Showing posts sorted by date for query Yazidis. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Yazidis. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, August 09, 2026

 

Source: Originally published by Z. Feel free to share widely.

The experience of the Communist Ansar[1] in Iraq remains one of the finest and most sincere chapters of communist struggle in modern Iraqi history. Every struggle carries both positive and negative aspects, and no human or political endeavor is free of this, however upright its integrity or noble its aims. Yet this experience, notwithstanding the debate and differing views surrounding some of its aspects, stands as living proof that leftist thought can produce some of the most genuine and inspiring models of struggle even in the harshest and darkest of circumstances. It embodied a remarkable example of sacrifice, self-giving, and determination to pursue the path of freedom and social justice, despite the siege, persecution, and repression it faced at the hands of the fascist Ba’athist regime[2].

The Communist Ansar movement was distinguished by the diversity of its ethnic and religious composition. Its ranks included Arabs, Kurds, Chaldeans, Assyrians, Syriacs, Turkmen, and Faili Kurds, alongside Armenians. They brought together Sunni and Shia Muslims, Christians, Mandaean Sabians, Yazidis, and Shabak, with men and women serving side by side. In this, the movement exemplified a living model of fraternity among the components of the Iraqi people. This internationalist character left a lasting impression on the residents of Kurdish villages, who came to understand that their true enemy was the Ba’athist regime and its repressive policies, not Arabs as a people, contrary to the narrative that some hardline nationalist forces on both sides attempted to promote, one that reduced the conflict to a narrow ethnic dimension.

The movement also achieved a notable historic first: communist women fighters, known as the Nasirat, literally “female Ansar,” carried arms for the first time in the history of armed struggle in Kurdistan, taking part alongside their comrades in every battle and duty of the resistance. The presence of women in combat left a profound mark on the consciousness of the Kurdish villages that sheltered the Ansar, helping to entrench a more egalitarian view of women’s role in society and opening a new horizon for the women of those villages to see themselves as active agents in public life, not merely as dependents within it.

Among the most painful chapters of this journey was the Bashtashan massacre[3], carried out by forces of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan against Ansar of the Iraqi Communist Party on the first of May 1983, claiming the lives of more than one hundred and fifty comrades. This crime remains a deep wound in the memory of the Ansar movement, and its record still calls for further documentation and accountability, in fairness to the memory of the victims.

In 1988, the Communist Ansar witnessed firsthand one of the most horrific acts of genocide in modern history: the Anfal campaign[4], waged by the Ba’athist regime against the Kurdish people. It claimed the lives of more than one hundred and eighty thousand people, destroyed thousands of villages, and involved the use of internationally banned chemical weapons.

Amid those brutal conditions, the Communist Ansar played a notable role in defending Kurdish villages and standing by their people in their ordeal, earning the trust and respect of the Kurdish population and leaving a lasting mark that remains present in the collective memory of that period. This armed presence was not confined to the Communist Ansar alone; other leftist factions, such as the Communist Current organization, also maintained a limited armed presence, which later took part in the March 1991 uprising that followed the Second Gulf War.

Before the Communist Ansar experience took the shape we came to know, the history of the Iraqi left had already seen an earlier attempt at armed struggle. It was led by the martyr Khalid Ahmad Zaki[5] in the southern marshes in 1968, drawing on the Guevarist model and the ideas of armed revolution he had absorbed through his internationalist connections. Khalid Ahmad Zaki fell alongside his comrades in the battle of Hor al-Ghomouka, yet his experience remained etched in Iraqi leftist memory, later inspiring literary and artistic works that documented that rare moment in the history of the Iraqi left.

Although I hold reservations today about armed struggle as a method of resistance, the conditions of that period, under the ferocious onslaught the fascist Ba’athist regime unleashed on leftists and other progressive forces, left, in my assessment, no option but to take up arms, if only in self-defense against repression and liquidation, and to help bring down the dictatorship of the time.

I turn here to my own personal experience with this movement. I am honored to have been among those who took part in it through my activity within the underground organizations of the Iraqi Communist Party[6] inside Iraq between 1983 and 1990, as a member of the March 31 Organization[7], one of the party’s largest clandestine organizations, in which I had the honor of taking part in its leadership. It brought together dozens of comrades from across Iraq.

The organization was initially linked to the Ansar movement through the Independent Fifth Battalion, and at times through the Third Battalion or directly with the Badinan sector[8]. We were, to a great extent, the “Ansar of the interior,” providing the Ansar movement with continuous support through intelligence and information on the movements of military and security forces, securing weapons, equipment, medicine, and documents, facilitating movement within the cities, and helping smuggle endangered comrades out to liberated areas, in addition to agitation and political and organizational work inside the cities. We also made continuous secret visits to Ansar military bases to meet with comrades overseeing party organizations.

Whatever our position today on this or that chapter of the Communist Ansar’s journey, and whatever our agreement or disagreement over the merits of armed struggle as a method of resistance, this experience will remain one of the significant chapters in the history of worldwide socialist struggle, alongside other experiences that walked the same path in different contexts.

These range from the Sierra Maestra rebels in Cuba, who overthrew the Batista dictatorship in 1959, to the Sandinista Front in Nicaragua, which brought down the Somoza family’s rule in 1979; from the Greek People’s Liberation Army, which resisted Nazi occupation before waging a bitter civil war against a Western-backed right, to the Dhofar rebels in Oman, who waged, between 1965 and 1976, one of the longest armed leftist revolutions in the Arabian Peninsula in defense of social justice and against British colonial presence; and on to the leftist resistance movements across Europe during the Second World War, from the French and Italian resistance to Tito’s Partisans in Yugoslavia, where communists and leftists formed the backbone of the armed struggle against Nazi occupation and fascism.

These experiences vary in their circumstances and outcomes, and each carries important lessons worth drawing on as well as mistakes that deserve frank, comradely critique. Yet they all share a common truth: that the left, when confronted with brutal repression and the closing off of any open political horizon, has proven capable of producing extraordinary forms of resistance that remain part of humanity’s shared memory in its struggle for freedom, social justice, and the socialist alternative.

In closing, the spirit of sacrifice and dedication embodied by the Communist Ansar experience, and by other chapters of leftist struggle in Iraq[9], ought to be channeled into a unified energy placed at the service of working women and men alike, of hand and of mind. I renew my call for the necessity of uniting leftist and progressive forces, across their various factions and currents, and for strengthening joint action among them.

Glory and eternal memory to the martyrs of the Iraqi and Kurdistani leftist movement in all its factions, foremost among them the martyrs, women and men, of the Communist Ansar. The left, in all its factions, will remain the shining human hope in the face of the corruption and authoritarianism prevailing in Iraq, both sustained by the notorious system of ethnic and sectarian power-sharing.

This text was written on the occasion of the fifth anniversary of the founding of Al-Nasir Al-Shuyu’i newspaper (literally, “The Communist partisan”)[10], to which I wish continued success in documenting this legacy of struggle and passing it on to new generations.

Explanatory Notes

[1] The Communist Ansar (Partisans) movement: A militant and armed formation founded by the Iraqi Communist Party in the mountains of Iraqi Kurdistan starting in the late 1970s, to confront Ba’athist repression through armed struggle after overt political activity had become impossible inside the cities. It brought together thousands of militants, women and men, who were forced to leave their cities for the liberated mountain areas.

[2] The Ba’athist regime: The regime that ruled Iraq under the leadership of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party between 1968 and 2003, under which repression against leftists, communists, and the political opposition reached its peak, particularly under Saddam Hussein. Despite its repressive character toward communists and the opposition at home, the regime received simultaneous backing from both blocs of the Cold War. The Soviet Union supplied most of its military hardware in the 1970s under the 1972 Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation, and continued arming it throughout the Iran-Iraq War of 1980 to 1988, while Western capitalist states, most notably France and West Germany, provided advanced weapons and technology, some of which was later used to manufacture chemical and biological weapons, alongside indirect American economic and intelligence support during that same war.

[3] The Bashtashan massacre: An armed attack carried out by forces of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, under the leadership of Jalal Talabani and Nawshirwan Mustafa, on the first of May 1983, with backing from the Ba’athist regime, against bases of the Iraqi Communist Party in the mountain village of Bashtashan near the Qandil mountain range. It resulted in the killing of more than one hundred and fifty party members and Ansar fighters, making it one of the bloodiest and most criminal episodes in the history of the Kurdish nationalist movement in Iraq.

[4] The Anfal campaign: A series of military operations carried out by the Ba’athist regime under Saddam Hussein between February and September 1988 against the Kurdish people in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. It comprised eight phases in which chemical weapons were used, resulting in the killing or disappearance of nearly one hundred and eighty thousand people, the destruction of thousands of villages, and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of residents. It was later recognized by a number of judicial bodies as an act of genocide against the Kurds.

[5] Khalid Ahmad Zaki: An Iraqi communist militant, born in Baghdad in 1935, who left his post as secretary of the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation in London to lead an armed struggle experiment inspired by the Guevarist model in the marshes of southern Iraq in 1968. He fell in battle alongside a number of his comrades at Hor al-Ghomouka in June of that same year, and later became known by the epithet “Iraq’s Guevara.” His story inspired the novel A Banquet for Seaweed by the novelist Haidar Haidar.

[6] The Iraqi Communist Party: Founded in 1934, it is one of the oldest communist parties in the Middle East and played a central role in Iraqi political and labor life throughout the twentieth century. It was subjected to repeated waves of repression under successive regimes.

[7] The March 31 Organization: One of the largest underground organizations of the Iraqi Communist Party operating inside Iraqi cities during the 1980s. It worked under extremely difficult clandestine conditions amid relentless surveillance by the Ba’athist security apparatus.

[8] The Badinan sector: A geographic area in the Kurdistan region of Iraq that served as one of the most important theaters of activity for the armed Communist Ansar movement. The Independent Fifth Company and the First and Second Battalions of the Communist Ansar were active in this sector.

[9] Iraqi leftist parties: Alongside the Iraqi Communist Party, the Iraqi leftist landscape includes other organizations, among them the Kurdistan Communist Party, the Iraqi Communist Party (Central Command), the Iraqi and Kurdistan Worker-Communist Party, the Communist Alternative Organization, the Communist Left Party, and others. These organizations differ in their history and ideological orientations, but all share a common belonging to Iraq’s leftist and communist field.

[10] Al-Nasir Al-Shuyu’i newspaper (literally, “The Communist Partisan”): A periodical published by the League of Iraqi Communist Ansar. Its inaugural issue (Issue Zero) appeared in July 2021, with the aim of documenting the history of the Communist Ansar movement and passing on its legacy of struggle to new generations, particularly the youth of the 2019 Tishreen uprising. It includes testimonies, articles, and archival material written by the Ansar themselves about their experience both in the mountains and in the cities.Email

Rezgar Akrawi is a leftist researcher specializing in issues of technology and the left, working in the field of systems development and e-governance.

Saturday, March 21, 2026

French jihadist jailed for life for Islamic State crimes against Yazidis

Paris (France) (AFP) – A French jihadist was sentenced to life in jail on Friday for involvement in Islamic State group atrocities against Iraq's Yazidi minority, the first case in France to tackle the issue.


Issued on: 20/03/2026 - RFI

An image grab from a video reportedly released by IS and showing French jihadist Sabri Essid. © - / AL-FURQAN MEDIA/AFP/File

The Paris Assizes Court found Sabri Essid guilty in absentia of genocide, crimes against humanity and complicity in the crimes, committed between 2014 and 2016 when the jihadists occupied swathes of northern Syria and Iraq.

"Sabri Essid took part in the genocide perpetrated by Islamic State," presiding judge Marc Sommerer told the court.

"Essid became part of the criminal network repeatedly buying and reselling a very large number of Yazidi victims," he said, adding the court judged that the group had "specifically targeted" the Yazidi minority for its religious beliefs.

The Islamic State group regarded the Yazidis, who follow a pre-Islamic faith, as heretics.

Essid, a Frenchman born in 1984 and who joined IS in Syria in 2014, is presumed to have been killed in 2018. But without proof of his death, he was tried and convicted in absentia.

He is accused of buying several Yazidi women at markets and then repeatedly raping them, as well as depriving them of water and food.

IS seized large swathes of Syria and neighbouring Iraq in 2014, declaring a so-called caliphate there.

In August of that year, they murdered thousands of Yazidi men in Iraq's Sinjar province and took into Syria thousands of women and girls to sell them in markets as sex slaves to be abused by jihadists from around the world.

United Nations investigators have qualified these actions as genocide.

France begins landmark trial over Islamic State genocide of Yazidis
'Genocidal policy'

On Thursday, a Yazidi woman who was sold by IS as a sex slave described in stark detail to the Paris court the horrors she endured under jihadist captivity in Syria.

She said she was raped almost daily by her first two owners – a married Saudi man and then Essid. She was resold to six other men before escaping with her daughter and walking through the night to reach a post manned by Kurdish forces.

Sommerer said on Thursday he had overseen several trials for crimes against humanity but had "never heard before" the atrocities endured by the woman, whose name AFP is withholding to protect her privacy.

Known in Syria as Abu Dojanah al-Faransi, Essid was thought to be close to Jean-Michel and Fabien Clain.

The Clain brothers, now believed to be dead, claimed responsibility on behalf of IS for France's worst ever jihadist attacks in Paris in 2015.

Lawyers had earlier stressed the significance of the Essid trial.

"Given that in the past Islamic State fighters believed to be dead have resurfaced, it is essential that this trial take place," said Patrick Baudouin, a lawyer for France's Human Rights League.

"It is essential that it shed light on the particularly grave abuses committed against civilian populations and in particular the genocidal policy implemented against the Yazidi population," said Clemence Bectarte, a lawyer representing three Yazidi women survivors and their eight children


Trials throughout Europe

After Essid went to Syria, his wife, their three children and her son from a previous relationship joined him.

In an IS propaganda video released in 2015, Essid is seen pushing his 12-year-old stepson to shoot a Palestinian hostage in the head.

His wife has been jailed since returning to France.

Similar trials have taken place elsewhere in Europe.

In 2021, a German court issued the first ruling worldwide to recognise crimes against the Yazidi community as genocide.

It sentenced an Iraqi man to life in jail on charges that he chained a five-year-old Yazidi girl "house slave" outdoors in heat of up to 50C as punishment for wetting her mattress, leading her to die of thirst.

Last month, a Swedish court convicted a 52-year-old woman of genocide for keeping Yazidi women and children as slaves in Syria in 2015.

US-backed forces eventually defeated the IS proto-state in 2019, though isolated cells still operate in the Syrian desert.

Hussein Qaidi, who heads the Kidnapped Yazidi Rescue Office, told AFP last year that IS had abducted 6,416 Yazidis, more than half of whom had since been rescued.

Monday, March 16, 2026

France begins landmark trial over Islamic State genocide of Yazidis

A French court on Monday began a landmark trial examining the Islamic State (IS) group’s campaign against the Yazidi religious minority in northern Iraq. It is the first time France has prosecuted a suspect for genocide linked to the attacks on the community in Iraq and Syria.


Issued on: 16/03/2026 - RFI

Many Yazidis fled their homes after attacks by the Islamic State group targeting the minority community in Iraq. PHOTO/AHMAD AL-RUBAYE

The accused is a French jihadist presumed dead but still being tried in absentia for his alleged role in enslaving and abusing Yazidi women and children.

Sabri Essid, born in Toulouse in 1984, joined the Islamic State group in Syria in early 2014. Investigators say he first worked as a bodyguard to a senior IS leader before becoming a member of the Amniyat, the organisation’s internal security and intelligence branch.

He faces charges of genocide, crimes against humanity and complicity in those crimes committed in Syria between August 2014 and 2016.

Four Yazidi women and their seven children have been identified as victims in the case.

Essid is presumed to have died in Syria in 2018. Because there is no official confirmation of his death, French courts say they can still try him in absentia in case he reappears in Syria or Iraq. The trial is scheduled to run until Friday.

Survivors speak out

The four Yazidi women described captivity marked by deprivation and repeated violence.

Investigators say they were deprived of water, food, medical care and freedom, and spoke of repeated rapes carried out with “violence and brutality”. They said Essid treated them “like sexual merchandise”.

“It is important to understand that an unspeakable horror fell upon these women,” said lawyer Clémence Bectarte, who represents three of the women and is a member of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), an international rights group.

Bectarte told RFI the women had been held by multiple Islamic State fighters during their captivity.

“When I started working with these four women, there was frustration. They had been detained, bought, raped and enslaved by sometimes 10 or 15 members of Daesh,” Bectarte said, using the Arabic acronym for the Islamic State group.

“This trial concerns just one of their tormentors. Of course it is nothing compared with what a trial could have been that delivered justice for all the crimes they suffered. But for each of them it is very important to name the crimes, to recognise them and to ensure their voices are heard through a process of justice."

The women are now focused on the future of their children, Bectarte added.

Recognising genocide


The Islamic State group targeted the Yazidis, a religious minority mainly living in northern Iraq, during its expansion in 2014.

Thousands of Yazidi men were killed while women and girls were abducted and enslaved.

More than 5,000 people were killed and more than 400,000 were displaced from their homes. Thousands of Yazidi women and children are still missing or believed to be held captive.

In May 2021, Karim Khan, who led a United Nations investigation into the atrocities, said investigators had found “clear and convincing evidence that genocide was committed by IS against the Yazidis as a religious group”.

The UN inquiry also identified 1,444 suspected perpetrators of the genocide, including 18 senior Islamic State leaders and the French national Sabri Essid.
National courts step in

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has not opened an investigation into the crimes because the most senior Islamic State leaders involved were nationals of countries that are not parties to the court.

In the absence of a case before the ICC, national courts have become the main path to justice for Yazidi victims.

Germany delivered the first conviction for genocide against the Yazidis in November 2021, when a court in Frankfurt found an IS member known as Taha Al J guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity.

Trials have also taken place in Sweden, the Netherlands and Belgium. In Brussels late last year, a court convicted Sammy Djedou, born to a Belgian mother and Ivorian father and also presumed dead, of genocide against the Yazidis.

For many years France mainly prosecuted citizens who joined the Islamic State group under terrorism charges rather than genocide or crimes against humanity.

Bectarte said that changed after years of legal advocacy.

“In 2017 we began a long effort with the FIDH to explain the importance of also prosecuting crimes against humanity and genocide when there were indications and evidence that French nationals had been involved, particularly in the sexual enslavement of Yazidis,” she told RFI.

Investigations also showed that the persecution of Yazidis formed part of a broader policy organised by the Islamic State group.

“What really emerges from these cases is how much the genocide committed against the Yazidis resulted from a policy put in place, planned and dictated by Islamic State even before or at the moment it captured Mount Sinjar in August 2014,” Bectarte said.
Path to jihad

Essid’s involvement in jihadist networks dates back years before he joined the Islamic State

As a teenager he developed an interest in religion and later became radicalised under the influence of Fabien Clain, one of the men who claimed responsibility for the November 2015 Paris attacks.

In 2006 Essid was arrested in Syria while trying to reach Iraq to fight US forces alongside another future IS member, Thomas Barnouin. He was returned to France and sentenced in 2009 to five years in prison, including one suspended year, for criminal association linked to preparing a terrorist act.

After his release he worked as a crane operator.

Essid later became close to Mohamed Merah, who carried out the 2012 attacks in Toulouse and Montauban. The two men became step-brothers when Essid’s father married Merah’s mother.

Despite being under surveillance by French intelligence services, Essid travelled to Syria in February 2014 with his family.

Investigators say he later appeared in an IS propaganda video released on 10 March 2015.

In the video, his 11-year-old stepson shoots a 19-year-old hostage presented as an Israeli agent. Essid can be heard threatening Israelis and referring to the attack on the Hyper Cacher supermarket in Paris.

Investigators say the video was also used to intimidate Yazidi women held captive by Essid. Some later recognised him in the footage and identified him as one of their abusers.

French woman faces genocide trial over enslavement of Yazidi girl

There are several conflicting accounts of Essid’s death.

Islamic State records captured by US forces list him as a “martyr” in January 2018. His wife said he died on 4 February 2018 after being executed by former IS members who had defected. Another propaganda account said he died after stepping on a mine.

Because none of these claims has been officially confirmed, French courts still consider him a fugitive and have proceeded with the genocide trial.

Next year, a 36-year-old French woman who returned from Syria is due to be tried on terrorism charges and for complicity in crimes against humanity. Sonia Mejri will also become the first French woman tried for genocide in Paris after an appeal challenging the case was rejected. She is accused of enslaving a Yazidi teenager in 2015.

Bectarte said investigations have also changed how some women linked to Islamic State are viewed.

“For a time, the women and family members of French nationals who joined Daesh were seen primarily as victims,” she said.

“But as investigations progressed, particularly through testimony from Yazidi survivors, it became clear that in some cases women had also played a role in the whole system.”

For the Yazidi community, the trials represent part of a broader search for justice after years of persecution that reached its worst point between 2014 and 2016.

This story was adapted from the original version in French by Anne Bernas and Laura Martel


Sunday, February 15, 2026

  


Syria: Can the Rojava Revolution survive?


New map of Syria

First published at Arguing for Socialism.

This January saw dramatic changes in Syria. From controlling one-third of the country, the Democratic Autonomous Administration of North East Syria (DAANES) and its military forces, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), have been pushed back to the Kurdish heartland in north-east Syria and forced to agree to a very harsh “integration” with the Islamist regime in Damascus.

On January 6 a meeting took place in Paris: Israel, Syria, the United States and Turkey were all involved. It set the seal on what later took place.

That same day the assault began against Kurdish districts in Aleppo. The SDF was soon pushed out of all positions west of the Euphrates. Next it was forced to withdraw from Arab-majority towns east of the river, in the south: Deir Ezzor, Taqba and Raqqa.

Raqqa had been the Islamic State (IS) capital in Syria. It was liberated at tremendous human cost in a gruelling four-month battle in 2017. The Women’s Protection Units (YPJ) played a central role in the victory.

Rojava Revolution

French Marxist Michel Löwy recently gave an interview to ANF News.

Löwy said the Rojava experience must be protected, adding that the coming weeks and months will show whether the Rojava model can survive. He said: 

If this experience comes to an end, it would be tragic. Despite all its problems, limitations, and contradictions, Rojava has been one of the most advanced experiences in the world in terms of real democracy and women’s liberation.

For everyone fighting for socialism, women’s rights, and ecology, it has been an inspiring experience. That is why its complete destruction would be a great loss.

Western governments profess a commitment to women’s rights, democracy, multiculturalism and ecology, but in reality they saw Rojava as a threat — they do not want anything like it in the Middle East or at home. So, beyond some empty words they have no intention of doing anything meaningful to support Rojava in its hour of need.

Alliance with the US

Washington has openly thrown the Kurds under the proverbial bus. What was involved? As US envoy Tom Barrack brutally explained, previously the US needed them, now it does not. Washington has instead plunged on Turkey and the Damascus regime.

I think it is incorrect to describe this as a “betrayal”. Washington was never on board politically and never pretended otherwise. The collaboration was never more than a tactical alliance between the US military and the Kurdish/SDF forces.

So, when Turkey seized Afrin in 2018 and two years later seized another chunk of Rojava, the US did nothing. In the light of what has happened, the idea — popular in some quarters — that the Kurds were a “proxy” of the US is simply ridiculous.

Arab involvement

The SDF was a majority Arab formation. Several hundred Arab fighters were martyred in various struggles. A significant number of Arab women joined the YPJ, attracted by the idea of a life free of patriarchal restrictions and commitment to the struggle.

Since the fall of Bashar al-Assad, the new Damascus regime and its Turkish backers have made an enormous and sustained effort to peel the Arab tribes away from their alliance with the Kurds. Arab chauvinism has always been a key weapon of successive regimes in Syria and it was obvious it would feature heavily this time around too. Because the revolution has had a differential impact on Kurdish and Arab society, this tack had a considerable effect.

Any Arab personalities or forces that continue to collaborate with the Kurds will be under mortal threat from Turkey and the Damascus gang.

Turkey’s role

From the foundation of the Turkish republic in 1923, the various regimes there have always been extremely anti-Kurd. There have been massacres, language bans, repression and marginalisation of the 25% of the population that is Kurdish. The regime aims to crush any manifestation of Kurdishness, wherever and whenever it appears.

Of course, Turkey is perfectly happy with the kleptocratic Barzani gang, which dominates the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in Iraq. The KRG is a typical Third World setup, with extreme inequalities of wealth and income. It is completely subservient to Turkey and the US.

Turkey constantly presents Rojava as a security threat. The idea that a few million people who simply want a peaceful life seriously threaten Turkey’s security is completely ludicrous. But what does threaten the Turkish regime is the power of a positive example (feminism, self-government, democracy, inter-ethnic harmony and so on).

In his interview, Lowy also addressed the ongoing process in Turkey aimed at a democratic solution to the Kurdish question, saying that the government of Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan has never approached this process sincerely. Löwy said: 

The attacks on Rojava are proof of this. The Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) accepted disarmament, yet ErdoÄŸan did not show even the smallest sign of goodwill. Kurdish prisoners remain in jail. The leaders of the legal Kurdish party are imprisoned. Kurdish mayors have been removed from the office. While steps have been taken on the side of the Kurdish movement, there has been no corresponding step whatsoever from the Turkish government.

We might add that Turkey continues building its bases in northern Iraq. Furthermore, Shengal (Sinjar), the autonomous area that is home to the Kurdish Yezidi people, is under constant threat from Turkey or the Iraqi government under Turkish pressure.

It seems that ErdoÄŸan simply wants an electoral boost for his party from the dissolution of the PKK and that is it.

Details of deal

Let us look at what the deal between the Kurds and Damascus involves. All this is taken from the January 30 article on X by MaximeAzadi (machine translation; I’ve numbered the points for convenience):

The main points of the agreement

  1. Ceasefire between Damascus and the SDF.
  2. Withdrawal of military forces from the lines of contact.
  3. Deployment of Syrian Ministry of the Interior security forces in the urban centres of Hasakah and Qamishli.
  4. Gradual integration of local security forces into the structures of the Syrian state.
  5. Creation of a military division integrated into the Syrian army, composed of three SDF brigades and one brigade from Kobani, under the authority of the Aleppo Governorate.
  6. Integration of the institutions of the Autonomous Administration into the Syrian state.
  7. Permanent positions for current civil servants.
  8. Guarantee of the civil, cultural, and educational rights of the Kurdish people.
  9. Safe and dignified return of displaced persons to their areas of origin.

So far, Kobani remains under total siege (by Turkey and the Damascus regime); no refugees have been allowed to return to Afrin and the other Turkish-occupied regions; and Damascus is demanding that the SDF hand over its heavy weapons (i.e., effectively disarm).

Maxime Azadi continues:

What is not stated

  1. Kurdish rights: To what extent will the civil, cultural and educational rights of Kurds be guaranteed? Will there be a dedicated education system in the Kurdish regions or will Kurdish language instruction be limited to a single optional subject, as Damascus desires? Will these rights be individual, collective or national in nature? No details have been provided at this stage.
  2. Afrin and Serekaniyê: What guarantees exist for the return of residents to Kurdish cities under Turkish occupation? What will the form of administration, security, and governance be in these regions? Here again, no clear mechanism has been announced.
  3. Women’s Defence Forces: Will the Women’s Defence Forces be part of the integrated brigades? Will their presence be maintained in the Kurdish regions as it is today? Will they be integrated into the local security forces in the Kurdish regions, or will they be completely dissolved? No specific details have been provided.
  4. Preservation of identities and ways of life: Will the Kurds be able to preserve the democratic and secular character of their regions, or will it be dominated by Damascus’s vision? This question also applies to all other ethnic and religious communities. Will they be able to preserve their distinctiveness and way of life?
  5. Applicability of the agreement: The implementation of the agreement remains uncertain in a context where the Syrian regime relies on a mosaic of armed groups, including several jihadist groups and pro-Turkish paramilitary militias, accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Some of these factions are still on Western terrorist lists.
  6. Guarantees and oversight: Who will be responsible for overseeing the implementation of the agreement? What mechanisms are in place to address violations or failures to uphold commitments?
  7. Justice and accountability: Will perpetrators of serious crimes be prosecuted and held accountable, or will they enjoy de facto impunity?
  8. Security of the Kurdish population: How can the Kurdish civilian population trust the Damascus forces deployed in Kurdish cities? Who will concretely guarantee the protection of Kurdish civilians on the ground?

Crucial role of solidarity

How bad will it get? As Azadi’s post indicates, things are already bad and could get much worse very quickly.

The Kurdish people and their allies will resist. They still have their armed forces. But they do not want Rojava to be given the Gaza treatment (that is, mass destruction and a general massacre).

International solidarity is of vital importance. Already, the large and repeated actions in Western Europe have put the spotlight on Rojava and forced the Western governments to sound some warnings to Damascus. The large protests in Iraqi Kurdistan have also been notable.

Was Rojava doomed from the start? That is not a revolutionary attitude. Was the Russian Revolution doomed? Is the human race doomed by climate change? In a particular situation people seize their chance and risk everything to push the struggle forward to a new level. The future is not given; the struggle decides.

Sheikh Akram Mashoush: ‘After all the martyrs, how could we suddenly ally with parties whose mentality we do not believe in?’


Sheikh Akram Mashoush talks to an SDF soldier in Heseke.

First published at Rojava Information Center.

What is the history of your tribe in this region? How was it during the Assad government?

The tribal connections between different tribes and communities go back decades, not only to the Assad era, but even to the Ottoman Empire. In particular, the links between Arab and Kurdish communities date back to Ottoman times, continued through the French mandate, and survived throughout the Assad regime. These connections endured all those eras and were never broken. After the establishment of the Autonomous Administration (AANES), these links did not disappear. For those of us who have a conscience, they cannot be ignored. We have family ties, neighborly ties, and shared village life. In our villages, Kurds and Yazidis live together with Arabs. These connections cannot be forgotten or denied. They were not created by us, but by our grandfathers. They made our communities connected and cohesive, and with time, they have only grown stronger. Today, when we see our Kurdish brothers suffering and under attack, can we abandon them? We see our Kurdish brothers being attacked by ISIS and by different forces that have taken control of parts of Syria. No, we cannot abandon these humanitarian, social, and ethical bonds. These ties force us to remain together — not only within AANES, but in all aspects of life. Even if AANES were to end, we would not separate or cut these ties. They are social bonds based on coexistence. These connections go so deep that they even exist at the level of milk kinship, a Middle Eastern tradition in which a child breastfed by a woman who is not his mother becomes her milk-son or milk-brother to her children. Such ties are never forgotten, regardless of what happens. We will continue on this path no matter what we go through.

In Hasakah, there are around one million people from the Jabour tribe. This tribe has a different and special relationship with the Kurds compared to other tribes. The Jabour tribe has a long history of ties with the communities of the region, and because we lived side by side with Kurds in mixed areas, these ties became even stronger. My own name, Akram Hajo Mashoush, comes from a Kurdish person from Tirbespiye. These ties are not new. We learned the Kurdish language through living together. It is impossible for us to abandon all of this simply because of military circumstances.

At the military level, the situation of Jabour was different. Even during the Assad era, we were marginalized. Unlike the Shammar tribe, which comes from broader regions and formed the Sanadid Forces to protect borders, we did not form a separate military entity. We preserved our tribal structure and focused on social cohesion and family ties through marriage with different communities. With full respect to other tribes, these factors gave Jabour a unique relationship with the Kurds. There are members of Jabour from Sheddadi married to Kurdish women in Darbasiye, and the same exists between Tel Brak, Qamishlo, and Derik. These ties were not invented or recently created; circumstances simply made the Jabour tribe more closely connected to the Kurds than any other tribe. What is the SDF? It is a force formed from tribes. There is a clan called Mahasin with more than 5,000 fighters within the SDF. There are more than 800 martyrs from the Jabour tribe within the SDF. We did not seek an autonomous entity or structure; we only wanted to protect ourselves. We joined the fight against ISIS because of its brutality – killings, slaughter, oppression, and harsh treatment of women. These conditions only strengthened our cohesion and unity.

What is your opinion about the most recent agreement between the SDF/DAANES and the Syrian Transitional Government (STG)?

The fundamental principle of the current agreement is the ceasefire. As people everywhere welcome such understandings, we, as people living in the area, strongly support and bless it. Government forces are only a few kilometers away, and we are surrounded. Deadlines were given for evacuating areas. Therefore, any ceasefire or agreement is something we genuinely support. All notable figures of the Jabour tribe welcome it. We have always sought a ceasefire between the Damascus government and the SDF. This agreement must lead to positive outcomes that serve the Syrian people. Fighting only brings bloodshed, displacement, and deeper divisions among communities. We want guarantors to take responsibility and ensure the agreement is implemented and not violated. We support the SDF and AANES delegations in their agreements related to security arrangements, integration, and the formation of brigades within the Syrian Army. In the end, we are Syrians. We do not want Syrian blood to be shed. All those killed are Syrians. None of the foreign states have lost their citizens; only Syrians pay the price. This agreement aims to preserve Syrian blood, and its most important pillar is the ceasefire, which can revive coexistence.

Can you explain about the recent tribal defections from the DAANES to the STG?

Turkey has worked to divide the tribes in order to destroy the social fabric. They do not see the SDF as representing Syrians, but only as representing Kurds, and they consider it an enemy, despite the SDF having over 15,000 martyrs and more than 50,000 wounded. Some tribes were influenced by this mentality, including ISIS-like thinking. Turkish intelligence (MIT) also played a role, convincing some tribes — not all — that their situation would improve if the SDF were gone. Even some figures within AANES, such as Muhbash, the head of the negotiation committee, acknowledged this. Tribes are not political organizations and lack deep political experience. They were subjected to pressure, threats, and promises of financial support. This explains why some switched sides. When cities like Tabqa, Raqqa, and parts of Deir ez-Zor fell, uprisings happened even before the Syrian army arrived, proving that there were prior plans. Weaknesses in the security experience of AANES prevented early detection of these breaches. At the same time, the SDF and AANES did not want to be dragged into cycles of violence. They did not want destruction or to kill their own brothers and sisters who rose against them. That is why these areas fell quickly. Many of my relatives and cousins are in Damascus. They offered me defection, positions, and benefits. I completely refused. This goes against my principles and conscience. After all the martyrs, sacrifices, and coexistence, how could we suddenly switch sides and ally with parties whose mentality we do not believe in? This is for those in Damascus. But unfortunately, some members of our tribe, here in the area, used extremely bad language toward me. They threatened me, sent insulting messages and videos, and attempted to intimidate me.

After the agreement is implemented, we hope bloodshed will stop and the situation will be organized. We are all Syrians, and no one should be denied their rights. The Kurdish people have a special situation and legitimate rights that must be recognized. They were among the first to fight and offer martyrs in the revolution, before the formation of the SDF, through the YPG and YPJ. They protected everyone, including Arab communities, even before the creation of the SDF and AANES.

Do you have any critiques for the DAANES?

We do acknowledge shortcomings in services and administration. These were not military or political failures, but administrative ones. Despite having agricultural land, oil, and resources, we failed to meet people’s needs. There was no water, electricity solutions were lacking, bread shortages existed despite wheat abundance, and fuel crises persisted despite oil resources.

These failures are real. However, they do not justify switching sides simply because AANES is weakening. Administrative and service failures exist, but abandoning everything because of them is not justified.

Sunday, January 25, 2026

 KURDISTAN (SYRIA)


To defend Rojava is to defend humanity

The Syrian regime and Turkey are seeking the complete surrender of Kurdish autonomous areas, reports Sarah Glynn.

Like so many others, I first heard of the Kurds in Syria in 2014, when the news was full of images of women fighters defending their city and the world against ISIS. Alongside these images, the occasional reporter stopped to enquire not only what these women and their male comrades were fighting against, but also what they were fighting for. The answer was startling – inspiring. While we were arguing that another world was possible, far away, in the middle of a warzone, these people were actually building a different society: a society that, in accordance with the philosophy of imprisoned Kurdish leader, Abdullah Öcalan, prioritised community over the crude economic interests that we had been trained to regard as inescapable. That society is in mortal danger.

Hope and its enemies

I am not going to claim that Rojava achieved all that it set out to do, or that the liberating proposals for radical democracy were able to properly survive the pressures of war, and of interaction with a world of nation states; but the inclusive community mindset remains strong, and – against all the odds – the Kurdish areas were able to create an oasis of peaceful coexistence and women’s rights.

Rojava is living proof of two suppressed ideas – that Kurdish culture and society is strong and resilient, and that a society that prioritises social values really is possible.

But, even as people across the world found hope for their own struggles in Rojava, we knew that the powers that be would never allow such a radical approach to succeed and to provide an example for others. We could also see that Turkey would never allow such Kurdish autonomy – especially an autonomy inspired by Öcalan. Western powers have made no secret of their desire to appease Turkey, which is a geopolitically important member of Nato, and this sits easily with their distrust of Rojava’s politics.

In Rojava, the Kurds created an extraordinary gift of hope for humanity. The attacks of the Turkish-backed Syrian Government, supported by the United States, aim to destroy this hope and to extinguish the people who created it – to extinguish them both culturally and physically.

2014 and the fight against ISIS

In 2014, the Kurdish regions of Rojava, which had gained autonomy in the power vacuum of the Syrian civil war, came under existential attack from ISIS, whose forces were sweeping across Iraq and Syria. In the small Kurdish city of Kobanê, ISIS met their first defeat – at the hands of a rag-tag army of Kurdish women and men – while the Turkish government, which had facilitated the passage of international ISIS recruits, watched from across the border, hoping for Kobanê to fall.

It was at this time that the United States, realising the danger of the forces that had been unleashed by their Iraq war, began to provide air support for the Kurdish fighters on the ground, beginning a tactical partnership that, by 2019, had liberated the last part of ISIS held territory. The Kurds tried, with limited success, to bring their social ideas to the liberated areas, and continued to work with American troops in combatting ISIS sleeper cells and preventing further attacks.

In the fight against ISIS, around 12,000 Kurds lost their lives, and the Kurdish region was left to manage tens of thousands of ISIS prisoners for whom no one wanted to take responsibility. But, despite their reliance on the Kurdish forces, no foreign power would give official recognition to the Kurds’ Autonomous Administration, nor protect them from Turkish attacks and invasions.

Islamists and the West in partnership

From the early years of the Syrian civil war, when the CIA-led Operation Timber Sycamore provided weapons and training to Islamist groups fighting the Assad government, up to the grooming and official recognition of Syria’s Interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa – former wanted terrorist al-Jolani – the United States and other Western nations have always backed conservative Islamists, just as they did so disastrously in Afghanistan against the Russians. And they have always avoided upsetting Turkey.

2026

These first weeks of 2026 have demonstrated, yet again, the cruel reality of international self-interest – or perceived self-interest-  as forces have been unleashed that are beyond the control of those causing this international disaster. For months, Turkey obstructed any agreement between the Kurds and al-Sharaa’s government short of complete Kurdish surrender; but military attack had been restrained by fear of Turkey’s rival for regional hegemony, Israel. On 6th January, in Paris, Israel and Syria signed an agreement that appears to have allowed Turkey to dominate the greater part of the country in exchange for leaving Israel free to dominate the south.

Supported by Turkish weaponry and intelligence, and spearheaded by Turkey’s mercenary militias – now officially part of the Syrian army – al-Sharaa has been able to take control of the greater part of the Kurdish-led Autonomous Administration, with Arab fighters switching loyalty to the winning side.

To achieve this, al-Sharaa’s government has not hesitated to break every agreement they have made, to target civilians, and to give leading roles to men notorious for their sadistic brutality. The Syrian army includes many men who have fought for ISIS or similar groups, and some who still wear ISIS patches. The militias have already released ISIS prisoners from captured prisons – prisoners whose nihilistic ideology has been reinforced by the desire for revenge. Videos shared by Syrian army fighters show them abusing captured Kurds in ways that have become only too familiar from the times of the ISIS ‘caliphate’ and from the many reports of human rights abuses in the Turkish-occupied areas.

America turns their back

The new American position has been starkly spelt out by their Ambassador to Turkey and Special Envoy to Syria, Tom Barrack, who had already announced his dismissal of democracy. In a long Twitter post, he stated that the US had no more need for the Kurds, and that the al-Sharaa government were their new partners in the fight against ISIS. It is clear that they don’t actually trust the al-Sharaa government in this role as they are transferring remaining ISIS prisoners to Iraq; but the fight against ISIS was never America’s primary reason for being in Syria. It was always about countering Iran.

Kobanê under siege

As I write, and despite another ‘ceasefire’, the Kurds remain under fire and have been pushed back to their core cities. Kobanê, the city that turned the tide against ISIS, is isolated and under siege. To its north, is the Turkish border, south, east and west, Syrian government forces are preparing to deal a final blow to freedom and hope. Electricity and water have been cut off, and fuel deliveries stopped. People are struggling to keep warm through freezing temperatures.

Despite internet disruption Commander Nisrin Abdullah of the Women’s Protection Units (YPJ) held a press conference today [Thursday] from Kobanê. In 2014, the battle of Kobanê was heralded as a modern Stalingrad – a vital victory against great odds. She was there in 2014 and later active in international diplomacy on behalf of Rojava, even visiting the Elysée Palace. Now, in her words, the Syrian Interim Government is “reestablishing the Islamic State”; and this time, international doors have been closed to the Kurds, so that “the siege today is even more dangerous’’ than it was eleven years ago.

While international leaders were reeling off sentences about integration, unity, and stability, Syria’s Ministry of Endowments issued a call for mosques to celebrate the army’s conquests and victories, headed with the same Quranic verse used by Saddam Hussein in his genocide of the Kurds of Iraq.

Sarah Glynn is a writer and activist – check her website and follow her on Twitter or bluesky. For four and a half years she wrote a weekly review of Kurdish news for Medya News. She blogs regularly on Kurdish affairs here. This article is drawn from the blog: it first appeared here.

Image: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:YPJ_-_Rojava.jpg Kurdish female fighter of the Women’s Protection Units of Rojava, Syria, November 2014. Author: Denilaur,  licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.


‘Your solidarity is part of our self-defense’: Two urgent calls from Rojava for global solidarity

Below we republish two calls for solidarity with the Rojavan revolution, one initiated by Women for Rovaja and RiseUp4Rojava (and signed by 183 organizations and 72 individuals from 39 different countries), the other from universities in Rojava/Northern and Eastern Syria.

Global Call for Solidarity: Days of Action in Defense of Rojava (January 25 – February 1)

Initiated by Women for Rovaja and RiseUp4RojavaJanuary 24

We, 183 organizations and 72 individuals from 39 different countries declare that:

Since January 6th, Kurdish and Arab regions in Syria have been subjected to sustained attacks, posing the most serious existential threat to Kurdish society and the autonomous system of self-governance that has been developed there for over 14 years. This military offensive is being coordinated by al-Sharaa’s islamist regime, the so called “transitional government” in Damascus, in collaboration with the Turkish Defense Minister, YaÅŸar Güler, and the Foreign Minister, Hakan Fidan. It is being carried out in direct collaboration with jihadist militias. This war of extermination has been greenlighted by western governments.

Rojava is under immediate threat from HTS and ISIS. These attacks endanger the hard-won achievements of the Women’s Revolution in Rojava, including the principles of local democracy and equal rights for ethnic and religious communities. They are trying to force the Democratic Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria to choose between total surrender and complete physical annihilation. The attack on Rojava is not solely aimed at destroying the achievements of Kurdish society. Rather, the goal of this international plan is to destroy the idea and project of a democratic Syria and a democratic Middle East.

Through these attacks, we are witnessing a new resurgence of ISIS. Thousands of ISIS-fighters have been freed by the government-militias of al-Sharaa, who himself shares a common history with the terrorist organization. Once again, ISIS is committing massacres against civil society all over Syria. Kobanê, the site of historic resistance against ISIS, is once again under attack and total siege by the same forces operating under different banners. Emboldened by these attacks ISIS once again poses a threat to societies worldwide.

Across all over Kurdistan, and all over the world, people are rising up to defend the Rojava Revolution and the hope it offers humanity. The Kurdish people, particularly women and young people, have responded to the call for a general mobilization by holding mass demonstrations and traveling to Rojava in thousands, to defend the territory. Social movements, trade unions, civil society organizations and academic communities on all continents have organized solidarity actions with the peoples of Rojava.

In 2014, millions of people took to the streets worldwide and together we liberated Kobanê. The defeat of ISIS at that time was made possible not only by the YPG and YPJ, but also by broad international solidarity, including political, social and moral support from democratic forces worldwide.

Today, we once again call for global solidarity to defend the revolution and human dignity.

In an era of increasing global fragmentation driven by profit rather than the needs of people, we must unite to demand the freedom of Rojava and stand up for humanity. In the face of coordinated military and political pressure, democratic forces must strengthen their solidarity.

We, the organizations and individuals listed below, therefore call to:

  • Organize actions in solidarity with Rojava, condemning the attacks and underlining the imminent threat of ethnic cleansing by the Syrian transitional government, Turkey and its allied jihadist militias.
  • Create a counter-public sphere in the media and civil society about the situation in Rojava and expose blatant Western support for the attacks.
  • Hold national governments and international institutions responsable for their complicity in the war crimes in Rojava.
  • Demand political and legal recognition and status for the DAANES in order to force Damascus to accept a decentralized solution that guarantees the existence and rights of Alawites, Druze, Yazidis, Assyrians, Armenians and all ethnic and religious communities in a future democratic Syria.

See list here


A Call for Solidarity from the Universities in Rojava/Northern and Eastern Syria

Universities in Rojava/Northern and Eastern Syria, January 22

We, the faculty, students, and staff of the Universities in Rojava/Northern and Eastern Syria, send you this message as we leave our classrooms to help defend our universities, our cities, and our revolution alongside the self-defense forces. Before the autonomous administration, Raqqa (Sharq) and Kobanê had no universities. Our campuses, built in the midst of war, have reclaimed long-denied education to young people, grounding learning in women’s liberation, ecology, and a democratic, communal life for the people.

For the past fifteen years in Rojava/Northern and Eastern Syria, under constant pressure and repeated attacks by imperial, sub-imperial, and colonial powers, our people have built a shared life through collective capacity. Against capitalism and patriarchy, we have worked to advance a society rooted in women’s liberation, ecological life, and democratic self-rule. Under the conditions of war across the region, and against the violence and impositions of regional states and their mercenaries, we relied on our own self-defense and our own diplomacy to carve out space, and within that space, we struggled to build a life that once seemed impossible.

Today, that life is under attack. What we have built, this source of hope for oppressed peoples in the region and around the world, is being targeted from all sides by the fascist forces of the Syrian Arab Army, an al-Qaeda lineage rebranded into state authority and dressed in suits, and by mercenaries, backed by regional and global imperial powers.

We are living through an unfolding feminicide and genocide. The situation on the ground is urgent and worsening by the day. Our university buildings are full of displaced people trying to survive the winter without blankets or extra clothing. Turkish drones have targeted several places near the University of Rojava in Qamishlo during the last few days. Students in the dormitories in Qamishlo are cut off from their families in Kobanê, not knowing if their loved ones are safe, and unable to reach them.

The situation in Kobanê is particularly dire. The city is currently under siege, surrounded by Syrian Army forces on one side and the Turkish army on the other. For seven days, there has been no electricity, no access to water, and no reliable access to basic necessities. Under these conditions, learning, safety, and survival are being targeted as part of a coordinated siege.

We say this clearly to our friends, colleagues, and comrades: we will defend ourselves with everything we have. We will defend our people, our universities, and the possibility of the life we have struggled to build.

We call on you, wherever you are, to stand with Rojava. Raise your voice. Organize on your campuses, in your unions, and in your communities. Use your positions, however limited they may feel, to push for action, to demand accountability, and to refuse silence. Strengthen the networks of solidarity that make resistance possible. Stand up for the revolutionary aims of freedom, women’s liberation, ecological life, and democratic communal life. Your solidarity is part of our self-defense, and it can help shift the balance and prevent yet another genocide in the region.

Universities in Rojava/Northern and Eastern Syria 
University of Rojava, 
Kobani University, 
University of Al-Sharq Students, 
Faculty and Staff

Source: Originally published by Z. Feel free to share widely.

Through the actions of regional and international hegemonic powers, the Middle East is being reshaped once again, a century after its last major reordering. The genocide in Gaza and the political elimination of Hamas, the intelligence-driven operations in Lebanon that have crippled Hezbollah, and finally the rapid overthrow of the Assad government by HTS under the leadership of the Salafi jihadist Mohammed al-Jolani, whose past is rooted in Al-Qaeda in Iraq, ISIS and Jabhat al-Nusra, mark a new phase of regional transformation. The process that began with Hamas’ attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 has continued with the dismantling of Iran’s so-called “axis of resistance.” Step by step, the focus appears to be shifting toward Iraq’s Hashd al-Shaabi forces and ultimately toward Iran itself. Scenarios are now openly discussed in which all ISIS elements are reorganized under the Damascus regime into a Sunni jihadist army to be used against Shiite communities in Iraq. This points to the likelihood of new massacres and an even deeper humanitarian catastrophe.

What some commentators describe as cold and calculated chess moves is, in reality, a state of collective madness of war crimes akin to genocide, where tens of thousands of civilians have lost their lives.

In a region where forced displacement, executions, abductions, sexual violence, and the desecration of bodies have become normalized, new atrocities emerged with the establishment of an HTS-centered jihadist regime in Damascus. Following the regime change, armed groups aligned with the new authority carried out continuous attacks, kidnappings, and acts of violence against Alawite communities along Syria’s coastal region. According to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), at least 1,068 civilians were killed in these attacks, which began on 6 March 2025.

In July 2025, after the circulation of an audio recording allegedly insulting the Prophet Muhammad and attributed to a Druze cleric, armed Sunni jihadist groups affiliated with Damascus launched attacks against Druze communities in Suwayda. Reports stated that at least 196 people were executed in mass killings, including 28 women, 8 children, and one elderly person. According to SOHR, between 15 and 22 July, 1,311 people were killed, including 637 Druze and 104 civilians.

With the support and approval of regional and international powers, these same forces turned their weapons to Kurdish neighborhoods in Aleppo on 6 January 2026, and soon after, towards the entire territory of the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria, known as Rojava. These unilateral attacks and the humanitarian crisis they created have largely gone uncovered in the international media. Instead, they are often portrayed as clashes in which both sides are equally aggressive.

The chronology below illustrates how the siege on Rojava gradually intensified, by examining the attacks and humanitarian devastation launched by Sunni jihadist forces loyal to Damascus on two Kurdish neighborhoods in Aleppo in January 2026.

1 January | Violence escalates

Violence intensified in areas controlled by Sunni jihadist forces aligned with Damascus. In December, 181 people, including women and children, were killed, and a mass grave was discovered in Aleppo.

2 to 4 January | Talks on “integration” with Damascus

The Autonomous Administration announced that contacts with the Damascus regime regarding military integration were ongoing and that high-level meetings were being planned. It was also announced that schools in the Kurdish neighborhoods of Aleppo, which had been closed on 30 December 2025 due to fuel shortages and an ongoing blockade, would reopen on 4 January 2026.

5 to 6 January | Damascus and Israel reach an understanding under US mediation

Damascus and Israeli delegations reached an understanding in Paris under US mediation. At the same time, talks between Turkey and Damascus accelerated. On 6 January, Sunni jihadist forces aligned with Damascus launched a large-scale attack on Kurdish neighborhoods in Aleppo. Civilians were targeted with heavy weapons, and the neighborhoods were besieged.

7 to 8 January | Civilian infrastructure targeted, humanitarian crisis deepens

The Damascus regime declared the Kurdish neighborhoods legitimate military targets. The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) stated that it had no military presence in Aleppo and had withdrawn under a public agreement, transferring security to the Internal Security Forces. Osman Hospital in Ashrafiyah was directly bombed, and disabled from service, and health workers were executed. Many Sunni jihadist groups on the international sanctions lists participated in assaults under the name of the transitional government. The Turkish Ministry of Defense stated that Turkey would provide support if the Damascus regime requested. Statements from the European Union were limited to calls for restraint.

9 January | EU aid to Damascus

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa met Ahmed al-Sharaa in Damascus. Von der Leyen announced a 722 million dollar aid package. On the same day, Khalid Fecir Hospital in Sheikh Maqsoud was also heavily attacked and hit at least seven times by reconnaissance aircraft and heavy weapons.

10 January | Attack on the body of a Kurdish woman fighter

A humanitarian aid convoy was blocked by Sunni jihadist forces aligned with Damascus, and safe corridors were not opened. Images circulated showing jihadist fighters throwing the body of a Kurdish woman fighter from a building while chanting religious slogans.

11 to 12 January | Ceasefire and civilian losses

A ceasefire and the evacuation of civilians were announced through international mediators. Local sources reported that women were taken to mosques, men to unknown locations, and that more than 271 people were missing.

13 to 14 January | Attacks spread to eastern Aleppo

The Israeli army shelled the areas around Abdin and Koya in Daraa, in parallel with its advances in the Quneitra countryside in southern Syria. At the same time, Sunni jihadist forces aligned with Damascus, with Turkish support, moved to the east of Aleppo and bombed Deir Hafir and the town of Meskene near Tabqa.

15 January | The heavy toll in Aleppo

The Turkish Ministry of Defense reiterated its support for the Damascus regime. According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, at least 120,000 people were displaced from the neighborhoods of Sheikh Maqsoud, Ashrafiyah and Beni Zed, and human rights organizations reported more than 500 missing persons. Ilham Ahmed, Co-Chair of the Foreign Relations Department of the Autonomous Administration, presented documentation detailing how the attacks were carried out, the forces that participated in them, and the war crimes that were committed.

16 to 17 January | SDF withdraws east of the Euphrates, clashes continue

US President Donald Trump announced the creation of a Gaza Peace Council. The SDF stated that it would reposition its forces to the east of the Euphrates. Despite this decision, attacks by Sunni jihadist forces aligned with Damascus continued. The Imrali delegation of the DEM Party stated that Abdullah Öcalan viewed the escalation in Syria as an attempt to sabotage the process of Peace and Democratic Society.

18 January | Jihadist attacks spread

The attacks launched by Sunni jihadist forces aligned with Damascus spread to Tabqa, Tishrin, Mansura, Raqqa and the countryside of Deir ez-Zor. The Autonomous Administration declared general mobilization. On the same day, Damascus announced that a 14-point agreement and a comprehensive ceasefire had been reached with the SDF. The SDF stated that to prevent a major civil war, it had decided to withdraw from Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor and would talk to the Damascus regime.

19 January | Attacks continue despite ceasefire, ISIS prisoners released

Despite the ceasefire, attacks continued. The SDF announced that Shaddadi Prison, which holds thousands of ISIS detainees, had fallen under the control of Sunni jihadist groups aligned with Damascus, and footage showed ISIS prisoners being released. It was reported that more than 10,000 civilians were displaced from Raqqa to Hasakah. Iraqi Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr warned that the conflict could spread to Iraq. President Recep Tayyip ErdoÄŸan and President Donald Trump held a phone call that included discussions on ISIS and the prisons in Syria. The SDF stated that the Damascus regime was demanding total surrender and that it had therefore decided to resist. The Damascus regime invoked the Quranic chapter al-Anfal to declare a conquest against the Kurds.

20 January | Hasakah and Kobane under blockade

More than 25,000 people fled from Raqqa and Tabqa toward Hasakah within 48 hours, and around 500 people were reported missing or forcibly disappeared. Civilians attempting to reach Hasakah were attacked by forces aligned with Damascus. The SDF stated that the Damascus regime imposed a blockade on Hasakah and Kobane and launched heavy attacks. The SDF also announced that it had withdrawn from Hol Camp due to attacks by Sunni jihadist forces and the failure of international forces to fulfill their responsibilities. The Damascus regime declared another ceasefire, while the SDF reported continued violations.

President Trump claimed he had prevented ISIS prisoners from escaping and shared a message that he said was sent by President Macron. US diplomat Tom Barrack stated that a centralized authority had been re-established in Syria, that the SDF’s role as the primary force against ISIS had largely ended, and that the Damascus regime was ready to take over the security of ISIS prisons and camps.

21 January | Military buildup

Protests were held across Kurdistan and in many European cities against the attacks on Rojava. Thousands of people displaced from Afrin, Shahba, Raqqa, and Tabqa took refuge in the Jazira Canton, sheltering in schools and mosques. The SDF reported systematic ceasefire violations in the Jazira and Kobane regions. ISIS flags were reported to have been raised again at the entrance to Raqqa. Turkey deployed tanks and artillery to the Kobane Suruc border line.

22 January | Humanitarian disaster warning

According to nine separate sources who spoke to Reuters, the attacks carried out by the Damascus regime against North and East Syria were approved by the United States, Israel, and Turkey at the meeting held in Paris in early January. 

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR) issued a warning of a “humanitarian catastrophe” in Kobane, which is under siege by the Turkish state and Sunni jihadist forces aligned with Damascus. It condemned the international community’s silence.

In a video said to have been recorded in Raqqa, which is under the control of the Damascus regime, a severed braid claimed to belong to a YPJ woman fighter was shown. The footage sparked anger and outrage in many parts of the world. Kurdish and Yazidi women launched a solidarity campaign on social media using the hashtag #kezi (braid).

23 January | ISIS prisoners released

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that non-Iraqi ISIS detainees would be temporarily held in Iraq. Sunni jihadist forces aligned with Damascus released hundreds of ISIS prisoners from al-Aktan prison in Raqqa.

Conclusion

The events that took place between 1 and 23 January 2026 show that the attacks against Rojava are part of a plan by global and regional powers to reshape the Middle East. What began with assaults on Kurdish neighborhoods in Aleppo has evolved into a multi-layered siege strategy that aims not only to dismantle the Rojava model but also to carry out a systematic destruction targeting the very existence of the Kurdish people. The horrific images coming from the region demonstrate that the crimes ISIS committed against humanity, particularly against the Kurdish people in 2014, are being re-enacted today.

The silence of international actors, along with direct or indirect approval of certain powers, has created the conditions for this destruction and the continuation of these crimes. What is happening in Rojava today is not only about one region; it is a clear indication of the kind of violent order shaping the future of the Middle East. The attacks on prisons holding ISIS detainees under SDF control, and the footage showing the release of these prisoners by forces aligned with the Damascus regime, provide serious evidence that a new Sunni jihadist army is being formed by uniting ISIS elements under the umbrella of the Damascus regime. These developments mark an extremely dangerous threshold, signaling that the Middle East is being pushed towards far wider humanitarian catastrophes and new waves of war.