Thursday, January 02, 2025

This is how racism pushes people into homelessness: 'I'd have been treated differently if I was white'

A Crisis report uncovered tales of racism and discrimination and showed how Black and ethnic minority communities are overrepresented in the UK's homelessness population

Liam Geraghty
THE BIG ISSUE
2 Jan 2025



Andrea Gilbert worked with Crisis to tell the story of homelessness and racism. Image: Supplied
Share


Last October Andrea Gilbert returned to her home after volunteering at a festival to find the doors locked and suddenly pushing her into homelessness.

Being made homeless is an experience affecting thousands of people in England and Wales – and Black people are over-represented in those figures.

A new report into racism and homelessness from Crisis, titled Where do I belong? Where is home?, reveals the racial inequality at the heart of the homelessness crisis.

The charity’s analysis of recent official government homelessness statistics shows that around 10% of households facing homelessness identified as Black between 2018 and 2023. Meanwhile, 20% of those seeking temporary accommodation identified as Black, while that was also true for nearly a quarter of people sleeping rough in London last year.

When compared to the 2021 Census, it shows that Black people make up just 4% of England’s population.

“I didn’t get access to the property for nine weeks so I wasn’t able to move to any other housing because I didn’t have access to my passport or any other clothing than what I went away with,” said Gilbert, from South London, who is currently sofa surfing with her mum and sister.

“It was really stressful. I ended up having to get some support with my mental health – I had to get some counselling sessions. I’m nowhere near getting housing than I was then to be honest.

“I am currently between family members. It’s really tough. I was living with my daughter before but she’s been put into temporary accommodation and I’ve been left to fend for myself. I’m not a priority as well so god knows when I’m going to get anywhere.”

Gilbert is far from alone.

Crisis’ report, co-produced with Black and ethnic minority communities with experience of homelessness, interviewed 58 people and found tales of racism and discrimination.

This report features direct, unfiltered quotations from people about their own experience, which refer to overt and implicit racism, including physical and verbal attacks and racial slurs, as well as sexual assault and drug and alcohol abuse.

The charity heard how racism affected people’s relationships with society, institutions and services and led to people being locked into poverty due to long-standing and deeply ingrained inequalities.

Testimonies spoke of being discriminated against by landlords, having negative experiences with the police and the criminal justice system and receiving inadequate medical care due to the colour of their skin.

Some participants described the isolating effects of racism and homelessness cutting them off from support groups too.

Francesca Albanese, executive director of policy and social change at Crisis, said: “These powerful testimonies once again show how people of colour are being repeatedly let down by our failure to tackle the institutional racism that exists in our housing and homelessness system.

“Ending homelessness is possible but to do that we need long-term systemic solutions that address inequality and remove the barriers that stop people from rebuilding their lives. This means scrapping hostile environment policies such as no recourse to public funds, which limits the help people can receive to find a home.

“As part of this, the forthcoming cross-departmental homelessness strategy must include improving access to social housing, as well as access to public services, so we can prevent homelessness amongst minoritised ethic communities and ensure they can leave it behind for good.”

For Gilbert, 36, who worked as a lived experience researcher on the report alongside Crisis, the interviews tallied with her own experiences of racism.

She told the Big Issue that she felt that her treatment would have been different if she wasn’t Black.

“It was really eye-opening to see some of the responses we got from the people we interviewed,” said Gilbert.

“The disparity shows how limited options are for Black families facing housing instability, pushing many into insecure short-term living arrangements.

“The lack of support I got. When I showed up to the council I had no phone, I had no way of communicating with anyone except for through a family member’s home. They ended up calling the wrong number and the person abused them down the phone so I was accused of doing that when I gave them my brother’s number.

“I feel like I was just left to the streets. I feel like I would have been treated differently [if I was white]. I’ve seen it for myself, people getting into accommodation within a month or up to three months where Black people can be there for years, sometimes in a overcrowded predicament.”

The government has been urged to include anti-racist measures in its upcoming homelessness strategy.

Tracey Bignall, director of policy and engagement at the Race Equality Foundation, said Crisis’ report “addresses a critical gap in understanding the challenges faced by Black, Asian, and minority ethnic communities, who are disproportionately affected by homelessness”.

Shabna Begum, CRO of Runnymede Trust, added: “Perhaps most telling is that not only is this disproportionality induced by institutional racism embedded in systems, but by active and intentional policies that push people of colour into the horrors of homelessness.”

But for Gilbert and others still facing homelessness going into 2025 like her, she would like to see a transformation in how the homelessness system treats people going forward.

“I’d like to see these barriers dismantled to see a housing system that prioritises dignity, justice and fair treatment for all residents,” said Gilbert.

“I’m just hoping I can find somewhere to live and find some stability because it’s all good me working and stuff but I haven’t got my own space and that’s the reality.

“I don’t want to have to keep on relying on people. You don’t want to fall out with the person and you don’t want to overstep the mark. How long can you stay at someone’s house also? You’ve got to think about all of these things because other people have their own lives to live as well. There are so many of us in that predicament.”

Homelessness in city still a 'massive problem'

Ben Woolvin
BBC News, Devon
BBC
Jim McCarthy (left) and Sophie Wisdom (right) work for charity Julian House

A homelessness charity has warned funding for its work is at risk, but demand for its services remains high.

Julian House's Exeter-based team said it was having to rely on donations from the public and fundraising to keep running its projects.

It said any donations - whether it be a one-off or regular commitment - could help provide support in the city.

Jim McCarthy, the charity's service manager, said he expected the next set of figures would show the number of people sleeping rough on the streets had decreased, but he added it was still a "massive problem" in Exeter.

He said any drop in homelessness figures would be a "positive outcome" for the charity.

However, Mr McCarthy remained cautious about the scale of the job at hand the charity was facing: "It's still a massive problem and there's still a lot of work to do."

'Changing lives'

Sophie Wisdom, outreach worker on the rough sleeper prevention team, said the charity wanted to help homeless people get back on their feet.

Miss Wisdom said: "Even if it's just a tiny bit of help each day... you're making that day better.

"Hopefully you're helping and encouraging them to get on the pathway that's going to change their life."


Former rough sleeper Alfie said Julian House helped him during tough times

Alfie, a former rough sleeper who spent a year on Exeter's streets before living in temporary accommodation for three years is about to move into a flat.

He said the help the Julian House charity provided was a vital resource to many.

Alfie said: "If it wasn't for Julian House, no-one would get a house, it's true."


January 2, 2025

Image by Mihály Köles.

With just weeks to go before Donald Trump waltzes back into the White House, America has an additional problem on its hands.

The homelessness rate has surged, rising by 18% in 2024 compared to last year.

According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s annual assessment report, more than 770,000 people were experiencing homelessness on a single night in January. Nearly 150,000 children experienced homelessness on a single night in 2024, a whopping 33% increase from 2023.

The number of homeless older Americans also rose, with more than 140,000 people over the age of 55 going unhoused in the U.S. this year. Nearly half of these older Americans reported living in places not meant for humans.

“No American should face homelessness, and the Biden-Harris Administration is committed to ensuring every family has access to the affordable, safe and quality housing they deserve,” HUD Agency Head Adrianne Todman said in a statement.

But the question remains: Why did 2024 see a surge in homelessness?

According to some experts, there are several factors that contributed to this increase, such as rising housing costs, surging immigration, and the end of many COVID-19 relief programs.

According to a Pew Charitable Trusts study, rising rental prices are directly linked to an increase in homelessness in the United States.

In other words, while homelessness often has several contributing factors, including substance abuse, mental health, weather, social safety net strength, poverty, or economic conditions, none are as impactful as the role of high housing costs.

According to the reports’ authors, “There are still places in the U.S. where levels of homelessness are low, either because those places have low-cost housing readily available—such as Mississippi, where homelessness is 10 times lower than California—or because they have rapidly added housing and made a concerted effort to reduce the ranks of residents without homes. In Houston, the rate of homelessness is 19 times lower than it is in San Francisco, even though Houston’s population has grown more than San Francisco’s in the past decade. Looking at these markets helps to show how population growth generally does not explain growth in homelessness, except in instances where there is not a sufficient increase in the housing supply.”

Interestingly, and perhaps recognizing the direct link between housing and homelessness, Enterprise Community Partners (Enterprise) recently announced a $65 million grant from philanthropist MacKenzie Scott, billionaire Jeff Bezos’s ex-wife, to assist in providing affordable housing for the homeless.

Like Enterprise, the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) has conducted research into this important issue and reached the same conclusion, suggesting that policymakers can solve homelessness by scaling up proven solutions: rental assistance and supportive services.

In CBPP’s view, evidence shows that “we can solve homelessness if we address its primary driver: the gap between incomes and rent. Rental assistance, which closes that gap, has been proven highly effective at both rehousing people experiencing homelessness and preventing future homelessness.”

Part of the problem with the numbers we see is that cities receiving HUD assistance must report once annually and they do this in the winter when more people seek shelter.

What this means is that if the census were taken in the summer months, we would see vastly greater numbers as more people are willing to spend time on the streets in warmer weather.

Thankfully, the Biden administration made some progress, reducing homelessness not only among the general population, but among veterans as well.

The number of homeless veterans decreased nearly 12% during Biden’s term from 2023 to 2024, going from 35,000 to 32,800, a drop of about 7.5%, according to data released by HUD. This fall, the department announced veteran homelessness was at its lowest level ever since tracking began in 2009.

But with Trump coming into office, these numbers are bound to jump back up and we are likely to witness an even greater rise in homelessness in the next four years.

Chloe Atkinson is a climate change activist and consultant on global climate affairs.


ZIMBABWE

Missing 8 year old boy found by rangers after wandering for 5 days in lion-infested game park

He survived on water and wild fruit, says MP

Unbelievable … a soiled Tinotenda Pundu is lucky to be alive after he got lost and spent five days wandering in the jungle


2.1.2025
by ZimLive

HARARE – An 8-year-old boy who went missing from his rural Kariba home was finally located safe by rangers after wandering alone for five days in wildlife infested Matusadonha Game Park in Mashonaland West.

Tinotenda Pudu wandered away, lost direction and unknowingly headed into the perilous Matusadonha Game Park, according to Mashonaland West Proportional Representation MP, Mutsa Murombedzi who succinctly captured the horror in a social media post on her X handle.

“A true miracle in remote Kasvisva community, Nyaminyami in rural Kariba, a community where one wrong turn could easily lead into a game park. 8-year-old Tinotenda Pudu wandered away, lost direction and unknowingly headed into the perilous Matusadonha game park,” she said.


“After 5 long, harrowing days in the jungle near Hogwe River, which feeds into Ume River, the boy has been found alive by the incredible rangers from Matusadona Africa Parks.

“His ordeal, wandering 23km from home, sleeping on a rocky perch, amidst roaring lions, passing elephants, eating wild fruits and just the unforgiving wild is too much for an 8-year-old.”

Eight-year-old Tinotenda Pudu got lost and for 5 days, he wandered alone in a lion-infested jungle

Added the legislator, “We are overwhelmed with gratitude to the brave park rangers, the tireless Nyaminyami community who beat night drums each day to get the boy hear sound and get the direction back home and everyone who joined the search.

“Above all, we thank God for watching over Tinotenda and leading him back home safely. This is a testament to the power of unity, hope, prayer and never giving up.”

Tonotenda, according to the MP, survived on eating a wild fruit called Nchoomva in Tonga.

“It is Tsvanzva like or its actually the Tsvanzva. Then water he would go on the dry riverbank and use hands and a stick to dig a Mukàla in Tonga or what we call Mufuku in Shona and drank water from there.”

Tinotenda was reportedly very frail when he was rescued and had to be put on a drip to regain his strength.

“On water what saved him is the technique learnt from a young age in dry and drought prone areas of drawing water from a dry riverbank – digging a mufuku,” Murombedzi said.

While in the jungle, Tinotenda reportedly heard a park rangers vehicle and tried to run towards the sound but was late only to see vehicle markings in the off the beaten path in the game park.

He then went back to the rocky outcrop but luckily when the park rangers used the same path on their return, they saw fresh little human footprints and scoured the area and found him.

“This was probably his last chance of being rescued after 5 days in the wilderness,” Murombedzi said.
NORTHERN IRELAND

Digital museum and monument aims to honour lost Irish sailors of First World War


Group planning fundraising drive for new project and assessing Belfast site for a monument


Captain John Rees beside HMS Caroline


Ralph Hewitt
1/1/2025
BELFAST TELEGRAPH

A cross-border project to create a museum in honour of more than 1,600 Irish sailors lost at sea during the First World War is to launch fundraising efforts.

It is hoped the digital museum will also include a physical monument in memory of those who died in the Great War, as well as subsequent conflicts.

A working group is assessing a site for a monument at Belfast’s Alexandra Dock, where First World War light cruiser HMS Caroline is moored.

It is made up of experts including representatives from Belfast Harbour Commissioners, Belfast City Council, Irish Naval Service, Glasnevin Cemetery and the HMS Caroline Preservation Company.

The group is chaired by Captain John Rees OBE, retired chief of staff at the National Museum of the Royal Navy and former director in charge of the restoration of HMS Caroline.

He said the Irish sailors who died in the war, as well as those killed in subsequent battles, deserve recognition.

“There is no physical monument existing anywhere to honour the Irish sailor,” said Captain Rees.

“When we were restoring HMS Caroline in time to open to the public for the centenary of the Battle of Jutland, we had been very conscious of this gap in history.

“Now our working group is progressing ways of resolving this by creating a physical and a digital presence which will allow families, descendants, and everyone to participate in the memory of these heroic men.”



Commodore Martin Quinn and former Harbour Commissioner Noel Brady.

The group includes leading Belfast business figure and former Harbour Commissioner Noel Brady, who said all communities must be acknowledged in Ireland’s shared history.

“This is not a political expression of anything,” added Mr Brady.

“It is acknowledgement that, as a divided society in pre-partition Ireland, we treated each other badly.

“These prejudices continued after partition and the historic ignorance of the roles played by people from all communities in Ireland’s past 100 years must be addressed.

“This memorial is one such step which will encourage continued reconciliation.”


Captain John Rees OBE.

Commodore Martin Quinn, chairman of the HMS Caroline Preservation Company board of trustees, said the acknowledgement has been a long time coming. “We enter a new year a quarter of the way into the century with renewed confidence as a society with dual identities,” said Commodore Quinn.

“We need much broader acknowledgement of the roles played by all in our shared history, and as chairman of the board of trustees would very much wish to see the physical embodiment of recognition of the Irish sailor close to the ship which saw action in a battle that cost the lives of thousands of sailors, including many hundred Irishmen.”

The group is aiming to make an announcement on fundraising strategies early this year.
My person of the year: Gisèle Pelicot

by Alain Catzeflis

Member ratings
Well argued: 87%
Interesting points: 82%
Agree with arguments: 87%27 ratings - view all

Person of 2024: Gisèle Pelicot. (Image created in Shutterstock)


There’s courage and then there’s courage. Courage in the face of danger or courage under fire is one sort. Call it bravery in the face of predictable danger: firefighters, soldiers, coppers. It’s what they face because of what they choose to do.

Then there’s courage in the face of the unforeseen: sudden war, personal tragedy, torment, abuse. All too often this is the kind women have to summon up in a world dominated by men, by the patriarchy. Women under the heel of the Taliban in Afghanistan are an obvious example. But not the only one.

Mother Courage, Bertolt Brecht’s masterpiece, was written in the white heat of anger by the German poet shortly after the invasion of Poland in 1939. It’s a story, among other things, about resilience in the face of war and injustice by a woman and a mother.


Eighty-five years later, we are spoiled for choice when considering the courage of women: the mothers of Gaza, Ukraine and Sudan, often subjected to horrific abuse, fighting with all they have to protect themselves and their children.

Women like Nadia Murad, the Iraqi-born Yazidi Nobel Peace laureate and advocate for survivors of sexual violence. She was captured, held in slavery, raped and abused by the group calling itself Islamic State.

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of these examples of man’s inhumanity to women is the astonishing endurance of the survivors and their willingness to call out their tormentors in open court.

One woman who joins this list long beyond numbers is Gisèle Pelicot, a petite 72-year-old grandmother, whose story, told in the solemn setting of a French courtroom in Avignon, has turbo-boosted the debate around sexual violence.

Her husband, father of her three children, their seven grandchildren and a dog called Lancôme, turned their cream stone cottage in the sleepy Provençal town of Mazan into a house of horror. For nearly ten years he repeatedly drugged his wife, raped her himself and invited dozens of other men to rape her while filming them.

Dominique Pelicot was caught filming up the skirts of women in a local supermarket. When police seized his computer they found a file called “Abus”. It had 20,000 photos and videos of his unconscious wife being violated by him — and by at least 83 men. Serial rapists, like serial killers, like to keep trophies.

Much of the coverage of this woman’s torment – and courage – speaks of uncomfortable questions for France. She was an “ordinary” grandmother, he was a retired electrician. They enjoyed shopping together. It was a shocking, surprising, seemingly extraordinary crime. But how extraordinary was it?

UNICEF recently published the findings of its first attempt to gauge how commonplace rape is around the world. It estimates – and this can only be an estimate because many, perhaps most, rapes go unreported – that more than 370 million girls and women alive today have experienced rape or sexual assault. That’s one in eight women.

This stain cuts across geographical, cultural and economic boundaries. You don’t have to be destitute to be a rapist. Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia top the list. But Europe and north America come a dishonourable third, with 68 million victims.

Rape has a long and painful history. It is perhaps the most egregious of all the manifestations of toxic masculinity. In her eye-opening book Our Bodies, Their Battlefield Christina Lamb , the Sunday Times chief foreign correspondent, lays out, in meticulous detail, how rape has been and remains a weapon of war.

Rape is not a private crime. Nor is it an incidental atrocity. In war, mass rape – whether on October 7 2023 in Israel by Hamas or by Russian troops in Bucha, Ukraine in 2022 – is a calculated, deliberate act of terror. It seeks to break the spirit of civilian communities in the same way that indiscriminate bombing does.

Conservative estimates of the number of women raped as part of the Serb strategy to subdue mainly Muslim women in the 1990s Bosnian war range from 20 to 50,000. They were held in so-called rape camps, systematically abused and often killed.

How does this differ, in essence, from the behaviour, the “strategy”, pursued by Dominique Pelicot? Or the British-Pakistani men who groomed and abused more than a thousand underage girls in Rotherham from the late 1980s to 2013, when the scandal broke.

Rape is a form of control, more precisely coercive control, whether in war or in the home. But these dry words do not begin to describe the acts of assault, intimidation, threats, abuse and humiliation that millions of women suffer.

Beyond that, and most unfair of all, is the shame women are made to feel at being violated. This is what makes Gisèle Pelicot’s stand so remarkable. Shame and victim-blaming is the default defence of the rapist and the culture that shields them.

Women often stay silent, some for their whole lives, about the abuse they suffer. The criminal justice system is still failing women. The investigation and prosecution of rapes remains slow, often harrowing for the victims and weakened by a prejudice that lies just beneath a thin veneer of good intentions.

The Pelicot trial has shone a light on a dark side of France. But we have no grounds to feel smug in the UK, where only 3.3% of rape reports result in conviction.

What happened to Gisèle Pelicot was exceptional but not unusual. Women, at least in Europe and America, are better placed to stand their ground. But we still live in a culture where sexual intimidation is excused by many (including the President-elect of the United States) as ”locker room talk”, or “banter”.

And yet do women feel safe enough to walk alone at night? Are they confident that they’ll be listened to should they walk into a police station to report a sexual assault? In many countries the police are still ruled by the patriarchy.

The legacy of rape is indescribably awful. After her first experience, Gisèle Pelicot contemplated suicide. She describes herself as a “totally destroyed woman…a field of ruins”. Things are slowly changing and her case may act as an accelerator of further change.

Rape is a destination on a continuum that begins with the objectification of women almost from birth. They may head Fortune 500 companies. They may run entire countries. But the prejudice that sees them as sex objects or playthings will not easily be erased.

Male influencers like Andrew Tate preach a radical, male culture that leads to extreme misogyny. Tate awaits trial in Romania on charges of rape, human trafficking and exploiting women.

Perhaps the best we can hope for is that Gisèle Pelicot’s stand will help abused women overcome their sense of isolation, the shame they feel and come forward. We must also teach our sons the true meaning of consent.

“It is not for us to feel shame,” she said memorably at the end of the trial, in which her husband and all his accomplices were found guilty and sentenced to up to 20 years in prison. “It is for them.”

Gisèle Pelicot is my candidate for Person of 2024.
UK

Zarah Sultana would 'absolutely' return to Labour after suspension: 'It has to be a broad church'


‘If a Labour government isn't committed to ending child poverty, then what do you stand for?" suspended MP Zarah Sultana tells Big Issue

Greg Barradale
2 Jan 2025
BIG ISSUE 

Zarah Sultana will find out in January whether she's allowed back as a Labour MP. Image: House of Commons//Flickr


Zarah Sultana’s 2024 started with an election looming which promised to put the Labour MP’s party back into power. It has ended with her waiting to find out whether she’ll have the whip restored and become a Labour MP once more. The Coventry South MP is outside of the tent, and not worried if Keir Starmer gets a little splash on his shoes. His government is not just complicit in genocide, but “actively participating”, she says. Starmer himself is “doing pretty bad”, while the party has lost a lot of goodwill on poor decisions and is embarking on “cruelty by choice” with benefits cuts.

And yet, despite all this, Sultana told Big Issue she’d “absolutely” go back to the Labour benches if they’d have her.

“I would want to be in a Labour Party that wasn’t complicit in genocide, that wasn’t selling arms, that wasn’t pushing austerity politics. And therefore as someone who’s still a member of the Labour Party, and hopefully a Labour MP, I have to do everything I can to take the party away from those positions. Otherwise I think I’m just giving up any responsibility,” Sultana said. “Yes, it’s shitty when there’s only a few people who are making those arguments, but I didn’t get into politics to just do what everyone else does, especially when I think it’s wrong.”John McDonnell fears ‘people will lose their lives’ due to Labour benefit cuts
Keir Starmer on being as ‘bold as Attlee’ and why there’ll be no return to austerity under his watch

Zarah Sultana had the whip suspended in July for voting against the government on the two-child benefit cap, and now sits as an independent MP. Elected to parliament in 2019, on a majority of just 401, the 31-year-old has established herself as a voice of the post-Corbyn left and become a touchstone politician for progressive young voters. This is at least in part because she is outspoken, a thorn in Starmer’s side on poverty, benefits cuts and most prominently Gaza. As she demonstrates in an interview with Big Issue to mark a seismic year, Sultana has not spent her suspension biting her tongue and waiting for the whip to come back.

Sultana added: “For me, if the Labour Party is to be electorally successful, it has to be a broad church. And therefore, if people like me are not welcome or not allowed to be in the Labour Party, that should be massively concerning to people who care about the Labour Party, care about young people feeling passionate about the Labour Party and politics overall, people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and people who are progressive. That would be worrying.”

In a funny way, then, the pivotal moment in Zarah Sultana’s year was not being part of a Labour Party swept to power with a 174-seat majority. Barely three weeks after this, Sultana voted with an SNP amendment to the King’s Speech calling on the government to lift the two-child benefit cap. Saying she was standing up for “true Labour values”, she was one of seven Labour MPs suspended from the party, including Apsana Begum and Rebecca Long-Bailey. It came after the party controversially deselected left-wingers Faiza Shaheen and Lloyd Russell-Moyle during the election campaign. “The approach was to finish the job and bury the left,” she said.

Her six-month suspension is up in January, pending a review. Sultana revealed she doesn’t know the terms of the review. An email from the chief whip, sent after the vote, simply told her she was expected to vote with Labour and that: “At the end of this period, I will make a judgement about restoring the whip based on your conduct during the suspension and your willingness to comply with the whip in the future.”

Zarah Sultana was in the dark over the rest of the process, she said: “It could be I get an email, it could be a call to a meeting, it could be something briefed out to journalists and then I just read about it on Twitter. I really don’t know.”

‘If a Labour government isn’t committed to ending child poverty and ending pension poverty, then what do you stand for?’


Labour may be on shakier ground with the public than many are willing to realise, she said. “In voting for the Labour Party, it wasn’t because they ultimately believed in the vision or all of the policies. In many ways, it was just to get rid of the Tories,” she said.

Take Gaza: it has been credited with a massive fall in Labour’s Muslim vote, with more than 300,000 votes lost in areas with the highest Muslim populations. Independent MPs unseated Labour from Birmingham Perry Barr and Blackburn, to Leicester South and Dewsbury and Batley. Jonathan Ashworth and Thangam Debbonnaire, shoo-ins for cabinet roles, lost their seats. It contributed to a big, yet under-discussed trend from 2024’s election: overall, 537,000 fewer people voted for Labour than in 2019. So was Zarah Sultana – a young, Muslim woman, from the left of the party – consulted on how the party might reach out to voters concerned about the ongoing military action?

“There were so many meetings we had before the general election with MPs who felt particularly concerned about this issue. They knew that there would be ramifications in their constituency, and it was literally a talking shop exercise, which I found quite futile, because I found myself moving away from making the moral, legal, right argument about what was happening in Gaza to an electoral argument that this was all part of the Labour Party, and that feels so dehumanizing. But that was a genuine concern,” she said.
“You had other people that were quite senior in LOTO [the leader of the opposition’s office], Keir was sitting in those meetings, Shabana Mahmood was sitting in on those meetings. You had a coalition of MPs who were Muslim, MPs who have significant Muslim voters, people who just care about the issue. You had quite a broad range of people. I would say there were in those meetings, 20 to 30 MPs making the same point repeatedly, and we had very little to show in terms of what came out of those meetings, if I’m honest with you.”

This national approach contrasts with the party’s regional strategy, where the West Midlands party asked Sultana to get involved with May’s mayoral election. While she managed to get an agreement from winning candidate Richard Parker on free school meals, “The other demand I had from the campaign was to call for an arms embargo. We weren’t able to get to a position that we both agreed on, and that is something that obviously I couldn’t then say we are working together on Palestine and Gaza. But I was able to endorse Richard Parker based on the free school meals campaign,” she said.

Sitting in the lobby of Portcullis House – parliament’s office block, where MPs drink gossipy coffee with journalists and landlord politicians eat lunch – Zarah Sultana spoke of the life-and-death stakes of the decisions made in Westminster. Labour is wrong to try and get the bad bits out of the way, though. “There’s no sign to show that’s going to stop, because the welfare reforms are for next spring,” she said. “This winter, we’re going to see the impact.” Constituents constantly came to Sultana worried about unexpected bills, the bus fare cap rising, and the winter fuel payment for pensioners being means tested. While she credited the government for increasing the minimum wage in the autumn budget, she cited figures that the two-child benefit cap will hit 63,000 children by April 2025, and that winter fuel payment changes could push up to 100,000 pensioners into poverty.

“That is just cruelty by choice. Those figures – I’m saying 63,000 here, 100,000 here – those are individual people who do not deserve to make those difficult choices around heating and eating. And politicians always say, ‘Oh, it’s a really difficult choice having to vote this way.’ Like, no, we earn a very good salary, we are going to be fine. We’re not going to have to make decisions about whether we put the heating on or whether we can afford a meal,” she said.

“And so I just wish that they would make different decisions, because if a Labour government isn’t committed to ending child poverty and ending pension poverty, then what do you stand for?”

‘Keir is doing pretty bad’


Starmer – who despite winning the recent election has never been a particularly popular politician when it comes to personal approval ratings – has his eye on improving the country within five years. But Zarah Sultana warned a “sandcastle majority”, built on a low vote share, could cause problems sooner.

“If we look at polls since the general election, the Labour Party isn’t doing particularly well. Keir is doing pretty bad. This parliamentary term is going to be another four, five years. The Labour Party has time, but you’ve already lost a lot of goodwill by making decisions that you shouldn’t have,” she said.

Political turmoil and economic hardship is often talked about as always being a big opportunity for the right. But it can be an opening for the left, Sultana argued.

“The left has to be in a position where it can be influential, it can shape policy, and – like Jeremy’s election showed within the Labour Party – the left can take power. Obviously people look at the 2019 election, gloss over the gains of the 2017 election, which is all political, let’s be honest,” she said.

“But politics changes very quickly. That’s what I’ve learned in my five years here. Boris, the 80 seat majority, is now banned from the House of Commons. Things change very quickly. Moments happen.”
Shocking connection between Tesla truck that exploded and pickup truck used in New Orleans massacre revealed

By Sumanti Sen
HT
Jan 02, 2025

A shocking link has been established between the Tesla truck that exploded outside Trump Las Vegas hotel and the pickup truck used in the New Orleans attack.

A shocking link has been established between a Tesla Cybertruck explosion outside Trump Las Vegas hotel and the New Orleans car attack. Authorities are now investigating the Tesla Cybertruck explosion that occurred on Wednesday, January 1, as a possible act of terror. 

At least seven bystanders suffered minor injuries and the driver was killed. In the New Orleans attack, suspected terrorist Shamsud-Din Jabbar plowed a pickup truck bearing an ISIS flag into New Year’s Eve revelers on Bourbon Street, killing at least 15 people before being gunned down by cops.

The cybertruck blast occurred just hours after the New Orleans attack. Las Vegas Metropolitan Sheriff Kevin McMahill noted that there are no indications that there was a connection between the electric truck blast and ISIS, however, investigators have determined that the Tesla truck was rented through the Turo app, which was also used to rent the pickup truck used in the New Orleans attack, law enforcement sources told New York Post. “That’s another coincidence that absolutely … we have to continue to look into,” McMahill said

Authorities are ‘not ruling anything out yet’

Joe Biden has revealed that law enforcement is looking into “whether there’s any possible connection” between the Cybertruck detonation and the New Orleans attack. Meanwhile, McMahill said that authorities are “not ruling anything out yet.” “I don’t know, but what I can tell you is we’re absolutely investigating any connectivity to what happened in New Orleans as well as other attacks that have been occurring around the world,” he said.

It has been confirmed that the Cybertruck was filled with fireworks-style mortars. Authorities are trying to determine whether they were set off deliberately.

Officials were not sure if there was any connection between the use of a Cybertruck and the detonation at Trump Las Vegas hotel, considering Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s political ties to Donald Trump. “It’s a Tesla truck, and we know that Elon Musk is working with President-elect Trump, and it’s the Trump Tower. So there’s obviously things to be concerned about there, and that’s something we continue to look at,” McMahill said on being asked about a possible connection.

Tesla cybertruck explosion outside Trump hotel in Las Vegas could be terror attack


The driver, who was inside the truck when it caught fire, died in the incident and seven other people were injured.


Wednesday 1 January 2025 


The blast happened as the truck was outside the president-elect's hotel in Las Vegas, police and fire officials said.

The probe is being looked at as a possible terror attack, three senior law enforcement officials told NBC News, Sky News' US partner.


Tesla boss Elon Musk wrote on X: "We have now confirmed that the explosion was caused by very large fireworks and/or a bomb carried in the bed of the rented cybertruck and is unrelated to the vehicle itself.



"All vehicle telemetry was positive at the time of the explosion."

Earlier, he wrote: "The whole Tesla senior team is investigating this matter right now. Will post more information as soon as we learn anything. We've never seen anything like this."

Work is under way to remove the body, and the FBI is involved in the investigation.

The seven people also affected were nearby and were taken to a hospital for treatment for minor injuries.

As yet, officials have not provided a cause.

They do not believe the incident is connected to Wednesday's deadly Ford pick-up truck attack in New Orleans, NBC News reported, citing two senior law enforcement officials.

Both the Tesla and the Ford were rented from the same rental company, two officials said.

A Clark County spokeswoman said the blaze in the valet area of the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas was reported at 8.40am local time (4.40pm UK time).




Eric Trump, Mr Trump's son and executive vice president of the Trump Organization, posted about the fire on social media.

He acknowledged that "a reported electric vehicle fire occurred in the porte cochere of Trump Las Vegas".

And he praised fire crews and local police "for their swift response and professionalism".

File pic: Reuters

Mary Lescano Paguada, 43, who was on holiday in Las Vegas from San Antonio, Texas, to celebrate the new year at the hotel, told Sky's US partner network NBC News she heard an explosion in the early morning.

At first, she did not worry until she started seeing law enforcement officers responding to the scene.

Ms Paguada said once she and her husband reached the reception area, they heard screaming and were told by hotel staff to get out and "don't breathe the smoke, don't stay".

She said they were not allowed to return to their rooms after they went downstairs in an attempt to get them to evacuate the area.

The 64-storey hotel is just behind the famous Las Vegas Strip and opposite the Fashion Show Las Vegas shopping mall.


Elon Musk links Tesla Cybertruck, New Orleans incidents to terrorism

By HT News Desk
Jan 02, 2025

A Tesla Cybertruck carrying what appeared to be fireworks caught fire and exploded outside President-elect Donald Trump's Las Vegas hotel.

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, said on Wednesday that the Cybertruck and F-150 suicide bomb incidents might be linked and appear to be acts of terrorism.

The remains of a Tesla Cybertruck that burned at the entrance of Trump Tower, are inspected in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S. January 1, 2025. REUTERS

A Tesla Cybertruck carrying what appeared to be fireworks caught fire and exploded outside President-elect Donald Trump's Las Vegas hotel, leaving one person dead and injuring seven others, authorities reported.

“Appears likely to be an act of terrorism. Both this Cybertruck and the F-150 suicide bomb in New Orleans were rented from Turo. Perhaps they are linked in some way,” Elon Musk wrote in a post on X.

Officials from the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police and Clark County Fire Department said at a news conference that one person died inside the futuristic pickup truck. Seven people who sustained minor injuries were taken to the hospital for treatment.

The fire in the valet area of the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas was reported at 8:40 am (local time) on Wednesday, according to a county spokeswoman.

A law enforcement official, speaking anonymously, revealed that the truck was rented through the Turo app and appeared to be carrying fireworks.

“I know you have a lot of questions,” Jeremy Schwartz, acting special agent in charge for the FBI's Las Vegas office, told reporters. “We don't have a lot of answers.”

President Joe Biden was briefed on the explosion. Earlier, a driver rammed a truck into a crowd in New Orleans' French Quarter on New Year's Day, killing at least 10 people before being fatally shot by police.

“The whole Tesla senior team is investigating this matter right now,” Tesla CEO Elon Musk wrote in a statement on X, adding: "We've never seen anything like this.”

In Las Vegas, witness Ana Bruce, visiting from Brazil, said she heard three explosions.

“The first one where we saw the fire, the second one, I guess, was the battery or something like that, and the third was the big one that smoked the entire area and was the moment when everyone was told to evacuate and stay away,” Bruce said.

Her travel companion, Alcides Antunes, showed video he took of flames lapping the sides of the silver-coloured vehicle.

The 64-story hotel is just off the Las Vegas Strip and across the street from the Fashion Show Las Vegas shopping mall.


BRICS expands membership, adding Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand



By bno - Taipei Office December 30, 2024

The BRICS bloc, a coalition formed by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, is broadening its reach as it seeks to challenge the dominance of the US dollar and reshape global financial and economic systems.

The group announced it will add three new Asian partner countries – Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand – from January 1. The expansion underscores BRICS' growing ambition to deepen ties across the Global South.

Indonesia's inclusion is particularly significant. As the world’s fourth most populous country, following BRICS members India and China as well as the United States, Jakarta’s participation bolsters the bloc’s demographic and economic clout.

The addition of Malaysia and Thailand further reflects BRICS' strategic pivot toward Southeast Asia.

With Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, and Jakarta accounting for three of the region’s top six economies, their partnership positions BRICS to gain greater influence in one of the world’s fastest-growing economic corridors.

Vietnam, another major Southeast Asian economy, had expressed interest in joining BRICS as a partner country in November. However, its failure to respond to an official invitation leaves its potential membership uncertain for now.

Russia seeks to expand its nuclear energy dominance with new international projects
/ Pexels - Johannes Plenio


By bne IntelliNews December 31, 2024

Russia is constructing over 10 nuclear power units on foreign soil to help capitalise on burgeoning energy demands driven by artificial intelligence and developing markets, a senior Kremlin envoy has revealed.

As bne IntelliNews reported uranium is the new gas and Russia remains one of the main sources of enriched nuclear fuel. At the same time Russia’s nuclear exports are booming as it seeks to tie more countries to itself using 60-year fuel supply and service contracts that come with Russian-built nuclear power plants (NPPs).

The country’s intensified nuclear efforts reflect a broader strategy to solidify its global influence, with projects underway in nations such as Bangladesh, China, Egypt, India, Iran, and Turkey. Despite heavy sanctions targeting its oil and gas industries following the invasion of Ukraine, Moscow has bolstered its role as a major provider of nuclear energy.

Boris Titov, President Vladimir Putin’s special representative for international co-operation in sustainability, highlighted Russia’s ambitions in an interview with the Financial Times. “We are building more than 10 different units around the world,” Titov said. “We need a lot of energy. We will not be able to provide this energy without using . . . nuclear. We know that it’s safe . . . it’s not emitting [greenhouse gas emissions], so it is very clean.”

Growing demand for nuclear energy

The International Atomic Energy Agency forecasts a 155% increase in global nuclear generating capacity by 2050, reaching 950 GW. Russia’s expanding portfolio includes reactor construction, fuel supply, and related services across 54 countries, according to research by the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.

Titov underscored projects such as Hungary’s Paks 2 plant and developments in Turkey and Bangladesh. Russia is also advancing plans for small modular reactors in Uzbekistan and has signed agreements with Burkina Faso’s ruling junta. The Financial Times previously reported that Russia is involved in over a third of all new reactors under construction globally.

Western governments are seeking to counter Russia’s dominance in the nuclear sector. The US banned imports of Russian-enriched uranium in May, while most eastern European countries have switched to alternative suppliers for fuel compatible with Soviet-era reactors. However, Hungary has resisted such measures, with Prime Minister Viktor Orbán supporting Russian partnerships.

EU energy policy divides

Efforts to decouple Europe from Russian nuclear supplies have encountered resistance. EU energy commissioner Dan Jørgensen aims to scrutinise the entire nuclear supply chain as part of broader sanctions. Nonetheless, Hungary and Slovakia remain critical of such initiatives, with Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico declaring after a meeting with Putin that sanctions threatening electricity production would be “unacceptable”.

Russia’s state nuclear agency, Rosatom, continues to prioritise reliability, an EU official acknowledged. However, sanctions on Gazprombank, a key conduit for Russian energy payments, pose immediate challenges. The measures exempt civil nuclear projects, except for Hungary’s Paks 2 plant—a move Hungary’s foreign minister, Péter Szijjártó, labelled an “entirely political decision”.

Expanding global opportunities

Russia is eyeing emerging markets for nuclear expansion as many developing countries look to nuclear energy for clean power. Malaysia, for example, is exploring its potential, according to Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, Malaysia’s minister of natural resources and environmental sustainability.

At the UN COP29 summit in Azerbaijan, US National Security Council senior energy director Jake Levine expressed concern over the growing role of Russia and China in global nuclear energy, calling the competition a “huge issue”.

With its aggressive push into international markets, Russia aims to reinforce its position as a leading nuclear power player, even as geopolitical tensions escalate.


The Budapest Memo holds keys to ending the Ukraine war


Decades of broken promises have raised hard questions about whether new security guarantees can be upheld

Mark Episkopos
Jan 02, 2025

As the incoming Trump administration prepares to launch negotiations aimed at ending the current phase of hostilities between Russia and Ukraine, the question of security guarantees is certain to feature prominently in talks.

Talk of security guarantees is nothing new — indeed, it has underscored much of the drama that has unfolded since Russia’s initial military buildup in 2021. Moscow insisted that the United States and NATO undertake legally binding obligations in its two “draft treaties,” published on the eve of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, aimed at guaranteeing Ukraine’s neutrality and rolling back NATO forces in Central and Eastern Europe to where they were prior to the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act. Kyiv, for its part, naturally wants ironclad measures that can ensure it will not fall victim to another war of aggression in the years ahead.

To some extent, however, this is all déjà vu. Thirty years ago last month, the Budapest Memorandum was signed.

Aimed at providing security assurances to Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan in exchange for their entry into the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Budapest Memorandum committed Russia, the United States and the United Kingdom to abstain from military and economic coercion against these three newly independent post-Soviet states. Its lessons offer important clues for how to bring peace to what has tragically become a war-torn region.

The memorandum has become the source of considerable mythmaking following Russia’s brazen violation of Ukrainian sovereignty on February 24, 2022 (though some have asserted that the United States was the first to violate the memorandum with its sanctions against Belarus). Most notably, Atlanticists and pro-Ukrainian advocates often insist that Kyiv gave up its nuclear weapons — the ultimate deterrent and guarantee of one’s own security — in exchange for promises that its borders would be respected.

Of course, these missiles were Soviet — they were never functionally Ukrainian and were beyond Kyiv’s ability to maintain. Lost even more often in this discussion is the fact that the newly minted Ukrainian state prohibited itself from accepting, producing or acquiring nuclear weapons in its 1990 Declaration of State Sovereignty, the same declaration in which Kyiv announced its “intention of becoming a permanently neutral state.”

Famously, the memorandum offered Ukraine security assurances rather than legally binding security guarantees, a distinction explicitly stressed by American diplomats during the talks. Indeed, the memorandum was never approved by the U.S. Senate, as treaties must be, because it did not proffer any security guarantees to Ukraine. Nor did it commit the U.S. — or any other signatory — to any specific punitive action in the event of aggression against Ukraine, affirming instead a “commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance” to Kyiv in case of an armed attack.

Given the history of the drafting process, Washington cannot be accused of pulling a fast one on Ukraine with ambiguous language or by using terms that may have been lost in translation. Simply put, the United States has never promised to fight for Ukraine — a position held in 1994 and reaffirmed by the Biden administration since Russia’s full-scale invasion. Any security guarantees offered to Ukraine aimed at bringing current hostilities to a close will be novel ones, not compensation for the West having supposedly failed to uphold its existing obligations.

In this context, Western states will need to weigh carefully just how far they are prepared to go, since Russia has demonstrated its willingness to fight for Ukraine while the West — initial suggestions of European peacekeepers aside — has not. French President Emmanuel Macron’s discussion earlier this year of sending European troops to Ukraine to prevent a Russian victory was promptly shut down by Western allies. One could argue that Ukraine’s status as a security “gray area” is what prompted Russia’s invasion, but permanent neutrality is just as plausible a resolution to this dilemma as NATO membership.

But perhaps the greatest lesson to derive from the history of the Budapest Memorandum is that context matters. The memorandum was agreed at a time when relations between Russia and the West were much more favorable (although by the end of 1994, Boris Yeltsin was already warning of the risk of a “cold peace”). The conclusion is that diplomacy — an evolving mixture of deterrence and reassurance — is consistently needed to tend to international relationships to ensure that agreements are upheld. The same will be true when it comes to “guaranteeing” that Russia will never invade Ukraine again.

By contrast, the Western approach to relations with Russia in the post-Cold War era has often been more legalistic than diplomatic — “throwing the book” at Moscow by pointing out the alleged ways in which it has failed to live up to its international commitments. Yet Kyiv was all too happy not to implement the Minsk agreements, which brought the initial rounds of fighting in the Donbas conflict to a halt, using the intervening years between 2015 and 2022 to strengthen its hand. Similarly, Moscow believed that the post-Cold War status quo was imposed upon it at a time of national weakness — something it sought to rectify by way of its “draft treaties.”

It is easy to say pacta sunt servanda, that agreements must be kept. But this requires building and maintaining trust. Doing so will require all sides to stop airing their tired narratives in public — such as when Moscow dismisses the perspectives of Central and Eastern European states as Russophobic or when Western countries pointlessly insist that NATO expansion is directed against no one — and recognize one another’s security concerns as legitimate.

Zachary Paikin
Dr. Zachary Paikin is Deputy Director of the Better Order Project and Research Fellow in the Grand Strategy Program at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. He is also Senior Fellow at the Institute for Peace & Diplomacy (IPD). Previously, Dr. Paikin was Researcher in EU Foreign Policy at the Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels and Senior Researcher in the International Security Dialogue Department at the Geneva Centre for Security Policy.


Mark Episkopos is a Eurasia Research Fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. He is also an Adjunct Professor of History at Marymount University. Episkopos holds a PhD in history from American University and a masters degree in international affairs from Boston University.

The views expressed by authors on Responsible Statecraft do not necessarily reflect those of the Quincy Institute or its associates.