Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Black Bloc Can Vote

Says Elections Canada.

Nothing in law requires visible face, Elections Canada says


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/a/a1/20050829001716!Black_bloc.jpg

After all we are over in Afghanistan fighting for womens rights.....to be veiled.

I don't understand the outcry over this it is a family value after all.

Constitution of Afghanistan 2004

Family is a fundamental unit of society and is supported by the state.

The state adopts necessary measures to ensure physical and psychological well being of family, especially of child and mother, upbringing of children and the elimination of traditions contrary to the principles of sacred religion of Islam.




ind blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , , ,

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, ,, , , , , , ,

Vencap

Once upon a time the Alberta Government created a Venture Capital fund called Vencap Equities Ltd. It ran for just over a decade between 1982 and 1995.

And contrary to the myth that the fund was mismanaged that was not so, it simply was bad times in the market. Despite that it was highly successful and became Western Canada's largest venture capital fund. However the myth that it was a failure was perpetuated by the Alberta Government.


In terms of publicly-funded venture capital funds, Alberta’s experience has not been positive. Vencap was established by the Alberta government with funding of $240 million and the objective of investing in venture capital. Vencap experienced many of the same problems as LSVCCs – a lack of good investments and a reluctance to take risks. As a result, a relatively small percentage of Vencap’s equity ended up in new Alberta ventures. The Alberta Opportunity Company faced similar problems in operating a program to support investments in start-up knowledge-based industries.
As late as 2005, Dr. Allan Warrick of the University of Alberta continued to promote this myth that Vencap was a failure.

A small venture capital (Vencap) company was formed, with limited success.


Vencap Equities invested not just in Alberta but in High Tech and bio-tech in Canada and the U.S.

Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd.
10180-101st St., Ste. 1980
Edmonton, AB, Canada T5J 3S4
(403)420-1171
Fax: (403)429-2541
Preferred Investment Size: $1,000,000 minimum. Investment Types: Start-up, first and second stage, control-block purchases, leveraged buyout, and mezzanine. Industry Preferences: Diversified. Geographic Preferences: Northwest, Rocky Mountain region, and Western Canada.


It often simply acted as an investor in a new project, back stopping a bigger corporate player in diversifying secondary and tertiary production, a long term goal of the Lougheed Government.

At Fort Saskatchewan near Edmonton, Dow
Chemical Canada Inc. extracted salt brines for the
manufacture of chloralkali and, at Lindberg, The
Canadian Salt Company Limited produced fine
vacuum pan salt. Near Bruderheim, two companies,
CXY Chemicals Canada Ltd. Partnership and
Albchem Industries, operated solution mines to produce
sodium chlorate used mostly for pulp bleaching
in the prairie provinces and western Canada. CXY
Chemicals Canada Ltd. Partnership (formerly known
as Canadian Oxy Ltd.) is planning a 30% expansion
of its chlorate production facility to be completed by
mid-1996. This increase will be achieved by increasing
the capacity of the equipment.
Albchem Industries was created by Sherritt Gordon and Vencap. CXY is the Canadian branch of Occidental Petroleum. Armand Hammer's company which VP Al Gore and his family has a long history with.

Vencap had more than a passing interest in the construction industry in Alberta during the first boom. Donald A. Carlson ,who owns Carlson Construction, was Chairman of the Vencap Board. Former Premier Peter Lougheed joined the Board of Carlson Construction after he retired.

At the same time the Alberta government was passing legislation to create non-union merit shops in Construction in order to bust the Building Trades Unions, Vencap had shares in the Construction industry.


Stuart Olson Construction Ltd., according to their solicitor, originally was engaged in employing union members on union jobsites. The last three years, however, Stuart Olson Construction Ltd. divested itself of employees covered under Certificate Nos. 21-75, 89-82 and 114-84.

The Company currently employs no employees at the present time.

The two major shareholders of Stuart Olson Construction Ltd. are Allen S. Olson who owns 99% and Vencap Equities who owns 1% of the Company. Counsel for the Employer states that the Employer currently holds property and assets which include buildings and equipment. In effect, Stuart Olson Construction Ltd. has become a holding company.
Vencap acted as a key investment that would allow Stuart Olson to go private, and claim to be go between, allowing it to contract out to non-union labour. Thus the nineties begin with the smashing of the construction trades unions to be followed with the smashing of the public sector unions. By then Vencap was sold.


Within Alberta, the provincial government moved away from becoming directly involved in the marketplace the early 1990’s and withdrew its direct financial involvement in the development of emerging industry sectors and specific firms. Venture capital functions carried by the Alberta Opportunity Company were withdrawn; the assets of VenCap were sold. A policy of no direct loans or loan guarantees to specific businesses was adopted by Alberta.
Yet it still made money.Despite the governments Big Lie that it was a failure. In fact as Dr. Michael Percy, Dean of the U of A Business School, points out they were one of several crucial pools of capital that helped build Alberta's secondary and tertiary businesses such as the embryonic Hi-Tech and Bio-Tech industry here. Which relies on a trilateral integration between Universities, corporations and the government to this day.

Performance of High-Technology Firms in a Peripheral Resource-Based Economy: Alberta, Canada

A young high-technology base is reflected further in the small size of the labor force although three out of four firms created jobs between 1980 and 1984. Marketing was a key area of performance identified by respondent firms as companies attempted to diversify away from local markets. Overall, the systematic policies of support by the Alberta government were found to assist the growth of the high-tech industry.


The AgBiotech Bulletin Volume 2 Issue 1  January/February 1994

Biostar Raises $10.9M

Biostar Inc., a Saskatchewan company which specializes in the
development of animal and human vaccines, has raised $10.9
million in equity. The funds were assembled through a syndicate
led by MDS Health Ventures of Toronto.

The investment will be used to establish an advanced product and
manufacturing facility in Saskatoon and to finance new product
development. Once the plant is in operation in 1994, Biostar
will be able to produce genetically engineered health products
and components for global markets.

The company markets three vaccines through its wholly owned
subsidiary Biowest Inc. The new plant will allow the company to
double its production levels. Current sales are valued at
$500,000. Steve Acres, Biostar president, anticipates that
within the next five to six years sales will reach $20 million.

Dr. Murray McLaughlin said that the equity investment in Biostar
was an affirmation of the strength of the Saskatoon agbiotech
community. "Biostar received the first funding assistance ever
provided by Ag-West. Our investment of just over $800,000 in
1989 has helped facilitate a major Canadian venture. The Ag-West
board is extremely gratified by the performance of Biostar in a
highly competitive market." It is Ag-West's role to fill the gap
between the research phase of development and commercialization.

The recent $10.9 million investment comes from MDS Health
Ventures, Health Care and Biotechnology Venture Fund, the
Saskatchewan Government Growth Fund, the International Centre for
Agriculture Science and Technology (ICAST), Working Ventures
Canadian Fund, Vencap Equities Alberta, Federal Business
Development Bank (FBDB) and CIC Industrial Interests.
For further information contact Steve Acres (306) 966-7473.


January 10, 1997

NeuroMotion Case Study

Tom Rice, acting CEO of NeuroMotion Inc., was anticipating a problem. He had
heard that NeuroMotion, a new medical device company, might receive only half
of the $6 million financing it had planned for. He called Business Manager Tricia
Cisakowski and Chief Financial Officer Christine Stacey into his office to help
develop a new strategy to deal with this potential setback.

Assuming full financing of $6 million, their strategy for penetrating the market
was an aggressive plan involving the commercialization of all of NeuroMotion’s
products in rapid succession. The products were the Glove, the WalkAid, and
the Tremor Control Cuff. Decreasing risk was a key strategy in the formation of
NeuroMotion. Increasing the number of product offerings increased the
probability that the company would generate significant sales, which made it a
more attractive investment opportunity.

Tom Rice, Ph.D. A business professional with over 24 years experience as an
executive, consultant, investor and researcher in the medical products industry.
He also has considerable experience as a consultant for start-up companies.
Rice brought substantial venture capital contacts to NeuroMotion through his
involvement in Vencap, a venture capital fund. He was employed as a part-time
CEO for approximately three, then became full time. He was a de facto MDS
appointee, who had verbally agreed to a three month contract with NeuroMotion.
He operates out of Edmonton and Minneapolis-St. Paul.

And then Klein got elected and since his government was not in the business of business, that is of making money, Vencap was caught up in the privatization frenzy of the nineties. Klein tossed the baby out with bathwater and sold it.

It was then gulped up by Charles Schwartz's private equity investment firm; Onex Corporation. Talk about a nice chunk of change.

Onex
also purchased Vencap Equities Alberta, Ltd., a promising venture capital fund located in western Canada.

The Onex Corporation of Toronto said yesterday that it planned to acquire Vencap Equities Alberta Inc. for $256 million (Canadian), or $187 million (United States), including the payment of $144 million (Canadian) in Vencap debt. Onex said it would buy all the shares of Vencap -- including the 30.5 percent stake in stock options the Alberta government holds -- for $8.50 (Canadian) a share. Onex, which owns interests in airline catering, food-distribution and delivery businesses, will also pay off Vencap's outstanding loan to the Alberta government. Vencap's stock reached a record high of $8.125 before closing at $7.875, up 37.5 cents, in trading on the Alberta Stock Exchange. Onex's stock was up 12.5 cents, to $14.125, in Toronto.

Vencap was sold off at fire sale prices, just like the provinces Liquor Stores were, benefiting its corporate board and not taxpayers. The supposed debt of Vencap was actually what it had invested in the market. In other words capital awaiting interest. Otherwise Onex would not have been interested.

Klein was on the band wagon that the province was in debt. So a valuable investment instrument was seen as being in debt, which it wasn't it just had outstanding investments in the market, so it was sold.

The Province of Alberta (the "Province") has made it known both to Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. ("Vencap") and publicly that it wishes to dispose of its interests in Vencap. Those interests (the "Alberta Investment") consist of a loan in outstanding principal amount of $199,988,000.00, one (1) special share and an option to acquire up to an additional 3,999,999 special shares at a price of $1.00 per share.

In order to effectively market the Alberta Investment the Province requires access to certain information from Vencap which has not heretofore been made public.

There could be significant benefits to Vencap and its shareholders in having the Province's loan paid out or purchased either by Vencap or some other party and in having the Province's special share and option dealt with at the same time.

Vencap would likely want the repeal of the Vencap Equities Alberta Act as part of any resolution of the Alberta Investment.

Thus there are significant material benefits to be gained by both parties through Vencap and the Province cooperating in the resolution of these issues.



Those that sat on its board brag today about its success before it was gutted by the Klein revolution. Former Vencap director Derek Mather notes one of his achievements as;

Helped to create a new Western based venture capital Company, the largest fund of its kind in Canada and, together with a team of professional executives built a portfolio of venture investments worth over $100 million.
And another board member, Peter van der Velden, notes in his corporate CV that Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd, was; arguably one of Canada's most successful venture capital firms

This is from the SEC report on the take over of Vencap by Onex in 1995.
Vencap                                              

Vencap is an Alberta, Canada corporation. Vencap is a value-added
private equity investor, operating in western Canada, the Pacific Northwest and
the Rocky Mountain region of the United States. Vencap purchases significant and
influential equity interests in selected high-growth companies, builds these
companies to positions of market leadership andgenerates a return on investment
either through profitable exit or by generating ongoing sustainable income.

The address of the principal business and principal offices of Vencap is Suite 1980,
10180 101st Street N.W., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5J 3S4.
Information relating to the directors and executive officers of Vencap
is set forth on Schedule A hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Directors and Executive Officers of
Vencap, Inc.

("Vencap") · Download Table


PRESENT PRINCIPAL
OCCUPATION OR
NAME BUSINESS ADDRESS EMPLOYMENT
---- ---------------- -----------------


Ian T. Morris Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President, Chief
Edmonton, Alberta, Financial Officer and
Canada T5J 3S4 Secretary

William R. McKenzie Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5J 3S4

David E. Stitt Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5J 3S4

Oleh S. Hnatiuk Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5J 3S4

Frank L. Stack Suite 1980, 10180 101st Street, N.W. Vice-President
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5J 3S4

Mark Hilson 161 Bay Street Director, Vice-
P.O. Box 700 President of Onex
Toronto, Ontario, Corporation
Canada M5J 2S1

Anthony Munk 161 Bay Street Director, Vice-
P.O. Box 700 President of Onex
Toronto, Ontario, Corporation
Canada M5J 2S1

Donald Carlson Carlson Development Corp. Director
Suite 1420, 9915 108th Street
Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada T5K 2G8

Vahan Koloian Polar Capital Corp. Director,
13th Floor
President and Partner
350 Bay Street
of Polar Capital Corporation,
Toronto, Ontario a merchant banking firm
Canada M5H 2S6


Onex

Onex is an Ontario, Canada corporation. It is a diversified company
that operates through autonomous subsidiaries, associated companies and
strategic partnerships. The address of the principal business and principal
offices of Onex is 161 Bay Street, P.O. Box 700, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA M5J
2S1.

Information relating to the directors and executive officers of Onex is set
forth on Schedule B hereto which is incorporated herein by reference. Onex is
the sole shareholder of Vencap Acquisition Holdings Inc. ("Vencap Holdings").
Vencap Holdings is an Ontario, Canada corporation which was formed to acquire
and hold the outstanding securities of Vencap and was one of the parties that
filed the Schedule 13D to which this amendment relates. Subsequently, Vencap
Holdings transferred the shares it owned in Vencap to affiliates of Onex. Onex
is the indirect beneficial owner of approximately 90% of the shares of Vencap.
The TSX lists the following as being on the Vencap Board of Directors.


Board of Directors
Name Position
Daryl Seaman *Director of the Board
Donald A. Carlson *Director of the Board
Donald John Taylor *Director of the Board
Fred Sparrow *Director of the Board
George Norman Wildgoose *Director of the Board
James Gregory Greenough *Director of the Board
John Edward Barry *Director of the Board
John Thomas Ferguson *Director of the Board
John Robert Mccaig *Director of the Board
John Howard Nodwell *Director of the Board
John Denison Wood *Director of the Board
John Brian Zaozirny *Director of the Board
Peter Parkin Macdonnell *Director of the Board
Robert Bertram Church *Director of the Board
Robert John Elliott *Director of the Board
Robert Alexander Slator *Director of the Board


But lo and behold if Albertans are still paying for it. Despite selling Vencap off at fire sale prices the Alberta government holds loans made to Vencap,thirty years later, from the Heritage Trust Fund, which appear in the 2007 provincial budget on page 62 under Loans and Advances.

December 2000: All of the loans made to provinces from 1977 to 1982 have been paid back on time and without any missed payments. The only project loans left on the Heritage Fund books are Vencap and Ridley Grain Ltd. for a total of $98.8 million, which represents 0.8% percent of the Heritage Fund's total portfolio.


Apparently despite the sale of Vencap and all its assets at a profit it is still on the government's books as an outstanding loan for a measly $2 million dollars, pennies really, which was never paid back. Which is curious if you consider that Onex took on all of Vencaps debt. Why is this still on the books?

Perhaps its because the directors who profited from the sale of Vencap did not owe us, the taxpayer investors, any fiduciary responsibility. After all they were pals of the government and insiders all. An embarrassment of riches were gotten except by the people of Alberta.

Fiduciary Duties to Shareholders
Tongue v. Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. (1994) AB
Similar facts to Source Data, but Alberta takes different approach.
A secretly offers to buy out V shares on the condition that V buys out T first. T would have been able to command a higher price if he had known about negotiations with A. T signs waiver of claims to future profits from the re-sale of the shares. V director sells shares to A at 3x the price.
· Court finds that T did not sign the waiver being fully informed. V should have disclosed the negotiations with A.
· There was a close relationship between the shareholders.
· As a result there was a duty to disclose the negotiations with A.
· V is forced to disgorge profits
· This is the opposite finding of the Ontario position in Source Data, hence the law is unsettled in Canada.

On the other hand, fiduciary duties have been developed by the courts. It is true that Canadian corporate law statutes and the Civil Code of Québec have generally codified fiduciary and care duties but this codification does not appear to have affected or been intended to affect their development. If Canadian courts expand the category of persons to whom directors owe fiduciary duties (as other common law jurisdictions have done), they are presumably responding to a concern about corporate governance of corporations.

Canadian authorities, following the New Zealand decision Coleman v. Myers,
[1977] 2 N.Z.L.R. 225 (C.A.), have already suggested that the directors may owe parallel fiduciary duties to shareholders in some circumstances: see Tongue v. Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd (1994), 14 B.L.R. (2d) 50 (Alta. Q.B.). In Tongue, at page 85, the Court held: "There is no general fiduciary duty that arises between a director and shareholders simply because of that relationship: something more must be present before a fiduciary duty arises."


Onex is around today thanks to Alberta taxpayers while the original Vencap board members have been sitting pretty ever since. The whole Vencap debacle smells funny.

So lets look at how Vencaps Directors did out of the deal. Vencap benefited the Directors whose fiduciary interest was to themselves and not the taxpayers. An example of the benefits of Vencap management being an integrated board of Directors.

As we shall see.

BANYAN CAPITAL PARTNERS is an institutionally funded growth capital firm headquartered in Vancouver, B.C., with offices in Calgary and Seattle. We invest in or buy well-managed, successful middle-market companies located primarily in western Canada and the northwestern United States.

Banyan, through its two funds, has $140 million in committed capital under management. Our investor base includes two of Canada's largest pension funds, one of the largest financial institutions in the United States, a multi-billion dollar Japanese trading company and Connor, Clark & Lunn Financial Group, Canada's fourth largest independent money management firm.

David Stitt
Managing Director

David joined Banyan at its inception in 1999. Prior to Banyan, he spent 13 years at Vencap, Inc. and its predecessor, Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd., then western Canada's largest investment company which invested approximately $300 million in 84 company , as Vice President. He has been a director of Coinstar since 1995.

Frank Stack
Managing Director

Frank joined Banyan in November of 2001. Prior to joining Banyan, he spent three years with privately owned Vencap, Inc., where he played a lead role in maximizing the value of a portfolio of 34 companies. The wind-up of Vencap, Inc. led to shareholders receiving $154 million on an investment of $25 million. Prior to Vencap, Inc. Frank spent two years with publicly owned Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. where he led or co-led investments in four companies in the consumer products and technology sectors which generated a 29% return ($21 million). Prior to Vencap, Frank was a director with the merchant banking group of US-based GATX Capital Corporation and spent a number of years with the investment banking groups of Salomon Brothers, Inc. and Citibank N.A. Frank has a B.Comm. from the University of Alberta and an MBA from Wharton. He is a past director of eight private and public companies and is currently a director of Q'Max Solutions Inc.

R.A. (Sandy) Slator who was another insider was the CFO and then CEO of Vencap. And has done well for himself since it was sold. PWA was the Alberta Airline that was part of Lougheed's diversification plan. The Tories created PWA to expand air operations to the North for the Tar Sands. PWA bought up smaller airlines, and the government sweetened the deals such as with Time Air, by expanding municipal airports for PWA planes.

Sandy Slator graduated as a Chartered Accountant in 1970 articling with the firm of Clarkson Gordon & Co. (now Ernst & Young) in Winnipeg, Manitoba. In 1973, Sandy joined Byers Transport Limited, a large western Canadian based truck transportation company, as Chief Financial Officer and 18 months later, led a management buy out of the Company from the then owner, Pacific Western Airlines. He assumed the role of President and Chief Executive Officer on the successful takeover, and in 1979 he sold the Company to Laidlaw Inc. Sandy remained as President and CEO until May 1982. In 1983 Sandy joined Vencap Equities as its second employee and as Chief Financial Officer. He became President and Chief Executive Officer of Vencap in 1989 and served in that role until Vencap's sale to Onex Corporation in 1996. As a venture capitalist, Sandy also served a three-year term as President of the Canadian Venture Capital Association. After a few years of retirement and golf, Sandy joined PTI Group Inc. as President and Chief Executive Officer in January of 2000. Sandy led the merger of PTI Group Inc. with three other U.S. based companies, with the combined group going public on the New York Stock Exchange in February of 2001, under the name of Oil States International Inc. Since then he has been Vice President of Well Site Services, PTI Group Inc. is North America's leading integrated supplier of lodging and food services to remote locations. PTI serves 35,000 meals and houses 11,000 people per day at its remote site locations throughout the world. Sandy has served on numerous corporate boards and is very involved in community related activities. He currently serves as Vice-Chair of the Edmonton Space and Science Centre Foundation, and was Chairman of the Centre's recently completed $14 million fund raising campaign.
He was on
the Steering Committee for The Alberta Deal Generator and its joint venture partner organizations (TEC Edmonton and Calgary Technologies Inc.)
A major player in bio-technology in Canada is another former member of the Vencap board.

Robert B. Church, PhD, BSc, MSc – Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary

Robert B. Church is President of Church Livestock Consultants Ltd. and Professor Emeritus of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Calgary. He is a past President of the Calgary Exhibition and Stampede and has served on the Board of Directors of several companies, including Connaught Laboratories Ltd., Vencap Equities Ltd., Biostar Inc. and Ciba-Geigy Ltd. He is currently on the Board of AVAC Ltd., CV Technologies Inc., and is the founding Chairman of the Board of the Alberta Science and Research Authority and is currently Chairman Emeritus. Dr. Church was a founding member of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research and has been a member of the Board of the Medical Research Council of Canada and of the Alberta Research Council. He has been a founder and/or advisor of a number of start-up high technology companies, including Alberta Livestock Transplants Ltd. (1971) through to GangaGen Inc. (2004), as well as a member of the Investment Committees of the Boards of Vencap Equities Ltd. and AVAC Ltd. Through his numerous activities, Dr. Church has over thirty years experience representing investments in high technology start-up companies of well over $50 million. In 2000, Dr. Church was appointed to the Order of Canada, this country’s highest honour for lifetime achievement.


And speaking of old boy clubs AVAC is one. Dr. Church and Sandy Slator sit on its board.

AVAC is truly a made in Alberta innovation…a unique private, not-for-profit company that invests in research initiatives and early stage commercial businesses that expand Alberta's value-added industry, with a particular focus on the agrivalue™, renewable resource, ICT, life sciences and other industrial technology sectors.


Ever the player in high tech and high finance Dr.Church was appointed to the board of Trustees of the joint provincial federal National Institute for Nanotechnology at its inception in 2005. And he sits on the Ontario Biotechnology Commercialization Centre Fund Advisory Committee.

In sum, the biotech industry has formidable and effective representation
within the traditional lobby sector. Yet, while these groups have
had great success in controlling government, they are less capable of
reaching the public. For this task, they have developed an intricate web
of hybrid lobby groups.

One of the most influential hybrid groups has been the National
Biotechnology Advisory Committee (NBAC), which was established as
part of the first National Biotechnology Strategy to bring business leaders
and scientists involved or interested in biotech into the federal policy-
making process. NBAC consisted mainly of industry representatives
or scientists from public institutions with personal commercial interests
in biotech. Twelve of the 19 members of the 1998 NBAC were from
industry and the consistency of NBAC over the years is striking. Seven
members of the 1998 NBAC were NBAC members prior to 1992.
It put forward the idea of a Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Council,
which would manage a “National Conversation” whose central goal
would be “the development of a socio-ethical framework for public policy
decision-making.”194 That year, as part of the Canadian
Biotechnology Strategy, the government morphed NBAC into the
Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee, with an expanded range
of members — maintaining the biotech community’s dominance but
decreasing the number of representatives directly from industry. CBAC
is administered by the Canadian Biotechnology Secretariat within
Industry Canada. Whereas each NBAC was convened by the government
at key times to develop biotech industrial strategies, the CBAC
facilitates an already established strategy. It reports to the
Biotechnology Ministers Co-ordinating Committee, advising them on
how to deal effectively with sensitive issues, and, at the same time,
engages with the public to provide the semblance of consultation.

Industry’s influence over CBAC is more indirect, yet still significant. The
linkages are there but more removed. For instance, the CBAC website’s
biography of its chair, Alan Naimark, lists his academic positions, but
does not mention that he’s a member of the Board of Directors of the
Winnipeg-based biopharmaceutical company Medicure Inc.195
Naimark’s also been on the Board of Directors of the Canadian
Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) since 1987 and owns, controls or
directs 4,174 shares in the company.196 CIBC is a leading investor in
biotechnology in Canada and its World Markets venture capital fund
for biotechnology and pharmaceuticals has “one of the broadest and
deepest of any financial institution, with current coverage of over 45
biotechnology companies and 35 specialty pharmaceutical
companies.”197 Similarly, the biography of CBAC member Robert
Church that is available on the web site provides a comprehensive listing
of his awards and service to academia and government, but does
not mention that he has served on the Board of Directors of several
biotech companies, including Connaught, Biostar, and Ciba Geigy, or
that he is the founder/advisor to “a number of start-up high technology
companies, including Alberta Livestock Transplants Ltd. (1971) through
to Neurospheres Ltd. (1990), as well as a member of the Investment
Committees of the Boards of Vencap Equities Ltd. and AVAC Ltd.” His
biography on another web site, that of the Board of Directors of the
Canadian Science and Technology Growth Fund, claims: “Through his
numerous activites, Dr. Church has over sixteen years experience representing
investments in high technology start-up companies of well over
$50 million.”198


Another company that is a who's who of Alberta politicians including Jim Dinning, former Calgary Mayor Al Duer and former MP Jim Gouk is Rocky Mountain Vacations. Whose CEO is a former Vencap board member.

MICHAEL PHILLIPS (Chairman)
Michael Phillips is retired as Senior Vice-President, Investments of GrowthWorks Capital Ltd., which manages the Working Opportunity Fund in British Columbia, Canada. The Working Opportunity Fund is a uniquely Canadian form of financial institution dedicated to providing risk capital to a wide range of entrepreneurial business in B.C.

Prior to joining GrowthWorks Capital Ltd., Mr. Phillips spent over twenty years with financial and venture capital businesses such as Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. and Business Development Bank.

Mr. Phillips is currently a director on the boards of nine Canadian companies including Armstrong Group (owners and operators of Rocky Mountaineer Vacations) where he has served as a director since 1991 and as Chairman since 1998.

Mr. Phillips resides in Vancouver, Canada.

It was Jim Dinning, as Treasurer of Alberta, under Ralph Klein, who put Vencap up for sale. He and other insiders and former politicians have benefited ever since. Because when the Ralph Revolution of privatization and contracting out began it was too benefit insiders as well as pals of the government.

Here are a few more of the successful Directors who were on the Vencap Board. Based on their insider knowledge from Vencap they have gone on to profit in the area of venture capital investments in bio-tech, high tech, oil field supplies and support services, all the things Vencap was invested in.


Elson McDougald, Director

Mr. McDougald is the Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Western Lakota Energy Services Inc. He founded Laredo Drilling Ltd. and was the Chief Executive Officer and a director of Tetonka Drilling Inc. Mr. McDougald has been a director of Alberta Treasury Branches and Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. He is currently a member of the board of directors of Phoenix Technology Services Inc. and its Income Trust; Phoenix Technology Income Fund ("Phoenix"), CCR Technologies Ltd. ,and Decision Dynamics Technology Ltd.

Derek Mather

Derek assisted in organizing the first AceTech Symposium in 1993 and, shortly thereafter, was appointed AceTech's Executive Director, a post he held until his retirement from the AceTech management group in 1999."

A graduate in Business from McGill University in 1954, Derek's career has included several years with the Investment Department of the Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada in Montreal and London, England, followed by a career in venture capital, first with Canadian Enterprise Development Corp.(CED), which he helped to create, and then as founding President and CEO of Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. in Edmonton.

While with CED, Derek was appointed President and CEO of a troubled investment, Westmills Carpets Ltd. of Calgary, which he assisted to return to profitable operations."

Derek is currently a Principal of the Osborne Group, Canada's leading firm of interim executives. As well he serves Science World of BC as a member of its Equity Committee and is a Partner of BC Technology Social Venture Partners. In 2002 he was appointed a director of CityXpress Corp.

Derek enjoys working with the managements of rapidly growing technology companies where his skills and experience can add value.

Peter van der Velden, B.Sc., M.Sc., M.B.A.,

is the President and CEO of MDS Capital. Throughout his career Peter has sought to leverage his entrepreneurial drive, academic background, and business experiences to help talented entrepreneurs build outstanding businesses. He started in the venture capital industry in 1988 with Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd, and from there took on the role of Vice President, Business Development at a venture capital backed drug delivery development company where he led their international licensing initiatives, established their subsidiary operations in Australian was instrumental in raising more that $70 million in private and public equity, as the company evolved to become a TSE 300 listed company. His experience also includes, four years as a partner at a Canadian merchant bank, a short time as a partner at a public equity investment bank, and four years as the founding partner of a leading Canadian private equity investment bank.

Peter holds B.Sc. honours and M.Sc. (Pathology) degrees from the Queen's University at Kingston, and an M.B.A. in finance and policy from the Schulich School of Business.

Oleh Hnatiuk

CCR Technologies Ltd. (TSX: CRL), a technology solutions company focused on the purification of process chemicals and sweetening of sour gas, has appointed Oleh Hnatiuk as its new President & CEO. Hnatiuk was formerly President & CEO of University Technologies International Inc. (The University of Calgary technology transfer agency) and Senior Vice President, Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. www.reclaim.com

Graeme R. Percy, CD, P.Eng., General Manager & COO World Oil Tools

World Oil Tools Inc. is a Canadian based manufacturer and supplier of high technology inflatable products to the oil and gas sector.

In 1984 a move from Oakville, Ontario to Edmonton, Alberta and a
new job at Vencap Equities Alberta, Ltd. took place recently
for Graeme R. Percy, BASc’69 (MEng, McGill)


Dr. William A. Cochrane OC, MD, FRCPC, FACP, DABP, D.Sc. (hon), LLD (hon)

During his career, Dr. Cochrane has shared his leadership with a range of organizations, from the National Biotechnology Advisory Committee, the Alberta Research Council, the Alberta Economic Development Authority and the Alberta Science and Research Authority, to private sector ventures such as Vencap Equities Alberta, Oncolytics Biotech, Q.S.V. Biologics and Resverlogix Biotech Inc. His extensive contributions to the non-profit sector include service to the Ronald McDonald Children's Charities Foundation, the Canada/China Child Health Foundation, the Calgary Rotary Club and the Banff Centre.

Vasogen Inc.

William A. Cochrane +,  OC, MD Chairman of the Board  February 1995
Calgary, Alberta and a Director of the Company and Healthcare Consultant

Dr. Cochrane acted as Chairman of Vasogen's Board of Directors from 1995
until March 2001. He also serves on the boards of Andre Wines, Fox Energy Corp.,
Medicure Inc., Nucleus Bioscience, Pheromone Sciences Corp., and StressGen
Biotech. For ten years, Dr. Cochrane served as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Connaught Laboratories and was a senior advisor to Vencap Equities
Alberta. He is a past-Chairman of the National Biotechnology Advisory Committee
and was the first Dean of Medicine of the University of Calgary Medical School.
His academic career culminated in his appointment as President and
Vice-Chancellor of the University of Calgary. He has served as Deputy Minister
of Health Services with the Government of Alberta and is currently an
international investment consultant in the area of health products and services.




And when David Stitt and Derek Mather met via Vencap. Stitt was 'Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Westmills Carpet Ltd., a regional carpet manufacturer located in western Canada.' The carpet manufacturer that was going under that fellow Vencap Director Derek Mather rescued through his private equity company.


Vencap was the largest pool of capital in Western Canada, comparable to OMERS and the the Teachers Pension Fund in Ontario and the Labour Fund; Solidarity in Quebec. It was investing in bio-tech and high tech, as well as well head service operations, and it made money. After the sale those who sat on its board benefited by investing in exactly these same sectors. The Klein government panicked and sold the golden goose for the price of the egg.


A decade later after selling Vencap, the Alberta government is looking at creating a pool of capital from Public Sector Pension Funds under its control merged with the Heritage Trust Fund, to be called AIM, for the purposes of generating venture capital.

At March 31, 2007, Alberta had about $45 billion in financial assets that are
invested in short-term, medium-term and long-term investments. The
investment strategies for these assets depend on the objectives of the funds.
In 2007-08, the new Alberta Investment Management Corporation will be
established to manage about $40 billion of these assets along with about
$30 billion in assets of public sector pensions and the Workers'
Compensation Board.

In 2007-08, investment income is estimated to be $2.5 billion (excludes
public sector pensions and Workers' Compensation Board). This is a
decrease of $601 million, or 19.4%, from 2006-07, primarily due to lower
expected returns of the Heritage Fund and other endowment funds. In 2006,
investments in the Heritage Fund and endowments benefited from strong
equity markets. Over the next three years, it is expected that the growth in
equity markets will be closer to historic levels.


Wait a minute isn't that Vencap all over again?
Jamais Vu!

A government-funded investment pool would provide critically needed financial backing to emerging enterprises and commercializing technology in Calgary and Alberta -- which suffer from an energy-centric investment community -- according to a report obtained by the Herald.

"There's an opportunity to leverage a government position in an equity capital market into a broader opportunity for growth of Alberta-based companies," said Calgary Economic Development director of research Adam Legge, who prepared the report, which will be issued later this week. "We have a real opportunity for Calgary to become Canada's centre of capital."

The 70-page report recommends the province examine the benefits of a so-called fund of funds -- government money injected into a range of venture investment funds -- to provide venture capital for companies and technology outside of oil and gas that may have difficulty attracting investors.

Masters noted that Alberta produces about 15 per cent of Canada's GDP, but receives two to three per cent of the country's venture capital. "It's an environment where we're behind and we need to make some changes."

Under the Ralph Klein regime, the province forcefully exited the venture capital area by liquidating its interest in a venture capital fund, Vencap Equities Alberta Ltd. -- which was sold in 1995 to Onex Corp. of Toronto for more than $170 million -- and closing the venture capital arm of Alberta Opportunity Co. "There was a nuclear winter after that," said Masters.



SEE:

Workers Want Tax Credits NOT Tax Cuts


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
,

Sunday, September 09, 2007

APEC Is Not Kyoto

Todays Headlines.

Made In Canada APEC Climate Accord.

More Hot Air in Sydney Declaration.

And, Harper gets his wish.

So if Kyoto is a failure for Australia, Canada, and the United States they get to scuttle the whole deal with their
Sydney Declaration on Climate Change

Which Harper can further use as evidence that Kyoto doesn't work. Abroad or at home. Canada will then set its own targets regardless of Kyoto. Which was his agenda all along. That and killing bill C-3o.

Note that the mutually agreed upon target date is the Tories target date of 2050.

Orwellian speak abounds in and around the APEC Anti-Kyoto statement. And that is all it is. An attempt to justify Canada's target date versus that of the rest of the G8 which has set more rapid targets.

"No one meeting, no one agreement is going to fix this issue," Howard said of human-caused climate change. "Kyoto didn't fix it. The Canadian prime minister made the comment about Kyoto that it was really an agreement that produced two groups of countries, those countries that didn't have any targets to meet, and those countries that have failed to meet the targets that were set."

But Harper said Howard was taking his comments out of context, and even messed up the punch line of his joke.

"The quip I think I said in a (previous international) leaders' meeting was that Kyoto divided the world into two groups: those that would have no targets and those that would reach no targets. It's, as I say, just a quip, but I think there's a fair amount of truth to it."



The Sidney Declaration is a self fulfilling prophecy for Harper and Howard.


Prime Minister Stephen Harper says it premature to be demanding climate-change goals of other countries, but he hopes that the participants at this weekend's APEC conference can at least agree those goals must be set.

"We haven't reached the point where we can dictate targets to the rest of the world," the Prime Minister told a late afternoon press conference on Friday.

Mr. Harper pointed out that the reduction targets set out in the Kyoto Accord — targets that his government rejects as being too costly to the environment — were never approved by countries that produce two third's of the world's emissions. And he said he believes that a G8 meeting held last June in Berlin produced the most reasonable approach to cutting the production of the gases that have been linked to global warming.

"Canada, Japan and others have articulated a specific goal that we would like to see which is a reduction of emissions by half by the year 2050. Not everybody even in the G8 yet subscribes to that," said Mr. Harper.


The 1997 Kyoto treaty – aimed at halting the speed of global warming – treats developing countries differently. It puts the burden of mandatory emissions cuts squarely on the shoulders of wealthy countries.

Harper, Howard and U.S. President George W. Bush are critical of that deal, with Harper suggesting yesterday it offered developing countries an escape hatch.

"Let's remember . . . if we can get an international protocol, this is a big, big step. It will be the first time the world has done this. In the Kyoto protocol, nations representing two-thirds of emissions essentially opted out. So we have to do a better job next time."

But Graham Saul, of Climate Action Network Canada, said in a telephone interview from Ottawa that Harper's statement is "outrageous" and "a total misrepresentation" of Kyoto's premise of "common but differentiated responsibilities."

"Kyoto is based on the principle that the rich countries are disproportionately responsible for the problem and so bear disproportionately the responsibility for solving it, and poor countries like India, where 500 million people don't even have light bulbs in their homes, shouldn't be forced to accept binding targets."

Until a global deal is reached, Harper also told reporters Canada would do well to join a group like the Asia Pacific Partnership, or AP-6, a six-member group co-founded by the U.S. and Australia that opposes binding targets on governments. Rather, it endorses a voluntary approach to greenhouse gas cuts, leaving governments to establish their own best methods of reaching goals.

Environmentalists have dismissed the climate-change declaration signed Saturday by the leaders of 21 Pacific Rim countries, including Canada.

The deal, announced in Sydney by Australian Prime Minister John Howard, includes the intention to set aspirational — voluntary — emissions reductions targets, and other green initiatives.

"We agree to work to achieve a common understanding on a long-term aspirational global emissions reduction goal," said the Sydney Declaration, issued after the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation leaders meeting.

Canada was given credit Saturday for helping the leaders set the targets. "We appreciate the efforts of Japan and Canada in proposing a long-term global goal," the declaration said.

Howard said that it "does transcend a number of international divisions. In particular I note that it is the first such gathering that has included both the United States and China in coming together regarding the aspirational goal."

Even a member of Howard’s cabinet had harsh words about aspirational targets in April. In a lecture at Monash University, Australia’s Foreign Minister Alexander Downer said aspirational targets are “code for ‘a political stunt.’ An aspirational target is not a real target at all.”

This appears to be part of the increasingly popular attempt by resistant governments to SAY they are taking climate change seriously while doing nothing serious about it. Australia's "principles" on climate change were clear enough when it helped to create the anti-Kyoto Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate: it seemed largely a matter of making the world safe for unrestrained coal exports.

Now, we have the prospect of the more formal and influential APEC organization joining this campaign to set a "long-term aspirationial goal."

It's instructive in these circumstances to listen closely to what people are actually saying. A goal, traditionally, is something that you want to achieve. A "long-term aspirational goal," on the other hand, sounds very like something that you would like to put off, or perhaps merely enshrine in a declaration while continuing to undermine the single international agreement (Kyoto) that has real and measurable climate change "goals."

There has been real movement in the last year on this issue. U.S. President George Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Australia's Prime Minister Howard no longer try to deny the science of climate change.

But their new tactic - nodding enthusiastically to a worried electorate while continuing to block international action - is still just so much spin. Until the world's largest energy producers (including coal countries like the U.S. and Australia) stop talking "aspirations" and start committing to measurable targets, there is no reason to take their declarations as anything more than public relations in its most poverty stricken form.

And again we have Alberta/Canada writ into the Sidney declaration, with reference to intensity targets.

Australian Prime Minister John Howard, host of the APEC summit, nevertheless says the leaders have agreed on three "important and very specific things."Firstly, the need for a long-term aspirational global emissions reduction goal. And that is enshrined in the Sydney Declaration," he said. "Secondly, the need for all nations, no matter what their stage of development, to contribute accordingly to their own capacities and their own circumstances to reducing greenhouse gases. Thirdly, we have agreed on specific APEC goals on energy intensity and forestry, and we've also agreed on the important role of clean coal technologies." "Energy intensity" is a measure of energy efficiency. The declaration said members should aim for a 25 percent reduction in energy intensity by the year 2030.


Ironically it is the Chinese who are demanding these three countries meet their Kyoto obligations as the basis for China coming into the second round of the Kyoto accord. Something that won't happen as long as Harper says we can't.


THE Prime Minister, John Howard, compromised on his Sydney climate change declaration to accommodate the tough stance of the Chinese President, Hu Jintao, supporting the United Nations and the Kyoto Protocol. The protocol includes binding targets for developed countries to cut emissions.

At the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation forum leaders' meeting on Saturday, shortly before the release of the declaration, Mr Hu bluntly told Mr Howard that the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change "and its Kyoto Protocol" was the legal basis for any international co-operation on climate change.

He also told Mr Howard the framework and the Kyoto Protocol were "the most authoritative, universal and comprehensive international framework" for tackling climate change.

"Developed countries should face their historical responsibility and their high per-capita emissions," Mr Hu insisted, saying the countries should "strictly abide by their emission reduction targets set forth in the Kyoto Protocol". His remarks were circulated by Chinese officials after the APEC leaders' meeting and before the final Sydney declaration was released.

So it goes back to the old cyclical argument; China is not in, the United States and Australia haven't signed on yet, and Canada can't meet its targets, so Kyoto is a failure. But that is just an excuse, and one that won't last through the next election.


But the program adopted by the 21-member Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit set precedents that the United States, Japan and Australia say are important as the world grapples with climate change. Chiefly, China, which if not already the biggest polluter will be soon, agreed to a goal that also applies to rich countries.

"This is the first occasion ever that China ... has agreed to any notion of targets at all for developing countries as well as developed countries," Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer told local television on Sunday. "That is, by the way, an enormous diplomatic breakthrough."

Although Chinese President Hu Jintao agreed to the climate-change pact, he argued that developing nations like China have a lesser role to play. In remarks to fellow leaders Saturday, Hu said rich countries have polluted for longer and thus must take the lead in cutting emissions and providing money and technology to help developing countries clean up.

"In tackling climate change, helping others is helping oneself," Hu said.

China, Indonesia and other poorer APEC members like Kyoto because it holds richer countries to this higher standard and exempts developing countries from emissions targets. Even though Kyoto supporters Canada, New Zealand and Japan have failed to meet their targets, experts say the agreement has had a positive effect.

"It's not simply whether any one particular country actually achieved its target or not, it's the overall impact of the protocol which has had an effect of bringing down emissions from what they would have been," said Graeme Pearson, who was the climate director of Australia's main scientific research body from 1992-2002.


The image “http://www.nbr.co.nz/images/emissions_150sq.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.



Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , ,

298 Baptistina

The more important discovery of a particular asteroid hitting earth, and wiping out the dinosaurs, which is how the MSM covered it, is the final two paragraph's.

IT WAS once suggested, to illustrate the chaotic and unpredictable way in which natural systems behave, that the beat of a butterfly's wing in China could eventually trigger a hurricane in the Atlantic. A bit of an exaggeration, perhaps, but the point was that even in the theoretically deterministic world of Newtonian mechanics, only a small amount of complexity is needed to make practical prediction well nigh impossible.

Thus it is perhaps not as far-fetched as it sounds to suggest that the collision 160m years ago of two space rocks, albeit quite large ones, resulted in the stormy death almost 100m years later of the dinosaurs and many other species on Earth. For although the orbits of the planets look to astronomers like a model of regular, Newtonian clockwork, on a scale of millions of years, the solar system is every bit as chaotic as the Earth's weather.

Asteroid that wiped out dinosaurs traced

Around 65 million years ago, one 10-kilometre-wide piece crunched into Earth, unleashing a firestorm and kicking up clouds of dust that filtered out sunlight. In this enduring winter, much vegetation was wiped out and the species that depended on them also became extinct. Only those animals that could cope with the new challenge.

The trace of the great event, called the Cretaceous/Tertiary (or K-T) extinction event, can be seen today in the shape of a 180-kilometre-diameter impact crater at modern-day Chicxulub, in Mexico's Yucatan peninsula.

The trio of researchers – William Bottke and David Nesvorny of Southwest Research Institute in Colorado, U.S. and David Vokrouhlicky of the Czech Republic's Charles University in Prague – took their theory a stage further and checked out sediment samples from the Chicxulub site. They found traces of a mineral called carbonaceous chondrite, which is only found in a tiny minority of meteorites, as the Earthly remains of plummeting asteroids are called. Most asteroids can be excluded from the Chicxulub event, but not Baptistina-era ones, they contend.

Putting simulation and chemical evidence together, the team rule out theories that a comet was to blame rather than an asteroid, and say there is a "more than 90 per cent" probability that the killer rock was a refugee from the Baptistina family.

The investigators also argue that there's a 70 per cent chance that a four-kilometre-wide Baptistina asteroid hit the Moon some around 108 million years ago, forming the 85-kilometre crater Tycho.

An important point raised by the study "is how severe the repercussions of cataclysmic collisions in the asteroid belt can be for the Earth–Moon system," commented geologists Philippe Claeys and Steven Goderis of Vrije University in Brussels, Belgium, in an accompanying commentary also in Nature.

"The terrestrial impact record needs to be scrutinized more closely to identify and understand these periods of more intense bombardment, and to link them to the huge and dangerous game of billiards continuously being played out between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter,"
they said.

Science Photo Library


nd blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:

, , , , , ,
, ,
,
, , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,