Saturday, March 19, 2022

GLENCORE

Swiss commodities traders help fill Putin's war coffers

The war in Ukraine has put Switzerland's commodities sector in the spotlight. The country makes billions trading raw materials but prefers to not look too closely into the details.


Russian oil may not flow through Switzerland, but the money it generates does

Switzerland is known for being an important financial hub. What is less in the limelight is its much more significant commodities sector.

Despite the country being far from all the global trade routes and without access to the sea, without former colonial territories and without any significant raw materials of its own, it is one of the most important trading hubs for raw materials in the world.  Oliver Classen, media officer at the Swiss NGO Public Eye, says that "this sector accounts for a much larger part of the GDP in Switzerland than tourism or the machinery industry."

Hidden from view, huge profits are made in this sector. According to a Swiss government report from 2018, the trade volume reaches almost $1 trillion ($903.8 billion). The five largest firms in Switzerland according to annual turnover are not banks or pharmaceuticals but commodity traders. Most of the 900 companies that trade raw materials are based in Geneva, Zug or Lugano.


Glencore is one Swiss raw materials giant

80% of Russian raw materials traded via Switzerland

About a third of the oil that is traded globally is bought and sold in Geneva.

 Two-thirds of the trade in base metals such as zinc, copper and aluminum are conducted in Switzerland, as are two-thirds of the trade in grain. Russia also benefits. Some 80% of Russian raw materials are traded via Switzerland, according to a report by the Swiss embassy in Moscow. Russian oil and gas flows largely thanks to deals signed on Swiss desks.

Gas and oil exports are the main source of income for Russian President Vladimir Putin. They account for 30 to 40% of the Russian budget. In 2021, Russian state corporations earned around $180 billion (€163 billion) from oil exports alone. This is money now being used to finance the war in Ukraine.

Loopholes in Swiss legislation

At a recent anti-war demonstration in the Swiss capital, Bern, Angela Mattli, joint managing director at Public Eye, said that Swiss commodity traders continued to turn a blind eye to what the Russian state was doing with this money. She deplored the fact that all of this was "quite legal within the framework of Swiss legislation, which had huge loopholes for commodity traders."

There has also been criticism from politicians: "Switzerland has to turn off the tap to the Russian war chest, " said Cedric Wermuth from the Swiss Social Democratic Party on public radio. He said that Switzerland had effective leverage — the commodities trade and the assets of rich Russians. So far, the sanctions imposed by the EU and the US do not concern the trade in raw materials, even if the US has said that it no longer wants to import Russian oil.


Switzerland has also seen anti-war demonstrations like this one in Zurich

Because of its historical status of neutrality, Switzerland does not impose sanctions of its own. Through its Embargo Act, it can only enact sanctions that have been ordered by others, for example, major trading partners or the UN Security Council.

Switzerland has capital

And so far, Switzerland has handled its golden calf, the commodities trade, with kid gloves.

Raw materials are often traded directly between governments and via commodities exchanges. However, they can also be traded freely, and Swiss companies have specialized in direct sales. One important reason is that in Switzerland there is certainly enough of the most important raw material for the commodities trade — capital. 

Depending on the current price of crude oil, a tanker load can cost $100 million — money that most companies do not have to hand. Certain instruments for handling such business have been developed in Switzerland.

In raw materials transactions, letters of credits or L/Cs are often used. A bank will give a loan to a trader and as collateral receive a document making it the owner of the commodity. As soon as the buyer pays the bank, the document and thus ownership of the commodity are transferred to him/her. The system gives traders more credit line without their creditworthiness having to be checked, and the bank has the value of the commodity as security.

Lack of regulation

This is an example of transit trade, where only the money flows through Switzerland. The raw materials usually do not touch Swiss soil but go directly from the country of origin to the recipient country. Thus, no details about the magnitude of the transaction land on the desk of the Swiss customs authority. The Swiss National Bank publishes certain details but no precise information about the flow of raw materials. What is clear is that everything is unclear.

"The whole commodities trade is under-recorded and underregulated," said Elisabeth Bürgi Bonanomi, a senior lecturer in law and sustainability at Bern University. "You have to dig around to collect data and not all information is available."

Who is buying what from whom at what price remains in the dark. The owners of unlisted commodity trading companies in Switzerland are mostly unknown. Apart from Glencore, which is a public company, they are all privately owned. "There are quite a few companies that fly under the radar of the authorities and whose actual beneficiaries are not known because, for example, they are managed in opaque offshore holdings," said Classen. This makes for a good investment opportunity for Russian oligarchs.

The lack of regulation is very appealing to commodity traders — especially because many raw materials are mined in non-democratic countries. "Unlike the financial market, where there are rules for tackling money laundering and illegal or illegitimate financial flows, and a financial market supervisory authority, there is currently no such thing for commodity trading," financial and legal expert at Public Eye David Mühlemann told the German broadcaster ARD.

"Commodity trading needs to be regulated," he said. "There has to be transparency of payments from traders to governments, especially to autocratic regimes that divert these funds into their own pockets, or even finance wars. And this is not only about Russia."

Oliver Classen from Public Eye explained that some commodity traders had become lenders to entire countries. Glencore, for example, had given over $1 billion to Chad as credit in return for access to the country's crude oil reserves.


The local population in Chad has not benefited much from profits from mining

Government relies on banks to police themselves

Even though the Swiss Federal Council acknowledges the problem, it continues to rely on the indirect monitoring of commodity traders by banks themselves, according to Amnesty International. These, however, are not obliged to take an interest in how their clients do business and where their money ends up, Amnesty says. "This seems to be enough for the government. In its eyes, there is no need for a commodities law or a special supervisory body," says the international human rights NGO.

For years, the Swiss NGO Public Eye has been calling for a supervisory body for the commodities sector based on the model of the one for the financial market. 

A Swiss Green Party proposal along these lines failed in parliament in 2015. The Greens now intend to make another such proposal.

But Thomas Mattern from the Swiss People's Party (SVP) has spoken out against such a move, insisting that Switzerland should retain its neutrality; "We do not need even more regulation, and not in the commodities sector either."

As long as politicians keep debating and Western countries do not impose sanctions on raw materials, Swiss commodity traders will continue making millions from Russian raw materials and help to fill Putin's war coffers.

This article was translated from German.


Russia claims hypersonic missile strike, Ukraine urges cease-fire







Russia claims hypersonic missile strike, Ukraine urges cease-fireAnalysts say Russia is leading the hypersonics race, followed by China and the US (AFP/Gal ROMA)

Emmanuel Duparcq and Dmytro Gorshkov
Fri, March 18, 2022, 11:26 PM·5 min read

Russia said Saturday that it had unleashed hypersonic missiles against an arms depot in Ukraine, the first use of the next-generation weapons in combat, after Kyiv's embattled leader pressed for "meaningful" talks to halt an invasion now in its fourth week.

Moscow also said its troops had broken through Ukrainian defences to enter the strategic southern port city of Mariupol, prompting more people to join the millions fleeing their homes.

If confirmed, the use of Russia's new Kinzhal (Dagger) hypersonic missile, which can elude most defence systems, would mark a new escalation in Russia's campaign to force Ukraine to abandon hopes of closer ties with the West.

Ukrainian air force spokesman Yuri Ignat told AFP that the depot in Deliatyn, a village near the border with Romania, had indeed been hit but "we have no information of the type of missile."


Russian President Vladimir Putin, who unveiled the Kinzhal missile in 2018, has termed it "an ideal weapon" that flies at 10 times the speed of sound -- analysts say Russia is leading the hypersonics race, followed by China and the US.

Ukraine officials also admitted they had "temporarily" lost access to the Sea of Azov, though Russia has effectively controlled the coastline for weeks after surrounding Mariupol.

- 'Time to meet' -

Moscow's announcement came hours after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky again appealed for peace, urging Russia to accept "meaningful" talks in his latest video posted on social media.

"This is the time to meet, to talk, time for renewing territorial integrity and fairness for Ukraine," he said.

"Otherwise, Russia's losses will be such that several generations will not recover."

Ukraine claimed Saturday that a Russian general had been killed by strikes on an airfield outside Kherson, just north of Crimea, saying he was the fifth top-ranking officer killed since the invasion began on February 24.

Fierce resistance has managed to stall Russian forces outside Kyiv and several other cities in the east, making them vulnerable to Ukrainian attacks against supply lines.

Britain's defence ministry said Saturday that Russia has been forced to "change its operational approach and is now pursuing a strategy of attrition."

"This is likely to involve the indiscriminate use of firepower resulting in increased civilian casualties," it warned.

But as in previous negotiations there appeared to be little progress in reaching a ceasefire, with Putin accusing Ukraine of "numerous war crimes" during a call late Friday with French President Emmanuel Macron.

British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss countered Saturday that Moscow was using the talks as a "smokescreen" as it carried out "appalling atrocities," saying she was "very sceptical" they would produce a breakthrough.

- Fighting rages -

Friday's attack on the arms depot was the latest strike in western Ukraine, which until a few days ago had remained relatively unscathed by Russia's push toward key cities from the north and east.

On Friday, Russian forces destroyed an aircraft repair plant near the airport of Lviv, where millions of people have fled as rockets and shelling continue to rain down on Kyiv.

In Mariupol, rescuers were still searching for hundreds of people trapped under the wreckage of a bombed theatre where over 1,000 people had been seeking shelter when it was struck on Wednesday.

There was still no information about potential fatalities, Zelensky said, but 130 people had been saved so far, some "heavily injured."

"This is no longer Mariupol, it's hell," said resident Tamara Kavunenko, 58. "The streets are full with the bodies of civilians."

Russian rockets also struck Mykolaiv in the south on Friday, killing dozens of young Ukrainian ensigns at their brigade headquarters.

"No fewer than 200 soldiers were sleeping in the barracks" at the time of the attack, a Ukrainian serviceman on the ground, 22-year-old Maxim, told AFP.

"At least 50 bodies have been recovered, but we do not know how many others are in the rubble," he said.

- Appeals to China -

Over 3.3 million refugees have fled Ukraine and countless others have sought havens in the country's west, though Putin said his forces were doing "everything possible" to avoid civilian casualties during his latest call with Macron, according to the Kremlin.

Russia's ally China told US President Joe Biden on Friday that the war was "in no one's interest," but showed no sign of giving in to US pressure to join Western condemnation of Russia.

Biden warned his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping of "consequences" for any financial or military aid for Russia, a move that could turn the standoff into a global confrontation.

Zelensky's aide Mikhailo Podolyak called on Beijing to denounce "Russian barbarism," tweeting that "China can be the global security system's important element if it makes a right decision to support the civilised countries' coalition."

Putin appears undeterred by further threats or sanctions, holding a triumphalist rally in Moscow on Friday to mark eight years since Russia's seizure of Crimea, saying his goal in Ukraine was "to rid these people from their suffering and genocide."

Russia wants Ukraine to disarm and disavow all Western alliances, in particular to renounce joining NATO or to seek closer integration with the European Union -- steps that Kyiv says would turn it into a vassal state of Moscow.

Russia's top negotiator said Friday that Moscow and Kyiv had brought their positions "as close as possible" on a proposal for Ukraine to become a neutral state.

But Mikhailo Podolyak, an advisor to Zelensky taking part in the negotiations, said his country's position had not budged.

burs-js/yad

Russia uses hypersonic missiles for first time in Ukraine as troops enter central Mariupol

Russian troops backed by Chechens enter central Mariupol

 



Bitcoin to the rescue: Cryptocurrencies’ role in Ukraine

Cryptocurrencies have taken on an unprecedented role in the war in Ukraine, helping the government raise millions of dollars to fund its fight against the Russian invasion.
© Provided by Al Jazeera Crypto donations are of value to Ukraine because they are less influenced by geopolitical or macroeconomic factors
[File: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg]

Why has Ukraine turned to cryptocurrencies, and how is the nascent crypto industry changing its reputation and having an effect amid the clouds of war?

How much crypto has been raised?

At the outset of the conflict, Ukrainian officials posted addresses for two crypto wallets on their Twitter account, giving donors a direct and clear address to which to send contributions.

The wallets attracted more than $10.2m (9.2 million euros) just four days after the start of the invasion.

Since then, more than $100m worth of crypto has been raised, with the “Crypto Fund for Ukraine” run by Michael Chobanian – the founder of the Ukrainian crypto exchange Kuna – accounting for 60 percent of all donations.

“We are still collecting crypto. It is being spent on aid like daily rations and bullet-proof vests and helmets,” the 37-year-old Ukrainian told AFP.

Initially, two funds were set up, one for humanitarian purposes and the other to support the Ukrainian military.

However, after the violence escalated across Ukraine, the funds were merged and focused fully on supporting the military, said Chobanian.

He said that the majority of crypto donations came in the form of Bitcoin, Ethereum and the stablecoin Tether – a coin pegged one-to-one to the dollar.
What are the benefits of donating in crypto?

Aid packages sent to Ukraine in fiat money from the United States and the European Union dwarf cryptocurrency donations, but the latter allow individuals to get involved.

US crypto charity, The Giving Block, told AFP that cryptocurrency donations have the potential to attract “younger donors” who are looking to support various causes.

Another reason crypto donations are of value to Ukraine is because they are less influenced by geopolitical or macroeconomic factors. Chobanian points to the depreciation in the value of the Ukrainian hryvnia as a result of inflation.

An extra advantage of donating in cryptocurrencies is the speed of the transfers. Bank wires may take up to 24 hours to be validated between two countries. However, cryptocurrency transfers typically take less time.
What are the drawbacks?

Despite the success of crypto in aiding the Ukrainian war effort, it has not always been a smooth ride.

In the early days of the conflict, the deputy minister for digital transformation wanted to issue Ukraine’s own crypto as a symbolic gesture for Kyiv’s cause, but the project was eventually cancelled.

To make matters worse, people seized the opportunity to mint and market fake versions of the planned government-issued crypto.

“There was a lack of communication” within the government, said Chobanian, who now works closely with the ministry.

“It was the first day of the war,” he recalls.

Moreover, cryptocurrencies have become a staple part of Ukraine’s shadow economy – used as a medium of exchange in online crime, tax avoidance and capital flight.

According to data analytics firm Chainalysis, transactions from Eastern Europe to other regions are particularly high, and the company suggests that “capital flight could account” for some of the crypto movement in the area.
What are the consequences?

Despite the risks associated with crypto, Chobanian is confident that it will become a core part of the Ukrainian economy.

“When we win the war, we will rebuild Ukraine using blockchain technology. All of us were helped by crypto,” he said.

While Chobanian’s aspirations may be very ambitious, they are based on real developments.

On Wednesday, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy passed a law that would provide a legislative framework for crypto platforms and users to operate within the country.

Caroline Malcolm, head of international public policy and research at Chainalysis, told AFP that the conflict in Ukraine “is forcing governments to develop their understanding of cryptocurrencies and their regulation”.

She believes that such discussions can be beneficial to the crypto industry, leading to “proportionate and effective regulatory policies”.

As of last week, US President Joe Biden signed an executive order seeking further clarification and guidance on crypto regulation – showing Washington’s willingness to contend with an ever-growing and new asset class.
Kyiv Calling: Ukrainian punk band reinvent Clash hit as ‘anthem’ of resistance
Alex Green 

Ukrainian punk band Beton have reimagined The Clash’s hit single London Calling as an “anthem” of “solidarity and hope” amid the Russian invasion.

The trio – Bohdan Hrynko, Oleg Hula and Andriy Zholob – recorded the new version, titled Kyiv Calling, on Thursday and Friday this week in a music studio in the city of Lviv.

The song features the lines “Come out of neutrality, you boys and girls” and criticises Russian president Vladimir Putin with the lyric: “Phony Putinmania has bitten the dust.”

A music video accompanying the song features footage from friends and family of the band, plus colleagues and volunteers, of Russian attacks taking place across Ukraine, from Kharkiv to Kyiv.

The track was mixed and mastered by producer Danny Saber, one of the last people to work with Joe Strummer, lead singer of The Clash before his death in 2002.

Proceeds from the song will go to the Free Ukraine Resistance Movement (FURM) – a citizen-led network bringing together 30 non-governmental organisations from across the country.

Since the war began, guitarist and vocalist Zholob has been working as an orthopaedist doctor treating war victims and soldiers while drummer and vocalist Hrynko and bassist and vocalist Hula have joined the territorial defence force, and are prepared to take up arms when asked.

© Provided by Evening Standard Beton in Skyborn Waves Studios in Lviv this week recording their resistance single Kyiv Calling (Beton/PA)

Zholob said: “Many Ukrainian musicians are now on battlefields or in territorial defence. This time they’ve changed guitars to guns.

“We hope this song shows Ukrainians’ spirit and our defiance to Russian aggression. The Clash were one of our inspirations when we fell in love with punk rock and music in general, there is no snobbery or pretentiousness to the music, they had something to say and voiced their opinions against human anger.

“London Calling epitomises all of that and we are very happy to be able to take this iconic classic and turn it into our own anthem with new meaning and life.”

He added: “We are glad it is being played not just in Ukraine but around the world as a symbol of solidarity and hope. Our country will defend our hard-won liberty and protect our right to self-determination

.
© Provided by Evening Standard The late Joe Strummer (Kirsty Wigglesworth/PA) (PA Archive)

“We have no doubt about our victory, we are proud to be Ukrainians and feel support from musicians abroad. This means so much!”

Ostap Kryvdyk, international secretary of FURM, said: “FURM calls on the world to listen to the call from Kyiv. For us the music of the Clash is the music of freedom. We must stop the new iron curtain falling.

“London Calling was the call sign of the resistance of Britain when it stood alone against the Nazis.

“We want Kyiv Calling to be the symbol of resistance to the new aggressor in Europe. No surrender. No compromise peace.

“For Ukraine, peace is not just the absence of war. Peace is the unity of Ukraine. FURM thanks the Clash for their support in our darkest hour. Bring on the dawn.”




Last apps standing? Telegram, WhatsApp duck Russia bans

Chat platforms like WhatsApp and Telegram have avoided being blocked by Russia – unlike some of the world’s biggest social networks – in a tenuous tolerance that experts warn could end suddenly.
© Provided by Al Jazeera Two men pose with smartphones in front of a screen showing the Telegram logo in this picture illustration taken in Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina [File: Dado Ruvic/Reuters]

Years of tension between Moscow and US-based Facebook and Twitter erupted into confrontation after the invasion of Ukraine, with the platforms targeting state-tied media and then finding themselves restricted in Russia.

YouTube, which has barred channels linked to Russian state media globally, was on Friday also facing a direct threat of being blocked after Russia’s media regulator, Roskomnadzor, accused the site’s owner Google of being “anti-Russian.”

Messaging apps, however, have gotten a pass so far in part because Meta-owned WhatsApp is less suited for mass communication, while Telegram’s ability to blast information to large groups has made it useful both for independent media and the Kremlin.

“I think it’s unlikely Russia will ban Telegram because they are so short on platforms where they can operate,” said Sergey Sanovich, a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton University, who noted that authorities in 2020 aborted efforts to block the service.

Telegram, criticised as having a lax content policing policy, offers a forum for Russian authorities to promote narratives friendly to their internationally condemned war.

Russia still operates accounts on platforms like Facebook, despite blocking the service at home, but this week the Silicon Valley giant took down posts from Moscow’s pages that contained misinformation about its deadly offensive.

Russia’s go-to platform

Telegram has become an essential exchange for news on the war, with its growth accelerating after the Kremlin’s latest crackdown on independent media and the lock-out of apps such as Facebook and Instagram.

An average of 2.5 million new users joined Telegram daily in the last three weeks, the firm said, about a 25 percent jump from the weeks prior.

According to daily figures provided by Telegram, the app has been downloaded more than 150 million times since the beginning of the year, with the official figure of half a billion active users dating back to January 2021.

Telegram has benefitted from the image of its creators, brothers Pavel and Nikolai Durov, Russian citizens who left their home country in 2014.

Under pressure from the authorities, Nikolai sold his stake in VK, which he had created, rather than hand over the personal data of activists to the government.

“Telegram is now a very nice revenge story, and we all love a good revenge story,” said Enrique Dans, a professor specialising in information systems at the IE Business School in Madrid.

“Will that be enough to make Telegram the world’s favourite messaging app? That’s a whole lot to say. The app still has a lot of things to demonstrate in areas such as security, encryption and business model,” he added.

‘Declaring war on YouTube’

But experts highlighted a risk to Telegram and its users due to a lack of default, end-to-end encryption that potentially leaves the company susceptible to government pressure to turn over information.

Alp Toker, director of web monitoring group NetBlocks, noted WhatsApp has put in place firestops that offer insulation against that sort of pressure.

“By improving their security and adopting end-to-end encryption technology, they have essentially protected their own platform from legal risk and potential demands for content access requests,” Toker added.

WhatsApp’s use for one-on-one or group chats make it less of a target for Russian authorities for now, but that could change if it became known as a key platform for protests against the war.

“Primarily, Roskomnadzor has been very concerned about channels and news and ways of disseminating information to large numbers of people, which WhatsApp and such are less good for,” said Eva Galperin, director of cybersecurity at Electronic Frontier Foundation.

But Toker noted that the question has not reached a critical point yet for authorities, partly because it was social media platforms, many of them now blocked, that had played a key role in organising.

“As those [platforms] disappear, the dynamics could change and messaging apps could become the next target,” he added.

WhatsApp was one of the most popular apps in Russia in 2021, with some 67 million users or about 65 percent of internet users in the country – far ahead of TikTok, Russian social media platform VK, and even Telegram, according to data from eMarketer.

But YouTube, with 76 million viewers in 2021, drew more Russians than any of the above platforms, the data showed.

Its popularity was due in part to the access it offers to entertainment for everyday Russians, who in turn provided an audience for politicians and the government seeking their attention.

Sanovich, the Princeton researcher, said the platform had simply gotten on the wrong side of authorities.

“They have a hard time controlling YouTube in terms of censorship and YouTube’s recent moves made it less valuable as a venue for foreign propaganda,” he noted.

The lack of a sufficiently high-quality homegrown alternative has also been a complicating factor for the government in deciding what to do with YouTube.

Toker, the NetBlocks director, cautioned that the blocking of YouTube would mean confronting Google, with its suite of services like Gmail.

“Declaring war on YouTube effectively means declaring war on the rest of the company,” he noted. “Google is a major force in business and a significant connection to the outside world.”
Brazil Supreme Court judge suspends messaging app Telegram, a key Bolsonaro platform

A Supreme Court judge in Brazil ruled to block popular messaging application Telegram nationwide, barring one of far-right President Jair Bolsonaro's favourite communication channels, in a decision published Friday.
© Adriano Machado, Reuters

Citing Telegram's failure to comply with orders from Brazilian authorities and remove messages found to contain disinformation, Judge Alexandre de Moraes ordered the app blocked immediately in Brazil, in a ruling dated Thursday and published Friday on the high court's website.

The decision comes as Bolsonaro gears up to seek reelection in October, facing a popularity slump and counting on Telegram to rally his base.

"Telegram's disrespect for Brazilian law and repeated failure to comply with countless court decisions... is completely incompatible with the rule of law," wrote Moraes.

He said the company had repeatedly refused to comply with rulings and requests from police, the Superior Electoral Tribunal and the Supreme Court itself.

That includes a Supreme Court-ordered investigation into allegations against the Bolsonaro administration of using official communication channels to spread disinformation, he said.

Bolsonaro has openly clashed with Moraes, who ordered him personally investigated in that case.

The president slammed the ruling as "inadmissible" and said it put the "freedom" of Brazilians at risk.

Moraes "failed to act against the two or three people that according to him should be blocked, so he decided to affect 70 million people," Bolsonaro said.

Earlier, Bolsonaro had tweeted a link to subscribe to his channel on Telegram -- which was still operational in Brazil Friday afternoon.

"Our Telegram informs people every day of many important actions of national interest, which many regrettably omit," he said.

"Welcome, and share the truth."

Bolsonaro's minister of justice and security, Anderson Torres, said on Twitter that millions of Brazilians were being "suddenly wronged by an individual decision" and added that his ministry was studying "a solution to give back to the people the right to use the social network," without specifying what measures he intended to adopt.

Moraes's ruling gave Brazil's National Telecommunications Agency (Anatel) 24 hours to suspend Telegram's operations nationwide.

The decision "will have big political and electoral repercussions," tweeted political analyst and digital communications specialist Pablo Ortellado.

"This could move one of the main game pieces of the campaign."

Founded by Russian-born tech entrepreneur Pavel Durov in 2013, Dubai-based Telegram is hugely successful in Brazil, where it has been downloaded on 53 percent of all cell phones.

Durov apologized Friday to the Supreme Court in an Instagram post and blamed a "miscommunication" problem.

"On behalf of our team, I apologize to the Brazilian Supreme Court for our negligence. We definitely could have done a better job," he said.

Bolsonaro, who has had various posts blocked on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube for violating their rules on misinformation, has been eagerly encouraging his base to follow him on Telegram ahead of the October elections.

He trails leftist ex-president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, his likely opponent, in the polls.
Election row

Moraes also cited Telegram's repeated lack of compliance with efforts by the Superior Electoral Tribunal to get it to cooperate in fighting disinformation in the run-up to the elections.

Telegram was notably absent last month when the tribunal signed an agreement with eight leading social networks to combat disinformation during the elections, including Twitter, TikTok, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram and YouTube.

The court's president, Luis Roberto Barroso, wrote to Telegram headquarters in December, asking for a meeting and warning that the app was rife with "conspiracy theories and false information about (Brazil's) electoral system."

Moraes said in his ruling that Telegram "ignored the Brazilian electoral authorities once again, underlining its total contempt for the Brazilian justice system."

The ruling came in a case on a court order that Telegram ignored to block the account of pro-Bolsonaro blogger Allan dos Santos.

Moraes said the company had also refused to comply with a wide range of other orders from Brazilian authorities, including in child pornography cases.

Bolsonaro has more than one million followers on Telegram, not including numerous fan groups with names like "Reelect Bolsonaro 2022."

He faces a series of investigations for spreading false information on social networks, notably over his repeated claims of rampant fraud in Brazil's electronic voting system, for which he has provided no evidence.

Telegram has made its refusal to cooperate with the authorities part of its brand.

It deliberately spreads its encryption keys and chat data on disparate servers around the world so governments cannot "intrude on people's privacy and freedom of expression," it says on its website.

(AFP)

France marks 60 years since Evian Accords ended the Algerian war

Issued on: 19/03/2022 -


02:19 France commemorated 60 years since the signing of the Evian Accords at an Élysée Palace ceremony on March 19, 2022. © Gonzalo Fuentes/POOL/AFP

Text by: FRANCE 24

Video by: Yena LEE

France commemorated 60 years since the signing of the Evian Accords – which ended the Algerian war and paved the way for independence from France – at an Élysée Palace ceremony on Saturday.

In the 60 years since Algeria won independence from France, bilateral crises have often fuelled by domestic politics. Yet some experts say the two sides had surprisingly good relations for four decades, and it was only in the 1990s that things started to fall apart.

"Generally, despite appearances and criticism, there has been a stable, very balanced relationship," said Luis Martinez, a Maghreb researcher at Sciences Po university in Paris.

That is despite the devastation caused by the eight-year war of independence that finally ended after the signing of the Evian accords on March 18, 1962.

French historians say half a million civilians and combatants died – 400,000 of them Algerian – while the Algerian authorities believe some 1.5 million were killed.

Under French General Charles de Gaulle, whose administration signed the accords, and his successor Georges Pompidou, Paris had good relations with Algiers. The same was true under François Mitterrand, even though he had been interior minister when Algeria's armed independence struggle began in 1954 and remained opposed to the country's independence.

"Mitterrand was surrounded by Socialist Party people, who were all pro-FLN," said historian Pierre Vermeren, referring to the National Liberation Front that led the revolt and has dominated Algerian politics ever since.

Mitterrand "was able to take a back seat" and let others deal with Algeria, said Vermeren, a professor at the Sorbonne University.

France was allowed to continue its nuclear tests in the Algerian Sahara until 1967, and de Gaulle managed to negotiate a secret deal with the new Algerian state to allow for chemical weapons tests until 1978.

But in 1992, Paris raised hackles by criticising Algiers for suspending elections after Islamist parties had won the first round.

Algeria withdrew its ambassador in response.

The cancellation of the polls sparked another decade of devastating conflict, only ending after an amnesty offer by Abdelaziz Bouteflika, who became president in 1999.

Despite being close to France, Bouteflika made use of anti-French discourse, primarily for domestic consumption, Vermeren said.

"To win back control of the ideological and political sphere after the civil war, [the Algerian leadership] 'forgot' that France had helped them fight the Islamists," he said.

"They went back to their traditional enemy."
'Good ties in secret'

Under Bouteflika, Algerian leaders used ever-stronger language against France, accusing it of having committed "genocide" during its more than 130-year occupation of Algeria.

Then in 2019 a vast protest movement toppled the autocratic Bouteflika after two decades in power – but the new regime has kept up the anti-French discourse.

Observers say, however, that cooperation behind closed doors has been surprisingly close. Starting in 2013, Algeria allowed French forces to use its airspace to reach Mali for its battle against the jihadists that threatened to overrun the country.

According to Naoufel Brahimi El Mili, who has written a book on 60 years of "secret stories" between the two countries, "French-Algerian relations are good when they're in secret. They're more hostile when they're in public."

Relations continued to be good under Emmanuel Macron, who became president after an election campaign in which he had visited Algiers, where he described colonisation as a "crime against humanity".

After taking office he made several gestures aimed at healing past wounds on both sides of the Mediterranean.

But he refused to apologise for colonialism, a highly sensitive topic in France, which for decades saw Algeria as an integral part of French territory and where far-right discourse has been escalating.

Comments reported last October dampened hopes around reconciliation. Macron accused Algeria's "political-military system" of rewriting history and fomenting "hatred towards France".

In remarks to descendants of independence fighters, reported by Le Monde, he also questioned whether Algeria had existed as a nation before the French invasion in the 1800s.

Once again, Algeria withdrew its ambassador.

'Algeria votes Macron'

Now, as French presidential elections loom in April, relations appear to be looking up again. Millions of French citizens of Algerian origin and descendants of Europeans who left after independence are among those casting votes.

"Algeria will vote for Macron," said author El Mili. "Algerians are convinced that a Macron II will be bolder."

Xavier Driencourt, a former French ambassador to Algeria, shared that view. "They don't want [conservative candidate] Valérie Pecresse, who has a fairly right-wing tone, and definitely not [Eric] Zemmour or Marine Le Pen," he said, referring to two far-right presidential hopefuls.

But much remains to be done. Martinez from Sciences Po said Macron's comments had done a lot of damage.

"They'll go back to the drawing board, and try to see what they can agree on," he said.

Former envoy Driencourt remarked that "it takes two sides to have a relationship", adding: "I'm not very optimistic."

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

Ukraine's Yaroslava Mahuchikh Defies Odds To Win World Indoor High Jump Gold

Yaroslava Mahuchikh overcame the "total panic" of armed conflict in her native Ukraine to win gold in the high jump at the World Indoor Championships on Saturday

Ukraine's Yaroslava Mahuchikh in the high jump at the World Indoor Championships.© AFP

Yaroslava Mahuchikh overcame the "total panic" of armed conflict in her native Ukraine to win gold in the high jump at the World Indoor Championships on Saturday. Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Mahuchikh was forced to flee her home, hide out in a cellar and eventually make the 2,000km trip over three days to Belgrade to face what she dubbed her own front line. The reigning European indoor high jump champion, who won Olympic bronze in Tokyo and world outdoor silver in Doha in 2019, left her home in Dnipro just three weeks ago as the conflict escalated.

She found her way to Serbia after "hundreds of phone calls, many changes of direction, explosions, fires, and air raid sirens".

Coming into the competition at 1.88m, Mahuchikh had a failure at 1.92 and two at 2.00 before making the latter height.

She sailed over 2.02 to ramp up the pressure on Eleanor Patterson. The Australian responded by passing, so the bar was raised to 2.04m.

But when Patterson failed at the new height, Mahuchikh was left celebrating in the Stark Arena, the crowd rising for a standing ovation with a handful of Ukrainian flags fluttering.

Patterson claimed silver with 2.00m, with Kazakhstan's Nadezhda Dubovitskaya taking bronze (1.98).

"To win a silver behind Yaroslava makes it even more special," said Patterson, who had painted her nails with a blue and yellow loveheart in support of Ukraine.

"She's had to deal with such hardships that no one deserves to, so I'm incredibly proud of her too.

"I'm in the same hotel as the Ukrainian team and I was able to see them beforehand and exchange small smiles and little gestures of support."

Mahuchikh, 20, is one of an all-female, six-strong Ukraine team in Belgrade.

Her teammate Iryna Gerashchenko, who fled her Kyiv with her husband and dog amid "everything at once: bombs and rockets" but no kit, finished fifth in the high jump with a best of 1.92m.

"I have such respect for both girls and all the Ukrainians who have made it here," added Patterson. "It's incredible to see them and phenomenal for Yaroslava to come away with the gold."

Mahuchikh's victory came in the absence of Russia's Mariya Lasitskene, who won gold in Tokyo competing as an accredited neutral athlete.

Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com

But Lasitskene was ruled out of the world indoors following World Athletics' ban on Russian and Belarusian athletes in the wake of the invasion of Ukraine.

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

UCP PRIVATIZES PUBLIC EDUCATION
CAPE School to benefit from $72M charter commitment

The government of Alberta provided further information on its $72-million investment in public charter schools and collegiate programs Tuesday, as first announced in the 2022 budget. Medicine Hat’s CAPE School is one of 16 charter schools in Alberta set to benefit from the investment; something CAPE superintendent Teresa DiNinno says is long overdue.

Between 2022 and 2025, the province will provide $25 million in operating funding and $47 million in capital investments for 16 public charter schools and several collegiate programs.

“Public charter schools play an important role in Alberta’s education system by offering unique programming to students,” Education Minister Adriana LaGrange, said in a release. “This investment builds on our commitment to strengthening Alberta’s long and successful tradition of providing choice in education.”

DiNinno agrees with LaGrange and believes government funding has historically favoured jurisdictions other than charter schools.

“It’s about time,” DiNinno told the News. “For the last 25 years, charter schools have been operating with less funding than other public jurisdictions, (so) these announcements are amazingly great. We feel very good about what’s happening right now.”

Not everyone was as happy as DiNinno however; Albert Teachers’ Association president Jason Schilling expressed concern with the investment in a Tuesday press release.

“The government is dedicating $72 million in new funding to just 16 schools,” Schilling’s statement read. “This is an inequitable, unjustified, ideological investment which epitomizes how privatization comes at the expense of public education.

“Since 2013, real per-pupil funding for public education in Alberta has declined by 15 per cent. Government funding to expand charter schools is simply an effort at privatization at the expense of our public education system, which is the first choice for 93 per cent of Alberta students. Public funds should go to public education.”

DiNinno refuted Schilling’s statement, saying charter schools are just another form of public school – one which offers specialized programs.

“The implication of (Schilling’s statement) is that charter schools are a way of privatizing education (but) charter schools are public schools, open to all students in Alberta … there is nothing private about it,” DiNinno said. “Our parents do not pay tuition fees. They pay fees, just like everyone else in Alberta pays fees to school jurisdictions … The curriculum is the same. It’s taught by certified teachers. It has a board of directors, just like all other jurisdictions. It has a superintendent and a treasurer, just like all the others. It complies with all requirements, just like everybody else does … what’s the private in that?”

DiNinno also disagreed with Schilling and the ATA’s belief “that charter schools should be incorporated as alternative programs within publicly funded and administered school boards,” stating the programs may not be able to operate in a large-scale system.

“Transplanting a program like ours into a public jurisdiction may not translate in the same way because of the structure of the organization,” she said. “The larger the organization’s structure is, (the) more time consuming.”

DiNinno believes the current education system – incorporating public and charter schools and allowing parents to choose – works well.

KENDALL KING, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, Medicine Hat News


Alberta's UCP government has removed the word "public" from all Alberta school boards, affecting eight of 41 divisions across the province and leaving educators and administrators scrambling to figure out why.

www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/public-alberta-school-boards-1.5275561



 



















  1. https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/why-do-it-ucp-government-orders-sch…

    2019-09-09 · The Alberta government has ordered a number of school divisions to remove "public" from their names, and while the education minister says it …

    • Estimated Reading Time: 7 mins

  • https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/the-commodification-of-education-is-never...

    Education advocates are concerned after the 

  • https://www.marxists.org/history/etol//newspape/atc/1708.html

    Assaulting Public Education in Canada: Privatization Plague Spreads — Eugene Plawiuk “I have no intention of increasing funds to schools, they should be looking for corporate partnerships.” —