USA
Trump’s Lisa D. Cook Firing: Use of Racism in Power Grab
Saturday 13 September 2025, by Malik Miah
Trump’s August 25 late night internet post firing Lisa Cook from the Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, the country’s central bank, came as a surprise. Why her?
For some time, Trump has been railing against — and threatening to fire — the Chairman of the Board, Jerome Powell. Because the Fed has been setting the basic interest rate not to his liking, Trump’s drive is to take it over and eliminate its independent status.
But he fired Cook, the only Black Governor, instead. She was the first Black woman to serve on the Board of Governors.
The day after Cook was fired the White House released a photo. It showed Trump, his cabinet and other officials giving a thumbs-up to the firing of Cook. Of the 24 people in the photo only one was Black.
Cook sued Trump with her lawyers contesting the firing as political interference. On September 9 a preliminary injunction temporarily blocked Trump’s decision but the administration immediately announced its intention to challenge the injunction at the U.S. Court of Appeals. This swift response is an attempt to see her gone by the time the Fed meets next week.
Black Reaction
Many in the Black community responded angrily. They say Trump’s effort to oust Cook fits a pattern of purging non-white voices from the higher ranks of government leadership.
As LaTosha Brown, co-founder of the organization Black Voters Matter, noted:
“His goal is to get control of the Federal Reserve and for that to no longer be an autonomous, independent body. But what he does recognize is that in America everything is about race. It is as lethal as a nuclear bomb.”
Race and economics (class) always intersect in the United States. That’s the case whether people are buying a home or seeking available job opportunities.
Who Is Lisa D. Cook?
Cook is a former economics professor whose research focused on racial disparities, the history of financial institutions, and crises in financial markets and innovation.
Cook taught economics and international relations at Michigan State University. Previously she was on the faculty of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government. She was a Marshall scholar who received degrees from Oxford University and Spelman College, a historically Black women’s college in Atlanta.
Cook dedicated much of her scholarship to examining how racial discrimination and targeted violence created barriers to economic advancement for African Americans. She also advised the Nigerian and Rwandan governments on banking reforms and economic development.
In other words, Cook is a well-respected and qualified economist and scholar. As business and economic experts told CNN, the Fed benefits greatly from having leaders with diverse professional and personal backgrounds.
Saqib Bhatti, co-founder and executive director of the Action Center on Race & the Economy, noted that in making the case for Cook’s nomination, only two of 417 Federal Reserve staff positions were Black while 318 of them were white. He concluded, “That’s a really big problem.”
In 2022 Cook was confirmed to the Fed’s Board of Governors by the Senate in a party-line vote to fill an unexpired term and later appointed for a term ending on January 31, 2038. Republicans have argued that she was unqualified and found her research overly focused on race. Democrats brushed off such critiques but refused to call out the racism of the opposition.
A member of the Board of Governors can only be removed for cause. The alleged “cause” was an error she supposedly made in mortgage applications before she was elected to the Fed. It has nothing to do with her qualifications or performance on the Board.
Powell said Cook remains on the Board unless legitimate cause is validated for her firing. If she is removed, Trump will be in the driver’s seat in taking over the Board. He has two votes already and with the resignation of Governor Adriana D. Kugler on August 8 Trump has nominated Stephen Miran, head of the White House Council of Economic Affairs, to finish out that term. Miran is considered the architect of Trump’s tariff policy. And if the Fed’s decisions on interest rates are dependent on Trump’s (or any subsequent president) wishes, it raises unknown consequences for the U.S. and global economy.
Reporters found that at least two members of the Trump Cabinet have similar discrepancies on their mortgage applications. The charge against Cook not only serves to get rid of someone who didn’t vote the way Trump wanted but pushes back racial justice and undermines the long-term gains of African Americans.
The Fed was established in 1913, but there was not a person of color on the Board of Governors until Andrew Brimmer, a Black man, was appointed in 1966. The first woman to serve on the Fed’s Board was Nancy Teeters, appointed in 1978. Cook, the first Black woman, was appointed almost fifty years later. Like all members, she has a 14-year term.
Hatred for Diversity
Trump’s attempt to fire Cook comes as his administration has more broadly tried to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), efforts across the federal government. Earlier this year, Trump fired Gwynne Wilcox, the first Black woman to serve on National Labor Relations Board, and Gen. Charles Brown Jr., a Black man who was the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the country’s armed forces.
Trump’s even pressured private-sector companies and institutions — often successfully — to end DEI programs. He is using the government’s purse to bludgeon universities into dismantling attempts to equalize the playing field.
Trump, and other white nationalists argue that merit is the basis on which people should be judged. And then they put their fingers on the scale by launching campaigns of misinformation and even slander. For example, Trump claimed former President Barack Obama, the first Black President, was not born as a U.S. citizen (the “birtherism” lie) and therefore was not eligible for the office. The lie becomes Trump’s truth.
Trump’s attempt to fire Cook comes as his administration has more broadly tried to dismantle diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), efforts across the federal government. Earlier this year, Trump fired Gwynne Wilcox, the first Black woman to serve on National Labor Relations Board, and Gen. Charles Brown Jr., a Black man who was the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the country’s armed forces.
Trump’s even pressured private-sector companies and institutions — often successfully — to end DEI programs. He is using the government’s purse to bludgeon universities into dismantling attempts to equalize the playing field.
Trump, and other white nationalists argue that merit is the basis on which people should be judged. And then they put their fingers on the scale by launching campaigns of misinformation and even slander. For example, Trump claimed former President Barack Obama, the first Black President, was not born as a U.S. citizen (the “birtherism” lie) and therefore was not eligible for the office. The lie becomes Trump’s truth.
Last In, First Out
Typical for Blacks in all jobs, Cook is the last hired and first fired.
While Cook refused to resign and filed a lawsuit asserting that Trump has no power to remove her from office, Trump’s Justice Department initiated a criminal investigation of her. She is an obstacle to be removed.
Activist LaTosha Brown explained to the Guardian why Trump picked Lisa Cook:
He picked her because he is betting that, in an industry that is probably 90% or more white male, his odds of removing her are greater than the odds for removing others from the board. That in itself is rooted in the history and how insidious racism is built into the fabric of how we see people of color in this country.
Trump also dismissed Carla Hayden, the first Black person to serve as librarian of Congress, after a reactionary advocacy organization accused her of being a “radical.”
Trump says he acts on his instincts no matter the facts. He seeks a return to the founding of the country where only European settlers were “real” Americans. Cook is clearly being fired because of racism.
In defending Cook, racism must be a central part of the argument. But Democrats, who oppose Trump, just want to focus on the independence of the central bank.
In Defense of DEI
While many liberals and even some on the left are quiet about DEI, it is crucial that DEI and wokeness be defended from the right’s racist attacks.
Why is that?
Diversity is a way to say the country is not only white, in fact non-whites will soon be a majority. To say diversity should be reflected in society’s institutions is not complicated. Yet Trump calls it “reverse discrimination” against whites, especially white men.
Equity is a call for fairness and equality. The Black-led civil rights movement saw the fight was to end legal segregation, but much more was necessary. That’s why the 1963 March on Washington was about jobs and freedom. Affirmative action can help close the gap between oppressed minorities and the majority white population.
Inclusion is simple: Let Blacks and others finally be accepted for their skills, knowledge, and abilities as equals. Lisa Cook has incredible expertise, but Trump and other right-wingers deny it.
Trump and his white nationalist base reject DEI (also called “wokeness”) and threaten to criminalize those who support full equality.
In his second term, Trump has managed to pick only one Black person to serve in his cabinet: Scott Turner, secretary of housing and urban development. In fact, in judging the Trump cabinet, we can say it’s one of the most unqualified group of people ever picked. As Rashad Robinson, a civil rights leader and former president of the group Color of Change, explained:
We live in a very diverse country, a country with many different types of people that come from many different backgrounds, and the president exhibits his values by who he puts in office.
“This is not simply that Donald Trump has put only one Black person in his cabinet. It’s that Donald Trump has gone out of his way to find some of the most unqualified and ill-equipped people to put in those jobs as a way to actually avoid having to put Black people in his cabinet.
We should keep in mind that in this country the exploitation of the working class and the oppression of Blacks and other people of color are intertwined aspects of capitalist rule.
The Lisa Cook battle of a successful Black woman who is a professional economist is important for the working class, Black community, labor movement and the socialist left. Trump’s sexism and racism can be defeated by opposing what can be easily seen as a blatantly unfair attack.
Source: Against the Current.
Attached documentstrump-s-lisa-d-cook-firing-use-of-racism-in-power-grab_a9167.pdf (PDF - 916 KiB)
Extraction PDF [->article9167]
Malik Miah is a retired aviation mechanic, union and antiracist activist. He is an advisory editor of Against the Current.

International Viewpoint is published under the responsibility of the Bureau of the Fourth International. Signed articles do not necessarily reflect editorial policy. Articles can be reprinted with acknowledgement, and a live link if possible.
Matthew Chapman
September 12, 2025
RAW STORY

FILE PHOTO: Bill Pulte, nominated to be the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, testifies during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 27, 2025. REUTERS/Annabelle Gordon/File Photo
President Donald Trump's Federal Housing Finance Agency director Bill Pulte has been on a tear accusing various critics of the administration of mortgage fraud — most recently Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, whom he claimed improperly took out mortgages on two separate properties as primary residences. However, a new Reuters report throws this in serious doubt, by revealing that preliminary loan documents indicate she had disclosed to her credit union one would be a vacation home.
The apparent misfire, which could significantly complicate Trump's attempts to fire Cook from the Fed, resulted in an explosion from commenters on social media, who broadly mocked Pulte — particularly since separate reporting suggested his parents had in fact committed the same fraud he tried to pin on Cook.
"Wait, so the entire claim that Cook claimed two primary residences was…false?" wrote Maryville College history professor Aaron Astor.
"I’ve been saying all along, as someone who’s handled extensive mortgage litigation, that these loan files are very complicated and can be thousands of pages," wrote veteran and former trial lawyer John Jackson. "Now it appears Lisa Cook did nothing wrong and was actually defamed by @pulte. What an idiot."
"So the bad faith pretext was also just fake?" wrote Bloomberg columnist Matthew Yglesias.
"Wowow, @pulte!! Is this why even right wingers think you're a loose canon [sic]?" wrote national security journalist Marcy "emptywheel" Wheeler. "Will you go to prison for lying to the FBI?"
"I really do hope she sues every single person possible, so that there is as much discovery as can possibly be provided, and that she keeps right on suing even after that," wrote MSNBC columnist Kali Holloway.
"Catching up on FHFA Director Bill Pulte's efforts, it sounds like Lisa Cook did not claim two primary residences at the same time, but Pulte's dad did?" wrote Mother Jones reporter Dan Friedman. "Tough week for that guy."
" Trump fired a Black woman economist from the Federal Reserve based on a lie pushed by a Twitter influencer, and the documents prove it," wrote investment banker Evaristus Odinikaeze. "Lisa Cook did not commit mortgage fraud. There was no double primary residence. Just another smear campaign used as political cover. Will there be accountability for the people who lied? Or does character assassination now pass as policy?"
"So, the only mortgage fraud discovered in all of this was Bill Pulte's family? May she sue the hell out of everyone," wrote former congressional staffer and Democratic campaign strategist Rhonda Elaine Foxx.
New docs blow hole in Trump admin’s mortgage fraud allegations against Fed official
Matthew Chapman
September 12, 2025
RAW STORY

FILE PHOTO: Lisa Cook testifies before a Senate Banking Committee hearing on her nomination to be a member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors (for a second term), on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., June 21, 2023. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
New documents obtained by Reuters contradict allegations made by a Trump administration bureaucrat that Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook committed mortgage fraud.
Federal Housing Finance Agency director Bill Pulte had previously claimed to have unearthed documents indicating Cook, who had been unwilling to follow President Donald Trump's demands to lower interest rates, had declared two separate residences as her primary home in mortgage statements, which, depending on the jurisdiction, can be against the law when it causes banks to lend under more favorable terms.
But according to Reuters, "A loan estimate for an Atlanta home purchased by Lisa Cook ... shows that Cook had declared the property as a 'vacation home.'"
"The document, dated May 28, 2021, was issued to Cook by her credit union in the weeks before she completed the purchase and shows that she had told the lender that the Atlanta property wouldn’t be her primary residence," said the report. "The document appears to counter other documentation that Cook’s critics have cited in support of their claims that she committed mortgage fraud by reporting two different homes as her primary residence, two independent real-estate experts said."
The revelation could be an obstacle to Trump's efforts to fire Cook from the Federal Reserve, which he justified by pointing to Pulte's unproven allegations. Cook has filed a lawsuit challenging her dismissal as unlawful.
Pulte, whose agency oversees the government-sponsored housing finance entities Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, has issued similar mortgage fraud claims against other Trump critics, including Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and New York Attorney General Letitia James, both of whom deny any wrongdoing.
A recent report found that Pulte's own father and stepmother may have been pulling that exact scheme on properties in Michigan and Florida. Upon Reuters' investigation into the matter, officials in Bloomfield Township, Michigan, revoked the couple's homestead exemption.
No comments:
Post a Comment