Saturday, April 16, 2022

Corporate America steps up to fight for abortion access — after backing anti-abortion Republicans

Jon Skolnik, Salon
April 16, 2022

Activists supporting a woman's right to choose to have an abortion protested 
in March 2020 outside the US Supreme Court(AFP)

Just after the Texas GOP's near-total abortion ban (S.B.8) officially took effect last September, companies like Uber, Lyft, Bumble, and Match parachuted into the political fray by providing their Texas-based employees with benefits packages designed to dampen the impact of the bill. Uber and Lyft, for instance, created legal defense funds for drivers who might be sued for providing rides to abortion doctors. And Match, which owns Tinder, a created relief fund for staffers and their dependents seeking to get an abortion outside the Lone Star State. This week, Citigroup and Yelp vowed to cover similar out-of-state care for their employees, a move that no doubt reinforces Corporate America's veneer of progressivism as more Republican-led states – like Idaho, Oklahoma, Arizona, South Dakota – join the race to pass draconian restrictions.

But campaign finance records reveal that at least four out of the six named companies donated heavily to anti-abortion Republicans over the past three decades, underscoring the ongoing disconnect between Corporate America's professed principles and its pocketbook.

Over the past three decades, Citigroup has donated over $6.2 million to the Republican Party, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. In Texas, for instance, Citigroup has given at least $452,370 to various GOP candidates, including the state's vehemently anti-abortion governor, Greg Abbott ($258,370), as well as many of the S.B.8's legislative sponsors. Most notably, the company has directed at least $2,000 toward the bill's chief architect, state Sen. Bryan Hughes.

In Oklahoma, which made abortion provision a felony by up to ten years in prison, Citigroup has lined up the campaign coffers of state Rep. Frank D. Lucas ($27,500), who has consistently voted to undermine abortion access, as well as U.S. Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla. ($7,000), who just this year described himself as "the leading voice in Congress for the protection of life."

Citigroup declined to respond to Salon's request for comment.


Yelp's political contributions similarly fly in the face of its recent stance on abortion, despite the company's reported "progressive" workplace.

Since 2014, Yelp has contributed at least $71,600 to both state and federal Republicans across the country, donating thousands to anti-abortion lawmakers like U.S. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah ($5,400), Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry ($5,000), Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes ($8,000), and former U.S. Rep. Randolph Farenthold, R-Texas ($5,500). The company has also donated to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, whose current chair, Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., rolled back abortion protections as the governor of Florida in 2016, imposing heightened requirements on abortion clinics and prohibiting them from collecting taxpayer dollars.

Asked about these donations, a Yelp spokesperson told Salon that the company's "limited and bipartisan government relations effort is focused on advocating for antitrust policies that rein in Big Tech."

"We take action against abortion bans that violate women's individual freedoms in a number of ways, including evaluating our employee benefits, using our voice to call out these inequities, making sure that when people visit our platform they can find the trusted information they need about the services they are looking for, and donating to organizations that are fighting the legal battle against abortion bans, as well as those that provide reproductive health services and financial support to underserved women," they said.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

Needless to say, none of this is untrue – at least on paper. In 2019, for example, Yelp signed the "Don't Ban Equality" letter condemning S.B. 8. And last year, it began double-matching employee donations to organizations that are pushing back against the measure. But still, these kinds of gestures are incredibly misaligned with the company's political contributions, said Jennifer Stark, Senior Director of Corporate Strategy at the Tara Health Foundation.


"Companies need to align their political giving with [their rhetoric and benefits policies] so that women and people of color and LGBTQ+ community are no longer the collateral damage of corporate political giving," Stark told Salon in an interview. "You can't really 'op-ed' or 'statement' your way out of where we're at. It takes structural reform on multiple levels."


Even ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft, which profit disproportionately from users in Democratic-led cities, bear responsibility in fueling the GOP's war on reproductive rights.

Uber has spent at least $78,000 on state and federal Republicans over the span of eight years, including anti-abortion advocates such as Illinois state Rep. Jim Durkin ($7,500), former Illinois state Sen. Bill Brady ($7,500), Georgia state Sen. Steve Gooch ($5,000), and California state Rep. Janet Nguyen ($4,900). The company has also given $100,000 to the Florida Republican Senate Campaign Committee, whose beneficiaries in the legislature recently passed a ban on abortion after fifteen weeks into pregnancy.

Uber did not respond to Salon's request for comment.

Lyft has followed a similar pattern, donating at least $175,614 to state and federal Republicans over the past eight years. Among its most notable beneficiaries are Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp ($3,000), who signed a "fetal heartbeat" bill in 2019, former Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens ($2,500), who in 2017 signficantly curtailed the state's access to abortion options; Gerogia Senate President Pro Tempore Butch Miller ($2,000), who is angling to pass a state measure along the lines of S.B.8; and Tennessee state Rep. Glen Casada ($2,000), who has consistently fought for a total ban on the abortion.

Likewise, Lyft has donated $101,100 to various GOP groups, like the Florida Republican Party ($30,000), the Texas Republican Legislative Caucus ($20,000), and the Senate Republican Caucus of Tennessee ($5,500).

Asked about these donations, a Lyft spokesperson told Salon that the company "could not be clearer about our stance on this issue."

"We believe women should be able to exercise their right to choose and have access to the healthcare they want and need," they added. "We are committed to providing support for the drivers on our platform which is why we created a Driver Legal Defense Fund to cover 100% of legal fees for drivers sued while driving on our platform."

While abortion may be the latest issue in which Corporate America has found itself torn between good business and bad politics, it's certainly not the only one.

Last year, Popular Information reported that 25 major U.S. corporations who advertised their support of Pride month donated over $10 million to lawmakers who have fought to curtail LGBTQ+ rights.

And while big companies like Amazon, Starbucks, and Microsoft issued commitments to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, many continue to sit on and donate to police foundations, which allow police departments secretly green-light off-the-books expenditures for initiatives that disproportionately harm people of color.

Most notably, after the Capitol riot, much of big business announced that it would halt donations to any lawmakers who objected to the 2020 presidential election. Two years later, dozens of companies have completely reneged on this pledge, donating nearly $5 million to insurrectionist political groups and members of the Sedition Caucus, according to the government watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).


"We've only seen a handful of companies stick to their commitments to quit giving to folks that wouldn't certify the election," Stark said. "We want corporate America, who will continue to give to both sides for as long as it's in their interest … to demand candidates that are less extreme, to demand a better quality of moderate. I think that is what we can and should hope for.
ECOCIDE
Ship carrying 750 tons of fuel sinks off Tunisia's southeast coast

Agence France-Presse
April 16, 2022

The ship started taking on water seven kilometers off the Gulf of Gabes in southeast Tunisia, not far from the beaches on the island of Djerba. 
Photo taken on July 9, 2011. © Paul Schemm, AP

A tanker carrying 750 tonnes of diesel fuel from Egypt to Malta sank Saturday in the Gulf of Gabes off Tunisia's southeast coast, sparking a rush to avoid a spill.

"The ship sank this morning in Tunisian territorial waters. For the moment, there is no leak," local court spokesman Mohamed Karray said.

A disaster prevention committee would meet in the coming hours "to decide on the measures to be taken", he added.

The Equatorial Guinea-flagged Xelo was headed from the Egyptian port of Damietta to the European island of Malta when it requested entry to Tunisian waters on Friday evening due to bad weather.

The tanker is 58 meters (63 yards) long and nine meters wide, according to ship monitoring website vesseltracker.com.

It began taking water around seven kilometers (over four miles) offshore in the Gulf of Gabes and the engine room was engulfed, according to a Tunisian environment ministry statement.

It said Tunisian authorities evacuated the seven-member crew.

Environment Minister Leila Chikhaoui was traveling to Gabes "to evaluate the situation... and to take necessary preventive decisions in coordination with the regional authorities", a ministry statement said.

Authorities have activated "the national emergency plan for the prevention of marine pollution with the aim of bringing the situation under control and avoiding the spread of pollutants".

Court spokesman Karray said the Georgian captain, four Turks and two Azerbaijanis were briefly hospitalized for checks and were now in a hotel.

The defense, interior, transport and customs ministries were working to avoid "a marine environmental disaster in the region and limit its impact", the environment ministry said.

Before the ship sank, the ministry had described the situation as "alarming" but "under control".

The Gulf of Gabes was traditionally a fishing area but activists say it has suffered from pollution due to phosphate processing industries based near the city of Gabes.

The last maritime accident involving the country was in October 2018, when Tunisian freighter Ulysse slammed into the Cyprus-based Virginia anchored about 30 kilometers (20 miles) off the northern tip of the French island of Corsica, sending hundreds of tonnes of fuel spilling into the Mediterranean.

It took several days of maritime maneuvers to disentangle the boats and pump some 520 cubic meters of propulsion fuel, which had escaped tanks.
Al Jazeera investigation ‘Myanmar’s State of Fear’ wins top award

Collaboration between 101 East and AJ Labs amongst top jury picks at prestigious data journalism award.


Published On 15 Apr 2022

Al Jazeera’s digital interactive investigation, This is Myanmar’s State of Fear, has been recognised at the prestigious Sigma Awards 2022.

Honouring the very best of data journalism worldwide, This is Myanmar’s State of Fear, was one of just 12 winners chosen by the Sigma Awards panel of judges from a pool of more than 600 entries from 86 organisations in 28 countries.

A collaboration between Al Jazeera English’s investigative documentary team, 101 East, and Al Jazeera’s digital unit, AJ Labs, the digital interactive investigation exposed cases of alleged torture, mysterious deaths, disappearances, and detention without charge in the months following the military coup in Myanmar in February 2021.

As a forensic, data-driven investigative project, the State of Fear digital interactive drew upon testimonies by those detained by the military, field reportage, and satellite technology to reveal the full extent of the violence forced on the civilian population by the military. The project also utilised data from Myanmar’s Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (AAPP).

In the making of State of Fear, Al Jazeera’s 101 East investigative documentary team uncovered a secret facility in a military compound on the outskirts of Myanmar’s largest city, Yangon. Working with the University of London’s Forensic Architecture team, Al Jazeera was able to first locate and then digitally recreate the compound, which was allegedly used for the interrogation and abuse of prisoners.

Sigma Awards Managing Director Simon Rogers said the competition continues to be the global standard for data journalism.

“I was incredibly impressed by the quality of work we saw this year,” Rogers said.

“To be coming through a pandemic and seeing data journalism around the world play such a powerful global role is really inspiring,” he said.

Al Jazeera’s 101 East reporter Ali Fowle thanked Sigma for the award and congratulated the extraordinary team effort that State of Fear involved.

“It is vitally important to shed light on the dire situation in Myanmar,” Fowle said.

“This data-driven project combined investigative reporting and impactful production to document the six months following the military coup on February 1, 2021. It is a lasting digital resource for online audiences,” she said.

101 East’s Senior Supervising Producer Nick Olle said the award was pleasing in light of Al Jazeera English’s commitment to journalistic collaboration.

“At 101 East, we’re keen to deliver more than just video documentary content and it was great to work with AJ Labs and the University of London’s Forensic Architecture team on this creative data-driven project,” he said.

Supported by the Google News Initiative, the Sigma Awards celebrate the very best data journalism from around the world.

Winners for 2022 can be found in the Sigma Awards winners gallery on Facebook.





SOURCE: AL JAZEERA

The banned weapon Russia (and the US) won’t give up

Why war crime investigators are looking for cluster bombs in Ukraine.

In Ukraine, human rights investigators like Amnesty International and Bellingcat have been tracking Russian attacks to aid in a potential war crimes investigation. One thing they’re paying special attention to is cluster bombs. Cluster bombs were first used in World War II, and scatter numerous smaller bombs over a wide area — often killing civilians. It’s this indiscriminate nature that often makes their use a war crime.

Our modern conception of war crimes was established by a series of treaties whose creation spanned decades. In 1977, one of those treaties banned what’s known as “indiscriminate attacks.” That means militaries are legally prohibited from attacking an area imprecisely, in a way that can harm civilians.

Russia is not alone in using these weapons: In conflicts since the 1977 treaty, many militaries continue using them in civilian areas, with impunity, including the US. This video explains how they’re being used by Russia, and why places like the US and Russia just won’t give them up.

This video is part of our ongoing, broader coverage of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. For more videos that provide historical context to the headlines in the news today, watch our playlist here.

The Hoplite



Russian POM-3 anti-personnel landmines documented in Ukraine (2022)
Mick F. & N.R. Jenzen-Jones
ARES

On the 28 March 2022, a pro-Ukrainian Facebook account posted several pictures of Protivopekhotnaya Oskolochnaya Mina 3 (противопехотная осколочная мина; ПОМ-3; POM-3) scatterable anti-personnel (AP) landmines and one КБ ПОМ-3 (KB POM-3) cassette—each holding four POM-3 mines—apparently taken in Kharkiv Oblast, in the east of Ukraine (bordering the Russian Federation). These images show markings which indicate that the KB POM-3 was produced in 2021, implying that the mines were likely also produced very recently (see Figure 1). Unlike display examples photographed in 2019, marked “КПОМ-3”, the cassette recovered in Ukraine is marked “КБ ПОМ-3”, possibly standing for кассета блок противопехотная осколочная мина (Kasetta Blok Protivopekhotnaya Oskolochnaya Mina 3; ‘cassette block POM-3’), instead of simply ‘cassette POM-3’

.
Figure 1 Four POM-3 AP mines and one KB POM-3 cassette, recorded in Kharkiv Oblast, Ukraine (source: ARES CONMAT Database via Олександр Мар’яш).

The POM-3 was unveiled in 2015 as the successor to the Soviet POM-2 series of scatterable AP mines. The POM-3 (sometimes referred to as the ‘Медальон’, or ‘Medallion’) is manufactured by JSC NPK Tekhmash, and uses a seismic proximity fuze—the seismic sensor embedded into the ground upon contact—to detect human footsteps, collecting data on vibrations proximate to the mine and comparing this data with seismic signatures in the munition’s onboard catalogue. If the vibrations are similar enough to the correct seismic signatures in the landmine’s memory, and have sufficient and increasing amplitude (indicating movement towards the mine), the munition is triggered. After the mine is triggered, an expelling charge detonates, projecting the warhead to approximately 1–1.5m above ground level, at which point the warhead detonates. This ‘bounding’ action maximises the lethality of the munition, project fragmentation at a height more likely to strike vital organs in a target’s body. The POM-3 is has a fragmenting body consisting of numerous ‘toothed’ rings that are stacked in a slightly offset manner to produce the mine‘s partially pre-formed fragmentation effect (see Figure 2). A parachute orients the mine after it is deployed from its cassette.

Figure 2 The fragmenting body of the POM-3 scatterable AP mine and a visualisation of its general fragmentation patter (source: TV Zvezda).

The mine is purportedly equipped with artificial intelligence (AI) that can recognise friendly soldiers, thus minimising the risk of collateral damage. This claim has not been established by independent sources. Additionally, the landmine can be armed for a variable period; after this it disarms itself. Claims that the mine can differentiate between soldier and civilian seem implausible given what has been made public about the mine’s sensors. It is possible that a magnetic influence sensor may be present or have been intended for future development. Deliveries of POM-3 AP mines to the Russian military started in early 2019
.
Figure 3 A POM-3 scatterable AP mine, recorded in Kharkiv Oblast, Ukraine
 (source: ARES CONMAT Database via Олександр Мар’яш).

The POM-3 is deployed by the ‘remote mining engineering system’ (инженерная система дистанционного минирования; Inzhenernaya Sistema Distantsionnogo Minirovaniya; ISDM) Zemledeliye (Земледелие; ‘Agriculture’), built by NPO Splav around a KamAZ-6560 8 × 8 vehicle. The ISDM first debuted at the Moscow Victory Day Parade in May 2020, and began to be issued to Russian troops toward the end of that year. The Zemledeliye minelaying system fires four-metre-long, 140 mm over-calibre rockets (with 122 mm rocket engines), each carrying an undisclosed number of KB POM-3 cassettes. Given the estimated overall length of the KB POM-3 as between 450 and 500 mm, it is estimated that each four-metre-long KIB rocket can carry 3 KB POM-3 cassettes, for a total of 12 POM-3 landmines per rocket.

Each Zemledeliye minelaying vehicle carries two blocks of 25 launch tubes, for a maximum total of 50 rockets dispersing an estimated total of 600 POM-3 landmines. Each block of 25 launch tubes, called a ‘transport and launch container’ (Транспортно-пусковые контейнеры; Transportno-puskovyye konteynery; TPK) weighs 3.8 tons, and can be transported and loaded separately. The Zemledeliye system is able to deploy a minefield at a distance of 5 to 15 km. According to Russian state sources, the vehicle’s sensors automatically creates a digital map of the minefield after it has been laid. The weapon has now been deployed in the area of Kharkiv City (Kharkiv Oblast) during the recent Russian invasion of Ukraine. At least two vehicles were documented firing their rockets at an unknown target. One video shows full salvos of 50 rockets being fired from two vehicles. 

Figure 4 A Zemledeliye ‘ISDM’ minelaying vehicle pictured in 2020
 (source: Vitaly V. Kuzmin).

JSC NPK Tekhmash has also designed the POM-4, which is a scatterable anti-tank (AT) landmine, and was reportedly working on a multipurpose (anti-tank and anti-personnel) landmine designated POM-5, which likely finished development in late 2020.
Technical Specifications

POM-3 scatterable anti-personnel landmine
Height: 200 mm
Diameter: 60–70 mm
Weight: 1.3 kg
Fragmentation: ~1,850 fragments
Effective range: 8–13 m (depending on if protective equipment is worn)
Shelf life: 11 years
Number of POM-3 mines in KB POM-3 cassette: 4

Figure 5 POM-3 scatterable AP mine (centre-right) and KPOM-3 cassette (rear-right) on display at the International Military-Technical Forum ‘ARMY-2019’ (source: soyuzmash.ru).

KIB rockets*
Diameter: 140 mm (122 mm rocket motor)
Overall length: 4,000 mm
Weight: 100 kg

*Russian army designation unknown at this time

Figure 6 KIB rockets fired by the Zemledeliye minelaying vehicle (source: Rostec).

Special thanks to Charlie Randall and Ivan Kochin.
Sources

ARES (Armament Research Services). n.d. Conflict Materiel (CONMAT) Database. Confidential. Perth: ARES.

Drozdenko, Dmitry. 2017. Проклятие вражеской пехоты: чем страшна мина ПОМ-3 [‘The curse of the enemy infantry: what is the terrible POM-3 mine?’]. Zvezda. 26 September. <https://tvzvezda.ru/news/201709260758-b9rq.htm>.

Gurov, S.V. 2021. Опытная инженерная система дистанционного минирования “Земледелие” [‘Experimental engineering system for remote mining “Agriculture”’]. Ракетная Техника. 21 May. <https://missilery.info/missile/isdm>.

Gurov, S.V. 2022. Иностранное СМИ о боевом дебюте инженерной системы дистанционного минирования “Земледелие” в ходе специальной военной операции ВС РФ [‘Foreign media about the combat debut of the “Agriculture” remote mining engineering system during a special military operation of the RF Armed Forces’]. Ракетная Техника. 30 March. <https://missilery.info/missile/isdm>.

Kirill, Ryabov. 2022. Противопехотная мина ПОМ-3. Современное оружие для современной войны [‘Anti-personnel mine POM-3. Modern weapons for modern warfare’]. Военное Обозрение. 2 April. <https://topwar.ru/194251-protivopehotnaja-mina-pom-3-sovremennoe-oruzhie-dlja-sovremennoj-vojny.html>.

Rostec. 2020. Ростех начал поставки машин дистанционного минирования «Земледелие» в войска [‘Rostec began deliveries of “Agriculture” machines for remote mining to the troops’]. 24 December. <rostec.ru/news/rostekh-nachal-postavki-mashin-distantsionnogo-minirovaniya-zemledelie-v-voyska/?sphrase_id=4835768>.

Rostec. 2021. Ростех показал на «Армии-2021» боевые возможности новейших систем ТОС-2 и ИСДМ [‘Rostec showed combat capabilities of the latest TOS-2 and ISDM systems at Army-2021’]. 23 August. <https://www.rostec.ru/news/rostekh-pokazal-na-armii-2021-boevye-vozmozhnosti-noveyshikh-sistem-tos-2-i-isdm/?sphrase_id=4835768>.

TASS. 2019. В России до конца 2020 года создадут многоцелевые мины нового поколения [‘In Russia, by the end of 2020, a new generation of multi-purpose mines will be developed’]. 15 December. <https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/7352759>.

Union of Machine Builders of Russia. 2019. ‘«Армия-2019»: «Умные» мины от концерна «Техмаш»’. <https://soyuzmash.ru/news/companies-news/armiya-2019-umnye-miny-ot-kontserna-tekhmash/>.

Voyennoye Obozreniye. Применение новейшей системы дистанционного минирования «Земледелие» под Харьковом показали на видео [‘The use of the latest remote mining system “Agriculture” near Kharkov was shown on video’]. Военное Обозрение. 27 March. <https://topwar.ru/194033-primenenie-novejshej-sistemy-distancionnogo-minirovanija-zemledelie-pod-harkovom-pokazali-na-video.html>.

World War III. 2015. Противопехотная мина “Медальон” ПОМ-3 – новинка ВПК России [‘Anti-personnel mine “Medallion” POM-3 – a novelty of the military-industrial complex of Russia’]. 12 November. <http://www.3world-war.su/vooruzhenie/vooruzhenie-rossii/1168-protivopehotnaja-mina-medalon-pom-3-novinka-opk.html>.

Remember, all arms and munitions are dangerous. Treat all firearms as if they are loaded, and all munitions as if they are live, until you have personally confirmed otherwise. If you do not have specialist knowledge, never assume that arms or munitions are safe to handle until they have been inspected by a subject matter specialist. You should not approach, handle, move, operate, or modify arms and munitions unless explicitly trained to do so. If you encounter any unexploded ordnance (UXO) or explosive remnants of war (ERW), always remember the ‘ARMS’ acronym:

AVOID the area
RECORD all relevant information
MARK the area from a safe distance to warn others
SEEK assistance from the relevant authorities

UK Rwanda asylum plan against international law, says UN refugee agency

By Doug Faulkner & Joseph Lee
BBC News


IMAGE SOURCE,PA MEDIA

Plans to send some asylum seekers from the UK to Rwanda are a breach of international law, the UN's refugee agency has said.

The UNHCR said attempting to "shift responsibility" for claims of refugee status was "unacceptable".

Boris Johnson has said he believes the scheme complies with international law.

Meanwhile, it has emerged that Priti Patel issued a "ministerial direction" to launch the policy amid concerns from Home Office civil servants.

Civil servants could not precisely quantify the benefits of the policy and uncertainty about the costs meant the home secretary had to take personal responsibility for it by issuing the direction.

A source close to Ms Patel said that "deterring illegal entry would create significant savings" and the fact that the savings could not be quantified precisely should not prevent action from being taken.

Ministerial directions have been used 46 times since the 2010 election, with two in the Home Office since 1990, according to the Institute for Government think tank.

The only other time the formal order was used by the Home Office was in 2019 by the former home secretary Sajid Javid, to bring in the Windrush Compensation Scheme before legislation was in place.

Under the £120m scheme, people deemed to have entered the UK unlawfully since 1 January could be flown to Rwanda, where they will be allowed to apply for the right to settle in the east African country.

The government said the first flights could begin within weeks, initially focusing on single men who crossed the Channel in small boats or lorries.

More than 160 charities and campaign groups have urged the government to scrap the plan, while opposition parties and some Conservatives have also criticised the policy.

Gillian Triggs, an assistant secretary-general at the UNHCR, told BBC Radio 4's the World At One programme the agency strongly condemned "outsourcing" the responsibility of considering refugee status to another country.

A former president of the Australian Human Rights Commission, she said such policies - as used in Australia - could be effective as a deterrent but there were "much more legally effective ways of achieving the same outcome".

Australia has used offshore detention centres since 2001, with thousands of asylum seekers being transferred out of the country since then.

It has been frequently criticised by the UN and rights groups over substandard conditions at its centres and its own projections show it will spend $811.8m (£460m) on offshore processing in 2021-22.

Ms Triggs pointed out Israel had attempted to send Eritrean and Sudanese refugees to Rwanda, but they "simply left the country and started the process all over again".

"In other words, it is not actually a long-term deterrent," she said.

Shadow justice minister Ellie Reeves called the policy "unworkable" and said if Labour was in charge, it would make it illegal to advertise people smuggling on social media and work more closely with France and others to tackle trafficking gangs.

line

Just another risk to factor in

By Jessica Parker, at a camp in Dunkirk, northern France

No-one we initially spoke to yesterday seemed to know about the Rwanda announcement - but it wasn't long before word spread.

Soon a group of men was asking us lots of questions: "When will this happen? Why? If I come from Afghanistan will it still apply to me?"

Shafi, who told me he had fled Afghanistan, said: "[Rwanda] is a lot worse place than Afghanistan, there is no future for us in Rwanda."

But I didn't meet anyone who said the government's plans would prevent them from trying to cross the Channel, including Shafi, who said he had no choice.

Many of these men have already faced huge risks to get this far and are willing to risk their lives crossing the Channel on a small boat.

The risk of being sent to Rwanda, at this stage, seemed like just another thing to factor in down the line.

line

A number of lawyers have warned the plan will face legal obstacles, such as the international human rights principle of "non-refoulement" - which guarantees no one can be returned to a country where they would face irreparable harm.

Last year, the UK government raised concerns at the UN about allegations of "extrajudicial killings, deaths in custody, enforced disappearances and torture" in Rwanda, as well as restrictions to civil and political rights.

But justice and migration minister Tom Pursglove said Rwanda was a progressive country that wanted to provide sanctuary and had made "huge strides forward" in the past three decades.

And a Home Office spokesperson added: "Rwanda will process claims in accordance with the UN Refugee Convention, national and international human rights laws, and will ensure their protection from inhuman and degrading treatment or being returned to the place they originally fled. There is nothing in the UN Refugee Convention which prevents removal to a safe country."

Ms Patel said the British public had been "crying out for change for years" and it was "incredibly unfair to the British public to see organisations in their own country effectively just putting blockages after blockages in the way".

The announcement came as part of a broader strategy to reduce the number of people entering the UK by crossing the Channel in small boats.

The Royal Navy has taken operational command of the Channel from UK Border Force in an effort to detect every boat headed to the UK.

Some 562 people on 14 boats made the journey on the day the new scheme was announced, according to the Ministry of Defence. No-one making the crossing was believed to have arrived on UK soil "on their own terms", it added.

Last year, 28,526 people made the crossing, up from 8,404 in 2020.




 

Mustafa Barghouti speaks to MEE from al-Aqsa complex hours after Israeli raid
Mohamed Hashem
UK
Tory MP convicted of sexual assault ‘bullied staff’ for years


Multiple former members of Imran Ahmad Khan’s staff questioned the Conservative Party’s vetting process for MPs.


British MP Imran Ahmad Khan | Neil Hall/AFP via Getty Images

BY ESTHER WEBBER
POLITICO.UK
April 15, 2022 

A Conservative MP convicted of sexual assault this week had a history of “bullying behavior” toward staff and “should never have been selected to stand for parliament,” according to multiple former members of staff and party colleagues who claim to have had long-standing concerns about Imran Ahmad Khan’s behavior.

The case puts further pressure on the Conservative Party over its vetting process for MPs and how it handles complaints by staff, following recent reports about another Tory MP in the Sunday Times.

On Monday, Khan was found guilty of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old in 2008, a verdict he has said he will appeal. He initially vowed to remain an MP while he fights the conviction, but resigned Thursday after being contacted regarding bullying allegations.

Two former staff members said that Khan would frequently scream and shout at his employees, leaving them distressed. A recording of one rant in which he berated his team for almost two hours was shared with POLITICO.

One assistant was signed off sick after bullying, according to colleagues, and left politics as a result. Another member of staff said their treatment resulted in panic attacks and the use of anti-anxiety medication.

Khan employed several young men who had recently graduated and whom he could “intimidate,” two ex-staffers and a party official said, while he was “misogynistic” in his behavior towards women. Parliamentary records show he had a high turnover of staff, with workers rarely lasting more than a few months.

After Khan was charged with sexual assault, he discussed details of the case with his office. A recording of that conversation was shared with POLITICO. Khan dismissed the victim as politically motivated and members of the justice system as “biased.” He suggested inviting a documentary crew to follow him round in order to release a film when he had cleared his name.

Ex-colleagues also spoke of inappropriate office management. Khan rented a large three-bedroom house in Wakefield as his constituency office, paying extra on top of the taxpayer-funded allowance, and used it to store personal belongings including beds and other furniture while aides were “crammed” together in one room unable to socially distance. He attempted to rent out rooms in the Wakefield property, offering them to his staff.

The local party was aware of his behavior but was itself paralyzed by infighting, members said. Khan was selected to fight the seat of Wakefield in Yorkshire at the last minute after the previous candidate was deselected because of offensive social media posts. He was elected to parliament in 2019.

A party member who worked with Khan raised concerns about his conduct to her employer after he repeatedly shouted at her, and the employer complained to the Conservative Party headquarters in March 2021, according to two people familiar with the case. The complainant said they received assurances the matter had been dealt with internally.

A party official said they had no record of the complaint, and stressed that vetting processes had been reviewed since 2019.

Staff who say they were bullied by Khan called for an inquiry into how he was selected in the first place and his behavior not picked up, as well as safeguards to prevent anything similar happening again. Conservative Party Campaign Headquarters declined to comment.

“It’s hard not to conclude there’s something seriously wrong with the vetting process,” said one former staffer. “He should never have been selected.”

Khan had the Conservative whip withdrawn after he was charged, meaning he was kicked out of the party in Westminster and could only stay in the House of Commons as an independent MP, and was fully expelled from the party after being found guilty. He declined to comment on any of the allegations his former colleagues raised with POLITICO.
U.S. Seafood Imports Helping Fuel Russian War Machine

By Associated Press
April 15, 2022

Despite a U.S. ban on seafood imports from Russia, it is still finding its way in by way of China.

A U.S. ban on seafood imports from Russia over its invasion of Ukraine was supposed to sap billions of dollars from Vladimir Putin’s war machine.

But shortcomings in import regulations mean that Russian-caught pollock, salmon and crab are likely to enter the U.S. anyway, by way of the country vital to seafood supply chains across the world: China.

Like the U.S. seafood industry, Russian companies rely heavily on China to process their catch. Once there, the seafood can be re-exported to the U.S. as a “product of China” because country of origin labeling isn’t required.

The result is that nearly a third of the wild-caught fish imported from China is estimated to have been caught in Russian waters, according to an International Trade Commission study of 2019 data. For pollock and sockeye salmon, the rate is even higher — 50% to 75%.

“China doesn’t catch cod. They don’t catch pollock. But yet, they’re one of the largest exporters of these whitefish in the world,” said Sally Yozell, a former policy director at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration who now is a senior fellow at the Stimson Center in Washington. “Having it labeled as a Chinese product is really not fair to the consumers and to restaurants.”

Fishing is big business in Russia, one closely linked to the Kremlin and Putin’s projection of power at sea. The country is the one of the world's top seafood producers and was the eighth-largest exporter to the U.S. last year, with more than $1.2 billion worth of sales, the bulk of it king crab.

But it’s unknown exactly how much manages to land in the U.S. by way of China, which sent another $1.7 billion in fish to the U.S. last year. Nor does the Biden administration’s ban require companies importing from China to find out.

Among Russia’s biggest seafood exports is Alaska pollock. A cousin of cod, Alaska pollock is the most harvested fish in the U.S., showing up in everything from imitation crabmeat to McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish. Every year, giant, floating factories in the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska catch 1.5 million metric tons of the fish.

But the same species is also harvested in Russia in similar amounts, and once processed and imported from China, fills an important gap in the U.S. market. In lieu of tracing the country of origin, U.S. producers rely on the name recognition of Alaska pollock to signal where the fish was caught.

Even before the invasion of Ukraine, pressure had been building to prevent what Sen. Dan Sullivan, a Republican of Alaska, called “authoritarian” pollock from entering the U.S. Putin banned U.S. seafood in 2014 following American sanctions to punish him for the invasion of Crimea that year. Since then Russian exports entering the U.S. duty free have nearly quadrupled in value.

While overshadowed by Russia’s role as an energy powerhouse, Russia’s seafood industry has increasingly been flexing its own muscle with strong support from the Kremlin.

At a congressional hearing this month on the Russian seafood ban, Rep. Jared Huffman, a California Democrat, led calls for the expansion of NOAA’s Seafood Import Monitoring Program, which aims to prevent illegal seafood from entering U.S. supply chains by tracking shipments from the point of catch. Currently the program covers just 13 species, only two of which — red king crab and Atlantic cod — are fished by Russia.

Additional reporting by The Associated Press.