Saturday, December 10, 2022

Can the new AI tool ChatGPT replace human work? Judge for yourself

New artificial intelligence tool can respond to a human

question better than predecessors, say observers

ChatGPT is artificial intelligence chatbot software capable of writing poems, college-level essays and even computer code. Experts say the software highlights how far AI has come in just a few years, while still spotlighting concerns around accuracy.

ChatGPT is a program where users can type in a question or a task, and the software will pull information from billions of examples of text from across the Internet, to come up with a response designed to mimic a human.

"One of the key features that sets it apart is its ability to understand and generate natural language. This means that it can provide responses that sound natural and conversational, making it a valuable tool for a wide range of applications."

Or, so says the chatbot about itself — ChatGPT wrote the paragraph above.

How well the processing tool actually "understands" language is not clear. But it is turning heads.

"You can have what seems alarmingly close to a human conversation with it, so I was a little taken aback," said Osh Momoh, chief technical advisor for MaRS, an innovation hub in Toronto.

A new artificial intelligence tool called ChatGPT, released Nov. 30 by San Francisco-based OpenAI, allows users to ask questions and assign tasks. (CBC)

The tool was created by OpenAI, a San Francisco-based research and development firm co-founded by Elon Musk that counts Peter Thiel and Microsoft among its investors. 

ChatGPT has captured the public's imagination because it's so easy to use. It was unveiled to the world just 11 days ago, and has already amassed more than a million users — gaining adoption more quickly than Facebook, which took ten months to hit the same milestone.

But there are challenges even the company behind it acknowledges, including the tendency to generate "nonsense" along the way.

Ask it anything

The prompts given to the bot can be silly, like asking it to write a movie script about elephants riding a roller coaster, or complex, like asking it to explain the history of the Middle East. It can write songslaw school essays, and even computer code.

Shouldn't this be in iambic pentameter? A poem written by the AI tool ChatGPT in response to the prompt: 'Write a poem about winter in the style of Shakespeare.' (Nisha Patel/CBC)

Momoh says the bot is better than anything that's come before at generating text responses to real human questions. He suggests people could use ChatGPT as a tool to enhance their productivity, especially in sectors like customer service, advertising and media.

"In a year or two, I think it will basically impact anything that involves generating text," he said.

While that may raise concerns about artificial intelligence putting people out of work, Melanie Mitchell, a computer scientist at the Santa Fe Institute, expects that jobs will just shift as workers are no longer required to complete repetitive tasks.

"Technology tends to create jobs in unexpected areas as it takes jobs away," she said.

'Incorrect or nonsensical answers'

The AI tool is in its early stages and users are discovering its limitations.

ChatGPT doesn't have a way to tell if the responses it's generating are true or false. Mitchell says that's a big problem, and for now, to use the bot for work responsibilities should require careful human fact-checking.

"I searched my own name and it said a lot of correct things about me, but it also said that I had passed away on Nov. 28, 2022, which is a little disturbing to read."

OpenAI has acknowledged the tool's tendency to respond with "plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers," an issue it considers challenging to fix.

An ad jingle written by AI tool ChatGPT. (Nisha Patel/CBC)

Releasing ChatGPT to the public may help OpenAI find and fix flaws. While it's programmed the bot in an effort to avoid inappropriate tasks like asking for advice about illegal activities, or biased or offensive requests, some users have still found ways around the guardrails.

Because it's trained on existing language, AI technology can also perpetuate societal biases like those around race, gender and culture.

"So what's the effect that those answers could have? Maybe not on me or you, but again on a small child or somebody who's impressionable that is just trying to form their worldview on some of these harder topics," said Sheldon Fernandez, CEO of Darwin AI, which is working on harnessing AI for manufacturing.

Still some in the field like Fernandez are describing ChatGPT's debut as a "seminal" moment. And as the bot gains traction with the public, it's also sparking debate about when and how it should be used — and who should regulate it. 

"We need to think about that hard….One of the challenges with this is the technology just moves so quick and quicker than often legislative bodies can," said Fernandez.

Ask ChatGPT itself if the world is ready for it, and it spits out this answer:

"It is important for society to carefully consider these issues and develop a responsible approach to the use of AI technologies."

What is ChatGPT? 


Everything you need to know about the new AI chatbot that garnered more than one million users in its first WEEK thanks to its eerily human-like responses 

The artificial intelligence system ChatGPT was launched by OpenAI last week
Chatbot is a large language model that is trained on a huge amount of text data

This allows it to generate eerily human-like text in response to a given prompt

Here, MailOnline looks at everything you need to know about the ChatGPT bot


By SAM TONKIN FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED: 9 December 2022

It's the world's new favourite chatbot, having already amassed more than one million users less than a week after its public launch.

But what exactly is ChatGPT, the artificial intelligence system created by a OpenAI, a US company that lists Elon Musk as one of its founders?

Well, the chatbot is a large language model that has been trained on a massive amount of text data, allowing it to generate eerily human-like text in response to a given prompt.

Here, MailOnline looks at everything you need to know about ChatGPT, including how it works, who can use it, what it means for the future, and any concerns that have been raised.



It is the world's new favourite chatbot, having already garnered more than one million users less than a week after its public launch. But what exactly is ChatGPT (stock image)

What is ChatGPT?

OpenAI says its ChatGPT model has been trained using a machine learning technique called Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).

This can simulate dialogue, answer follow-up questions, admit mistakes, challenge incorrect premises and reject inappropriate requests.



OpenAI says its ChatGPT model has been trained using a machine learning technique called Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Sam Altman is OpenAI's CEO

It responds to text prompts from users and can be asked to write essays, lyrics for songs, stories, marketing pitches, scripts, complaint letters and even poetry.

Initial development involved human AI trainers providing the model with conversations in which they played both sides — the user and an AI assistant.

How does it work?


The version of the bot available for public testing attempts to understand questions posed by users and responds with in-depth answers resembling human-written text in a conversational format.

Experts say a tool like ChatGPT could be used in real-world applications such as digital marketing, online content creation, answering customer service queries or as some users have found, even to help debug code.

The bot can respond to a large range of questions while imitating human speaking styles.

Although ChatGPT has been released to the public for anyone to use, for free, the AI has been so popular that OpenAI had to temporarily shut down the demo link.

More than one million people signed up in the first five days it was released, an engagement level that took Facebook and Spotify months to achieve.

It is available to use again now on OpenAI's website.

Who created it?


The new ChatGPT artificial intelligence system has been created and developed by the San Francisco-based company OpenAI.

The firm was founded in in late 2015 by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and others, who collectively pledged $1 billion (£816,000.

Musk resigned from the board in February 2018 but remained a donor.

Examples of ChatGPT's human-like responses

People have been taking to Twitter to share their conversations with ChatGPT. Here are just a few examples below.





One Twitter users shared a response that ChatGPT had to being asked to write an essay about how important it is for the UK and Switzerland to be part of the EU's research program Horizon Europe



Another Twitter user set a challenge for ChatGPT to come up with the solution for (pictured)



This Twitter user asked ChatGPT to come up with five options for a Christmas Day social media post



Here ChatGPT was asked how rare neurological diseases can be studied and effectively treated


What does it mean for the future?


In ChatGPT's own words, it could revolutionise the way we talk to machines.

The software program's ability to answer complex questions has led some to wonder if it could challenge Google's search engine monopoly.

Critics feel Google has been too focused on maximising revenue through prominent advertising and too cautious about incorporating AI into how it responds to users' searches.

Paul Buchheit, 45, a developer who was behind Gmail, believes Google's search engine dominance in particular could soon be disrupted.

'Google may be only a year or two away from total disruption. AI will eliminate the search engine result page, which is where they make most of their money,' he tweeted.

'Even if they catch up on AI, they can't fully deploy it without destroying the most valuable part of their business!'



The fluency and coherence of the results being generated now has those in Silicon Valley wondering about the future of Google's monopoly

DailyMail.com asked ChatGPT: 'Will sophisticated AI chatbots end Google's search engine dominance?'

ChatGPT gave a long answer, so DailyMail.com asked it for a shorter one. It responded: 'It is unlikely that AI chatbots, even sophisticated ones, will be able to end Google's search engine dominance.

'AI chatbots are designed for specific tasks, while search engines like Google are designed to search vast amounts of information. It is unlikely that AI chatbots will be able to replace search engines in the near future.'


What are its rivals?


Google is developing its own AI and is researching conversational and voice search. The tech company bought DeepMind, an AI company, to further develop such areas.

Meta and Microsoft have also got in on the act.

However, Meta's BlenderBot 3 had some rather strong opinions about its boss, Mark Zuckerberg.

In response to questions from journalists, the new chatbot described the CEO as 'creepy and manipulative' and said that his business practices are 'not always ethical'.

BlenderBot 3, which gives answers by searching the internet, also said it was 'funny' that Zuckerberg 'still wears the same clothes'.

Meta introduced BlenderBot 3 in August and let people try it out as part of a public demo, but it's since said the bot 'can make untrue or offensive statements'.

In 2016, Microsoft was forced to apologise after an experimental AI Twitter bot called 'Tay' said offensive things on the platform.

It was aimed at 18 to-24-year-olds and designed to improve the firm's understanding of conversational language among young people online.

But within hours of it going live, Twitter users took advantage of flaws in Tay's algorithm that meant the AI chatbot responded to certain questions with racist answers.

These included the bot using racial slurs, defending white supremacist propaganda, and supporting genocide.

Are there any concerns about it?

As with many AI-driven innovations, ChatGPT does not come without misgivings.

OpenAI has acknowledged the tool's tendency to respond with 'plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers', an issue it considers challenging to fix.

It also warns the chatbot can exhibit biased behaviour.

AI technology has been controversial in the past because it can perpetuate societal biases like those around race, gender and culture.



A tool like ChatGPT could be used in real-world applications such as digital marketing, online content creation, answering customer service queries or as some users have found, even to help debug code

As previously mentioned, tech giants including Alphabet Inc's Google and Amazon have acknowledged that some of their projects that experimented with AI were 'ethically dicey' and had limitations.

At several companies, humans had to step in and fix AI havoc.

Rather chillingly, when the BBC asked ChatGPT a question about HAL, the malevolent fictional AI from the film 2001, it seemed somewhat troubled.

The reply stated that 'an error had occurred'.

What happens next?


Despite these concerns, AI research remains attractive.

Venture capital investment in AI development and operations companies rose last year to nearly $13 billion (£10.5 billion), and $6 billion (£4.9 million) had poured in through October this year, according to data from PitchBook, a Seattle company tracking financings.

Open AI wants people to use ChatGPT so the company can gather as much information as possible that will help to develop the bot.

The artificial intelligence research firm said it was 'eager to collect user feedback to aid our ongoing work to improve this system'.

A TIMELINE OF ELON MUSK'S COMMENTS ON AI



Musk has been a long-standing, and very vocal, condemner of AI technology and the precautions humans should take

Elon Musk is one of the most prominent names and faces in developing technologies.

The billionaire entrepreneur heads up SpaceX, Tesla and the Boring company.

But while he is on the forefront of creating AI technologies, he is also acutely aware of its dangers.

Here is a comprehensive timeline of all Musk's premonitions, thoughts and warnings about AI, so far.

August 2014 - 'We need to be super careful with AI. Potentially more dangerous than nukes.'

October 2014 - 'I think we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. If I were to guess like what our biggest existential threat is, it’s probably that. So we need to be very careful with the artificial intelligence.'

October 2014 - 'With artificial intelligence we are summoning the demon.'

June 2016 - 'The benign situation with ultra-intelligent AI is that we would be so far below in intelligence we'd be like a pet, or a house cat.'

July 2017 - 'I think AI is something that is risky at the civilisation level, not merely at the individual risk level, and that's why it really demands a lot of safety research.'

July 2017 - 'I have exposure to the very most cutting-edge AI and I think people should be really concerned about it.'

July 2017 - 'I keep sounding the alarm bell but until people see robots going down the street killing people, they don’t know how to react because it seems so ethereal.'

August 2017 - 'If you're not concerned about AI safety, you should be. Vastly more risk than North Korea.'

November 2017 - 'Maybe there's a five to 10 percent chance of success [of making AI safe].'

March 2018 - 'AI is much more dangerous than nukes. So why do we have no regulatory oversight?'

April 2018 - '[AI is] a very important subject. It's going to affect our lives in ways we can't even imagine right now.'

April 2018 - '[We could create] an immortal dictator from which we would never escape.'

November 2018 - 'Maybe AI will make me follow it, laugh like a demon & say who’s the pet now.'

September 2019 - 'If advanced AI (beyond basic bots) hasn’t been applied to manipulate social media, it won’t be long before it is.'

February 2020 - 'At Tesla, using AI to solve self-driving isn’t just icing on the cake, it the cake.'

July 2020 - 'We’re headed toward a situation where AI is vastly smarter than humans and I think that time frame is less than five years from now. But that doesn’t mean that everything goes to hell in five years. It just means that things get unstable or weird.'

April 2021: 'A major part of real-world AI has to be solved to make unsupervised, generalized full self-driving work.'

February 2022: 'We have to solve a huge part of AI just to make cars drive themselves.'


Read more:
















US MILITARY HAS ALL THE $$$$
House lawmakers just authorized the most expensive project ever recommended by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

BYJUAN LOZANO, MICHAEL PHILLIS AND THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
December 10, 2022 

A scene from the Texas coast near Galveston after Hurricane Ike spared key facilities of the nation's petrochemical industry.
MATT SLOCUM, FILE—AP PHOTO

Fourteen years after Hurricane Ike ripped through thousands of homes and businesses near Galveston, Texas — but mostly spared the region’s oil refineries and chemical plants — the U.S. House of Representatives voted Thursday to authorize the most expensive project ever recommended by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to protect against the next raging storm.

Ike erased beachfront neighborhoods, causing $30 billion in damage. But with so much of the nation’s petrochemical industry in the Houston-Galveston corridor, it could have been even worse. That close call inspired marine science professor Bill Merrell to first propose a massive coastal barrier to protect against a direct hit.

Now, the National Defense Authorization Act includes authorizations for a $34 billion plan that borrows from Merrell’s idea.

“It was quite different than anything we had done in the United States and it took us a little while to come around to it,” said Merrell of Texas A&M University at Galveston.

The House passed the $858 billion defense bill by a vote of 350-80. It includes major projects to improve the nation’s waterways and protect communities against floods made more severe by climate change.

Specifically, the vote advances the Water Resources Development Act of 2022. That lays out a sprawling set of policies for the Army Corps and authorizes projects that touch on navigation, improving the environment and protecting against storms. It typically passes every two years. It received strong, bipartisan support and now advances to the Senate.

The Texas coastal protection project far outstrips any of the 24 other projects greenlit by the bill. There is a $6.3 billion plan to deepen vital shipping channels near New York City and a $1.2 billion effort to raise homes and businesses on the central Louisiana coast.

“No matter what side of politics you are on, everyone is interested in having good water resources,” said Sandra Knight, president of WaterWonks LLC.

Researchers at Rice University in Houston have estimated that a Category 4 storm with a 24-foot storm surge could damage storage tanks and release more than 90 million gallons of oil and hazardous substances.

The most prominent feature of the coastal barrier would be floodgates, including some 650 feet wide – roughly the equivalent of a 60-story building on its side – to prevent storm surge from entering Galveston Bay and plowing up the Houston Ship Channel. An 18-mile ring barrier system would also be built along the backside of Galveston Island to protect homes and businesses from storm surge. The plan took six years of study involving roughly 200 people.

There will also be beach and dune ecosystem restoration projects along the Texas coast. The Houston Audubon Society raised concerns the project would destroy some bird habitat and harm fish, shrimp and crabs populations in the Bay.

The legislation authorizes the construction of the project, but funding will remain a challenge — money must still be allocated. The huge cost burden falls heaviest on the federal government, but local and state entities also will have to pitch in billions. Construction could take two decades.

“It significantly reduces the risk of that catastrophic storm surge event that is not recoverable,” said Mike Braden, chief of the Army Corps Galveston District’s mega projects division.

The bill also includes a range of policy measures. When future hurricanes hit for example, coastal protections can be rebuilt with climate change in mind. Designers will be able to think about how much seas will rise when they draw up plans.

“The future for a lot of these communities is not going to look like the past,” said Jimmy Hague, senior water policy advisor at the Nature Conservancy.

The water resources bill continues a push towards wetlands and other flood solutions that use nature to absorb water instead of concrete walls to keep it at bay. On the Mississippi River below St. Louis, for example, a new program will help restore ecosystems and create a mix of flood control projects. There are also provisions for studying long-term drought.

There are measures to improve outreach with tribes and make it easier to complete work in poorer, historically disadvantaged communities.

It can take a long time to study projects, move them through Congress and find funding. Merrell, who will turn 80 in February, said he hopes to see some of the Texas project be constructed but he doesn’t think he’ll be around to see it finished.

“I just hope the end product comes and it protects my children and grandchildren and all the other citizens of this area,” Merrell said.

—Phillis reported from St. Louis



CLASS WAR IN OLD ENGLAND

Royal Mail staff to stage fresh strike in dispute over pay, jobs and conditions

10 December 2022, 

Dave Ward
Royal Mail strike. Picture: PA

Communication Workers Union staff have staged a series of walkouts over the increasingly bitter row.

Royal Mail workers will stage a fresh strike on Sunday in the long running dispute over pay, jobs and conditions.

Members of the Communication Workers Union (CWU) are embroiled in an increasingly bitter row which has sparked a serious of walkouts.

More strikes are due to be held in the run-up to Christmas, which the union said will cause a huge backlog of mail.

Royal Mail strike
Members of the CWU outside Buckingham Palace (Jonathan Brady/PA)

Thousands of CWU members joined a huge rally in central London on Friday to show their ongoing support for the strikes.

CWU general secretary Dave Ward said: “Royal Mail bosses are risking a Christmas meltdown because of their stubborn refusal to treat their employees with respect.

“Postal workers want to get on with serving the communities they belong to, delivering Christmas gifts and tackling the backlog from recent weeks.

“But they know their value, and they will not meekly accept the casualisation of their jobs, the destruction of their conditions and the impoverishment of their families.

Royal Mail strike
CWU members marched from Parliament Square to St James’s Park on Friday (James Manning/PA)

“This can be resolved if Royal Mail begin treating their workers with respect, and meet with the union to resolve this dispute.”

A Royal Mail spokesperson said: “The CWU know full well that in a business losing more than £1 million a day, we need to agree changes to the way we work so that we can fund the pay offer of up to 9% we have already made.

“While the CWU refuses to accept the need for change, it’s our customers and our people who suffer. Strike action has already cost our people £1,200 each. The money allocated to the pay deal risks being eaten away by the costs of further strike action.

“The CWU is striking at our busiest time, deliberately holding Christmas to ransom for our customers, businesses and families across the country.

“We are doing everything we can to deliver Christmas for our customers and settle this dispute. During the last strike days, we delivered more than 700,000 parcels, and more than 11,000 delivery and processing staff returned to work. We recovered our service quickly, but the task becomes more challenging as Christmas nears.

“We remain willing to talk at any time about our best and final offer and urge the CWU to call off their damaging strike action.”

Rail union boss Mick Lynch calls for urgent meeting with Prime Minister

10 December 2022

Mick Lynch, general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union
Royal Mail strike. Picture: PA

The RMT general secretary has written to Rishi Sunak saying a meeting between the two men was now the best prospect of making any progress.

The leader of the biggest rail workers union has called for an urgent meeting with the Prime Minister in a bid to help resolve the long-running dispute over pay, jobs and conditions.

Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union (RMT) are due to stage two 48-hour strikes next week following months of industrial action over the deadlocked row.

RMT general secretary Mick Lynch has written to Rishi Sunak saying a meeting between the two men was now the best prospect of making any progress.

Mr Lynch said that from press reports, Transport Secretary Mark Harper’s appearance at the Transport Committee this week and from what he has been directly told by the Rail Delivery Group’s negotiators, it was clear that No 10 is “directing the mandate for the rail companies and has torpedoed the talks”.

Prime Minister’s Questions
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak (House of Commons/PA)

He wrote: “There is no reason why this dispute could not be settled in the same way that RMT has resolved disputes in Scotland and Wales.

“Where the Scottish and Welsh governments have had responsibility for mandates, pay settlements for 2022 have been agreed and neither of these settlements have been conditional on cutting staffing, and eroding safety, security and accessibility.

“It is already a national scandal that your government has been paying the train operating companies not to settle the dispute, indemnifying them to the tune of £300 million so that they have no incentive to reach a resolution.

“It’s not clear to me why, on top of this, your government has now torpedoed the negotiations, but I now believe that a meeting with yourself represents the best prospect of any renewed progress.

“We have a duty to explore every possible option for settling this dispute and I’m willing to do my part. I hope you will agree to meet me.”

A Government spokesperson said: “It’s incredibly disappointing that, despite a new and improved deal offering job security and a fair pay rise, the RMT continues to hold Christmas hostage with more damaging strikes.

“The Government has played its part by facilitating a fair and decent offer and the RMT and its members should vote this deal through and end this harmful disruption.”

By Press Association



Union bosses must NOT be allowed to jeopardise UK economy, says Jeremy Hunt: 

Chancellor believes high pay demands will hurt fight against inflation as he predicts it will fall to 3.7% early next year

ITS NOT WAGES ITS PROFITS THAT CAUSE INFLATION

Jeremy Hunt said the predicted inflation drop could be damaged unless unions moderated their pay demands

In a letter to the Prime Minister RMT union leader Mick Lynch said No 10 has 'torpedoed the negotiations'
 
He said a meeting represents the best prospect of renewed progress


By JAMES CALLERY FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED:  10 December 2022

Jeremy Hunt has warned trade unions not to jeopardise Britain’s recovery, noting that high pay demands will affect the fight against inflation and damage the workers they are trying to help.

In an interview with the Financial Times, the Chancellor did not deny that ministers had blocked a possible 10 per cent pay offer to rail workers spread over two years.

A subsequent 8 per cent offer was immediately declined by the RMT union.

Speaking at the launch of a package of financial services reforms in Edinburgh, Mr Hunt said that managing inflation was vital for any recovery from the recession.


Jeremy Hunt (pictured) warned that this 'very dramatic' drop could be jeopardised unless unions, especially in public services, moderated their pay demands

He said the independent Office for Budget Responsibility believed inflation would drop to 3.7 per cent in the first part of 2024, falling from October’s 11.1 per cent.

He warned that this 'very dramatic' drop could be jeopardised unless unions, especially in public services, moderated their pay demands.

Mr Hunt said Number 10, the Treasury and all government departments agreed that pay rises need to be kept under control.

'If we make the wrong choices now, we won’t have that 3.7 per cent of inflation in January or February of 2024 and this will change from being a one-off problem to being a permanent problem,' Mr Hunt said.

'We just have to be really careful not to agree to pay demands that have the opposite of the intended effect because they lock in high inflation.'

Liz Truss' Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has admitted he and the Prime Minister 'blew it' with his disastrous mini-budget and said her top team got 'carried away'.

Mr Kwarteng said his 'biggest regret' from his time as Chancellor was that he was 'too impatient'.

The leader of the biggest rail workers union has called for an urgent meeting with Rishi Sunak in a bid to help resolve the long-running dispute over pay, jobs and conditions.

Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union (RMT) are due to stage two 48-hour strikes next week following months of industrial action over the deadlocked row.

+8
View gallery


Pictured: Mick Lynch at the Postal Workers Strike Rally in Parliament Square yesterday

In a letter to the Prime Minister, RMT union leader Mick Lynch said a meeting between the two men was now the best way of making progress.

Mr Lynch said that from press reports, Transport Secretary Mark Harper's appearance at the Transport Committee this week and from what he has been directly told by the Rail Delivery Group's negotiators, it is clear that No 10 is directing the mandate for the rail companies and has 'torpedoed' the talks.

He wrote: 'There is no reason why this dispute could not be settled in the same way that RMT has resolved disputes in Scotland and Wales.

'Where the Scottish and Welsh governments have had responsibility for mandates, pay settlements for 2022 have been agreed and neither of these settlements have been conditional on cutting staffing, and eroding safety, security and accessibility.

'It is already a national scandal that your government has been paying the train operating companies not to settle the dispute, indemnifying them to the tune of £300 million so that they have no incentive to reach a resolution.'

He added: 'It's not clear to me why, on top of this, your government has now torpedoed the negotiations, but I now believe that a meeting with yourself represents the best prospect of any renewed progress.

'We have a duty to explore every possible option for settling this dispute and I'm willing to do my part. I hope you will agree to meet me.'

A Government spokesperson said: 'It's incredibly disappointing that, despite a new and improved deal offering job security and a fair pay rise, the RMT continues to hold Christmas hostage with more damaging strikes.

'The Government has played its part by facilitating a fair and decent offer and the RMT and its members should vote this deal through and end this harmful disruption.'



Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union (RMT) are due to stage two 48-hour strikes next week following months of industrial action over the deadlocked row

Network Rail has warned passengers that services will be limited, overcrowded or cancelled until at least January 8 as RMT union members strike for 11 days over the holiday season.

Conservative MP David Jones said: 'The unions should consider that by going for such hefty pay settlements, they will not only stoke inflation but also make Christmas miserable at best, and dangerous at worst.'

The RMT will shut down the railways in two 48-hour strikes from Tuesday and Friday, destroying the plans of millions for the weekend before Christmas and costing high streets hundreds of millions of pounds.

Services will be disrupted every day for at least a month, Network Rail warned travellers last night.

Additionally, an unprecedented overtime ban for train operating staff, running from December 18 until January 2, will result in thousands more cancellations.

Up to 100,000 Royal College of Nursing (RCN) members will also strike on Thursday for the first time in the union's 126-year history, causing considerable disruption to the NHS.

As many as 15,000 operations could be postponed next week due to the NHS walkouts. And more than 100,000 outpatient appointments could also be affected by the strikes, analysis by The Daily Telegraph suggests.

NHS trusts were instructed to ensure all affected patients are notified of the scheduling changes by Tuesday. They were told that later cancellations should only be made in 'exceptional circumstances'.

Hospitals were also instructed to reschedule cancelled appointments as soon as possible. But the NHS' long waiting lists have left some doubtful that they will get new appointments soon.

An insider told The Daily Mail: 'If there are strikes they will have an impact on patients. Many aren't going to get the care and treatment they need. Unions should think again.'



Mr Lynch said that from press reports, Transport Secretary Mark Harper's appearance at the Transport Committee this week and from what he has been directly told by the Rail Delivery Group's negotiators, No 10 is clearly 'directing the mandate for the rail companies and has torpedoed the talks'

RCN general secretary Pat Cullen, whose members are due to take part in unprecedented strike action on December 15 and December 20, has accused Health Secretary Steve Barclay of refusing to negotiate properly because she leads a largely female workforce.

Mr Barclay has repeatedly been accused by the RCN of failing to fully engage in discussions with nurses, even as he insists that his 'door remains open'.

Ms Cullen, who represents hundreds of thousands of nurses, criticised the Health Secretary in an interview with The Guardian.

'I'm a woman negotiating for a 90 per cent female profession that is trying to operate with a Government that's particularly macho and tends to operate with a bullyboy tactic,' she said.

'Perhaps that's the reason why we can't get moving forward. By refusing to negotiate Steve Barclay is ignoring nurses and ignoring me.

'I think there's an issue here with us being female. I ask myself, would that [refusal to negotiate] be different if it was a 90 per cent male profession and I was a male? I truly believe it would be. I think we'd be treated differently.'

She added: 'Everything is on the table and negotiations will inevitably involve some give and take on each side. I won't dig in if they won't dig in.

'But they need to come to the table with me.'


Postal staff (pictured) are expected to continue striking on Sunday, as well as next week and the two days leading up to Christmas

Nurses and other nursing staff will take action at half of the locations in England where the legal mandate was reached for strikes, every NHS employer except one in Wales and throughout Northern Ireland.

The RCN has said that despite this year's pay award of £1,400, experienced nurses are worse off by 20 per cent in real terms due to successive below-inflation awards since 2010.

The union is calling for a pay rise of 5 per cent higher than RPI inflation.

A Department of Health spokesperson said that Mr Barclay has the 'utmost' respect for nurses and 'is hugely grateful for the dedication of all NHS staff'.

The spokesperson added: 'Ministers have had constructive talks with unions, including the RCN, on how we can make the NHS a better place to work - and have been clear the door remains open for further talks.

'These are extremely challenging times, we have accepted the recommendations of the independent NHS Pay Review Body in full and have given over one million NHS workers a pay rise of at least £1,400 this year.

'This is on top of a 3 per cent pay increase last year when public sector pay was frozen and wider government support with the cost of living.'

Pictured: The Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, together with Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Steve Barclay, meets the Elective Recovery Taskforce in Downing Street this week


The Health Secretary has repeatedly insisted that the concerns raised by trade unions are not just about pay and said that the Government was pushing to improve conditions for workers in other areas.

Industrial action at Royal Mail that has already caused issues with the Christmas post will continue tomorrow and on Wednesday and Thursday.

Postal service bosses warned customers that they had just two days to post gifts second class in time for Christmas Day.

A source said: 'The back-up of the post is really bad. Royal Mail is focusing on parcels and there is not a lot of room in the model for letters.'

Dave Ward, of the Communication Workers Union, said that his members had 'kept the country going' during the pandemic and warned that turning Royal Mail into a parcel courier would destroy it.

Union sources have also warned that Christmas cards 'won't arrive until February' because of Royal Mail backlogs, as hundreds of postal workers marched with 'Grinch Lynch' on the first day of mass walkouts.

Communication Workers Union (CWU) members gathered outside Parliament in central London yesterday - joined by Mr Lynch - in their latest attempt to secure a pay rise that matches the rising cost of living.


The RCN has said that despite this year's pay award of £1,400, experienced nurses are worse off by 20 per cent in real terms due to successive below-inflation awards since 2010. The union is calling for a pay rise of 5 per cent above RPI inflation

More than 115,000 Royal Mail workers walked out on Friday as part of a wave of strike action which is expected to continue on Sunday, as well as two days next week and the two days before Christmas.

Picket lines were mounted outside Royal Mail offices across the country.

Royal Mail, criticising the CWU for causing customers to 'suffer,' said company leaders are 'doing everything we can to deliver Christmas for our customers and settle this dispute' but insiders told the Telegraph that the 'catastrophic' impact could see people waiting months for their mail.

A source told the paper: 'The backup of the post is really bad, it's tremendous.

'Royal Mail is focusing on parcels and there is not a lot of room in the model for letters.'

CWU general secretary Dave Ward said Royal Mail staff, who were classed as key workers during the coronavirus pandemic, are 'fighting for their jobs, their livelihood, and the service that they provide to the public.'

'What the company are asking postal workers to agree is that we sack thousands of them whilst at the same time bringing in self-employed drivers, new recruits ... and whilst retaining agency workers,' Mr Ward argued.

He said the company's demands for workers to start up to three hours later 'will destroy the future of Royal Mail'.

'We're not prepared to accept that under the banner of modernisation.'

Mr Ward also explained that the strike action was aimed at setting in place job security for postal staff, who were classed as key workers during the coronavirus pandemic.

'It's about keeping postal workers, decent working people, in work and making sure that this company has a successful future and that it doesn't just get turned into just another parcel courier,' he said.



In his letter to Rishi Sunak, pictured here yesterday, RMT union leader Mick Lynch said a meeting between the two men was now the best chance of making progress

A Royal Mail spokesperson said: 'We spent three more days at Acas this week to discuss what needs to happen for the strikes to be lifted.

'In the end, all we received was another request for more pay, without the changes needed to fund the pay offer.

'The CWU know full well that in a business losing more than £1 million a day, we need to agree changes to the way we work so that we can fund the pay offer of up to 9 per cent we have already made.

'While the CWU refuses to accept the need for change, it's our customers and our people who suffer....

'We are doing everything we can to deliver Christmas for our customers and settle this dispute.'

The union claims Royal Mail imposed a two per cent pay increase on members without consultation and is 'refusing' to treat employees with respect, according to Mr Ward.

Next week's strikes extend to workers at Heathrow, some bus companies, Eurostar and National Highways.

MPs fear the 'coordinated' disruption will stop carers from reaching the elderly and force patients to cancel hospital appointments.

But the Prime Minister yesterday refused to make 11th-hour concessions, saying: 'What I'm not going to do is ask ordinary families up and down the country to pay an extra £1,000 a year to meet the pay demands of the union bosses.'

Mr Sunak did not rule out extending planned 'tough' anti-strike laws to prevent walkouts by emergency service workers.






















Meanwhile, The New York Times this week hailed Mr Lynch as 'an unlikely national hero' in Britain.

In an opinion piece published by the US newspaper, journalist Rachel Shabi praised RMT union leader.

The article - titled 'Britain Is Miserable, but Britons Are Fighting Back' - said: 'Britons are fighting back. Months after what was called a hot strike summer, in which almost 200,000 workers staged walkouts, Britain is witnessing industrial action on a scale not seen in decades — and in all sorts of unlikely places.'

It continued: 'The strikes, usually contentious, have unexpectedly captured the public mood. People go to picket lines and speak up for workers on television and radio phone-ins.

'Mick Lynch, the leader of the transport union that has been at the forefront of strikes, has become an unlikely national hero. His refusal to accept things as they are, as well as his evisceration of hostile interviewers, has struck a chord.'


Nobel Peace Prize winners slam Putin's 'insane' war


The Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian winners of the Nobel Peace Prize denounced Russian President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine during the award ceremony in Norway.


Human rights activists from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus were hailed as "champions of peace" on Saturday as they took possession of this year's Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo.

The now-banned Russian human rights organization Memorial, the Center for Civil Liberties (CCL) from Kyiv and imprisoned Belarusian human rights lawyer Ales Bialiatski were honored with the world's most prestigious political award.

The winners were honored for their many years of work criticizing those in power and defending essential civil rights.

Their groups went to great lengths to document war crimes, human rights abuses and abuses of power, the prize jury said.

Saturday's prize-giving coincided with the UN's Human Rights Day, which commemorates the 74th anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Bialiatski has been in prison in Belarus for a year and a half, so was represented by his wife, Natalia Pinchuk. Representatives from CCL and Memorial, however, were able to personally receive the medals and diplomas. They used their speeches to denounce Russian President Vladimir Putin for launching his "insane and criminal" invasion of Ukraine.

Rights campaigners win Nobel Peace Prize
02:31

Surrender is not real peace

"The people of Ukraine want peace more than anyone else in the world. But peace cannot be reached by a country under attack laying down its arms," the head of the CCL, Oleksandra Matviichuk, said.

Founded in 2007, the CCL has documented more than 27,000 cases of war crimes allegedly committed by Russian troops in Ukraine, which she said were "only the tip of the iceberg."

Matviichuk reiterated her appeal for an international tribunal to judge Putin, his ally Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko and "other war criminals."

Her Russian co-laureate Yan Rachinsky, the chairman of the human rights organization Memorial, denounced Russia's "imperial ambitions" inherited from the ex-Soviet Union "that still thrive today."

Putin and his "ideological servants" have hijacked the anti-fascist struggle "for their own political interests," he said.

Now, "resistance to Russia is called 'fascism'" and has become "the ideological justification for the insane and criminal war of aggression against Ukraine," Rachinsky added.

Belarusian activist's words delivered by wife

Pinchuk spoke on behalf of Bialiatski, who faces a prison sentence in Belarus of up to 12 years for tax evasion — charges his supporters say are trumped up.

"In my homeland, the entirety of Belarus is in a prison,'' he said in the remarks delivered by Pinchuk, in reference to a sweeping crackdown on opposition protests against strongman Alexander Lukashenko's August 2020 fraud-tainted election win.

"This award belongs to all my human rights defender friends, all civic activists, tens of thousands of Belarusians who have gone through beatings, torture, arrests, prison.''


Nobel panel announces winners of Peace Prize
09:57

Stockholm hosts other Nobel winners

The Nobel prizes for chemistry, physics, medicine, literature and economics were presented later Saturday. After a two-year COVID-19 pandemic break, award ceremonies took place at Stockholm's Concert Hall with nearly 1,500 invited guests.

Annie Ernaux of France won the literature prize, Barry Sharpless of the United States won the chemistry prize for the second time, Svante Paabo of Sweden took the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work on the study of human evolution, while Alain Aspect, John F Clauser and Anton Zeilinger, scientists based in France, the US and Austria, accepted the Nobel Prize in Physics for work on quantum information science.

Former US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and economists Douglas Diamond and Philip Dybvig received the Nobel economics prize for their research on how a deeper economic crisis can be averted by propping up failing banks.

The Nobel prizes for chemistry, physics, medicine, literature and economics were awarded in Stockholm, Sweden
 AFP via Getty Images

Many strong economies are struggling this year with high inflation and a looming recession, as the conflict in Ukraine has led to an energy crisis and affected food supplies and prices.
Who is invited to this year's banquet?

The list of invitees to the banquet held after this year's ceremony in Stockholm has stirred some controversy. Traditionally attended by the Swedish royal family, government officials and dignitaries from different countries, some names have been intentionally left off this year's guest list.

One such name is Jimmie Akesson, the leader of the Sweden Democrats. The anti-immigration, right-wing party became the second-biggest in parliament after elections in September.

The ambassadors of Russia and Belarus were also left off the guest list.

The Nobel Prize was founded by Alfred Nobel to present prizes for achievements in science, literature and peace.

The dynamite inventor left behind some 31 million crowns, equal to $174.2 million (roughly €165 million) in today's money to fund the prizes, awarded annually since 1901.

mm, rmt/fb (AFP, Reuters)