously building the resistance movement in all its many different aspects. 2026 can  end up being a happy, a joyous, successful new year of popular, nonviolent uprising for justice, democracy, peace and defense of our threatened ecosystems.

Ted Glick has been a progressive activist and organizer since 1968. He is the author of the recently published books, Burglar for Peace and 21st Century Revolution, both available at https://pmpress.org. Read other articles by Ted, or visit Ted's website.

Wednesday, December 03, 2025

 

New camera traps snap nearly three times more images of endangered Sumatran tigers than before




In Sumatra, researchers captured almost three times as many images of critically endangered tigers as during previous surveys, which shows the positive impact of conservation efforts even outside of national parks




Frontiers

Tigress with cub 

video: 

Tigress with cub in the Leuser ecosystem. Credit: Figel et al. 2025, BKSDA-Aceh, DLHK. Please write to press@frontiersin.org for higher resolution video. 

view more 

Credit: Figel et al. 2025, BKSDA-Aceh, DLHK




Destroyed habitats, poaching, and prey depletion have dramatically reduced tiger habitats around the world. Today, tigers occupy just 5 to 10% of their historical habitats. But on the Indonesian island of Sumatra, an important population of critically endangered Sumatran tigers may persevere, a new Frontiers in Conservation Science study showed.

Using infrared cameras, researchers working on the island, have set out to estimate sex-specific population densities and tigers’ movements during three surveys.

“We documented a robust tiger population, apparently among the healthiest on the island,” said Dr Joe Figel, a conservation biologist, who works with Indonesian wildlife and forestry agencies. “For those on the ground, the onus now falls on us to double down and adequately protect them.”

Long-time tenants

In many ways, the Leuser ecosystem is ideal habitat for Sumatran tigers. Three times the size of Yellowstone National Park, it is the largest contiguous tiger habitat remaining in Sumatra. It’s made up of lowland, hill, and montane forests, of which 44% are classified as intact forest landscape. “It’s also more thoroughly patrolled by rangers than nearly any other place on the island,” Figel said.

Working with local collaborators from communities at the edges of the study area, the team put up cameras in the northern stretches of Leuser, located in Aceh province, and kept them there for three monitoring periods: 34 cameras were installed during March to May 2023, 59 cameras between June and December 2023, and 74 cameras between May and November of 2024.

“Multi-year camera trap monitoring is critically important for estimating key tiger demographic parameters such as survival, recruitment, tenure, and population growth rate,” explained Figel. “With these data – and only with these data – can we even begin to evaluate conservation efforts.”

During the monitoring periods, the team captured a total of 282 sufficiently clear images of Sumatran tigers to allow for the identification of individuals. Analyzing stripe patterns, the team identified 27 individuals from camera-trap images, including 14 females, 12 males, and one tiger of unknown sex. The relatively high number of tigers suggests there is adequate prey in the area to support tiger presence. Over the study period, female and male individuals were photographed an average of 14 and 16 times, respectively. High densities of female tigers indicate a healthy tiger social system and high-quality habitats, where they can raise about three litters of cubs over a decade. During the six-month session in 2023, three different sets of cubs were documented. Two tiger brothers photographed together as cubs were later spotted individually as adults.

Thriving tigers

Inside the Leuser ecosystem lies Gunung Leuser Nation Park, however, the present study was conducted in forests provincially protected by the Aceh government. In Indonesia, provincially protected forests receive far fewer resources than national parks, which are supported and managed by the central government.

The camera traps placed by Figel and colleagues snapped nearly three times as many tiger images as during previous 90-day surveys at other sites in Sumatra, and the team was able to identify many more individuals than reported in earlier studies. Only three previous surveys – all carried out in protected national parks – documented more than 10 tigers in a single survey. Higher tiger density estimates than reported in the present study were only documented in an intensive protection zone in southern Sumatra.

The current study also provides valuable insights for future monitoring of tigers, the team said. The data on tiger movement collected here could, for example, inform survey protocols and optimal camera spacing.

The high numbers of tiger sightings reported here highlights a success story that is due to a multitude of factors, said the team. “Thanks to the work, activities, and support of government agencies, local Acehnese and Gayo communities, donors, and other researchers, Leuser has maintained important patches of lowland and hill forests where, in Sumatra, tiger prey densities reach their highest levels,” concluded Figel. “The persistence of these habitats and prey populations are the main reasons for our findings.”

Tuesday, December 02, 2025

'HIV-free generations': prevention drug rollout brings hope to South Africa

Ga-Rankuwa (South Africa) (South Africa) (AFP) – Kegoratile Aphane did not flinch when the needle pierced the skin of her right buttock, injecting a yellow-coloured drug touted as a revolution that could end the HIV pandemic.


Issued on: 03/12/2025 - RFI

A nurse holds a vial of Lenacapavir at a clinic north-west of. The drug has been shown overwhelmingly to reduce the risk of HIV transmission © Ihsaan Haffejee / AFP

The 32-year-old was among the very first South Africans -- and Africans -- to receive a dose of lenacapavir, a drug taken twice a year that has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV transmission by more than 99.9 percent, making it functionally akin to a powerful vaccine.

"I didn’t even feel any pain," she said with a relieved smile after receiving the two injections that form the first dose.

Five other patients received lenacapavir Tuesday at a clinic outside of Pretoria as part of an implementation study by a Wits University research unit and funded by the international health agency Unitaid, which works on ensuring equitable access to medical innovations.

The study would enrol 2,000 people and "follow them for at least a year to understand how this prevention option works in real life", according to the Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (RHI)'s Saiqa Mullick.

'Life-changing'

With close to one in five adults living with HIV, South Africa has one of the highest rates in the world, and reported last year the highest number of new infections for any single country -- 170,000.

Until now, the best available prevention drug for HIV-negative people was through a daily pill.

The twice-yearly lenacapavir jab would be "life-changing", said the clinic’s manager Magdaline Ngwato, especially for young people who struggled to maintain the daily schedule of the pill and groups like sex workers or LGBTQ patients who wanted to be discreet.

"Now with the injection it will be fine, because you can do it secretly," she told AFP, adding that many people had already expressed interest.

"Even mothers said they will send their children to come get it," Ngwato enthused. "I think we are going to have a lot of HIV-free generations."

For Aphane, the decision to take the groundbreaking treatment was deeply personal.

"I just lost my mom in 2021 -- she was HIV positive," she told AFP with emotion.

"It's a very, very, very painful disease. So that's why I (am) so serious about this. Let me be safe and try this."

Twenty-year-old student Katlego, who asked to speak under a pseudonym, was "proud" to have received one of the very first doses.

A broader national rollout is expected next year, starting with 400,000 doses that would be received through a deal between lenacapavir's manufacturer Gilead Sciences and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS.

While lenacapavir currently costs around $28,000 a year in the United States, generic versions are expected to be available from 2027 at around $40 per year in more than 100 countries through agreements by Unitaid and the Gates Foundation with Indian pharmaceutical companies.

The rollout could usher in a different world for Aphane's daughters and future grandchildren, she said.

"The more they introduce, the more they talk about it, the more they show (it) everywhere, it will save lives," she said.

© 2025 AFP

 

The minority dilemma in media reports




Psychology


Ruhr-University Bochum

Group of authors 

image: 

The Bochum-based team of authors: Johanna Woitzel, Moritz Ingendahl, Anna Schulte, Hans Alves (from left)

 

view more 

Credit: © RUB, Marquard





The research team conducted five studies involving more than 900 participants, as well as an analysis of six large language models such as ChatGPT. In one of the studies, U.S. American participants received a fictitious FBI press release about a criminal incident, including a suspect description (age, sex, weight, height, country of origin, clothing, other characteristics). The suspect’s membership in either a social majority or minority was systematically varied through the country of origin: The suspect either came from the United States (majority) or from one of the countries with the largest immigrant groups in the U.S. (Mexico, India, China, Philippines, El Salvador, Vietnam, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Korea; random assignment).

Minority membership is also mentioned more frequently in positive contexts

Participants were asked to summarize the information for a news article. The researchers analyzed whether the suspect’s origin was mentioned or not. “The results showed that the country of origin was mentioned more than three times as often when the suspect belonged to a minority, regardless of whether the participants themselves belonged to a minority,” reports Anna Schulte.

Because these findings could also be explained by motivational factors such as prejudice, the study was repeated with positive events. Instead of criminal incidents, participants read about lottery winnings or scientific breakthroughs. Here, the effect was even more pronounced: The subject’s origin was mentioned almost four times as often when they belonged to a minority. “This study is particularly central because it shows that the primary driver is the communicative focus on distinct characteristics, not a specifically negative portrayal of minorities,” says Anna Schulte.

AI overgeneralizes these tendencies

The research team also had six different AI language models perform the same task. They created 1,000 negative and 1,000 positive scenarios and presented them to the models as prompts, asking them to summarize the information for a news article. The result: AI models mentioned minority group membership even more frequently than humans did, both in negative and positive contexts. Why the models exhibit this tendency more strongly is not yet fully understood. “The findings suggest that AI models adopt statistical patterns from their (human-generated) training data and overgeneralize existing communication tendencies. Further research is needed here,” says Anna Schulte.

The dilemma

“The results indicate that no deliberate disparagement of minority groups is taking place,” concludes Schulte. Instead, the researchers see a fundamental cognitive principle behind the excessive emphasis on minority characteristics. Nonetheless, this tendency results in minority groups being disproportionately represented in media contexts –  which are usually negative. “We refer to this phenomenon as the ‘minority dilemma’,” the researcher explains.

What media professionals can do

Media professionals who are aware of the effect could try to mitigate it by either always or never mentioning a subject’s origin. Both approaches, however, have drawbacks: Since people are generally interested in distinct information, omitting such details may undermine trust in a news source. Conversely, consistently reporting all characteristics of all individuals may create the impression that the news source provides irrelevant and redundant information, which can also undermine trust. “One possible intervention would be to report other distinct characteristics instead, such as a person’s birthplace. This could provide sufficient distinctiveness and informativeness even for minority group members. We plan to systematically investigate such measures in a follow-up project,” says Schulte. Another important implication concerns the use of AI in news production: Since AI models not only reproduce existing biases in training data but even amplify them, media professionals should be aware of these risks when relying on AI for text generation.

Monday, December 01, 2025

WORLD AIDS DAY, EXCEPT IN TRUMP'S USA

 



World AIDS Day highlights major innovations amid decline in global funding


As World AIDS Day is marked around the globe, rapid scientific progress is being overshadowed by funding shortfalls and weakened health systems that are putting the global fight against HIV at risk.



Issued on: 01/12/2025 


Volunteers light candles during an awareness campaign event organised on the eve of 'World AIDS Day' in Kathmandu on 30 November 2025. AFP - PRAKASH MATHEM

The global fight against HIV/Aids has found itself at a troubling crossroads. On one hand, scientific progress is picking up pace; on the other, the latest UNAIDS report paints a stark picture of a world struggling to keep its momentum.

International response is weakening, held back by falling funding and disrupted health services.

Worldwide, an estimated 41 million people are now living with HIV. Last year saw 1.3 million new infections, and 9.2 million people still lack access to life-saving antiretroviral (ARV) treatment.

According to UNAIDS Executive Director Winnie Byanyima: “the global response to HIV has suffered its biggest setback in decades.”

But she insists that “HIV is not over,” and has called for renewed global mobilisation.

Her plea follows especially disappointing news: the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria raised just over €9 billion for the next three years – far short of the €15 billion it says is needed.

This is even lower than the last replenishment round in 2022, threatening the future of crucial programmes around the world.

Positive developments in the lab


But it’s not all bleak. In research centres worldwide, scientists are making remarkable advances.

Yazdan Yazdanpanah, director of the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Emerging Diseases (ANRS-MIE), describes the situation as a paradox: impressive scientific advances on one side, declining capacity to roll them out on the other – a sort of “double dynamic”.

One encouraging development is the arrival of long-acting antiretroviral treatments. Instead of taking a pill every day, people can now receive treatment once every two months.

This, Yazdanpanah explains, boosts adherence and generally feels more manageable for many. Some 43 percent of people living with HIV say these long-acting treatments are their first choice – even before considering side effects or tablet size.

Prevention tools are also evolving. A major breakthrough is injectable PrEP, which offers long-term protection against HIV.

Lenacapavir – recently recommended by the World Health Organization – provides six months of protection with a single shot.

“It’s one injection every six months to prevent HIV,” says Yazdanpanah. Thanks to an international pricing agreement, the cost could be around €35 per year in 120 low-resource countries, compared with roughly €25,300 per year previously charged in the United States.


 A pharmacist holds a vial of lenacapavir, the new HIV prevention injectable drug, at the Desmond Tutu Health Foundation's Masiphumelele Research Site, in Cape Town, South Africa, Tuesday, 23 July, 2024, which was one of the sites for Gilead's lenacapavir drug trial. © Nardus Engelbrecht / AP


South Africa, Eswatini and Zambia on Monday began administering the groundbreaking injection in the drug's first public rollouts in Africa.

Eastern and southern Africa account for about 52 percent of the 40.8 million people living with HIV worldwide, according to 2024 UNAIDS data.

Under the programme, manufacturer Gilead Sciences has agreed to provide lenacapavir at no profit to two million people in countries with a high HIV burden over three years.

Critics say this is far below the actual requirement and that the market price is out of reach for most people.
Progress needs power, power needs funding

These advances, impressive as they are, risk remaining theoretical unless health systems can keep up.

In 2025, global development aid for health fell by 22 percent, driven largely by reductions or withdrawals from major US programmes.

The consequences are already being felt, says Françoise Vanni, external relations director at the Global Fund.

“There has been a crisis in international financing for the fight against HIV/Aids and for global health more broadly, with drastic cuts from a number of donor countries that have really caused major interruptions in the delivery of essential services,” she explained to RFI.

With infections rising again in several countries, she is blunt about the reality for frontline programmes: “Very concretely, it means it is much more difficult to fight these diseases effectively.”

Nowhere is this fragility clearer than in sub-Saharan Africa, which bears a disproportionate share of the epidemic. The region accounts for a large share of new HIV infections and is home to 60 percent of all people living with the virus.

In 13 countries, fewer people started treatment last year. Supply shortages have been felt, too, with disruptions in Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of Congo affecting both HIV testing and access to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy.

Khanyiswa Kwatsha, who runs a mobile clinic for the Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (RHI) background, shows containers of PrEP medication used in the prevention of HIV infectionin in the Soshanguve Township, north of Pretoria, South Africa, Thursday, 26 November 2020. AP - Denis Farrell


The funding crisis, compounded by the lasting effects of the Covid-19 pandemic, is undermining the progress made since the early 2000s.

In Nigeria, condom distribution has dropped by 55 percent.

Community organisations – traditionally the backbone of HIV work – are also under heavy strain, with more than 60 percent of those led by women forced to suspend essential programmes.

UNAIDS makes its position clear: science alone cannot end the epidemic. The agency is urging the global community to rethink the funding model so that heavily affected countries invest more of their own resources. Without this shift, the world will almost certainly fall short of its goal to end the HIV/Aids epidemic by 2030.

At best, current trends would allow the international community merely to hold the epidemic steady. At worst, if the decline in funding continues, UNAIDS warns of a resurgence of HIV/Aids by 2030.

Treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS: Unfinished business




Georgetown University Medical Center




WASHINGTON – As the world marks World AIDS Day on Dec. 1, world-renowned infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci, MD, and his colleague Greg Folkers, MS, MPH, highlight advances made in the treatment and prevention of HIV that could finally end the pandemic, but caution, “History will judge us harshly should we squander this opportunity.”

Writing in PLOS Medicine (“Treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS: Unfinished business,” December 1, 2025), Fauci, Distinguished University Professor in Georgetown’s School of Medicine and McCourt School of Public Policy, and Folkers, Fauci’s long-time chief of staff at the National Institutes of Health explore a path forward for eliminating HIV/AIDS. The number of people living with HIV globally in 2024 exceeded 40 million, with 1.3 million new infections and 660,000 deaths in that year alone.

They reflect on significant advances made in the development of powerful therapeutics to treat and prevent HIV and underscore the importance of programs such as the Global Fund and the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which have allowed for successful implementation and scale up of treatment and prevention interventions that have saved millions of lives.

However, pauses in U.S. foreign development assistance leading to the termination of clinical services “likely has resulted in the illness and death of thousands of people with HIV. Modelling studies suggest that millions of additional HIV infections and deaths could occur if withheld funding is not reconstituted and expanded,” they write, adding, “The time is now to advocate for the US Congress to renew funding of the Global Fund and PEPFAR at robust levels.”

Fauci and Folkers acknowledge that these two programs alone will not end the epidemic and they highlight the importance of countries taking control of their own HIV responses complemented by the work of international agencies, donors, community groups, drug manufacturers, researchers and implementers.

“Only with such a multi-pronged effort will we end the HIV/AIDS pandemic,” they write.