It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Sunday, November 21, 2021
Donnachadh McCarthy
Sun, November 21, 2021,
‘Cop26 is dead. Long live (the reformed) Cop27– and mass global peaceful direct action’ (Crispin Hughes )
Cop26 is dead – long live (the reformed) Cop27.
Let us be clear – Cop26 utterly failed on the only issue that counts: cutting global carbon emissions. The latest IPCC report stated that we needed a 45 per cent cut in carbon emissions by 2030. UN analysis of the latest Cop26 pledges suggests that they will lead to a 16 per cent increase.
The reason Cop26 – just like every previous Cop – failed to stop emissions rising is that its institutional structures are incapable of delivering the actions necessary to save civilisation. Take for example the stark fact that Saudi Arabia has been able to veto the adoption of agreed voting procedures at every Cop since 1995. Thus every oil-producing or high-fossil-fuel-consuming state has the power of veto over every single word “agreed” at these summits.
Watching these failures unfold is like watching the Titanic catastrophe in real time. Human civilisation is the Titanic. The climate crisis is the iceberg we have now hit, despite all previous Cop summits supposedly seeking to avoid such a crash. The ship is now holed, and the poorest countries in the global south are literally having their third-class berths flooded and possessions destroyed.
These countries pleaded for years with the global north to stop burning fossil fuels at such a rate that the climate crisis would flood and destroy them. They then pleaded for funding to help protect them from the coming floods, droughts and storms. The industrialised nations promised $100bn per year from 2015, but failed to deliver. Forty per cent of the funds provided were not grants but loans, which require interest repayments, further damaging the ability of poor countries to protect themselves. They are now in vain pleading with the global north to help pay for the damage being caused as a result of past emissions.
Then we have the industrialising nations, including China, India and Brazil, with large populations, in the Titanic’s second-class cabins. These countries are demanding the right to burn vast amounts of fossil fuels in order to gain first-class cabin riches and a comfortable standard of living, something the first world has enjoyed for the past century. They are so obsessed with seeking first-class cabin status on the ship that their soaring fossil-fuel consumption is ramming that same ship even faster into the iceberg, which is sinking all of humanity, including their own populations.
And then, finally, we have the hypocritical arrogance of the industrialised north: the first-class occupants. They are insisting on the second world phasing out the coal-fired power stations that are fuelling its rapid increase in living standards, while the west continues to pour huge investment into new oil and gas fields around the world. They refuse to pay for the destruction and death their first-class luxury is imposing on the third-class occupants, though its effects will increasingly devastate their own populations.
Cop26 decisions, yet again, were littered with loopholes, postponing the rapid cuts required. Mark Carney’s GFANZ finance “agreement” allows the banks to invest in fossil fuels for another three decades.
The deforestation “agreement” allows deforestation to continue for another decade, even if signatories deliver on their pledges. Already Indonesia, which is a signatory, has declared that it will continue to prioritise “development” over protecting its forests.
When Cop26 defenders have to point out that the final “agreement” for the first time actually mentions fossil fuels, and that they have agreed to discuss “cuts” again next year, and that these are the “big wins” of the conference, you realise how flawed the whole process is.
So, what do we do now?
First, we need to reform the Cop process. Governments by themselves cannot create a zero-carbon economy without the agreement of the other three pillars of the fossil-fuel economy: banks, fossil-fuel corporations and media. The UK, as the current Cop president, needs to work with the incoming presidency, Egypt, and convene simultaneous Cop27 summits of the other three pillars to agree binding proposals to achieve net zero by 2030.
To keep up to speed with all the latest opinions and comment sign up to our free weekly Voices newsletter by clicking here
Second, the climate movement needs to prioritise two targets. It must press the global corporate media leadership to use their immense political power to advocate for the urgent fair transition to a zero-carbon economy by 2030. And it must put pressure on the world’s banking system to implement the IEA ban on all new fossil-fuel investments. If Cop27 agreed that the $5 trillion investments planned for fossil-fuel expansion should be redirected instead into the energy transition, it would be a game-changer.
Finally, and tragically, we need a massive expansion in disruptive direct action. The global visceral anger from young people in response to Cop26’s betrayal needs to be channelled into waves of peaceful disruptive actions to force the pillars of power to take the necessary action.
With the Titanic ploughing at full speed into the iceberg, this is no time for hand-wringing. Action is what is needed, or the entire ship sinks, affecting all of us indiscriminately, whether our children are from the first, second or third-class cabins. The Canadian fires, the devastating floods in China and Germany and the droughts in Africa have shown that we are all now united in mortal danger.
Cop26 is dead. Long live (the reformed) Cop27– and mass global peaceful direct action.
Bethany Biron
Sat, November 20, 2021
Pike Electric service trucks line up after a snow storm on February 16, 2021 in Fort Worth, Texas.Ron Jenkins/Getty Images
A new report found that Texas could be in danger of widespread power outages again in the case of extreme winter weather.
The state is still grappling with the fallout of deadly February storms that left millions without electricity and water.
If a storm hits, the Texas power grid is projected to be 37% short of providing the total energy needed for the state.
Residents of the Lone Star State may have another long, difficult winter ahead.
Texas is once again in danger of widespread power outages if extreme weather strikes this season, according to a new report from the non-profit North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), a harrowing warning after the state was devastated by severe storms earlier this year.
While NERC also indicated risk for additional regions in the South and the Midwest, the greatest risk remains with Texas, which is projected to fall 37% short of providing the total energy needed in the case of a storm.
The evaluation comes as the state continues to grapple with the fallout of historic February storms that brought freezing temperatures, snow, and ice and left millions of Texans without electricity and clean water for days on end. The unprecedented weather left 210 people dead and led to more than $50 billion in damages, prompting the Biden Administration to declare a national disaster in the state.
In the aftermath, many residents also faced a slew of billing and insurance issues, causing some to be saddled with astronomical electric bills of upwards of $1,000 a day because their plans were tied to wholesale rates.
"Winter Storm Uri highlighted the vulnerabilities of our electricity and natural gas systems during long duration, widespread cold-weather conditions," Mark Olson, NERC's manager of reliability assessments, said in a press statement. "The industry has taken major steps to prepare for extreme weather conditions this winter, but our existing generation fleet and fuel infrastructure remain exposed in many areas."
To further mitigate outages, NERC said power companies should take proactive measures to prepare for extreme winter weather, including implementing emergency operating plans, conducting drills, and polling generators for fuel and availability status.
"To be resilient in extreme weather, we are counting on our grid operators to proactively monitor the generation fleet, adjust operating plans and keep the lines of communication open," Olson said in the press statement.
According to News 4 San Antonio, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas — the company that operates the Texas power grid — plans to inspect 300 power plants during the course of 21 days in December in an effort to prevent power outages.
"To see what could happen under extreme cases in ERCOT, I think is very disappointing and something that we need to see how we can rectify," John Moura, NERC's director of reliability assessment, told News 4.
Ivana Saric
Sun, November 21, 2021, 3:47 PM·1 min read
The proportion of U.S. adults who don't have children and say they're unlikely to want them in the future is growing, according to a new Pew Research Center survey published Friday.
Why it matters: The declining U.S. birth rate, which has dropped for the last six years, raises questions about whether the U.S. will have enough workers in years to come to sustain the economy and fund social programs, according to the Washington Post.
The big picture: The survey found that about 44% of non-parents aged 18-49 said it was "not too or not at all likely" that they will have children.
This represents a 7 point increase from 2018, when 37% of respondents said the same, per Pew Research Center.
Adults below 50 with children who say they're unlikely to have any more — about 74% — remain consistent with 2018 levels.
Between the lines: About 56% of non-parents who say they're unlikely to have kids say it's because they "just don't want" them.
Among other reasons, 19% cited medical issues, 17% cited finances and 15% said because they don't have a partner.
9% based their decision on the "state of the world" and 5% of these respondents attributed their reluctance to climate change.
Sun, November 21, 2021
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - A greater number of countries are sliding towards authoritarianism, while the number of established democracies under threat has never been so high, the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) said on Monday.
Populist politics, the use of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions to silence critics, a tendency of countries to mimic the anti-democratic behaviour of others, and disinformation used to divide societies are mainly to blame, the Stockholm-based intergovernmental organisation said in a report.
"More countries than ever are suffering from 'democratic erosion'," IDEA said in its 2021 study on the state of democracy, relying on data compiled since 1975.
"The number of countries undergoing 'democratic backsliding' has never been as high," it said, referring to the regressive turn in areas including checks on government and judicial independence, as well as media freedom and human rights.
Afghanistan, which was taken over by Taliban militants in August after international troops withdrew, is the most dramatic case this year, while Myanmar's Feb. 1 coup marked the collapse of a fragile democracy. Other examples include Mali, which has suffered two coups since 2020, and Tunisia, where the president has dissolved parliament and assumed emergency powers.
Large democracies such as Brazil and the United States have seen presidents question the validity of election results, while India has witnessed the prosecution of groups of people critical of government policies.
Hungary, Poland, Slovenia and Serbia are the European countries with the greatest declines in democracy. Turkey has seen one of the largest declines between 2010 and 2020.
"In fact, 70 per cent of the global population now live either in non-democratic regimes or in democratically backsliding countries," the report said.
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge in authoritarian behaviour by governments. The study said that there was no evidence that authoritarian regimes were better at fighting the pandemic, despite Chinese state media reports to the contrary.
"The pandemic provides additional tools and justification for repressive tactics and silencing of dissent in countries as diverse as Belarus, Cuba, Myanmar, Nicaragua and Venezuela," the report said.
(Reporting by Robin Emmott; Editing by Hugh Lawson)
FILE PHOTO: Belarusian opposition leader Tsikhanouskaya visits Warsaw, where she meets with the Belarusian diaspora in Warsaw
VIENNA (Reuters) - Belarusian opposition leader in exile Svetlana Tikhanouskaya urged Austria's government and Austrian companies present in Belarus to do more to help her allies against President Alexander Lukashenko in remarks published on Sunday.
Her comments in a joint interview with Austrian newspapers Kleine Zeitung and Die Presse come on the eve of a video conference hosted by Austria in support of Belarusian civil society in the face of a crackdown on opposition by Lukashenko's government. Tikhanouskaya helped organise the conference.
Austrian companies are among the most important European Union firms in Belarus. Raiffeisen Bank International's Priorbank is the fourth-biggest bank in the country in terms of loans, and phone operator A1 Telekom Austria has a share of roughly 42% of its mobile market.
"We understand that large companies like A1 do not want to give up their business activities in our country," Tikhanouskaya said.
"However, they could make their presence subject to certain conditions and make clear that their employees cannot be thrown in prison simply because they have a different opinion to Lukashenko."
Austria could take in students expelled from university in Belarus, she added.
Lukashenko claimed a resounding victory in last year's presidential election despite the widely held view that the vote was fraudulent. Various opposition groups say Tikhanouskaya won.
The resulting crackdown has involved hundreds thrown in prison, allegations that opposition activists were tortured, and spurred a lively opposition movement in countries like Latvia, Lithuania and Germany where many Belarusians live.
In the latest confrontation between the EU and Minsk since the election, Europe accuses Belarus of flying in thousands of people from the Middle East and pushing them to cross the Polish border into the EU.
Monday's conference, which was switched to a virtual format because Austria is going into a COVID-19 lockdown that day, is due to feature the foreign ministers of Germany, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Slovenia and Slovakia. The Belarusian government declined to take part.
The aim is to seek "constructive approaches for a peaceful, dialogue-based solution" in Belarus, Austria says.
(Reporting by Francois Murphy; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)
Oriana Pawlyk
Sat, November 20, 2021
The wave of airline cancellations that snarled thousands of flights over the past three months did more than strand passengers at airports from Florida to Indiana and points in between.
It also angered lawmakers who had given the airline industry more than $50 billion in pandemic relief money over the last year and a half — based on the carriers’ promise that the cash would help them be ready for travelers' return to the skies. Now Congress is demanding answers about why airlines have been so unprepared for the inevitable upswing in passenger demand, a question with big implications for the holiday travel season that kicks off this weekend.
“There should have been every reason, particularly given the bailout money for the airlines, to prepare for the surge we're seeing now,” Democratic Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D.C.’s representative in Congress, told POLITICO. “This money was for a very specific purpose.”
Norton, who said she has some “buyer’s remorse” for supporting the bailout, is calling for hearings on the topic before the House Transportation Committee — and she’s not the only one. The Senate’s transportation panel is already preparing to grill airlines on the matter in early December.
“The airlines owe Americans better service,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a member of the panel. “In my view, they're failing to keep their side of the bargain.”
Airlines for America, the trade group for major U.S. airlines, said the hiccups carriers have experienced recently "are wholly unrelated" to federal support payments, which was "used exclusively" to keep workers on the job.
"Travelers have been returning to the skies at a rapid pace, and U.S. airlines are working to hire and train new employees and return to service aircraft that had been put in storage in order to meet the growing demand," the group said. It did not respond to a further question about why airlines didn't use the federal money to stay more adequately staffed for the return of demand.
So far, the start of the pre-Thanksgiving weekend has not seen a new surge in mass cancellations — though that could change with the next wave of stormy weather.
Weathering the weather
Southwest last month canceled more than 2,000 flights after what it called an “unexpected air traffic control issue” compounded by weather in Florida that disturbed flight operations. American Airlines had a similar meltdown with thousands of flights canceled over Halloween weekend, also citing bad weather. Spirit canceled more than 60 percent of its flights for roughly three days in August, attributing its snafu to system outages, staffing and the weather.
The airlines involved in this recent turmoil have typically blamed a set of cascading problems that begins with bad weather, which for example has hampered crews trying to fly to the airports where their next assignment begins. Those crews are still on the work clock even during those delays, which means that by the time they're in position, they're sometimes forced to stop for the night because of rules intended to ensure they don't fly tired. And because the airlines lack adequate reserve crews to fill in those gaps, problems snowball from there.
Aviation industry experts are skeptical that weather is always the root cause, though, instead blaming tight crew scheduling and lack of personnel slack in general. For instance, Southwest said its October flight meltdown was over air traffic control delays and weather in Florida. But no other airline that operates out of Florida had such severe problems in the same span.
In an Oct. 21 earnings report, Southwest CEO Gary Kelly acknowledged a personnel crunch at the airline, saying its "available staffing fell below plan and, along with other factors, caused us to miss our operational ontime performance targets."
'What did you do with all the money?'
Last year, as lawmakers began to grasp the nature of the pandemic challenge at the country’s doorstep, Congress enacted the CARES Act, H.R. 748 (116), with a tranche of money for airlines to use to protect their workers — from crews to baggage handlers — from mass furloughs. The idea was to keep employees, many of whom require training and certifications to perform their jobs, in place so that operations could resume seamlessly as travel ramped back up.
“The support our government has entrusted to us carries immense responsibility and an obligation that American Airlines is privileged to undertake,” CEO Doug Parker said in April 2020 following the news that grants were on the way. “It is our privilege to continue flying through the downturn and to be in a ready position as our country and the world return to the skies.”
Ultimately, federal money saved hundreds of thousands of flight attendant, pilot and support jobs. Yet the disruptions experienced over recent weeks are expected to continue as travel climbs. Southwest has already decided to cut flights from its schedule for December and through early next year to try to get ahead of its staffing concerns and avoid last-minute cancellations of the sort that strand passengers.
Dennis Tajer, an American Airlines pilot and a spokesperson for the Allied Pilots Association, the union for pilots at American, said it's not just lawmakers who are frustrated with the way airlines are behaving. He said crews aren't always being managed well, with pilots and flight attendants waiting around after a canceled flight for airline planners to attempt to reschedule them as the clock ticks down on their shift.
He said pilots also want to be able to have a better-planned routine that doesn't devolve into chaos at the first hint of trouble. He noted that the relief funding — $25 billion in grants, and $25 billion more in financial assistance — was supposed to provide a cushion to give airlines the ability to execute flights in a post-pandemic world.
"So we're asking our management team, even before these [travel] events, 'What did you do with all the money?'" Tajer said.
Tajer didn't have an answer, but Norton did. She speculated that it appears that "who really benefited are the shareholders of the airlines — that's one of the reasons that I'm requesting a hearing."
Like Norton, Tajer said he remains dumbfounded as to how these problems could happen knowing the money was there as a protective measure.
"I did interviews everywhere, along with other union groups and the airlines saying, 'We've got to be ready for the recovery, that's why this is important; this is an investment in that recovery,'" Tajer said. "And now here I sit talking about, 'How in the world could you not be ready for this?'"
Congress weighs in
Senate Commerce Chair Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) has already been probing the issue. Over the summer, she asked airlines for information on the staffing shortages that some experts contend have led to flight cancellations and disarray.
Specifically she has asked for current staffing figures, information about layoffs, buyouts and furloughs, and other statistics that will form the basis of what could be an uncomfortable hearing on the matter when her committee convenes in December.
Congress put strings on its bailout money — chief among them that airlines agreed to stop furloughing or laying off their employees during the pandemic. But John Breyault of the National Consumers League said he suspects that even with that directive, airlines got creative in how they balanced their capacity, avoiding furloughs and layoffs in part by offering incentives for employees to take voluntary leave or retire early. Though allowed under the terms of the legislation, that's contributed to the current staffing crunch, he suggested.
Now, "consumers are really reaping the whirlwind when it comes to delays and cancellations because the airlines don't have the staff to fly those planes," added Breyault, the league's vice president of public policy, telecommunications and fraud. The nonprofit organization advocates for citizens on marketplace and workplace issues.
In a memo to flight attendants, American Airlines acknowledged that disruptions were caused by past staffing decisions, including buyouts and early retirements that the airline encouraged. The company said another factor was the need to juggle new hurdles, such as peaks in travel demand as more Americans sought out leisure travel for the first time in more than a year.
"As the demand for air travel was slow to return, we offered early outs and extended voluntary leaves," Brady Byrnes, American's vice president of flight service, said in a Nov. 5 internal memo to flight attendants. "Fast forward a few months, and the landscape has changed dramatically. … That's why we're taking steps to minimize disruptions to your work schedule and our customers' travel plans as we gear up for the busy holiday season."
With holiday travel coming up, airlines say they're accelerating efforts to get schedule and staffing right to avoid gaps in the system, including making sure they have enough staff to crew the scheduled flights they have already planned, and creating bonus and pay incentives for overtime work. Byrnes, for example, said American will offer its flight attendants 300 percent pay premium increases for working during holiday peak periods if they don't skip a shift between Nov. 15 and Jan. 2.
A contributing factor is the continuing tight labor market, which has left many industries with a dearth of personnel slack that the pandemic is only worsening, said Richard Aboulafia, vice president and analyst at the Teal Group.
Aboulafia said airlines couldn’t predict when exactly travel would climb out of its pandemic slump back to pre-Covid levels. “Who could have predicted that?”
If airlines had brought on more employees, jet fuel and planes ahead of market demand, it would have plunged them into a financial hole deeper than deficits wrought by the pandemic, Aboulafia said. “By having too little capacity, you're embarrassed, [but] if you get it wrong by having too much capacity, you run the risk of bankruptcy,” he said.
But Norton said this was entirely predictable.
“Any fool could tell that as Covid declined, airline traffic would go up,” she said.
Travel roars back
The trends have been clear, particularly recently. Airline bookings have been on the upswing over the last few weeks, especially with the Thanksgiving holiday coming up. An airline consumer index released last week by Adobe Digital Economy shows bookings from six U.S.-based carriers are 78 percent higher than 2020 levels, and are up 3 percent over pre-pandemic levels.
Airport businesses are also predicting an uptick in need for services such as parking spots and other items, all of which suggest consumer demand is soaring. Another data point is a reported rise in wait times at airlines' call centers.
Airlines’ zeal to return to profitability as soon as possible is skewing how they accommodate consumers, argued Breyault of the National Consumers League.
He said that in a meeting with Department of Transportation officials Nov. 10, his organization called for an investigation into whether airlines are deceptively advertising flights and selling tickets that they can't possibly meet because of limited crews.
Asked about the meeting, DOT responded that it meets regularly with representatives of consumer advocacy organizations, who "often highlight aviation consumer protection priorities for their organizations."
"The Department welcomes this input and considers the perspective of these organizations and other stakeholders in determining what action is in the public interest," a spokesperson said Tuesday.
Between January 2020 and the end of June 2021, DOT received 124,918 complaints concerning refunds, with 84 percent pertaining to mishandling of a canceled flight, according to the agency. “There certainly seems to me to be some shenanigans here that the DOT should be investigating,” Breyault said.
Lawmakers have long been concerned by airline behavior on refunds, especially during the pandemic. On Wednesday, Blumenthal and Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) reintroduced a bill, S. 3222 (117), to expand protections for air travelers. The legislation, similar to one introduced in 2019, would provide passengers with fair compensation in the event of airline-driven cancellations or delays and other items.
'Doing the best they can'
Some lawmakers weren't as eager to upbraid airlines for canceled flights, saying they’ve managed as best they can with this unpredictable pandemic and the government’s sometimes patchwork requirements for travel.
“They're dealing with Covid and just like the rest of this country and the rest of the world, it's made life very difficult and much more complicated,” said Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo). Pilots and flight attendants also have additional stressors to deal with, including spiking incidents with unruly passengers.
“It’s not the airlines failing to act. … They are doing the best they can,” he said.
That reasoning won’t satisfy other lawmakers. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said the airlines received funding solely because they are a key part of the nation’s transportation infrastructure.
But “if they can’t keep their promises to taxpayers and travelers, Congress should find out why,” she said.
Jefferson Morley
Sun, November 21, 2021
As a professional journalist who has been reporting on the assassination of John F. Kennedy for almost 30 years, I have long been skeptical about the pursuit of a proverbial “smoking gun” that supposedly will blow open the case of the murdered president. hen When the congressional deadline for the release of the last of the JFK files approached last month, I instinctively advised friends that there would no smoking gun in the released material.
After all, no serious investigative reporter seeks a single piece of evidence to decisively prove some kind of wrongdoing. To the contrary, good investigative journalism assembles myriad pieces of evidence into a mosaic that depicts a granular story of wrongdoing not previously visible to the public and law enforcement. Most prize-winning journalistic investigations do not depend on, or even feature, a “smoking gun” piece of evidence. So why should the JFK assassination story?
As the editor of the JFK Facts blog, I report on new pieces of evidence that filled in blank spaces in the historical record of JFK’s assassination. Think mosaic, not smoking gun.
But when the Biden White House announced late in the evening of Oct. 22 that the last of the JFK documents would not be released until December 2022 at the earliest, I began to rethink my caution. Friday nights are traditionally when the White House press office takes out the president’s smelliest garbage in hopes that the stench will pass by Monday morning. The announcement that the CIA and other federal agencies had delayed compliance with the 1992 JFK Records Act for the second time in four years was a story the White House understandably wanted to go away.
Smoking gun?
The delay struck me — and University of Texas Professor James Galbraith, among others — as a smoking gun in itself. The CIA’s slow-walking tactics are not quite definitive proof of a JFK conspiracy. They do, however, demonstrate that the CIA does not intend to obey a law concerning the assassination of a sitting American president.
The most plausible explanation of the CIA’s six-decade long history of deception, deceit and delay about assassination-related records is the desire to hide embarrassment or malfeasance. If nothing else, Biden’s order on the JFK files indicates that the CIA has a JFK problem: the clandestine service today cannot afford full disclosure about what happened in Dallas a long time ago.
To be sure, there are other possible explanations. Mark Zaid, a leading national security attorney in Washington, suggests that the CIA is hiding legitimate non-JFK secrets. This is possible, if not probable. But the CIA, facing a deadline set by President Trump in October 2017, released no JFK documents of any kind, basically saying, “the COVID dog at my homework.” You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to wonder if non-JFK secrets is all they are withholding.
In fact, JFK researchers know something about what the CIA is hiding. Most of the still-secret JFK files have been partially declassified. In some documents only a paragraph, sentence or single word remains secret. From context we can deduce much about what is still hidden.
A redacted 123-page CIA file on Watergate burglar Howard Hunt, released in April 2018, for example, may shed light on what President Richard Nixon called “the whole Bay of Pigs thing.” Nixon used this phrase as a coded reference to JFK’s assassination, according to his chief of staff, H.R. Haldeman. The Hunt file lends credence to Haldeman’s claim.
Cuba policy
In 1970, Hunt, a leading figure in the failed invasion of Cuba, circulated the manuscript of his memoir, “Give Us This Day,” which denounced JFK’s Cuba policy as weak, if not traitorous. Hunt did not go through the agency’s pre-publication clearance process, a serious breach of protocol. Five documents, comprising eight pages of material, have been removed from the Hunt file with the notation that they can be found in CIA’s JFK files. I doubt these documents include a smoking gun, but they are certainly relevant to the assassination story.
The CIA file of Hunt’s fellow burglar Frank Sturgis has more smoking-gun potential. Sturgis, a long-time resident of Miami, was a soldier of fortune involved in anti-Cuba operations in the 1960s. Accused of involvement in Kennedy’s assassination, Sturgis denied he was in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963. But behind closed doors, Sturgis boasted to investigators that the FBI considered him a plausible suspect in JFK’s murder. The redacted material in the Sturgis file may shed light on questions about Mafia involvement in JFK’s murder.
These passages concern the agency’s long-running interest in a man named Robert Maheu. He was a corrupt former FBI agent who facilitated the first CIA conspiracy to assassinate Fidel Castro in 1960. In 1971, Maheu shared what he knew of the Castro plots with syndicated columnist Jack Anderson. Maheu’s source, Mafia hitman Johnny Rosselli had hinted that the CIA’s efforts to kill Castro had led to the assassination of JFK. Rosselli, under federal investigation, with the possibility of deportation to Italy, threatened to tell the whole story to a Las Vegas grand jury. The blackmail ploy worked. The agency protected Rosselli from deportation, and Maheu never told the story to prosecutors. Years later, Rosselli, facing a congressional subpoena seeking his JFK testimony, was found stuffed in an oil drum floating in Biscayne Bay before his appearance on Capitol Hill.
Another still-secret file concerns a Miami man named Eladio del Valle. Some of his associates — not conspiracy theorists and not enemies— believed was involved in Kennedy’s assassination. Del Valle was murdered in 1966, a crime that never was solved. David Kaiser, a diplomatic historian and author of “The Road to Dallas,” a scholarly book about Kennedy’s assassination, sought to get access to Del Valle’s CIA records. He learned the Del Valle file was — and is — classified in its entirety.
Aware of Oswald
Then there’s a 338-page file that traces the very interesting career of James Walton Moore, the chief of the Dallas office of the agency’s Domestic Contacts Division in 1963. Moore knew all about Lee Harvey Oswald a year before he supposedly killed Kennedy. In the summer of 1962, Moore learned that Oswald, a former Marine who had defected to the Soviet Union out of sympathy for communism, had returned to Texas with a Russian wife. If the official JFK story is true — if Oswald alone killed the president — Moore was one of a half dozen senior CIA officials who failed to discern the threat he posed.
The CIA has largely managed to keep Moore out of the JFK investigations. He was never questioned about his pre-assassination knowledge of the accused assassin. His personnel file was partially released in 2018. A dozen pages remain redacted in their entirety.
Even more sensitive are the files of George Joannides, chief of CIA covert action operations in Miami. In 1963, Joannides ran a network of Cuban agents, recruited under a program code-named AMSPELL, who generated propaganda about the pro-Castro Oswald before and after JFK was killed. A dozen documents from Joannides’ personnel file in 1963 are still kept secret on the grounds that their release would harm the national security of the United States in 2021.
This claim sounds extreme but I’m inclined to believe it. The release of these records could do real damage to the reputation of the CIA. One heavily redacted memo that I obtained in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit concerns a security clearance Joannides received to participate in a still-undisclosed top-secret operation in the summer of 1963. If that operation involved AMSPELL agents and Oswald’s Cuba activities, the memo will be strong evidence, that certain CIA officers were complicit in Kennedy’s murder.
The CIA partially declassified an 87-page AMSPELL file in 2018. A dozen pages are still hidden from public view. If, and when, they are declassified, these pages may shed light on the CIA cover-up that followed JFK’s murder.
Of course, my educated guesses could be wrong. After all, I cannot see the redacted material. Only top CIA officials know what the agency will — and will not — release in compliance with Biden’s order. The sheer variety of the still-secret JFK files, however, indicates the scope of the agency’s JFK problem today. Six decades after the Dallas ambush, there is a lot of potentially embarrassing JFK material — hundreds of pages worth-- that the CIA is loath to share with the Congress and the American people.
Do one or more of these pieces of the JFK mosaic add up to a veritable smoking gun?
In my opinion, yes, which is why I doubt any significant JFK files will be released in the coming weeks or in December 2022. The CIA, of course, could prove me wrong and dispel all doubts by releasing these files in their entirety at any time. That is not going to happen for one increasingly obvious reason. When it comes to the JFK assassination story, the CIA’s files are smoking suspiciously.
Jefferson Morley, editor of the JFK Facts blog, is the author of the forthcoming “Scorpions Dance: The President, the Spymaster, and Watergate,” to be published in June 2022.
Telegraph reporters
Sat, November 20, 2021
Cyclists are putting themselves and others in danger by ignoring signs warning them off and getting in the way of the round-up, say agisters - Stuart Martin/Alamy Stock Photo
It is an ancient tradition dating back to the time of William the Conqueror.
For almost 1,000 years, the wild ponies of the New Forest have been rounded up for annual health checks in a countryside custom known as “the drift”.
However, this year’s drift has been disturbed by “abusive” cyclists who have been accused of treating the historic woodland as a “playground”, putting themselves and others in danger by ignoring signs warning them off and getting in the way of the round-up.
Some have even sworn at park rangers telling them to stay away as the round-up is carried out by agisters, the group responsible for caring for the 6,000 ponies that roam the national park.
The beauty of the New Forest is at risk of being destroyed by visitors who do not respect it, the group said.
It has warned that visitors who disobey signs asking them not to use certain areas and paths in the park are startling the ponies and frightening them off.
About 6,000 ponies roam the national park in Hampshire - RichardALock/E+
The group has said taking care of the ponies is important as the grazing animals are what makes the park’s landscape so unique which is the very reason visitors flock to the area in the first place.
Jonathan Gerrelli, the head agister, explained the importance of the round-ups: “The drift is very much an ancient tradition. The act of the animals going out grazing is what has made the New Forest what it is today. They have very much shaped the forest.
“You would not have the lovely grassy lawns or the open heathland without the grazing animals. You would just have woodland and scrubland.
“There is hardly anywhere else in the country where you have large numbers of grazing animals turned out all year round onto thousands of acres of open land, so it is a unique area.”
Mr Gerrelli explained that as the forest attracts increased visitors, it is having a big impact on his team’s ability to properly look after the horses.
He said: “During the round-up, we are getting more issues with people getting in the way and putting themselves in danger and us in danger. By ignoring signs telling them the cycle route is close, some cyclists are getting in the way as you are gathering up herds of galloping ponies.
“It is dangerous and spooks the horses away from the designated route, so we cannot catch them. The forest is a working forest. People look at it as a bit of playground and it is certainly not that.”
Mountain bikers were the biggest problem as they do not stick to cycle routes, according to Jonathan Gerrelli, the head agister - Jordan Pettitt/Solent News & Photo Agency
Mountain bikers were the biggest problem, according to Mr Gerrelli, as they do not even stick to cycle routes and they cannot put signs warning people of the horse round-up all over the forest.
“Although it is great for visitors to come down and enjoy it, they have got to respect it, so we would ask people to take great care and obey instructions. The signs aren’t put up for nothing. They are there for a reason,” he said.
“They don’t mean to do it. It is just ignorance of country ways and the countryside. People need to be more respectful and think a bit more of their actions.
“Everybody thinks ‘it is only just me’, but you have got to think there is 1,000 more only ‘just yous’ coming behind you and doing the same thing.
“It is a constant pressure with the volume of people coming into the forest, which is threatening the very thing they are coming to see.”
The issue first emerged in a report to the Verderers’ Court, an elected group responsible for the protection and conservation of the national park, which noted problems with cyclists and walkers.
In a meeting in September, the court was told: “Unfortunately, a small number of cyclists have caused problems at some drifts by refusing to follow advice. On occasion they have been abusive.
“On the Hilltop drift, some members of the public out walking had seen the notices warning of the drift, but still thought it was OK for them to proceed.”
Throughout the autumn, there are about 40 round-ups in which often more than 200 horses are gathered up for health checks - Solent News & Photo Agency
Damage to fencing in the forest was also raised as a problem, with agisters complaining they had lost half the ponies they had intended to catch on a recent drift due to a lack of fencing.
The court was told: “On the recent Fawley drift, only about 50 per cent of the ponies the agisters aspired to catch were driven in. The remainder got away due to a lack of fencing that has been removed.”
The people of the New Forest have been rounding up their horses since before it was officially created in 1079 by King William I. The drift is seen as an essential part of managing the herd of ponies in the forest.
Throughout the autumn, there are about 40 round-ups in which often more than 200 horses are gathered up for health checks.
They are also fitted with reflective collars in order to decrease the amount of road accidents.
Some regions of Canada were
global climate hot-spots in October
Following a record-hot September across the southern hemisphere, temperatures across land in the northern hemisphere reached new highs in October. In particular, Canada stood out among other nations last month, logging some of the hottest temperatures in the world.
According to NOAA's October Global Climate Report, last month ranked as the fourth warmest month of October on record for the globe, at 0.89°C above the 20th century average temperature of 14°C.
Global temperatures for October from 1880 to 2021, as compared to the 20th century average of 14°C. Credit: NOAA NCEI
NASA's records agree, placing October 2021 as fourth warmest. Meanwhile, the Japanese Meteorological Agency (JMA) and Europe's Copernicus Climate Change Service have the month estimated as the third warmest, behind 2015 and 2019.
Counting only stations on land, where nearly the entire population of the planet lives, October jumped up into the #3 spot in NOAA's records, at 1.39°C above the 20th century average. Specifically across land in the northern hemisphere — where close to 90 per cent of people call home — October 2021 was the warmest October ever, in the 142 years since record-keeping began.
Two hot spots stood out in NOAA's records last month. Both Central Siberia and the eastern half of Canada logged temperatures far above normal in October. Notably, in Nunavut, northern Quebec, and southwestern Ontario, new monthly records for heat were set.
This map of global average temperatures for October 2021 shows the relative hot spots and cool spots on the planet during the month. The cooler sea surface temperatures across the central Pacific Ocean note the presence of a La Nina pattern there, while eastern Canada and central Siberia are the hot-spots for the globe. Credit: NOAA NCEI
"According to Meteorological Service of Canada, Ontario (located in eastern Canada) had October temperatures that were 3.0–6.0°C above average," NOAA stated in the report. "During October 7–15, several locations across Ontario had maximum temperatures above 20°C."
WHERE DOES 2021 STAND?
Taking the entire year into account, thus far, NOAA ranks January–October of 2021 as the 6th hottest such period on record.
This graphic compares the year-to-date temperature anomalies for 2021 (black line) to what were ultimately the ten warmest years on record: 2016 (1st), 2020 (2nd), 2019 (3rd), 2015 (4th), 2017 (5th), 2018 (6th), 2014 (7th), 2010 (8th), 2013 (9th), and 2005 (10th). Each month along each trace represents the year-to-date average temperature anomaly. In other words, the January value is the January average temperature anomaly, the February value is the average anomaly of both January and February, and so on. Credit: NOAA
"Looking ahead," the report states, "the year is virtually certain to rank among the ten warmest years on record, with the highest probability of ranking as the sixth warmest year on record."
Peter Blumberg
Sat, November 20, 2021,
(Bloomberg) -- Former Theranos Inc. President Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani says there’s no good reason for the jury in his criminal fraud trial next year to learn that one of his sports cars was decorated with a “DASKPTL” vanity license plate.
Federal prosecutors have hinted they may introduce the plate as evidence to help make their case that Balwani benefited from conspiring with Elizabeth Holmes, the founder of the blood-testing startup, to defraud investors of hundreds of millions of dollars. Holmes is on trial now and Balwani faces a separate trial. Both have pleaded not guilty.
Noting that Balwani was independently wealthy before he joined Theranos, his lawyer urged the judge to rule that the “apparent reference” to Karl Marx’s opus “Das Kapital” is irrelevant.
“Whether intended as a heartfelt homage, a casual reference, or an ironic joke, Mr. Balwani’s license plate does not support any element of the charges that he engaged in a scheme to defraud people of money or other property,” his attorney Jeffrey Coopersmith wrote in a Friday court filing, which didn’t make clear whether the “DASKPTL” plate was on Balwani’s Porsche or his Lamborghini.
Coopersmith reminded U.S. District Judge Edward Davila of his ruling in Holmes’s case that prosecutors are free to put on evidence that she enjoyed the perks and benefits of a chief executive officer, but must avoid making “appeals to class prejudice” by detailing specific purchases, brands of clothing, hotels and other personal items.