Tuesday, December 17, 2024

SPACE/COSMOS


HEY KIDZ

How does the International Space Station orbit Earth without burning up?


The Conversation
December 17, 2024

International Space Station (Shutterstock)

Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, send it to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com.

How is the International Space Station able to orbit without burning up? – Mateo, age 8, New York, New York


Flying through Earth’s orbit are thousands of satellites and two operational space stations, including the International Space Station, which weighs as much as 77 elephants. The International Space Station, or ISS, hosts scientists and researchers from around the world as they contribute to discoveries in medicine, microbiology, Earth and space science, and more.

One of my first jobs in aerospace engineering was working on the ISS, and the ISS remains one of my favorite aerospace systems. I now work at Georgia Tech, where I teach aerospace engineering.

The ISS travels very quickly around the Earth at 5 miles per second (8 kilometers per second), which means it could fly from Atlanta to London in 14 minutes. But at the same time, small chunks of rock called meteoroids shoot through space and burn up when they hit Earth’s atmosphere. How is it that some objects – such as the International Space Station – orbit the Earth unscathed, while others, such as asteroids, burn up?

The ISS moves quickly while it orbits the Earth.



To answer why the ISS can stay in orbit for decades unscathed, you first need to understand why some things, such as meteoroids, do burn up when they enter our planet’s atmosphere.


Why do meteoroids burn up in the atmosphere?

Meteoroids are small chunks of rock and metal that orbit the Sun. These space rocks can travel between 7 and 25 miles per second (12 to 40 km per second). That’s fast enough to cross the entire United States in about 5 minutes.


Sometimes, the orbit of a meteoroid overlaps with Earth, and the meteoroid enters Earth’s atmosphere – where it burns up and disintegrates.

Even though you can’t see them, the atmosphere is full of a combination of particles, primarily nitrogen and oxygen, which make up the air you breathe. The farther you are from the surface of the Earth, the lower the density of particles in the atmosphere.

The atmosphere has several layers. When something from space enters the Earth’s atmosphere, it must pass through each of these layers before it reaches the ground.


Meteoroids burn up in a part of Earth’s atmosphere called the mesosphere, which is 30 to 50 miles (48 to 80 kilometers) above the ground. Even though the air is thin up there, meteoroids still bump into air particles as they fly through.

When meteoroids zoom through the atmosphere at these very high speeds, they are destroyed by a process that causes them to heat up and break apart. The meteoroid pushes the air particles together, kind of like how a bulldozer pushes dirt. This process creates a lot of pressure and heat. The air particles hit the meteoroid at hypersonic speeds – much faster than the speed of sound – causing atoms to break away and form cracks in the meteroid.

The high pressure and hot air get into the cracks, making the meteoroid break apart and burn up as it falls through the sky. This process is called meteoroid ablation and is what you are actually seeing when you witness a “shooting star.”




The ISS orbits in the thermosphere, about 200 miles (322 km) from Earth. NOAACC BY-ND


Why doesn’t the ISS burn up?


So why doesn’t this happen to the International Space Station?

The ISS does not fly in the mesosphere. Instead, the ISS flies in a higher and much less dense layer of the atmosphere called the thermosphere, which extends from 50 miles (80 km) to 440 miles (708 km) above Earth.

The Kármán line, which is considered the boundary of space, is in the thermosphere, 62 miles (100 kilometers) above the surface of the Earth. The space station flies even higher, at about 250 miles (402 km) above the surface.


The thermosphere has too few particles to transmit heat. At the height of the space station, the atmosphere is so thin that to collect enough particles to equal the mass of just one apple, you would need a box the size of Lake Superior!

As a result, the ISS doesn’t experience the same kind of interactions with atmospheric particles, nor the high pressure and heat that meteoroids traveling closer to Earth do, so it doesn’t burn up.

A high-flying research hub

Although the ISS doesn’t burn up, it does experience large temperature swings. As it orbits Earth, it is alternately exposed to direct sunlight and darkness. Temperatures can reach 250 degrees Fahrenheit (121 degrees Celsius) when it’s exposed to the Sun, and then they can drop to as low as -250 degrees F (-156 degrees Celsius) when it’s in the dark – a swing of 500 degrees F (277 degrees C) as it moves through orbit.

The engineers who designed the station carefully selected materials that can handle these temperature swings. The inside of the space station is kept at comfortable temperatures for the astronauts, the same way people on Earth heat and cool our homes to stay comfortable indoors.

Research on the ISS has led to advancements such as improved water filtration technologies, a better understanding of Earth’s water and energy cyclestechniques to grow food in spaceinsights into black holes, a better understanding of how the human body changes during long-duration space travel, and new studies on a variety of diseases and treatments.

NASA plans to keep the ISS active until 2030, when all of the astronauts will return to Earth and the ISS will be deorbited, or brought down from orbit by a specially designed spacecraft.


As it comes down through Earth’s atmosphere in the deorbiting process, it will enter the mesosphere, where many parts of it will heat up and disintegrate.

Some spacecraft, such as the crew capsules that bring astronauts to and from the ISS, can survive reentry into the atmosphere using their heat shield. That’s a special layer made up of materials that are able to withstand very high temperatures. The ISS wasn’t designed for that, so it doesn’t have a heat shield.

If you’d like to see the space station as it passes over your area, you can check out NASA’s website to find out when it might be visible near you.


Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you’d like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.

And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you’re wondering, too. We won’t be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.

Kelly Griendling, Lecturer of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Boldly brewing where noone has brewed before: Japanese sake to be made in space 

Boldly brewing where noone has brewed before: Japanese sake to be made in space
/ Unsplash - Erik Eastman
By bno - Taipei Office December 17, 2024

Asahi Shuzo Co., renowned for its premium Dassai sake, has unveiled a pioneering plan to brew rice wine on the International Space Station (ISS) in 2025, marking the first step in its audacious vision of brewing on the moon. The Iwakuni-based sake producer, in collaboration with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. and the Aichi Center for Industry and Science Technology, will launch rice, koji mold, and yeast to the ISS next year. This marks a groundbreaking experiment in both the world of brewing and space exploration, as reported by The Asahi Shimbun.

The company’s ambition doesn’t stop at the ISS. Asahi Shuzo's ultimate goal is to establish a sake brewery on the moon, using lunar water to create its signature Dassai sake. "Our ultimate goal is to brew Dassai on the moon using water found there," a spokesperson for the company said, underlining the long-term vision of lunar colonisation.

The project will use Japan's Kibo module on the ISS to initiate the fermentation process. Astronauts will mix the ingredients with water, setting the stage for a unique brewing experience in microgravity. The mixture will then undergo automated stirring and alcohol-level monitoring, before being frozen and returned to Earth. This moromi, or unrefined sake, will be used to create a single 100-millilitre bottle of "Dassai MOON–Space Brew."

This limited-edition bottle, which will carry a price tag of JPY100mn (about $653,000), is expected to capture the public’s imagination. All proceeds will go towards supporting domestic space development projects, reinforcing Japan’s commitment to advancing space technology. Asahi Shuzo believes that sake, due to the lighter weight and lower water content of rice compared to grapes, makes a more viable experiment than winemaking in space.

By venturing beyond Earth's atmosphere, Asahi Shuzo aims to explore new frontiers for brewing while also contributing to the development of space-related technologies. The ambitious project signals a bold future where space exploration and traditional craftsmanship converge, bringing sake brewing to the stars and potentially beyond.

 The Scottish spaceport stuck in limbo


Steven McKenzie
BBC Scotland Highlands and Islands reporter

A site on A'Mhoine Peninsula was selected for a spaceport

A Highland peatbog was to be home to the UK's first spaceport.

But more than six years after a UK government announcement confirming the plan, rockets launching from Sutherland Spaceport seems unlikely any time soon.

Where is the spaceport site?

It is on A'Mhoine Peninsula, a landscape of moorland, peatbogs, grazing pastures, lochs and hills in north west Sutherland.

The 86-acre (35ha) site is owned by Melness Crofters' Estate.

The estate, which covers a total area of 10,000 acres (4,074 ha), is run by crofters.

Crofting is a system of land tenure and farming unique to Scotland.

The nearest homes from the spaceport's boundary are just over two miles (3km) away.

Tongue, a community of about 500 people, is about four miles (6km) away.




Why Sutherland?


The area has been billed as one of the few places in Europe that is sparsely populated and in the right place for launching small rockets vertically into space.

A north facing coast means rockets avoid flying over populated areas - and ideally placed for launching small satellites into commercially-desirable orbits.

The plan for Sutherland was for 12 launches a year and satellites designed for monitoring climate change.

Public agency Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) has been leading the project.

It previously said the spaceport would bring much-needed highly skilled jobs and investment to the Highlands.

The facility was to be developed as part of a wider network of spaceports.

The billionaire opponents

The Holch Povlsens own land in Sutherland and had concerns about the spaceport's environmental impacts

After Conservative business secretary Greg Clark announced a package of support back in July 2018 at Farnborough International Air Show the project hit a number of milestones in the planning process:Scottish Land Court, which hears disputes in crofting and farming, approved a change use of the land in September 2021
Highland Council granted full planning permission in August 2020
Amended plans were given the go-ahead in October this year

But this journey has been far from smooth.

Some crofters objected because of concerns about the spaceport's impact on the environment, local roads and crofting rights.

Billionaire couple Anders and Anne Holch Povlsen, who own land near the site, also objected because of concerns about its impact on the Caithness and Sutherland Peatlands Special Protection Area.

Their opposition even saw them invest almost £1.5m in a rival project - Shetland's SaxaVord Spaceport.

A project in limbo


The news broke at the start of December.

Orbex, one of the major backers of Sutherland Spaceport, announced construction was paused and it was instead focused on launching its first rockets from SaxaVord.

The rocket manufacturer, which employs 150 people at a factory in Forres in Moray, did not rule out completing the Highland site in the future.

But chief executive Phil Chambers said: "Our primary goal is to support the European space industry by achieving a sustainable series of satellite launches into low Earth orbit.

"This is best achieved by focusing our resources and talents on developing launch vehicles and associated launch services.

"This decision will help us to reach first launch in 2025 and provides SaxaVord with another customer to further strengthen its commercial proposition. It's a win-win for UK and Scottish space."

HIE said the decision was an "unexpected change in direction", but added it was important to stress Orbex was a very significant player and employer in the UK space industry.


Orbex


In numbers:

Sutherland Spaceport costs and investment

£17mExpected cost of the facility


£1.9mHIE grants up to November 2024 given to Orbex for costs associated with developing the site


£2mHIE previously invested. UK Space Agency also gave £2.5m and Nuclear Decommissioning Authority £2.6mSource: HIE

What next?


Melness Crofters' Estate (MCE) wants to work with HIE and Orbex to get the spaceport operational.

A spokesperson told BBC Scotland News: "We were never just doing this for Melness.

"We saw this as planting a seed of something from which other opportunities could grow for the wider community in the north.

"There are very few job opportunities for young people in our area."

They added: "Our payments from the rental of our land have already resulted in MCE investing in several other local projects.

"There are plans for 12 affordable houses in planning at the moment."

HIE said the impact of Orbex decision was unclear.

It added: "We want to send a clear message to local people in north Sutherland that we are deeply disappointed at this turn of events and remain committed to working with them to develop a positive future for Melness and the surrounding area."

Shares in Hungary’s 4iG skyrocket amid speculation over SpaceX collaboration

Shares in Hungary’s 4iG skyrocket amid speculation over SpaceX collaboration
Elon Musk (left), Viktor Orban (centre), and Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto (to Orban's left) at Mar-a-Lago.
By Tamas Csonka in Budapest December 11, 2024

Shares of 4iG, a leading Hungarian ICT, rallied 9% on December 10 on speculation that the company could work together with Elon Musk's SpaceX. 

President-elect Donald Trump hosted Prime Minister Viktor Orban and his Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto at his Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago, on December 9. It marked the first meeting between the two leaders since the November elections. The talks were attended by Gellert Jaszai, head of Budapest-listed 4iG and incoming National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and and tycoon Elon Musk.

One of the topics discussed was the launch of 4iG’s HUSAT satellite programme, the first of its kind in the CEE region to develop satellite-based telecommunications and Earth observation capabilities, the Hungarian IT group 4iG said in a statement. This could open a whole new chapter in the field of innovation and cooperation between the US and Hungary, it added.

Under the HUSAT initiative, the 4iG Group plans to deploy and operate one geostationary satellite (HUGEO) and an additional eight (6+2) low-Earth orbit satellites (HULEO) by 2032.

The company will manufacture the low Earth orbit satellites in a 4,000 sqm space technology centre, near Budapest, slated to start operating by 2026. 4iG’s space and defence arm, grouping a dozen companies, focuses on space and satellite development, the manufacturing of drones and anti-drone systems, and defence sector digitalisation.  

"The friendly discussions marked the beginning of efforts to foster the adoption of advanced technologies and bolster transatlantic economic ties,"  Jaszai was quoted as saying in the statement.

The meeting signals Hungary's ambition to position itself as a credible player in the global space industry. This move represents a notable shift from initial scepticism toward Hungary’s space ambitions, which even drew criticism from within Orban’s own political circles. Over time, however, increased investment and strategic focus from both the Hungarian government and 4iG have turned these efforts into a serious undertaking, Telex.hu writes.

At a joint press conference with his Georgian counterpart, Szijjarto said Hungarian-American political relations are set to enter a "golden age" with the election of Donald Trump.

 

University of Texas at San Antonio launches new center to propel space technology


The Center for Space Technology and Operations Research (CSTOR) is poised to leverage UTSA expertise to strengthen national security and Texas leadership in the emerging trillion-dollar cislunar economy. 




University of Texas at San Antonio

UTSA- Center for Space Technology and Operations Research 

image: 

The Center for Space Technology and Operations Research (CSTOR) is poised to leverage UTSA expertise to strengthen national security and Texas leadership in the emerging trillion-dollar cislunar economy. 

view more 

Credit: The University of Texas at San Antonio



UTSA’s Office of Research today announced the launch of the Center for Space Technology and Operations Research (CSTOR), a new research center dedicated to advancing engineering, technology and operations that will support space missions between the Earth and the Moon, an area referred to as cislunar space, as well as the lunar surface. The center will address the growing demand for research and workforce development by civil, commercial and national security space agencies and companies. David Silva, UTSA distinguished professor of physics and astronomy, will serve as the center’s inaugural director.

CSTOR will provide enhanced support to the more than 35 UTSA researchers and over 200 students working on space technology related research and career development in areas such as uncrewed spacecraft, lunar habitation, hypersonics and propulsion. It will further augment the university’s effort to attract even more of the nation’s brightest minds in space technology through UTSA's clustered and connected faculty hiring plan, supported by the UT System Board of Regents’ Research Excellence Program.

“UTSA has intentionally expanded its capacity, facilities and expertise in space technology to meet the rapidly growing demand for innovation and enable stronger comprehensive partnerships with key organizations like Southwest Research Institute and Department of Energy National Labs,” said UTSA President Taylor Eighmy. “The launch of this new center positions UTSA as a destination for innovation, knowledge creation and talent development for the space economy.”

Technology and workforce development for the space economy is a growing priority in federal and state policy. In 2022, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy released a strategy outlining its approach to cislunar space, titled the National Cislunar Science and Technology (S&T) Strategy. The plan affirms the growing role of cislunar space in diplomacy and national security and aims to bolster support for research and development in the field. At the state level, the Texas Space Commission was established in 2024 to sustain and grow Texas’ leadership in space exploration.

“We may not always think about space technology as being integral to national security,” Silva said, “but when you consider the fact that our daily lives rely on satellites for GPS services, telecommunications and weather forecasting, it's clear that cislunar space is a linchpin in our national defense. Our new center is poised to leverage UTSA expertise to strengthen national security and Texas leadership in the emerging trillion-dollar cislunar economy.”

Satellites can also be used in agriculture, logistics and energy to monitor crops, traffic patterns and energy grids. They can optimize supply chains and strengthen maritime security by monitoring ports. They also provide key insight into the environment, for instance by monitoring freshwater availability providing early warnings of natural disasters such as floods and wildfires.

Space infrastructure represents a rapidly growing market in the global economy. A 2022 McKinsey & Company report projects that the industry will grow from $630 billion in 2023 to $1.8 trillion by 2035. This growth will be catalyzed by the rapidly increasing cost-effectiveness of launch, which has been enabled by companies based or operating in Texas such as Blue Origins, Firefly and SpaceX. This expansion will likely spur corresponding growth in the job market, with U.S. aerospace engineering jobs expected to increase by 6% between 2023 and 2033.

CSTOR will support a range of technological space research focus areas in which UTSA excels, including advanced chemical propulsion, fuel for nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP), lunar habitation and surface operations, secure satellite communications and vehicle atmospheric reentry. UTSA is also home to space-related expertise in advanced manufacturing, cybersecurity, energy storage in extreme environments, neuromorphic AI, power systems, robotics, and semiconductor devices for high-power, extreme environment applications.

UTSA’s space technology capabilities are further supported by several research centers and facilities. These include the Hypersonics Lab, the Center for Advanced Measurements in Extreme Environments, the Kleberg Advanced Microscopy Center, the Planetary Material CHaractErization Facility (PMCHEF), the Laser Spectroscopy and Chemical Propulsion Lab, the Wireless Next Generation Systems Laboratory, the Heat and Mass Transfer Experimental Rheology Lab, the Extreme Environments Materials Laboratory, the Laboratory of Turbulence, Sensing, & Intelligence Systems, the Next Generation Networks Laboratory (NGNL) and the Unmanned Systems Lab.

CSTOR will collaborate closely with the National Security Collaboration Center to promote research aimed at advancing and securing these and other critical systems, as well as UTSA’s other existing centers, including the Cybersecurity Manufacturing Innovation Institute, the Center for Infrastructure Assurance and Security, the Institute for Cyber Security, the Cyber Center for Security and Analytics, as well as the NSF CREST Center for Security and Privacy Enhanced Cloud Computing.

Abortion suit against doc came from boyfriend with 'your body, my choice' vendetta: expert

Sarah K. Burris
December 16, 2024
RAW STORY







A legal expert gave an eyebrow-raising opinion on a controversial effort in Texas, where the state's far-right attorney general last week sued a New York doctor for prescribing abortion pills to a woman in suburban Dallas.

MSNBC legal correspondent Lisa Rubin shared a startling update to the lawsuit from Ken Paxton against an abortion provider after a woman lost her pregnancy.

Rubin wrote on X that the suit came from the boyfriend, who was assumed to be the father of the "unborn," and said he believed the woman did something that led to the loss of the pregnancy.

"As we discussed on @Morning_Joe today, part of what's so chilling about Ken Paxton's lawsuit against a New York OB/GYN is how it likely came to be: through a patient's boyfriend with an apparent 'your body, my choice' vendetta," wrote Rubin.

ALSO READ: How Republicans paved the road to Texas with misogyny

Jessica Valenti, who follows laws around reproductive freedom, posted a screen capture of the lawsuit from Paxton, which explains that the angry boyfriend found medications from a New York doctor.


"If you read Paxton's brief, it's clear that the patient's boyfriend is the protagonist - it's all about him," Valenti wrote on X. "This is what happened when a doc mentioned that the patient had lost a pregnancy (she hadn't told her boyfriend)."

The suit reads: "The biological father of the unborn, upon learning this information, concluded that the biological mother of the unborn child had intentionally withheld information from him regarding her pregnancy, and he further suspected that the biological mother had, in fact, done something to contribute to the miscarriage or abortion of the unborn child. The biological father, upon returning to the residence in Collin County, discovered the two above-referenced medications from Carpenter."

Valenti wrote that the man's immediate reaction to the news was to be "angry and suspicious - and head to her place to look for evidence of an abortion."

She referred to him as an example of "aggrieved men."

"All of which is to say: Texas Republicans want this to look like a case where they're protecting women from dangerous abortion pills and irresponsible doctors. But scratch at the surface even a little, and you can see that it's plain old controlling misogyny," said Valenti.

She predicted similar lawsuits would likely surface over the next few years. It's critical, she argued, to ensure careful investigation before reporting something like a woman having "abortion complications" when the reality is something entirely different.


Valenti wrote a report on the way Texas concealed abortion data last year. In the Texas abortion ban, there are 28 medical issues the state considers to be "abortion complications." However, medically, they have nothing to do with abortions. Regardless, Texas requires doctors to input false information so the state can inaccurately claim "any woman who develops one of these issues" is because she had an abortion earlier in life.

For example, if a woman died as a result of ectopic pregnancy and she had an abortion 10 years before that, Texas would deem that "abortion complications."

"Some, like 'adverse reactions to anesthesia,' are risks associated with having any medical procedure," wrote Valeti.

In Texas, this would be categorized as "abortion complications." Another is a "hemolytic reaction resulting from the administration of ABO-incompatible blood or blood products." If a woman dies as a result of being given the wrong blood type, it would also be deemed "abortion complications."




Why does red wine cause headaches? Our research points to a compound found in the grapes’

WORD OF THE DAY; ENOLOGY


The Conversation
December 17, 2024 


Pouring glass of red wine (Shutterstock)


Medical accounts of red wine headaches go back to Roman times, but the experience is likely as old as winemaking – something like 10,000 years. As chemists specializing in winemaking, we wanted to try to figure out the source of these headaches.

Many components of red wine have been accused of causing this misery – sulfites, biogenic amines and tannin are the most popular. Our research suggests the most likely culprit is one you may not have considered.

The common suspects


Sulfites have been a popular scapegoat for all sorts of ailments since it became mandatory in the 1990s to label them on wines in the U.S. However, not much evidence links sulfites directly to headaches, and other foods contain comparable levels to wine without the same effects. White wines also contain the same amount of sulfites as red wines.

Your body also produces about 700 milligrams of sulfites daily as you metabolize the protein in your food and excrete it as sulfate. To do so, it has compounds called sulfite oxidases that create sulfate from sulfite – the 20 milligrams in a glass of wine are unlikely to overwhelm your sulfite oxidases.

Some people point the finger for red wine headaches at biogenic amines. These are nitrogenous substances found in many fermented or spoiled foods, and can cause headaches, but the amount in wine is far too low to be a problem.

Tannin is a good guess, since white wines contain only tiny amounts, while red wines contain substantial amounts. Tannin is a type of phenolic compound – it’s found in all plants and usually plays a role in preventing disease, resisting predation or encouraging seed dispersal by animals.

But there are many other phenolic compounds in grapes’ skin and seeds besides tannin that make it into red wines from the winemaking process, and are not present in white, so any of them could be a candidate culprit.

Tannin is also found in many other common products, such as tea and chocolate, which generally don’t cause headaches. And phenolics are good antioxidants – they’re unlikely to trigger the inflammation that would cause a headache.

A red wine flush

Some people get red, flushed skin when drinking alcohol, and the flushing is accompanied by a headache. This headache is caused by a lagging metabolic step as the body breaks down the booze.

The metabolism of alcohol happens in two steps. First, ethanol is converted to acetaldehyde. Then, the enzyme ALDH converts the acetaldehyde to acetate, a common and innocuous substance. This second step is slower for people who get flushed skin, since their ALDH is not very efficient. They accumulate acetaldehyde, which is a somewhat toxic compound also linked to hangovers.




Leftover acetaldehyde not converted into acetate can cause hangover symptoms. Compound Chemistry, CC BY-NC-ND

So, if something unique in red wine could inhibit ALDH, slowing down that second metabolic step, would that lead to higher levels of acetaldehyde and a headache? To try to answer this question, we scanned the list of phenolics abundant in red wine.


We spied a paper showing that quercetin is a good inhibitor of ALDH. Quercetin is a phenolic compound found in the skins of grapes, so it’s much more abundant in red than white wines because red grape skins are left in longer during the fermentation process than white grape skins.
Putting enzymes to the test

Testing ALDH was the next step. We set up an inhibition assay in test tubes. In the assay, we measured how fast the enzyme ALDH breaks down acetaldehyde. Then, we added the suspected inhibitors – quercetin, as well as some other phenolics we wanted to test – to see whether they slowed the process.




The chemical structure of quercetin, which may cause red wine headaches. Johannes Botne, CC BY-SA

These tests confirmed that quercetin was a good inhibitor. Some other phenolics had varying effects, but quercetin glucuronide was the winner. When your body absorbs quercetin from food or wine, most is converted to glucuronide by the liver in order to quickly eliminate it from the body.

Our enzyme tests suggest that quercetin glucuronide disrupts your body’s metabolism of alcohol. This disruption means extra acetaldehyde circulates, causing inflammation and headaches. This discovery points to what’s known as a secondary, or synergistic, effect.

These secondary effects are much harder to identify because two factors must both be in play for the outcome to arise. In this case, other foods that contain quercetin are not associated with headaches, so you might not initially consider quercetin as the cause of the red wine problem.

The next step could be to give human subjects two red wines that are low and high in quercetin and ask whether either wine causes a headache. If the high-quercetin wine induces more headaches, we’d know we’re on the right track.

So, if quercetin causes headaches, are there red wines without it? Unfortunately, the data available on specific wines is far too limited to provide any helpful advice. However, grapes exposed to the Sun do produce more quercetin, and many inexpensive red wines are made from grapes that see less sunlight.

If you’re willing to take a chance, look for an inexpensive, lighter red wine.

Andrew Waterhouse, Professor of Enology, University of California, Davis and Apramita Devi, Postdoctoral researcher in food science and technology, University of California, Davis

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
'Tried My Best,' AOC Says After Losing Bid for Top Oversight Role

"Sorry I couldn't pull it through everyone—we live to fight another day," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote on social media following the vote.


Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) attends a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol on November 19, 2024.
(Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)


Jake Johnson
Dec 17, 2024
COMMON DREAMS

Update:

The House Democratic caucus on Tuesday chose Rep. Gerry Connolly over Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for the ranking spot on the House Oversight Committee in the upcoming Congress.

The result of the secret-ballot vote, according toAxios, was 84 for Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and 131 for Connolly (D-Va.).

"Tried my best," the New York progressive wrote on social media following the vote. "Sorry I couldn't pull it through everyone—we live to fight another day."

In a statement, Connolly thanked his colleagues "for their support and the confidence they've placed in me to lead House Democrats on the Oversight Committee," which will be under GOP control through at least 2026.

"We know what the Republican playbook will be. We have seen it before," said Connolly. "They have demonstrated that they are willing to traffic in debunked conspiracy theories and enable the worst abuses of the Trump administration. This will be trench warfare. Now is not the time to be timid."

"I promise the American people that our committee Democrats will be a beacon of truth and prepared from Day One to counter Republican gaslighting," he added. "We will be disciplined. We will be laser-focused on getting results on the kitchen table issues that affect the American people the most. We will stand up for our democracy and for truth. And we will protect the tremendous and historic progress we have made as House Democrats."


Earlier:


Rep. Gerry Connolly narrowly bested Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in a secret-ballot vote Monday for the ranking spot on the House Oversight Committee in the upcoming Congress—but the New York progressive still has a shot to secure the role in a full Democratic caucus vote on Tuesday.

Connolly's (D-Va.) bid for the top Democratic slot on the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability—which could play a central role in investigating the incoming Trump administration in the coming years—is backed by former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who has frequently clashed with Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and other progressives on policy.

The House Democratic Steering and Policy Committee voted 34-27 behind closed doors on Monday to recommend Connolly over Ocasio-Cortez for the oversight role. While full caucus votes "typically align with the steering panel's recommendations," Politiconoted, "two Democratic allies of Ocasio-Cortez... predicted the full caucus, composed of younger members who might be more likely to favor the 35-year old liberal compared to the steering panel, could sway in favor of the progressive New Yorker."

"Members said Connolly attracted staunch support from centrist Democrats after spending the last several weeks campaigning with key members," Politico reported. "He moved to lock down critical bases of support like the centrist New Democrat Coalition."

Ocasio-Cortez, for her part, is backed by the roughly 100-member Congressional Progressive Caucus as well as the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. The New York progressive also secured the backing of a majority of members on the House Oversight Committee, which is set to be controlled by Republicans through at least 2026.

Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) wrote on social media late Monday that "many" in the House Democratic caucus, including himself, will back Ocasio-Cortez in Tuesday's vote.

"AOC is objectively a more skilled communicator and narrative shaper than just about anyone in her party, and certainly more than Connolly."

Following Monday's steering panel vote, Ocasio-Cortez told reporters that she is "locked in" and "working hard."

"We are still in this," she wrote on social media. "This is the difficult business of hope and defying expectation. We do not give up. We run through the tape."

In private, Ocasio-Cortez—who won her seat in Congress by toppling a high-ranking Democrat—has "signaled" to her colleagues that she "might no longer back congressional primary challenges" against them, according toPolitico, which cited three unnamed people familiar with her remarks.

The race between Connolly and Ocasio-Cortez is widely seen as a proxy fight between the younger, more progressive faction of the Democratic Party and the old guard, which appears bent on maintaining control. In recent days, Pelosi has reportedly been "actively working to tank" Ocasio-Cortez's chances of winning the oversight spot by making calls in support of Connolly.

Slate's Alexander Sammon wrote in a column Tuesday that "it's a bad move" for Pelosi and other leading establishment Democrats to back Connolly over Ocasio-Cortez, "one of the best-known progressives in the country" and also "one of the best-known Democrats period."

"With Trump in office, the role of Oversight will be extremely important, especially for a party that is begging voters to believe that they are well positioned to tackle corruption," Sammon wrote. "AOC is objectively a more skilled communicator and narrative shaper than just about anyone in her party, and certainly more than Connolly. Her ability as an explainer is top-notch, and her penchant for conveying outrage and injustice is sorely lacking in the party's upper echelons."

"Pelosi's penchant for backroom sabotage was easy to cheer when she was pushing fellow octogenarian and likely loser Joe Biden out of the presidential race; it's harder to justify when an eminently qualified rising star—who, whether Pelosi likes it personally or not, is widely known to be a cornerstone of the party's future—pushes for a simple promotion," Sammon added.

AOC handed bruising defeat in fight to become top Dem on House committee

Sarah K. Burris
December 17, 2024 
RAW STORY

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). (Shutterstock)

Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-MD) will become the top Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Reform after beating a challenge from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).

The vote, according to Punch Bowl News, was 131-84.

Reporter and Punch Bowl co-founder John Bresnahan noted that Ocasio-Cortez was "gracious" in her defeat, hugging Connolly after the loss.

If Democrats take power back at the 2026 midterm elections, the oversight committee could be critical in investigating Donald Trump's administration.



'Backroom sabotage': Nancy Pelosi accused of hijacking AOC over festering feud

Matthew Chapman
December 17, 2024 8:49AM ET
RAW STORY

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) is facing likely defeat in her candidacy to lead the Democratic minority on the House Oversight Committee, after previously building momentum for the role — because Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has been working behind the scenes to thwart it.

This "backroom sabotage" is not a healthy development for Democrats, wrote Alexander Sammon for Slate — and it's a reflection not of legitimate debate over who is best to lead the committee, but a yearslong vendetta Pelosi is unable to let go of, and a reluctance to truly pass the torch to a new generation of leaders.

Pelosi "now appears to be score-settling over a feud with Ocasio-Cortez that is six years old," she wrote.

"After November’s drubbing, House Democrats signaled that they were prepared to accept a changing of the guard atop some of the important House committees," wrote Sammon, including Reps. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Raul Grijalva (D-AZ) stepping aside for relatively younger leaders.

But when Ocasio-Cortez stepped up for Oversight, and began to attract support, things changed.

"Not one to let a young person ascend quietly, Nancy Pelosi entered the fray," wrote Sammon. "The patron saint of Democratic gerontocracy, 84-year-old Nancy Pelosi is supposedly retired from leadership, but this month, she actively threw her weight behind 74-year-old Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly, who was just diagnosed with throat cancer. Now, Pelosi is whipping votes for Connolly, whose potential promotion would cap off this 'changing of the guard' by replacing a 61-year-old with a guy in his mid-70s. And because Pelosi suffered a fall in Germany and had to have her hip replaced, she’s essentially whipping votes from a hospital bed."

Ocasio-Cortez's outspoken progressive record has made some more centrist lawmakers uneasy, Sammon noted, but she is arguably perfect for this role: "During a second Trump presidency, Oversight will be one of the most important bully pulpits to expose and interrogate the incoming administration’s flagrant corruption," and AOC, who already serves on Oversight, has repeatedly gone viral demolishing Trump allies in that committee. "Her ability as an explainer is top-notch, and her penchant for conveying outrage and injustice is sorely lacking in the party’s upper echelons."

Connolly has extensive experience on the committee, said Sammon, with "a positive reputation for his work beating back Republican witch hunts during the Barack Obama years" — but "it’s pretty obvious which one of these representatives has a bigger megaphone to explain what’s going on. Ocasio-Cortez has 8.1 million followers. Connolly has 4,600."

Pelosi, Sammon noted, was instrumental in building the consensus to force President Joe Biden out of running for a second term — but those same tactics are "harder to justify when an eminently qualified rising star — who, whether Pelosi likes it personally or not, is widely known to be a cornerstone of the party’s future — pushes for a simple promotion."

GERONTOCRACY

'Breathtakingly counter-productive': Writer says Pelosi's victory over AOC cost Dem party

Daniel Hampton
December 17, 2024 
RAW STORY

House Speaker Emirata Nancy Pelosi. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) secured a victory on Tuesday at the cost of the Democratic Party, according to a writer at The New Republic.

Pelosi, 84, reportedly helped nix Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's (R-NY) bid to become ranking member on the House Oversight Committee.

Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-VA), 74, who revealed a throat cancer diagnosis last month, defeated Ocasio-Cortez in a closed-door vote.

New Republic writer Kate Aronoff noted that Connolly joins other Democrats in their 70s and 80s set to take up committee leadership positions next year: Richard Neal (D-MA), 75; Frank Pallone (D-NJ), 73; Maxine Waters (D-CA), 86; and Rose DeLauro (D-CT), 81.

"The elderly are not too old to govern. But they may, in this case, be too attached to a failed way of doing things," wrote Aronoff.

ALSO READ: New Trump foreign affairs pick has history of forging ties with right-wing authoritarians


She noted that the Oversight Committee's purpose is to ensure the government and its agencies run efficiently and effectively. Connolly is set to take up the leading Democratic position despite accepting more than $118,000 from political action committees, or PACs, tied to the bloated defense industry.

Similarly, Neal received hundreds of thousands of dollars from insurance industry PACs, HMOs and pharmaceutical companies, this cycle, and will take a leadership position on the House's top tax-writing committee that oversees revenue-related aspects of Social Security and Medicare.

"In other democracies, the leadership of parties that have endured humiliating defeats like the one Democrats saw in November—or even just regular defeats—resign," she argued. "That kicks off a process by which members determine a new, ideally more successful direction, represented by different people."


But America's Democratic Party isn't like other countries' parties where members and constituencies have some control over how it operates.

"Members mostly make decisions based on their own interests rather than to drive some shared, democratically-decided agenda forward," said Aronoff.

She said that facet partly contributes to "what’s so depressing about the Oversight Committee ordeal."


"Pelosi and the old guard’s continued opposition to younger talent seems breathtakingly counter-productive in the face of the Democratic party’s numerous challenges right now," said Aronoff
Free Speech Coalition Vows to Defend Nonprofits From 'Unprecedented' Threat



"Presenting a strong and united front against political and ideological censorship is the only way to protect Americans' right to stand up for what they believe in under the First Amendment," said a spokesperson for Americans Against Government Censorship.


Jake Johnson
Dec 17, 2024
COMMON DREAMS


An alliance of labor unions and advocacy groups launched a new coalition on Tuesday aimed at defending nonprofit organizations from "unprecedented government attacks on free speech," a move that comes amid a Republican-led effort to empower the incoming Trump administration to shutter dissenting organizations.

Americans Against Government Censorship—whose founding members include the AFL-CIO, Oxfam America, Service Employees International Union, and Indivisible—said it was founded to combat the threat posed by bills such as H.R. 9495, which would allow the U.S. Treasury Department to unilaterally strip nonprofits of their tax-exempt status if they're deemed supporters of terrorism.

The legislation, which the ACLU said provides merely an "illusion of due process" for accused groups, represents a potentially existential threat to human rights organizations, news outlets, government watchdogs, and other nonprofits that could be key to uncovering and fighting abuses by the incoming administration.

"This sweeping authority could be weaponized against any tax-exempt organization across the ideological spectrum, depending on which party is in power at a given moment," Caitlin Legacki, a spokesperson for the new coalition, said in a statement. "Presenting a strong and united front against political and ideological censorship is the only way to protect Americans' right to stand up for what they believe in under the First Amendment."

"Any trade union, church, philanthropic, nonprofit media outlet or social welfare organization could become a target if they fall out of favor with the current administration."


The coalition was launched weeks after the U.S. House passed H.R. 9495, with 15 Democrats joining nearly every Republican to push the legislation through the lower chamber.

It appears unlikely that the bill will get a vote in the Senate before the new Congress is sworn in next month, but Republicans could revive the measure once they take control of both chambers and the White House.

On its website, Americans Against Government Censorship warns that "increasingly aggressive activists have been very clear about their intent to use the full force of the federal government to target their enemies and hinder the ability of any opposition to slow or stop their policy agenda—including new efforts to target and weaponize tax status through the IRS."

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) is among the Republicans pushing the IRS to revoke the tax-exempt status of a number of nonprofit groups that support Palestinian rights, including Jewish Voice for Peace and American Muslims for Palestine.




Americans Against Government Censorship emphasized that the powers included in bills such as H.R. 9495 "could be weaponized by any administration against any tax-exempt organization across the ideological spectrum."

"Any trade union, church, philanthropic, nonprofit media outlet or social welfare organization could become a target if they fall out of favor with the current administration," the coalition said. "At any time, this agenda would allow a sitting president—Democratic or Republican—to use their power to punish ideological opponents without fundamental due process."

Newsmax guest rips Trump for 'seeking attention' with 'frivolous' lawsuit against pollster

David Edwards
December 17, 2024 
RAW STORY

Newsmax/screen grab

President-elect Donald Trump was desperately "seeking attention" when he filed a "frivolous" lawsuit against a pollster who showed him losing Iowa this year, an attorney told a conservative news network Tuesday.

In an interview on Newsmax, host Katrina Szish asked lawyer Chandelle Summer to comment after Trump sued pollster Ann Selzer and The Des Moines Register.

"I don't believe there is a case there, Katrina," Summer argued. "I think this is, quite frankly, a frivolous lawsuit filed by Trump seeking attention."

"I think this particular poll hurt him badly at the time, because it was so widely published," she continued. "And there are no damages, because he won the state. He exceeded the poll numbers."

"And I just don't think you can sue for false advertising, which is what this case is."

While announcing the lawsuit on Monday, Trump accused the newspaper of "election interference."

"I'm doing this because I feel I have an obligation to. I'm going to be bringing one against the people in Iowa, their newspaper, which had a very, very good pollster who got me right all the time, and then just before the election, she said I was going to lose by 3 or 4 points," the president-elect complained.

Watch the video below from Newsmax or at this link.




'Open season': Experts slam Trump’s 'disgusting' lawsuit against Iowa newspaper and pollster


Donald J. Trump speaks with members of the press along the South Lawn driveway of the White House Friday, Feb. 28, 2020, prior to boarding Marine One to begin his trip to South Carolina. (Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian)
December 17, 2024
ALTERNET

On Tuesday, President-elect Donald Trump announced multiple lawsuits against media organizations, including one against the Des Moines Register and now-retired pollster Ann Selzer.

As Puck News' Tara Palmeri reported Monday night, the incoming president is arguing that Selzer's late October poll that incorrectly predicted Vice President Kamala Harris would eke out a narrow victory over Trump in the Hawkeye State amounted to election interference. Trump's lawyers are basing their argument on what Palmeri called an "extremely aggressive" interpretation of a consumer fraud law in Iowa that penalizes businesses from making misrepresentations to customers.

Trump is also suing the Pulitzer Prize board over its awards to New York Times and Washington Post journalists who reported on Trump-Russia developments during his first administration, and is continuing to seek $10 billion in damages from CBS News over its editing of 60 Minutes reporter Bill Whitaker's interview with Harris during the campaign cycle.

READ MORE: 'We're going to go after the people in the media': Trump ally calls for prosecuting journalists

"As with Trump’s other recent and ongoing lawsuits against media organizations, the objective isn’t to win but rather to intimidate," Palmeri wrote. "Already, nervousness is spreading in the industry, with media companies preparing for litigation targeting journalists, including for charges like defamation or even violations of the Espionage Act."

News of the lawsuit prompted calls from various journalists, activists, commentators and legal experts on Bluesky. Writer and activist Amy Siskind referenced ABC News' recent decision to settle Trump's defamation lawsuit over anchor George Stephanopoulos' on-air assertion that Trump was found liable for "rape" rather than "sexual abuse" (even though Judge Lewis F. Kaplan stated that "sexual abuse" was essentially the same thing) as "emboldening" Trump to further go after his enemies in the media. She opined that the new lawsuit against the Register and Selzer in the wake of ABC News' settlement was "disgusting."

Former federal prosecutor Harry Litman warned that the lawsuit meant it was "open season" on journalists. In a post to his Substack newsletter, Litman warned that Trump had already "shifted the balance of power between the media and the presidency before even taking office."

"This is a significant and deeply troubling development, especially as Trump continues to erode other democratic norms that make it all the more important that the media perform its traditional function of reporting the facts and pushing back against abuses of power," Litman wrote.

READ MORE: Trump calls for 'dishonest' ABC News to lose license following debate fact-check

Lawyer Adam Cohen posited that Trump's lawsuit wasn't just a salvo against the Register, but also against its parent company, Gannett, which owns USA TODAY and hundreds of affiliated newspapers. He added that Gannett's decision to not endorse a candidate in the 2024 race amounted to "obeying in advance," and wryly observed that it "didn't even help them" in the long run.

Jeff Jarvis, a journalism professor emeritus at City University of New York, posted to Bluesky that Trump's actions in the wake of the ABC News settlement should serve as a warning to media outlets across the United States as Trump prepares to enter the White House for a second term next month.

"If you act as his stenographer, #BrokenNews, and if you accede to his pressure, you are complicit in his totalitarianism," Jarvis wrote. "It begins."

"This is not a joke," journalist and author Keith Boykin skeeted (the term for posts on Bluesky). "He’s trying to intimidate the press with lawfare and threats of retaliation if they say or do anything he dislikes. Do not capitulate to his threats. Fight back."

'Chilling effect': ABC News employees condemn network‘s 'surrender' to Trump


George Stephanopoulos image via ABC Screengrab



December 17, 2024
ALTERNET


Earlier this week, ABC News announced it was settling a defamation lawsuit filed by President-elect Donald Trump by writing him a $15 million check for his future presidential library (and another $1 million for legal fees).

Trump's lawsuit, which was filed earlier this year, accused the network of defamation after anchor George Stephanopoulos said on the air that Trump was found liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll, rather than for the actual verdict rendered by the jury of sexual abuse. Judge Lewis F. Kaplan maintained that while rape and sexual abuse were different terms, they were essentially the same thing as the public understands them.



But following the settlement, Rolling Stone's Asawin Suebsaeng and Nikki McCann Ramirez reported that several unnamed ABC News journalists are angry at their employer for rolling over for Trump without putting up a fight. Several anonymous sources confided to Rolling Stone that they feared the settlement would have a "chilling effect" on journalism as a whole.

READ MORE: Trump slammed for 'completely wacko' suit against ABC News and George Stephanopoulos

“It is frightening,” one ABC reporter set to cover the incoming Trump administration said. “My fear is this sets a tone for the next four years and that the tone is: Do not upset the president... That’s not our job. I’m not the only person here who saw this as a big win for Donald Trump and a surrender [by ABC].”

Rolling Stone further reported that executives at the network were motivated to make the problem "go away" as quickly as possible. But the settlement may have emboldened Trump to pursue additional litigation against other news outlets: On Monday, Trump filed a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register and pollster J. Ann Selzer, arguing that a poll published in the final days of the election predicting Vice President Kamala Harris would win the state by three points was "election interference" (the poll proved to be an outlier as Trump won Iowa by double digits).

In her Substack newsletter The Present Age, journalist Parker Molloy cited former Buffalo News editor Margaret Sullivan's warning to all news outlets to never settle defamation cases. According to Sullivan, "settling would only encourage more people to sue," which invites more bullying of the news media by the rich and powerful.

"Sullivan cites historian Timothy Snyder's crucial insight about resisting autocracy: 'Do not obey in advance.' When institutions preemptively submit to potential autocrats, they teach those autocrats what they can get away with," Molloy wrote. "ABC News just gave Trump a blueprint for how to bend media organizations to his will."

READ MORE: 'Open season': Experts slam Trump's 'disgusting' lawsuit against Iowa newspaper and pollster

Click here to read Rolling Stone's report in full.

Billionaire newspaper owner slaps major new restrictions on anti-Trump editorials: report

Brad Reed
December 17, 2024 
RAW STORY

Patrick Soon-Shiong. Photo by NHS Confederation/Creative Commons.

Patrick Soon-Shiong, the billionaire owner of the Los Angeles Times, has reportedly implemented even more stringent rules against running editorials criticizing President-elect Donald Trump.

An internal memo signed by LA Times opinion page staffers and obtained by journalist Oliver Darcy claims that Soon-Shiong has barred op-eds that are critical of Trump unless the paper runs a separate editorial that gives the "opposite view" of the president's rhetoric and actions.

The staffers who signed the memo expressed concern that this policy could violate the paper's own ethics policy and damage the newspaper's reputation.

“We understand that Dr. Soon-Shiong has a role in shaping the tone and direction of the editorial board and Opinion section, but we are still bound by the core values and ethics of journalism, including a duty to be transparent and act in service of the public,” the memo said. “We believe we have an obligation to report these under the ethics policy, which states that ‘the primary goal always should be to protect The Times’ integrity.’”

This is not the first time that Soon-Shiong has meddled in the newspaper's editorial process, as he axed the LA Times' endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris shortly before the 2024 election.

These policies have also led to some high-profile resignations from the paper's editorial board.