Structural racism: Communities with higher redlining scores had higher rates of stroke

American Stroke Association International Stroke Conference -- presentation P873

AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION

Research News

 

DALLAS, March 11, 2021 -- Discriminatory housing policies that restricted the sale or purchase of homes by race in certain neighborhoods across the U.S., called 'redlining,' which were established nearly a century ago and outlawed by the Fair Housing Act of 1968, were associated with higher rates of stroke in the same neighborhoods in 2017, according to preliminary research to be presented at the American Stroke Association's International Stroke Conference 2021. The virtual meeting is March 17-19, 2021 and is a world premier meeting for researchers and clinicians dedicated to the science of stroke and brain health.

"Differences in stroke rates, whether we are studying ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, are usually attributed to biological differences or differences in underlying conditions," said lead study author Jeffrey J. Wing, Ph.D., M.P.H., an assistant professor of epidemiology in the College of Public Health at The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio. "Yet, our findings suggest the difference we found in the Columbus area may actually be the result of structural racism."

Beginning in 1936, the Home Owners' Loan Corporation began restricting the sale of homes in certain neighborhoods across the country by redlining or marking neighborhoods by "risk for investment," which equated to race. As a result, residents who lived within these redlined areas were denied home loans, which lowered tax revenues in these communities, thereby reducing investment in schools and services, and creating numerous inequities for residents for multiple generations.

"Even though redlining was abolished in 1968, redlining is a form of structural racism that perpetuated segregation and racial inequities. Accumulating evidence shows this divisive and exclusionary housing practice continues to have long-term effects on the health of many people, even today - more than 80 years later," said study co-author Helen Meier, Ph.D., M.P.H., assistant research scientist at University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research. "Our study is one of the first to link historic redlining in a U.S. city to frequency of stroke."

Researchers examined the association between the discriminatory housing policies of redlining and stroke rates in Columbus, Ohio neighborhoods in 2017. They calculated historic redlining scores for neighborhoods within the boundaries of Columbus based on the degree of redlining. Thus, the greater the redlining, the higher the redlining score.

Researchers then matched the redlining scores with stroke rates measured in the same neighborhoods from the 500 Cities Project. The 500 Cities Project is from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and reports on 27 chronic disease measures for the 500 largest American cities in all 50 states, quantified by city and census tract-level data. They assessed the association between historic redlining scores and stroke rates across neighborhoods in Columbus in 2017.

Researchers found:

• Higher historic redlining scores were associated with greater rates of stroke, when comparing the highest to the lowest quartile of historic redlining scores. 
• Neighborhoods in the highest group of historic redlining scores had a 1.48% higher stroke rate, compared to those with the lowest redlining scores.

"As different cities across the country declare racism as a public health crisis, it's important to have more research that shows the link between racism and health disparities," Wing said. "Our research has the potential to help change how we treat and care for all individuals and promote equitable access to care that can lead to improved health outcomes."

"Health disparities in stroke are going to persist until we address the legacy of structural racism, of which historical redlining is one form," Meier said. "It's important to document the significant, negative impacts of structural racism on health."

Study limitations include people who had a history of stroke may not have always resided in the same census tract, leading to unmeasured variability in redlining exposure. In addition, this is an ecologic-designed study, where redlining exposure was combined with stroke rate to a neighborhood level, which limits the assessment of individual associations, Wing added.

The American Heart Association recently published a presidential advisory that names structural racism as a cause of poor health and premature death from heart disease and stroke. The advisory, titled "Call to Action: Structural Racism as a Fundamental Driver of Health Disparities," reviews the historical context, current state and potential solutions to address structural racism in the U.S. and outlines steps the Association is taking to address and mitigate the root causes of health care disparities.

###

Co-authors of the study are Emily E. Lynch, M.P.H.; Sarah E. Laurent, Ph.D. candidate; Bruce C. Mitchell, Ph.D.; and Jason Richardson, M.A. The authors' disclosures are listed in the abstract.

Meier's work was funded in part by the Shaw Scientist Award from the Greater Milwaukee Foundation. Wing reports no study funding.

Additional Resources:

• Multimedia is available on the right column of release link https://newsroom.heart.org/news/structural-racism-communities-with-higher-redlining-scores-had-higher-rates-of-stroke?preview=cda802f68a8cb4086b88134ed14788de
• African American celebrities and influencers to amplify national conversation on health justice and equity
• Structural racism causes poor health, premature death from heart disease and stroke
• What does the life - and senseless deaths - of Black men and women mean for the health of Black Americans?
• Lifetime discrimination may increase risk of hypertension among African Americans
• For more news at ASA International Stroke Conference 2021, follow us on Twitter @HeartNews #ISC21.

Statements and conclusions of studies that are presented at the American Heart Association's scientific meetings are solely those of the study authors and do not necessarily reflect the Association's policy or position. The Association makes no representation or guarantee as to their accuracy or reliability. The Association receives funding primarily from individuals; foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers and other companies) also make donations and fund specific Association programs and events. The Association has strict policies to prevent these relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from pharmaceutical and biotech companies, device manufacturers and health insurance providers are available here, and the Association's overall financial information is available here.