Showing posts sorted by date for query SURREALISM. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query SURREALISM. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Monday, November 11, 2024

 

Stalking The Nightmare of Control

Stalking The Nightmare of Control by Invecchiare Selvatico

Invecchiare Selvatico Reflects on War of Dreams: A Field Guide to DIY Psy-Ops by Jason Rodgers (Autonomedia 2024)

In my review of Jason Rodger’s first book, Invisible Generation: Rants, Polemics, and Critical Theory Against The Planetary Work Machine (see anarchistnews.org/content/‘cause-i-see-you), I wrote: “As they ponder the banality and degradation of modern life, non-ideological anarcho-primitivism meshed and mashing with anarcho-surrealism, critiques of contemporary and historical philosophical pitfalls and their self-referential trappings, and so much more, Jason emotes provocation. In a time where almost anything remotely interesting or transgressive has been absorbed, reconstituted, and sold back to the anemic herd willing to lap up just about anything served to them and call it “radical”, Jason still finds edges that have not been smoothed down, still pokes, tears, and rips at the silicone and ideological flesh of control, still engages in psychic warfare against civilization…. It is rare in a world of posers, of fakes, of superficial trend surfers, of programed zombies, of reified rebels, of performative soldiers, of plastic identities, and such, to find someone who critically grapples with complexity and nuance and is not afraid to dip toes into the dangerous, a true free-spirit, an anarchist, or at least what that once meant before it all became so safe, so comfortable, so predictable, so non-anarchist. And when I am pleasantly surprised, usually by accident, that my paths come across one of these kindred spirits and their creative little explosions into the world, I am moved to respond. I begin to realize that I am not alone. There are others out there who are still alive, who have not been lobotomized and neutered by this displaced and dispirited post-modern techno-reality. I see you.”

Well, War of Dreams: A Field Guide to DIY Psy-Ops, Jason’s follow-up offering, not only confirms my suspicions, and dare I say hopes, but hits me smack in my wet thinking flesh with even deeper, more expansive, more clever, more biting analysis, and provocatively belly-shaking laughter than I had even imagined. Well done. Read these two books and call me in the morning (on my landline, it is all I got). I am sure there will be no shortage of things to discuss.

As in their previous book, War of Dreams combines Rodger’s dense and provocative collages and flyers with detailed essays and other assorted wordplay on a significant spectrum of subjects and over a decent chunk of time. I am not sure of their process for linking writings with collages (topic, chronology, chaos theory, drunken blind darts, etc), but they fit perfectly together as an unfolding journey of critique. Similar to their first book, and throughout their collage and flyer project, Campaign to Play for Keeps (CtPFKs), Jason seems to have rejected the current trend to oversimplify, reproduce, and dumb things down in analysis and presentation. Jason crams so much content, both visual and in critique, that a highly complex density of meaning is created, what I view as an anti-meme (or a least what memes have come to mean today). The writing and subjects are at times moderately complicated, but Jason manages to express and explain in a way that reads clearly and smoothly, never a chore, and always interesting. The range is phenomenal. Not yer one trick ideological pony here. The only thing you can pin Jason down on is their unabashed heretical digging, prodding, and poking, as well as their insatiable appetite for reading (from actual dead-tree flesh and ink books), in every direction that can be conceived as interesting, an immoral (amoralists are almost as big of cop-outs as atheists) and precise mesh of ideas filtered through a creative, perceptive, and intense person. Although Jason does seem to have some personal favorites, like Walter Benjamin, Jerry Mander, The Situationists, Bob Black, Freddy Perlman, Hakim Bey, Feral Faun, William Burroughs, John Zerzan, Renzo Novatore, Genesis P-Orridge, and a whole lotta old school and hardcore punk, they never get old and they bring them into the analysis in fresh ways, clever angles, and from a place of comprehension, unlike the googled and wikied name-dropping turds who love to puke out phrases and unbaked concepts they haven’t even begun to digest (I can still see the nuts and corn you morons).

The chorus: “Can we clone this mutant?”

No.

“Why Not!” they cry.

Because this is someone who is still very much alive and kicking and unique and breathing, someone who is present in this world with their eyes pried wide open. They engage in living critique, not dead games, not redundant gestures and ptsd ticks. And not online.

One of the many things I love about Jason’s writing is that I continually expand my vocabulary with every page. Who knew a word like “teledildonics” existed and how perfectly it names cybersex? Jason uses this evocative language as they come out swinging at social alienation and the technologies and processes which deepen, expand, and accelerate its control in their opening piece “Alienation Cycles Of The Identity Image”. This essay sets a solid tone for the book, only slightly distracting for me by a subtle attitude towards what feels framed as an almost obligatory, more active refusal over supposedly more passive escape. In this regard, Rodgers has previously called what they perhaps at times perceive as a more dormant, stagnant, self-referential, or even resigned response as “quietism” (which comes up more specifically further in the book). It is a term I think that can be too liberally applied, especially when its really hard to know what people do in their real world, away from print, cameras, and screens, in the middle of nowhere, between each other, underground, anonymously, without report-backs, away from scenes, behind fences and doors, in locked damp basements or dim dusty attics, in minds and hearts, off-the-grid, obscured by costumes and masks, up my nose, in the darkness, away from peeping eyes and measurements of the spectacle that is society. There are lots of ways to be willfully disobedient and to attack. Rejection and refusal can occur in many ways, including what may be termed as certain kinds of escape (either brief and temporary or more extended). I know Jason gets this. It is clear in so much of their writing, but what feels sometimes like a more overt call-to-duty may still go unrecognized by many with touches of lingering revolutionary residue and still a slight smear of social baggage along these lines. This is one of the few places Jason and I seem to meet across the creek a bit, but I actually enjoy the pushing and pulling, tussling and tugging. I find it inspiring, provoking, and challenging. I am all in.

Section One: Media is an analytically-leaning, yet not overly detached, attack on the post-modern cyber-world of global communication and control. Some of it feels like a freshening up and recontextualizing of the Situationists within the current cyber-hell (“Cyberia” as Jason cleverly describes the barren wasteland most have self-banished themselves to), but from a specifically anarchist and anti-civ perspective. In “The Object of Alienation and Reification” Rodgers examines the almost totalizing power of the technologically mass-ified illusion and its all-consuming affects on understanding and meaning. “As the world becomes more and more saturated with images it becomes more difficult to draw conclusions… Everything becomes fake news. The image is objectified into just more discrete components to be reassembled as entertainment.” Again, Jason’s proposal for a disconnection from the tentacles of fiber-optic mass media and their DIY prioritization seems to be the most relevant pushback to this mostly all-invasive and almost all-encompassing force.

Section Two: Anti-Media has a more nuts and bolts, active-oriented approach. This was one of my favorite sections and lets you really get to know what motivates Jason, their DIY attitudes, influences, their love of zines, punk rock aesthetics, deconditioning and decentering activities, and strategy of chaos and Dis Information, which Rodgers explains as “the scattering of the formation, allowing elements to reform in new, unpredictable, and dynamic ways.” This section is not only filled with their usual (unusual) collaged flyers, drawings, and essays, but also very playful and pointed correspondence, letters to editors and zines, stories, reviews, and some really off-the-map and forgotten or only marginally known micro-histories. I specifically appreciated Jason’s shinning the light on Susan Poe and Gerry Reith, two essential, yet virtually forgotten about, figures in the early incubation of a general perspective that became post-Left anarchy.

“My Date With Susan Poe” is Rodgers “fictionalizing an actual meet-up with a marginal” and offers glimpses into a time, place, person, and attitude that is typically only poorly and superficially understood and mimicked these days. Suzy “Crowbar” Poe seemed like a truly an anarchic unique one. She was a co-conspirator with Rodgers on a zine, a cult formation, some general mayhem, and, according to Jason, was a “butt sniffer”, oh, and she also put out Popular Reality, a staple of radical deviants and early post-Left anarchist appetites, with all the usual seemingly compulsory controversies (but more about all that in future Jason Rodgers releases).

Even more enlightening for me was “Gerry Reith’s Terminal Clarity”, a review of a compilation of Reith’s writings put out by Nine Banded Books called Neutron Gun Reloaded: a Gerry Reith Reader. It recalled for me this barely mentioned yet crucial embryonic element who helped facilitate the particular version of anarchy that I would dive into in the late 90s, but someone I knew almost nothing about. After reading Jason’s piece I quickly asked my ol’ pal Staplecide if he had heard of Neutron Gun, of which he had multiple copies of different editions. Reith seems to be an invaluable lost piece in the puzzle for many of my generation of anarchists going forward. In his very short and volatile life (he ended it abruptly at the age of twenty-five with a bullet to his head at his typewriter in 1984), Gerry seemed to have provoked, offended, picked apart, and smashed politics, complicity, collectivism, and society with a cynical “post-right anarchist” individualist OG-edge-lordy transgression that is so desperately needed today as one of many important infusions (Sorry you thin-skinned over-sensitive lil’ neo-emo liberal-lefties, its true, but that’s another story). Unlike many of his contemporaries (and most anarchists today), Reith entered anarchy from a libertarian background, which probably contributed to his very interesting and unique offering. According to Rodgers, “He was a crucial part of the start of a movement towards a new politics, towards a new writing, towards a new form of adversarial media.” Thanks Jason for reminding us, and for passing on the history to those few of us who can still read, and still want to.

Section Three: Politics starts to really cut into the meat of the multifaceted motivations, motions, and maneuvers of control, and some of Rodgers’ proposals for an “insurrectionary guerilla-ontology attack on multiple fronts” to “cause damage that will resonate through the whole totality” as they conclude “Internalized Control (In Hopes of a Short Circuit)”, a concise piece on contemporary forms of systematic power. While “Against Alienated Rationality” offers a sober critique of the “reductive conception of humanity” as well as enthusiastic calls for divergent and resonating infusions of irrationality. Jason accurately sights dada as one historical precedent for the “free sovereign” and “the anarch” to be inspired by in this way. There is so much in this section and the next (Anti-Politics) to keep diving back into again and again, way too much for summing up in review and well worth an in-depth one-on-one investigation. Whether it is work, academia, careers, activism, collectivism, progress, morality, or the misinterpreted, weaponized, or forbidden authors like HL Mencken or Ragnar Redbeard, when Rodgers is dissecting an idea, author, or tendency, they use well-oiled precession tools and maintain the wide-eyed fascination, unconstrained curiosity, and unabashed honesty of a young’n in the basement with a bloated roadkill bunny. That’s how the political is best treated.

Section Four: Anti-Politics follows the biting CtPFKs flyer “Food Not Bombs: Diarrhea for the People!” which asks the politicized culinary questions: “Have you internalized enough guilt to think that you deserve to eat half rotten (but not fermented) produce, handled (but not washed) by junky traveler kids?” and “Do you consider expecting those preparing your food to wash their hands after a bowel movement to be an example of a privilege to be checked?” and responds with the anti-political just dessert: “People are too full of shit. Food Not Bombs can Help! One meal and your system is clear!” Turn the page and Divine’s Invasion Squad takes aim and fires off: “FILTH IS MY POLITICS” as Jason then opens the section with a concise and clarifying distillation: “For every negative about my philosophy and program there is also a positive. You may notice that my positive still contains a negation. I suppose this is an example of a point in which I differ from a nihilist: a nihilist believes in nothing. I, however, believe in negation. Furthermore, this destruction can also be creative. From carrion compost left by negation, imaginal blossoms may bloom.” This is a crucial distinguishing position, one I absolutely resonate with, and Rodgers fleshes it out well in the section that follows. It is a continuation of the previous section’s attack on the political, handled with the same Rodgers’ standard of concision and derision, but from the opposite direction.

The first major piece in this section, “Chaos Is Immanent: Struggle, Ontology, and The Condition Of Freedom” gets to the heart of Jason’s project. It also fleshes out in more detail the subject of minor points of divergence I have had with them over what they term “quietism”. I find their more extended and contextual explanations of this concept more agreeable, nuanced, and useful, yet, in moments, still a bit stuck in the concept of “struggle” for my taste. Although, I think most of the residual divergence to be only partially of substance, and mostly semantical and very close in actual perspective in reference to the goals, inspirations, and tensions concerning the self-willed individual in society. I think this quote from the piece sums up Jason’s admirable motivations quite well: “Hope should be thrown out to begin with, and instead a joy of a life in struggle adopted. Why bother seeking easily attainable goals that are really just more banal miserabilism? Instead I’d like to seek a pataphysical objective, something so wonderful that it has never happened (or at least hasn’t happened since Babylon erected ziggurats). I’d rather lose at the great work than a lifetime of success maintaining a sewer system.” I cannot argue with this at all.

This section contains worlds within worlds of subjects and perspectives, becoming a swirling dervish of ideas connected in very interesting ways. “Feral Magik” is one of these gleaming gems, a spider-webbing pursuit covering vast terrains of the occult, deconditioning, altered states, telepathy, language, rewilding, resistance, and much more with a rigor and enthusiasm deserving of considerable note. In “Consensus Submission Making” Jason aptly critiques the herd mentality and hive mind that most people submit to on a daily basis due mostly, according to Jason, to their internalization of the external authority of society. Rodgers brings their analysis back to the more activist and collectivist of the so-called anarchist milieu who “sit through long-drawn-out-consensus-based meetings with rigid, formalized procedure, easily prone to abuse by politico-pervo authoritarian types drawn to these sort of structures. They join a community of peer pressure and shame, where comrades will pressure them into engaging in behavior they don’t want to engage in, just like they were initially pressured by mass society. They confront the alienation of mass society by submerging themselves into a hive, reduced to a number on a membership roll.” Instead, Rodgers proposes a revolt on every level against the Totality, especially, perhaps, on the micro, in our daily lives, a suggestion I could not agree with more. “Field Studies in Misanthropology”, a subject dear to my little black heart, is a brief and quite personal piece that stems from a very revealing journal entry which includes: “I often find it nearly impossible to relate to people I encounter in my daily life. I can’t relate to anything about them. I find nothing of interest in their interests. When I try to share how I feel, to communicate something about my being, I feel like I might be speaking a foreign language. I speak, but most often I am met by blank stares or mild disgust.” Jason’s response to these very understandable yet potentially crippling misanthropic tendencies in their own and in others’ hearts and minds is a very thoughtful temporary acceptance without an overwhelming submission into despair, and yes, quietness.

This section continues to flow into a very impressive arch through a seemingly unending set of deeply engaging and furthering pieces like “Affinity and Passional Conspiracy”, “The Journey Beyond Anarchism”, “Individuality, Identity, and The Creative Nothing”, “Notes On the Death of the Social”, “Trajectories Against Civilization”, “Uncivilized and Queer: An Anti essentialist Critique of Gender”, “Sodomy and Sigils In the Circle Pit” and much more to sink your ravenous feral fangs into. The section concludes with one of my favorite pieces in the book, “Escapism”. It fleshes out the sometimes touchy subject historically, philosophically, and practically, and comes up with a fairly adjacent assessment to my own, that without an intentional situation to sustain, protect, and nourish us, and without people of deep affinity (yet containing unique and individual difference), our resistance to civilization will not only be limp and fruitless, it will be unsatisfying on so many levels. This terrain is complicated and vast, for sure, fraught with many potential trappings, pitfalls, and leechings, but one worth the dangerous, endless, and satiating lived experimentation. We are not soldiers, we are living beings who need to be filled with a continual vitality to resist civilization and our precious energy needs to be replenished directly and daily in our lives. Surrogate activities and might-sucking distractions magnate all around us as we attempt to be at home in our world.

And finally, Section 5: Schiz/Misc wraps it all up with an assortment of oddities, misfits, and loose ends. Personally, for me this concluding section was slightly less interesting, but I appreciate Jason’s enthusiasm for their endlessly veining-out unconventional interests and it does help dissipate the heaviness of the previous sections into a more dream-like and playful goo, sending us all on our limitless little ways. In this almost afterward-like section we rub elbows with visionary artist Paul Laffoley and their psychotronic art, chomp down some amanitas with a shamanistic and hermetic Santa, and get a few other entertaining conspiratorial tutorials. Most relevant to me was the opening statement to the final section, pulled out in part for the back cover: “I am interested in ideas that don’t fit… The limitations of an alien reality must be smashed. It isn’t important to reach the masses, instead we want a growing lunatic fringe, schizoid anarchs who are uncontrollable and irresistible.” Delightful.

If it were not for the likes of Jason Rodgers and a ragged assortment of other such kindred deviants scattered about I would have left anarchists behind long ago. These rare crackles, sparks, and glimmers lighten my darkening heart, blow out my dusty mind, and rattle my creaking bones. They put a crooked skip in my step and rowdy stomp in my boot. They don’t delude, distract, or soothe with such false balms as hope or lofty philosophical ideals, but instead invigorate with a potent rejection and intoxicating honesty so sorely needed. It hurt so good.

Jason is no mere propagandist, that is a project for politics and power. Rodgers is a provocateur of the highest degree and a psychic warrior of great finesse. In their attempt to corrupt the perceptions and attitudes of individuals, groups, and powers, Jason’s psychological operations have no limits, but don’t expect the played out and obtuse knuckle-headed full-frontal attack! attack! attack! No, Rodgers is like a brilliant little termite, chewing away the rotting structures and shitting out the detritus for dreams to grow in as the mutherfucker crumbles from within. Chew!

“I know life is a game and I intend to play for keeps.
Time to get serious about joking and work at play.
It is time to play hard and play the ultimate game, war games.”
- Campaign to Play for Keeps

————

Jason Rodgers can be reached at:
Campaign to Play for Keeps
PO Box 701 Cobleskill, NY 12043
(no email)
Invisible Generation and War of Dreams
are available from Jason directly
or
autonomedia.org
or
underworldamusements.com

Invecchiare Selvatico
was a primary editor and writer for Green Anarchy magazine
and is the author of Black Blossoms At The End Of The World (LBC)
available from underworldamusements.com
Contact: nazelpickens@gmail.com
PO Box 316 Williams, OR 97544

*Both Jason Rodgers and Invecchiare Selvatico (as well as some other interesting deviants)
can be found writing for the preeminent anti-civilization anarchist publication:
OAK JOURNAL - PO BOX 485, WV 26851 - oakjournal@protonmail.com

Friday, November 01, 2024

 

Lindsann on In the Digital Age: Poetic Reason as an Alternative

From Fifth Estate #415, Summer 2024

a review of Poetic Reason in the Age of Digital Control by Jesús Sepúlveda. Bad Idea Publishing, 2023

Jesús Sepúlveda’s Poetic Reason in the Age of Digital Control addresses some of today’s most pressing threats and sketches out some promising ideas of a strategy in response, which will hopefully be elaborated in future works.

Most of the book is devoted to describing the threats of ecological collapse, economic exploitation, neoliberal colonialism, rising totalitarianism, and a widespread failure of empathy. These phenomena are attributed to the root cause of the unrestrained rule of instrumental reason: “eclipsed by its reduction to an instrument—a tool that performs calculations,” a totalitarian force leveraged by industries, bureaucracies, internet algorithms, and now by AI technologies.

The precise nature of the proposed response, poetic reason and its methods, is less developed, and sometimes gets lost amidst rhetoric or peripheral details. Sepúlveda bases his conception of poetic reason on an essentialist perspective, declaring that because “Nature’s experience is unmediated, so is poetry, whose gratuity is not commodifiable because one cannot sell one’s experience.”

The examples of poetic reason offered, while relatively few, are drawn from a wide range of regions across the globe, including the animism of Amazonian indigenous peoples, and the balance of instrumental and poetic reason displayed in the construction of a windmill from recycled material in Malawi, in Kamkwanba and Mealer’s memoir The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind (albeit twice mis-cited as “The Boy Who Harnessed the Wing”).

The precise nature of poetic reason nonetheless remains ambiguous and receives less attention and detail than the description of the general geopolitical situation. Some of this context is necessary, and the various factors of the global situation are persuasively woven into a strong critique of instrumental reason. The basic analysis will be familiar to anyone with a knowledge of green/anti-civ anarchy, Fifth Estate, or much of avant-garde poetics. However, this context takes up about three-fourths of the compact book. The focus shifts fully from describing the problem to presenting a solution about ten pages from the end, leaving little room for an in-depth exploration of poetic reason itself.

It is never made clear precisely what poetry itself, or by extension poetic reason, is for Sepúlveda. The relatively few poets cited, including the powerful examples of Vallejo and Paz, give some indication, but the reader trying to discern the exact nature of poetic reason’s revolutionary core is left mainly with familiar, essentialist declarations of poetry’s special purity. But what makes the reason of poetry more pure than that of prose? What constitutes its essential, radical nature: its speakable rhythms, its sensuous form? The social roles of the poet? Its evocation of imagery and symbol? Its alteration of the writer’s and reader’s state of consciousness?

It is never explained in what way poetry, a product of language, arguably mediation par excellence—is unmediated. Sepúlveda declares that “Written verses mediated by the market are not poetry,” but it is unclear whether this is part of the working definition of poetry, a turn of rhetoric, or a practical call for gatekeeping against the selling of all poetry. For instance, does selling a poem disprove this definition? Would this include zines? Busking? At least several of the poets he cites as inspiration have sometimes sold their poetry.

Sepúlveda certainly makes a strong case for the necessity of poetic reason, however defined, raising key questions: how exactly might we begin to cultivate it individually and/or culturally? How is it learned, how is it practiced beyond the confines of poetry itself? What are some strategies whereby it can combat systemic misery?

These questions have been energetically explored for generations, but there is no discussion of them here, nor of the multiple histories of anti-instrumental poetry, or analysis of the social roles or forms that characterize modern poetry.

No account is taken of poetry’s evolution and its variety in countless societies, seemingly taking contemporary bourgeois culture’s understanding of poetry for granted as a static concept.

Therefore, the idea of poetry that seems to be at play reflects the dominant model of lyric poetry which permeates bourgeois culture, regarding the purity of individual expression, its relation to mimesis (the representation of reality within art) and the social, cultural, and spiritual roles of the poet.

As a result, we miss the opportunity to explore some of the clearest, most developed, and most marvellous modes of poetic reason, including mysticism, ritual poetry, glossolalia, and shamanism. Though Brazilian Amazonian animism is offered as an example of the result of poetic reason, there is surprisingly no mention of their poetry, song, or use of language.

The modern movements and traditions which have explored this territory present an additional missed opportunity; despite the main concerns of Sepúlveda’s thesis seeming apparently congruent with those of Romanticism and Surrealism, neither is mentioned. The poetic experiments and experience of Dada, Fluxus, the Situationists, Ethnopoetics, and asemic writing, despite the strong anarchist ties of all these movements, plus the theories of anarchist and radical linguistics and semiotics, currently thriving, are all missing from the discussion, aside from one reference to Debord’s theory of the Spectacle. Explaining the reasons that Sepúlveda is, one must assume, dissatisfied with these approaches might go far in clarifying his own ideas.

The most intriguing aspect of the theory, which comes through in glancing hints and touches, concerns the relationship between poetry and time. Sepúlveda sees poetic reason as counteracting the linear time wielded by instrumental reason, leading to some thought-provoking notions regarding poetry, history, and chronology.

These scattered ruminations make one yearn for a more focused and fully manifested explanation. Poetic Reason in the Age of Digital Control stands as an eloquent critique of the pressing problems facing us in the current historical epoch and evokes a brief sketch of some ideas pointing toward a promising response.

It leaves the reader with a keen hope for future books that will flesh out this sketch into a fully articulated theory, which can provide us with a potent source of strategies for radical poetic reason and action.

Olchar E. Lindsann is a poet, theorist, publisher, translator, archivist & historian of 19th Century radical and avant-garde counterculture. He is the editor of the DIY mOnocle-Lash Anti-Press, with a catalog of over 200 zines at monoclelash.wordpress.com.

Tuesday, October 15, 2024

 

Surrealist Manifesto

2024 marks the 100th anniversary of the formal announcement of surrealism in the Surrealist Manifesto written by French poet, André Breton. It gathers strength today as it combines with anarchism to shout: ALL POWER TO THE IMAGINATION!

by 

Fifth Estate # 415, Summer 2024

a review of
Surrealism and the Anarchist Imagination by Ron Sakolsky. Eberhardt Press, 2023

“Contrary to prevalent misdefinitions, surrealism is not an aesthetic doctrine, nor a philosophical system, nor a mere literary or artistic school. It is an unrelenting revolt against a civilization that reduces all human aspirations to market values, religious impostures, universal boredom, and misery.”

—Franklin Rosemont, André Breton and the First Principles of Surrealism

Surrealism and the Anarchist Imagination is Ron Sakolsky’s most recent book in a string of texts exploring different aspects of the fertile crossroads of surrealism and anarchism. It contains fifteen pieces, ranging from poems and collective manifestos to longer essays.

These pieces argue passionately that it is precisely at the crossroads of these two currents that surrealists and anarchists are at our rebellious best. For that insight alone it is a very valuable book. Early on, the surrealists described themselves as “specialists in revolt”, and it is the spirit of total refusal that has kept surrealism a vital force for more than 100 years. The surrealist slogan, “All Power to the Imagination,” rang out in Paris during the revolutionary events of May 1968 and is still ringing today.

Throughout the book Sakolsky gives examples of the intersecting of anarchist and surrealist currents. From the anarchist/feminist/surrealist publication The Debutante to the visual art of Maurice Spira; from anarchist involvement in indigenous land defence to Hakim Bey’s concept of the Temporary Autonomous Zone, which was influenced by and critical of surrealism.

In Undoing Reality, Sakolsky examines the surrealist concept of miserabilism and his related concept of mutual acquiescence. It is crucial for us to reject miserabilism: “a way of life rooted in the rigid assumptions of a status quo finality that constitutes ‘reality.'” Sakolsky points to John Clark (and his surrealist alter-ego Max Cafard) as seeking “to subvert such realist thinking by examining the miserabilist basis of the ubiquitous popular culture meme of ‘It is what it is!'”

Clark argues, “From the viewpoint of dialectical thinking, the crucial challenge is to see the ways in which things are not what they are. It always is what it isn’t and isn’t what it is. Getting trapped in the world of ‘it is what it is’—what I call Isisism—is the royal road to delusion, disaster, and domination. The right road to illumination and liberation is what I call Isisntism.”The essay ponders the “question of why we are willing to surrender our individual and collective autonomy to the repressive demands of ‘reality’.” Equally important, it examines what tools anarchism and surrealism can provide us to resist and overturn this “absence of the will to revolt.”

Free Jazz: Imagining the Sound of Surrealist Revolution is the longest essay in the book and a tour de force of radical scholarship. It provides all the facts that you need, but suffused with rebellious energy. Surrealists value free jazz because “as a musical form of insurrection, free jazz improvisation is a convivial creative practice that fully embodies the surrealist search for a revolution of the mind (which pointedly includes a critique of the dreariness of the commonsensical in favor of an explosion of the insurgent imagination) and is emblematic of the flowering of its libertarian aspirations for society as a whole.”

Sakolsky points to these aspirations as having a “particularly powerful resonance with the Black Liberation movement.” Archie Shepp is an example given of a free jazz musician dedicated to Black Liberation who also had a strong connection to surrealism, but he isn’t the only one. There is a long list of prominent figures within free jazz who have had short or long term connections with surrealism.

Joseph Jarman and Henry Threadgill were participants in the 1976 International Surrealist Exhibition in Chicago and both composed pieces specially for the exhibition. Doug Ewart’s Sun Song Ensemble performed there as well. Pianist Cecil Taylor was in attendance at the exhibition and also contributed to Arsenal: Surrealist Subversion, the international journal of the Chicago Surrealist Group. William Parker, who played with Taylor for more than a decade, is quoted in the piece as saying, “black surrealism is a vision that has come to me most of my life.” Sakolsky invokes the potent mixture of radical political vision and the visionary power of the human imagination present in free jazz. “In combination, these improvisational acts can provide the sparks that ignite the powder keg of surrealist revolution.”

Opening the Floodgates of the Utopian Imagination: Charles Fourier and the Surrealist Quest for an Emancipatory Mythology is another of the long essays in the book. It discusses the work of 19th century Utopian Socialist Charles Fourier who has been a figure of fascination for surrealists and anarchists alike. Sakolsky explores the history of surrealist engagement with Fourier starting at the very beginning of the Paris Surrealist group in the 1920s.

Fourier’s refusal to be limited by political realism infuriated his later critics Marx and Engels but has endeared him to anti-authoritarians. Fourier dreamed so wildly that he imagined the political equality of women and coined the term feminism. He imagined a world of passional attraction and refused to be limited by the tyranny of what is (deemed) possible.

The essay also discusses the rejection by progressive movements of mythology, which French philosopher George Bataille saw as one of the factors that led to the spread of fascism. The lack of any emancipatory myth left a vacuum for the fascist nightmare. Recent translations into English of Bataille’s journal Aciphale, as well as public lectures that he gave around the same time, have provided more detail of his thoughts on this subject. Sakolsky argues that Fourier could provide at least parts of an emancipatory myth for anarchists and surrealists. It is very heady stuff and a fascinating discussion.

The third long essay in the book is Chance Encounters at the Crossroads of Anarchy and Surrealism: A Personal Remembrance of Peter Lamborn Wilson A.K.A. Hakim Bey. It is a remembrance of Sakolsky’s 35 year long friendship with Wilson. As the title implies, it provides details about Wilson’s engagement with and critique of surrealism, and how Wilson’s critiques encouraged Sakolsky’s own explorations of the crossroads of surrealism and anarchy.

It is a touching tribute to Wilson, a long-time anarchist comrade of Sakolsky’s, not to mention prolific author and contributor to Fifth Estate.

The shorter pieces in the book have a lot to offer too. A Spark in Search of a Powder Keg: An International Surrealist Declaration is a strong reminder that the surrealist movement is vibrant, not a dead historical art avant garde. It provides a glimpse of the internationalism of surrealism. There are signatories from the US and Canada, Central and South America, North Africa and the Middle East, Australia, and all over Europe. It highlights the surrealist spirit of total refusal in opposition to Canadian pipeline projects and the violence of the police. The declaration is a strong voice for solidarity with Indigenous land defence and radical environmentalism.

It is well known that André Breton and many of the French surrealists had an interest in and affinity with West Coast Indigenous art. The declaration states: “as surrealists we honor our historical affinity with the Kwakwaka’wakw Peace Dance headdress that for so long had occupied a place of reverence in Breton’s study during his lifetime before being ceremoniously returned to Alert Bay on Cormorant Island by his daughter, Aube Elleouet, in keeping with her father’s wishes.”

The authors also draw connections to outrage and resistance in response to the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis which occurred during the period that signatures were being gathered for the declaration. A postscript points out that it “was only fitting that in solidarity with the uprisings about police brutality kicked off by George Floyd’s execution/lynching at the hands of the police, anti-racism protesters in the United States would take direct action by beheading or bringing down statues of Christopher Columbus, genocidal symbol of the colonial expropriation of Native American lands.”

Uncovering the Surrealist Roots of Détournement is an excellent short examination of what the Situationists termed detournement, the subversive appropriation of popular imagery, usually a comic combined with radical text, and its roots in surrealist practice. The piece is accompanied by an example of contemporary anarcho-surrealist detournement, a collaboration between Sakolsky and John Richardson. The same image and 20 others, along with an introduction by Sakolsky can be found in their recently co-authored book Surrealist Détournement, published by Dark Windows Press.

Surrealism and the Anarchist Imagination benefits from a beautiful printing job by Eberhardt press and full color art throughout by Rikki Ducornet, Maurice Spira, Zigzag, Peter Lamborn Wilson, Sheila Knopper and many others, which contributes greatly to the effect of the book. Surrealist visual art is a powerful aid to help fire the anarchist imagination.

David Tighe is an anarchist, mail artist, and zine maker living in Alberta, Canada.


Newsletter | vol. 32 | no. 4 | 15 October 2024

André Breton: the deluxe edition of Magic Art

Dear Eugene

In celebration of the centenary of the publication of the First Manifesto of Surrealism on 15th October 1924, we are delighted to announce the deluxe edition of André Breton's Magic Art is now available to pre-order.  

 
Inspired by the work of the surrealist bookbinder Paul Bonet (left, Second Manifeste du surréalisme, 1930), our full morocco deluxe is signed by André Breton's daughter, Aube Elléouët Breton. It is limited to 88 copies and is presented in a silk box, with a supplementary volume, Magic Art Redux.


 
PRE-ORDER DISCOUNT

We have just a few weeks left of the special pre-order price for the standard hardback issue, and with advance sales over the last few weeks the edition is currently 30% sold. Full detail can be found below.


SHIPPING DATES

Standard Hardback Edition: 04 November 2024
Special limited 'Jappard' Edition: 02 January 2025
Deluxe signed 'Enigma' Edition: late January 2025

 
Click here for further details




LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Search results for SURREALISM 

Friday, September 20, 2024

SURREALISM André Breton: Magic Art

 

Newsletter | vol. 32 | no. 3 | 20 September 2024

André Breton: Magic Art

Dear Eugene

We've been quiet recently, and this project is the reason why. Written between 1953 and 1957, Magic Art was the last great project by André Breton, the founder and principal theorist of Surrealism. Lost for many years, the text has never been translated into English... until now.

In celebration of the centenary of Surrealism on October 15th, we are delighted to announce André Breton's Magic Art is now available to pre-order. We are releasing the standard hardback and special edition first, with early birds receiving discounts and bonus items. The pre-order for the deluxe signed by André Breton's daughter will open on October 15th.

In response to customer requests, we have introduced Klarna as a payment option to help spread the cost. Just click the Klarna option in the checkout.


Shipping dates 
Standard Hardback Edition: 04 November 2024
Special limited 'Jappard' Edition: 02 December 2024
Deluxe signed 'Enigma' Edition: mid-January 2025

 
Click here for further details
LAUNCH EVENT

Warburg Institute, London, Saturday November 2nd, 2024

In collaboration with the Warburg Institute, Fulgur Press is pleased to host a special one-day symposium to celebrate the first English publication of André Breton’s L’Art magique. Tickets are £15.00 (£10.00 with concessions) and available via the Warburg Institute website.

The event will take place in the newly refurbished premises, and will include a talk exploring the genesis of L’Art magique (Robert Shehu-Ansell) presentations from artists whose work is infused with magic (Jesse Bransford, Elijah Burgher, Judith Noble and Nooka Shepherd) followed by a round table discussion, and a talk from surrealism scholar Will Atkin (Courtauld Institute) exploring the relevance of magic art today.

Refreshments and an evening wine reception are included.

Click here for further details




Robert Shehu-Ansell
MANAGING DIRECTOR

Monday, July 29, 2024

Paris exhibition celebrates global spread of surrealism

Jennifer Rankin in Brussels
Sun, 28 July 2024 


Max Ernst: The Fireside Angel (The Triumph of Surrealism)
.Photograph: Classicpaintings/Centre Pompidou

One hundred years ago, in a tiny studio flat in a bohemian district of Paris, a former medical student turned writer set out to define surrealism “for once and for all”. In his Manifesto of Surrealism André Breton called for a new kind of art and literature fired by the unconscious, “the dictation of thought free from any control by reason, exempt from aesthetic or moral preoccupation”.

Far from settling surrealism “for once and for all”, the handwritten document was a departure point for a sprawling, subversive movement of bad dreams, haunting landscapes, fantastical alien creatures, unsettling portraits and visual tricks. Now, a century later, a major exhibition at the Pompidou Centre in Paris, opening in September, will celebrate how surrealism spread around the world, far beyond the environs of the French capital.

The Paris exhibition is the second in a sequence of five. The show opened in Brussels and will move on to Madrid, Hamburg and Philadelphia in 2025. Organisers say it is an unprecedented way to organise an exhibition: while some works and themes remain constant in each city, others change and each museum tells its own story.

Perfect, then, for a movement that always aimed to subvert traditional artistic norms.

When the Pompidou Centre last held a major exhibition on surrealism in 2002, it was characterised as an essentially European movement emanating from a group in Paris. Since then, a great deal of research by universities and museums has enlarged that view, said Marie Sarré, the curator of the show at the Pompidou Centre, the organisation that initiated the project. “This exhibition, on the centenary, aims to show surrealism in all its diversity,” she said.

“It is important to remember that surrealism was a movement that spread – and this is exceptional for an avant-garde movement – around the world, in Europe, but also the United States, South America, Asia and the Maghreb.”

What unites all these artists is Breton’s call to live by the imagination, she suggests. “There is this attention to the wondrous in everyday life. [Surrealism] wants to provoke, to shock, [to show] the wonderful aspect of everyday life that comes from consciousness or access to dreams.”

At the heart of the exhibition will be Breton’s first manifesto, with pages of the original manuscript on display, in a loan from the French national library, which acquired the document in 2021 after it was declared a national treasure.

The emblematic names of the surrealist movement will be present, with works by René Magritte and Salvador Dalí. But visitors will find less well-known figures, such as Japanese artist Tatsuo Ikeda, whose art evoked the horrors of war and the toxic consequences of Japan’s postwar reindustrialisation, and Rufino Tamayo, a Mexican painter active in the middle of the 20th century, who is credited with fusing modernism with pre-Columbian motifs in vividly coloured works.

Reflecting a growing tendency, the Pompidou Centre restores to view neglected female artists, who were long reduced to girlfriends and muses with colourful bit parts in the surrealist story, rather than complex creatives in their own right, such as Leonora Carrington, Dorothy Tanning and Dora Maar.

And it will show surrealism’s contemporary resonances, suggests Marré, citing the surrealist preoccupation with the forest as an echo of modern environmentalism. Surrealism’s anticolonial messages also feature – the Paris exhibition includes artists’ tracts against France’s 1954-62 war in Algeria.

In Brussels, the Royal Museum of Fine Arts took the concept of surrealism backwards in time, looking at the links between late 19th-century symbolists and the surrealists, long seen as separate movements.

“There was no real rupture between what happened before and after the first world war,” said Francisca Vandepitte, the curator of the Brussels exhibition, which closed in late July. “Our fundamental approach is trying to show, for the first time, the links,” she said, citing Fernand Khnopff’s austere, somewhat unsettling late 19th-century portrait of his sister as an influence on Magritte’s 1932 work The Unexpected Answer, which shows a person-sized hole in a similarly sterile-looking doorway.

Related: Keeping it surreal: my Dalí-inspired art trip to Catalonia

Many of the works that were on display in Brussels are going to Paris, although the show will continue to evolve as it tours. The Royal Museum of Fine Arts is lending one of the jewels of its collection to Paris: René Magritte’s The Dominion of Light, where a clear blue sky filled with white fluffy clouds frames a row of trees and houses shrouded in nocturnal light. “If only the sun could shine tonight,” went a 1923 Breton poem that Magritte quoted.

But “it is not the classic travelling exhibition”, said Vandepitte. Instead, similar themes will emerge in some, but not of all the museums, themes suggested by Breton’s manifesto: dreams and nightmares, night, forests, the cosmos. “Each partner puts on the exhibition, building on the richness of its own collections and heritage,” she said.

After Paris, the exhibition moves to the Fundacíon Mapfre in Madrid, which will turn the spotlight on surrealists from the Iberian peninsula, such as Dalí and Joan Miró. Then it is on to the Hamburger Kunsthalle, which will explore the heritage of German romanticism, before arriving at the Philadelphia Museum of Art in late 2025 to tell the story of surrealists in the Americas during their second world war exile.

Fleeing the Nazi advance, artists came to the US, Mexico and the Caribbean, where they encountered new influences. In Mexico, for instance, surrealists discovered traditional mythologies about volcanoes, “wonderful fodder for the surrealist mindset”, says Matthew Affron, the curator of the Philadelphia exhibition.

“Someone who sees all five versions [of the exhibition] is going to have a wonderfully varied and broad understanding both of the character of surrealist art, in terms of its themes and styles, [and] its main concerns,” he said.

Perhaps the changing nature of the exhibition is particularly well suited to surrealism in all its strange and transgressive variety. “There is no such thing as surrealist style,” Affron said. “I would say it’s really a philosophy of life, almost, and a mindset. One of the key ideas of surrealism is that we must let the imagination be freed to take us to places that we have not yet been.”

Surrealism is at the Pompidou Centre in Paris from 4 September to 13 January