Saturday, September 10, 2022

Scientists discover how air pollution may trigger lung cancer in never-smokers

ESMO Congress 2022, 9-13 September 2022

Reports and Proceedings

EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR MEDICAL ONCOLOGY

Charles_Swanton_ESMO 

IMAGE: CHARLES SWANTON view more 

CREDIT: EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR MEDICAL ONCOLOGY

  • Particles linked to climate change also promote cancerous changes in airway cells 

  • Cells with EGFR and KRAS gene mutations can turn cancerous when exposed to air pollutants 

  • Late-breaking data pave way to new approaches to lung cancer prevention and treatment 

Paris, France, 10 September 2022 - A new mechanism has been identified through which very small pollutant particles in the air may trigger lung cancer in people who have never smoked, paving the way to new prevention approaches and development of therapies, according to late-breaking data [to be] reported at the ESMO Congress 2022 by scientists of the Francis Crick Institute and University College London, funded by Cancer Research UK (1). The particles, which are typically found in vehicle exhaust and smoke from fossil fuels, are associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) risk, accounting for over 250,000 lung cancer deaths globally per year (2,3).   

“The same particles in the air that derive from the combustion of fossil fuels, exacerbating climate change, are directly impacting human health via an important and previously overlooked cancer-causing mechanism in lung cells. The risk of lung cancer from air pollution is lower than from smoking, but we have no control over what we all breathe. Globally, more people are exposed to unsafe levels of air pollution than to toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke, and these new data link the importance of addressing climate health to improving human health,” said Charles Swanton, the Francis Crick Institute and Cancer Research UK Chief Clinician, London, UK, who will present the research results at the ESMO 2022 Presidential Symposium on Saturday, 10 September. 

The new findings are based on human and laboratory research on mutations in a gene called EGFR which are seen in about half of people with lung cancer who have never smoked. In a study of nearly half a million people living in England, South Korea and Taiwan, exposure to increasing concentrations of airborne particulate matter (PM) 2.5 micrometres (μm) in diameter was linked to increased risk of NSCLC with EGFR mutations.  

In the laboratory studies, the  Francis Crick Institute scientists showed that the same pollutant particles (PM2.5) promoted rapid changes in airway cells which had mutations in EGFR and in another gene linked to lung cancer called KRAS, driving them towards a cancer stem cell like state. They also found that air pollution drives the influx of macrophages which release the inflammatory mediator, interleukin-1β, driving the expansion of cells with the EGFR mutations in response to exposure to PM2.5, and that blockade of interleukin-1β inhibited lung cancer initiation. These findings were consistent with data from a previous large clinical trial showing a dose dependent reduction in lung cancer incidence when people were treated with the anti-IL1β antibody, canakinumab (4). 

In a final series of experiments, the Francis Crick team used state-of-the-art, ultradeep mutational profiling of small samples of normal lung tissue and found EGFR and KRAS driver mutations in 18% and 33% of normal lung samples, respectively.  

“We found that driver mutations in EGFR and KRAS genes, commonly found in lung cancers, are actually present in normal lung tissue and are a likely consequence of ageing. In our research, these mutations alone only weakly potentiated cancer in laboratory models. However, when lung cells with these mutations were exposed to air pollutants, we saw more cancers and these occurred more quickly than when lung cells with these mutations were not exposed to pollutants, suggesting that air pollution promotes the initiation of lung cancer in cells harbouring driver gene mutations. The next step is to discover why some lung cells with mutations become cancerous when exposed to pollutants while others don’t,” said Swanton.  

Commenting on the results, Tony Mok, Chinese University of Hong Kong, not involved in the study, said: “This research is intriguing and exciting as it means that we can ask whether, in the future, it will be possible to use lung scans to look for pre-cancerous lesions in the lungs and try to reverse them with medicines such as interleukin-1β inhibitors. We don’t yet know whether it will be possible to use highly sensitive EGFR profiling on blood or other samples to find non-smokers who are predisposed to lung cancer and may benefit from lung scanning, so discussions are still very speculative.” 

Like Swanton, he stresses the importance of reducing air pollution to lower the risk of lung diseases, including cancer. “We have known about the link between pollution and lung cancer for a long time, and we now have a possible explanation for it. As consumption of fossil fuels goes hand in hand with pollution and carbon emissions, we have a strong mandate for tackling these issues – for both environmental and health reasons,” Mok concluded.  

-END- 

ESMO Press Office contact: press@esmo.org 

Francis Crick Press Office contact: +44 (0) 7918 166 173 

Notes to Editors 
Please make sure to use the official name of the meeting in your reports: ESMO Congress 2022 
Official Congress Hashtag: #ESMO22 

Disclaimer 
This press release contains information provided by the author of the highlighted abstract and reflects the content of this abstract. It does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of ESMO who cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the data. Commentators quoted in the press release are required to comply with the ESMO Declaration of Interests policy and the ESMO Code of Conduct. 

References  

1 LBA1 ‘Mechanism of action and an actionable inflammatory axis for air pollution induced non-small cell lung cancer in never smokers’ will be presented by Charles Swanton during Presidential Symposium 1 on Saturday, 10 September, 16:30 to 18:00 CEST in Paris Auditorium. Annals of Oncology, Volume 33 Supplement 7, September 2022 

2 Liu X, Mubarik S, Wang S. Lung Cancer Death Attributable to Long-Term Ambient Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Exposure in East Asian Countries During 1990–2019. Frontiers in Medicine 2021 Oct 15;8:742076 

3 Turner MC, Andersen ZJ, Baccarelli A et al. Outdoor Air Pollution and Cancer: An Overview of the Current Evidence and Public Health Recommendations. CA: Cancer J Clin 2020; 70: 460-479 

4 Ridker PM, MacFadyen JG, Thuren T et al. Effect of interleukin-1β inhibition with canakinumab on incident lung cancer in patients with atherosclerosis: exploratory results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2017 Oct 21; 390 (10105): 1833-1842 

About the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 

ESMO is the leading professional organisation for medical oncology. With 25,000 members representing oncology professionals from over 160 countries worldwide, ESMO is the society of reference for oncology education and information. Drawing on more than 45 years of experience, ESMO serves its members and the oncology community by providing networking and professional growth opportunities: oncologists can engage in projects, committees and working groups aiming to promote science and foster improvements in the oncology practice. With training, resources and tools, oncologists are enabled to stay up to date with the latest scientific advances and continue to deliver the best possible care to cancer patients. By representing and advocating for the oncology community at the highest political levels, ESMO ensures that the needs of both patients and doctors are properly taken care of. 
Driven by a shared determination to secure the best possible outcomes for patients, ESMO is committed to standing by those who care about cancer through addressing the diverse needs of #ONEoncologycommunity, offering #educationforLIFE, and advocating for #accessiblecancerCARE. www.esmo.org  

About the Francis Crick Institute 

The Francis Crick Institute is a biomedical discovery institute dedicated to understanding the fundamental biology underlying health and disease. Its work is helping to understand why disease develops and to translate discoveries into new ways to prevent, diagnose and treat illnesses such as cancer, heart disease, stroke, infections, and neurodegenerative diseases. An independent organisation, its founding partners are the Medical Research Council (MRC), Cancer Research UK, Wellcome, UCL (University College London), Imperial College London and King’s College London. The Crick was formed in 2015, and in 2016 it moved into a brand new state-of-the-art building in central London which brings together 1500 scientists and support staff working collaboratively across disciplines, making it the biggest biomedical research facility under a single roof in Europe. www.crick.ac.uk   

 About Cancer Research UK  

Cancer Research UK is the world’s leading cancer charity dedicated to saving lives through research, influence and information. Cancer Research UK’s pioneering work into the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer has helped save millions of lives. Cancer Research UK has been at the heart of the progress that has already seen survival in the UK double in the last 40 years. Today, 2 in 4 people survive their cancer for at least 10 years. Cancer Research UK wants to accelerate progress and see 3 in 4 people surviving their cancer by 2034. Cancer Research UK supports research into the prevention and treatment of cancer through the work of over 4,000 scientists, doctors and nurses. Together with its partners and supporters, Cancer Research UK is working towards a world where people can live longer, better lives, free from the fear of cancer. www.cancerresearchuk.org or +44(0) 300 123 1022  

 

LBA1 - Mechanism of action and an actionable inflammatory axis for air pollution induced non-small cell lung cancer: towards molecular cancer prevention 

C. Swanton1, W. Hill2, E. Lim3, C. Lee4, C.E. Weeden5, M. Augustine6, K. Chen7, F.-C. Kuan8, F. Marongiu9, F. Rodrigues10, H. Cha11, T. Jacks12, M. Luchtenborg13, I. Malanchi14, J. Downward15, C. Carlsten16, A. Hackshaw17, K.R. Litchfield18, J. DeGregori19, M. Jamal-Hanjani20 

1Translational Cancer Therapeutics Department, Francis Crick Institute, London/United Kingdom, 2Cancer Evolution And Genome Instability Laboratory, Francis Crick Institute, London/United Kingdom, 3Cancer Evolution And Genome Instability Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London/United Kingdom, 4Cegi, Francis Crick Institute, London/United Kingdom, 51 Midland Rd, The Francis Crick Institute, London/United Kingdom, 6Tumour Immunogenomics And Immunosurveillance, UCL - University College London, London/United Kingdom, 7Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing/China, 8Hematology Oncology, Chang Gung Medical Foundation - Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Puzi City/Taiwan, 9Department Of Biochemistry & Molecular Genetics, UCHealth Cancer Care - Anschutz Medical Campus - University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora/United States of America, 10Tumour-host Interaction Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London/United Kingdom, 11Division Of Hematology-oncology, Samsung Medical Center (SMC) - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul/Korea, Republic of, 12The Jacks Lab, Koch Institute For Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, Cambridge/United States of America, 13National Cancer Registration And Analysis Service, Public Health England, London/United Kingdom, 14Tumour Host Interaction Lab, Francis Crick Institute, London/United Kingdom, 15Oncogene Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London/United Kingdom, 16Centre For Lung Health, UBC - The University of British Columbia, Vancouver/Canada, 17Clinical Trials, Cancer Research UK & University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London/United Kingdom, 18Tumour Immunogenomics And Immunosurveillance, UCL Cancer Institute - UCL - London's Global University, London/United Kingdom, 19Biochemistry And Molecular Genetics, UCHealth Cancer Care - Anschutz Medical Campus - University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora/United States of America, 20Medical Oncology Dept., UCL Cancer Institute - Paul O'Gorman Building, London/United Kingdom 

Background: A mechanistic basis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) initiation in never smokers, a disease with a high frequency of EGFR mutations (EGFRm), is unknown. The air pollutant, particulate matter (PM), is known to be associated with the risk of NSCLC, however a direct cause and mechanism remain elusive. 

Methods: We analysed 463,679 individuals to address the associations of increasing 2.5um PM (PM2.5) concentrations with cancer risk. We performed ultra-deep profiling of 247 normal lung tissue samples, analysed normal lung tissue from humans and mice following exposures to PM, and investigated the consequences of PM on tumour promotion in mouse lung cancer models. 

Results: Increasing PM2.5 levels were associated with increased risk of EGFRm NSCLC in England, S.Korea and Taiwan and with increased risk of mesothelioma (HR=1.19), lung (HR=1.16), anal (HR=1.23), small intestine (HR=1.30), GBM (HR=1.19), lip, oral cavity and pharynx (HR: 1.15) and laryngeal carcinomas (HR=1.26) in UK Biobank; HR for each 1ug/m3 PM2.5 increment. 18-33% of normal lung tissue samples harbour driver mutations in EGFR and KRAS in the absence of malignancy. PM promotes a macrophage response and a progenitor-like state in lung epithelium harbouring mutant EGFR. Consistent with PM promoting NSCLC in at-risk epithelium harbouring driver mutations, PM increased tumour burden in three EGFR or KRAS driven lung cancer models in a dose-dependent manner. Finally, we uncover an actionable inflammatory axis driven by IL1B in response to PM, with anti-IL1B therapy preventing PM-induced mouse tumour formation, consistent with reductions in human lung cancer incidence with anti-IL1B therapy. 

Conclusions: These results shed light on the aetiology of EGFRm lung cancer, particularly in never-smokers, and suggest that oncogenic mutations may be necessary but insufficient for tumour formation. These data reveal a mechanistic basis for PM driven lung cancer in the absence of classical carcinogen-driven mutagenesis, reminiscent of models of tumour initiation and promotion proposed 70 years ago, providing evidence to limit air pollution and opportunities for molecular targeted cancer prevention. 
 

Clinical trial identification: TRAcking Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Evolution Through Therapy (Rx) (TRACERx) (NCT01888601) The PEACE (Posthumous Evaluation of Advanced Cancer Environment) Study (PEACE) (NCT03004755) Biomarkers and Dysplastic Respiratory Epithelium (NCT00900419)  

Legal entity responsible for the study: Francis Crick Institute and UCL Hospitals NHS Trust 

Funding: Foundation or academic group WITHOUT funding from a pharma, biotech, or other commercial company 
- This work has been supported by the Mark Foundation ASPIRE I Award (Grant 21-029-ASP), Lung Cancer Research Foundation Grant on Disparities in Lung Cancer, Advanced Grant (PROTEUS, Grant Agreement no. 835297), CRUK EDD (EDDPMA-Nov21100034), and Rosetrees Out-of-round Award (OoR2020100009). E.L.L. receives funding from NovoNordisk Foundation (ID 16584), The Mark Foundation (Grant 21-029-ASP) and has been supported by Rosetrees. W.H is funded by an ERC Advanced Grant (PROTEUS, Grant Agreement no. 835297), CRUK EDD (EDDPMA-Nov21100034), The Mark Foundation (Grant 21-029-ASP) and has been supported by Rosetrees. K.C. is supported by Research Unit of Intelligence Diagnosis and Treatment in Early Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2021RU002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82072566) and Peking University People's Hospital Research and Development Funds (RS2019-01). T.K. receives grant support from JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships Program (202060447). S.H.L is supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020R1A2C3006535), the National Cancer Center Grant (NCC1911269-3), and a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number : HR20C0025). N.M. is a Sir Henry Dale Fellow, jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (Grant Number 211179/Z/18/Z) and also receives funding from Cancer Research UK, Rosetrees and the NIHR BRC at University College London Hospitals and the CRUK University College London Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre. J.D., M.G., Y.E.M. D.T.M. and R.L.K receive funding from American Association for Cancer Research/Johnson&Johnson (18-90-52-DEGR), and J.D. is supported by the Courtenay C. and Lucy Patten Davis Endowed Chair in Lung Cancer Research. M.G., Y.E.M. D.T.M. and R.L.K. were supported by National Cancer Institute (NCI) RO1 CA219893. E.J.E. was supported by NCI Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award T32-CA190216. The work at the University of Colorado was also supported by NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA046934. M.J.-H. has received funding from Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research, Rosetrees Trust, UKI NETs and NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. C.S. is Royal Society Napier Research Professor. He is supported by the Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (FC001169), the UK Medical Research Council (FC001169), and the Wellcome Trust (FC001169). C.S. is funded by Cancer Research UK (TRACERx, PEACE and CRUK Cancer Immunotherapy Catalyst Network), Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, the Rosetrees Trust, Butterfield and Stoneygate Trusts, NovoNordisk Foundation (ID16584), Royal Society Research Professorships Enhancement Award (RP/EA/180007), the NIHR BRC at University College London Hospitals, the CRUK-UCL Centre, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF). This research is supported by a Stand Up To Cancer-LUNGevity-American Lung Association Lung Cancer Interception Dream Team Translational Research Grant (SU2C-AACR-DT23-17). Stand Up To Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation. Research grants are administered by the American Association for Cancer Research, the Scientific Partner of SU2C. C.S. also receives funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) Consolidator Grant (FP7-THESEUS-617844), European Commission ITN (FP7-PloidyNet 607722), an ERC Advanced Grant (PROTEUS) from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (835297) and Chromavision from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (665233). This work was supported by the Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (grant no. FC001112), the UK Medical Research Council (grant no. FC001112), and the Wellcome Trust (grant no. FC001112) and the European Research Council (grant no. ERC CoG-H2020-725492).  

Disclosure:C. Swanton: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Activity took place in 2016.: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, October 26th 2020: Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche/Ventana; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Activity took place in 2016.: Celgene; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Illumina; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, AdBoard - November 12th, 2020: Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Genentech; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sarah Canon Research Institute; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Joined October 2020. Also have stock options: Bicycle Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Medicxi; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: GlaxoSmithKline; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Member of the Science Management Committee. Also have stock options: GRAIL; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultancy agreement: Roche Innovation Centre Shanghai; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Chief Clinician since October 2017: Cancer Research UK; Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest, Co-Founder of Achilles Therapeutics. Also, have stock options in this company.: Achilles Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Stocks owned until June 2021: GRAIL; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Stocks owned until June 2021: Apogen Biotechnologies; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Epic Biosciences; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bicycle Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Funded RUBICON grant - October 2018 - April 2021.: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Collaboration in minimal residual disease sequencing technologies.: Archer Dx Inc; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, Chief Investigator for the MeRmaiD1 clinical trial and chair of the steering committee.: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Ono Pharmaceutical; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research Grants from 2015-2019.: Roche-Ventana; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Co-chief investigator: NHS-Galleri Clinical Trial; Non-Financial Interests, , Principal Investigator, Chief Investigator for MeRmaiD1 clinical trial: AstraZeneca; Non-Financial Interests, , Invited Speaker, From 2019: AACR; Non-Financial Interests, , Other, Board of Directors: AACR; Non-Financial Interests, , Advisory Role, EACR Advisory Council member: EACR.  T. Jacks: Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Thermo Fisher Scientific; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, co-Founder: Dragonfly Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, co-Founder: T2 Biosystems; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: SQZ Biotech; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Skyhawk Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Break Through Cancer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Johnson & Johnson.  J. Downward: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, consultant: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, consultant: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, consultant: Jubilant; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, consultant: Theras; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, consultant: Vividion; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, consultant: Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Revolution Medicines; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Boehringer Ingelheim.  K.R. Litchfield: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche Tissue Diagnostics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consulting work: Monopteros Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Ono/LifeArc; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Research funding: Genesis Therapeutics; Non-Financial Interests, Institutional, Proprietary Information, Collaboration on data analysis: Bms.  M. Jamal-Hanjani: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Invited speaker honorarium: Oslo Cancer Cluster; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Invited speaker honorarium: Astex Pharmaceutical; Non-Financial Interests, , Advisory Role, Scientific Advisory Board and Steering Committee member: Achilles Therapeutics; Other, , Other, I am named as co-inventor on patent PCT/US2017/028013 relating to methods for lung cancer detection.: Patent.  All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. 

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
Mississippi wasted welfare funds on Brett Favre speeches he never made

Bob Brigham
September 01, 2022

Brett Favre / Shutterstock.

With schools closed in Jackson and water out at the Mississippi state Capitol, the state is struggling through a different scandal about broken government services.

"Brett Favre earned nearly $140 million as a star NFL quarterback over two decades and millions more in product endorsements," NBC News reported. "But that didn’t stop the state of Mississippi from paying Favre $1.1 million in 2017 and 2018 to make motivational speeches — out of federal welfare funds intended for needy families. The Mississippi state auditor said Favre never gave the speeches and demanded the money back, with interest."

The payment was reportedly directed by former GOP Gov. Phil Bryant.

"Favre has repaid the fees, although not the $228,000 in interest the auditor also demanded," NBC News reported. "But the revelation by the auditor that $70 million in TANF welfare funds was doled out to a multimillionaire athlete, a professional wrestler, a horse farm and a volleyball complex are at the heart of a scandal that has rocked the nation’s poorest state, sparking parallel state and federal criminal investigations that have led to charges and guilty pleas involving some of the key players."

Favre's lawyer, Bud Holmes, revealed the former NFL quarterback had been interviewed by the FBI.

"The speeches aren’t the only welfare grants tied to Favre. Text messages obtained by the website Mississippi Today and authenticated by [Brad] Pigott show that Favre sought a $3.2 million grant to a drug company in which he was a shareholder and a $5 million award that built a volleyball arena at the University of Southern Mississippi, where his daughter played the sport and where he played football," NBC News reported.

Favre golfed with Donald Trump when he was president and went on to endorse his unsuccessful 2020 re-election bid.
‘Are you kidding me?’: Reporters slammed for panning Biden’s anti-fascism speech

David Badash, The New Civil Rights Movement
September 02, 2022

President Joe Biden (Shutterstock.com)

President Joe Biden Thursday night delivered a 23-minute primetime address urging Americans to choose democracy over fascism, while calling out, by name, Donald Trump and his MAGA Republicans

Historians, political scientists, and journalism and extremism experts are praising the President for standing up for American values in the face of rising far-right threats of political violence. President Biden in very clear terms warned Americans they must "defend" and "protect" democracy against the fascism of the far-right – which is not a political speech, but a speech about, as Biden said, the "soul of the nation."

As expected, many Republicans expressed outrage over President Biden calling out the portion of the GOP that identifies as "MAGA," even though he made clear his criticism was not of mainstream Republicans.

One news network's coverage in particular is being highly criticized as several of its reporters took umbrage with President Biden delivering what they wrongly characterized as a "political" speech, while criticizing that two uniformed Marines were standing behind him.

CNN Chief National Affairs Correspondent Jeff Zeleny tweeted a photo of the President in front of the Marines, saying: "There’s nothing unusual or wrong with a President delivering a political speech — it’s inherent in the job description — but doing it against a backdrop of two Marines standing at attention and the Marine Band is a break with White House traditions."


Journalist Jamison Foser observed that "Biden is talking about defending democracy and the rule of law from assault by a fascist movement that staged a deadly insurrection. Marines take an oath to 'support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.' Pretty compatible!"

Former U.S. Senator Claire McCaskil (D-MO) slammed Zeleny.

"Are you kidding me Jeff? The last President did official Republican political events at the White House! And used the National Park Service as political event planners. How about political interview inside the Lincoln Memorial? Those are all examples of demolishing WH traditions," she wrote.

U.S. Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) asked, "Didn’t TFG," referring to Donald Trump, "accept his nomination on the White House lawn?"

"I recall a certain president giving a political speech on a damn aircraft carrier," blasted national security attorney Brad Moss. "I recall another president accepting his political nomination at the WHITE HOUSE. Ask me how little I care about the two marines deep in the background."

The former Communications Director for Senator Amy Klobuchar, Tim Hogan, corrected the record with photographic evidence:

Zeleny was not the only CNN journalist to instigate the ire of Americans watching the President's speech.

"Whatever you think of this speech the military is supposed to be apolitical. Positioning Marines in uniform behind President Biden for a political speech flies in the face of that. It’s wrong when Democrats do it. It’s wrong when Republicans do it," tweeted CNN host Brianna Keilar.


University of South Carolina Political Science Professor David Darmofal corrected Keilar, saying: "It was a speech about defending democracy."

Mary Trump, the former President's niece who is a psychologist, added: "I see everyone at CNN got their talking point. This was NOT a political speech (unless you think condemning fascism and encouraging people to vote are political positions in which case--that's what we call a tell).

CNN wasn't the only news outlet with reporters attracting anger.


CBS News' Ed O'Keefe was also criticized for equating a call to fight fascism and defend democracy as a "political" speech.

O'Keefe characterized the fight for civil rights as partisan politics, which it is not.

Marquette University Political Science Professor Julia Azari, who teaches about the American presidency, American political parties, and the politics of the American state blasted O'Keefe: "This frame undermines both democracy and journalism."

White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain graciously challenged O'Keefe:

Dan Froomkin, one of the most credible media critics also slammed O'Keefe.

"Biden is describing a major democratic crisis that actually exists. But political journalists only see a Democrat saying negative things about Republicans and so, you know, both sides," he wrote.

The White House Deputy Press Secretary, Andrew Bates, summed up what many were saying: "Democracy is not a partisan or political issue."

 

⚡ NEWS ALERT

Federal Ministers Targets of ‘Violent Extremist Threats’ Ahead of Ottawa Convoy, Counterterrorism Report Reveals

A newly released internal counterterrorism report reveals that at least four federal cabinet ministers were subjects of specific “violent extremist threats” in the lead-up to the Ottawa convoy occupation in January.

PressProgress obtained the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre (ITAC)'s report through Access-to-Information, revealing threats were concerning enough to meet the thresholds of what might be considered terrorism, and threats to national security. Read more.

Social Security enemy Ron Johnson endorses plan to 'coax' retirees back to work

Jake Johnson, Common Dreams
September 02, 2022

Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin speaking at CPAC 2011 
in Washington, D.C. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)


Republican Sen. Ron Johnson this week endorsed a proposal to "coax" seniors out of retirement to address so-called worker shortages, drawing backlash from his Democratic opponent and other critics who noted the GOP lawmaker's long history of attacking Social Security.

"There are a number of innovative ideas I would support," Johnson (R-Wis.) said during a tele-town hall with constituents on Wednesday as he's locked in a close reelection race with Democratic challenger Mandela Barnes in the key battleground state of Wisconsin.

"Former Senator Phil Gramm came to the Senate, we were talking about our labor shortage, and one of his suggestions was to coax seniors that could reenter the workforce—don't charge them payroll tax," Johnson said in remarks first reported by the Heartland Signal. "They're not paying it anyway so if they want to get back and earn a few extra bucks, let them start working."

The Republican senator's comments came weeks after he sparked outrage by suggesting that funding for Social Security and Medicare should be discretionary rather than mandatory, a change that would pave the way for cuts or the complete demise of the popular programs.

Barnes, Wisconsin's lieutenant governor, was quick to respond to Johnson's latest remarks, slamming his opponent for "waging a war on our seniors and the benefits they've worked towards their entire lives."

"Ron Johnson's solution to the labor shortage: send seniors back to work," Barnes said in a statement Thursday, noting that Johnson has voted to raise the retirement age from 65 to 70.


Social Security Works, a progressive advocacy group, also denounced Johnson's comments on social media.

"This is the same senator who wants to turn Social Security into 'discretionary spending,'" the group tweeted Thursday. "Ron Johnson thinks that working-class Americans don't deserve to retire. That's why he's trying to steal our earned benefits."

Survey data released in recent days shows that Barnes is out to a narrow lead over Johnson in Wisconsin's U.S. Senate contest, which could play a pivotal role in determining control of the upper chamber.

"On Sunday, the Trafalgar Group released the results of a survey of Wisconsin voters conducted between August 22 and August 25. Barnes led Johnson 49.4% to 47.1%," Wisconsin Public Radio reported earlier this week. "Just more than 3% of those surveyed were undecided. Barnes' lead was within the poll's 2.9% margin of error."

"A Fox News poll released August 18 had Barnes with 50% of the support of likely voters and Johnson trailing with 46%," the outlet added. "The Democrat's lead was just outside the survey's 3% margin of error."
NATIONALIZE PG&E 
Operators of Diablo Canyon apply for $6 billion federal aid program for nuclear plants

2022/09/06

Aerial view of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant which sits on the edge of the Pacific Ocean at Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County, California, on March 17, 2011. - Mark Ralston/Getty Images North America/TNS

Fresh from getting an extension to keep the last nuclear power plant in California open, Pacific Gas & Electric now looks to receive a chunk of a $6 billion federal program aimed at helping the nation's nuclear fleet remain online.

PG&E turned in paperwork Friday to the U.S. Department of Energy's Civil Nuclear Credit program, created by the Biden administration earlier this year, beating the program's Sept. 6 filing deadline.

The Department of Energy has not indicated if it will give PG&E's application the OK but shortly after SB 846 passed, the department's assistant secretary came out in support.

"I'm extremely pleased to see California extending the operation of Diablo Canyon," Katy Huff said in a statement. "These reactors critically underpin our nation's decarbonization goals and their 24/7 power will support grid stability for consumers in the state during our transition to net zero."

Now that PG&E has turned in its application, the Department of Energy will determine if PG&E is eligible to receive funding and then will determine how much the utility will receive. Diablo Canyon is the only plant that is potentially eligible for the Civil Nuclear Credit's first award period.

The submission came less than two days after California's Legislature, at the urging of Gov. Gavin Newsom, reversed the previously scheduled closure dates of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in San Luis Obispo.

Introduced as an emergency measure, Senate Bill 846 zoomed through the Assembly on a 67-3 vote and passed the Senate, 31-1, capping a frantic final night of the legislative session.

Under the terms of the bill, Diablo Canyon's Unit 1 reactor can continue to produce electricity up to Oct. 31, 2029, and Unit 2 can continue as long as Oct. 31, 2030. That's five years longer than a 2016 agreement had called for.

Newsom pushed Sacramento lawmakers to pass SB 846, saying the 2,200 megawatts generated by the power plant is needed to ensure short-term reliability to California's increasingly shaky electric grid. The governor signed the bill into law Friday.

"Following the state's direction, we submitted an application seeking Department of Energy funding through its Civil Nuclear Credit program to help lower costs for customers should the plant's operating license be extended," PG&E spokeswoman Suzanne Hosn said in an email to the Union-Tribune Tuesday.

SB 846 included a provision that allows PG&E to access a $1.4 billion forgivable loan from the state's general fund, i.e., taxpayers, "to facilitate the extension of the operating period of the Diablo Canyon power plant."

But in the runup to the vote, the governor's office said the federal government is "expected to cover most if not all of the cost of the loan" and if the Department of Energy turns down PG&E's application, the loan will be terminated.

The bill also establishes a framework for rate recovery and power purchases at the plant that sets fixed and volumetric fees charged to "all load-serving entities" under the jurisdiction of the California Public Utilities Commission. That means utility customers across the state, including those in the San Diego Gas & Electric service territory, will share in the expense — not just PG&E customers.

However, one of the bill's sponsors, Sen. Bill Dodd, D-Napa, cited estimates on the Senate floor that an extension of Diablo Canyon would lead to an increase in monthly bills of no more than 57 cents per month and potential savings of $5.43 per month, "depending upon on load and how much is sold on the system," Dodd said.

A number of environmental groups and opponents of Diablo Canyon lambasted the extension, with Friends of the Earth calling it "reckless beyond belief."

PG&E still has to obtain licenses from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and receive approval from state agencies. Also, lawsuits over earthquake safety at Diablo that were put aside will now be resurrected, said David Weisman of the Alliance for Nuclear Responsibility, an anti-nuclear group in San Luis Obispo.

"Here's every deadline, here's every report (the state) says needs to be issued, we will be bird-dogging and watching every single step," Weisman said. "We're going to make sure every I is dotted and every T is crossed."

Diablo Canyon produces some 2,200 megawatts of electricity, accounting for almost 9 percent of the state's power supply and 17 percent of California's zero-carbon electricity.

© The San Diego Union-Tribune
GOOD QUESTION
Why haven’t California lawmakers decriminalized psychedelic drugs such as mushrooms?

2022/09/10
In this file photo from June 7, 2018, Sen. Wiener speaks at the Lambda Legal 2018 West Coast Liberty Awards at the SLS Hotel in Beverly Hills, California. 
- Randy Shropshire/Getty Images North America/TNS

In February 2021, state Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat, introduced a bill that would have decriminalized the possession and use of psychedelic drugs and ordered a state health committee to explore policies that could help California prepare for any regulatory changes to federal drug classifications in the future.

Here’s a beakdown:

The proposal

Senate Bill 519, would not have changed penalties for people who illegally sell psychedelic drugs, and would have imposed new restrictions on school grounds and for minors. Supporters viewed the legislation as a stepping stone to solidify a nascent decriminalization movement nationwide.
Supporters, opposition

The primary sponsors were the Heroic Hearts Project, Veterans Exploring Treatment Solutions and other veterans groups and research institutes that support psychedelic access for research and therapeutic purposes. Several law enforcement groups, including the California Police Chiefs Association and the California District Attorneys Association, opposed the legislation but did not actively lobby against it.
The bills track record

To the surprise of some, the bill quickly gained momentum last year and advanced through three committees in the Legislature’s higher house, an indication that there was broad public support for decriminalizing psychedelics. On June 1, 2021, SB 519 received a majority vote with support from both major political parties, and advanced to the Assembly.

After progressing through the lower house’s public safety and health committees, Wiener opted to slow down in August 2021 to help generate more support, and made SB 519 a two-year bill.

Despite polling that showed 58% of California voters supported psychedelic decriminalization, the legislation was gutted last month by the opaque Assembly Appropriations Committee, which completely removed the legal provision and only retained the health study.

What’s next


Wiener’s office still doesn’t know what happened. A spokesperson for Assemblyman Chris Holden, a Democrat who chairs the committee, directed questions to appropriations staff members. Committee staff did not respond to requests for comment.

The bill’s demise was a setback for veterans and people suffering from mental illnesses in California, but Wiener vowed to reintroduce the bill next year. A spokesperson for his office said they expect to bring forward a similar bill with the hopes that the path laid over the past two years in the Legislature will lead to its enactment.

© The Sacramento Bee