Musical artists sound AI infringement warning
By Dr. Tim Sandle
October 28, 2024
DIGITAL JOURNAL
Singer-songwriter Billy Bragg performing in Vancouver, Canada at the Body of War Concert. Image by Kris Krug (CC BY-SA 2.0)
Many companies using artificial intelligence technologies are seeking to improve the performance of their platforms. This involves training AI through a variety of media. Many artists are protesting over their works being used as training data for large language models (LLMs).
The companies involved include OpenAI, Anthropic, and now Perplexity. In the U.S. this has led to several lawsuits being filed. The defence from Anthropic argues that this form of training constitutes a ‘fair use’ under current U.S. copyright law.
In move set to aggravate creatives even more, the UK government is considering changing copyright law to allow AI companies to train on copyrighted works without a licence in place.
In response, the Human Artistry Campaign has organized a petition, signed by more than 11,500 actors, artists, authors, musicians, and organisations against this move. Thise involved in the campaign include Thom Yorke, Björn Ulvaeus, Max Richter, and Billy Bragg.
The petition reads: “The unlicensed use of creative works for training generative AI is a major, unjust threat to the livelihoods of the people behind those works and must not be permitted.”
Earlier in 2024, Billie Eilish, R.E.M., and Nicki Minaj signed a separate open letter protesting “the predatory use of AI” in the music industry.
The organiser of the new letter, the British composer and former AI executive Ed Newton-Rex, has told The Guardian that people who make a living from creative work are “very worried” about the situation.
“There are three key resources that generative AI companies need to build AI models: people, compute, and data. They spend vast sums on the first two – sometimes a million dollars per engineer, and up to a billion dollars per model. But they expect to take the third – training data – for free,” Newton-Rex states.
Another controversy is with the AI music generator Suno. The $500 million company was sued by the major record companies, along with fellow AI firm Udio, for allegedly training their systems using the majors’ recordings without permission.
Since then, the artist Timbaland has joined the company in a strategic advisory role. In addition, he is also previewing his latest single, Love Again, exclusively on the platform, according to Music Business Worldwide.
Other musical artists and composers who have signed the letter include the Cure’s Robert Smith, Portishead’s Geoff Barrow, ABBA’s Björn Ulvaeus, Hot Chip’s Joe Goddard, Jamiroquai’s Jason Kay, AURORA, Nitin Sawhney, and Sir John Rutter.
It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Tuesday, October 29, 2024
MISOGYNIST MAGA
Josué Perez, Newark Advocate
Mon, October 28, 2024
An advertising company removed a billboard posted in Licking County showing a fake image of Vice President Kamala Harris after a spokesperson said they were made aware of its "vulgar" nature.
The billboard, visible heading westbound on Ohio 16 in Newark, showed a fake, provocative image of Harris about to engage in a sex act. Former President Donald Trump, Harris’ opponent for president, was also on the billboard in a separate image that described him as the defender of the people. The Dispatch is not publishing an image of the billboard because of its crude nature.
Clayton, a spokesperson for Kennedy Outdoor Advertising who declined to share their last name for fear of threats, told The Advocate the company removed the billboard Sunday night after learning about its sexual nature. It had been up since at least Friday afternoon.
An advertising company removed a billboard at this location off Route 16 in Newark showing a fake, "vulgar" image of Vice President Kamala Harris. The current billboard as of Monday is shown here.
Clayton confirmed that RK Towing, a Newark-based towing service, paid for the billboard. An email shared with The Advocate shows RK Towing giving Kennedy Outdoor Advertising permission to disclose that it did so.
“Once it was brought to our attention how vulgar the advertisement actually was, we immediately removed it,” Clayton said. “We don’t condone anything like that, not in any way whatsoever. Whether we agree with it politically or not, we would never agree to do anything like that. That was definitely a mistake.”
The Advocate reached out to RK Towing for comment but did not immediately hear back.
The billboard had a disclaimer at the bottom noting that RK Towing’s owner paid for it, according to Clayton. The disclaimer was difficult to identify in circulated social media images of the billboard, which many users condemned.
Clayton said the company took the billboard down on Sunday “within an hour” of learning about the sexually suggestive nature of it. He said the company was unaware the message in the billboard referenced a sexual act, believing it was simply calling her a “crybaby.”
Clayton said he believes just one person vetted the billboard before the company approved printing it.
“We don’t always look and try to analyze every detail in the design,” Clayton said. “We deal with a lot of artwork so we don’t analyze every little thing. It may only be one person looking at the artwork.
“If there would have been three to four people looking at this artwork, it probably would have never made it to the billboard, obviously. But if there’s one person reviewing it, they may not think anything of it or realize the sexual innuendo that the ad presented. It’s not like the ad goes through five or six people to review and approve it.”
Clayton said the company has received threatening and vulgar messages via email and phone over the billboard. He confirmed that RK Towing frequently advertises with the company.
As of Monday afternoon, the Licking County Board of Elections had not received any calls about the billboard, Director Brian Mead said.
"We're ashamed of it," Clayton said. "We don't want that up on our billboards. It's horrible."
Harris and Trump are expected to campaign in several states in the coming days before Election Day.
Advocate reporter Josué Perez can be reached at jhperez@newarkadvocate.com.
This article originally appeared on Newark Advocate: Harris, Trump billboard in Newark removed over 'vulgar' nature
Vulgar billboard that showed Kamala Harris in a sexual position removed from Ohio highway
Kelly Rissman
Tue, October 29, 2024
An advertising company removed a large billboard along an Ohio highway that depicted Vice President Kamala Harris in a vulgar way.
The billboard showed a fake image of the Democratic presidential nominee about to engage in a sex act surrounded by text that reads: “Kamala can’t talk right now. She’s at a baby shower.” It had been posted along a highway on Friday in Licking County, Ohio, but was removed on Sunday, Kennedy Outdoor Advertising told The Newark Advocate.
A Kennedy Outdoor Advertising spokesperson told the outlet the billboard was taken down “once it was brought to our attention how vulgar the advertisement actually was.”
The spokesperson, who remained anonymous due to fear of threats, said that his company didn’t see the crude aspect of it, but thought it portrayed the vice president as a “crybaby.”
“We don’t condone anything like that, not in any way whatsoever. Whether we agree with it politically or not, we would never agree to do anything like that. That was definitely a mistake,” the spokesperson continued. “We’re ashamed of it.”
Vice President Kamala Harris addresses the crowd at her campaign rally at Burns Park in Ann Arbor, Michigan on October 28. A vulgar billboard with a fake photo of Harris posted alongside an Ohio highway has been taken down (EPA)More
RK Towing, a towing service in Newark, paid for the billboard, Kennedy Outdoor Advertising told The Newark Advocate. The Independent has reached out to RK Towing for comment.
The Licking County Board of Elections had not received any calls about the billboard before it was taken down, Director Brian Mead told The Independent.
On a billboard next to the controversial one, was a photo of Donald Trump that showed him as a martyr.
Trump was looking at the camera alongside one of his quotes: “In reality, they’re not after me, they’re after you. I’m just in the way.” The former president first uttered those words in June 2023 in the wake of his historic indictment in the classified documents case. It has since become a rallying cry for the MAGA movement.
The sexualized photo of Harris is just the latest sexist attack on the vice president.
Since moving to the top of the Democratic ticket this summer, Harris has faced a wave of sexist remarks from Trump and Republicans.
The former president suggested she slept her way into power, allegedly referred to the vice president as a “bitch” behind closed doors, and likened her to a “ play toy,”
Meanwhile, a Fox News guest referred to her as the “original ‘Hawk Tuah’ girl” and Trump’s running mate JD Vance described Harris as a “childless cat lady,” claiming that she doesn’t have a “direct stake” in America’s future — despite the fact that she has two stepchildren.
Kelly Rissman
Tue, October 29, 2024
An advertising company removed a large billboard along an Ohio highway that depicted Vice President Kamala Harris in a vulgar way.
The billboard showed a fake image of the Democratic presidential nominee about to engage in a sex act surrounded by text that reads: “Kamala can’t talk right now. She’s at a baby shower.” It had been posted along a highway on Friday in Licking County, Ohio, but was removed on Sunday, Kennedy Outdoor Advertising told The Newark Advocate.
A Kennedy Outdoor Advertising spokesperson told the outlet the billboard was taken down “once it was brought to our attention how vulgar the advertisement actually was.”
The spokesperson, who remained anonymous due to fear of threats, said that his company didn’t see the crude aspect of it, but thought it portrayed the vice president as a “crybaby.”
“We don’t condone anything like that, not in any way whatsoever. Whether we agree with it politically or not, we would never agree to do anything like that. That was definitely a mistake,” the spokesperson continued. “We’re ashamed of it.”
Vice President Kamala Harris addresses the crowd at her campaign rally at Burns Park in Ann Arbor, Michigan on October 28. A vulgar billboard with a fake photo of Harris posted alongside an Ohio highway has been taken down (EPA)More
RK Towing, a towing service in Newark, paid for the billboard, Kennedy Outdoor Advertising told The Newark Advocate. The Independent has reached out to RK Towing for comment.
The Licking County Board of Elections had not received any calls about the billboard before it was taken down, Director Brian Mead told The Independent.
On a billboard next to the controversial one, was a photo of Donald Trump that showed him as a martyr.
Trump was looking at the camera alongside one of his quotes: “In reality, they’re not after me, they’re after you. I’m just in the way.” The former president first uttered those words in June 2023 in the wake of his historic indictment in the classified documents case. It has since become a rallying cry for the MAGA movement.
The sexualized photo of Harris is just the latest sexist attack on the vice president.
Since moving to the top of the Democratic ticket this summer, Harris has faced a wave of sexist remarks from Trump and Republicans.
The former president suggested she slept her way into power, allegedly referred to the vice president as a “bitch” behind closed doors, and likened her to a “ play toy,”
Meanwhile, a Fox News guest referred to her as the “original ‘Hawk Tuah’ girl” and Trump’s running mate JD Vance described Harris as a “childless cat lady,” claiming that she doesn’t have a “direct stake” in America’s future — despite the fact that she has two stepchildren.
NORTH CAROLINA
Battleground state voting data reveals over 200K votes cast in red counties impacted by hurricane
Aubrie Spady
Aubrie Spady
FOX NEWS
Mon, October 28, 2024
Voting figures from North Carolina – a pivotal battleground state – indicate that despite the severe impact of Hurricane Helene, more than 200,000 votes have already been cast in counties that traditionally lean Republican.
Early voting in North Carolina set a statewide record of over 350,000 ballots cast on Oct. 17.
Over 2.8 million ballots have since been cast in North Carolina, which represents 36% of the registered voters population in the state, according to the North Carolina Board of Elections (NCSBE).
Of the ballots cast, 2.5 million were early votes, while 151,000 were absentee ballots.
The data represents an increase in early voting since the same time in 2016, eight days before the election, which saw 1.6 million ballots cast. However, 2020 saw 3.1 million early votes during that time in the cycle, in big part due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
People wait outside an early voting site on Oct.17, 2024, in Asheville. Several counties affected by Hurricane Helene saw a large turnout for the first day of early voting in western North Carolina.
Data also shows that 1.42% more Democrats than Republicans have cast their vote, as of Sunday.
After Hurricane Helene made a deadly sweep across western North Carolina, concerns over ballot box access prompted state lawmakers to adjust their voting rules ahead of early voting in the state.
The NCSBE identified 13 counties as being most impacted by Hurricane Helene, but Karen Brinson Bell, executive director of the state Board of Elections, told reporters on Friday that the affected areas are seeing "tremendous turnout."
An aerial view of destroyed and damaged buildings in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene flooding on Oct. 8 in Bat Cave, North Carolina.
Since early voting started, over 218,000 have already been cast in the western counties, despite damage from the disastrous storm.
To ensure voting access for residents in the affected areas, North Carolina lawmakers passed a bill on Thursday to require that the 13 counties open one early voting site per 30,000 individuals.
Those identified in western North Carolina as most impacted have seen tens of thousands of votes cast, as of Sunday: Ashe [7,541], Avery [3,823], Buncombe [78,645], Haywood [19,079], Henderson [31,158], Madison [6,036], McDowell [11,205], Mitchell [4,224], Polk [7,270], Rutherford [14,873], Transylvania [11,804], Watauga [16,993], and Yancey [5,477].
Mon, October 28, 2024
Voting figures from North Carolina – a pivotal battleground state – indicate that despite the severe impact of Hurricane Helene, more than 200,000 votes have already been cast in counties that traditionally lean Republican.
Early voting in North Carolina set a statewide record of over 350,000 ballots cast on Oct. 17.
Over 2.8 million ballots have since been cast in North Carolina, which represents 36% of the registered voters population in the state, according to the North Carolina Board of Elections (NCSBE).
Of the ballots cast, 2.5 million were early votes, while 151,000 were absentee ballots.
The data represents an increase in early voting since the same time in 2016, eight days before the election, which saw 1.6 million ballots cast. However, 2020 saw 3.1 million early votes during that time in the cycle, in big part due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
People wait outside an early voting site on Oct.17, 2024, in Asheville. Several counties affected by Hurricane Helene saw a large turnout for the first day of early voting in western North Carolina.
Data also shows that 1.42% more Democrats than Republicans have cast their vote, as of Sunday.
After Hurricane Helene made a deadly sweep across western North Carolina, concerns over ballot box access prompted state lawmakers to adjust their voting rules ahead of early voting in the state.
The NCSBE identified 13 counties as being most impacted by Hurricane Helene, but Karen Brinson Bell, executive director of the state Board of Elections, told reporters on Friday that the affected areas are seeing "tremendous turnout."
An aerial view of destroyed and damaged buildings in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene flooding on Oct. 8 in Bat Cave, North Carolina.
Since early voting started, over 218,000 have already been cast in the western counties, despite damage from the disastrous storm.
To ensure voting access for residents in the affected areas, North Carolina lawmakers passed a bill on Thursday to require that the 13 counties open one early voting site per 30,000 individuals.
Those identified in western North Carolina as most impacted have seen tens of thousands of votes cast, as of Sunday: Ashe [7,541], Avery [3,823], Buncombe [78,645], Haywood [19,079], Henderson [31,158], Madison [6,036], McDowell [11,205], Mitchell [4,224], Polk [7,270], Rutherford [14,873], Transylvania [11,804], Watauga [16,993], and Yancey [5,477].
Ed Pilkington in Creston, North Carolina
Mon 28 October 2024
Eric Farmer at his destroyed home in Creston, North Carolina, on 15 October.Photograph: Jesse Barber/The Guardian
Eric “Rocky” Farmer is stoking a bonfire of what’s left of his life. Billows of smoke rise from a mound of debris burning in front of what he once called his home – a large two-storied house that is now a contorted mass of twisted metal and broken beams.
When Hurricane Helene struck western North Carolina last month, the North Fork New River that runs beside his property broke its banks, rising more than 20ft. The raging waters lifted up a mobile home from upstream as effortlessly as if it were a rag doll, slamming it into the corner of his house and causing the structure to crumple.
Farmer, 55, will have to dismantle the mess and rebuild it, largely with his own hands. “It’s a bad scene, but we’ll get back up,” he said, sounding remarkably serene.
Farmer’s struggle has now become entangled in the painfully close and hyper-tense election in North Carolina. The state is one of seven battlegrounds that will decide the outcome of the presidential race on 5 November.
Several tracker polls, including the Guardian’s, show the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris to be neck-and-neck in the state.
With polls so tight, the impact of Hurricane Helene has made a complicated election look as mangled as Farmer’s house. What the disaster does to turnout, and with that to the candidates’ chances, could tip the race.
Amid the wreckage of his home, Farmer is taking a philosophical approach. “Politics is like mother nature,” he said. “You just watch what it does from the sidelines, then deal with the consequences.”
Though he plans to vote on 5 November, he is still not sure whether that will be for Trump or Harris. “Guess I’ll go with the lesser of the two evils – they’re both evil as far as I’m concerned,” he said.
The hurricane that struck on 26 September hit the Appalachian mountain region of western North Carolina hard, killing at least 96 people. Many roads are still closed and thousands of people have been displaced or remain without power and running water.
More than 1.2 million voters live in the stricken region – about one in six of the state’s total electorate. The obvious fear is that turnout will be depressed.
“Nobody’s talking about politics here, because it doesn’t matter,” said Shane Bare, 45, a local volunteer handing out donated coats. “If you can’t flush your toilet or get to your mailbox, you could care less about the election.”
Bare expects he will vote in the end, probably for Trump, whom he doesn’t much like but thinks has the edge on economic policy.
Other voters are more upbeat about the election. Kim Blevins shared her passion for Trump as she was picking up free tinned food and bottled water from a relief station in Creston.
“If Trump doesn’t get in, it’s going to be worse than the hurricane,” she said. “It’ll be world war three. Kamala Harris wants to make us a communist country.”
Harold Davis, 68, a Harris supporter salvaging lumber from the side of the river, told the Guardian that he also cares more than ever about the election. “It’s so important. Maga is really Mawa – Make America White Again – and the sooner we can get back to treating everyone as equals the better,” he said.
For Trump, the stakes in North Carolina could not be greater. For decades, the state has veered Republican, only backing Democrats twice in almost half a century (Jimmy Carter in 1976 and Barack Obama in 2008).
Nobody’s talking about politics here, because it doesn’t matter
Shane Bare, North Carolina resident
If Trump can take the state, as he did four years ago by a razor-thin 75,000 votes, along with Georgia and Pennsylvania, he will return to the White House. Without it, his path is uncertain.
“It’s very hard for us to win unless we’re able to get North Carolina,” Trump’s running mate, JD Vance, has said.
Trump descended on North Carolina for two days this week, scrambling between Asheville in the storm zone to Greenville and Concord, and then Greensboro. He has been busily spreading lies about the hurricane response, accusing the Biden administration of refusing aid to Republican voters and falsely claiming that federal money has been redirected to house undocumented immigrants.
His frenetic schedule and lies are perhaps indications of Trump’s anxieties about the impact of the hurricane on his electoral chances. Of the 25 counties hit by the disaster, 23 voted for Trump in 2020.
“Outside the cities of Asheville and Boone, which are pretty Democratic, most of the hurricane area went strongly for Trump in 2020. So if turnout is down because of the disaster, it is likely to hit Trump most,” said David McLennan, a political scientist at Meredith College who runs the Meredith opinion poll.
Republicans in the state have drawn comfort from the record-breaking early voting. In the first week of in-person early voting, almost 1.6 million people cast their ballots, surpassing the total crop of early votes in 2020.
Four years ago, Republican early voting slumped in the wake of Trump’s false claims about rampant fraud. But this year’s record-smashing turnout suggests that the party has now put that behind it – Republicans and Democrats are virtually tied in their early voting numbers.
“Despite all the challenges, people have shown they are determined to come and vote, a lot of them specifically against Kamala Harris,” said Matt Mercer, communications director for the North Carolina Republican party. “So we are feeling optimistic.”
***
In the tranquil tree-lined suburbs on the north side of Charlotte, the effort to squeeze out every vote for Kamala Harris is entering its final heave. Here, sandwiched between the solidly Democratic city and the heavily Trumpian countryside, the suburban voters, women especially, could hold the key.
Fern Cooper, 83, standing at the door of her detached suburban house, said she was powerfully motivated to vote because of her disdain for Trump. As a former New Yorker from the Bronx, she’s observed his flaws up close.
She recalled how he was gifted huge sums of money from his real estate father; how he called for Black young men known as the Central Park Five to be executed for a rape they did not commit and for which they were later exonerated; how he treated his first wife, Ivana Trump, badly.
“I know everything about Trump,” she said. “He’s not getting my vote.”
Hannah Waleh, 66, is also all-in for Harris, for more positive reasons: “She will bring change, she is real, not a liar. She is for the poor and working-class people.”
Waleh, a medical technician, has been urging her colleagues at her hospital and church to get out and vote early for the Democratic candidate: “I’m begging them. If everybody votes, I’m sure she will win.”
She might be right. The Meredith poll has tracked the extraordinary transformation in the race after Harris took over the Democratic nomination from Joe Biden.
“Biden was losing North Carolina,” McLennan said. “Harris’s entry into the race returned the state to being 50-50 again – it’s back to being purple.”
It is one thing bringing North Carolina back into contention and quite another to win. Part of the challenge is that, according to the poll, 2% of voters are still undecided, a tiny slice of the electorate that both campaigns are now frantically chasing.
“I’ve never seen undecideds that low so close to the election,” McLennan said.
They include Faith and Elizabeth, both 27, who have erected a 15ft Halloween skeleton on the lawn outside their house in the Charlotte suburbs. They told the Guardian that the most important issue, in their view, is abortion and the rights that women have already had taken away from them under Trump.
And yet they still haven’t committed to voting for Harris. “We want to be certain,” Faith said.
The Democrats are prioritising such suburban women, including those who formed part of the 23% of Republicans who backed Nikki Haley in the Republican presidential primary. They are doing so by focusing on abortion rights, with the Harris-Walz campaign warning that the state’s current restrictive 12-week abortion ban would be tightened under a Trump administration to a total nationwide abortion ban.
Harris’s entry into the race returned the state to being 50-50 again – it’s back to being purple
David McLennan, Meredith opinion poll
They have also sought to tie Trump to extreme Republicans further down the ballot. The main target is the Republican candidate for governor, Mark Robinson, who has described himself as a “Black Nazi” and has been revealed to have made extreme racist remarks.
During the past 18 months, Democrats have invested in the state, opening 28 offices with more than 340 staffers. They have even pushed into rural counties that previously had been assumed to be beyond the party’s reach.
“The Democrats have prioritized getting the party’s message out in more rural parts – on the grounds that a vote from rural areas is just as useful as from the city,” said Jason Roberts, a political scientist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Bolstering the party’s ground game is a vast alliance of non-profit progressive organizations such as the Black-led group Advance Carolina and Red Wine & Blue, which works with suburban women. The alliance, which playfully calls itself Operation We Save Ourselves, has a goal of knocking on 4m doors to promote candidates with progressive values – the largest independent program of its sort in North Carolina’s history.
If hard work were all it took to win presidential elections, Harris would already have one foot inside the Oval Office. But anxieties continue to swirl around the Democratic ticket, led by concerns that early turnout from African American voters, who in past cycles have swung overwhelmingly Democratic, is lower this year than at the same stage four years ago (37% in 2020, compared with 20% today).
As the months remaining until election day turn into days, and days into hours, the Harris-Walz campaign will be making last-ditch efforts to persuade Black voters to get out and vote – voters like Christian Swims, 21, a student at community college, who would be voting in his first presidential election.
If he votes at all, that is.
“I don’t follow the election much,” he said. “My friends don’t talk about it. People round here aren’t very political.”
Or Joseph Rich, a Fedex worker, 28. “I don’t know too much about Trump and Kamala Harris,” he said. “I’ll read up on them, but now I’m not sure.”
Time is running out for Democrats to connect with voters like Swims and Rich. Whether or not they succeed could make all the difference.
Wall Street regulator pledges to press on amid Trump threats, political pressure
Lananh Nguyen and Douglas Gillison
Mon, October 28, 2024
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler during interview with Reuters in New York
LAS VEGAS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Gary Gensler, chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, said on Monday that he would continue his work to protect investors after threats of firing and calls for his dismissal from prominent Republicans and Democrats as the Nov. 5 presidential election approaches.
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
Gensler's remarks so close to the presidential election show he is confronting the new political power of the cryptocurrency industry, which has spent heavily to influence the outcome of November's vote and garnered support among key demographics.
KEY QUOTE
"Democracies have consequences, but we're going to continue to do that which we do well at the SEC until, as I say, the ref calls the whistle," Gensler told a Las Vegas financial technology convention. "Traditionally, presidents decide who chairs the SEC. That's a good part of democracy."
CONTEXT
Republican former President Donald Trump has pledged to fire Gensler should he take office while crypto industry supporters of Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris have also called for Gensler's ouster in a new administration, according to Bloomberg.
Gensler was appointed to head the SEC by Democratic President Joe Biden in 2021.
(Reporting by Lananh Nguyen in Las Vegas and Douglas Gillison in Washington; Editing by Leslie Adler)
Lananh Nguyen and Douglas Gillison
Mon, October 28, 2024
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler during interview with Reuters in New York
LAS VEGAS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Gary Gensler, chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, said on Monday that he would continue his work to protect investors after threats of firing and calls for his dismissal from prominent Republicans and Democrats as the Nov. 5 presidential election approaches.
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
Gensler's remarks so close to the presidential election show he is confronting the new political power of the cryptocurrency industry, which has spent heavily to influence the outcome of November's vote and garnered support among key demographics.
KEY QUOTE
"Democracies have consequences, but we're going to continue to do that which we do well at the SEC until, as I say, the ref calls the whistle," Gensler told a Las Vegas financial technology convention. "Traditionally, presidents decide who chairs the SEC. That's a good part of democracy."
CONTEXT
Republican former President Donald Trump has pledged to fire Gensler should he take office while crypto industry supporters of Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris have also called for Gensler's ouster in a new administration, according to Bloomberg.
Gensler was appointed to head the SEC by Democratic President Joe Biden in 2021.
(Reporting by Lananh Nguyen in Las Vegas and Douglas Gillison in Washington; Editing by Leslie Adler)
Google-backed Open Cloud Coalition launches to lobby European lawmakers
The launch comes hours after Microsoft's deputy general counsel Rima Alaily preempted the announcement, publishing a blog post accusing Google of conducting a "shadow campaign" to influence cloud regulation in Europe. Alaily called the new organization an “astroturf group organized by Google,” adding that the search giant had “gone through great lengths to obfuscate its involvement, funding and control” by using smaller European cloud providers as the face of the coalition.
The OCC is broadly comparable to another industry trade organization called the Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe (CISPE), which launched in 2017 and has Amazon's AWS as its flagship member alongside several dozen smaller players. Indeed, the OCC is a direct response to a settlement Microsoft reached with CISPE members (not including AWS) to abandon an antitrust complaint against a licensing change Microsoft had made in 2019, which made it more expensive to run its enterprise software on rival cloud services.
That July settlement, which reportedly included a $22 million payment and promises to make it easier for smaller cloud providers to run Microsoft software on their own infrastructure, spurred Google to launch its own complaint with the European Commission (EC). The complaint alleged that Microsoft uses anti-competitive licensing practices to force companies into staying on its Azure cloud infrastructure.
The OCC's launch comes at an opportune time. A new European Commission is set to take office, and the U.K. is also carrying out an in-depth cloud market investigation of vendor lock-in practices. AWS and Microsoft are in the lens of the investigation as the market leaders, and the results are expected to be published in 2025.
Heading up the Coalition is Nicky Stewart, public sector director of U.K. cloud hosting company Civo. He says that with cloud infrastructure becoming the norm, businesses are increasingly finding themselves "trapped in restrictive agreements, facing high costs and barriers" when trying to switch providers.
"The OCC is determined to reverse this trend by promoting a more competitive and flexible market and driving the adoption of open standards," Stewart said in a statement.
Microsoft insists that Google is the main driving force of the OCC in terms of support, but DGA Group, an "advisory firm" enlisted to drive recruitment for the Coalition, said it wasn't disclosing individual members' contributions. However, DGA noted that the total funding would eventually be made public through the EU Transparency Register.
No Lobbyists sign · TechCrunch · Image Credits:Walter Bibikow / Getty Images
Paul Sawers
Updated Tue, October 29, 2024
Europe has a new lobbying body, one with a self-stated mission to "improve competition, transparency and resilience" in the cloud computing sector.
The Open Cloud Coalition (OCC) counts 10 members at launch, the most notable of which is Google, supported by international and local cloud providers Centerprise International, Civo, Gigas, ControlPlane, DTP Group, Prolinx, Pulsant, Clairo and Room 101. Part of the collective's work will involve conducting cloud market research and presenting the results to regulators in the European Union and the U.K., while "engaging in consultations on competition and market fairness," according to a statement.
Updated Tue, October 29, 2024
Europe has a new lobbying body, one with a self-stated mission to "improve competition, transparency and resilience" in the cloud computing sector.
The Open Cloud Coalition (OCC) counts 10 members at launch, the most notable of which is Google, supported by international and local cloud providers Centerprise International, Civo, Gigas, ControlPlane, DTP Group, Prolinx, Pulsant, Clairo and Room 101. Part of the collective's work will involve conducting cloud market research and presenting the results to regulators in the European Union and the U.K., while "engaging in consultations on competition and market fairness," according to a statement.
The launch comes hours after Microsoft's deputy general counsel Rima Alaily preempted the announcement, publishing a blog post accusing Google of conducting a "shadow campaign" to influence cloud regulation in Europe. Alaily called the new organization an “astroturf group organized by Google,” adding that the search giant had “gone through great lengths to obfuscate its involvement, funding and control” by using smaller European cloud providers as the face of the coalition.
The OCC is broadly comparable to another industry trade organization called the Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe (CISPE), which launched in 2017 and has Amazon's AWS as its flagship member alongside several dozen smaller players. Indeed, the OCC is a direct response to a settlement Microsoft reached with CISPE members (not including AWS) to abandon an antitrust complaint against a licensing change Microsoft had made in 2019, which made it more expensive to run its enterprise software on rival cloud services.
That July settlement, which reportedly included a $22 million payment and promises to make it easier for smaller cloud providers to run Microsoft software on their own infrastructure, spurred Google to launch its own complaint with the European Commission (EC). The complaint alleged that Microsoft uses anti-competitive licensing practices to force companies into staying on its Azure cloud infrastructure.
The OCC's launch comes at an opportune time. A new European Commission is set to take office, and the U.K. is also carrying out an in-depth cloud market investigation of vendor lock-in practices. AWS and Microsoft are in the lens of the investigation as the market leaders, and the results are expected to be published in 2025.
Heading up the Coalition is Nicky Stewart, public sector director of U.K. cloud hosting company Civo. He says that with cloud infrastructure becoming the norm, businesses are increasingly finding themselves "trapped in restrictive agreements, facing high costs and barriers" when trying to switch providers.
"The OCC is determined to reverse this trend by promoting a more competitive and flexible market and driving the adoption of open standards," Stewart said in a statement.
Microsoft insists that Google is the main driving force of the OCC in terms of support, but DGA Group, an "advisory firm" enlisted to drive recruitment for the Coalition, said it wasn't disclosing individual members' contributions. However, DGA noted that the total funding would eventually be made public through the EU Transparency Register.
Mexican border crackdown takes heat out of Trump’s migrant jibes
Diego Oré, Laura Gottesdiener, Ted Hesson and Jose Luis Gonzalez
Mon, October 28, 2024
Mexico's unprecedented migration crackdown gives Democrats surprise border boost
Mexico's unprecedented migration crackdown gives Democrats surprise border boost
Mexico's unprecedented migration crackdown gives Democrats surprise border boost
CIUDAD JUAREZ, Mexico (Reuters) - At a remote military checkpoint in the Mexican desert some 25 miles (40 km) south of the border city of Ciudad Juarez, immigration agents bundled dozens of migrants onto a bus headed south on a hot night in September.
Hundreds of scenes like this one, witnessed on Sept. 24 by a Reuters reporter, form part of Mexico’s largest ever migration crackdown.
The crackdown encompasses a growing program to bus and fly non-Mexican migrants to the country’s south, far from the U.S. border, along with widespread detentions and administrative obstacles, according to public data and conversations with a dozen U.S. and Mexican officials.
Partly as a result of Mexico’s efforts, the number of migrants caught by U.S. authorities at the border in recent months fell sharply to the lowest level since 2020, taking some heat out of an issue on which, polls show, voters trust Republican candidate Donald Trump more than his Democratic rival, Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the Nov. 5 U.S. presidential election.
“A border perceived to be out of control is fuel for Donald Trump,” said Justin Gest, an immigration expert and professor at George Mason University. Mexico’s crackdown helps the Biden administration throw “water over that fire,” he said.
Collectively, the measures aim to tire migrants so they give up before reaching U.S. territory, five Mexican officials told Reuters. Mexico is on track to bus a third more migrants to its southern states this year, previously unreported data shows.
Venezuelan Jose Díaz was detained by migration agents in the northern border city of Tijuana and then taken by bus over 2,000 miles (3,500 km) to the southern city of Villahermosa, over a three-day journey early in September.
“They send you back and then you have to head north all over again,” he said.
The officials asked not to be named to discuss measures that contrast with the Mexican government’s stated humanitarian migration policy. In response to Reuters questions, Mexico’s foreign ministry said the goal was to protect migrants from human traffickers, not exhaust them.
Now in its tenth month, the crackdown followed pressure from the United States, the Mexican officials told Reuters, including the temporary closure in December of several trade routes into Mexico at an estimated daily cost of $100 million, and explicit requests by U.S. officials in private meetings and in a phone call between President Joe Biden and his Mexican counterpart.
Harris has used the U.S. numbers to argue in her campaign that the Biden administration has been tough on border issues.
While Trump has increasingly turned toward darker and more violent language about immigrants, Mexico itself has been less of a target than in his 2016 campaign.
That is the point of the crackdown, one senior Mexican official said: Mexico is determined not to be the focus of the election.
Newly inaugurated Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has said she will work closely with whoever wins the White House, and the foreign ministry said the country’s migration strategy was unrelated to the election. Sheinbaum's office did not reply to a request for comment.
The Harris campaign declined to comment. The Trump campaign did not respond to requests for comment.
In response to Reuters questions to the White House, a senior official said Mexico acted in its own interests, adding that both sides made “a joint effort to address” the issue. The official requested anonymity as a condition of the interview.
PRESSURE
Starting in late November last year, the United States experienced a spike in border apprehensions, after the Mexican government suspended busing and flying of migrants, citing a funding crunch.
In response, the Biden administration closed several commercial border ports, including busy Texas railway bridges in El Paso and Eagle Pass on Dec. 18, citing the need to redirect personnel to process migrants.
One former senior U.S. Customs and Border Protection official who served under Trump said no such lengthy closures occurred under the former president, despite his repeated threats to shut the border over immigration.
The cost to Mexican companies, around $100 million per day in lost trade according to business lobby Coparmex, dwarfs the $158 million that internal government documents seen by Reuters show Mexico allocated to internal busing and flying of migrants over the previous four years.
On Dec. 22, the day after a call between President Joe Biden and Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and with a visit by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken looming on Dec. 27, the Mexican president said the country had a plan to “strengthen” its migration program.
The buses quickly reappeared, carrying more migrants than before.
The bridge closures were an operational necessity that had the additional benefit of pressuring Mexico, three current and former U.S. officials told Reuters.
It "certainly got Mexico's attention,” a senior State Department official said.
The move put Mexico “between a rock and a hard place” said one Mexican official, who along with two others said they understood it as a way to force the government’s hand.
Mexico’s foreign ministry, in its response to Reuters questions, said the closures responded mainly to U.S. internal security and were not aimed “specifically at pressuring Mexico.”
In the meetings with Blinken and on a subsequent call with Biden, Mexico offered to do more, the five Mexican government officials said.
In January, Mexico increased checkpoints on highways and railroads heading north.
Starting in March, Mexico’s National Migration Institute, INM, allocated $30 million for local low-cost airline Viva Aerobus to operate migrant flights in 2024, almost triple the amount allocated to the company in 2023, government documents seen by Reuters show. INM allocated around $5 million for migrant transport each year in 2023 and 2024 to airline Magnicharters, the documents showed.
Roberto Alcantara, the owner of Viva Aerobus, also owns coach company Turistar, which INM paid more than $65 million since last year for the busing program, government documents show.
Alcantara, Viva Aerobus, Magnicharters and Turistar did not respond to requests for comment. INM did not reply to questions about the contracts.
Reuters could not establish if other companies had similar contracts.
Mexico’s foreign ministry said the United States does not fund Mexico’s migration program.
The Biden administration’s broad asylum ban implemented in early June has contributed to decreasing U.S. apprehensions, U.S. officials have said. With U.S. funding, Panama in August started regular deportation flights for migrants caught crossing the dangerous Darien jungle, part of U.S. efforts across Central America to keep migrants from reaching Mexico.
Nonetheless, Mexico's effort has been “absolutely crucial,” for lowering U.S. migrant apprehensions, said Wayne Cornelius, director emeritus of the Mexican Migration Field Research Program at the University of California-San Diego. His comments were echoed by the U.S. and Mexican officials.
At the same time as it increased busing, Mexico slowed immigration and asylum processing. Public data shows a 97% drop this year in issuance of humanitarian visitor cards, a key document migrants use to avoid detentions.
INM permanently closed 10 offices where migrants apply for this document this year, two of the sources said. Refugee applications dropped by half in the first nine months of the year compared to the same period a year earlier, public data shows.
These steps were deliberate measures to make it harder for migrants to traverse the country, three of the Mexican sources said. INM did not respond to a question about the administrative measures.
BUSES
As they boarded the white commercial coach witnessed by Reuters at the Samalayuca military checkpoint near Ciudad Juarez in September, at least one of the migrants had their hands cuffed with parcel ties, Reuters photographs show.
The bus was headed to the city of Monterrey, some 700 miles (1,100 km) to the southeast, and from there the migrants were to be flown further south, a source with knowledge of the operation told Reuters. The news agency could not independently confirm the destination of the bus.
In response to Reuters questions, INM said it carries out immigration control actions "by air, sea and land," It did not answer questions about the number of migrants, their nationalities, the bus’ destination or custody conditions, including why a man was cuffed.
Mexico’s government calls migrant detentions “rescues” that save people from smugglers. It rarely talks about the busing program in public comments.
However, Ana Saiz, head of the legal advisory unit at Mexico’s public defender’s office, which advises migrants and Mexican citizens, called busing an “illegal practice.” She and other legal experts cited cases where migrants were transported without any record of their detention until reaching the destination in the south, and violations of immigration and custody rules, including consular access.
“There was no communication, no documents, nothing,” said Milka, a Tanzanian migrant, picked up by immigration agents in the northern state of Sonora and transported some 1,500 miles (2,400 km) south to Villahermosa.
(Editing by Frank Jack Daniel)
Diego Oré, Laura Gottesdiener, Ted Hesson and Jose Luis Gonzalez
Mon, October 28, 2024
Mexico's unprecedented migration crackdown gives Democrats surprise border boost
Mexico's unprecedented migration crackdown gives Democrats surprise border boost
Mexico's unprecedented migration crackdown gives Democrats surprise border boost
CIUDAD JUAREZ, Mexico (Reuters) - At a remote military checkpoint in the Mexican desert some 25 miles (40 km) south of the border city of Ciudad Juarez, immigration agents bundled dozens of migrants onto a bus headed south on a hot night in September.
Hundreds of scenes like this one, witnessed on Sept. 24 by a Reuters reporter, form part of Mexico’s largest ever migration crackdown.
The crackdown encompasses a growing program to bus and fly non-Mexican migrants to the country’s south, far from the U.S. border, along with widespread detentions and administrative obstacles, according to public data and conversations with a dozen U.S. and Mexican officials.
Partly as a result of Mexico’s efforts, the number of migrants caught by U.S. authorities at the border in recent months fell sharply to the lowest level since 2020, taking some heat out of an issue on which, polls show, voters trust Republican candidate Donald Trump more than his Democratic rival, Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the Nov. 5 U.S. presidential election.
“A border perceived to be out of control is fuel for Donald Trump,” said Justin Gest, an immigration expert and professor at George Mason University. Mexico’s crackdown helps the Biden administration throw “water over that fire,” he said.
Collectively, the measures aim to tire migrants so they give up before reaching U.S. territory, five Mexican officials told Reuters. Mexico is on track to bus a third more migrants to its southern states this year, previously unreported data shows.
Venezuelan Jose Díaz was detained by migration agents in the northern border city of Tijuana and then taken by bus over 2,000 miles (3,500 km) to the southern city of Villahermosa, over a three-day journey early in September.
“They send you back and then you have to head north all over again,” he said.
The officials asked not to be named to discuss measures that contrast with the Mexican government’s stated humanitarian migration policy. In response to Reuters questions, Mexico’s foreign ministry said the goal was to protect migrants from human traffickers, not exhaust them.
Now in its tenth month, the crackdown followed pressure from the United States, the Mexican officials told Reuters, including the temporary closure in December of several trade routes into Mexico at an estimated daily cost of $100 million, and explicit requests by U.S. officials in private meetings and in a phone call between President Joe Biden and his Mexican counterpart.
Harris has used the U.S. numbers to argue in her campaign that the Biden administration has been tough on border issues.
While Trump has increasingly turned toward darker and more violent language about immigrants, Mexico itself has been less of a target than in his 2016 campaign.
That is the point of the crackdown, one senior Mexican official said: Mexico is determined not to be the focus of the election.
Newly inaugurated Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has said she will work closely with whoever wins the White House, and the foreign ministry said the country’s migration strategy was unrelated to the election. Sheinbaum's office did not reply to a request for comment.
The Harris campaign declined to comment. The Trump campaign did not respond to requests for comment.
In response to Reuters questions to the White House, a senior official said Mexico acted in its own interests, adding that both sides made “a joint effort to address” the issue. The official requested anonymity as a condition of the interview.
PRESSURE
Starting in late November last year, the United States experienced a spike in border apprehensions, after the Mexican government suspended busing and flying of migrants, citing a funding crunch.
In response, the Biden administration closed several commercial border ports, including busy Texas railway bridges in El Paso and Eagle Pass on Dec. 18, citing the need to redirect personnel to process migrants.
One former senior U.S. Customs and Border Protection official who served under Trump said no such lengthy closures occurred under the former president, despite his repeated threats to shut the border over immigration.
The cost to Mexican companies, around $100 million per day in lost trade according to business lobby Coparmex, dwarfs the $158 million that internal government documents seen by Reuters show Mexico allocated to internal busing and flying of migrants over the previous four years.
On Dec. 22, the day after a call between President Joe Biden and Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and with a visit by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken looming on Dec. 27, the Mexican president said the country had a plan to “strengthen” its migration program.
The buses quickly reappeared, carrying more migrants than before.
The bridge closures were an operational necessity that had the additional benefit of pressuring Mexico, three current and former U.S. officials told Reuters.
It "certainly got Mexico's attention,” a senior State Department official said.
The move put Mexico “between a rock and a hard place” said one Mexican official, who along with two others said they understood it as a way to force the government’s hand.
Mexico’s foreign ministry, in its response to Reuters questions, said the closures responded mainly to U.S. internal security and were not aimed “specifically at pressuring Mexico.”
In the meetings with Blinken and on a subsequent call with Biden, Mexico offered to do more, the five Mexican government officials said.
In January, Mexico increased checkpoints on highways and railroads heading north.
Starting in March, Mexico’s National Migration Institute, INM, allocated $30 million for local low-cost airline Viva Aerobus to operate migrant flights in 2024, almost triple the amount allocated to the company in 2023, government documents seen by Reuters show. INM allocated around $5 million for migrant transport each year in 2023 and 2024 to airline Magnicharters, the documents showed.
Roberto Alcantara, the owner of Viva Aerobus, also owns coach company Turistar, which INM paid more than $65 million since last year for the busing program, government documents show.
Alcantara, Viva Aerobus, Magnicharters and Turistar did not respond to requests for comment. INM did not reply to questions about the contracts.
Reuters could not establish if other companies had similar contracts.
Mexico’s foreign ministry said the United States does not fund Mexico’s migration program.
The Biden administration’s broad asylum ban implemented in early June has contributed to decreasing U.S. apprehensions, U.S. officials have said. With U.S. funding, Panama in August started regular deportation flights for migrants caught crossing the dangerous Darien jungle, part of U.S. efforts across Central America to keep migrants from reaching Mexico.
Nonetheless, Mexico's effort has been “absolutely crucial,” for lowering U.S. migrant apprehensions, said Wayne Cornelius, director emeritus of the Mexican Migration Field Research Program at the University of California-San Diego. His comments were echoed by the U.S. and Mexican officials.
At the same time as it increased busing, Mexico slowed immigration and asylum processing. Public data shows a 97% drop this year in issuance of humanitarian visitor cards, a key document migrants use to avoid detentions.
INM permanently closed 10 offices where migrants apply for this document this year, two of the sources said. Refugee applications dropped by half in the first nine months of the year compared to the same period a year earlier, public data shows.
These steps were deliberate measures to make it harder for migrants to traverse the country, three of the Mexican sources said. INM did not respond to a question about the administrative measures.
BUSES
As they boarded the white commercial coach witnessed by Reuters at the Samalayuca military checkpoint near Ciudad Juarez in September, at least one of the migrants had their hands cuffed with parcel ties, Reuters photographs show.
The bus was headed to the city of Monterrey, some 700 miles (1,100 km) to the southeast, and from there the migrants were to be flown further south, a source with knowledge of the operation told Reuters. The news agency could not independently confirm the destination of the bus.
In response to Reuters questions, INM said it carries out immigration control actions "by air, sea and land," It did not answer questions about the number of migrants, their nationalities, the bus’ destination or custody conditions, including why a man was cuffed.
Mexico’s government calls migrant detentions “rescues” that save people from smugglers. It rarely talks about the busing program in public comments.
However, Ana Saiz, head of the legal advisory unit at Mexico’s public defender’s office, which advises migrants and Mexican citizens, called busing an “illegal practice.” She and other legal experts cited cases where migrants were transported without any record of their detention until reaching the destination in the south, and violations of immigration and custody rules, including consular access.
“There was no communication, no documents, nothing,” said Milka, a Tanzanian migrant, picked up by immigration agents in the northern state of Sonora and transported some 1,500 miles (2,400 km) south to Villahermosa.
(Editing by Frank Jack Daniel)
JD Vance Attacks Immigrant Children At Swing State Rallies
Nathalie Baptiste
Thu, October 24, 2024 at 10:43 AM MDT
With less than two weeks until election day, GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance has begun attacking immigrant children in multiple swing states. At rallies this week in Arizona and Nevada, Donald Trump’s running mate said that children whose parents are undocumented are ruining the “quality of American education.”
Immigration has been a main focus of the Trump campaign; there have been promises of mass deportations of even people who are here in the U.S. legally, as well as vicious lies spread about Haitian immigrants living in Springfield, Ohio. Those rumors led to multiple bomb threats at local schools in the city.
At a rally in Peoria, Arizona, on Tuesday, Vance said there are thousands of children who don’t speak English in Arizona schools. “What does that do to the education of American children when their teachers aren’t teaching them, but they’re focused on kids who don’t have the legal right to be here?” he said.
There are 273,000 undocumented immigrants in Arizona and 15,000 of them are children enrolled in public schools, according to the Migration Policy Institute.
“Nothing against the children, but we can’t have a border policy that ruins the quality of American education,” Vance added.
In Arizona, however, children who aren’t yet proficient in English learn separately from other students, thanks to an Arizona law passed in 2000 that bans bilingual education.
Studies are mixed on the impact of immigrant children in public schools. At least some of the negative outcomes are tied to the fact that non-immigrant families start to flee school districts with growing immigrant populations. One study earlier this year that attempted to control for that effect found that “greater exposure to immigrant peers correlated with better math and reading scores among U.S.-born students,” according to Education Week.
Either way, accusing immigrant children of making America worse is part of a racist trope that blames Black and brown immigrants for straining public services or bringing diseases across the border.
On Wednesday, Vance made similar comments in Nevada, saying teachers are overwhelmed with “thousands upon thousands” of immigrant children and are forced to “focus on kids who don’t even speak English.”
“Nevada’s children are getting the short end of the stick and not getting the education they deserve,” he said.
According to the Migration Policy Institute, Nevada has 168,000 undocumented immigrants, and 9,000 of those are children in the school system. The state has a robust English language learners program that supports local districts in helping students reach English proficiency.
Vance’s comments come at a time when education has emerged as another leading issue for conservative voters. Elected officials and right-wing activists have been promoting false claims about indoctrination and sexually explicit content in schools.
Under the guise of “parental rights,” which in practice has meant the right of conservative parents to object to any material that’s being taught in schools that they personally don’t like, far-right groups and parents have launched an all-out culture war on schools by working to get extremists elected in school board races, attempting to ban books and smearing LGBTQ+ teachers as abusers.
Nathalie Baptiste
Thu, October 24, 2024 at 10:43 AM MDT
With less than two weeks until election day, GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance has begun attacking immigrant children in multiple swing states. At rallies this week in Arizona and Nevada, Donald Trump’s running mate said that children whose parents are undocumented are ruining the “quality of American education.”
Immigration has been a main focus of the Trump campaign; there have been promises of mass deportations of even people who are here in the U.S. legally, as well as vicious lies spread about Haitian immigrants living in Springfield, Ohio. Those rumors led to multiple bomb threats at local schools in the city.
At a rally in Peoria, Arizona, on Tuesday, Vance said there are thousands of children who don’t speak English in Arizona schools. “What does that do to the education of American children when their teachers aren’t teaching them, but they’re focused on kids who don’t have the legal right to be here?” he said.
There are 273,000 undocumented immigrants in Arizona and 15,000 of them are children enrolled in public schools, according to the Migration Policy Institute.
“Nothing against the children, but we can’t have a border policy that ruins the quality of American education,” Vance added.
In Arizona, however, children who aren’t yet proficient in English learn separately from other students, thanks to an Arizona law passed in 2000 that bans bilingual education.
Studies are mixed on the impact of immigrant children in public schools. At least some of the negative outcomes are tied to the fact that non-immigrant families start to flee school districts with growing immigrant populations. One study earlier this year that attempted to control for that effect found that “greater exposure to immigrant peers correlated with better math and reading scores among U.S.-born students,” according to Education Week.
Either way, accusing immigrant children of making America worse is part of a racist trope that blames Black and brown immigrants for straining public services or bringing diseases across the border.
On Wednesday, Vance made similar comments in Nevada, saying teachers are overwhelmed with “thousands upon thousands” of immigrant children and are forced to “focus on kids who don’t even speak English.”
“Nevada’s children are getting the short end of the stick and not getting the education they deserve,” he said.
According to the Migration Policy Institute, Nevada has 168,000 undocumented immigrants, and 9,000 of those are children in the school system. The state has a robust English language learners program that supports local districts in helping students reach English proficiency.
Vance’s comments come at a time when education has emerged as another leading issue for conservative voters. Elected officials and right-wing activists have been promoting false claims about indoctrination and sexually explicit content in schools.
Under the guise of “parental rights,” which in practice has meant the right of conservative parents to object to any material that’s being taught in schools that they personally don’t like, far-right groups and parents have launched an all-out culture war on schools by working to get extremists elected in school board races, attempting to ban books and smearing LGBTQ+ teachers as abusers.
Opinion
Letters to the Editor: Are they praying for Trump, or are they giving a salute?
Los Angeles Times Opinion
Mon, October 28, 2024 at 4:00 AM MDT
To the editor: It's laughable that former President Trump calls Vice President Kamala Harris lazy. This is coming from a man who spent more time on the golf course than any other president. ("Trump denigrates Harris as ‘lazy,’ invoking a racist trope against Black people," Oct. 22)
But what is not laughable is the accompanying photo of Trump supporters. Their right arms are raised, reminiscent of the Nazi salute. Heads bowed, eyes closed, they are praying for a convicted felon, an adjudicated sexual abuser, a man who incited an insurrection to stay in power.
Someone who mishandled a pandemic resulting in an estimated 200,000 unnecessary deaths. Someone who embraces our adversaries and alienates our allies. His lies are harmful and dangerous, most recently about migrants eating pets and federal disaster workers who are providing emergency assistance after devastating hurricanes.
Is this what blind faith looks like?
D.H. Sloan, Los Angeles
To the editor: The prayer salute looks disconcertingly like the salute we used when we said, "I pledge allegiance to the flag," and which was dropped when I was in grade school during World War II because it looked too much like the Nazi salute.
I don't think even now Jesus would like to be saluted.
Marcia Edwards, Riverside
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Letters to the Editor: Are they praying for Trump, or are they giving a salute?
Los Angeles Times Opinion
Mon, October 28, 2024 at 4:00 AM MDT
Supporters of Donald Trump pray during an event in Doral, Fla., on Oct. 22.
(Alex Brandon / Associated Press)
To the editor: It's laughable that former President Trump calls Vice President Kamala Harris lazy. This is coming from a man who spent more time on the golf course than any other president. ("Trump denigrates Harris as ‘lazy,’ invoking a racist trope against Black people," Oct. 22)
But what is not laughable is the accompanying photo of Trump supporters. Their right arms are raised, reminiscent of the Nazi salute. Heads bowed, eyes closed, they are praying for a convicted felon, an adjudicated sexual abuser, a man who incited an insurrection to stay in power.
Someone who mishandled a pandemic resulting in an estimated 200,000 unnecessary deaths. Someone who embraces our adversaries and alienates our allies. His lies are harmful and dangerous, most recently about migrants eating pets and federal disaster workers who are providing emergency assistance after devastating hurricanes.
Is this what blind faith looks like?
D.H. Sloan, Los Angeles
To the editor: The prayer salute looks disconcertingly like the salute we used when we said, "I pledge allegiance to the flag," and which was dropped when I was in grade school during World War II because it looked too much like the Nazi salute.
I don't think even now Jesus would like to be saluted.
Marcia Edwards, Riverside
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Opinion
Trump campaign's obsessive hate may not boost him, but it will cause long-term damage
Trump campaign's obsessive hate may not boost him, but it will cause long-term damage
Amanda Marcotte
Mon, October 28, 2024
In my swing state of Pennsylvania, it's common for people to joke about how exhausted they are by all the campaign ads. But this year, the jokes fail to capture the ongoing psychic damage Donald Trump and his allies are inflicting with their lie-laden appeals. While ads for Vice President Kamala Harris are largely soothing promises of middle-class tax cuts, every Trump spot is maximum-volume bile. We're routinely threatened with rape and murder at the hands of roving gangs of dark-skinned immigrants. Or we're subjected to wildly distorted tapes of Harris laughing as if she's a horror movie villain about to torture us in a basement. But what makes me cringe the hardest are the anti-trans ads.
Because all of the Trump ads are vicious garbage, I spent a lot of time pondering why the hatred against trans people stands out. It's the tagline: "Kamala is for they/them, Trump is for you." Whoever wrote this no doubt thinks it's a cutesy troll, but what's striking is that it's more blunt than any other ad in its zero-sum mentality. According to these ads, one can either be for trans people or cis people, but it is not possible to be for both. (Never mind that Harris is a cis woman herself.) The not-so-subtle implicit message is that the mere existence of trans people threatens cis people.
To be certain, this is the central message of the Trump campaign, regardless of topic: If any two people are different — whether due to gender, sexual orientation, skin color or background — they must be in a locked battle for dominance, and there can only be one winner. If women gain, men automatically lose. If people immigrate here, it can only be at the expense of those who live here. But rarely is it stated so nakedly as in the anti-trans ads. We're told it is impossible that there's room enough for both cis and trans people in our communities.
Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.
It's so obviously untrue, given a single moment's thought. Even for those who don't fully understand trans identities, this is a classic "mind your own business" matter. The correlation between someone else's gender identity and chromosomal arrangement does not affect you. The efforts to make someone else's gender identity relevant to a cis person's life are laughable in the level of stretching. Oh, you heard some 5th-grade soccer team has a trans kid on it? The person in the stall next to you might have different-looking genitals? You saw pronouns on a nametag? How empty must your life be, to even care? It affects you less than a moth's fart in China. It makes no sense, which is why Republicans have turned to QAnon-level lies — such as Trump's bizarre claim kids are being forced into sex change surgeries in the course of a school day — to give this nonsense juice.
And yet, as Melissa Gira Grant wrote in the New Republic, anti-trans attacks "have become the 'closing message' from Trump and other Republican candidates to voters." Anyone living in a swing state can confirm. While Trump at his rallies talks more about his racism, calling immigrants of color "garbage" who "poison the blood" of the nation, the "they/them" ads dominate on TV.
It's gross, but it's also confusing. Research repeatedly shows that anti-trans messaging doesn't move the needle, electorally. Most voters hate these ads, calling them "shameful" and "mean-spirited." As Dave Weigel reported in Semafor, Republicans went all-in on anti-trans messaging in past elections, but the issue "hasn’t previously worked for GOP candidates in swing states." Weigel argues that the Republicans are ignoring all the data showing this issue falls flat, mostly on a gut sense that it will resonate this time.
One certainly hopes they are wrong, and voters will continue to be puzzled as to why they're being told to be scared about the personal business of strangers. But even if this strategy fails another time for Republicans, there's every reason to be worried about the long-term impacts of blanketing the airwaves with such hateful rhetoric. The most immediate consequence is to further mainstream this unhinged hatred towards trans people. A lot of people, perhaps most, are under this illusion that a mysterious "they" wouldn't allow these ads on TV if the rhetoric was that bad. This isn't true, but this false assumption allows people to see these ads and believe that it's normal to be this fixated and angry over the gender identities of other people. That creates a permission structure for unstable people to wallow in their irrational hatreds.
We can already see the impact of the previous election cycles, where Republicans dangled trans people out as a hate object for their followers. It didn't win them more elections, but it likely contributed to the alarming rise in hate crimes, most of which is due to a dramatic increase in attacks on people perceived to be trans. In the past, a person like Chaya Raichik would be widely regarded as needing medical interventions for her all-consuming preoccupation with trans strangers. Instead, she's a thought leader inside the GOP, despite the constant drumbeat of terrorism against people and schools she's targeted for being LGBTQ-friendly. The terror campaign is spreading internationally and against anyone the right deems somehow not fitting into their narrow gender roles. Cis Algerian boxer Imane Khelif was subject to an international harassment campaign — egged on by Trump and his running mate, Sen JD Vance of Ohio — after false claims she is a "biological male" because she beat a lighter-skinned woman in an Olympic match.
The abuse and violence against trans people is reason enough to be concerned, but the attacks against Khelif illustrate how this dark cloud of hate is billowing out and consuming ever more people. It all goes back to the nasty "they/them" tagline in the Trump ads. Implicit in those ads is a belief that any difference between people, no matter how inconsequential, creates a zero-sum conflict between them, even if there's no rational reason to think their differences should matter. That mentality breeds paranoia, alienation, and fighting between people who otherwise would be fine to live peacefully as neighbors, even friends. For people told to hate each other for irrational reasons, no good comes from it — just stress and pointless anger. The only people who benefit are scummy politicians like Trump, who ruin lives to gain votes and dance away from the social ruins the rest of us have to live in.
Mon, October 28, 2024
In my swing state of Pennsylvania, it's common for people to joke about how exhausted they are by all the campaign ads. But this year, the jokes fail to capture the ongoing psychic damage Donald Trump and his allies are inflicting with their lie-laden appeals. While ads for Vice President Kamala Harris are largely soothing promises of middle-class tax cuts, every Trump spot is maximum-volume bile. We're routinely threatened with rape and murder at the hands of roving gangs of dark-skinned immigrants. Or we're subjected to wildly distorted tapes of Harris laughing as if she's a horror movie villain about to torture us in a basement. But what makes me cringe the hardest are the anti-trans ads.
Because all of the Trump ads are vicious garbage, I spent a lot of time pondering why the hatred against trans people stands out. It's the tagline: "Kamala is for they/them, Trump is for you." Whoever wrote this no doubt thinks it's a cutesy troll, but what's striking is that it's more blunt than any other ad in its zero-sum mentality. According to these ads, one can either be for trans people or cis people, but it is not possible to be for both. (Never mind that Harris is a cis woman herself.) The not-so-subtle implicit message is that the mere existence of trans people threatens cis people.
To be certain, this is the central message of the Trump campaign, regardless of topic: If any two people are different — whether due to gender, sexual orientation, skin color or background — they must be in a locked battle for dominance, and there can only be one winner. If women gain, men automatically lose. If people immigrate here, it can only be at the expense of those who live here. But rarely is it stated so nakedly as in the anti-trans ads. We're told it is impossible that there's room enough for both cis and trans people in our communities.
Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.
It's so obviously untrue, given a single moment's thought. Even for those who don't fully understand trans identities, this is a classic "mind your own business" matter. The correlation between someone else's gender identity and chromosomal arrangement does not affect you. The efforts to make someone else's gender identity relevant to a cis person's life are laughable in the level of stretching. Oh, you heard some 5th-grade soccer team has a trans kid on it? The person in the stall next to you might have different-looking genitals? You saw pronouns on a nametag? How empty must your life be, to even care? It affects you less than a moth's fart in China. It makes no sense, which is why Republicans have turned to QAnon-level lies — such as Trump's bizarre claim kids are being forced into sex change surgeries in the course of a school day — to give this nonsense juice.
And yet, as Melissa Gira Grant wrote in the New Republic, anti-trans attacks "have become the 'closing message' from Trump and other Republican candidates to voters." Anyone living in a swing state can confirm. While Trump at his rallies talks more about his racism, calling immigrants of color "garbage" who "poison the blood" of the nation, the "they/them" ads dominate on TV.
It's gross, but it's also confusing. Research repeatedly shows that anti-trans messaging doesn't move the needle, electorally. Most voters hate these ads, calling them "shameful" and "mean-spirited." As Dave Weigel reported in Semafor, Republicans went all-in on anti-trans messaging in past elections, but the issue "hasn’t previously worked for GOP candidates in swing states." Weigel argues that the Republicans are ignoring all the data showing this issue falls flat, mostly on a gut sense that it will resonate this time.
One certainly hopes they are wrong, and voters will continue to be puzzled as to why they're being told to be scared about the personal business of strangers. But even if this strategy fails another time for Republicans, there's every reason to be worried about the long-term impacts of blanketing the airwaves with such hateful rhetoric. The most immediate consequence is to further mainstream this unhinged hatred towards trans people. A lot of people, perhaps most, are under this illusion that a mysterious "they" wouldn't allow these ads on TV if the rhetoric was that bad. This isn't true, but this false assumption allows people to see these ads and believe that it's normal to be this fixated and angry over the gender identities of other people. That creates a permission structure for unstable people to wallow in their irrational hatreds.
We can already see the impact of the previous election cycles, where Republicans dangled trans people out as a hate object for their followers. It didn't win them more elections, but it likely contributed to the alarming rise in hate crimes, most of which is due to a dramatic increase in attacks on people perceived to be trans. In the past, a person like Chaya Raichik would be widely regarded as needing medical interventions for her all-consuming preoccupation with trans strangers. Instead, she's a thought leader inside the GOP, despite the constant drumbeat of terrorism against people and schools she's targeted for being LGBTQ-friendly. The terror campaign is spreading internationally and against anyone the right deems somehow not fitting into their narrow gender roles. Cis Algerian boxer Imane Khelif was subject to an international harassment campaign — egged on by Trump and his running mate, Sen JD Vance of Ohio — after false claims she is a "biological male" because she beat a lighter-skinned woman in an Olympic match.
The abuse and violence against trans people is reason enough to be concerned, but the attacks against Khelif illustrate how this dark cloud of hate is billowing out and consuming ever more people. It all goes back to the nasty "they/them" tagline in the Trump ads. Implicit in those ads is a belief that any difference between people, no matter how inconsequential, creates a zero-sum conflict between them, even if there's no rational reason to think their differences should matter. That mentality breeds paranoia, alienation, and fighting between people who otherwise would be fine to live peacefully as neighbors, even friends. For people told to hate each other for irrational reasons, no good comes from it — just stress and pointless anger. The only people who benefit are scummy politicians like Trump, who ruin lives to gain votes and dance away from the social ruins the rest of us have to live in.
Founder of TikTok owner ByteDance jumps to top of China's rich list
Mon, October 28, 2024
By Casey Hall
SHANGHAI (Reuters) - ByteDance founder Zhang Yiming is China's richest person, with personal wealth of $49.3 billion, an annual rich list showed on Tuesday, although counterparts in real estate and renewables have fared less well.
Zhang, 41, who stepped down as chief executive of ByteDance in 2021, becomes the 18th individual to be crowned China's richest person in the 26 years since the Hurun China Rich List was first published.
He overtook bottled water magnate Zhong Shanshan, who slipped to second place as his fortune dropped 24% to $47.9 billion.
Despite a legal battle over its U.S. assets, ByteDance's global revenue grew 30% last year to $110 billion, Hurun said, helping to propel Zhang's personal fortune.
Third on the list was Tencent's low-profile founder, Pony Ma, while Colin Huang, founder of PDD Holdings, slipped to fourth place from third last year, even as his firm's discount-focused e-commerce platforms, Pinduoduo and Temu, continue to show healthy revenue growth.
The number of billionaires on the list dropped by 142 to 753, shrinking more than a third from its 2021 peak.
"China’s economy and stock markets had a difficult year," said Hurun Report Chairman Rupert Hoogewerf.
The most dramatic falls in fortunes have come from China's real estate sector, he added, while consumer electronics is clearly rising fast, with Xiaomi founder Lei Jun adding $5 billion to his wealth this year.
"Solar panel, lithium battery and EV makers have had a challenging year, as competition intensified, leading to a glut, and the threat of tariffs added to uncertainties," said Hoogewerf, who is also the list's chief researcher.
"Solar panel makers saw their wealth down as much as 80% from the 2021 peak, while battery and EV makers were down by half and a quarter respectively."
(Reporting by Casey Hall; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)
Zhang Yiming, founder and global CEO of ByteDance, poses in Palo Alto, California ·
Mon, October 28, 2024
By Casey Hall
SHANGHAI (Reuters) - ByteDance founder Zhang Yiming is China's richest person, with personal wealth of $49.3 billion, an annual rich list showed on Tuesday, although counterparts in real estate and renewables have fared less well.
Zhang, 41, who stepped down as chief executive of ByteDance in 2021, becomes the 18th individual to be crowned China's richest person in the 26 years since the Hurun China Rich List was first published.
He overtook bottled water magnate Zhong Shanshan, who slipped to second place as his fortune dropped 24% to $47.9 billion.
Despite a legal battle over its U.S. assets, ByteDance's global revenue grew 30% last year to $110 billion, Hurun said, helping to propel Zhang's personal fortune.
Third on the list was Tencent's low-profile founder, Pony Ma, while Colin Huang, founder of PDD Holdings, slipped to fourth place from third last year, even as his firm's discount-focused e-commerce platforms, Pinduoduo and Temu, continue to show healthy revenue growth.
The number of billionaires on the list dropped by 142 to 753, shrinking more than a third from its 2021 peak.
"China’s economy and stock markets had a difficult year," said Hurun Report Chairman Rupert Hoogewerf.
The most dramatic falls in fortunes have come from China's real estate sector, he added, while consumer electronics is clearly rising fast, with Xiaomi founder Lei Jun adding $5 billion to his wealth this year.
"Solar panel, lithium battery and EV makers have had a challenging year, as competition intensified, leading to a glut, and the threat of tariffs added to uncertainties," said Hoogewerf, who is also the list's chief researcher.
"Solar panel makers saw their wealth down as much as 80% from the 2021 peak, while battery and EV makers were down by half and a quarter respectively."
(Reporting by Casey Hall; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)
'A joke': GOP guest attacks CNN for booting him off show after furious on-air fight
Adam Nichols
October 29, 2024
Ryan Girdusky and Abby Phillip (CNN screenshot)
A GOP guest booted from CNN after a bitter blow-up with a pro-Palestinian panelist hit back early Tuesday, claiming his comment that sparked a furious on-air fight was a "joke."
Republican strategist Ryan Girdusky infuriated guest Mehdi Hasan, a former MSNBC host, current editor-in-chief of Zeteo and a pro-Palestine campaigner, on the network's show "Newsnight."
He was removed from the show after quipping, "All right, well, I hope your beeper doesn't go off" as Hasan spoke about supporting Palestinians. It was a reference to an Israeli attack on Hezbollah which targeted beepers and walkie talkies.
"Are you a racist, violent person, inciting violence against me?!" said Hasan. "Good job CNN, let's have first block say the Muslim guy should be blown up on TV."
The blow-up left the panel in chaos as host Abby Phillip tried to calm the situation. After a commercial break, she said Girdusky had been asked to leave.
But Girdusky took to X in an attempt to get the last word, calling his comment, "a joke."
ALSO READ: Not all former Trump 'spiritual advisors' appear in public to support his 2024 campaign
"You can stay on CNN if you falsely call every Republican a Nazi and have taken money from Qatar-funded media," he said. "Apparently you can't go on CNN if you make a joke.
"I'm glad American gets to see what CNN stands for."
In a statement, CNN said, "There is zero room for racism or bigotry at CNN or on our air. We aim to foster thoughtful conversation and debate, including between people who profoundly disagree with each other, in order to explore important issues and promote mutual understanding. But we will not allow guests to be demeaned or for the line of civility to be crossed.
"Ryan Girdusky will not be welcomed back at our network."
Adam Nichols
October 29, 2024
Ryan Girdusky and Abby Phillip (CNN screenshot)
A GOP guest booted from CNN after a bitter blow-up with a pro-Palestinian panelist hit back early Tuesday, claiming his comment that sparked a furious on-air fight was a "joke."
Republican strategist Ryan Girdusky infuriated guest Mehdi Hasan, a former MSNBC host, current editor-in-chief of Zeteo and a pro-Palestine campaigner, on the network's show "Newsnight."
He was removed from the show after quipping, "All right, well, I hope your beeper doesn't go off" as Hasan spoke about supporting Palestinians. It was a reference to an Israeli attack on Hezbollah which targeted beepers and walkie talkies.
"Are you a racist, violent person, inciting violence against me?!" said Hasan. "Good job CNN, let's have first block say the Muslim guy should be blown up on TV."
The blow-up left the panel in chaos as host Abby Phillip tried to calm the situation. After a commercial break, she said Girdusky had been asked to leave.
But Girdusky took to X in an attempt to get the last word, calling his comment, "a joke."
ALSO READ: Not all former Trump 'spiritual advisors' appear in public to support his 2024 campaign
"You can stay on CNN if you falsely call every Republican a Nazi and have taken money from Qatar-funded media," he said. "Apparently you can't go on CNN if you make a joke.
"I'm glad American gets to see what CNN stands for."
In a statement, CNN said, "There is zero room for racism or bigotry at CNN or on our air. We aim to foster thoughtful conversation and debate, including between people who profoundly disagree with each other, in order to explore important issues and promote mutual understanding. But we will not allow guests to be demeaned or for the line of civility to be crossed.
"Ryan Girdusky will not be welcomed back at our network."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)