Tuesday, October 24, 2023

Killers of the Flower Moon and Hollywood’s ‘red face’ shame



Tom Fordy
Tue, 24 October 2023


Marilyn Monroe with extras on the set of her 1954 film River Of No Return - Moviepix


Martin Scorsese’s Killers of the Flower Moon may have racked up five-star reviews across the board, but not everyone has been enthusiastic.

The film tells the story of the Osage Indian murders in 1920s Oklahoma. Leonardo DiCaprio plays Ernest Burkhart, who – along with his uncle, William Hale (Robert De Niro) – conspires to poison Burkhart’s Native American wife, Mollie (Lily Gladstone), in a plot to seize Osage oil land headrights.

Christopher Cote, an Osage language consultant for Scorsese, attended the premiere and told The Hollywood Reporter he had “some strong opinions” about the finished film. “As an Osage, I really wanted this to be from the perspective of Mollie and what her family experienced,” said Cote, “but I think it would take an Osage to do that.”

The criticism comes despite efforts from Scorsese to not make this story about white people. Scorsese had dinners and meetings with members of the Osage Nation and – based on these meetings – decided to change the perspective of the script, to steer it away from a white saviour narrative about law enforcement investigating the case.

Scorsese worked with Osage Principal Chief Geoffrey Standing Bear, and local Osage people were also employed in behind-the-scenes and consultant roles. “But no Native American is credited as being involved in the movie’s screenwriting, production or directing creative processes,” wrote Angela Aleiss, a film historian and author of several books on Native Americans in films. “This is an ongoing problem.”

Native Americans and Hollywood have a long history together. Depictions of Indians go back to some of the very first moving pictures. Angela Aleiss explains that film representations of Native people have gone through cycles – from noble savage to savage warrior, from hostile to sympathetic portrayals. More positive portrayals – as well as significant contributions from Native American filmmakers and actors – have been lost to time, since overshadowed by the more popular, negative stereotype: untamed Indians in headdresses, firing arrows at cowboys and talking in what Indigenous Canadian critic Jesse Wente called “Tonto speak”.

Over the years, Native American actors have had to go along with it. Navajo actor and filmmaker Brian Young wrote about the issue for Time Magazine. He vowed to never wear war paint and feathers again. “At some point, every Native American actor comes to a career crossroads and has to answer the question: do I participate in stereotyping or maintain my cultural integrity?” That’s if Native American actors are cast at all. Hollywood has a history of casting white actors as Indians – playing “red face”. Higher status “Indian chief” roles have gone to non-Native actors, while Native actors make up the background (not to mention lower paid) roles.

As recently as 2013 there was controversy over Johnny Depp playing Tonto in the Disney reboot of The Lone Ranger – then Rooney Mara playing Tiger Lily in 2015’s Pan. The problem, perhaps, is that movies – including Killers of the Flower Moon – are made through white eyes. Hanay Geiogamah – a Native American playwright, producer, and UCLA professor – agrees. “It’s not that complicated,” he says. “The only way to tell the American Indian’s story is for American Indians to write it.”


Johnny Depp and Armie Hammer in The Lone Ranger - Peter Mountain

Westerns – and Native Americans – became popular in the early days of silent cinema. By the time of the silent Westerns, Native people had been herded into reservations. “This part of American history, of course, was really still ongoing at the time cinema was really being born,” said Jesse Wente in the 2009 documentary, Reel Injun.

As noted by Angela Aleiss, early film studios pumped out one or two-reel pictures at a rate of around 12 to 15 per month (a reel amounted to around 10 minutes). Portrayals of Native people – sometimes sympathetic and romantic – were inspired by Buffalo Bill’s Wild West vaudeville show, dime novels, and classic literature, such as James Fenimore Cooper’s The Last of the Mohicans. “The silent films were a mixed bag,” says Aleiss. “You had the savage warrior, the noble Indian, the ‘half-breed’. Then you had movies that very much said Indians were loyal.”

Director DW Griffith – best known for the landmark, KKK-glorifying epic, The Birth of a Nation – made 30 Indian-themed films. Thomas H. Ince – a pioneering producer dubbed “the father of the Western” – moved families of Oglala Sioux to his mountainside production village in Santa Monica.

Hollywood’s first Native American filmmaker was James Young Deer, who managed the West Coast base of Pathé Frères. He oversaw production of over 150 silent one-reel Westerns and enjoyed significant creative freedom. His films were quirky satires that subverted the already-traditional Western stories. Young Deer was also embroiled in Hollywood’s first sex scandal. In 1913, he was accused of introducing an actress into a sex-trafficking ring and then the rape of a 15-year-old. He fled to England but returned to the US, by which time his accusers were long gone. His career never fully recovered, though he did make the first film about the Osage murders – Tragedies of the Osage Hills. The film premiered in May 1926, just four months after the arrests of the men portrayed by De Niro and DiCaprio in Killers of the Flower Moon.

John Wayne, Jeffrey Hunter and Beulah Archuletta in The Searchers - Getty

By the early 1930s, Westerns fell out of favour and were reduced to B-movie status – formulaic, churned-out films that often starred John Wayne. The Hollywood Indian became a stereotyped savage – all war bonnets, teepees, and Tonto speak. These films would later fill up TV schedules, cementing negative stereotypes. “In the 1960s, those B-movies were sold to TV,” says Aleiss. “People saw this very superficial thing of cowboys and Indians. There’s so much more out there that wasn’t sold to TV.” Indeed, there were films about the Native American experience – such as The Silent Enemy and Laughing Boy – but they flopped. “The problem is, people didn’t want to see it,” says Aleiss. “They didn’t line up.”

In 1936, Cecil B. DeMille’s The Plainsman reinvigorated the Western, followed by the John Ford-directed Stagecoach. In that film, John Wayne and a rabble of white folk journey to New Mexico – under the threat of attack from Geronimo and his bloodthirsty Apache warriors. “Stagecoach is the iconic Western,” said Jesse Wente in Reel Injun. “It’s the Western that all others were really modelled after and it’s one of the most damaging movies of Native people in history. You have white society inside the stagecoach and they are besieged – and on all sides – by Native people. By the wild of America.”

Even now, the stereotypes of those Westerns hold firm. Hanay Geiogamah describes being “instantly exotified” as a Native American. “There’s almost no way you can respond to it,” he says. One age-old stereotype seen in movies is the “drunken Indian”. “Even somebody like myself would be suspected of being a drunken Indian behind the scenes,” says Geiogamah. “Or I have a herd of horses in my backyard that I jump on, or I have a big tepee and prefer to sit in that than my house. All of that is so firmly rooted in the non-Indian mind. I don’t think non-Indian people employ this thinking in a mean, negative way. I think it’s just there.”

Dewey Martin and Elizabeth Threatt in the 1952 film The Big Sky - Getty

During the Second World War, onscreen relations between white Americans and Native people softened. “Studios didn’t want to send movies abroad where white people are shooting down Indians,” says Aleiss. “We were supposed to be fighting fascists and genocide.” Aleiss points to 1941’s They Died with Their Boots On, a history-bending biopic of Lieutenant Colonel George Custer (Errol Flynn), leading to his death at the Battle of Little Bighorn. “What happens to Custer is they modify him,” says Aleiss. “He becomes a friend and ally to Crazy Horse [the infamous Lakota who fought against Custer’s cavalry at Little Bighorn]. Custer even calls Crazy Horse his brother.”

In the film, Crazy Horse is played by Anthony Quinn, an American actor of Mexican-Irish descent. Many non-Indian actors took Native roles – standard practice in Hollywood. The likes of Burt Lancaster, Elvis, Rock Hudson, Burt Reynolds, Boris Karloff, Chuck Connors, Audrey Hepburn, Debra Paget, and Charles Bronson all played Native Americans. “The reason they give Indians is because, ‘Y’all don’t know how to act,’” says Geiogamah. “That’s just absolutely not true. There are some really good Indian actors. I know, I’ve worked with them in the theatre! But there’s still that perception built into the system.”

The issue of authenticity goes back to the early days of cinema. As noted in Aleiss’s 2005 book, Making the White Man’s Indian, trade magazine Moving Picture World praised a film in 1910 for using real Native actors. “The public is no longer satisfied with white men who attempt to represent Indian life,” wrote the magazine. “The actors must be real Indians.” The following year, a delegation of Chippewa people protested against “a false representation of Indian life” in a film called The Curse of the Red Man.

The actor known as Iron Eyes Cody - who was actually Italian - with Roy Rogers - Reuters

In 1936, the actor, author, and activist Luther Standing Bear started the Indian Actors Association in response to non-Native actors being cast in Indian roles. Members slated Indian stereotypes who “talk and grunt like morons” and demanded equal pay. Non-Indian extras were paid almost double what the actual Indian actors were paid. And roles were few and far between (which Brian Young was still saying in 2015).

Native American athlete Jim Thorpe – the first Native American to win an Olympic gold medal for the US, in fact – became a film bit-player and spoke out against casting non-Indian actors. “There are only a few pictures each year that we can work in and when they use white men it just means we can’t make a living,” he said. The decidedly white Burt Lancaster would play Thorpe in a 1951 film of his life, Jim Thorpe – All American.

There were other issues of authentic Indian-ness: Chief Buffalo Child Long Lance claimed Canadian Blackfoot ancestry. It was revealed he was of mixed African-American descent. He later shot himself. Iron Eyes Cody was famous for playing Native American roles – most famously as the crying Indian in the anti-pollution commercial. Cody claimed Native heritage, though he was actually of Sicilian descent. Even Sacheen Littlefeather – who declined Marlon Brando’s Oscar at 1973 Academy Awards – was revealed to be of Mexican descent following her death last year. (Which the Native community apparently knew for years.)

Richard Harris in A Man Called Horse - Getty

Brando had boycotted the event to protest Hollywood’s treatment of Native Americans. Certainly, it was a bloody period for Native people on film. As detailed in Reel Injun, the American Indian became an allegorical tool amid anxieties over the Vietnam War. In 1970, Ralph Nelson’s Soldier Blue depicted the US cavalry carrying out a censor-troubling slaughter of a Cheyenne village – a nod to both the Sand Creek Massacre from 1864, in which US troops killed 230 people, and the My Lai Massacre, which happened in Vietnam barely two years before Soldier Blue.

There was more brutality in A Man Called Horse, also released in 1970, in which Richard Harris survives the savagery of the Sioux. The film provoked protests for its depiction of Sioux and for making a white man the hero. The director, Elliot Silverstein, clashed with the studio bosses over scenes of the Sioux laughing. The studio apparently thought that their Indians were too inhuman to laugh.

The controversial 1970 film Soldier Blue - Getty

The Brando-Littlefeather protest came at the time of more real-world activism. From 1968 to 1971, Native American protestors and supporters staged a 19-month occupation of Alcatraz. In 1972, 500 Native Americans marched on Washington DC over political sovereignty. And in 1973, the American Indian Movement occupied Wounded Knee – the site of an 1890 massacre – in a two-month standoff with the FBI.

As the Hollywood legend goes, John Wayne was incensed at the Sacheen Littlefeather Oscars protest and had to be restrained. The story has been debunked in the years since. But Wayne’s Westerns created the kind of cultural damage that Brando was protesting against. The Searchers, released in 1956, contains awful stereotypes and has one of the most obscene assaults on Native Americans: Wayne’s hero – a bigoted cowboy – shoots out the eyes of an already-dead Comanche.

By the mid-1970s, Will Sampson – from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest – became a new type of Indian hero. “He was trying to take the Indians out of the old cliches and put them into modern settings,” says Aleiss. “He was very successful at that.”

Sacheen Littlefeather, who declined Marlon Brando's Best Actor Oscar at the 1973 Academy Awards - Getty

After falling out of favour, the Western – and Hollywood Indian – was revived by the huge success of Dances with Wolves in 1990, which was credited for humanising its Indians. The film also earned an Oscar nomination for Native Canadian actor Graham Greene. Dances with Wolves, however, has since been criticised for telling the story from a white perspective.

Hanay Geiogamah found the same problem when working on a series of five TV movies in the mid-1990s. “I worked with five white writers – five,” he says. “They were talented but they had no idea about Indian life. Not at all. I offered thematic suggestions that would have been really effective – it just didn’t happen. They were following the standard. They grew up on decade-after-decade of the Hollywood Indian persona. It was burned in their minds, like the minds of millions of American citizens.”

For Geiogamah, the portrayal of Native Americans is like so much else in the US: a matter of economics. “The Hollywood system has so many things built into it,” he says. “There has to be a star – a big white hero – a Robert Redford or John Wayne. The distortion begins immediately with the economic factors that are attached to the process.” That’s likely the reason Hollywood doesn’t have white actors playing red face now: because The Lone Ranger was a dud.

Geiogamah credits Little Big Man – the 1970 Western starring Dustin Hoffman – as a rare success in depicting Native Americans. Also, Chris Eyre’s 1998 comedy Smoke Signals, a then-rare story about modern day Native Americans – actually starring, written, and directed by Native talent, no less. Other recent, contemporary stories include the TV series Reservation Dogs and Rutherford Falls.

While many Hollywood portrayals have been sympathetic to Native Americans, that is perhaps not the same as culturally sensitive – particularly in the context of our current awareness of representation and cultural appropriation. Which is easy for a white man in 2023 to say. The history of protest within the industry shows that depictions that it’s long been an issue for Native Americans actors and filmmakers. As recently as 2015, there were reports of Native actors walking off the set of the Adam Sandler spoof, The Ridiculous 6, for offensive portrayals. The reports were apparently overblown but the story tapped into still-present tensions. For Geiogamah, Hollywood’s attempts at telling Native stories is “by and large a failure”.

Angela Aleiss is keen to stress the achievements of Native actors and filmmakers. That’s the subject of Aleiss’s book, Hollywood’s Native Americans. Aleiss points back to Chickasaw filmmaker Edwin Carewe, who made around 60 movies; Will Rogers, a Cherokee actor and mega-star of his day; and Jay Silverheels – TV’s Tonto – who started the Indian Actors Workshop. “Native people don’t have the numbers of black Americans, Asians, or Latinos in American society,” says Aleiss. “I think that’s why it’s important to look back and give them the credit they deserve.”

HEALTH & SAFETY IN SPORTS
Every year of playing rugby increases risk of degenerative brain disease CTE by 14 per cent


Ben Rumsby
Tue, 24 October 2023

Former England hooker Steve Thompson has early onset dementia and cannot remember 2003 World Cup final - Guzelian/Mark Pinder

Every year playing rugby union significantly increases the risk of serious brain damage, a landmark study has found.

Ahead of Saturday’s World Cup final, alarming research has been published identifying a link between the length of time participating in the sport and the danger of developing the degenerative condition chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).

Based on post-mortems of the brains of former players, the study led by consultant neuropathologist Professor Willie Stewart found each additional year in rugby added to their risk of CTE – long linked with repeated head impacts and injuries – by as much as 14 per cent.


CTE was also found in more than two thirds of the 31 brains examined of players with an average rugby-playing experience of 18 years.

Even more worryingly, the mean age of those whose brains were examined died over the age of 60.

That meant many of them were likely to have played the game prior to it turning professional in 1995, before which it is widely regarded to have been significantly less physical.

The study was conducted against the backdrop of a multi-million-pound lawsuit brought by former players, including England’s World Cup-winning hooker Steve Thompson, against World Rugby, the Rugby Football Union and the Welsh Rugby Union.

Thompson and others diagnosed with early onset dementia have accused the governing bodies of an “abject failure” in their management of concussion protocols, something the organisations deny.

The new research, published in Acta Neuropathologica, was the result of a world-first collaboration between leading laboratories at Stewart’s University of Glasgow, the University of Sydney and Boston University.

It follows major findings last year which reported neurodegenerative disease risk among former Scotland players approximately two-and-a-half-times higher than expected.

Stewart, an honorary professor at the University of Glasgow, said: “In this study, we have combined the experience and expertise of three leading international brain banks to look at CTE in former rugby players.

“These results provide new evidence regarding the association between rugby union participation and CTE. Specifically, our data show risk is linked to length of rugby career, with every extra year of play increasing risk.

“Based on this it is imperative that the sport’s regulators reduce exposure to repeated head impacts in match play and in training to reduce risk of this otherwise preventable contact sport related neurodegenerative disease.”

A World Rugby spokesperson said: “World Rugby is aware of the findings from the University of Glasgow study and we are committed to always being informed by the latest science. Our Independent Concussion Working Group recently met with Boston University representatives, including Professor Ann McKee, alongside other world leading brain health experts, to continue our dialogue on how we can make the game safer for the whole rugby family.

“What all the experts told our Independent Concussion Working Group was, that we should continue to reduce the number of head impacts, and that is exactly what we will do. World Rugby will never stand still when it comes to protecting players’ brain health which is why community players around the globe are taking part in trials of a lower tackle height this season. It is also why we have rolled out the use of world leading smart mouthguard technology in WXV, our new elite women’s competition, and from 2024 all elite competitions using the Head Injury Assessment will use smart mouthguards, in addition to the current independent doctors and in-game video footage to ensure that players are receiving the best possible care.”

The RFU was approached for comment.

Richard Boardman of Rylands Garth solicitors, which represents Thompson and around 450 other players, said: “As great a spectacle as the World Cup has been, the brutal, chilling current reality for the sport is that many more rugby players will die prematurely or lead significantly impacted lives as a result of neurological impairment, including CTE, caused by playing the sport.

“Immediate, substantive changes are required to be made to the sport. Otherwise, many more players, both current and future, will be condemned to the same fate as earlier generations. This is not just about reducing concussions, but the accumulation of sub-concussive blows, too. Elite players, in particular, play far too much rugby.”


Risk of degenerative brain disease increases with longer rugby careers – study

Jamie Gardner, PA Chief Sports Reporter
Tue, 24 October 2023 



A rugby player’s risk of developing an incurable brain disease uniquely associated with repeated head impacts is relative to the length of their career, a new study indicates.

Each additional year of playing was found to increase the risk of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) by 14%, in a study of the brains of 31 former players whose average career length was 18 years.

CTE can only be diagnosed post-mortem, and to date the only recognised risk factor for CTE is traumatic brain injury and repeated head impact exposure.


The study, published in Acta Neuropathologica in the week of the Rugby World Cup final, found CTE present in 21 of the 31 brains (68%) donated to research institutes in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia.

Cases with CTE averaged a career length of 21.5 years, while in those without CTE the average was 12.1 years.

The study’s lead author Professor Willie Stewart, of the University of Glasgow, said: “In this study, we have combined the experience and expertise of three leading international brain banks to look at CTE in former rugby players.

“These results provide new evidence regarding the association between rugby union participation and CTE.

“Specifically, our data shows risk is linked to length of rugby career, with every extra year of play increasing risk.

“Based on this it is imperative that the sport’s regulators reduce exposure to repeated head impacts in match play and in training to reduce risk of this otherwise preventable contact sport related neurodegenerative disease.”

Twenty-three of the players played at amateur level only, while eight also played at the elite level. The study found no correlation between the level the individual had played at and an increased risk of CTE, nor between whether they played as a forward or a back.

World Rugby is exploring ways to mitigate the risk of concussion and improve how diagnosed or suspected concussions are managed.

The governing body’s executive board has recommended that unions participate in an opt-in global trial of lowering the tackle height in the community game to below the sternum – also known as a “belly tackle”.

World Rugby also promotes a “recognise and remove” approach to dealing with concussion in the amateur game, while it has detailed return-to-play protocols at that level and in the elite game.

A group of former professional and amateur players diagnosed with early-onset dementia are involved in legal action against World Rugby, the Rugby Football Union and the Welsh Rugby Union.

The players claim the governing bodies were negligent in that they failed to take reasonable action to protect them from permanent injury caused by repetitive concussive and sub-concussive blows.

A World Rugby spokesperson said: “World Rugby is aware of the findings from the University of Glasgow study and we are committed to always being informed by the latest science.

“Our Independent Concussion Working Group recently met with Boston University representatives, including Professor Ann McKee, alongside other world leading brain health experts, to continue our dialogue on how we can make the game safer for the whole rugby family.

“What all the experts told our Independent Concussion Working Group was that we should continue to reduce the number of head impacts, and that is exactly what we will do.

“World Rugby will never stand still when it comes to protecting players’ brain health, which is why community players around the globe are taking part in trials of a lower tackle height this season.

“It is also why we have rolled out the use of world leading smart mouthguard technology in WXV, our new elite women’s competition, and from 2024 all elite competitions using the Head Injury Assessment will use smart mouthguards, in addition to the current independent doctors and in-game video footage to ensure that players are receiving the best possible care.”
China raids iPhone maker Foxconn as founder runs to be Taiwan president

Hannah Boland
Sun, 22 October 2023


Foxconn is headquartered in Taiwan but does most of its manufacturing in China - ANN WANG/REUTERS

Chinese officials have raided the offices of key Apple supplier Foxconn as the company’s founder prepares to run for the presidency of Taiwan.

Officials are investigating iPhone supplier Foxconn’s tax affairs and its use of land, Chinese state media reported on Sunday. Investigators have searched the company’s local offices as part of their inquiries.

The raids come as Foxconn’s founder and biggest shareholder, Terry Gou, prepares to mount a bid for the presidency of Taiwan. His candidacy has led to questions over whether Beijing could put pressure on Mr Gou through his business interests.


Foxconn is headquartered in Taiwan but does most of its manufacturing in China. The company, which had revenues of £168bn last year, is a key manufacturing partner for Apple and assembles the iPhone.

Two sources close to Foxconn said they believed the Chinese investigations may be political, Reuters reported. The disclosure about the inquiries comes less than three months before the Taiwanese election.

Premier Chen Chien-jen said Taiwan’s government had been in touch with Foxconn about the investigation and would help as necessary.

According to a report in the Chinese state-run Global Times, Foxconn’s offices in Guangdong and Jiangsu were searched by tax officials. Offices in the Henan and Hubei provinces have also faced inspections by China’s Ministry of Natural Resources, the report said.

The investigation comes against a backdrop of growing tensions between China and Taiwan, which Beijing argues is part of its territory. Chinese officials have threatened to invade the country and have stepped up a campaign of military pressure.

Taiwanese officials believe that China could be preparing to annex the country by 2027.

Mr Gou, who founded Foxconn in 1974, announced his intention to run for the president of Taiwan over summer. The 73-year-old billionaire, who is worth an estimated $6.6bn, stepped back from running the company in 2019 and left Foxconn’s board last month to focus on his campaign. However, he remains the company’s biggest shareholder with a stake of 12.5pc.
Mr Gou is seen as one of the most pro-Beijing candidates in the running for next year’s election. He has advocated for diplomacy with Beijing and has said the current ruling party in Taiwan, the Democratic Progressive party, is to blame for the growing threat of invasion. However, he said in August: “I will not bow to China’s threats.”

Scrutiny of Foxconn comes as Apple’s position in China also comes under pressure. Chinese government officials have reportedly discouraged the use of iPhones and sales of the company’s newest handsets have been weaker than expected.

Tim Cook, Apple’s chief executive, visited the country last week and met China’s vice premier Ding Xuexiang, and commerce minister Wang Wentao. He said Apple remained committed to growth in China.

Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush, said the investigations into Foxconn appeared to be a “shot across the bow from Beijing towards Foxconn and Apple in this ongoing geopolitical cage match.”

He said: “With a battle for AI and chips getting nastier, this is China pushing back and going after the golden goose Foxconn.”

Foxconn has been attempting to shield itself from geopolitical pressures by expanding manufacturing outside of China. Around three quarters of its factories are in China, according to estimates, but it has been opening facilities in Vietnam and India in a drive to diversify.

A spokesman for Foxconn said: “Legal compliance everywhere we operate around the world is a fundamental principle of Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn). We will actively cooperate with the relevant units on the related work and operations.”
Rolls-Royce facing £350m class action lawsuit from investors


Luke Barr
Sun, 22 October 2023 



Rolls-Royce, the FTSE 100 engineering giant, is facing a potential legal claim from investors worth at least £350m after a bribery and corruption scandal wiped millions of pounds from the company’s value.

City lawyers are working with a group of investors seeking compensation from Rolls-Royce after the bribery allegations rocked the aircraft engine maker in 2017.

Shareholders are to claim that the company made misrepresentations to the market about the bribery scandal.


Rolls-Royce previously agreed to a £497m settlement with the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in a bid to draw a line under the wrongdoing.

The SFO’s agreement with Rolls-Royce in 2017 covered “12 counts of conspiracy to corrupt, false accounting and failure to prevent bribery” across its aerospace and energy divisions.

It said the conduct spanned three decades and took place in countries including Indonesia, Thailand, India, Russia, Nigeria, China and Malaysia.

As part of its four-year inquiry into Rolls-Royce, investigators at the SFO examined claims that Rolls paid millions of pounds in bribes - or used middlemen to pay them - to win civil and military deals.

Allegations included Rolls paying a $20m (£13m) bribe in return for persuading Indonesia’s flag carrier, Garuda, to buy 700 engines.

It is understood Rolls has drafted in Slaughter and May to fend off the potential litigation, using the same set of lawyers that worked on the SFO agreement.

The company said it will “robustly defend” any class action, and stressed that it has not received any formal claim.

Proceedings are yet to be launched but it is understood allegations could be made against Rolls’ former chief executive John Rishton, as well as former board members including Michael Terrett, Sir Simon Robertson and Colin Smith.

Rolls was also found by the SFO to have falsified documents to conceal commissions in India and paid off an official working for Gazprom, Russia’s state-owned energy giant, to win a contract.

Under the terms of the so-called Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), which at the time was the largest-ever fine of its kind in the UK, Rolls was able to account for its “conduct without suffering the full consequences of a criminal conviction”.

The company previously said it “apologised unreservedly” for the corruption, which also sparked investigations by regulators in Brazil and the United States.

Rolls warned in its last annual report that the DPA, which is a voluntary arrangement to avoid potentially tougher legal penalties, could spark potential claims “from current and former investors”.

Sir Brian Leveson, who oversaw the SFO investigation, said in 2017 that Rolls would have to “suffer the undeniably adverse publicity” from its DPA.

David Green, a former SFO director, said at the time that it allowed “Rolls-Royce to draw a line under conduct spanning seven countries, three decades and three sectors of its business”.

In Sir Brian Leveson’s 2017 judgment, he said Rolls’ conduct had “involved very senior” employees.

There has been a significant overhaul of the business in recent years, after the pandemic halted long-haul overseas travel, forcing Rolls to cut thousands of jobs and raise billions of pounds to survive.

Just last week the company announced it will cut up to 2,500 jobs in an effort to slash costs.

The move was announced by new chief executive Tufan Erginbilgic, who took over at the start of the year and said soon after that the company was a “burning platform”.

The engineer posted profits of £524m for the first half of the year, compared to a £111m loss for the same period in 2022.

The company also managed to slash its debt by £500m to £2.8bn.

A Rolls spokesman said: “Rolls-Royce today is a fundamentally different business. Rolls-Royce has zero tolerance for business misconduct. We have transformed our internal ethics and compliance procedures, that is why in January last year the Serious Fraud Office filed a notice releasing us from the UK Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA).”



Barclays bankers fear cost-cutting job losses after profits fall


Kalyeena Makortoff Banking correspondent
Tue, 24 October 2023 

Photograph: Stefan Wermuth/Reuters

Barclays bankers are steeling themselves for potential job losses after executives warned of a fresh wave of cost cuts intended to boost payouts for their shareholders.

The lender reported a slight drop in pre-tax profits on Tuesday, which fell 4% to £1.9bn in the third quarter amid concerns over a potential rise in customer defaults and a slowdown in corporate dealmaking that hit returns at its investment bank.

Barclays also suffered a larger-than-expected drop in deposits and warned that its net interest margin – the difference between what it charges for mortgages and what it pays out to savers – would probably fall in the fourth quarter, putting a further squeeze on its income.

Executives are now planning a wave of “structural” cost cuts that they said would boost dividends for investors.

When asked whether the cost-cutting plans would involve job losses, including for UK staff, the chief executive, CS Venkatakrishnan, told journalists: “We always modulate the size of our workforce everywhere in the world in which we are, and that’s what we will continue to do.”

He said Barclays bosses would “look for efficiencies in different parts of the bank … We are trying to make, and create, and run, a more efficient organisation … and you should expect us to look in all those places where we think we can increase productivity”.

Venkatakrishnan refused to give further details but said the bank would provide an update for investors after the release of Barclays’ full-year results in the new year, “which will include setting out our capital allocation priorities, as well as revised financial targets”. The news sent Barclays shares down 7% on Tuesday morning.

Profits from the lender’s corporate and investment bank tumbled 11% in the third quarter. While the bank recently took part in Arm’s $65bn (£53bn) stock market debut, bosses said the division’s woes reflected “lower client activity” more broadly.

There was also a 14% rise in the amount of money put aside for potential defaults, to £433m compared with £381m a year earlier. However, the cash put aside for defaults at its UK business fell by 27% in the third quarter, suggesting confidence about the prospect of mortgage borrowers keeping up with payments, despite rising interest rates.

“We continue to see limited signs of credit stress,” Barclays’ group finance director, Anna Cross, said.

Meanwhile, net interest income at the UK bank rose just 1%, to £1.6bn in the quarter. The figure is likely to be cheered by campaigners who claimed banks were failing to pass on higher interest rates to savers while raising charges for home loan customers.

“We have been very disciplined and prudent and pass through interest rates to customers,” Venkatakrishnan said.

Cross said customers, particularly Barclays’ wealthy, private banking clients, were moving cash into savings accounts that offered higher interest rates. The trend is expected to contribute to a drop in net interest margins in the fourth quarter.

The lender’s finance chief said it had suffered a 6% drop in deposits, which was “a little higher than we anticipated”. That was partly due to price inflation that had forced customers to pay more for everyday goods, as well as competition in the savings market that had seen clients park their cash with rival banks offering higher interest rates.

Venkatakrishnan was also pressed over the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) decision to fine and ban his predecessor, Jes Staley, from the City, this month for misleading the regulator over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

“I’m really not going to add commentary to this topic,” Venkatakrishnan said. “The FCA has made extensive disclosures, the bank has issued an RNS [market statement] in response, including the action of the board’s remuneration committee. I have told you since the day I took this job that I’m recused from all of this.”

When asked whether the matter could lead to the resignation of other Barclays bosses, including the chair, Nigel Higgins, Venkatakrishnan said he would not comment further.
UK
‘I can see no way forward for the Conservative party but a thumping loss and reset’


Candela Orobitg-Baena

TORY TELEGRAPH POLL

Tue, 24 October 2023 


Some Telegraph readers are doubting Rishi Sunak's 'Prime Ministerial qualities' - Kin Cheung/AP

After two historic by-election losses for the Conservatives in Mid Bedfordshire and Tamworth, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was warned his party is heading towards a 1997-style defeat.

A low turnout of previous Conservative voters may be to blame for Labour’s record-breaking victories; as well as growing support for the right-wing Reform party, which picked up a greater number of votes than the Labour majority in either constituency.

Following the news, Telegraph readers took to the comments section and sent in their reactions to Dominic Penna via the Telegraph’s Politics newsletter.

Read on for the best of the debate, and join the conversation in the comments section below.

‘If the Tories were a business, they would have gone bust by now’

Some Telegraph readers believe no hope is left for the Tories come the next General Election. Reader Richard Lindsay claims that the Conservative Party has “backed itself into a corner”.

“There is no room for tax cuts and, with one million open vacancies, tightening the points-based immigration system is fraught,” Mr Lindsay says.

He argues “slashing public services to pay for tax cuts might look appealing but generating the money needed to reduce tax meaningfully would mean essentially privatising huge chunks of the NHS, cutting education and gutting benefits, including pension. That’s no platform for winning a General Election next year.”

Therefore, he “can see no way forward for the party but a thumping loss and reset.”

Meanwhile, reader Stuart Priest claims that “if the Tories were a business, they would have gone bust by now,” as he argues how “they simply refuse to listen to their loyal customers and seem content with virtue signalling to people who will never buy from them.”


‘Mr Sunak will have to resign’

Others blame the Prime Minister for the Conservatives losing the faith of their voters. Reader Patricia Mattimore believes Mr Sunak is “is a nice moderate fellow” but suggests he is “weak and full of platitudes, which will certainly not win the 2024 election.”

She says: “Rather than be soundly beaten next year, Mr Sunak will have to resign. Why not take the bold step now and replace him with somebody who stands a good chance of reforming and clearing out a lot of ineffectual MPs who have been inherited from former prime ministers?

“There is a year to do this, but it must be done soon.”

Alan Bishop argues that if Mr Sunak “had Prime Ministerial qualities, he would have been able to make his own ‘good’ luck.”

He continues: “Despite a recent litany of poor political leaders over the past 40 years, Mr Sunak has plumbed to new depths. All his recent ‘presidential’ foreign visits will not make a jot of difference, other than adding to his CV for his return to a financial career.”
‘The rise of Reform is a serious threat to the Conservatives’

Other readers said that having lost all faith in the Conservatives they are now more inclined to support another party, namely Reform UK.

Richard Long shares: “There’s very little difference now between the Tories and Labour. Both are high taxation, high immigration parties. They were also both heavily supportive of the crippling and unnecessary lockdown policies.

“The only party that questioned the lockdowns and the only party with a net-zero immigration policy is Reform UK. They’ll definitely be getting my vote going forward. I’m through with this ‘pretend’ Conservative party, which is sad after being a lifelong supporter, but I cannot support this left wing shower.”

Reader Ken Worthy writes: “The rise of Reform is a serious threat to the Conservatives. Since the general move to the Left in British politics over recent years, a lot of Conservative members, including long-term Conservative activists like myself, have felt that the present government is nowhere near Conservatism and doesn’t represent them.

“There is a notable lack of enthusiasm among activists and many have dropped out. Conservative voters, too, have no enthusiasm for this government and its policies. There is not much time left.”
‘Two simple steps can get Conservative voters back’

However, there are some Telegraph readers who believe not all is lost for the Conservative Party – and still see them as contenders for the next General Election.

The Telegraph’s Political Correspondent Dominic Penna asked readers what Mr Sunak could do to “pull things back”, and many wrote in with their suggestions.

“Conservative voters are fed-up because of the shambles and self-serving drama of the Boris Johnson and Liz Truss era,” reader Tim Green says.

However, he argues “by contrast, Rishi Sunak is proving a fair-to-good PM with a clear and professional focus”

“Voters take time to forgive. If Mr Sunak hangs in for 12 more months, then the election could be close, as Tory supporters come back round.”

Mr Green suggests the Prime Minister needs to “focus again on illegal immigration; which is the Reform Party message,” as “Starmer is not Blair by any means because he has no clear moral purpose or vision and little charm.”


 

Further suggestions come from reader Alan Smith, who says “the first thing that Rishi Sunak needs to do is to shore up his own voters.”

He continues: “The Prime Minister has to take away the desire to vote Reform and trust that the soft centre vote returns once Labour’s policies become more exposed to analysis. There are many policies, such as VAT on private schools plus the threat of even higher taxes which should do that, though he must unleash some ‘attack dogs’ to frighten them!

“His personality is holding him back. He’s too keen to grovel in interviews and needs to be more robust in his responses. Say less but say it smarter and get those soundbites in. Remember ‘Labour’s not working’ and ‘Get Brexit done’? They actually work because people like simple messages.”

Telegraph reader James Fairrie presents “two simple steps that can get conservative voters back on side in this parliament.”

“First, deal with the illegal boat traffic and remove illegal migrants to Rwanda. Second, take a much-needed step back from the extremities of the net zero policies in a way that gains practical acceptability to the population.”

‘Sunak must move right and take the Cabinet with him’

Reader Jim Walton comments on the by-election results, arguing that the Tory defeat was “was more to do with the Right-wing voters not voting and protest-voting, rather than an outright switch to Labour”.

He says: “The Tories still have an opportunity to win back support. The Labour poll lead is ‘soft’ in the context of a General Election, and they don’t have the solutions to the country’s problems.

“Keir Starmer doesn’t have a direction of travel other than reaching Downing Street by attempting to agree with everyone with different messages on different days.”

David Apperley believes: “We need a proper Tory manifesto covering the areas that matter,” because “the Right will split without this, and Sunak must accept this and move accordingly.

“I would support a leadership challenge, but that will not happen, so Sunak must move right and take the Cabinet with him, and then we have a good chance.”
Sunak faces further pressure over net zero U-turn after IEA warning

Rob Davies
Mon, 23 October 2023 



Rishi Sunak faces further pressure over his U-turn on net zero targets, after the head of the world’s energy watchdog said countries that water down green policies risked worsening the climate crisis and damaging their own economies.

In its annual World Energy Outlook, the International Energy Agency (IEA) hailed the gathering pace of the worldwide transition to cleaner energy, forecasting for the first time that demand for oil, gas and coal would peak before the end of the decade.

But the report called on governments not to derail progress by weakening climate measures, warning that effects such as wildfires and flooding meant that “no country is an island”.


Sunak caused consternation among environmental campaigners and the automotive sector alike when he announced measures that included a delay to the phasing out of new petrol and diesel cars by 2030. The prime minister – who has vowed to end the “war on motorists” – set a new target of 2035.

However, the UK’s 2030 target is still included in a section of the IEA report listing policies that large economies have announced and must implement if global heating is to be slowed.

The director of the IEA, Dr Fatih Birol, told the Guardian that while the U-turn would not affect his organisation’s global projects, countries that rowed back on climate promises would harm their own economies, as well as the planet.

“Governments are entitled to their policy choices,” he said. “But leaving aside … climate change and being a good citizen of the world, I believe the world is entering an era of clean energy technology manufacturing. They [governments] are competing with each other for pole position to create good jobs in modern industries.

“Countries who are slowing down in terms of pushing clean energy may well have a disadvantage in terms of their competitiveness for the next chapter of industry.”

The shadow energy secretary, Ed Miliband, said: “This report is further evidence that Rishi Sunak’s retreat from a clean energy future is wrong for Britain and will mean higher bills and less energy security.

“Shrinking from climate action will send the wrong message to the world just at the moment when the power of our example can show that clean energy means lower bills for families, energy independence for our country, more jobs, and will protect future generations.”

The IEA set out a range of scenarios affecting the projected global temperature increase by 2100.

Under the policies in place, it predicted a rise of 2.4C above pre-industrial levels, resulting in “very widespread and severe” effects.

The increase can still be kept to 1.5C, in line with the 2015 Paris agreement, through measures such as tripling renewable energy capacity and doubling investment in energy efficiency, the IEA said.

Its mid-range scenario, under which the world heats up by 1.7C, is based on policies that have been announced but not yet enacted, including the UK’s now-defunct 2030 pledge on petrol and diesel cars.

Birol echoed concerns about Sunak’s U-turn that have been expressed by senior figures in the automotive and energy sectors.

“You can’t give investors one strategic direction today and change it tomorrow, these are up-front investments,” he said. “Capital you put on the table is huge and this could lead to hesitation for investors.”

Birol highlighted weather events such as this summer’s European wildfires and UK flooding caused by Storm Babet as one justification for increasing efforts to reduce carbon emissions.

He also pointed to the escalating violence in the Middle East – as well as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. “No one can convince me that oil and gas represent safe or secure energy choices … especially if you consider that we are witnessing the hottest year in history, driven by the use of fossil fuels,” Birol said.

The Paris-based IEA struck a broadly upbeat tone on the potential for a faster global energy transition, predicting for the first time that fossil fuel demand will peak this year and insisting that net zero by 2050 is still possible.

Birol said nearly one in two cars sold by 2030 would be electric, compared with one in 25 two years ago, while 70% of energy came from fossil fuels 10 years ago, compared with a projection of 40% by 2030.

But achieving net zero will require a significant increase in investment.

The IEA estimates that $2.8tn (£2.3bn) will be invested in energy this year, about $1.8tn of which will be in clean energy and infrastructure.

Investment would reach $3.2tn in 2030 under the 2.4C projection, while the mid-range scenario would require $3.8tn. It would take $4.7tn a year by 2030 to put the world on track to reach net zero emissions by 2050, it said.

A spokesperson for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: “The UK is a global leader in clean energy having attracted £200bn in low carbon investment since 2010, with a further £100bn expected by 2030 – powering up Britain and supporting up to 480,000 jobs.

“We also continue to back domestic oil and gas, which supports over 200,000 skilled jobs, develops supply chains and helps build the engineering expertise needed to support our energy security and end reliance on foreign regimes.

“We have cut emissions faster than any other G7 country and oil and gas will play important role in the transition to net zero supporting the development of low carbon technologies, such as carbon capture, while adding billions to the UK economy.”
Labour planning electric car cash incentive after committing to 2030 petrol ban


Szu Ping Chan
Sat, 21 October 2023 

Labour wants buying an electric car to be an ‘easy and cheap choice’, according to a party source - Darren Staples/Bloomberg

Labour will hand drivers cash to buy electric vehicles under plans being considered to help the party stick to a 2030 ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars.

Officials are examining ways to tie subsidies and interest-free loans to British jobs and manufacturing amid fears that cheap Chinese models will start flooding the market in order to help Britain meet its net zero target.

It is understood that Labour prepared a package of financial incentives designed to help motorists switch to electric vehicles to be unveiled at its party conference in Liverpool which took place earlier this month.


One proposal at an advanced stage included a universal cash subsidy worth around £1,500 to help people who want to buy an electric car to fund a deposit.

Three-year interest-free loans were also proposed for those taking out personal contract purchase agreements, which allows people to rent cars over a multi-year period, with the option of buying it at the end.

Loan guarantees for people using car finance deals were also considered, as well as extra help for people on low and middle incomes.

However, a split within the party over both the costs and approach of the scheme is understood to have delayed an official announcement.

The shadow Treasury team led by Rachel Reeves is understood to have been the most resistant to subsidies and officials are now exploring ways to link any subsidies to cars made in Britain.

Others have raised concerns that mass government subsidies or guarantees could end up boosting Chinese manufacturers.


Electric vehicles cost significantly more than equivalent petrol or diesel models. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn pledged in 2019 to provide up to £60bn over five years to fund interest-free loans on electric cars.

But soaring debt and high inflation means any subsidy scheme is likely to be on a much smaller scale as Labour focuses on planning reforms to make it easier to build battery gigafactories, as well as infrastructure to support the switch to electric and more support for buyers of second-hand EVs.

Labour has already been forced to scale back plans to borrow £28bn a year to invest in green jobs and industry in an attempt to prove its fiscal credibility.

“We need value for money,” said one Labour source. “We don’t want to end up in a situation where we’re spending taxpayers’ money to subsidise Chinese companies, so we need to make sure that the models that are available are built in Britain.”

Others have warned that Labour’s commitment to no new petrol and diesel cars by 2030 could threaten the survival of the UK car industry.

Just one in 10 of all cars purchased in the UK are currently made in Britain, according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers & Traders (SMMT).

More than 30pc of EVs sold in the first quarter of 2023 were manufactured in China. Only the Nissan Leaf and Mini electric are currently made in Britain.


“The only non-subsidy way to meet the target is we have a bunch of cheap Chinese EVs dumped on our shores,” said another Labour source.

The party has also been studying how other countries are encouraging the switch to electric vehicles. Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act provides a tax credit of up to $7,500 for EVs made in the US.

Officials have also looked at French incentives of up to €7,000 that were recently changed to exclude many EVs made in China.

There are also concerns that state subsidies could fall foul of international trade rules.

President Biden faced a backlash from countries including South Korea and Japan after their car exports were excluded from the generous consumer tax credits.

The UK exports 80pc of the cars it makes, mainly to Europe.

It is understood that Labour has sought legal advice to ensure that subsidies do not fall foul of World Trade Organisation rules.

Last month, Rishi Sunak announced Britain will push back a ban on new petrol and diesel cars and vans to 2035 from 2030,to protect “hard-pressed British families” from “unacceptable costs”.

Labour is understood to be waiting for any more green announcements from Jeremy Hunt in the Autumn Statement and is also watching for progress between the UK and EU on post-Brexit tariff arrangements on electric vehicles that threaten to raise prices by £3,400 next year.

“Ultimately we want to make sure that going electric is the easy and cheap choice whether you’re looking to buy a new or second-hand car ahead of the 2030 switchover,” said one figure familiar with Labour’s plans.

A Labour spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.
As a global energy crisis returns, the UK push for a green economy makes even more sense


Richard Partington
THE GUARDIAN
Sun, 22 October 2023

Photograph: Gary Calton/The Observer

Earlier this year, the world economy had a lucky escape. After a mild winter in Europe, energy prices were in retreat as the continent shifted away from Russian gas supplies. Inflation was cooling, while economic growth remained resilient.

“Hello lower gas prices, bye-bye recession,” analysts at the US investment bank JP Morgan wrote in January. Less than a year later, the Israel-Hamas war serves as a stark warning that the global energy crisis has far from vanished.

European gas prices have jumped by more than a third since the start of October, before a difficult winter to come, as the conflict in the Middle East threatens to escalate. Oil prices have risen sharply, with a leap of more than $20 a barrel since June, continuing a rise that began even before the war.

Related: The planet warms, the world economy cools – the real global recession is ecological | Larry Elliott

While not underestimating the human tragedy in Israel and Gaza, most experts reckon that a serious escalation engulfing the wider region remains unlikely – limiting the impact for the world economy. Yet the outbreak of war in another of the world’s most important energy exporting regions, less than two years after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, is an all too painful reminder of economic vulnerabilities.

Mohamed El-Erian, the president of Queens’ College, Cambridge, and a former deputy managing director of the International Monetary Fund, says a further rise in tensions would compound existing fragilities as policymakers navigate weak economic growth and stubborn inflation.

“If this horrific crisis is not contained then this will add to the supply constraints facing the global economy. The very first impact will be higher prices, and possibly less oil around, and that is inherently stagflationary. It’s not just inflationary, it’s stagflationary,” he says.

At a highly uncertain juncture, the extreme risk is the possibility of Iran becoming directly involved and impeding transit through the Strait of Hormuz – the supply route for about 30% of the world’s seaborne oil and one-fifth of global liquified natural gas (LNG). It’s a concern raised with alarming regularity – in these darkest of days for the Middle East, this is a danger many are considering.

For Britain and other European countries there should be particular alarm. After efforts to diversify gas supplies away from Russia, the reliance on fossil fuel imports from the Middle East has only risen – especially from Qatar, the world’s largest LNG exporter, which ships through Hormuz.

European LNG imports from the gulf state rose by 71% last year in the rush to replace Russian gas – including a 74% rise to the UK, which sources almost one-third of its imported supply from the country.

With the UK experiencing a much slower decline in inflation than almost any other advanced economy, there is potential for any renewed energy shock to trigger a fresh phase in the cost of living crisis before the last one is over.

Fossil fuels account for almost 80% of the UK’s primary energy consumption, and reliance on imports is a risk the government is all too aware of. So far, Rishi Sunak’s answer to the question of Britain’s energy security has been to redouble efforts to exploit North Sea oil and gas reserves.

The prime minister also wants to see billions of pounds invested in renewables, carbon capture and storage, and nuclear. Yet despite promising “long-term decisions for a brighter future” in his Tory party conference speech, nowhere near enough is being done to move to a low-carbon economy fit for an increasingly volatile world.

Rather than accelerate the transition, Sunak has chosen to water down net zero policies in an attempt to build a narrow electoral advantage. This is not only shortsighted, but makes little economic sense.

After the Covid pandemic, leading nations have struggled to cope with successive shocks to the supply side of the economy – not least because of the current energy crisis. All have added to inflationary pressures, fuelling the cost of living emergency.

One shock is the restructuring of global supply chains. After severe disruption in the pandemic, and in an increasingly volatile geopolitical world, businesses are putting more emphasis on resilience over efficiency. Supply chains are being reshored, nearshored and friendshored, with higher costs entailed.

Another disruption is the function of the labour market. Repatriation of workers during the pandemic, and tighter post-Brexit controls on migration in the UK, alongside an ageing population, have cut the supply of workers available to businesses.

However, the energy crisis also presents a serious economic opportunity – from the jobs, growth and future energy security that building a low-carbon economy could bring.

In the US, Joe Biden is aiming to capture this opportunity with the vast Inflation Reduction Act, ploughing billions of dollars into helping the US meet its climate goals, while creating jobs and ultimately bringing down bills for households and businesses.

It’s a plan that EU nations are responding to, and one now forming the cornerstone of Labour’s economic agenda. As free marketeers, the Conservatives are naturally sceptical, yet there is a recognition in the mainstream of economics that state activism and taxpayer funding are vital components in this transition.

“This is a case where governments need to be involved in partnership with the private sector,” says El-Erian. “These are generation-defining transitions the private sector can’t handle on its own.”

Britain has a serious opportunity to revive growth and restore economic security. Given the clear risks in the world economy, there isn’t a moment to lose.