Sunday, December 12, 2021

Swiss museum to give up more works from Gurlitt LOOTED NAZI art trove

BERLIN (AP) — A Swiss museum to which the late collector Cornelius Gurlitt bequeathed an art trove he amassed at his home said Friday it will relinquish ownership of works where no specific evidence has been found they were looted under Nazi rule, but where research points to “conspicuous circumstances.”

The reclusive Gurlitt, who died in 2014, had squirreled away more than 1,200 works in his Munich apartment and a further 250 or so at a property in Salzburg, Austria. He inherited much of the collection from his father, an art dealer who traded in works confiscated by the Nazis.


Authorities first stumbled on the art while investigating a tax case in 2012.


Gurlitt’s will bequeathed roughly 1,600 works to Switzerland's Kunstmuseum Bern. A German government-backed foundation worked with it to ensure that any pieces looted from Jewish owners were returned to their heirs, and German authorities said in January that 14 works from the Gurlitt collection that were proven to have been looted had been handed over.

The museum said Friday that it “will give up its ownership of any works of unclarified provenance that may lack specific evidence of being Nazi-looted art but for which implications of looted art and/or conspicuous circumstances exist.”

It said that there are 29 works in that category. The museum proposed that two watercolors by German artist Otto Dix be transferred jointly to the descendants of two possible rightful owners. Another five will be handed over to German authorities and the remaining 22 will remain at the museum for further research.

The museum said it is putting the works in the bequest online and that “new research findings will be immediately published in the database and thus ... made internationally accessible." It said it also will publish the research and considerations behind its decision-making.

The Associated Press

Cornelius Gurlitt

Art Collector
Rolf Nikolaus Cornelius Gurlitt was a German art collector. The son of Hildebrand Gurlitt, a Third Reich dealer of Nazi-looted art, Gurlitt was the final guardian of the Gurlitt Collection, a large collection of art acquired in part under dubious circumstances before and during the reign of the Nazis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Dix

Wilhelm Heinrich Otto Dix was a German painter and printmaker, noted for his ruthless and harshly realistic depictions of German society during the Weimar Republic and the brutality of war. Along with George Grosz and Max Beckmann, he is widely considered one of the most important artists of the Neue Sachlichkeit.























 


















































Colonial looted art: When a museum becomes home

Works by contemporary African artists and colonial looted art are on show side by side in Dortmund, curated by Nana Oforiatta Ayim, an art historian from Ghana.


REINVENTING THE MUSEUM AS A HOME
A different concept of the museum
Efie means home in Twi, one of Ghana's official languages. The exhibition "EFIE: The Museum as Home" questions traditional forms of presentation. In a sense, the museum is to become a home for the works of art, because in African tradition, objects are considered to be animate and alive, which differs from the presentations common in European museums.
1234567



Imagine that artistic objects have a soul, and could feel emotions like suffering, sadness and loneliness — that is what the Ghanaian author and filmmaker Nana Oforiatta Ayim envisioned when she curated the exhibition "EFIE: The Museum as Home," at the Dortmunder U culture center.

Efie, in the Twi language means home, says Nana Oforiatta Ayim. "Historically when we had objects, it wasn't that they were like inanimate things to be put in glass cases — they have a spirit, they were dynamic, they were alive, and the structures they were in were homes for them," she told DW.
A space of healing

In the show, Ayim juxtaposed works by contemporary artists with historical artifacts on loan from German collections. Home, and the loss of home, is the theme that spans past and present.

Ayim created a special space for the historical artworks, what she calls "a kind of space of healing, a home." European museums traditionally present art in a value-neutral way — sculptures stand next to each other in display cases, illuminated by a spotlight. Ayim's exhibition wants to allow a subjective view of the objects to give them back their soul.

Nana Oforiatta Ayim's preoccupation with art from a colonial context is no coincidence, as she serves as Ghana's commissioner for restitution. She is largely responsible for creating strategies for the restitution of looted art from Ghana.

What is most important is to come to terms with history and regain control over one's own narrative, she says, pointing out that the objects were stolen using varying degrees of violence. "There's a separation that's happened between us and our histories and our narratives." Ayim hopes to help ease the pain of separation by inserting this "in-between step before the objects come back [to Ghana]."

Reclaiming one's own history is an issue the eight contemporary artists Ayim has selected for the Dortmund show focus on, too.

Kuukua Eshun "has made a really haunting, beautiful film about women who have gone to various levels of physical abuse and how these women have made their bodies into their homes again," points out Ayim.


Kwasi Darko explores identity and sexuality


The show also presents works by Afroscope, El Anatsui, Diego Arauja, Rita Mawuena Benissan, Kwasi Darko, Na Chainkua Reindorf and Studio Nyali, contemporary artists with different perspectives of the concept "home." Their art is embedded in a mobile bamboo structure within the exhibition, the "fufuzela," that can be expanded when needed and used for a variety of projects.
Mobile museums

DK Osseo Asare, an architect, originally developed the fufuzela for Ayim's mobile museums in Ghana.

With these museums built in the style of typical Ghanaian kiosks, Ayim — who was raised in Germany but now lives in Ghana's capital Accra — wants to bring art closer to her fellow countrymen again: "We do have a national museum in Ghana. It's been closed for a while now, but even when it was open, it was primarily for tourists, maybe school children," Ayim says.

People don't feel connected to the museum, but they will come to cultural festivals by the thousands, she adds, arguing that it's not a lack of interest, but the form of presentation.

Ayim wants to use her exhibitions to question the traditional understanding of museums and to introduce new perspectives. It's a concept that works, whether in Ghana or in Germany.

Reinventing the museum as a home

Nana Oforiatta Ayim, an art historian from Ghana, shows historical and contemporary art from her native country in the "EFIE: The Museum as Home" exhibition in the German city of Dortmund.


Voice of the people: The GOP has become a party with no shame

The Ledger
Thu, December 9, 2021,

A campaign sign in support of President Donald Trump sits on a lawn Thursday, Oct. 22, 2020, in a Hispanic neighborhood of Miami. Florida's Cuban American voters remain a bright spot in Trump's effort to retain his winning coalition from 2016. Polls show his strong support from these key voters may even be growing to include the younger Cuban Americans that Democrats once considered their best hope of breaking the GOP's hold. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky)

The GOP has become a party with no shame

What has happened to the GOP?


Let’s look at the faces of the Republican Party. The QAnon Squad: Marjory Taylor Green, Georgia; Lauren Boebert, Colorado; and Paul Gosar, Arizona; right-wing nuts all. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, a man who allowed the ex-president to dishonor his father and wife and still kisses the ring. A man who vacations in Cancun while his constituents literally freeze to death.

A Party that has no policies only culture wars, no solutions only grievances. A Party that supports vigilantes, be it Kyle Rittenhouse or the Texas abortion law. A Party that has lost its conservative way. A Party that stands for fear and hate. A Party slipping into fascism. A Party that is so hypocritical that it claims Christian morals and punishes the poor and downtrodden. A Party the espouses pro-life and discounts the science and actively obstructs simple and proven lifesaving measures to minimize the deaths from COVID-19.

A Party whose titular head is a lying conman, an instigator of an insurrection, a grifter bringing in millions of dollars from his "marks."

A Party with no shame.

A Party with only two honorable members who would dare to stand up to these bigots, liars and cheats.

Bruce W. Paulson, Winter Haven


This article originally appeared on The Ledger: Voice of the people: The GOP has become a party with no shame
Capitol attack panel obtains PowerPoint that set out plan for Trump to stage coup


Hugo Lowell in Washington
Fri, December 10, 2021



Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows turned over to the House select committee investigating the 6 January Capitol attack a PowerPoint recommending Donald Trump to declare a national security emergency in order to return himself to the presidency.

Related: Capitol attack committee issues new subpoenas to two ex-Trump aides

The fact that Meadows was in possession of a PowerPoint the day before the Capitol attack that detailed ways to stage a coup suggests he was at least aware of efforts by Trump and his allies to stop Joe Biden’s certification from taking place on 6 January.

The PowerPoint, titled “Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 Jan”, made several recommendations for Trump to pursue in order to retain the presidency for a second term on the basis of lies and debunked conspiracies about widespread election fraud.

Meadows turned over a version of the PowerPoint presentation that he received in an email and spanned 38 pages, according to a source familiar with the matter.

The Guardian reviewed a second, 36-page version of the PowerPoint marked for dissemination with 5 January metadata, which had some differences with what the select committee received. But the title of the PowerPoint and its recommendations remained the same, the source said.

Senators and members of Congress should first be briefed about foreign interference, the PowerPoint said, at which point Trump could declare a national emergency, declare all electronic voting invalid, and ask Congress to agree on a constitutionally acceptable remedy.

The PowerPoint also outlined three options for then vice-president Mike Pence to abuse his largely ceremonial role at the joint session of Congress on 6 January, when Biden was to be certified president, and unilaterally return Trump to the White House.

Pence could pursue one of three options, the PowerPoint said: seat Trump slates of electors over the objections of Democrats in key states, reject the Biden slates of electors, or delay the certification to allow for a “vetting” and counting of only “legal paper ballots”.

The final option for Pence is similar to an option that was simultaneously being advanced on 4 and 5 January by Trump lieutenants – led by lawyers Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, as well as Trump strategist Steve Bannon – working from the Willard hotel in Washington DC.

The Guardian revealed last week that sometime between the late evening of 5 January and the early hours of 6 January, after Pence declined to go ahead with such plans, Trump then pressed his lieutenants about how to stop Biden’s certification from taking place entirely.

The recommendations in the PowerPoint for both Trump and Pence were based on wild and unsubstantiated claims of election fraud, including that “the Chinese systematically gained control over our election system” in eight key battleground states.

The then acting attorney general, Jeff Rosen, and his predecessor, Bill Barr, who had both been appointed by Trump, by 5 January had already determined that there was no evidence of voter fraud sufficient to change the outcome of the 2020 election.

House investigators said that they became aware of the PowerPoint after it surfaced in more than 6,000 documents Meadows turned over to the select committee. The PowerPoint was to be presented “on the Hill”, a reference to Congress, the panel said.

The powerpoint was presented on 4 January to a number of Republican senators and members of Congress, the source said. Trump’s lawyers working at the Willard hotel were not shown the presentation, according to a source familiar with the matter.

But the select committee said they did find in the materials turned over by Meadows, his text messages with a member of Congress, who told Meadows about a “highly controversial” plan to send slates of electors for Trump to the joint session of Congress.

Meadows replied: “I love it.”

Trump’s former White House chief of staff had turned over the materials to the select committee until the cooperation deal broke down on Tuesday, when Meadows’ attorney, Terwilliger, abruptly told House investigators that Meadows would no longer help the investigation.

The select committee announced on Wednesday that in response, it would refer Meadows for criminal prosecution for defying a subpoena. The chairman of the select committee, Bennie Thompson, said the vote to hold Meadows in contempt of Congress would come next week.

“The select committee will meet next week to advance a report recommending that the House cite Mr Meadows for contempt of Congress and refer him to the Department of Justice for prosecution,” Thompson said in a statement.



Trump’s White House Emailed About a PowerPoint on How to End American Democracy

Ryan Bort
Thu, December 9, 2021

Mark Meadows - Credit: AP

The House Select Committee to Investigate the Jan. 6 Attack on the Capitol has obtained a trove of electronic messages from former Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, including an email referring to a PowerPoint suggesting Trump could declare a national security emergency in order to delay the certification of the results of the 2020 election.

The revelation is the latest indication that Trump and his inner circle, including his allies in Congress, were very actively and very aggressively trying to overturn the results of the election, which Trump lost handily.

The PowerPoint presentation, which spanned 38 pages and was titled “Election fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 JAN,” was part of an email sent on Jan. 5, the day before the attack on the Capitol. The email pertained to a briefing that was to be provided “on the hill.” Hugo Lowell of The Guardian tweeted slides from the presentation on Thursday detailing a conspiracy theory-laden plan for Vice President Pence to install Republican electors in states “where fraud occurred,” and for Trump to declare a national emergency and for all electronic voting to be rendered invalid, citing foreign “control” of electronic voting systems.

In the 13 months since the election, no evidence has emerged that foreign entities influenced the election, or that any significant fraud occurred.

The committee noted in a letter on Wednesday that Meadows had provided text messages in which he discussed a “highly controversial” plan to overturn the election results by appointing alternate electors in certain states. “I love it,” Meadows replied to the idea, which was sent to him by a lawmaker. Meadows discussed the same plan, which was described as a “direct and collateral attack,” in a separate email. The letter referenced the PowerPoint presentation, as well, but did not provide details of its contents.

The letter sent on Wednesday, which was addressed to Meadows’ attorney, explained that the committee had “no choice” but to move to hold Meadows in contempt of Congress for his refusal to comply with his subpoena. How, if Meadows is refusing to comply, did the committee get ahold of all of these damning documents from the former chief of staff? Meadows last week reached an agreement to cooperate, turned over the material, and then earlier this week changed his mind and is now stonewalling the committee. He’s now suing the committee in an attempt to block his subpoena.

It’s unclear what exactly inspired the reversal. Meadows says the committee was not respecting his claims of executive privilege, to which Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said the committee “tried repeatedly to identify with specificity the areas of inquiry” were subject to privilege, but Meadows wouldn’t cooperate. It’s also possible that Meadows decided to buck the committee after reports began to circulate that Trump was pissed at him for revealing a bunch of damning information about how the White House covered up details of Trump’s bout with Covid last year. It’s also possible that Meadows just isn’t very bright.

Regardless, the committee is now in possession of a trove of his documents indicating the extent of Trumpworld’s very real efforts to overturn the election results, efforts that culminated in a throng of supporters storming the Capitol in a violent attack that resulted in five deaths and dozens of injured police officers.

The material turned over by Meadows may be the tip of the iceberg. Committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) said last week that the committee is preparing to hold “several weeks” worth of public hearings that will tell the story of the riot at the Capitol in “vivid color.” She added on Thursday that the committee has met with nearly 300 witnesses, that it is conducting multiple depositions and interviews every week, and that it expects a ruling imminently on whether it can obtain Trump’s White House documents. “The investigation is firing on all cylinders,” she wrote.

Hours after Cheney teased an upcoming ruling on Trump’s executive privilege claim, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals struck it down.


January 6 committee releases documents detailing Trump’s plot to overthrow election by declaring bogus “National Emergency”

Jacob Crosse
WSWS.ORG

Earlier this week, the January 6 House Select Committee charged with investigating former President Donald Trump’s attempted coup released an explosive slide show presentation turned over to the committee by former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. The slide show revealed Trump’s and his co-conspirators’ systematic plan for overturning democratic forms of rule in the United States.

White House chief of staff Mark Meadows speaks with reporters outside the White House, Oct. 26, 2020, in Washington [Credit: AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, File]

The presentation, dated January 5 and titled “Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 Jan,” begins by citing false claims of “foreign interference” by China through Venezuela and Dominion Voting Systems software.

In response to the alleged “INFLUENCE and CONTROL” of “US Voting Infrastructure in at least 28 States as part of [an] ongoing globalist/socialist operation to subvert the will of United States Voters and install a China ally,” the slides describe in detail the multifaceted plot by Trump and his allies to declare a phony “National Security Emergency” in order to use US Marshals and the National Guard to seize election infrastructure nationwide and “declare electronic voting in all states invalid.”

After declaring the results invalid, the slides call for a “federalized” National Guard, under the command of a so-called “Trusted Lead Counter” appointed “with authority” from Trump to “direct the actions of select federalized National Guard units and support from [Department of Justice], [Department of Homeland Security] and other US government agencies.” These entities would “disqualify all the counterfeit ballots” (emphasis in original) and “then count all the remaining legal paper ballots.”

In a slide titled “Ballot Adjudication,” the document outlines the procedure for suspending the Constitution in order to facilitate the counting of “legal paper ballots.” After the National Guard finishes counting every so-called “legal” ballot in “5-10 days,” the ballots would then be approved by state legislators. Ballot exceptions, the document states, “will require an affirmative vote by the [Supreme Court of the United States] stating that Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 has been suspended. Otherwise all officials will follow the Constitution.”

The shoddy slide show presentation is a window into the thinking of an increasingly fascistic and desperate ruling class that is becoming further untethered from reality by the day. Its existence is further confirmation of the wide-ranging plot orchestrated by Trump, and supported by significant sections of the Republican Party, to overthrow the election of Biden and with it, what little remains of bourgeois democracy in the US. It is further proof that the storming of the Capitol on January 6, which the World Socialist Web Site alone warned the working class in the months following Trump’s electoral defeat, was not a spontaneous riot but the culmination of the dictatorial scheme orchestrated from the highest levels of the US government.

The presentation was part of a tranche of documents turned over by Meadows before he declared earlier this week that he would no longer be complying with the committee’s request. In a letter to Meadows’ lawyer Wednesday citing the presentation, Select Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (Mississippi-Democrat) wrote that the document was slated for distribution to those “on the hill,” that is, it was to be presented to members of Congress.

In the same letter to Meadows’ lawyer, Thompson noted that in the documents already turned over by Meadows to the committee, the former chief of staff is shown sending emails as early as November 7, 2020 suggesting Republican-controlled states send “alternate” slates of presidential electors to Congress on January 6.

Meadows also turned over to the committee “a November 6, 2020, text exchange with a Member of Congress apparently about appointing alternate electors in certain states as part of a plan that the Member acknowledged would be ‘highly controversial’ and to which Mr. Meadows apparently said, ‘I love it,’” Thompson said.

Thompson noted that in addition to the texts and slide show, Meadows turned over “a January 5, 2021, email about having the National Guard stand by.” This revelation is significant, given the ongoing cover-up within the Pentagon over the purposeful delay of sending National Guard soldiers to the besieged Capitol.

The plan to reject Biden electors and appoint new pro-Trump electors was further described in the presentation as part of three different “options” for Vice President Mike Pence on “6 JAN.”

These options included Pence unilaterally and illegally seating “Republican Electors over the objections of Democrats in states where fraud occurred.” Mimicking the arguments laid out previously in coup lawyers John Eastman’s and Jenna Ellis’s memoranda, the document also suggests that Pence “reject[s] the electors from States where fraud occurred causing the election to be decided by remaining electoral votes.”

The slide directed Pence to delay “the decisions in order to allow for a vetting and subsequent counting of all the legal paper ballots.”

The coup slide show is believed to have been written by retired Army Colonel Phil Waldron of the Allied Security Operations Group, according to professor and national security expert Karen Piper.

Waldron and co-owner of the Allied Security Operations Group, Russell Ramsland Jr., were frequent visitors at Trump’s Willard “war room” command center. The Washington Post previously noted that Waldron, who specialized in “psychological operations” with the Army, led a team of people that reported to Rudy Giuliani’s political crony, Bernard Kerik. This team allegedly provided Kerik with election data analysis supporting Trump’s fraudulent claims.

In a separate article by the Post they write that “to an extent not widely recognized, Ramsland and others associated with ASOG played key roles in spreading the claims of fraud. … They were circulated by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Tex.), a staunch Trump ally who had been briefed by ASOG. And Ramsland’s assertions were incorporated into the “kraken” lawsuits filed by conservative lawyer Sidney Powell who the Post learned had also been briefed two years earlier by ASOG…”

Confirming the authenticity of the slide show in an interview posted this past June was the recently subpoenaed founder of the fascistic 1st Amendment Praetorian paramilitary group, Robert Patrick Lewis. In an interview with Doug Billing’s “The Right Side,” Lewis, who boasts of providing security to Flynn, describes the “national objectives” and “intelligence” he claimed to be “delivering to the White House, directly to the President.”

“That was stuff based on China’s influence in the United States and specific propaganda that we were outlining…”

A month prior, Lewis gave another interview in which he cited the Maricopa County recount, which was conducted in Arizona earlier this year by Trump partisans as an example of what “we” were “suggesting to Trump” his last week in office.

“It’s interesting how the Maricopa recount ... is extremely similar to what Patrick Byrne, General [Michael] Flynn and Sidney Powell suggested to President Trump there in the last week in the White House,” said Lewis.

“We said, ‘Bring the National Guard in, have a recount’ and livestream across the nation so that everybody can look and see that everything is above board.

“Minus the National Guard,” added Lewis. “Everything they (Byrne, Powell, Flynn) suggested is going on in Maricopa.”

There is no doubt that there remains a mountain of evidence left to uncover that will further implicate Trump, the Republican Party and elements of the police-intelligence-military apparatus in the coup.

Ranking member and one of two Republicans on the committee, Wyoming Representative Liz Cheney, promised earlier this week that the committee will hold a series of hearings “next year” to lay out what has been uncovered, presumably after which the committee will wind down in preparation for the midterms.

Like the “bipartisan” 9/11 Commission that the Select Committee is modeled after, information revealing the widespread support for Trump’s coup within the Republican Party and the capitalist state as a whole will continue to be excluded and omitted. Despite claiming to have interviewed nearly 300 witnesses, the Select Committee has continued to hold hearings and depositions behind closed doors.

The chloroforming of the working class to the true danger of fascism by the Democrats, the pseudo-left and their media supporters continues. This coup memo was known to lawmakers and media sources, prior to Meadows turning it over to the committee.

In fact, the entire document was publicly tweeted out by current far-right Fox News host and former CBS correspondent Lara Logan on the morning of January 5.

The fact that its contents are only now being publicly broadcast by the committee and select news outlets, nearly a year after the coup and 10 months after Trump’s truncated second impeachment trial ended with his acquittal, is a testament to the scale of the ongoing bipartisan cover-up of Trump’s coup.





Isfahan Fatal Crackdown: Water Protests and the Iranian Regime’s new Dilemma

by Pedram Samiêi
December 8, 2021
in Latest Articles


Isfahan farmers' protest on the dried riverbed that runs through the city.

On Friday, the 3rd of December, people of Isfahan called for a mass religious ritual: the Friday Prayers to be joined in on a dried riverbed that runs through the city. The Iranian religious authorities on any other day would welcome any conformist religious convention such as the Friday Prayers. However this time, the city of Isfahan faced a massive raid by security forces to prevent this religious assembly.

Isfahan citizens, symbolically, wanted to conduct their prayers on the dry riverbed of Zayandeh-Rood. This clever decision happened after a brutal, violent, and fatal crackdown of farmers’ peaceful gathering on the same riverbed a few days earlier. The farmers had gathered on the riverbed to express their dissatisfaction about the severe water shortage and water policies of the state.

Iranian authorities insist that the environmental crisis in the country is happening “naturally” because of drought, and they reject claims of mismanagement. However, they do not hesitate to use their violent pattern of behavior to suppress dissatisfaction over this “act of nature.”

The crackdown on the peaceful rally of farmers and residents of Isfahan, the country’s third-largest city, was very violent. The Center for Human Rights in Iran said that based on its investigations, 120 people were arrested in Isfahan. Videos posted on social media show that armed security forces shot and badly injured protesters, targeting protesters’ heads and blinding several protesters. The judicial system of the Islamic Republic confirmed 130 arrests (+).

Iranian suppressive forces are now using their weapons against ordinary residents, workers, and farmers.

Peaceful Protest of Farmers, the Brutal Response of the Regime, and World’s Reticence


News about Iran’s military interventions in the region, the country’s negotiations with world powers to revive the 2015 nuclear deal, and the dissatisfaction of Israel and the US right-wing politicians with these talks, dominate the coverage of the Western media about Iran. The news about the nuclear negotiations is probably not the only and the main concern of every Iranian. Only a few days before the new round of nuclear talks, the violent suppression of farmers’ peaceful protests in Isfahan shocked the country.

In late November, shortly before the onset of the new round of the nuclear talks, Iranian farmers in Isfahan convened in thousands over severe water shortage and water mismanagement. They followed an ‘occupy movement’ pattern as they set up tents and refused to leave the dry riverbed of Zayandeh-Rood. This pattern of protesting with the protesters’ hesitancy to take on a visible anti-regime stance (such as chanting political slogans or carrying political banners) seemingly bewildered the regime. At first, the Isfahan farmers’ protest even got covered by the state-owned television. However, it did not take long until the Isfahan farmers received the same response that the Iranian regime shows to any political protest.

 
The protest of Isfahan farmers over water shortage in November 2021. Climate crisis, water shortage, and severe drought present a novel challenge for the Iranian regime.

After a week of peaceful protest, the farmers’ tents and protest location were raided by the security forces. They started setting up tents on fire, beating up protestors with batons, shooting tear gas and bb guns, and detaining protestors. Videos on social media shows, fatal shooting with shotguns and bb guns that blinded according to one report 40 protestors in at least one eye (+).

This violent response was not unprecedented. Since July, Iranian farmers, as well as the urban and rural citizens have been protesting water shortage and living conditions in Khuzestan and several other provinces. Human rights groups have verified the identities of at least nine protestors that security forces killed during the water protests of summer 2021 in Khuzestan and other provinces who joined the protests.

As evidenced in Isfahan, climate movements and environmental protests are tolerated by the Iranian regime and suppression is the main response; very similar to the crackdown that formerly the regime in Iran has used against political dissidents, students, women and middle-class citizens that raised their voices to protest political issues. Only this time, the weapons of the Islamic Republic are targeting poorer residents in peripheral provinces, rural places, farmers, and workers, and now gatherings to express unrest because of the climate issues that are affecting the lives of every Iranian.

The regime, evidently, has no hesitation to use violence even to disperse a religious gathering, such as the Friday Prayers organized by farmers and workers who are suffering from environmental crises. The Islamic Republic is inevitably setting foot on a self-destructive course. The security forces of the regime, target the very Islamic foundation of this state when they prevent a Friday Prayer. By attacking workers and farmers, they also target the very same people that this state was founded upon their right – the unprivileged and the underserved.

Despotism against itself: IRI’s Self-Destructive Gamble


If the climate and environment crisis in Iran is an “act of nature” or “act of God,” as Iranian religious leaders might like to put it, then why is protesting such condition a felony?

Ahmad Alamolhoda, senior hardliner cleric and widely known as a figure close to IRI’s supreme leader has famously claimed that drought cannot be resolved by protest, but prayers (+). To the eyes of the religious clerics, it might be true that objection to God’s will is not conventional, but the people of Isfahan were conducting a very standard religious rite – they were praying. Friday prayer on the dry riverbed that once supplied the water for the city of Isfahan and all the farms in the province is not against the rule of sharia, nor against the Islamic traditions. Indeed, it is a very acceptable religious response to this catastrophe of not having enough water.

 
The same pattern of behavior formerly has been used to suppress political rallies. But this old model is now the regime’s new weapon to crush environmental protests.

The behavior of the Islamic republic shows either they are skeptical about the very same Islamicness that the state is founded upon or worst, they have become non-believers. Forcefully preventing people from praying to God is an extremely ungodly, if not sinister or heretical deed. Then why does a religious regime commit heresy? Either it has not truly religious, or it is accepting that the environmental crisis is not an act of god and that it is happening at least partially because of man’s water management policies. Most likely, both scenarios are true.

Iran, as a country in the Middle East, has a history of battling water shortage and long-standing drought. On the other hand, other countries in the region, like Israel or the United Arab Emirates, are facing the same environmental conditions and planning strategies for it. Therefore, even the Islamic Republic of Iran, covertly though, acknowledges that the living condition of Isfahan farmers, as well as other people all around the country, is the result of decades of mismanagement.

Consequently, it should not be surprising that the security forces of the regime follow the same pattern to respond to environmental protesters as they typically respond to any political protestation. The environmental issues, in the eyes of Iranian authorities and most likely also, in actuality, are not happening only because of “natural reasons.” They are indeed the result of years of mismanagement, mishandling, corruption, and senselessness policies set forth by high-ranking officials both at the level of provinces and at the capital. Subsequently, any protest to the environmental conditions including the water crisis is also a political.

Both in the water protests of summer 2021, and the Isfahan farmers protests of November 2021, the protesters are not (only) students or middle-class middle-income urban inhabitants who demand freedom and better living conditions. The environmental protesters who are demanding access to water and better living conditions are from poorer populations, farmers, and ordinary urban and rural citizens that battle for their basic natural needs.

The battle between IRI and poorer Iranians started if not shortly after the 1979 revolution, but undeniably after the brutal suppression of recent years’ demonstrations (especially vast nationwide demonstrations in November 2019 known as Aban-98). The new development of Isfahan water protests also shows that the IRI is not only battling poorer Iranians, but also religious Iranians. As a result, the Islamic Republic of Iran is now overtly contradicting itself by prohibiting one of its dominant origins; the Friday Prayer.

All in all, Isfahan’s instance clearly demonstrates the novel transformation of the Islamic Republic regime – the transformation from a religious authoritarian regime, to a full military dictatorship. The Islamic Republic is so close to confessing that is not a successor of another self-centered regime, but a logical continuation of what was going on in Iran before the 1979 revolution: a military dictatorship.
UK
MPs demand Met Police ‘institutional homophobia’ inquiry after Stephen Port probe

Officers had denied accusations of prejudice and homophobia, instead blaming mistakes on being understaffed and lacking resources


By Sophie Wingate, PA
Will Maule 11 DEC 2021
Met police assistant commissioner Helen Ball speaks to the media after the conclusion Barking Town Hall today, after an inquest jury found that police failures in the investigation into the death of Stephen Port's first victim Anthony Walgate "probably" contributed to the death of Gabriel Kovari, the second young gay man to die in almost identical circumstances in Barking, east London

A group of London MPs are calling for a public inquiry into claims of institutional homophobia in the Metropolitan Police after an inquest concluded that failures by officers investigating the victims of serial killer Stephen Port probably cost lives.

Families of the four young gay men killed by sex predator Port have renewed accusations that police prejudice played a part in officers’ failure to listen to their concerns.

Dame Margaret Hodge said she and 17 other signatories had written to Met Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick “to demand a public inquiry considers whether the Met is institutionally homophobic”.

It comes after Dame Margaret, Labour MP for Barking, was told by the Met that an inquiry into the issue was not being proposed, according to the letter.

The letter says: “The police have admitted their mistakes, instituted new protocols, and emphasised that a lack of resources was to blame.

“However, resourcing alone does not explain the sheer number of failures by the police in this matter.

“The key question everyone is asking is yet to be answered – whether institutional homophobia in the Met played a role in these investigations.”

The letter concludes that it is “imperative that a public inquiry takes place urgently to consider if institutional homophobia played a role in this case”.

On Friday, the inquest jury found officers in Barking, east London, missed repeated opportunities to catch Port after he plied first victim Anthony Walgate with a fatal dose of date-rape drug GHB and dumped his body.

Port struck three more times before he was caught, killing each victim in near-identical circumstances, with police failing to link him to the other deaths despite detective work carried out by the victims’ family and friends that would lead to the culprit.

Officers had denied accusations of prejudice and homophobia, instead blaming mistakes on being understaffed and lacking resources, with some acting up in senior positions.

Jurors at the inquests into the deaths of Mr Walgate, 23, Gabriel Kovari, 22, Daniel Whitworth, 21, and Jack Taylor, 25, concluded police failings “probably” contributed to the deaths of the three last victims.

The MPs’ letter lists a “litany of failures” by police, including that the individual deaths were not properly investigated because “a presumption was made that these were young gay men, some of them ‘rent boys’, who were habitual GHB users and accidentally overdosed”.

“Throughout the 12 months the murders took place, family members, partners and friends of the victims were ignored by the police,” MPs wrote.

The letter also notes that of the 17 officers investigated for misconduct, none were dismissed.
FASCIST COUP
Bosnia: Serbs vote to leave key institutions in secession move

Lawmakers have voted to start work on pulling their autonomous Serb Republic out of Bosnia's armed forces, judiciary and tax system. The decision sparked warnings from the international community about a new conflict.



The non-binding motion by the Republika Srpska parliament is meant to pave the way for secession from Bosnia

The parliament of the Serb part of Bosnia-Herzegovina decided Friday to transfer powers away from the country's central institutions.

The approval by the regional legislature of Republika Srpska (RS) comes in spite of warnings against such a move from the international community and an opposition boycott.

What did the Republika Srpska parliament agree?

MPs voted to strip the Bosnian state of competencies in the areas of taxation, justice, and security and defense for the RS region.

The three institutions represent key pillars of joint security, the rule of law and the economic system in Bosnia, which was divided into two autonomous regions after its 1992-1995 war.

The proposal won a clear majority with 49 votes in favor in the 83-seat chamber.

The vote amounted to a non-binding agreement that fell short of a final decision to quit the institutions — a move that would have needed the support of the region's upper house.
Who is behind the move towards succession?

Milorad Dodik, head of the SNDS party and a Serb member of the Presidency of Bosnia-Herzegovina, was the driving force behind the initiative.

Dodik, a former Western protege turned nationalist, has been threatening for years to separate Republika Srpska from the Bosnian state.

He has long complained about state institutions, saying they were established based on decisions by international peace envoys and were not enshrined in the constitution.

Bosnia-Herzegovina is nothing more than "a paper republic," Dodik told the Banja Luka parliament on Friday.

He announced that within six months, he would initiate legislation to reorganize the areas for which the central state no longer has jurisdiction.

It is not yet clear whether he will follow through on a promise made in September to create a separate army.


Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik


What could be the impact of this decision?

Dodik's course threatens to destroy the architecture of the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement, which ended more than three years of war between Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks. The early 1990s conflict killed roughly 100,000 people.

The agreement saw one half of Bosnia given over to Bosnian Serbs while the other was to be ruled by a Muslim-Croat federation. The two entities are held together by federal institutions.

Opposition leaders warned the moves may lead the Serb Republic into a new conflict.

"I think the path you have chosen is dangerous for Republika Srpska and we cannot follow you," said Mirko Sarovic, the head of the largest opposition Serb Democratic Party (SDS).
How has the West reacted?

In a joint statement, the embassies of Germany, the United States, United Kingdom, France, Italy as well as the European Union delegation said the parliament's motion was "a further escalatory step."

"Members of the governing coalition in the RS must be aware that continuing this dead-end path of challenging the Dayton framework is damaging the economic prospects of the entity, threatening the stability of the country and the entire region and jeopardizing Bosnia's future with the EU," the ambassadors said in a joint statement.

The Peace Implementation Council, which monitors compliance with the Dayton agreement, recently warned that a "unilateral withdrawal" from federal institutions is not possible. It has threatened "consequences" for any party that violates the peace agreement.

This statement was not co-signed by Russia, which is part of the PIC, along with representatives of Western countries.

The Kremlin supports Dodik's actions, and the Bosnian Serb leader met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow last week.

mm/rc (AFP, dpa, Reuters)
Bezos’ Blue Origin cleared of safety allegations by FAA
Dec. 10, 2021
Blue Origin flew Jeff Bezos and three others to the boundary of space on July 20. Above, Bezos is shown at a news conference that day. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images North America)

By Alan Levin
Bloomberg
Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin has been cleared of safety allegations and can proceed with a planned launch on Saturday.

The Federal Aviation Administration said Friday in an emailed statement that it had “found no specific safety issues.”

The FAA in September began a review of the company after a whistle-blower wrote an essay alleging that the company’s culture had compromised safety. Blue Origin flew Bezos and three others to the boundary of space on July 20 and plans to take another group on its rocket and capsule on Saturday.

FAA: No more commercial astronaut wings

NASA astronauts will still get their wings


Tony Gutierrez/Associated Press File photo: Oliver Daemen, from left, Mark Bezos and Wally Funk, look on as Jeff Bezos, second from right, is awarded his Blue Origin made astronaut wings by former NASA astronaut, Jeff Ashby.

PUBLISHED: December 10, 2021
By Marcia Dunn | Associated Press

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — Heads up, future space travelers: No more commercial astronaut wings will be awarded from the Federal Aviation Administration after this year.

The FAA said Friday it’s clipping its astronaut wings because too many people are now launching into space and it’s getting out of the astronaut designation business entirely.

The news comes one day ahead of Blue Origin’s planned liftoff from West Texas with former NFL player and TV celebrity Michael Strahan. He and his five fellow passengers will still be eligible for wings since the FAA isn’t ending its long-standing program until Jan. 1.

NASA’s astronauts also have nothing to worry about going forward — they’ll still get their pins from the space agency.

All 15 people who rocketed into space for the first time this year on private U.S. flights will be awarded their wings, according to the FAA. That includes Blue Origin founder Jeff Bezos and Virgin Galactic’s Richard Branson, as well as the other space newbies who accompanied them on their brief up-and-down trips. The companies handed out their own version of astronaut wings after the flights.

All four passengers on SpaceX’s first private flight to orbit last September also qualified for FAA wings.

Adding Blue Origin’s next crew of six will bring the list to 30. The FAA’ s first commercial wings recipient was in 2004.

Earlier this year, the FAA tightened up its qualifications, specifying that awardees must be trained crew members, versus paying customers along for the ride. But with the program ending, the decision was made to be all-inclusive, a spokesman said.

Future space tourists will get their names put on a FAA commercial spaceflight list. To qualify, they must soar at least 50 miles (80 kilometers) on an FAA-sanctioned launch.

“The U.S. commercial human spaceflight industry has come a long way from conducting test flights to launching paying customers into space,” the FAA’s associate administrator Wayne Monteith said in a statement. “Now it’s time to offer recognition to a larger group of adventurers daring to go to space.”
TO THE EDITOR
Letter: The science is clear, humans are causing global warming and related climate changes




Carol Coleman
Fri, December 10, 2021

I’m very concerned about the impacts of climate change on the lives of my future grandchildren. Instead of becoming paralyzed by fear or counting on magic, though, I’ve become active in the Central Illinois chapter of Citizens’ Climate Lobby (CCL) to learn more.

I don’t believe every headline I read about climate change, but I do trust briefings by the experts working for CCL. They draw on extensively vetted, peer-reviewed reports that represent the consensus of thousands of scientists, such as the latest IPCC report (https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-i/). The science is unequivocal: humans are causing global warming and related changes that the world is currently experiencing.

The weather-related disasters and fires of recent years show that agriculture, fisheries, water supplies, and infrastructure around the world are vulnerable to climate change. I’m troubled when I read letters to the State Journal-Register that suggest that we don’t need to be concerned. Rather, America needs to share the burden when people living in more vulnerable locations are affected by climate change since we have significantly contributed to causing it.

A prudent way to minimize risk of increasingly devastating climate impacts to our health, economy, and ecosystems is to immediately begin reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Our government must stop subsidizing the production of fossil fuels and impose a sensible price on carbon emissions. To learn how this can work, I invite you to visit our CCL chapter and meet a community dedicated to finding bipartisan solutions to climate change through respectful dialogue. citizensclimatelobby.org

Carol Coleman, Springfield

This article originally appeared on State Journal-Register: Minimize risks of climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions
Who will be the judge of countries' climate plans?



There is no formal organisation tasked with making sure individual nations' climate plans are on track
 
(AFP/INA FASSBENDER)

Amelie BOTTOLLIER-DEPOIS
Sat, December 11, 2021, 11:20 PM·4 min read

Countries have until the end of next year to ensure their climate commitments meet the Paris agreement's cap on global warming. But who will check that their promises really do stack up?

The question is so sensitive that, for now, the answer is: the countries themselves.


While nations have agreed to a global target aimed at avoiding the most catastrophic impacts of climate change, fossil fuel and other greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise when they should be falling.

And there is no formal organisation tasked with making sure individual nations are on track.

"There are no 'police' to check; this is a weakness of the process," climatologist Corinne Le Quere told AFP.


Nearly 200 countries signed up to the landmark Paris deal in 2015, committing to halt warming "well below" two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, preferably limiting it to 1.5C.

And in November at the COP 26 climate summit in Glasgow, nations called for all governments to ensure their emissions plans for this decade align with the Paris temperature goals, strengthening them if necessary, by the end of 2022.

But each country will effectively mark its own climate homework.

The process means countries can move forward "at the pace suited to their political system", said Le Quere.

So far, it has not pulled down emissions nearly fast enough.





- 'Peer pressure works' -


At a global level, the United Nations' climate change body estimates that countries' 2030 emissions reduction plans will lead to warming of a devastating 2.7C.

A separate annual analysis by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), which looks at the gap between climate commitments and actual reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, drills down into slightly more detail.

It includes a particular focus on richer nations from the G20, responsible for around 80 percent of emissions.

"We don't name and shame but we do point to the G20 members that are definitely not on track" like Australia and Mexico, said Anne Olhoff, one of the authors of the UNEP report.

But going further would be "so political, I don't see it happening in a UN context to be quite honest", she told AFP.

In fact, experts doubt that nations would agree to any formal external scrutiny.

"We heard very clearly in Glasgow, countries like the USA say that they -- and they alone -- will determine what is a 1.5C pathway for their country," said Bill Hare, of the research group Climate Analytics.

And the United States are by no means the only ones.

"I don't think the onus in this case is on the EU because we are on track to stay well within Paris," European Commission Vice President Frans Timmermans told AFP during the COP conference in Glasgow.

"We can prove it with facts."


There are a few independent analyses like Climate Action Tracker (CAT) which calculate countries' estimated trajectory -- towards 1.5C, 2C, 3C, or worse.

Hare said CAT, which his organisation partners with, and other assessments will spark "a lot of discussion and disagreement" in 2022 as the deadline looms.

"There needs to be a certain amount of naming and shaming of countries for progress to happen," said Hare.

"At least the visible risk of being named and shamed helps some countries focus on what they need to do to do the right thing."

Even the most ambitious countries will have to "sharpen their arguments" to convince people that their numbers add up, said Lola Vallejo, from the IDDRI think tank.

Civil society, the media, and even other nations will all push governments to do more.

"Countries that are not in line with the Paris agreement will feel they are in the hot seat. Peer pressure works," said one Western diplomat.

- Fair share -

Even the most ambitious emissions cutters will not be able to rest on their laurels.

Olhoff said richer nations will likely face questions over "the historical emissions burden and of fairness and equity".

The Paris agreement underlines the principle of "common but differentiated responsibilities" according to national situations.

So some believe that wealthy countries, largely responsible for global warming, have a duty towards the poorest, and should therefore do more to achieve a "fair" contribution.

There are multiple ways to measure this: historical emissions, emissions per capita, carbon footprint that takes into account emissions generated by imported goods, aid to poor countries.

But essentially the key message remains the same, said Olhoff.

If they hope to curb global warming, she said, "all countries need to go back and see if there is anything we can do more and quicker".

abd/klm/nrh/imm/gw/dl