Saturday, May 03, 2025

Another round of auto tariffs just went into effect. They could change the industry forever


Chris Isidore
Sat, May 3, 2025


The average car buyer doesn’t think about where the parts in their vehicle come from – but automakers do.

That’s why a new round of auto tariffs – this time on parts – coming into effect Saturday could upend the industry, even more than previous levies on imported cars.

As of 12:01 am ET on Saturday, most auto part imports will come with a 25% import tax.


The previous auto tariffs left US-made cars untouched. Not anymore. Not a single of the 10 million cars turned out by US plants last year was built without at least some imported parts. The tariffs on parts could now mean tens of billions of dollars in new cost to the industry – and eventually to American car buyers and owners.

Vehicles on the trim assembly line at the General Motors assembly plant in Fort Wayne, Indiana, on April 9, 2024. - Emily Elconin/Bloomberg/Getty Images

“Frankly, from my perspective, (the parts tariffs) looks worse for the broader economy than the tariffs on imported vehicles,” said Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive, at an Automotive Press Association webinar this past week.

More than 50% of the content of cars assembled in American auto plants is imported, according to the government’s own estimates. But the tariffs won’t apply equally to all those imports.

For example, parts from Canadian or Mexican suppliers who pay their workers $16 or more an hour are deemed “compliant” with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, a trade deal negotiated during the first Trump administration. That means most Canadian parts are exempt from tariffs, but relatively few Mexican parts.

And as of last week, automakers assembling cars in the United States will be able to offset part of the parts tariff, at least temporarily. The White House said it would refund automakers up to 3.75% of price of the vehicle against their parts tariffs bill in the first year, sliding to 2.5% in the second year before being phased out in the third year.

But even with that refund, the added cost of tariffs could still come to an average of about $4,000 per vehicle, according to estimates derived from a CNN analysis of government trade data.


For car buyers, it might take awhile to see price hikes. General Motors CEO Mary Barra told CNN Thursday tariffs will cost her company between $4 billion and $5 billion this year, but she doesn’t expect car prices to change in the near term. Ford CEO Jim Farley told CNN on Wednesday that it would extend its “employee pricing” offer through July 4.

But everyday Americans will still see higher prices elsewhere, like the repair shop.

“The tariffs on parts that will lead to higher inflation in repair and maintenance and insurance which impact every American and not just the people thinking about buying a new imported vehicle,” Smoke said.

No such thing as an all-American car

The recent change in the parts tariff rules means any car assembled in the United States with 85% “USMCA compliant” parts would essentially be tariff-free.

A car hauler truck makes its way to the Ambassador Bridge in Windsor, Canada to cross into the United States on April 1. - Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

The problem is that virtually no vehicle meets that 85% threshold, according to analysis by Frank DuBois, a retired professor at American University’s Kogod School of Business.

That’s because automakers have been operating for decades as if North America is a single market, moving parts repeatedly across the US borders with Canada and Mexico with few if any tariffs.

Judging which content is actually domestic could be tough, as well, DuBois said, getting down to such minor points as where the oil and antifreeze come from.

Besides the $19.2 billion in imported Canadian components, most other imported parts will not be exempt.

For example, Mexico sent $82.5 billion in parts to the United States last year, by far the largest source of imported parts. But few of those are considered “USMCA compliant,” so most will have the tariff attached.

If current tariffs for auto parts (and additional levies for Chinese goods in general) had been in effect last year, the total price tag would have been about $60 billion. Even with the refund rules announced this past week would only have taken that bill down to $40 billion.

The parts refund, Smoke said, is just about “taking a bad situation and making it slightly less worse.”

CNN.com
Russia's Medvedev says Trump's statement about US World War Two role was 'pretentious nonsense'


Reuters
Sat, May 3, 2025 



Deputy head of Russia's Security Council Medvedev speaks at educational marathon in Moscow

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, said on Saturday that President Donald Trump's assertion that the U.S. had done more than any other country to win World War Two was "pretentious nonsense".

Trump posted on social network Truth Social late on Thursday that "nobody was close to us in terms of strength, bravery, or military brilliance" in both world wars, and that "we did more than any other country, by far, in producing a victorious result in World War II."

Medvedev, a former Russian president who has emerged as one of Moscow's most outspoken anti-Western hawks since the start of Russia's war in Ukraine, made his own statement at a time when Washington and Moscow are trying to reset their troubled ties while discussing a possible way to end the conflict.

"Trump recently announced that the U.S. made the biggest contribution to victory in World War Two and that he will introduce a special holiday on May 8. A holiday is not a bad thing, but his first statement is pretentious nonsense," Medvedev said in a post on the VK social network.

"Our people sacrificed 27 million lives of their sons and daughters in the name of destroying accursed fascism. Therefore, Victory Day is ours and it is May 9! So it was, so it is, so it will always be!" wrote Medvedev.

(Reporting by Reuters; Editing by Andrew Osborn)

WAIT, WHAT?!

University of Utah Researchers Develop Explainable AI Toolkit to Predict Disease Before Symptoms Appear



University of Utah Health
Nina de Lacy 

image: 

Nina de Lacy, MD, MBA.

view more 

Credit: Kristan Jacobsen Photography / University of Utah Health.





Researchers at the University of Utah's Department of Psychiatry and Huntsman Mental Health Institute today published a paper introducing RiskPath, an open source software toolkit that uses Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to predict whether individuals will develop progressive and chronic diseases years before symptoms appear, potentially transforming how preventive healthcare is delivered. XAI is an artificial intelligence system that can explain complex decisions in ways humans can understand.

The new technology represents a significant advancement in disease prediction and prevention by analyzing patterns in health data collected over multiple years to identify at-risk individuals with unprecedented accuracy of 85-99%. Current medical prediction systems for longitudinal data often miss the mark, correctly identifying at-risk patients only about half to three-quarters of the time. Unlike existing prediction systems for longitudinal data, RiskPath uses advanced timeseries AI algorithms and makes them explainable in order to deliver comprehensive models that provide crucial insights into how risk factors interact and change in importance throughout the disease development process.

"Chronic, progressive diseases account for over 90% of healthcare costs and mortality," says Nina de Lacy, MBA, MD, assistant professor in psychiatry at University of Utah Health and first author on the study. She adds, "By identifying high-risk individuals before symptoms appear or early in the disease course and pinpointing which risk factors matter most at different life stages, we can develop more targeted and effective preventive strategies. Preventative healthcare is perhaps the most important aspect of healthcare right now, rather than only treating issues after they materialize."

The research team validated RiskPath across three major long-term patient cohorts involving thousands of participants to successfully predict eight different conditions, including depression, anxiety, ADHD, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome. They say that the technology offers several key advantages:

  • Enhanced Understanding of Disease Progression: RiskPath can map how different risk factors change in importance over time, revealing critical windows for intervention. For example, the study showed how screen time and executive function become increasingly important risk contributors for ADHD as children approach adolescence.
  • Streamlined Risk Assessment: Though RiskPath can analyze hundreds of health variables, researchers found that most conditions can be predicted with similar accuracy using just 10 key factors, making implementation more feasible in clinical settings.
  • Practical Risk Visualization: The system provides intuitive visualizations showing which time periods in a person's life contribute most to disease risk, helping researchers identify optimal times for preventive interventions.

The research team is now exploring how RiskPath could be integrated into clinical decision support systems, preventive care programs, and the neural underpinnings of mental illness. They plan to expand their research to include additional diseases and diverse populations.

###
The full study on RiskPath was published in the April issue of Patterns as "RiskPath: Explainable deep learning for multistep biomedical prediction in longitudinal data." The research was led by Nina de Lacy, Michael Ramshaw, and Wai Yin Lam from the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Utah. De Lacy serves on the One-U Responsible AI Initiative Executive Committee. The work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (grant number R00MH118359). Content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
###

CAPPLETALI$M
Apple eases App Store rules under court pressure


By AFP
May 2, 2025


Analysts don't expect letting developers link to payment platforms outside the App Store to be a major hit to revenue generated by Apple's services business - Copyright AFP Hector RETAMAL

Glenn CHAPMAN

Apple on Friday relaxed its App Store payment rules in the face of a scathing court order, with Spotify quick to reap the benefit.

Apple’s update to its App Store guidelines let developers know they could now provide links to outside payment platforms, allowing people to buy apps featured in its US online shop without paying through the App Store.

The rule change came just two days after a US judge accused Apple of defying an order to loosen its grip on the App Store payment system to the point that criminal charges could be warranted.

Music streaming giant Spotify said Friday that Apple had approved an update “that will finally allow us to freely show clear pricing information and links to purchase” in its app in the US App Store.

“In a victory for consumers, artists, creators, and authors, Apple has approved Spotify’s US app update,” the Sweden-based service said in a post on X.

“Today represents a significant milestone for developers and entrepreneurs everywhere who want to build and compete on a more level playing field.”

Epic Games chief executive Tim Sweeney shared the Spotify post along with a message of congratulations for it “being the first major iOS app to exercise its court mandated right to do digital commerce with customers free of Apple obstruction, interference, and the Apple Tax!”

US District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers found that Apple “willfully” violated an injunction she issued at trial, with the company instead creating new barriers to competition with the App Store and even lying to the court in the process.

Gonzalez Rogers ordered the injunction be enforced.

An Apple spokesperson told AFP it strongly disagrees with the judge’s decision and will appeal to a higher court, but would comply.



– ‘Junk fees’ –



Fortnite-maker Epic launched the case in 2021 aiming to break Apple’s grip on the App Store, accusing the iPhone maker of acting like a monopoly in its shop for digital goods and services.

After a trial, Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Apple’s control of the App Store did not amount to a monopoly, but that it must let developers include links to other online venues for buying content or services.

Apple’s response to the trial order included new barriers and requirements including “scare screens” to dissuade people from buying digital purchases outside of its App Store, the judge concluded.

“Apple’s 15-30 percent junk fees are now just as dead here in the United States of America as they are in Europe under the Digital Markets Act,” Sweeney said in a post on X.

The act, which went into effect last year in Europe, requires Apple and other US tech giants to open up their platforms there to competition.



– Courting developers –



Apple has made a priority of building up its services business as the Silicon Valley titan tries to reduce its reliance on iPhone sales for revenue.

The unit, which includes Apple’s television and music streaming services along with iCloud data storage and App Store income, now accounts for more than a quarter of the company’s revenue.

The App Store changes include letting app makers use alternate payment systems free or charge or commission, according to Apple.

“Whatever revenue Apple was getting, it is not worthwhile for them to continue to look as if they don’t have the developers best interest at heart,” said Creative Strategies analyst Carolina Milanesi.

Apple will be courting app makers at its annual developers conference in June.

“There’s still a lot of revenue coming in from subscriptions, iCloud and more, so this is not the end of the App Store being a good source of revenue for Apple,” Milanesi said.

Most apps in the App Store make their money from ads, and Apple shares in that revenue, according to the analyst.

“And for smaller developers, the App Store is still the best way to reach consumers without having to invest the kind of money that an Epic Games or Spotify can invest in setting up alternative payment methods,” the analyst added.
Meta fighting Nigerian fines, warns could shut Facebook, Instagram


By AFP
May 3, 2025


Meta says it 'may be forced to effectively shut down the Facebook and Instagram services in Nigeria' - Copyright AFP RONALDO SCHEMIDT

Meta on Saturday vowed to fight Nigerian fines for various consumer data violations, reportedly threatening to cut off Facebook and Instagram in Africa’s most populous country.

A Nigerian tribunal last week rejected the US social media giant’s appeal against a $220 million fine imposed by the country’s consumer protection agency, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC).

In appeals court papers cited by various media, including the BBC and The Africa Report, Meta said it “may be forced to effectively shut down the Facebook and Instagram services in Nigeria in order to mitigate the risk of enforcement measures”.

Meta’s social media platforms — WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram — are among the most popular in the country.

Meta has until the end of June to pay the fine, Nigerian media reported.

“We disagree with the NDPC’s (Nigerian Data Protection Commission) decision, which fails to take into account the wide range of settings and tools that allow everyone using Facebook and Instagram in Nigeria to control how their information is used,” a Meta spokesperson told AFP.

“We’re committed to protecting user privacy and have appealed the decision,” the company spokesperson said in an email response.

Nigeria had accused Meta of violating the country’s data protection and consumer rights laws on Facebook and WhatsApp.

FCCPC chief executive officer Adamu Abdullahi had said investigations carried out in conjunction with the NDPC between May 2021 and December 2023 revealed “invasive practices against data subjects/consumers in Nigeria”.

A WhatsApp spokesperson told AFP on Saturday: “The FCCPC order contains multiple inaccuracies and misrepresents how WhatsApp works, and we are urgently applying to stay the order and appeal the Tribunal’s decision to avoid any impact to users.”

On Saturday, the FCCPC described Meta’s reaction as “a calculated move aimed at inducing negative public reaction and potentially pressuring the FCCPC to reconsider its decision”.

In its statement it said that Meta had been sanctioned for “similar breaches” in Texas, India, South Korea, France and Australia, but had “never resorted to the blackmail of threatening to exit those countries. They obeyed”.

“Threatening to leave Nigeria does not absolve Meta of liabilities for the outcome of a judicial process,” the statement read.

Nigeria had some 164.3 million internet subscriptions as of March, according to figures published on the National Communication Commission’s website.
NAKBA II; TOTAL WAR

Israel calls up tens of thousands of reservists for Gaza offensive


By AFP
May 3, 2025


Israelis again called on the government to bring home the remaining hostages
 - Copyright GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP/File Jamie McCarthy


Callum PATON

Israel was issuing orders to call up tens of thousands of reservists ahead of an expanded offensive in Gaza, Israeli media reported Saturday, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attacked truce mediator Qatar.

Several news outlets reported the army had begun sending the orders for reservists to replace conscripts and active-duty soldiers in Israel and the occupied West Bank so they can be redeployed to Gaza.

A military spokesperson neither confirmed nor denied the reports but relatives of AFP journalists were among those who received mobilisation orders.

According to Israel’s public broadcaster, the security cabinet is scheduled to meet on Sunday to approve the expansion of the military offensive in Gaza.

Israel resumed major operations across Gaza on March 18 amid deadlock over how to proceed with a two-month ceasefire that had largely halted the war sparked by Hamas’s October 2023 attack.

Qatar, which hosts Hamas’s political office, brokered the truce alongside the US and Egypt that came into effect in January. Efforts to secure a new deal however have appeared to stall in recent weeks.

Netanyahu accused the gas-rich Gulf state of “playing both sides with its double talk”. Posting on X, he said Qatar had to “decide if it’s on the side of civilization or if it’s on the side of Hamas barbarism”.

The Israeli prime minister, under pressure from his far-right supporters, without whom he would lose his governing coalition, has been increasingly vocal in his calls to continue the war since the restart of the Gaza offensive.

“Israel will win this just war with just means,” he added.



– ‘Prisoner 24’ –



Hamas on Saturday released footage of an apparently injured Israeli-Russian hostage held in Gaza as 11 Palestinians, including three infants, were killed in a strike on the territory, its civil defence agency said.

The health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza said at least 2,396 people had been killed since Israel resumed its campaign in Gaza, bringing the overall death toll from the war to 52,495.

Gaza militants still hold 58 hostages, 34 of whom the army says are dead. Hamas is also holding the remains of an Israeli soldier killed in a previous war in Gaza in 2014.

The militant group’s armed wing, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, released a video on Saturday showing a hostage AFP and Israeli media identified as Russian-Israeli Maxim Herkin.

In the undated four-minute video, Herkin, who turns 37 at he end of May, was shown wearing bandages on his head and left arm.

Speaking in Hebrew in the video, which his family urged media to disseminate, he implied he had been wounded in a recent Israeli bombardment and referred to himself only as “Prisoner 24”.

AFP was unable to determine the health of Herkin, who gave a similar message to other hostages shown in videos released by Hamas, urging pressure on the Israeli government to free the remaining captives.

Herkin also appeared in a previous video released by Hamas in early April. In that video, he appeared alongside a second hostage Israeli media identified as soldier Bar Kuperstein.



– ‘Bright light’ –



Several thousand Israelis demonstrated outside the defence ministry in Tel Aviv on Saturday, demanding action from the government to secure the hostages’ release.

The government says its renewed offensive is aimed at forcing Hamas to free its remaining captives, although critics charge that it puts them in mortal danger.

“We’re here because we want the hostages home. We’re here because we don’t believe that the war in Gaza today, currently, is justified at all,” Arona Maskil, a 64-year-old demonstrator told AFP.

In Gaza, the civil defence agency said on Saturday that an overnight Israeli strike on the Khan Yunis refugee camp killed at least 11 people, including three infants aged one or less.

Agency spokesman Mahmud Bassal say they were killed in the “bombardment of the Al-Bayram family home in Khan Yunis camp” at around 3:00 am (0000 GMT).

Bassal told AFP that eight of the dead had been identified and were all from the same extended family, including a boy and girl, both one, and a month-old baby.

An Israeli army spokesperson confirmed the strike, saying it targeted a “Hamas member”.

Rescue workers and residents combed the rubble for survivors with their bare hands, under the light of hand-held torches, an AFP journalist reported.

Neighbour Fayka Abu Hatab said she “saw a bright light, then there was an explosion, and dust covered the entire area”.

“We couldn’t see anything, it all went dark,” she said.

Israel has blocked all aid deliveries to Gaza since March 2, prompting warnings from UN agencies of impending humanitarian disaster.
Singapore votes with new PM seeking strong mandate amid tariff turmoil


By AFP
May 2, 2025


Polls opened at 8:00 am (0000 GMT) for 12 hours of voting, with some results expected to stream in around midnight - Copyright AFP Roslan RAHMAN

Satish Cheney

Singaporeans cast their votes Saturday in an election where Prime Minister Lawrence Wong faces his first major test against a rejuvenated opposition in uncertain economic times for the trade-centred nation.

Wong’s ruling People’s Action Party (PAP), which has steered the island to prosperity while using an iron hand to suppress dissent, is expected to easily retain a clear majority in parliament.

Polls opened at 8:00 am (0000 GMT) for 12 hours of voting, with some results expected to stream in around midnight.

Popular after leading Singapore’s Covid task force, Wong took over last year from his predecessor Lee Hsien Loong, the son of founding premier Lee Kuan Yew who ruled the island state after its bitter break-up with Malaysia in 1965.

Wong has repeatedly said he needed a strong mandate to navigate heavily trade-reliant Singapore through economic uncertainty in light of tariffs levied by US President Donald Trump.

He has warned Singapore would be hit hard if Trump went ahead with the tariffs he announced and then paused for most countries except China, and needed to stay open and competitive to counter their effects.

“So I say to all Singaporeans, please consider carefully. This is not a gamble. This is your family, your future, our Singapore,” he said during the campaign.

– ‘Steady hand’ –

Political analyst Nydia Ngiow said the PAP had long been seen as Singapore’s steady hand in crises but that the recent tariff turmoil may not be a big factor for voters yet.

“Given that general elections in Singapore tend to focus on local issues, it is unlikely that geopolitics will shape voters’ decisions — unless Singaporeans feel a direct and tangible impact on their cost of living, job security or the broader economy,” she told AFP.

The overwhelming PAP majority in Singapore’s unicameral legislature is such a norm in the wealthy island’s political landscape that the opposition and its supporters will consider a few more seats gained as a significant victory, observers said.

But the PAP’s dominance is increasingly being challenged by a more vocal electorate, especially among younger voters who appear open to alternative political voices.

“Young voters will be a factor in some wards. Unlike the older voters they are prepared to listen to both sides and make an informed decision,” said veteran former news editor and political observer P.N. Balji.

– Historical gains –

In 2020, the country’s largest opposition group, the Workers’ Party (WP), made historic gains, winning 10 of the 93 seats at stake — a significant jump from its previously held four seats.

The WP — which has become politically slicker — is hoping to build on that momentum with a slate of charismatic candidates, including a top lawyer.

The party pulled in massive crowds at its rallies during the campaign, just like in previous elections, but those big numbers have seldom translated into electoral wins in the past.

WP candidates have lambasted the government for raising a goods and services tax amid rising inflation and insist the government has not done enough to curb rising costs in one of the most expensive countries in the world.

They also say more opposition MPs are needed in parliament so that the PAP does not have a “blank cheque” and can be held accountable.

The PAP, however, points to the billions of Singapore dollars it has spent in helping citizens cope with rising costs, including via cash handouts and grocery vouchers.

Singapore has around 2.75 million eligible voters who will elect 97 members of parliament.
Trump may have aided Australian PM’s election victory: analysts


By AFP
May 3, 2025


Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese waves as he arrives onstage in Sydney after winning a general election - Copyright AFP Saeed KHAN

David WILLIAMS

Donald Trump’s stinging trade tariffs may have helped Australia’s left-leaning prime minister snatch a resounding election victory Saturday, analysts say.

Unlike Canada’s Trump-swayed vote three days earlier, the US president was far from the biggest concern for voters who backed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, academics said.

But some said Trump nevertheless appeared to have a significant impact on the governing Labor Party’s late turnaround in the opinion polls, and the emphatic election result.

After trailing three months ago, Labor overtook opposition leader Peter Dutton’s conservative coalition and led a string of polls up to election day.

Dutton’s perceived “Trump-lite” policies — such as axing public service jobs in a drive for government efficiency — had turned some voters off, said Henry Maher, politics lecturer at the University of Sydney.

“Of course, there are other concerns — cost of living, defence, health and everything else,” he told AFP.

“But if we want to understand why a good chunk of the electorate has changed across the election campaign over the last couple of months, I think that’s the biggest thing.”

Trump’s unpopular 10-percent tariff on goods from longtime ally Australia, and the financial market disruption caused by his global trade policy, may have unnerved voters, Maher said.

“In times of instability, we expect people to go back to a kind of steady incumbent,” he said.

– ‘Volatility’ –

The Australian public’s confidence in its strongest ally, the United States, appears to have evaporated under Trump.

Only 36 percent of Australians trust the United States, according to an annual poll by the Lowy Institute — down 20 percentage points from 2024.

Dutton, who lost his own parliamentary seat in the election drubbing, earlier this year described Trump as a “big thinker” and “shrewd”.

But he and Albanese both stiffened their rhetoric, insisting they would not bow to the American leader when defending Australia’s interests.

Kate Harrison Brennan, who was an advisor to Labor’s former prime minister Julia Gillard, said Dutton’s coalition had tried out policies that “looked quite similar to those in the United States”.

Trump “definitely” had an impact on the election, she told AFP.

Australians had seen the global disruption under Trump, said Harrison Brennan, director of the University of Sydney’s Policy Lab.

This, in turn, had benefited Albanese.

“He’s made that case well, that in that type of changing world and volatility, he’d bring calm but effective leadership for Australia,” she said.

Not all analysts agreed that Trump was the deciding factor.

Paul Williams, political scientist at Griffith University, said Albanese would have won even if Joe Biden was still in the White House.

– ‘Turning point’ –

The Australian central bank’s decision to cut key interest rates in February represented a “turning point” in Labor’s fortunes, he said.

“Obviously this has been a cost-of-living election, but my take is that the sting is coming out of the tail of the cost of living, because wages are catching up to inflation,” Williams told AFP.

He did not believe Dutton had lifted policies from Trump.

But the conservative leader had only proposed a few policies, such as introducing nuclear power to Australia, and had failed to explain them clearly to voters.

And he had been forced to abandon a short-lived, coolly received plan to stop public servants working from home, which would have hit women voters in particular, Williams said.

That and other shifts in the Dutton campaign’s policies opened him up to accusations that he could not be relied on to govern.

“They have not gone through a single week of this campaign where they have not flipped and flopped,” Albanese said on the eve of the election.

Undecided voters were not avoiding Dutton because he reminded them of Trump, Williams said.

“They are doing it because of Peter Dutton. Peter Dutton has lost this election because of Peter Dutton.”


Australia's Albanese claims election victory, riding anti-Trump wave



Supporters of Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese react at a Labor party election night event, after local media projected the Labor Party's victory, on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters

By Kirsty Needham, Alasdair Pal and Christine Chen

SYDNEY (Reuters) -Australia’s Anthony Albanese claimed a historic second term as prime minister on Saturday in a dramatic comeback against once-resurgent conservatives that was powered by voters' concerns about the influence of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Peter Dutton, leader of the conservative Liberal party, conceded defeat and the loss of his own seat - echoing the fate of Canada's conservatives and their leader whose election losses days earlier were also attributed to a Trump backlash.




Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese celebrates with his partner Jodie Haydon, his son Nathan Albanese and Minister for Foreign Affairs Penny Wong at a Labor party election night event, after local media projected the Labor Party's victory, on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters

Supporters at Labor’s election party in Sydney cheered and hugged each other as Albanese claimed victory and said his party would form a majority government.

"Our government will choose the Australian way, because we are proud of who we are and all that we have built together in this country," Albanese told supporters.

"We do not need to beg or borrow or copy from anywhere else. We do not seek our inspiration from overseas. We find it right here in our values and in our people," he added.




Supporters of Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese react at a Labor party election night event, after local media projected the Labor Party's victory, on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters

Albanese would be the first Australian prime minister to win a consecutive term in two decades. He said Australians had voted for fairness and "the strength to show courage in adversity and kindness to those in need".

The Australian Electoral Commission website projected Labor would win 81 of 150 seats in the House of Representatives, increasing its majority in parliament, with 68% of the vote counted.

Dutton - whose Liberals had been leading in opinion polls as recently as February until he became dogged with comparisons to Trump - said he had phoned Albanese to congratulate him.

"We didn't do well enough during this campaign. That much is obvious tonight, and I accept full responsibility for that," Dutton said in a televised speech.


Supporters of Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hug at a Labor party election night event, after local media projected the Labor Party's victory, on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters

The former policeman with a reputation for being tough on crime and immigration said he had spoken to Labor's candidate in the seat of Dickson he had held for two decades, and congratulated her on her success.




Supporters of Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese hug at a Labor party election night event, after local media projected the Labor Party's win, on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters

"We have been defined by our opponents in this election which is not the true story of who we are" Dutton said, promising the party would rebuild.

TRUMP COMPARISONS

Cost-of-living pressures and concerns about Trump's volatile policies had been among the top issues on voters' minds, opinion polls showed.

"If you sling enough mud it will stick," said Liberal Senator for the Northern Territory Jacinta Price, whose comments that her party would "make Australia great again" had fuelled comparisons to Trump's own "Make America Great Again" slogan.




Supporters of the Labor party react to the first preliminary results at an election night event, on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters

"You made it all about Trump," she said on ABC. Dutton had said he would appoint Price to a ministry of government efficiency, one of several echoes of Trump's policies.

"Losing Peter Dutton is a huge loss," she added.

Opposition Liberal Party spokesman, Senator James Paterson, defended the conservative campaign, which he said was negatively affected by "the Trump factor".

"It was devastating in Canada for the conservatives ... I think it has been a factor here, just how big a factor will be determined in a few hours' time," he earlier told ABC.




A supporter of Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese wears sunglasses with the words 'Albo 2025' written on it at a Labor party election night event on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters

Earlier, as counting got under way, Labor Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the government had been "in all sorts of trouble" at the end of 2024 but got back into the contest because of Albanese's strong campaign performance, policies that addressed concerns about the cost of living, and the Trump effect.


Related video: Australia’s Labor leader claims victory in election, opponent loses seat (cbc.ca)
Australia's estimated 18,000,000 voters have re elected the ruling Labour
cbc.ca
View on Watch


As the results started emerging, he told ABC the projected victory was "a win for the ages”. Albanese "has pulled off one of the great political victories since federation,” he said.

The results were "absolutely unbelievable", Labor supporter Melinda Adderley, 54, said through her tears at the election party.

(Reporting by Kirsty Needham and Alasdair Pal in Sydney; Editing by Edmund Klamann and Andrew Heavens)


Willie The Boatman the Albo pale ale is served at Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's Labor party election night event on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters




Members of the media wait at Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's Labor party election night event on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters




A supporter of Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reacts at a Labor party election night event, on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters


Supporters of the Labor party react at an election night event, on the day of the Australian federal election, in Sydney, Australia, May 3, 2025. 
REUTERS/Hollie Adams© Thomson Reuters




Anthony Albanese: Australia’s dog-loving, Tory fighting PM


By AFP
May 3, 2025


Copyright AFP/File Tetiana DZHAFAROVA
Steven TRASK

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is a craft beer afficionado who loves “fighting Tories”, clawing his way to the nation’s highest office from hardscrabble blue-collar beginnings.

Albanese’s centre-left Labor Party won a second term in government on Saturday night, dealing a crushing defeat to its conservative rivals.

A Labor Party lifer, Albanese has roamed the halls of parliament for almost 30 years since he was first elected as a fresh-faced 33-year-old in 1996.

“I like fighting Tories. That’s what I do,” was how he succinctly summed up his political mantra in 2012.

The 62-year-old grew up in a modest government-subsidised flat in Sydney’s inner city, and his blue-collar back story has become something of political legend.

He was raised as the only child of a single mother, who worked as a cleaner before her hands were wracked with rheumatoid arthritis.

Albanese spent much of his teenage years looking after his mother Maryanne, crediting his difficult upbringing as the inspiration for a career in progressive politics.

He started working for the Labor Party soon after graduating from the University of Sydney with a degree in economics in 1984.



– DJ ‘Albo’ –



Known simply as “Albo” to friends and foes alike, Albanese has made much of his ability to connect with middle Australia.

A favourite gimmick is helming the turntable at parties and campaign events under the alias “DJ Albo”.

To lighten up his regular appearances on Australian breakfast television, Albanese often calls on his shaggy cavoodle “Toto”.

At the height of his popularity in 2022, a popular Sydney brewery put Albanese’s grinning face on the side of its “Albo pale ale”.

The same beer, bearing a cartoon of Albanese in his student radical days, was handed out at his victory party on Saturday night.

True to his Labor roots, Albanese’s first term has focused on household concerns such as the cost of childcare and hospital funding.

He has promised to embrace renewable energy, tackle a worsening housing crisis and pour money into a creaking healthcare system.

And he won support from many Australians by criticising US President Donald Trump’s 10-percent trade tariffs as “not the act of a friend”.



– Stabilising China ties –



The rate of inflation has eased under Albanese’s leadership but the cost of food, fuel and rent remains stubbornly high.

One of Albanese’s flagship policies was a national referendum that aimed to give greater constitutional recognition to Indigenous Australians.

That vote ended in a stinging defeat.

His government has poured money into renewable energy and green manufacturing, and is bidding to host the COP climate conference in 2026.

But it has also granted permits for new mining projects while handing out subsidies to polluting fossil fuel industries.

Albanese has, however, been praised for stabilising ties with Australia’s largest trading partner, China.

He was the first Australian premier to visit China in seven years, and helped to end a trade war that hampered billions of dollars in trade.



Op-Ed: First Canada, now Australia – Anti-Trump backlash continues


By Paul Wallis
DIGITAL JOURNAL
May 3, 2025


A volunteer replaces campaign posters of Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese with new ones in his Sydney electorate ahead of a general election May 3. - Copyright AFP Saeed KHAN

The Australian Labor Party achieved a huge success that even it wasn’t expecting. In a crushing defeat of the conservative opposition Labor now has more than double the numbers of the Liberal National Party Coalition in the House of Representatives.

Australia isn’t a particularly left or right country. Politics are generally centrist. Any form of extremism is unpopular and, in fact, usually despised. It’s considered un-Australian with good reason. Over the last century a lot of Australians have emigrated to Australia specifically to get away from political nutcases.

Like most Western countries, Australia was equally baffled by the return of Trump and not at all thrilled. Australians do not want to risk the misery of even traveling to the US after their revolting experiences last time.

It’s nothing personal. Most of us have American friends and relatives and do business in the States in some form. The problem is that you can’t be pro-American and support this melodramatic incompetence at the same time. These idiots are literally putting our friends and relatives at serious risk.

This election outcome really was an anti-Trump backlash, but only to a point. People are tired of politics. They are tired of governments ignoring basic human realities. The constant disruption and stresses of political madnesses since 2016 have long since outstayed their welcome.

Making things worse for the opposition were a series of Trump-like noises. Shamelessly imitating foreign ideologies isn’t terribly popular either. These noises included cuts to the public sector, a large nuclear program, and a seeming total disregard for the unpopularity of Trump’s various crusades.

It looks like conservatives around the world are all singing from the same hopelessly outdated and largely irrelevant hymn book. The same dogmatic approach to practically every subject simply doesn’t work. It’s particularly hard to see how millennials or Gen Z could possibly relate to these anachronisms.

Far worse is the fact that none of these Illiterate slash-and-burn policies could ever work. The world simply doesn’t do business like that anymore, and doesn’t live like that anymore. The classic conservative anti-globalism and anti-all other human beings obsession is merely insane.

The election delivered a truly punishing result. The relatively low-profile opposition leader who was weirdly and inaccurately described as an Australian Trump lost his own seat. He had held that seat for 24 years.

The new majority is unbreakable and will outlast Trump’s second term. That suits just about everybody because the distrust of Trump is pretty much universal on both sides of Australian politics. Only the senile and the infantile trust a windbag.

There are now few if any right-wing governments remaining in the English-speaking world. The question is whether or not global conservatism can understand the response.


Factbox-Policies of Australia's political parties at a glance

Reuters
Thu, May 1, 2025 




People vote at a pre-polling place in Sydney


(Reuters) -Australians will vote on Saturday in a close-run national election marked by concerns over the cost of living and housing affordability, as well as trade tensions triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs.

Here's how Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's centre-left Labor party and the conservative Liberal-National coalition, led by Peter Dutton, compare on key policies:

HOUSING


Labor:

Would let all first-time home buyers enter the property market with a 5% down payment and has pledged to spend A$10 billion ($6.40 billion) to build up to 100,000 new homes.

Liberal-Nationals:

Would allow first-time home buyers to access up to A$50,000 from their government-mandated retirement savings for down payments. Mortgage interest payments would be made tax deductible. It has also pledged A$5 billion to fund housing infrastructure.

HEALTH

Labor:

Has pledged A$8.5 billion for an extra 18 million subsidised general practitioner visits each year as part of strengthening Medicare, the universal healthcare system, along with A$1 billion for more free-of-charge public mental health services.

Would open an additional 50 free urgent care clinics to ease pressure on hospitals.

Liberal-Nationals:

Has matched Labor's A$8.5 billion funding boost to Medicare, pledged A$400 million for youth mental health services, and plans to double Medicare-subsidised psychology sessions to 20 from 10.

ECONOMY

Labor:

Would give taxpayers a one-off, instant A$1,000 deduction for individual work-related expenses and cut student debt by 20%. It also passed legislation to cut the lowest marginal tax rate before calling the election.

Liberal-Nationals:

Has vowed to undo Labor's tax cuts and instead introduce an offset that would let taxpayers earning up to A$144,000 receive up to A$1,200 in tax relief.

Would lower fuel costs by A$0.25 per litre (0.26 gallon) for 12 months by reducing government duties.

Wants to shrink the public service by 41,000 jobs through a hiring freeze and natural attrition, which it estimates would save A$7 billion each year.

ENERGY

Labor:

Committed A$2.3 billion to subsidise household batteries to store solar power and pledged to extend rebates on energy bills for households and small businesses.

Announced an A$2 billion increase in clean energy technology funding through its green bank to achieve a majority-renewables grid, which would be backed up by power from gas, batteries and hydropower.

Liberal-Nationals:

Aims to bring down gas and electricity costs through a reservation scheme forcing liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters on Australia's east coast to sell a portion of their uncontracted gas into the domestic market.

Pledges to cut "red and green tape" for new gas projects and fast-track a decision on extending the life of Woodside's North West Shelf LNG plant.

Long term, wants to build a nuclear industry with seven plants across the country. Nuclear power is currently banned in Australia.

DEFENCE

Labor:

Has not pledged any new defence funding, pointing to an existing commitment to an A$50 billion increase over the next decade that would boost spending to 2.3% of gross domestic product from 2%.

Liberal-Nationals:

Would spend A$21 billion more than Labor over five years to reach 2.5% of GDP within five years and 3% within a decade. Has pledged A$3 billion to acquire extra joint strike fighter jets.

MIGRATION

Labor:

Has not announced any election pledges specific to migration.

Liberal-Nationals:

Promises to cut the permanent migration programme, now at 185,000 per year, to 140,000 for two years, then 150,000 in year three and 160,000 in year four.

Also would cut net migration by 100,000 below Labor's yearly levels and reduce the number of international students commencing at public universities by 30,000 per year.

($1 = 1.5635 Australian dollars)

(Reporting by Sam McKeith and Christine Chen in Sydney; Editing by Edmund Klamann)



How ‘safe’ is your EV? Safest budget-friendly electric cars ranked


By Dr. Tim Sandle
DIGITAL JOURNA;
May 2, 2025


Tesla, whose electric Cybertruck is pictured, is a potential manufacturer of 'armored electric vehicles' for the US government - Copyright AFP/File Patrick T. Fallon

Electric vehicles with similar crash rates can differ significantly in price, indicating safety and affordability do not always go hand in hand.

A recent study by ranks electric vehicles (EVs) based on a composite score that equally weights ‘crashability’ and affordability. ‘Crashability’ was calculated using fatal crash data for 4 years, normalized as crashes per 10,000 cars sold. Affordability was measured using each vehicle’s starting MSRP.

These two metrics were combined using Min-Max Scaling to generate a balanced composite score. Rankings highlight EVs that offer the strongest combination of low crash risk and entry-level pricing. The research comes from the Bruning Law Firm.

Hyundai Kona Electric ranks first, offering the best blend of low crash rate and starting price among all EVs analysed. The outcomes were:

Car modelTotal Vehicles Involved in Fatal Crashes (2019-2022)Total Sales (2019-2022)Crashes per 10K Cars (Total)Starting MSRPComposite Score
Hyundai Kona Electric220,8030.96$32,97582.09
Chevrolet Bolt EV21100,0152.10$30,00081.59
Ford Mustang Mach-E269,9950.29$38,49080.52
Nissan Leaf2648,1935.39$28,14076.85
VOLKSWAGEN ID.4237,2530.54$46,52076.13
TESLA MODEL Y49484,9331.01$46,00075.58
Audi e-tron238,2920.52$49,80074.55
TESLA MODEL 3147574,6552.56$44,13073.83
Kia Niro5319,93826.58$20,49044.15
Hyundai Ioniq3612,39329.05$42,60028.99

As indicated above, Hyundai Kona Electric ranks first with a composite score of 82, offering the best balance of safety and price among all models analysed. With just 0.96 crashes per 10K cars and a base MSRP of $32,975, it scores high on both metrics. Though not the cheapest on the list, its lower crash rate contributes significantly to its top placement.

Coming in second with a composite score of 81, the Chevrolet Bolt EV delivers a strong mix of affordability and crash performance. With a starting price of $30,000, it is one of the most affordable options. It experiences 2.10 crashes, a higher rate than some top contenders, but its low MSRP boosts its affordability score enough to earn it the second spot overall.

In third place, the Ford Mustang Mach-E earns a score of 80, driven mainly by its class-leading crash safety. It logs only 0.29 adjusted crashes, the lowest crash rate of any EV analyzed. Its higher MSRP of $38,490 slightly reduces its affordability score, pushing it into third place despite leading in safety.

The Volkswagen ID.4 holds the fourth spot with a score of 76, providing a solid mix of safety and cost-efficiency. It has a moderate crash rate of 0.54 and a starting price of $46,520. While not the cheapest, its strong crash performance keeps it among the top five.

The Nissan Leaf secures the fifth spot, supported by its relatively low price point. Although the Leaf logs 5.39 crashes, one of the highest among top-half vehicles, its $28,140 starting price helps it secure a solid ranking. Its popularity as an early-market EV may contribute to its higher crash exposure.

Tesla’s Model Y takes sixth place with a score of 75. Holding the seventh position, the Audi e-tron earns a score of 74 by pairing low crash rates with a luxury price tag. With a score of 73, Tesla’s Model 3 comes in eighth, impacted by both its crash rate and price point.

The Kia Niro ranks ninth with a score of 44, reflecting its imbalance between low pricing and high crash frequency. Finishing in tenth place with a composite score of 28.99, the Hyundai Ioniq trails the list in both crash safety and affordability.