'Moment of hope': UN urges Yemen peace talks on truce anniversary
AFP
Sun, 2 April 2023
The United Nations' Yemen envoy warned on Sunday the war-ravaged country faces a "critical time" and urged steps towards lasting peace, exactly a year since a truce has dramatically reduced fighting.
Swedish diplomat Hans Grundberg called the UN-brokered truce that took effect in April 2022 a "moment of hope" and said it was largely holding, despite lapsing in October.
"But the truce's most significant promise is its potential to jumpstart an inclusive political process aimed at comprehensively and sustainably ending the conflict," the UN secretary-general's special envoy said in a statement.
Nearly a decade of war in Yemen has claimed hundreds of thousands of lives, both directly and indirectly, and set off one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.
"There are still significant risks," Grundberg said, calling to "protect the gains of the truce and to build on them towards more humanitarian relief, a nationwide ceasefire and a sustainable political settlement that meets the aspirations of Yemeni women and men".
A landmark reconciliation deal announced last month between Iran and Saudi Arabia, the two regional powerhouses that back rival sides in Yemen's war, added to the optimism that started last year with the truce.
Riyadh is leading a military coalition on behalf of the ousted Yemeni government while Tehran backs Huthi rebels, who seized control of the capital in 2014.
Amid renewed deadly fighting and warnings from the rebels, the UN envoy said: "The military, economic and rhetorical escalation of recent weeks is a reminder of the fragility of the truce's achievements."
He urged the government and the Huthis to "sit together and responsibly engage in serious dialogue" that would lead to "a peaceful resolution of the conflict".
Yemen remains deeply fractured along regional, confessional and political lines, and riven with rival factions including Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State group.
"At this critical time, any new temporary or partial arrangement needs to include a clear commitment from the parties that ensures it is a step on the course of a peaceful solution... in an inclusive political process," Grundberg said.
"Moments like now are fleeting and precarious," he warned.
"More than ever, now is the time for dialogue, compromises, and a demonstration of leadership and serious will to achieve peace."
It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Monday, April 03, 2023
WTF
Nova Scotians now need to be paying 50% of income on housing to qualify for rent supplement
CBC
Mon, April 3, 2023
Leigh MacLean said the rental subsidy is a stopgap measure, and more non-market housing is the solution. (Brian MacKay/CBC - image credit)
When housing support worker Leigh MacLean noticed a change on Nova Scotia's rent supplement application form, she thought it was a misprint.
The threshold to qualify for the program had been hiked from 30 to 50 per cent of a person's pre-tax income being spent on housing.
But it wasn't an error.
In late January, the province quietly changed the eligibility rules for the Canada-Nova Scotia Targeted Housing Benefit, known as the rent supplement program.
The definition of severe housing need was changed to only apply to those spending 50 per cent or more of their income on housing.
MacLean fills out the same form with clients dozens of times a week in her work as housing and homelessness team lead at Welcome Housing in Halifax. She said she and others in the sector weren't expecting a change.
"I think it's a drastic move and it's very secretive," MacLean said.
"I wish there would have been a little more transparency, community consultation around it because it just showed up on the new application and it wasn't discussed."
MacLean is concerned about the impact this change will have on the hundreds of clients served by her organization.
"I think if we're targeting 50 per cent [of income spent on housing], that's a lot less subsidies that they'll have to give out, ultimately," she said. "We're in a housing crisis, we're in a instability crisis. We really should be trying to help as many people as we can."
CBC
On Friday, Housing Minister John Lohr echoed the idea that Nova Scotia is in a housing crisis, but said the change to the program was made for budgetary reasons.
"We could see that the demand for the program was exceeding what the budget would offer," Lohr said in an interview. "So, we felt the need to prioritize ... this to those most in need, and that's why that decision was made."
Though the change was made in January, it just came to light publicly recently when Suzy Hansen, MLA for Halifax-Needham, asked Lohr about it in question period at Province House Tuesday.
Hansen told CBC she found out about the change from a constituent.
"When you think about who this is gonna affect the most, it's gonna affect those that are on low income, those that are struggling seniors, and they didn't tell any of us," Hansen said. "So, for me, it was really shocking."
Robert Short/CBC
Lohr said his department didn't consult community groups because a decision had to be made, but it wasn't done in secret.
"We put it right out there," he said. "It's on the website. Anybody applying could see the change."
What is the rent supplement?
The Canada-Nova Scotia Targeted Housing Benefit is a joint provincial-federal program that provides monthly funding to renters or homeowners who are determined to be in core housing need.
In order to qualify, a person needs to meet multiple requirements and fall under income thresholds. They also must be in "severe housing need" — the definition that was recently changed.
The 50 per cent of income spent on rent isn't calculated based on a person's actual rent, but based on the CMHC average rent for the area where they live.
For Halifax, this number was $1,449 for a two-bedroom unit. But MacLean said this number is usually much lower than actual rents in an area.
According to the Department of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the province is providing 7,000 rent supplements across the province. In Halifax, the monthly payment ranges from $403 to $963.
Old applications grandfathered in
Just two weeks ago, the Houston government didn't increase income assistance rates in this fiscal's budget, but instead said it would focus on "targeted supports" like the rent supplement.
A spokesperson for the department said in a statement that the Houston government has invested an additional $21.6 million in this fiscal year's budget to create at least 1,000 new rent supplements and "continue to support those we already have in place."
This means those who applied to the rent supplement program before the change took place on Jan. 27, 2023, will be grandfathered in if they meet the previous requirements.
"Recipients who continue to meet the eligibility criteria in place at the time they applied will continue to receive the benefit," spokesperson Krista Higdon said in an email.
Paul Palmeter/CBC
But those who spend 30 per cent of their income on housing and applied for the supplement after Jan. 27 are likely to be out of luck.
Brian Dauphinee is one of them. He recently found out he and close to 80 other tenants in his building on Quinpool Road in Halifax are being renovicted.
Dauphinee had been living in the same studio apartment since 2015, paying $637.50 monthly. He fears his pension won't be enough to pay the current rents in the city.
"It's going to impact me severely," Dauphinee said. "It's going to force me into making decisions about what kind of food I buy, what kind of medical service I can afford to get ... what clothes I can afford to buy."
Working with Welcome Housing, Dauphinee sent in an application for the rent supplement in March. But now he knows about the change to the eligibility requirements, he isn't confident his application will be accepted.
MacLean said application waiting times have slowed from around eight weeks to up to 14 weeks. For Dauphinee, this just means more time in limbo.
"I'll have to take it at that time," he said. "I'm so shocked, I can't plan beyond right now. I don't know what I'm gonna do."
CBC
Mon, April 3, 2023
Leigh MacLean said the rental subsidy is a stopgap measure, and more non-market housing is the solution. (Brian MacKay/CBC - image credit)
When housing support worker Leigh MacLean noticed a change on Nova Scotia's rent supplement application form, she thought it was a misprint.
The threshold to qualify for the program had been hiked from 30 to 50 per cent of a person's pre-tax income being spent on housing.
But it wasn't an error.
In late January, the province quietly changed the eligibility rules for the Canada-Nova Scotia Targeted Housing Benefit, known as the rent supplement program.
The definition of severe housing need was changed to only apply to those spending 50 per cent or more of their income on housing.
MacLean fills out the same form with clients dozens of times a week in her work as housing and homelessness team lead at Welcome Housing in Halifax. She said she and others in the sector weren't expecting a change.
"I think it's a drastic move and it's very secretive," MacLean said.
"I wish there would have been a little more transparency, community consultation around it because it just showed up on the new application and it wasn't discussed."
MacLean is concerned about the impact this change will have on the hundreds of clients served by her organization.
"I think if we're targeting 50 per cent [of income spent on housing], that's a lot less subsidies that they'll have to give out, ultimately," she said. "We're in a housing crisis, we're in a instability crisis. We really should be trying to help as many people as we can."
CBC
On Friday, Housing Minister John Lohr echoed the idea that Nova Scotia is in a housing crisis, but said the change to the program was made for budgetary reasons.
"We could see that the demand for the program was exceeding what the budget would offer," Lohr said in an interview. "So, we felt the need to prioritize ... this to those most in need, and that's why that decision was made."
Though the change was made in January, it just came to light publicly recently when Suzy Hansen, MLA for Halifax-Needham, asked Lohr about it in question period at Province House Tuesday.
Hansen told CBC she found out about the change from a constituent.
"When you think about who this is gonna affect the most, it's gonna affect those that are on low income, those that are struggling seniors, and they didn't tell any of us," Hansen said. "So, for me, it was really shocking."
Robert Short/CBC
Lohr said his department didn't consult community groups because a decision had to be made, but it wasn't done in secret.
"We put it right out there," he said. "It's on the website. Anybody applying could see the change."
What is the rent supplement?
The Canada-Nova Scotia Targeted Housing Benefit is a joint provincial-federal program that provides monthly funding to renters or homeowners who are determined to be in core housing need.
In order to qualify, a person needs to meet multiple requirements and fall under income thresholds. They also must be in "severe housing need" — the definition that was recently changed.
The 50 per cent of income spent on rent isn't calculated based on a person's actual rent, but based on the CMHC average rent for the area where they live.
For Halifax, this number was $1,449 for a two-bedroom unit. But MacLean said this number is usually much lower than actual rents in an area.
According to the Department of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the province is providing 7,000 rent supplements across the province. In Halifax, the monthly payment ranges from $403 to $963.
Old applications grandfathered in
Just two weeks ago, the Houston government didn't increase income assistance rates in this fiscal's budget, but instead said it would focus on "targeted supports" like the rent supplement.
A spokesperson for the department said in a statement that the Houston government has invested an additional $21.6 million in this fiscal year's budget to create at least 1,000 new rent supplements and "continue to support those we already have in place."
This means those who applied to the rent supplement program before the change took place on Jan. 27, 2023, will be grandfathered in if they meet the previous requirements.
"Recipients who continue to meet the eligibility criteria in place at the time they applied will continue to receive the benefit," spokesperson Krista Higdon said in an email.
Paul Palmeter/CBC
But those who spend 30 per cent of their income on housing and applied for the supplement after Jan. 27 are likely to be out of luck.
Brian Dauphinee is one of them. He recently found out he and close to 80 other tenants in his building on Quinpool Road in Halifax are being renovicted.
Dauphinee had been living in the same studio apartment since 2015, paying $637.50 monthly. He fears his pension won't be enough to pay the current rents in the city.
"It's going to impact me severely," Dauphinee said. "It's going to force me into making decisions about what kind of food I buy, what kind of medical service I can afford to get ... what clothes I can afford to buy."
Working with Welcome Housing, Dauphinee sent in an application for the rent supplement in March. But now he knows about the change to the eligibility requirements, he isn't confident his application will be accepted.
MacLean said application waiting times have slowed from around eight weeks to up to 14 weeks. For Dauphinee, this just means more time in limbo.
"I'll have to take it at that time," he said. "I'm so shocked, I can't plan beyond right now. I don't know what I'm gonna do."
Women players benefit most in Cricket Australia’s new $634m pay deal
Guardian sport and Australian Associated Press
Sun, 2 April 2023 a
Photograph: Steve Bell/Getty Images
The majority of women’s cricketers on minimum contracts will earn more than $100,000 a year after Cricket Australia and the players’ union announced a landmark $634m pay deal on Monday.
CA and the Australian Cricketers’ Association on Monday revealed details of a new five-year memorandum of understanding that will see professional women players share $133m – an increase from $80m in the previous agreement – and benefit from a 66% increase in payments.
Related: Teenager Phoebe Litchfield selected in Australia’s Women’s Ashes squad
Under the new deal, minimum and average CA women’s contracts will increase by 25%, while the number of contracts will increase from 15 to 18. Domestic players who do not play for Australia, who play both WNCL (50 over) and WBBL (T20) formats, can earn on average $151,019 annually, inclusive of match fees.
This makes them on average the highest-paid female players of team sports in Australia, with its nearest competitor being Super Netball where the minimum salary is $43,000 with no additional match payments. The AFLW minimum wage sits at close to $40,000, while NRLW is $30,000 and A-League Women’s is $25,000.
The WBBL salary cap will also increase to $732,000 per year in a bid to keep pace with the women’s Hundred in England, India’s WPL and other franchise leagues.
“Cricket now clearly offers the best earning opportunities of any team sport for elite female sportspeople,” CA CEO Nick Hockley said.
“I am particularly pleased this MOU represents another major step forward in the rise of women’s cricket with significant increases in remuneration for the inspirational role models of the world champion Australian women’s team and the WBBL who are driving substantial growth in female participation.”
Centrally-contracted Australian male players will have their pay increase by 7.5% to an average of $951,000 before match payments, while the squad will increase to 24 players.
At a domestic men’s level, more significant changes are coming. The men’s BBL salary cap will rise from $2m to $3m. That will allow the league’s top earners to be paid up to $420,000, with CA desperate to keep and attract new top-line talent. It comes after officials made the competition a priority last season, and agreed to reduce the number of games from 14 for each team to 10 for 2024-25 at the latest.
“We have recognised the need to ensure that the BBL remains highly competitive in a changing global cricket landscape,” Hockley said. “We’re confident this agreement will help maintain its place at the heart of the Australian summer.”
Overall, the changes represent a 26% pay rise for players across the sport, with the deal the first done between Hockley and ACA counterpart Todd Greenberg.
“There is enormous capacity for growth right across the women’s game, as well as the BBL, both of which we believe have enormous untapped potential,” Greenberg said. “Our men and women will benefit from significant investment into the BBL and WBBL, which will help ensure we have the best players playing.”
Guardian sport and Australian Associated Press
Sun, 2 April 2023 a
Photograph: Steve Bell/Getty Images
The majority of women’s cricketers on minimum contracts will earn more than $100,000 a year after Cricket Australia and the players’ union announced a landmark $634m pay deal on Monday.
CA and the Australian Cricketers’ Association on Monday revealed details of a new five-year memorandum of understanding that will see professional women players share $133m – an increase from $80m in the previous agreement – and benefit from a 66% increase in payments.
Related: Teenager Phoebe Litchfield selected in Australia’s Women’s Ashes squad
Under the new deal, minimum and average CA women’s contracts will increase by 25%, while the number of contracts will increase from 15 to 18. Domestic players who do not play for Australia, who play both WNCL (50 over) and WBBL (T20) formats, can earn on average $151,019 annually, inclusive of match fees.
This makes them on average the highest-paid female players of team sports in Australia, with its nearest competitor being Super Netball where the minimum salary is $43,000 with no additional match payments. The AFLW minimum wage sits at close to $40,000, while NRLW is $30,000 and A-League Women’s is $25,000.
The WBBL salary cap will also increase to $732,000 per year in a bid to keep pace with the women’s Hundred in England, India’s WPL and other franchise leagues.
“Cricket now clearly offers the best earning opportunities of any team sport for elite female sportspeople,” CA CEO Nick Hockley said.
“I am particularly pleased this MOU represents another major step forward in the rise of women’s cricket with significant increases in remuneration for the inspirational role models of the world champion Australian women’s team and the WBBL who are driving substantial growth in female participation.”
Centrally-contracted Australian male players will have their pay increase by 7.5% to an average of $951,000 before match payments, while the squad will increase to 24 players.
At a domestic men’s level, more significant changes are coming. The men’s BBL salary cap will rise from $2m to $3m. That will allow the league’s top earners to be paid up to $420,000, with CA desperate to keep and attract new top-line talent. It comes after officials made the competition a priority last season, and agreed to reduce the number of games from 14 for each team to 10 for 2024-25 at the latest.
“We have recognised the need to ensure that the BBL remains highly competitive in a changing global cricket landscape,” Hockley said. “We’re confident this agreement will help maintain its place at the heart of the Australian summer.”
Overall, the changes represent a 26% pay rise for players across the sport, with the deal the first done between Hockley and ACA counterpart Todd Greenberg.
“There is enormous capacity for growth right across the women’s game, as well as the BBL, both of which we believe have enormous untapped potential,” Greenberg said. “Our men and women will benefit from significant investment into the BBL and WBBL, which will help ensure we have the best players playing.”
Copies of ASR 86 (Spring 2023) have been mailed to all subscribers
Contents:
Editorial An Economy Built On Cruelty
Wobbles Falling Wages, Climate Catastrophe
Syndicalist News FoodPanda, Alternative Unions, AIT Centenary compiled by Mike Hargis
Articles Profits of Doom: Green Syndicalism and Tar Sands Worker Deaths by Jeff Shantz
Labor Resurgence in Maine by Lisa Feldman
Is the Labor Movement Blowing It? by Alexis Buss
Shorter Hours, Everywhere But Here?
Workers’ Resistance to the Russia-Ukraine War by John Kalwaic
(R)Evolution in the 21st Century: Reflections on Syndicalist Strategy by Rasmus Hästbacka
The General Strike: Past, Present & Future by Jon Bekken
Curious Saviors of the Spanish Revolution: Myths of the POUM by Jeff Stein
Reviews Wild Socialism by Martin Comack
American Autocracy by Jeff Stein
A Passion For Work? by Jon Bekken
Redwashing Stalinism by Shelby Shapiro
Anarchist Women in Mexico by Jon Bekken
Letters Ukraine, Rebellion in Ir
CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M; WINK,WINK
Swiss prosecutors probe Credit Suisse ahead of UBS takeoverThe Canadian Press
Mon, April 3, 2023
GENEVA (AP) — The Swiss attorney general’s office says it has opened a probe into the events surrounding embattled bank Credit Suisse, which is to be taken over by rival UBS.
Switzerland's government and financial regulators helped engineer the hastily arranged, $3.25 billion agreement that was aimed in part to help calm worries about the global financial system and will leave the country with a single huge global bank.
The attorney general's office said Monday that it wanted to “proactively fulfill its remit and its responsibility to contribute to a clean Swiss financial sector.” It said that it has set up “monitoring” that would enable it to get involved immediately if any offenses were committed that come under its auspices.
The office said the probe falls short of a formal investigation and is not a criminal inquiry. The office was responding to an emailed request Monday for comment after the Financial Times reported about the probe over the weekend. The statement made no reference to UBS.
Both banks declined to comment about the probe.
Prosecutors said they want to gain an overview of the events surrounding Credit Suisse and to “secure and evaluate the available information” to analyze and identify any relevant offenses. It stressed that it cannot anticipate the result of the “clarifications” it has set in motion and didn't identify any specific possible offense.
The takeover of Credit Suisse — which is set to host its annual shareholder meeting in a Zurich stadium Tuesday — has drawn both praise and criticism in the prosperous country of about 8.5 million people.
Before the bank marriage was orchestrated on March 19, Credit Suisse was hemorrhaging deposits, shareholders were dumping its stock and creditors were rushing to seek repayment.
The bank faced years of troubles that predated financial turmoil spurred by the collapse of two U.S. banks, ranging from losses on hedge fund bets to fines over failing to prevent money laundering by a Bulgarian drug ring and not reporting secret offshore accounts that wealthy Americans used to avoid paying taxes.
The Associated Press
TASMANIA
Four decades on, has the Franklin River and those who fought to save it been forgotten?
Peter Hannam
Sun, 2 April 2023
Jeni Wallwork’s recent journey down Tasmania’s Franklin River was wild and treacherous but the 72-year-old trusted a splash of karma would get her through.
“My raft with four others capsized on the first day and we were stuck under water in the washing machine of a rapid for what seemed like a long time,” she says. “I thought about my mortality in those seconds … but should’ve realised that the river wouldn’t take a protester!”
Her “Amazon woman friend”, Kathy Fox, helped haul Wallwork back into her raft but the dumping meant “freezing almost to hypothermia for hours until we reached camp”. The eight-day trip was “the most terrifying, fear-inducing, challenging, exciting, beautiful, amazing thing I think I’ve ever done”.
Rafting on the Franklin River. Photograph: Andrew Bain/Alamy
Each year, fewer than 500 people take the chance to tackle one of the world’s most famous rafting rivers. For Wallwork, the odyssey had added poignancy, coming 40 years after she and her late husband, John Bright, joined thousands protesting in Tasmania and on mainland Australia to prevent the Franklin being dammed.
“I put a small amount of his ashes in the river the third day in. Of course he beat me to the end of the trip!” she says, adding later, “It’s sad that it was too late for John” who died four years ago.
Related: ‘The Franklin would be dammed today’: Australia’s shrinking environmental protections
All up, 1,272 protesters would be arrested over the four months to March 1983. Most were charged for trying to block bulldozers and construction workers near the proposed dam site on the Gordon River.
Both major parties in Tasmania – the Liberals then in government and Labor – backed at least two dams that would have flooded a large region of the Franklin catchment and tributaries. The Hawke government, which won office 40 years ago this month, launched action in the high court, securing a narrow 4-3 vote in its favour the following July that finally ended the project.
“It was wonderful to be thanked in person by our young rafting guides and young fellow rafters for protesting and thus saving the river for us all,” says Wallwork, an artist and designer, recalling marches in Hobart she and John attended.
The Gordon-below-Franklin dam would have delivered 172 megawatts of electricity, an amount that today seems almost trivial – it’s roughly what Australians now add every three weeks in rooftop solar capacity alone – and was not even needed at the time, says Andrew Blakers, an Australian National University professor.
Blakers, a doctoral student at the time of the blockade, made submissions to a Senate inquiry into the dam plans in lieu of protesting himself.
“My brother, father, mother and sister were in jail at the time I was writing,” he says, adding that his estimates of Tasmania’s power needs were far lower than projected by the Hydro-Electric Commission “and still higher than actually happened”.
Logbooks at the Newlands caves near the last major rapids on the Franklin and at the Sir John Falls hut on the Gordon River at the end of the 125km journey detail memories of blockaders grateful to have made it through the unspoilt wilderness, with its soaring ravines and lush rainforest.
“My first association with the Franklin was the Sydney protest march in early 1980s,” Felicity Hall wrote a year ago, illustrating her entry with a leatherwood in flower. “Fantastic to finally experience the Franklin in its wild state.”
“Group of 27 people joined to celebrate 30 years to the day that the Franklin River Blockade started. We are the UPRIVER MOB,” Alice Hungerford wrote in an entry dated 15-19 December 2012. “We have reclaimed this hut – the old hydroelectric Commission/Police camp – for the people.
“We have revisited the old camps, the old tracks, monitored the regrowth on the destruction site, and sang songs, eaten food and generally celebrated our beautiful world heritage,” Hungerford wrote.
Carmel, another member of the group, wrote it was “remarkable” to be part of a “family re-united directly opposite Warner’s Landing where we were arrested blockading the bulldozer. Uplifting to see how the rainforest has regrown.”
“Twenty-six years ago, the magistrate ordered me not to lurk, loiter, hide or secrete myself in the south-west of Tasmania,” wrote John McLaine in an entry after “an excellent trip” down the river in 2009. “I’m still defying those Blockade bail conditions!”
That those records and the hut itself have been preserved owes much to decades of devotion by David and Judith Clarke, members of the Franklin River Wildcare branch, who have coaxed dozens of volunteers to help save the history that governments haven’t been eager to celebrate.
David Clarke, a river guide who was honoured 30 years on for saving a rafter’s life, says many paddlers take the Franklin’s rescue for granted.
“It was an awakening,” he said last month during his latest work trip to restore the Sir John Falls hut. “The Franklin itself was just symptomatic of all of the beautiful places that had been destroyed in the past. We couldn’t afford to lose any more.”
Judith protested for a week at the blockade near Strahan even though her father worked for Hydro at the time as an electrical engineer. “He knew we had enough power.”
Four decades on, she says people should remember this as a seminal win for the environment.
“We’ve saved [the Franklin] for this generation but they don’t even know about it.”
• The author rafted the Franklin in January-February 2023
Four decades on, has the Franklin River and those who fought to save it been forgotten?
Peter Hannam
Sun, 2 April 2023
Jeni Wallwork’s recent journey down Tasmania’s Franklin River was wild and treacherous but the 72-year-old trusted a splash of karma would get her through.
“My raft with four others capsized on the first day and we were stuck under water in the washing machine of a rapid for what seemed like a long time,” she says. “I thought about my mortality in those seconds … but should’ve realised that the river wouldn’t take a protester!”
Her “Amazon woman friend”, Kathy Fox, helped haul Wallwork back into her raft but the dumping meant “freezing almost to hypothermia for hours until we reached camp”. The eight-day trip was “the most terrifying, fear-inducing, challenging, exciting, beautiful, amazing thing I think I’ve ever done”.
Rafting on the Franklin River. Photograph: Andrew Bain/Alamy
Each year, fewer than 500 people take the chance to tackle one of the world’s most famous rafting rivers. For Wallwork, the odyssey had added poignancy, coming 40 years after she and her late husband, John Bright, joined thousands protesting in Tasmania and on mainland Australia to prevent the Franklin being dammed.
“I put a small amount of his ashes in the river the third day in. Of course he beat me to the end of the trip!” she says, adding later, “It’s sad that it was too late for John” who died four years ago.
Related: ‘The Franklin would be dammed today’: Australia’s shrinking environmental protections
All up, 1,272 protesters would be arrested over the four months to March 1983. Most were charged for trying to block bulldozers and construction workers near the proposed dam site on the Gordon River.
Both major parties in Tasmania – the Liberals then in government and Labor – backed at least two dams that would have flooded a large region of the Franklin catchment and tributaries. The Hawke government, which won office 40 years ago this month, launched action in the high court, securing a narrow 4-3 vote in its favour the following July that finally ended the project.
“It was wonderful to be thanked in person by our young rafting guides and young fellow rafters for protesting and thus saving the river for us all,” says Wallwork, an artist and designer, recalling marches in Hobart she and John attended.
The Gordon-below-Franklin dam would have delivered 172 megawatts of electricity, an amount that today seems almost trivial – it’s roughly what Australians now add every three weeks in rooftop solar capacity alone – and was not even needed at the time, says Andrew Blakers, an Australian National University professor.
Blakers, a doctoral student at the time of the blockade, made submissions to a Senate inquiry into the dam plans in lieu of protesting himself.
“My brother, father, mother and sister were in jail at the time I was writing,” he says, adding that his estimates of Tasmania’s power needs were far lower than projected by the Hydro-Electric Commission “and still higher than actually happened”.
Logbooks at the Newlands caves near the last major rapids on the Franklin and at the Sir John Falls hut on the Gordon River at the end of the 125km journey detail memories of blockaders grateful to have made it through the unspoilt wilderness, with its soaring ravines and lush rainforest.
“My first association with the Franklin was the Sydney protest march in early 1980s,” Felicity Hall wrote a year ago, illustrating her entry with a leatherwood in flower. “Fantastic to finally experience the Franklin in its wild state.”
“Group of 27 people joined to celebrate 30 years to the day that the Franklin River Blockade started. We are the UPRIVER MOB,” Alice Hungerford wrote in an entry dated 15-19 December 2012. “We have reclaimed this hut – the old hydroelectric Commission/Police camp – for the people.
The Franklin itself was just symptomatic of all of the beautiful places that had been destroyed in the past
David Clarke, river guide
“We have revisited the old camps, the old tracks, monitored the regrowth on the destruction site, and sang songs, eaten food and generally celebrated our beautiful world heritage,” Hungerford wrote.
Carmel, another member of the group, wrote it was “remarkable” to be part of a “family re-united directly opposite Warner’s Landing where we were arrested blockading the bulldozer. Uplifting to see how the rainforest has regrown.”
“Twenty-six years ago, the magistrate ordered me not to lurk, loiter, hide or secrete myself in the south-west of Tasmania,” wrote John McLaine in an entry after “an excellent trip” down the river in 2009. “I’m still defying those Blockade bail conditions!”
That those records and the hut itself have been preserved owes much to decades of devotion by David and Judith Clarke, members of the Franklin River Wildcare branch, who have coaxed dozens of volunteers to help save the history that governments haven’t been eager to celebrate.
David Clarke, a river guide who was honoured 30 years on for saving a rafter’s life, says many paddlers take the Franklin’s rescue for granted.
“It was an awakening,” he said last month during his latest work trip to restore the Sir John Falls hut. “The Franklin itself was just symptomatic of all of the beautiful places that had been destroyed in the past. We couldn’t afford to lose any more.”
Judith protested for a week at the blockade near Strahan even though her father worked for Hydro at the time as an electrical engineer. “He knew we had enough power.”
Four decades on, she says people should remember this as a seminal win for the environment.
“We’ve saved [the Franklin] for this generation but they don’t even know about it.”
• The author rafted the Franklin in January-February 2023
Unravelling the threads that link us to the slave-owning past
The Guardian
Sun, 2 April 2023
Photograph: Christopher Jones/Alamy
My career in textiles from the 1970s to the 1990s took me many times to the mills of West Yorkshire and Lancashire. Being fascinated with old buildings, I marvelled at the architectural glories of the likes of Salts Mill, the Black Dyke Mills, Lister Mill in Bradford and many smaller, though equally impressive edifices. Never once did it cross my mind that these dark satanic mills were not only products of Yorkshire and Lancashire entrepreneurs, but built on the back of a vast network of slaves and slave-owning people who amassed the wealth of Great Britain in the industrial revolution.
Is it too patronising to congratulate the Guardian for the recognition of its involvement in this, with the founders of the paper being patrons and owners of companies involved?
The Guardian
Sun, 2 April 2023
Photograph: Christopher Jones/Alamy
My career in textiles from the 1970s to the 1990s took me many times to the mills of West Yorkshire and Lancashire. Being fascinated with old buildings, I marvelled at the architectural glories of the likes of Salts Mill, the Black Dyke Mills, Lister Mill in Bradford and many smaller, though equally impressive edifices. Never once did it cross my mind that these dark satanic mills were not only products of Yorkshire and Lancashire entrepreneurs, but built on the back of a vast network of slaves and slave-owning people who amassed the wealth of Great Britain in the industrial revolution.
Is it too patronising to congratulate the Guardian for the recognition of its involvement in this, with the founders of the paper being patrons and owners of companies involved?
David Olusoga’s wonderful research and work on this (Slavery and the Guardian: the ties that bind us, 28 March) should make us all think about how we have enjoyed the fruits of these industries. MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION
As a white, middle-class, elderly woman, I take my hat off to them and hope that we can all begin to see ourselves in a new light and set about realising where the privileges have come from that built the successful towns and cities in our country, and which shaped the lives of people of my background.
Sue Neave
Cleethorpes, North East Lincolnshire
• David Olusoga lifts the veil on the relations between slavery and the growth of Britain’s cotton industry. His article, revealing as it is of blind spots in official and folk histories, still misses a vital part of the narrative – how Britain came to command the global cotton industry through the deliberate destruction of the textile industry of India, the hitherto dominant producer of finished cottons.
Mechanisation of cotton production in British factories depended on securing a mass Indian market through the dispossession and starvation of the Bengali handloom weavers, a process that was then duplicated (as documented by Edward Thompson in The Making of the English Working Class) in the metropolis.
Empire was a system in which slavery was central, as was the transformation of the colonies into sources for the extraction of raw materials to feed the industries of the coloniser.
Chris Sinha
Cringleford, Norfolk
• A thousand thanks – what a tremendous emotional shakeup the articles in your Cotton Capital series gave me. Above all, the list of names of those slaves whom your journalists and investigators successfully identified. Behind each name is a tragic story that is impossible to understand from our position of comfort and security that we enjoy today. I would especially like to thank David Olusoga for his remarkable article.
We can never atone enough for the wrongs that our English ancestors did, and I am so grateful that you have decided to at least acknowledge the wrongs and make every effort to provide opportunities for others to find some sort of justice.
David Hesketh
Castanet Tolosan, France
• Here is my suggestion for a concrete, meaningful way that the Guardian can begin to pay reparations for its past ties to slavery: set up a fund to pay for schoolchildren in Ghana to visit Cape Coast Castle, one of the main slave-trading forts, for free. When I visited it a few years ago to give a lecture on the history of the slave trade, I was shocked to learn that Ghanaian children are charged to enter the castle, making this important historical site off-limits to many of them. This history is their history; they must learn about this past, and the Guardian can help them to do it.
Michelle Faubert
University of Manitoba, Canada
As a white, middle-class, elderly woman, I take my hat off to them and hope that we can all begin to see ourselves in a new light and set about realising where the privileges have come from that built the successful towns and cities in our country, and which shaped the lives of people of my background.
Sue Neave
Cleethorpes, North East Lincolnshire
• David Olusoga lifts the veil on the relations between slavery and the growth of Britain’s cotton industry. His article, revealing as it is of blind spots in official and folk histories, still misses a vital part of the narrative – how Britain came to command the global cotton industry through the deliberate destruction of the textile industry of India, the hitherto dominant producer of finished cottons.
Mechanisation of cotton production in British factories depended on securing a mass Indian market through the dispossession and starvation of the Bengali handloom weavers, a process that was then duplicated (as documented by Edward Thompson in The Making of the English Working Class) in the metropolis.
Empire was a system in which slavery was central, as was the transformation of the colonies into sources for the extraction of raw materials to feed the industries of the coloniser.
Chris Sinha
Cringleford, Norfolk
• A thousand thanks – what a tremendous emotional shakeup the articles in your Cotton Capital series gave me. Above all, the list of names of those slaves whom your journalists and investigators successfully identified. Behind each name is a tragic story that is impossible to understand from our position of comfort and security that we enjoy today. I would especially like to thank David Olusoga for his remarkable article.
We can never atone enough for the wrongs that our English ancestors did, and I am so grateful that you have decided to at least acknowledge the wrongs and make every effort to provide opportunities for others to find some sort of justice.
David Hesketh
Castanet Tolosan, France
• Here is my suggestion for a concrete, meaningful way that the Guardian can begin to pay reparations for its past ties to slavery: set up a fund to pay for schoolchildren in Ghana to visit Cape Coast Castle, one of the main slave-trading forts, for free. When I visited it a few years ago to give a lecture on the history of the slave trade, I was shocked to learn that Ghanaian children are charged to enter the castle, making this important historical site off-limits to many of them. This history is their history; they must learn about this past, and the Guardian can help them to do it.
Michelle Faubert
University of Manitoba, Canada
Mar 2, 2022 — Capitalism and Slavery, by the future first prime minister of Trinidad and Tobago Eric Williams, argues that the abolition of slavery was ...
UK
Grand National to allow protests despite Animal Rebellion threat to block race course
Will Bolton
Sun, 2 April 2023
Aintree Animal Rebellion - PAUL ELLIS/AFP via Getty Images
Protesters will be allowed at the Grand National despite a plot by Animal Rebellion activists to glue themselves together and block the race course.
Merseyside Police said that it “respected the right to peaceful protest”, but warned any criminal actions threatening the event would be dealt with “robustly”.
Members of Animal Rebellion, an offshoot of Extinction Rebellion, plan to form a human barricade across the course at Aintree, Merseyside, after sneaking into the event with ladders and bolt cutters, according to reports.
The group has vowed the uncovering of the plan by the Mail on Sunday will not prevent them going ahead with the action at the Grand National, and causing further disruption throughout the summer.
Merseyside Police has been given a dossier of evidence obtained by an undercover reporter at the newspaper posing as a member of the group.
The Countryside Alliance warned the activists’ “increasingly irrational and confrontational” tactics could put spectators at risk.
Mo Metcalf-Fisher, a spokesman for the group said: “While small in numbers, Animal Rebellion’s pattern of increasingly irrational and confrontational behaviour must serve as a red flag to Merseyside Police, who should exercise a zero tolerance approach towards any behaviour which threatens the welfare of attendees, riders and horses.”
The Jockey Club, which owns Aintree racecourse, declined to comment on the security arrangements it had in place.
Merseyside Police did not confirm whether it was aware of the activists' plans before the Mail on Sunday investigation.
A spokesman for the force said: “Merseyside Police has a robust policing plan in place for Aintree, as it does for any major public event, to ensure the safety and wellbeing of everyone involved.
“We have been working with our partners, including The Jockey Club, for a number of months in the build-up to this year’s festival to ensure that any necessary plans and processes are in place to deal with any incidents that may arise and to prevent any significant or ongoing disruption to racegoers and local residents and businesses.
“We respect the right to peaceful protest and expression of views, but public order or criminal offences will not be tolerated and will be dealt with robustly.”
A post on Animal Rebellion’s website branded this year’s race “The Last Grand National” and said it needed donations from supporters to “make this action happen”.
Will Bolton
Sun, 2 April 2023
Aintree Animal Rebellion - PAUL ELLIS/AFP via Getty Images
Protesters will be allowed at the Grand National despite a plot by Animal Rebellion activists to glue themselves together and block the race course.
Merseyside Police said that it “respected the right to peaceful protest”, but warned any criminal actions threatening the event would be dealt with “robustly”.
Members of Animal Rebellion, an offshoot of Extinction Rebellion, plan to form a human barricade across the course at Aintree, Merseyside, after sneaking into the event with ladders and bolt cutters, according to reports.
The group has vowed the uncovering of the plan by the Mail on Sunday will not prevent them going ahead with the action at the Grand National, and causing further disruption throughout the summer.
Merseyside Police has been given a dossier of evidence obtained by an undercover reporter at the newspaper posing as a member of the group.
The Countryside Alliance warned the activists’ “increasingly irrational and confrontational” tactics could put spectators at risk.
Mo Metcalf-Fisher, a spokesman for the group said: “While small in numbers, Animal Rebellion’s pattern of increasingly irrational and confrontational behaviour must serve as a red flag to Merseyside Police, who should exercise a zero tolerance approach towards any behaviour which threatens the welfare of attendees, riders and horses.”
The Jockey Club, which owns Aintree racecourse, declined to comment on the security arrangements it had in place.
Merseyside Police did not confirm whether it was aware of the activists' plans before the Mail on Sunday investigation.
A spokesman for the force said: “Merseyside Police has a robust policing plan in place for Aintree, as it does for any major public event, to ensure the safety and wellbeing of everyone involved.
“We have been working with our partners, including The Jockey Club, for a number of months in the build-up to this year’s festival to ensure that any necessary plans and processes are in place to deal with any incidents that may arise and to prevent any significant or ongoing disruption to racegoers and local residents and businesses.
“We respect the right to peaceful protest and expression of views, but public order or criminal offences will not be tolerated and will be dealt with robustly.”
A post on Animal Rebellion’s website branded this year’s race “The Last Grand National” and said it needed donations from supporters to “make this action happen”.
The Guardian view on carbon offsetting: an overhaul is overdue
Editorial
Sun, 2 April 2023
The emerging carbon offsets market is chaotic and dysfunctional. Problems need to be addressed openly, and resolved as quickly as possible. A joint investigation by the Guardian, the German weekly Die Zeit and SourceMaterial revealed in January that the vast majority of rainforest offset credits from the leading certifier – which are sold to companies that then use them to make claims about their overall emissions – do not offer the environmental benefits that they claim. Since then, scrutiny has only increased, with more questions being asked of the western businesses behind projects such as Kariba, a huge offset-promoted forest in Zimbabwe.
Recognising the urgent need to rebuild flagging confidence, if the carbon-trading system is not to collapse as it did once before, the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market last week announced that new rules for offset issuers will be announced in May. A separate process overseen by a different body is reviewing the claims that businesses make, based on their offset purchases. While all this might sound remote from the concerns of most people, the stakes could hardly be higher. Many environmentalists would prefer governments to oversee a transfer of resources from rich countries to the forested nations that need incentives to conserve precious carbon sinks. The reality is that due to the way our global economic system is organised, we all depend on market mechanisms.
As the body that certifies most offsets, including for household-name companies such as Disney and Shell, the Washington-based non-profit Verra is in a particularly awkward position. Last month it announced that its current rainforest programme would be phased out and replaced by July 2025. But it has also defended its current methodologies, describing them as the “best in class” for now. It is not clear whether organisations that use Verra credits will stick with them.
The danger of carbon offsets, frequently raised by campaigners, is that their primary function is greenwashing. Fossil fuel companies are among their biggest buyers; Verra has close ties to the industry. Allowing companies to declare themselves, or products including airline tickets, to be “carbon neutral”, is not just misleading – when the offsets have been shown to be flawed – but harmful. As well as giving businesses a licence to carry on polluting, it fuels the widespread fantasy that western lifestyles do not need to change, and that consumption can continue unabated.
There is also evidence that some credit schemes are not only failing to promote the role of Indigenous people as stewards of important habitats, but doing the opposite. Community leaders have complained of “carbon pirates” turning up in remote places with lucrative offers which turn out not to be what they seem.
Some carbon offset schemes have been shown to work, as a means of financing conservation. If the $2bn (£1.6bn) industry can learn from recent events, by increasing transparency and integrity, there is a chance that good practice can be built on, while poor practice is stamped out. If the voluntary carbon market fails, then alternative mechanisms must be found to honour the implicit promise of the Paris climate agreement, that the world’s forests will be worth more alive than dead. That we can’t trade or offset our way out of the climate crisis remains the most important message. Our planet’s resources are finite.
Editorial
Sun, 2 April 2023
The emerging carbon offsets market is chaotic and dysfunctional. Problems need to be addressed openly, and resolved as quickly as possible. A joint investigation by the Guardian, the German weekly Die Zeit and SourceMaterial revealed in January that the vast majority of rainforest offset credits from the leading certifier – which are sold to companies that then use them to make claims about their overall emissions – do not offer the environmental benefits that they claim. Since then, scrutiny has only increased, with more questions being asked of the western businesses behind projects such as Kariba, a huge offset-promoted forest in Zimbabwe.
Recognising the urgent need to rebuild flagging confidence, if the carbon-trading system is not to collapse as it did once before, the Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market last week announced that new rules for offset issuers will be announced in May. A separate process overseen by a different body is reviewing the claims that businesses make, based on their offset purchases. While all this might sound remote from the concerns of most people, the stakes could hardly be higher. Many environmentalists would prefer governments to oversee a transfer of resources from rich countries to the forested nations that need incentives to conserve precious carbon sinks. The reality is that due to the way our global economic system is organised, we all depend on market mechanisms.
As the body that certifies most offsets, including for household-name companies such as Disney and Shell, the Washington-based non-profit Verra is in a particularly awkward position. Last month it announced that its current rainforest programme would be phased out and replaced by July 2025. But it has also defended its current methodologies, describing them as the “best in class” for now. It is not clear whether organisations that use Verra credits will stick with them.
The danger of carbon offsets, frequently raised by campaigners, is that their primary function is greenwashing. Fossil fuel companies are among their biggest buyers; Verra has close ties to the industry. Allowing companies to declare themselves, or products including airline tickets, to be “carbon neutral”, is not just misleading – when the offsets have been shown to be flawed – but harmful. As well as giving businesses a licence to carry on polluting, it fuels the widespread fantasy that western lifestyles do not need to change, and that consumption can continue unabated.
There is also evidence that some credit schemes are not only failing to promote the role of Indigenous people as stewards of important habitats, but doing the opposite. Community leaders have complained of “carbon pirates” turning up in remote places with lucrative offers which turn out not to be what they seem.
Some carbon offset schemes have been shown to work, as a means of financing conservation. If the $2bn (£1.6bn) industry can learn from recent events, by increasing transparency and integrity, there is a chance that good practice can be built on, while poor practice is stamped out. If the voluntary carbon market fails, then alternative mechanisms must be found to honour the implicit promise of the Paris climate agreement, that the world’s forests will be worth more alive than dead. That we can’t trade or offset our way out of the climate crisis remains the most important message. Our planet’s resources are finite.
Campaigners in fight with energy giants over 100-mile pylon route through Highlands
Herald Scotland Online
Sun, 2 April 2023
Energy firm SSEN has put forward plans for a network of pylons to run for about 100 miles through the Highlands. (Image: PA)
Campaigners including a clan chief have vowed to fight power giants seeking to construct a “critical” new line of pylons through the Scottish Highlands.
Energy firm SSEN has put forward plans for a network of pylons to run for about 100 miles between Spittal, in Caithness, in the far north of Scotland, to Beauly, near Inverness.
The plans are seen as critical in moving renewable energy generated in the Highlands to more populated areas of central Scotland and England.
But a new campaign group has been formed in a bid to urge the power firm to reconsider parts of the route – with campaigners vowing to seek a public inquiry if the line as currently planned is “bulldozed through regardless of local feeling”.
Members of the Strathpeffer and Contin Better Cable Route Group want a third party to be brought in to work with both SSEN and local residents to plot a less disruptive route for the line.
As it stands, they fear pylons which are “Glasgow tower block size” could be “marching along the skyline, carving a swathe through the wood”.
READ MORE: 'Super pylon' plan emerges to run through Scots countryside
Group spokesman Dan Bailey said: “We’re talking as big as they get in terms of overhead pylons, through a landscape that has no built environment over a couple of storeys.”
HeraldScotland: Undated handout photo of Lower Strathconon.
Mr Bailey, from the Highland village of Strathpeffer, said the plans were for pylons between 50m and 60 in height to be placed every few hundred metres along the route – adding that the only consultation with residents had been about where in a 1km-wide strip of land these should be sited.
He said: “The line they have chosen as their preferred route, it is potentially the most damaging line they could have chosen on all sorts of measures, environmental, habitat loss, rare species, the fact that it carves through a really valuable local resource of recreational woodland that is used by walkers and mountain bikers in their thousands.
“It just damages the landscape setting of Strathpeffer, which is a historic Victorian spa village and a heritage centre. It is like nothing we will ever have seen.”
HeraldScotland: Undated handout photo of Ben Wyvis.
The Strathpeffer conservation area, the ancient Knockfarrel hill fort, Castle Leod and its woodlands, and the Loch Kinellan crannog, which is a scheduled monument, could all be impacted, campaigners say.
READ MORE: Highland road 'unsuitable for learners' named among world's most dangerous
Mr Bailey said residents of both Strathpeffer and the nearby village of Contin “feel like we are going to be collateral damage in the national drive to net zero”.
He claimed SSEN has drawn up its preferred route using desk-based computer modelling “with no on-the-ground assessments for habitat loss, rare species, the impact on landscape quality in a tourist area”.
He continued: “This will absolutely destroy the thing that brings people to the area.
“We are on the edge of the Highlands, we are a scenic, accessible location, we have got campsites, we have got hotels, mountain bike businesses, walking guides, wildlife watching, all of these things feed into the local economy and all of these things are under threat if you plough the line through the wrong part of our area.”
A different route could “substantially mitigate” the impact of the new power line, which SSEN is consulting on until April 14.
But with a lengthy public inquiry having to be held before approval was granted for the similar Beauly to Denny power line, Mr Bailey said: “We will do everything we can to try to trigger a public inquiry if the preferred route is just bulldozed through regardless of local feeling.”
He added: “Scottish ministers have a role to play in this, and the system they preside over is in danger of steamrollering local people.”
John Mackenzie, the Earl of Cromartie and the current chief of Clan Mackenzie, is among those voicing concerns.
He said that locals had been “told at short notice with limited time to assert our democratic rights, that 60m high pylons would be marching across our scenery, cutting across homes and villages as if this area was some industrial wasteland”.
He added: “This is not a wasteland, this is an area of natural beauty where people come to live because it is a good place to bring children up, to work and to appreciate just how wonderful it is.
“In Europe, power lines running across areas of outstanding scenery would be undergrounded, so why not here?”
Helen Smith of Rowan Tree Consulting, which specialises in tourism and heritage projects in the Highlands, said: “The huge threat to heritage in the Strathpeffer area is repeated right along the route from Caithness to Beauly.
“Every moor, strath and glen the pylons will cross has special sites, some dating back 6,000 years, and even if these sites do not end up with huge pylons on top of them, their surrounding landscape will be drastically affected.”
SSEN said that “in order to support the continued growth in onshore and offshore renewables across the north of Scotland, supporting the country’s drive towards net zero, further investment in network infrastructure is needed to connect this renewable power and transport it from source to areas of demand across the country”.
The company’s website added that “following extensive system studies, Spittal to Beauly has been identified as a critical corridor in establishing this required reinforcement”.
A spokesperson for SSEN Transmission said the project was “part of a GB wide programme of works that are required to meet UK and Scottish Government 2030 renewable targets”.
They added: “Whilst delivering this critical national infrastructure by 2030 requires an acceleration of the project development and delivery phases, we remain fully committed to work closely with the local community and wider stakeholders to help inform our design and it is important to note that the project remains in the early stages of development and no specific overhead line route alignments have been identified.
“We are currently seeking feedback on potential route options within approximately 1 kilometre wide areas and preferred substation locations, with this feedback helping inform more detailed overhead line route options and our proposed substation site selections, which we will further consult on later this year.”
Herald Scotland Online
Sun, 2 April 2023
Energy firm SSEN has put forward plans for a network of pylons to run for about 100 miles through the Highlands. (Image: PA)
Campaigners including a clan chief have vowed to fight power giants seeking to construct a “critical” new line of pylons through the Scottish Highlands.
Energy firm SSEN has put forward plans for a network of pylons to run for about 100 miles between Spittal, in Caithness, in the far north of Scotland, to Beauly, near Inverness.
The plans are seen as critical in moving renewable energy generated in the Highlands to more populated areas of central Scotland and England.
But a new campaign group has been formed in a bid to urge the power firm to reconsider parts of the route – with campaigners vowing to seek a public inquiry if the line as currently planned is “bulldozed through regardless of local feeling”.
Members of the Strathpeffer and Contin Better Cable Route Group want a third party to be brought in to work with both SSEN and local residents to plot a less disruptive route for the line.
As it stands, they fear pylons which are “Glasgow tower block size” could be “marching along the skyline, carving a swathe through the wood”.
READ MORE: 'Super pylon' plan emerges to run through Scots countryside
Group spokesman Dan Bailey said: “We’re talking as big as they get in terms of overhead pylons, through a landscape that has no built environment over a couple of storeys.”
HeraldScotland: Undated handout photo of Lower Strathconon.
Mr Bailey, from the Highland village of Strathpeffer, said the plans were for pylons between 50m and 60 in height to be placed every few hundred metres along the route – adding that the only consultation with residents had been about where in a 1km-wide strip of land these should be sited.
He said: “The line they have chosen as their preferred route, it is potentially the most damaging line they could have chosen on all sorts of measures, environmental, habitat loss, rare species, the fact that it carves through a really valuable local resource of recreational woodland that is used by walkers and mountain bikers in their thousands.
“It just damages the landscape setting of Strathpeffer, which is a historic Victorian spa village and a heritage centre. It is like nothing we will ever have seen.”
HeraldScotland: Undated handout photo of Ben Wyvis.
The Strathpeffer conservation area, the ancient Knockfarrel hill fort, Castle Leod and its woodlands, and the Loch Kinellan crannog, which is a scheduled monument, could all be impacted, campaigners say.
READ MORE: Highland road 'unsuitable for learners' named among world's most dangerous
Mr Bailey said residents of both Strathpeffer and the nearby village of Contin “feel like we are going to be collateral damage in the national drive to net zero”.
He claimed SSEN has drawn up its preferred route using desk-based computer modelling “with no on-the-ground assessments for habitat loss, rare species, the impact on landscape quality in a tourist area”.
He continued: “This will absolutely destroy the thing that brings people to the area.
“We are on the edge of the Highlands, we are a scenic, accessible location, we have got campsites, we have got hotels, mountain bike businesses, walking guides, wildlife watching, all of these things feed into the local economy and all of these things are under threat if you plough the line through the wrong part of our area.”
A different route could “substantially mitigate” the impact of the new power line, which SSEN is consulting on until April 14.
But with a lengthy public inquiry having to be held before approval was granted for the similar Beauly to Denny power line, Mr Bailey said: “We will do everything we can to try to trigger a public inquiry if the preferred route is just bulldozed through regardless of local feeling.”
He added: “Scottish ministers have a role to play in this, and the system they preside over is in danger of steamrollering local people.”
John Mackenzie, the Earl of Cromartie and the current chief of Clan Mackenzie, is among those voicing concerns.
He said that locals had been “told at short notice with limited time to assert our democratic rights, that 60m high pylons would be marching across our scenery, cutting across homes and villages as if this area was some industrial wasteland”.
He added: “This is not a wasteland, this is an area of natural beauty where people come to live because it is a good place to bring children up, to work and to appreciate just how wonderful it is.
“In Europe, power lines running across areas of outstanding scenery would be undergrounded, so why not here?”
Helen Smith of Rowan Tree Consulting, which specialises in tourism and heritage projects in the Highlands, said: “The huge threat to heritage in the Strathpeffer area is repeated right along the route from Caithness to Beauly.
“Every moor, strath and glen the pylons will cross has special sites, some dating back 6,000 years, and even if these sites do not end up with huge pylons on top of them, their surrounding landscape will be drastically affected.”
SSEN said that “in order to support the continued growth in onshore and offshore renewables across the north of Scotland, supporting the country’s drive towards net zero, further investment in network infrastructure is needed to connect this renewable power and transport it from source to areas of demand across the country”.
The company’s website added that “following extensive system studies, Spittal to Beauly has been identified as a critical corridor in establishing this required reinforcement”.
A spokesperson for SSEN Transmission said the project was “part of a GB wide programme of works that are required to meet UK and Scottish Government 2030 renewable targets”.
They added: “Whilst delivering this critical national infrastructure by 2030 requires an acceleration of the project development and delivery phases, we remain fully committed to work closely with the local community and wider stakeholders to help inform our design and it is important to note that the project remains in the early stages of development and no specific overhead line route alignments have been identified.
“We are currently seeking feedback on potential route options within approximately 1 kilometre wide areas and preferred substation locations, with this feedback helping inform more detailed overhead line route options and our proposed substation site selections, which we will further consult on later this year.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)