Unhealthy commodities—like alcohol and social media—are connected with poor mental health
Commercial determinants such as social media, air pollution associated with depression and suicide
image:
Mental health
view moreCredit: Image by Rosy / Bad Homburg / Germany; free to use under Pixabay Content License
“Unhealthy commodities” such as tobacco, alcohol, ultra-processed foods, social media, and fossil fuels, as well as impacts of fossil fuel consumption such as climate change and air pollution are associated with depression, suicide, and self-harm, according to a study published August 28 by Kate Dun-Campbell from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, and colleagues.
Globally, around one out of every eight people currently live with a mental health disorder. These disorders—including depression, suicide, anxiety, and other diseases and disorders—can have many underlying causes. Some of those causes could be related to commercial determinants of health—the ways in which commercial activities and commodities impact health and equity. Commercial determinants of health can be specifically unhealthy, such as alcohol or tobacco consumption, unhealthy food, and the use of fossil fuels. To further understand how these unhealthy commodities might impact mental health, the authors of this study performed an umbrella synthesis of 65 review studies examining connections between six specific commodities—tobacco, alcohol, ultra-processed foods, gambling, social media, and fossil fuels. The author also included studies looking at mental health impacts of fossil fuel use such as climate change and air pollution.
The umbrella review found evidence for links between depression and alcohol, tobacco, gambling, social media, ultra-processed foods and air pollution. Alcohol, tobacco, gambling, social media, climate change and air pollution were associated with suicide, and social media was also associated with self-harm. Climate change and air pollution were also linked to anxiety. The review brought together many different methodologies and measurements, and could not establish the underlying cause of the negative mental health outcomes. But the results indicate that unhealthy commodities should be considered when researchers attempt to understand and improve mental ill health.
The authors add: "Our review highlights that there is already compelling evidence of the negative impact of unhealthy products on mental health, despite key gaps in understanding the impact of broader commercial practices."
#####
Press-only preview: https://plos.io/4cC5eui
In your coverage please use this URL to provide access to the freely available article in PLOS Global Public Health: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003605
Citation: Dun-Campbell K, Hartwell G, Maani N, Tompson A, van Schalkwyk MC, Petticrew M (2024) Commercial determinants of mental ill health: An umbrella review. PLOS Glob Public Health 4(8): e0003605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003605
Author Countries: United Kingdom
Funding: This work was supported by the Three NIHR Research Schools Mental Health Programme (award number: MH004) The grant was received by GH, NM, and MP. . MVS is funded by a National Institute for Health Research Doctoral Fellowship (Ref NIHR300156). MP is a co-investigator in the Spectrum consortium, which is funded by the UK Prevention Research Partnership (UKPRP), a consortium of UK funders (UK Research and Innovation research councils: Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, and Natural Environment Research Council; charities: British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Welcome, and The Health Foundation; Government: Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office, Health and Care Research Wales, National Institute of Health Research and Public Health Agency. AT is also supported by the Spectrum consortium. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Method of Research
Systematic review
Subject of Research
People
No comments:
Post a Comment