SPECTRE

Oh those Russians.They have a really good sense of humour naming satellites after SPECTRE the secret Russian organization out to get James Bond.

Russia is also planning to orbit Specter-M, Specter-RG and Specter-UF spacecraft, and launch a Coronas-Photon satellite to conduct extensive scientific research of outer space, he said.

And I always liked Blofeld, a man and his cat.

The word SPECTRE stands for Special Executor for Counter-Intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion. The powerful and ruthless criminal organisation is dedicated to gaining wealth and power though criminal schemes the involve extortion, instigation of major wars to gain power and acts of revenge. Throughout several missions, Bond has been dedicated to the destruction of SPECTRE and it's leader, Ernst Stavro Blofeld.

It should not be confused with SMERSH.


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Russia, Spectre, Bond, satellites, space, spacecraft,
Ian, Fleming, 007, movies, books, spy, spies, Blofeld, SMERSH, SPECTRE

As Long As Its Not Iran

So why would South Africa need nuclear weapons? Russia, SA agree on nuclear fuel, satellites

Cause we all know enriched uranium is used for weapons. Just look at Iran.


Also See:

Iran

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
South, Africa, SA, Russia, Putin, Mbeki, Nuclear, Fuel, Sattilites, Space, WMD, Nukes, Nuke

Americans Kill Canadian Olympian

Now if I was the paranoid conspiracy theory kind of guy I would suspect that with all that wonderful high tech super secret spy weaponry the U.S. has, satellites in the sky that can read your address on your door, high tech listening equipment that can hear you fart in bed, all that stuff. That maybe, just maybe, they targeted this guy cause they didn't want him to beat them in the Olympics.

See my articles:

• Canadian Death Toll In Afghanistan
• Deja Vu

Also See:

Friendly Fire

Afghanistan

War





Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
NDP, liberals, Afghanistan, PB, BT, Canada, Progressivebloggers, bloggingtories, blogs, blogging, bringthetroopshome, Layton,NDP, Layton, TroopsOut, Afghanistan, War, Harper, Conservatives, Liberals, Canada, politics, military, NATO, peacekeeping, Karzai, NDP, liberals, Afghanistan, PB, BT, Canada, Progressivebloggers, bloggingtories, blogs, blogging, bringthetroopshome, Layton,NDP, Layton, TroopsOut, Afghanistan, War, Harper, Conservatives, Liberals, Canada, politics, military, NATO, peacekeeping, Karzai, Graham, Liberals, Canada, Soldiers, Death, Injury, Afghanistan, Government, Politics, values,


Tags
Canada
USA
War
Friendly Fire
Canadian Troops
Afghanistan
Kandahar
NATO

Harpers Night Of the Long Knives

Couldnt happen to a nicer party. You know the one that is critical of others, claims to be open, transparent, accountable, not going to act like the Liberals......

Tory infighting flares as members sue party
OTTAWA (CP) - The federal Conservative party is facing a lawsuit from grassroots members over its nomination process, while officials continue to reject would-be candidates with no explanation.

Opps better not look in the mirror....cause this guy




is looking a lot like this guy

Also See:

Harper


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Harper, Ottawa, Canada, Conservatives, Government, PM, PMO, politics, media,

Policing the Police

Yep like having the fox guard the hen house.....


RCMP officer won't be charged after shooting
An RCMP officer won't be charged in the death of a man who was shot in the back of the head at a rural B.C. police detachment after he was arrested for drinking beer outside the local hockey arena. Cameron Ward, a lawyer who has acted for several families who have lost loved ones in misadventures with police, said he was not surprised at the decision not to lay charges because the Crown based its decision on police investigating police.


Also See:

RCMP

Crime

Murder

Taser


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
RCMP, B.C., Canada, policekillman, shooting, police, brutality, murder, civilians,

America Safe From Terrorism

George Bush in his speech today said America had not been attacked since 9/11 implying his war in Iraq was the reason.

He forgot to mention that Russia was attacked in the summer of 2004, London was attacked last summer. Spain was attacked in 2004. Indonesia has suffered terrorist bombings. India has suffered from terrorist attacks.

And the base support for many of these attacks came not from Iraq or Afghanistan, or Iran or North Korea but from the terrorist state that is America's ally; Pakistan.

Sure America has not been attacked, not because of the war in Iraq, or the failed occupation of Afghanistan, or because they have increased Homeland Security and decreased civil liberties.

Nope its because the terrorists hit other targets. And they are not living in America.

Foreign Affairs - Is There Still a Terrorist Threat? - John Mueller
Summary: Despite all the ominous warnings of wily terrorists and imminent attacks, there has been neither a successful strike nor a close call in the United States since 9/11. The reasonable -- but rarely heard -- explanation is that there are no terrorists within the United States, and few have the means or the inclination to strike from abroad.

Five years after 9/11: The fear and dread campaign

But this overblown "terror" rhetoric is clearly augmenting and thereby empowering the very terrorist networks Bush and Blair say they are trying to constrain.

The most powerful recruiting tool for suicide bombers certainly isn't Osama bin Laden, says Margolis, but Bush and his administration's attempt to "exploit terrorism" for political gain.

Ironically, while Bush's policy may be encouraging support for terror networks across the Muslim world, it's beginning to backfire at home.

As its fifth anniversary approaches, 9/11 has become dwarfed by the carnage in Iraq, where more civilians are killed every month than died in the attack on America.

Also See:

Pakistan

Afghanistan

War

Bush

9/11

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Bush, 9/11, Iraq, Terrorism, war, waronterror, terrorists, USA, America,

Harper Out Of Touch With Canada

Aloof, cold, unapproachable, distant, serious, all those adjectives ascribed to Stephen Harper place him outside of main street. As does his politics. Good thing he has his garret in Ottawa where he can run the country solo. But he should never say he speaks for us or for them.

New poll released that shows Canadians overwhelming support Kyoto's objectives: Prime Minister Stephen Harper has rejected the Kyoto Protocol, an international pact to cut greenhouse emissions that cause global warming, and federal officials suggest their top priority is air and water quality, not climate. McAllister's poll suggests that the great majority of Canadians don't agree with that stance Canadians: Massive Support for Kyoto

Put all the data together, and the SES-Sun poll paints a political landscape that is pocked with major challenges for the Harper government between now and the next election.

First, the war in Afghanistan and, to a lesser degree, Harper’s pro-Israel stance on the conflict in Lebanon, are taking a definitive toll on Conservative popularity, particularly in Quebec where the party has tanked since the spring.

Second, the Conservative communications strategy of making the government “all Harper, all the time” has also turned him into the lightning rod for voter discontent.

Asked what they don’t like about the Harper government, voters didn’t point to Conservative policies, but “his policies.” Steve, it’s time to wake up

Canada's ruling Conservatives are not in a position to win an overall majority in a new federal election, and many voters dislike their tough foreign policy positions, according to two recent opinion polls.

Pollsters Ipsos-Reid, whose survey was published in the National Post newspaper on Saturday, said a tough pro-Israel line appeared to be lowering support for the Conservatives, especially in the French-speaking province of Quebec, where the Conservatives must do well to win an majority. Poll finds aversion for Harper's foreign policy

September 4: Majority (54%) Feel P.M. Was Wrong Not To Attend Recent International AIDS Conference

Canadians seem to have figured out for themselves that Afghanistan could turn out to be a disaster: a Strategic Counsel poll this week found that 55 per cent opposed the military mission in Kandahar, up from 41 per cent in March. Reversing that trend might seem like an obvious step for Stephen Harper. Yet the Prime Minister hasn't made explaining Afghanistan to Canadians much of a priority, beyond his speech on a motion in the House last spring to extend the mission by two years to February 2009 -- a parliamentary ploy that looked more designed to expose a rift in the Liberal party on the issue than to spark serious debate.Bullets fly. Ottawa ducks

Also See:

Harper


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Harper, Ottawa, Canada, Conservatives, Government, PM, PMO, politics, media,

Afghanistan, AIDs, polls, poll, polling, SES, IpsosReid, Sun, Weston, Canadians, Bush, CanadaUS, Lebanon, Israel

Whose A Nazi Now?

Gee them Tories like to throw the term NAZI around.

As the saying goes it takes one to know one....

Spectre of Hitler invoked by Tories
,Darrel Reid, the Tory hopeful in Richmond riding, once compared Canada to Nazi Germany, warning that Christians could face imprisonment for speaking out against homosexuality.

Day compares Hezbollah to Nazi Party

Harper says comparison of Hezbollah, Nazis is fair

Layton forcing the war issue
Conservative MP Jason Kenney said it would be like talking to Hitler's Nazis, a comparison which created good headlines but neatly sidestepped the history. (In the 1930s, no one, including Winston Churchill, objected to the idea of talking to Nazis; the only dispute, which peaked during the 1938 Munich crisis, was whether to cave in to Hitler's demands.)



Also See:

Harper


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Kenney, Harper, Nazi, Nazi's, MP, Canada, politics, Hitler, Hezbollah, Liberals, Lebanon, Israel

Stephen Harpers Galaxy Quest

This headline from the Star;


Harper rewrites book on being PM
He rarely retreats, never explains,



reminded me of this......

Never give up... and never surrender.





















Also See:

Harper

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Harper, Toronto, Star, Delacourt, Ottawa, Canada, Conservatives, Government, PM, PMO, politics, media, Galaxy, Quest, Tim, Allen

Lenin bin Laden

Seriously the greatest terrorist threat in the world began when an "ex-lawyer wrote What Is To Be Done? "

That's the claim made by King George II today in his speech and explaination of why America is still in Iraq.

And why the U.S. moved out of the Cold War of Containment into the New Cold War of Ameica Liberating the World....well some parts of it...if you call bombing Iraq back to the stone age liberation.....

And still looking for bin Laden....which he compared Lenin too.

His speech pre-empted Liberal Leadership announcements by Dryden and Dion.

I always thought of Lenin as a journalist, editor of Pravda. Leinin the ex-Lawyer, boy George sure has it in for trial lawyers.

Now, I know some of our country hear the terrorists' words, and hope that they will not, or cannot, do what they say. History teaches that underestimating the words of evil and ambitious men is a terrible mistake. In the early 1900s, an exiled lawyer in Europe published a pamphlet called "What is to be Done?" -- in which he laid out his plan to launch a communist revolution in Russia. The world did not heed Lenin's words, and paid a terrible price. The Soviet Empire he established killed tens of millions, and brought the world to the brink of thermonuclear war. Remarks by the President on the Global War on Terror

Gee I thought it was the US that launched the cold war. Yep they did. Right after WWI.

The seeds of hostility between the United States and the USSR began near the end of World War I. The Bolsheviks (later Communists) overthrew the existing Russian government. In December 1922 began the formation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) under Communist control. The United States refused to recognize the Soviet state until 1933. In 1947 president Harry S. Truman authorized U.S. aid (The Truman Doctrine) to anti-Communist forces in Greece and Turkey. The policy was expanded to justify support for any nation that the U.S. government considered to be threatened by Soviet expansionism. This policy, known as the containment doctrine, was aimed at holding back and restricting the spread of Communism world wide.The Cold War

Thor-Agena preparing for launch with a top secret payload, 1959. (credit: Paul Gatherer)

When were we on the brink of thermonuclear war? And who got us into it?

It promised to be a quiet evening at the Soviet nuclear early warning center when Lt. Col. Stanislav Petrov settled into the commander's seat on Sept. 26, 1983. But within minutes, Colonel Petrov was locked in perhaps the most dangerous drama of the cold war. An alarm sounded, warning screens blinked. A computer map on the wall showed the hostile launch of a US nuclear warhead."Every second counted.... My legs were unsteady, my hands were trembling, my cozy armchair became a hot frying pan," says the former officer. It only got worse. Within five minutes the computer registered five more launches; the alarm flashed: "Missile Attack."The decision that Petrov made in those pressure-cooked minutes - that the computer was in error, and the elaborate early warning system that he helped build was wrong - may have prevented a nuclear holocaust. US and Russia nukes: still on cold war, hair-trigger alert ...

And I think George is confusing Lenin with Stalin. The Russian that all post WWII neo-cons love to hate cause they were once socialists who became Trotskyists and then became liberals.

In an interview with Stephen Schwartz in Canada’s National Post, Jeet Heer showed just how deeply the Marxist right has burrowed into the Bush administration:

To this day, Schwartz speaks of Trotsky affectionately as “the old man” and “L.D.” . . . “To a great extent, I still consider myself to be [one of the] disciples of L.D.,” he admits, and he observes that in certain Washington circles, the ghost of Trotsky still hovers around. At a party in February celebrating a new book about Iraq, Schwartz exchanged banter with Wolfowitz about Trotsky, the Moscow Trials and Max Shachtman. “I’ve talked to Wolfowitz about all of this,” Schwartz notes. “We had this discussion about Shachtman. He knows all that stuff, but was never part of it. He’s definitely aware.”

The "Trotskyist roots" of neoconservatism

As far back as the mid 1980s, paleoconservatives were caustically commenting on the supposed "Trotskyist roots" of the neoconservatives. At an infamously raucous debate between conservatives held at the Philadelphia Society in 1986, the paleoconservative historian Stephen J. Tonsor expressed dismay that former Marxists had come to play such a dominant role within conservatism, and quipped that had Trotsky not been assassinated he would no doubt be working for the Hoover Institute and writing articles for Commentary. [4] But it was not until the Gulf War of 1991 that the tale about neoconservatism's "Trotskyist roots" took the form in which we know it today.

What gets all these right wingers is that the NEO-CONS were not just influenced by Trotskyism but originated in the liberal intellectual circle of New Yorkers. You know those Latte drinking, BMW types.

Neoconservatism--the term was Michael Harrington's--originated in the 1970s as a movement of anti-Soviet liberals and social democrats in the tradition of Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, Humphrey and Henry ("Scoop") Jackson, many of whom preferred to call themselves "paleoliberals." While there was a pro-Israel wing, the movement's focus was on confrontation with the Soviet bloc abroad and on the defense of New Deal liberalism and color-blind liberal integrationism against rivals on the left at home. With the end of the cold war and the ascendancy of the Democratic Leadership Council, many "paleoliberals" drifted back to the Democratic center. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, once spoken of as a possible neoconservative presidential candidate, broke with the movement in the 1980s over its growing contempt for international law and its exaggeration of the Soviet threat. Today's neocons are a shrunken remnant of the original broad neocon coalition.

Ah well Bush never was much of a historian, any more then he was much of a businessman.

The first cold war erupted amid Western alarm over the march of Soviet power into Eastern Europe after WWII, as Moscow staged coups against democratic governments and encouraged local Communist Parties to turn their countries into Soviet "satellites." Ironically, Russians today report similar feelings of outrage at what they view as Western incursions into the post-Soviet region through pro-democracy revolts. "Russians feel that these [neighboring] countries are part of us, and they can't accept that someone else wants to control them," says Yevgeny Bazhanov, vice rector of the Diplomatic Academy, which trains Russian diplomats. Russia and USA to launch another Cold War

Guess he didn't like Lenin saying this, about Georges favorite fetish...freedom...

“Freedom” is a grand word, but under the banner of freedom for industry the most predatory wars were waged, under the banner of freedom of labour, the working people were robbed.

He probably got his 'facts' about Lenin from this article.

Besides everyone knows Bush is an idiot. Scary thing is not only is he an idiot he appears to be channeling Barry Goldwater, thinking it's God telling him what to do.

The origins of the containment doctrine, dating from consular official George Kennan’s cable from Moscow in 1947 setting forth the strategy, have been amply researched, but the origins of the liberation doctrine have not been. As a strategy, it became the trademark of a new generation of conservative Republicans, led by Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater. It was originally developed, however, neither by Republicans nor self-styled conservatives, but by former Communists and Trotskyists like Whittaker Chambers, the former spy who fingered Alger Hiss, and James Burnham, a former CIA consultant. These were men who were still halfway on a journey from left to right and whose view of the Soviet Union was not shaped by debates with State Department officials, but by their anguished reflection on their own revolutionary pasts. The Origins Of Conservative Foreign Policy



Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Bush, Lenin, neo-cons, Trotsky, whatistobedone, Iraq, 9/11, Afghanistan, Stalin, Soviet-Union, ColdWar