Friday, September 18, 2020

DNA data shows not all Vikings were Scandinavian

The Vikings were more genetically diverse than researchers thought, according to new DNA analysis. Photo by Pikist/CC

Sept. 16 (UPI) -- In the public imagination, the Vikings were closely-related clans of Scandinavians who marauded their way across Europe, but new genetic analysis paints a more complicated picture.

For the last six years, researchers in Britain and Denmark have been sequencing and analyzing DNA from more than 400 Viking skeletons recovered from dig sites across Europe and Greenland.

The data, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, suggests Vikings were more genetically diverse than researchers thought.

"We have this image of well-connected Vikings mixing with each other, trading and going on raiding parties to fight kings across Europe, because this is what we see on television and read in books -- but genetically we have shown for the first time that it wasn't that kind of world," lead researcher Eske Willerslev said in a news release.

RELATED Germany was blanketed by ice some 450,000 years ago

"This study changes the perception of who a Viking actually was -- no one could have predicted these significant gene flows into Scandinavia from Southern Europe and Asia happened before and during the Viking Age," said Willerslev, a professor of evolutionary genetics at Cambridge University.

The so-called Viking Age begins with the earliest record of a Viking raid, dated to 800 A.D. The age lasted through the 1050s. During that time, Vikings raided monasteries and coastal cities, but also engaged in less violent activities, trading fur, tusks and seal fat.

Researchers knew the Vikings altered the political and economic landscape of Europe. In the 11th century, a Viking, Cnut the Great, ascended to the thrown of the North Sea Empire, comprising Denmark, England and Norway. But until now, researchers weren't really sure what the Vikings looked like, genetically speaking.

RELATED Genome study reveals history of human populations in Northern Europe

"We found genetic differences between different Viking populations within Scandinavia which shows Viking groups in the region were far more isolated than previously believed," said Willerslev, director of the Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Center at the University of Copenhagen.

"Our research even debunks the modern image of Vikings with blonde hair as many had brown hair and were influenced by genetic influx from the outside of Scandinavia," he said.

The DNA recovered from Viking burial sites showed raiding parties from what's now Norway traveled to Ireland, Scotland, Iceland and Greenland, while groups from what's now Sweden traveled to Baltic countries.
RELATED Archaeologists try to unravel secrets of ancient Swedish massacre



"We discovered that a Viking raiding party expedition included close family members as we discovered four brothers in one boat burial in Estonia who died the same day," said study co-author Ashot Margaryan.

"The rest of the occupants of the boat were genetically similar suggesting that they all likely came from a small town or village somewhere in Sweden," said Margaryan, an assistant professor of evolutionary genomics at the University of Copenhagen.

Researchers also found evidence that local people in Scotland, Celtic-speaking people known as Picts, adopted Viking identities and were buried as Vikings, but never genetically mixed with Scandinavians.

The DNA sequencing efforts showed Viking populations in Scandinavia continued to receive genetic inflows from throughout Europe during the Viking Age.

"Individuals with two genetically British parents who had Viking burials were found in Orkney [Scotland] and Norway," said Daniel Lawson, lead author from the University of Bristol in Britain. "This is a different side of the cultural relationship from Viking raiding and pillaging."




Ancient footprints in Saudi Arabia help track human migrations out of Africa




Researchers found ancient human and animal footprints in a lake deposit in the western Nefud Desert, Saudi Arabia. Photo by Palaeodeserts Project


Sept. 18 (UPI) -- Paleontologists have discovered a diverse assemblage of 120,000-year-old human and animal footprints in an ancient lake deposit in Saudi Arabia's Nefud Desert, offering new insights into the trajectories of human migrations out of Africa, according to a study published Friday in the journal Science Advances.

A mounting body of evidence, compiled and published over the last two decades, has upended early theories that humans migrated out of Africa in one or two giant waves.

"As more and more fossils are discovered, it seems that humans repeatedly dispersed out of Africa and did so much earlier than previously thought," study co-author Mathew John Stewart told UPI in an email.

"Precisely when, how often and under what conditions remain open questions," said Stewart, a researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Germany.

RELATED Ancient footprints in South Korea made by crocodiles that walked on two legs

For answers to these questions, researchers have mostly looked to Africa and Eurasia, ignoring the Arabian Peninsula. Though it neighbors both Africa and Asia, evidence of human occupation in the region is scant.

"The area today is a hyper-arid desert, characterized by very little rainfall and large, expansive sand dunes," Stewart said. "The conditions are not very amenable to the preservation of material and sediments. Significant erosion of sediments and the subsequent destruction of material, such as fossil remains, is unfortunately common."

Paleoclimate data suggests that Arabia wasn't always as dry as it was today, and a scattering of fossil discoveries has confirmed that humans were able to make forays into the Arabian interior when shifts in climate turned the peninsula's deserts into grassland.

RELATED Israeli archaeologists find 'Hanukkah gelt': rare, centuries-old gold coins

The ancient footprints found in the Nefud Desert, fossilized in an ancient lake deposit known as 'Alathar' -- Arabic for "the trace" -- suggests humans made one of those forays roughly 120,000 years ago.

"The age of the footprints are consistent with Homo sapiens fossils in the Levant, and suggests that there were multiple routes that humans took upon expanding beyond Africa," study co-author Richard Clark-Wilson told UPI in an email.

"There is earlier evidence for our species moving into the Mediterranean environment of the Levant and southern Greece, but this is the earliest evidence of our species moving into a semi-arid grassland as Arabia would have been," said Clark-Wilson, a postgraduate research student at Royal Holloway in Britain.

RELATED Earthquake may have destroyed Canaanite palace 3,700 years ago

In addition to human footprints, researchers uncovered footprints left by elephants, horses and hippos, suggesting Homo sapiens weren't the only species drawn to the open grasslands and water resources of northern Arabia. Research suggests it's possible humans were following animals when they first moved into the region.

"Whats exciting about the animal footprints is that it closely ties human and animal movements around lakes in northern Arabia," Stewart said. "Unlike most other records, footprints provide very high-resolution information, on the order of hours or days. Also, the animal footprints provide information on what the environment and ecology was like when these people were moving through the landscape."

While the discovery of ancient footprints in Arabia suggests human movements out of Africa extended eastward into northern Arabia, Stewart said plenty of questions remain unanswered.

"Precisely what happened to these people during the more arid periods? How long did they occupy the Arabian interior? Where did they go?"

Poll: Migrants more vulnerable than natives in developed nations


A displaced girl is seen at a temporary shelter in Kabul, Afghanistan, on April 29. Friday's survey showed that Afghanistan has the greatest share of citizens in the "high vulnerability" category. File Photo by Hedayatullah Amid/EPA-EFE

Sept. 18 (UPI) -- Migrants in the developed world are more likely to face high vulnerability than native residents due to multiple factors, according to a Gallup survey Friday.

The poll, part of Gallup's Basic Needs Vulnerability Index, said migrants and natives in developed countries face the same health threats in the COVID-19 era -- but migrants have been particularly vulnerable due to working and living conditions and no access to medical care

The vulnerability index gauges potential exposure to risk from economic and other types of challenges, like a pandemic. The index measures a population's ability to afford food and shelter and their access to personal safety nets.

According to the survey, 36% of migrants in developed economies were found to be in either "high vulnerability" or "moderate vulnerability" situations compared to just 24% of natives. In underdeveloped economies, the split was 65% to 59%, respectively.

Gallup acknowledged that persons in "high vulnerability" situations include those who struggled over the past year to afford food or shelter and didn't have family or friends who could help. The moderately vulnerable faced the same situation, except they had some social support.

The survey also noted that low-income migrants in some nations have accounted for a high percentage of coronavirus cases.

"With an estimated 37 million people thrown into extreme poverty since the start of the pandemic, the ranks of the world's most vulnerable are likely only to grow before the pandemic runs its course," Gallup wrote. "These vulnerable populations will continue to bear a disproportionate burden from the pandemic."

RELATED Pandemic exposes vulnerability of U.S. economy

The survey said 5% of the U.S. population fell into the "high vulnerability" category and a quarter faced "moderate vulnerability."

Afghanistan has the highest share of its population considered "highly vulnerable" (50%) -- while Britain, Singapore, Sweden, Denmark, Lithuania, Iceland and Switzerland have the lowest (1%).

Gallup polled more than 1,000 adults in 142 nations for the survey, which has a margin of error between 1.5 and 5.4 points.

Bushmeat trade changes hint at erosion of cultural taboos in West Africa


Despite religious taboos against the consumption of pigs and monkeys in the Muslim-dominated regions of West Africa, researchers have found evidence of increased demand for warthogs and green monkeys at bushmeat markets in rural Guinea. Photo by Charles Sharp/Wikimedia Commons

Sept. 18 (UPI) -- Researchers have identified a shift in the bushmeat trade in and around Niger National Park in Guinea, West Africa.

New survey data, published Friday in the journal Oryx, revealed in an uptick in the trade of several species that forage on local crops, including the green monkey, Chlorocebus sabaeus, and warthog, Phacochoerus africanus.

The discovery suggests economic realities have eroded cultural taboos against the killing and consumption of monkeys and wild pigs in West Africa, a predominantly Muslim region.

Researchers were able to identify fluctuations in the bushmeat, or wildmeat, trade by comparing more recent market survey data, collected between 2011 and 2017, with data collected during the 1990s and between 2001 and 2011.

RELATED Scientists map hot spots for bat-human virus transmission

"No other study to our knowledge has really explored temporal changes when it comes to the wild meat trade, and our study clearly highlights key shifts in this regard," lead study author Tatyana Humle, professor of ecology and conservation at the University of Kent in Britain, told UPI.

To collect accurate data, Humle said it's important for researchers to build trusting relationships with wildmeat vendors and help them understand the purpose of the study. It's also important for researchers not to interfere in market activities.

During regular visits to local markets, Humle's research team recorded where wildmeat was being sold, as well as what types of wildmeat -- at the species level, whenever possible -- was available for sale.

RELATED Hunting said pushing central African forests to point of collapse

The market data comparison showed that fluctuations in Guinea's wildmeat trade are being largely driven by increases in rural demand. Bushmeat trade patterns have remained fairly stable in the city of Faranah over the last few decades.

"In Guinea, like many other countries in the region, rural people in particular depend heavily on wildmeat for protein consumption and income," Humle said. "It is hence critical to understand what is going on in order to more effectively align conservation actions with the livelihoods challenges faced by people in these localities."

Researchers found small mammals dominate the bushmeat trade in Guinea, especially species that feed on local crops. With a single kill, farmers can both protect their crops and make some extra money.

RELATED Illegal hunting threatens African wildlife

"Increased trade in crop-foraging wildlife species is potentially a trend that we expect to see elsewhere as both subsistence and commercial agricultural activities and other land use conversion practices are spreading across landscapes, encroaching into habitats utilized by wildlife," Humle said.

The wildmeat trade presents a variety of risks, including an increased risk of zoonoses, diseases that jump between wildlife and both people and livestock.

"The international trade in wildlife is one of the major threats to biodiversity," Humle said.

The wildmeat trade can also lead to local extinctions and significant biodiversity losses, resulting in lost ecological services, such as pollination and seed-dispersal of critical fruit trees.

Researchers hope their market surveys can help conservationists develop more effective strategies to curb the growth of the wildmeat trade.

"Research is key to combat the growth of the wildmeat trade, as without understanding the patterns and drivers we cannot identify in concert with the people involved in this activity effective solutions to tackle the trade," Humle said.

"It is also vital that research findings inform policy and community development and conservation actions," she said. "Law enforcement is futile on its own, unless drivers are understood and addressed adequately."

upi.com/7039055

Shiite fears, demands jeopardize French initiative to save Lebanon


An anti-government protester carries a national flag as she shouts slogans in front of the Lebanese army soldiers during a protest on the road leading to the presidential palace in Baabda, east Beirut, Lebanon, last Saturday. Photo by Wael Hamzeh/EPA-EFE

BEIRUT, Lebanon, Sept. 18 (UPI) -- Internal disputes, Shiite demands and fears -- fueled by new U.S. sanctions on two former officials -- and the U.S.-Iran rivalry are obstructing French-led efforts to form a new government aimed at saving Lebanon from a deep economic crisis.

Lebanese rival sectarian factions, including Hezbollah, failed to honor commitments to French President Emmanuel Macron to form a cabinet of specialist ministers by a Tuesday deadline.

Prime Minister-designate Mustapha Adib, a Sunni Muslim, has been quietly trying to put together a new government since he was named Aug. 31. His efforts to exclude traditional political leaders, avoid usual consultations and switch control of ministries have particularly annoyed the powerful Shiite parties, the Amal movement led by House Speaker Nabih Berri and Iran-backed Hezbollah.

U.S. sanctions imposed last week against Berri's top aide, former Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil, and former Transport Minister Yusuf Fenianos for engaging in corruption and enabling Hezbollah angered both groups, prompting their insistence on taking back the Finance Ministry and naming the Shiite ministers in the new government.

RELATED Experts: Lebanon blast brings foreign insistence on reform

"No one wishes a confrontation and an escalation is in no one's interest," Kassim Kassir, a political analyst and expert on Islamic movements, told UPI. "But no one, too, can impose his conditions. No one would accept that."

Kassir said all Macron wants is for Lebanon to form a cabinet that would restore confidence in the country and start implementing urgent reforms. But former Prime Minister Saad Hariri and a group of former heads of government, who selected Adib, took advantage of the French initiative "to run the country and exclude the other political parties."

"The new cabinet cannot be formed without the approval of the parties," he said, referring to Shiite groups, as well as the Christian Free Patriotic Movement headed by Gebran Bassil, the son-in-law of President Michel Aoun.

RELATED Sabotage, negligence eyed as possible causes of new Beirut fire

Kassir acknowledged that new U.S. sanctions increased worries for Berri and Hezbollah: "Berri felt that he was targeted. It was like a warning to him."

France said Wednesday, after the deadline had passed, that "it is not yet too late" for Lebanese officials to "assume their responsibilities and finally act in the sole interest of Lebanon" by allowing Adib to form a government that reflects the "seriousness of the situation," according to a statement by Macron's office.

A new deadline has been set for Sunday.

RELATED Voices: In war-torn Syria, pandemic brings people to brink of starvation

Macron's initiative is the last chance to save Lebanon, Druze leader Walid Jumblatt wrote on Twitter.

The country is on the verge of collapse as a result of years of political disputes, corruption and economic mismanagement.

"It seems that some did not understand or do not want to understand that the French initiative is the last opportunity to save Lebanon and prevent its disappearance, as the (French) foreign minister said clearly," Jumblatt wrote.

Amin Kammourieh, a journalist and independent political analyst, told UPI the fresh U.S. sanctions came "to make matters worse as they reached Berri" and so the Shiites felt that they are targeted. "They won't accept to be eliminated from political life...They control the country and are well-armed and thus will not give in.

"If they are to end up in prison," he said, because of their years of engagement in corruption, "they will let the country burn."

A new government and the speedy adoption of reforms are needed to unblock international support and persuade the International Monetary Fund to finance a rescue plan, the beginning of a long recovery process.

But allowing the Shiite and other parties to name their ministers to the new government would mean a duplication of the previous cabinets, run by the same politicians responsible for the country's deterioration.

Experts say the Shiite parties are playing at the edge of the abyss and Berri might paint himself into a corner. International pressures could intensify, making the situation very complicated and dangerous.

Will there be a compromise to satisfy the Shiites or more sanctions targeting them?

The United States and France are showing patience, but if they realize that their efforts are leading nowhere, they may impose more sanctions on Lebanese officials and wait for them to come to them.

Hezbollah, Amal and their patron Iran can't bear the responsibility of letting Lebanon collapse. It is also not in the interests of the United States and France to see the tiny country falling apart.

If Lebanon plunges into chaos, Paris fears an influx of Lebanon's 1.5 million Syrian refugees to Europe while Washington is more concerned about Israel's security and reactivation of Islamic State sleeper cells.

The United States and France also differ over how to deal with Hezbollah. U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned this week that the Lebanese crisis cannot be resolved without tackling the issue of Hezbollah's arms.

On Thursday, the U.S. treasury blacklisted a senior Hezbollah Executive Council official identified as Sultan Khalifah As'ad and two Lebanon-based companies, Arch Consulting and Meamar Construction, accused of being linked to the Iran-backed Shiite group.

Report: Trump policies could add 1.8B gigatons of greenhouse gases


Environmental rule changes under the administration of President Donald Trump, shown speaking at the White House Thursday, could result in 1.8 gigatons of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere by 2035, a new report released Thursday said.


Sept. 18 (UPI) -- The Trump administration's unraveling of Obama-era environmental rules could lead to the release of an additional 1.8 billion gigatons of greenhouse gas emissions by 2035, according to a new examination released Thursday by the Rhodium Group.

The independent research firm said the extra release of the carbon dioxide is equivalent to one-third of all greenhouse emissions pumped into the atmosphere in 2019 and could speed up global warming.

"While some of these moves remain mired in legal uncertainty, the Trump administration has successfully unraveled the majority of Obama-era climate policies, including the Clean Power Plan, fuel economy standards for passenger vehicles, and efforts to curb potent greenhouse gases from refrigerants and air conditioning."

The White House in August eased regulations preventing methane leakage from oil and gas facilities, the firm said.


RELATED Study: Full transition to electric cars would improve U.S. air, health

The Trump administration had been fighting to prevent California from creating its own emissions standards, which would be stricter than once proposed by the White House.

Other possible greenhouse contributions could come from methane emissions from the oil and gas industry and coal-fired power plants that have found some new life under Trump.

"Having promised to cut environmental regulation on the campaign trail, President Trump wasted no time once in office," the report said. "In March 2017, Trump signed an executive order directing then-Environmental Protection Agency director Scott Pruitt to repeal and replace the Clean Power Plan (CPP), former President Obama's signature climate policy."

RELATED Study: Models underestimate amount of carbon absorbed by Earth's oceans

The report said Trump doubled down on his environmental policy by taking the United States out of the Paris Climate Accord in 2017.

Study: Private insurers pay 2 1/2 times what Medicare does for hospital services
ONLY INSURERS WANT PRIVATISED HEALTHCARE



A RAND analysis says that private insurers pay prices well above those charged to Medicare for hospital services. Photo by Thomas Breher/Pixabay

Sept. 18 (UPI) -- Private insurers paid roughly 2.5 times what Medicare paid for hospital-based care in 2018, an analysis released Friday by the RAND Corp. found.

Hospitals charged private insurers, on average, rates that were 247% of those assessed Medicare beneficiaries, the data showed.

However, in several states -- Alaska, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee and West Virginia -- the figure was as high as 325%.

Some states -- Arkansas, Michigan and Rhode Island -- had relative costs under 200% of those paid by Medicare, according to analysts.

RELATED Prostate cancer death racial disparities linked to socioeconomic differences

"This analysis provides the most-detailed picture ever of what privately insured individuals pay for hospital-based care relative to what the government pays for people insured through Medicare," analysis co-author Christopher Whaley said in a statement.

"Employers can use the information in this report to ... make judgments about appropriate pricing," said Whaley, a RAND policy researcher.

RELATED Many in U.S. struggling to afford health care during pandemic

A large portion of private health insurance contracting for hospitals is on a discounted-charge basis, in which the insurer agrees to pay a percentage of billed charges.

Medicare, however, issues a fee schedule that determines the amount it will pay for each service, with adjustments for inflation, hospital location, the severity of a patient's illness and other factors.

The RAND analysis, which includes information from more than half of the nation's community hospitals, is a broad-based study of amounts paid by private health plans to hospitals, using information from 49 states and Washington, D.C.

RELATED Study: 55% in U.S. with health savings accounts don't contribute to them

Maryland was excluded because it has a system in place where the privately insured and Medicare recipients pay the same, RAND said.

Researchers also found found "a steady increase" in hospital prices charged to private insurers, from 224% of Medicare rates in 2016 to 230% in 2017, RAND analysts said.

Overall, 3,112 hospitals nationwide billed private insurers $33.8 billion in 2018, including approximately 750,000 claims for inpatient stays and 40.2 million claims for outpatient services.

RELATED Study: 5.4M Americans lost health insurance amid pandemic

If employers and health plans participating in the study had paid hospitals using Medicare's payment formulas, they would have spent nearly $20 billion less, a potential savings of 58%, the researchers said.

Spending on hospital services accounts for approximately 44% of total personal healthcare spending for those with private insurance.

"The rising gap between public and private hospital prices is a cause for concern and raises questions about the efficiency of the employer market," Katherine Hempstead, senior policy adviser at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation said in a statement. The foundation funded the analysis.

"The goal of this work is to arm employers with data so they can negotiate more effectively. Curbing excessive spending on employer health insurance is in the public interest," Hempstead said.

The RAND researchers analyzed healthcare claims obtained from self-insured employers, six state all-payer claims databases and records from health insurance plans that chose to participate.

For each private claim, researchers repriced the service using Medicare's grouping and pricing formulas, the researchers said.

A detailed list of both relative and standardized prices for each hospital, identified by name and Medicare provider number, is included in the report's supplemental material, which also contains Hospital Compare star ratings -- a ranking system maintained by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services -- for those hospitals.

No relationship existed between prices and two widely recognized metrics of quality and patient safety, the data showed.

"In the case of specific high-priced hospitals, there may be justification for the unusually high prices, such as offering specialized services or a well-deserved reputation for higher-quality care," RAND analyst Whaley said.

"However, if two hospitals have similar quality, then any difference in prices may be harder to justify.


upi.com/7039075






Assange lawyer: Trump offered pardon to reveal DNC hack source

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange arrives at a London court on April 11, 2019. His lawyer claimed the Trump administration offered to pardon him on espionage charges if he revealed the source of the 2016 DNC email hacks, File photo by EPA-EFE

Sept. 18 (UPI) -- The Trump administration offered WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange a presidential pardon if he revealed the source of the 2016 Democratic National Committee email hack, his lawyer said Friday.

Jennifer Robinson, an Australian lawyer representing Assange, made the assertion at the Old Bailey Court in London as Assange fought extradition to the United States, where he faces espionage charges stemming from WikiLeaks' release of confidential diplomatic cables in 2010 and 2011.

Robinson claimed the offer was made by Republican U.S. Congressman Dana Rohrabacher and Trump associate Charles Johnson, who visited Assange at the Ecuadorian embassy in London in 2017.

She said the pair told Assange that Trump was aware of the proposal and had approved it.

RELATED Judge threatens to remove Assange on 2nd day of extradition hearing

"Rohrabacher explained that he wanted to resolve the ongoing speculation about Russian involvement in the Democratic National Committee leaks to WikiLeaks," Robinson said. "He said that he regarded the ongoing speculation as damaging to U.S.-Russian relations, that it was reviving old Cold War politics, and that it would be in the best interests of the U.S. if the matter could be resolved."

In return for revealing the source of the leak, the pair offered Assange "some form of pardon, assurance or agreement" which would both prevent his extradition and benefit Trump politically.

Assange did not accept the offer, Robinson said, because "that would not be "consistent with WikiLeaks editorial policy."

RELATED WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange appears at extradition hearing

The meeting with Rohrabacher and Johnson came as special counsel Robert Mueller was investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and probing connections between Trump associates and Russian officials.

Mueller concluded the trove of confidential DNC emails were stolen by Russian hackers and given to Wikileaks in an attempt to sway the election against Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

Rohrabacher denied he had offered a pardon to Assange when the claims were initially made earlier this year.

RELATED Defense team alleges U.S. officials using Assange case for political ends

"At no time did I offer Julian Assange anything from the president because I had not spoken with the president about this issue at all," he said in a statement in February.

More than 3,000 test positive in brucellosis outbreak in China



Sept. 17 (UPI) -- Doctors diagnosed more than 3,000 people in China's Gansu province with a bacterial disease known as brucellosis after a leak at a biopharmaceutical company.

The National Health Commission in Lanzhou said health officials tested nearly 22,000 people in the city for the illness and 3,245 came back positive.

No deaths have been associated with the outbreak.

Brucellosis is a bacterial infection that humans can contract after coming into contact with or drinking the milk of livestock infected with brucella. It's also known as Malta fever or Mediterranean fever and causes headaches, muscle pain, fever, sweating, loss of appetite, and fatigue.

The NHC said it first detected cases of the illness in November after a leak at the Zhongmu Lanzhou factory "caused by contaminated exhaust from a vaccine factory in Lanzhou, due to the use of expired disinfectant from late-July to mid-August last year."

The biological pharmaceutical factory produced a brucella vaccine, though its license to do so has since been revoked.

Among those infected were employees at the Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, which is located near the location of the leak, and students and faculty members at Lanzhou University.

Nearly 3 million people live in Lanzhou, the capital city of Gansu province

 

This Scientist Kept It Real About What Life Looks Like Juggling Parenthood And Doing Her Job

“It's entirely unsustainable. It's just laughably infeasible for parents to be working like this.”

Posted on September 17, 2020, 

Gretchen Goldman

A scientist and mom who shared a behind-the-scenes look at life as a parent and as a regular news contributor told BuzzFeed News that her now-viral tweet was inspired by transparency. She also wanted to highlight the long-term implications that the pandemic could have on minority groups.

“I guess I just wanted to be honest about the situation because a lot of people are struggling right now, and I think it's helpful to be reminded that it's not you alone. We all don't have it together," Gretchen Goldman, 36, told BuzzFeed News.

After appearing on CNN this week, Goldman shared on Twitter what the CNN interview didn’t capture. She said she had "45 minutes to prepare and that's prepared both in terms of content and appearance."

"And because of expectations on women on camera, a significant part of that time has to also be spent on my physical appearance and then getting the right setup," she added.

As part of the Union of Concerned Scientists, Goldman's job often means that she is regularly called on to give her expert opinion or comment on news developments relating to science.

“Normally, if that happened in the middle of the workday, it wouldn't be as big of a deal, right? I would walk a few blocks to the CNN studio, go record and I wouldn't have to rearrange my house and make sure that children and their things were out of the camera view and out of the sound space,” she said.

From the waist up, Goldman appeared on The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer on CNN in a canary yellow blazer to discuss the dangers of appointing David Legates to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

From the waist down, she opted for casual black shorts with her laptop perched on a chair and a floor covered in children’s toys.

“We're not near any extended family or anything so we really needed that paid, outside-the-house care to give us that time and space to work," Goldman said. "Normally I would have a lot more freedom and the time and space to have uninterrupted time, and I think that's one of the biggest impacts on professionals now is the lack of uninterrupted time.”

Goldman, who has two sons, ages 2 and 4, highlighted the number of news segments that had been gatecrashed by surprise appearances from children over the pandemic and said how working from home with young children had various challenges.

“I think especially with my very young kids, that's magnified by the micro stressors of every time you hear a sound in the other room, if they are crying or screaming, you have to worry about whether it is, like, a threat to their physical safety because they're young enough that you have to actually watch them and I need to make sure, like, while I was distracted writing this email, did the TV fall on them? Did they choke on a toy? It's very stressful,” she said.

“By the end of the day, parents, employees are just mentally exhausted.”

Her tweet capturing the two very different setups has been liked more than 280,000 times, and the responses have been “overwhelmingly positive” and reassuring.

Gretchen Goldman

“I am amazed at how positive it is given that it's a tweet by a woman that mentioned climate change, and I have a Jewish last name. It's overwhelmingly — like there's not many trolls yet — it's actually impressive," she said.

While Goldman was able to revel in the lighthearted humor her tweet provided, she was also critical of the ongoing dynamic for parents and working professionals as a result of the global pandemic.

“It's entirely unsustainable. It's just laughably infeasible for parents to be working like this,” she said. “There's a lot of threats under COVID, and I do want to acknowledge that it's a privilege to be able to work from home safely with your kids. But at the same time, I am very concerned with how this is going to adversely affect women's careers, especially in science where women are already underrepresented, and people of color are underrepresented, and this is going to exacerbate and dismantle a lot of the progress that we've made on that diversity.”

The mom of two sits on the board for a grassroots organization called 500 Women Scientists and has developed a list of recommendations with the hopes of mitigating the career penalties they believe women could face as a byproduct of their working conditions during the pandemic.

“At the top level, I really wanted to emphasize that this is something that our leaders, institutions, and employers should deal with. It should not be up to parents to hack their way out of this,” said Goldman.

She believes the best thing employers can offer parents right now is flexibility.

"And that has to be balanced at the same time with making sure that that is not causing employers to withhold opportunities for employees that happen to be parents because people need flexibility right now," she said.