Thursday, June 22, 2023

How E-Bike Battery Fires Became a Deadly Crisis in New York City


Charred bicycles and scooters from a fire at an e-bike repair store in Chinatown in New York City. (NYT)

Winnie Hu
Wed, June 21, 2023

NEW YORK — His girlfriend told him not to buy the electric scooter.

But Alfonso Villa Muñoz was intrigued. He was working in a Brooklyn bodega last August when a delivery man said he knew someone selling one for $700. Muñoz said yes.

The scooter was cherry red with the number 7 on the front. Under the seat was an extra-large lithium ion battery. When it needed charging, Muñoz would remove the battery from the scooter and use both hands to lug it up to the couple’s third-floor apartment in College Point, Queens.

A month later, the battery exploded in the living room, unleashing flames that engulfed the apartment. Muñoz screamed for their 8-year-old daughter, Stephanie, who was asleep. He could not breach the wall of black smoke to get to her. Stephanie died from smoke inhalation.

“It’s like you bring in death and destruction to your house, and not only to you, to everybody around you,” said Muñoz, 36, pulling off his glasses to wipe away tears. “You could lose everything.”

E-bikes and e-scooters have flooded New York City’s streets in recent years, embraced by delivery workers and commuters as an economical and efficient new way to get around. But even as the devices have become nearly ubiquitous, the batteries inside them have made New York City an epicenter for a new kind of ferocious and fast-moving fire.

These fires are “uniquely dangerous,” warned Laura Kavanagh, the city’s fire commissioner. With little or no warning, the batteries can ignite, leaving seconds for people to escape. In just three years, lithium battery fires have tied electrical fires and have surpassed blazes started by cooking and smoking for major causes of fatal fires in the city.

Reasons for the uptick of these fires are myriad. They include a lack of regulation and safety testing for individually owned devices, hazardous charging practices (like using mismatched equipment or overcharging) and a lack of secure charging areas in a population-dense city with numerous residential buildings, where most fires start.

But for New Yorkers who rely on e-bikes and other battery-powered devices to make deliveries or otherwise earn a living, the fires have forced a choice between financial stability and personal safety.

Across the country, over 200 micro-mobility fire or overheating incidents have been reported from 39 states, resulting in at least 19 fatalities, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. But the organization emphasized that the problem is particularly acute in densely populated areas like New York City. In London, lithium battery fires are the fastest-growing fire risk, with 57 e-bike fires and 13 e-scooter fires this year, according to the London Fire Brigade.

In New York, lithium battery fires have killed 13 people this year, including four people in a blaze that started in an e-bike store in Chinatown on Tuesday. A total of 23 people have died in battery fires since 2021. This year, there have been 108 fires, compared with 98 fires for the same period last year.

‘These devices are here now, and there’s lots of them.’

During the pandemic, when public transit was compromised and the demand for food deliveries skyrocketed, a ready supply of cheap e-bikes and e-scooters of questionable quality cropped up across the city.

New Yorkers looking for good deals pounced. With many residents living in tight quarters, they would charge their batteries in their apartments.

But once a lithium battery overheats or malfunctions, all bets are off; the speed and impact of lithium battery fires make them particularly perilous, especially when people live close together.

This has pushed more and more landlords to ban e-bikes and other e-mobility devices, while New York’s leaders have worked to prevent the fires on several fronts. In September, New York will become the first city in the nation to ban the sale of e-bikes and other e-mobility devices that fail to meet recognized safety standards.

City and fire officials have also pushed for greater state and federal oversight of the devices, shut down illegal battery charging stations, worked with food delivery apps to educate workers and shown public service messages with exploding batteries.

“I have very, very serious concerns in the short term,” Kavanagh said. “These devices are here now, and there’s lots of them.”

A ‘mini inferno’ at Citi Bike foreshadows a crisis.


In March 2019, Citi Bike, the popular bike-share program, was charging its pedal-assisted e-bikes in its Brooklyn warehouse when a fire broke out.

It started with a loud bang like a pistol shot. Then came flames with chrome-colored sparks flying out and a rush of heat. “In an instant, the batteries began to explode into flames one by one, like a domino effect, going from right to left,” recounted a witness in the fire marshal’s report. “Within 10 seconds, the entire top row became a mini inferno.”

Though e-bike fires were just becoming a problem, fire officials had been aware of the dangers of lithium batteries for years. They initially focused on the highly regulated batteries in energy storage systems, which hold backup electricity for buildings.

Leo Subbarao, who worked as a fire protection engineer in the New York City Fire Department until 2019, recalled there had been talk back then about whether the city should allow a battery storage system to be placed under an elevated subway track. Fire officials quickly put an end to that.

“The technology was moving forward so fast, and we were trying to catch up with regulations,” said Subbarao, who lectures at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

After the Citi Bike fire, battery safety became a priority for the bike-share program. It uses only batteries that have been certified to safety standards and have built-in sensors to monitor their condition in real time, as well as a shut-down switch. In the warehouse, each battery is inspected and charged in a rack with fireproof concrete dividers. There has not been a major battery fire at Citi Bike since these protocols were added.

Fire officials also revised the city fire code, which now requires buildings to provide safety measures, such as a dedicated charging room with a sprinkler, when more than five e-bikes are charging.

But the fire code does not cover the individual use of e-bikes, and fire inspectors do not enter private dwellings to check for safety violations without a warrant.

So there are no safeguards to prevent what happened to Josue Mendez.


Mendez, a delivery worker, had plugged an e-bike battery to charge beside his bed in his Bronx apartment in 2021. He woke up to see it “throwing smoke,” and then it exploded like fireworks. Mendez and his family sprinted out the door, flames chasing them. “Thank God we were able to come out alive,” said Mendez, 31, a Mexican immigrant, who was burned on his back and arms.

After the fire, Mendez’s family moved to another building in northern Manhattan. This year, the building banned e-bikes, but it did not ban the batteries themselves, which pose the most danger. So Mendez parked his e-bike on the street and took the batteries upstairs to charge.

‘We’re trying to squeeze too much energy out of these batteries.’


Lithium batteries, which have been used commercially since 1991, have a history of sparking fires in Dell notebook computers, Samsung smartphones and hoverboards, leading to huge recalls.

But after years of research to “engineer the hazard out,” lithium batteries have generally become safer, said Adam Barowy, a fire protection engineer who specializes in lithium batteries for the Fire Safety Research Institute at UL Research Institutes, a nonprofit.

Inside a lithium battery, a number of small cells are bundled together. When the battery is used, lithium ions move between the electrodes inside each cell, generating an electrical current. The danger occurs when a cell goes into “thermal runaway,” a chain reaction in which heat develops extremely quickly, creating a threat of fire and sometimes explosion. A cell can be sent into thermal runaway by overcharging, a manufacturing defect or even the heat from an adjacent cell in the battery pack that is already in thermal runaway.

But there is market pressure on manufacturers to add more energy to batteries, which can push safety limits. The batteries in e-bikes contain far more energy than in cellphones and, as a result, are more destructive in a fire.

“The problem is that we’re trying to squeeze too much energy out of these batteries, and that makes them more dangerous,” said Nikhil Gupta, a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at New York University’s Tandon School of Engineering.

Regulation means costly testing but safer devices.


More powerful batteries are only part of the reason that so many e-bikes and e-scooters are catching fire. Electric cars and energy storage systems, which are being increasingly adopted to fight climate change, require far more energy and yet have fewer fires.

The difference, according to battery and fire safety experts, is that those industries are closely regulated and have to go through several layers of testing to show their products are safe. Until recently, e-bikes and e-scooters have not received similar scrutiny.

Victoria Hutchison, a senior research project manager at the Fire Protection Research Foundation, said the lack of safety regulations and testing requirements has allowed cheaper, low-quality devices and batteries of questionable safety to enter the market. “That’s really the root of the problem,” she said.

These products of questionable origin also make it difficult for victims to sue. The batteries are often destroyed in the fires, and even when they can be recovered, they can lack identifying marks to trace back to a specific manufacturer or distributor who can be held legally responsible, according to lawyers and fire experts.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission has increased its oversight of e-mobility devices, urging companies to “comply with established voluntary safety standards or face possible enforcement action.” And New York lawmakers, including Sen. Chuck Schumer, have proposed a federal safety standard for lithium batteries used in those devices.

Ash Lovell, the electric bicycle policy and campaign director for PeopleForBikes, the national trade association for bike manufacturers, which has called for more safety regulations, said the low-quality batteries do not reflect the overall e-bike industry. Most of their members also sell e-bikes in Europe and have already met robust safety regulations there, she said.

Fatal flames and a heartbroken family.

When Muñoz brought home the red e-scooter from the bodega, it did not come with any safety certifications. He did not know to be worried.

He met his girlfriend, Marilu Torres, at a party in Sunset Park, Brooklyn, in 2013. He drank too much and left his sweater and an ID card. She returned them. They moved in together, and the next year, Stephanie was born.

They called her “gatito,” kitten in Spanish, because she made meowing sounds when she was young. She had a big heart for all creatures, even alligators and tarantulas. “She would like something odd and make it her own,” said Jefferson Jimenez, 19, Torres’ son.

Muñoz said he bought the e-scooter so Jimenez could ride it. He also used it to make extra money delivering Grubhub orders.

But then the trouble started. Muñoz was riding it one day when the battery died. He had to push the scooter home. “I’m going to throw it in the garbage,” he said he told himself. When he plugged in the battery, it would not charge.

His co-worker at the bodega brought in another charger, and then another, until one finally worked. That night, Muñoz brought the charger and battery to his apartment and went to sleep. Hours later, he woke up to smoke “like the darkest thing you have ever seen.”

With severe burns on his face, arms and hands, Muñoz spent two months in the hospital. He was there when he found out that the cause of all the misery and devastation had been the battery.

Torres said the e-scooter she never wanted has “broken part of me.”

c.2023 The New York Times Company
'Oppressive' and 'unbearable' heat wave scorches Texas, with no end in sight

Doyle Rice and Thao Nguyen, USA TODAY
Tue, June 20, 2023 

Although the summer solstice isn't until Wednesday, blistering, dangerous summer-like heat has already been the main weather story across the south-central U.S. over the past few days. And there is little relief in sight for sun-scorched states such as Texas and Louisiana, forecasters said.

“It’s going to be really bad,” said Bob Fogarty, a National Weather Service meteorologist in the Austin/San Antonio office. “It’s going to be oppressive.”

The temperature in San Angelo, Texas, soared to an all-time high of 114 degrees on Tuesday, according to the weather service.

Meanwhile, Texas’ power grid operator asked residents Tuesday to voluntarily cut back on electricity due to anticipated record demand on the system. While the Electric Reliability Council of Texas said it was "not experiencing emergency conditions," the agency noted the state hit an unofficial June record for energy demand on Monday.

AccuWeather meteorologists expect that the heat dome that has caused temperatures to skyrocket throughout June will continue to jeopardize heat records for at least the next several days.
Excessive heat warnings in effect

High temperatures were forecast to soar into the 100s and 110s across southern Texas, the weather service said. And there will be little respite in the evenings as lows only drop into the 70s and 80s.

"No clear end in sight to this oppressive heat," the weather service said on Twitter. "Continue to do what you can to keep cool!"

Excessive heat warnings and heat advisories are in effect for much of Texas and Louisiana as a result, according to the weather service. An excessive heat warning means that "dangerously hot conditions with heat index values of 110 - 120 degrees are expected, the weather service said.


Dymond Black sits with a towel over his head in the shade on June 19, 2023 in Austin, Texas. Extreme temperatures across the state have prompted the National Weather Service to issue excessive heat warnings and heat advisories that affect more than 40 million people. The southwestern region of the state has suffered record-breaking 120-degree heat indexes in recent days, with forecasters expecting more of the same.

Austin, Texas, sees uptick in heat-related illness calls

According to the Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services, first responders have received dozens of heat-related calls since temperatures began to increase last week.

The agency said there has been 67 heat-related illness calls from June 11 through Tuesday morning. Cpt. Christa Stedman, an agency public information officer, said there has "unquestionably" been more heat-related illness calls than what data shows.

"Extreme heat and humidity will significantly increase the potential for heat-related illnesses, particularly for those working or participating in outdoor activities," the weather service warned.
'Unbearable,' 'horrible' heat

Tens of thousands of people across the south-central U.S. remained without power Tuesday as a result of big storms late last week and over the weekend, adding to the heat misery.

“It’s been unbearable,” Leigh Johnson, a resident of Mount Vernon, Texas, told Dallas television station KXAS Monday. She had not had power for about three days.

“It’s been horrible because it’s like, the heat index has been so bad that literally, we’re having to sit in the cold baths to cool ourselves down. Our animals as well, we’re having to stick them in the bathtub just to keep them from having a heat stroke, it’s been that bad,” she said.
Why is it so hot?

A strong high-pressure system and unusual humidity are to blame for the uncomfortable weather, Fogarty said. The high-pressure, stagnant air tends to make the area above it hotter.

“It just lets us get hotter and hotter,” he said. “The sun just kind of bakes it each day.”
How to stay safe in extreme heat

People should approach the heat with care, Fogarty said.

“Try to avoid the hottest hours of the day, if you can,” he said. “If you have to be outside, the recommendations are wear loose-fitting, light-colored clothing. Try to take breaks in the shade. Try to stay hydrated.”

AccuWeather recommends that people:

Drink plenty of fluids


Stay in an air-conditioned room, out of the sun


Check up on relatives and neighbors


Do not leave young children or pets unattended in vehicles in any circumstance


When possible, reschedule strenuous activities to early morning or evening if you work or spend time outside

Contributing: The Austin-American Statesman; The Associated Press

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Texas and Louisiana heat: No relief in sight for sun-scorched states
The data on 40 years of California wildfires is alarmingly clear

Clarisa Diaz
 Quartz
Tue, June 20, 2023 

Wildfire in California

Wildfires in northern and central California increased fivefold between 1971 and 2021, according to a new study published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The scientists behind the study found that those fires were mostly caused by anthropogenic climate change, the kind accelerated by human actions like burning fossil fuels and clear-cutting land.

As part of their research, the scientists did a statistical analysis of the summer months during those four decades, which helped them understand how the California landscape might have looked without human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. They discovered that the wildfire burn area grew 172% more than it would have in the absence of such emissions.

Compounding the problem, poor forest management leaves brush and dead wood that fuel fires, according to the researchers. Drier and hotter conditions make this organic matter ripe for ignition. Meanwhile, clear-cut areas allow fires to spread faster and grow out of control.

datawrapper-chart-8QMcB

Five of California’s 10 biggest fires were in 2020

The past two decades have seen the 10 largest wildfires in California’s history. Half of those occurred in 2020 alone, including the August Complex, North Complex, LNU and SNU Lightning Complex, and Creek fires. Eight of the top 10 biggest wildfires in the state took place from 2017 onward.

The August Complex blaze of August 2020 was California’s largest, burning more than a million acres (roughly 400,000 hectares). The Dixie fire of July 2021 consumed some 900,000 acres. In total, the state’s 10 biggest wildfires have burned around 4.8 million acres.

In their study, the scientists estimate that the area burned during an average summer in northern and central California could surge up to 50% by 2050 if current levels of drought and extreme heat continue. They hope their research will prompt immediate action to reduce CO2 emissions, helping reverse the higher temperatures driving these wildfires.


Why cutting down trees may be the best way to save forests from wildfires

Mike Bebernes
·Senior Editor
Tue, June 20, 2023 
“The 360” shows you diverse perspectives on the day’s top stories and debates.

Photo by George Rose/Getty Images

What’s happening

As wildfires like the ones that blanketed the northeastern U.S. in smoke earlier this month become more frequent and more powerful, governments are adopting new approaches to protect forests and the communities that live near them.

While that includes using new technologies to track and manage active wildfires, the most significant change is a new emphasis on a strategy experts call “fuels reduction” — ridding forests of the materials that allow fast-moving “megafires” to develop.

Early last year, the U.S. Forest Service announced a plan to treat more than 50 million acres of forest across the country over the next 10 years to make them less susceptible to fires. Congress has allocated billions of dollars to fund the effort.

Fuels reduction largely relies on two main strategies: Prescribed fires and forest thinning. Prescribed fires are fires that are started deliberately by forest managers to burn up highly flammable materials like dead trees and ground-level brush. Forest thinning is a similar process, but done by humans. Sometimes it is nothing more than individuals on foot trimming small saplings and clearing dry debris by hand. In other cases, forest thinning involves using heavy machinery to cut down full-grown trees to make forests less dense and create fire breaks.

Why there’s debate


Somewhat surprisingly, it’s forest thinning — not prescribed fires — that is the subject of the most controversy. While there are examples of prescribed burns getting out of control, most experts generally agree that periodic fires are necessary to create a healthy forest ecosystem and more than a century of aggressive fire suppression in the U.S. is at least partly to blame for the rise in megafires.

When it comes to forest thinning, especially when it includes knocking down living trees, there’s less of a consensus. Advocates, who include most forestry leaders in the federal and state governments, say it's crucial to prepare forests so wildfires that will inevitably come are more manageable. They argue that, while it may seem counterintuitive to cut down part of a forest in order to save it, fires that hit untreated wilderness become so powerful that there’s effectively no way to stop them from spreading to new areas where they destroy more forests and threaten communities. Many add that thinning also means the remaining trees are more resilient and capable of completing their natural cycle of post-fire renewal because they have less competition for water and sunlight.

But critics of the practice, including several environmental groups, question how effective forest thinning is at reducing the potency of forest fires and say it does serious harm to wild ecosystems. Many make the case that the most important way to reduce wildfire damage is to do everything possible to limit the effects of climate change, which has driven temperatures up and caused droughts that dried out forests. Cutting down carbon-absorbing trees, they argue, works directly against that goal. Others have no issue with clearing low-lying brush and grass, but say large-scale thinning can often be used as guise to allow logging in vulnerable forests.
Perspectives

Environmentalists are so desperate to save every inch of forest, they’re leaving them to be burned beyond saving

“The Left continues to treat forests as pristine natural shrines that must be kept free from human interference at all costs. … All we accomplish with a vacuous romanticism that insists on leaving nature in its ‘natural state’ is create an unnatural accumulation of fuel that will eventually rage in an uncontrollable inferno.” — Editorial, Washington Examiner

Rakes and chainsaws aren’t the solution to a climate-level problem

“When the whole forest is a dry tinderbox, having one area where you’ve done a fuels reduction may not be anywhere near enough to reduce fire risk. We are not doing nearly enough to tackle the root of the problem, which is climate change.” — William Anderegg, professor of biological sciences at the University of Utah, to Bloomberg Law

Letting wildfires run rampant is much worse for the climate than cutting down a few trees

“Yes, cutting down mid-small and middle-sized trees does reduce the carbon sequestration that’s happening in Western forests. But they are at such a risk of annihilation by wildfire that we have to make them less flammable in order to save any of our forests and the incredibly important ecosystem that they are, at all.” — Emily Shepard, freelance writer and former firefighter, to Oregon Public Broadcasting

Whatever its benefits, thinning isn’t enough to stop megafires

“The belief people have is that somehow or another we can thin our way to low-intensity fire that will be easy to suppress, easy to contain, easy to control. Nothing could be further from the truth.” — Jack Cohen, wildfire researcher, to ProPublica

Thinning is often used as an excuse for wide-scale logging

“The Biden administration is telling the public they need to ‘thin’ small trees and underbrush. The public hears that and they think: pruning shears. They don’t realize this is actually bulldozers and chain saws. These are industrial, commercial logging operations.” — Chad Hanson, forest ecologist, to Denver Post

The thinning process leaves forests more vulnerable to human-caused fires

“Logging requires road building and skid trails, leaving lasting ecosystem damage: soil compaction, surface erosion, increased stream sedimentation, degraded water quality and aquatic habitat, reduced biodiversity, spread of invasive vegetation and suppression of forest regeneration. Nearly 85% of forest fires are human caused, and roads invariably increase human presence in the forest and ultimately more fires.” — Brian Moench, Deseret News

Forest thinning only works when it’s paired with controlled burns

“Thinning and prescribed burning are the one-two punch that will knock out many severe wildfires. Prescribed fires do have drawbacks. … Nevertheless, they are sorely needed, and without them, thinning rarely succeeds.” — Emily Shepard, High Country News

Photo Credit: (Robert Galbraith/Reuters)
Poland Lures US Big Tech to Front Line of East-West Tension

Wojciech Moskwa
Tue, June 20, 2023 


(Bloomberg) -- When Intel Corp. announced plans to build a semiconductor assembly plant in Poland last week, the US technology giant highlighted the economics of the $4.6 billion project. But it’s the geopolitics of the country’s biggest-ever greenfield investment that could prove equally significant.

Poland is on the frontline of Russia’s war in Ukraine, the nexus of NATO’s effort to help counter Vladimir Putin’s offensive. As a cog in the European Union’s supply chain, the nation is also in the middle of broader east-west tension triggered by friction between the US and China.

Intel said it feels “safe” in Poland, thanks in part to the country’s “strategic” position on the EU’s and NATO’s eastern flank. At the event in the city of Wroclaw on Friday, Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki talked of how foreign investment “at the same time helps strengthen security.”

Companies are seeking to shorten supply lines and add locations to avoid being caught on the wrong side of that trade war. That’s trumping concerns the war in Ukraine might escalate and destabilize neighbors such as Poland.

Intel joins Google parent Alphabet Inc. and Visa Inc. in expanding in the country. Less than two weeks after the war started in February 2022, Alphabet announced a $700 million office-building investment in Warsaw. The new 2,500-person hub is the firm’s largest site working on cloud technologies in Europe. In May, Visa announced plans for a global tech and product center employing as many as 1,500 workers.

“Poland is very critical to the European Union because of its strategic location,” Intel Chief Operating Officer Keyvan Esfarjani said in Wroclaw. “I’m not worried that all of a sudden things are going to come to a halt.”

Intel’s factory will complete a pan-EU supply chain to ensure the company can meet demand for microchips. Poland has also attracted numerous companies looking to tap its nearly 300,000 university graduates each year by setting up hubs and service centers, especially in the tech and financial industries.

In the services industry alone, foreign companies created 43,000 new jobs in the country of 38 million people last year, a 40% increase from 2021, according to industry lobby group ABSL. Project44, a startup that helps clients look after their supply chains, opened an office in Krakow, some 270 kilometers (168 miles) from the Ukrainian border.

Scott Newman, head of State Street Bank International in Poland, said decisions on locating offshore centers were primarily based on costs before the fallout from the pandemic elevated the concept of “concentration risk” — having too many people in one place.

“There’s a lot of work across the industry to really try to move to more of a follow-the-sun footprint, which one could say offers more of an opportunity for growth in Poland and central and eastern Europe,” Newman told a business forum in Berlin in March.

The offshore services industry in Poland has doubled its workforce over the last seven years and employs about 450,000 people. It’s now responsible for about 5% of the country’s gross domestic product.

Economists attributed an improvement in Poland’s trade balance to a boom in services, a surprise that helped the zloty appreciate to a two-year high against the euro this month. The country registered a net $3.5 billion monthly surplus in services transactions over the past 12 months, $1 billion more than a year earlier, according to central bank data.

Poland offers wages with stronger purchasing power compared with centers in Asia, along with the same data-protection regime as other EU nations and ease of travel, according to Beata Javorcik, chief economist of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

As well as the EU, the country is also an ally of the US should the world break into an “everybody loses scenario” of two separate trading spheres, she said.

While bolstered by the war in Ukraine, the relationship between Warsaw and Washington has been strained in recent weeks after Poland passed legislation that allows the ruling party to effectively put opposition leader Donald Tusk on trial just before the tightly contested election slated for October.

The US is now studying the revision of the law, and wants to see a level political playing field and a peaceful transfer of power should the opposition win, said Mark Brzezinski, the US ambassador to Poland. In the meantime, the country remains at a key crossroads of business and geopolitics.

“The way we see this is an overlay between the commercial context and the strategic context,” Brzezinski said on the sidelines of the Intel event in Wroclaw. “It’s fantastic that despite the fact that Poland is literally on the edge of a war zone, it continues to attract major investment.”
HOARDER
146 dogs found dead at home of animal rescue group’s president, Ohio officials say




Mitchell Willetts
Tue, June 20, 2023

Animal welfare workers found 146 dead dogs at the home of an Ohio canine rescue group’s president, according to a news release.

On June 16, the Portage Animal Protective League arrived at the Mantua home with a search warrant, which it obtained “after receiving a tip that an animal cruelty charge was pending” against the homeowner, the organization said in a June 19 release.

“The homeowner is known to be a founding operator of Canine Lifeline, Inc., a nonprofit animal rescue,” the release said.

Inside the home, workers found 146 dogs “in varying stages of decay,” many of them in crates and cages, the organization said. There were no dogs alive on the property.


The organization will carry out necropsies on the dogs to determine their causes of death, according to the release.

McClatchy News has reached out to the Portage County Sheriff’s Office for more information and did not immediately receive a response.

Canine Lifeline was quick to speak out about the accusations.

“Like the general public, volunteers of the non-profit animal rescue organization Canine Lifeline have been shocked, horrified and confused to learn of the devastating revelations regarding its president and co-founder,” the group said in a statement. “We share your grief and despair.”

The co-founder suffered a medical incident in early June, collapsing in her home, the group said. First responders showed up to the residence and an investigation was launched, revealing evidence of animal neglect at the Mantua home, and another home in Parma, according to the group.

Canine Lifeline added that, since the group was first established, it has homed more than 6,000 dogs.

“[She] was a very private person who appeared, to us, to be devoted to these rescue animals,” the group said. “Volunteers and adoptive families that gave their time and energy to the cause of animal welfare are now navigating feelings of bewilderment, betrayal, and grief in light of what has been learned about [her] secret treatment of animals.”

Mantua is roughly 40 miles southeast of downtown Cleveland.
California wants to make electricity more affordable for poor people by charging rich more

Medora Lee, USA TODAY
Tue, June 20, 2023 

How much you pay for electricity in California could depend on your income if the California Public Utilities Commission approves plans by the state’s three major utilities to do just that.

Pacific Gas & Electric, San Diego Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison each proposed in April to implement a fixed charge to pay for the transformation of the state's electricity infrastructure whose amount would vary by customers’ income. Meanwhile, the rate for each kilowatt hour of electricity, or usage fee, would decline for everyone, the utilities said.

The plans are in response to a new state law (AB 205) requiring utilities to adopt a fixed price – based on household income – to help fund the wires, poles, meters, and customer service that will drive the state's transition to renewable energy.

The lowest income users would pay the smallest fixed charge while the highest earners would pay the largest to cover the upgrade, maintenance and transitioning of the electric grid as California moves toward net zero carbon pollution by 2045. The California Independent System Operator said $9.3 billion is needed over the next decade to support the state’s shift to renewable energy and plug-in cars.
What’s the breakdown of what people would pay on the income-based fixed charge?

Each utility has its own rates, but here’s what each says about its plan:

San Diego Gas & Electric says income limits will vary by the number of people in households but, basically, those with an annual household income of:

◾ Less than $28,000* would pay a $24 fixed charge

◾ $28,000 to about $69,000* would pay $34

◾ $69,000 to $180,000 would pay $73

◾ $180,000 or more would pay $128

* Lower income-qualified customers enrolled in discount programs will continue to receive discounts.

"All these fees are tacked on before using a single kilowatt hour, meaning median-income San Diegans will pay $876 a year in electricity rates, regardless of whether they use any electricity,” said San Diego County Supervisor Jim Desmond in April. “Also...San Diegans will still get charged these monthly rates if they have residential solar.”

Pacific Gas & Electric said the monthly fixed charge for its low-income customers could be as low as $15, and no greater than $30; moderate-income customers would pay about $51; and the highest fixed charge, for customers in the top 25% of earners, would be about $92. Assuming electricity uses stays the same, the utility company estimates its lowest-income customers would receive a 21% bill reduction; other lower-income customers would receive an 8% cut; moderate-income customers would receive a reduction of 6%; and high-income customers would see bills increase by 24%.

“It’s taking the utility system and applying a progressive tax system to it,” said Mark Wolfe, director of the National Energy Assistance Directors Association, which provides grants to states to help low-income families pay their utility bills. “It’s a real shift in thinking.”

Southern California Edison said its lower-income customers would see a monthly charge as low as $15 but no greater than $20; and the highest fixed charge, for customers in the top 19% of earners, would be $85.


In this March 23, 2010, file photo, team leader Edward Boghosian, right, and electrician Patrick Aziz, both employees of California Green Design, install solar electrical panels on the roof of a home in Glendale, Calif. California has set a goal of getting 33% of its electricity from renewables by 2020 and has a separate effort to install nearly 2,000 megawatts worth of solar panels on rooftops by the end of 2016


How will utilities know how much people earn?

Ultimately, the California Public Utilities Commission determines which entity and what methods will be used to determine individual household income. However, the utilities are recommending an agreed-upon third party under state agency supervision or a state agency to manage the data.
When would these plans take effect?

The utilities commission will issue a final decision on the plans. That’s expected by July 2024. After that, utilities will get additional time for implementation.

Energizing help: White House announces billions in federal money to help lower energy bills this winter

Are there any concerns?

Lots, Wolfe said, including:

◾ Utilities have never collected income data, and customers do not want utilities to have their income information. If they use a third party to verify incomes, “it’s another level of bureaucracy,” Wolfe said.

◾ Difficulty getting people to sign on and reveal income information. “Something like this would require 100% compliance, and how do we know low-income people will sign up,” Wolfe said, noting only about half the people eligible for Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, or WIC, enroll. “You’ll have to educate them to sign up. And what if they don’t? Will they be automatically charged the highest amount?”

◾ High fixed prices for upper-income families could possibly discourage green investments because recapturing the cost of your investment in solar will take much longer.

◾ Electric prices in California are among the highest in the nation, with residents paying in March an average of 27.15 cents per kilowatt hour compared with the nation’s average of 15.85 cents, according to the Energy Information Administration. “And the cost to move to net zero as well as upgrade the state’s grid will be very high and shifting the cost to higher income families could be divisive,” Wolfe said.

◾ “The possibilities of...gaming are endless,” he said.

Rich should pay more: President Joe Biden's budget proposal will include tax increases. What are they?

Is there a better way to make electricity affordable for low-income people?

Possibly, improving the existing system of offering discounts or capping costs for low-income households.

Eligible low-income customers enrolled in the California Alternate Rates for Energy program receive a 30% to 35% discount on their electric bill and a 20% discount on their natural gas bill. Families of at least three whose household income slightly exceeds the energy program allowances will qualify to receive a monthly Family Electric Rate Assistance Program of 18% on their electricity bills.

The federally funded Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program provides low-income households assistance for home energy bills, energy crises, weatherization, and minor energy-related home repairs.

In Wisconsin, WEC Energy Group and consumer advocates will soon begin working to create a payment plan for low-income households that would cap utility costs at no more than 6% of household income for qualifying families. This follows the footsteps of Percentage-of-income payment plans in states like Minnesota, Illinois and Ohio.

Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@usatoday.com and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: California wants electricity bills based on income. How would it work?
Elton John denounces anti-LGBTQ laws: ‘We seem to be going backwards’



Judy Kurtz
Tue, June 20, 2023

Elton John is denouncing anti-LGBTQ legislation being introduced across the United States, saying there’s a “growing well of anger and homophobia that’s around America.”

“I don’t like it at all,” the “Rocket Man” singer said in an interview with Radio Times published this week and cited by multiple outlets.

“It’s all going pear-shaped in America,” the 76-year-old performer and longtime LGBTQ rights advocate said, calling “laws enacted” in Florida “disgraceful.”

“We seem to be going backwards,” said John, who received the National Humanities Medal from President Biden last year. “And that spreads. It’s like a virus that the LGBTQ+ movement is suffering.”

More than 490 bills targeting LGBTQ Americans have been introduced in at least 45 states this year, according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Fifty-seven of those bills have become law, the ACLU said.

Last month, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed four LGBTQ-related bills, including legislation that bans gender-affirming medical care for transgender youths and expands a state education law that limits classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Italian prosecutor demands cancellation of birth certificates for lesbian couples


: Annual LGBTQ+ Pride parade in Rome


Tue, June 20, 2023 
By Crispian Balmer and Francesca Piscioneri

ROME (Reuters) - A state prosecutor in northern Italy has demanded the cancellation of 33 birth certificates of children born to lesbian couples dating back to 2017, saying the name of the non-biological mother should be removed.

The move by the prosecutor of Padua, which came to light late on Monday, highlighted the legal morass facing gay families in Italy. It came months after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's government ordered city councils to stop registering same-sex parents' children.

Italy legalised same-sex civil unions in 2016 under a centre-left government, but stopped short of giving couples full adoption rights, fearing that it would encourage surrogate pregnancies, which remain illegal.

In the absence of clear legislation on the issue some courts have ruled in favour of allowing such couples to adopt each others' children, and mayors of some cities, including Padua, have registered births to both partners from same-sex unions.

However, the prosecutor of Padua, Valeria Sanzari, opened a legal case this month, saying that 33 birth certificates signed by the city mayor since 2017 should be changed, with the name of the non-biological mother removed.

A court will rule on her requests later this year.

The prosecutor's initiative outraged Italy's LGBTQ+ community.

"These children are being orphaned by decree," said centre-left parliamentarian Alessandro Zan, who has pushed for gay rights in Italy. "This is a cruel, inhumane decision," he added.

Removing the name of a parent from a birth certificate creates both bureaucratic hurdles and emotional strains.

The mother whose name is eliminated will no longer be able to fulfil a series of tasks, including picking up her child from school without the written permission of her partner. If the legally recognised parent dies, the children could be taken from the family home and become a ward of the state.

To regain her parenting rights, the non-biological mother has to go through a lengthy and expensive special adoption procedure.

The government defended the prosecutor's decision.

"In Italy, marriage is only between a man and a woman, and therefore only the biological parent is the parent whose surname can be registered," Luca Ciriani, the minister for parliamentary relations, told RTL radio on Tuesday.

Italy's lower house is currently debating a law that would make it a crime, punishable by up to two years in jail, for couples who go abroad to have a surrogate baby, even in places where it is legal, such as the United States or Canada.

Meloni, a self-declared enemy of what she calls "gender ideology" and "the LGBT lobby", faces increasing scrutiny from abroad over her highly conservative agenda for families.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told Meloni publicly at a summit of Group of Seven leaders in Japan last month that Canada was "concerned" about some of the positions that Italy was taking in terms of LGBTQ+ rights.

(Additional reporting by Alvise Armellini, editing by Frank Jack Daniel)



Most Americans oppose religious-based bias against LGBTQ people, defying growing wave of restrictions

Marc Ramirez, USA TODAY
Tue, June 20, 2023 

Most American adults – including two-thirds of those identifying as Catholics or Christians – disagree with religious-based denial of medical care, employment, or other services to LGBTQ individuals, a national poll has found.

The results reflect Americans’ increasing support of LGBTQ rights and protections, in sharp contrast to a growing wave of legislation and legal action nationwide chipping away at such rights and protections.

Chris Erchull, attorney for GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), said the findings show most Americans believe in treating each other fairly.

“This poll shows that the current campaign of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation and efforts to weaken existing nondiscrimination protections is out of step with what the majority of Americans want," Erchull said. ".... Targeting one community with harmful legislation is not a winning political strategy long-term and runs contrary to core principles in our democracy.”

Similar sentiments were expressed by Christy Mallory, legal director for the Williams Institute and one of the study's authors.

“Recent efforts by some state legislatures to expand religious exemptions from LGBTQ-inclusive non-discrimination laws are largely out of alignment with the views of most Americans,” she said in a release accompanying the findings.

A record number of anti-LGBTQ bills


As of May 23, the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest LGBTQ civil rights group, had tallied a record 520 anti-LGBTQ bills introduced in legislatures this year, with more than 40% of those targeting transgender and nonbinary people. More than 125 bills would ban transgender youth from accessing gender-affirming care.

Additionally, a recent report found the number of LGBTQ-hostile states on the rise, reflecting the growing amount of legislation targeting gender-affirming care, reducing protections for transgender people, and limiting discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is expected to rule this year in the case of Colorado web designer Lorie Smith, who is asking the state not to compel her to create web pages for same-sex weddings, which she said conflict with her religious beliefs. LGBTQ advocates fear a decision in Smith's favor could have more far-reaching consequences.


Activists wave progress pride flags as they and hundreds of others march toward the Capitol in a Queer Capitol March on Saturday, April 15, 2023, in Austin. Activists gathered to protest recent anti-LGBTQ legislation in Texas.

The survey findings were gleaned from a national poll of 1,003 U.S. adults conducted in September 2022 and commissioned by nonpartisan research firm NORC at the University of Chicago in partnership with the Williams Institute, a think tank dedicated to gender identity and sexual orientation research at the University of California Los Angeles School of Law.

More than 8 in 10 respondents (84%) opposed allowing medical professionals to cite religious beliefs as a reason to deny care to LGBTQ people, while 74% said they were against letting employers deny jobs to LGBTQ individuals. About 7 in 10 (71%) said they objected to business owners citing religious beliefs as a reason for denying LGBTQ people service.

The majorities were consistent across political affiliations, religions, race, ethnicity and gender, the poll found. Women, people of color and Democrats were most likely to say they opposed discrimination against LGBTQ people on religious grounds, including more than 80% of Black respondents.

Democrats were far more likely (92%) than Republicans (71%) to oppose religious-based discrimination against LGBTQ individuals in terms of medical care, as well as business services (90% to 52%) and employment (89% to 54%).

In terms of gender differences, women were likelier (86%) than men (81%) to oppose religious-based discrimination by medical professionals, as well as by business owners (76% to 67%) and employers (79% to 69%).

Opposition to bias lowest among the most religious

When broken down by religious attendance, those regularly frequenting religious services were least likely to oppose religious-based denial of such services to LGBTQ people, though those who did still represented a majority of the group. Just 53% of that category opposed religious-based discrimination against LGBTQ people on the part of business owners, while 59% opposed such bias from employers and 71% from medical providers.

Opposition was highest among those who never attended services, with at least 8 in 10 among that group objecting to allowing religious-based discrimination by medical professionals (89%), employers (82%) and business owners (80%).

The findings, the study authors said, should give pause to policymakers, business owners and service providers given the growing pattern of restrictions against LGBTQ people.

While LGBTQ people are not explicitly protected from discrimination at the federal level, laws banning sex-based discrimination have been interpreted to extend to members of the LGBTQ community. Additionally, 33 states and the District of Columbia also provide discrimination protections in areas such as employment, housing and public accommodations.

Earlier this month, Human Rights Campaign issued its first "state of emergency" in its more than 40-year history after more than 75 anti-LGBTQ bills had been passed in state legislatures in 2023.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: LGBTQ people: Americans largely oppose religious-based discrimination














Pride of place: The world has changed for the better

Bruce Anderson
Tue, June 20, 2023 

Ledger Columnist Bruce Anderson in Lakeland Fl Thursday December 22,2022.Ernst Peters/The Ledger

June is Pride Month - a celebration of the gay, lesbian, and transgender members of our community and their continuing struggle for acceptance. But it’s really more than that. It is a festival of recognition of the wonderful diversity of this great country, and the folks who make it up.

Few nations on earth have the amazingly varied population of the U.S. and each group has had to push and shove and demand acceptance. But people of wide-ranging sexual orientations and gender identities are everywhere. LGBTQ+ people make up about 10% of the earth’s population and when you add in folks that are not sure where they fit, but do not directly identify as one thing or another, that number goes up – perhaps way up.

As with every other group demanding equal treatment under the law, the LGBTQ+ community has had to struggle. For one thing, sexual orientation and gender identity is elusive. It only becomes real when someone is transparent - when someone comes out.

Hiding or being “in the closet” was, for centuries, the norm – people pretending to be someone they emphatically were not. Why? Often simply being yourself was illegal – you could literally do time for being gay. So, few were “out” that those few could be easily marginalized and ostracized from the wider society. The weird and unnatural phobia against the other could be easily reinforced against the few.

What turned the tide? Honesty. When the coming out movement evolutionarily spun a wider and wider circle, the LGBTQ+ community became undeniable. In a matter of a decade or two, everyone straight suddenly had brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers, kids, longtime friends, and casual acquaintances who were not. Longtime LGBTQ+ antagonists had to confront the reality that being against it would mean being against people they knew and loved.

The political experience of the new century has been one where folks of all sorts were being assimilated into the mainstream, becoming part of the great experiment: diversity was celebrated for its contribution to the whole – marginalizing folks was no longer on. This does not mean that homophobia did not exist – of course it did – but it was massively reduced on both sides of the aisle and, for the stubborn bigots who still felt that way, falling rapidly out of fashion to display it.

But there has been an inexplicable reactionary backlash: it is now trendy to marginalize LGBTQ+ folks again, in some circles.

Proclamations of support for Pride events have come under fire, with some polities abandoning them altogether. Despite widespread acceptance, laws that threaten this community are being filed and passed across the red states, and the blundering bigotry of fringe groups – ever a threat to peace – are becoming more open, more violent, and more public.

Political appeals to the base of the GOP – primary voters, for the most part, in the upcoming election – have been geared to the apparent lowest common denominator. I write “apparent” because I suspect that any return to the gross homophobia of the past will force politicians onto a third rail. In addition to its inherent dreadfulness, this strategy won’t work. The political base of the GOP has interests quite different from those of Democrats, to be sure, but the general acceptance of LGBTQ+ people is something most people share, regardless of political party.

LGBTQ+ folks are out now more than ever and pushing this brand of crass ugliness about who people are is a likely loser in most primaries, and in the few places where it isn’t, it is a likely a death sentence in the general election.

The world has changed. And for the better.

Pride celebrations are community celebrations and celebrate the whole of the community. Let’s be sure the message is always clear that “our community” means everyone.

Bruce Anderson is the Dr. Sarah D. and L. Kirk McKay Jr. Endowed Chair in American History, Government, and Civics and Miller Distinguished Professor of Political Science at Florida Southern College. He is also a columnist for The Ledger.

This article originally appeared on The Ledger: Pride of place: The world has changed for the better





Florida Really Just Banned Chinese Immigrants from Owning Property. We're Suing


Patrick Toomey and Clay Zhu
Wed, June 21, 2023

Protesters stand outside Florida's Capitol on April 29, in opposition to a bill that would ban Chinese people who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents from owning any land or property in the state. 

Credit - Lawrence Mower—Tampa Bay Times/TNS/ABACA/Reuters

Barring people from buying a house because of where they’re from is unconstitutional and unacceptable. And yet that’s exactly what Florida’s new law attempts to do.

On May 8, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed SB 264 into law, putting much of Florida off-limits to many Chinese immigrants, including people here lawfully as professors, students, employees, and scientists who are looking to buy a home in the state. The law also unfairly discriminates against many immigrants from Cuba, Venezuela, Syria, Iran, Russia, and North Korea. But it singles out people from China for especially draconian restrictions and harsher criminal penalties.

With geopolitical tensions between the United States and Chinese government rising, we’re once again seeing politicians like DeSantis lean into racism, hate, and fear for their own political gain. Florida’s pernicious new law weaponizes false claims of “national security” against Asian immigrants and others.

Worryingly, Florida isn’t alone. Lawmakers across the country are trying to enact similar laws to ban Chinese citizens and other immigrants from owning property, but Florida’s is the first one to pass and go into effect. That’s why our organizations and our partners—the ACLU, the Chinese American Legal Defense Alliance, the Asian American Legal Defense & Education Fund, and the law firm Quinn Emanuel—are working to challenge Florida’s unconstitutional law in court and have asked a judge to block the law from going into effect on July 1.

DeSantis has said this bill is necessary to combat the influence of the Chinese Communist Policy in Florida, but he is wrongly equating Chinese people with the Chinese government. This law will not keep Floridians safe. It instead codifies and expands housing discrimination against people of Asian descent—something expressly forbidden by the Fair Housing Act. It will also put a burden of suspicion on anyone with a name that sounds vaguely Asian (not to mention Russian, Iranian, Cuban, Venezuelan, or Syrian), perpetuating racist stereotypes even more.

Read More: What Ron DeSantis’ Florida Agenda Could Mean for America

This is history repeating itself: In the early 20th century, politicians used similar justifications to pass “alien land laws” in California and more than a dozen other states prohibiting Chinese and Japanese immigrants from becoming landowners. Over time, these laws were struck down by the courts because they violated the Constitution’s equal protection guarantees or were repealed by state legislatures. But not before people were harmed.

For instance, in 1915, California’s alien land law forced Japanese immigrants Jukichi and Ken Harada to purchase their family home in the name of their children, who were U.S. citizens. Neighbors were so outraged they tried to pressure the family to sell the house and leave. When they refused, the neighbors sued them in court. Eventually a judge agreed that because the children were U.S. citizens with equal rights under the law, the family was entitled to stay in their home. Although the Harada family won their case, anti-Asian sentiment continued to rise, and 25 years later, they were forced from the same home and into internment camps as part of the Japanese American incarceration of World War II.

Discriminatory new land laws in Florida and other states around the country could cause immense harm, too. The plaintiffs in our lawsuit are Chinese immigrants who live, work, study, and raise families in Florida—but they will soon be prohibited from purchasing real estate there. Zhiming Xu, is a Chinese citizen who lives in Florida and came to the U.S. after fleeing political persecution in China. Earlier this year, Xu signed a contract to purchase a new home near Orlando, with a closing date of September 2023. But because of Florida’s law, he will be forced to cancel the contract, putting both his deposit and his dreams for the future in jeopardy.

Similarly in Louisiana, high school senior Abigail Hu recently testified against a similar bill being considered there. “This bill tells us that we are not good Americans, we are not Americans deserving of protection under the law, we are not Americans that the legislators we elect care to serve,” Hu said. “This bill tells us that we are Americans whose lives are pure political pawns, subject to the whims of the state and condemned to exist under a perpetual instability.”

Under Florida’s new law, people who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents, and whose “domicile,” or permanent home, is in China, will be prohibited from purchasing property altogether. (A similar but less restrictive rule would apply to citizens of Cuba, Venezuela, and other “countries of concern.”) The sole exception is incredibly narrow: People with non-tourist visas or who have been granted asylum may purchase one residential property under two acres that is not within five miles of any “military installation.” This term is vaguely defined in the law, but there are at least 21 large military bases in Florida, many of them within five miles of cities like Orlando, Miami, and Tampa—putting many major residential and economically-important areas completely off-limits.

In addition to imposing economic harms on immigrants and their communities, the law fuels discrimination and xenophobia. When politicians pass laws and engage in rhetoric that stigmatizes Asian communities—like President Trump’s “China virus” claim—anti-Asian hate crimes ensue. Laws like Florida’s, and similar proposals around the country, raise widespread fears of more harassment and violence.

DeSantis and the Florida legislature have sent a clear message: The state believes home ownership by Chinese citizens is a threat to national security. This view is racist and baseless. Just as there was no actual evidence to justify the alien land laws of an earlier era, there is no evidence of any actual national security harm resulting from real estate ownership by Chinese people in Florida.

At a time when one in two Asian Americans report feeling unsafe in the U.S. due to their ethnicity and nearly 80% don’t feel they fully belong or are accepted, Florida’s leaders have a responsibility to the people who live there to do better. Until they do, we’ll see them in court.
New immigration law sparks fear and worker exodus from Florida

Ana Goñi-Lessan and John Kennedy
Wed, June 21, 2023 

On a June afternoon in Quincy, Florida, hundreds of gloved hands move 3,000 pounds of green tomatoes by-the-minute from plastic bins to conveyor belts to boxes to be sold across the country.

In his packing plant, Graves Williams, a lifelong Republican, proudly explained the skill, labor and manpower needed to provide tomatoes across North America, a feat that he says wouldn’t be possible without immigrant laborers.

“We all love them to death,” said Williams, whose family has been farming tomatoes for decades. “We couldn’t run a business without them.”

But with one of the strictest laws in the nation taking effect July 1 aimed at cracking down on illegal immigration, Florida is being rocked by an exodus of migrant workers. The departures are sparking fear that a labor shortage will leave crops unpicked, tourist hotels short of staff and construction sites idle.

Gov. Ron DeSantis, now campaigning for the Republican presidential nomination, pushed Senate Bill 1718 through the state’s GOP-dominated Legislature and signed it into law last month in Jacksonville.

At the bill signing, DeSantis condemned President Joe Biden’s border policies for causing a massive influx of illegal arrivals, and said, “We have to stop this nonsense, this is not good for our country,” adding, “this is no way to run a government.”

The new law imposes tough criminal penalties on human traffickers, restrictions on undocumented residents, and new employment requirements that will next year include random audits of businesses suspected of hiring illegal workers.

But amid signs that thousands of migrants and their families are now choosing to leave Florida, including many legally in the U.S., even some of the governor's supporters are questioning the new law.


Graves Williams, owner of Quincy Tomato Company, said his business couldn’t operate without immigrant laborers. He employs hundreds of immigrants to sort and package thousands of pounds of tomatoes each day during the season.


'It's definitely chaos': How immigration law impacts Florida restaurants, construction

Many business owners, though, refuse to speak publicly about the measure, fearing it could antagonize DeSantis.

“How can one man pass one law and destroy all these businesses in Florida?” said Williams, owner of Quincy Tomato Company.

“It’s almost like he’s doing it on purpose. I know he’s doing it for politics, but the end results, it’s going to be hard.”
Economy could be rocked even if small share of workforce leaves

Florida employers in construction, restaurants, landscaping and many other service sectors already are struggling to fill jobs during what has been a post-pandemic, sustained stretch of low unemployment. The new immigration limits will compound that, many say.

But as he campaigns across the country, DeSantis cites the new law as proof of his tough record on immigration, casting himself as smartly and aggressively conservative in trying to distinguish himself from his top Republican rival, former President Donald Trump.

Florida businesses, though, are already losing a portion of the almost 800,000 undocumented workers estimated to be in the state.


Hundreds of workers sort and package thousands of tomatoes during a shift at Quincy Tomato Company on Monday, June 12, 2023. Graves Williams, owner of Quincy Tomato Company, said his business couldn’t operate without immigrant laborers.


“Even if, say 25% of undocumented workers were to leave, that’s 200,000 people,” said Samuel Vilchez, Florida director of the American Business Immigration Coalition, which is urging Congress to enact laws that expand legal immigration.

“The consequences of those departures are going to be clear to many in the business community,” he added. “This is creating incentives for people to leave Florida and find work in other states.”

Florida's food and agriculture businesses paid $53.76 billion in taxes, according to a 2023 report by Feeding the Economy.

USA TODAY NETWORK-Florida spoke to a dozen immigrant workers in the Florida Panhandle, some who have lived in the state for more than 20 years, others who recently migrated.

All said their community is worried. Many plan to leave, they added, if they haven’t already left.

But some are taking the risk, waiting to see if Florida actually enforces the law.


Governor Ron DeSantis speaks to the press during his Secure Our Border Secure Our States press conference at the Escambia County Sheriff's Office Wednesday, June 16, 2021.

As for DeSantis, Williams said he’s not the only business owner in the state who say the new measure is steering them away from DeSantis in his bid for the GOP’s presidential nomination.

“He’s been good for Florida except for this insane bill,” he said. “He’s hurt himself.”

A spokesman for DeSantis pushed back against critics.

“The media has been deliberately inaccurate about this distinction between legal and illegal immigration to create this very sort of outrage based on a false premise,” said Jeremy Redfern, DeSantis’ press secretary.

“Any business that exploits this (border) crisis by employing illegal aliens instead of Floridians will be held accountable,” he added.

DeSantis enacts law with swipe at Biden: DeSantis signs illegal immigration crackdown and rails against Biden

A closer look at the law: Florida House passes sweeping new immigration bill. Here's what's in SB 1718:

Employment practices change July 1

For three months out of the year, Williams runs a crew of 650 people to pick and package tomatoes on 758 acres in Florida and Georgia. Starting pay is $14.31, he said, but he pays as high as $25 an hour.

All of his employees must have the documents required to fill out an I-9, which include a driver’s license and a social security number. Current federal and state laws for most businesses only require an I-9 for employment.

Employers have been free to hire those applicants whose certificates appeared legitimate. But those in the industry say farm owners aren’t compelled to check the veracity of employment documents they’re given.

That’s going to change with Florida’s new immigration law, when businesses must begin using the federal database, E-Verify, if they have 25 or more employees to check the legal status of any new hire.

The law also invalidates out-of-state driver’s licenses issued to undocumented workers and makes it a felony to use false identity documents to get employment.

Local governments would be banned from contributing money to organizations that create identification cards for undocumented immigrants.

Sen. Keith Perry, a Gainesville Republican, said he had no problem supporting the immigration law and said it fits with the view he takes at Perry Roofing Contractors, the company he founded and runs.

“Don’t make a rule unless you’re going to enforce it,” Perry said of immigration policy, both at the federal and now, Florida state level.

Many directly affected by the new law defend it as long overdue in Florida. They say it’s a reckoning for the state’s biggest industries – agriculture, construction and tourism – which have profited from their use of immigrant labor, legal and not.

Perry, whose company has about 130 employees, said “it’s pretty simple for myself and my colleagues,” but he acknowledged that the fear immigrants are sensing, “is pretty unfortunate.”

Perry also said he downplays concerns when other business owners ask him what they should expect in coming months.

“I don’t think it’s going to be as draconian as some are expecting,” he added.

Many, though, fear the worst.

Law keeps hospitality exec up at night as supporters say fears are overblown

Eric Garvey, chief operating officer for the Cocoa Beach-based Baugher Hospitality Group, said his company's biggest concern with the new law is how it might affect the availability of outside service companies that perform tasks like carpet cleaning, pest control and roofing for its two hotels in Cocoa Beach and three in nearby Cape Canaveral.

"It's already a very difficult labor market that affects us directly and indirectly," said Garvey, a former executive director of the Space Coast Office of Tourism. "Labor markets are so tight. Everything is so difficult. These are extraordinary times."

Garvey said worrying about a labor crunch "keeps me up at night."

Rep. Rick Roth, a West Palm Beach Republican and third-generation farmer who grows vegetables, rice and sugar cane, said Florida’s worker problem could magnify in the fall, when crops become ready for harvest.

“There’s going to be workers who don’t come here because they don’t want the hassle,” Roth told USA TODAY NETWORK-Florida. “Maybe they usually work in New York for the summer and then come to Florida in the fall. Well, they may not come now.”

But he acknowledges that he’s already hearing from nursery growers and landscapers in his county who have lost laborers. Roth blames “disinformation.”

“The employees are leaving because they’re listening to the news and radio telling them that they’re going to get pulled over, you’re going to get deported and you’re not going to get health care,” Roth said. “That’s all a big lie, there’s nothing further from the truth.”

While these risks are likely more plausible than Roth admits, he says workers should feel confident to stay in Florida – if they currently have jobs.

“If you have a job... I guarantee you that your employer has documents. Maybe you didn’t go through the E-Verify process. But nobody is looking for you. E-Verify is only for new hires,” he said.

Roth earlier this month took part in a public meeting organized by the Hispanic Ministers Association of South Florida in Hialeah where he downplayed the law's impact as “more of a political bill than it is policy.”

Another lawmaker participating, Rep. Alina Garcia, R-Miami, told the pastors and community activists gathered that the law is “basically to scare people from coming into the state of Florida, and I think that it’s done its purpose.”

DeSantis has seized on immigration as an animating issue for GOP voters, gaining notice in May by dispatching more than 1,100 Florida state law enforcement agents and National Guard members to Texas’ border with Mexico.

He also used Florida taxpayer dollars earlier this month to send three-dozen migrants from Texas to California, an echo of last year’s attention-grabbing migrant flights to Martha’s Vineyard.

Last year, after a group of migrants who were bused to Washington D.C. from the Texas border said they planned to settle in Miami, DeSantis gave them a warning.

“Do not come to Florida,” he stated. “Life will not be easy for you.”

Tough choices for immigrants without documents


Antonia stocks the shelves at a convenience store in the Florida Panhandle on Thursday, June 8, 2023.


At a convenience store on the Florida Panhandle, Antonia, 39, an undocumented immigrant who asked to be identified only by her first name, rips open brown cardboard boxes filled with tostadas.

She’s ready to place them on shelves for the many immigrant customers who frequent the store, which is on a busy roadway. Antonia has lived in Florida for 15 years, owns two homes and has 80-plus family members in the surrounding community.

She watched the meeting Garcia and Roth attended in Hialeah and heard Roth blame “disinformation” as the reason for immigrants leaving the state.

She doesn’t agree.

Antonia followed Senate Bill 1718 as it was fast-tracked through the Legislature during session this year. She knows what the law says about hospital admissions and about crossing the Florida state border with undocumented immigrants in the car.

On May 10, she watched DeSantis sign the bill behind a lectern that said “Border Crisis.”


Antonia stocks the shelves at a convenience store in the Florida Panhandle on Thursday, June 8, 2023.

Antonia has lived in Florida for 15 years, owns property and has 80-plus family members in the surrounding community.

But Antonia, her husband and their three children have talked about leaving Florida.

She and her husband brought their oldest daughter to the U.S. from Mexico when she was age 2. Antonia’s two youngest children were born in the U.S., but their citizenship, she said, doesn’t protect Antonia and the rest of her family from Florida’s new law.

“We’re mixed. Some have papers, others don’t,” she said.

The law taking effect next month makes it a felony to transport undocumented immigrants into Florida, which could affect mixed-status families or farm workers who travel together.

Antonia used to take her children to church every Sunday across the Georgia line, to Bainbridge. But she’s stopped driving across the state border since DeSantis signed the bill.

Meanwhile, she said another friend who is pregnant is afraid of going to the hospital to deliver her baby.

The new Florida law requires hospitals to track their spending on care for undocumented residents and to ask patients before treatment whether they are in the country legally, a standard opponents say will discourage many people from seeking health care.


Marchers protest the new controversial immigration law, SB 1718, that was signed into law by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. Hundreds gathered and marched in downtown West Palm Beach, Florida on June 1, 2023.


“If I didn’t have my home, I would be thinking about leaving. But what am I going to do? It’s my life savings... how am I going to leave that?” Antonia concluded, saying she expects to remain and risk encountering trouble.

Advocates for Florida’s immigrant community say the new law has soured many on the state.

But they say that if businesses began criticizing a lack of workers, maybe that will draw the attention of the federal government and Congress, which has failed to reach any consensus on needed immigration changes.

“It’s now a problem for the business community, which has quietly relied on undocumented workers for so long,” said Yvette Cruz, with the Farmworker Association of Florida, in Homestead.

Cruz’s organization helped organize June 1 work stoppages around the theme “A Day Without Immigrants,” in protest of the new Florida law and part of a national campaign to urge Congress to act.

“People are now realizing, yes, they depend on immigrants. They need them. But they don’t want them,” Cruz said.

Daily demands getting harder to meet


Business owners worry the new immigration law going into affect in Florida could hit the construction industry hard. A Tallahassee lobbyist who did not want to be named for the story said businesses are facing workforce challenges that seem to be directly related to the immigration bill. There have been cases of workers leaving job sites and going to other states, the lobbyist said.
 (Credit: Corey Perrine/Florida Times-Union)

On June 1, Juan Valdez didn’t go to work.

The owner of a Naples construction company, Valdez, who is also from Mexico, stayed home in solidarity with his Hispanic workers who boycotted Florida’s new immigration law.

Since DeSantis signed the immigration bill, Valdez has lost 15 of his best workers, who have moved to other states like Illinois and North Carolina.

Florida is already the state with the most H2A visas, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, with 12.3%, or 25,451 of the total number of visas going to the Sunshine State. The visas let employers bring foreign workers into the country for temporary agricultural jobs.

The majority of H2A visas in the U.S. – more than 80% – go to farmworkers for crops and plant nurseries.

The construction industry mostly relies on the H2B visa program, which according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, reached its cap of 33,000 nationwide for the second half of this fiscal year in March.

They also added an extra 64,716 visas to be awarded to businesses who can cite “irreparable harm,” if they cannot hire H2B workers, including an allocation of 20,000 visas reserved for workers from Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.

But Valdez still can’t find enough people to replace the crew members who left.

He used to pay painters $18-$20 an hour. Now, he’s paying $30-$35, which ended up increasing the costs for his work.

“I have to adapt,” he said.

Valdez already had a $300,000 drywall project fall through because he couldn’t find enough crew members to get the work done.

Before DeSantis signed the law, Valdez’s crew of 45 was a mix of undocumented workers and workers with visas, he said. But even some of his documented workers moved out of state because they had family members who didn’t have papers.

Valdez said his employees weren’t misinformed, like Roth said during this month’s meeting in Hialeah.

They didn’t want to take the risk when “they can find work anywhere,” Valdez said. “They’re amazing workers.”

Dave Berman, business editor of Florida Today, contributed to this report. John Kennedy is a reporter in the USA TODAY Network’s Florida Capital Bureau. He can be reached at jkennedy2@gannett.com, or on Twitter at @JKennedyReport. Ana Goñi-Lessan is the State Watchdog Reporter for USA TODAY- Florida and can b e reached at AGoniLessan@tallahassee.com. Follow her on Twitter @goni_lessan.

This article originally appeared on USATNetwork: Florida immigration law: Business owners fear exodus of workers