Saturday, February 01, 2020

INTERVIEW
Jackson Browne: ‘My generation were idealistic and naive but we were right about so many things’

The singer-songwriter talks to Kevin E G Perry about his benefit album for Haiti, the calamitous state of the planet, Donald Trump’s ‘wild lies’, his fears about the election, and getting old



Jackson Browne performing at a benefit concert in New York, December 2019 ( Rex )

The morning after our interview I get a call from Jackson Browne. I stare at my phone in bleary-eyed confusion, trying to remember if one of the all-time great singer-songwriters had let slip anything scandalous he might be eager to recant, but when I pick up I hear his warm Californian tones overflowing with enthusiasm. “I just realised I didn’t finish telling you about Rick!”

Rick appears in the third verse of Browne’s song “Love Is Love”, the lead single from a new benefit album, Let the Rhythm Lead, which he recorded in Haiti along with a group of fellow musicians to support the charity Artists for Peace and Justice (APJ). Browne has been passionate about their work since playing a benefit concert after the devastating 2010 earthquake, and was impressed by APJ’s ability to swiftly build a school in Port-au-Prince that now provides free education to 2,600 of the most impoverished children in the western hemisphere. Moved by the stories he heard from Haiti, Browne wrote “Standing in the Breach”, the title track of his 2014 album about the disaster and the long history of colonialism and slavery that preceded it. “It’s a difficult subject, so it took me a long time to finish that song,” he says. “I think it took me longer to write than it took them to build the school.”

Browne made his name in the Seventies as a writer of deeply introspective songs about love, death and desire. He had his first hit in in March 1972 with “Doctor My Eyes”, which was soon covered by The Jackson 5. A few months later, Eagles frontman Glenn Frey completed Browne’s unfinished song “Take It Easy” and the track launched his band’s career. As rock lore has it, Browne was stuck on the line: “Well, I’m a-standin’ on a corner in Winslow, Arizona…”, before Frey provided: “Such a fine sight to see. It’s a girl, my lord, in a flatbed Ford, slowin’ down to take a look at me.”

Browne filled the remainder of the decade with a string of classic albums: 1973’s For Everyman, 1974’s Late for the Sky, 1976’s The Pretender and 1977’s Running On Empty, a portrait of life on the road which gave him his biggest commercial success. In the Eighties, Browne’s songwriting became more overtly political as he began to turn his lacerating gaze outward.

It was only when he arrived in Haiti to visit the school that APJ built that Browne learned they’d also constructed an artist’s institute in the south coast town of Jacmel, where young people were learning to become sound engineers in a modern studio. “When I saw it I thought, well, people from outside of Haiti should come here and work,” he says. “So I asked some people if they wanted to come.”

The group he rounded up included the songwriter and producer Jonathan Wilson (“A very willing partner and accomplice”) and former Rilo Kiley singer Jenny Lewis (“One of my heroes. I love her music”) as well as Paul Beaubrun, Habib Koite, Raul Rodriguez and Jonathan Russell. On the island they also teamed up with members of the Haitian roots band Lakou Mizik. They set about trying to capture the reality of the country in song, which brings us back to Rick, who Browne didn’t finish telling us about. In the song he’s riding a motorbike through the slums: “The father and the doctor to the poorest of the poor / Raising up the future from the rubble of the past”. As it turns out, he’s a real person.

“Father Rick Frechette is a major figure in this whole story,” explains Browne. “He’s a Catholic priest, but when he arrived in Haiti it was so rough he said: ‘These people don’t need a priest, they need a doctor.’ He went away, became a doctor and then came back to Haiti and built a hospital. He’s an inspiration, and he was instrumental in starting the school.”

Browne’s determination to shine a light on Rick and the work still being done in Haiti is in part motivated by the knowledge that the world’s attention has long since moved on. “It’s such a vibrant culture,” he says. “But the art and music and the incredible resilience of these people is matched by the environmental problems which have come with global warming, the hurricanes and the effects of centuries of deforestation. The problems are formidable.”

Jackson Browne (fourth left) with the musicians who worked on charity album ‘Let the Rhythm Lead’

Browne is fiercely passionate about the environment. He lives in an off-grid ranch supported by wind and solar power, and since 2008 has banned plastic bottles from his tours. His 1974 song “Before the Deluge” spoke of anger at those who had forged the earth’s “beauty into power”, and warned of the “magnitude of her fury in the final hour”. It could almost have been written today, although Browne sadly points out our situation is now even more dangerous. “That song was inspired by a writer named Paul Ehrlich,” he says. “He laid forth a scenario in which the world’s dysfunctions compound and create an apocalyptic outcome, but even he couldn’t have predicted the calamitous situation we’re in now where we have a world leader who is flagrantly disregarding information from the scientific community.”

As if to underscore his point, the day we speak the Trump administration announces it is scrapping pollution protections for America’s streams and wetlands. Browne says he doesn’t believe America will re-elect their president this year, but his optimism is shaded with caution. “I don’t think it’s in the bag or anything, but I have to hope,” he says. “He didn’t win the popular vote, and he only has a 30 per cent approval rating, but that 30 per cent of people are the ones I’m worried about. I saw a photograph of him at a rally, and there was a sign saying: ‘Thank Baby Jesus for President Trump’. Holy s**t! He’s telling these wild lies and still receiving that sort of adoration.”


Read more
Louis Tomlinson: ‘Being in One Direction was like a drug’

All of these issues will filter into his next album, which he plans to release in September. He’s currently finishing a track called “Downhill from Everywhere”, inspired by the oceanographer Captain Charles Moore’s remark that “the ocean is downhill from everywhere”. Another new song is called “A Little Soon to Say”. He recites a few lines of it: “I want to see you holding out your light / I want to see you find your way / Beyond the sirens in the broken night / Beyond the sickness of our day / And after all we’ve come to live with / I want to know if you’re OK / I have to think it’s gonna be alright / It’s just a little soon to say.”


“That’s my way of touching upon what I’m worried about most,” he explains. “I wonder how young people coming into positions of authority in this world are going to deal with what we’re leaving them. Even as my generation were somewhat myopic or idealistic or naive, we were right about so many things. It’s the same people that opposed the Vietnam War, who wanted to protect the planet, who want to feed the hungry and educate the uneducated.”

He sees echoes of that Sixties idealism in the “very inspiring” activism of Greta Thunberg. “This generation coming into the world taking these problems seriously is exactly what’s needed,” he says. “I don’t feel I have the right to be pessimistic or feel defeated, but it’s a struggle I have every day because the news is so unremittingly bad. Activism by young people is one of the brighter spots.”
Browne in 1974 (Rex)

For Browne, America’s problems are manifold but intertwined. He brings up the failings of the criminal justice system and the unchecked power of the industrial war complex that he sang about on 1986’s “Lives in the Balance”. “This is the worry I have about democracy,” he says. “It can be gamed by private interests, whether they be robber barons in the 1800s or the fossil fuel industry today. They get us to drag our feet so they can keep making their corporate fortunes. As Warren Zevon said in his great song: our s**t’s f***ed up.”


That would be Zevon’s “My S**t’s F***ed Up”, released in 2000, which is about a man hearing bad news from his doctor. Two years later Zevon received his own terminal diagnosis, learning of the cancer that would kill him in 2003. Browne and Zevon had been friends and collaborators since the Seventies, and they shared a knack for sharply prescient songwriting. When Browne was on his most recent tour, with the headlines full of Russia’s attempts to influence American politics, he took to covering Zevon’s “Lawyers, Guns and Money”. It opens with the line: “I went home with the waitress / The way I always do / How was I to know / She was with the Russians, too?” Browne clearly got a kick out of its continued relevance. “If you didn’t know that song you’d think it was written last week,” he laughs. “That song is 40 years old. It was funny then, and it’s even funnier now.”

Let the Rhythm Lead interpolates languages like Creole and Spanish, much as Zevon did on his 1982 track “The Hula Hula Boys”. When I remind Browne of this he howls with delight. “Do you know what the chorus of ‘The Hula Hula Boys’ actually means?” he asks mischievously. “It’s a saying in Hawaii that loosely means ‘get to the point’, but literally means ‘sing the chorus’. So when they sing the chorus, they’re singing ‘sing the chorus’. That is the funniest f***ing thing I have ever f***ing heard! That’s Warren Zevon at his best. With one stroke, he’s saying nothing and everything. Zevon is a singular writer.”

Now 71, after more than half a century of songwriting, Browne still believes in the power of music to change lives. He was just 16 when he wrote “These Days”, which is made all the more remarkable by the fact it contains one of the most devastating lyrics ever committed to song: “Don’t confront me with my failures/ I had not forgotten them”. Was the teenage Browne really that tortured, or was it a case of art imitating art?

“I don’t know,” he says after a pause. “I listened to a lot of old men making music when I was a kid. Blues and folk, as well as Bob Dylan, who sounded old. I was emulating them to an extent, but I wasn’t just posing as an old person. That thought resonated with me. I’ve had therapists say to me: ‘What the hell happened to you when you were young?’” He thinks he was just always an old soul. He remembers reading a book of blues lyrics his mother had given him. “There was a lyric where it arrived at the place: ‘I got so old,’” he says. “It hit me really hard. I thought: ‘F***, that’s going to happen.’ You get to a place where you can’t believe how old you are. No one ever thinks it’s gonna happen to them, isn’t that wild?”

He may be of their generation, but The Who’s line about hoping they’d die before they got old never rang true for Browne. “I’ve always disputed that inwardly,” he says. “I’ve had a problem with my back most of my life. In my thirties it got to where it was so painful I could barely lean over the sink when I brushed my teeth. I thought: ‘This is the onset of decrepitude,’ but I hadn’t tried anything! With yoga and chiropractic doctors I eradicated the problem. I remember thinking with amusement: ‘You were really ready to accept the idea that you were decrepit and there was nothing to be done about it.’ That’s maybe a metaphor for what we’re talking about, about hope in the world. Things are so bad, but I still don’t hope the world dies before it gets older.”

‘Let the Rhythm Lead: Haiti Song Summit Vol 1’ by Artists for Peace and Justice is released today (31 January)

MY FAVORITE JACKSON BROWNE SONG

‘The haters will shut up when we win’: Rashida Tlaib boos Hillary Clinton at Sanders rally in Iowa

Bernie Sanders’ backers are upset by Hillary Clinton’s recent comments about the 2020 hopeful, in which she said: ‘Nobody wants to work with him’


A rally in support of Bernie Sanders erupted in boos when a moderator mentioned Hillary Clinton’s name – and even Michigan representative Rashida Tlaib joined in from the stage.

It came at the end of a panel discussion between Ms Tlaib and fellow representatives Ilhan Omar and Pramila Jayapal. All three have endorsed Sanders in the 2020 Democratic primary.

When moderator Dionna Langford mentioned Hillary Clinton at the end of the discussion – raising her recent statement that “nobody likes Sanders” – the audience began to boo.

Langford attempted to quiet then down, saying: “We’re not gonna boo, we’re not gonna boo. We’re classy here.”

But Ms Tlaidb jumped in, saying: “I’ll boo. Boo,” as her fellow panellists began laughing.

“You all know I can’t be quiet,” Ms Tlaib added. “The haters will shut up on Monday when we win.”

She later rowed back with a Twitter statement, saying: “I am so incredibly in love with the movement that our campaign of #NotMeUs has created. This makes me protective over it and frustrated by attempts to dismiss the strength and diversity of our movement.

“However, I know what is at stake if we don't unify over one candidate to beat Trump and I intend to do everything possible to ensure that Trump does not win in 2020. In this instance, I allowed my disappointment with Secretary Clinton's latest comments about Senator Sanders and his supporters get the best of me.

"You all, my sisters-in-service on stage, and our movement deserve better."

It happened during Mr Sanders’ first ‘Caucus Concert’ ahead of Monday’s Iowa Caucuses.

The event was mainly taken up with discussions of progressive issues such as climate change, but it ended with the discussion of Ms Clinton because of her recent negative comments about Mr Sanders, in which she said: “Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done.”

Ms Clinton has also refused to confirm whether she will endorse and campaign for him if he wins the Democratic nomination. 


AND THAT SAYS IT ALL ABOUT THE 1% BITCH 
A SORE LOSER WHO RIGGED THE PRIMARY AGAINST BERNIE IN 2016










H&M has been criticised over its plans to start making clothes from Circulose, a sustainable fabric made from up-cycled clothing and fashion waste.
The Scandinavian fashion giants will be the first retailer to sell garments made from the material, which is produced by Swedish company Re:newcell.

The clothes sold by H&M will comprise a Circulose/Viscose blend that uses 50 per cent Circulose sourced from upcycled cotton jeans fabric and 50 per cent viscose sourced from FSC-certified wood.

The retailer told WWD that its Circulose clothes will be in stores from spring and that it plans to use only recycled or sustainably sourced materials by 2030.

However, the move has been criticised by anti-fast fashion campaigner, Venetia La Manna, who tells The Independent that it is another example of H&M “greenwashing” its consumers.

“Circulose is an absolute box-ticker,” La Manna says. “Not only is it creating something from waste, it’s also vegan-friendly, non-toxic, durable and biodegradable. As a ‘new’ material, it’s much more planet friendly than a lot of the sustainable yarns that are already on the market.

“With this in mind, it’s a real shame to hear that Circulose chose to partner with H&M on such an exciting, circular and innovative yarn. Sustainable fashion absolutely needs to be as accessible for as many people as possible, but the fast fashion model will never reach that all important net zero target that we need to be aiming for.”

La Manna explained that textile waste has increased drastically in recent years and the focus should be on reducing how much we buy and slowing production rates rather than introducing new materials to consume.

“H&M will do whatever they can to continuously greenwash consumers,” La Manna added, citing the retailer’s Conscious Collections, which are made from environmentally friendly materials.


“Ultimately, the sheer amount of product H&M produces is causing irreversible harm to both planet and people, and completely outweighs their sustainability efforts,” she explained. “Fashion this fast can never and will never be sustainable.”

As for how best to be an eco-conscious shopper, La Manna advises enjoying the clothes you already own by finding different ways to style them rather than constantly looking to revamp your wardrobe with new purchases.


“I’d suggest organising a Swap Shop with friends or co-workers to get the dopamine hit of something new, without actually making a purchase,” she adds.

“If you’re craving Zara, try a car boot sale, charity or vintage shop and take advantage of online circular fashion via websites like eBay, Depop or Vestiaire Collective. I’d also recommend renting an outfit for when you want something for an event or wedding, my go-to is Hurr.”

venetiafalconer's profile picture

venetiafalconer
Verified

BOYCOTT BLACK FRIDAY?
I want to start by saying that for some people, Black Friday is their only chance to afford something they’ve been lusting after for a really long time - and perhaps something that is going to add real value to their life. I am not in a position to comment on those people. But what I will say, is that crucially, they are in the minority. ⁣

To bring you up to speed, Black Friday is a shopping weekend that traditionally starts the day after Thanksgiving in America (NB, this is not a public holiday here in the UK, we just love an excuse to over consume). It started as a day, then it spread to a long weekend, and now, with consumerism at an all time high, it’s an entire week long. In fact…
⁣
⚫️Last year in the UK, shoppers spent £1.49 billlion over Black Friday weekend [Interactive Media In Retail Group via Fashion Revolution] ⁣
⚫️In the USA, more than £6.4billion was spent on Cyber Monday, the highest e-commerce sales day in American history [Adobe Analytics via Fashion Revolution]

A few pointers I just learned from a quick click onto the websites of some of the the UK’s fastest fashion stores…
⚫️@PrettyLittleThing are offering up to 80% off their entire site
⚫️@Missguided are offering up to 90% off everything
⚫️@ASOS are offering 70% off - their ‘biggest ever’

Not only is this level of consumption having a negative impact on the planet, it’s having a negative impact on the PEOPLE who are making these clothes ⚫️ We are producing 80 BILLION pieces of clothing each year - that’s 400% more than the amount we consumed just two decades ago (@truecostmovie) ⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣
We are being encouraged to BUY BUY BUY as a means to make us think that this will bring us happiness. NEWSFLASH: it doesn’t. And fun fact, NOT SHOPPING IS FREE.

It’s time to ask ‘WHY?’ before you buy. 
If you truly LOVE something, buy it. 
If you don’t, leave it. 
And again, NOT SHOPPING IS FREE!⁣

♻️#OOOTD (old outfit of the day) : t shirt: @depop, skirt @hurr, jacket, belt + kicks: 4 years old

Venetia La Manna


🌎recovering hypocrite + climate activist
♻️on a mission to slow fast fashion
🌱host of #TalkingTastebuds podcast
🤳🏼@48hourchallenge 2020 retreat👇🏼
www.ourretreat.co.uk/retreat/march-27th-30th-2020
If you’re not ready to change your shopping habits and completely boycott the high street, La Manna suggests simply trying to shop less frequently.

“Slowing down our overall consumption can have a huge impact,” she adds.

Rand Paul named the whistleblower and revealed the hypocrisy at the heart of the Republican Party

rand paul is not a real libertarian he is a right wing american who has no clue about libertarianism anymore than he has a clue about what socialism is.

It would be pertinent to remember this the next time right-wing people call themselves 'free speech advocates'


Noah Berlatsky New York January 31,2020


Kentucky Senator Rand Paul today named the whistleblower whose revelations sparked the House impeachment hearing. Paul is, in theory, a libertarian, who believes in the protection of free speech. But in naming the whistleblower, he showed how little his free speech principles are worth — and how the GOP has morphed into a party bent on crushing speech, dissent, and liberty.

The Constitution protects free speech from government interference in part because the founders believed that criticism of those in power was necessary to prevent abuse. Government employees who come forward with information about crimes or abuses are alerting the public, and checking corruption. Even if a whistleblower's information turns out to be incorrect after investigation, it's important to protect the ability of people to speak up and come forward. And you do that by ensuring anonymity and freedom from retaliation.

But instead Rand Paul, a Senator and government actor, chose to reveal the whistleblower's name today on Twitter and in a press conference, after Chief Justice Roberts refused to read out his question because it contained the name in question. The whistleblower has already received death threats; he will now receive many more. Any other potential whistleblowers in the Trump administration and intelligence services are now on notice that if they come forward, Republican members of our government will not protect them. This will have a chilling effect on how our democracy works. Whether or not he realizes the consequences of his actions, Paul has contributed to an atmosphere of fear and oppression. Those who might otherwise have spoken out — about anything at all — will now wonder whether they should instead shut up for the sake of themselves and their families.

Republicans have insisted for some time now that they inhabit the party of free speech; indeed, right-wingers across the world have styled themselves as “free speech advocates” fighting the “leftie language police” and “political correctness gone mad”. Conservative commentators, and many in the center, have lamented campus protest of talks by right-wing figures like Milo Yiannopolous and Charles Murray. They argue that the left is intolerant and unwilling to hear opposing viewpoints, and this could have a harmful effect on education and the future of open discourse.

But student protestors on campus are not in positions of substantial power and authority. In contrast, the right has brazenly and with little pushback cultivated an ethos of intimidation intended to muzzle any critic on the left, or anyone who dares to push against a reactionary agenda. Yiannopoulos himself first rose to prominence as a leader of Gamergate, a floating right-wing harassment campaign loosely connected to video games, which under his guidance quickly spread to other targets. As just one example, in 2016, Yiannopoulos wrote an essay attacking Leslie Jones for her participation in the female-led reboot of Ghostbusters. Her social media accounts quickly filled with horrific racist and sexist abuse. Yiannopoulos and his fans regularly singled out targets large and small in this way; in doing so, they sent the message to leftists, women, and black people that their words and cultural products were being policed, and that they could face vicious, psychologically damaging abuse if they stepped out of line.

Some might dismiss Yiannopolous and his type as clowns or an irrelevant bullies. But the same tactics have been used by the President of the United States. When Trump retweeted a lie that Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota had celebrated after the 9/11 attacks, Omar was sent death threats by Twitter trolls. And just this week, the president tweeted about House impeachment manager Adam Schiff, saying he had “not yet paid the price” for his role in the hearings.

This sort of behavior has become a theme for right-wingers, and it’s seriously concerning. Unlike students speaking up against right-wing debaters, such suppression of dissent has serious, tangible risks. It seems that Rand Paul, cheerleader of liberty, would do well to remember that - because today he did his part to make his country a little less free.
How climate-conscious children are forcing their schools to be more eco-friendly

‘Five-year-olds can be incredibly convincing because they are incredibly passionate’


Eleanor Busby Education Correspondent

Students at Pipers Corner School are presenting business pitches on how to be green ( Pipers Corner School )


Young people across the country have caused controversy with school walkouts to demand action on the climate crisis – but they're also forcing change inside the classroom.

As thousands of students prepare to take to the streets again this month, politicians are not the only ones under the spotlight. Pupils are demanding more from their teachers and families.


Children as young as five are presenting business pitches to schools on how to be greener, while pupils are begging their parents to stop engines running outside the school gates and calling on teachers to make school trips closer to home.




The number of eco-conscious students across the country has grown as a result of the movement led by teenage activist Greta Thunberg in recent months and the “Attenborough effect”, headteachers say.

Plastic bottles, straws and Christmas crackers are a thing of the past at some schools after student-led campaigns for the environment.

Best Global Climate Strike protest signs, Friday 27 September 2019
Show all 57






And pupils are increasingly demanding for school trips to be scaled back and for meat dishes to be replaced to reduce their carbon footprint.

Pipers Corner School, a private girls’ school in Buckinghamshire, has employed an “environmentalist in residence”, believed to be the first of its kind, to address the rising interest among students.

Phil Williams is helping teachers at the school embed lessons on climate issues across the curriculum, including in maths and psychology, and he is urging pupils to look at the school as a business.

A group of five- and six-year-olds wanted a gutter on a shed in the playground to collect rainwater to help the environment, so the headteacher asked them to present the idea to senior leaders at the school.

Helen Ness-Gifford, headteacher of Pipers Corner School, said: “There are eco-groups and teams of students as young as five-years-old who see it as absolutely vital. They are very active.”

On the bid for a gutter, she said: “It wasn’t high on the priorities of my maintenance team so I said ‘girls you are going to come in and present to my finance manager and you are going to convince him why it matters. Five-year-olds can be incredibly convincing because they are incredibly passionate.” 

Read more
Schools move trips closer to home to ‘lower their carbon footprint’

Last year, her students also called for Christmas crackers to be scrapped as they did not want the plastic waste on site. The school had already decided to get rid of plastic bottles and straws.

Meanwhile, at Sheffield High School, pupils are leading a campaign against air pollution. They created posters warning parents against car idling outside the school which were displayed on roads nearby.

Nina Gunson, head of the girls’ school, said: “The posters are very emotive and they are almost following suit in some of the language that Greta Thunberg has used. ‘Turn off your engines and don’t pollute my air’.”

The headteacher said more children are sharing their “dissatisfaction” with policies through eco-committees and they are calling on their families “to be mindful of their world”.
Children created posters to stop parents from engine idling (Sheffield High School)

Television programmes, like Sir David Attenborough’s Blue Planet II, have helped raise awareness among pupils of the environmental damage caused by plastic pollution. Children as young as seven at Sheffield High School recently made a business pitch to remove single-use plastics from the canteen.

And they are increasingly questioning the school’s plans for trips and long-haul flights. “Our eco-agenda has really gained more momentum in recent years. It is so important to our girls so they are really leading this more than they have done in the past,” Ms Gunson said.

Pupils now tell their classmates off if they bring in plastic bottles of water, Ms Gunson added. “Greta Thunberg is definitely having an impact but also David Attenborough has had a huge impact.”

Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said: “There is certainly an increasing appetite among young people for more action on environmental issues, and schools respond to this through things like eco-committees so that it is the pupils who are themselves leading that change.

“This can involve a wide range of activities, including campaigns to save energy around the school site by switching off lights and plug sockets, encouraging parents not to leave their car engines running outside the school gates, and having a meat-free day each week.”

Commercial airlines made more than 1,300 deportation flights for ICE in the last year
Isaac Scher
A detainee, shackled at the ankles, boards an ICE deportation
 flight to Honduras. John Moore/Getty Images

A Newsweek report found that commercial airlines, including some of the biggest in the United States, deported unauthorized individuals on behalf of ICE.

The airlines made at least 1,386 flights between January 1, 2019, and January 16, 2020.
ICE paid discounted fares for the deportation flights.

A new report has found that three of the biggest commercial airlines in the United States made more than 1,200 deportation flights for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in just over one year.

Commercial airlines made at least 1,386 flights to remove unauthorized individuals from the United States between January 1, 2019 and January 16, 2020. The data, published Friday morning by Newsweek, was obtained by the outlet through a Freedom of Information Act request with ICE.

United Airlines accounted for almost half of the tallied flights, with 677 trips. American Airlines made 345 deportations, and Delta Airlines made 266. Together, the three airlines hold 49.9% of the domestic commercial-flights market, according to the US Bureau of Transpiration.

All the reported flights went to Latin America. Over 80% of them were destined for Northern Triangle countries — Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.

Honduras received 605 flights, 429 went to Guatemala, and 79 landed in El Salvador.

Three foreign airlines — the Colombian company Avianca, Panama's Copa Airlines, and Mexico's AeroMexico — also flew individuals out of the country on behalf of the US government agency. But in total, their deportations made up less than 0.7% of the reported 1,386 flights.

Alaskan Airlines made one flight for ICE.

Roughly half of all reported deportation flights flew out of airports in Texas and New York. According to the Pew Research Center, nearly 11 million unauthorized immigrants live in the United States. Texas and New York are both in the top-four states by number of unauthorized people. Around 1.6 million live in Texas, and more than 750,000 live in New York.

According to Newsweek, 450 commercial-flight deportations departed from Texas. 280 flew out of New York's John F. Kennedy (JFK) International Airport.

An American Airlines spokesperson sent an email to Newsweek explaining that US commercial carriers offer discounted fares to ICE for its flights through the City Pair Program (CPP).

Delta, United, American, and Alaskan Airlines all offer CPP-discounted fares to ICE, according to the US General Services Administration.

The Newsweek report found that while a typical flight from JFK to Honduras costs roughly $500, the discounted fare for ICE is as little as $177.

The CPP discount, according to ICE spokesperson Danielle Bennett, is not only for ICE operations.

"It is government-wide," Bennett told Newsweek.

It is unclear whether the commercial flights were for detainees alone. Neither ICE nor any of the airlines responded to whether non-detainee passengers typically traveled on the same flight as unauthorized individuals being deported.

ICE's use of commercial airlines for deportations has been previously reported, but is "hidden in plain sight," according to a report from the George Washington University Center for Human Rights.

The report noted that "only small numbers of deportations take place on commercial flights."

In the 2017 fiscal year, ICE "coordinated the removal of 8,288 aliens via commercial flights and the removal or transfer of 181,317 aliens via charter flights," according to a 2019 report from the US Office of the Inspector General.


A US Air Force veteran was knocked off his feet after learning his watch is worth up to $700,000. Antiques Roadshow/PBS/YouTube

A US Air Force veteran purchased a Rolex for $345 while he was stationed in Thailand in the 1970s.

On a recent episode of "Antiques Roadshow," the veteran found out that the watch was similar to one Paul Newman wore in a film, making it extremely valuable.

He kept the watch in a safe deposit box for nearly 40 years, which increased its value.
In the video, the man falls to the ground after the "Antiques Roadshow" host tells him watches like his sell for $400,000.

The host then says that the watch could actually sell for up to $700,000 at an auction because it's so special.
Trump to appeal to evangelicals with unprecedented speech at anti-abortion rally

US President Donald Trump delivers a speech via video 
from the White House to the March for Life on January 19, 2018. 
© BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP

Text by:Ségolène ALLEMANDOU


Donald Trump will become the first sitting US president to address the March for Life anti-abortion rally when he speaks on Friday. Trump will use the rally to strengthen his ties with his conservative evangelical Christian base in the run-up to the 2020 US elections.

No US president has ever attended the March for Life, an annual anti-abortion rally protesting against both the practice and legality of abortion, in the event's 47-year history. It is held every year in Washington, DC around the anniversary of the landmark Roe vs Wade Supreme Court case.

In that case, the court ruled on January 22, 1973 that the Constitution must protect a pregnant woman’s liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.

Every year since becoming president, Trump has welcomed representatives from the March for Life to the White House. But this is the first time that he will go in person to the protest.


See you on Friday...Big Crowd! https://t.co/MFyWLG4HFZ— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 22, 2020

Trump made this surprise announcement on Twitter on Wednesday, writing “See you on Friday...Big Crowd!”

Trump’s critics see it as an attempt to divert attention from the impeachment trial, which opened on Tuesday in the Senate.

Also on Twitter, the president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, Ilyse Hogue, described the president’s announcement as “a desperate attempt to divert attention from his criminal presidency and fire up his radical base”

BREAKING: In a desperate attempt to divert attention from his criminal presidency and fire up his radical base, Trump will be the 1st POTUS to attend the annual gathering of anti-choicers on Friday, which he announced today on the anniversary of #RoevWade bc that's how he rolls. https://t.co/xN5TzktwLL— ilyse hogue (@ilyseh) January 22, 2020

The planned address is the latest example of Trump continuing to woo evangelical Christians.

“This is definitely a watershed moment for the pro-life movement, but it is also the latest gesture of support from Donald Trump to a key part of his conservative base: the religious right,” said FRANCE 24’s Washington correspondent Kethevane Gorjesthani.

“As a political block, they’ve stood by him throughout all the controversies, despite his divorces, despite his lack of obvious interest in religion. All of that is because because Donald Trump has delivered on one of their key issues: abortion.”

“Since taking office, the man who once called himself very pro-choice has appointed countless very conservative judges from the lower courts all the way to the Supreme Court. He has also cut federal funding for abortion and has pushed for more laws restricting access to abortions. Donald Trump is now hoping that these same conservative voters will once again turn out at the polls for him,” said Gorjesthani.

‘The most pro-life president in history’

Trump’s administration has already embraced the march in unprecedented ways. In 2017, Mike Pence became the first sitting vice president to attend the event.

The following year, in January 2018, the White House incumbent himself addressed the march by video, promising that his administration “will always defend the very first right in the Declaration of Independence, and that is the right to life”.

Writing in the conservative news outlet The Daily Wire on Wednesday, Russell Vought, Trump’s acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, called him “the most pro-life president in history” and celebrated what he called “a golden chapter for our movement”.

“Trump is seeking to reaffirm his pro-life position," confirmed Nicole Bacharan, a political scientist specialising in American politics and author of "Le Monde selon Trump" (The World According to Trump), speaking with FRANCE 24.

“Trump governs for his electorate: those that are anti-immigration, but also pro-life," Bacharan said. The latter category is widely represented among evangelical Christians, 81% of whom voted for the Republican candidate in 2016.

By speaking at the March for Life, the president intends to directly address his electoral base, “to prove his loyalty", says Bacharan. “But also to remind them of what he has already done for their movement and to tell them that he is prepared to commit even more to it".

‘Good people can have different opinions about what decisions they might make about their own bodies’ — Celebs including @DebraMessing, @BradleyWhitford, and @SophiaBush explain how the abortion debate is really about freedom and human rights #RoeVWade pic.twitter.com/x9X6bOL3Ao— NowThis (@nowthisnews) January 22, 2020

Abortion remains a highly divisive issue in America. According to a study published by Pew Research Center in August 2019, 61 percent of Americans believe that voluntary termination of pregnancy should be legalised in all cases, compared to 38 percent who believe it should be prohibited in all circumstances.

As soon as Donald Trump came to power in January 2017, his administration was particularly aggressive on the issue of abortion rights. It introduced a ban on funding international NGOs that support abortion, and a reduction in aid for abortions.

Trump also nominated two conservative judges for the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, who were both confirmed by the Senate. In 2019, several conservative states in the south and centre of the United States (the "Bible Belt") tightened the laws pertaining to abortion.

As a result, access to abortion is declining in the United States, according to a New York Times study published on 31 May 2019. Dozens of specialized clinics in the country have closed in recent years, with more than 11 million women in the United States living more than an hour's drive from one.

In January 2019, New York State passed a law protecting the right to terminate a pregnancy after 24 weeks in certain cases, while in the same year, the governors of Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi and Ohio signed controversial ‘heartbeat’ bills banning abortions if an embryonic heartbeat could be detected.

Pro-life candidates receive ‘record’ funding

Trump’s announcement came a few days after the pro-life political action group the Susan B. Anthony List announced that it would spend $52 million to support the president and other pro-life Republican candidates throughout the 2020 election cycle, a sum the group called a record

President @realDonaldTrump is the most #ProLife president in U.S. history.
From the moment he was sworn in, his administration hit the ground running to defend LIFE.

Let's WIN in November to secure FOUR MORE YEARS of WINNING for babies & moms to Make America Pro-Life Again!! 👍 pic.twitter.com/yqkMpJyTcY— Susan B. Anthony List (@SBAList) January 23, 2020

Trump’s aim by breaking protocol to attend this Friday’s March for Life is clear: He wants to solidify his old evangelical base and attract those who are not regular voters.

"Up until now, evangelicals have long been considered a marginal group and uncultured. Above all, this gives them a sense of legitimacy,” Bacharan said.

This piece is an adaptation by Sophie Gorman from the original in French.
Is Canada shifting away from its pro-Israel stance on Palestine?

Ottawa supported a vote for Palestinian self-determination at the UN, but moved in the opposite direction on refugees and settlements

Canadian Foreign Minister Chrystia Freeland speaks after

 her meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
 in Jerusalem, 31 October 2018 (AFP)

Terry Rempel , Jeremy Wildeman

Canada is a close ally of Israel, something the Trudeau Liberal government has repeatedly and ardently reinforced. But the country recently reversed a years-long trend by voting in favour of a United Nations General Assembly resolution on the Palestinian right to self-determination.

The resolution was first introduced in 1994 and has since been reintroduced on an annual basis. Canada initially voted in favour of the resolution, but abstained for the first time in 2000, expressing concern that a reference to the Palestinian “right to a state” could prejudice a negotiated outcome to the conflict.

It had been a pillar of Canadian policy for decades that a solution should be found through talks between the parties, rather than a unilateral resolution.

Settlements are widely regarded as a major obstacle to a two-state solution, and Canada has long agreed with this in its official policy

In 2011, after winning a majority government, the Harper Conservatives voted against the resolution on Palestinian self-determination. John Baird, the former foreign minister, said Canada would not support unilateral efforts by the Palestinian Authority to secure international recognition for a Palestinian state.

That year, Canada voted against all but two of 16 UN resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, siding with Israel at the expense of the Palestinians. This was a voting pattern that the Trudeau government maintained - until now.

The recent shift restores a degree of consistency between Canadian policy and the country’s voting record prior to the Harper era, including its recognition of the Palestinian right to self-determination and “the creation of a sovereign, independent, viable, democratic and territorially contiguous Palestinian state, as part of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace settlement”.

Canadian officials explained that the latest vote aimed to shore up prospects for a two-state solution. By contrast, barely a month earlier, the US announced that it would “no longer recognise Israeli settlements as per se inconsistent with international law”.

Settlements are widely regarded as a major obstacle to a two-state solution, and Canada has long agreed with this in its official policy, stating that it does not recognise permanent Israeli control over territories occupied in 1967, including the Golan Heights, the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza.

“Israeli settlements in the occupied territories are a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention,” the government states. “The settlements also constitute a serious obstacle to achieving a comprehensive, just and lasting peace.”
From Harper to Trudeau

In 2019, Canada voted against all but three out of 16 recurrent resolutions at the UN on the question of Palestine. The Trudeau government has consistently suggested that the resolutions are “biased” or seek to “single out Israel”.

The Trudeau government’s position is consistent with the Harper government’s view that Canada should take a stand with Israel, “the only country in the world whose very existence is under attack, is consistently and conspicuously singled out for condemnation”.

Even so, Canada’s refusal, alongside six other countries, to condemn Israeli settlement-building at the UN seems strange in light of its support for Palestinian self-determination and long-standing official policy.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former
 Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper shake hands 
in Jerusalem in 2014 (AFP)

Canada also continued this year to vote against a resolution on Palestinian inalienable rights, including the right of refugees to return to their homes and properties. The Trudeau government’s vote against a resolution on the operations of UNRWA, the UN agency that assists Palestinian refugees, also stands out.

In contrast, one of the Trudeau government’s biggest decisions upon gaining power several years ago was to restore funding to UNRWA, which had been cut by the Harper government.

Canada has mostly supported the agency since its inception in 1949, and was the third-largest donor to UNRWA in its first 20 years of operations, contributing tens of millions of dollars. Canada also oversaw the Refugee Working Group during the Oslo process in the 1990s.


'Absolutely unacceptable'

It is useful to put Canada’s international voting record into context with the hotly contested domestic politics of Israel and Palestine in Canada. A common site of contestation is the realm of higher education.

In November, a campus event at York University for an Israeli advocacy group was met with protests by Palestine solidarity activists. The event featured members of Reservists on Duty, a group founded by former members of the Israeli army with a goal to counter the boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement.

Also at the event were members of the Jewish Defense League (JDL), a group that has been classified as a terrorist organisation in the United States. Indeed, reports of violence followed.

How Israel became one of the world's worst rogue statesRead More »

The immediate response by Canadian politicians at all levels was, without investigation, to condemn the Palestine solidarity advocates. True to past form, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was quick to denounce them, tweeting: “What happened that night was shocking and absolutely unacceptable. Antisemitism has no place in Canada.”

Yet, recognising that the real threat came from the JDL, two York students’ associations issued a statement noting: “We the students demand that the university take immediate action to ensure that known members of the JDL, and other organizations that are complicit in violent and harmful behaviour, are no longer allowed on our campus.”

Amnesty International joined many other civil society organisations in expressing concern about the violence students faced on campus.
Deeply one-sided

Meanwhile, the Trudeau government has been attempting to facilitate the sale of products from Israeli settlements in Canada through the renewed Canada-Israel Free Trade Agreement. Unusually, the agreement lacks a human rights provision, and despite Canada’s official policy on settlements, the deal makes no distinction between products made in settlements and other Israeli products.

According to Amnesty International, “failure to make this distinction is destructive to the human rights situation for the Palestinian people” living in the occupied territories. Though a federal court ruled that these products could not be labelled as “product of Israel” in Canada, that ruling is currently being appealed by the Canadian government.


The real test of Canada's support for the Palestinian right to self-determination will lie in whether, and how, the Trudeau government translates the positive vote into action

For advocates of the Oslo two-state process or Palestinian rights, the recent vote in favour of Palestinian self-determination was unexpected, but welcomed as a positive development. Supporters of Israel in Canada, meanwhile, felt betrayed.

Overall, the vote for self-determination was significant because Canadian policy has been deeply one-sided for years, and the vote suggests a potential shift to a fairer approach of the sort that the Government of Canada consciously tried to adopt in the 1990s. Still, the gap between official policy and the country’s UN voting record remains significant.

The self-determination vote may mean nothing without transformative structural change, especially when we see concurrent moves in the opposite direction on refugees and settlements.

The real test of Canada’s support for the Palestinian right to self-determination will lie in whether, and how, the Trudeau government translates the positive vote into action.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Terry Rempel holds a PhD from the University of Exeter. He is a writer and an independent research consultant specialising in forced displacement in Palestine/Israel. He is a founding member of BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency & Refugee Rights.

Jeremy Wildeman holds a PhD from the University of Exeter. He is a researcher of international relations, critical development and security studies, Middle East politics and Canadian foreign policy. He has conducted a number of major research studies on development programming in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and on Canada’s relationship with the Palestinians.

Recommended

Iran plane crash poses a challenge for Canada-US relations
'Foolish': Muslim convention criticised for hosting anti-Palestinian politician
Canada's Conservative Party to list Iran's IRGC as terrorist group if elected

Farming without pesticides: How can we make agriculture greener?

Cornflowers or potatoes? Wildflowers are disappearing due to increased fertilization in agricultural areas. An otherwise conventional farmer in Germany is testing organic farming methods — with varying success.
Hanging on a gate is a sign reading: "Potatoes — healthy and delicious." The slogan, to which the word "rare" could justifiably be added, is in line with Cornel Lindemann-Berk's philosophy of quality over quantity. "We don't have enough rain in the summer," he tells DW. "And since we don't want to water them, we've turned this weakness into a strength."
The yields are 50% lower than they might otherwise have been, but even the rare varieties such as Bergerac or Bamberg aren't watery. Customers from across the region come to the farm shop to buy these spuds known for their rich flavor and high mineral content.
Those who came last summer also got to witness the strips of brightly colored flowers around the edge of the Lindemann-Berk's fields. His mixes of brilliant red poppies, cornflowers and wild daisies attracted an abundance of insect life.
"The number of [plant] species has increased, and the number of each insect species has gone up fourfold," says the agronomist.
Scientists began recording the growth of the flowers after carrying out targeted planting for insects and birds. Here, the animals can find food and nectar, as well as a safe place to reproduce.
This is conventional organic farming
This family-run business in Germany's Rhineland region is one of 10 farms across the country taking part in a project to test and implement practical and economically viable conservation measures alongside traditional agriculture.

Rare and exotic-looking, but from the region: Purple or Bergerac potatoes from the farm are a popular choice

Growing and thriving: Wildflowers bloom next to the cultivated field
By taking part in the project, which is known as F.R.A.N.Z. (Future Resources, Agriculture & Nature Conservation) and runs from 2017 to 2027, Lindemann-Berk is on his way to becoming an organic farmer.
"As part of this project, we don't use liquid manure or crop protection agents," he says. "The yield is sometimes zero, because weeds such as thistles and burdock are rampant here." For every crop plant, around 30 unwanted herbs and grass also push through the ground.
Lindemann-Berk has been making losses on grain and rapeseed for years. But when he took over the Gut Neu-Hemmerich farm three decades ago he converted several disused buildings into flats and offices, and so he doesn't have to rely on agriculture alone to make a living. Nonetheless, it's still important to him to plant a diversity of grains. He doesn't cultivate monocultures but practices crop rotation, just as farmers did centuries ago. Varying what he grows each year helps to regenerate the soil, while also reducing disease and pests.
As part of other experiments for F.R.A.N.Z, Lindemann-Berk has sown corn and runner beans together. The beans grow up the corn plants and prevent light from reaching the soil, thereby significantly reducing the growth of weeds. Because the beans are rich in protein and the corn contains starch, the mix also lends itself to cattle feed.
"Skylark-windows" — rectangular strips in the shape of windows which are cut into the crops — were also introduced in the fields. This allowed the heavily decimated bird population to breed undisturbed on the ground among the dense grain.
Lindemann-Berk only uses fertilizers and pesticides in an emergency — and even then in homeopathic doses.
"Too much fertilizer can even cause unwanted weeds to multiply. We've been calculating the requirements for more than 40 years. Using soil samples, we examine the amount of nutrients in the soil and calculate exactly how much fertilizer we need to use in order to get a good yield. Only then do we buy what we need," he says.
High tech in the fields
He also prefers to use organic fertilizer made of animal excrement. "It's delivered from the Netherlands, because there's hardly any livestock nearby," he says. His farm supplies grain for the Dutch cattle. "So why shouldn't we get the animal's excrement back?" he asks wryly. "Organisms in the soil digest the valuable liquid fertilizer and excrete minerals like nitrogen, which the plants then absorb through their roots."

Having a mixture of plants if part of the F.R.A.N.Z project
This liquid crop protection mixture can be applied to troublesome plants using a satellite-navigated and digitally controlled syringe. This kind of work is particularly effective after sunset.
With the help of his own weather station, data collected from the soil and the meteorological service, Lindemann-Berk can make forecasts in order to calculate the risk of attack from fungus. Even then, pesticides should only be used if the plant isn't able to help itself.
By using lactic acid bacteria, Lindemann-Berk was able to dramatically reduce his use of chemical fungicides.
Once the harvest is complete, he takes soil samples again. "So far, the measurements have shown no residues of glyphosate and its breakdown products within the grain," he says.
He points to the shelf behind him, which is full of files, explaining how he has to keep his records for five years. Although fertilizer regulations have been tightening for many years now — causing many farmers to give up on agriculture — he says the positive impacts won't show up in groundwater for 30 years.
Not an organic farm — but still environmentally friendly
Organic farms can only treat their plants with copper formulations, which stimulate growth and act as deterrents against fungus. Although it's a heavy metal, people still need copper in small doses to help with blood formation and to support a functioning nervous system.

Organic pesticides are preferred over chemical ones at the Gut Neu-Hemmerich farm — but they're only used in emergencies

Not everyone is enthusiastic about pulling weeds by hand
"We do everything we can to be environmentally friendly, and do what the organic farms do so well," says Lindemann-Berk. "Because no one wants to harm the environment. Agribusinesses have been working in the same places for hundreds of years."
Sustainable practice is a priority here. But in order to be certified as an organic farm, he would need to pluck the weeds by hand and — as was done centuries ago — regularly rake the soil around the plants to uproot unwanted herbs and grasses.
"No one wants to do this job, not even young people doing an internship," he says. And so the job is left to machines, in the age of industrial agriculture in Germany.
Lindemann-Berk gives his plants plenty of space to grow, which allows them to absorb enough nutrients from the soil, and in turn leads to well-aerated earth that is less susceptible to fungal diseases. He also calls on customers who pay too much attention to the appearance of their fruits and vegetables to reconsider.
"If I offer my customers tasty and untreated apples from the orchards, you'll always get complaints about a few marks on the fruit," he says, adding that people want produce that is both organic and flawless. "Those two things don't go together."