Wednesday, April 06, 2022

U.S. Coal Miners Surge as Europe Proposes Ban on Russian Imports


(Bloomberg) -- U.S. coal miners including Peabody Energy Corp. and Arch Resources Inc. surged as the European Union is proposing banning imports of the fuel from Russia.  

Peabody, the biggest U.S. coal producer, jumped as much as 7.1% before the start of regular trading in New York. Arch, the second-biggest miner climbed as much as 6.3%, while Consol Energy Inc. gained as much as 8.6% as prices spiked in Europe.

Russia supplied about 18% of global coal exports in 2020, with Europe as the largest buyer. The prospect of restrictions on Russian coal has already upended international energy markets, driving prices to record highs, though in recent weeks they have erased some of those gains. 

However, it may be hard for U.S. suppliers to take advantage of surging international prices, said Ernie Thrasher, chief executive officer of Xcoal Energy & Resources LLC., the biggest U.S. exporter. Miners have already sold most of their output under long-term contracts and have few spare tons to deliver to Europe. Increasing production will be difficult because the long-term prospects for the dirtiest fossil fuel are grim, and producers have had little incentive to invest in new capacity. 

Those issues have been exacerbated by tight labor markets, while supply-chain bottlenecks would make it difficult to deliver additional tons to export terminals, Thrasher said. 

“I don’t see any ability for the industry to expand production,” he said. “It’s like looking at a sweet dessert that you just can’t reach.”

Prices in the U.S. have also been surging, surpassing $100 a ton last week for the first time in 13 years.

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

FROM THE RIGHT 

AEI Op-Ed

How Republicans really feel about Russia and Ukraine

Vladimir Putin’s war against Ukraine has triggered sweeping reassessments of conservative foreign policy opinion within the United States. Leading authorities have argued this represents the death of supposedly pro-Russian GOP “isolationism,” in favor of a liberal internationalist approach. Both halves of that argument reveal a misunderstanding of Republican foreign policy views, past and present.

It would be more accurate to say there’s been strong majority Republican support for some hardline measures against Putin’s Russia, and broad sympathy for Ukraine, alongside continuing discomfort over how far this crisis may escalate. GOP voters, while backing core U.S. alliances, remain ambivalent over many aspects of U.S. activism overseas. That is true of Republican voters as well as Democrats and independents. Whatever burst of support there has been for Ukraine should not be interpreted as a more sweeping conversion to liberal internationalist precepts where such conversion does not exist. Moreover, Republican voters were never pro-Putin or pro-Russia in the first place. A liberal-leaning press has tended to misrepresent conservative GOP foreign policy views for many years now.

Let’s start with some recent polls. According to the numbers, GOP voter opinion on foreign policy remains divided. This includes responses specifically about Ukraine. A significant minority of Republicans lean toward a non-intervention stance on this issue. According to a Yahoo/YouGov poll conducted mid-March, GOP voters are less likely than Democrats to support President Joe Biden’s existing measures against Russia. Most Republicans, like other Americans, are opposed to placing U.S. ground troops in Ukraine. William Saletan, writing at The Bulwark, frames this in ways I would dispute, but one central point of his is correct: a good many grassroots Republicans believe we should pay more attention to problems at home, rather than problems overseas. This was also the finding of some leading polls from last fall, including the October 2021 Chicago Council Survey.

Here, it’s worth noting that a certain ambivalence regarding U.S. intervention abroad is the norm in American opinion, not the exception. The same is true of Democrats and independents. There are limits on what the public will tolerate. Opposition to U.S. ground troops fighting in Ukraine, for example, is a point of bipartisan agreement. That is not “isolationism”; it is simply good sense.

Where Saletan is mistaken, judging from a fuller range of polling results he does not mention, is in the predominant direction of Republican dissatisfaction with the president’s approach to Ukraine. It is abundantly clear that the overwhelming number of Republicans do not approve of Biden’s handling of this crisis. When pressed, however, most GOP voters say they disapprove of Biden’s Ukraine policy in that he has not done enough to push back against Russian aggression. According to a Pew Research Center poll released on March 15, 54 percent of conservative Republicans say exactly that. Another 21 percent say the president has it about right. Only 9 percent of conservative Republicans say that Biden has done too much to stop Russia.

A whole host of polls from the past month back up this central finding. The same Pew survey mentioned above found that 73 percent of Republicans favor working with U.S. allies to respond to the Russian invasion. According to an early March survey conducted by Reuters, an overwhelming majority of GOP voters support a robust set of U.S. measures against Putin’s Russia. Some three-quarters of Republicans support U.S. arms shipments to Ukraine, rigorous economic sanctions, a ban on the import of Russian oil, and the seizure of assets from Russian oligarchs. And according to a Gallup poll released March 14, only 15 percent of Americans view Putin’s Russia favorably. Democrats and Republicans both respond in the same way. There is no real partisan difference on this issue.

At the same time, in cases where Biden has gone overboard—for example by saying that Putin “cannot remain in power,” and thereby implying a U.S. policy of regime change—a significant number of GOP national security hawks have joined with GOP non-interventionists in noting the president’s potentially dangerous rhetorical overkill.

Part of the problem with current reporting, I think, is that a wildly partisan press never really cared to understand Republican foreign policy opinion in the first place. During the Trump presidency, it was almost obligatory for a certain type of journalist to refer to GOP voters as “pro-Putin” or “pro-Russian.” As I pointed out in my 2019 book, Age of Iron: On Conservative Nationalism, based on a close look at polling from the time, the great majority of Republican voters were neither pro-Putin nor pro-Russian, and never had been. Most GOP voters, and for that matter most core Trump supporters, said quite consistently throughout those four years that they supported NATO—and that they had no warm feelings toward Putin’s Russia. But you would never have known this from mainstream reporting during those years. The facts simply didn’t fit the required liberal narrative. And so, they were not reported.

This goes to a broader problem with mainstream liberal academic, think-tank, and journalistic analyses of the Republican Party on foreign policy issues. Most liberals take it for granted that there is one benign tradition of U.S. foreign policy, namely the liberal internationalist approach. Liberals will certainly permit debate between hawks and doves within that one tradition: namely, how, why, and whether to use force overseas for liberal purposes. Liberal hawks (i.e., globalists) debate liberal doves. But honest disagreement from outside the liberal internationalist tradition altogether is treated as a religious heresy, or a kind of emanating darkness, rather than a serious alternative.

The challenge liberals face, though, is that most of the American foreign policy tradition, measured by timespan and long-term impact, is not liberal internationalist. And neither are most Republicans. Liberals appear to have no way of mentally processing this reality without slotting people into one of a few officially approved pejorative categories. As a contemporary conservative, either you are an isolationist or a warmonger. Or better still, an isolationist warmonger. We are already witnessing this type of recurrent, biased reporting in response to the range of GOP foreign policy opinions over the last month.

And yet most GOP voters who disagree with Biden’s foreign policy, like most GOP elected officials past and present, are neither warmongers nor isolationists. Rather, at the beating heart of the Republican Party, going back to its founding, is an intense sense of American nationalism. This has foreign policy consequences as well. Depending on international events, political leadership, and domestic political constraints, Republicans—like most Americans—have cycled back and forth between international activism and non-intervention. One GOP constant, however, has been a jealous regard for U.S. national sovereignty, and for preserving America’s freedom of action in world affairs. As I have tried to suggest in a series of books going back to Barack Obama’s first term, this is what sets conservative Republicans apart from their modern liberal counterparts. Our starting point is not rules-based multilateral world order. Our starting point is America.

Given the stubborn conservative affection for the notion that this is still an independent country, regardless of cosmopolitan dreams for global governance, then your typical GOP voter and your typical GOP leader are not going to sign up for the full menu of internationalist policy proposals as defined by liberals, whether over Ukraine or anywhere else. For example, conservative Republicans are going to continue to view the utterly dysfunctional condition of America’s southern border as a legitimate national security issue. And they are right to do so. This doesn’t mean Republicans won’t also support robust, sensible measures against authoritarian aggression overseas. In fact, we are seeing strong indications of that support right now.

Still, some observers seem baffled by GOP voters’ reaction to the Russian war in Ukraine. This isn’t rocket science: when a smaller, free country is viciously attacked by a much larger authoritarian power, most Americans—including most Republicans—tend to sympathize with the little guy. They look to help if they can, understanding that broader interests may be at stake. At the same time, most Americans—including most Republicans—look to avoid full-blown hostilities with one of the world’s leading nuclear weapons states. That is not an unreasonable mix of concerns. In fact, it sounds about right to me. The whole task of any U.S. president, in such a crisis, is to strike a healthy balance between competing priorities.

The problem with Biden’s approach to Ukraine is not that Republicans have failed to support the right balance on this issue, but that he himself has not struck the right balance.

The American public seems to be unimpressed by the president’s handling of this crisis. Looking at the polling numbers, we find that Biden’s foreign policy approval rating is low, just as it has been for months. According to RealClearPolitics, as of April 3, his rolling average of support on foreign policy issues stood at just under 41 percent. This is no great strength. Democratic Party strategists let it be known to Politico after the start of the war in Ukraine that they hoped this crisis could be used to rescue their party’s fortunes in the upcoming midterm elections. They must be disappointed.

ECOCIDE
Navy captain fired after another Hawaii fuel leak

By Diana Stancy Correll
Apr 5, 08:23 AM

Capt. Albert Hornyak is piped ashore assuming command of Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center Pearl Harbor during a change of command ceremony. (Shannon R. Haney/Navy)


The Navy relieved the commanding officer of the Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center on Monday due to a loss of confidence “following a series of leadership and oversight failures at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility,” the service said.

Capt. Albert Lee Hornyak has served as the commanding officer since August 2021, and Red Hill has historically suffered fuel leaks in the past. But his ouster comes days after the Navy kicked off another investigation into another fuel release at the Red Hill facility on Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii.

According to the service, that fuel release consisted of no more than 30 gallons of a mixture of water and fuel near tanks 13 and 14 at the storage facility.

Rear Adm. Kristin Acquavella, special assistant to the commander at NAVSUP, will serve as the commanding officer in the interim until a permanent replacement is identified, the Navy said.

NAVSUP commanding officer Rear Adm. Peter Stamatopoulos will also designate additional senior fuel subject matter experts to help Acquavella.

In November 2021, a fuel leak from the same storage facility contaminated roughly 9,000 military families’ drinking water, and prompted thousands to seek treatment for nausea, headaches, rashes and other conditions.

The Red Hill well was initially shut down following reports that the water smelled like fuel, but officials originally claimed it was still safe to drink. Testing days later revealed petroleum products were present in the water.

Following an effort to flush the Navy’s water distribution system, the Hawaii Department of Health declared that the water in the final four of all 19 zones within the Navy water system was safe for drinking, bathing, cooking and cleaning on March 18.

The facility has previously experienced fuel leaks, including in 2014 when one of the tanks leaked 27,000 gallons.

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin ordered the closure of the Red Hill facility last month, and the Navy and Defense Logistics Agency leadership have until the end of May to create a plan for “safe and expeditious defueling” of Red Hill.

EU Targets Man-Made Greenhouse Gases in Climate Neutrality Push

(Bloomberg) -- The European Union will ramp up curbs on man-made gases found in refrigerators, building materials and electrical equipment in a bid to slash emissions that have a greater warming effect on the planet than carbon dioxide.

The Commission proposed on Tuesday to speed up the reduction of fluorinated greenhouse gases and ozone depleting substances, in measures designed to slash emissions equivalent to an additional 490 million tons of CO2 by the middle of the century. That’s roughly the same as France’s total annual greenhouse gas output. 

It marks the latest effort by the EU to cut greenhouse gases other than CO2, as it attempts to reach climate neutrality over the coming three decades. In December, the bloc proposed measures to curb methane, which is one of the most potent greenhouse gases.

The bloc aims to accelerate the reduction of new hydrofluorocarbons -- which have a global warming potential thousands of times stronger than CO2 -- and introduce new prohibitions on their use, with the aim of reducing their heating impact by 98% by 2050. Globally, a phase-down of HFCs is seen as avoiding around 0.4 degrees Celsius of temperature rises by the end of the century.

“Making climate-friendly technologies more widely available will help us reach the EU’s long-term climate goals,” said Frans Timmermans, the EU’s climate chief. “Science urges us to go further and faster now.”

Cutting hydroflurocarbons is a quick-fire way to reduce global warming given its potency, yet relatively short lifespan. Others like perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride though, can remain in the atmosphere for thousands of years. So-called F-gas emissions in the EU have declined since 2014.

Read more: Earth Is on Track to Warm to Twice Paris Accord’s Target Level

Under a separate measure Tuesday, the Commission proposed to tighten regulation on emissions and pollution that are not covered by the bloc’s carbon trading system and produced by big factories, power plants and livestock farms. Member states will need to set stricter criteria for the technologies used to reduce emissions like methane and refrigerants, while operators will have to show how they plan to meet the EU’s pollution goals after 2030, it said.

The Industrial Emissions Directive will also be expanded to cover cattle farms, targeting methane and ammonia emissions in particular. Around 850 mining sites may now be covered by the rules, as well as almost 100 battery factories. Citizens meanwhile will have more scope to seek compensation if their health is affected by unlawful pollution.

“If operators fail to meet their obligations, citizens get better access to legal redress and compensation,” said Virginijus Sinkevicius, Commissioner for the Environment. “These rules are designed to make our economy more efficient and more sustainable.”

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

New Yorkers Are Split by Race and Income on How to Reduce City Crime

(Bloomberg) -- New Yorkers are divided along racial lines over the best strategies to improve public safety citywide, according to the results of a survey of more than 60,000 people conducted by a coalition of nonprofits run by allies of Mayor Eric Adams. 

Asian American and Pacific Islander New Yorkers ranked “more police presence” as the top priority in improving neighborhood safety amid an uptick in anti-Asian American hate crimes, including multiple high-profile violent assaults and deaths. 

By contrast, Black and White New Yorkers ranked housing and mental health first responders as more pressing fixes to the city’s spike in violent crime compared to adding more police officers.

The survey comes as major cities allocate more resources to police forces, even though money alone doesn’t seem to lead to a reduction in crime. Called “NYCSpeaks,” the $2.1 million survey initiative was backed by boldface philanthropic organizations including crypto billionaire Mike Novogratz’s Galaxy Gives, the Robin Hood Foundation and the Ford Foundation. 

The group sent more than 150 canvassers into 33 different neighborhoods earlier this year, with the aim of soliciting a large number of New Yorkers’ views on more than two dozen different policy questions, with the intention of using the results to help Mayor Adams craft his policy agenda.

Overall, New Yorkers who responded to the survey ranked “housing” as their top priority in making neighborhoods safer. But the results also varied by income level: Respondents earning less than $35,000 a year were likelier to rank “more police presence” as their second priority, while those earning more than $35,000 a year were likelier to call for more “mental health first responders,” as their second priority.

A third of New Yorkers said safety was a top concern when riding public transit, trumping other priorities including better maintained trains, buses and stations, as well as shorter transit wait times and less expensive fares.

The survey also found that one in four New Yorkers want to increase accountability for police misconduct as a way to “improve trust in the criminal legal system” among people of color and that nearly 60% of adults “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the city should provide reparations to New Yorkers who are descendants of Africans enslaved in the U.S. 

In terms of workplace protections that Adams should prioritize, a third asked to expand $15 minimum wage and paid sick leave to all gig workers.

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

Buyers Turn Down Moderna’s Covid Vaccine as Pandemic Demand Wanes


A healthcare worker prepares a dose of the Moderna Inc. Covid-19 vaccine booster shot for a Rakuten Group Inc. employee at the company's head office in Tokyo, Japan, on Friday, Feb. 18, 2022. About 11% of the Japanese population had received a third dose of the vaccine as of Tuesday, according to Bloomberg data. Photographer: Toru Hanai/Bloomberg

(Bloomberg) -- Two buyers of Covid-19 vaccines for low- and middle-income countries have declined options to purchase hundreds of millions of additional doses from Moderna Inc., a sign of waning demand as the pandemic eases. 

The African Union and Covax, the World Health Organization-backed group, decided not to obtain more of the vaccine as developing nations struggle to turn supplies into inoculations. Lower-income countries left behind in the global rollout are now grappling with a lack of funds, hesitancy, supply-chain obstacles and other factors that are hampering distribution.

For months, Moderna’s highly effective messenger RNA vaccine was out of reach for large parts of the world, and the company faced growing pressure to expand access. Now the tables have turned, even as health officials push to boost vaccination rates amid the risk of new variants.

“The vaccine landscape has changed drastically in recent months,” said Safura Abdool Karim, a public-health lawyer and researcher in Johannesburg who’s focused on equity in the pandemic. “We went from really needing vaccines super urgently to now having them.”

While the African Union agreed to purchase 50 million doses for delivery in the first quarter, the body of 55 member states opted not to acquire another 60 million doses in the second quarter, a Moderna spokesperson said in an email.

Covax, meanwhile, turned down two purchase options, one for 166 million doses in the third quarter and a second for 166 million doses in the fourth quarter, Moderna said. Covax remains in discussions with Moderna, according to a spokesperson for one of its key partners, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.

Short Shelf Life

The groups decided not to secure the doses despite Africa’s low immunization rate. Only 15% of the continent’s population is fully vaccinated, compared with a global average of 57%, the WHO said last month. About 400 million of the more than 700 million doses Africa has received have been administered. 

Enthusiasm turned to hesitancy in some African countries after months of delays, according to Edward Kelley, a former director of health services for the WHO. Donated vaccines arriving with little notice and short shelf lives have made it even harder. The problem highlights how the global effort failed to sufficiently address the delivery challenge, he said.

“The focus was almost exclusively on vaccines, and not on vaccinations,” said Kelley, who is now global health lead at ApiJect Systems Corp., a medical technology company. 

With new Covid cases dropping, many African countries are scaling back surveillance and quarantine measures. The WHO is calling for caution, urging countries not to lose sight of the risks of variants and pushing to expand vaccination coverage.

Future Sales

Covid vaccine sales remain relatively brisk. Moderna said it has signed deals for $21 billion in 2022 vaccine sales, up from $19 billion announced in February. But the company’s shares have fallen by about two-thirds from their August peak amid concerns about future sales and ability to develop new products. Moderna fell 0.9% as of 9:48 a.m. in New York. 

Lower demand is also expected to hit sales for companies including Pfizer Inc. and AstraZeneca Plc, as well as new entrants like Novavax Inc., and put pressure on manufacturers in countries such as India and Indonesia that invested in vaccine capacity. While more than 9 billion doses could be produced in 2022, demand may decline to a rate of about 2.2 billion to 4.4 billion doses a year in 2023 and beyond, according to London-based analytics firm Airfinity Ltd. 

With supplies now outpacing demand and more shots available, governments are taking a stronger stance against the terms that vaccine manufacturers are offering, Abdool Karim said. They’ve also turned increasingly to bilateral deals rather than relying on Covax, she added.

Covax has picked up the pace of deliveries after struggling to get access to shots last year, with shipments rising to more than 1.4 billion doses to 145 countries. In recent months, its focus has shifted to distribution challenges.

“Flexibility is crucial when it comes to options in our portfolio,” Gavi wrote. “We are in conversations with manufacturers as part of our active portfolio management strategy to align with magnitude and timing of country needs.”

Moderna in October announced a deal to make up to 110 million doses of its vaccine available to the African Union, which didn’t respond to a request for comment. Moderna agreed in May to supply Covax with 34 million doses in 2021 and as many as 466 million doses in 2022, then in December said it would make up to 150 million additional doses available. 

(Updates with shares in second section)

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

High Oil Prices Underpin Another Solid Canada Trade Surplus

The Nord Steady oil and chemical tanker is guided by tugboats past the Chevron Canada Burnaby Refinery at the Port of Vancouver in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, on Tuesday, July 11, 2017. Statistics Canada (STCA) is scheduled to release International Trade Balance Figures On Aug. 4.

(Bloomberg) -- Canada ran another large trade surplus in February, as the nation benefits from surging prices for oil.

The country shipped C$2.7 billion ($2.2 billion) more abroad than it bought from other countries during the month, with exports rising 2.8%, Statistics Canada reported on Tuesday. The surplus narrowed from C$3.1 billion in January, as imports increased by more than exports.

The surge in oil prices over the past year has helped the nation swing into recurring surpluses for the first time since 2014, a further boost to an economy that is already up against capacity. Energy exports rose 7.8%, and now account for 26% of total shipments during the month -- the highest proportion since 2014.

Most of the overall export gains, however, reflect price increases rather than increased volumes, which were up 0.6% in February. 

Blockades at border crossings set up by protesters denouncing Covid-19 restrictions had little impact on trade flows, the agency said, with alternative routes offsetting any losses.

Traffic over the Ambassador Bridge from Windsor, Ontario to Detroit -- which carries about a quarter of Canada’s trade with the U.S. -- was halted for nearly a week in early February. That demonstration was an offshoot of a trucker convoy that descended on Ottawa in late January and occupied the city’s downtown core for weeks, prompting to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to invoke emergency powers to quell the protests.

(Updates with chart, impact of border blockades)

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

 

 

Poland hit by a shortage of Ukrainian workers

For years, Poland's economy has relied on Ukrainian workers. Above all, male laborers have helped support the construction and transport industries. But many are now returning to Ukraine to fight, leaving Poland unsure as to what's next.


 

MADE IN GERMANY

Food security under threat from Ukraine war

German farmers fear for their harvests. The war in Ukraine has made fertilizers harder to come by and much more expensive. Supermarket food prices are rising and there are the first signs of panic buying. Is food security under threat?

PUTIN'S TOTAL WAR
18 journalists killed so far during Russia's war on Ukraine

Local, foreign journalists continue to risk their lives to report from ground zero of war amid Russian attacks


News Service
April 06, 2022
AA

File photo

Local journalists and press members who flooded into Ukraine from around the world are risking their lives at every turn to report on the latest developments on the ground in the war-torn country.

Since Feb. 24, the beginning of Russia's war on Ukraine, 18 journalists have been killed and 13 injured, Ukraine's Ministry of Culture and Information Policy said on Tuesday. During the war, it added, three journalists went missing, and eight journalists, including four women, were kidnapped.

Russia committed at least 148 crimes against journalists and media in Ukraine in the first month of the war along, according to the Institute of Mass Information (IMI), an independent NGO backing the interests of civil society of Ukraine and, in particular, responsible journalists.

At least 10 TV towers were targeted by Russian forces, causing complete or temporary disruption of TV and radio broadcasting in eight regions of Ukraine, it said.

In addition, some 70 regional media outlets were forced to shut down across the country due to war-related threats, the institute said.

Last month, Russian troops attacked a team of Sky News reporters in their car. Several team members sustained bullet injuries but survived thanks to bulletproof vests.


- Maksim Levin

On April 2, the Ukrainian Defense Ministry announced on Twitter that photojournalist and documentary filmmaker Maksim Levin was found dead near the capital Kyiv where he was documenting "Russian war crimes." It said that unarmed Max, according to investigators, was killed by Russian troops with "two shots from firearms."

"He is survived by his wife and four children," the ministry added.

Levin, 40, who went missing on March 13 while working on the frontlines near the capital city, was found dead near the village of Huta-Mezhyhirska on April 1, according to Ukrainian presidential aide Andriy Yermak.

Anton Gerashchenko, an adviser and former deputy interior minister, also confirmed on Telegram that the Ukrainian journalist went missing over two weeks ago when reporting in the Vishgorod district, an area of intense fighting.

Levin, accompanied by Oleksiy Chernyshov, a serviceman and former photographer, went to Huta-Mezhyhirska on March 13 "to document the consequences of the Russian aggression," said LB.ua, a Ukrainian media outlet Levin worked with for over a decade.

"They left the car and went in the direction of the village of Moshchun. Since then, there has been no contact with either man. Later, it became known that intense combat started in the area where Maksim Levin was going to work. The location and fate of Oleksiy Chernyshov are currently unknown," it added.

Levin was also working with the international media, with most of his documentaries concerning the war in Ukraine.


- Oksana Baulina

Russian journalist Oksana Baulina of investigative website The Insider was killed in Russian shelling of Kyiv on March 23 in the line of duty.

The outlet said in a statement that Baulina was reporting from Kyiv and the western city of Lviv, and she was killed when Russian troops shelled a residential area of Kyiv called Podil while she was filming the destruction.

She died "during a bombardment while carrying out an editorial assignment," it added.

The Insider, whose editorial offices are based in the Baltic nation of Latvia, said that another civilian also died in the shelling, while two others who were with Baulina were wounded and admitted to hospital.

Baulina was known for previously working for Russian opposition politician Alexey Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation.

She left Russia last year after authorities added Navalny's foundation to a list of extremist groups.


- Oleksandra Kuvshinova and Pierre Zakrzewski

Oleksandra "Sasha" Kuvshinova, 24, a Ukrainian filmmaker and journalist, died on March 14 together with Irish journalist Pierre Zakrzewski, 55, a cameraman for Fox News, when their car was struck by gunfire from Russian troops in the village of Horenka in the northwestern outskirts of the Kyiv region.

British correspondent Benjamin Hall, 39, was also injured in the attack.

Zakrzewski, a veteran cameraman, covered conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria for Fox News.

Kuvshynova had served as an on-the-ground consultant for Fox News.



- Brent Renaud

Another foreign journalist who was killed while covering the Russian war in Ukraine was Brent Renaud, an award-winning filmmaker and journalist.

The American journalist, 50, was killed near the Russian checkpoint in the town of Irpinin in the Kyiv region on March 13, according to police.

Renaud, a former New York Times contributor, was shot dead when, along with a colleague, he went to report the situation of refugees fleeing the region.

Brent was in the region to work for a TIME Studios project on the global refugee crisis.

Kyiv police chief Andriy Nebytov said the journalist was targeted by Russian soldiers, while his two colleagues were injured and taken to hospital by Ukrainian rescuers.

One of the injured journalists was identified as Colombian-American reporter Juan Arredondo.




- Viktor Dudar

Viktor Dudar, a 44-year-old journalist from the Lviv region, was shot dead in Mykolaiv, Ukraine's southern strategic port city on the Black Sea, on March 4.

He was a crime correspondent for Express, Ukraine's weekly newspaper, until he volunteered for the 2014-2015 war in the eastern Donbas region.

After becoming a reservist and returning from the war, the Ukrainian journalist took the paper's defense correspondent position.

Dudar, who in peacetime was a journalist, again joined the army to fight the advancing Russian forces with the start of Moscow's war.




- Yevhenii Sakun

Ukrainian cameraman Yevhenii Sakun, 49, who was working for LIVE TV, was killed on March 1 during a Russian rocket attack on the TV tower in Kyiv's Babyn Yar area.

When the missile hit the building, Sakun was working with his colleagues there.

His body was identified by his press card only.

Besides Sakun, four more people were killed and five others injured in a strike on a TV tower in Kyiv's Shevchenkivskyi district.




- Dilerbek Shakiro

Shakirov Dilerbek Shukurovych, a journalist for the information weekly Navkolo Tebe (Around You), was killed on Feb. 26, just two days after the war began.

He was shot dead from a car with an automatic weapon near the village of Zelenivka, a suburb of the southern city of Kherson.

The International Federation of Journalists on Twitter condemned the killing of the Ukrainian journalist.

The Russian war against Ukraine, which started on Feb. 24, has drawn international outrage, with the EU, US, and Britain, among others, implementing tough financial sanctions on Moscow.

At least 1,417 civilians have been killed in Ukraine and 2,038 injured, according to UN estimates, with the true figure feared to be far higher.

More than 4.17 million Ukrainians have fled to other countries, with millions more internally displaced, according to the UN refugee agency.
ILLEGAL Settlement building to continue in West Bank says Israel’s Bennett

Bennett says there will be no freeze on settlement construction


News Service April 05, 2022

Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett

Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said Tuesday that his government will continue settlement construction in the occupied West Bank.

“We will continue to build in Judea and Samaria [the West Bank] and there will be no freeze of constructing the settlement. [...] Things will happen in order,” Bennett said in statements cited by Israeli Army Radio.

Meanwhile, Bennett said Israeli security services thwarted more than 15 major attacks in the West Bank and Israel.

He added that, "207 suspects have been arrested in recent days.”

Last week, the Israeli premier announced the deployment of extra army forces in the West Bank in the wake of a spate of attacks, in which 11 Israelis were killed.

*Writing by Bassel Barakat