Monday, December 30, 2024

PATRIARCHY

Russian high school textbook urges girls to ‘trick rapists’ and not to ‘provoke boys and men’ with short skirts, lipstick, and ‘wild colors’

 December 26, 2024
Source: Meduza

A ninth-grade health and wellness textbook has caused a minor uproar in Russia after activist Yekaterina Mizulina — more commonly known for championing Internet censorship measures — unearthed excerpts showing dubious advice to young women about navigating the hostile world of male sexual predators. For example, the textbook urges schoolgirls to avoid wearing bright makeup and short skirts to prevent becoming victims of sexual violence, reasoning that such displays “provoke boys and men.” Despite claims from the book’s lead author that it’s not required reading in Russian schools, the victim-blaming lessons offered in the text have raised concerns that at least some schoolchildren are being subjected to a backward education in gender norms.


Sergey Vangorodsky, who coauthored The Foundations of Life Safetytold RTVI that Mizulina’s complaints are “unfounded” because the book is not standard reading in Russia’s high school curriculum.

However, several readers told Mizulina that the textbook is used in health and wellness classes at schools in Rostov-on-Don, Volgodonsk, and Tambov. It’s also available for sale online. “Given that not all school library collections are updated in a timely manner, it may still be in use in [other] schools. I’m confident that the Education Ministry will investigate the matter,” Mizulina wrote on her Telegram channel.

In a section called “Safe Behavior for Girls,” Vangorodsky and his coauthors write that women who are alone with a man “should be prepared for him to develop a desire for intimacy.” Here are some other eyebrow-raising snippets from The Foundations of Life Safety:

  • “Many conflicts and attacks occur due to the victim’s own behavior, signaling through her appearance that she is either ‘ripe for it’ (being in the wrong place at the wrong time), willing (too available), or defenseless (drunk, scared, aroused, [or] overly trusting). Avoid standing out among others with excessive extravagance.”
  • “If you are alone with a man (even one you know well), be prepared for him to develop a desire for intimacy with you. Maintain a relaxed demeanor, but do not try to flirt or tease him, as in an intimate setting, he may interpret your flirting as an invitation to intimacy and your resistance as playacting.”
  • “If you cannot escape or counter a rapist’s weapon or physical superiority, you can still defend yourself by leveraging men’s psychophysiological traits during sexual intercourse and targeting their vulnerable spots. Try to trick the rapist into believing you agree to intimacy, get him to lower his defenses, and then act decisively according to your chosen plan.”
  • “How not to become a victim of violence: When going to a party, a cafĂ©, a bar, a concert, any large event, or somewhere with a bad reputation, do not wear very short skirts or paint your lips, eyelids, and eyelashes in wild colors. This provokes boys and men and is perceived by them as a signal.”


‘Ethnic’ weapons and immortality How spying charges against a U.S. citizen reflect the Russian authorities’ fear and obsession with genetics

 
Eugene Spector stands behind bars in a courtroom in Moscow, Russia. February 20, 2020.
Igor Ivanko / Kommersant / AP / Scanpix / LETA

December 27, 2024
Source: Meduza

Until Friday, Russia had kept its espionage case against U.S. citizen Gene Spector entirely under wraps. But today’s statement from the FSB — that Spector was convicted for collecting information to help the Pentagon develop a “genetic screening system” for Russians — has done little to clarify the situation. What exactly Spector is accused of remains a mystery, but fears of outsiders exploiting Russia’s “unique” genetic material are nothing new. The Kremlin’s fixation on the idea that scientific advances could either threaten or preserve Russia’s genetic legacy stretches back over a decade. To unpack Vladimir Putin’s complicated love-hate relationship with genetics — and what it might have to do with Spector’s conviction — we spoke to an expert from Meduza’s Razbor (“Explainers”) team.

For security reasons, this article refers to Meduza’s correspondent simply as “the expert.”

In the summer of 2023, Russia indicted Gene Spector, a Russian-born U.S. citizen, on espionage charges. At the time, Spector was already serving a 3.5-year prison sentence for allegedly facilitating a bribe to an aide of former Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich. This time, however, authorities revealed no details about the case. Spector’s trial was held behind closed doors, and even at his sentencing this December — where he was handed 15 years in a high-security prison — the court only published the introductory and dispositive parts of the verdict, citing the case’s classified nature.

A few days later, however, Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) released a statement accusing Spector of collecting “biotechnological and biomedical information” and transferring it to the Pentagon to help the U.S. develop a “high-speed genetic screening system for Russia’s population.” What exactly the FSB means by this is anyone’s guess.

Before his initial arrest, Spector served as chairman of the board of directors at Medpolymerprom Group, a Russian medical supply company specializing in cancer treatments. How this connects to the FSB’s claims — if it even does — is unclear. In medical contexts, genetic screening typically refers to identifying genetic disorders or assessing the risk of developing them. But, once again, the specifics of what the FSB is alleging remain a mystery.

According to Meduza’s expert, Russian authorities and intelligence agencies have been fixated on potential threats related to the collection of biological samples and data for well over a decade — at least since 2007. That spring, the Federal Customs Service imposed a ban on exporting biological samples from Russia, and the FSB began inspecting companies conducting clinical trials for Western firms. At the time, Kommersant sources linked this sudden crackdown to a report presented by then-FSB chief Nikolai Patrushev to President Vladimir Putin, warning of alleged Western efforts to develop “genetic-biological weapons” targeting Russia’s population.

The ban was later lifted, only to be reinstated during another wave of “anti-genetics” fervor among Russia’s leadership in 2017, Meduza’s expert notes. This particular wave of paranoia about genetic data appears to have been fueled by a report from the state propaganda outlet RT about a U.S. government tender for RNA and synovial fluid samples from Russia, reportedly for Pentagon research purposes.

That same year, during a Council for Civil Society and Human Rights meeting, Putin voiced concerns over foreign intelligence agencies collecting biological samples from Russians: “Do you know that biological material is being gathered across the country? From various ethnic groups and people living in different geographic areas of the Russian Federation. The question is — why are they doing this? They’re doing it deliberately and systematically.”

The theory that the West was developing “ethnic” weapons against Russians was further amplified by figures like Mikhail Kovalchuk, a key architect of Russia’s federal genetics research program, Meduza’s expert says. Over time, the narrative evolved to include new claims about biolabs in Ukraine and weaponized mosquitoes, eventually becoming a staple of Russian propaganda and rhetoric from Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, head of Russia’s radiation, chemical, and biological defense forces. (Kirillov, notably, was recently assassinated.) The Russian Defense Ministry has also frequently invoked the idea of biological and “ethnic” weapons, allegedly developed by Ukraine, to stoke public fears during the ongoing war.

Indeed, the Russian authorities’ obsession with genetics seems to stem from own their fears, no matter the focus. Alongside concerns about “genetic weapons,” Putin appears fixated on combating aging and extending life. In early 2024, he announced a new “national project” aimed at “preserving the health” of Russian citizens — presumably, starting with his own.

Anthropologist Alexandra Arkhipova and the BBC unmask the historian responsible for ‘denouncing’ opposition-minded Russians from behind a pseudonym


December 26, 2024
Source: The BBC

A historian from Yekaterinburg is likely behind the pseudonym “Anna Korobkova,” a name used to file hundreds of reports to the Russian authorities denouncing people for supposedly anti-government views. Former college lecturer Ivan Abaturov has allegedly spent years informing the police about “opposition” activity, according to a new investigation by the BBC’s Russian-language service. Meduza summarizes the report’s findings, which rely largely on independent research by anthropologist Alexandra Arkhipova. 


Alexandra Arkhipova, an anthropologist targeted by “Korobkova” two years ago, discovered evidence linking Abaturov to the denunciations. In the fall of 2022, the name “Anna Korobkova” was signed on a letter submitted to Arkhipova’s employer at the time, the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, demanding that she be fired for “immoral acts” during an interview with the opposition network TV Rain. According to “Korobkova,” Arkhipova’s remarks “discredited” Russia’s “special operation” in Ukraine.

In February 2023, Arkhipova began compiling a database of Korobkova-signed denunciations to determine whether they were the work of a single person or multiple individuals (such as a Russian police agency). She also gathered Korobkova-signed letters to journalists and began corresponding directly with the person(s) claiming the identity.

By late 2024, Arkhipova had collected 74 messages signed by “Korobkova,” including denunciations against teachers, academics, professors, human rights activists, doctors, and lawyers. Threatening Korobkova-signed letters also reached individuals who had given comments to “foreign agent” media outlets, urging them to pledge not to repeat the infraction. “Korobkova” bragged to the BBC about writing 1,357 denunciations between February and September 2023 alone and filing them with agencies like the Prosecutor General’s Office, the Federal Security Service, the Federal Penitentiary Service, the Justice Ministry, and others. In correspondence with Arkhipova, “Korobkova” claimed to have sent 764 such reports to the Russian authorities during the first year of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Arkhipova also discovered a Russian-language Wikipedia page about Korobkova, citing multiple copies of responses from Russian government agencies to Korobkova-signed denunciations. In other words, as Arkhipova noted, the Wikipedia page’s editor had access to the official replies to the Korobkova-signed reports. Collaborating with linguist Daniil Skorkin, Arkhipova compared the Wikipedia article with the Korobkova-signed letters sent to her and several journalists. Using stylometric analysis (a method based on the frequency of certain function words), they found a strong similarity between the Wikipedia article and the Korobkova-signed letters.

The Wikipedia article’s edit history shows it was written by a user named “Arkadiy2023.” This same user uploaded photos to Wikimedia Commons, primarily of events in Yekaterinburg, often held at the Yeltsin Center, taken with a Panasonic DMC-FT4 camera. Before “Arkadiy2023” appeared on Wikipedia in April 2023, only one user in Russia — nicknamed “Ivan Abaturov” — had used this exact camera model.

Arkhipova and Skorkin gathered texts written by Abaturov, including his posts on Wikinews, descriptions of Wikipedia edits, social media posts, and comments on various platforms. They compared these to the Korobkova-signed denunciations and letters and reached the following conclusion, according to the BBC:

The structure and thematic segments of texts by “Korobkova” and Abaturov were identical, although the order sometimes varied. Denunciations by other authors, also analyzed by Arkhipova and Skorkin, were structured differently. Specific phrases frequently found in Korobkova-signed denunciations, such as “I (categorically) oppose any/all [X],” were also regularly used by Abaturov. […] Furthermore, both Abaturov and “Korobkova” shared unique lexical and grammatical features and made similar errors. For example, they both used a dash instead of the grammatically correct commas when writing mol [“so they say”] to convey indirect speech.

Additionally, “Korobkova” often began sentences with complex conjunctions like prichem (“moreover”), pri etom (“at the same time”), and to est’ (“that is”). Arkhipova found hundreds of similar examples in Abaturov’s texts. Both frequently used expressions like “this person” or “the given individual” and repeatedly wrote the relative pronoun “which” within a single sentence referring to different objects.

Arkhipova also analyzed the autobiographical information revealed in the Korobkova-signed correspondence with her and numerous journalists, finding that some of the data matched what is known about Abaturov from public sources. For example, both were born in 1985, received a humanities education, and worked in teaching. Also, both of their grandfathers had special roles in World War II. In the Korobkova-signed letters, the author attributed their knack for denouncing anti-state behavior to their grandfather, who himself was an NKVD informant during Stalin’s time. 

BBC journalists learned that “Korobkova” and Abaturov shared the same IP address for filing complaints and denunciations — an IP address registered to the Yekaterinburg Internet provider Insis.

According to the investigation, Ivan Abaturov graduated in 2008 with a master’s degree in history from Ural State University, where his academic advisor was Alexey Mosin, a historian who headed the Ural branch of the human rights organization Memorial. Mosin described Abaturov’s reputation among colleagues as ranging “from cautious to hostile.” He noted that Abaturov once threatened a professor, accusing her of giving him unfairly low grades. Mosin also told the BBC about an incident where Abaturov’s grandmother came to the university to demand an explanation for why her grandson was given a “B” instead of an “A.”

In 2013, a local court fined Abaturov 5,000 rubles (about $160 at the time) for assault after he allegedly started a fight with a student at the Yekaterinburg Technical College, where he was lecturing at the time. Abaturov denied the charges but claimed that students often pelted him with objects like tin cans, chalk, and pine nuts.

Journalists learned that Abaturov began filing complaints with the authorities in the late 2010s and uploading scans of the government’s responses to Wikimedia Commons. Around the same time, he started regularly attending public events in Yekaterinburg, including talks hosted at the Yeltsin Center and monthly demonstrations supporting political prisoners. Abaturov introduced himself as a journalist and wrote about the events for Wikinews.

According to the BBC, Abaturov later began writing denunciations under his own name against public figures. For example, in January 2020, scientist and human rights activist Sergei Zykov learned that Abaturov had filed a police report against him. The name “Anna Korobkova” didn’t gain notoriety as a serial snitch until 2022. A source told the BBC that some public figures in Yekaterinburg began to suspect Korobkova was Abaturov’s pseudonym, given the familiar style of the Korobkova-signed denunciations.

“He's a historian, and he knows judicial statistics well — better than all lawyers. He supported the war when it started. In private conversations, he’s said denunciations are good. The word donos [‘denunciation’] has a positive connotation for him. He explained that denunciations are a means for civil society to interact with the state,” one public figure in Yekaterinburg who knew Abaturov told the BBC.

At the same time, Alexey Mosin says he’s not ready to believe that his former student is responsible for the letters signed with Korobkova’s name, which include several threatening messages addressed to him personally. “I watched him grow as a student. He was a boy with peculiarities (to put it gently), but I still have a special place in my heart for him. You know, you can’t help but feel a special way about your own students. I just can't believe he's capable of this. To behave like this... I still believe he respects me as a teacher,” Mosin told the BBC.

In messages on VKontakte, the BBC asked Abaturov if he uses the pseudonym “Anna Korobkova” to write reports against anti-government-minded compatriots. “Greetings. You are mistaken,” he answered. A reporter for the Yekaterinburg-based outlet It's My City reached Abaturov by phone, but he refused to answer the journalist's questions, citing a court order to revoke the publication’s media license and block its website.

After the BBC published its investigation on Thursday, Wikipedia permanently blocked Ivan Abaturov's user profile.

Did Trump rebuke Musk on the Truth Social platform?


Verdict: False


Illustration
Illustration (AFCL)

An image of what appears to be a screenshot of a social media post by U.S. President-elect Donald Trump circulated among Chinese online users alongside a claim that it shows Trump’s post on the Truth Social platform rebuking Tesla CEO Elon Musk.

But the claim is false. AFCL found no credible records showing that Trump uploaded such a post. An analysis of the image shows signs of digital manipulation.

The image was shared on X on Dec. 22.

It shows what appears to be a long post taken from Trump’s account on his self-owned Truth Social social media platform, alongside a Chinese translation.

“Let me clear something up right now: I am the President-elect of the United States. Not Elon Musk. Not anyone else. I know the media (the FAKE NEWS) and even some of you out there keep saying things like ‘Elon’s really running the show,’ but let me tell you—-this is MY vision, MY leadership, and MY America we’re talking about,” text in the purported post read.

An image showing a purported post in which Trump rebuked Musk.
An image showing a purported post in which Trump rebuked Musk. (USABelAir2021 via X)

The same image had appeared earlier in pro-Democrat posts on X and Threads.

Trump plans to appoint Musk to head the Department of Government Efficiency, a presidential advisory commission charged with reducing federal spending.

After Musk criticized a temporary spending bill, Trump asked Congressional Republicans in a Truth Social post to “pass a streamlined spending bill that doesn’t give Chuck Schumer and the Democrats everything they want.”

While the bill passed in time to avoid a government shutdown, some Democrat lawmakers mocked Trump as taking orders from Musk.

In response, Trump said at an event in Phoenix on Dec. 22: “And all the different hoaxes and the new one is President Trump has ceded the Presidency to Elon Musk… He’s not going to be president that I can tell you. And I’m safe, you know why? He can’t be - he wasn’t born in this country.”

But the claim about Trump rebuking Must in a social media post is false.

Keyword searches found no credible records showing Trump uploaded such a post.

Photo analysis

An analysis using the image verification tool InVID shows that the image circulated among Chinese-speaking online users was likely to have been digitally manipulated.

AFCL discovered that most of the image displayed clear signs of double-compression, while some sections of the text appeared unnaturally consistent, likely because they had been generated by AI and later pasted into the frame.

InVID’s analysis shows a high likelihood that the screenshot was a composite image.
InVID’s analysis shows a high likelihood that the screenshot was a composite image. (AFCL)

AFCL also found no reports to confirm any Trump rebuking of Musk publicly in the way described by Chinese social media users.

Translated by Shen Ke. Edited by Taejun Kang.

Asia Fact Check Lab (AFCL) was established to counter disinformation in today’s complex media environment. We publish fact-checks, media-watches and in-depth reports that aim to sharpen and deepen our readers’ understanding of current affairs and public issues. If you like our content, you can also follow us on FacebookInstagram and X.

'We're going to grow him': Human composting is rising in popularity as an earth-friendly life after death

The first time Laura Muckenhoupt felt a glimmer of hope after the death of her 22-year-old son Miles was the drive home from the Washington state facility that had turned his body into hundreds of pounds of soil.
There was an empty seat in the family pickup truck where Miles should have been sitting. But riding with her husband and daughter on the 12-hour drive home, Laura felt her son's presence clearly.
"We're going to grow him," she remembered thinking. "We're going to grow him, and we're going to continue to be his parents and his sister and his friends."
Miles (right) and his family. Laura Muckenhoupt. (Laura Muckenhoupt)
Human composting turns bodies into soil by speeding up "what happens on the forest floor," according to Tom Harries, chief executive of Earth Funeral, the human composting company the Muckenhoupt family worked with.
"What we're doing is accelerating a completely natural process," Harris told CNN. Human composting is emerging as an end-of-life alternative that is friendlier to the climate and the Earth — it is far less carbon-intensive than cremation and doesn't use chemicals involved to preserve bodies in traditional burials.
In a haze of grief in the immediate aftermath of his death, the knowledge that her son's soil represented a new beginning brought Muckenhoupt some measure of comfort. And in the years since, Miles' soil has traveled and been planted as far as Indonesia and Tuscany, used to help grow passionfruit trees in Portugal and ferns in Hawaii. It's fitting for Miles, a dancer who thrived in the outdoors.
At Muckenhoupt's home, Miles' soil was used to plant a rosebush in the garden. And much of the soil resides in a planter in the backyard, next to her son's favourite hammock chair.
"Every time that rose bush blooms, you watch it with such anticipation," Muckenhoupt said. "It's such a gift, and it seems like a small visit from him, and it's gorgeous."
Composting your loved one's remains feels different than cremation or burial, Muckenhoupt said.
"You have had your ceremony, and then the story ends," she said. "With soil, the story is just beginning."
An example of the composting vessel Earth Funeral uses to turn human remains into soil. (John Naccarato/Earth Funeral via CNN Newsource)

How human composting works

Harries spent years working in the funeral industry but began rethinking it by contemplating his own mortality.
"One of the things that I really realised was I didn't resonate personally with the existing options. I didn't want to be buried and didn't want to be cremated," Harries said.
The rise of cremation has "been the absolute biggest trend in the funeral space" over the past few decades, Harries said, given it is less expensive and more convenient than traditional burial services. About 60 per cent of people who die in the US are cremated, according to the Cremation Association of North America.
But cremation pollutes the climate, using predominantly natural gas to power the furnaces that burn the bodies. And traditional burial uses chemicals including formaldehyde and other chemicals used in embalming fluid.
Human composting takes surprisingly little to complete. A body is wrapped in a biodegradable shroud and placed in a long metal capsule — surrounded with a mixture of wood chips, mulch and wildflowers. As it decomposes, the body releases nitrogen and the added natural materials provide carbon. With the cask kept at an optimal temperature, it creates perfect conditions for microbes to break the body down at a molecular level.
At the end of 45 days, the cask is left with about 300 pounds of nutrient-rich soil, Harries said. Families can choose to take home as much or as little as they want, and Earth Funeral sends any remaining soil to conservation projects in Washington and California.
Earth Funeral combines human remains with mulch, wood chips, and wildflowers to kickstart the composting process. (Human composting)

A clean death

The practice is becoming more popular; it has been legalised in 12 states with bills pending in eight others. Harries said Earth Funeral customers who are doing end of life planning for themselves or a loved one care about the Earth and the climate, or those who are passionate about the outdoors.
"This is their final act on Earth," Harries said. "They're thinking about kids and future generations."
Kimberly Cooley-Reyes, 66, falls into that category. An avid gardener, Cooley-Rees found human composting after her best friend passed away several years ago and had a green burial. Doing her own end-of-life planning with human composting has given her a sense of peace.
"This is something that moves me," Cooley-Reyes told CNN. "I am going back into the earth, and I will go back cleanly. I'm not going to cause pollution."
Cooley-Reyes lives in San Francisco with her husband, in a home they've shared for almost 19 years not far from the beach. When she looks of out her bedroom window, she can see all the way to the Farallon Islands. Immediately below her bedroom window is the beloved garden she will one day amend as soil.
"It makes me feel immortal, quite frankly," she said. "This is the only home I've ever owned; it's the happiest place I've ever lived, so for me to be able to stay here is pretty special."