Showing posts sorted by date for query TOMMY DOUGLAS. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query TOMMY DOUGLAS. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, September 29, 2025

Influential ‘theo-bros’ unite in the US – but will they gain ground in the UK?


Right-Wing Watch
20 September, 2025 
Left Foot Forward


Are we witnessing the beginnings of a Christian nationalist movement in Britain - one inspired by a distinctly American form of evangelicalism, rooted not just in belief, but in an aggressive pursuit of power?



By chance or calculation, Tommy Robinson’s far-right march in London took place on the same weekend that Christians were marking the Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross, which honours Christ’s sacrifice through the cross. And the ‘Unite the Kingdom’ gathering was no ordinary Robinson rally. It was saturated in Christian symbolism: gospel rock blared from loudspeakers, crosses were hoisted like banners, and images of the late Charlie Kirk, the Trump ally, conservative influencer and ‘Christian martyr’ as US evangelical circles are hailing him, made their way through the sea of Union Jacks and flags of St George.

Robinson, who claims to have found Christ while in prison, has, it seems, begun fusing religious themes into his nationalist, far-right messaging. Whether his conversion to Christianity is genuine or not, it raises a pressing question: are we witnessing the beginnings of a Christian nationalist movement in Britain — one inspired by a distinctly American form of evangelicalism, rooted not just in belief, but in an aggressive pursuit of power?

In the US, this ideology has already taken hold. Charlie Kirk may have started as a political influencer, but in recent years, he came to symbolise a broader shift within American conservatism. Once a champion of secular politics and the separation of church and state, Kirk had, by the 2024 presidential election, rebranded himself as one of Donald Trump’s most vocal evangelical surrogates.

Addressing megachurch congregations and campaign rallies, Kirk increasingly portrayed politics as a form of spiritual warfare, declaring Democrats “stand for everything God hates,” and framing elections not as civic exercises, but as battles between good and evil.

His influence extended beyond US borders. Last week, the European Parliament briefly descended into chaos as far-right MEPs demanded a minute’s silence in Kirk’s honour. Hungary’s Christian nationalist prime minister, Viktor Orbán, claimed Kirk’s murder was “the result of the international hate campaign by the progressive-liberal left.”

Yet Kirk is just one figure in a much wider and increasingly powerful movement.

Pete Hegseth and the weaponisation of faith

At the heart of this movement is the entanglement of religion and state. Under Trump, a new ‘faith office’ has been created within the White House, tasked with recommending changes to federal policy to combat what it describes as “antisemitic, anti-Christian, and other forms of anti-religious bias.” A subsequent executive order established a federal task force to investigate so-called “anti-Christian bias” in government agencies.

One of the key architects of this agenda is Pete Hegseth, Trump’s Secretary of Defence. A former Fox News host and army veteran, Hegseth has emerged as a leading voice in the mainstreaming of Christian nationalist ideas within the highest ranks of government.

Earlier this month, Trump announced plans to rename the Department of Defense as the “Department of War.” “It just sounds better,” he explained, pointing to its use during the World Wars. But as The Atlantic observed, the rebranding also reflects how Trump, and Hegseth, view themselves: not as defenders, but as warriors, engaged in spiritual and ideological combat.

Hegseth, who has often described America as a Christian nation under threat, recently came under fire for promoting a video featuring pastors claiming women should not be allowed to vote or hold leadership positions in the military. He reposted the video with the caption: “All of Christ for All of Life.”

Critics were quick to condemn the post. Doug Pagitt, a progressive evangelical pastor and executive director of Vote Common Good, called the views “very disturbing” and “deeply fringe.”

Still, a Pentagon spokesperson defended Hegseth, describing him as a “proud member” of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches (CREC)-affiliated church.

Yet Hegseth’s personal conduct appears to contradict the values he publicly champions. The LA Times reports that by the age of 45, he had already been married three times. His first marriage ended after he admitted to multiple extramarital affairs. He later paid off a woman who accused him of sexual assault, an allegation he denies. Even his own mother once accused him of being “an abuser of women,” though she later retracted the claim during his Senate confirmation process.



Then came a serious breach of national security. In March, Hegseth shared classified information about an impending US airstrike in Yemen via an unsecured Signal group chat, which included his wife and, accidentally, a journalist from The Atlantic.

As the LA Times put it, Hegseth, may be the “least serious man ever to lead this nation’s armed forces.”

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Hegseth issued a warning to all military and civilian personnel, stating that the Pentagon was now “tracking” any government employee who mocked or celebrated the killing.

Douglas Wilson


Then there’s the Pastor Douglas Wilson, a controversial and influential figure within the American Christian right. Earlier this month, Wilson shared a stage with members of the Trump administration at an event in Washington.

“This is the first time we’ve had connections with as many people in national government as we do now,” he told the Associated Press.

Wilson and his acolytes within the CREC espouse views that are unapologetically patriarchal, authoritarian and regressive. They teach that empathy can be a sin, that the United States is a Christian nation, and that giving women the right to vote was a bad idea.

Hegseth recently reposted an interview with Douglas Wilson, in which the pastor elaborated on his worldview: women, he claimed, should serve as “chief executive of the home” and should not have the right to vote, as their husbands can do that for them. He called for the criminalisation of gay sex and same-sex marriage. “We know that sodomy is worse than slavery by how God responds to it,” he told CNN.

While he insists that slavery is “unbiblical,” he has also defended it. In a 1990 pamphlet, Wilson bizarrely claimed that slavery in the American South produced “a genuine affection between the races” unmatched in any nation before or since the Civil War.

And Wilson’s influence is growing. His Christ Church, based in Moscow, Idaho, opened a new branch just blocks from the US Capitol this summer. Pete Hegseth, who’s a member of a CREC church in Tennessee, was present at the opening.

Together, Wilson and Hegseth represent a new front in American politics. Under the banner of Christian nationalism, they seek to reshape American democracy around explicitly religious, often authoritarian principles.

What about in Britain?


As this ideology gains ground in the US, echoes are being felt in the UK, where discussions around the rise of Christian nationalism are emerging.

Writing for the Young Fabians, Ryan Rodrigues, who was a Parish Priest in East London and now works as a researcher in Parliament, says the deliberate co-opting of Christian imagery to stoke division and fear is emerging in British politics.

Rodrigues notes how from Diane Abbott to Sadiq Khan, high profile people-of-colour have long been the targets of abuse, with issues of race and migration fuelling the hate. “But increasingly today, that hostility is often cloaked in Christian language and symbolism.”

Abroad, figures like JD Vance have defended hardline immigration policies as a “very Christian concept, turning ideas of “loving your neighbour” on its head.”

“This is more than just rhetoric – it’s a calculated effort to use the language of Christianity as a tool to divide.”

Rodrigues notes how the Labour Party itself was founded on the values of Christian Socialism, whose co-founder, Keir Hardie – of whom Keir Starmer is named after – was himself a devoted believer.

“I wonder whether the version of Christianity promoted by some of these figures today would be recognisable to Hardie,” he writes.

Turning to the recent flag-waving spectacle across the UK, Rodrigues argues that it’s ironic that what has become the symbol of English nationalism is the cross of a Christian saint, St. George, itself a reference to the cross of Jesus.

“With the nationalist agenda being popularised, the growing resurgence of movements such as Blue Labour, which call for a renewal of local faith communities such as Churches, must prompt us to examine what it really means to incorporate the values of faith into public life?” he continues.

But while some argue that a US-style religious right is emerging in Britain, others remain sceptical. In a paper entitled Is there a ‘Religious Right’ Emerging in Britain?, the religion and society think-tank Theos contends that although there is increasing coordination among Christian groups with strong socially conservative views, particularly on issues like sexuality, marriage, family life, and religious freedom, it is misleading to describe this as a US-style religious right.

“There is no sign of the kind of tight-knit, symbiotic relationship between a right of-centre political party and a unified Christian constituency emerging in Britain as it did in the last quarter of a century in the US,” the report states.

The key difference, it argues, is structural. In the US, the religious right transformed politics by aligning with the Republican Party. Britain, by contrast, lacks a similar alliance between a religious voting bloc and any major political force.

What about Farage?

Yet some moments challenge that conclusion.

Farage’s populist brand of politics may rarely make reference to the Christian faith, but in 2024, he stood on stage in Blackpool declaring that “Judeo-Christian values” lie at the heart of everything British. Earlier that year, at a US right-wing conference, he bizarrely claimed that pro-Gaza protests across Western cities threatened these very values.


According to MEND, a charity that supports British Muslims in media and politics, Farage’s invocation of ‘Judeo-Christian values’ serves to marginalise Muslims. Sadly, it works for some though in that the Tory MP and noted evangelical Christian Danny Kruger, and former MP Maria Caulfield, a practising Roman Catholic opposed to abortion rights and defender of ‘family values, both joined Reform this week. Farage might be all about division but bringing an evangelical and a Catholic together shows that for a small number of people, Christian nationalism has political potency.

Pro-life march in London fuelled by US Christian ‘hate group’

And if we thought the influence of US evangelical Christianity hadn’t reached the UK, we should think again.

Earlier this month, a major anti-abortion march took place in London, heavily influenced by the US-based Christian right group, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). Headquartered in Arizona, ADF is a legal advocacy organisation designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group.

The Good Law Project reported that more than half of the speakers at the 2025 ‘March for Life’ event in London had direct ties to ADF, including Northern Irish MP Carla Lockhart.

ADF played a key role in the 2022 US Supreme Court decision that overturned federal abortion rights, and it actively supports state-level bans on gender-affirming care for minors in the US.

Among the UK religious leaders present was Andrea Williams, co-founder of Christian Concern, a group that opposes banning LGBTQ+ conversion therapy and has worked closely with ADF.

Perhaps the most unsettling development is the growing role of religion in Tommy Robinson’s activism. One has to suspect that ‘born again’ Tommy is being opportunistic, but the overt use of Christian symbols at a highly charged political event that was mired in violence and intimidation, suggests a troubling trend, that a faith centred on compassion is being reframed as a tool of division and dominance. Moral high ground matters in politics and it is ground that the far-right, with its message of hate, has always struggled to command. Co-opting Christianity provides a readymade, off the shelf suit of clothes in which to dress pernicious policies. It’s all a long way from those trade union marchers a century ago with their banners proclaiming Christ the Carpenter.

To end on a personal note, my grandad was a vicar. He embodied the values I’ve always associated with Christianity: humility, compassion, forgiveness, and selfless care. These stand in stark contrast to the division, hostility, and disdain for democratic institutions that figures like Robinson, Trump and his allies push under the guise of ‘Christianity.’

Gabrielle Pickard-Whitehead is author of Right-Wing Watch. and Editor at large for 

Friday, March 14, 2025

Canada’s Navy Sails With US Ships as Trump Talks Annexation



Reprinted from Yves Engler’s website.

As Donald Trump seeks to cripple Canada economically to pursue annexation, the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) is assisting the US bid to stoke war with China. With far-right Trump supporters calling for the US to invade, Canada continues to assist US belligerence in Asia.

Last month HMCS Ottawa transited through the Taiwan Strait with a US warship. It was the first non-US warship to make the provocative move in 2025. A Chinese Navy commander claimed Canada’s actions “deliberately disturbed the situation and undermined the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait.”

It’s the sixth time an RCN vessel has transited through the waterway since Canada released its Indo Pacific Strategy in November 2022. The Indo Pacific Strategy calls on Canada to augment the regular number of warships in east Asia from one to three vessels.

A few days before traversing the Taiwan Strait HMCS Ottawa participated in a joint exercise with US and Filipino ships in the Philippines Exclusive Economic Zone. They said it “underscores our shared commitments to upholding the right to freedom of navigation…as well as respect for maritime rights under international law as reflected in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).”

A month ago the Associated Press reported that Ottawa and Manila are in the final stages of negotiating a defense pact to boost joint military exercises. Canada’s ambassador in the Philippines David Hartman said the agreement “will enable us to have even more substantive participation in joint and multilateral training exercises and operations with the Philippines and allies here in the region.”

Hartman didn’t hide that China is the target. He declared, “we have been vocal in confronting the provocative and unlawful actions of the People’s Republic of China in the South China Sea and the West Philippine Sea. We will continue to do so.”

Ottawa has been assisting Washington’s push to turn the Philippines into a bulwark against China. Since Bongbong Marcos came to power two years ago the US has established four new bases there and promoted Filipino territorial claims opposed by China and other states. (When US troops invaded the Philippines in 1898 CIBC acted as a main bank for the US occupation administration. Other Canadian corporations such as Sun Life and ScotiaBank also followed US forces into this quasi colony.)

At the start of last year Canada signed a memorandum of understanding on defense cooperation with the Philippines. In June HMCS Montreal participated in Canada’s first ever naval patrol with a Filipino vessel in the South China Sea. Two months later the frigate visited Philippines and then participated in a US-Australia-Philippines operation in the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic Zone.

A year ago, Ottawa offered Philippines satellite technology to track fishing boats even when they shutter their location transmitting devices. “Canada’s Dark Vessel Detection tech helps Philippines manage territorial dispute with China,” explained a June Globe and Mail headline.

To those who look at the world through Washington’s eyes China is a threat all over. Over the past two months both the Liberal and Conservative parties have released Arctic strategies that suggests China is a threat. But China is 1,500 kilometers away from the Arctic and doesn’t dispute any Canadian claim there, while the US does. (A recent Antiwar.com article helpfully explained, “both Russia and Canada claim that their respective Arctic sea-routes traverse their sovereign internal waters, giving them the right to control who goes through and under what conditions. The US disagrees and claims they should be open to ships of all nations as critical international sea lanes, based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).” But, the US hasn’t even ratified UNCLOS.)

Ottawa even sees China as a threat near the South Pole. Over the past year Ottawa has intervened to undercut Canadian firms from selling Argentinean and Chilean resources to Chinese companies. They’ve taken similar measures against mining companies partnering with Chinese counterparts in Ecuador and Guinea. As the Financial Post detailed this week in “Mining companies leaving Toronto Stock Exchange”, restricting mining firms from partnering with Chinese companies is imperiling Canada’s international mining dominance.

Canada is assisting Washington in its conflict with China as the US president seeks to destroy Canada’s economy to annex the country. Why are no mainstream commentators denouncing this flagrant absurdity? Why would Canada’s military continue to do Washington’s bidding? If our government was serious about its independence wouldn’t that include revisiting our military’s attachment to US foreign policy?

At minimum political leaders need to be calling on Ottawa to pause joint naval patrols with the US in Asia until Trump stops calling for the annexation of Canada.

Yves Engler is the author of Stand on Guard for Whom? A People’s History of the Canadian Military and twelve other books.


The United States Versus Canada: Mine Eyes Don’t See Any Glory



 March 14, 2025
Facebook

“The Grapes of Wrath” by Michèle White, 2025.

Having declared a national emergency on the first day of his administration, the newly sworn-in American president Donald Trump announced plans to implement tariffs on Canadian goods, countering his own reworked NAFTA/USMCA reciprocal free trade agreement from five years earlier. After weeks of insulting remarks, annexation jokes, and social-media frothing, a 25% tariff came into effect on March 5, which lasted a day before being threatened again for April 2 in another disruptive flip flop, roiling stock markets and setting off a tit-for-tat economic war between two previously friendly nations. The “world’s longest undefended border” just got a whole lot chillier. As the saying goes, “With friends like these, who needs enemies?”

Citing an imbalance in trade, the United States added fentanyl and illegal immigrants to the mix to justify the national emergency … from Canada. Good fences make good neighbo(u)rs, but the strategy doesn’t wash as with most Trumpian logic. In 2024, the US had a global trade deficit of over $1 trillion, $60 billion with Canada. Excluding subsidized petroleum products, which helps keep American gas prices low, the exchange in goods is almost equal, while the US runs a surplus in services. The amount of drugs and illegals entering the United States from Canada is also minimal. Are these the acts of a rational player or a smokescreen for more uncertainty and a new kind of trampling on the rights and dreams of others?

Whatever the motivation, the economic ramifications of impeded trade between two highly integrated economies are potentially devastating, costing millions of jobs in both countries, especially in the carmaking industry where hundreds of different parts can transit the border many times before a finished vehicle rolls off the factory floor. The cultural, social, and political ramifications are incalculable with many Canadians venting their anger by cancelling trips to the States, booing the American national anthem at sporting events, and enacting “Buy Canadian” or “Anything but American” campaigns. The maker of Jack Daniel’s noted that removing American liquor from Canadian stores is “worse than a tariff.” Echoing the feelings of many anxious compatriots, a former Canadian ambassador to the US stated that relations “may never be the same.”

As a Canadian, I admit to harbouring some anti-American sentiment that comes from growing up next to a giant. Former prime minister Pierre Trudeau famously declared that living next to the United States is “like sleeping with an elephant.” A popular saying is “When the US sneezes, Canada catches a cold.” But this is different. Our best friend older brother wants to own us, or at least says he does. Some call it a negotiating tactic. Oh yeah, “your mother wears army boots.” WTF? Is this the level of American diplomacy?

I also admit having grown up admiring the US, both learned and experienced in Canada and abroad. I regularly watched American TV shows – there were 3 Buffalo stations in the Toronto area – puzzling over the subtle differences in our worlds. Hockey teams I played on billeted each other as we played home-and-away games versus teams from Detroit. Many of my heroes are American (the list is very long). But when an American president stakes claim to Canada as his own and openly taunts the prime minister as the governor of the 51st state, it’s no longer geopolitical gamesmanship. American elephantism/exceptionalism has run wild. The US is now as dangerous to Canadians as in the days of cross-border raids during the War of Independence, the 1814 burning of the White House, or “54-40 or fight.”

Canadians get it, probably more than many Americans think. You feel you’ve been pushed around after you helped save the world for democracy in World War II. The country that spent trillions of dollars to beat the Soviet Union to the moon quite literally created the modern world with the transistor, integrated circuit, personal computer, and the Internet. We have you to thank for the car, IBM, and Elvis Presley (but not the telephone, universal health care, or Joni Mitchell). And now we are all ungrateful.

Sorry to suggest how you might feel, but do you really believe Canada threatens your existence with fentanyl and underpaid workers or that international agreements can’t be renegotiated? Go ahead, pull the other one Johnny Appleseed. More likely, the chaos is by design to undermine governance and put even more power in fewer hands. Of course, the facts don’t matter in Trump’s supercritical black hole of imploding nonsense.

Perhaps gangster tactics are needed to forge a successful real estate business in New York City. Self-promotion, barstool bullying, and buying one’s own ghostwritten books en masse to ensure entry on the New York Times book list may be the cost of success in such rarefied skyscraper air, but bullying people is not the mark of anything great. Leader? Statesman? No responsible governmental steward plays games with the lives and livelihoods of hard-working citizens and families. I think Trump has watched too many Times Square reruns of The Godfather. Government is not a business and everything is personal.

Is it fealty you want? Oh Donald. You are so fine. Must everyone kiss the hand? Please tell us your world is more than game-playing, whatever the consequences to others, in the name of a fairytale Golden Age. The conflict-seekers taking advantage of the conflict-averse. The rich stamping on the poor. Prehistoric, medieval, the American Way? Don’t you know Lucy will never hold the ball for good old Charlie Brown?

Is it our minerals – the gold, copper, nickel, and uranium? You could have asked politely and we would have sold more to you at a reasonable price (now surcharged by 25%). Is it 2% GDP spending on NATO, an organization you actively undermine? Do you want to arm the world in what economist and former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis calls “military Keynesianism” so that others will buy more American weapons, adding to an already bloated death industry and undercutting social spending and diversity?

Do you want Canadians to apologize for “American Woman,” even though New Yorker Lenny Kravitz also covered that classic ‘70s Guess Who hit. In this case, “woman” is a metaphor for the coloured lights that hypnotize. Sorry for the Toronto Blue Jays winning the World Series for the first time on foreign soil in 1992, but Babe Ruth hit his first professional home run in Toronto and Jackie Robinson played his first professional game for the Montreal Royals. Besides, you’ve won the last 30 Stanley Cups. Three decades of Detroit, Tampa Bay, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and other amazing American cities lifting the greatest sporting prize ever – even Anaheim’s Disney-owned Ducks – albeit with mostly Canadian players.

Sorry that Superman was co-created by a Canadian. Sorry Margaret Atwood wrote about a Christian patriarchal takeover in the Republic of Gilead, a.k.a. a future USA gone mad. I know Canadians are famously courteous and nice and apologize too much (sorry), but we’re not sorry for any of that. It’s called life. We all know the madness isn’t going to stop, but why didn’t you tell us you wanted to break up? You are like a crazed boyfriend from an Alanis Morissette song. Oh yeah, Americans don’t do irony.

We are sorry for the Great Northeast Blackout of 1965 that knocked out power to most of the eastern seaboard after a transmission line near Niagara Falls tripped. That got fixed and the shared international CANUSE grid is stronger for it. We didn’t cause the largest ever US blackout, however, that crashed the grid for two days in northern Ohio in 2003. Canada was initially blamed, but it was a fallen American tree and software bug. Essentially, reduced public works such as insufficient tree pruning because of too much deregulation. If you don’t pay for services, everything goes to pot (shades of DOGE to come). We’re not sorry for the Texas freeze of 2021. That was Ted Cruz. No it wasn’t, sorry, I lie – see what happens when facts don’t matter?

But don’t worry friends, I doubt Ontario premier Doug Ford will turn off the juice to New York, Michigan, or Minnesota. That’s illegal in winter and dumb. Premier Ford is a conservative, but politics and economic takeovers make strange bedfellows. I am proud that Canadians also encourage friendly civic mindedness by asking everyone to shovel their snow within 24 hours of a snowfall as seen in cutesy government-funded ads: “Be nice, clear your ice.” If you are over 65, the city workers do it for free. Big city homes do come with locks, although some doors are probably still left open as our Michigan neighbour Michael Moore famously noted in Bowling for Columbine. Many Canadians have never seen a gun in their life other than in a police holster.

What is it you really want, Donald? Our lifestyle? We are sorry the US doesn’t live up to world standards when it comes to health, education, and diversity. Or civility. Calling women names is neither presidential nor patriotic to a nation of supposed god-fearing citizens. Your misogyny is beneath even a schoolboy taunt. Nor are community-minded citizens “commies,” “libtards,” and “losers.”

Why are Americans so angry? Breitbart is littered with vile. Ditto the Murdoch-owned New York Post? Clearly one has to watch out for the armed bands of evil squirrels, beavers, and moose amassing on the Canadian border. Dudley Do-Right and Nell Fenwick are readying the furry forces. It may be a constitutionally protected war of words (or paid Russian bots), but who actually thinks this? Is it our stoicism (a.k.a. “socialism” to Americans) nurtured in the depths of yet another endless winter?

Like many Americans, Canadians grew up during the biggest jump in technology since the Industrial Revolution in an age of transistors, space travel, and satellites. Like others, we were left to navigate a vastly different world than that of our parents, both scary and revealing, from relaxed social mores and crazy Cold War posturing to an explosion of artistic expression in a growing technological tyranny. How did we drift so far apart, brother? We are not a coloured square on a Risk board to conquer. It’s not our place to tell other countries what to do, but can you please curb your arrogance?

Sadly, we have to get used to the vindictive game playing, exaggerated outrage, and unpredictable behaviour as Bizarro Trump exports the chaos in his own country abroad. The motive behind his rambling, unsympathetic, and know-it-all posturing may be to undermine governance and increase billionaire wealth even more. Sowing dissent at home is not enough; the US is now encouraging division elsewhere to turn life into permanent crisis, anxiety, and poverty for the wealthy to exploit the fearful. So long fellowship, respect, and diversity; hello more 1% wealth and fewer taxes for the rich. First he took Manhattan, then he tried to take the World. But as Leonard Cohen warned us “there is no beauty to their weapons.”

We can debate the hierarchy of social responsibility: garbage pickup, sanitation, infrastructure, emergencies, policing, tax collecting (sales tax/income tax) and the efficiencies within any public system. But why doesn’t Donald Trump fix his own US health system, education scores, and potholes first? Canada can be an example of how to provide a publicly funded universal health care that both aids and protects workers (thank you Tommy Douglas, number one in a 2004 “Greatest Canadian” newspaper poll). Did you know a tenant can’t be evicted from a Canadian home in winter? Equal pay and a 40-hour work week are the law. The minimum federal wage is $17.30/hour indexed to inflation. As Dylan sang “the money you make can’t buy back your soul.” Or “The first one now will later be last.” That’s from the Bible.

For all his divisiveness at home Trump is uniting the world … against the United States. The governing Liberals were expected to lose the next election, but are now rising in the polls as former banker Mark Carney takes over from the outgoing three-term prime minister Justin Trudeau. In his acceptance speech on March 9, Carney stated, “We didn’t ask for this fight, but Canadians are always ready when someone else drops the gloves.”

Others are signalling with their “elbows up” in a nod to Mister Hockey, Gordie Howe, who played 25 seasons for the Detroit Red Wings and whose poorly remunerated prowess was instrumental in establishing a hockey labour union. Across Europe, far-right parties are being asked to reconcile their fealty to Trump and his anti-European rhetoric. America First is becoming America Alone as the world unites in opposition against such gauche tribalism.

Degrading or even dismantling an integrated economy won’t happen overnight. The resistance is beginning as citizens rise against the common enemy seeking to rip up long-standing agreements. Deep down, we all know more unites than divides us. Trump’s cruelty has been laid bare from Ukraine to Gaza and from Panama to Greenland. If the politics were any good, there would be no need to bully. Business uncertainty may be the most important last check as investors shun the United States amid a looming Trumpcession. The painted ponies go up and down. No one wants to keep on rockin’ in an un-free American world.

Cruelty will never be a virtue. Trump has tapped into the vengeful apocalyptic Christian war machine, imaging himself at the head of the troops, their blood-wine feet hovering over whoever dares call out the lies, venality, and misogyny. The answered chorus is not to declare “Glory glory Hallelujah” but to call out the wrath as a failed ideal, a misinformed and misguided act of a dying republic. When the abuser claims abuse and the bully cries victim, we know the vintage has spoiled. Conflict is a con, sold by those afraid to understand the meaning of communion and the depth of community.

Trump isn’t responsible for all the nastiness blowing from the south, but he is the mouthpiece, permanently campaigning on a trail of pain while spending other people’s money. For now, the boycotts will grow against Colgate, Coke, Gillette, …, and the United States. We will protest, stand up, and be heard. Because we don’t live in Donald Trump’s angry world. The Toronto singer Jim Cuddy lamented about how “We used to be the best of friends,” but as Montreal Canadiens star goalie Ken Dryden and former member of parliament notes, “Canadians will need to be defiantly Canadian.” I am Canadian. Sorry friends, life is not a game and Donald Trump is nobody’s king.

Michèle White is a Toronto artist and professor emeritus at the Ontario College of Art and Design University (OCAD U). “The Grapes of Wrath” is part of an ongoing series entitled “Written on the Body.” Her newest work can be viewed on squarespace and Instagram.

John K. Whitea former lecturer in physics and education at University College Dublin and the University of Oviedo. He is the editor of the energy news service E21NS and author of The Truth About Energy: Our Fossil-Fuel Addiction and the Transition to Renewables (Cambridge University Press, 2024) and Do The Math!: On Growth, Greed, and Strategic Thinking (Sage, 2013). He can be reached at: johnkingstonwhite@gmail.com


Sunday, October 27, 2024

Election 'challenging' says Sask. Party's Moe, as NDP's Beck addresses her party's rural prospects

CBC
Sat, October 26, 2024 

NOT THE GREEN PARTY

Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe speaks to supporters at a rally Saturday in Saskatoon (Trevor Bothorel/CBC - image credit)


Saskatchewan's 2024 provincial election campaign is close to the finish line and the leaders of the NDP and the Sask. Party are making their final appeals.

Monday is the last day of voting (polls are closed on Sunday) and Elections Saskatchewan says results deciding who will govern the province — should be out by midnight that day.

The leaders of Saskatchewan's two main parties were in Saskatoon on Saturday renewing their pitches to voters.

Speaking to reporters after a noon-hour event, Sask. Party leader Scott Moe responded to questions about recent provincial elections outside of Saskatchewan.

That includes the New Brunswick election that brought an end to six years of Progressive Conservative rule.

The Liberals won after taking 31 seats there. In B.C. the race after an election earlier this month remains too close to call and counting resumed on the weekend with NDP maintaining a narrow lead.

"I would say incumbent governments have had it tough, and that's likely the case we're having — a challenging election, I would say here in Saskatchewan. That being said, we have 61 of the finest candidates," Moe said Saturday.

He also addressed some of the unexpected issues that have popped up on the campaign trail.

That includes a report that came out mid-campaign that former Sask. Party MLA Gary Grewal breached conflict of interest rules by owning motels that profited from government contracts.

There was also some confusion over damage to a Sask. Party campaign office that Moe initially said was caused by gunshots. Police later confirmed the damage was not caused by gunshots.

Then there were defections from one-time party loyalists, including Randy Weekes, former Sask. Party MLA and Speaker of the Saskatchewan Legislature.

Weekes made a series of allegations on his way out of the party and in recent days was among those putting his support behind the NDP and Carla Beck.

Moe says despite the challenges, his team has waged "a very strong campaign."

"There's been various discussions in the media and questions asked of which we've always right to provide the clarity. And we feel it's important for us as a party, for myself as a leader, to provide clarity to the people of Saskatchewan," Moe said.

He said the party is focused on forming a majority government and planning for a vibrant economy.

Sask. NDP Leader Carla Beck speaks at a rally outside the Royal University Hospital in Saskatoon on Saturday.

Sask. NDP Leader Carla Beck speaks at a rally outside the Royal University Hospital in Saskatoon on Saturday. (Trevor Bothorel/CBC)

Meanwhile, NDP leader Carla Beck was holding an event outside the Royal University Hospital to talk about health care.

Political experts have said the New Democrats need a breakthrough in rural constituencies to boost their chances of winning the election.

Speaking to reporters, Beck argued that that the issues her party is focusing on resonate in rural areas as much as they do in urban cities.

"Our message is not just for urban Saskatchewan, it's not just for a select few voters. These priorities — delivering relief on the cost of living, fixing our healthcare system, investing in our kids and their education, dealing with crime, mental health and addictions which are rising right across this province — these are issues no matter which community you're in," Beck said.

Beck said the NDP sat down with the Saskatchewan Union of Nurses to discuss the challenges they face in the healthcare system. She says she has a plan to invest more in health care, hire more workers, and reduce wait times.

"When we look at health care, rural Saskatchewan is facing some of the highest numbers of closures. Women giving birth on the side of the road, people going without care, lab service is closed, people being forced to get in their car and drive down sometimes, over two hours with symptoms of a heart attack," Beck said.

She said she's not ruling any constituencies out in rural and urban Saskatchewan.

"My whole family lives in rural Saskatchewan I've seen the impact on health care ... this is a message for all people in the province, we can deliver that change," Beck said.

She said if elected her priority would be providing relief on the cost of living, fixing the healthcare system, investing in education and dealing with crime, mental health and addictions.



'Dumb mistake': What politicians had to say during the Saskatchewan election campaign

The Canadian Press

Sun, October 27, 2024 



REGINA — Saskatchewan's provincial election is on Monday. The Saskatchewan Party, in government for the last 17 years, is hoping for a return to power, while the NDP is fighting to move out of the Opposition benches.

Here are some memorable quotes from politicians during the four-week campaign:

"Very dumb mistake. One word and it can change your life ... to the people involved, I offer my apology again. I wish I could bring it back. Unfortunately, I can't." — Saskatchewan Party candidate David Buckingham, after it came to light that he used a racial slur referencing a Black person in the government caucus office last year

"We very much strive to be a diverse and inclusive party, very much with the policies that we have enacted with the honour of forming government over the last decade and a half." — Saskatchewan Party Leader Scott Moe said in response to Buckingham's apology

"I said things in my 20s that I don’t believe now whatsoever ... my focus now is on being a positive influence in our society, and any music I’ve created in recent years has been devoted to that." — NDP candidate Phil Smith, a former rapper, after the Saskatchewan Party criticized some of his lyrics as misogynistic, pro-drugs and pro-crime

"If that's what (Moe) wants to focus on, he can fill his boots ... but we're focused on the things that Saskatchewan people need." — NDP Leader Carla Beck in response to the Saskatchewan Party's criticism of Smith's music

"I'm so proud of our province and all that we have been able to achieve together." — Moe during the televised leaders' debate

"I see opportunity in every corner of this province. But under Scott Moe and the Sask. Party, there's too much opportunity being left on the table and too many Saskatchewan people being left behind." — Beck during the debate.

"There will be a directive that would come from the minister of education that would say that biological boys will not be in the change room with biological girls." — Moe said the campaign promise would be his first order of business if re-elected premier, as he had recently heard of a school change room complaint about the issue. The pledge was not part of the Saskatchewan Party's platform document.

""Politics is a difficult job. When you sign up for the job, you know that your public life will be open to scrutiny. Your children don't sign up for that." — NDP candidate Nicole Sarauer said in response to Moe's change room promise, as it was revealed another NDP candidate's children were the subjects of the school complaint.

"What appears is there was at least one bullet that was shot into their campaign office ... we've seen this in the U.S. presidential campaign, not in a provincial Saskatchewan election.” — Moe said after holes were found in a window at the Regina campaign office of Saskatchewan Party candidate Rahul Singh. Police later said the damage was not the result of a firearm.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 27, 2024.



A timeline look at Saskatchewan elections and governments over five decades

Jeremy Simes

Sun, October 27, 2024



REGINA — Saskatchewan's general election is on Monday. Here's a look at the provincial governments over the last five decades:

New Democrats, 1971-78

The NDP and leader Allan Blakeney, a former cabinet minister under Tommy Douglas, defeated Ross Thatcher's Liberals in 1971. Blakeney and the NDP were re-elected in 1975 and 1978.

Progressive Conservatives, 1982-86

Blakeney’s NDP was defeated by Grant Devine's Progressive Conservatives in 1982. Devine won a second term in 1986 but the PCs went down to defeat at the hands of the NDP and leader Roy Romanow in 1991.

New Democrats, 1991-2007

Romanow, a former attorney general under Blakeney, was premier for three terms. He retired in 2000 and Lorne Calvert was named the new party leader and premier. Calvert and the NDP won the 2003 election but lost to Brad Wall’s Saskatchewan Party in 2007.

Saskatchewan Party, since 2007

The Saskatchewan Party, founded a decade earlier by a coalition of former provincial Tories and Liberals, formed government for the first time in 2007 and won again in 2011, 2016 and 2020. Wall, a former ministerial assistant in Devine's government, was re-elected twice as premier. He retired in 2018 and his environment minister, Scott Moe, was voted by party members to replace him. Moe was at the helm for the win in the 2020 election, held during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 27, 2024.

Jeremy Simes, The Canadian Press