Monday, August 14, 2023

Israel’s actions in West Bank like Nazi Germany, says retired general



James Rothwell
Mon, 14 August 2023

Amiram Levin said there was ‘total apartheid’ in the occupied West Bank - Eyal Warshavsky/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

A retired Israeli general and former Mossad spy accused his country’s government of “total apartheid” as he appeared to compare the occupied West Bank to Nazi Germany.

Amiram Levin, who served as commander of the Israeli army’s northern forces and deputy director of Mossad, made the remarks during an interview with the Israeli broadcaster Kan.

“There hasn’t been a democracy there in 57 years. There is total apartheid,” Mr Levin said, referring to the ongoing Israeli military occupation of the West Bank.


“It [the army] is standing by, looking at the settler rioters and is beginning to be a partner to war crimes. These are deep processes,” he added.

Israel increasingly faces accusations from human rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, of imposing apartheid on Palestinians in the West Bank. But such criticism from former military commanders or other senior officials is rare.

Later in the interview, the former Mossad deputy drew an apparent comparison between Nazi Germany and the situation in the West Bank, which this year has suffered some of the worst Israeli-Palestinian violence in two decades.

“Walk around Hebron and you will see streets where Arabs cannot walk, just like what happened in Germany,” the Jerusalem Post quoted him as saying, referring to the southern West Bank city where Palestinians live in close quarters with a Jewish settler minority backed by the army.

Change of heart

Mr Levin’s comments suggest he has had a profound change of heart on the issue since 2017, when he claimed Palestinians “deserved” to be occupied.

Danny Danon, a senior figure in Israel’s ruling Likud party, rejected the claims. “Those who compare us to Germany or the Nazi regime should be examined,” he said.

Israel’s government vehemently denies the charge of apartheid and has suggested that applying the label to Israel is anti-Semitic. Apartheid was the policy of racial segregation and discrimination enforced by South Africa’s white minority government against black people from 1948 to 1991.

In recent years a number of human rights groups, including Israeli organisations, have started using the word in the context of the West Bank occupation.

In January 2021, the leading Israeli rights groups B’Tselem levelled the charge against Israel for the first time. This was followed by an April 2021 report by Human Rights Watch accusing Israel of “committing the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution”.

The following January, Amnesty International published its own report accusing Israel of apartheid on the grounds that it “considers and treats Palestinians as an inferior non-Jewish racial group”.

It is not the first time a former senior Israeli official has issued the apartheid charge. In 2015, former Mossad chief Meir Dagan said of prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu: “On the Palestinian matter, his policies are leading to either a binational state or an apartheid state.”

iPhone maker Foxconn’s cautious pivot to India shows limits of ‘China plus one’

Kathrin Hille in Taipei and John Reed in New Delhi
Mon, August 14, 2023

When Foxconn chair Young Liu was in Tamil Nadu two weeks ago to discuss more investment by the iPhone manufacturer in the southern Indian state, two ministers from neighbouring Karnataka sought him out for their own meeting — and later produced documents claiming Foxconn also intended to build two factories in their state. While Foxconn insisted it had not committed to any project, the Karnataka government’s lobbying was a sign of the intense competition brewing in India to attract more investment from the world’s biggest contract electronics manufacturer, as Apple and other tech companies diversify away from their reliance on China. Multinationals’ desire for a “China plus one” strategy, following supply chain disruptions and geopolitical tensions between Washington and Beijing, is driving Foxconn into a renewed push into India, where it first invested 15 years ago but where it still only employs some 50,000 of its 1mn global workforce.
WHAT  ABOUT STALIN?!
Hitler, Burr and Trump: Show trials put the record straight for history but can also provide a powerful platform for the defendant

Stefanie Lindquist, Foundation Professor of Law and Political Science, Arizona State University
Sat, August 12, 2023 

The Washington, D.C., courthouse where Donald Trump's Jan. 6-related trial will likely take place. Bonnie Jo Mount/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The trial of Donald Trump on charges that he conspired to undermine the peaceful transition of power will likely be a show trial – but not in the usual sense of the words.

The phrase “show trial” has two connotations. In the most common understanding of the term, those connotations are negative: Show trials in authoritarian regimes are sham trials used for propaganda purposes where the outcome is predetermined and the defendants condemned as traitors to the motherland.

Think of the show trials mounted by the Baathist regime under Saddam Hussein, the show trials of Josef Stalin’s dictatorship, or those of the Chinese Communist Party under Mao Zedong. These sham trials were used to persecute enemies and consolidate power through the fear they generated.

But trials that capture widespread public attention and expose wrongdoing by political or business figures may also produce highly constructive and positive outcomes as well. They can promote accountability for crimes against the state or against humanity.

Yet even these positive show trials, meant to affirm the laws and values of a democracy, can end badly, as with one prosecution in Germany in the mid-1920s – of the young Nazi party leader, Adolf Hitler, who had led an unsuccessful revolt to overthrow the country’s democratic government.


Adolf Hitler, fourth from right, with his fellow defendants in the Munich Putsch trial of 1924 for their failed coup attempt by the Nazi party to seize power in Munich, Bavaria, in November 1923. Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Prosecuting war crimes and corruption

As international law scholar Martti Koskenniemi has astutely noted, political show trials may be useful “for establishing an impartial account of the past and for teaching younger generations of the dangers involved in particular policies.” Political trials that provide the public with a compelling narrative about crimes against the public trust can therefore have positive consequences for a democracy.

The Nuremberg trials after World War II highlighted Nazi atrocities to the world, the 2002 trial of former Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic exposed his war crimes, and the trials of Rwandans held to account those who engaged in the mass slaughter of 800,000 Tutsis and Hutus. These trials served as an opportunity to expose the truth about the defendants’ actions and to hold them accountable for those actions for all the world to see.

Show trials are not only useful for exposing war criminals, however. In democracies, show trials of political officials – defined as such because they captivate public attention – promote the rule of law and order to a very wide audience.

Korean President Park Geun-hye was indicted and charged with high-profile corruption charges and convicted of the abuse of power in 2018; she was later pardoned. The high-profile trial of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has found him accused of accepting bribes and breaching the public trust – that trial is ongoing. And after he left office, former French President Nicolas Sarkozy was convicted in 2021 and imprisoned for illegal campaign financing.

These are but a few examples of heads of state in functioning democracies who have been held to account in trials that have riveted the public’s attention.

Even the U.S. has a history of political show trials.

In 1807, then-President Thomas Jefferson became personally involved in promoting the prosecution of his own vice president, Aaron Burr, for treason. Burr was Jefferson’s political rival: He had challenged Jefferson for the presidency in a fight over electoral college votes in the House of Representatives.

Burr’s defense counsel claimed that the fairness of Burr’s trial was compromised by widespread news coverage of the event – an issue that was ultimately decided in the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that exposure to news coverage did not compromise the trial. Burr was acquitted.

But there is a darker outcome lurking in show trials.

Several hundred journalists line up outside the War Crimes Tribunal where former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic was being tried for alleged war crimes, July 3, 2001, in The Hague, Netherlands.

Hitler’s trial fueled rise to power


The facts underlying many political trials arise in a historical context. The interpretation of that context – let alone the very facts of the history – may be disputed.

Although comparisons with Hitler are largely considered out of bounds when discussing current politics and politicians, it’s relevant to any discussion of high-profile political trials that the future Nazi dictator’s rise to power was fueled in large part by a show trial.

In 1923, Adolf Hitler led an effort to foment revolution in Bavaria. Known as the Beer-Hall Putsch because it literally began in a beer hall, Hitler and his followers sought to lead a revolt against the governing German Weimar democracy. His effort failed and he was tried for the crime of subverting the constitution of Germany.

But in the 1924 trial, presided over by a judge sympathetic to the Nazi agenda, Hitler used the courtroom as a platform, writes law professor Douglas O. Linder, “to showcase his oratorical skills and promote his views to as wide an audience as possible.”

As Hitler used the trial to argue that German institutions were corrupt, his popularity grew substantially. Historian David King writes in his book about the trial that “the incident caused headlines all over the international press, and Hitler’s name became known thereafter. He could not have bought the kind of publicity he got at the trial even if he wanted to.”

And even though he was ultimately convicted, Hitler used his time in prison to write “Mein Kampf” – his manifesto for Nazism – and to reinvigorate his political movement by building the Nazi party platform. By 1933, Hitler was named chancellor. After the staged Reichstag fire, the government capitulated to Nazi party rule, abolished elections and succumbed to Hitler’s dictatorship.

The United States has a justice system that is far more impartial than the German judicial system during Hitler’s rise to power.

But the history lesson remains relevant: Trials within a political context and the charging of political crimes have risks. Though they may be necessary to uphold the rule of law, these types of show trials may also provide the defendant with the opportunity to dispute the historical record and challenge the very governmental authority holding them to account.

Donald Trump has already begun his version of that effort.

Significant political consequences


With every indictment, Trump has become more popular with the GOP’s electoral base. His social media posts clearly reflect his efforts to undermine faith in the rule of law and in the justice system.

Most recently, Trump has made statements that seem aimed at goading U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the Jan. 6 case, into holding him in contempt of court. A public post by Trump stating, “If you go after me I’m coming after you,” seems tailor-made to convince a judge that the defendant is prepared to intimidate witnesses and disrupt the administration of justice.

History tells us that trials of political figures like Donald Trump – if he is found guilty of the crimes charged – may promote the rule of law and democracy.

But history also shows that trials may produce significant political consequences that reverberate well beyond the simple administration of justice.

This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. 
KARMA IS A BITCH
Bankman-Fried heads to Brooklyn jail notorious for poor conditions

Luc Cohen
Mon, August 14, 2023 

FILE PHOTO: Former FTX Chief Executive Bankman-Fried at the Manhattan federal court in New York City


By Luc Cohen

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Sam Bankman-Fried will prepare for his fraud trial from a Brooklyn jail where inmates ranging from convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell to Honduras' former president have complained of subpar conditions.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan ruled on Friday that Bankman-Fried, the founder of bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX, must be jailed for tampering with witnesses while free on $250 million bond at his parents' home in Palo Alto, California.

Bankman-Fried, who has pleaded not guilty to fraud charges over FTX's collapse, will now be housed before his Oct. 2 trial in Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center, a far cry from the luxurious Bahamas resort where he lived until his December 2022 arrest and extradition to the United States.

In recent years, MDC has been plagued by persistent staffing shortages, power outages and maggots in inmates' food. Earlier this year, a guard pleaded guilty to accepting bribes to smuggle in drugs. Public defenders have called conditions "inhumane."

In the winter of 2019, an electrical fire cut off the jail's lighting and heat for days as temperatures fell to near zero Fahrenheit (minus 18 Celsius).

Lawyers for Maxwell, who was convicted of recruiting and grooming teenage girls for abuse by the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, said raw sewage seeped into her MDC cell. Her attorneys compared the "reprehensible and utterly inappropriate" conditions there to Hannibal Lecter's incarceration in the 1991 movie "The Silence of the Lambs", "despite the absence of the cage and plastic face guard."

They also cited "hyper-surveillance" by overbearing guards, a bad diet, and sleep deprivation.

Maxwell was sentenced last year to 20 years and is being held at a prison in Florida.

The U.S. Bureau of Prisons, which runs MDC, did not respond to a request for comment. The agency previously has said it is committed to the safety of inmates and staff, and that humane treatment of inmates is a top priority.

Founded in 1994, MDC currently hosts 1,608 inmates. It is now the jail housing detainees awaiting federal trials in New York City, after the Manhattan Correctional Center closed in 2021 for improvements. Epstein killed himself in his MCC cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

Bankman-Fried's lawyers had urged Kaplan not to jail the 31-year-old former billionaire, in part because a "staffing crisis" at MDC meant there would be too few guards to escort him to a room where he could access computers to review prosecutors' evidence against him.

Kaplan said during the hearing that while MDC "is not on anybody's list of five star facilities," he was not sure whether housing Bankman-Fried at a minimum security jail in Putnam County, about 50 miles (80 km) north of New York City, as prosecutors had requested, was "doable."

It is not Bankman-Fried's first time behind bars. In the Bahamas, he was held for nearly a week at the Fox Hill Prison, which a 2021 U.S. State Department report said was plagued by rodents and a lack of toilets. Local authorities said in December conditions had improved.

Other high-profile inmates currently being held at MDC include Juan Orlando Hernandez, the former president of Honduras who has pleaded not guilty to drug trafficking charges, and Guo Wengui, an exiled Chinese businessman who has pleaded not guilty to fraud charges.

Hernandez' lawyers have likened his confinement conditions to those of a "prisoner of war." Guo's lawyers in March called MDC "an extraordinarily dangerous environment," citing a recent lockdown in response to an increase in contraband including weapons.

(Reporting by Luc Cohen in New York; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Daniel Wallis)

World's first mass-produced humanoid robot? China start-up Fourier Intelligence eyes two-legged robots with AI brains

South China Morning Post
Sun, August 13, 2023 at 3:30 AM MDT·6 min read


When Fourier Intelligence unveiled its lanky, jet-black humanoid robot GR-1 at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai in July, it instantly stole the show.

While the global technology community has been fixated on artificial intelligence (AI) software since the launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT in November, the Chinese-made GR-1 - said to be capable of walking on two legs at a speed of 5km an hour while carrying a 50kg load - reminded people of the potential of bipedal robots, which are being pursued by global companies from Tesla to Xiaomi.

For Fourier, a Shanghai-based start-up, GR-1 was an unlikely triumph.

Do you have questions about the biggest topics and trends from around the world? Get the answers with SCMP Knowledge, our new platform of curated content with explainers, FAQs, analyses and infographics brought to you by our award-winning team.

"It is an unprecedented attempt by us - we barely had any reference when it came to the technology," Alex Gu, founder and chief executive of Fourier, said in a recent interview with the South China Morning Post in the Chinese financial capital.

Fourier's focus has not always been on humanoid robots. Named after the 19th-century French mathematician and physicist Joseph Fourier, the company was originally set up in 2015 in Shanghai's tech hub Zhangjiang with the aim of developing rehabilitation robotics.

The firm's current products include a smart exercise bike, a wireless robotic glove and a series of computer-guided contraptions that help users restore movement in their arms and legs.

But just like many of his peers, 42-year-old Gu, a mechanical engineering graduate from Shanghai Jiao Tong University, had long dreamed about creating his own humanoid robot.

So in 2019, after Fourier brought its intelligent rehabilitation devices into hundreds of hospitals and medical care centres in over 10 countries and established itself in the industry, Gu decided it was time to kick off a new venture.

Back then, few companies in the world had successfully launched a humanoid robot due to the high technological barrier and development costs. In the US, there were a handful of projects including Atlas by Boston Dynamics, the company known for its robot dog Spot, and Digit by Agility Robotics.

In China, most firms chose to dedicate their efforts on lightweight products like four-legged robots. Gu thought he could do better.

"Many technologies used in rehabilitation robots are essentially applicable to humanoid robots," Gu said. "Humanoid robots require very good motors that are both powerful and light, and we are able to develop them ourselves."


Alex Gu, founder and chief executive of Fourier Intelligence

GR-1 was born in a small laboratory on the first floor of the Fourier headquarters, where a group of engineers were busy refining and testing the robot when this reporter visited last month. The team reached a major breakthrough in 2022 - three years after the start of the project - when it managed to make the 1.65-metre tall robot rise up on both legs and walk.

"When we saw it standing up for the first time, untethered and walking around by itself, it was a big encouragement for all our engineers," said Gu. "It felt like raising a newborn baby."

Fourier later published an online video of the walking GR-1, drawing compliments from many viewers, but also plenty of scepticism.

"Some overseas viewers said the video was computer-generated," said Gu. "I understand that the field is still at an early stage and that people will have different opinions, just like some had argued 20 years ago whether electric vehicles would be able to travel on roads."

In addition to technical challenges, researchers and robotics experts have cautioned that companies still face massive difficulties in commercialising humanoid robots in the broader consumer market.

"[Humanoid robots] mostly live in the labs now and are extremely expensive," said Zhang Xiaorong, director of Chinese research institute Shendu Technology. "A relatively high-quality machine can cost millions of yuan."

Those problems have not stopped companies from trying.

Lei Jun, founder of Chinese smartphone giant Xiaomi, in August 2022 showed off on stage the company's first humanoid robot CyberOne, which was seen to be capable of walking, but not much else.

Less than two months later, Elon Musk, the billionaire founder of Tesla, unveiled a prototype of its highly anticipated Optimus robot during the company's AI Day. It walked and danced live on stage. The audience was also shown a video of the robot doing tasks like carrying a box and moving metal bars.

Musk said at the WAIC conference last month that Optimus was not intended to "have great intelligence", but to help humans with "boring, repetitive or dangerous tasks".

Gu said he shared similar visions with Musk, but added that robots "can also become very good friends of humans by providing emotional value".

While current humanoid robots still have "large gaps with humans in both movement and cognitive ability", the development of large language models (LLM) - the type of software that underpins AI chatbots like ChatGPT - could be "epoch-changing", Gu said.

"LLMs will give robots the ability of logical reasoning, making them much more human-like," Gu said.


A Fourier Intelligence engineer tests the self-balancing ability of the company's humanoid robot.

While Gu emphasised that Fourier will focus on developing the hardware that makes up the "body" of the robots and leave AI developers to work on the "brain", Fourier co-founder and chief strategy officer Zen Koh said a few AI companies had already reached out for potential collaboration in LLMs.

"We're hoping to work with all the major ones and ... as a system, be open," Koh said.

The GR-1 robot has already been delivered in small quantities to some universities and AI companies for research and development, according to Gu. He plans to begin mass production by year-end and deliver thousands of units in 2024.

Musk last year also claimed that production could start in 2023.

Gu expects Fourier's humanoid robots, which he said have great potential in various scenarios including elderly care, education and guest reception, to generate more revenue than its rehabilitation robots in the next three to five years.

Still, there is a long way to go before humanoid robots become a part of our daily lives, he said.

"Don't expect a miracle to come out in a year or so - even for Tesla, we have to give them time [to achieve mass production of humanoid robots]," said Gu.

"But also, don't underestimate the possibility that this thing may become part of people's family lives in five or 10 years."

Copyright (c) 2023. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.




WHAT WAR? SAYS GUNRUNNER
Russia supplying S-400 air defence systems to India on schedule - defence official

Reuters
Mon, August 14, 2023 

Russian S-400 missile air defence systems are seen during a training exercise in Kaliningrad region


(Reuters) - Russia will deliver an order of S-400 anti-aircraft systems to India within the agreed timeframe, Interfax news agency quoted a senior Russian defence export official on Monday as saying.

India is the world's biggest arms importer and still mostly uses Russian technology for traditional arms, but officials in New Delhi have expressed concern that Russia's war in Ukraine could delay planned deliveries of weapons and equipment.

"The production of S-400 Triumf anti-aircraft missile systems is being carried out according to schedule," Interfax quoted Dmitry Shugaev, head of Russia's Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation, as saying.

"The delivery of the equipment of the S-400 Triumf system is expected to be completed within the agreed time frame," he said in comments made during an armed forces event.

India purchased the S-400 Triumf air defence system units in 2018 for $5.4 billion. Three of the systems have been delivered and two more are still awaited.

The deliveries are scheduled to be completed by the end of 2024, according to Interfax.

The Indian Air Force said in March that the war in Ukraine was holding up vital defence supplies from Russia.

New Delhi has been seeking in recent years to diversify imports or replace them with home-built hardware.

It is buying French fighter jets, Israeli drones and U.S. jet engines. But Russia still accounted for $8.5 billion of the $18.3 billion India has spent on arms imports since 2017, according to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

(Reporting by Felix Light; Writing by Gareth Jones; Editing by Toby Chopra and Sharon Singleton)
TOXICS REGULATION
U.S. Sunscreen Is Stuck in the ’90s. Is This a Job for Congress?

Sandra E. Garcia
Sun, August 13, 2023 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
(AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)

After months of prompting, I have finally managed to help my husband form a daily sunscreen habit. Whenever I see traces of paper-white cream in his dark beard, I think, ‘We’re halfway there.’

Hoping to avoid the white cast, heaviness and greasiness common in many sunscreen products available in U.S. drugstores, some Americans, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, have taken matters into their own hands, opting for sunscreens manufactured abroad. In a recent interview, the congresswoman said she toggled between Bioré in the summer and Beauty of Joseon in the winter — two Asian brands that employ active ingredients not approved for use in the United States.

“The technology is very sophisticated,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “You don’t feel like you have a layer of sunscreen on, and it kind of just feels like you’re putting on a moisturizer in that sense, which makes it easier to use.”

While sunscreen is regulated as a cosmetic in major skin-care hubs such as South Korea, Japan and the European Union, in the United States it falls under the purview of the Food and Drug Administration. Any drug product marketed to American consumers must be approved by the FDA, and because sunscreen “makes a drug claim” — namely, that it can prevent sunburn, decrease the risk of skin cancer and mitigate early skin aging — the agency regulates it as an over-the-counter drug.

The last time the FDA approved new active ingredients for use in sunscreens was more than two decades ago, and at times it can feel as if the rest of the world has surpassed the United States in the development of new sunscreen formulations and protocols. Skin-care influencers on TikTok and Instagram are in a near-constant state of frenzy over exciting new products and innovations that are nowhere to be found on American shelves. Currently there are 14 sunscreen filters approved for use by the FDA. The European Union employs more than 30.

Frustrated by what seems to be a wealth of more exciting options for sun protection overseas, skin-care-conscious Americans have been quick to point the finger at the FDA for the delay in approving new active ingredients. But according to Ocasio-Cortez, the agency is not to blame for the holdup, at least not entirely.

“I think the assessment here is that Americans need sunscreen, and they have sunscreen,” she said. “Are there other avenues that we can use in order to kind of break through this standstill? Yeah.”

Congress has begun a “preliminary, early process” of examining what a better approval procedure might look like, she said: a way that pushes the manufacturers of sunscreen filters to do the appropriate research and development to submit drug information to the FDA for approval.

“I also think it’s very important that we maintain a level of rigor around safety,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “We want to make sure this is not about advocating for the deregulation of these filters.”

Many sunscreen ingredients that have appeared in foreign-made sunscreens for decades, favored by consumers for their ease of use, are still awaiting approval by the FDA. The ultraviolet-filtering compounds amiloxate, enzacamene and octyl triazone, for instance, have been stuck in the FDA regulatory pipeline since at least 2003.

In November 2014, President Barack Obama signed the Sunscreen Innovation Act into law. The legislation gave the FDA five years to approve or deny the use of new sunscreen ingredients, including several under review since 2002. In 2019, the FDA reaffirmed the safety of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide in mineral sunscreens and asked manufacturers for more information on 12 other ingredients.

“They said you can continue to market products and utilize these but we want to see more data,” said Thomas F. Myers, executive vice president for legal and regulatory affairs at the Personal Care Products Council, a trade group representing companies that make cosmetics and personal care products. As long as the FDA continues to defer a final decision on a product, Myers said, it remains eligible for use on the market.

In 2020, the CARES Act included a change in the approval process for over-the-counter drugs.

Under the new procedure, the FDA asked for more information from manufacturers on new sunscreen filters, essentially kicking the can — or bottle — back over to them but not flat-out denying approval. The 14 chemicals moved up from 2019 to 2020 to satisfy the CARES Act are the chemicals allowed for use now.

In a statement, the FDA said it was committed to helping “facilitate the marketing of sunscreen products that include additional over-the-counter sunscreen active ingredients.” It continued, “To do so, the FDA relies on industry to submit the data needed to make safety and effectiveness determinations for these ingredients.”

Although skin cancer remains the most common type of cancer in the United States, the worrisome rates of the disease cannot be blamed on a lack of new sunscreen filters, according to Dr. Steven Q. Wang, chair of the Skin Cancer Foundation’s photobiology committee.

The current rate of skin cancer in the United States is a result of the past 50 years, Wang said. Even today, new diagnoses are the legacy of the lack of awareness of sun damage in the 1950s, as well as the sun tanning and tanning bed culture of the 1980s and ’90s.

“Sunscreen is only a part of the overall protection,” said Wang, who is also a member of the Public Access to SunScreens Coalition. The other parts? Avoiding sunlight during the hours of most intense daylight, seeking out shade and wearing protective clothing.

U.S. sunscreen manufacturers, he added, have done “a pretty good job with the existing UV filters to make a superior, better sunscreen to protect Americans.”

Although there are many potential solutions, the onus to provide the greatest possible sun protection to Americans is on Congress, Ocasio-Cortez said, adding that there had not been much attention on the matter since Obama signed the Sunscreen Innovation Act in 2014.

“It just doesn’t seem that this issue has risen to a level of awareness in Congress that creates the political momentum necessary to make things a priority,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “What I’m very excited about is that it does seem like there is a growing awareness among everyday people about this issue.”

Across her various platforms, she is trying to foster that political momentum. On Thursday, the congresswoman posted an Instagram video in which she told her 1.5 million followers that “U.S. sunscreens are far behind the rest of the world,” adding, “We deserve better here in the U.S.”

Online, influencers have been more outspoken about sunscreens, developing their own rules of thumb for use and creating videos of themselves trying one brand after another to determine which takes to the skin best. New, targeted brands such as Black Girl Sunscreen populate the shelves at Target. Americans are branching out when it comes to the sunscreens they want to use.

“That, I think, is also creating a certain political and popular and cultural momentum that’s necessary for us to actually make changes around these things,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

“I don’t think this is a left or right flashpoint,” she added. “I think this is something that all people need.”

c.2023 The New York Times Company
Takakia survived the upheaval of early Earth, but it may soon go extinct

Ashley Strickland, CNN
Wed, August 9, 2023 

The world’s oldest moss, called Takakia, has persisted in some of Earth’s most extreme environments for millions of years. And despite the fact that this ancient plant is one of the fastest-evolving species of moss known to science, it may not survive the climate crisis.

A team of researchers spent a decade studying the 390 million-year-old moss that grows on the icy, isolated cliffs of the Tibetan Plateau.

Called the “roof of the world,” this remote area surrounded by the Himalayas is the world’s highest and largest plateau. The tiny, slow-growing moss can also be found in parts of Japan and the United States.

The researchers went on 18 expeditions between 2010 and 2021 to understand how Takakia has adapted to survive for millions of years in its home, located 13,123 feet (4,000 meters) above the ground. A study detailing the findings was published Wednesday in the journal Cell.

“We set out to describe and analyze a living fossil,” said study coauthor Dr. Ralf Reski in a statement. He is a plant biotechnologist and professor in the faculty of biology at the University of Freiburg in Germany.

The crucial role of early plants

As animal life began in Earth’s oceans around 500 million years ago, plant life that evolved from freshwater algae began to cover the planet’s rocky land masses and adapted to live in harsher terrestrial environments, according to the study authors. The tiny plants caused a huge shift in Earth’s atmosphere as they eroded the rocks they grew on and converted light energy into chemical energy through photosynthesis. As the plants broke down stone, this biological weathering released minerals, and the photosynthetic process resulted in organic compounds and oxygen.

The plants made Earth’s landmasses more hospitable to animal life, which began to evolve and become more complex over time.


The researchers embarked on multiple expeditions in the Himalayas to study Takakia moss. - Dr. Ruoyang Hu

When the Indian and Eurasian tectonic plates collided 65 million years ago, the cataclysmic event created the Himalayas. Takakia, already about 100 million years old at the time, rose right along with the Himalayas and was forced to quickly adapt to the much harsher environment.

“In the Himalayas, you can experience four seasons within a day,” said lead study author Ruoyang Hu, plant biologist and co-expedition leader at Capital Normal University in China, in a statement. “At the foot of the mountain, it is sunny and clear. When you get to the halfway point, there is always a light rain — it feels like you’re walking in a cloud. And when you get to the top, it snows and it’s very cold.”
The secrets of plant DNA

The research team collected samples to sequence Takakia’s DNA for the first time and determine how the climate crisis is affecting the plant. Given how ancient the plant is, the team also wanted to determine whether Takakia was really a moss or another type of ancient plant, such as liverwort or algae. The study research showed that Takakia is indeed a moss.

“The idea was to go as deep as possible into the history of the first land plants to see what they can tell us about evolution,” Reski said. “We found that Takakia is currently the genome with the highest number of fast-evolving genes. It’s very active on the genetic level.”

Takakia’s genome has evolved over time, adapting to recover from ultraviolet damage and make alterations and fixes to broken DNA, the researchers said. But the plant’s actual form has changed very little, despite the fact that its genetics are always changing. The moss has also adapted to grow in different locations by branching.

“Takakia plants are covered with heavy snow for eight months each year, and then are subjected to high-intensity ultraviolet radiation during the 4-month light period,” said study coauthor Yikun He, plant biologist at Capital Normal University, in a statement. “As a result, this continuous branching forms a network structure and a very sturdy population structure, which can effectively resist the invasion of heavy snowstorms.”

The research team also studied the plants using time-lapse cameras and satellite weather data to track larger changes in the moss’ environment. As the local temperature average increased each year, the population of Takakia moss decreased by 1.6% annually, the study authors noted.

As the planet warms, the plateau’s glaciers are rapidly melting. The moss is also experiencing higher levels of UV radiation that is capable of killing plants adapted to harsh environments.

Takakia’s uncertain future

During the decade-long study, the moss became harder to find.

“Our prediction shows that suitable conditions (and) regions for Takakia will shrink to only around 1,000 -1,500 square kilometers all over the world at the end of the 21st century,” Hu said.

The study authors don’t think the moss is likely to survive another 100 years and could face extinction, despite its millions of years of evolution and resilience.

“As a sensitive environmental indicator species, its observed decline over the past decade is an early warning signal of the grave danger of global warming,” the authors wrote in the study.

The research team wants to protect the moss by cultivating it in labs and transplanting it to new areas.

“Plant scientists cannot sit idly by. We are attempting to multiply some plants in the laboratory and then transplant them to our experimental sites in Tibet,” Yikun He said. “After five years of continuous observation, it has been found that some transplanted plants can survive and thrive, which may be the dawn of the recovery — or at least a postponement of extinction — of Takakia populations.”

The study authors hope that the study of rare, tiny species like Takakia can serve as a larger wake-up call about the climate crisis. “But the dinosaurs came and went, and so might humans, if we are not careful with our planet. Takakia may die because of climate change, but the other mosses will survive, even if we humans cannot.

“We humans like to think that we are on top of evolution,” Reski said. “But the dinosaurs came and went, and so might humans, if we are not careful with our planet. Takakia may die because of climate change, but the other mosses will survive, even if we humans cannot. You can learn a lot from the simplest plants about the history of this planet, and maybe the future.”
300,000-year-old skull found in China unlike any early human seen before

Hafsa Khalil and Jack Guy, CNN
Thu, August 10, 2023

Xiujie Wu/National Research Center on Human Evolution

An ancient skull dating back 300,000 years is unlike any other premodern human fossil ever found, potentially pointing to a new branch in the human family tree, according to new research.

An international team of researchers from China, Spain and the United Kingdom unearthed the skull — specifically the mandible, or lower jaw — in the Hualongdong region of eastern China in 2015, along with 15 other specimens, all thought to originate from the late Middle Pleistocene period.

Scientists believe the late Middle Pleistocene, which started around 300,000 years ago, was a pivotal period for the evolution of hominins — species that are regarded as human or closely related — including modern humans.

Published in the Journal of Human Evolution on July 31, a study by the research team found that the mandible, known as HLD 6, is “unexpected” and does not fit into any existing taxonomic groups.

Many Pleistocene hominin fossils discovered in China have been similarly difficult to classify, and were previously perceived to be anomalies, according to the study. However, this discovery, along with other recent research, is slowly changing what people know of the evolutionary pattern in the late Middle Pleistocene.
HLD 6 and a mosaic of features

By comparing the HLD 6 mandible to those of Pleistocene hominins and modern humans, the researchers found it has features of both.

It is similarly shaped to the mandible of Homo sapiens, our modern human species that evolved from Homo erectus. But it also shares a characteristic of a different branch that evolved from Homo erectus, the Denisovans. Like the Denisovans, HLD 6 does not appear to have a chin.

“HLD6 does not present a true chin but has some weakly expressed traits that seem to anticipate this typically H. sapiens feature,” said study author María Martinón-Torres, director of the National Research Center on Human Evolution (CENIEH) in Spain.

“Hualongdong are thus the earliest fossil population known in Asia to present this mosaic of primitive and H. sapiens-like features,” she added.

The researchers theorize that HLD 6 must belong to a classification that hasn’t yet been given a name, and that modern human characteristics could have been present as early as 300,000 years ago — before the emergence of modern humans in east Asia.

The researchers also considered the age of the individual that the jawbone belonged to, as skull shapes can differ between children and adults.

HLD 6 is thought to have belonged to a 12- to 13-year-old. While the researchers didn’t have an adult skull of the same species to compare with, they looked at Middle and Late Pleistocene hominin skulls of similar and adult age and found their shape patterns remained consistent regardless of age, further supporting the scientists’ theory.

According to Martinón-Torres, more work is needed to properly place HLD 6.

“More fossils and studies are necessary to understand their precise position in the human family tree,” she said.

 
SEE 

UK
River Wye waste to be used in Aston University biochar study

Nicola Goodwin - BBC Hereford & Worcester
Wed, August 9, 2023

The status of the River Wye was downgraded by Natural England in May due to pollution


Centuries-old science could help to remove pollution from the River Wye and bring millions of pounds to the West Midlands economy, researchers say.

Biochar, a charcoal-like substance made from wood, leftover crops and agricultural waste, is being studied by a team at Aston University, Birmingham.

It could be used to treat chicken muck to turn it into items such as compost and building materials, they claim.

Sixteen biochar hubs are set to be built in the Wye Valley by a company.

The firm, Onnu, have purchased a site for their first hub in Madley, Herefordshire and said they plan to buy waste from poultry farmers to turn into biochar.

Biochar has been produced for centuries like charcoal, where material is heated without oxygen up to temperatures of 300C or higher.

The process, called pyrolysis, breaks down materials by heating them and turning them into a gas, before it is then condensed and cooled to produce solid or liquid substances.

Herefordshire Council said they hoped to find out more about the process soon.

In May, Natural England downgraded the status of the River Wye due to pollution.

In the catchment area, 24 million chickens are farmed and their waste is spread as fertiliser but some of it washes into the river when it rains.

The phosphorus from it causes prolonged algal blooms which suffocate plants and wildlife by sucking up all the oxygen and turning the water an opaque green.

A research team at Aston University's Energy and Bioproducts Research Institute (EBRI) believe the muck could be valuable if it is used in the right way.
Develop new products

They have been given a government grant of almost £2m to see how biochar can be used commercially.

"We are pulling together a lot of science to make it work for communities and the economy," said Tim Miller, director of engagement at EBRI.

"We are taking the material, such as chicken muck, processing it and then producing a range of new materials which then can be developed into new products."

The biochar has already been used as compost for the plants used in Birmingham's gold medal winning Chelsea Flower Show entry.


Tim Miller, from Aston University, said the waste could be processed and produced into "a range of new materials"

The team are also working on matting for chicken sheds to soak up smells and ammonia and to help prevent spillages from the farms.

They said it was a multi-million pound scheme which could create hundreds of jobs.

Michael Douglas, from Onnu, said their hubs could each potentially handle 10,000 tonnes of agricultural waste annually.

"None of these plants are massive. To minimize transport and by serving a relatively small catchment we'll be looking at ultra-local solutions," he added.

Chicken producer Avara processes two million chickens at its factory in Hereford every week and it is the county's largest employer.

The company said they have met with Onnu but there was a lot of research to be done.