Friday, January 03, 2025

Moldovans Facing Gas Shortages Are Chopping Wood To Get Through Winter


January 03, 2025 
By RFE/RL's Moldovan Service,
Eugenia Apostu and Will Tizard

Some Moldovans are scrambling to find ways to heat their homes days after gas supplies from Russia were abruptly stopped. As of January 1, Ukraine refused to transit Russian gas, leaving the breakaway Transdniester region and some nearby Moldovan villages cut off. RFE/RL spoke to locals who are now firing up wood stoves, burning biomass, and hoarding gas cylinders.

Algeria and Russia seek to mend ties after tensions over 'Wagner attacks'

At the heart of Algeria's concerns lies the presence of Russian paramilitary Wagner Group in Libya and Mali—which orchestrated attacks near its border.


Basma El Atti
Rabat
03 January, 2025
THE NEW ARAB

On the Ukraine front, Algiers voted at the UN to condemn Russia's
 invasion, angering Moscow. [Getty]

Algeria and Russia, long-time allies, are scrambling to patch up ties after months of tension over the Sahel, Libya, and military presence in North Africa.

Vyacheslav Volodin, Speaker of Russia's State Duma, is scheduled to visit Algiers in the coming weeks, marking his second trip to the North African nation in six months, reported local media.

The visit comes after Wagner Group airstrikes near Algeria's southern border with Mali in April, which prompted Algeria to ask for the UN intervention.

Last month, the Algeria-Russia Friendship Parliamentary Group met in Algiers to discuss strengthening relations. "Our interests in Sudan, Syria, and energy overlap, but we need clearer dialogue," said Abdelsalam Bachagha.

This diplomatic push follows months of tensions, fuelled by Russia's military footprint in North Africa.


At the heart of Algeria's concerns lies the Wagner Group. Russia's paramilitary forces have become entrenched in Mali after French troops were ousted in 2022.

Last February, Algeria's permanent representative to the UN, called for international accountability for the parties responsible for a deadly a drone attack that struck civilians in the Tinzaouatene region of Mali, just meters from the Mali-Algeria border.

It was reportedly orchestrated by Malian army and Wagner Group against Tuareg "terrorists."

The Tuareg are an ethnic group who have been fighting for independence since 2012.

Algeria has been vocal in opposing Moscow's attempts to brand Tuareg political movements as "terrorists" warning that further military action in Mali would only destabilise the region.

"We told our Russian friends that we will not accept the rebranding of Tuareg political movements as terrorist groups to justify further military action in northern Mali," Foreign Minister Ahmed Attaf told state media.

"Military solutions have always failed," added Attaf stating his country's expertise in the Sahel.

The North African state is also worried about the escalating situation in Libya, its eastern neighbour—another country where Wagner is reportedly active.

Moscow is backing Libyan warlord Khalifa Haftar, whose forces have targeted Algerian border crossings.

The Wagner Group has had a foothold in Libya since 2018.


Miloud Ould Essedik, a political analyst, suggests the tensions go deeper. "In addition to supporting Tuareg, Algeria's role in supplying natural gas to Europe amid the Ukraine war has irked Moscow," he said.

Historical accords and discord between Algeria and Russia

Algeria and Russia's cooperation dates back to the Soviet era, when the USSR supported Algeria's independence movement and became a major arms supplier. In 2001, they signed a "Strategic Partnership Agreement," Russia's first of its kind in the region.

However, cooperation has not been without its challenges. Competition over gas exports to Europe has created friction, and Algeria's refusal to join a Russia-led gas cartel proves that the North African state wanted to maintain its own autonomy instead of committing to one camp.

The Algerian "neutrality" diplomacy has often clashed with Russia's.

In Libya, the two countries are on opposing sides: Russia backs Haftar, while Algeria supports the UN-backed government in Tripoli. On the Ukraine front, Algiers voted at the UN to condemn Russia's invasion, angering Moscow.

Despite this, Algiers has remained resolute in its support for Russia, resisting Western pressure to isolate Moscow.

Meanwhile, arms trade and defence collaboration continue to serve as the cornerstone of their bilateral relations.

The two countries are set to sign a proposed $12-$17 billion arms deal, including advanced fighters, submarines, and air defence systems, according to local media.

Despite these frictions, both sides seem determined to repair their relationship. Diplomatic visits have increased, with Russian officials—including Deputy Defence Minister Alexander Fomin and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov—visiting Algiers last year. Algeria has reciprocated with high-level trips to Moscow.


The two nations have also created a formal mechanism for quarterly consultations involving officials from both sides on foreign policy, security, and defence.

CHINA

Migrant workers' rights, urban renewal among key issues discussed in State Council executive meeting



CGTN


 


With the help of Xiangyang Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, migrant workers get delayed wage payments in Xiangyang, Hubei Province, November 19, 2024. /CFP

Chinese Premier Li Qiang on Friday was briefed about efforts to ensure wage payments of migrant workers as he presided over a State Council executive meeting.

The meeting focused on the study and promotion of urban renewal work and also deliberated and approved a draft regulation on the protection of both ancient and notable trees.

Ensuring the wage payments of migrant workers is a significant issue concerning people's well-being, the meeting noted.

It is important to earnestly safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of migrant workers, the meeting stressed, while also highlighting the necessity of strengthening data connectivity among relevant departments, including human resources and social security, as well as finance.

Urban renewal is crucial for enhancing the appearance and living quality of cities and serves as an important lever for expanding domestic demand, the meeting determined, while also calling for efforts to build resilient and smart cities that are desirable to live in.

The renovation of old residential communities, blocks, factory areas and urban villages in cities should be accelerated, and renovation of urban infrastructure should be strengthened, the meeting resolved.

In addition, the meeting stressed the need to remediate urban ecosystems and preserve urban history and culture.

Efforts should be made to bolster the supply of resources such as funds and land, as well as attract more private capital to participate in urban renewal initiatives, the meeting stated.

The meeting also vowed support for innovative efforts in accordance with local 

Traditional Conflicts and Dynamic Coali­tions at the World Climate Conference

COP28: New Room for Manoeuvre in International Climate Politics


SWP Comment 2024/C 03, 05.02.2024, 8 Pages
doi:10.18449/2024C03

Research Areas

PDF | 205 KB
EPUB | 638 KB
MOBI | 931 KB

The outcome of the 28th UN Climate Change Conference shows that international co­operation remains possible despite today’s challenging geopolitical situation. Instead of the feared blockade, an agreement was reached for the first time – some three decades after the start of the COP process – to move away from fossil fuels in energy systems. Overall, the steps agreed in Dubai are a compromise that sends a political signal short of what is necessary from a scientific perspective. On the one hand, inter­national climate cooperation continues to be characterized by traditional conflicts between developing countries and industrialized nations (issues of global justice, financial commitments), with new trade tensions and what at times amounted to an obstructionist attitude among a handful of countries compounding the difficulties. On the other hand, dynamic North-South coalitions have formed in the negotiation tracks on “loss and damage” and the global energy transition. These must be further strengthened as the starting point for lasting alliances against fossil fuel interests. German climate foreign policy can make an important contribution by undertaking consistent diplomatic efforts to implement structural reforms of the international financial system and by offering attractive partnerships.
Turkey sentenced 58 journalists to prison, arrested 26 in 2024: report


ByTurkish Minute
January 3, 2025

Turkish authorities sentenced 58 journalists to a total of 135 years in prison, detained 112 and arrested 26 in 2024, according to a report released by an opposition lawmaker, the Stockholm Center for Freedom reported.

Zeynep Oduncu Kutevi, a member of the pro-Kurdish People’s Equality and Democracy Party (DEM Party), presented the findings in a report titled “2024 Press Freedom Report Card: The Anatomy of Silencing the Truth.” The report accuses President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s ruling Justice and Development Party of intensifying efforts to stifle independent journalism and suppress dissent.

“These are not just numbers — they reflect lives disrupted, voices silenced and a society deprived of its right to know the truth,” Kutevi said during a press conference. She accused President Erdoğan of weaponizing the legal system to intimidate journalists and control public narratives.

The report also documented 60 investigations launched against journalists, 33 new court cases and the prosecution of 872 media workers. Financial penalties totaling 261,820 Turkish lira ($7,413) were imposed on journalists, as well as 240 documented incidents of threats, attacks or obstruction.

“Silencing journalists means silencing society,” Kutevi said. “It leaves the public uninformed and injustices unchallenged. The government’s message is clear — only its version of the truth matters.”

Calling for reforms to protect journalists and restore media independence, Kutevi pledged her party’s commitment to defending press freedom. She said democracy cannot survive without critical voices and transparency, adding that the struggle for press freedom is essential not just for journalists, but for the public’s right to information.

Turkey, which became the world’s biggest prison for journalists in 2018 during a state of emergency imposed after a coup attempt, was ranked 158th of 180 countries in the 2024 World Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders.

How Will Mexico’s New President Deal with Trump, Migration, and Drug Cartels?

Laura Carlsen discusses how Claudia Sheinbaum will navigate a series of domestic challenges and a changing U.S.-Mexico relationship.


January 3, 2025
Source: FPIF


US – Mexico Border Fence by Tony Webster is licensed under CC BY 2.0 / Flickr

In June 2024, Mexicans elected a female president, Claudia Sheinbaum to replace Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador. Arguably, Mexico is Washington’s most significant foreign policy partner, playing a central role in two issues that Donald Trump manipulated to win the 2024 presidential election: migration and drugs.

Laura Carlsen, one of Mexico’s most distinguished progressive journalists and political analysts, takes stock of President Sheinbaum’s performance so far and how she plans to deal with Trump. Carlsen is based in Mexico City, where she directs the international relations think tank, Mira: Feminisms and Democracies. She also coordinates knowledge and global solidarity with Just Associates, JASS. Holding graduate degrees from Stanford, she is a dual Mexican-US citizen.

How is the Mexican government taking Trump’s threat of mass deportations?

The Mexican government estimates there are 4.8 million Mexicans in the United States without papers and 11.5 currently with some form of legal residence, so the demographic implications could be enormous. President Claudia Sheinbaum and her cabinet have taken a dual approach to Trump’s threat to immediately begin a campaign of mass deportation after taking office. On the one hand, the government—along with many analysts in the United States—has questioned how far Trump will actually go, pointing out that the U.S. economy would suffer, experiencing labor scarcity, loss of tax revenues, inflation, and deceleration if Trump carries out the threat. Mexico is preparing facts-based studies to discuss the real impact on the U.S. economy and society with Trump’s team and find other solutions.

That doesn’t mean that the Mexican government isn’t taking it seriously though. Several days ago, Sheinbaum warned Mexicans in the United States that they are facing “a new reality” as of January 20. On this side of the border, Mexico is actively preparing for the possibility of mass deportation. Although we don’t yet have all the details, the government is working on plans to receive returning Mexicans, including reducing paperwork and obstacles to reincorporation in schools and employment, and some sort of support. The Secretary of Foreign Relations Juan Ramon de la Fuente announced measures for Mexicans residing in the United States, including a “panic button” to alert the nearest consulate and relatives if apprehended for deportation, and know-your-rights campaigns. Consulates have already registered a spike in queries and widespread fear in immigrant communities. With Tom Homan as border czar—founder of the family separation policies that stripped children from their parents with many still not reunited after years of searching—concerns run deep. The government has also been talking to Central American countries to develop plans for safe return to other countries of origin. The threat to apply a 25 percent tariff on all Mexican exports to the US (80 percent of Mexico’s trade) has increased pressure to accept and accommodate deportees even from other countries.

In 2016 after Trump’s first election, we organized a “caravan against fear” along the border on the U.S. side to register reactions in immigrant communities. Families were literally afraid to leave their homes and mixed-status families faced the disintegration of the home. Daily routines fell apart and the stress was palpable. This time around threatens to be worse and no matter how fast deportation proceeds or how deep it goes, millions of lives—especially children’s—will be irreparably traumatized.

Do you think the results of this policy will depart significantly from that of Obama and Biden?

It is a fact that Biden continued Trump’s hardline immigration policies and by the end of his administration had surpassed the first Trump administration in deportations. A new report states there were 271,000 deportations in fiscal year 2024, more than Trump’s peak year of 2019 and only less than Obama in 2014. That the highest levels of deportation have occurred under Democrats reveals the paradox of Trump’s accusing Biden of “open borders.” This line, repeated over and over and often embellished with outright lies due to ignorance or indifference to the truth, seems to have swayed millions of voters to vote for Trump.

Biden did not significantly change Trump immigration policy, although he quickly reversed some Trump measures including child separation, safe third-country agreements and the Muslim ban and increased legal immigration and refugee resettlement. Since his administration continued detention policies, his actions had little or nothing to do with high migratory flows to the US during his administration. Corporate extractivism, the profound inequality and poverty caused by neoliberal policies in the Global South, violence, and displacement caused by climate change are among the primary causes of increased immigration to the US. They are structural causes inherent in the global system and as such will not reverse, although there may be temporary fluctuations.

Although there have been more apprehensions at the border, many are repeat attempts, and the numbers are neither unprecedented nor in any way threatening. The “backlash” against immigration evident in the 2024 campaign was almost completely a result of the fomentation of racist and nativist fears. It is interesting to note that districts with the highest Trump vote often correlated with very low immigration, meaning that these voters have little direct contact or impact from immigration in their daily lives and yet were convinced that immigrants pose a threat to the American “way of life.”

Since at least Bill Clinton, the Democrats made a strategic decision to abandon the defense of human mobility and human rights in migration and embrace the Republicans’ national security framework that presents immigration as a threat. Although both parties now employ similar anti-immigrant arguments and policies and in the last election tried to outdo each other in terms of restriction and repression, there is reason to believe that Trump will institute more hardline policies that will further endanger and disrupt the lives of immigrants. Homan has announced a return to family separation, and anti-immigrant mastermind Stephen Miller is expected to find more ways to cut off rights to asylum, family reunification, and legal residence.

How would you describe AMLO’s approach to the drug cartels? Was it successful or merely a confession that Mexico had lost the war on the cartels? Some say that unless it is able to control the cartels, the Mexican government’s other initiatives at reducing poverty and promoting development will have little positive impact. In other words, the cartels pose a real existential crisis to the future of the Mexican state.

Mexico has always been forced to follow U.S. policy in the war on drugs. Since Richard Nixon announced the war on drugs in the United States in 1971, the policy has been imposed on Mexico through trade sanctions, military strong-arming, and even temporary border closure. The Bush administration’s Merida Initiative, funded by Congress during the Obama administration, tied Mexico to the DEA strategy of drug seizures and arrests or killing of drug lords, known as the kingpin strategy. The Mexican president at the time, Felipe Calderon, agreed to an unprecedented level of U.S. involvement as part of his own war on drugs.

By 2018 it had become clear that the strategy was a disaster for Mexico. Homicide rates shot up, disappearances became a tragic reality for thousands of families, and cartels that had previously restricted activities to drug trafficking to the U.S. market, had been fragmented, causing more violent turf wars between cartels and a diversification into other criminal activities including extortion, human trafficking, and territorial control. AMLO campaigned with the promise to end the war on drugs and address root causes.

Some of the social programs for youth did address some of the root causes, but the kingpin strategy and U.S. control of Mexican security policy continued. The “hugs not bullets” strategy, continuously mocked by conservatives and the macho press, could have been a solid conceptual approach, but due in large part to U.S. pressure it was never really applied. The vicious cycles set in motion by the drug war’s militarized response to cartel crime continued and even deepened. Although the last years showed some reduction in the homicide rate, the AMLO administration registered the highest homicide rate on record, with more than 115,000 disappearances and high rates of injury and gender violence compounding the problem.

The binational effort to defeat cartels militarily in Mexico instead of addressing the economic roots of black-market smuggling and sale of prohibited substances—mostly found within the borders of the United States–led to massive bloodshed in Mexico. It also stimulated more economic gain for the U.S. arms industry and opened the country up to much more expansive U.S. presence in Mexican security. It reinforced social and patriarchal control by emphasizing macho militarist models of domination and militarizing regions where indigenous peoples, rural populations, and urban poor carry out defense of land and resources.

The cartels have historically been a violent and economically powerful corrupting force in the country, but they focused primarily on the lucrative business of trafficking drugs to the U.S. black market. Now they are entrenched in battles for territorial control between rival cartels and with state armed forces. This means that the violence has permeated civic life much more than before.

It can’t be conceived of as a criminal versus state battle because the lines are so blurred. State actors at all levels, including the armed forces, often act with and for the cartels. The war on drugs shifts allegiances and balances of power between cartels, but never advances in terms of common-sense objectives such as abating the flow of illegal drugs, reducing the power of cartels, or increasing rule of law, and it causes more, not less, violence. The last kingpin capture orchestrated by the U.S. government, of El Chapito, Joaquin Guzman López, and Ismael Zambada, is just the latest in a series of hits against specific cartels that trigger inter-cartel battles and end up favoring the first cartel’s rivals.

Can you describe the other key challenges that face the Scheinbaum government and how it plans to tackle them? Aside from the cartels and the undocumented migrants issue, I would imagine the list would include the transgenic corn issue, agrarian reform, climate change, corruption, and gender inequality.

That’s a big question. Her political platform of “100 steps toward Transformation” in reference to the continuation of what AMLO dubbed the Fourth Transformation of Mexico—after Independence, the Reform Period, and the Revolution—includes: A “moral economy” with fiscal control and pension reform; development with well-being and regional perspective and broad infrastructure plans; streamlined policy-making and enforcement; social rights and welfare and reducing inequality, health rights; reducing violence against women and assuring equality; Indigenous and Afromexicans; energy sovereignty, rural development; environment, water and natural resources; science and culture and democracy. Among these, some challenges are more acute than others. Mexico has to make the space to determine its own development and security policy, but continues to be under the U.S. thumb. The policies of immigration repression that Trump demands of Mexico is at heart a tool to keep the Global South under control as capitalism intensifies at an even more predatory and brutal stage. Mexico is under pressure to serve up key natural resources including oil, water, and labor. U.S. policies such as the drug war and Trump’s climate change denial run counter to the stated aims of the new government. Finding ways to stand up to pressure without provoking economic reprisals from a volatile and unpredictable U.S. president with an America First—or rather America Only—view on U.S. domination will be a constant challenge.

Specifically, several controversies are on the horizon. President Sheinbaum has reaffirmed that Mexico has the right to limit the import and prohibit the cultivation of U.S. genetically modified corn to protect native landraces, indigenous rights, health and food sovereignty. Mexico just lost in a NAFTA court on the question of import restrictions. A powerful civil society movement has been working for decades to defend Mexico’s right to make its own decisions on GM corn. Now they will be forced to abide by the decision while continuing to try to protect native corn and customs. There will be more legal and political run-ins on this and related issues, with powerful transnationals such as Bayer/Monsanto seeing Mexico’s bid for food sovereignty as a dangerous global precedent.

Sheinbaum also faces a major challenge in ending discrimination and reducing violence against women, and repairing the relationship with feminist and women’s rights organizations in the country. While declaring support for women’s equality, Sheinbaum inherits the conflicted relationship established by AMLO, who accused women’s groups that protested against violence as being pawns of the conservative opposition and tended to see women’s equality solely in terms of parity in formal representation. The femicide rate continued to be very high throughout his term and yet the government minimized the crisis of gender violence.

Now several feminist leaders form part of the government and Sheinbaum’s platform includes the goal of reducing femicide and preventing gender violence, although without many details on how. In the economic sphere, most of the emphasis is on continuing with existing social programs, which have reduced female poverty somewhat but have not addressed structural discrimination and inequality or patriarchal relations.

In this area, as in most areas, a huge obstacle is that the “Fourth Transformation” under AMLO largely froze out the movements responsible for demanding and making social gains and for electing MORENA. Without the active participation of women’s groups—and indigenous, campesino, urban, environmental, etc. organizations—top-down measures cannot be effective and lasting.

What foreign policy initiatives should we expect from the new administration? Will it provide progressive leadership for the rest of Latin America as well as the Global South? How will it wade into the transnational conflict that now pits Lula and the left and Milei and the right?

AMLO took a leading role in reinvigorating regional South-South ties explicitly with the aim of reducing U.S. hegemony in the region and taking advantage of newly elected left to center-left governments. Later, in his term however, this work declined as the focus shifted back to the United States. Sheinbaum has specifically promised to ”recuperate CELAC” (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States) and strengthen regional ties, work with CELAC on an initiative to provide needed medicines, and work together on a new model for immigration that kind of keeps getting launched and never quite takes off. The relationship with the United States is also listed as a priority. Controlling illegal gun smuggling from the United States to Mexico is a critical issue for Mexico and will continue to be. The new government emphasizes multilateralism and in print anyway wants to strengthen Mexico’s role. This could be positive, but actual efforts have been sporadic and it’s not clear how much emphasis and resources will be devoted to it. Nor is it clear to what degree the new Mexican government, keen on preserving U.S. investment as key to the neoliberal model still very much in place, will buck U.S. hegemony.

How would you compare President Scheinbaum to the other dominant female leader in Latin America, Cristina Fernandez Kirchner of Argentina, in terms of their ability to navigate a culture of male political leadership?

Sheinbaum’s response to Trump’s vow to enact 25 percent tariffs on Mexican exports “on Day One” if Mexico did not do enough to stop immigration and control cartels was firm. She underlined all that Mexico was already doing but also said the nation would develop its own policies and the United States should do the same. This is a departure from the chummy and often subordinate relationship with Trump that AMLO’s foreign secretary, Marcelo Ebrard, and Lopez Obrador projected.

Trump is a public misogynist and has little respect for women, even those who are world leaders (as shown in his treatment of Angela Merkel). Sheinbaum seems to be taking a practical approach in the relationship with Trump that takes into account the need to sustain the bilateral relationship but draws the line at sovereignty. Her best bet is to maintain as much distance as possible.

Globally, so far she looks solid as a leader. She has strong experience as former mayor of Mexico City, and while she is unlikely to be a feminist leader on the world stage, she seems to know how to hold her own. Some other leaders, notably Dilma Rousseff, have underestimated the power of patriarchy, old-boys networks, and misogynist memes with tragic results. The male vote, organized in online clubs and chats with explicitly anti-women’s rights positions that draw on insecurities and a particularly virulent form of modern-day misogyny, elected Donald Trump and Javier Milei. Now they feel vindicated and emboldened globally by these wins.

The irony is that the United States—self-proclaimed as beacon for democracy and progress—proved itself unready to accept a woman in the highest position of power while Mexico—constantly derided as macho– elected its first woman president in a landslide. Now Sheinbaum will have to prove her leadership on the world stage in an increasingly hostile environment for women leaders.




Laura Carlsen is director of the Americas Program of the Center for International Policy and a member of the Mesoamerican Women Human Rights Defenders’ Initiative. Before joining the Americas Program, Carlsen worked in Equipo Pueblo, was a correspondent for Latin Trade magazine, editor of Business Mexico, and a freelance writer. She has been a gender and communications consultant with Just Associates (JASS) and the Nobel Women’s Initiative, and policy consultant and writer for the International Organization for Migrations.
Mexico Reaffirms Anti-Drug Cooperation with U.S., Asserting Sovereignty


By RT Staff Reporters
January 3, 2025
THE RIO TIMES

President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico restated her commitment to work with the United States in combating drug trafficking. She spoke at her first press conference of 2025, addressing recent statements by US President-elect Donald Trump.

Sheinbaum emphasized Mexico’s willingness to collaborate while maintaining its independence. She declared that Mexico would not accept any interference or subordination from the US. The president stressed that Mexicans would handle their own affairs.

The Mexican leader clarified that cooperation with the US stems from humanitarian concerns. She expressed readiness to assist in addressing the health crisis caused by drug-related deaths. However, Sheinbaum drew a clear line between cooperation and submission

.
Mexico Reaffirms Anti-Drug Cooperation with U.S., Asserting Sovereignty. (Photo Internet reproduction)

Sheinbaum challenged a recent New York Times article about fentanyl production in Sinaloa, Mexico. She questioned the scientific credibility of the report’s claims. The president pointed out inconsistencies in the portrayed manufacturing process.

The Mexican leader raised doubts about the lack of focus on fentanyl production within the US. She questioned the whereabouts of US drug cartels distributing fentanyl in American cities. Sheinbaum also wondered about the destination of profits from fentanyl sales in the US.

Sheinbaum’s statements reflect a balanced approach to US-Mexico relations on drug trafficking. She aims to maintain cooperation while asserting Mexico’s sovereignty. This stance aligns with her government’s commitment to addressing the drug issue independently.
Economist says mass deportations will cost Mexico tens of billions of dollars, a blow to its economy


by: Salvador Rivera
Posted: Jan 2, 2025 
BorderReport.com 

SAN DIEGO (Border Report) — Mass deportations proposed by President-elect Donald Trump will be a huge blow to Mexico’s economy, according to Ismael Plascencia López, specialist with the Northwest Mexico Federation of Economists.

“They’re talking about deporting 11 to 13 million undocumented migrants now in the United States, it seems like an impossible task,” said Plascencia López. “But, if only one to two million people get deported, it would still be a huge strike on the Mexican economy.”

He predicts Mexico will have to invest millions of dollars to care, feed, house and transport deported migrants, not to mention those from other nations.

“It’s going to be a blow just in terms of the number of people sent here, but what about all those countries that refuse to take in their own people, they will likely end up in Mexico, you have to care for them as well,” he said.

Plascencia López predicts the biggest loses will be due to the lack of money being sent home by migrants working north of the border, something Mexico’s economy is heavily dependent upon.

According to Banxico, Mexico’s National Bank, $63.3 billion dollars were sent to Mexico in 2023 by migrants in the U.S., and from January through October of this year, the figure was almost $55 billion.

“This is the result of a worldwide campaign to oust migrants from many countries, something promoted by President-Elect Donald Trump.”

“There are always extremes, some say it’s good Donald Trump won, there were some who opposed his initiatives before, but now with him having control of Congress and the Senate, there won’t be anyone to stop him, this will hurt Mexico.”
India’s Free Library Movement Counters Caste Discrimination and Authoritarianism

Organizers are leaning into the library as a crucial institution in broader movements for social and political change.
January 3, 2025
Source: Truthout

LGBTQ+ community members are welcome at the The Community Library Project in Delhi. Image by Emily Drabinski



Outside the Khirki branch of Delhi’s Community Library Project, a signboard details the day’s programs, including scheduled story times and art activities. Children bounce and buzz as they wait in line to check out their books. Patrons take advantage of clean public bathrooms, drinking water (in short supply in many of Delhi’s unplanned communities) and internet-connected laptops. This library feels more like my home Windsor Terrace branch of the Brooklyn Public Library than it does the Delhi Public Library a few kilometers away. The biggest difference? Anyone can join the Khirki library for free, while the Delhi Public Library charges 100 rupees a year. It’s a number too small to make a meaningful difference to the library budget, and too large for the poor and working class who make up much of the city — a nominal figure that serves only to exclude.

Changing this system is the singular priority of India’s Free Libraries Network (FLN). “The mandate to be free is one of the most important demands we are making,” Prachi Grover told Truthout. Grover is part of a network of grassroots activists and practitioners pushing for changes to the country’s public library system under the banner of the FLN, a consortium of more than 100 community libraries and individuals founded in 2019. Group members are committed to the development of free public libraries open to all Indians, regardless of gender, class or caste. In December, the group launched its People’s National Library Policy at an event held at Delhi’s India International Centre. Community organizers, legislators, librarians, booksellers, authors and the interested public gathered to learn more about the network and its legislative priorities. Speakers included Grace Banu, director of the country’s Trans Rights Now Collective; V. Sivadasan, a Marxist member of parliament from Kerala; and a panel of speakers from community libraries across the country. (This author also spoke at the event.) The gathering marked a turn toward organizing for government support for libraries, a recognition that the kind and scale of transformation FLN members seek requires action from the state.

The demand for a free public library goes well beyond the rupee. “Free for us is also the freedom to be in that space, to use it without fear, to have the support to learn how to use the space or read the books, to be a space where everyone moves with respect and dignity,” said Grover.

This means the library must be explicitly anti-caste and feminist, says Purnima Rao, a member of FLN’s board. “We must release the Indian public library from the chokehold of patriarchal and Brahminical systems, which have long gone unchallenged,” she told Truthout. In Khirki, those commitments are listed clearly in colorful signage that reminds members that all are welcome in the space, including women and those whose caste position has long excluded them from these institutions.

Such restrictions are rarely listed in the rules. For example, the Delhi Public Library states that it provides service “irrespective of any distinction of sex, caste, creed, and religion.” For FLN activists, such statements are insufficient, given deepening inequality in Indian society more broadly. To join, charging fees effectively exclude the poor from libraries, embedding a class-based hierarchy into an ostensibly public institution. By contrast, FLN libraries must be explicitly anti-caste and gender-inclusive, and programs must reflect this priority. “One of my first jobs at the Community Library Project was managing the line at circulation,” Rao told Truthout. “I was told not to allow anyone to cut the line, no adult could skip ahead of any child.” For Rao, it was among the first times she had experienced a line that nobody could cut, regardless of class or caste status. The community library is a space where everyone is equal.

As they advocate for a free public library system with politicians and policy makers, FLN organizers continue to build community libraries on the ground as examples of the world they want. In Dibrugarh, a city of just over 150,000 in the northeast corner of Assam, trans rights activist and storyteller Rituparna Neog established the Chandraprabha Saikiani Feminist Library & Resource Centre as a library and community space. The brightly lit space features walls festooned with rainbow flags and shelves of books for patrons of all ages in a mix of languages including Hindi, English and Assamese. Library leaders also support Project Kitape Katha Koi, a community library that serves children in nearby Chenijan, Jorhat, among the region’s industrial tea plantations. “Within a free community library, we can sit together, we can exercise democratic values, have discussion and conversation, sharing of information, knowledge,” Rituparna told Truthout. “The free community library is a site of resistance.”

Grover sees free libraries in Assam and across India as part of a history of public library organizing in the country. “For the longest time, we have seen waves of library movements and individual and collective efforts to build a public library system in India,” says Grover. “Each time it gains momentum the ideas are filtered down, diluted and eventually buried, perhaps barring in Kerala, till they are unearthed again with a fresh set of demands for public libraries for the people. No matter the number of blows to the movements, the demand keeps resurfacing.”

For now, FLN activists and organizers are leaning into the library as a crucial institution in broader movements for social and political change, especially urgent as the extreme right continues to consolidate state power in the country. “Libraries are the people’s tools to educate, organize and agitate,” says Rao. “FLN recognizes the critical role of the library in listening and responding to the people’s struggles. The library must employ its resources, infrastructure and services to empower all.”
The Term ‘Antisemitism’ is Being Weaponised and Stripped of Meaning – and That’s Incredibly Dangerous

Israel uses it to silence critics of its Gaza war while the right uses it to attack opponents. Meanwhile, the issue itself goes unaddressed
January 3, 2025
Source: The Guardian


Fascist rally. Image by DT Rocks, Creative Commons 4.0



When the international criminal court issued arrest warrants for Israeli officials in November, the response from the country’s government was all too familiar. The prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, rejected outright the warrants for alleged war crimes in Gaza against him and the former defence minister Yoav Gallant, calling them “an antisemitic decision”. The ultranationalist national security adviser, Itamar Ben-Gvir, declared that the court had shown “once again that it is antisemitic through and through”. And the transport minister, Miri Regev, chimed in, claiming: “This is modern antisemitism in the guise of justice.”

Bleakly, none of this was a surprise. Over a year into Israel’s assault on Gaza, which some experts have described as a genocide, accusations of antisemitism raised to counter criticism of Israel have gone into overdrive. Such claims have been made against protesters crying out for an end to the bloodshed in Gaza and against the UN and aid agencies warning of a humanitarian catastrophe. They have been levelled at global news channels and the international court of justice; against actors, artists, pop stars and even British-Jewish film-makers. So sweepingly and speech-chillingly are such claims made by Israel’s diehard defenders that the very term “antisemitism” is losing its meaning. It is exactly as the British-Jewish philosopher Brian Klug warned 20 years ago: “When antisemitism is everywhere, it is nowhere.” Blanket misuse has, troublingly, turned the term into a feature on an Israeli politician’s lingo-bingo scorecard.

And all this is happening precisely at a time when antisemitism is increasing globally. When Britain’s Jewish community has experienced verbal and physical attacks. When Jewish schools and synagogues have been dealing with death threats and desecrations. In the past 18 months, a Jewish woman was stabbed in her home in France, there have been shootings at schools in Canada and we saw a full-blown antisemitic riot in Dagestan in Russia.

Meanwhile, the far right is taking advantage of the political crisis brought about by Israel’s world-changing war, alternately using actual antisemitism and a pretence of caring about antisemitism to advance its bigoted ideology. For some sections of the far right, antisemitism is the active ingredient powering a racist, migrant- and Muslim-bashing agenda. It echoes the antisemitism that has always been at the core of white supremacism and has made a comeback with the “great replacement” theory: the conspiracy that Jewish people are secretly plotting to flood western countries with people of colour. On the other hand, for resurgent far-right parties across Europe, a performative fight against antisemitism has provided a path to political rehabilitation. Extremist leaders from Hungary’s Victor Orbán to Geert Wilders in the Netherlands present as self-declared champions of Jewish minorities in a supposed clash of civilisations against Islam.

All of these factors – and a few more besides, just to add to the confusion – have collided to turn our conversation on antisemitism into one characterised by accusations and rebuttals, contortions and misunderstandings, bad faith interpretations and endless blind spots. It’s the sort of dissonant mess from which any reasonable person might decide to quietly step away. Because what is the uninvolved onlooker supposed to make of it all? While researching my new book on the subject, several people I spoke to told me they were afraid to even ask about antisemitism, for fear that this might itself be construed as antisemitism. This is another clear sign, if any other were needed, that something has gone badly wrong in the way we talk about the issue.

Untangling these confusions, I found it was possible to identify distinct themes so that the moving parts of this chaos came into focus. For starters, there is the way that racism is commonly understood as a colour line. While the invention of “black” and “white” is key to understanding the racism that enabled slavery and colonialism and that still inflicts daily harms today, this doesn’t help us to fully comprehend the roots of antisemitism. Studying the histories of racism and antisemitism shows us that one has always influenced the other. The persecution of Jews in the middle ages helped create the architecture of racism that underpinned colonisation and enslavement in the Americas, and reveals how the category of “whiteness” is a fundamentally unstable invention – which is why Jewish people have in the past fallen in and out of it, confusing and intensely irritating racists through the ages.

Then there is the grim hypocrisy of our political conversation on antisemitism, which remains hyperfocused on the left. While media cycles spin out over whether the chanting of long-used Palestinian slogans constitutes antisemitism, examples of anti-Palestinian hatred from supporters of Israel get waved along. This is not just about the silencing of voices protesting against Israel’s carnage in Gaza – although that is bad enough. If antisemitism is so blatantly wielded as a political weapon, it creates the impression of a fundamental unseriousness about the subject. Dedicating endless column inches to campus protests over Gaza is shifting the spotlight, not just away from the devastation in the Palestinian strip, but away from the dangerous antisemitism coming from the far right.

In her latest book, Doppelganger, Naomi Klein writes about the important political issues that have been discarded by the left, only to be opportunistically seized and twisted by the right. So during the pandemic, for instance, people’s reasonable fears about pharma monopolies were commandeered to spew out vaccine conspiracies. The same dynamic now applies to the fight against antisemitism, where the right has strategically filled a space vacated over decades by the left. But far from raising awareness of this ancient prejudice, the right has instead turned the issue into a wedge with which to clobber political opponents: those protesting against Israel’s multiple aggressions and violations of international law, the Black Lives Matter movement, diversity and equity programmes or those grouped together under that catch-all irritant “wokeism”. The effect has been to sow division, derailing progressive movements, thwarting efforts at social, economic and climate justice and helping an increasingly extreme right wing win elections around the world.

A true understanding of what has gone so wrong with our discussion of antisemitism – and how to put it right – will not just fortify the left in this urgent political moment. It will also consolidate our antiracist endeavours. It will yield inclusiveness, moral clarity and cohesion. And most of all, it will help us to make sense of the alarming, divisive and destructive rightwards shift of the world – because only then do we stand a chance of changing it.

 

Pakistani police claim 35 percent of militants in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa are Afghan nationals

File-Photo

PESHAWAR, Pakistan — Akhtar Hayat Khan, the police chief of Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, has alleged that 35 percent of the approximately 4,000 militants active in the region are Afghan nationals.

Speaking at a meeting with provincial lawmakers, Mr. Khan also revealed the existence of 188 militant groups operating in the province. He emphasized that these groups benefit from “uninterrupted logistical lines” extending across the border into Afghanistan.

Senior police officials at the meeting highlighted the militants’ strongholds in southern districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, including Dera Ismail Khan, Tank, Bannu, and Lakki Marwat. The proximity of these areas to the Afghan border, combined with active terror networks, has made the region a hub of insurgent activity, they said.

The officials acknowledged the limitations faced by the police force in countering the insurgency. They admitted that the current security infrastructure is insufficient to withstand large-scale attacks on checkpoints and noted that police are unable to conduct patrols in many areas, leaving militants free to operate, especially at night.

Meanwhile, the Pakistani daily newspaper Dawn reported that the Inspector General of the Frontier Corps and the commander of Peshawar’s military corps are scheduled to brief lawmakers behind closed doors next week on the security situation in the region.

The escalating violence in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has underscored the challenges facing Pakistan as it grapples with a resurgence of militancy, particularly in areas bordering Afghanistan, where the Taliban’s return to power has added to security concerns.

MAGA vs. foreign workers, part 2


-Chinese visitors talk with education consultants at the booth of the United States during an expo in Beijing, China

Riley Callanan
Jan 03, 2025
GZERO

First, they came for the H-1B visa. Now, MAGA activists are pushing to end the US’ Optional Practical Training, or OPT, program, calling it a“guest worker program” that acts as a backdoor to the H-1B and threatens American jobs.

What is OPT? The program was introduced in 1947 to allow foreign students to work in the US if their employment was required or recommended by their school. Initially, the program was designed for short-term, practical training, but itwas extended for STEM grads in 2008 from 12 to 29 months and again in 2018 for up to 36 months. It is widely used bystudents from India: In 2023-24, 42.9% of Indian students in the US were pursuing mathematics or computer science, while 24.5% were enrolled in engineering programs.

What would happen if the US OPT-ed out? Ending OPT would impact the nearly 350,000 students who qualify for the program every year, particularly in STEM fields, and cause a cash crunch for universities reliant on high international tuition fees. It would affect businesses in tech, health care, and engineering, industries that attract the most OPT candidates. Opponents claim, however, that the US has no STEM worker shortage and that ending the program would provide more work for homegrown grads. So far, Elon Musk has not waded into the OPT fray, but we’re waiting.
Trump's New Orleans terror attack comments foretell foreboding future: analyst

Sarah K. Burris
January 3, 2025 
RAW STORY


Anthony Crider

The way that President-elect Donald Trump responded to the terrorist attack in New Orleans on New Year's Day says a lot about how he is likely to behave when it comes to terrorism in his second term.

Writing for The Guardian, Robert Tait said that Trump's reaction "especially when combined with his false accompanying message that the episodes confirmed his frequent warnings against open borders and illegal immigrants."

Trump's post on Truth Social claimed "the USA is breaking down" and claimed only "strength and powerful leadership" will stop it.

Tait recalled the 20% increase in anti-Muslim hate that erupted after a radicalized Islamist husband-and-wife team killed 14 people in San Bernardino, California in 2015 after Trump took to social media and ranted about it.

Professor Brian Levin of the California State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism recalled that after Trump lashed out at the Black Lives Matter movement, anti-Black crime surged.

“It’s about the most extreme language you can get when it comes to anti-immigrant comments,” Heidi Beirich told The Guardian. She co-founded the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, which tracks far-right movements.

“The attacks on immigrants, coming from Trump for a long time now, and inflamed by the situation where the person who did the [New Orleans] attack is not even an immigrant, are certainly going to raise the level of violence and attacks on immigrants in the country," Beirich added.

“Statements by presidents and other political leaders have a violent impact downstream,” Levin said. “Those toxins surface elsewhere."

The former New York City police officer said that a president's use of stereotypes and conspiracies reverberates into aggression.

The danger, he warned, is that Trump's comments will inspire vigilante attacks from his supporters.

“We’re concerned that this will in some way be taken as a message to folks who think they’ve been deputized to go after people who they think are undocumented,” Levin said.

He claims that there will still be far-right terrorism but that there's a rising threat "likely to emerge from the hard left." He used the U.S. response to President Richard Nixon from defunct groups like the Symbionese Liberation Army and the Weather Underground as examples.

“Couple that with what we have going on internationally, where we have the highest frequency of conflicts we’ve seen in some time; add in idiosyncratic extremists, either their single-issue or idiosyncratic prejudices and hatreds, then you see there really is a perfect storm. The key words going forward are everything, everywhere, all at once. We’re diversifying and evolving with regard to extremism," he predicted.

Read the full report here.
Trump will impose sanctions on ICC, report says


January 3, 2025 
MEMO

US president-elect Donald Trump at The Elysee Presidential Palace in Paris, France on December 7, 2024 [Mustafa Yalçın/Anadolu Agency]

US President-elect Donald Trump plans to impose devastating sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague immediately after taking office, Israel Hayom newspaper reported citing informed sources.

The sources claimed the “executive orders could be unveiled as soon as January 21”, just one day after Trump’s inauguration and “will target both individual ICC personnel, including judges and prosecutors, and the institution as a whole.”

“The administration intends to classify the ICC as an organisation threatening US interests, employing designation procedures similar to those used by the State Department for terrorist organisations globally. This designation will trigger severe restrictions on anyone involved with the court’s operations,” it added.

According to the paper, the restrictions aim to force the court to withdraw the arrest warrants issued against Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and former Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant.

The incoming administration considers the ICC’s arrest warrants a direct threat to US national security and fear these actions ultimately seek “to strip the US and its allies of their ability to mount military defences against global threats.”

Officials also fear the US could face similar warrants.
ECOCIDE

Oil slick from Russian tanker spill reaches Crimea

Oil from two Russian tankers, which sank and ran aground in the Kerch Strait after a storm in December, has spread 250 kilometres to reach the coast of Sevastopol in Crimea, Moscow-installed officials said on Friday.



 03/01/2025
FRANCE24
By: NEWS WIRES
A photo released on December 17, 2024 showing rescuers responding to an oil spill along the coastline of the Black Sea, caused by the wreck of two oil tankers. © Russian Emergencies Ministry via AFP


Oil from two ageing and damaged Russian tankers -- one of which sank -- was detected on Friday off the coast of Sevastopol, the largest city in Moscow-annexed Crimea.

The Volgoneft-212 and the Volgoneft-239 were hit last month by a storm in the Kerch Strait, which links Crimea to the southern Russian Krasnodar region and is about 250 kilometres (155 miles) from Sevastopol.

One sank and the other ran aground, pouring around 2,400 tonnes of mazut, or heavy fuel oil, into the surrounding waters, according to Russia's transport ministry.

"A small oil slick reached Sevastopol today," the Moscow-installed head of the city, Mikhail Razvozhayev, said on Telegram, publishing a video of the oil, a thick substance known as mazut.

He said it was around 1.5 metres in width and length.

Sevastopol, with a population of over half a million, is the historic home of the Russian navy's Black Sea fleet, heavily targeted by Ukraine throughout the nearly three-year conflict.

President Vladimir Putin has called it an "ecological disaster" and hundreds of volunteers have been deployed to scoop up contaminated soil from beaches in Crimea and along Russia's southern coast.

The transport ministry said the type of oil is particularly hard to clean as it is dense and heavy and does not float on the surface.

It is the first incident of its kind ever involving M-100 grade mazut, Russia's transport ministry said.

"There is no proven technology anywhere in the world to remove it from the water column," it said on social media.

"Therefore the main method is collection from the shoreline, when the mazut has been dumped on the coastal zone," the ministry said.

Some 78,000 tonnes of contaminated soil and sand has been removed from beaches so far, Russia's emergency situations ministry said Friday. Up to 200,000 tonnes may need to be removed.

Ukraine has slammed Russia over the spill, accusing it of trying to ship oil products in vessels unfit for harsh winter sea conditions.

Under Western sanctions, Russia has resorted to using a so-called "shadow fleet" of mostly old tankers to export its fuels around the world.

Russia seized the Crimean peninsula in 2014 following a pro-EU revolution in Kyiv.

(AFP)
Ethiopia villagers flee volcanic activity 'in panic'


Sultan Kemil
BBC


Hundreds of people in a rural part of Ethiopia, 165km (100 miles) north-east of the capital, Addis Ababa, have been leaving their homes in panic as a nearby volcano has been showing signs of a possible eruption, a local chief told the BBC's Afaan Oromoo service.

The smoke coming from Mount Dofan that began around 17:00 local time (14:00 GMT) on Thursday "has a fiery plume and it's very high," Sultan Kemil said.

In a video posted by the Ethiopian Geological Institute on its Facebook page steam and debris can be seen shooting out from the mountain.

In recent weeks, there have been more than a dozen seismic events around Awash Fentale - an earthquake-prone area of Ethiopia's Afar region.

Abdu Ali, the chief administrator of the local area in Afar told Ethiopia's FBC news site that an evacuation process is under way to prevent harm to residents.

He is quoted as saying that there have been earthquakes that are getting "higher and stronger".

Tremors have also been felt away in Addis Ababa.

Shiferaw Teklemariam, from the Ethiopian Disaster Risk Management Commission, told the Reuters news agency that while it was too early to classify the activity as an eruption, authorities were taking precautions.


Risk of Ethiopian volcanic eruption prompts evacuation of residents


03 January 2025 - By Reuters

The Ethiopian Geological Institute posted a video showing what appeared to be dust and smoke emerging from a volcano in Awash Fentale in Afar region. File image.
Image: 123rf/Jerry Rainey

A volcano in northeastern Ethiopia was showing signs of starting to erupt on Friday, prompting authorities to move residents to temporary shelters, a state-affiliated broadcaster and a government geological office said.

The Ethiopian Geological Institute posted a video on its Facebook page showing what appeared to be dust and smoke emerging from a volcano in Awash Fentale in Afar region.

Fana Broadcasting, citing a regional administrator in Afar, reported that authorities had evacuated residents out of the affected area, which is roughly 165km from the capital Addis Ababa.

Shiferaw Teklemariam, commissioner of the Ethiopian Disaster Risk Management Commission, said it was too early to label the activity an eruption but authorities were not taking chances.

"The community; some are already leaving those areas. We are also preparing to do it in a well organised manner. It [moving the community] will be done based on predictions," he told Reuters.

The area experiencing volcanic activity has also been prone to earthquakes and tremors in recent months.

'Unique' Neolithic Child Burial With Puzzling Bone Modifications Revealed


Published Jan 03, 2025 
By Aristos Georgiou
Science and Health Reporter
NEWSWEEK

Archaeologists have revealed a "unique" prehistoric burial featuring the remains of a child whose skeleton displays evidence of unusual marks on its bones.

The child's remains were discovered at an early Neolithic archaeological site known as Jiahu, in northern China, that dates back to around 7,000-5,000 B.C.

While the modifications remains something of a mystery, the bones may be indicative of burial practices that have previously not been documented in Neolithic China.

The Jiahu site was discovered in the 1960s in the town of Beiwudu in Henan province. It holds great significance for Chinese Neolithic archaeology having yielded important remains over several excavation seasons—including one of the world's oldest fermented beverages and possibly the oldest silk. Archaeologists have also uncovered dozens of human burials at the site.

The M511 Neolithic burial at the Jiahu archaeological site in China is shown in this image. The burial was found to contain the remains of a child with mysterious bone modifications. Rong et al., International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 2024

During a thorough lab analysis of human skeletal remains excavated from the site in 2001, the authors of a study published in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology noticed an intriguing set of bones.

These bones, which appear to belong to a child who died around the age of 8-10, originated from a multiple burial containing three individuals in total. The child's remains appear to have been placed in the grave in a "concealed" way with various funerary goods, including a bone flute.

The burial, known as M511, is located in a central cluster at the site dating to around 6,000 B.C. This cluster contains distinctive finds and features that were possibly associated with rituals or ritual practitioners, according to the study.

For example, M511 lies in close proximity to two "unique" archaeological features, including a large burial containing at least 23 individuals and a pit containing numerous turtle shell rattles, as well as a fork-shaped bone tool.

"Many burials in this cluster yielded objects such as turtle shells with pebbles inside, handle-shaped stone ornaments, fork-shaped bone tools, and bone flutes that are proposed as ritual paraphernalia," the authors wrote in the study.

Examining the child's bones, the study authors observed numerous modifications—including cut marks, scrape marks and possible chop marks—on the individual's lower limbs that most likely resulted from human activities.

Some of the marks suggests activities that involved the removal of flesh from the child's body, according to the study.

The researchers also observed signs on the bones that the child was suffering from a disease around the time of death—possibly scurvy—or malnutrition.

The context of the burial along with the bone marks and the child's pathological condition are indicative of a ritual setting or a ritual practitioner's burial practices. These practices may have been associated with the child's underlying disease or condition.

For example, the modifications could have been intended to release the child from suffering lower limb pain in the afterlife.

Another possibility is that the marks are indicative of preparation for making bone tools. Similar scrape patterns are found on bone objects.

"The craftspeople might have chosen them based on the quality of the bone material itself rather than exclusively using animal bones. A future re-examination of bone objects at Jiahu may resolve this debate and lead to a new avenue of research," the study authors wrote.

While the intentions of the bone modifications remain uncertain, it is clear that the burial treatment the child received was different to that of other children of the same age interred at the Jiahu site.

"In this rare case, the unique treatment of the diseased child was subtle and hidden," the authors wrote in the study.

According to the researchers, the bones represent the first reported case of human modification on a child's remains from a relatively early time period of Neolithic China.

"Although we may never know the real intention behind the modifications, this child reveals a broader set of mortuary practices than previously discovered in Neolithic China," the authors wrote.

Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about archaeology? Let us know via science@newsweek.com.
Reference

Rong, F., Xingtao, W., Juzhong, Z., & Minghui, W. (2024). An "Invisible" Child—A Case of a Child With Anthropogenic Modification Marks and Pathological Conditions in Early Neolithic China. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.3368

'Mystery volcano' that erupted and cooled Earth in 1831 has finally been identified



By CNN
 Jan 4, 2025

An unknown volcano erupted so explosively in 1831 that it cooled Earth's climate.
Now, nearly 200 years later, scientists have identified the "mystery volcano".
The eruption was one of the most powerful of the 19th century, spewing so much sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere that annual average temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere dropped by about one 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit).

An unknown volcano erupted so explosively in 1831 that it cooled Earth's climate. (CNN)

The event took place during the last gasp of the Little Ice Age, one of the coldest periods on Earth in the past 10,000 years.

While the year of this historic eruption was known, the volcano's location was not.
Researchers recently solved that puzzle by sampling ice cores in Greenland, peering back in time through the cores' layers to examine sulfur isotopes, grains of ash and tiny volcanic glass shards deposited between 1831 and 1834

Using geochemistry, radioactive dating and computer modeling to map particles' trajectories, the scientists linked the 1831 eruption to an island volcano in the northwest Pacific Ocean, they reported Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

According to the analysis, the mystery volcano was Zavaritskii (also spelled Zavaritsky) on Simushir Island, part of the Kuril Islands archipelago, an area disputed by Russia and Japan.

Before the scientists' findings, Zavaritskii's last known eruption was in 800 BC.

Now, nearly 200 years later, scientists have identified the "mystery volcano." (CNN)

"For many of Earth's volcanoes, particularly those in remote areas, we have a very poor understanding of their eruptive history," said lead study author Dr. William Hutchison, a principal research fellow in the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of St. Andrews in the United Kingdom.

"Zavaritskii is located on an extremely remote island between Japan and Russia. No one lives there and historical records are limited to a handful of diaries from ships that passed these islands every few years," Hutchison told CNN in an email.

With little information available about Zavaritskii's activity during the 19th century, no one previously suspected that it could be a candidate for the 1831 eruption.

Instead, researchers considered volcanoes that were closer to the equator, such as the Babuyan Claro volcano in the Philippines, according to the study.

"This eruption had global climatic impacts but was wrongly attributed to a tropical volcano for a long time period," said Dr. Stefan Brönnimann, unit leader in climatology at the University of Bern in Switzerland.

"The research now shows that the eruption took place on the Kurils, not in the tropics," said Brönnimann, who was not involved in the study.

'A genuine eureka moment'

Examination of the Greenland ice cores revealed that in 1831, sulfur fallout — a sign of volcanic activity — was about 6 ½ times greater in Greenland than it was in Antarctica.
This finding suggested that the source was a major eruption from a midlatitude volcano in the Northern Hemisphere, the researchers reported.

The study team also chemically analyzed ash and shards of volcanic glass measuring no more than 0.0008 inch (0.02 millimeter) long.

When the scientists compared their results with geochemical datasets from volcanic regions, the closest matches were in Japan and the Kuril Islands.

Volcanic eruptions in 19th century Japan were well-documented, and there were no records of a large eruption in 1831.


This finding suggested that the source was a major eruption from a midlatitude volcano in the Northern Hemisphere, the researchers reported. (CNN)

But colleagues who had previously visited volcanoes in the Kuril Islands provided samples that led the researchers to a geochemical match with the Zavaritskii caldera.

"The moment in the lab analysing the two ashes together — one from the volcano and one from the ice core — was a genuine eureka moment," Hutchison said in his email.
Radiocarbon dating of tephra, or volcanic ash, deposits on Simushir Island placed them within the past 300 years.

What's more, analysis of the caldera's volume and sulfur isotopes suggested the crater formed after a massive eruption between 1700 and 1900, making Zavaritskii "the prime candidate" for the mystery eruption in 1831, the authors wrote.

"I am still surprised that an eruption of this size went unreported," Hutchison added. "Perhaps there are reports of ash fall or atmospheric phenomena occurring in 1831 that reside in a dusty corner of a library in Russia or Japan.

The follow-up work to delve into these records really excites me."

The end of the Little Ice Age

Along with Zavaritskii, three other volcanoes blew their tops between 1808 and 1835. They marked the waning of the Little Ice Age, a climate anomaly that lasted from the early 1400s to around 1850.

During this time, annual temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere dropped by 1.1 degrees Fahrenheit (0.6 degrees Celsius) on average.

In some places, temperatures were 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius) cooler than normal, and the cooling persisted for decades.

Two of the four eruptions were previously identified: Mount Tambora in Indonesia exploded in 1815, and Cosegüina erupted in Nicaragua in 1835.

The volcano that produced the 1808/1809 eruption remains unknown. The addition of Zavaritskii highlights the potential of volcanoes in the Kuril Islands for disrupting Earth's climate, the study authors reported.



After the 1831 eruption, cooler and drier conditions emerged in the Northern Hemisphere.

Reports of widespread hunger and hardship swiftly followed, with famines sweeping across India, Japan and Europe, affecting millions of people.

"It seems plausible that volcanic climate cooling led to crop failure and famine," Hutchison said.

"A focus of ongoing research is to understand to what extent these famines were caused by volcano climate cooling, or by other socio-political factors."

By providing a long-missing piece of information about the 19th century volcanoes that cooled Earth's climate, "the study perhaps strengthens our confidence on the role of volcanic eruptions for the last phase of the Little Ice Age," Brönnimann said.

Like Zavaritskii, many volcanoes worldwide are in isolated places and are poorly monitored, making it challenging to predict when and where the next large-magnitude eruption may strike, Hutchison added.

If there's a lesson to be learned from the 1831 eruption, it's that volcanic activity in remote spots can have devastating global consequences — which people may be unprepared to face.

"We don't really have a coordinated international community to kick into gear when the next big one happens," Hutchison said.

"That is something we need to think about as both scientists and as (a) society."