Thursday, August 25, 2022

Scientists find ancient forest hidden in newly discovered 192-metre-deep sinkhole in southern China

The sinkhole contained trees that were 40 metres tall and thick “shoulder-height” vegetation

It was discovered using satellite imagery and explored in early May in an expedition



Kevin McSpadden
25 May, 2022

Sinkholes are common phenomenons in China’s karst landscapes. Photo: CGTN

It is not every day that scientists stumble on to a beautifully preserved ancient forest nestled deep inside a sinkhole the size of a large residential complex.

Such a discovery was made in a stunning karst mountain range in Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region in south China when a team of explorers entered the 192-metre-deep sinkhole on May 6 and found a forest that featured trees that were almost 40-metre tall.

The sinkhole also featured other plants that were “shoulder-height”, said Chen Lixin, the leader of the expedition team, in an interview with Xinhua, China’s state-owned wire service. Videos of the exploration reveal a dense plush forest.

Chen added that he would not be surprised if undiscovered plant and wildlife species lived in the sinkhole.

The large sinkhole featured a beautiful forest that had been untouched by human activity.
 Photo: CGTN

Besides being deep, the sinkhole is 306 metres long and 150 metres wide, meaning it qualifies as a large sinkhole.

The scientists said the forest was “a well-preserved” ancient woodland, which means it had probably never been disturbed by human activity. These types of woodlands, also called primitive forests, can be ecological jewels because they showcase an ecosystem devoid of human interference.


Sinkholes, also known as dolines, are created by the above-ground surface collapsing upon itself because of erosion caused by rainwater and groundwater seeping through the cracks in dissolvable rocks like limestone. They are a common feature of karst topography.

In Leye county, where the giant sinkhole was found, there are 29 other similar sinkholes in the nearby area.

This sinkhole took the expedition crew an entire day to explore because they had to abseil about 100 metres down the side of the hole before trekking for several hours through thick vegetation to reach the bottom.

Zhang Yuanhai, a senior engineer with the Institute of Karst Geology of China Geological Survey, told Xinhua that there are three large caves along the sinkhole walls, which he said were likely the scars left from geological degradations that led to the collapse.

He said the sinkhole was found by his friend, surnamed Wu, who used satellite imagery to pinpoint the likely location of the geological phenomenon.

Zhang said he went to the area to confirm Wu’s hypothesis that the area contained a sinkhole and then organised a more official expedition to explore it properly.

He said that it had been “six or seven years” since the last sinkhole was discovered in the area.

Large sinkhole discovered in southern China, the 30th of its kind in the same county

China is home to the world’s deepest sinkhole, Xiaozhai Tiankeng, which measures 662 metres deep and was caused by a massive underground river that still flows below the natural wonder.

Much like the new-discovered sinkhole, it features a full-scale ecosystem, including a stunning cave connected to an underground river found in 2017 by a team based in Hong Kong.

The term tiankeng means “heavenly pit” in Chinese.

According to Nasa, 13 per cent of East and Southeast Asia is karst topography. China’s landscapes are particularly spectacular, with places like the Guilin countryside in Guangxi and The Swords at the Stone Forest in Yunnan province attracting tourists from all over the world.

In the Bahamas, Dean’s Blue Hole is another sinkhole famous for its natural environment, except that it formed in the ocean and is home to a large population of tropical fish, making it one of the world’s top destinations for snorkelling and scuba diving.

Did Pelosi Say the President Does Not Have ‘the Power for Debt Forgiveness’?

The House speaker also allegedly said that debt forgiveness “has to be an act of Congress.”

Madison Dapcevich
Published 25 August 2022
Image via Justin Sullivan/Getty Images


Claim
U.S. House Speaker Pelosi once said: “People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. He does not. He can postpone. He can delay. But he does not have that power. That has to be an act of Congress.”

Rating

Correct Attribution
About this rating


Fact Check

Shortly after U.S. President Joe Biden unveiled his plan for student loan forgiveness in August 2022, the right-leaning online publication National Review reported in an article published on Aug. 24 that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the president lacks the authority to forgive student debt.

During a weekly news conference held on July 28, 2021 (archived here), Pelosi was asked to explain why the Biden Administration and Democrats in Congress were pushing for student loan debt forgiveness and cancellation, she replied:

Here’s the thing. People think that the President of the United States – is this more on the subject than you ever want to know? Well, you’ll let me know. People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness. He does not. He can postpone. He can delay. But he does not have that power. That has to be an act of Congress. And I don’t even like to call it forgiveness because that implies a transgression. It’s not to be forgiven, just freeing people from those obligations.

So, the question of who gets forgiven – to use the term of art that is out there – is a debate. Do we use whatever money there is for the broadest base of support of the, those with – more people with even less debt, or fewer people with more debt? That’s a policy discussion.

But the difference between the President – the President can’t do it. So that’s not even a discussion. Not everybody realizes that. But the President can only postpone, delay, but not forgive.

Nevertheless, U.S. President Joe Biden announced that he would be using executive action to push forward a student loan forgiveness plan that allowed up to $20,000 in student debt cancellation for qualified borrowers, following up on promises made on the 2020 campaign trail. At the time of this writing, it’s not yet clear how exactly that forgiveness plan would work, and, as The Associated Press reported, it will likely face legal challenges in the months to come. The three-part plan has not officially been executed and specifics haven’t been released.

Because Pelosi did, in fact, state that the president does not “have the power for debt forgiveness,” we have rated this claim as a “Correct Attribution.”


Sources:


“Big Student Loan Forgiveness Plan Announced by Biden.” Snopes.Com, https://www.snopes.com/ap/2022/08/24/big-student-loan-forgiveness-plan-announced-by-biden/. Accessed 25 Aug. 2022.

“Flashback: Nancy Pelosi Said President Lacks Authority to ‘Forgive’ Student Debt.” National Review, 24 Aug. 2022, https://www.nationalreview.com/news/flashback-nancy-pelosi-says-president-lacks-authority-to-forgive-student-debt/

House, The White. “FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces Student Loan Relief for Borrowers Who Need It Most.” The White House, 24 Aug. 2022, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/08/24/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-student-loan-relief-for-borrowers-who-need-it-most/

Lieber, Ron, and Tara Siegel Bernard. “What You Need to Know About Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan.” The New York Times, 24 Aug. 2022. NYTimes.com, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/24/business/biden-student-loan-forgiveness.html

Minsky, Adam S. “Biden Announces Historic Student Loan Forgiveness Of Up To $20,000 And Extension Of Student Loan Pause: Key Details.” Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamminsky/2022/08/24/biden-announces-historic-student-loan-forgiveness-and-extension-of-student-loan-pause-key-details/. Accessed 25 Aug. 2022.

The Biden-Harris Administration’s Student Debt Relief Plan Explained. https://studentaid.gov/debt-relief-announcement/. Accessed 25 Aug. 2022.

“Transcript of Pelosi Weekly Press Conference Today.” Speaker Nancy Pelosi, 28 July 2021, https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/72821-2

Published 25 August 2022
U$A
Ask an Expert: How to Connect With Hesitant Voters

Ahead of the midterm elections, People Power volunteer Connie Jeung-Mills tells us how she motivates people to get to the polls and what fuels her activism.


Rotimi Adeoye,
he/him/his,
Communications Strategist, ACLU


August 25, 2022


With the election just around the corner, we are chatting with some of our great volunteers about what issues are most important to them, and how they motivate voters to cast their ballots. We hope these conversations inspire you to vote for your values and join us in this once-in-a-generation battle to protect our nation.

This election, join us by pledging to vote for your values, and fight for your rights by encouraging your friends and family to do the same.

This week we talked with Connie Jeung Mills, a California-based arts activist and team volunteer with the ACLU People Power text team. People Power is the ACLU’s platform for grassroots action. Our volunteer teams help mobilize and organize communities all across the country in defense of our civil liberties by making calls, sending texts, and connecting with prospective voters about the issues that matter most to them.

ACLU: What motivated you to get involved with the ACLU as a volunteer?

CJM: I’ve known about the ACLU since I was a kid and they’ve always done great work. I’ve worked with other voting rights organizations in the past, so I was very inspired to work with an organization that cared about the same issues important to me.


Activist Connie Jeung-Mills persuading people to vote in her community.


ACLU: What experiences have informed your activism?

CJM: I’ve voted my entire life, and my family has been involved in activism since I was young. An important part of my activism is the artwork I do. I remember watching television and seeing political activists at the D.C. Courthouse during the Trump administration holding signs with messages that were so powerful. And after that moment, a light bulb went off in my head, it was just the impetus for me to use my art and passion for activism to fight back.

ACLU: How do you explain to people why voting is important, and persuade them to take part in upcoming elections?

CJM: I find the best way to motivate people is to find out what motivates them. What issues motivate them to want to do something to help their community. And then I try to connect the dots between their passion for that issue and voting by explaining how the electoral process has a direct impact on their lives. Because when they’re voting, they’re voting for people that are going to represent them in government to bring about the change that they seek.

Being an activist and voter is not just one action for an election, it’s a lifelong effort.

ACLU: Sometimes people feel like their vote doesn’t matter, and are really discouraged by the current state of politics. What would you like to say to people who might opt not to vote because they feel powerless?

CJM: I would tell them that I understand how they feel. But especially right now, they can’t give up and change doesn’t come overnight. Although things seem tough right now, as we saw with the Supreme Court recently, too much is at stake in our country. Being an activist and voter is not just one action for an election, it’s a lifelong effort.

ACLU: Do you have any other advice for people who want to encourage people to get to the polls? What else do you want people to know about your experience?

CJM: The biggest piece of advice I could give people when talking to their friends and family about voting this November is it takes one person at a time and to always be authentic. People can tell when you talk to them if you are really listening to what they are saying to you. Also, I’m so happy to be volunteering for the ACLU. The ACLU stands up for me and I want to help them, help other people, not just me.

Interested in working with people like Julia to defend our rights? Find out more about how to get involved here

BECAUSE OF COURSE HE DID
Trump-Backed Republican Bragged About Committing Voter Fraud: Report

BY NICK MORDOWANEC ON 8/25/22 

Donald Trump-backed Republican candidate for Arizona attorney general allegedly advocated for voter fraud and supported former President Barack Obama in the past.

New reporting by the Phoenix New Times alleges that in 2007 Abraham Hamadeh admitted on online forums that he illegally voted at age 16 for then-Senator Barack Obama for president—in response to "Obama getting all of this crap simply cause hes black, he has an Arab name, hes the only senator who is black in the Senate, he is successful, and he is a Harvard Law graduate," one post read.

"No I cannot vote, I just submitted my mothers absentee ballot, she votes who I vote for, she voted for Ron Paul, and I'm saddened that I had to vote for Barack Obama, but it was the right thing I had to do," another post read.

It was one of reportedly 4,163 posts from Hamadeh on a message board called Ron Paul Forums, which focused on former congressman and three-time presidential candidate Ron Paul.

Hamadeh served 14 months in the U.S. Army Reserve and worked as prosecutor in the Maricopa County Attorney's Office. He is running on the issue of what he calls "election protection," to "rebuild the confidence of our elections by prosecuting election fraud to the fullest extent of the law."

The voter fraud allegations from Hamadeh's youth came after former President Trump endorsed Hamadeh partly due to his stance on elections fraud.

"Abraham Hamadeh is a fantastic candidate running for Arizona Attorney General," Trump said in his endorsement. "He is a veteran, a former prosecutor and, most importantly, he's tough and he's smart. Abe Hamadeh knows what happened in the 2020 Election, and will enforce voting laws so that our Elections are Free and Fair again."

Above, a voter places a ballot in a drop box outside of the Maricopa County Elections Department on August 2 in Phoenix. Arizona Republican attorney general candidate Abe Hamadeh allegedly committed voter fraud when he was a teen and has run as a Trump-endorsed candidate who has called out the results of the 2020 election.
JUSTIN SULLIVAN/GETTY IMAGES

Hamadeh has also been endorsed by other prominent Republicans, including Ron Paul's son, Senator Rand Paul; Richard Grenell, Trump's former acting director of national intelligence; Robert O'Brien, Trump's former national security adviser; and Kash Patel, former Department of Defense chief of staff under Trump.

Aside from calling former Republican presidential candidate and longtime Arizona political mainstay John McCain a "radical fascist," Hamadeh's posts also delved into antisemitism, according to the Phoenix New Times.

"If you think Jews arent big in america (2%) how come 56% of them are CEO'S ... Jews are influential and for the most part rich," one post reportedly said. "its good were targetting Arabs now, next will target Jews."

Erica Knight, a spokesperson for the Hamadeh campaign, did not provide a full-fledged denial regarding the posts in question but told the Phoenix New Times that Hamadeh's comments came at a time in his life when he aspired to be a professional wrestler.

"We are entering a new era of political opposition where candidates who have lived through their adolescent years on the internet are being judged and criticized based on comments they made well before their minds were even fully developed," Knight said.

 "It is now our responsibility to be careful where we draw the line."

Hamadeh tweeted on August 24 that "the media hates minority Republicans." Newsweek reached out to the Hamadeh campaign for comment.

Kris Mayes, Hamadeh's Democratic opponent this November, told Newsweek via phone on Thursday that Arizona "has among the best-run elections in this country" yet her opponent has continually attacked election officials and discussed decertifying the results of the 2020 election, which she said is indicative of a candidate "wildly out of step with the people of Arizona and frankly dangerous to democracy."

Hamadeh's website features interview clips in which he makes reference to the film 2,000 Mules, saying that it revealed "real criminal and fraudulent activity surrounding the 2020 election."

"It is incredibly hypocritical for Abe Hamadeh to have spent the last year undermining trust in our elections when it would appear that he himself engaged in voter fraud at one time," Mayes said. "This is just conduct unbecoming of a top law enforcement officer in the state of Arizona. We cannot have an attorney general who not only espoused antisemitic beliefs but also may have committed voter fraud.

"I think the voters of Arizona are going to reject someone who has these antisemitic views, and also appears to be a complete hypocrite on the issue of voter fraud," Mayes added.

Another Arizona election denier backed by Trump, Mark Finchem, won his secretary of state primary.

Trump's secret papers and the 'myth' of presidential security clearance
Devlin Barrett, Ellen Nakashima and Josh Dawsey
, Aug 26 2022

Prosecutors scrutinising former US president Donald Trump for possible mishandling of classified information will have to do so without a key legal and factual element that has long been a staple of such cases, according to intelligence experts.

That's because, unlike the vast majority of federal workers who access secret information, presidents are not made to sign paperwork on classified documents as part of their joining or leaving the government.

Typically, when a person gets access to restricted information, they are "read in" – a process that includes signing documents at the outset, in which they acknowledge the legal requirements to not share information on sensitive programmes with unauthorised people or keep classified documents in unauthorised places.

When they leave such jobs, they are "read out," again acknowledging in writing their legal responsibilities and declaring that they do not have any classified documents in their possession.


READ MORE:
* FBI seized 300 classified documents from Trump at Mar-a-Lago
* Trump seeks special master to review Mar-a-Lago documents
* Donald Trump's turbulent White House years culminate in Florida search


David Priess, a former CIA officer who is publisher of Lawfare, a national security website and podcast producer, said presidents are not read out of classified programmes when they leave office. That, he said, "is because presidents are not formally read in"

Said Priess: "There's a myth out there that presidents have a formal security clearance. They don't."


GERALD HERBERT/AP
Boxes that were moved out of the Eisenhower Executive Office building on the White House grounds on January 14, 2021, before President Donald Trump's departure from Washington.

The "commander in chief has the ability to classify or declassify documents," Priess said, by virtue of having been elected president by the American people.

"A former president might receive access to limited classified material after leaving office to assist with writing memoirs or at the discretion of the current president, but a formal security clearance isn't involved."

In past classified mishandling cases involving non-presidents, the formal paperwork of being read in and out of classified matters has been an important part of the investigation.

When former general and CIA director David Petraeus pleaded guilty in 2015 to a misdemeanour charge of mishandling classified information, for example, the court papers stated that he had repeatedly signed documents saying that he would not improperly share or keep classified material.

Petraeus signed at least 14 such nondisclosure agreements over the course of his career in the military and intelligence work, including a declaration in 2006 that he "shall return all materials that may have come into my possession or for which I am responsible because of such access, upon demand by an authorized representative of the United States Government or upon the conclusion of my employment or other relationship with the United States Government."


JULIA NIKHINSON/AP

The Trump investigation grew out of a dispute in which the National Archives repeatedly pressed the former president to provide material that was considered government property under the Presidential Records Act.

That same declaration says Petraeus understood that if he did not return such materials upon request, that could be a violation of the Espionage Act - the same section of the criminal code cited in the FBI's search warrant for Trump's Mar-a-Lago home earlier this month.

In 2012, as Petraeus left the CIA, he signed a document that declared, "I give my assurance that there is no classified material in my possession, custody, or control at this time". That document later became part of the case against him.

But Trump, like his predecessors, apparently did not sign such paperwork, which could have legal significance for how prosecutors view his case.

The Trump investigation grew out of a dispute in which the National Archives repeatedly pressed the former president to provide material that was considered government property under the Presidential Records Act.

Eventually, Trump advisers turned over 15 boxes of material, including, the agency said, more than 100 classified documents, some of them top-secret.

The return of those boxes from Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club in January set off alarm bells in the government that the former president or his aides had mishandled and kept significant amounts of sensitive national defence information.

But Trump's unique position as a former president means that the criminal investigation may, by necessity, end up more focused on what Trump did starting in May, when he received a grand jury subpoena for any remaining material bearing classified markings, rather than his actions regarding items handed over in January.

If Trump did not fully comply with the subpoena, experts said, he could face legal jeopardy regardless of whether he was read out of classified programmes when leaving office.

"It is yet another reason why criminally investigating and prosecuting a former president has complexities," said Brandon Van Grack, a lawyer in private practice who previously worked classified mishandling cases when he was a federal prosecutor.

"What it highlights is the criminal case is focused on what happened after May, not about what happened before then."


STEVE HELBER/AP

The return of those boxes from Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club set off alarm bells in the government that the former president or his aides had mishandled and kept significant amounts of sensitive national defence information.

A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment on how the apparent lack of a read-out or read in for Trump might affect prosecutors' legal analysis of the facts in the Trump case.

John Kelly, a onetime chief of staff to Trump who has said he disliked classification rules and distrusted intelligence officials, said government officials should have given the 45th president some kind of farewell debriefing about classified matters and documents when he left the White House.

"It would have been important to read him out because it would have been in some hopes that he would not violate all these rules on classified materials. The important message would have been, 'Once you're not the president any more, all the rules apply to you,'" said Kelly.

A Trump spokesman did not respond to a request for comment about whether the former president received any kind of exit briefing about classified material. Trump has criticised the FBI for raiding his home, and his defenders have claimed that he declassified the material he took with him before leaving office - though no evidence has been made public that he went through the process for doing that.

On Monday, Trump's lawyers filed court papers seeking to have a special master appointed to review the material seized in the August search - a curious request given that such appointments are generally done to handle matters of attorney-client privilege, not classified information, and the request didn't come until two weeks after the search, meaning law enforcement officials have already been reviewing the seized material for a significant period of time.

DAMON HIGGINS/PALM BEACH DAILY NEWS VIA AP

Donald Trump has criticised the FBI for raiding his home, and his defenders have claimed that he declassified the material he took with him before leaving office

A federal judge in Florida who received that request has asked Trump's legal team to clarify why they made it, giving the lawyers until Friday to respond.

Mishandling of national security evidence is not the only crime being investigated in the Mar-a-Lago probe, and Trump's unique status as a former president may not lesson his legal risk to the other two potential criminal charges listed on the search warrant: destruction of records and concealment or mutilation of government material.

Still, Ashley Deeks, a law professor at the University of Virginia who until recently was deputy legal adviser to the National Security Council, said the laws and practices regarding classified information places the president in a somewhat unique position.

"Because the president himself is the ultimate classifying authority, it makes sense that agencies do not formally read presidents in to classified programmes," Deeks said.

"In terms of former presidents, Congress itself has recognised in statute that former presidents would still have access to at least some of their records, though Congress also has made clear that former presidents do not own those records personally."


The Washington Post

Dominion Voting Systems deposes Carlson, Hannity in suit against Fox News

Dominion brought the $1.6 billion defamation suit after the outlet covered its role in the 2020 presidential election



By Ben Whedon
Updated: August 25, 2022 - 

Fox News anchors Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity will sit for depositions with attorneys representing Dominion Voting Systems as part of the firm's ongoing defamation suit against the cable outlet.

Carlson will face deposition on Friday, while Hannity and former host Lou Dobbs will answer questions from Dominion attorneys next week, according to the New York Times.

Dominion brought the $1.6 billion defamation suit after the outlet covered its role in the 2020 presidential election, suggesting that the company was complicit in voter fraud.

Lawyers for the company have asserted that Fox knowingly aired false coverage about its voting machines and “decided to promote former President Trump’s narrative after Trump’s condemnation of Fox damaged its stock and viewership,” The Hill reported. The network sought to dismiss the suit on First Amendment grounds but a judge allowed the case to move forward.

Dominion voting machines were the subject of intense scrutiny by the Trump campaign and its allies after the 2020 presidential election, with many groups alleging they produced inaccurate vote tallies and were susceptible to the malicious influence of outside code.
REI Workers At Berkeley Store Vote To Unionize In Another Win For Labor

They follow in the footsteps of REI workers in New York City who formed a union earlier this year.


By Dave Jamieson
Aug 25, 2022, 

REI employees in Berkeley, California, have formed the outdoor retailer’s second union, extending a winning streak for organized labor at largely non-union companies.


Workers at the Berkeley store voted 56 to 38 in favor of joining the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) union in a mail-in election this month, according to a vote count held Thursday by the National Labor Relations Board. Employees at REI’s store in the SoHo neighborhood of New York City were the first to unionize earlier this year.

The organizing success at REI follows other recent, notable labor victories at Amazon, Starbucks, Apple and Trader Joe’s, all of which have seen their workers unionize for the first time in recent months. Labor officials have reported a surge in election petitions this year as more workers try to come together to bargain collectively.

Bloomberg Law reported new data earlier this week showing that unions won 639 elections between January and June of this year, labor’s best showing for the first half of the year in almost two decades. However, union membership is still hovering near a historic low, with a mere one in ten workers belonging to a union last year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

REI, which is structured as a customer cooperative, has more than 170 stores around the country, many of them in liberal urban centers where union support would be high. Given the success of the first two campaigns, the company may well face organizing efforts at other stores in the near future.

REI's SoHo store in New York City was the first to unionize.
SPENCER PLATT VIA GETTY IMAGES

The workers in SoHo organized with the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, an affiliate of the UFCW, which will represent the workers in Berkeley. Both unions have a long history of representing workers in the retail, grocery and meatpacking industries.

Having won their elections, the SoHo and Berkeley workers now face the more daunting task of trying to bargain a first contract. It can take years for workers to secure a collective bargaining agreement after successfully unionizing, and some never manage to do so. Although they are separate unions, the two groups may coordinate their strategies and demands with the company at the bargaining table.

Most companies have been fighting these new organizing efforts, and REI has been no different, despite its progressive reputation. The company produced a widely mocked podcast earlier this year aimed at discouraging employees from unionizing (the episode began with Indigenous land acknowledgments by the speakers).

The Berkeley employees created a petition calling on the company to “stop the union-busting,” saying REI was using “textbook” tactics to “scare” them.

“They’ve told us our relationship with management will have to change, our existing benefits and retirement will go away, and a union representative will be required to attend our reviews,” the petition read. “They even told someone that they would need the union’s approval to go on vacation.”

Student Newspaper in Nebraska Shuttered After Expressing LGBTQ+ Solidarity

The staff of Northwest Public Schools’ 54-year-old Saga newspaper was informed on May 19 of the paper’s elimination.

CREDIT: AP PHOTO

GRAND ISLAND, Neb. (AP) — Administrators at a Nebraska school shuttered the school’s award-winning student newspaper just days after its last edition that included articles and editorials on LGBTQ issues, leading press freedom advocates to call the move an act of censorship.

The staff of Northwest Public Schools’ 54-year-old Saga newspaper was informed on May 19 of the paper’s elimination, the Grand Island Independent reported. Three days earlier, the newspaper had printed its June edition, which included an article titled, “Pride and prejudice: LGBTQIA+” on the origins of Pride Month and the history of homophobia. It also included an editorial opposing a Florida law that bans some lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity and dubbed by critics as“Don’t Say Gay.”

Officials overseeing the district, which is based in Grand Island, have not said when or why the decision was made to eliminate the student paper. But an email from a school employee to the Independent cancelling the student paper’s printing services on May 22 said it was “because the school board and superintendent are unhappy with the last issue’s editorial content.”

The paper's demise also came a month after its staff was reprimanded for publishing students' preferred pronouns and names. District officials told students they could only use names assigned at birth going forward.

Emma Smith, Saga’s assistant editor in 2022, said the student paper was informed that the ban on preferred names was made by the school board. That decision directly affected Saga staff writer Marcus Pennell, a transgender student, who saw his byline changed against his wishes to his birth name of “Meghan" Pennell in the June issue.
“It was the first time that the school had officially been, like, ‘We don’t really want you here,’” Pennell said. “You know, that was a big deal for me.”

Northwest Principal P.J. Smith referred the Independent's questions to district superintendent Jeff Edwards, who declined to answer the questions of when and why the student paper was eliminated, saying only that it was “an administrative decision.”
Some school board members have made no secret of their objection to the Saga's LGBTQ content, including board president Dan Leiser, who said “most people were upset" with it

Board vice president Zach Mader directly cited the pro-LGBTQ editorials, adding that if district taxpayer had read the last issue of the Saga, "they would have been like, ‘Holy cow. What is going on at our school?’”

“It sounds like a ham-fisted attempt to censor students and discriminate based on disagreement with perspectives and articles that were featured in the student newspaper,” said Sara Rips, an attorney for the Nebraska chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Nebraska Press Association attorney Max Kautsch, who specializes in media law in Nebraska and Kansas, noted that press freedom is protected in the U.S. Constitution.

“The decision by the administration to eliminate the student newspaper violates students’ right to free speech, unless the school can show a legitimate educational reason for removing the option to participate in a class … that publishes award-winning material,” Kautsch said. “It is hard to imagine what that legitimate reason could be."

---

VIA THE AP

Court: Arkansas can’t ban treatment of transgender kids

By ANDREW DeMILLO

FILE - Dylan Brandt speaks at a news conference outside the federal courthouse in Little Rock, Ark., on Wednesday, July 21, 2021. Brandt, 15, has been receiving hormone treatments and is among several transgender youth who challenged a state law banning gender confirming care for trans minors. A federal appeals court on Thursday, Aug. 25, 2022, said Arkansas can't enforce its ban on transgender children receiving gender affirming medical care. (AP Photo/Andrew DeMillo, File)


LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — A federal appeals court on Thursday said Arkansas can’t enforce its ban on transgender children receiving gender-affirming medical care.

A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a judge’s ruling temporarily blocking the state from enforcing the 2021 law. A trial is scheduled for October before the same judge on whether to permanently block the law.

Arkansas was the first state to enact such a ban, which prohibits doctors from providing gender-confirming hormone treatment, puberty blockers or surgery to anyone under 18 years old, or from referring them to other providers for the treatment. There are no doctors who perform gender-affirming surgery on minors in the state.

“Because the minor’s sex at birth determines whether or not the minor can receive certain types of medical care under the law, Act 626 discriminates on the basis of sex,” the court’s ruling Thursday said.

The American Civil Liberties Union challenged the law on behalf of four transgender youth and their families, as well as two doctors who provide gender-confirming treatments.

“The Eighth Circuit was abundantly clear that the state’s ban on care does not advance any important governmental interest and the state’s defense of the law is lacking in legal or evidentiary support,” Chase Strangio, deputy director for Transgender Justice at the ACLU’s LGBTQ & HIV Project, said in a statement. “The state has no business categorically singling out this care for prohibition.”

Arkansas argued that the restriction is within the state’s authority to regulate medical practices.

Republican Attorney General Leslie Rutledge will ask the full 8th Circuit Court of Appeals to review the ruling, said spokeswoman Amanda Priest, adding that Rutledge was “extremely disappointed in today’s dangerously wrong decision by the three-judge panel.”

The 8th Circuit covers Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska and the Dakotas. The ruling on Arkansas’ law comes after the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals that covers Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia ruled last week that gender dysphoria is covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act. Experts and advocates have said that decision could help block conservative political efforts to restrict access to gender-affirming care.

Republican Gov. Asa Hutchinson vetoed Arkansas’ ban last year, and GOP lawmakers overrode him. Pediatricians, social workers and the parents of transgender youth said the measure would harm a community already at risk for depression and suicide. Hutchinson said the law went too far, especially since it wouldn’t exempt youth already receiving the care.

Multiple medical groups, including the American Medical Association, oppose the ban and have said the care is safe if properly administered. The Justice Department has also opposed the ban as unconstitutional.

An attorney for the ACLU told the appeals panel in June that reinstating the restriction would create uncertainty for families.

A federal judge in May blocked a similar law in Alabama. A Tennessee ban that was enacted last year on transgender treatments for youth, which is limited to providing gender-confirming hormone treatment to prepubescent minors, remains in effect.

In Texas, child welfare officials have been blocked from investigating three families of transgender youth over gender-confirming care the minors have received. A state judge is considering whether to prevent additional investigations.


Arkansas cannot enforce ban on gender-affirming care for trans kids, court rules


Federal appeals court affirms ruling stopping state enforcing 2021 law before trial on possible permanent block in October


Arkansas’s attorney general, Leslie Rutledge, said she was ‘extremely disappointed in today’s dangerously wrong decision by the three-judge panel’. 
Photograph: Staci R Vandagriff/AP

Reuters in Little Rock, Arkansas
Thu 25 Aug 2022 

A federal appeals court on Thursday said Arkansas cannot enforce its ban on transgender children receiving gender-affirming medical care.

A three-judge panel of the eighth US circuit court of appeals affirmed a ruling temporarily stopping the state enforcing the 2021 law. A trial is scheduled in October before the same judge on whether to permanently block the law.



Arkansas governor who vetoed anti-trans law defends other anti-trans bills


Arkansas was the first state to enact such a ban, which prohibits doctors from providing gender-confirming hormone treatment, puberty blockers or surgery to anyone under 18 years old, or from referring them to other providers for the treatment.

There are no doctors who perform gender-affirming surgery on minors in the state.


“Because the minor’s sex at birth determines whether or not the minor can receive certain types of medical care under the law, Act 626 discriminates on the basis of sex,” the ruling on Thursday said.

The American Civil Liberties Union challenged the law on behalf of four transgender youth and their families, as well as two doctors who provide gender confirming treatments.

“The eighth circuit was abundantly clear that the state’s ban on care does not advance any important governmental interest and the state’s defense of the law is lacking in legal or evidentiary support,“ Chase Strangio, deputy director for transgender justice at the ACLU LGBTQ & HIV Project, said in a statement.

“The state has no business categorically singling out this care for prohibition.”

Arkansas argued that the restriction is within the state’s authority to regulate medical practices. The Republican attorney general, Leslie Rutledge, plans to ask the full eighth circuit court of appeals to review Thursday’s decision, said a spokesperson, Amanda Priest, adding that Rutledge was “extremely disappointed in today’s dangerously wrong decision by the three-judge panel”.

The Republican governor, Asa Hutchinson, vetoed the ban last year, but GOP lawmakers overrode him.

Medical groups including the American Medical Association oppose the ban and have said the care is safe if properly administered. The US justice department has also opposed the ban as unconstitutional.

An attorney for the ACLU told the appeals panel in June reinstating the restriction would create uncertainty for families around the state.

Hutchinson vetoed the ban following pleas from pediatricians, social workers and the parents of transgender youth who said the measure would harm a community already at risk for depression and suicide. Hutchinson said the law went too far, especially since it would not exempt youth already receiving the care.

A federal judge in May blocked a similar law in Alabama, and that state has appealed.

A Tennessee ban that was enacted last year on transgender treatments for youth, which is limited to providing gender-confirming hormone treatment to prepubescent minors, remains in effect.
Hypocrisy of Christian nationalism on display as GOP ignores Bible in its panic over student loans: columnists

Bob Brigham
August 25, 2022

College graduation / Shutterstock.

The Republican outrage over President Joe Biden's student loan debt relief has exposed the hypocrisy of Christian nationalism, according to a new analysis by Time magazine.

"While President Biden’s announcement of student-debt forgiveness elicited shouts of joy from many of the 43 million Americans who could experience relief under his plan, Republicans have responded by declaring their opposition to the very idea of debt forgiveness," Bishop William Barber, Jr. and Jonathan Wilson-Hartgrove wrote in Time.

Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) argued, "Democrats' student loan socialism is a slap in the face to working Americans who sacrificed to pay their debt or made different career choices to avoid debt."

"'Forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors,' is more than a line from the Lord’s Prayer that children memorize in Sunday school," Barber and Wilson-Hartgrove wrote.

IN OTHER NEWS: Texas Right to Life political director arrested for 'soliciting a minor' online

"For practicing Christians, it is a regular reminder of the Jubilee tradition that Jesus embraced in his first sermon in Luke’s gospel. 'The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,' Jesus declared from the prophet Isaiah, 'and has anointed me to proclaim… the favorable year of the Lord.' As his 1st-century hearers knew, Jesus was referring to the debt forgiveness laid out in Leviticus 25, which prescribes a regular social practice of clearing debts in order to correct for the accumulated injustice of an unequal distribution of resources in society," the two explained. "The idea doesn’t come from Karl Marx, as McConnell suggests, but from ancient Scripture."

The two explained the biblical history of debt forgiveness.

"While the Jubilee is a clear command of Scripture, biblical scholars have debated how often it was actually practiced in ancient Israel," the two wrote. "But the economic historian Michael Hudson, who has directed a decades-long study at Harvard’s Peabody Museum, argues in his book …and forgive them their debts that the notion of Jubilee wasn’t simply an ideal for ancient Israel, but rather a practical lesson learned during the Babylonian exile. Ancient Mesopotamian societies had learned from experience that crippling debt was an inevitable consequence of lending at interest (what the Bible calls 'usury'). For the good of the whole, a practice of 'Clean Slate' debt forgiveness emerged to keep society functioning. The children of Israel came to understand this practice as God’s design."


Barber and Wilson-Hartgrove argue the GOP's talking points have exposed hypocrisy.

"For decades, Republicans have claimed to champion biblical values, and MAGA enthusiasts like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene have more recently embraced the goal of a “Christian nation.” But nothing exposes the hypocrisy of Christian nationalism more than Republicans’ knee-jerk reaction against debt forgiveness," they wrote. "As Christian pastors, we know that the false promise of a 'Christian nation' has persuaded millions of Americans to support policies that hurt God’s people. In a multi-faith democracy, we don’t need our faith to be privileged by state power. But every faith can and should inform our vision for our common life. The tradition of debt forgiveness, which is shared by Christians, Jews, and Muslims alike, offers a powerful vision for a way forward from the historic inequality that currently harms our economy."

Read the full analysis.
BEHIND PAYWALL