Showing posts sorted by date for query THWAITES. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query THWAITES. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Saturday, October 17, 2026

 

Satellite data reveal how Antarctica’s ice cliffs behave over time



The cliffs don’t always collapse in the runaway process that scientists had expected.




Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Ice Cliffs Calving

image: 

Researchers at MIT and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) analyzed over 15,000 ice cliffs in Antarctica to reveal how they behave over time.

view more 

Credit: Caroline Needell




With rising temperatures, the buttressing ice shelves at the edges the Antarctic ice sheet are melting and calving off at record rates, leaving behind sheer cliffs of solid ice. The stability of these exposed ice cliffs could influence how Antarctica further breaks apart and contributes to sea level rise around the world. 

Scientists have assumed that an ice cliff’s stability depends on its height: Ice cliffs that are taller than 100 meters — about the height of the Statue of Liberty — should collapse under their own weight. And once a cliff sloughs off, it should expose even taller, inland cliffs that collapse in turn. At least, that’s been the idea.

But researchers at MIT and the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) have found that the stability of an ice cliff depends on more than its height. And even when a cliff topples, it doesn’t necessarily set off a runaway collapse. 

In a study appearing in Science, the team presents an analysis of over 15,000 ice cliffs in Antarctica that were monitored by satellites over a four-year period. They observed how the ice cliffs and the larger ice sheet evolved over time, and found that those ice cliffs that collapsed did so at a much faster rate than scientists had predicted. But these collapsing cliffs also quickly stabilized, instead of continuing to erode the larger ice sheet. 

“We found that when the cliffs were retreating, they were doing so faster than what has been modeled, which would mean more ice loss and higher contributions of sea level rise,” says study author Caroline Needell, a graduate student in the MIT-WHOI Joint Program. “But because we found that the retreat was short-lived, and all the glaciers eventually stabilized, that would suggest that things won’t be so bad. We don’t see this runaway effect.”

The study’s co-authors are Catherine Walker, assistant scientist at WHOI, and Jeremy Bassis, associate professor at the University of Michigan.

Ice height

In glacial science, ice cliff collapse is described by a process known as marine ice cliff instability (MICI), which assumes that if an ice cliff exceeds a critical height, it will collapse. If then a taller cliff is exposed, it too should collapse, triggering a cascade of instabilities that shrink and erode the ice sheet over time. 

In previous studies, scientists have characterized MICI mainly by modeling the physical properties of ice, scaling these relationships up to the size of an ice cliff and combining these predictions with a few observations of actual ice cliffs in Antarctica. Through these efforts, scientists had determined that ice cliffs become unstable and collapse when they are taller about 100 meters.  

“Predictive ice-sheet models that have been used so far to represent ice cliff instability just take into account cliff height,” Needell notes. “That’s the only variable that matters. And once the cliff height reaches the critical threshold, usually 100 meters, it should initiate this runaway effect of ice sheet retreat.”

But she and her colleagues wondered: How tall do ice cliffs really get? And when they collapse, do they really set off a runaway retreat? 

To answer these questions, they looked to data collected by NASA’s Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) — a satellite that passes over the Earth’s polar regions and uses a laser altimeter to measure the height of ice sheets, glaciers, sea ice, and the level of the ocean in and around Antarctica. 

The team collected the satellite’s data from 2019 to 2023, which included measurements every three months of over 15,000 ice cliffs. From this dataset, they observed that the average ice cliff was about 30 meters tall — much shorter than the proposed critical height. But they did see a few rare ice cliffs that exceeded 100 meters. 

They also looked for other features that might influence a cliff’s stability. Interestingly, they found that ice cliffs that more or less stayed in place over time also had thicker mélange — a term for the slushy mix of broken icebergs and sea ice that gathers at the front of an ice cliff. 

“We measured mélange height and found taller cliffs have thicker mélange, which could be a built-in stabilizing effect,” Needell explains.

The satellite data also showed that the height of the surrounding water can stabilize a cliff: The deeper the water, the more it can buoy and push back against the cliff, keeping it from collapsing. 

Glacial speed bump

“After we did that global analysis, we thought, ok, let’s zoom in on the tallest cliffs and see how they’re behaving,” Needell says.

The team focused in on four regions around the Antarctic ice sheet where the satellite captured the tallest ice cliffs, each about 100 meters tall, with one that was 127 meters tall. They compiled measurements of these four cliffs and how they evolved every three months, over four years. 

From these measurements, they saw that indeed, the tallest cliffs collapsed, and the ice sheet in those regions retreated, at a surprisingly faster rate than MICI models had predicted. 

“But that retreat was short-lived,” Needell notes. 

After that, the ice spread back out toward the ocean.

“It’s this rapid retreat, punctuated by periods of stabilization,” Needell says. “That was puzzling to us. Then, we thought: We need to look at all the things that affect cliff height.”

The first thing they considered was the topography of the land underneath the ice. If that topography is relatively flat, then the slope of the overlying ice sheet reflects that actual height of the ice itself. But if there’s a bump or rise in the land, the ice sitting directly over that bump is in fact shorter than it appears. The topography then could act as a literal speed bump, thinning the overlying ice, and making it less likely to collapse. 

When the researchers checked topographic measurements of Antarctic, they found that indeed, ice cliffs stabilized around regions where the land happened to rise up. 

They also found that the taller a cliff is, the faster they “thin out” — as they collapse, once tall cliffs settle into shorter, more stable cliffs that prevents further collapse. 

“Now we know what to look for,” Needell says. “We really need to know the bed topography, and we need to know the ice thinning rate, in order to get ice cliff instability right, because this value really matters in the context of projecting sea level rise.” 

This research was supported, in part, by NASA, the U.S. National Science Foundation, and the DOMINOS project, a component of the International Thwaites Glacier Collaboration.

###

Written by Jennifer Chu, MIT News

Thursday, September 17, 2026

 

Speeding glaciers drive half a century of polar ice loss



The longest satellite record ever assembled shows that Greenland and Antarctica have lost 11.3 trillion tonnes of ice since the 1970s, raising global sea levels by more than 3 centimeters




Northumbria University

Image-1-Greenland.-Credit-Dr-Sammie-Buzzard-scaled

image: 

Greenland

view more 

Credit: Dr Sammie Buzzard (CPOM / Northumbria University)






The longest satellite record ever assembled shows that Greenland and Antarctica have lost 11.3 trillion tonnes of ice since the 1970s, raising global sea levels by more than 3 centimetres – and that most of the loss has come from glaciers flowing faster into the ocean, not from melting at the surface.

An international team of polar scientists has produced the most complete picture of ice loss from Greenland and Antarctica to date. The Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE) Team combined 42 independent satellite surveys, drawing on 27 satellite missions and reaching back to 1972 for Greenland and 1979 for Antarctica using the early Landsat archive.

The findings show the two ice sheets lost 11,309 billion tonnes of ice between 1979 and 2023, pushing global sea levels up by 31.4 millimetres. Greenland accounts for the larger share and Antarctica contributed 13.3 millimetres. Strikingly, 84% of the combined loss was driven by glaciers speeding up and pouring more ice into the ocean, with just 16% due to surface melting. The polar ice sheets are now responsible for around a quarter of all global sea level rise.

The assessment was led by Dr Inès Otosaka and Professor Andrew Shepherd at Northumbria University, and Dr Tyler Sutterley of the University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory. It is supported by the European Space Agency (ESA) and the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and is published in the journal Scientific Data.

Dr Inès Otosaka, who led the study, said: “By reaching back to the 1970s, we can now see how the ice sheets have changed across half a century. More than four-fifths of the ice lost was discharged into the ocean by faster-flowing glaciers, rather than melted at the surface – which tells us the long-term trend is being driven by the dynamic response of the ice sheets to a warming ocean.”

The record shows ice losses climbing steeply from the 1990s onwards. Greenland, close to balance in the 1970s, saw its rate of loss rise from around 60 billion tonnes a year in the 1980s to 264 billion in the 2010s, a decade marked by repeated extreme summer melt events. Antarctica’s rate rose from around 48 billion tonnes a year in the 1980s to 202 billion in the 2010s, with all of its net loss caused by ocean melting of its outlet glaciers; West Antarctica’s ice discharge, led by Pine Island and Thwaites glaciers, has risen in every decade of the record.

The most recent years (2020–2023) brought a temporary slowdown in ice loss. Record snowfall over East Antarctica have offset some of the continent’s glacier losses elsewhere, while a run of milder Greenland summers roughly halved its surface melting. Scientists caution these are short-term fluctuations against a clear long-term trend, not a reversal of ice loss.

The findings also underline the ice sheets’ central role in future sea level rise. Their response to a warming climate is the single largest source of uncertainty in sea level projections: high-end estimates of global sea level rise by 2150 increase by a factor of 2.6 once the risk of ice-sheet instability is accounted for. A continuous, half-century record of how the ice sheets are behaving
is therefore vital to anticipating the risks facing the hundreds of millions of people who live in low-lying coastal areas.

Professor Andrew Shepherd, Head of the School of Geography and Natural Science at Northumbria University and founder of IMBIE, said: “Three centimetres of sea level rise may sound small, but that puts another six to nine million people at risk of coastal flooding and erosion. With the ice sheets set to lose much more ice in the decades ahead, global assessments like IMBIE are vital to protecting communities impacted by climate change.”

Dr Tyler Sutterley, IMBIE co-lead, said: “The added length of the record, the larger pool of participating teams and our improved ability to assess uncertainties make this the most robust assessment of ice sheet mass balance produced so far. Satellites give us continent-wide, year-on-year evidence of what is happening now, and that is exactly what we need to test models and narrow the uncertainties in projections of future sea level rise.”

Dr Diego Fernández, Head of the Science Section at ESA, said: “These findings show the fundamental importance of using satellites to monitor the ice sheets and to evaluate the models used to predict the effects of climate change. Sustaining missions such as CryoSat-2 and the Sentinels, and maintaining the long-term ice-sheet climate data record, is critical for the decades ahead.”

 

Further information
To request an interview with the IMBIE Team, please contact the Northumbria University Press Office at media.communications@northumbria.ac.uk. Dr Inès Otosaka can be reached at ines.otosaka@northumbria.ac.uk.

A media package with the paper, films, animations and photographs is available at https://imbie.org/news/. The paper ‘Mass balance of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets from the 1970s to 2023’ by the IMBIE Team is published in Scientific Data. Embargoed until 10:00 London / 05:00 US Eastern on 16th September 2026.

Notes to editors
1. The study is an outcome of the Ice Sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE), supported by the ESA Climate Change Initiative, the NASA Cryosphere Program, and the NERC UK Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling.

2. It combined 42 independent estimates – 23 for Greenland and 19 for Antarctica – from satellite altimetry, gravimetry and the input-output method, with regional climate models used to separate surface processes from ice dynamics. Data came from 27 satellite missions, including ESA’s CryoSat-2, the EU’s Sentinels, NASA’s ICESat-2, the NASA / German Aerospace Center GRACE missions, and the early Landsat archive.

3. 360 billion tonnes of ice is equivalent to roughly 1 millimetre of global sea level rise. Between 1979 and 2023 the ice sheets lost a combined 11,309 ± 565 billion tonnes (31.4 ± 1.6 mm); Antarctica lost 4,780 ± 513 billion tonnes (13.3 ± 1.4 mm) and Greenland 6,215 ± 467 billion tonnes since 1972. Ice dynamics accounted for 84% of the combined loss.

4. The dataset extends the previous IMBIE assessment (Otosaka et al., 2023), which reported a combined 21.0 ± 1.9 mm sea level contribution between 1992 and 2020.

Northumbria University

Northumbria University, Newcastle, is a research-intensive university whose Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling leads UK research into how the polar ice sheets are responding to climate change, using satellite observations. www.northumbria.ac.uk



Antarctica

Credit

Professor Alison Banwell (CPOM / Northumbria University)



Antarctica

Credit

Professor Andrew Shepherd (CPOM / Northumbria University).

Contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data (2024–2025), processed by ESA [VIDEO] | 



Sea level contribution data from IMBIE; Ice sheet elevation change from satellite altimetry (Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling) [VIDEO] 


Sea level contribution data from IMBIE; Ice sheet elevation change from satellite altimetry (Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling). In collaboration with Northumbria University, University Grenoble Alpes, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, University of Washington APL, University at Buffalo University of Liverpool, University of California Irvine, Technical University of Denmark, NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Canadian Geodetic Survey, Utrecht University, Université Paris-Saclay, Delft University of Technology, European Space Agency, University of Liège, University College London, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, University of Edinburgh, Danish Meteorological Institute, University of Arizona, Alfred Wegener Institute, Aarhus University, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Lancaster University, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, isardSAT, University of Texas at Austin, Seoul National University, University of Bologna, Indian Institute of Science, WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF.

Credit

: ESA/NASA IMBIE Initiative

Friday, May 22, 2026

Global Warming Icon “Doomsday Glacier” in Trouble

 May 22, 2026

Image by Dominik Van Opdenbosch.

Thwaites “the Doomsday Glacier” West Antarctica is the world’s most famous icon of global warming. It is acting up!

Recent satellite images show a massive breakup in-process, to wit: “It’s dramatic. I was there in 2019/2020 and when I look at the satellite images now, I don’t recognize the shelf. There are huge gashes where there used to be none,” says Karen Alley at the University of Manitoba in Canada, who has been analyzing how this break-up is playing out.” (The ‘Doomsday’ Glacier’s Giant Ice Shelf is About to Break Away, New Scientist, May 18, 2026)

If global warming needs a symbol for progress to a hotter planet, the Thwaites Doomsday Glacier coming apart while nestled within the coldest continent on Earth is evidence of resounding success. Yes, human-generated CO2 global warming is overtaking and powerfully altering the coldest spot on Earth. It is breathtaking and should rattle the bones of anybody questioning the dangers of climate change. After all, it’s cracking apart the ice shelf of a 75-mile-wide behemoth. It’s met its match in the 21st century for the first time in a few million years.

Meanwhile, Trump’s proposed budget and administrative directives have significantly reduced U.S. polar science funding. The cuts target the National Science Foundation (NSF) by proposing reductions slashing up to 70% of polar research funding and terminating the lease on America’s only Antarctic research icebreaker the Nathaniel B. Palmer, so polar scientists can’t go there.

The administration doesn’t want Americans exposed to the impact of global warming. It’s far too depressing for the public to handle. It’s much better if they are kept in the dark, unknowing, whilst spending tons of money, on credit cards, on goods and services, without a worry. But at what point in time will the residents of Miami Beach feel compelled (“scared”) enough to hit the streets with placards: “Refund Polar Science Now!” The “need to know” is paramount.

The Monster

Antarctica contains thousands of individual glaciers. The continent is dominated by three massive ice sheets: East Antarctic, West Antarctic, and Antarctic Peninsula combined as large as Mexico and the U.S. together.

Thwaites is a monster glacier and a trigger mechanism for the entire West Antarctic Ice Sheet (“WAIS”) containing 10 feet of sea level frozen solid in ice. However, removing Thwaites’ Ice Shelf is like removing the goalie late in a hockey game, leaving the net wide open. WAIS is free to flow faster than ever before to the sea.

Thwaites is the world’s widest glacier at 75 miles width. It is 1,000-to-3,500 feet deep. It is currently a stabilizing buttress for the entire West Antarctic Ice Sheet but starting to lose stability in a big noticeable way!

According to the New Scientist article: “Antarctica’s most threatened glacier is about to be further destabilized, as the floating ice shelf in front of Thwaites glacier is set to break away… its collapse is expected to set off a domino effect in the entire West Antarctic ice sheet, ultimately resulting in a calamitous sea-level rise of 3.3 metres and changing the coastline of the entire planet.”

Although, the timing of this is unknown. There are polar scientists who claim 13’ feet of sea level rise by 2100 (if so, how much by 2030-40, Ouch!) Gino Casassa, a glaciologist and head of Chilean Antarctic Institute, said that current estimates show sea levels rising by 4 meters by 2100 and more if emissions continue to grow with current generations. Other climate scientists claim only one-to-two feet, not thirteen, take your pick. Frankly, nobody knows, but what is known is that Thwaites is well ahead of where anybody thought it would be only a few years ago, to wit: “Huge fractures are opening up around the pinning point – where the ice shelf’s floating front is held in place by a raised ridge on the ocean floor – and along the grounding line, the point where the glacier meets the ocean and starts to float,” Ibid.

And even more concerning: “The ice shelf’s demise is also signaled by a dramatic speed-up in its flow rate. ‘It’s tripled from January 2020 to January 2026, to just over 2000 metres per year, which is nuts,’ says Christian Wild at the University of Innsbruck in Austria. And in the past five months, the flow has accelerated further. ‘It’s essentially in free fall now,” Ibid.

According to Richard Alley, Professor of Geosciences at Penn State: “Ice shelves are only really stable when it’s quite cold… The ocean has to be cold and the atmosphere has to be cold. But we’re warming the world and we’re losing the ice shelves, and that’s exactly what you’d expect,” Ibid.’

Global Warming Clobbers Antarctica

Antarctica has been experiencing record-breaking, massive temperature spikes and unprecedented deep ocean heating. In recent winters, parts of the continent have seen temperatures soar between 15°C to 40°C (72°F) above normal. During the Southern Hemisphere’s winter, regions of East Antarctica recorded temperatures spiking more than 40°C (72°F) above average driven by a distorted polar vortex and “atmospheric rivers” carrying warm, moist air deep into the continent’s interior.” Additionally, research published in Communications Earth & Environment shows heat trapped deep in the Southern Ocean rising and melting sea ice and glaciers from below.

“Since 2015, Antarctic sea ice has declined sharply. In 2023, winter sea ice extent fell to record lows – so far below the long-term average that scientists considered it an event with roughly a one-in-3.5 million probability of occurring by chance… Antarctica was long considered a part of the climate system expected to change slowly. The speed of the recent sea ice decline has therefore come as a shock. In our new scientific study: Compound Drivers of Antarctic Sea Ice Loss and Southern Ocean Destratification, Science Advances, Vol 12, Issue 19, May 8, 2026, we show that the ocean around Antarctica has undergone a fundamental shift. Heat that had been trapped deep below the surface is rising upwards, where it can melt sea ice.”

The Doomsday Glacier is living up to its billing, and it’s happening faster than climate models predicted. One can only hope that sea level rise will not also beat predictions. It is the wild card of all wild cards with enough mass to spook the world. Meanwhile it cannot be overlooked that U.S. policies have sided with fossil fuels, instead of renewables, which emit the greenhouse gases that heat up the planet that directly impacts and collapses Antarctica. They are on the wrong side of history. The rapidly deteriorating Thwaites Glacier is proof positive,

Robert Hunziker lives in Los Angeles and can be reached at rlhunziker@gmail.com.