Tuesday, May 02, 2023

WGA Calls for Strike to Begin Tuesday, 
Slams Studios for Creating ‘Gig Economy’ That Aims to Turn Writing into ‘Entirely Freelance’ Profession

Story by Cynthia Littleton • Yesterday 

 Cheyne Gateley/Variety Intelligence Platform

The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers ended contract talks with the Writers Guild of America on Monday night, hours before the contract expiration deadline. The WGA responded by calling for a strike to begin on Tuesday.

The AMPTP cast the WGA as refusing to compromise on key issues and for “the magnitude” of its asks at the bargaining table.

“Negotiations between the AMPTP and the WGA concluded without an agreement today,” the AMPTP said in a statement issued Monday night. “The AMPTP presented a comprehensive package proposal to the Guild last night which included generous increases in compensation for writers as well as improvements in streaming residuals. The AMPTP also indicated to the WGA that it is prepared to improve that offer, but was unwilling to do so because of the magnitude of other proposals still on the table that the Guild continues to insist upon. The primary sticking points are ‘mandatory staffing,’ and ‘duration of employment’ — Guild proposals that would require a company to staff a show with a certain number of writers for a specified period of time, whether needed or not.

The WGA slammed Hollywood’s major employers for not responding to fundamental shifts in the entertainment economy.

“The companies’ behavior has created a gig economy inside a union workforce, and their immovable stance in this negotiation has betrayed a commitment to further devaluing the profession of writing,” the WGA said. “From their refusal to guarantee any level of weekly employment in episodic television, to the creation of a “day rate” in comedy variety, to their stonewalling on free work for screenwriters and on AI for all writers, they have closed the door on their labor force and opened the door to writing as an entirely freelance profession. No such deal could ever be contemplated by this membership.”

The AMPTP in its statement left the door open for more negotiations, saying it was “willing to engage in discussions with the WGA in an effort to break this logjam.”

But in the WGA’s view, “the studios’ responses have been wholly insufficient given the existential crisis writers are facing.”

Labor action by the WGA will have widespread repercussions across the industry. Topical TV series such as late-night comedy and daytime talk shows will be the first to feel the pinch.

The sides had been meeting since March 20 at AMPTP headquarters in Sherman Oaks. AMPTP leaders left the building around 8 p.m. on Monday night. WGA negotiating committee members followed about 30 minutes later and declined to comment to Variety.

The AMPTP’s statement points to issues around staffing of TV series as the primary sticking point for the talks. It’s understood that the WGA has sought guarantees for the number of writers to be hired on TV series as well as guarantees for the number of weeks that writers will be on the payroll. Concerns about the number of writers hired and the duration of their employment have been stirred up by massive changes in the way TV series are produced under the streaming and binge watching model.

As the contract expiration deadline approached, the WGA flexed its members muscle by conducting a strike authorization vote from April 11-17. Just shy of 98% of voters gave their OK for the WGA board to call a strike against Hollywood’s largest employers. The WGA’s latest strike authorization vote also drew a record voter turnout at 79% of eligible members in the WGA West and WGA East.

The impact of a strike would be far-reaching. Not only would a strike gradually shut down film and TV production across the country, the economic shock would have a ripple effect throughout Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, Atlanta and other production hubs. According to FilmLA, production in Los Angeles has slowed sharply over the past three months, dropping 24% compared with the first quarter of last year. Though it is difficult to disentangle the effects of broader corporate reorganizations and the cost-cutting that has accompanied these moves, FilmLA president Paul Audley says the labor situation “seems to have delayed the start of some programming.”

That’s the opposite of what happened just ahead of the 2007 writers strike, when studios accelerated production in the months before the deadline. That work stoppage lasted 100 days, from early November 2007 to mid-February 2008.

This round of bargaining comes at the end of a decadelong ramp-up in TV production. From 2009 to 2019, the number of working TV writers increased by 70%, according to guild data, bringing a flood of fresh talent into the business. Newer writers typically make minimum salaries — $4,546 per week for a staff writer or $7,412 for anyone above entry level. The boom has greatly expanded the number of writing jobs available in a year, but it also led to structural changes that dramatically changed the way writers get paid, as well as the nature of how they work. More recently, less-experienced writers have struggled to break in as more seasoned writers are the first choices for jobs that run for a shorter number of weeks than the 27-30 week norm of traditional network television.

The pandemic hit in 2020, and then investors started souring on the economics of Netflix and other streaming services two years later, leaving many of those new writers without a clear path forward in their careers.

“A lot of production companies and streamers were doing lots of overproduction of shows,” says David Goodman, past WGA West president and co-chair of the WGA negotiating committee along with another past WGAW president, Christopher Keyser. “We had this peak number of shows that were being made, but that’s now starting to shrink,” Goodman said.

At the same time, the shows that are getting produced have fewer episodes, leaving many writers looking for other jobs or unemployed for most of the year. The guild is seeking to push back with a proposal to set minimum staffing levels for TV, to help ensure that younger and less experienced writers have the ability to break into the business. Writers also want a more robust streaming residual, to tide them over in periods of unemployment.

But the companies — faced with a streaming business model that doesn’t generate much profit — seem in no mood to accede to those demands.

In its message to members, the WGA urged writers to hang tough together despite the hardships that may come with a strike. They also put the blame for the massive change across the industry on the companies on the other side of the table.

“Here is what all writers know: the companies have broken this business. They have taken so much from the very people, the writers, who have made them wealthy,” the WGA told members. “But what they cannot take from us is each other, our solidarity, our mutual commitment to save ourselves and this profession that we love. We had hoped to do this through reasonable conversation. Now we will do it through struggle. For the sake of our present and our future, we have been given no other choice.”

Late-Night Shows To Shut Down Immediately After Writers Guild Strike Called

Story by Peter White • Yesterday

 Provided by Deadline

Nightly talk shows including The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel Live! and The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon, are set to go dark starting on Tuesday after writers agreed to strike.

Late Night with Seth Meyers and The Daily Show, which had correspondent Dulcé Sloan host this week, also will be hit, while such weekly shows as Saturday Night Live, Real Time with Bill Maher and Last Week Tonight with John Oliver will be similarly impacted, though final decisions on those shows are expected to come later in the week.

The Late Show, Jimmy Kimmel Live!, The Tonight Show, Late Night and The Daily Show are all expected to pivot to re-runs.

Colbert was set to have Priyanka Chopra Jonas and Chita Rivera on Tuesday’s show, with Chris Hayes, Zach Cherry, Michael J. Fox and Shonda Rhimes lined up for later in the week. Fallon was set with Ken Jeong and Emma Chamberlain on Tuesday, with the likes of Jennifer Lopez, JJ Watt, Elle Fanning and Bowen Yang among guests for later in the week. Kimmel was welcoming Dr. Phil, Gina Rodriguez and The Pixies on Tuesday, with Melissa McCarthy, Will Poulter, Ricky Gervais, Anthony Carrigan and Smashing Pumpkins set for later in the week. The Daily Show was set to welcome authors Vashti Harrison and Jason Reynolds and former NFL All-Pro Brandon Marshall.

Seth Meyers, speaking on Late Night this afternoon, said: “I love writing. I love writing for TV. I love writing this show. I love that we get to come in with an idea for what we want to do every day and we get to work on it all afternoon and then I have the pleasure of coming out here. No one is entitled to a job in show business. But for those people who have a job, they are entitled to fair compensation. They are entitled to make a living. I think it’s a very reasonable demand that’s being set out by the guild. And I support those demands.”

Pete Davidson, whose Peacock comedy series Bupkis starts this week, was set for his SNL return on May 6. We hear that there are a number of possibilities for the Lorne Michaels-created show if there is a strike and that a decision is set to be made closer to showtime.

Speaking on The Tonight Show, Davidson joked that he was taking it personally. “It sucks because it just feeds my weird story I have in my head, like, of course that would happen to me.”

Two of the nightly hosts, Kimmel and Colbert, went through this situation in 2007-08, the latter as the host of The Colbert Report. Meyers was at Saturday Night Live during the last strike, and Oliver was on The Daily Show. Maher’s Real Time was also hit, with its season finale replaced by a rerun.

One of the issues in this year’s negotiation between the writers guild and the studios is also, in fact, surrounding late-night shows on streaming. As it stands, writers who work on “comedy variety programs made for new media,” such as Peacock’s The Amber Ruffin Show, do not qualify for MBA minimums, something the WGA has been fighting for.

Late-night showrunners have told Deadline that they will stay in touch with each other as the strike progresses to give a unified approach to the situation, something that didn’t happen in ’07-’08.

“I have been and will continue to talk to the other shows to see what they’re up to,” one showrunner said. “We’ve got to support the writers — our writers are amazing. That said, the rest of the staff is amazing, and I don’t want to see anybody lose their jobs or lose a paycheck. What’s the happy medium there? Figuring that out, it’s not been easy.”

One SNL star told Deadline: “We have to think about our crew too. I absolutely support the writers, and I want the writers to get what they deserve and need, but I don’t want our crew to be out of work. We can’t make this art without each other.”

WGA Leaders Say AMPTP Refused To Bargain On Guild’s Core Issues

Story by David Robb • 1h ago
Deadline


Writers Guild of America leaders are saying Monday night that the guild was forced to go on strike at midnight PT because their proposals to the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers on core contract issues “fell on deaf ears.”

Money is a big issue — the guild is seeking a new contract that would increase pay and benefits by $429 million over three years, but says that the studios only offered $86 million. But preserving writing as a profession is an even bigger issue and goes to the core of what the strike is about.

In a phone interview with Deadline shortly after the contract negotiations broke off, WGA West president Meredith Stiehm, and WGA negotiating committee co-chairs David A. Goodman and Chris Keyser – the latter two former WGA West presidents – described how the companies “stonewalled” the guild from the very beginning of the negotiations on a “constellation” of proposals that guild members are demanding.

RELATED: WGA Strike Picket Line Locations List And Times Set For Los Angeles & New York

“I’m just surprised by the conversations we did not have,” Stiehm said of the bargaining sessions. “We’ve been here for six weeks talking to them and those core proposals were literally ignored. And we made it very clear to them that 98% of our membership is demanding that we fight for something different; not just the usual negotiation that we’ve been having. We told them from the beginning that members are feeling an existential threat, and that they need to take this seriously. And it just fell on deaf ears. They just didn’t seem to hear us when we were telling them about the plight of writers and how much has gone wrong, and that they need to fix it. And they just didn’t seem to listen.”

“The biggest problem we had in this negotiation was that the companies would not engage on a slew of core issues that affect the ability of a writer to maintain a career,” Goodman said. “So we’re far apart in that the companies would not engage with us on those topics, so in that sense, we were far apart. There were other areas of negotiations in which we were able to negotiate things, but the companies stonewalled us on very important issues. They would not talk about them.”

Issues that the WGA says the AMPTP was unwilling to discuss, the guild says, include minimum staffing, the establishment of viewer-based streaming residuals, the use of artificial intelligence, and full pension and health contributions for writing teams.

The AMPTP said in a statement tonight that “the primary sticking points are ‘mandatory staffing,’ and ‘duration of employment’ – guild proposals that would require a company to staff a show with a certain number of writers for a specified period of time, whether needed or not.”

See the WGA’s proposals and the AMPTP’s offers here.


The AMPTP also said that it is “willing to engage in discussions with the WGA in an effort to break this logjam,” but guild leaders called that “disingenuous.”

Asked if the guild is willing to continue discussions, Goodman said: “We’re willing to talk about the issues we raised, but they’re not willing to engage with us on those issues. So, when they say they’re willing to talk, they’re being disingenuous. They’re willing to have us hang out at the AMPTP, but they’re not willing to have a negotiation around our core proposals.”

RELATED: WGA Strike Explained: The Issues, The Stakes, Movies & TV Shows Affected — And How Long The 2023 Work Stoppage Might Last

Keyser agreed. “They said, ‘Yeah. If you drop everything you want to talk about, we’ll talk to you about the things we want to talk about.’”

“They literally said that,” Goodman said. “‘If you drop all these proposals, then we can talk about the rest.’ And we’re not gonna do that. We’re here to negotiate a deal. We made a bunch of opening proposals that the companies would not, under any circumstances, consider. They literally told us we had to drop them all. That’s not a negotiation.”

With regard to minimum staffing, Keyser said: “Yeah, they say that that’s one of the things they’re not going to do, and I know they highlighted it because they think that’s to their advantage, but the truth is, minimum staffing is only one proposal that’s part of a constellation of proposals in all of the areas that go to the question: Can writers have a stable, steady income across a year and across a career? We are looking at a world in which they are slowly eliminating the number of weeks we work; the number of writers who work those weeks, and not paying writers for the value they create. We can’t let that happen. They won’t talk to us about AI; they won’t talk to us about guaranteed weeks of work for comedy/variety writers; they won’t talk to us about the fact that the effect of pre-greenlight mini-rooms mean that writers work for very few weeks and then they get rid of most writers for the rest of the television show. They won’t talk about any of those things.

RELATED: Late-Night Shows To Shut Down Immediately After Writers Guild Strike Called

“They won’t talk about writers who work into production, because writing happens all the way through the process. They are entirely closed off about that. And we believe they’re closed off about that because it is their intention to slowly eliminate our weekly employment and make a very limited kind of freelance workforce in all sectors of the business. And we told them from the very beginning that that’s not gonna happen in this negotiation.”


Best of Deadline
WGA Strike Picket Line Locations List And Times Set For Los Angeles & New York - Update
WGA Strike Explained: The Issues, The Stakes, Movies & TV Shows Affected — And How Long The 2023 Work Stoppage Might Last


Viewership Transparency, A.I. Among Issues Dividing Writers and Hollywood Companies in Contract Talks

Story by Borys Kit • 1h ago
The Hollywood Reporter


Viewership-based residuals, artificial intelligence and minimum staffing for writers room are some of the issues that the Writers Guild of America wanted to tackle that went nowhere with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, according to a document laid out by the writers on Monday night.

The proposals, and the alleged response by the studios, came after the AMPTP and the WGA ended negotiations Monday evening without a deal, with the WGA then calling for a strike to begin Tuesday.

According to the document, revealing for the first time the exact nature of what the WGA was asking for, there was some movement on issues such as staff writer script fees and an increase in span cap, but other issues proved to be non-starters. (The Hollywood Reporter has asked the AMPTP for comment on their alleged responses as told in the document.)

For streaning projects, the WGA asked for viewership-based residuals, in addition to their existing fixed residuals, “to reward programs with greater viewership,” according to the document. This would require viewership transparency, something that streamers have proved to be unwilling to do, even to the stars of shows and movies themselves. The WGA said the AMPTP rejected the proposal and refused to make a counter.

Concerns about AI taking over writing also are alleged to have been glossed over by the studios. The WGA wanted to regulate the use of AI and wanted assurance that AI could not be used to write or rewrite literary material, nor could it be used as source material. The AMPTP rejected the guild’s proposals, countering by offering annual meetings to discuss advancements in technology, the WGA said.

The features side showed some give and take, but the sides were still far apart as of Monday night. The WGA wants movies with a budget of $12 million-plus to receive their theatrical terms. The movie companies countered that movies should be $40 million or more and were willing to make a 9 percent increase to initial compensation, although there was “no improvement in residuals” offered, the WGA said.

The guild also wanted a guaranteed second writing “step,” or point of payment, for feature deals, while the producers rejected that idea and instead said they were willing to have meeting for executives and producers to educate them on writers’ “free work concerns.”

“The studios are more focused on greed than keeping people working,” observed one writer-producer when reading the proposals.

On the television side, the WGA and AMPTP are far apart on the guild’s efforts to “preserve” writers’ rooms with a proposal for a minimum of six writers per room and that number growing as the episode order does with one additional staffer added for every two episodes with a maximum of 12 per room. The proposal would effectively eliminate auteurs looking to write each and every episode of a series without the benefit of a room. The studios rejected the WGA’s proposals and have refused to counter, the guild said.

One of the other central issues at stake in the negotiations is the proliferation of so-called “mini rooms” that feature a handful of writers breaking stories before a formal series order, which is not always a guarantee. The guild is looking for guarantees of 10 straight weeks of work that include sending writers to set. The latter used to be a no-brainer for broadcast, but has fallen out of favor with studios and streamers given the added costs of getting writers to set. Some showrunners, like former WGA negotiating committee member Shawn Ryan (Netflix’s The Night Agent) have successfully requested streamers send writers to set as they look to help train the next generation.

Heading into negotiations, many writers and lit agents were concerned with “span,” which is the time it takes to make scripted series. Span protections would ensure that writers are fairly compensated for programming that may take years to complete, a trend that has been increasingly common in the Peak TV era of lavish premium content. The guild is proposing a minimum staff guaranteed 10 consecutive weeks of work and that writers are allowed at least three weeks per episode and half of the minimum staff be employed through production and one writer employed through postproduction. The studios rejected the proposals and declined to counter.

“They’re very, very far apart,” one showrunner with multiple series spread across broadcast and streaming platforms told THR after reviewing the proposals.

The WGA said its proposals would gain writers an estimated $429 million per year with the AMPTP’s offer coming in at about $86 million annually, 48 percent of which is from the minimums (wage floor) increase. The WGA proposed minimum increases of 6 percent/5 percent/5 percent across the board over the course of the three-year contract, including residuals. The studios countered with 4 percent/3 percent/2 percent, including a one-time increase to residual bases of 2 percent or 2.5 percent.

There was some progress made over the course of the weeks of bargaining however, the WGA says: Tentative agreements include staff writers earning script fees in addition to their weekly salaries, an increase in span cap from $400,000 to $450,000 and extending those protections to writers on limited series. The guild also offered one free “promotional” airing for broadcast series.

In its own statement Monday night, the AMPTP said that sticking points in the negotiations included the WGA’s push for a minimum size of writers’ room and minimum duration of a writers’ room. These proposals “would require a company to staff a show with a certain number of writers for a specified period of time, whether needed or not,” the AMPTP said.

The Alliance added that it presented a “comprehensive package proposal” of compensation and streaming residuals increases on Sunday night, just one day before the expiration of the writers’ contract. “The AMPTP also indicated to the WGA that it is prepared to improve that offer, but was unwilling to do so because of the magnitude of other proposals still on the table that the Guild continues to insist upon,” the group said.

More from The Hollywood Reporter


WGA Spells Out Vast Differences That Led to Strike

Story by Gene Maddaus •  
Variety
Yesterday 


The Writers Guild of America has detailed the vast differences between writers and the studios that led to the first strike in 15 years, which will begin Tuesday.

In a lengthy document, the guild spelled out its proposal for a TV staffing minimum, which would range from six to 12 writers per show, based on the number of episodes. That proposal is a non-starter for the studios, which declined to make a counter-offer.

The guild also wants a guaranteed minimum number of weeks of employment per season, ranging from 10 weeks to 52 weeks. The studios likewise rejected that proposal and did not make a counter-offer.

In a statement on Tuesday night, the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers called those the two “primary sticking points.” But the AMPTP said that it was willing to increase compensation and streaming residuals, and might have gone even farther than its last proposals, were it not for “the magnitude of other proposals still on the table that the Guild continues to insist upon.”

The guild also wants a streaming residual that would factor in the success of shows, but the studios rejected that offer. By the guild’s calculations, its proposals would cost $429 million per year. The guild said the studios’ counter-offers amounted to only $86 million per year.

The guild also wants regulation of artificial intelligence. According to the guild’s document, it is proposing that AI “can’t write or rewrite literary material,” and can’t be “used as source material.” Variety previously reported that the guild’s proposal was that AI material would not be “considered” as either literary or source material. The AMPTP agreed only to study the issue, according to the guild.

The guild is also proposing increases in minimums of 6%, 5% and 5%. The AMPTP is offering only 4%, 3% and 2%, according to the WGA.

The WGA is also seeking to create a new minimum tier for writer-producers. Under the current system, the minimum for everyone above staff writer is $7,412 per week. The guild wants everyone at the level of co-producer and above (producer, supervising producer, co-executive producer, etc.) to be have a minimum pay tier that is 25% higher than the tier for story editors and executive story editors. The AMPTP was willing to create a new tier, but with a minimum only 2-7% above the story editor level.

The WGA is also looking for a 25% premium for writers who work in a “pre-greenlight” writers room. The AMPTP was willing to give a 5% premium. The writers’ proposal also called for half of the minimum TV writing staff to be employed all the way through production, which would give writers producing experience. The AMPTP rejected that proposal and did not counter, according to the guild.

The document did spell out a few limited areas of agreement, including increasing the “span cap” from $400,000 per year to $450,000. Writers who earn less than that amount would be guaranteed that their episodic rate would cover no more than 2.4 weeks of work. The AMPTP also tentatively agreed to allow staff writers — the entry level in TV writing — to get script fees, which they do not currently get.

“Here is what all writers know: the companies have broken this business,” the guild leadership told members Monday night. “They have taken so much from the very people, the writers, who have made them wealthy. But what they cannot take from us is each other, our solidarity, our mutual commitment to save ourselves and this profession that we love. We had hoped to do this through reasonable conversation. Now we will do it through struggle. For the sake of our present and our future, we have been given no other choice.”

More from Variety
WGA Tells Writers to Be Ready to Picket if No Deal Is Reached
What Price Hollywood? For WGA Contract Talks, History Doesn't Have to Repeat Itself
WGA and AMPTP to Meet Saturday as Talks Go Down to Final 72 Hours

Hollywood writers to go on strike, bringing production on many television shows to a halt

Story by Chris Isidore • Yesterday 

More than 11,000 members of the Writers Guild of America (WGA) are set to go on strike Tuesday morning for the first time since 2007, a move that could bring an immediate halt to the production of many television shows and possibly delay the start of new seasons of others later this year.

“Though we negotiated intent on making a fair deal … the studios’ responses to our proposals have been wholly insufficient, given the existential crisis writers are facing,” said a statement from the union leadership.

“They have closed the door on their labor force and opened the door to writing as an entirely freelance profession. No such deal could ever be contemplated by this membership.”

While union members would be on strike as of 3 am EDT Tuesday, the WGA tweeted that it would not set up picket lines until Tuesday afternoon.

The studios, which disclosed that the talks ended late Monday just hours before the strike deadline without an agreement, responded by saying it was willing to improve on its offer but was not willing to meet some of the union’s demands.

“The primary sticking points are ‘mandatory staffing,’ and ‘duration of employment’ — Guild proposals that would require a company to staff a show with a certain number of writers for a specified period of time, whether needed or not,” said the statement from management’s negotiating committee.

“Member companies remain united in their desire to reach a deal that is mutually beneficial to writers and the health and longevity of the industry, and to avoid hardship to the thousands of employees who depend upon the industry for their livelihoods.”

The distance between the two sides suggested this could be the start of a long strike. The last strike that started in November 2007 stretched 100 days into February of 2008.

Many shows on cable and broadcast networks have already filmed their final episodes for the current season, but viewers could see an impact with late night shows, daytime soap operas and shows such as “Saturday Night Live,” which could have early ends to their seasons.

Show host Seth Meyers, who was on the picket line as a writer at SNL during the last strike, prepared his viewers that Late Night with Seth Meyers won’t be on the air if there is a strike. Other shows likely to be immediately impacted did not immediately respond to requests for comments about their plans.

Financial pressure

The strike comes at a time when both sides say they are feeling financial pain.

Many of the media and tech companies producing shows that use the writers have seen drops in their stock price, prompting deep cost cutting, including layoffs.

Management’s side of negotiations is represented by the Alliance of Motion Pictures and Television Producers (AMPTP), which represents Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), CBS (VIAC), Disney (DIS), NBC Universal, Netflix (NFLX), Paramount Global, Sony (SNE) and CNN’s parent company, Warner Bros. Discovery.

But the writers, many of whom can’t support themselves with writing alone, are suffering from reduced job opportunities and the loss of some sources of income due to an industry shift from traditional broadcast and cable programming to streaming services.

While not all members of the WGA are currently working, the strike could soon idle thousands of other workers on the sets of shows and movies. The strike could have widespread implications for the industry, and for the economies of Southern California and some other locations, such as New York City.

There could be as many as 20,000 people working on as many as 600 productions who could be out of work if the writers shutdown production, according to an estimate from AMPTP.

Rise of streaming


The 2007 strike caused an estimated $2 billion in economic damage, mostly in Southern California. Adjusted for inflation, that comes to nearly $3 billion today. The industry has changed radically in the 15 years since the last strike ended.

Those changes have accelerated since the last round of negotiations in 2020 in the early weeks of the pandemic. The rise of streaming services changed the way audiences consume both television shows and movies, and studios adjusted their business models in an attempt to respond.

Writers have traditionally gotten residuals when a show they wrote is sold to run again in syndication or on basic cable. It’s been an important source of income for many writers over the years. But they’re unlikely to get meaningful residuals, if any at all, when they create original content for streaming services as contracts stand today.

With streaming services poised to become the future of television entertainment, the Guild was fighting in these negotiations for some kind of ongoing compensation from streaming services.

The hunger for content by those streaming service also means that it might not take as long for the strike to start to impact production schedules. Typically broadcast shows due to air with the start of the fall season would be on hiatus for the next couple of months. But productions take place on a more year-round basis today than in the past.

Although many streaming services are not yet profitable, they provide the studios with a source of income from subscribers’ monthly fees, making them less dependent on advertising revenue that might be lost from the need to air reruns on broadcast or cable channels.

Streaming services also have a massive stockpile of older content that could keep their customers satisfied, at least temporarily, while they await new shows.

CNN.com

Hollywood writers, slamming 'gig economy,' to go on strike



NEW YORK (AP) — Television and movie writers declared late Monday that they will launch a strike for the first time in 15 years, as Hollywood girded for a walkout with potentially widespread ramifications in a fight over fair pay in the streaming era.

The Writers Guild of America said that its 11,500 unionized screenwriters will head to the picket lines on Tuesday. Negotiations between studios and the writers, which began in March, failed to reach a new contract before the writers’ current deal expired just after midnight, at 12:01 a.m. PDT Tuesday. All script writing is to immediately cease, the guild informed its members.

The board of directors for the WGA, which includes both a West and an East branch, voted unanimously to call for a strike, effective at the stroke of midnight. Writers, they said, are facing an “existential crisis.”

“The companies’ behavior has created a gig economy inside a union workforce, and their immovable stance in this negotiation has betrayed a commitment to further devaluing the profession of writing,” the WGA said in a statement. “From their refusal to guarantee any level of weekly employment in episodic television, to the creation of a ‘day rate’ in comedy variety, to their stonewalling on free work for screenwriters and on AI for all writers, they have closed the door on their labor force and opened the door to writing as an entirely freelance profession. No such deal could ever be contemplated by this membership.”

The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, the trade association that bargains on behalf of studios and production companies, signaled late Monday that negotiations fell short of an agreement before the current contract expired. The AMPTP said it presented an offer with “generous increases in compensation for writers as well as improvements in streaming residuals.”

In a statement, the AMPTP said that it was prepared to improve its offer “but was unwilling to do so because of the magnitude of other proposals still on the table that the guild continues to insist upon."

The labor dispute could have a cascading effect on TV and film productions depending on how long the strike persists. But a shutdown has been widely forecast for months due to the scope of the discord. The writers last month voted overwhelming to authorize a strike, with 98% of membership in support.

At issue is how writers are compensated in an industry where streaming has changed the rules of Hollywood economics. Writers say they aren’t being paid enough, TV writer rooms have shrunk too much and the old calculus for how residuals are paid out needs to be redrawn.

“The survival of our profession is at stake,” the guild has said.

Streaming has exploded the number of series and films that are annually made, meaning more jobs for writers. But WGA members say they’re making much less money and working under more strained conditions. Showrunners on streaming series receive just 46% of the pay that showrunners on broadcast series receive, the WGA claims. Content is booming, but pay is down.

The guild is seeking more compensation on the front-end of deals. Many of the back-end payments writers have historically profited by – like syndication and international licensing – have been largely phased out by the onset of streaming. More writers — roughly half — are being paid minimum rates, an increase of 16% over the last decade. The use of so-called mini-writers rooms has soared.

Related video: Hollywood TV, film writers get closer to strike 
(KTLA-TV Los Angeles)  Duration 2:23 View on Watch

The AMPTP said Monday that the primary sticking points to a deal revolved around those mini-rooms — the guild is seeking a minimum number of scribes per writer room — and duration of employment restrictions. The guild has said more flexibility for writers is needed when they’re contracted for series that have tended to be more limited and short-lived than the once-standard 20-plus episode broadcast season.

At the same time, studios are under increased pressure from Wall Street to turn a profit with their streaming services. Many studios and production companies are slashing spending. The Walt Disney Co. is eliminating 7,000 jobs. Warner Bros. Discovery is cutting costs to lessen its debt. Netflix has pumped the breaks on spending growth.

When Hollywood writers have gone on strike, it’s often been lengthy. In 1988, a WGA strike lasted 153 days. The last WGA strike went for 100 days, beginning in 2007 and ending in 2008.

The most immediate effect of the strike viewers are likely to notice will be on late-night shows and “Saturday Night Live.” All are expected to immediately go dark. During the 2007 strike, late-night hosts eventually returned to the air and improvised material. Jay Leno wrote his own monologues, a move that angered union leadership.

On Friday’s episode of “Late Night,” Seth Meyers, a WGA member who said he supported the union’s demands, prepared viewers for re-runs while lamenting the hardship a strike entails.

“It doesn’t just affect the writers, it affects all the incredible non-writing staff on these shows,” Meyers said. “And it would really be a miserable thing for people to have to go through, especially considering we’re on the heels of that awful pandemic that affected, not just show business, but all of us.”

Scripted series and films will take longer to be affected. But if a strike persisted through the summer, fall schedules could be upended. And in the meantime, not having writers available for rewrites can have a dramatic effect on quality. The James Bond film “Quantum of Solace” was one of many films rushed into production during the 2007-2008 strike with what Daniel Craig called “the bare bones of a script.”

“Then there was a writers’ strike and there was nothing we could do,” Craig later recounted. “We couldn’t employ a writer to finish it. I say to myself, ‘Never again’, but who knows? There was me trying to rewrite scenes — and a writer I am not.”

With a walkout long expected, writers have rushed to get scripts in and studios have sought to prepare their pipelines to keep churning out content for at least the short term.

“We’re assuming the worst from a business perspective,” David Zaslav, chief executive of Warner Bros. Discovery, said last month. “We’ve got ourselves ready. We’ve had a lot of content that’s been produced.”

Overseas series could also fill some of the void. “If there is one, we have a large base of upcoming shows and films from around the world,” said Ted Sarandos, Netflix co-chief executive, on the company’s earnings call in April.

Yet the WGA strike may only be the beginning. Contracts for both the Directors Guild of America and SAG-AFTRA, the actors union, expire in June. Some of the same issues around the business model of streaming will factor into those bargaining sessions. The DGA is set to begin negotiations with AMPTP on May 10.

The cost of the WGA’s last strike cost Southern California $2.1 billion, according to the Milken Institute. How painful this strike is remains to be seen. But as of late Monday evening, laptops were being closed shut all over Hollywood.

“Pencils down,” said “Halt and Catch Fire” showrunner and co-creator Christopher Cantwell on Twitter shortly after the strike announcement. “Don’t even type in the document.” ___

Follow AP Film Writer Jake Coyle on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/jakecoyleAP

Jake Coyle, The Associated Press

Ancient 'Bear Bone' Reveals a Hidden Truth About Native American Ancestry

Story by David Nield • Yesterday

Tlingit indian© Provided by ScienceAlert

Sometimes you need to make sure you know what you're looking at before its scientific value is made clear – and that's the case with a 3,000-year-old piece of human bone initially thought to have come from a bear.

The remains were discovered in Lawyer's Cave in Southeast Alaska. The cave is on the mainland, east of Wrangell Island, and in the Alexander Archipelago, in an area inhabited by the Indigenous Tlingit people.

In cooperation with the Wrangell Tribe that now lives in the area, the ancient individual whose remains were found was named 'Tatóok yík yées sháawat' (TYYS for short). It translates as 'Young lady in cave'.

"We realized that modern Indigenous peoples in Alaska, should they have remained in the region since the earliest migrations, could be related to this prehistoric individual," says evolutionary biologist Alber Aqil from the University at Buffalo in New York.

After a detailed genetic analysis of the bone fragments, the researchers discovered that TYYS is closely related to the region's current inhabitants, in genetic terms – the modern coastal Pacific Northwest tribes Tlingit, Haida, Nisga'a, and Tsimshian.

This evidence of genetic continuity passed through the female line over the course of at least three millennia backs up the Tlingit declaration that they have been custodians of this part of Alaska since "time immemorial".


Live ScienceAncient Bear Dog Found in France
2:12



There aren't many other remains in this part of the world dating back thousands of years that have been discovered to date, but there are a few. Researchers compared them with TYYS to better understand how populations would have spread across this region.



TYYS was compared to remains from other parts of Alaska.
 (University at Buffalo)© Provided by ScienceAlert

"Based on TYYS's nuclear genome, this individual is more closely related to Pacific Northwest coastal individuals than to inland peoples," write the researchers in their published paper.

"We find that the split between the coastal and inland peoples of the northern Pacific Northwest took place before ∼6,000 years ago."

That divergence between coastal and inland peoples is important for studying how North and South America were first inhabited. Travelers were thought to have crossed the Bering Land Bridge from Siberia some 17,000 years ago, though increasing alternate evidence exists.

As always, more research is needed to work out exactly what happened all those years ago, and discoveries are being made all the time; the genetic analysis carried out here wouldn't have been possible 20 years ago, the study authors say.

The only problem is the rarity of remains like these. That makes the discovery of TYYS an important new data point for researchers – at least once it had been established that it was a human rather than an animal.

"Many specifics of the population histories of the Indigenous peoples of North America remain contentious owing to a dearth of physical evidence," write the researchers.

"Only a few ancient human genomes have been recovered from the Pacific Northwest Coast, a region increasingly supported as a coastal migration route for the initial peopling of the Americas."

The research has been published in iScience.
GOOD NEWS FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE
'Anti-woke' group loses elections at Law Society of Ontario

Story by Tyler Dawson • Yesterday

Toronto's Osgoode Hall, home of the Law Society of Ontario.© Provided by National Post

In the fight for control of the Law Society of Ontario, a slate of progressive candidates held the line against a group positioning themselves as the “anti-woke” alternative in board elections.

The coalition, calling themselves FullStop, ran under the slogan “stop bloat, stop creep, stop woke.” In addition to concerns over legal fees and the size of the society’s staff, the coalition also takes the position that there’s ideological mission creep within the law society.

Yet, in voting last Friday, the FullStop candidates were roundly defeated by the Good Governance Coalition, which had positioned itself as a “common sense” alternative to the “extreme” FullStop candidates.

Lawyers are governed by a board of directors, called “benchers,” who meet several times a year in a “convocation.” They make various decisions affecting the legal profession in Ontario, such as participating in disciplinary hearings and developing policy. Forty Good Governance lawyers and five paralegals were elected to the board. While FullStop didn’t have a single successful candidate, one of their lawyers may be able to take a board position vacated by the treasurer.

As the culture wars seep into various institutions, law societies have hardly been immune. In Alberta, a number of insurgent lawyers attempted — and failed — to change the Law Society of Alberta’s rules to eliminate a specific course in Indigenous history and culture.

“In our view, the Law Society has lost its way,” the FullStop group says on its website. “It has strayed from its core mandate of ensuring competence and ethical conduct in the public interest. Instead, it has increasingly become a political institution with a political agenda.”

In a YouTube video explaining why he was running for re-election as a bencher, Murray Klippenstein, a Toronto lawyer, put it more bluntly: A “wokeist cult,” he said, has “taken over the law society.”

FullStop emerged out of an earlier coalition, called StopSOP, which sought to repeal a statement of principles that the law society had adopted in 2016. It called on lawyers to affirm they supported diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.

In that, they succeeded: Back in 2019, the statement was repealed, as the StopSOP candidates had a number of seats as benchers. They argued the statement of principles amounted to “compelled speech.”

The group, wrote Ottawa lawyer Michael Spratt in the publication Canadian Lawyer, succeeded primarily in “bringing chaos and poisonous politics rarely seen at Osgoode Hall.”

For the 2023 election, the coalition evolved into FullStop.

Lisa Bildy, a London, Ont., lawyer and FullStop candidate, told the Law Times that the other slate of candidates, which she called “the big governance slate” believed the law society should be a political regulator.

“Its candidates are committed to making the law society a woke institution. They insist the legal profession in Ontario is systemically racist. They expect lawyers to toe an ideological line to be permitted to practice law,” Bildly said.

It had the support of a number of prominent lawyers and pundits, including National Post’s Conrad Black , who wrote that if FullStop’s opponents won, it would “be a catastrophic disorientation of society’s most influential profession.” (The slate of candidates included Howard Levitt, who writes a legal column for the Financial Post.)

CRIMINAL CAPITALI$T GAVE UP CITIZENSHIP 
TO BECOME BRITISH LORD GETS IT BACK

















Bruce Pardy, a Queen’s University law professor who worked on the FullStop campaign, said the future of FullStop remains to be seen, noting that such groups could be banned by the law society in the future.

“It is difficult to see how reform movements could get a foothold in the future. We are grateful to our supporters for their courage and vision. They understood the moment,” Pardy wrote in an email to National Post.

The battle within the law society in recent years has involved other issues, including a proposal to have an official name reader at the call-to-the-bar ceremony to ensure that new lawyers’ names were pronounced correctly in what is a day of significance for those beginning their legal careers.

Bruce Pardy: Ontario lawyers must vote against the woke onslaught

The campaign itself, normally a quiet law society affair, was waged on social media, as lawyers dredged up information on competing candidates and their views relating to various aspects of the culture wars. For example, one oft-shared tweet is from StĂ©phane SĂ©rafin, a University of Ottawa law professor who wrote on Twitter that the “cultural left’s fixation on drag shows for children is weird and, dare I say it, a bit predatory?”

Chris Horkins, a Toronto lawyer, campaigned vociferously on social media against FullStop’s attempts to gain seats on the board in what was “probably the most important election in the LSO’s history.”

“It’s a vote of confidence for what most lawyers in this province believe — which is that having a diverse bar, having a profession that everybody has equal access to, and opportunity to thrive in, regardless of who they are, is important,” said Horkins in an interview. “And it’s a rejection of these sorts of extreme, fringe beliefs that FullStop was promoting.”

The FullStop group had also raised concerns about the disciplinary action taken against Jordan Peterson by the Ontario College of Psychologists, and warned that lawyers could face mandatory training.

“The new re-education and public narrative super-powers recommended for (the disciplinary committee) could enable the cancel culture mob to label one of your social media posts as an offensive micro-aggression that somehow brings the profession into disrepute,” wrote Joseph Chiummiento, a FullStop candidate, in a February newsletter .

The Good Governance Coalition had been endorsed by a number of groups, including the Criminal Lawyers’ Association.

“We welcome (lawyers’ and paralegals’) choice of diversity over division and look forward to serving the public interest,” wrote the coalition, in a statement on its website.


— With additional reporting by the Ottawa Citizen

• Email: tdawson@postmedia.com | Twitter: tylerrdawson
Union wants to see talks resume in Windsor Salt strike

Story by CBC/Radio-Canada • Yesterday

A union representing striking Windsor Salt workers wants to see both sides return to the table after negotiations were halted last week in wake of an assault at the Ojibway mine.

Bill Wark, with Unifor Local 1959, says he's hoping talks can resume as soon as possible.

"We need a renewed interest by the company to get back and reach a fair resolve and get us back to work," he said. "People need to get back to work. The company needs to get back to work and the community needs us to get back to work."

Windsor Salt said in a statement last week that no new talks are scheduled at this time.


Employees from Windsor Salt stand on the picket line.
© Darryl G. Smart/CBC News

Wark made the comments on Monday at the Windsor Salt picket line, where celebrations for May Day took place. The day is recognized by the labour community on the first day of May each year to commemorate labour movements across the world.

On Feb. 17, Unifor Locals 240 and 1959 units — representing about 250 Windsor Salt employees — walked off the job. A union spokesperson previously told CBC News, that workers went on strike due to de-unionizing actions by the mine's owner Stone Canyon Industries.



Bill Wark, with Unifor Local 1959, at a May Day rally on the picket line at Windsor Salt.
© Dale Molnar/CBC

Windsor Salt announced last week that it was suspending negotiations after a worker was assaulted.

In a statement, the company said three masked people illegally entered the mine and struck an employee repeatedly with baseball bats. Windsor police confirmed an assault took place, but didn't share further details.

Mario Spagnuolo, the interim president of Windsor's labour council ,says "corporate greed" is what's keeping Windsor Salt and its local unions from reaching a deal.

He accused Windsor Salt of not negotiating in good faith. The company disputes this, saying last week that it had been doing so since the start of the process.

"I know that the workers want to see a deal and I know their community wants to see them get a deal because it hurts to see them out this long."
CRIMINAL CAPITALI$M
N.W.T. First Nation accuses head of economic development arm of diverting millions

Story by The Canadian Press • Yesterday 

N.W.T. First Nation accuses head of economic development arm of diverting millions© Provided by The Canadian Press

YELLOWKNIFE — A Northwest Territories Supreme Court justice has ordered that Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation companies be put in the care of a receiver-manager as the First Nation accuses the head of its business arm of misappropriating millions of dollars through self-dealing.

The First Nation and Chief James Marlowe filed suit against Ron Barlas, his wife, Zeba Barlas, and several companies last week, accusing Barlas of oppression, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and fraud. In court documents, they allege that Barlas, through "duplicity, threats and legal manoeuvring," had "illegally seized control" of the First Nation's companies and diverted an estimated $10 to $14 million from them to companies controlled by him and his wife over several years.

Barlas, who has been chief executive officer of Denesoline Corporation Ltd. since 2014, has denied any wrongdoing and said in a statement he plans to challenge the claims. None of the allegations have been proven in court.

The Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation has approximately 800 members and about 350 people are estimated to live in the remote community on the East Arm of Great Slave Lake.

Denesoline Corporation is the economic development arm of the First Nation and is responsible for business negotiations and management of various joint ventures. Its primary source of revenue comes from contracts with the three diamond mines in the territory, with which the First Nation has agreements.

Marlowe and the First Nation allege that since being hired as chief executive officer of Denesoline, Barlas has taken control of Ta'egera Company Ltd., a real estate holding corporation, and Tsa Corporation, a non-profit that owns Denesoline and Ta'egera, through invalid means. They allege these companies are no longer being operated for the benefit of First Nation members, they lack proper governance and oversight, and Tsa has not held an annual general meeting since 2019.

They further allege three companies — Northern Consulting Group Inc., Equipment North Inc., and Dene Aurora Environmental Technologies Inc. — are "alter-egos" of Barlas and his wife. They allege that these companies perform no independent work and have been used to divert and hold funds and assets that rightfully belong to the First Nation. In particular, the suit claims a joint venture between Denesoline and Northern Consulting Group was created to divert 49 per cent of revenues generated by Denesoline from other joint venture contracts, which they allege Barlas concealed from Tsa members.

Related video: Treaty 9 First Nations leaders say their message is clear, no development without us as partners (cbc.ca)   Duration 6:00  View on Watch





Other allegations the First Nation has made against Barlas include that Ta'egera purchased his family's home in Yellowknife, Equipment North bought an aeroponic farm that Barlas sold to Denesoline for $140,000 in profit but sent it to a former colleague in B.C. rather than Lutsel K'e, and that Denesoline paid $40,000 for renovations to a property owned by Equipment North in Yellowknife as well as $15,000 in monthly rent to the company.

Barlas has denied any wrongdoing and said the affidavits filed in support of the First Nation's suit contain "numerous false, unfounded or misleading allegations." He stated in his own affidavit that no funds have been diverted to companies owned and controlled by him or his family, full disclosure has been provided to Tsa members and he purchased his home with his own money.

"I have never taken funds which belong to the community, I have never taken steps to take over control of the corporations," he wrote.

Barlas said in an affidavit that Denesoline is the only Indigenous community-owned company to have no debts, has been awarded a Canadian Business Excellence Award annually from 2019 to 2023 and provides significant benefits to the community. In it, he also included an email attributed to former Lutsel K'e Dene First Nation chief Darryl Marlowe stating Barlas had "done more for the community of Lutsel K'e than anyone over the past 10 years" and that all of his agreements were signed lawfully.

The First Nation and its current chief applied to the court last week for an interim order appointing Riley Farber Inc., a business advisory firm with offices in Calgary, as receiver-manager of Denesoline, Tsa and Ta'egera while litigation proceeds. They also requested an interim Mareva injunction, which allows the court to freeze the assets of a defendant, to prevent the respondents from potentially dissipating funds or destroying evidence. They expressed concern that a large payment was pending to Denesoline, arguing there was "serious risk" those funds could be diverted.

An affidavit from Angela Bigg, president and chief executive officer of Diavik Diamond Mines Inc., indicates that a total of $13.5 million was due to Denesoline-related entities by the end of April and further invoices totalling $6 million are expected in the coming weeks.

Deputy Justice William Grist granted both orders on Friday, which he said were "extraordinary," noting there was "some urgency" given the significant funding due.

The temporary orders are subject to review. The Maerva injunction order states it will cease to have effect if Barlas provides the court $9 million in financial security.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 1, 2023.

This story was produced with the financial assistance of the Meta and Canadian Press News Fellowship.

Emily Blake, The Canadian Press
END OF TWO DECADE DROUGHT
Leafs amazed by home support as playoff run continues
Story by Lance Hornby • Yesterday 
Toronto Sun


The crowds are going wild in Maple Leaf Square and all over the city as the Leafs continue their playoff campaign, and Leafs goaltender Ilya Samsonov can’t get enough. “Just huge. So nice,” he said.
 Chris young/THE CANADIAN PRESS© Provided by Toronto Sun

After Ilya Samsonov helped secure Game 6 on Saturday in Tampa Bay, his wife sent him some video of the party scenes back home that the overtime win had sparked.

They included the thousands reacting in real time in Maple Leaf Square, the honking horns and Leaf flags in the streets. People climbing light poles on Bremner Boulevard.

“Just huge, so nice” said the Russian goaltender. “She said it was so loud after we won and because we live downtown, our baby (one-month-old son Miroslav) is almost waking up.”

After their own emotional scene on the ice and in the visitors’ room at Amalie Arena, other Leafs caught clips of the celebrants. Morgan Rielly had been told to expect this whenever the team got past the first round, but it took 10 years. For impatient revellers it had been 19 seasons.

“To win one is like a breath of fresh air,” the defenceman said. “We all knew pretty quickly what was happening here, because we had friends in the Square. It’s so cool. We feel so lucky to have this kind of support and don’t take it for granted. It makes you want to win more for them.”

Another veteran blueliner Luke Schenn, whose first stint in Toronto as a young draft pick had no playoff series, had now been in two Cup parades in Tampa, but wants to keep the streets filled post-game here.

“That was wild, all the fans holding up jerseys,” he said. “Seemed like it brought a ton of people a lot of joy. People have been waiting for that a long time.

“It kind of brings people closer together. We have some who probably grew up talking about the history of the Leafs with their parents or grandparents and friends. That’s what you want sports to be.”

Samsonov came home Sunday and stepped out to dinner with a couple of Russian-speaking Marlies where he was quickly recognized by a few fans.

“They said ‘congrats, good job boys’. I know how important the first round is for this city.”

lhornby@postmedia.com
How encrypted Victorian newspaper personal ads shaped fiction like Sherlock and Enola Holmes
Story by Nathalie Cooke, Professor of English and Associate Dean (McGill Library), McGill University  Jacquelyn Sundberg, Outreach Librarian, McGill Library, McGill University
 • Yesterday THE CONVERSATION

How familiar are you with the Victorian-era newspaper feature known as the Agony Column? You are likely familiar with its methods and central plot lines, even if you don’t know what it is!

Anonymous personal advertisements made up the Agony Column in the mid- to late- 19th century. Authors of these advertisements sometimes coded them using different kinds of numbered ciphers and pseudonyms.

Although the Agony Column no longer exists as it did in the 19th century, our research has documented how private messages on this public forum have had an enduring impact on fiction, entertainment and popular culture.
Power of encryption

Encryption gave authors writing personal messages the ability to share private messages in a public forum. Personal dramas unfolding there day after day meant the Agony Column was widely popular in 19th-century English newspapers.

In 1881, a book was published about these private messages, in which editor Alice Clay wrote:

“Most of the advertisements … show a curious phase of life, interesting to an observer of human existence and human eccentricities. They are veiled in an air of mystery … but at the same time give a clue unmistakable to those for whom they were intended.”


Nearly all original and modern reworkings of Sherlock Holmes contain a plethora of newspaper codes to crack, harkening to the Agony Column.© (Shutterstock)
Longing, tragedy and the everyday

Advertisements written by individuals from across the British Empire were dubbed “the agonies” by 1853 because they were full of longing, tragedy and profound misfortune shadowing the Victorian domestic everyday. They occupied prime real estate in the second column on the front page of The Times.

Messages featured voices of desperate parents, forlorn lovers and savvy detectives. Many were published anonymously or under pseudonyms, making it impossible for most readers to know who wrote them.

As interest grew, the private was increasingly made public. Readers not only followed the episodic narratives, but also worked to crack the most puzzling codes and ciphers.

Detectives and amateur enthusiasts alike followed the drama of the agonies. As Stephen Winkworth wrote in Room Two More Guns: the Intriguing History of the Personal Column of the Times, the Agony Column became “more a meeting-place than a market-place and a forum where national quirks and characteristics can be expressed, where lovers can make their rendezvous and lost causes can be proclaimed.”



Fascination shaped novels

During the Victorian era, fascination with the Agony Column shaped both newspapers and novels.

Elements of sensational stories like the Constance Kent Road Hill House murder from front-page news began to appear in novels like Lady Audley’s Secret.

Original and modern reworkings of Sherlock Holmes contain a plethora of newspaper codes to crack. In the 2020 Netflix film adaptation of Enola Holmes, based on Nancy Springer’s novels, Sherlock Holmes’ case-cracking younger sister, Enola, communicates with her missing mother via ciphers.

Far beyond Sherlock and spinoffs, many popular films have had their plots advanced by the personal columns in the newspaper: movies like Ghost World (2001), Kissing Jessica Stein (2001) and Desperately Seeking Susan (1985).

Comparing novels and ‘the agonies’

We explore this cultural fascination in the exhibition News and Novel Sensations online through the McGill Library.

This includes access to two data sets: Our research team scraped 650,000 sentences from the Agony Column of The Times between 1860 and 1879, and over 25 million words from a corpus of 220 Victorian novels from 1800 to 1920.

Both datasets are available for anyone to explore and download on the project webpage. This will be a valuable resource for those studying the Victorian era and print history.

We will use both computational analysis of those data sets, and close reading, to continue to explore ways newspapers and the Agony Column featured in and shaped Victorian novels and Victorian readers’ experiences.

Victorian detective’s perspective


1874 image from ‘Figaro’s London Sketchbook of Celebrities,’ showing Ignatius Pollaky.© (Lindsay Scrapbook/Ohio State University, Billy Ireland Cartoon Library & Museum)

While the agonies and coded advertisements have captured some time in the spotlight thanks to the popularity of film productions of Sherlock and Enola Holmes, understanding just how popular or influential they were on Victorian society is difficult today.

Visitors to the website can explore some of the encrypted stories of The Times in a few unexpected ways, and gain a firsthand glimpse of another era’s print media.

Ignatius Pollaky, the so-called real-life Sherlock Holmes, was known for advertising his own business in the Agony Column and for inserting mysterious notes and messages in the newspaper relating to his cases.

We created a game as part of the exhibit called Pollaky’s Agonizing Adventure. The game allows visitors to track coded clues in the agony columns by following fictionalized detective case notes.

Visitors can experience how the agonies were embedded in the emerging world of detective practice, and experience how the agonies made communicating private messages and plans possible in the public medium of the newspaper.



The front page of ‘The Times’ as the player sees it in an online exhibit game, Pollaky’s Agonizing Adventure, designed to teach tracking coded clues in the Agony Columns.© (Jacquelyn Sundberg and Nathalie Cooke)
Changing vocabulary

Do you write like a Victorian? How far has our vocabulary shifted since that time? Our research team created the Victorian Vibecheck to allow visitors to create period-appropriate text.

Vibecheck quantifies how rarely, if ever, words in a given text appear in our corpus of more than 450 Victorian novels. The program then gives you a score based on whether it over- or under-uses words.

Visitors can enter their own text or choose from a list of examples to see if they can approximate a Victorian vibe.

How closely do Victorian novels resemble the agonies, or does our own language resemble the Victorians’? We invite visitors to explore for themselves.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts.

Read more:
How 19th-century Victorians’ wellness resolutions were about self-help — and playful ritual fun

Spirit photography: 19th-century innovation in bereavement rituals was likely invented by a woman

Jacquelyn Sundberg received funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Nathalie Cooke receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
STONE O' SCONE IS A ROUGH ASHLER
The Stone of Destiny has a mysterious past beyond British coronations

Story by Ronan O’Connell • Yesterday
National Geographic

Prince Andrew steps off a dais on which rests the Stone of Scone, or Stone of Destiny, during a ceremony to reinstall it at Edinburgh Castle in Scotland. The sandstone slab has been used for British royal coronations for centuries, but its origins are shrouded in legend.© Photograph by Gary Doak, Camera Press/Redux

When Britain’s King Charles III is crowned in London on May 6, he’ll sit on an ancient chair housing a 335-pound boulder cloaked in mystery. Used for British coronations since the late 14th century, the Stone of Scone is of unknown origins and age.

Legend traces this rectangular slab to Palestine 3,000 years ago, but scientists believe it is likely from Scotland. The stone is among the most prized treasures of this nation, where it was long used to crown Scottish kings. Then in 1296, it was stolen by England.


The full moon rises behind Scotland’s Edinburgh Castle, where the Stone of Scone is kept when not used for British coronations.© Photograph by Jane Barlow, PA Images/Getty Images

Until 1996, when it was finally given back to Scotland, the stone resided at Westminster Abbey, where it is now reappearing for Charles’ grand coronation. Soon after, the boulder will return to its current home, Scotland’s Edinburgh Castle.

Tourists to this magnificent fortress, which looms above the city on a hilltop, can admire the stone in the castle’s Crown Room. Or they can kneel upon a replica at lavish Scone Palace, 33 miles north of Edinburgh, where the original was part of Scottish coronations for centuries.


Elizabeth II sits on the throne during her coronation ceremony in Westminster Abbey, on June 2, 1953. Three years before the coronation, the Stone of Scone was stolen and taken to Arbroath Abbey, north of Edinburgh.© Photograph by Fox Photos, Hulton Archive/Getty Images

In Edinburgh, Scone, and Westminster, travelers form a fleeting connection with the enduring puzzle of an artifact that’s been stolen twice, damaged repeatedly, mythologized endlessly, and disputed for seven centuries.

Rock of legend



The Stone of Scone rests inside the Coronation Chair in Westminster Abbey, where it has been used for royal coronations since the 14th century.© Photograph by Sean Dempsey, PA Images/Getty Images

One enduring myth gives the stone an even longer history. This legend states it was used as a pillow by biblical figure Jacob, more than three millennia ago, before being moved from Palestine to Egypt, Italy, Spain, and Ireland, where it was then seized by Celtic Scots.

But the Stone, which is made of sandstone, “cannot have been Jacob’s Pillow because that would have been limestone,” the bedrock of the Holy Land, says British archaeologist David Breeze, who co-authored the book The Stone of Destiny: Artefact and Icon.

After King Edward I conquered Scotland in 1296, he moved the stone to Westminster Abbey. “It was later fitted into King Edward’s chair, upon which all English and British sovereigns have been crowned since the end of the 14th century,” says British royal historian Tracy Borman.

(How did England’s ‘lost king’ end up beneath a parking lot?)

Stealing the stone

The last time the stone was brought out to exercise its crowning powers was the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II in 1953. Yet it nearly missed that event thanks to a bizarre caper three years earlier, involving Scottish city Arbroath. The stone was stolen from Westminster, which has hosted every British coronation since 1066, and turned up at the 12th-century Arbroath Abbey, about 80 miles north of Edinburgh.

This extraordinary heist was not the work of professional thieves, says Borman. Instead, it was the crude work of four Scottish students. They broke into the iconic Westminster, dragged the stone across its floor, and then drove away with it.

“After some negotiation between the Scottish and English governments, it was brought back to London in time for the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II,” Borman explains. “In 1996, amidst growing support for Scottish devolution, the then-U.K. prime minister, John Major, announced the stone would be kept in Scotland when not in use at coronations.”

(Why Elizabeth II was modern Britain’s most unlikely queen.)

Upon its return to Scotland, scientific research established the stone’s geology was local, says Dauvit Broun, professor of Scottish history at the University of Glasgow. “It has been suggested that it could be the same kind of stone as is found near Scone itself,” Broun notes.

Link to kings

Yet even cutting-edge science can’t fully decode the stone, says Ewan Hyslop, head of research and climate change at Historic Environment Scotland (HES). This month, the organization completed a study involving 3D modeling and X-ray examinations that provided further evidence that the boulder appeared to be from Scone. But Hyslop conceded they still didn’t “have all the answers.”

(Here’s how the spirit of ancient Stonehenge was captured with a 21st-century drone.)

Along with the stone’s provenance, mystery surrounds its earliest uses. Researchers have yet to pinpoint when it first became associated with coronations, says Kathy Richmond, head of collections and applied conservation at HES.

“But legends around its origin strongly link it with kingship and the emergence of Scotland as a nation,” she says. “Sources such as the Scotichronicon attest to inauguration ceremonies taking place at Scone from at least the late ninth century.”

Myth also etched a powerful message into the stone’s surface. The 14th-century Scottish chronicler John of Fordoun claimed that before it was seized by the English, it had been inscribed with these words: “As long as fate plays fair, where this Stone lies, the Scots shall reign.”

For many centuries, fate was harsh. But now the Stone of Scone again sits proudly in the cradle of Scotland’s finest castle, when not in London bathed in the reflected glory of a coronation.


Mysterious New Markings Have Appeared on the U.K.'s Ancient Stone of Destiny

Story by Tim Newcomb • Yesterday 

Strange new markings have appeared on the U.K.'s ancient Stone of Destiny. The stone will be used during King Charles III's coronation. What do the clues mean?
© SUSANNAH IRELAND - Getty Images

An ancient stone, housed in Scotland and dubbed the “Stone of Destiny,” has been used in the coronation of kings since around 840 AD.

The origins of the stone’s prominence remain unknown.

New research has revealed never-before-seen markings on the stone, which will be used during King Charles III’s coronation in May.


There’s a special stone used in the coronation ceremonies of monarchs in the United Kingdom. It’s been this way since around 840 AD. And now we have found, for the first time, hidden markings on the red sandstone slab that will be a part of King Charles III’s May coronation.

An oblong block 25 inches long, 15 inches wide, and about 10 inches thick, the stone’s earliest origins are a mystery. But it has long held a special place in the royal history of the United Kingdom, and is considered by many to be a sacred object.

Believed to have been moved to Scone about 840 AD by Kenneth I from western Scotland, this block—also called the Stone of Scone—became part of the coronation tradition for Scottish rulers. It didn’t remain in Scotland forever, though, as King Edward I of England pillaged it in 1296 and moved it to Westminster. It was officially returned to Scotland in 1996—with some theft now a part of it’s history—and is currently housed in Edinburgh Castle. It remains part of the United Kingdom’s coronation tradition, however, and Scotland has agreed to allow it to be used as part of the coronation chair in Westminster Abbey come May 6.

Due to the remaining ambiguity in the Stone of Destiny’s very early history, the Historic Environment Scotland (HES) has renewed its investigation into the red slab ahead of the big royal event. Using a newly created 3D model, researchers now have access to fresh angles and details, showing off what appear to be Roman numerals on the stone’s surface for the first time.

“It’s very existing to discover new information about an object as unique and important to Scotland’s history as the Stone of Destiny,” Ewan Hyslop, head of research and climate change at Historic Environment Scotland, says in a news release. “The high level of detail we’ve been able to capture through the digital imaging has enabled us to re-examine the tooling marks on the surface of the stone, which has helped confirm that the stone has been roughly worked by more than one stonemason with a number of different tools, as was previously thought.”


Digital imaging done with the help of Engine Shed—Scotland’s national building conservation center—showed off cross bedding, something HES calls ”indicative of the geological conditions in which the sandstone was formed and which is characteristic of sandstone of the Scone Sandstone Formation.” Prior and current research likely places the geologic origin of the stone in the Scone Sandstone Formation, near Perth.

The scan also shows off various tooling marks, degradation, and signs of repair. The digital scan was turned into a 3D-printed replica, which also helps with the coronation chair preparations.

Those new markings, though—we just don’t know what they’re all about. “The discovery of previously unrecorded markings is also significant, and while at this point we’re unable to say for certain what their purpose or meaning might be,” Hyslop says, “they offer the exciting opportunity for further areas of study.”

Additional X-ray fluorescence analysis revealed copper alloy traces on the surface, meaning the stone was likely used to house some sort of bronze or brass object. The finding of microscopic traces of gypsum plaster means a cast of the stone could have once been made.

“We may not have all the answers at this stage,” Hyslop says, “but what we’ve been able to uncover is testament to a variety of uses in the Stone’s long history and contributes to its provenance and authenticity.”

CANADA/UNCEDED TERRITORIES OF BC
New virtual reality app puts user in the shoes of ecological destroyer

Story by The Canadian Press • Yesterday 

As individuals, it can be difficult to understand how one’s own seemingly innocuous actions can have such a calamitous effect on the environment. Especially when those actions, no matter how accumulative, are meagre compared to those of big corporations and companies.

So what if you could witness first-hand the devastation caused as a result of your own actions and decisions? What if you could see, directly in front of you, the flora and fauna ravaged at your own hands? Would it make you think differently? Take responsibility?

Unceded Territories, a facet of Vancouver Biennale’s mobile app, is a hybrid of game and activism art that is designed to force users to think about their own role in the destruction of the environment.

It is an extension of its Oculus-based, namesake VR experience that world premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival in 2019, the brainchild of First Nations artist Lawrence Paul Yuxweluptun and VR filmmaker Paisley Smith.

Miriam Blume, producer of the app and director of the Vancouver Biennale, said Unceded Territories is a call to action to be more conscious of both environmental destruction and systemic racism.

“The message about the intersection of the environment, colonialism and Indigenous human rights … well, relevant doesn’t even begin to describe it,” she said. “It is an important message to bring to the world, and when you can do that through art, that is a really important and special thing.”

The game begins by transporting its user to a beautiful and verdant landscape, with flourishing greenery and sparkling waters brought to life via Yuxweluptun’s vibrant, surrealist artwork. Orcas splash in the ocean nearby as wildlife flits between the trees.

A spirit bear appears as a warning of the user’s perilous role but it is too late, they have already become the villain. An ominous drumbeat by The Halluci Nation amplifies as the user drains the environment of its resources, shattering the picturesque scene until all that remains is the skeletons of wildlife and a forest aflame.

“You’re too greedy, leave it alone” a voice booms over the quickening drums. “Can’t you see you’re hurting Mother Earth?”

It is provocative and confrontational, a not-so-subtle representation of the environmental chaos mankind is wreaking on the planet.

Recommended video: Climate Activist Glues Hand to Podium During Swiss Election (Veuer)  Duration 1:11   on Watc

Yuxweluptun said he made Unceded Territories to force audiences to recognize their role in the destruction of the environment by having them embody the greedy Super Predator.

He said he wants the user to feel the anger of the Indigenous communities who have watched their lands be put in peril, to fight for change.

“Are we that different than the pipeline executives sacrificing Mother Earth for their own wealth?” he said.

While by now we shouldn’t need an app to be made aware of the effects of environmental degradation, Vancouver’s own changing weather and recent wildfires is enough evidence of that alone, it does provide a more accessible way for people of all ages and backgrounds to engage.

“If we can engross a school child that is otherwise not interested in textbooks or traditional learning, or adults who think it’s a conversation that they don’t need to engage in, then we have succeeded, and Lawrence’s art activism does that so beautifully, and so poignantly,” she said.

“The idea of bringing Unceded Territories onto an app gave the project more extensibility. It allowed us to bring the artwork to where the audience was, and the audience is on their phone,” she said.

Vancouver Biennale’s founder and president Barrie Mowatt said the app, “in a playful way,” re-emphasizes how history has “gone wrong.”

He said it’s high time we all confronted our history, and took the time to realize that there is much to learn from the Indigenous communities who are more connected to, and thus have a greater respect for, the land.

“That land shouldn’t be used to amass wealth or to enhance their lifestyles, but for survival and collaboration, communication and connection,” he said.

The interactive experience is available through the Vancouver Biennale app, available on iOS and Android. Visit the VB website for more information and to download.

Mina Kerr-Lazenby is the North Shore News’ Indigenous and civic affairs reporter. This reporting beat is made possible by the Local Journalism Initiative.

MKerrLazenby@nsnews.comtwitter.com/MinaKerrLazenby

Mina Kerr-Lazenby, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, North Shore News