Sunday, May 22, 2022

BALOCHISTAN
The sustainable approach

Ali Raza Zaidi 
Published May 22, 2022



A COMMON perception that holds true within our society is that poverty and lack of education are the major factors contributing to youth being engaged in violent extremist activities. Knowing that Shari Baloch belonged to a highly educated, upper middle class, respectable family in Balochistan was therefore a major ‘shock’ to the nation. How could someone so literate, so open-minded, belonging to such a respectable family, be brainwashed to commit such a horrific act?

Read: An insurgency restructured

Unfortunately, this common perception is a flawed one. Over the last 30 years, we have repeatedly witnessed highly educated, middle-class youth being involved in terrorist activities all over the world, including here in Pakistan. Many of the United States 9/11 hijackers had middle-class, educated backgrounds, and in some cases grew up in secular families. Similarly, research points to the fact that youth joining the Islamic State group are not driven by poverty; in fact, the number of IS fighters joining from a particular country positively correlates with the country’s per capita GDP, with many foreign fighters originating from highly developed European countries. The tragic Safoora Goth massacre in 2015 in Karachi, where 43 civilians were killed, was perpetrated by youth who attended some of the most prestigious institutes of Pakistan such as, IBA, NED and Karachi University.

The point here is not to fixate on simply structural factors like the lack of education or poverty, but to get to the core of why youth, in this case Baloch youth, are being attracted to violent extremism by groups such as the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), because unless we do that, we will never be able to achieve any semblance of a sustainable solution to this problem.

Residents of Balochistan in general and Baloch youth in particular, have been grossly marginalised and disenfranchised for decades, despite having their province significantly contribute to the welfare and prosperity of Pakistan for decades. What BLA provides Baloch youth with is a sense of purpose, a sense of shared Baloch identity and belonging, which they feel has been trampled upon by Pakistan’s government and military for decades.

There is a solution to Baloch militancy that does not involve disappearances and arrests.

With the advent of CPEC and other China-led projects in Balochistan, the exploitation of Balochistan in the eyes of Baloch youth has greatly increased, adding more fuel to their already defensive, marginalised mindset. The resulting effect is, unfortunately, what we saw in the form of the suicide attack by Shari Baloch.

Read: What the state must do to prevent others from following in the KU attacker's footsteps

One approach of fixing this problem is the counterterrorism one — going after the BLA perpetrators, conspirators and masterminds behind this and any possible future attacks, which the government and military are rightly doing. I put this akin to bandaging or treating an open wound, which is necessary, but unless we address the cause behind the wound and take preventive measures, we are highly likely to get hurt repeatedly.

Countering violent extremism experts will tell you that there is actually a sustainable solution to this, one that doesn’t involve disappearances, arrests and capital punishment, but rather, requires painstaking efforts to be taken, which start by engaging the community in a sincere manner, especially the youth at various levels of Baloch society — including in universities, vulnerable neighbourhoods within districts, cities and even down to the union council levels.

Read: Renewed insurgency?

The first step is to give the disenfranchised Baloch youth a platform to voice their genuine concerns — one that is legitimised by the state machinery so that the youth believe the endeavour to be a sincere effort for the betterment of Balochistan. This can be done through gatherings in universities across the state and public places in vulnerable neighbourhoods, where there is representation from not only Baloch youth and intellectuals, but also the civil government and military leadership. Such gatherings should be given local and national media coverage whenever possible, as having these discussions in a publicised, open and transparent manner will act as a deterrent to the recruitment efforts of radical groups such as the Majeed Brigade, as youth will have a positive platform to air their grievances.

Once trust through sustained engagement has been established between the Baloch community and the government and military leadership, the key is to not simply leave it at that stage, but to follow it up by giving Baloch youth a greater practical role in shaping the development programmes in their regions. If gentrification and exploitation of the Baloch due to ‘Chinese exploitation projects’ is the concern, then Baloch community leaders and youth should be included in the decision-making process of how Chinese projects will benefit Baloch youth, instead of threatening the erosion of Baloch society.

It is important that this entire process is led by a central government agency such as the National Counter Terrorism Authority, whose official mandate is to “to assume the crucial role of an effective coordinating entity ... synergise the efforts of law enforcement/intelligence agencies and other departments/ministries in countering terrorism, extremism, and factors leading to terrorism in the country” and implemented through local NGOs or organisations. What’s imperative for long-term success is that the organisations implementing these community engagement activities have the trust and buy-in of the community and youth leadership in Balochistan. This can only happen if the implementing organisations are already known to and trusted by the communities on ground. Simply awarding the funding for such programming to large national or international NGOs having little or no contextual knowledge and community buy-in, could further exacerbate the problem.

It is paramount for us to understand that no matter how many terrorists we arrest and punish, no matter how good our counter-intelligence becomes to prevent similar BLA attacks, we will never be able to find a solution to Baloch militancy unless our civil, political and military leadership engages Baloch community leaders, especially the youth in good faith, treating them as equals and giving them ownership in shaping the future of Balochistan.

The writer is a Countering Violent Extremism expert currently working in Somalia on stabilisation programming.
alirzaidi@gmail.com
https://twitter.com/gandairi
Published in Dawn, May 22nd, 2022

AFGHANISTAN
Intolerance & populism

Khadim Hussain
Published May 22, 2022

AS if closing secondary schools for girls was not enough, the Afghan Taliban issued another order for women to don the head-to-toe burqa when leaving their homes, else they would be forced to stay home permanently. In other words, women have been commanded to restrict their movements.

The Taliban may want to give the impression that they have imposed restrictions as per Sharia injunctions but, arguably, a majority of Islamic scholars think otherwise. Severe restrictions have also reportedly been clamped on mediapersons, teachers and those who have worked for the previous government in Afghanistan, while targeted killings and terrorist attacks on civilians continue.

Incidents of lynching and torture of both Muslims and adherents of other faiths have been reported recently in India on the suspicion of cow slaughter and other ‘violations’ of norms set by the RSS that wants to enforce its Hindutva brand. The harassment of journalists and intellectuals is regularly reported from various parts of India. People belonging to different faiths feel insecure, and have little space to express their views publicly. Severe insecurity surrounds the observance of their cultural and religious rites.

Last month, a Pakistani-origin mob violated the sanctity of Masjid-i-Nabawi by chanting nasty slogans against visiting officials of the new government. Scathing verbal and physical attacks on political opponents, journalists, artists, writers, analysts and even sportspersons in markets, in the media and on social media, the incessant levelling of false blasphemy charges against personal rivals and political opponents, using religion as a tool to further political interests, and the mantra of ‘foreign conspiracy’ have made the sociopolitical environment more toxic.

Certain regional trends have led to a combustible situation.


Extremism in Afghanistan, populism in India and extremist-populism in Pakistan, as these examples show, have combined to produce a lethal form of instability in the region.

Some patterns are evident. There is chronic intolerance of diverse views; the beliefs and practices of various cultures and faiths are not accommodated; there is no acceptance of gender equality; and little acknowledgement of different political and religious identities. Fascist tendencies make up the present sociopolitical and cultural fabric of Afghanistan, India and Pakistan, if not the entire South Asian region. Instead of presenting road maps for economic development, political efficacy of institutions and efficient social service delivery, policymaking and governance, the political narratives in these countries have begun to revolve around slogans which arouse aggressive feelings and extremist sentiments against political opponents. Hence bigotry, extremism and populism have become a lethal combination that is disrupting social norms and political stability.

South Asia, which is home to numerous cultures, ethnicities, languages and faiths, and that has produced geniuses and reformers, now sees intolerant views against gender, religion, ethnic identities and diverse opinions. Why have the lands where Buddha, Maulana Rumi, Bulleh Shah, Rehman Baba, Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai, Sachal Sarmast, Rabindranath Tagore, Gandhi and Bacha Khan were born reached a point where multiple intellectual traditions are abhorred? It is alarming that, instead of subsiding, the trends of intolerance, bigotry, extremism and fascism are on the rise.

Complex economic, social, political, strategic and cultural policymaking and psychological factors need to be analysed and remedial measures that have been suggested by experts installed before intolerance is normalised, if it hasn’t already been.

The political structures that have created ‘centres’ and ‘peripheries’ and ‘rural’ and ‘urban’ divides have, in effect, led to polarisation and a severe sense of deprivation. Lack of equitable representation in state and government structures and the unequal distribution of wealth have created structural marginalisation. The predominance of neoliberal economic policies has given rise to huge disparities. A combination of such factors has led to a sense of insecurity that breeds intolerance, bigotry and populism.

The implementation of policies based on extremist versions of religion, authoritarianism and sectarianism in order to achieve strategic objectives, and a dissipating support base for mainstream political parties, have immersed a generation in absolutism and otherisation, depriving it of critical consciousness. The use of media and curricula for the purpose has magnified the effect, thus leaving large sections of the population, especially the youth, with little or no political consciousness.

It goes without saying that it is the responsibility of state institutions, the political leadership, the intelligentsia, academia, religious scholars, the media, CSOs, teachers and writers to reverse this situation.

The writer is author of The Militant Discourse.
Twitter: @khadimhussain4
Published in Dawn, May 22nd, 2022
PAKISTAN
Money & control

Can a country be truly independent whose super-rich do not even pay their taxes and where the foreign hand feeds the poor?

Zubeida Mustafa Published May 20, 2022 - 


Zubeida Mustafa

AS charges of foreign intervention in Pakistan’s affairs ring loud and clear in the chaotic political discourse, there is no talk of forging a consensus to sort out issues that could lead to an economic collapse. The blame game doesn’t allow compromises.

The fact is, our public intellectuals had been warning us for decades about what lay in store for us if we didn’t check our begging bowl syndrome. What is happening today is the accumulated consequence of accepting foreign aid.

In an essay titled ‘Pakistan: the burden of US aid’ (1962), Hamza Alavi, one of our widely acclaimed scholars, wrote: “Successive US governments have … fre­quently felt called upon to insist that the mechanism of US aid was directly geared to the furtherance of US interests, at home and abroad.”

There is absolutely no doubt that the billions of dollars the US has spent on Pakistan have carried a heavy price tag. The strings attached are ‘monumental’, and deeply interwoven into the fabric of our governance. Compliance with policies that serve American global interests has been ensured by installing a subservient regime in Pakistan’s capital. Through such rulers the US has designed our economy to perpetuate our dependence on the aid giver ad infinitum and robbed us of a level playing field.


Our super-rich are reluctant to pay their taxes.


The process of self-destruction began in 1953 when Pakistan signed an aid treaty with Washington followed by the Baghdad Pact and Seato. Our leaders tried to engage in Cold War politics to neutralise America’s growing grip on the country but failed as its increasing dependence on the US limited its options.

Unsurprisingly, our foreign policy has also followed the same pattern. Our former cricketing captain, who is now posing as an innocent victim of an American conspiracy, apparently did not do his homework well before he entered the stadium of politics. Had he done so he would have also announced a contingency plan for the economy which no mature and responsible leader would leave in the lurch.

The economy, not politics, is what we need to focus on. In that context, London-based senior economist Yousuf Nazar offers a five-point plan in his article in The Friday Times that could show the way out without limiting our future options or requiring us to borrow funds from abroad. His recommendations are:

“1. Increase petrol prices by Rs30 to Rs50 per litre. Remove tax exemptions/subsidies (for Rs800 billion) for the corporate sector immediately… . 2. Impose a financial emergency under Article 235(1) of the Constitution and ask the provinces to collect at least Rs100bn through higher taxes on land, property, and agricultural income… . 3. Impose a special emergency tax of Rs500,000 on vehicles of 1,600cc or more. This can bring in at least Rs20bn. Double the electricity tariff on residential properties of 800sq yards or more. 4. Cut non-combat defence spending by Rs100bn out of the total defence budget of more than Rs1.3 trillion. Downsize the federal government and abolish/downsize all those divisions that handle subjects [devolved under the 18th Amendment]. This can bring in an additional Rs30bn. 5. Ban all land allotments and make it mandatory to sell state land by public auction only and launch a privatisation programme to create an investment-friendly environment.”

One hopes that an immediate solution is found and Pakistan doesn’t default with all its dire consequences. Then what? Plan for restructuring the taxation system and boosting our revenues, manufacturing and industrial output as well as services that should be competitive in the international market.

The real problem is the reluctance of our super-rich to pay the taxes they should in accordance with the principles of social justice and equity. They either block the passage of taxation laws that are needed or cheat to circumvent the law if it is already in place.

Who are the super-rich? Yousuf Nazar identifies them as the corporate sector, the landowners, big property holders and big agriculturists. He rightly observes that their assets have to be documented.


Part of this work has already been done during the tenure of Shabbar Zaidi, appointed as FBR head by PM Khan. A sizeable part of his work was to bring all major bank account holders into the tax net by documenting their assets with Nadra. But he could not even last two financial years when the corporate sector stepped up its pressure and Imran chickened out. Agricultural land has been registered by various bodies such as the provincial boards of revenue and the mukhtiarkars under the district commissioners. But these records do not give sufficient information to the tax authorities to enable them to do their job properly. What is needed is the political will and the moral courage to fight corruption in high places.

Can a country be truly independent whose super-rich do not even pay their taxes and where the foreign hand feeds the poor?

www.zubeidamustafa.com
Published in Dawn, May 20th, 2022

PAKISTAN

Shireen Mazari’s arrest


Editorial 
DAWN
Published May 22, 2022 -

AS if the political climate was not toxic enough, Punjab’s anti-corruption department took former human rights minister Shireen Mazari into custody in Islamabad yesterday. The incident ignited a firestorm of denunciation across the board.

Soon after her arrest, her daughter Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir alleged that she had been “beaten and taken away by male police officers”. While admittedly the entire episode was not captured on camera, a video clip that emerged later showed female police officers pulling Ms Mazari by the arm out of her car after she refused to step out. That said, the timing makes it seem like a clear case of political victimisation.

The former minister has ostensibly been arrested on the basis of an FIR in which she has been accused of encroaching on a piece of land in Rajanpur district, but the timing of the arrest is suspect. Ms Mazari has of late been harshly critical of the ruling coalition as well as the senior military leadership for its declared ‘neutrality’ in the events of the last few months that led to the ouster of the PTI government.

Read: Everyone knows 'neutrals' were not actually neutral during 'regime change conspiracy': Mazari

Given that Punjab Chief Minister Hamza Shehbaz ordered her immediate release, at the time of writing it seemed highly likely she would be set free within a few hours. Nevertheless, there must be an investigation as to why Ms Mazari was taken into custody in the first place.

What happened yesterday came across as a regrettable attempt to intimidate a prominent opposition leader into silence. The PML-N-led coalition should not be using the same tactics against the PTI that the latter had employed while in government, and for which it was justifiably criticised.

And if there are other reasons behind Ms Mazari’s arrest rather than the somewhat prosaic contents of the aforementioned FIR, then she should be formally informed of what law she has violated, if any, and given full opportunity to defend herself. Abuse of power can never be condoned, regardless of who it targets or from where it emanates.

Published in Dawn, May 22nd, 2022

'Smacks of political victimisation': Condemnations pour in from all quarters on Shireen Mazari's arrest

 Published May 21, 2022 -  Updated a day ago
A file photo of former human rights minister Dr Shireen Mazari. — APP/File

After former human rights minister and PTI leader Shireen Mazari was 

arrested from outside her Islamabad residence on Saturday, almost unanimous condemnation poured in, with journalists, analysts and politicians from 

both the government and opposition's side criticising the development.

In footage of her arrest, which was aired by broadcasters, Mazari could be seen being dragged out of a car by female police personnel from outside her residence while she could be heard protesting: "No. Don't touch me."

PPP Senator Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar said Mazari's arrest was "deplorable and the worst form of political oppression". "Things never seem to change in the land of the pure," he rued.

PPP MNA Nafisa Shah said it was "wrong to arrest" Mazari who had no allegations against her.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan said the incident "smacks of political victimisation".

From the media fraternity, journalist Mazhar Abbas tweeted, "Shireen Mazari, the first political prisoner under the present government. Political leaders and governments not ready to learn lesson from the past. I don't agree with all her views but strongly condemned her arrest and humiliation."

Also condemning the detention was journalist Asma Shirazi, who said it was "simply harassment".

Senior journalist Hamid Mir said the PML-N government should clarify its position.

Dawn News anchor Absa Komal said Mazari's arrest in a "50 year old dubious property case is condemnable". "Evident from her Twitter timeline that she was stepping on some sacred toes," she added.

Journalist Saleem Safi demanded that no injustice should be committed with Mazari and condemned her arrest.

Journalist Ahmed Quraishi said Mazari had "tried to smear me, incite extremists in her political party by linking me to a fake conspiracy to topple ex-prime minister Imran Khan and provoke violence against me", yet he wished her well and hoped that her case would be resolved amicably.

The journalist and Mazari had recently been involved in a spat on Twitter revolving around allegations by the former that former prime minister Imran Khan had tried to establish formal relations with Israel through use of his personal and family contacts.

"Deplorable. This unlawful conduct is blatant harassment and a clear violation of fundamental rights," said Reema Omer, Legal adviser for the International Commission of Jurists.

Barrister Asad Rahim Khan, meanwhile, noted that Mazari was arrested "in a case that was investigated all of half a century later – but just 48 hours after the PTI govt fell".

Researcher Ammar Rashid said he had many political differences with Mazari, but, it was "clear" that her arrest was related to her recent criticism of the establishment.

Michael Kugelman, a scholar of South Asian affairs at the Wilson Centre, Washington, pointed out that the arrest would "further weaken an already beleaguered new government by giving Imran Khan and his party another rallying cry".