Saturday, September 14, 2024

WOMAN LIFE FREEDOM

Women in Iran are going without hijabs as the 2nd anniversary of Mahsa Amini's death approaches

JON GAMBRELL
Fri, September 13, 2024







 An Iranian woman without wearing her mandatory Islamic headscarf walks in downtown Tehran, Iran, June 10, 2024. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File)

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — On the streets of Iranian cities, it's becoming more common to see a woman passing by without a mandatory headscarf, or hijab, as the second anniversary of the death of Mahsa Amini and the mass protests it sparked approaches.

There's no government official or study acknowledging the phenomenon, which began as Iran entered its hot summer months and power cuts in its overburdened electrical system became common. But across social media, videos of people filming neighborhood streets or just talking about a normal day in their life, women and girls can be seen walking past with their long hair out over their shoulders, particularly after sunset.

This defiance comes despite what United Nations investigators describe as “expanded repressive measures and policies” by Iran's theocracy to punish them — though there's been no recent catalyzing event like Amini's death to galvanize demonstrators.

The country's new reformist President Masoud Pezeshkian campaigned on a promise to halt the harassment of women by morality police. But the country's ultimate authority remains the 85-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who in the past said “unveiling is both religiously forbidden and politically forbidden.”

For some observant Muslim women, the head covering is a sign of piety before God and modesty in front of men outside their families. In Iran, the hijab — and the all-encompassing black chador worn by some — has long been a political symbol as well.

“Meaningful institutional changes and accountability for gross human rights violations and crimes under international law, and crimes against humanity, remains elusive for victims and survivors, especially for women and children,” warned a U.N. fact-finding mission on Iran on Friday.

Amini, 22, died on Sept. 16, 2022, in a hospital after her arrest by the country’s morality police over allegedly not wearing her hijab to the liking of the authorities. The protests that followed Amini’s death started first with the chant “Women, Life, Freedom.” However, the protesters’ cries soon grew into open calls of revolt against Khamenei.

A monthslong security crackdown that followed killed more than 500 people and saw over 22,000 detained.

Today, passersby on the streets of Tehran, whether its tony northern suburbs for the wealthy or the working-class neighborhoods of the capital's southern reaches, now routinely see women without the hijab. It particularly starts at dusk, though even during the daylight on weekends women can be seen with their hair uncovered at major parks.

Online videos — specifically a sub-genre showing walking tours of city streets for those in rural areas or abroad who want to see life in the bustling neighborhoods of Tehran — include women without the hijab.

Something that would have stopped a person in their tracks in the decades follwing the 1979 Islamic Revolution now goes unacknowledged.

“My quasi-courage for not wearing scarves is a legacy of Mahsa Amini and we have to protect this as an achievement," said a 25-year-old student at Tehran Sharif University, who gave only her first name Azadeh out of fear of reprisal. "She could be at my current age if she did not pass away.”

The disobedience still comes with risk. Months after the protests halted, Iranian morality police returned to the streets.

There have been scattered videos of women and young girls being roughed up by officers in the time since. In 2023, a teenage Iranian girl was injured in a mysterious incident on Tehran’s Metro while not wearing a headscarf and later died in hospital. In July, activists say police opened fire on a woman fleeing a checkpoint in an attempt to avoid her car being impounded for her not wearing the hijab.

Meanwhile, the government has targeted private businesses where women are seen without their headscarves. Surveillance cameras search for women uncovered in vehicles to fine and impound their cars. The government has gone as far as use aerial drones to monitor the 2024 Tehran International Book Fair and Kish Island for uncovered women, the U.N. said.

Yet some feel the election of Pezeshkian in July, after a helicopter crash killed Iranian hard-line President Ebrahim Raisi in May, is helping ease tensions over the hijab.

“I think the current peaceful environment is part of the status after Pezeshkian took office,” said Hamid Zarrinjouei, a 38-year-old bookseller. “In some way, Pezeshkian could convince powerful people that more restrictions do not necessarily make women more faithful to the hijab.”

On Wednesday, Iran’s Prosecutor General Mohammad Movahedi Azad warned security forces about starting physical altercations over the hijab.

“We prosecuted violators, and we will,” Movahedi Azad said, according to Iranian media. “Nobody has right to have improper attitude even though an individual commits an offense.”

While the government isn't directly addressing the increase in women not wearing hijabs, there are other signs of a recognition the political landscape has shifted. In August, authorities dismissed a university teacher a day after he appeared on state television and dismissively referred to Amini as having “croaked.”

Meanwhile, the pre-reform newspaper Ham Mihan reported in August on an unpublished survey conducted under the supervision of Iran's Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance that found the hijab had become one of the most important issues in the country — something it hadn't seen previously.

“This issue has been on people’s minds more than ever before,” sociologist Simin Kazemi told the newspaper.

___

Associated Press writers Nasser Karimi and Amir Vahdat in Tehran, Iran, contributed to this report.

UKRAINIAN NATIONALISTS ARE FASCISTS

'Shockingly unCanadian': TIFF execs, film producers and public respond strongly to pausing of controversial Russian war doc screenings

In an unprecedented move, the film festival announced they would pause screenings of 'Russians at War' amid concern of 'threats'


Corné van Hoepen
·Editor, Yahoo News Canada
Fri, September 13, 2024 



The Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) announced it will pause all upcoming screenings of the film Russians at War — a move that has garnered a strong response from those connected to the film and festival executives.

In a statement published Thursday, TIFF supported a right to peacefully assemble but added that “we have received reports indicating potential activity in the coming days that pose significant risk; given the severity of these concerns, we

Filmmaker Anastasia Trofimova, who identifies as Russian-Canadian, is behind the doc, which details a first-person account of Russian soldiers in Ukraine.

"This temporary suppression is shockingly unCanadian. We call on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to fully investigate this affront, from within a sovereign government, to our democratic values and a free media," reads a statement shared by producers of Russians at War late Thursday.



Controversy around the film first emerged at the Venice Film Festival, where the film had its world premiere, Hollywood Reporter states in a report. Trofimova sparked backlash after the film’s press conference on the Lido when she defended the film, which she made while embedded with a Russian army battalion in Eastern Ukraine.

On Sept. 10, over 400 Ukrainian Torontonians gathered outside TIFF Lightbox in downtown Toronto. They held signs that read “Russians at War Justifies and Victimizes Killers and Rapists” and “Hello TIFF?! Russian Propaganda Kills.”

TORONTO, ON: SEPTEMBER 10: Protestors demonstrate in front of the headquarters of the Toronto International Festival in protest against the use of public funds for the film 'Russians At War' on September 10, 2024 in Toronto, Ontario Canada. Credit: mpi099/MediaPunch /IPX

Ukrainian critics, in addition to Canadian MPs and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, who herself is Ukrainian, have denounced any attempts to portray the Russians in a sympathetic light and accused the filmmakers of “whitewashing” the Russian army’s crimes in Ukraine.

"This is a war of Russian aggression, this is a war where Russia is breaking international law," said Freeland when speaking with reporters on Tuesday. "It's not right for Canadian public money to be supporting the screening and production of a film like this."

Oleh Nikolenko, Consul General of Ukraine in Toronto, has expressed his outrage over the initial decision by TIFF to proceed with the screening of the film, and shared a lengthy statement over Facebook.


Festivalgoers who had tickets for the Friday screening of Russians at War were told via email that the screening was canceled and that refunds would be issued. The email made no mention of the potential threats to public safety.

TIFF issued a statement to their website Thursday in which they announced the immediate halting of the Russian war doc screenings.



Effectively immediately, TIFF is forced to pause the upcoming screenings of Russians at War on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday as we have been made aware of significant threats to festival operations and public safety. While we stand firm on our statement shared yesterday, this decision has been made in order to ensure the safety of all festival guests, staff, and volunteers. This is an unprecedented move for TIFF. As a cultural institution, we support civil discourse about and through films, including differences of opinion, and we fully support peaceful assembly. However, we have received reports indicating potential activity in the coming days that pose significant risk; given the severity of these concerns, we cannot proceed as planned. This has been an incredibly difficult decision. When we select films, we’re guided by TIFF’s Mission, our Values, and our programming principles. We believe this film has earned a place in our Festival’s lineup, and we are committed to screening it when it is safe to do so.TIFF statement on halting of 'Russians At War' doc
'We did it' to 'Censorship has no place in Canada': Social media has mixed reactions

"This film has no place in Canada," shares MP for Etobicoke Centre over X.


Prominent writer Stas Olenchenko, who is known for shedding light on myths surrounding the Ukraine war shared his insights in a lengthy thread posted to X, calling the halting of the screening "a teachable moment."


Others are going so far as to ask how a propaganda film like Russians at War received Canadian funding from the get-go.


Response to the halting of screening of the Russian war doc is pouring in from outside Canada's borders, with one Ukrainian page offering an analysis on "what is wrong with the documentary."


Others are going so far as to defend the Russian-Canadian filmmaker, saying that her story sounds "entirely plausible."
TIFF 2024 'Viktor': Russia's war on Ukraine from the perspective of a Deaf man wanting to defend his country

"It's a bit of a testament to how embracing our own differences can really unlock profound fulfillment and purpose," filmmaker Olivier Sarbil said

Elisabetta Bianchini
Fri, September 13, 2024 

Viktor (Courtesy of TIFF)


Filmmaker and veteran war photographer Olivier Sarbil gave us one of the most uniquely impactful films at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) with Viktor. With Darren Aronofsky among the film's producers, the documentary is set amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine, with the focus on the life of a Deaf Ukrainian man who has a desire to help defend his country.

"More than 10 years ago I was wounded during the war in Libya and I lost half of my hearing on my right side, and I think it really reshaped the way I understand the world," Sarbil told Yahoo Canada. "Especially my perception of sound."

"This is actually the perspective that really drove me to explore the world of a Deaf man, with the backdrop of the world. ... I was trying to find a character from the Deaf community in Ukraine, and I found Viktor via Facebook, and then I went to meet him. I know, as a filmmaker, it doesn't take a lot of time when you meet someone and your instinct, your gut is telling you, 'That's the guy.' He has so much charisma. He's amazing. ... Of course, the communication was not easy, but I treated Viktor's deafness the same way I usually do when I work with people in foreign languages."


As Sarbil explained, using visual aids, Google Translate, Viktor Korotovskyi's ability to read lips, learning basic sign language and having a Ukrainian field producer, there was an "organic" connection and trust built to tell Korotovskyi's story, amid Russia's attack.

The black-and-white cinematography, paired with sounds meant to mimic how Korotovskyi's hears the world, creates a powerful experience for the film's audience.

"The visual grammar of the film, the visual language of the film, the soundscape even, were not thought beforehand. I didn't plan it," Sarbil said. "So it really evolved naturally, as I was getting to know Viktor better, really when our relationship deepened."

"When it came to the black-and-white, for example, ... Viktor loves it. He takes a lot of pictures in black-and-white, and it's interesting, he believes that the black-and-white somehow bring out a greater sense of fairness and balance in the world. And this is really the reason why I chose the black-and-white, to reflect the way Viktor sees and experiences life."

As Sarbil highlighted, what was of the highest importance was ensuring the film was consistently connected to Korotovskyi's point of view. That included his desire to join the Ukrainian forces.

"The key element of the film is to stay on Viktor, always. When it came to his really deep desire to join the military, it's an element that came in a very organic and natural way in the narrative," Sarbil said.

"Viktor was raised with stories of wars by his father. ... When the war starts, it is an immense frustration for Viktor, not being able to join the fight to defend his homeland, his nation. And all the time I was with him, he was really desperate to be able to join the military and to find a purpose in this war."

TORONTO, ONTARIO - SEPTEMBER 08: (L-R) Olivier Sarbil and Viktor Korotovskyi attend the premiere of "Viktor" during the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival at TIFF Lightbox on September 08, 2024 in Toronto, Ontario. (Photo by Rodin Eckenroth/Getty Images)


'It's extremely challenging to operate in war'

In terms of being able to have access to Korotovskyi and filming in Ukraine, there was "constant stress" for the filmmaker and his crew, as circumstances were constantly changing.

"When it comes to war, obviously access is the most difficult part," Sarbil said. "When you go to Ukraine you need to get accreditation for the Ministry of Defence, but then it's very hard, you cannot plan, really."

"Maybe today you have a curfew, maybe you have a checkpoint, maybe today you cannot move. Maybe I can meet Viktor for one hour today, the next two days I cannot be with him, and you have to operate with constant stress. It's an extremely hostile environment, so it's extremely challenging to operate in war, and especially in Ukraine. But the people that we met, the soldiers, everyone was remarkable. .... So much bravery. They helped us on the ground. So it went very well."

One of the most emotional moments in Viktor comes near the end of the film where we see Korotovskyi speaking to a soldier who lost his hearing.

"I know how hard it is for you to lose your hearing in an instant and find oneself in complete silence," Korotovskyi tells him. "But deafness is not the end of you. It is the beginning."

"It was pretty emotional," Sarbil recalled. "We actually met that soldier not too long before we had the shoot, and is was the Deaf community that actually put us in touch with him and Viktor was really willing to meet him, and to help him."

"I didn't know what Viktor was going to tell him, really. And so it became very natural, very organic."

For anyone who watches Viktor, Sarbil hopes the film will raise awareness for the Deaf community, specifically at a time of war, which is often overlooked.

"I think it's a bit of a testament to how embracing our own differences can really unlock profound fulfillment and purpose," Sarbil said.


TIFF 2024: Protests go on despite suspension of 'Russians at War' screenings

Reuters
Updated Fri, September 13, 2024 at 6:58 p.m. MDT·2 min read


FILE PHOTO: Protesters gather outside the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) screening of 'Russians at War', in Toronto


TORONTO (Reuters) -Ukrainian Canadians protested on Friday at the Toronto International Film Festival even after its organizers reversed course and suspended screenings of a documentary about Russian soldiers in Ukraine that has been criticized as propaganda.

Earlier this week, "Russians At War" drew scores of protesters outside a Toronto theatre demanding TIFF withdraw the film from the festival.

TIFF organizers initially rebuffed their demands but on Thursday the festival said it was "forced to pause" planned screenings over the weekend after becoming aware of threats to festival operations and public safety.

"This is an unprecedented move for TIFF," organizers said in a statement. "We support civil discourse about and through films, including differences of opinion, and we fully support peaceful assembly."

Anastasia Trofimova, a Russian Canadian director and cinematographer, based "Russians At War" on footage she shot while embedded for seven months with Russian troops near the front line in Ukraine.

"I understand that emotions are high, but come see the film," she told Reuters in an interview when asked about her response to the protests.

"I did not come here with the intention of being part of a war... I've seen enough of wars."

Trofimova has denied accusations from Ukrainian critics that her documentary is propaganda. On the contrary, she said, it was filmed without permission from the Russian government, putting her at risk of criminal prosecution in Russia.

The documentary is a raw and visceral look at the conflict from the unfiltered perspective of soldiers fighting on the ground. They speak directly to the camera about fear, death and hope as the war rages around them.

Earlier in the week, Ukrainian Consul General in Toronto Oleh Nikolenko said the documentary was an attempt to whitewash war crimes committed by the Russian military since its invasion of Ukraine began in 2022.

Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, who is of Ukrainian heritage, also condemned the film and its inclusion at TIFF.

Trofimova said it was "wrong" and "irresponsible" for authorities to comment on the film without watching it.

After TIFF announced its decision to pause the screenings, the film's producers called on Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to "fully investigate this affront, from within a sovereign government, to our democratic values in a free media."

Nikolenko said TIFF's decision was "the only right decision" and the group would "continue to fight Russian propaganda."

Over 100 protesters gathered on Friday, dressed in traditional white clothing and holding sunflowers, a symbol of peace and resilience.

(Reporting by Nivedita Balu and Kyaw Soe Oo in Toronto; Editing by Frank McGurty, Jonathan Oatis and Rosalba O'Brien)


'Significant threats' of violence halt Toronto Film Festival screenings of Russia-Ukraine war documentary

Joey Nolfi
Fri, September 13, 2024 at 11:04 a.m. MDT·3 min read


'Significant threats' of violence halt Toronto Film Festival screenings of Russia-Ukraine war documentary


TIFF said its "decision has been made in order to ensure the safety of all festival guests, staff, and volunteers."

The Toronto International Film Festival has temporarily canceled all screenings of a new documentary chronicling the Russia-Ukraine war, citing "significant threats" to public safety as a reason for halting the its rollout in the Canadian city.

After previously announcing on Wednesday that the festival would proceed with showing director Anastasia Trofimova's Russians at War despite large protests outside festival venues, TIFF released a new statement the following day confirming that it would postpone all presentations.

"Effectively immediately, TIFF is forced to pause the upcoming screenings of Russians at War on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday as we have been made aware of significant threats to festival operations and public safety. While we stand firm on our statement shared yesterday, this decision has been made in order to ensure the safety of all festival guests, staff, and volunteers," the statement read, calling it an "unprecedented move" for the festival.

VALERIE MACON/AFP via Getty; Courtesy of TIFFThe 2017 Toronto International Film Festival; 'Russians at War'

"As a cultural institution, we support civil discourse about and through films, including differences of opinion, and we fully support peaceful assembly," the statement continued. "However, we have received reports indicating potential activity in the coming days that pose significant risk; given the severity of these concerns, we cannot proceed as planned. This has been an incredibly difficult decision. When we select films, we're guided by TIFF's mission, our values, and our programming principles. We believe this film has earned a place in our festival's lineup, and we are committed to screening it when it is safe to do so."

Entertainment Weekly has reached out to TIFF representatives for more information.

The festival's official description of Russians at War touts the project as going "beyond the headlines to join Russian soldiers in Ukraine placing themselves in a battle for reasons that become only more obscure with each gruelling day," and further describes the conflict as an "unjust war on Ukraine." The conflict has raged for more than two years, with Russian and Ukrainian celebrities like Regina Spektor, Vera Farmiga, and more speaking out on the violence.

Related: Stars strike a pose in EW's Toronto International Film Festival portrait studio

In defense of the film, Trofimova told The Hollywood Reporter that "because of the geopolitical climate that exists, these guys [Russian soldiers] just wanted to share with someone. Yes, I went there and no one else has."

Ann Semotiuk, a Ukrainian Canadian Congress board member, told the outlet she thought the film "ignored the fact that Russia was an aggressor that invaded a sovereign, independent, democratic, and peaceful neighbor for no reason other than their own imperialist plan."

Last week, a medical emergency interrupted the festival's world-premiere screening of Ron Howard's historical thriller Eden, starring Jude Law, Ana de Armas, Sydney Sweeney, Vanessa Kirby, and Daniel BrĂ¼hl.

Want more movie news? Sign up for Entertainment Weekly's free newsletter to get the latest trailers, celebrity interviews, film reviews, and more.

EW was in the room for the event, where the lights came on and the film was paused while an attendee was carried out of the Roy Thomson Hall venue over a health-related incident.

TIFF continues through Sunday in Toronto.

Read the original article on Entertainment Weekly.

 

BALOCHISTAN IS A NATION


Dispelling Myths: Recognizing The True Baloch Identity Amidst Misconceptions – OpEd


Baluchistan, Pakistan. Credit: VOA


By 

The heart cries tears of blood over the situation in Balochistan. In 2006, an American Colonel Ralph Peter presented a new map of the region titled “Blood Borders” in the American Defense Journal, which is considered the world’s largest defense magazine, showing Balochistan separated from Pakistan.

It was and this is the real agenda of the colonial forces, for the fulfillment of which brutal terrorists and separatist elements are burning Balochistan in the fire of terrorism with their successive heinous incidents. To deal with these conspiracies of the enemy, the top military and civil leadership in the Apex Committee meeting decided to root out terrorism from Balochistan. Undoubtedly, it is the sincere determination of the Pakistan Army that they are offering daily sacrifices of their lives for the motherland.

It is a moment of thought that Balochistan has been made a Battle Ground. Indian intelligence agency is sponsoring sabotage in Balochistan. In Balochistan, RAW along with BLA fueled Baloch nationalism. Baloch Liberation Army, Baloch Liberation Front, Baloch Liberation Organization and Lashkar-e Balochistan are gritty for independent Balochistan. Five districts of Balochistan, Sibi, Khuzdar, Turbat, Quetta and Dera Bugti are severely affected by the killings of these organizations. In the name of nationalism, Baloch Liberation Army is involved in other subversive activities including target killing, firing on trains, explosions, blowing up railway tracks and blowing up gas pipelines in these districts.

According to sources, there are three camps of TTP in Kabul and two training camps of BLA in Jalalabad which are running under the patronage of RAW. More than 400 BLA terrorists are receiving training in these camps and are targeting Chinese citizens in Pakistan at the behest of their foreign masters, they have advanced weapons and communication systems. It was also revealed that banned organizations also receive a share of the proceeds from the smuggling of Iranian oil in Balochistan. Many banned Baloch armed organizations including Baloch Liberation Army, Baloch Liberation Front are directly involved in oil smuggling. BLA has also been involved in gang wars in Karachi. BLA had started terrorist activities in Pakistan on India’s behalf, in return for these activities, RAW provides arms, ammunition and financial support to the terrorists. 

However, the ongoing skirmish in Balochistan has led to widespread misconceptions about the Baloch people. One of the most damaging of these misconceptions is the tendency to equate the entire Baloch community with terrorism. This is not only a gross oversimplification but also an injustice to the vast majority of Baloch citizens who are loyal, peace-loving Pakistanis. It is essential to distinguish between a group of insurgents and the larger Baloch population, who have made significant contributions to Pakistan’s development and prosperity.

The Baloch people, one of the major ethnic groups in Pakistan, have a rich cultural heritage and a deep sense of pride in their identity. Historically, the Baloch have played a crucial role in the formation of Pakistan, contributing to its political, social, and economic development. The contributions of the Baloch community are evident in their active participation in Pakistan’s armed forces, where many Baloch soldiers have served with distinction, defending the nation’s borders. The insurgents, who engage in acts of terrorism, do not represent the Baloch people or their aspirations.

Unfortunately, the actions of these few have led to a dangerous narrative that paints the entire Baloch community with the same brush. It alienates the Baloch people, who are already facing socio-economic challenges and undermines their contributions to the country. Labeling an entire ethnic group as terrorists based on the actions of a few insurgents is a disservice to the nation and an insult to the Baloch citizens who have sacrificed so much for Pakistan.

To overcome this narrative, the media and educational institutions have a role to play in dispelling myths about the Baloch people. By highlighting the positive contributions of Baloch citizens and promoting their rich cultural heritage, these institutions can help build a more inclusive and united Pakistan.



Sehrish Khan

Sehrish Khan is a freelancer and media activist. She writes on political developments 

and security issues with special focus on South Asia and the region.

 terrorism military war army

Axis Of Upheaval: New Era Of Confrontation – OpEd


By  and 

‘For the powerful, crimes are those that others commit,’ Noam Chomsky once remarked, highlighting a key critique of U.S. global dominance. Now, the U.S. faces another confrontation with its rivals—China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea (CRINK)—a coalition that endangers the global order, as described in the research termed “Axis of Upheaval,” coined by Andrea Kendall-Taylor, a fellow and director at the Center for a New American Security.

As the Biden administration’s foreign policy has seen deviation, these four countries are teaming up against the U.S., challenging the global political system through anti-Western and anti-hegemony collaboration that significantly challenges international political norms. Thus, America faces a new type of challenge in dealing with these four autocratic states. In the two years since Russia’s invasion, the evidence of their convergence has mounted, making it impossible and even irresponsible to dismiss their alignment. Let’s explore the situation currently unfolding on the world stage.

First, Russia is engaged in a war that marks Putin’s point of no return in his effort to undermine NATO and the West—particularly the U.S.—pursuing a long-term confrontation. To better position Moscow for this conflict, Putin has effectively doubled down on relations with like-minded partners: China, Iran, and North Korea. This has made Russia the key catalyst of this emerging axis.In the current war, Moscow has deployed over 3,700 Iranian Shahed drones and is producing 330 of these drones monthly inside Russia.

Moreover, Russia and Iran share deep ties, which are expected to extend further in coming years. In 2022, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi proposed a 20-year cooperation agreement, which will be finalized soon. In exchange, Russia has provided Iran and Iranian proxies, such as Hezbollah, with more weapons, especially following the onset of the 2023 Israel-Hezbollah conflict. In 2024, this dynamic saw little change. Russia defended Hezbollah and Hamas, offering arms and ammunition to groups that share Iran’s political vision.

Next, China—a rising global power—has emerged as a new threat to the U.S. in global trade, military, and diplomatic affairs, which has raised concerns for the U.S. as China’s ambition is to surpass America’s sphere of dominance from Asia to Africa and Latin America.As a permanent member of the UN Security Council, China wields significant influence, often using its position to neutralize U.S. and allied actions towards North Korea, Russia, and Iran. China has also solidified its relationship with these countries, dealing treaties with Iran and Russia and using megaphone diplomacy with the U.S.

Following the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war, China became Russia’s new major oil and gas importer, effectively replacing Saudi Arabia. China exported $300 million worth of dual-use items—goods with both civilian and military applications—including microchips, jamming equipment, telecommunications gear, jet plane parts, sensors, and radar systems. These exports have helped sustain Russia’s war effort and offset the effects of Western sanctions.

Further along, Putin’s surprise visit to North Korea shocked global media, as he praised Kim Jong-un for “firmly supporting” Moscow’s war in Ukraine. Putin also promised to build trade and security systems with Pyongyang “that are not controlled by the West.” During the war, North Korea supplied roughly 2.5 million rounds of ammunition and ballistic missiles to Russia, with Russia vowing to send energy, food, and other essential goods to North Korea in return.

Diplomatically, Russia and China use their UN Security Council positions to shield Iran and North Korea from sanctions, strengthening their bond for greater aspirations. Diplomatic ties are also growing through platforms like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and BRICS, which recently granted Iran membership.In reality, despite heavy sanctions imposed by the U.S., this axis has turned adversity into opportunity, forging stronger ties through security treaties and threatening the West by stoking conflicts in Ukraine, Taiwan, and Israel, challenging global stability.

“Under threat in a way we haven’t seen since the Cold War,” warned CIA Director Bill Burns and MI6 Chief Richard Moore, as the axis continues to destabilize the world order. This statement also highlights the growing fear of the Axis of Upheaval.

Andrea Kendall-Taylor, the originator of the term “Axis of Upheaval,” suggested increasing defense funding to help Ukraine win the war as a way to destabilize this emerging alliance.

In response, Western nations, led by the U.S., have focused on countering the collective challenge posed by the axis. This has involved strengthening existing alliances, enhancing the Indo-Pacific strategy, and increasing the EU defense budget. Meanwhile, the Axis of Upheaval has coordinated countermeasures to bypass sanctions and undermine the global financial system by using its own currencies for trade.. 

This growing confrontation is likely to further increase global tensions, much like the widespread impacts of the Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Hamas wars, which have halted global trade in some regions.

In conclusion, smart power and diplomatic measures may ease this pressure, and the upcoming U.S. elections could also shift the dynamics. However, the true impact of this new era of confrontation remains to be seen.

‘It’s pure war.’ A nation key to fight against Haiti’s gangs puts deployment on hold

Jacqueline Charles
MIAMI HERALD
September 13, 2024 

Jose Iglesias/jiglesias@miamiherald.com

The West African nation of Benin is supposed to be a critical partner in the multinational security mission helping Haiti fight violent gangs — pledging the single-largest force of 1,500 to 2,000 soldiers, who also would be the only native French-speakers enlisted in the campaign.

But now the nation’s deployment plans appear to be on hold. At issue is who Beninese troops, once deployed to Haiti, will be answering to and whether the international effort to stabilize and secure the country for elections should be carried out by police or military personnel.

“Our position and our commitment remains the same, to help Haiti,” Benin Foreign Minister Shegun Adjadi Bakari told the Miami Herald in an interview. “But since the beginning …we said clearly, what Haiti needs is not a police mission. We believe that we need a military mission in Haiti to fight against gangs, restore the security in the country and restore the stability, which is a prerequisite for any election.”

The participation of Benin, where the population speaks French like many Haitians, is considered a key to the success of the mission. Its concerns about the rules of engagement recently came up in a briefing with congressional foreign affairs staff. Some congressional staff have been concerned about the pulling of resources by the Biden administration from strained areas of the globe to put out fires in other areas.

Islamic State and al Qaeda militants, for example, are currently spreading violence across West Africa, and the Pentagon has turned to coastal countries such as Benin and others in the region, to house U.S. forces and assist U.S. counterinsurgency efforts after American soldiers over the summer were forced to withdraw from Niger.

Benin first offered to join the Multinational Security Support mission in February amid calls from the Caribbean Community for more Francophone nations to join the effort after the United Nations agreed to the deployment of foreign forces to help the Haitian national police dismantle armed gangs controlling most of the capital.

Kenya had volunteered to lead the effort and agreed to deploy 1,000 of its police officers. However, the effort was delayed due to court challenges in Nairobi and funding issues in Washington. Still, Washington was able to amass a list of countries to volunteer troops to what it continuously touted as a police-led security mission. Those countries The Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belize, Benin, Chad, Jamaica and most recently, Guatemala.

Of those, the Kenyans were the first to deploy. The first contingent of the 400 Kenyan police officers began arriving in late June. On Thursday, they were joined by 25 Caribbean security personnel including members of the Jamaican military and police force, and two members of Belize’s military.

In welcoming the Caribbean contingent, Godfrey Otunge, the Kenyan force commander and a policeman, said the presence of the Caribbean forces “will enhance the synergy” of the ongoing operations between the Multinational Security Support mission and the Haiti National Police.

Until now, both groups have struggled to make a significant impact against the armed gangs, which have grown even more emboldened amid the mission’s lack of resources, which include a lack of security personnel, equipment and financing.

Bakari said Benin has several concerns about the mission, which the government shared with partners from the onset. Among them was about the command structure, which was voiced the minute it offered to contribute between 1,500 to 2,000 military soldiers.

“They came back to us and said are you ready to send your military right now? We said, ‘Yes. But you cannot ask the military to be led by policemen,’ ” he said. “It hasn’t happened anywhere in the world. You need the military to command military people.This is where we stand today, we said ‘We cannot send our military persons in Haiti to be led by policemen coming from Kenya.’ ”

The State Department did not respond to a request for comment.

This is not the first time the question of who is better equipped at taking on Haiti’s armed gangs has come up. A confidential U.N. document obtained by the Herald ahead of Kenya’s pledge to lead the effort suggested that the international armed force could consist of a mix of military and police units, but must have the muscle, assets and intelligence capabilities necessary to fight heavily armed kidnapping gangs.

Bakari said Benin raised this very idea in its own conversations, suggesting that the security mission be a mix of army and police, or just army.

“All of us know that it is impossible for policemen to solve this issue,” he said. “They don’t know how to do this kind of operation; it’s a pure war, we know that.”

He also raised another concern, one that also help lead to the decision by Canada not to take the lead despite heavy courting by the United States to do so.

“They should understand us also, how can I send my people to Haiti and they will be shot at? What will I tell my constituents?” Bakari said.

While some in Washington view the uncertainty around Benin as a blow to U.S. efforts to securing Haiti enough for the country to be able to hold long-overdue general elections next year, Bakari said he remains hopeful that his nation can keep its commitment to the troubled Caribbean country that not only shares the French language but other cultural touchstones.

There is a diplomatic meeting with U.S. Secretary Antony Blinken later this month, he said, where Benin plans to once more raise its concerns.

The U.S. is the largest financial contributor to the Kenya-led Multinational Security Support mission, providing more than $300 million toward its operations and the construction of a base near the international airport in Port-au-Prince.

Despite the largess, there still isn’t enough money to support the 2,500-security personnel it who are expected to field the operation. Concerns are also growing that while the current funding, including $84.5 million in a U.N.-controlled Trust Fund, is enough to support the troops currently employed, funding will soon run out by early next year.

To address the funding and resource issues, the U.S. plans to push for more funding during the upcoming U.N. Genera Assembly that begins on Tuesday. It is also pushing to transform the non-U.N. mission into a formal U.N. peacekeeping operation. Along with Ecuador, the U.S. is floating a resolution among members of the Security Council for a year’s extension on the mandate of the current mission until October 2025, and for planning to begin on transforming it into a peacekeeping operation.

As a peacekeeping mission, funding would come from member state assessed contributions, and not voluntary contributions. It would also have assets like helicopters and a hospital capable of doing surgeries, which doesn’t currently exist.

But for any of this to happen, the U.S. will first need to convince U.N. Secretary-General AntĂ³nio Guterres that a formal peacekeeping mission is the way to go, and then it will have to ensure that neither Russia nor China vetoes the idea when the resolution comes up for a vote on Sept. 30, two days before the mandate expires.

“I believe at some point our partners will hear us and they will understand our position and what we are asking for,” Bakari said.

“Our position is simple,” he added. “We are ready. Our people are trained, they have all of the clearances but at the same time the United States, Canada, France and other countries, they have to commit in terms of financing.”