Monday, March 27, 2023

IT'S A MYTH
Opinion: Carbon capture and storage a good deal for Canada and the world
Opinion by James Millar • Friday

As we await further details on support for carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects in the upcoming federal budget, there are almost daily reports expressing concern that Canada is losing ground to the United States and other competitors when it comes to breaking ground on large-scale CCS facilities.


Pipes run through a carbon capture facility in Alberta.
© Provided by Calgary Herald

Canada and the European Union are indeed scrambling to craft policies promoting private-sector investment in CCS following the landmark incentives put in place in the U.S. late last year. The United Kingdom has also doubled down with last week’s announcement of a CAD $33-billion investment in CCS for the next 20 years. Getting the right framework built, and quickly, is critical as the clock is ticking on Canada’s commitment to reach net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Meeting this goal will rely heavily on implementing CCS in heavy industries across the country, including power generation; cement, steel and fertilizer manufacturing, mining, petrochemical processing, and oil and gas production.

While much attention is on the hefty upfront price tag for building large-scale CCS infrastructure, what is often lost in the debates over how to create the right conditions for investment in CCS are the longer-term costs to our society if we do not proceed on pace with the massive build-out required if we hope to meet our Paris Agreement commitments.

At the highest level, the world can’t afford to ignore CCS as a key tool in fighting climate change. The International Energy Agency estimates that CCS will be required for as much as one-quarter of the GHG reductions necessary by 2050, while the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change forecasts that the cost of climate mitigation could more than double without the application of CCS technologies.

It is also important to look beyond the direct cost of building a CCS facility, and consider how the cost of CCS impacts end users of the products we all rely on for daily life. A new study by Norwegian and Dutch experts concluded that implementing CCS on large-scale industrial projects yields significant CO2 reductions at minimal cost to the public over the long term. The researchers concluded that CCS is a relatively cheap emissions reduction solution for the end users of the commodities that heavy-emitting industries provide. After all, the average person does not tend to buy a lot of steel, cement, fertilizer or crude oil, but we do rely on these inputs for our homes, buildings, roads, clothing, food, pharmaceuticals and electronic devices. It turns out the overall cost for mitigating CO2 emissions from these products with CCS is marginal and well within the normal range of variation we see in market prices for such goods.

Focusing on the situation in Canada, our current federal emissions reduction plan calls for more than tripling Canada’s current CCS capacity by 2030. Adding the capture facilities, pipelines and underground storage systems needed for keeping at least another 15 million tonnes of CO2 per year from entering the atmosphere by the end of the decade is a massive undertaking that will require enormous political will, public confidence, and collaboration between industry, government, academia, Indigenous communities, and other partners.

Related video: Pressure grows on the shipping industry to accept carbon levy (WION)   View on Watch

The major players in Canada’s heavy-emitting industries – which provide major contributions to national GDP and government revenues, employ millions of people, and include firms that are at the core of most Canadians’ pension plans and investment portfolios – are committed to achieving net zero by 2050, and they are set to invest billions in Canada. Capital Power announced last December a limited notice to proceed for its Genesee CCS project. Heidelberg Materials continues to advance the world’s first CCS project on a cement plant in Edmonton. And the oilsands industry is already spending tens of millions of dollars on environmental assessments, early-stage engineering work and stakeholder engagement that is necessary to receive permits for construction.

All heavy emitters are awaiting key details to be released in the March 28 budget for how the Government of Canada will create a competitive regulatory environment with co-financing models allowing for multi-decade investments that will be tenable through the volatile cash flows that can define industry, especially the oil and gas sector.

Canada’s federal government has already lined up significant support for CCS projects through a proposed investment tax credit, new capital cost allowance classes for CCS projects, a federal price on carbon emissions, and several federal and provincial carbon credit systems that will allow companies to monetize the emissions they permanently send underground. When taken together, these incentives provide a promising basis for CCS investment in Canada.

The focus now needs to be on ensuring these programs move from proposals to reality, and for the government to provide long-term certainty on its carbon pricing regime so that industry can be confident its economic models won’t collapse due to the shifting winds of climate politics in the decades to come.

In the meantime, the risk that capital available for CCS development will move south of the border continues to grow. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act contained straightforward incentives for CCS, including a production tax credit that provides $85 for every tonne of CO2 captured – a juicy carrot analysts believe will cover two-thirds of a project’s lifetime capital and operating costs.

As the world’s good intentions for addressing climate change become concrete plans with dollar figures attached, some argue that funding for the energy transition be directed towards renewable power and other emissions reduction technologies, but not CCS. This is an unrealistic approach considering the magnitude of the challenge ahead.

To be clear, global decarbonization requires using all the tools we have at our disposal. CCS is the only proven solution we have today that can dramatically cut CO2 emissions from heavy industries that are the pillars of our economy. It is worth pointing out that investment in this emission reduction pathway has been virtually non-existent compared to the trillions of dollars that have been spent on wind turbines, solar panels, electric vehicles and energy efficiency programs so far this century – during which time greenhouse gas emissions have continued to climb and the share of fossil fuels in the world’s energy mix has only budged marginally from 87 per cent in 2000 to 84 per cent by 2020.

It’s time to bring CCS to life, and Canada is uniquely suited to capture enormous value from the CCS boom on the horizon. With the right geology for safely storing CO2 deep underground, the technical experience from building and operating many of the world’s first CCS facilities, and the desire to fight climate change in a just and sustainable manner, Canada is poised to continue its global leadership in the CCS space.

Let’s make sure we don’t miss out on this once-in-a-generation opportunity. Our children are counting on us.

James Millar is president and CEO of the International CCS Knowledge Centre.

Carbon Capture Technology And Its Growing Role in Decarbonisation

Editor OilPrice.com
Sat, March 25, 2023

With a greater number of climate policies coming into place worldwide, from the Biden Administration’s IRA to the European Union’s New Green Deal, companies are feeling mounting pressure to decarbonise. And while some are doing it to enhance their ESG practices and futureproof their business, others are concerned about rising carbon taxes, which could slash their profits. So, as well as introducing green energy technology, many are turning to carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies to support their decarbonisation efforts. Big Oil is pumping billions into CCS equipment at operations around the globe to keep production ‘low-carbon oil’, while other industries, such as manufacturing, are looking to the technology to help clean up operations.

The International Energy Agency (IEA) sees CCS technology as key to the decarbonisation of fossil fuel operations and industrial processes, particularly useful as a bridge to greater renewable energy production. By 2021, the total annual carbon capture capacity stood at close to 45?Mt?of CO2, a figure that is expected to increase substantially with approximately 300 projects under construction. CCS equipment could capture more than 220 Mt CO2 a year by 2030. This will help companies achieve net-zero ambitions when paired with renewable energy technologies.

By 2022, 35 commercial facilities were using CCS for industrial processes, fuel transformation, and power generation. Deployment of the technology has been slow to date but investment in the sector is rising sharply, as companies look for ways to reduce their carbon output, improve their ESG practices, and avoid carbon taxes, to support a green transition. However, improved political policies and regulatory frameworks are required to ensure the effective rollout of the technology, in line with climate policies.

According to research by Wood Mackenzie, 2023 will be a milestone year for CCS. The global CCS pipeline rose by more than 50 percent in 2022, with projects planned across several industrial sectors. In recent years, government funding of up to 50 percent has helped CCS projects get off the ground, a trend that is expected to continue. The U.S. government has so far committed $3.7 billion to finance CCS projects and meet its net-zero goal by 2050. The introduction of new climate policies worldwide will also support the uptake of the technology.

In terms of how the CO2 is used, much of the sequestered carbon is currently going to enhanced oil recovery operations at present, responding to the ongoing need for fossil fuels to ensure energy security worldwide. However, as green energy capacity increases worldwide, much of the CO2 will go to designated storage sites, with 66 percent expected to be pumped deep underground by 2030. New legislation and supporting incentives for CO2 utilisation will encourage this change.

David Lluis Madrid, the CCUS analyst at BloombergNEF (BNEF), explained, “CCS is starting to overcome its bad reputation.” Madrid added, “It is now being deployed as a decarbonization tool, which means the CO2 needs to be stored. A lack of CO2 transport and storage sites near industrial or power generation point sources could be a major bottleneck to CCS development. But we are already seeing a big increase in these projects to serve that need.”

One of many projects underway globally is an innovative CCS offshore site, the Greensand project, in the Danish part of the North Sea, where construction began this month. CO2 captured in Belgium will be transported via ship for injection in a depleted oil field, located 120 miles from the North Sea coast. The project is being undertaken by a consortium of companies including Germany’s Wintershall Dea and Britain’s INEOS. It is considered to be the world’s first cross-border offshore carbon dioxide storage with the explicit purpose of tackling climate change.

Meanwhile, in Norway, a joint venture between Equinor, TotalEnergies, and Shell is also underway. The Northern Lights project will see 1.5 million tonnes of CO2 injected into saline aquifer near the Troll gas field annually, starting in 2024. In the U.K., the Accorn CCS project is being launched off the coast of Scotland, aimed at creating an annual capacity of 5-10 mtpa of CO2 by 2030. The project is being operated by Storegga, Shell, Harbour Energy and North Sea Midstream Partners. And in the Netherlands, the Porthos project by the Port of Rotterdam, Gasunie, and EBN is expected to provide a storage capacity of 2.5 mtpa of CO2. Porthos will be located in depleted Dutch gas fields in the North Sea, with operations expected to start in 2026.

Many companies worldwide are now looking to CCS technologies to help them achieve decarbonisation aims without giving up on their traditional operations. The rollout of CCS around the globe will be supported by new climate policies, decarbonisation incentives, and better regulation of the industry. In addition, greater public funding for CCS projects is expected to spur private investment in the sector and boost the world’s CO2storage capacity significantly in the coming decades.

By Felicity Bradstock for Oilprice.com


Why Japan Isn’t Tapping It's Incredible Geothermal Potential

Editor OilPrice.com
Sun, March 26, 2023

Japan, a large energy importer where coal and gas make up two-thirds of electricity generation, has one abundant domestic renewable energy source that has remained untapped—geothermal energy.

Geothermal resources in Japan, thought to be the world's third largest, could stay deep underground despite Japan's net-zero by 2050 pledge and the fact that it is still very much dependent on fossil fuels for a large part of its electricity consumption.

Japan lies along the western edge of the Pacific Ring of Fire, one of the most seismically active places on Earth. As much as 10 percent of the world's volcanic activity takes place in Japan, and the country is blessed with geothermal resources.

But a very powerful and centuries-old Japanese industry and tradition – hot spring resorts – is opposed to large-scale development of geothermal energy, fearing that tapping the resources would affect the temperatures and quality of hot springs, a major business with more than 13,000 inns and baths across Japan.

Japan has some geothermal plants, around 20 facilities generating a total of 535 megawatts (MW). This represents only 0.3% of the total electricity generation in Japan, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).

There have been some rare examples recently of small geothermal plants co-existing with hot springs – the so-called 'onsen' in Japanese. But an overwhelmingly large part of onsen owners are opposed to geothermal development.

"Rampant geothermal development is a threat to our culture," Yoshiyasu Sato, owner of a secluded inn next to a hot spring in the mountains of Fukushima Prefecture, told The New York Times' investigative reporter Hiroko Tabuchi.

"If something were to happen to our onsens, who will pay?" Sato says.

Yutaka Seki, executive director with the National Hot Spring Association, told NYT, "We aren't opposed to geothermal energy for the sake of opposing it."

"But we strongly caution against unchecked large-scale development."

Opposition to geothermal energy development has remained even after the energy crisis of the past two years, which has had Japan's energy import bill surge due to high coal and natural gas prices and has resulted in calls on households and businesses to conserve energy.

In 2021, natural gas accounted for 35% of electricity production in Japan, followed by coal at 32.5% share. Geothermal energy represented just 0.3% of power generation, despite the fact that the potential would be equivalent to 23 gigawatts (GW), according to IRENA. High upfront costs and rigorous regulatory processes have hindered geothermal development, despite the technical and construction achievements of Japan's domestic giants such as Toshiba and Mitsubishi.

Some local governments with hot spring resorts have recently introduced new restrictions on geothermal plant development. For example, the town of Kusatsu passed an ordinance last year stating that companies seeking to develop geothermal resources have to prove a project would not negatively impact hot springs in the area.

Even nuclear energy generation in Japan has made more progress since the start of the energy crisis and the focus on energy security after the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Japan is bringing back nuclear power as a key energy source, looking to protect its energy security in the crisis that has led to surging fossil fuel prices. The Japanese government confirmed in December a new policy for nuclear energy, which the country had mostly abandoned since the Fukushima disaster in 2011.

A panel of experts under the Japanese Ministry of Industry decided that Japan would allow the development of new nuclear reactors and allow available reactors to operate after the current limit of 60 years.

But Japan's hot springs are a hurdle to the development of a domestic renewable source of energy. Geothermal energy could generate 10% of Japan's electricity if tapped, analysts say.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com
32% of all racist incidents in 2022 were directed at Arab Israelis - Justice Ministry

Story by By JERUSALEM POST STAFF • Yesterday

Israel's Justice Ministry released a study examining the racist incidents which occurred in Israel in 2022 last week in honor of the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on March 21, 2023,

RALLYING AGAINST racism in Tel Aviv’s Rabin Square.© (photo credit: TOMER NEUBERG/FLASH90)

The data represented incidents that were reported to the Justice Ministry's Unit for Coordinating the Fight Against Racism in 2022

According to the report, the complaints were primarily about discrimination in the provision of public services (19% of all complaints), employment (12%), and general racist statements in the public sphere (11%). There were also reports of racist advertising in public, racism on the part of the police, racial discrimination from public servants and educators, and racially-motivated criminal offenses.

In total, 415 racist incidents were investigated by the Justice Ministry in 2022. This, according to Tuesday's report, indicates a general downward trend in the number of reported instances of racism.

Of those, 32% of incidents represented allegations of racism against Arabs and 17% alleged racist action against Ethiopian Israelis. 18% of racist incidents were reported by Israelis who came from the former USSR, 5% from Mizrahi Israelis, 5% from haredim, and another 15% from miscellaneous categories not listed by name in the report.



PALESTINIAN SUPPORTERS and Israeli delegates argue outside the World Conference Against Racism, in Durban, 2001. (credit: REUTERS)© Provided by The Jerusalem PostPALESTINIAN SUPPORTERS and Israeli delegates argue outside the World Conference Against Racism, in Durban, 2001. (credit: REUTERS)

The percentage of cases opened for Ethiopians between 2019-2022 represents twice the percentage of the Israeli population which Ethiopians make up. That is to say, 3.5% of all cases 2019-2022 alleged racism against Ethiopian Israelis, who constitute approximately 1.7% of the population of Israel. This proportion is slightly smaller for Arab citizens, who represented 35% of cases in the three-year period and constitute approximately 21% of the population.

The same ratios were even more dramatic when applied to "contact cases" which are cases of alleged assault by a police officer. The percentage of police violence cases brought to the Justice Ministry by Ethiopians is approximately two and a half times larger than the Ethiopian percentage of the Israeli population. For Arabs, the percentage of cases is twice the percentage of the total population.


Related video: Tens of thousands of Israelis protest judicial overhaul (Reuters)
Duration 1:12  View on Watch


WIONIsrael protests: Cracks in Israel's coalition government
3:41



WIONIsrael: Minister cites threat to national security as anger grows
7:20


The International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and the UDHR


The International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination was established by the United Nations and is observed on March 21, the day the police in Sharpeville, South Africa, killed 69 people at a peaceful demonstration against apartheid in 1960, per the United Nations' website.

The protesters were specifically demonstrating against the "pass laws," South Africa's internal passport system which allowed the strict maintenance of racial segregation.

The 2023 theme of the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination focused on the urgency of combatting racism and racial discrimination, according to the United Nations' website. The 2023 observance of the day marked 75 years since the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Among many other things, the UDHR states unequivocally that all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.

Racism against Ethiopian Israelis

Teachers from a school in Netivot opened a racist WhatsApp group earlier this month in which they gossiped and laughed about their Ethiopian students.

The students departed for a school trip on March 12, and the girls sitting behind the teachers on the bus noticed their teachers texting in the group called “Black [Girls] School Trip.”

The girls who saw this took photos and videos and shared them with the rest of the class.

One of the girls sent out a message to the teachers admonishing them for their racism.

The teachers were made to attend a hearing, where it was decided that they could continue teaching and their status would be reviewed in the next academic year.

Ariella Marsden contributed to this report.
‘They are formidable creatures’: life with Northumberland’s rare white wild cattle







\




Story by Mark Brown North of England correspondent • 7h ago

From a distance they look so placid and approachable, but you would not want to get on the wrong side of the wild white cattle of Chillingham, one of the rarest animals in the world.

“They are formidable creatures,” says the warden, Ellie Waddington. “If they are cornered, they will defend themselves. Obviously we think of cattle as being big, lumbering, docile animals that we have in fields today … but these guys are a completely different beast.”


The cattle are very different to what you would see on a farm. For one thing, they are ghostly white with beautiful mottled faces. They are nimble, short, stocky with big muscles in their shoulders and chests, and they have wonderful horns akin to fancy-dress Viking headgear.

The herd lives in 150 hectares (380 acres) of idyllic north Northumberland countryside, and they are remarkable survivors of the ancient cattle that once roamed Britain’s forests.

This year, there are about 130 cattle, so they are far more rare than mountain gorillas or pandas. They live as wild animals and are not handled by anyone or treated by vets. The only way to see them is by taking a tour organised by a charity that manages the park and conserves the landscape. Those tours begin this year on 3 April.

Quite why the cattle were brought to what was a deer park in Northumberland, perhaps 700 years ago, is unclear. But here they remain. Waddington says the wild cattle are some of the most inbred animals in the world. They have had no human interference for centuries and have not been subject to the breeding processes that other cattle have gone through to improve meat or dairy output.

“These guys are incredibly inbred,” she says. “It is kind of a marvel that they’re still here and standing because realistically, when you look at animals that do inbreed over a long period of time, they become infertile and they die out.”

It can be a tough life. “They have been breeding for survival so the bulls will fight for dominance. It’s the biggest, strongest bulls that win those fights and pass on their genes. If there is a calf that’s weak and isn’t able to make it then it dies. It is survival of the fittest.”

The cattle live in smaller subherds with dominant bulls. When a younger bull challenges, there can be a full-on fight, although rarely to the death. “Most of the time one bull backs down. It would have to be an incredibly stubborn animal that would carry on until it was dead.”

Generally, the cattle could not care less about human observers, and the biggest danger might be from a mother that has calved for the first time and will be hyper-alert to possible threats. “There are certainly animals I would take you a little close to and others I wouldn’t,” says Waddington.

The cattle are important as a scientific marvel – Charles Darwin was a fascinated visitor – but also important because of their magic and mystery.

No one knows for sure why they are here. Were they brought over by the Vikings or Romans? Are they part of Celtic folklore that talks about the Irish goddess Brigid being raised on the milk of a white cow?

It is known that the wild cattle were once hunted and that is one reason they are still here, says Waddington. “We wouldn’t be able to look at them today if they weren’t a hunted animal. It was a bit of a novelty because there was nowhere else where you could hunt wild white cattle.”

Waddington, whose husband and sister are also wardens, has understandably developed a real affection for the wild white cattle.

“They are very relaxing, very soothing,” she says. “But then I’ve always found cattle quite relaxing. I’ve just come back off maternity leave and when I was giving birth I had a playlist of cattle sounds because I find them so relaxing.”

Chillingham cattle were not on the playlist but perhaps they should be recorded. “They make a wonderful noise,” Waddington says. “The bulls make a wonderful loud hooting bellow to compete with the other bulls and show how big and strong they are.”

The charity-organised tours begin on 3 April and run to October
High rates of eczema could be caused by the air that we breathe, new research suggests

Story by Erika Edwards • 13h ago

Chemicals that spew from vehicle exhaust and are used to make a variety of common products — from spandex to memory foam mattresses — could cause eczema in infancy, according to research from the National Institutes of Health.


High rates of eczema could be caused by the air that we breathe, new research suggests© Provided by NBC News

"We have solid data establishing that pollutants are very likely behind increasing cases of atopic dermatitis," Dr. Ian Myles, chief of the Epithelial Research Unit in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology. (Disclosure: I participated in a clinical trial run by Myles in 2018.)

Atopic dermatitis, more commonly known as eczema, is an incredibly itchy, inflammatory skin condition that affects 31.6 million Americans. It almost always begins in the first year of life, and peaks in early childhood, according to the National Eczema Association. Allergens, such as pets, perfumes, dyes and food, can cause the condition to flare up unexpectedly, even in adults.

What causes eczema in the first place has been a mystery. Genetics play a role, but the incidence of eczema has risen two to three times in industrialized countries since the 1970s, leaving experts convinced something in the environment is behind the dramatic increase.

Myles and his team turned to eczema "hot spots" around the country — places where clinics were treating higher numbers of eczema patients — and studied toxins in the surrounding environment. They found similar chemicals called diisocyanates and isocyanates to be most prevalent.

Diiocyanates are used in the manufacturing process of many polyurethane products, such as adhesives, flexible foams, carpeting and fabrics designed to be stretchy or weather-resistant.

Other than exposures for factory workers, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, part of the CDC, says the chemicals are unlikely to be toxic in polyurethane products as long as those items have been cured, or dried, appropriately by the manufacturer.

But it's exhaust fumes from modern vehicles that may have been driving eczema rates for the past 50 years.

Catalytic converters work by eliminating many of the harmful chemicals found in gasoline, but in that process, they produce isocyanates as a byproduct. Catalytic converters became mandatory for all vehicles in the U.S. in 1975, coinciding with the beginning of the rise in eczema cases.

The findings were published in Science Advances in January.

Dr. Jessica Hui, a pediatric allergist and immunologist at National Jewish Health in Denver, called the research "exciting."

"I think these authors are spot on in recognizing that the incidence of allergic conditions is increasing concurrently with how different pollutants are increasing in our environment," Hui said. "We're finally understanding more about why people are getting eczema."

The NIH team went beyond simply linking diisocyanates and isocyanates to eczema hot spots. They took the chemicals into their lab and, using mice and bacterial cultures, found that they directly affect the skin's microbiome in two ways.

They force healthy, protective bacteria to stop making oils that moisturize the skin. And "while they're doing that, they are also activating a specific receptor on your skin, sending signals to the brain to induce itch and inflammation," Myles explained.

Proving that the chemicals prompt atoptic dermatitis reactions on the skin could help lead to new treatments.

The research team then studied whether spraying a type of healthy bacteria called Roseomonas mucosa onto a person's skin would reduce eczema flares. The bacteria are found in the microbiomes of healthy people who do not have eczema.

They found that most people had a modest, sustained improvement. And the effect was even more dramatic if those people lived in areas where diisocyanate levels were higher.

What can people prone to eczema outbreaks do?

Avoiding car exhaust and even the wide variety of polyurethane-containing products is unreasonable for most people.

"It's a very interesting study, but we don't have evidence that there's something you could do" to reduce exposures to diisocyanates and isocyanates, said Dr. Peck Ong, a pediatric allergist and immunologist at Children's Hospital Los Angeles.

"So much of this is out of our control. I mean, you can't shut the highways down," Myles said.

It is possible that some air filtration systems might be able to remove diisocyanates and isocyanates. Research is needed, Myles said, to determine which ones might do so effectively to reduce eczema risks.

Follow NBC HEALTH on Twitter & Facebook.

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
RIP
CNES astronaut Jean-Jacques Favier, 1st French scientist to fly in space, dies at 73

Story by Robert Z. Pearlman • 11h ago

Jean-Jacques Favier, who in 1996 became the sixth astronaut and first scientist from France to launch into space, has died at the age of 73.



STS-78 payload specialist Jean-Jacques Favier, representing the French space agency CNES, holds up a Bubble Drop Particle Unit test container to a camera inside the Spacelab module aboard the space shuttle Columbia in July 1996.© NASA

Favier's death on March 19 was confirmed by the CNES (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales or National Centre for Space Studies), France's space agency.

"The passing of astronaut Jean-Jacques Favier leaves a great void in the space world: CNES has lost one of its own," said Philippe Baptiste, president of CNES, in a statement issued on Friday (March 24). "As the first French scientist to go into space, I know he will leave his mark on future generations and inspire many of us."

Selected with France's second group of astronauts in 1985, Favier made his first and only launch as a payload specialist aboard NASA's space shuttle Columbia. During 17 days in Earth orbit, Favier and his six STS-78 crewmates operated the fifth Spacelab mission dedicated solely to life and microgravity research, in part to prepare for crews living on the International Space Station four years later.

Related: NASA's space shuttle program in pictures: A tribute

Flying with Favier were Tom Henricks, Kevin Kregel, Rick Linnehan, Susan Helms and Charles Brady of NASA, as well as Canadian Space Agency astronaut Bob Thirsk.

"For a scientist like me, [the most incredible aspect of being aboard the shuttle] was being able to conduct my own experiments in space. That was very exciting from a professional point of view," Favier said at a 2018 conference hosted by the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology in Moscow. "Basically, I brought my experiments full-circle. I prepared them in the lab, I developed the flight models, I flew the flight models and then after the mission I brought them back to the lab to exploit the data, and then made publications."

"I'm one of very few people who has been able to do that," he said.

Aboard Columbia, Favier operated more than 30 physics investigations and took part in over a dozen physiology studies. His responsibilities included operating the Advanced Gradient Heating Facility (AGHF), a furnace used to test how different types of materials transitioned as they solidified, directly related to his own research.

Columbia landed at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida on July 7, 1996. As his only spaceflight, Favier logged a total of 16 days, 21 hours, 48 minutes and 30 seconds while completing 271 orbits of Earth.

Jean-Jacques Henri Favier was born on April 13, 1949. in Kehl, Germany, but he attended school and grew up in Strasbourg, France.

"Yuri Gagarin [the first human in space] flew on the eve of my 12th birthday, and that really resonated with me," Favier said. "So I followed developments in human spaceflight after that — both Soviet and American. But I never dreamed that one day I would be a part of it."

He received an engineering degree from the National Polytechnical Institute of Grenoble in France in 1971, and earned doctorate degrees in engineering and in metallurgy and physics, respectively, from the Mining School of Paris and the University of Grenoble in 1977.

Favier was serving as a research engineer, heading up the solidification group and advising the director of the Material Science Research Center at the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA or Commissaniat a l'Energie Atomique), when he applied and was subsequently selected by CNES to become an astronaut. Initially, he was considered for a flight with the Russians to the Mir space station.

"So I started my training [in] Russia, but it only lasted for about six weeks — until we started training on the Soyuz capsule," he recalled. "Then they discovered that at 193 centimeters (6.3 feet) I was too tall to fit into the Soyuz [spacecraft]. The seats were designed for pilots, who at the time, tended to be on the shorter side."

Fortunately, he was also the principal investigator for MEPHISTO, a joint CNES and NASA furnace system, which had already been flown on several space shuttle missions, which opened the door to his also flying on the U.S. winged orbiter.

Prior to his own launch, Favier was assigned as an alternate payload specialist on STS-65, the second International Migrogravity Laboratory (IML) mission, in 1994. He supported the mission as a crew interface coordinator from the Payload Operations Control Center at Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

Related: Weightlessness and its effect on astronauts

After his career as an astronaut, Favier returned to his research and became more involved in education. He helped contribute to the work between the Clément Ader-Albi Institute and the CNES team in charge of the Spaceship FR project, identifying the resources and technologies needed to support a future lunar base. He was also named an honorary professor at the Mining School of Paris and became a full professor at the International Space University near Strasbourg, where he also served on the board of advisors and chaired the research steering committee.

In 2009, Favier co-founded the remote imaging company Blue Planet to offer sub-meter color imagery of Earth.

For his contributions to CNES and NASA, Favier was honored as a Knight of the French Legion of Honor and a recipient of the NASA Space Flight Medal, among other awards.

Favier was married to Michele Jean and together they had four children, Adrien, Jeanne, Pierre and Claire.

'HEWERS OF WOOD, DRAWERS OF WATER'

U.S. offers cash to Canadian critical minerals projects during Biden's visit

Story by Alexander Panetta • Friday

There was a pot of gold at the end of President Joe Biden's jaunt to Canada. It's going to Canada's mining sector.

The U.S. military will deliver funds this spring to critical minerals projects in both the U.S. and Canada. The goal is to accelerate the development of a critical minerals industry on this continent.

The context is the United States' intensifying rivalry with China.

The U.S. is desperate to reduce its reliance on its adversary for materials needed to power electric vehicles, electronics and many other products, and has set aside hundreds of millions of dollars under a program called the Defence Production Act.

The Pentagon already has told Canadian companies they would be eligible to apply. It has said the cash would arrive as grants, not loans.

On Friday, before Biden left Ottawa, he promised they'll get some


U.S. President Joe Biden addresses Parliament in Ottawa, Canada, on March 24, 2023.
© Kevin Lamarque/AFP/Getty Images

The White House and the Prime Minister's Office announced that companies from both countries will be eligible this spring for money from a $250 million US fund.

Which Canadian companies? The leaders didn't say. Canadian officials have provided the U.S. with a list of at least 70 projects that could warrant U.S. funding.

Biden also said Canadian semiconductor projects would be eligible for access to another Defence Production Act program.

Related video: Biden visits Canada: Defence, energy, migration, trade on agenda (WION)
Duration 2:36  View on Watch

"Our nations are blessed with incredible natural resources," Biden told Canadian parliamentarians during his speech in the House of Commons.

"Canada in particular has large quantities of critical minerals that are essential for our clean energy future, for the world's clean energy future.

"And I believe we have an incredible opportunity to work together so Canada and the United States can source and supply here in North America everything we need for reliable and resilient supply chains."

Canada has also promised billions of dollars to the sector. One participant at a recent Pentagon briefing in Washington said the U.S. funding would reassure potential private-sector investors that a given project has U.S. military backing.

It's not clear which types of jobs these projects would create in Canada.

Biden may have triggered some cringes in Canadian political circles when he appeared to suggest the value-added transformation jobs from this future sector would go to the U.S.

He cast it as an ideal partnership: Canada would extract the minerals, Americans would build things with them.

"You guys – we don't have the minerals to mine, you can mine them," he said. "You don't want to produce, I mean, turn them into product."

Cut the red tape, mining sector says


Another unknown is how quickly this sector will grow in Canada, and whether it can ramp up in time for this country to become a major player in providing raw materials for growing fleets of electric vehicles.

Some business groups have told the Canadian government it must speed up permitting times or risk seeing this window close for Canada.

The Mining Association of British Columbia, for example, has proposed numerous measures to alleviate what it called interminable delays.

"The permitting and authorization processes that regulate mining projects are too cumbersome, untimely and inconsistent with the urgent need," it said in a recent briefing paper.

The federal government has acknowledged this issue and has promised to speed things up.

"It cannot take us 12 to 15 years to open a mine in this country. Not if we want to achieve our climate goals," Environment Minister Jonathan Wilkinson said late last year.
Lawmakers say TikTok hearing validated security concerns. But TikTokers aim criticism at Congress

Story by Sarah Elbeshbishi and Ella Lee, USA TODAY • 15h ago


TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew's testimony before Congress Thursday drew heavy criticism from lawmakers and pundits, who called the app's leader evasive and left the platform's future in America uncertain.


U.S. officials. worried the Chinese-owned TikTok is spying on Americans and spreading misinformation, are considering banning the app.
© Provided by USA TODAY

USA TODAY
TikTok CEO testifies before Congress as social media app faces potential ban in US
View on Watch   Duration 1:35

But on TikTok, the criticism was directed toward Congress.

"This is so embarrassing. I swear to god we need to get competent and younger people in office," one TikToker wrote in the caption of a video with more than 10.7 million views.

"I have beef with our Congressmen and women," another TikToker said in a video with more than 350,000 views. "These people already have their mind made up."

Skeptical lawmakers on the House Energy and Commerce Committee grilled Chew for more than four hours during the hearing on TikTok's potential threat to national security.

Lawmakers from both political parties have raised alarm in recent weeks that the short video site, owned by Chinese company ByteDance, could be used by the Chinese government to spy on Americans and spread misinformation. Several lawmakers recently introduced bills that could ban the app in the U.S.

But for some people on the app, national security concerns were overshadowed by the lawmakers' line of questioning that TikTok users say highlighted Congress' lack of understanding of social media.

“It was embarrassing. I can’t even call it a joke because jokes are funny,” said Peyton Frye, 28, a TikTok user from Warwick, Rhode Island. “It is painfully obvious that these people did not understand the questions that they were asking.”

Congress 'does not understand how the internet works'


Moments after the hearing went viral on the app, TikTok users criticized what they said was poor comprehension of TikTok and the internet.

Some commenters drew comparison to the infamous viral clip of Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., asking a top Facebook official if the company would "commit to ending finsta" — a slang term for the secondary Instagram accounts teens often use more authentically and privately.

“It was really clear to me and to a lot of other people that Congress really as a whole does not understand how the internet works and also really just doesn’t understand what TikTok is,” said Gabrielle Cerberville, 31, a content creator from Kalamazoo, Michigan.

TikTok more than dancing, users say


“I don’t think that they seem to get TikTok is really no longer just a place where teenagers do dances. It hasn’t really been that way since 2018,” Cerberville added.

The app has provided a space for users with a variety of interests and purposes, including the ability to promote small and local businesses. Some users have even managed to earn a living through the app.

Ahead of the hearing, TikTok went on the offensive; Chew took to the platform himself to make his case to users, claiming in a video posted to the company's account that a ban would stop TikTok's 150 million Americans from accessing the app and asking users to share what they love about TikTok in the comments.

Commenters appeared largely sympathetic to Chew's plea, giving personal testimony about the app's impact on their lives and requesting that he "save us all" from a possible ban.

TikTok spokesperson Brooke Oberwetter said in a statement that the hearing was dominated by "political grandstanding" and criticized the committee for failing to acknowledge the "5 million businesses on TikTok or the First Amendment implications of banning a platform loved by 150 million Americans."

Data privacy concerns remain

While hordes of TikTokers immediately came to the defense of Chew and the platform, the CEO did little to dissuade lawmakers about the app's potential risks.

“I’m not been reassured by anything you’ve said so far,” Rep. Lisa Blunt Rochester, D-Del., told Chew Wednesday. “Quite frankly your testimony has raised more questions for me than answers.”

Central to the lawmakers' inquiries was the question of how TikTok uses American users' personal data. Chew dodged questions about what the app does with users’ data, its ties to China and the ways the platform prevents harmful content for children, though he said that TikTok does not sell data to “any data broker.”

While TikTok and its proponents have argued it's not the only social media company to collect personal data, the app’s Chinese ownership makes the platform not subject to U.S. laws.

“In the U.S, if these companies get your data and they do bad things with it, you have recourse, you can go to court,” said Doug Schmidt, co-director of Vanderbilt University's Data Science Institute. “Not so with TikTok …if it’s accessed by people in other parts of the world and they do things with it that you don’t like, you’re just basically out of luck. There’s nothing you can do.”

Chew did not answer fundamental questions during the hearing, including what kinds of data the app collects and what it is being used for, according to Schmidt.

Security experts have said that the company's ties to China and vast American influence are reasons for alarm. FBI Director Christopher Wray testified in December the agency was concerned the app could be used to collect user data for "traditional espionage operations."

As Chew on Thursday repeatedly avoided clear yes or no answers to the lawmakers' inquiries, committee members grew frustrated and signaled that their minds were made up.

“TikTok has repeatedly chosen a path for more control, more surveillance and more manipulation,” said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., chair of the committee. "Your platform should be banned.”

Dig deeper:
 
Is TikTok getting banned?: 
TikTok hearing:
Bipartisan legislation: 
National security risks:
TikTok's political power:

Contributing: Ken Tran, Rachel Looker

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Lawmakers say TikTok hearing validated security concerns. But TikTokers aim criticism at Congress




Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rejected banning TikTok in her first TikTok video, saying it 'just doesn't feel right to me'

Story by stabahriti@insider.com (Sam Tabahriti) • 11h ago

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez posted her first TikTok video Saturday. 
Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez discussed calls to ban TikTok in her debut on the app.
The New York Democrat said the bipartisan push to ban TikTok in the US "doesn't feel right to me."

AOC said America needed stronger data and privacy protection laws rather than a TikTok ban.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said TikTok should not be banned in her first video on the app Saturday.

The New York Democrat started her video by saying: "This is not only my first TikTok, but it is a TikTok about TikTok. Do I believe TikTok should be banned? No."

"I think it's important to discuss how unprecedented of a move this would be. The United States has never before banned a social media company from existence, from operating in our borders," Ocasio-Cortez said. "And this is an app that has over 150 million Americans on it."

Her video, which has had about 3 million views and 545,000 likes, came two days after TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testified before Congress. Several politicians did not appear interested in listening to full answers from the executive, as the hearing quickly devolved into a bloodbath of "yes or no" questions.
The debate around TikTok's potential threat to national security started in 2020 when the Trump administration attempted to force a sale of the Chinese-owned app.

A potential ban of TikTok also centres on concerns around data privacy, the spread of misinformation, and the safety of minors.

"They say because of this egregious amount of data harvesting, we should ban this app. However, that doesn't really address the core of the issue," Ocasio-Cortez said.

The New York Democrat noted that major social media companies like Meta also collect "troves of deeply personal data." She pointed out that the US doesn't have "significant data or privacy protection laws," before mentioning the European Union's data privacy law, known as the General Data Protection Regulation.

"So to me, the solution here is not to ban an individual company — but to actually protect Americans from this kind of egregious data harvesting that companies can do without your significant ability to say no," Ocasio-Cortez said.

She said issues that posed a significant risk to national security usually triggered a classified briefing for Congress, which had not happened. "So why would we be proposing a ban regarding such a significant issue without being clued in on this at all? It just doesn't feel right to me."

Ocasio-Cortez concluded: "I think a lot of this is putting the cart before the horse because our first priority should be in protecting your ability to exist without social media companies harvesting and commodifying every single piece of data about you, without you, and without your consent."



Asian Americans are anxious about hate crimes. TikTok ban rhetoric isn’t helping

Story by Brian Fung • CNN


Ellen Min doesn’t go to the grocery store anymore. She avoids bars and going out to eat with her friends; festivals and community events are out, too. This year, she opted not to take her kids to the local St. Patrick’s Day parade.

Min isn’t a shut-in. She’s just a Korean American from central Pennsylvania.

Ever since the US government shot down a Chinese spy balloon last month, Min has withdrawn from her normal routine out of a concern she or her family may become targeted in one of the hundreds of anti-Asian hate crimes the FBI now says are occurring every year. The wave of anti-Asian hate that surged with the pandemic may only get worse, Min worries, as both political parties have amplified fears about China and the threat it poses to US economic and national security.

“You can’t avoid paying attention to the rhetoric, because it has a direct impact on our lives,” Min said.

That rhetoric surged again this week as a hostile House committee grilled TikTok CEO Shou Chew for more than five hours on Thursday about the app’s ties to China through its parent company, ByteDance. After lawmakers repeatedly accused Chew, who is Singaporean, of working for the Chinese government and tried to associate him with the Chinese Communist Party, Vanessa Pappas, a top TikTok executive, condemned the hearing as “rooted in xenophobia.”

Chew had taken pains to distance TikTok from China, going so far as to anglicize his name for American audiences and to play up his academic credentials — he holds degrees from University College London and Harvard Business School. But it was not enough to prevent lawmakers from blasting TikTok as “a weapon of the Chinese Communist Party” and as “the spy in Americans’ pockets,” all while mangling pronunciations of Chew’s name and the names of other officials at its parent company, ByteDance. After Chew’s testimony, Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton said the CEO should be “deported immediately” and banned from the United States, saying his defense of TikTok was “beneath contempt.”

There are good reasons to be mistrustful of ByteDance given that it is subject to China’s extremely broad surveillance laws. (TikTok has failed to assuage concerns the Chinese government could pressure ByteDance to improperly access the data, despite a plan by TikTok to “firewall” the information.) And the Chinese government’s authoritarian approach to numerous other issues clashes with important American values, said many Asian Americans interviewed for this article.

But they also warned that policymakers’ choice to use inflammatory speech — in some cases, language tinged with 1950s-era, Red Scare-style McCarthyism — endangers countless innocent Americans by association. Moreover, politicians’ increasingly strident tone is creating conditions for new discriminatory policies at home and the potential for even more anti-Asian violence, civil rights leaders said.



TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testifies during a hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, on the platform's consumer privacy and data security practices and impact on children, Thursday, March 23, 2023, on Capitol Hill in Washington. - Jose Luis Magana/AP

“We are afraid that, more and more, the actions and the language of the government is premised on the assumption that just because we are Chinese or have cultural ties to China that we could be disloyal, or be spies, or be under the influence of a foreign government,” said Zhengyu Huang, president of the Committee of 100, an organization co-founded by the late architect IM Pei, the musician Yo-Yo Ma and other prominent Chinese Americans. “We want to deliver the message: Not only are we not a national security liability — we are a national security asset.”

But as the country wrestles with China’s influence as a competitive global power, caught in the middle are tens of millions of Americans like Min who, thanks to their appearance, may now face greater suspicion or hostility than they experienced even during the pandemic, according to Asian American lawmakers, civil society groups and ordinary citizens.

From ‘Kung-flu’ to national security


The heated rhetoric surrounding China has undergone a shift from the pandemic’s early days, when xenophobia linked to Covid-19 was unambiguous.

At the time, Asian Americans feared an uptick in violence inspired by derogatory phrases such as “Kung-flu” and “China virus.” That language had emerged amid then-President Donald Trump’s wider criticisms of China, which had led to a damaging trade war with the country. It was against that backdrop that Trump first threatened to ban TikTok, a move some critics said was an attempt to stoke xenophobia.

In recent years, criticism of China has significantly expanded to encompass even more aspects of the US-China relationship. Concerns about China have gone mainstream as US national security officials and lawmakers have publicly grappled with state-backed ransomware attacks and other hacking attempts. The Biden administration has sought to confront China on how the internet should be governed, and like the Trump administration, it’s now taking aim at TikTok, again.

As that shift has occurred, criticism of China has stylistically evolved from blatant name-calling to the more clinical vocabulary of national security, allowing an undercurrent of xenophobia to lurk beneath the respectable veneer of geopolitics, civil rights leaders said.



People rallied during a "Stop Asian Hate" march to protest against anti-Asian hate crimes on Foley Square in New York, on April 4, 2021
. - Wang Ying/Xinhuay/Getty Images

In January, House lawmakers stood up a new select committee specifically focused on the “strategic competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party.” At its first hearing, the panel’s chairman, Wisconsin Republican Rep. Mike Gallagher, said: “This is an existential struggle over what life will look like in the 21st century — and the most fundamental freedoms are at stake.”

A week later, US intelligence officials warned that the Chinese Communist Party represents the “most consequential threat” to US global leadership. An unclassified intelligence community report released the same day said China views competition with the United States as an “epochal geopolitical shift.” (Even so, the report maintained that the “most lethal threat to US persons and interests” continues to be racially motivated extremism and violence, particularly by White supremacy groups.)

While some policymakers have added that their issue is with the Chinese government, not the Chinese people or Asians in general, leaders of Asian descent say the caveat has too often been a footnote in debates about China and not emphasized nearly enough. Leaving it unsaid or merely implied creates room for listeners to draw bigoted conclusions, critics said.

“That can’t be a footnote; it can’t be an afterthought,” said Charles Jung, a California employment attorney and the national coordinator for Always With Us, a nationwide memorial event to remember the 2021 Atlanta spa shootings that killed six Asian women. “I’m speaking specifically, directly to both GOP and Democratic politicians: Be mindful of the words that you use. Because the words you use can have real world impacts on the bodies of Asian American people on the streets.”

Rising tensions between US and China

The current climate has led to at least one US lawmaker directly questioning the loyalty of a fellow member of Congress.

California Democratic Rep. Judy Chu, who was born in Los Angeles and is the first Chinese American elected to Congress, last month confronted baseless claims of her disloyalty from Texas Republican Rep. Lance Gooden. Gooden’s remarks were swiftly condemned by his congressional colleagues. But to Chu, the incident was an example of the way politics surrounding China, technology and national security have fueled anti-Asian sentiment.

“Rising tensions with China have clearly led to an increase in anti-Asian xenophobia that has real consequences for our communities,” Chu told CNN.

Concerns about xenophobia are bipartisan. Rep. Young Kim, a California Republican, told CNN there is “no question” that anti-Asian hate crimes have risen since the pandemic.


California Democratic Rep. Judy Chu, who was born in Los Angeles and is the first Chinese American elected to Congress, last month confronted baseless claims of her disloyalty from Texas Republican Rep. Lance Gooden. - Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty Images

“This is unacceptable,” said Kim. “Asian American issues are American issues, and all Americans deserve to be treated with respect. We can treat all Americans with respect and still be wary of threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party.”

But even in discussing the Chinese government’s real, demonstrated risks to US security, the way that some Americans describe those dangers is counterproductive, needlessly provocative and historically inaccurate, said Rep. Andy Kim, a New York Democrat and a member of the House select committee. Even the name “Chinese Communist Party” can itself prime listeners to adopt a Cold War mentality — a framework whose analytical value is dubious, Kim argued.

“A lot of my colleagues, especially on the select committee, use rhetoric like, ‘This is a new Cold War,’” said Kim. “First of all, it’s not true: The Soviet Union was a very different competitor than China. And it’s framed in a very zero-sum way … It’s very much being talked about as if their entire way of life is incompatible with ours and cannot coexist with ours, and that heightens the tension.”

In a November op-ed, Gallagher and Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio directly linked that rhetoric to TikTok, calling for the app to be banned due to the United States being “locked in a new Cold War with the Chinese Communist Party, one that senior military advisers warn could turn hot over Taiwan at any time.”

Confrontational posture leads to bad policy


Just because China may view its dynamic with the United States as an epic struggle does not mean Americans must be goaded into doing the same, Kim argued. Beyond the violence it could trigger domestically, a stark confrontational framing could cause the United States to blunder into poor policy choices.

For example, he said, the right mindset could mean the difference between legally fraught “whack-a-mole” attempts to ban Chinese-affiliated social media companies versus passing a historic national privacy law that safeguards Americans’ data from all prying eyes, no matter what tech company may be collecting it.

Security researchers who have examined TikTok’s app say that the company’s invasive collection of user data is more of an indictment of lax government policies on privacy, rather than a reflection of any TikTok-specific wrongdoing or national security risk.

“TikTok is only a product of the entire surveillance capitalism economy,” said Pellaeon Lin, a Taiwan-based researcher at the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab. “Governments should try to better protect user information, instead of focusing on one particular app without good evidence.”

Asked how he would advise policymakers to look at TikTok, Lin said: “What I would call for is more evidence-based policy.” Instead, some policymakers appear to have run in the opposite direction.

Anti-China sentiment has already led to policies that risk violating Asian-Americans’ constitutional rights, several civil society groups said.

John Yang, president of Asian Americans Advancing Justice, pointed to the Justice Department’s now-shuttered “China Initiative,” a Trump-era program intended to hunt down Chinese spies but that produced a string of discrimination complaints and case dismissals involving innocent Americans swept up in the dragnet. The Biden administration shut down the program last year.

More recently, Yang said, proposed laws in Texas and Virginia aimed at keeping US land out of the hands of those with foreign ties would create impossible-to-satisfy tests for Asian-Americans, showing how anti-China fervor threatens to infringe on the rights of many US citizens.

“National security has often been used as a pretext specifically against Asian-Americans,” Yang said, referring to the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II and the racial profiling of Muslim-Americans following Sept. 11. “We should remember that many Chinese-Americans came to this country to escape the authoritarian regime of China.”




Though he fears the situation for Asian-Americans will get worse before it gets better, Yang and other advocates called for US policymakers to stress from the outset that their quarrel lies with the Chinese government and not with people of Chinese descent.

“We know from experience in the United States that once you demonize Chinese people, all Asian people living in this country face the brunt of that rhetoric,” said Jung. “And you see it not just in spy balloons and the reactions surrounding it and TikTok and Huawei, but also in modern-day racist alien land laws.”

Growing up in Pennsylvania, Min was no stranger to racially motivated violence: Her home was regularly vandalized with eggs, tomatoes and epithet-laden graffiti (“Go home, gooks”); her father once discovered a crude homemade explosive stuffed in his car.

But fears of racism stoked by modern US political rhetoric has forced Min to change how her family lives in ways they never had to during her childhood.

Last year, amid another spate of assaults targeting elderly Asian-Americans, Min said her mother sold the family dry-cleaning business and moved to Korea, following Min’s father who had moved the year before.

“It was a sad reality to say that as much as we want our family close to us and their grandchildren, they will be safer in Korea,” Min said.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com