Thursday, March 03, 2022

Pussy Riot's Nadya Tolokonnikova talks Ukraine DAO NFT and why she's 'really tired of the global community being complacent about what Putin does'


·Editor in Chief, Yahoo Music

It was almost exactly 10 years ago that Russian protest art/punk collective Pussy Riot became an international cause célèbre after they were charged with hooliganism for staging a "sacrilegious" anti-Putin guerrilla performance at Moscow's Cathedral of Christ the Savior. Pussy Riot's leader, conceptual artist and activist Nadya Tolokonnikova, and Pussy Riot member Maria Alyokhina were sentenced to two years behind bars; Tolokonnikova went on a hunger strike to protest the horrific prison conditions and ended up being sent to a Siberian penal colony. Tolokonnikova's spirit was not broken, however, and since she was released from prison in December 2013, she has co-founded the independent news service Mediazona, published the book Read and Riot: Pussy Riot's Guide to Activism, spoken before the U.S. Congress, British Parliament, and European Parliament, and continued to make important music and art.

Now, Tolokonnikova and Pussy Riot have turned their attention to the NFT/crypto space as members of PleasrDAO, a supporter of a stronger female representation in that space. And as Russian President Vladimir Putin wages war on Ukraine, the collective has now founded UkraineDAO, funding a bid for a 1/1 NFT image of the Ukrainian flag. UkraineDAO was formed during the early hours of Feb. 24 to support Ukrainian civilians suffering from the attack by Putin's forces, and has already raised $7 million, with more than 3,000 bidders. Come Back Alive, an initiative founded in 2014 by Kyiv-based IT specialist Vitaliy Deynega, will receive 100 percent of the funds.

This week Tolokonnikova — speaking from a "geographically anonymous" location for her own safety, and preferring to focus on her current and future activism rather than discuss the details of her imprisonment a decade ago — engaged in a frank and fascinating conversation with Yahoo Entertainment about the importance of cryptocurrency in activism, her fears and concerns for Ukraine and the rest of the planet, and why she refuses to stay silent, no matter what the risk.

Yahoo Entertainment: Please tell me about UkraineDAO and how it is helping Ukrainian civilian organizations.

Nadya Tolokonnikova: Yes, we just raised $7 million for an organization that's called Come Back Alive. They're going to use this money to provide medical help for those who suffered from the war in Ukraine. The way we found this organization, we brainstormed for two days within UkraineDAO, and we connected with a number of organizations in Ukraine and my trusted activists, because I have big presence in Ukraine. I have a lot of allies and friends and fellow activists. So, we asked everyone who they would suggest, and most of the people suggested Come Back Alive as one of the most efficient and transparent organizations. So, we've been raising money for them. We started UkraineDAO at the very moment when the war in Ukraine was started by Putin. This is my deep belief, that crypto is a great tool for activists, and I think we just proved that blockchain is a really great organizational tool. It helps us to scale our efforts globally, because these days we're facing global issues like peace and war, climate change, global inequality, and all of these problems have to be addressed by the global community. They cannot be solved just on a nation-state level. And I believe that blockchain allows us to communicate and organize our efforts without being sanctioned by governments or corporations. One example of that is Sberbank, one of the biggest banks in Russia — everyone and their grandmother has, um, their money in Sberbank. They just blocked cards of all Russians who send money to help Ukrainians. And basically, this is a reason why we use crypto to help Ukrainians.

Nadya Tolokonnikova of 'Pussy Riot' performs at the Sotheby's Institute of Art, The Eli And Edythe Broad Stage and Claremont Graduate University Host Artists, Activism, Agency in 2019. (Photo: Rodin Eckenroth/Getty Images for ABA)
Nadya Tolokonnikova of Pussy Riot performs in 2019. (Rodin Eckenroth/Getty Images for ABA)

What are your biggest fears and concerns, on a broad scale, regarding what is going on right now in Ukraine?

We talk about a possibility of nuclear war. Um, it's not a joke. We're talking about something that questions the existence of humanity. Putin laid it out really bluntly in his program speech for 25 minutes. I watched it yesterday — just yesterday, because I hate looking at Putin. I just hate that man so much. But I realized I just have to watch this stupid speech. And he was threatening the world with a nuclear war, in the case of NATO helping Ukraine with this war.

The last time I spoke with you, which was in 2017, was right after Donald Trump had been elected president here. I'm wondering if you have any thoughts about what might be happening if Trump were still in the White House now. I suspect like he would be in cahoots with Putin...

Well, I think that Trump is dangerous, but I honestly do not think that Trump is as dangerous as Putin — maybe partly because the American political system has better checks and balances. That doesn't mean that they cannot be eroded, and that's been happening during Trump's rule, but I just think that comparison between Trump and Putin, personally for me, is kind of old. After Putin started a bloody war in Europe, you can't really compare him to anyone anymore. I mean, there's been comparisons of him as Hitler; I think that might be more accurate. He is a bloody dictator. He's a war criminal. He's a terrorist that threatens the peace and survival of human species. And that's fairly unique. So, if he wanted to end up in history as a unique character — he definitely did that. Will people give him positive characteristics for his role? I highly doubt it. He just destroyed the remains of his reputation. But to your point that it would be so much more challenging for the world if Trump was in office and Putin started a war in Ukraine while Trump was in office — yes, I agree with you 100 percent. It would be more challenging if Trump was in office. So, I think it's really important right now that the global community comes together to stop, neutralize Putin ASAP. It's time to act. I'm really tired of the global community being complacent about what Putin does. When he annexed Crimea in 2014, we heard a lot of threats, but in fact not a lot of sanctions were imposed against Kremlin. I really think that regular Russians have suffered enough and they don't have to be sanctioned, but Putin, his oligarchs, whole Kremlin crew, has to be sanctioned really hard. And I haven't seen that happening after Putin annexed Crimea. And I think part of the fault for what is happening currently in Ukraine is on the global community who did not react strongly enough [to the Crimean annexation]. Putin learned his lesson: that he can do whatever he wants.

Do you have any theories as to why there is such complacency?

Yes. Greed. Greed, because Russia has lots of money and resources and it's probably really profitable to have business with Russia. It's probably really profitable for Western countries to host Putin’s oligarchs and their kids. They're living in London, they're living in Europe, they're coming to Miami to spend money they stole from Russian people. And we've been asking the global community — and by saying "we," I mean me, my fellow protesters, and the anti-Putin community in Russia, including [Pussy Riot member Maria] Alyokhina, who is in jail right now — we've been asking for years to freeze bank accounts of Putin's oligarchs. Just basically stop making business with them, because it's just hypocritical. If you say in a speech that you condemn them for the crimes against Russian people and against Ukrainians they're committing, but also at the same time you make business with them, this is highly hypocritical. And finally I see this validation against him and his cronies. I think it's coming a little bit late, but better now than never.

There are a lot of high-profile Western musicians, like Nick Cave and Green Day, who are boycotting performing concerts in Russia. What are your thoughts about that?

Regarding boycotting tours and shows in Russia ... well, it's up to every musician, obviously, to decide. I personally always would rather come and express my solidarity with the anti-Putin community really loudly. If you decide to make a show in Russia, just make sure that you just don't go and don't say anything, because that's cowardly. But if you actually go there and say that Putin is a liar and a war criminal and a terrorist and has to be removed from office ASAP, and if you express solidarity with the anti-Kremlin movement, then by all means, go for it.

Pussy Riot - PUNISH (Official Music Video)


After all you went through 10 years ago, I admire so much that you're still so very much in the public eye, on the frontlines. I would imagine there have been times when you just wanted to retreat, for the sake of your own safety or mental health, or that people have advised you to do just that.

Well, I don't have a choice. I want to make this world better place, and at least to ensure that we’re going to survive as species — not just because of Putin’s aggression, but as I said before, we are facing a number of global, really pressing problems like climate catastrophe and global inequality. Those issues are going to define geopolitics for 100 years to come. And I believe that we have just one life, and we have to live it in a way that we're not going to be ashamed of ourselves on our deathbed. I just live according to this belief. Of course, I've been advised by at least 10 people every day to shut the f*** up and just be careful. But I'm an extremely rational individual here. I believe that I made this decision once in my life: that I'm going to go against one of the most powerful individuals on the planet. Yeah, it implies certain risks, but I'm ready to live with these risks. But also at the same time, that being said, I'm not looking to be murdered. So, I am using certain techniques to ensure my safety. But that's true not just about me, but about pretty much all members. We follow certain protocol to ensure our safety. But at the same time, it's really important for us to don't let fear paralyze us, because that's exactly what Putin wants.

What would be your advice to laypeople who are not artists or not politicians, who are just regular people, who want to do something? So many people around the world are watching this war on the news and feel frustrated and powerless and not sure how to help.

There is no such a thing as "regular people." We are all regular — and we're all unique. We all have our unique skill set. What is the thing that you do the best? What is the thing that you enjoy the most? The reason why I tackle a lot of political issues with my art is because I just genuinely love to do art, and I know that would not be sustainable for me to be an activist for 15 years and years to come. ... You have to work within your own constraints and make sure that you are doing something that you really love. Pick that one thing, or this range of things that you really love. Like maybe you are a psychologist; that means that you can contact people in Russia and people in Ukraine and work with them, because it's a highly traumatic situation. If you're a doctor, there is so much room for you to work remotely — or if you feel really passionately, while I'm not advising anyone to do this, I have been seeing a lot of people from Western countries are traveling to Ukraine to contribute their time and energy and help people on the ground. And I have so, so much respect for them; it's so brave, knowing how critical and how dangerous the situation is. ... There is always a room to make change and not to be silent. The possibilities are honestly endless.

After the past few years, especially after the pandemic, many people have outrage fatigue. They're so tired of the endless bad news and the feeling of powerlessness. What would be your advice for people who just want to check out? How do they stay engaged?

Being in touch with your community is something that gives you energy. The only reason why human beings made such big progress in building this civilization is because they are in touch with some networks of support around them. That's what gives me strength. When I feel burnt out, I just talk with my people. We talk about activism; it's important to build these networks of trusted individuals, to be ready to act when it's needed. Like, with UkraineDAO, it does look from the outside like we just magically put together this decentralized, autonomous organization and raised $7 million in a few days. But in fact, it's a result of long work on establishing communications and networks of many, many people. That's the beauty of big people's movements. So, I guess what I'm trying to say is that activist work requires a lot of political organization that's mostly going to be unseen by the world. And you're most likely not going to get credit for that, but that's OK. For instance, if you talk about United States, if you build this network of trusted individuals, and if you build this horizontal people's movement, when time comes and Trump wants to be elected [for a second time], you just go to the streets and refuse to leave and block public transport until Trump is gone. Without this preparation work, you can't expect things just magically happen. And there are a lot of brilliant activists in the United States who are working on a daily basis on that. It's really important to understand that you have to be somehow involved in this organizational work every day, and this is the kind of work that gives back. It's extremely rewarding, because you see how something bigger than you, than yourself is growing. It's the same economy as love. Love is not a finite resource. You give it, and you receive more back.

Pussy Riot's Nadya Tolokonnikova (Photo: Neil Krug)
Pussy Riot's Nadya Tolokonnikova. (Neil Krug)

What else are you and Pussy Riot working on right now?

We're releasing a song called "Laugh It Off" on International Women's Day, the 8th of March. We prepared and wrote this song obviously before the war in Ukraine started, but we decided to still release it because this is an activist song. Also, at the same time we work on an organization that is going to distribute large sums of money towards female and LGBTQ+ artists in the digital art space. That's what we've been working on over the last year. And honestly, that activist work on this feminist DAO allowed me and my community to regroup really quickly and refocus our energy on UkraineDAO, because we basically use the same resources that we've been using for building this feminist organization. But now when the [UkraineDAO fundraising campaign] is about to be over, another important step for UkraineDAO is to advise the organization Come Back Alive on cybersecurity to make sure the funds are secure and they're not going to be hacked, because it's a large sum of money. So, once that's done, we're going to switch back our attention at least 50 percent on building this feminist movement on blockchain. We raised significant amount of money already — I'm not going to tell you the exact number because the announcement is still coming, but it is a sum that is comparable with what we were able to raise with UkraineDAO. And basically our goal of this feminist movement is to redistribute wealth to historically underrepresented groups, female artists and LGBTQ+ artists, who still have to work really hard to just prove that they're worthy — which is fairly insane, given that it's 2022.

Read more from Yahoo Entertainment:

Follow Lyndsey on FacebookTwitterInstagramAmazon

Who is Viktor Yushchenko? What you need to know about the former Ukrainian president

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has risen to the global spotlight for his staunch approach in defending his country against invading Russian forces, and as a result, turned attention to the country's history.

In 1919, the country became the independent state of the Ukrainian People’s Republic, but it wasn't long before it was under the rule of the Soviet Union in 1922. It would remain part of the country until it achieved independence in 1991 as the Soviet Union collapsed.

Since then, Ukraine has had seven presidents, but as Zelenskyy faces threats from Russia, one former president, Viktor Yushchenko, has resurfaced because of former threats against him and an assassination attempt during his presidency.

Here is what to know about the third president of Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko speaks to journalists after a meeting with French President Nicolas Sarkozy at the Elysee Palace, in Paris, Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2008.
Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko speaks to journalists after a meeting with French President Nicolas Sarkozy at the Elysee Palace, in Paris, Wednesday, Feb. 20, 2008.

Live updates: Shells pound Kharkiv as Russia escalates attacks on Ukrainian civilian areas; US to ban Russian planes from airspace

The news comes to you: Sign up for the latest updates on the situation in Ukraine here

When was Viktor Yushchenko president?

Yushchenko was elected president of Ukraine in 2004, took office in 2005 and remained there until 2010. However, Ukraine's 2004 presidential election was anything but ordinary.

What was the Orange Revolution?

Ukraine has a two-part election system, in which if no presidential candidate gains at least 50% of votes, a runoff election will take place between the top two vote-getters.

After no one gained 50% of votes, a runoff took place between Yushchenko and Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. Yanukovych went on to win the runoff and the election, but the Yushchenko campaign claimed the election was rigged in favor of Yanukovych, claiming he was strongly supported by Russia and that officials there had interfered.

The claims of a rigged election by Russian interference gained traction in the country, resulting in mass protesting taking place across Ukraine. The civil protests became known as the "Orange Revolution" and gained global attention over Russia's influence in Ukraine.

The protests were successful in having a another election between the two candidates, in which Yushchenko won with 52% of votes.

Was Viktor Yushchenko poisoned?

Another factor that contributed to the "Orange Revolution" was what happened to Yushchenko during his presidential campaign.

In September 2004, Yushchenko became seriously ill, so much so that he was transported to a hospital in Vienna, Austria, suffering from intestinal issues as well as face disfigurement with jaundice and pockmarks.

Tests confirmed Yushchenko had been poisoned with dioxin, a chemical found in agent orange, according to The New York Times. Doctors said his blood dioxin level was "more than 1,000 times" normal and suggested he had eaten the poison.

"It is my growing conviction that what happened to me was an act of political reprisal against a politician in opposition. The aim, naturally, was to kill me," Yushchenko said at the time.

To this day, there is no definitive answer as to how and who poisoned Yushchenko, but many pointed to a dinner he had with Ukrainian officials who had ties with Russian officials after which he fell ill.

Contributing: Karina Zaiets and Janet Loehrke, USA TODAY

Follow Jordan Mendoza on Twitter: @jordan_mendoza5.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Viktor Yushchenko: Former Ukraine president who was poisoned

Russian sanctions risk ‘developing world debt crisis’ — not a Lehman moment

Talk of risk of another ‘Lehman moment’ from Russian sanctions is overdone, says Adam Posen, president of Peterson Institute The risks from the profound economic and financial sanctions that the West has put on Russia as a result of its invasion of Ukraine are not tantamount to another 2008 “Lehman” meltdown in financial markets, said Adam Posen, the president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, on Tuesday.

The risks are akin instead to the developing nation debt crises that roiled the banking sector in the early 1980s, Posen said, in an interview with MarketWatch.

Russia is not systemically connected enough and not large enough to cause that sort of shock, according to Posen. The bankruptcy of Lehman was the pivotal event of the 2008 financial crisis and caused the Great Recession.

Russian assets are not as widely held, Posen said.

“There just aren’t that many people exposed to Russians,” Posen said. Instead, it’s worth a comparison to another country facing a financial crisis.

“I think its analogous to distress when Argentina was defaulting on the International Monetary Fund,” Posen said. Someday, the debts will be paid off in some measure but there may be a legal fight to get paid off at face value, he said.

“We all remember 2008. In this case, I don’t think it’s there. I hope I’m right,” he added.

Experts say that more than $500 billion of Russian securities have been effectively frozen due to the moves to the moves to isolate Russia.

Read: Experts see risk of a massive liquidity shock from sanctions of Russia

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s effort over the past eight years to make his country’s economy sanction-proof has backfired, Posen said.

Putin’s moves to building a fortress of foreign-exchange reserves and reducing exposure to U.S. and European creditors also “cuts the other way.”

“If you make yourself too disentangled from the world economy, than the world’s governments don’t have to care that much about you. They can afford to play hardball,” he said.

Posen, a leading academic on monetary policy, was a voting external member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee from 2009 until 2012.

He said the U.S. Treasury’s decision to freeze assets of Russia’s central bank “is an extremely big step.”

The collapse of the value of the Russian ruble RUBUSD, -3.82%, the decline in Russian stocks, the rise in the cost of living will hit Russia hard.

In response, the Russian central bank is forcing people to turn over foreign exchange and not letting foreign owners get their money out.

“These are familiar from financial crisis textbooks from Latin America or Southeast Asia,” he said.

The sanctions are analogous in some ways to strategic bombing campaigns, he said, with a goal of breaking support for the Russian government.

“Ethically, it is not quite the same as bombing, but it is not that different. You’re saying women and children, you’re going to be deprived of medicines and technology and quality of life and opportunities to make a living indefinitely until your government changes,” he said.

“It is not costless,” he added.

Depending on how long the sanctions last, Russians will experience a significant rise of inflation with shortages of goods. Rents will be higher and purchasing power will fall due to the weaker currency, he said.

The Russian economy is also likely to experience a contraction in GDP growth.

Dow skids about 750 points, U.S. stocks drop sharply as Russia says it will begin attacks on Kyiv Salesforce stock options priced for much bigger than usual move reaction earnings Ukrainian activist tells Boris Johnson World War III has already started and ‘Ukrainian children [are] taking the hit’ These companies are positioned to create the first U.S. super app ‘They all promise to help’ but no financial adviser seems to offer what I need. I have two 401ks, Roth accounts and real estate, and want a one-time plan for managing my money myself. Can you help?
Click Here To Get Funded!

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/russian-sanctions-risk-developing-world-debt-crisis-not-a-lehman-moment-11646160454

Let’s recall what exactly Paul Manafort and Rudy Giuliani were doing in Ukraine

Russia has been working for years to influence and undermine the independence of its smaller neighbor. And some Americans have played a role in that.


SOURCEProPublica
 
Image Credit: NY Mag

Though Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine is just days old, Russia has been working for years to influence and undermine the independence of its smaller neighbor. As it happens, some Americans have played a role in that effort.

One was former President Donald Trump’s campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Another was Trump’s then-lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

It’s all detailed in a wide array of public documents, particularly a bipartisan 2020 Senate report on Trump and Russia. I was one of the journalists who dug into all the connections, as part of the Trump, Inc. podcast with ProPublica and WNYC. (I was in Kyiv, retracing Manafort’s steps, when Trump’s infamous call with Ukraine’s president was revealed in September 2019.)

Given recent events, I thought it’d be helpful to put all the tidbits together, showing what happened step by step.

Americans making money abroad. What’s the problem?

Paul Manafort was a longtime Republican consultant and lobbyist who’d developed a speciality working with unsavory, undemocratic clients. In 2004, he was hired by oligarchs supporting a pro-Russian party in Ukraine. It was a tough assignment: The Party of Regions needed an image makeover. A recent election had been marred by allegations that fraud had been committed in favor of the party’s candidate, prompting a popular revolt that became known as the Orange Revolution.

In a memo for Ukraine’s reportedly richest man, Rinat Akhmetov, Manafort summed up the polling: Many respondents said they associated the Party of Regions with corruption and considered it the “party of oligarchs.”

Manafort set to work rebranding the party with poll-tested messaging and improved stagecraft. Before long, the Party of Regions was in power in Kyiv. One of his key aides in Ukraine was, allegedly, a Russian spy. The Senate Intelligence Committee report on Trump and Russia said Konstantin Kilimnik was both “a Russian intelligence officer” and “an integral part of Manafort’s operations in Ukraine and Russia.”

Kilimnik has denied he is a Russian spy. He was indicted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller for obstruction of justice for allegedly trying to get witnesses to lie in testimony to prosecutors in the Manafort case. Kilimnik, who reportedly lives in Moscow, has not been arrested. In an email to The Washington Post, Kilimnik distanced himself from Manafort’s legal woes and wrote, “I am still confused as to why I was pulled into this mess.”

Manafort did quite well during his time in Ukraine. He was paid tens of millions of dollars by pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych and other clients, stashing much of the money in undeclared bank accounts in Cyprus and the Caribbean. He used the hidden income to enjoy some of the finer things in life, such as a $15,000 ostrich jacket. Manafort was convicted in 2018 of wide-ranging financial crimes.

“We are going to have so much fun, and change the world in the process”

In 2014, Manafort’s plum assignment in Ukraine came to an abrupt end. In February of that year, Yanukovych was deposed in Ukraine’s second uprising in a decade, known as the Maidan Revolution, in which more than a hundred protesters were killed in Kyiv. He fled to Russia, leaving behind a vast, opulent estate (now a museum) with gold-plated bathroom fixtures, a galleon on a lake and a 100-car garage.

With big bills and no more big checks coming in, Manafort soon found himself deep in debt, including to a Russian oligarch. He eventually pitched himself for a new gig in American politics as a convention manager, wrangling delegates for an iconoclastic reality-TV star and real estate developer.

“I am not looking for a paid job,” he wrote to the Trump campaign in early 2016. Manafort was hired that spring, working for free.

According to the Senate report, in mid-May 2016 he emailed top Trump fundraiser Tom Barrack, “We are going to have so much fun, and change the world in the process.” (Barrack was charged last year with failing to register as a foreign agent, involving his work for the United Arab Emirates. He has pleaded not guilty. The case has not yet gone to trial.)

A few months later, the Trump campaign put the kibosh on proposed language in the Republican Party platform that expressed support for arming Ukraine with defensive weapons.

One Trump campaign aide told Mueller that Trump’s view was that “the Europeans should take primary responsibility for any assistance to Ukraine, that there should be improved U.S.-Russia relations, and that he did not want to start World War III over that region.”

According to the Senate report, Manafort met Kilimnik twice in person while working on the Trump campaign, messaged with him electronically and shared “sensitive campaign polling data” with him.

Senate investigators wrote in their report that they suspected Kilimnik served as “a channel for coordination” on the Russian military intelligence operation to hack into Democratic emails and leak them.

The Senate intel report notes that in about a dozen interviews with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Manafort “lied consistently” about “one issue in particular: his interactions with Kilimnik.”

Manafort’s attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Manafort didn’t make it to Election Day on the Trump campaign. In August 2016, The New York Times revealed that handwritten ledgers recovered from Yanukovych’s estate showed nearly $13 million in previously undisclosed payments to Manafort from Yanukovych and his pro-Russian party. Manafort was pushed out of his job as Trump’s campaign chairman less than a week later.

After Trump won the election, the Senate report says, Manafort and Kilimnik worked together on a proposed “plan” for Ukraine that would create an Autonomous Republic of Donbas in separatist-run southeast Ukraine, on the Russian border. Manafort went so far as to work with a pollster on a survey on public attitudes to Yanukovych, the deposed president. The plan only would need a “wink” from the new U.S. president, Kilimnik wrote to Manafort in an email.

Manafort continued to work on the “plan” even after he had been indicted on charges of bank fraud and conspiracy, according to the Senate report. It’s not clear what became of the effort, if anything.

“Do us a favor”

With Manafort’s conviction in 2018, Rudy Giuliani came to the fore as the most Ukraine-connected person close to President Trump. Giuliani had long jetted around Eastern Europe. He’d hung out in Kyiv, supporting former professional boxer Vitali Klitschko’s run for mayor. One of Giuliani’s clients for his law firm happened to be Russia’s state oil producer, Rosneft.

By 2018, Giuliani had joined Trump’s legal team, leading the public effort to discredit Robert Mueller’s investigation. Giuliani saw that Ukraine could be a key to that effort.

Giuliani ended up working with a pair of émigré business partners, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, to make contacts in Ukraine with corrupt and questionable prosecutors, in an effort to turn up “dirt” on Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, who had served on the board of a Ukrainian energy company. Giuliani also worked to sow doubt about the ledger that had revealed the secret payments to Manafort, meeting with his buddies in a literally smoke-filled room.

Parnas and Fruman told the president at a donor dinner in 2018 that the U.S. ambassador in Kyiv was a liability to his administration.

Trump recalled Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, who had been a vocal opponent of corruption in Ukraine, from Kyiv in May 2019.

Two months later, Trump had his infamous call with Ukraine’s new President, Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Zelenskyy asked Trump for anti-tank Javelin missiles. You know what happened next. Trump said he needed Zelenskyy to first “do us a favor” and initiate investigations that would be damaging to Joe Biden. He also pressed Zelenskyy to meet with Giuliani, according to the official readout of the call:

These events became publicly known in September 2019, when a whistleblower complaint was leaked.

“In the course of my official duties, I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election,” the whistleblower wrote.

In December 2019, as an impeachment inquiry was at full tilt, Giuliani flew to Ukraine and met with a member of Ukraine’s parliament, Andrii Derkach, in an apparent effort to discredit the investigation of Trump’s actions. Derkach, a former member of the Party of Regions, went on to release a trove of dubious audio “recordings” that seemed to be aimed at showing Biden’s actions in Ukraine, when he was vice president, in a negative light.

Within months, the U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned Derkach, describing him as “an active Russian agent for over a decade” who tried to undermine U.S. elections. Derkach has called that idea “nonsense.”

In a statement, Giuliani said, “there is nothing I saw that said he was a Russian agent. There is nothing he gave me that seemed to come from Russia at all.” Giuliani has consistently maintained that his actions in Ukraine were proper and lawful. His lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Where they are now…

Many of Trump’s allies have been charged or investigated for their work in and around Ukraine:

Paul Manafort: convicted of financial fraud — then pardoned by Trump

Rick Gates: a Manafort aide who pleaded guilty to conspiracy and lying to the FBI

Sam Patten: another Manafort associate convicted for acting as a straw donor to the Trump inaugural committee on behalf of a Ukrainian oligarch

Rudy Giuliani: reportedly under criminal investigation over his dealings in Ukraine; his lawyer called an FBI search of his home and seizure of electronic devices “legal thuggery”

Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman: convicted for funneling foreign money into U.S. elections; Parnas’ attorney said he would appeal

Key documents

THE STALINIST DEFENSE OF PUTIN

AN ALTERNATIVE VIEW OF THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLES UPRISING OF 2014


Ukraine exposes the White supremacist foreign policy of the U.S. and NATO

Commentary by Margaret Kimberley, first published on Black Agenda Report, March 2, 2022

White supremacy is at the heart of U.S. war propaganda. The exhortation to ‘stand with Ukraine’ is no exception to this rule.

(Margaret Kimberley is executive editor and senior columnist of Black Agenda Report. Her commentary is part of a special edition on Ukraine by the online journal. Part of the special edition is a statement by the Black Alliance for Peace. That statement was re-published on A Socialist In Canada on March 1, here.)



Empire State bldg in New York lit in the colours of the flag of Ukraine

By now everyone knows that Ukraine’s flag is blue and yellow. It is impossible to miss as the Empire State Building in New York, the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, and the Eiffel Tower in Paris have all been bathed in those colors. Nearly every city and town across the United States has followed suit and politicians ranging from local legislators to members of congress shout ‘Stand with Ukraine!’ at every opportunity.

Yet it must be pointed out that those blue and yellow motifs and pleas for solidarity are all about white supremacy. Ukraine is upheld as a bastion of ‘civilization’ which is supposed to put it off limits for war and suffering. The quiet part is now being spoken out loud. We are told that Ukrainians are more deserving of concern because they are Europeans.

Ukraine’s deputy chief prosecutor said as much in a BBC interview. “It is very emotional for me because I see European people with blue eyes and blonde hair being killed…” He wasn’t alone in his assessment. An reporter at NBC was asked why Poland was willing to admit Ukrainians even as it turned away other refugees. “Just to put it bluntly, these are not refugees from Syria, these are refugees from neighboring Ukraine. That, quite frankly, is part of it. These are Christians, they are white, they’re … um… very similar to the people that live in Poland.”

CBS followed suit, “This isn’t a place, with all due respect, like Iraq or Afghanistan who has seen conflict rage for decades. This is a relatively civilized, relatively European – I have to choose those words carefully – city where you wouldn’t expect that or hope that it was going to happen.”

The narrative that only white people deserve peace and security is all the more shameful because the global south suffers from war and privation as a direct result of U.S./NATO actions. It is NATO that destroyed the nation of Libya, NATO which attempted to do the same in Syria, NATO that occupied Afghanistan, NATO which wages war across African countries with U.S., French and British troops deployed across the continent. The white world causes suffering and then says that the people of the global south are “uncivilized” with no rights that need to be respected.

A Watson Institute of Brown University study showed that more than 37 million people in North Africa, Western and Central Asia, and the Horn of Africa have been displaced by the U.S. and its allies since 2001. The humanitarian disasters begun years ago are ongoing, as refugees use the Mediterranean and even the U.S. border with Mexico as points of escape. After experiencing wars of aggression, these nations are then subjected to punishment as the United States steals Afghanistan’s assets and keeps Syria under the thumb of Caesar Sanctions. These thefts cause more suffering and even death as nations are robbed of the ability to care for their people. Who is civilized and who is not?

Ukraine has been pushed to the forefront of American thought in order to defend the imperialist foreign policy which led to the current conflict with Russia. If the blue eyed nation is suffering, it is because of U.S. and NATO arrogance and aggression. Ukraine’s current situation is a direct result of the 2014 coup engineered by the U.S. and its EU partners. An elected president was dispatched and a civil war began that has killed some 14,000 people. Ukraine is a U.S. colony with a puppet government now under military attack. Ukrainians are themselves refugees as they flee to neighboring Poland, Romania, Slovakia and other countries. It is the supposedly advanced, democratic and supposedly civilized who have created their problems.

Yet once again, bare faced racism is evident. African migrants and students in Ukraine were prohibited from boarding trains and buses that could take them to safety. A group of Jamaican students was forced to walk 20 kilometers when they were forced off of a bus en route to Poland. Africans and Jamaicans live and study all over the world because the U.S. and Europe underdevelop their nations through a variety of means. Yet Ukrainians and Poles didn’t see people in need of help. They determined that the non-blondes were not deserving of assistance.

Ironically, it is the white supremacist underpinnings of U.S./NATO foreign policy which has created all of Ukraine’s suffering. The need to dominate, to “contain” Russia and its ally China is not playing out the way they had hoped, but the Ukrainians be damned. The Minsk II agreement of 2015 which was unanimously approved in the United Nations Security Council was a roadmap to peace. Ukraine should be a neutral nation but that is the exact opposite of what its lords and masters in Washington want. The good faith negotiations that could resolve the crisis are a non-starter because NATO is a very dishonest broker.

The corporate media have joined the state in an extraordinary effort to create war propaganda. They deliberately tug at heartstrings and demand solidarity with Ukraine because the truth is very unpalatable. Instead of standing with Ukraine, Americans should stand with humanity across the world. If they did, they would be better able to understand why there are wars in Europe and elsewhere.

Margaret Kimberley is the author of Prejudential: Black America and the Presidents . Her work can also be found at patreon.com/margaretkimberley and on Twitter @freedomrideblog

THIS IS THE SAME POSITION OF THE CPUSA, CPGB, CP CANADA

FOR MORE STALINIST APOLOGETICS SEE
  





















 
'Manifest Violation' of UN Charter: Amnesty Decries Russia Invasion

The head of the advocacy group said that the invasion sparked "a massive human rights, humanitarian, and displacement crisis that has the makings of the worst such catastrophe in recent European history."


Secretary General of Amnesty International Agnes Callamard holds a press conference in East Jerusalem on February 1, 2022. 
(Photo: Mostafa Alkharouf/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)


ANDREA GERMANOS
COMMON DREAMS
March 2, 2022

Amnesty International said Tuesday that Russia's invasion of Ukraine amounted to "a manifest violation of the United Nations Charter" and urged U.N. member states against letting Moscow "push the world closer toward an abyss of violence."

"There are long-lasting consequences from this for us all."

The statement from the human rights organization came as Russian forces continued to pummel large Ukrainian cities in a weeklong invasion that the U.N. says has already forced over 874,000 people to flee to neighboring countries.

The invasion, said Agnès Callamard, secretary general of Amnesty International, is singularly defined by "aggression" and "cannot remotely be justified on any of the grounds that Russia has offered."

"Yet," she continued, "all of this is being committed by a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council."

Callamard added that the invasion unleashed "a massive human rights, humanitarian, and displacement crisis that has the makings of the worst such catastrophe in recent European history," and accused Russia of "not only breaching the sovereignty of a neighbor and its people" but "also challenging the global security architecture and exploiting its frailty, including a dysfunctional U.N. Security Council."

"There are long-lasting consequences from this for us all," she said.

Amnesty further welcomed the announcement on Monday from the International Criminal Court's (ICC) prosecutor that his office intends to open an investigation into the situation in Ukraine given his satisfaction that "there is a reasonable basis to believe that both alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity have been committed."

Neither Ukraine nor Russia is state party to the Rome Statute of the ICC. In 2015, however, Ukraine accepted the court's jurisdiction over crimes committed since 2014.

Callamard said that further steps toward "comprehensive accountability" were necessary including "concerted and innovative efforts of the U.N. and its organs, as well as initiatives at the national level pursuant to the principle of universal jurisdiction."

"Above all," she said, "we must ensure that the tragically increasing number of victims of war crimes in Ukraine hear a message that the international community is already determined to secure redress for their suffering."

Related Content

Amnesty Says Russia's 'Indiscriminate Attacks' in Ukraine May Be War Crimes
Jessica Corbett

Amnesty International and other humanitarian groups have already expressed grave concern about indiscriminate harm to civilians and civilian infrastructure and potential war crimes since Russian President Vladimir Putin launched the invasion on February 24.

Both Amnesty and Human Rights Watch have documented use of cluster munitions in eastern cities of Ukraine, including in strikes that damaged a hospital and preschool.

Meanwhile, on Wednesday the U.N. General Assembly, during an emergency meeting, voted overwhelmingly in favor of a nonbinding resolution calling for the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of all Russian forces from within Ukraine's "internationally recognized borders" and expressing "grave concern at reports of attacks on civilian facilities such as residences, schools, and hospitals, and of civilian casualties, including women, older persons, persons with disabilities, and children."

Also on Wednesday Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's government called for a "thorough and unbiased" review of Russia's permanent membership on the U.N. Security Council.

This article was updated to reflect the voting result of General Assembly resolution.