Sunday, October 13, 2024

 Support centre opens in Port Talbot to help those affected by Tata Steel job losses


The facility is located in the Aberafan Shopping Centre




News By
Lewis Smith
Local Democracy Reporter
12 OCT 2024
Port Talbot Steelworks (Image: Jonathan Myers)

A new community support centre has been opened in Port Talbot with the aim of helping those who have been affected by job losses at the town's Tata Steel site. The facility, located in the Aberafan Shopping Centre, was opened on October 9 and comes just weeks after the closure of the site's blast furnaces which has left almost 3,000 employees facing redundancy.

The new centre is being opened by the Community Union with funding from the Welsh Government and will help provide support and advice to both Tata and supply chain workers as well as their families and other affected businesses. Their work will include helping people to find new jobs and opportunities to learn new skills in areas where there are vacancies.

While visiting the centre, secretary of state for Wales and chair of the Tata Transition Board Jo Stevens said: "This innovative hub will act as a one-stop shop to help deliver the support to workers affected by the changes at Tata Steel. I am determined to do everything I can to support workers and businesses who are affected by the changes at Tata Steel.

"That’s why this renewed partnership of governments, unions, and the local council is working together to make sure the town gets what it needs. The funding from the UK Government, via the transition board, is already making a difference.

"We know there is still a huge amount of work to do but we are already seeing people successfully placed in new jobs as a direct result of the £13.5m that we made available." Neath Port Talbot council leader Steve Hunt added: "This is a welcome addition to the package of support which is being developed by the transition board to both employees of Tata and the companies in its supply chain."
We will NOT nationalise Grangemouth oil refinery, admits Labour 

Union accuses Sir Keir Starmer of ‘industrial vandalism’

Prime Minister finally admits government rescue deal ‘not on the table’


By Georgia Edkins, 
THE DAILY MAIL
12 October 2024

Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of ‘industrial vandalism’ as Labour confirmed it would not strike a rescue deal to nationalise the Grangemouth oil refinery.

Ahead of the Prime Minister’s major UK investment summit on Monday, his energy department finally admitted that pleas for the UK government to buyout Scotland’s only refinery - even if only on a temporary basis - were not being considered.

Desperate union chiefs, workers and campaigners have for weeks implored UK ministers to take a stake in the oil refinery to keep it running amid fears closing it would threaten the country’s energy security, and de-industrialise the local area.

However, in a devastating hammer blow to thousands of Scots workers, an energy department insider said: ‘The company [Petroineos] were very clear that there was no viable commercial future for the refinery operation.

'It would not be right for the Government to underwrite a business that does not have a viable commercial future.’

Grangemouth’s owner Petroineos announced it was shutting the facility in the second financial quarter of 2025

And an official spokesman for the Department of Energy and Net Zero said: ‘We have never received any proposals about nationalising Grangemouth and there are no discussions under way about doing so.

‘We are focused on finding a viable clean energy future for Grangemouth and have provided £100 million funding, alongside the Scottish Government, to help the workforce find good, alternative jobs and invest in the community.’

Grangemouth’s current owner Petroineos announced it was shutting the facility in the second financial quarter of 2025 with the loss of 400 jobs last month - to the fury of the local community.

Thousands more ancillary workers will also be affected by the closure according to a report by PriceWaterhouseCooper carried out on behalf of Scottish Enterprise.

Despite pressure from unions and campaigners for the UK government to take a stake in the plant the Mail on Sunday has been told this is ‘not something the government is looking at’ and it is ‘not on the table’.

Last night local Labour MP Brian Leishman said the newly-revealed position had filled him with ‘despair’ and called on Sir Keir to ‘learn from what happened to the miners of the 1980s,’ referring to Margaret Thatcher's closure of the mines.


Sir Keir Starmer will not step in to save the refinery at Grangemouth despite the pleas of local Labour MP Brian Leishman

Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: ‘What is happening in Grangemouth is an act of industrial vandalism. Unite will not allow Scotland’s only refinery to be mothballed with the loss of hundreds of jobs.

'It doesn’t matter the colour of a party’s rosette, Unite will always ferociously hold the government to account when they are wrong and putting jobs at risk,’ adding: ‘We need public investment to come with public stakes that guarantee jobs and a long-term commitment.’

In September, the site’s current owners Petroineos, a joint venture between Asia’s largest oil and gas producer PetroChina and Ineos - the chemicals firm founded by Manchester United’s billionaire co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe - blamed global competition and falling demand for fossil fuels as they announced its impending closure next year.

It sparked serious concern over a raft of job losses at the site, which produces vast quantities of petrol, diesel, heating oil and aviation fuel for the UK.

In response Labour and SNP Ministers hastily added £20 million to an existing £80 million growth fund for the local Falkirk area.

They also talked up Project Willow, a joint government investment scheme that would examine ways of creating a new long-term industry at the site, focused mainly around storing green renewables.

Yet unions hit back, and insisted the oil refinery must be saved.

Addressing the Unite Union conference in Dundee, general secretary Sharon Graham said Energy and Net Zero secretary Ed Miliband and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer were ‘on notice’.

She said: ‘The government must make the necessary investments to safeguard its future. Labour must be forced to act.’

The Keep Grangemouth Working campaign group has also blasted the decision by PetroIneos to close the site and called on the UK and Scottish Governments to act to save jobs.

Last week, local MP Brian Leishman submitted a House of Commons Early Day Motion calling on the UK Government to buy a so-called ‘transitional stake’ in Grangemouth.

That would see the UK Government takeover the plant from as early as next year until a ‘viable’ green energy alternative is found for the plant.

It has been signed by a dozen MPs, including fellow Labour MPs Euan Stainbank and Diane Abbott, and has been supported by campaigners.

In an article for this newspaper published today, Mr Leishman suggested that he had held ‘early discussions’ with UK ministers over his plans.

Labour MP Brian Leishman called on the UK Government to buy a so-called ‘transitional stake’ in Grangemouth

However, a UK government source said that no such proposals were being considered.

They said that nationalisation - either temporarily or in full - was not being discussed by ministers or policy officials.

As well as threatening a Labour civil war, the newly-revealed government position may cast a long shadow over Sir Keir Starmer’s big UK Investment Summit tomorrow, during which his Scotland Office will tout the government’s newly-launched industrial strategy.

It is another bombshell ahead of the major event on Monday, intended to showcase the attractions of Britain to international business, after a £1billion deal was seemingly pulled after Sir Keir’s ministers criticised P&O Ferries.

Ports and logistics giant DP World, the parent company of P&O Ferries, reportedly dropped a major announcement about its London Gateway container port after a press release from Angela Rayner and Transport Secretary Louise Haigh described action by P&O Ferries towards seafarers as ‘outrageous’ and a ‘national scandal’.

Discussions about the future of Grangemouth have also involved claims there is a serious prospective buyer that could step in to keep the refinery going.

North American petroleum giant Hudson Reid Holdings Inc., headed by Canadian businessman Garth Reid, is reported to be interested in the site.

Stacey Oil Services - an equipment company based at Portlethen, near Aberdeen - is also understood to have been working on a possible deal, however Petroineos says it has not received any ‘credible’ bids for the facility.
Jewish school in Canada hit by gunfire for second time

By AFP
October 12, 2024

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said anti-Semitism is 'a disgusting and dangerous form of hate' - Copyright AFP/File Ludovic MARIN

A Jewish school in Toronto was hit by gunfire Saturday for the second time this year, police said, as Canada sees a rise in anti-Semitic attacks since the start of the war in Gaza.

No one was injured after shots were fired from a vehicle at around 4 am (0800 GMT) at the Bais Chaya Mushka girls school, with the only damage being a broken window, according to authorities.

The school in the North York area of Toronto was targeted in a similar incident in May, and police believe the two shootings are connected.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he was “very disturbed” by the incident, which came as Jewish people celebrated Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the year in Judaism.

“As we wait for more details, my heart goes out to the students, staff and parents who must be terrified and hurting today,” Trudeau said in a post on X.

“Anti-Semitism is a disgusting and dangerous form of hate — and we won’t let it stand,” he added.

According to a report published in May by Jewish organization B’nai Brith Canada, anti-Semitic acts more than doubled in the country between 2022 and 2023.

In November 2023, a Jewish school in Montreal was shot at twice in a single week, with no one injured.

Hate crime: Muslims still the most targeted group in England and Wales

By 5Pillars (RMS)
-12th October 2024

FacebookLikeShareTweetEmail

Muslims continue to be the most targeted group in England and Wales when it comes to hate crime, according to recently published Home Office data.

The figures, which recorded hate crimes from March 2023-24, show that there has been an increase in religious hate crimes targeting Muslims with 3,866 offences, up 13% from 3,432 recorded the previous year.

Almost two in five (38%) religious hate crimes targeted Muslims even though the figures do not include the anti-Muslim riots in the summer.

Overall, there was a 25% increase in police recorded religious hate crime over the latest year, up from 8,370 to 10,484 offences. This is the highest annual count since the hate crime collection began in the year ending March 2012.

The increase in offences was driven by a sharp rise in religious hate crimes targeted at Jewish people since the beginning of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians.

Annually, there were 3,282 religious hate crimes targeted at Jewish people in the year ending March 2024, more than double the number recorded the previous year (1,543).

These offences accounted for a third (33%) of all religious hate crimes in the last year. By comparison, the proportion in the previous year was 20%.

Other key results include:There were 140,561 hate crimes recorded by the police in England and Wales, a decrease of 5% from the year ending March 2023 (147,645 offences), and the second consecutive annual fall.

There were 98,799 race hate crimes, a fall of 5% from the previous year when there were 103,625 offences, which was driven by decreases in public fear, alarm or distress and malicious communication offences.

As in previous years, the majority of hate crimes were racially motivated, accounting for 7 in 10 of all such offences

There were falls in the other three strands of hate crime; sexual orientation hate crimes fell by 8%, disability hate crimes by 18% and transgender hate crimes by 2%.
Palestinian woman wins £30,000 LGBTQ+ film award

Nick Horton
BBC News
Iris Prize
Blood Like Water is described by the Iris Prize international jury chair as "an important reminder that queer people exist everywhere"


A Palestinian woman has won the world's largest LGBTQ+ short film award.

Dima Hamdan said she was “deeply honoured" to receive the £30,000 2024 Iris Prize, because it was both "the 'Oscars' of the LGBTQ+ short film world" and "it comes from a community that has increasingly voiced its support for Palestine in recent years".

Former Plaid Cymru leader Adam Price, who chaired the international jury, called Blood Like Water "an important reminder that queer people exist everywhere, including in Palestine at a time of war and occupation".

Louisa Connolly-Burnham won the Best British Short at the Cardiff-based festival for her work, Sister Wives.


'Queer joy' hard to find at Iris Prize - director


Russell T Davies: I want to do darker LGBTQ+ drama


Cardiff first UK city to host LGBTQ+ EuroGames



Hamdan is a self-taught filmmaker and journalist based in Berlin.

According to the festival, her film "tells the story of Shadi, who embarks on a secret adventure and accidentally drags his family into a trap where they only have two choices; collaborate with the Israeli occupation or be shamed and humiliated by their own people".

Reacting to the prize, Hamdan said: "It is difficult to celebrate personal achievements when the most televised and live-streamed war in human history has dragged on for one year with no end in sight.

Iris Prize
Winner Dima Hamdan, who is based in Berlin, with Berwyn Rowlands, the Iris Prize LGBTQ+ Film Festival director, at the Cardiff event


“In order to survive these dark times, I find strength by envisioning a future when all of this will be over.

"In that vision, I take solace knowing that the Iris Film Prize, its wonderful team and the jury will hold a special place in my heart for standing with us and helping to amplify our voices."

Festival director Berwyn Rowlands said he was proud that the event shared "stories not necessarily covered by the mainstream".

He added: "This year the filmmakers have focused on the more serious aspect of LGBTQ+ life. Although many are dark there is still hope."

Iris Prize
Sister Wives is described as a "beautifully nuanced and performed drama about two women rebelling against their community’s social and religious constraints"


Connolly-Burnham, who is from Birmingham, wrote, directed, produced and co-starred in her film.

Sister Wives is described as a "multi-layered love story that tells the tale of young women living in a strict, fundamentalist, polygamous society in 2003 Utah, USA".

Tim Highsted, who chaired the jury for the Best British Short, called it a "beautifully nuanced and performed drama about two women rebelling against their community’s social and religious constraints and finding love for each other".

Channel 4 will stream all 15 films shortlisted in the Best British Shorts category for a year after the festival.
Labour MPs urge Reeves to spend tens of billions more on ailing public services

Michael Savage Policy Editor
THE GUARDIAN
Sat 12 October 2024 

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is said to be examining an increase in employer national insurance contributions. Photograph: Murdo MacLeod/The Guardian


Scores of Labour MPs are pleading with Rachel Reeves to embrace spending tens of billions more on ailing public services as part of an increasingly wide-ranging budget that could raise tax on employers and the wealthy.

In a huge gamble that comes after a rocky first 100 days in office and a Downing Street reset, the chancellor is closely examining an increase in employer national insurance contributions that could significantly fill a black hole in public spending.

With Labour MPs desperate for the government to show that the new administration can make a tangible difference to the country before the next election, a group of about 70 supportive Labour MPs have now written to Reeves urging her to commit to a major rewriting of fiscal rules that would allow tens of billions to be poured into schools, hospitals, transport links and other crucial infrastructure.


The letter from the Labour Growth Group, seen by the Observer, warns Reeves that Labour must not repeat the mistakes of the previous Tory governments by ducking the “tough choices required to unlock investment” and encourage growth.

The group wants Reeves to follow through with a change that would see the value of new assets built with investment reflected in the calculation of Britain’s debt. The move could unlock as much as £50bn, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, though the figure allocated by the chancellor is likely to be markedly less than that.

“We give voice to the silent majority who benefit from economic reforms, infrastructure projects and growth, no matter how well organised the vocal minority,” writes the group, which includes influential MPs such as Josh Simons, the former head of the Labour Together thinktank, Torsten Bell, the former chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, and Chi Onwurah, the Labour chair of the science, innovation and technology committee.

“It is time to value these assets properly in our fiscal framework … Time is of the essence – the sooner we invest, the sooner our constituents will begin to benefit from that investment in their communities.

“If we delay, we risk further entrenching the barriers to growth that have held our country back for too long. We say this upcoming budget is the time to grasp the opportunity before us and act with conviction.”

While the letter from the group is a show of support from loyalists, it also reflects fears among some in Labour’s ranks that Reeves may opt for a less ambitious change such as excluding Bank of England losses from debt calculations, freeing up between £10bn and £20bn. MPs also want immediate action on investment that will deliver tangible benefits by the next election.

While some in Whitehall are concerned about frightening the markets with extra borrowing, figures close to the chancellor say that there is plenty of scope for a change and that the new rules would provide for a far more sensible amount of fiscal “headroom” that would help the government plan for the longer term.

Lucy Rigby, co-chair of the Labour Growth Group, said the government needed to “break the Tory doom loop of low investment, low productivity and low growth if we’re going to deliver the change our constituents want to see” in their communities. “There is no time to waste and that’s why we’re encouraging the chancellor today to be bold and ambitious in investing for growth in the coming budget,” she said.

Simons warned that the government’s fiscal framework had already become an “object of derision” among some economists. “It’s time we listen to them, to businesses and to investors, and make the government a serious partner for investment again,” he said.

Related: How Labour promises have left Rachel Reeves with a giant budget headache

Onwurah added: “After 14 years of Tory economic stagnation, economic growth is rightly the priority for this government – economic growth founded on a virtuous cycle of investment, innovation, productivity, good jobs and rising incomes – and that is the path toward a prosperous future that my constituents deserve, and which will put us in the forefront of the industries of the future.”

Reeves appears to be already committed to a rewriting of fiscal rules, though the final details of the budget have yet to be finalised.

In what would amount to more of a political gamble, she is considering the increase to employer national insurance.

That measure – either an increase to contributions or applying employer national insurance to pension contributions – could raise tens of billions, but will be labelled a “jobs tax” by the Conservatives
Starmer sucks up to bosses and angers unions on Labour’s 100th day in office

The Labour government says it's had ‘warm engagement’ with DP World bosses who sacked 800 P&O Ferry workers two years ago


Workers march against P&O bosses in Dover in April 2022 
(Picture: Guy Smallman)


By Tomáš Tengely-Evans
Saturday 12 October 2024 
SOCIALIST WORKER Issue

Keir Starmer marked Labour’s first 100 days in office on Saturday by siding with bosses who’d sacked hundreds of workers on the spot.

Transport secretary Louise Haigh had described P&O Ferries—which sacked 800 workers in a brutal fire and rehire in 2022—as a “rogue operator”. “I’ve been boycotting P&O Ferries for two-and-a-half years and I would encourage consumers to do the same,” she said on Wednesday.

Her comments came the day before Labour unveiled its Employment Rights Bill, which is a step forward but falls short on the party’s pledges. It promised to “end unscrupulous fire and rehire practices”, but wouldn’t ban bosses from using the vicious tactic.

That still outraged DP World—P&O’s owner—which threatened to pull a £1 billion investment into the Thames Gateway port project on Friday.

Starmer slapped down Haigh in a BBC interview, saying, “Well, look, that’s not the view of the government.”

Whitehall sources told BBC News that there was “warm engagement” between senior figures in the firm and the government since Starmer’s criticism.

DP World bosses will now go to the International Investment Summit on Monday. Starmer, chancellor Rachel Reeves and business secretary Jonathan Reynolds are preparing to court big business at the conference.

Reeves and Reynolds supported “intense lobbying” from bosses to water down protections in the Employment Rights Bill.

Starmer is desperate to regain control after almost a month of scandals surrounding luxury gifts. Morgan McSweeney—a ruthless Labour right winger—was appointed as his chief of staff last week after Sue Grey was pushed out.

But the sense of panic remains for Labour and is opening up potential divisions. One ally of Haigh described the briefings as “disgraceful” and suggested the circle around the prime minister “are running out of friends.”

Labour’s support for big business is driving more tension with the unions, which had been more than willing to “give Labour a chance”.

Matt Wrack, FBU firefighters’ union general secretary, slammed Starmer’s criticism of Haigh as “unacceptable”. “Louise Haigh has the full support and solidarity of the FBU in setting out clear opposition to P&O and other rogue employers,” he said.

“Any backlash or briefing against Labour politicians and trade unionists who challenge or clamp down on firms that have been exploiting and abusing workers in that way is completely unacceptable, wherever it comes from.”

He added, “It’s outrageous that DP World is seeking to derail the extension of employment rights that Labour was voted into government to deliver.

“Rogue employers and corporate bullies cannot be allowed to hold a democratically elected government to ransom.”

A new YouGov poll this week showed that half of Labour voters are disappointed in Starmer’s government.

Starmer unpopularity goes deeper than the gifts scandal because Labour is committed to austerity mark 2 ahead of the budget on 30 October.

Labour MPs, including “soft left” figures such as Haigh, voted to keep children in poverty and snatch winter fuel payments from pensioners.

Earlier this week Wrack addressed an FBU rally of over 1,000 firefighters, who demanded Labour breaks with austerity.

He described the Labour government as an “opportunity” after 14 years of Tory rule. “The question is whether we seize that opportunity to fight for better conditions,” he said.

He warned “those who think it’s going to be easy under a Labour government”, pointing to the Tony Blair government’s attacks.

The Labour government is dashing hopes for what little change it promised, as it sucks up to bosses and prepares for a new round of austerity.

But struggle outside parliament—on the picket lines and streets—can win the transformative change working class people need. Let’s seize that opportunity by fighting back.

 United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres Photo Credit: UN

Banning Diplomacy: Israel’s Ban On Guterres And The Future Of Middle East Peace – OpEd



By 

In an extraordinary diplomatic move, Israel has declared United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres “persona non grata,” effectively banning him from entering the country.


The decision comes amid escalating violence in the Middle East, with tensions flaring between Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. By blocking Guterres, Israel has intensified an already precarious situation, raising questions about its relationship with the UN, the role of diplomacy in conflict resolution, and the broader implications for peace efforts in the region.

Why Did Israel Ban the UN Chief?

The immediate trigger for the ban was Guterres’ speech to the UN Security Council in which he called for de-escalation in the region, condemning violence on all sides without directly naming Iran for its missile strikes on Israel. For Israel, this neutrality was seen as unacceptable. Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz accused Guterres of failing to condemn Iran—viewed by Israel as the orchestrator behind the recent violence, with its backing of Hamas and Hezbollah.

The broader context of this decision is Israel’s long-standing dissatisfaction with what it perceives as the UN’s bias against it. Israel has often accused the UN of disproportionately focusing on Palestinian rights and overlooking the threats posed by groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. Guterres’ recent statements aimed at balancing calls for peace with critiques of all parties involved were perceived by Israel as insufficient in recognizing its security concerns, especially in light of the deadly Hamas attacks on October 7, which resulted in over 1,200 Israeli casualties.

A First in Diplomacy?

This unprecedented ban marks the first time a sitting UN Secretary-General has been barred from a member state. While tensions between Israel and the UN have persisted for decades, no previous Secretary-General has been excluded in this way. The UN Charter, under Article 100, mandates the neutrality of the Secretary-General, stating that member states must respect the international nature of the office and refrain from interfering with its work. By banning Guterres, Israel has breached a fundamental norm of international diplomacy, raising serious questions about the future of Israel-UN relations.

Historically, the UN has played a pivotal role in mediating conflicts, particularly in volatile regions like the Middle East. Previous Secretaries-General, such as Dag Hammarskjöld during the 1956 Suez Crisis or Kofi Annan during the Second Intifada, have navigated extremely tense situations without being barred from key member states. Israel’s move to declare Guterres “persona non grata” undermines the very principles of diplomacy and multilateral engagement that the UN represents.


Israel’s Friction with the UN

The ban on Guterres is not an isolated incident but part of a long history of strained relations between Israel and the UN. Despite the UN’s instrumental role in the creation of Israel in 1948, relations soured as the Arab-Israeli conflict intensified. Over the years, numerous UN resolutions have condemned Israeli settlement activity, the occupation of Palestinian territories, and violations of international law, which Israeli leaders have long viewed as unfair and biased.

A major point of contention has been the UN’s approach to Israel regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict. In particular, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) has drawn significant criticism from Israel, which argues that the agency exacerbates the Palestinian refugee crisis and encourages anti-Israel sentiment. More broadly, Israel has often pointed to the UN’s inability to effectively address the threats posed by militant groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, which receive significant backing from Iran.

The current crisis has only deepened these tensions. Israel sees itself as facing an existential threat from Iran’s influence in the region, especially with Tehran’s support of groups like Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. The failure of the international community, particularly the UN, to decisively condemn Iran’s role has exacerbated Israel’s frustrations.

Guterres’ Call for Peace: A ‘Sickening Cycle of Escalation’

In reaction to the ban, Guterres reaffirmed his condemnation of violence from all parties and urged an immediate ceasefire to halt the “sickening cycle of escalation” in the region. His statements underscore the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where Israeli airstrikes have resulted in thousands of deaths, including a substantial number of civilians. Guterres has consistently emphasized the need to protect civilian lives, asserting that both sides bear a responsibility to uphold international humanitarian law.

Guterres’ balanced approach—condemning Hamas’ actions while also criticizing Israel’s military response—reflects the UN’s longstanding position on the conflict. However, this neutrality is precisely what Israel finds problematic. At a time when Israeli leaders are facing unprecedented security threats, they expect unequivocal support from the international community, particularly in their fight against groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.

International Reaction and Diplomatic Fallout

Israel’s decision to ban Guterres has sparked significant international concern. Several members of the UN Security Council, including European powers like France and the UK, expressed dismay over Israel’s actions. In a rare moment of consensus, the Council issued a statement reaffirming their support for Guterres and condemning the decision to bar him. While the United States, a key ally of Israel, stopped short of outright condemnation, it described the ban as “unhelpful” and urged Israel to engage diplomatically with the UN.

Regional powers like Egypt and Jordan, both of which have played critical roles in past peace negotiations, also voiced concern that Israel’s ban on Guterres could derail future mediation efforts. These countries have a vested interest in stabilizing the region, and any move that undermines diplomatic channels is viewed as a setback.

Within Israel, the ban has polarized public opinion. While many Israelis support their government’s hardline stance against what they see as UN bias, others fear that cutting off diplomatic engagement with the international community could isolate Israel at a time when it needs allies the most.

A Dangerous Precedent for Diplomacy

Israel’s ban on Guterres could set a dangerous precedent for international diplomacy. The role of the UN Secretary-General is to act as a neutral mediator in global conflicts, and by denying him access, Israel risks further eroding the authority of multilateral institutions. At a time when the Middle East is already engulfed in violence, sidelining diplomacy threatens to worsen an already catastrophic situation.

The ban also raises the question of how other countries might respond to UN criticism in future conflicts. If Israel can bar the UN’s top diplomat without consequence, what’s to stop other nations from doing the same? Such actions undermine the principles of international diplomacy, where dialogue, even amid disagreements, remains essential.

Diplomatic Isolation or Engagement?

Israel’s decision to ban António Guterres highlights the deepening rift between the country and the UN, but it also underscores a larger problem—the erosion of diplomacy in the face of escalating violence. By sidelining the UN’s top diplomat, Israel risks not only isolating itself but also weakening the very institutions that could help broker peace in the region.

At a moment when the Middle East is on the brink of wider conflict, diplomacy is needed more than ever. The “sickening cycle of escalation” that Guterres warned about cannot be stopped without dialogue. Israel’s ban, however, suggests that diplomacy may be becoming another casualty of this long-standing conflict.


United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres Photo Credit: UN



Debashis Chakrabarti

Debashis Chakrabarti is an international media scholar and social scientist, currently serving as the Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Politics and Media. With extensive experience spanning 35 years, he has held key academic positions, including Professor and Dean at Assam University, Silchar. Prior to academia, Chakrabarti excelled as a journalist with The Indian Express. He has conducted impactful research and teaching in renowned universities across the UK, Middle East, and Africa, demonstrating a commitment to advancing media scholarship and fostering global dialogue.

SUNDAY SERMONArmageddon Lamb Lion End Times Religion

An Armageddon War Leads To A Messianic Age – OpEd


By 

An apocalyptic war is a Biblical ‘end of war’ War that uses the word Armageddon from the Biblical Hebrew Har Meghiddo, meaning “Mountain of Megiddo”. Har Magedon, which is 80 miles north of Jerusalem, is the symbol of a major battle in which, when the need is greatest and the believers are most oppressed, God reveals His power to His distressed people; and their evil enemies are destroyed. The word Armageddon does not appear in the Hebrew Bible and appears only once in the Greek New Testament, in Revelation 16:16.


Many religious people now think that the road to Armageddon started with the Hamas October 7th 2023 massacre in Israel, when 3,000 terrorists burst across the border into Israel from the Gaza Strip by land, air and sea, killing some 1,200 people and seizing 251 hostages of all ages. Armageddon is a warning of humanity’s need to change to avoid Armageddon. 

Like Judaism and Christianity, Islam has a powerful eschatological strain. It anticipates the end to the world as we know it; a final Last Day confrontation between good and evil (Armageddon); after which, with God’s help, human life will be rewarded and transformed into the Messianic Age of peace and prosperity. 

As the Qur’an states: “Verily! Those who believe and those who are Jews, Christians, and Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day, and do righteous good deeds, shall have their reward with their Lord, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.” (2:62 and 5:69) 

Notice that the Qur’an specifically stresses religious pluralism applies on God’s judgment day.  

As ibn Babuya writes in Thawab ul-A’mal, “The Apostle of God said: `There will come a time for my people when there will remain nothing of the Qur’an except its outward form, and nothing of Islam except its name, and they will call themselves by this name even though they are the people furthest from it.  “The mosques will be full of people but they will be empty of right guidance. The religious leaders (Fuqaha) of that day will be the most evil religious leaders under the heavens; sedition and dissension will go out from them and to them will it return.” 


This sounds, and indeed is, terrible. But, those who trust in God know that the night is coldest in the last hours before sunrise. Secularists believe that these apocalyptic visions of a future (Armageddon) are absurd, although many secularists themselves fervently believe that runaway genetic modification of food and/or extreme climate change is going to doom human civilization in future generations. 

The basic difference between the pessimistic, humanist secularists and the religious optimists is that those who believe in the God of Abraham also believe that God’s inspiration and guidance guarantees that the spiritual forces of good, will overcome all the world’s evils at the end of days; and  justice, peace and religious pluralism will prevail. Or as Prophet Micah envisions it: (4:1-5)

“In the end of days the mountain of the Lord’s Temple will be established  as the highest mountain; it will be exalted above the hills, and peoples will stream to it. Many (not all) nations will come and say, ‘Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the Temple of the God of Jacob. who will teach us his ways, so that we may walk in his paths.

“Torah will be broadcast from Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. God will judge between many (not all) peoples and will settle disputes among powerful nations far and wide. They will beat their swords into ploughs, and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war any more.


“Everyone will sit under their own vine and under their own fig-tree, and no one will make them afraid, for the Lord Almighty has spoken. All the nations will walk in the name of their gods, and we (Jews) will walk in the name of the Lord our God for ever and ever.”

Thus, the Hebrew Bible and the Qur’an’s final judgement is the self-destruction of violent, hate filled, religion twisted terrorism and narrow ‘my way or death’ philosophy (Armageddon); and the victory of kindness, love, democracy and religious pluralism. 

The Qur’an refers to Prophet Abraham as a community or a nation: “Abraham was a nation/community [Ummah]; dutiful to God, a monotheist [hanif], not one of the polytheists.” (16:120) If Prophet Abraham is an Ummah then fighting between the descendants of Prophets Ishmael and Isaac is a civil war and should always be avoided.

If all Arabs and Jews can live up to the ideal that ‘the descendants of Abraham’s sons should never make war against each other’ is the will of God; we can help fulfill the 2700 year old vision of Prophet Isaiah: “In that day there will be a highway from Egypt to Assyria. The Assyrians will go to Egypt, and the Egyptians to Assyria. The Egyptians and Assyrians will worship together. On that day Israel  will join a three-party alliance with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing upon the heart. The LORD of Hosts will bless them saying, “Blessed be Egypt My people, Assyria My handiwork, and Israel My inheritance.” (Isaiah 19:23-5)

Although it might seem impossible now, I do believe that within a decade or two Muslims will visit Jerusalem and pray together with Jews as Prophet Isaiah states: “And the foreigners who join themselves to the (monotheistic one) Lord, to minister to him, to love the name of the Lord, and to be his servants, everyone who keeps the Sabbath and does not profane it, and holds fast to my covenant, these I will bring to my holy mountain (Zion), and make them joyful in my house of prayer; their burnt offerings and sacrifices will be accepted on my altar; for my house shall be called a house of prayer for all peoples.” (Isaiah 56:6-7)

As the Qur’an states: “And We certainly sent Moses with Our signs, [saying], “Bring out your people from darkness into light, and remind them of the days of Allah .” Indeed, there are signs for everyone patient and grateful.” (14:5) and “Allah is an ally of those who believe. He brings them out from darkness into light.” (2:257) This Light that comes out of Darkness is not natural light. It is the light of religious enlightenment. There are lights coming out of the darkness. 

The Hamas controlled health ministry said that the death toll in Gaza since October 7 had passed 42, 000, ignoring the fact that the UN had reduced its Estimate of Women and Children Killed in Gaza by half, said the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. The UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has also revised its child fatality figure from the Gaza war sharply downward, reporting 14,500+ deaths on May 6 but 7,797 on May 8. 

OCHA also revised downward its figure for female fatalities from more than 9,500 deaths to 4,959 deaths. The Gaza Ministry of Health admitted it did not have names for more than 10,000 of the individuals it claimed to be deceased.  Also an Associated Press analysis of Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry data, has found that the death rate for women and children in October 2023, when the war began following Hamas’s October 7 onslaught, was above 60 percent. By April, 2024 it was below 40%. That is a 1/3 reduction in fatalities. 

As the Qur’an states: “Perhaps Allah will put, between you and those to whom you have been enemies among them, affection. And Allah is competent, and Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”  (60:7) Then the words of the Qur’an will be full-filled “From the depths of Darkness into the Light; for Allah is very kind and merciful to you.” (57:9)

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib says, “From the river to the sea is an aspirational call for freedom, human rights, and peaceful coexistence, not death, destruction, or hate.” I say make it truly aspirational by making it focus on both people first and the land second. From the river to the sea Palestinians and Israelis should be freed of hatred and suffering by ‘a two state for two peoples sharing of the land peacefully’ solution.

But the Hamas’ 2017 charter states that in principle, it “rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea.” Hamas opposes a two state solution, wants all the land between the Mediterranean Sea and the River Jordan, and violently opposed the Oslo peace accords negotiated by Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) in the mid-1990s. If the war ends with Hamas weakened, and with a new Israeli government elected; there is the hope that the miracle of the Yom Kippur War may be repeated. 

On October 27, 1978, only five years after Egypt started the Yom Kippur War with a surprise  attack on Israel, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin were named winners of the Nobel Peace Prize for their progress toward achieving a Middle East accord. The Yom Kippur War was followed six years later by a Peace Treaty between Egypt and Israel. 

Could the same process follow the defeat of Hamas, and its opposition to a two state solution?  The only possible chance for avoiding more wars is the two state solution. To establish a Palestinian state alongside Israel. That will not be possible with the current leaders on either side. Extremists, both Israeli and Palestinian, will do all they can to sink the idea, as they have done since the 1990s. 

If  a year of war does not deliver enough shock to break deeply-held prejudices and to make the idea of two states viable, nothing will. And without a mutually-acceptable way of ending the conflict, more generations of Palestinians and Israelis will be sentenced to more wars.

Although it might seem impossible now, I do believe that within a decade or two Muslims will visit Jerusalem and pray together with Jews as Prophet Zechariah predicts: “Then everyone who survives from all the nations that came against Jerusalem shall go up year after year to worship the King, the LORD of hosts, and to celebrate the Feast of Booths.” (Zechariah 14:16)

For more than eight decades political nationalist leaders in Israel and Palestine have failed to find a way to end the conflict between their two peoples. Perhaps it is time for religious leaders who understand the religious importance of repentance, humility, forgiveness, compromise and hope for peace in overcoming more than seven decades of pain and anger. 

As the Qur’an states: “Perhaps Allah will put, between you and those to whom you have been enemies among them, affection. And Allah is competent, and Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.”  (60:7) Then the words of the Qur’an will be full-filled “From the depths of Darkness into the Light; for Allah is very kind and merciful to you.” (Qur’an 57:9)

Thomas Friedman writes: “The only just and workable solution to this issue is two nation-states for two indigenous peoples. If you are for that, whatever your religion, nationality or politics, you’re part of the solution. If you are not for that, you’re part of the problem.”

Dr. Mohamed Chtatou, a Professor at a university in Rabat, Morocco writes: “After the current (Hamas-Israel) war, Israel’s ultra-nationalist coalition will undoubtedly be undermined by public opinion, and probably by a commission of inquiry. If the Palestinian Authority were to agree to take over Gaza – backed by the international reconstruction aid that would inevitably arrive – and if a centrist coalition government were to emerge in Israel, everything would once again be possible. Two difficult “ifs”? Perhaps, but there is no serious alternative.”  

Of course, any final deal must include the release of all the hostages (34-40 of whom are presumed dead) still held in Gaza.

As the Qur’an states: “‘Believers, be steadfast in the cause of God and bear witness with justice. Do not let your enmity for others turn you away from justice. Deal justly; that is nearest to being God-fearing.” (5:8)

As the Qur’an states: “Good and evil deeds are not equal. Repel evil with what is better; then you will see that one who was once your enemy has become your dearest friend…”  (41:34)

As the Qur’an states: “Good and evil deeds are not equal. Repel evil with what is better; then you will see that one who was once your enemy has become your dearest friend…”  (41:34)






Rabbi Allen S. Maller
Allen Maller retired in 2006 after 39 years as Rabbi of Temple Akiba in Culver City, Calif. He is the author of an introduction to Jewish mysticism. God. Sex and Kabbalah and editor of the Tikun series of High Holy Day prayerbooks.