Showing posts sorted by date for query SWEAT SHOP. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query SWEAT SHOP. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, September 15, 2024

“The Myth of Our Disposability”: Reflections from an Amazon Warehouse Worker on Prime Day

On July 16 and 17, Amazon made $14.2 billion off the backs of its workers during its annual Prime Day sale. The “holiday” means extra hours, increased rates of injury, and sweltering temperatures for workers like me. But Amazon workers have been uniting this summer to fight for the wages, conditions, and autonomy that we deserve.


Pola Posen 
August 29, 2024
LEFT VOICE


On July 16, fire hydrants were open on every block, and the streets were empty, cleared by the heat wave that swept over New York City that week. Inside the Amazon warehouse where I work, it was just as hot.

July 16 and 17 — some of the hottest days recorded on the planet — were also Amazon’s 2024 Prime Days. The brutality of the temperatures was matched by that of the record-breaking profits Amazon made off its workers during the sale, which for customers lasted two days, and for workers, two weeks.

Amazon created Prime Day, its own commercial holiday, in 2015. The holiday reflects Amazon’s global ascendency and the increasing centrality of the logistics industry in the United States. Other companies, like Walmart, Target, and Temu, have been forced to create their own sales in July to compete with Prime Day. In the United States, there are about 170 million Amazon Prime members, or about half of the country’s population. Amazon Prime is enormously popular, but our warehouse labor is invisibilized—the hours, stress, and life force that this mammoth industry extracts from us and relies on to feed its own rise.

The company made $14.2 billion in profits during Prime this year, an 11 percent increase from last year. That same week, I earned $900 for working a mandatory 60 hours.

Most of us work the overnight shift, from 1 a.m. to 11:50 a.m., which is Amazon’s most common shift schedule, and which makes possible its characteristic same-day and next-day shipping. During Prime and Peak season (around Christmas time), we work forced overtime hours for two weeks — this year, we were scheduled to work 60 hours, or 12 hours a night for five days straight. This forced overtime is implemented to account for the sharp increase in volume that our warehouses process during Prime and Peak — the number of packages that my warehouse processes doubled during Prime week. The daily number of packages that we unload and sort jumped from about 20,000 to 40,000 packages overnight, meaning that not only did our site force us to work longer hours and hire more workers for Prime season, but we were also pressured through a variety of tactics to work harder.

During this period, we are not allowed to take time off. The mandatory extra time (known as MET) exhausts everyone, and is especially difficult for workers who are single parents or have second jobs that they depend on. If we miss time during MET, this time is subtracted from our paid or unpaid time off — time that we rely on for emergencies, since we do not have sick days. If we run out of our allotted unpaid time off hours (UPT), we can be fired.
On Being Disposable

This dynamic underlies Amazon’s employment model. We are at constant risk and live in constant fear of being fired. This disposability is a practical mechanism for the company: it serves the double purpose of keeping production high and facilitating company control of the shop floor. Amazon employs about 1.5 million mostly young workers around the world, uses up our bodies, and drives us to exhaustion and burnout. Then they throw us out, either by firing us or pressuring us, through the intensity of the work, to quit. The high levels of turnover at Amazon are entirely by design. By guaranteeing a constant flow of new hires who have energy and are not yet injured, the company has an easier time demanding high rates and fast work — in other words, making us do more work for the same low hourly wage.

The disposability model can be seen most acutely during Prime and Peak. The highest numbers of people hired by Amazon are hired right before Prime, and the highest numbers of people fired are fired right after Prime. Amazon, like UPS, has tier systems to instill false and arbitrary divisions between workers who do the same job. Most of these new hires are “white badges,” who are technically seasonal workers, and who do not receive the same benefits (such as vacation hours) or minimal job security as the full-time “blue badge” workers. Their employment status means that they could be fired at any time. The company is supposed to convert white badges to blue badges after three months, but the policy is inconsistent and unenforced. Several of my coworkers have been waiting for nearly a year to get blue badge status. Furthermore, favoritism and, conversely, the targeting of specific people based on bias or if they are seen as a “troublemaker” means that rules are enforced discriminately — one person may be fired for a minor offense that another worker would not be. This is another of management’s attempts to divide us.

The reality and feeling of being disposable is one of powerlessness. Amazon uses disposability to keep us down: the real risk of being fired for next to nothing discourages workers from organizing and forming unions. Amazon’s tools of disposability make us, sometimes, suspicious and resentful of each other. They make workers afraid to speak up against the injustices that we witness every day. Amazon wants us to believe that they easily can, and will, replace us. We get secret write-ups and are constantly surveilled for breaking the smallest, most meaningless rules (like checking our phones). This means our livelihoods are always on the line.

In this way, management seeks to control the shop floor. They use fear and discipline to control how we work, down to the smallest details: when we talk, how many minutes we use the bathroom, how fast we move. Our risk of disposability and material precariousness also facilitate manager harassment, which intensified during Prime. Many of my friends at work have been driven to tears or overcome by blind anger by the disrespect with which we are treated by the managers. There is very little appreciation given to us for breaking our backs 10 hours a night.

Managers will purposefully harass workers on the basis of their gender, race, and language/immigration status. They will mask discipline behind a phony facade of concern, and only later will you discover that when they asked, “Are you OK?” they wrote you up afterward. They will yell our names across the warehouse to get our attention and tell us to move faster. They will use passive-aggressive comments to dismiss and invalidate the hours of hard physical work that we do daily. These types of insidious incidents complement and strengthen the more material forms of disrespect, such as low pay and few benefits, that we face.

Amazon’s tactic of disposability, however, perpetuates a fundamental lie: that we are unimportant. When we are made to feel small and precarious, it helps the company in its quest to make us think that they, the managers and omnipresent Corporate, have the power, and that our role in the company is negligible. But the true balance of power is precisely the opposite. They move nothing; we move the boxes that make Amazon all of its profits and the managers their salaries. Without us, there would be no Amazon.

Alone, we may be disposable, but together, we have the power to decide our futures. In the moment that we are organized enough to all lift one foot in sync and take a step toward freedom together, Amazon’s myth of our disposability will dissolve. As the Wailers famously sang, “You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Earth’s Safest Place to Work

In a 2020 letter from Jeff Bezos to Amazon’s shareholders, he pledged Amazon’s commitment to be “Earth’s safest place to work.” As an Amazon employee in 2024, it is clear that nothing could be further from the truth.

On Prime Day 2022, Amazon worker Rafael Reynaldo Mota Frias died in a fulfillment center warehouse in New Jersey. Under the immense pressures of working conditions during the sale, Mota Frias had a heart attack.

Coworkers attested that they believe that he was “overworked and overheated.” Mota Frias’s warehouse, like my own, did not have air-conditioning on the warehouse floor. Throughout the summer, it is as hot inside the warehouse as outside, a condition that only worsens each year with the climate crisis. While management’s offices are air-conditioned, the shop floor, where we sweat and exercise for 10 to 12 hours each night, is not. My coworkers joked throughout Prime week that management would wait for someone to pass out from heat exhaustion before they would give us AC.

Indeed, throughout the heat wave that lasted the week of Prime Day this year, management expressed consistent disregard for our heat safety. After an associate complained about the heat, a manager told us that the fans they set up were “sufficient” and that, if someone had a complaint, they should just write again on the useless “Voice of Associates” board. Many of my coworkers told me at different points that they felt overheated and lightheaded. In another instance, I paused work to drink water, and a manager approached me. “What’s going on?” they asked disapprovingly, as I was mid-sip. In coded language, they told me to get back to work.

On July 15 of this year, the U.S. Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Senate Committee released an interim report entitled “Peak Seasons, Peak Injuries: Amazon Warehouses Are Especially Dangerous during Prime Day and the Holiday Season — and the Company Knows It.” In its investigation, the committee found that far more Amazon workers are injured each year than are reported to OSHA, the federal occupational safety regulator. They also found that the company tends to overlook safety procedures during peak periods; when safety requirements inhibit productivity and profit, they are pushed aside. As in an example given in the report, the company commonly floods the conveyor belt with boxes beyond any reasonable capacity, such that they fall off the belt and often hit workers. We are discouraged from turning off the belt to ensure our safety.

According to OSHA, only injuries that are treated beyond first aid must be reported to the agency. This leads to a vast discrepancy between the total injury rate (TIR) and recorded injury rate (RIR) of Amazon warehouse workers, which the Senate committee analyzed using worker testimony and internal Amazon data. Through its RIR, the company artificially manufactures injury rates for the federal regulator that are far lower than they really are — the company often discourages workers from seeking aid beyond first aid and does not provide information about how we can seek outside medical care and workers compensation. As the report notes,


When Amazon workers are injured, they typically visit an on-site first-aid clinic called AMCARE. If their injuries are minor and require only first aid, they are usually treated and sent back to work. But if their injuries are more serious and require additional attention, they are often still only given first aid and sent back to work instead of being sent to a doctor. The result is that their injuries can be rendered not recordable, regardless of severity.

Further, the report demonstrates that injury rates spike during Prime and Peak seasons.



Graph excerpted from the Senate report, originally sourced from a 2020 Amazon Workplace Health and Safety report.

The committee report, while progressive in its orientation and useful in exposing Amazon’s systemic maneuvering, has two important limitations.

First, most injuries at Amazon go unreported. I know this from firsthand experience; one of my coworkers gets injured nearly every day. Often, they choose not to report the injury, for an array of reasons. They fear that they could get in trouble for the injury — managers often blame injuries on the victims, or even reprimand them for getting injured because of what they identify as unsafe practices. Workers are often shamed and harassed after sustaining injuries, even when they receive medical accommodations. For many of my immigrant coworkers, there is a significant language barrier that leads them to avoid reporting injury. In other cases, workers feel that AMCARE, Amazon’s on-site resource, will not help them. Nearly all that AMCARE can prescribe is ice, a heat compress, or ibuprofen; what many workers need is rest, and in more severe cases, physical therapy or more intensive medical treatment. But the process for accessing this treatment is obscured by the company. And, regardless, many workers cannot afford to take unpaid time off.

Second, the report places its trust in OSHA and implores action from Congress as a solution to the injustices perpetrated by Amazon. But this trust is misplaced — Amazon workers have a more accurate understanding that Amazon is not bound by federal laws and regulations. It operates, in a practical sense, outside the law. Though its union busting and abusive occupational practices can be challenged in court, only the organized power of Amazon workers can confront the company.
Amazon Workers Fight Back

Across the country and around the world this summer, Amazon workers are fighting back and growing the movement to transform our working conditions.

On Juneteenth, 600 Amazon workers across five warehouses in the New York area signed petitions, demanding Amazon recognize Juneteenth as a paid holiday, as well as $25-an-hour base pay, time-and-a-half pay for Prime Day (“Prime Pay for Prime Day”), and automatic conversions of seasonal white badge workers to regular blue badge workers in 30 days. Workers marched on their bosses together to deliver the petitions. These warehouse workers are organizing in coordination with what they call the “Amazon Workers Summit, a loose network of workplace committees across New York and New Jersey.”

The Amazon Labor Union at JFK8 on Staten Island is also entering a new era of more militant and renewed struggle against Amazon. The ALU formally affiliated with the Teamsters in June, and in July, the ALU Democratic Reform Caucus slate won the first leadership elections within the union. For the new leadership board, a new chapter of democracy and rank-and-file leadership for the union will allow them to more effectively confront the company and bring them to the bargaining table.

On Sunday, July 21, several days after Prime, more than 130 workers walked out of their warehouse in San Bernardino, California.

Most recently, on August 22, the National Labor Relations Board determined that Amazon is a joint employer of the drivers who deliver its packages in Palmdale, California. Previously, the company has claimed that these workers are the sole employees of third-party delivery service partner (DSP) companies. In 2023, Palmdale drivers at one DSP voted to unionize with the Teamsters and were voluntarily recognized by the DSP management — but because they weren’t technically employees of Amazon, Amazon terminated the DSP contract and refused to bargain with the drivers. Now Amazon must negotiate with the Palmdale drivers, and Amazon drivers have a position of increased leverage against the company.

Organizing at Amazon is entering a new period. As our actions and organization grow, we inspire each other and multiply in our power and confidence. The landscape has also been influenced significantly by the Teamsters’ increased investment in organizing efforts. This influence is exciting to workers as organizing momentum grows, but also poses new problems for workers, as many organizing committees that were formerly independent choose to affiliate with the powerful business union. In this new chapter, it is essential that we recognize and uplift the need for rank-and-file leadership and worker democracy in the actions that we take.

The need for worker power is felt most acutely during peak periods like Prime, when we are most exploited and abused by the company. And the contradiction that rules our lives is felt most acutely: when we are most exploited by Amazon, the company makes the most money from us. All the billions of dollars of profit that Amazon made this year on Prime Day is wealth that we created, and that we should fight to reclaim. The more sweat that we spend on Amazon, the more injuries and sleepless hours we give, the more wealth that the bosses amass and the further we are buried in precarity. Only our united power as workers can turn this system upside down. Only together can we take back the humanity and abundance that is ours.

Saturday, June 22, 2024

Source: Labor Notes

If you’re dreading summer on the job this year, you’re not alone.

Every month last summer was the most scorching on world record. Trapped under heat domes, dozens of metro areas busted their longest streaks ever of highs over 100 degrees. Phoenix afternoons were over 110 for a month straight.

On asphalt yards nearly hot enough to melt, bonus-hungry managers forced workers to keep up the usual pace. The results were lethal.

In 2022, the latest year for which we have data, 43 U.S. workers lost their lives to heat on the job. That’s up from 36 in 2021, and we can expect this cruel number to keep climbing.

But from warehouses to coffeehouses to construction sites, workers using solidarity and creative action—even without the protection of a union contract—have won shop floor fights to keep their co-workers safe and cool.

WEEKLY CHATS

Nosebleeds and heat exhaustion had become eerily normal at the massive Amazon San Bernardino air hub, east of Los Angeles. Outdoor workers on the tarmac had it worst. But when even an indoor worker was taken away in an ambulance last year, that was the final straw.

“The on-site medical department tried to say he just had lingering effects of Covid,” said warehouse worker Anna Ortega. “The paramedics told him it was heatstroke. That really kicked us off. We didn’t want it to get any worse, because people can even die from heatstroke.”

Workers were starting an organizing drive as Inland Empire Amazon Workers United, with support from the Teamsters. Before the day of the ambulance, “we had already made our own kind of health and safety committee,” Ortega said. “We’d meet weekly or biweekly, after work, and talk about what’s going on at the facility, what our co-workers are experiencing and saying to us.”

They realized the bosses weren’t following their own safety rules, like allowing workers to take short breaks if they felt early symptoms of heatstroke. “A lot of times, management announces these changes just once, and doesn’t keep track of who they need to get the information to,” Ortega said.

After the indoor worker collapsed, the committee realized enough people were ready to act. “We handed out flyers to co-workers on breaks. We marched on the boss with over 20 people. It was after that they finally installed fans.”

But workers wanted more than fans—they wanted those safety breaks. They kept up the breakroom conversations and public flyering, and they put in a complaint to the state job safety board—which sent inspectors and eventually cited the company for unsafe heat exposure.

“We won breaks and cold drinks,” Ortega said. “Our annual training got updated to say if we’re feeling symptoms of heat, we have the right to take a five-minute break. That’s something we pushed forward. It showed that we really could win, that they could have done it from the beginning. They didn’t have to wait until something terrible happened.”

MANAGEMENT NEGLECT

Bosses ignoring their own safety rules is a problem across industries. In steamy Jacksonville, Florida, the Electrical Workers (IBEW) won contracts that require bosses on construction sites to supply cool water all day. But contractors often conveniently forget.

When managers brought no water to a job wiring a Navy hangar last summer, tempers boiled. “One journeyman told the foreman he wasn’t working until there was water—and did so publicly in front of the entire crew,” said an apprentice from the site, who requested not to be named. “The crew refused to work. [The foreman] immediately folded and left to go get some.”

Meanwhile at a Starbucks in Prosser, in eastern Washington, overheating became the spark for a union drive.

Managers claimed the AC had been fixed, but “we put a fridge thermostat out on the counter and it’s reading over 80 degrees,” said barista Anthony Warwick. “This was in March, not the height of summer. It was hotter inside than it was outside, because we have 500-degree ovens, water boilers going all the time, fridges giving out heat. It goes up exponentially.”

His Starbucks co-workers (called “partners” in company lingo) were hesitant to come out in open conflict with management, but last August “the heat of the moment” changed everything, Warwick said.

Soaring temperatures were combined with severe wildfire smoke, even inside their cafe: “We were all choking, wearing masks but still suffocating as we worked. I talked to other partners, and we decided we couldn’t work.”

A callous store manager struck the final blow. When she came in to respond to workers’ request to close at least half the shop, Warwick said, “her first thing was to call out one of our partners for wearing something off-code. That’s when partners started walking out.

“There was nothing she could do. It was very spur of the moment.”

Since they all walked out together, “nobody got a write-up,” Warwick said. “That got people realizing, we don’t have to suffer through unworkable conditions.”

The group won a union authorization election the following month—and the manager finally hauled in fans.

HEAT PAY

For the budding union at Homegrown, a Seattle chain of sandwich cafes and caterers, heat was the clear unifying issue

In organizing committee meetings, “we found out every single person working can feel the heat, in front or back of house,” said Kai Ortiz, who preps pastramis and runs the register up front. “People going back home after a long day in the heat, you’re totally exhausted. Nobody wants to live like this.”

So the workers started using creative tactics to make management sweat. “At my store, we did a march on our boss,” said Ortiz. “We did flyering [of customers outside the store] on our breaks—in front of our managers. Pretty badass. We did sidewalk chalking. We asked an industrial hygienist to come to check out our conditions, and they set up a medical station in front of the store to interview people.”

Homegrown sandwich cafe workers brought in an industrial hygienist, who set up a medical station in front of the store to interview people about the dangerous heat inside. (Photo: Mike Rodriguez)

After Homegrown managers responded with “Gatorade, visors, cut fruit, and a few more breaks,” Ortiz recalled, “we said, ‘That’s not enough.’” After a near-unanimous strike vote, in August 2022 they shut down the stores with a series of one-day strikes over heat.

Getting to that unanimous vote took time. “Workers who were on the fence, we brought them in,” Ortiz said. “These were intense conversations, not the easiest. We’ve got high schoolers and college students working in front, then often immigrants and older folks working in back.”

The committee had to build enough trust among these groups to take a big risk together. And while heat was a unifying issue for the store workers, it turned out the catering workers already had decent AC and fewer ovens in their production area.

Still, they joined the strike wave after adding a demand to end a pay gap between distribution and catering drivers with similar jobs—“equal pay for equal work.” “Our student workers came out of school to cheer them on,” Ortiz said.

In the strikes, the workers won their most ambitious demand: the discretion “to close the stores if we had to, to keep us safe—if it got too hot, or smoky from wildfires.”

That fall, Homegrown workers won union recognition with UNITE HERE Local 8. And after a long contract battle and a three-month strike to reinstate a fired co-worker, they finally won their first union contract this March.

The contract locks in an innovative idea: heat pay. After an hour above 82 degrees in the shop, they earn 150 percent wages for the rest of the shift; above 86 degrees, double wages or the right to leave work with no punishment.

The point is to make management “cave and give AC so they don’t have to give double pay,” Ortiz said. And if management doesn’t, “we won the right to picket, flyer [customers] even [while we’re] under contract—to take the fight to the public.”

Those might be the most important wins, since these battles aren’t going away. “The company can get AC, but heat waves are going to get hotter and hotter,” Ortiz said. “Wildfires are going to get worse. This is going to be a workplace issue forever.”

Thursday, June 06, 2024

Killer Heat’s Shadow: India’s Labourers on the Frontlines, Face Boiling Temperatures


Country:
INDIA

Authors:
Shagun Kapil
GRANTEE

Joel Michael
GUEST CONTRIBUTOR

Project
No Escape From Heat for India’s Vulnerable Workers

READ MORE ABOUT THIS PROJECT


From L-R, Construction worker Rohit Kumar Paswan, boiler plant worker Bhim Singh
 
and tailor Kajalben all face extreme, intense heat at work.
 Images by Joel Michael/CSE. India, 2024.

In part one of this series, DTE investigates how the new normal of extreme heat is impacting informal workers and workplaces lacking climate control mechanisms

Rohit Kumar Paswan’s daily job involves securing himself to a harness and ascending scaffolding on the 10th floor of a building under construction, with the mercury soaring to around 47 degrees Celsius.

Bhim Singh works inside a boiler plant that operates a textile unit.

Kajalben spends a significant portion of her day within her cramped house, operating a sewing machine to stitch clothes for her customers.

All three work in different occupations, in distinct workspaces — the first is directly exposed to the sun during his working hours, the second works within a factory and the third from the comfort of her own home. However, a common factor binds them in their workplaces: Extreme, intense heat is unavoidable for all three.

Video courtesy of Down To Earth. India, 2024.

Down To Earth’s (DTE) Shagun and Joel Michael travelled to brick kilns, construction sites, factories, small-scale units and homes serving as workplaces for thousands of informal workers in Delhi, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh (UP) and Gujarat to understand how a rapidly warming planet has made work extremely challenging, testing people’s tolerance limits.

Around 82 per cent of India’s workforce is engaged in the informal sector and nearly 90 per cent is informally employed.

This new series by DTE will report on how heat is affecting labourers and workplaces that lack climate control mechanisms like cooling or air conditioning, or where these systems cannot be implemented due to the nature of the work. The reports will also examine the health impacts heat has on the most vulnerable populations, along with possible prevention measures that industries can explore.

In the first part of the series, DTE reports on outdoor workers who build our cities but are directly exposed to the scorching heat.

“MY BODY FEELS like it is trapped in a heat island, soaked in sweat. I would choose any other job over this if given the choice,” 34-year-old Biresh Kumar described his daily job, which entails working directly under the sun’s rays for four hours (from 8 am to 1 pm) and then for another two hours after a break (1-3 pm).

Kumar works at a brick kiln in Bhopani village in the Faridabad district in Haryana, part of the Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR). He prepares clay from soil and crafts raw bricks in the open, under the sun. These bricks must be sundried before firing in the kiln.

Brick kiln worker Biresh Kumar. Image by Joel Michael/CSE. India, 2024.

DTE first met him in mid-April and recorded the area’s surface temperature using a ‘particle counter’ instrument, which measures air temperature, relative humidity and wet bulb (WB) temperature, among other factors. The temperature reading of the area where he works was 38.4°C.

WB is the lowest temperature to which air can be cooled by evaporating water at a constant pressure.

Workers in brick kilns are subjected to both extreme ambient temperatures and intense radiant heat from the kilns where the bricks are fired. “A person cannot walk for more than an hour in the sun and here our work entails continuously working under it. My job requires me to squat for most hours while making the bricks, which leads to knee pain and reduced blood circulation to the lower limbs,” he said.

This is Kumar’s first year working at a brick kiln. A native of Hathras district in the neighbouring UP, he owned a juice shop in Rajasthan’s Sri Ganganagar town until 2020, when he had to close it down during the COVID-19-induced lockdown.

The shop was rented. As Kumar was unable to afford the monthly rent in the pandemic, he and his family of five (wife and three children) had to relocate to their hometown in UP, with no savings and no source of income.

There, he encountered the contractor of the brick kiln, who offered him a non-institutional loan in exchange for his labour. The family accepted the advance and arrived in Faridabad in February 2024 to commence work at the kiln.

Sitting on a cot at some distance is Kumar’s co-worker, Somveer (he only provided his first name). For two days, Somveer was experiencing body aches, weakness and fever, forcing him to miss work and consequently forfeit his wage. He was unsure of the exact cause of his condition but suggested it could be due to heat exhaustion.

Neeraj Kaushik, the medical officer in charge of the Government Hospital (Community Health Centre) in Faridabad's Kheri Kalan, which is accessible to Somveer and Kumar, said he noticed an increase in the number of brick kiln workers presenting to the hospital with complaints of dehydration and fainting episodes.

“We see more such patients in the months of May and June. Sometimes they are severely dehydrated, have dry lips and are extremely weak, so we have to instantly administer rehydration fluids. For those with co-morbid conditions like diabetes, it becomes an emergency situation when their vitals are disoriented and then it takes a lot of time to revive them,” he said, pointing out that the patients were mostly people working in brick kilns, construction sites and agricultural farms.
India in grip of heatwave


On May 24, when DTE revisited two brick kilns (including the one where Kumar and Somveer work), the device recorded a temperature of 43°C at the site, with a relative humidity of 38.5 per cent and a WB temperature, which indicates both temperature and humidity, of 30°C.

India’s northern, northwestern and central regions are in the grip of a relentless heatwave, with temperatures even surpassing 50°C in some areas of Rajasthan, Haryana and Delhi on May 28. India Meteorological Department (IMD) defines a heatwave threshold as when the maximum temperature reaches 40°C in the plains, 30°C in hilly areas and 37°C in coastal areas, with a departure from the normal maximum temperature of at least 4.5°C.

The IMD, in its forecast, stated that there is a “very high likelihood of developing heat illness and heatstroke in all age groups.” According to media reports, there have been 11 deaths due to suspected heatstroke in the state of Rajasthan and two in Gujarat.
How hot is too hot to work?


The recommendations by National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in the United States permit continuous work at heavy intensities in hot environments up to 34°C and 30 per cent relative humidity.

The year 2024 has witnessed every month breaking global heat records since the pre-industrial era. It commenced with Earth experiencing its warmest January since records began in 1850, followed by the hottest March and now May 2024 is poised to become the 12th month to continue the streak of record-breaking temperatures.

Climate change and the El Nino phenomenon have significantly contributed to this record-shattering heat surge across Asia, including India, as analysed by an international team of 13 leading climate scientists from the World Weather Attribution group in a global study on May 15, 2024.

While intense heat driven by climate change remains relentless worldwide, individuals engaged in heavy physical labour are particularly at risk as their work exposes them to greater heat stress.

In addition to brick kiln workers, outdoor labourers also include agricultural workers performing heavy physical labour in heat, construction workers, gig workers, autorickshaw drivers, street vendors, among others, who are more exposed due to the nature of their work and challenging economic conditions.

“My first visit to a brick kiln was as a child, 20 years ago, with my father (who worked at one of them). I used to play around then. Even then, work lasted from morning to evening, but there was less heat. There is a big difference between then and now,” said Kumar.

Similarly, Somveer has been working in various brick kilns for six years, but in the last two to three years, he claimed, the heat has tested his body’s tolerance level. “This work used to feel normal just two years ago,” he said.

Both make around 2,500 bricks a day on average and receive Rs 520 ($6.26) per 1,000 bricks. However, the number of bricks they produce decreases as temperatures peak.

India is projected to lose 5.8 per cent of working hours in 2030, a productivity loss equivalent to 34 million full-time jobs, due to global warming, the International Labour Organization (ILO) estimated in its 2019 report. As a result, this will lead to a loss of income and livelihood for informal workers, who are most vulnerable to extreme and intense heat.

A brick kiln in Bhopani village, Haryana. Image by Joel Michael. India, 2024.

According to World Bank estimates, nearly 75 per cent of India’s workforce, or 380 million people, depend on heat-exposed labour.

A study conducted in brick kilns in Chennai in 2013 and 2014, published in 2019, found that occupational heat exposure in the kilns during the summer months sometimes exceeded international standard limits for safe work.

Kumar and Somveer are just two of the nearly 440 million people employed in India’s unorganised sector, as per the Economic Survey 2021-22. But they both exemplify how work has not only been disrupted by excessive heat but now feels almost like an intolerable punishment.

Brick manufacturing is a highly labour-intensive industry. Large numbers of workers are employed at each stage, including moulding bricks, transporting sundried and baked bricks to the kiln, adding fuel to the kiln and removing bricks once they have cooled to transport them further.

In May, the work of moulding and transporting bricks at the brick kiln sites was moved to night-time. However, night-time temperatures have also increased substantially, along with humidity. Additionally, mosquito bites increase at night. The IMD, in its May 24, 2024 forecast, cautioned that warm night conditions could also intensify in different parts of northern India.

The workers in charge of firing the kiln and ensuring that the bricks are adequately burned, on the other hand, are not permitted to change their schedules because this is a 24-hour job. Kilns in Delhi-NCR start up on March 1 and only shut down when the monsoon arrives in mid-June.

Those working in the third stage (fuelling the kilns) are constantly exposed to sunlight and additional heat from the furnaces inside the kiln. The chambers that feed the fuel (husk in this case) and burn the bricks at temperatures ranging from 1,100°C to 1,200°C produce scorching heat. Temperatures in the area where bricks are baked rise significantly when compared to other areas on the site.

Video courtesy of Down To Earth. India, 2024.

At one of the two kilns visited by DTE on May 24, a group of seven dedicated ‘firemen’ continuously fed fuel into each chamber. DTE recorded a temperature of 48°C and a WB temperature of 30.3°C at 3.30 pm. There was a temperature difference of 2°C just 200 metres away, where it was around 46°C.

How hot does it feel to the workers? “Crossing 50°C,” said Rajendra Kumar, who works with six others in two shifts from 1 pm-7 pm and 1 am-7 am, for Rs 600 ($7.22) per day. Out of these 12 hours, a total of six hours are spent near the chamber. Of these six hours, three are during the daytime. This means that for at least three hours of their day shift, the group is exposed to extreme temperatures continuously.

Most men stay away from their families. “Yahan aayenge gharwale? Marna hai kya? (Why will they come here? Do they want to die?),” said Rajendra rhetorically.

India is the second-largest brick producer in the world, with the sector producing 233 billion bricks each year and employing about 23 million people, who are at risk of extreme heat exposure. The brick industry is growing, with the demand for bricks increasing due to rapid urbanisation and the growing number of construction projects in the country.
Infrastructure boom and heat conundrum


Madhu Mandal wonders if he will ever find a workplace where he can escape the heat. It is around 1 pm on a blazing hot day in the national capital, Delhi. Mandal and his wife work as masons at a construction site along one of the stretches of the Dwarka Expressway.

Construction work is progressing rapidly on the eight-lane expressway, which is being developed as a residential and commercial hub and has seen a massive transformation over the last 10 years, with high-rises, gated communities and retail hubs dotting the 29-kilometre highway. The Mandals, natives of Katihar district in Bihar, are working on one such high-rise.

The brick kiln sector supports the rapidly expanding construction industry, which is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of six per cent from 2024 to 2033, fuelled by the government’s infrastructure push and rapid urbanisation.

Construction workers like Mandal are the backbone of this economic activity in India. The sector is the second largest employer in India, next only to agriculture, employing nearly 74 million workers, according to the National Sample Survey Office 2016-17.

Construction work in Ahmedabad. Image by Joel Michael/CSE. India, 2024.

Scientists have said that heatwaves are not only here to stay but will intensify in the coming years. In a country where approximately 50 per cent of gross domestic product or GDP is contributed by workers who work in heat-exposed conditions, are there enough safety measures?

Mostly, no. For example, Paswan, a construction worker in Ahmedabad city in the state of Gujarat, has been requesting his manager to install a green net on the top floor of an under-construction shopping mall where he works, but to no avail.

He has to work in a scaffolding operation, which involves standing for long hours at a height. When he takes a break, he looks for a place with some shade. “But for that, we have to go downstairs, which is a challenge. We have been telling the managers to arrange for a green net somewhere on the top floor where we work,” he said.

Temperature readings at different sites at an outdoor workplace showed that in a shaded area, the temperature gets reduced by a good 3-4°C, compared to the open area. Thus a simple solution like putting up a green net, making a shaded area that will block direct sunlight, or having more green spaces just near where the workers spend their time working, will allow them to cool down their bodies and have a proper rest during their breaks.
Illustration by Yogendra Anand. Interactive design by Ritika Bohra.


A recent study by the Delhi-based think tank Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) showed that enhancing green spaces can cool down temperatures by as much as 5°C and up to a distance of more than 250 metres. When DTEmet Paswan in mid-May, the temperature was 46.7°C, with a WB temperature of 31.2°C.

“I start work at 8 am and just after 10 am, I start feeling the heat. After 10 am, I feel like taking a break every 20-30 minutes,” said 22-year-old Paswan.

However, his job involves clipping himself to a harness and treading the scaffold, so he cannot take breaks often. “There are moments in the day when the body just wants to stop and rest,” he said.

According to a study by National Institute of Occupational Health-Indian Council of Medical Research in Ahmedabad with 29 young male construction workers, heat exposure at the construction workplace during the summer months was very high, with WB globe temperatures reaching 33°C. This exceeds the international standard limit values for moderate level work activities in a hot environment, which are set at 30°C.

Among all the hazards exacerbated by climate change, heat is undoubtedly a major disaster that will become more intense. Disaster risk must be considered during a country’s development, said Abhiyant Tiwari, lead, health and climate resilience at Natural Resources Defense Council India.

“At the rate we are urbanising, almost 70 per cent of infrastructure is yet to be built for the future and it has to factor in the rate of warming we are facing across the world, particularly in the Global South. If we do not consider that, we will fail drastically,” said Tiwari, who was part of the development and implementation of the first heat action plan of South Asia in 2013.

This calls for India to seriously include the ‘heat factor’ in its work policies. Are the workers that build and run our cities at the centre of climate change? Are governments, companies and civil society considering heat in their workplaces and seeking real-life adaptation solutions? The second part of the series will explore these questions.




As a nonprofit journalism organization, we depend on your support to fund more than 170 reporting projects every year on critical global and local issues. Donate any amount today to become a Pulitzer Center Champion and receive exclusive benefits!

Thursday, May 30, 2024

 SWEAT SHOP POLITICS

'We were going to win': Activist kingmaker stages coup at Gildan


Usman Nabi was certain from the beginning that it would end this way — with his firm seizing control of Gildan Activewear Inc. as the company’s directors headed for the exits.

“We’ve always known we were going to win,” he said. 

Six months ago, few people inside corporate Canada had even heard of Browning West LP, the investment partnership founded in 2019 by Nabi and Peter Lee. They know it now, after Browning triumphed in an expensive and high-profile proxy fight at Gildan, one of world’s largest makers of T-shirts and other cheap apparel.  

The battle — which began in December when Gildan’s board sacked longtime Chief Executive Officer Glenn Chamandy — featured lawsuits, conspiracy theories and plenty of mudslinging. Browning West wanted Chamandy back. The board hired a new CEO in Vince Tyra, an ex-Fruit of the Loom executive who’d had a stint as the University of Louisville’s athletic director.

In the end, Gildan spent some US$65 million on advisers, legal fees, severance and other related expenses, according to Chamandy — more than one per cent of its market capitalization. It’s even more than Walt Disney Co. paid to fend off activist shareholders including Nelson Peltz earlier this year. 

The dollar figure is one indicator of how hostile it was. Gildan’s board publicly accused Chamandy of being a checked-out CEO, more interested in his golf resort in Barbados than running a $6 billion public company. But inside Gildan, some executives were quietly organizing on his behalf and urging shareholders to back Browning’s campaign to oust the existing board and Tyra, their new boss. 

The rebellion worked. 

Faced with imminent defeat, Gildan’s entire board quit last week. The departures included former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. executive Tim Hodgson, who was brought in as Gildan’s new chair on May 1 — an unsuccessful attempt to persuade shareholders they could get an improved board without handing control to Browning West and Chamandy.

Now Tyra is gone, Chamandy is back and the directors are the eight men and women chosen by Browning West. All of them received at least 82 per cent of the shares voted in the board election, Gildan said in a statement Wednesday.  

“I think when we approach other public companies where change is required,” Nabi said, “folks are probably going to listen a little bit more carefully the next time.” 

Leadership focus

The Gildan proxy fight was shaped by Nabi’s time at H Partners Management LLC. There, he was part of the team that recapitalized Six Flags Entertainment Corp. and later pushed to replace the CEO of mattress maker Tempur Sealy International Inc. 

Under new leadership, both companies produced nice gains for investors, though in Tempur’s case it took several years for the strategy to work. Browning West is its fourth-largest holder today, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The experience showed that the quality of the top executives can make all the difference, Nabi said. Lee had a similar mindset. The two men, who both once worked for Lazard Inc., linked up to launch Browning West about five years ago and soon started building a stake in Gildan, which has produced annual returns of more than 18 per cent for shareholders since it went public in 1998. 

Chamandy — who ran Gildan with his brother Greg before becoming sole CEO in 2004 — is a supplier to Walmart Inc. and other apparel sellers. It has steadily built market share by exploiting a cost advantage over rivals such as Fruit of the Loom, a product of what Gildan executives said was Chamandy’s unparalleled knowledge of an intricate supply chain. 

The company takes cotton from the U.S. South and turns it into yarn that’s eventually transformed into T-shirts, socks and underwear by workers in low-wage textile centers such as Bangladesh. Chamandy knows better than anyone how to squeeze costs out of a vertically integrated manufacturing chain, Nabi said, and that’s the key. 

“It’s this game of inches,” Nabi said. “So the first thing you’d know is, let’s not hire someone who has no manufacturing experience, which is what the board did” when it chose Tyra, he said. 

Gildan’s board may have made a tactical error in the way it announced Chamandy’s departure on Dec. 11. The statement gave no explanation as to why the veteran CEO had left and said Tyra wouldn’t start working for two months. The stock fell 11 per cent that day.

It wasn’t until later that the board, then led by former alcohol executive Don Berg, came out with its story: that Chamandy, who’s in his early 60s, had run out of sensible ideas for growth, was proposing risky acquisitions and was stalling the board’s planning to find his eventual replacement. 

By that point, Chamandy had already grabbed control of the narrative, saying he’d been fired by a board that hadn’t consulted shareholders. Several of the largest investors went public with their unhappiness about the CEO change. 

By the end of December, Nabi and Lee had recruited former United Rentals Inc. CEO Michael Kneeland as a prospective new chair for Gildan, and the fight was on. “Our campaign started with a request for two board seats, then it went to five, and then it went to eight,” Nabi said. 

Browning West, which is based in Los Angeles, manages $1.6 billion for investors, including university endowments, wealthy individuals and the partners. Lee and Nabi say they have more than 90 per cent of their net worth in their fund. And the investment strategy is unusual. All of the money is in just six stocks, with the intention of owning them for years.

Under the operating plan unveiled by Browning West and Chamandy in March, Gildan will borrow more, repurchase stock, move additional production to Bangladesh and try to expand its sales of higher-quality products. There are ambitious targets — a $60 stock price by the end of next year, about 60 per cent higher than Tuesday’s closing price. If anything, the pressure on Chamandy is greater now: he’s accountable to a board that helped him get his job back. 

Gildan is Browning West’s second-largest holding, with a stake worth about $350 million. “What that means is, Gildan is extremely important to us as a fund,” Lee said, “but it’s also extremely important to us personally.


Proxy battle cost Gildan US$65M, as investors re-elect Chamandy, new slate to board

The bitter battle over who would run Gildan Activewear Inc. cost the company at least US$65 million, according to its newly returned CEO, as the apparel maker looks to turn a corner after a turbulent six months.

“This is probably the largest proxy fight in history, even more so than Disney, for example, which is 40 times our size,” said chief executive Glenn Chamandy, referring to a high-profile struggle at the entertainment company in recent years.

Shareholders of the T-shirt manufacturer voted to place Chamandy back on its board alongside a slate of candidates put forward by activist investors on Tuesday, capping a months-long leadership battle.

The election marks another vote of confidence for the company co-founder, who retook the helm last week after being ousted from the top job in December amid accusations he was no longer fit to lead the firm.

Chamandy told reporters in Montreal that Gildan's conduct over the past several months showed "poor judgement," causing a stressful period for him, his family and employees at the company. 

“I was a little saddened, I would say, by the way I think the board handled the succession — and handled me personally," he said.

Activist shareholders, including Browning West LP, pushed for Chamandy's return to the apparel manufacturer for months after former Fruit of the Loom executive Vince Tyra took over Gildan's CEO post. Gildan's largest shareholder, Jarislowsky Fraser, supported Browning West.

In a shock move last week, Tyra and Gildan's board stepped down, paving the way for Chamandy's return and for Browning West's slate of directors to be elected.

The US$65-million battle includes severances to outgoing board members and two executives, the company sale process — floated in March and since scrapped — as well as legal costs that include a pair of lawsuits launched by Gildan against Browning West, which were dismissed earlier this month, Chamandy said. That doesn't include his own severance, which he said he never received.

"This board was very entrenched and I think was very abusive to shareholders’ money,” he said of the departing directors. 

Roughly US$26 million of the US$65-million total went to Tyra, who headed the company for four months, and Arun Bajaj, Gildan's former human resources chief, said Chamandy, who called the compensation to his predecessor "shocking."

“They actually got the money for their severance and then left the company subsequently a couple days later, which is really strange,” he said. “From our view, it’s not very clean.”

Nonetheless, Chamandy suggested legal recourse is unlikely: “We’re putting this behind us.”

Meanwhile, the new board slate received “overwhelming support” from shareholders, the CEO said. The precise tally is expected by Wednesday morning.

Leading proxy firms Institutional Shareholder Services Inc., Glass Lewis and Egan Jones had all recommended Browning West's group of candidates be elected.

Gildan had previously replaced five directors in April and said it would back two Browning West nominees.

Browning West co-founder Peter Lee said Tuesday the legal battles cost his firm “millions of dollars.” The Los Angeles-based hedge fund will determine "down the road" whether Gildan might cover some of that expense, he said.

“Overall, justice has prevailed,” Chamandy told reporters. “The shareholders have spoken. This is a new beginning for Gildan.”

However, questions have already arisen around succession plans, given the tortuous saga of the past half-year.

“I’ve got a lot of energy. I’m in my early 60s, which is early 50s in the future," he said.

While Chamandy declined to speculate on when he might step down, chairman Michael Kneeland said, "Obviously, we’ll say three to five years — that’s probably good guardrails, but there’s no set time limit."

Chamandy also threw cold water on the idea of a sale of the clothing maker, which the previous board announced barely two months ago. The chief executive pointed to Gildan's ability as a publicly traded company to raise billions of dollars in capital for investment in garment factories.

“Private equity comes in and they buy the company and they put $5 billion of debt on the company, which is unmanageable," he said. "We're not going be able to reinvest in the company itself and we'll lose our competitive advantage."

Asked about complaints from factory workers in Honduras reported on by the Globe and Mail, Chamandy stood by the company’s practices, saying that most facilities are unionized and subject to periodic audits from monitoring and certification programs such as Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production. He also claimed high worker satisfaction among Gildan’s 44,000 employees and highlighted the whistleblower lines available to them.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 28, 2024.

Sunday, May 26, 2024

SWEAT SHOP BOARD ROOM POLITICS

Glenn Chamandy officially back at the Gildan helm after boardroom battle

Glenn Chamandy is officially back as the chief executive of Gildan after a months-long public battle over leadership of the Montreal-based clothing company he co-founded.

Chamandy was terminated last year to make way for Vince Tyra, kicking off protests by several major Gildan shareholders that disagreed with the decision.

Shareholders, led by activist investor Browning West, campaigned to have the Gildan board replaced at the company's annual meeting next week, and to have co-founder Chamandy brought back.

Browning West announced Thursday evening that its campaign was successful, as Gildan's board and new CEO stepped aside after preliminary votes showed the investor's plan was the clear favourite.

Gildan announced Friday that Chamandy is officially back in as its president and CEO, effective immediately.

The company says Michael Kneeland is now the non-executive chair of the board.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 24, 2024


Gildan's board resigns en masse, handing victory to activist Browning West

GILDAN ACTIVEWEAR INC (GIL:CT)

51.41 2.60 (5.33%)
As of: 05/26/24 5:17:46 am
REAL-TIME QUOTE. Prices update every five seconds for TSX-listed stocks
22. May24. May46485052
Chart Type - 5day
See Full Stock Page »

Gildan Activewear Inc.’s entire board of directors and Chief Executive Officer Vince Tyra quit on Thursday, conceding defeat after a bruising five-month battle with an activist shareholder over the future of the Canadian clothing maker.

The mass resignation marks a dramatic win for investment firm Browning West LP, owner of about five per cent of Gildan’s shares. It will take control of the board, install Michael Kneeland as chair and reinstate former CEO Glenn Chamandy to run the business under a new strategy.

Gildan’s board took the decision after shareholders “made their views clear” in advance of an investor meeting scheduled for May 28. Browning West said preliminary results suggested an “overwhelming majority” of shares would be voted in favour of its eight proposed directors at that meeting. 

The outgoing board halted all discussions on a previously-announced sale process, Gildan said in a statement. 

The company, one of the world’s largest makers of affordable T-shirts and owner of the American Apparel brand, has spent months embroiled in a toxic feud over its direction and who should be in charge. Browning West launched a campaign to eject the board in December after directors fired Chamandy and replaced him with Tyra, a former Fruit of the Loom executive and former athletic director at the University of Louisville. 

Montreal-based Gildan, which was founded by Chamandy’s grandfather, has become a US$6 billion company through a strategy of manufacturing in cheap-labour countries, allowing it to become a low-cost supplier of T-shirts and other apparel to retailers such as Walmart Inc. and to printwear shops and designers.

The board had accused Chamandy of being a disengaged CEO, of stalling an agreed-upon succession plan and of wanting to pursue a risky acquisition strategy — he proposed to acquire two distributors for more than $3 billion, according to documents seen by Bloomberg News.

But shareholders, led by Browning but including other large investors such as Jarislowsky Fraser and Janus Henderson Group, rallied to Chamandy’s side and called for his reinstatement.

The very public proxy fight already prompted Gildan to overhaul its board only one month ago. On May 1, five directors stood down, with replacements appointed including former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. executive Tim Hodgson as chairman. Another two said they’d leave at the May 28 shareholder meeting.

But that wasn’t enough. In recent days, proxy advisers Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. and Glass Lewis & Co. backed Browning West. Unusually, so did a group of Gildan’s own executives, who wrote a letter to shareholders suggesting they should support Browning West’s efforts so that Chamandy could return. 

In March, Browning West and Chamandy laid out plans to boost revenue, borrow more money and accelerate share buybacks to lift the stock price. Their strategy proposed that Gildan, which employs about 43,000 people worldwide, should shift more of its production to a facility in Bangladesh and away from Honduras, where energy and labor costs are higher, and focus on trying to grow in higher-end segments of the market, such as fleece products and clothing with better-quality fabric.

Their stated goal is to increase the share price to $60 by the end of next year and more than $100 in about five years. Gildan closed at $35.55 on Thursday in New York. 

“Our directors are eager to begin working toward their common goal of delivering enhanced shareholder value, which begins with reinstating Glenn Chamandy as CEO,” Browning West’s Usman Nabi and Peter Lee said in a statement. 

“Glenn is a visionary leader with a track record of value creation, an unparalleled knowledge of Gildan’s manufacturing business, a deep connection with the company’s employees and shareholders, and an impressive ability to foresee key industry shifts to keep Gildan one step ahead of competitors.”