Monday, March 10, 2025

GLOWING GREEN WASHING
Spain under pressure to abort nuclear energy phase-out

Valentin BONTEMPS
Fri, March 7, 2025 

Spain's energy sources (Julie PEREIRA)Julie PEREIRA/AFP/AFP


Spain, a European renewable energy leader, is coming under increasing pressure from the right and business groups to reverse its plans to phase out its nuclear power plants by 2035.

At the height of enthusiasm for nuclear power in the 1980s, Spain had eight nuclear plants providing 38 percent of its electricity. Now it has five, providing 20 percent of its power.

Under the country's nuclear phase-out plans, agreed in 2019 under the government of Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, these remaining plants will be closed over the next decade, as the country focuses instead on green energy sources such as solar and wind power.

But as the planned closure of the country's oldest and most powerful atomic plant at Almaraz in western Spain in 2027-28 approaches, calls are growing for Spain to follow in the footsteps of other European countries that are reviving their nuclear power.

The two reactors at Almaraz generate around seven percent of the total electricity produced in the European Union's fourth-largest economy.

Spain's decision to close its plants "was adopted in a completely different industrial, geopolitical, social and economic context" and no longer makes sense without "a viable alternative," the Nuclear Forum lobby group that represents the sector said in a statement.

Atomic power will be needed to meet Spain's electricity needs as demand will soar due to growing sales of electric vehicles and the expansion of data centres to accommodate the greater use of AI, it added.


- 'Absolutely necessary' -

Ignacio Sanchez Galan, the chairman of Spanish energy company Iberdrola, which operates several atomic power plants as well as renewable energy farms, said nuclear energy is "absolutely necessary" to keep the lights on.

Iberdrola is one of around 30 companies that signed a manifesto last month calling for the extension of Spain's nuclear power plants.

"Dismantling this infrastructure prematurely would cause irreparable economic and social damage," the manifesto said.

Since gas prices spiked with the Ukraine war, global interest in the nuclear sector is at its highest since the oil crises in the 1970s, according to the International Energy Agency.

The Netherlands and Sweden are planning to build new nuclear plants, while Belgium's new conservative-led government has reversed a two-decade pledge to phase out atomic power.

Italy's cabinet last month opened the door to a return to nuclear power, 25 years after the closure of its last reactors.

- 'Not ready' -

Spain's conservative main opposition People's Party (PP) has added to the pressure.

It has tabled a motion, which has been approved by the parliament, calling on the government to keep the nuclear plants in operation.

During a visit to the Almaraz plant last month, the influential PP head of Madrid's regional government, Isabel Diaz Ayuso, said the measure was necessary to "protect jobs and energy sovereignty" and warned that Spain was "not ready to replace nuclear energy".

The price of electricity in Spain could rise by 23 percent for domestic consumers and by 35 percent for businesses if the country's nuclear reactors are shut down, according to a study by PwC.

Abandoning nuclear power is a "big change" because it means replacing a "constant and predictable energy supply" with "more volatile" sources such as solar and wind, Enric Bartlett, a professor of environmental law at Esade Law School, told AFP.

But it should be possible to close the remaining nuclear plants "without disruption" if Spain has the right amount of installed capacity to generate electricity by other means by 2035, and the "appropriate transport and storage networks", he added.

"There will have to be a significant increase in investment," Bartlett said.

vab/ds/imm/rl


Saint John energy company says it hit milestone in recycling nuclear waste for energy

CBC
Sat, March 8, 2025


Rory O’Sullivan, chief executive officer of Moltex Energy, says his company plans to use the spent fuel at Lepreau to power its small modular nuclear reactor.
 (Roger Cosman/CBC - image credit)

A Saint John-based nuclear engineering company says it has hit a milestone in its aim to reduce waste coming from nuclear energy by turning that waste into usable energy.

The company — Moltex Clean Energy — is developing a process to extract usable energy from nuclear waste in what it calls the waste to stable-salt process.

This process takes the "high-level waste" from existing nuclear fuel that comes from nuclear generating plants and creates new fuel out of it, said company CEO Rory O'Sullivan on Information Morning Saint John.

The company announced success this week in extracting what O'Sullivan called "long-lived hazardous materials" out of nuclear waste.

"Nuclear waste has been one of the big impediments of nuclear power because of that long radioactivity of the waste," O'Sullivan said.

And while there are existing processes to manage nuclear waste, that waste isn't generally well accepted by the public, "whereas the concept of recycling the waste, and getting more energy out of it, and reducing the amount of long-lived hazardous radioactive products is very appealing," he said.


Moltex expects their reactor near Point Lepreau to be operational by the early 2030s. (Submitted by N.B. Power)

The company is aiming to use the process to power a 300 megawatt small modular reactor at the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station. Moltex expects that SMR to be operational by the early 2030s.

The process — according to information released by Moltex — takes nuclear fuel and separates it. What starts out as a "bundle of fuel," which is 100 per cent "high-level" waste, becomes 98 per cent "intermediate" waste by removing what's called "fuel salt" and other products.

The high-level waste accounts for roughly one per cent of the total waste, according to the company.

This extracted "stable salt" would be used to create energy and the leftover "intermediate waste" has a footprint three times less than the original fuel bundle, Moltex said.

Reduced liability for future generations

Warren Mabee, director of energy and environmental policy at Queen's University, said the technology holds great promise.


"This is one of the most important things I think that the nuclear industry has to figure out — how to deal with waste that comes from these plants," Mabee said.

"Despite the fact that nuclear energy is now more than half a century old, we really haven't cracked that nut. This announcement is just one step closer to hopefully having solved that problem."

O'Sullivan said that while putting nuclear waste in ground repository is safe, it's also a large and costly endeavour and that using parts of the waste for fuel makes more economic sense.

The project is funded by the Federal Strategic Innovation Fund and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency and has partnerships with national stakeholders, such as reactor supplier Candu Energy.

No comments: