Showing posts sorted by date for query HAITI. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query HAITI. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Friday, June 05, 2026

Summer Lee Condemns Democrats’ Silence After Anti-Muslim Attacks on Tlaib, Hamawy

“The silence from Democrats when Muslim colleagues and candidates are attacked is a cancerous rot.”


Reps. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and then-Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) attend the State of the Union address in Washington, DC on March 7, 2024.
(Photo: screenshot/Fox News)

Julia Conley
Jun 05, 202
COMMON DREAMS

Congresswoman Summer Lee spoke at length Thursday evening about recent anti-Muslim attacks that have been launched by Republicans as well as the corporate media against two progressive political leaders—reserving much of her condemnation for Democratic lawmakers who have remained silent as Rep. Rashida Tlaib and US House candidate Adam Hamawy have been both directly and indirectly accused of “terrorism” in recent days.

“Democrats, we are way too quiet right now,” said Lee (D-Pa.) in a three-minute video she posted on her official social media accounts. “This is a moral rot that we are dealing with, and I hope that we will not stand by and let this particular hatred grow and grow until it’s out of our control.”

Lee spoke up a day after Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio) openly accused Tlaib, the only Palestinian-American member of Congress, of advocating “for terrorists on a daily basis” during a debate on a proposal she introduced to block US forces from taking part in Israel’s invasion of Lebanon—a war powers resolution that ultimately failed to pass Thursday after House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and more than 100 other Democrats joined the GOP in opposing it.

More than 3,500 Lebanese people have been killed and 1.2 million have been forcibly displaced since Israel began attacking Lebanon in March, in what it says is an effort to defeat Hezbollah. Israeli officials have said they are using the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) decimation of Gaza as a “model” in Lebanon.

While Tlaib advocated on the House floor for Lebanese civilians, Miller characterized Hezbollah as “butchers that you like to hang out with to a certain extent,” addressing the progressive congresswoman—prompting her to demand that Miller’s comments be stricken from the record and accusing him of a “direct attack on my character.”

Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), who volunteered to serve in the IDF in 2015, also said supporters of Tlaib’s resolution were acting as “proxies for Hezbollah.”

In her statement Thursday, Lee said, “Yesterday on the House floor, two different Republicans basically called my sister Rashida a terrorist for nothing more than being there, being Palestinian, being Muslim, being a woman.”



She emphasized that the attacks on Tlaib followed similar remarks about congressional candidate Dr. Adam Hamawy, a retired US Army surgeon who volunteered to treat victims of Israel’s assault on Gaza and saved the life of Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) after her helicopter was shot down in Iraq in 2004.


Before voters in New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District went to the polls this week to vote in the primary the progressive Democrat won, opponents attacked him for his former association with Omar Abdel-Rahman, a cleric who was convicted of terrorism in 1995 and whom Hamawy said he met through the Egyptian-American community in New Jersey.

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) said Hamawy was “not in line with our values,” and The New York Times focused its subheadline on Abdel-Rahman in its report on Hamawy’s primary victory, before editing the subhead.



“The anti-Muslim rhetoric is picking up,” said Lee on Thursday. “And we don’t often talk about how dangerous that is, and we also don’t talk about how dangerous it is to our coalition. As the Democratic Party, we are supposed to be the ones that are the standard-setters, the ones who are fighting for justice and equal opportunity and liberation, and if we aren’t able to speak up against this right now, then how can we continue to hold that particular mantle?”

“It’s not just Republicans who are dealing in this,” she added. “I’ve heard Democrats use and deal in some of the worst tropes and stereotypes of my Muslim colleagues.”

Lee was applauded for speaking out about attacks that Democratic leaders had not directly addressed—and that Jeffries was accused of amplifying recently when he said he planned to speak to Hamawy about “his past affiliations.”




“Incredibly brave stuff for Summer to explicitly name and condemn Democratic Islamophobia and do so on broad terms,” said organizer and writer Cole Sandick. “I hope more elected progressives follow her lead.”

Lee emphasized that “no marginalized person should have to deal with the abuse that they are dealing with daily from the White House on down, by themselves.”

“So I just really hope that we can be as clear about anti-Muslim hate as we are about all the other forms of hatred that we’re fighting back right now,” she added, “and recognize that our liberation is tied together.”



Adam Hamawy, Doctor Who Served in Gaza During Genocide, Wins New Jersey Primary


Hamawy called for “health care, not bombs; to abolish ICE; and to unrig this economy.”

June 5, 2026

Nurse Monica Johnston (L) listens as Adam Hamawy speaks during an interview before a meeting at the White House in Washington DC, on June 14, 2024.Drew Angerer / AFP

Adam Hamawy, a doctor who served in Gaza amid the genocide, won a New Jersey congressional primary on Tuesday, demonstrating the continued impact of the Palestine solidarity movement on U.S. politics.

Egyptian-born Hamawy beat 11 other Democrats and will be the Democratic candidate on the ballot for New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District. The winner of the Democratic primary is expected to easily win a seat in Congress in November.

Hamawy’s campaign focused on ending U.S. aggression in the Middle East and a call to abolish ICE.

“You’ve heard throughout this race that I said over and over again: health care, not bombs; to abolish ICE; and to unrig this economy,” he told supporters on Tuesday night — echoing the calls of the Palestine solidarity movement and immigrant justice advocates. Hamawy also supports ending U.S. military aid to Israel.

“They are solutions to a crisis that was born out of a broken and rigged political and economic system – a system that floods money overseas to bomb children’s schools, while at the same time says that child care here in America is pie in the sky,” he explained.

Hamawy worked as an army combat doctor during the Iraq War in 2004 and 2005. He has also participated in numerous medical missions: to Bosnia, Sudan, Haiti, Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza.

Hamawy participated in medical missions to Gaza in 2024 and 2025, which he credits as part of the reason he ran for office.

In an interview with Mondoweiss, Hamawy said, “over the last two years, I’ve been to Gaza twice and the West Bank. What I witnessed there really compelled me to get more involved. I’ve seen war before; I’ve been to Iraq. I know the horrors of war, but what I witnessed was a genocide. I saw more children and civilians blown up than ever in my life. It was so horrible that when I came back, I felt it was my obligation to go to Congress and speak about what I had seen. These are American bombs that are being dropped. These are our taxpayer dollars that are being used.”

After the medical mission, “I felt I had to go to Washington to fix this myself,” he told Al Jazeera.

The medical mission – organized by the World Health Organization and the Palestinian American Medical Association – was temporarily blocked by Israel from exiting Gaza. When other foreign medical workers were eventually evacuated from the Strip, Hamawy and two other doctors refused to leave, demanding more medical workers be let into the enclave.

In the days before the primary race, media reports smeared Hamawy as tied to Islamic extremists because of his testimony in a 1995 trial for Omar Abdel-Rahman, a New Jersey-based religious leader who was convicted of inspiring terror attacks. Hamawy has said that he knew Abdel-Rahman through the local Egyptian American community, that he opposes all forms of violence, and that smears against him are simply Islamophobia.

“There once was a time where this might have worked, when racist and anti-Muslim attacks would have turned an election,” he said upon winning the primary. “But tonight we proved that this era of American politics is over.” This was also the case with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s race in 2025 — while the Islamophobic attacks on him in the period prior to the election would have made his win unlikely in the past, the shift is likely due to the impact of the Palestine solidarity movement since Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

The Institute for Middle East Understanding, which supported Hamawy’s race, wrote on X that “Voters were drawn to Dr. Hamawy’s candidacy because he knows firsthand the reality of Israel’s genocide in Gaza like few do – having worked to save the lives of Palestinian children under bombardment and unimaginable conditions.”

Yet while Hamawy is likely to win a seat in Congress in November and perhaps join the “Squad” of progressive lawmakers, there are serious obstacles to changing U.S. policy on Palestine from within the halls of Congress. In fact, Hamawy’s election comes as Biden-era advisors who helped engineer Israel’s genocide in Gaza are reportedly regrouping to shape the Democratic Party’s approach to Palestine ahead of the next presidential race.


‘A Strong Working-Class Agenda With Moral Clarity’: UAW Endorses Abdul El-Sayed

In what could be his most important endorsement in the tight Senate primary, Michigan’s largest and most influential union said El-Sayed was “someone we can trust to have our backs.”



Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed speaks to members of United Auto Workers (UAW) Local 600 in Dearborn, Michigan on March 9, 2026.
(Photo from Abdul El-Sayed/X)

Stephen Prager
Jun 05, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Momentum behind Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, the progressive hopeful for Michigan’s US Senate seat, continued to build on Friday when the candidate won a major endorsement from the state’s largest and most influential labor union, the United Auto Workers.

“The UAW is proud to endorse Abdul El-Sayed for US Senate,” the union said in a post to social media. “UAW members in Michigan want a fighter in Washington, DC who isn’t afraid to push forward a strong working-class agenda with moral clarity.”



Working Families Party Goes ‘All-In’ to Support El-Sayed in Michigan



El-Sayed Announces ‘We Can Do Better’ Tour Across Michigan to Hear From Biden-to-Trump Voters

“Having never taken a dime from corporate PACs, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed is someone we can trust to have our backs,” the union continued. “From Medicare for All to banning stock buybacks, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed is ready, eager, and well-equipped to move our core issues in the US Senate.”


Despite stronger establishment backing for his opponents, Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) and state Sen. Mallory McMorrow (D-8), recent polls show El-Sayed, Detroit’s former health director, as a narrow frontrunner for the Democratic primary scheduled for early August, where the winner is expected to face the Republican former US Rep. Mike Rogers for the vacant Senate seat.

El-Sayed has won the endorsements of other unions, such as National Nurses United; progressive groups, including the Working Families Party; Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.); and several like-minded Democrats, such as Michigan’s US Rep. Rashida Tlaib; Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.); and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.

But the endorsement of the storied UAW, which boasts over 350,000 active and retired members in Michigan, might be his biggest yet as he seeks to transition fully from insurgent to frontrunner.

“I am so honored and humbled,” El-Sayed said on social media as he prepared to join striking UAW Local 2093 American Axle workers on the picket line in Three Rivers on Friday. “Michigan union autoworkers built the American middle class and proved that when people stand together, there’s nothing we can’t accomplish. Solidarity forever.”



Dan Merica, a reporter at The Washington Post, noted that losing the UAW endorsement to El-Sayed was a particularly big blow to Stevens, “who is running as a technocrat, often referring to herself as a ‘manufacturing geek’ because of her work as one of President Barack Obama’s top officials on the 2009 auto rescue.”

It could have major implications in a race that is not only critical for deciding the balance of power in the Senate this November, but is widely perceived as a battle for the future of the Democratic Party.

Michigan’s importance is surely not lost on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). The New York Times reported on Friday that despite a public stance of neutrality, he is working behind the scenes to push party donors to support Stevens, the most conservative Democrat in the three-way race. The representative for suburban Detroit recently came under scrutiny over her backing from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the for-profit health insurance industry.

In response to what The Washington Post described as the establishment’s “concerted bid to hew to the political center,” the progressive advocacy group MoveOn said, “Once again the Democratic establishment seems to think it knows what’s best for voters [more] than voters themselves,” and congratulated El-Sayed on his endorsement.

“There’s a reason his campaign is inspiring people all over the state,” said MoveOn’s chief communications officer Joel Payne. “His economic populism resonates with Michiganders who are sick of lip service, dark money, and politicians who don’t seem to get their day-to-day struggles.”

“Those in congressional cloakrooms and in the establishment class in DC may not like it,” he continued, “but real Michiganders continue to make their support for El-Sayed’s economic populism and people-centered agenda clear.”

Thursday, June 04, 2026

 

Research Brief: Better land use and management could improve biodiversity, climate and economic development




University of Minnesota
Boundary where the Mau forest ends and becomes agricultural land near Bomet in Narok, Kenya. 

image: 

This paper helps provide information on where to locate crops and natural areas, such as forests, to achieve climate, biodiversity, and economic development goals. This photo shows a boundary where the Mau forest ends and becomes agricultural land near Bomet in Narok, Kenya.

view more 

Credit: Kate Holt (WWF, UK).





National governments and multilateral institutions face difficult challenges reconciling environmental goals, such as biodiversity conservation and addressing climate change, with economic development goals. 

In a first-of-its-kind analysis done for 146 countries around the world, an interdisciplinary research team led by researchers at the University of Minnesota found large potential gains in biodiversity, climate and economic development from improved land use and land management. The findings were recently published in Science.

The researchers integrated spatial biophysical and economic data with optimization methods to develop sustainable landscape efficiency frontiers for each of 146 countries included in the analysis. The landscape efficiency frontier in each country shows the maximally feasible combinations of biodiversity conservation (including both species and ecosystem measures), land-based climate mitigation (net carbon sequestration and methane emissions reductions) and net economic value from agricultural crops, livestock and forestry production. For example, the landscape efficiency frontier shows the highest economic value from agriculture and forestry for a given score for biodiversity conservation and climate mitigation, or the maximum climate mitigation possible for a given biodiversity score and economic values from agriculture and forestry. In most countries, land use and land management generates outcomes well inside their landscape efficiency frontier showing that simultaneous gains in environment and economic development are possible.  

The analysis found:

  • Summing results across all 146 countries included in the analysis shows potential to increase climate mitigation by over 200 billion metric tons CO2 equivalents (>20% increase) or net economic value by over $350 billion (>80% increase) without loss in other objectives important for carbon sequestration and biodiversity and expansion of agriculture and 

  • These gains occur both from land reallocation, involving selective restoration of forestry areas in highly productive lands, and crop intensification, especially in lower-income countries with current low-yield agriculture. 

“We know we're facing both a climate crisis and a biodiversity crisis but, usually, the pushback against doing something about either is that it's going to cost too much,” said lead author Stephen Polasky, a Regents Professor and co-founder of NatCap TEEMs in the University of Minnesota College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resources Sciences. “One of the main reasons for doing this study was to show, in fact, that there are ways where we can be more efficient and address climate and biodiversity without bankrupting people.” 

The research team discusses the analysis in greater detail here.

According to Polasky, this information is useful for organizations involved in supporting and financing development, such as international finance institutions, to help them better direct their resources and support for countries in a way that helps them meet their national goals but, at the same time, meet international commitments for biodiversity, conservation, climate change, and adaptation.

“One of the advantages we find from doing this analysis is that we show people what's possible, and that tends to open their minds to thinking about a wider set of alternatives, when they can see the gain that could be had by making some of these changes. Then making some of the changes is not so scary,” said Polasky.

"This research proves that the supposed tradeoff between protecting nature and growing economies is false,” said Becky Chaplin-Kramer, Global Biodiversity Lead Scientist at World Wildlife Fund-US. “By mapping what's truly possible country by country, we've given policymakers and investors a roadmap to pursue biodiversity gains, climate mitigation, and development goals together."  

NatCap TEEMs and its collaborators, including NatCap Insights, have started working with other partners to apply this work, including working with the World Bank to do country-specific analyses to answer their specific questions.

The research team added that there are also many ecosystem services and economic activities that are not yet included in this analysis, so there is much additional work that can be done to deepen that analysis.

Funding for the analysis was provided by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the University of Minnesota Fesler-Lampert Endowment, the University of Minnesota Institute on the Environment, World Resources Institute, and the World Bank.

About NatCap TEEMs 
NatCap TEEMs (Natural Capital Alliance: The Earth-Economy Modelers) in the Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, aims to improve understanding of the integrated earth-economy system and to inform decision-making for sustainable development on a livable planet. NatCap TEEMs is a part of the Natural Capital Alliance, a global partnership whose mission is to pioneer science, technology, and partnerships that enable people and nature to thrive (formerly the Natural Capital Project). Learn more at natcapteems.umn.edu

About the College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences 
The University of Minnesota’s College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences strives to inspire minds, nourish people, and sustainably enhance the natural environment. CFANS has a legacy of innovation, bringing discoveries to life through science and educating the next generation of leaders. Every day, students, faculty, and researchers use science to address the grand challenges of the world today and in the future. CFANS offers an unparalleled expanse of experiential learning opportunities for students and the community, with 12 academic departments, 10 research and outreach centers across the state, the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, the Bell Museum, and dozens of interdisciplinary centers. Learn more at cfans.umn.edu

Sustainable landscape efficiency frontiers and current performance showing potential simultaneous gains for environmental and economic outcomes and tradeoffs for illustrative countries. 

Sustainable landscape efficiency frontiers and current performance showing potential simultaneous gains for environmental and economic outcomes and tradeoffs for illustrative countries: (A) Haiti, (B) Iceland, (C) Gabon, and (D) Japan. The horizontal axis measures net economic value from agricultural crop production, livestock grazing, and forestry. The vertical axis is the geometric mean of climate mitigation and biodiversity scores. The optimization was performed in three dimensions (biodiversity, climate mitigation, net economic value) but represented in two dimensions, and hence the frontier is often thicker than a single line. Minimum and maximum scores in each country for each outcome are normalized to 0 and 1, with maximum environmental geometric scores often occurring at negative net economic value because of the incorporation of transition costs that outweigh positive net production value.

Credit

Stephen Polasky

Monday, June 01, 2026

Opinion

I've dedicated my career to soccer. I'm boycotting this World Cup.

(RNS) — A scholar specializing in soccer explains why he believes this World Cup is debasing the world's secular religion.


Fans celebrate during the announcement of the United States men's national soccer team roster, Tuesday, May 26, 2026, in New York, ahead of the FIFA World Cup soccer tournament. (AP Photo/Eduardo Munoz Alvarez)

Kirk Bowman
June 1, 2026 
RNS

(RNS) — I have devoted my career to soccer. I teach a college course on Soccer & Global Politics. I’ve conducted research in 35 countries on the social dimensions of the people’s game. I truly believe soccer is the closest thing that the secular world has to a universal religion.

This summer, eight World Cup matches will be held in Atlanta, where I live, yet I am not going to any of the games. As much as it pains me, I’ve decided to boycott the 2026 Men’s World Cup in Canada, Mexico and the United States.

I am not a fervent FIFA critic, and I am looking forward to going to Brazil for the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup. But I cannot in good conscience attend matches, watch matches on television or collect Panini stickers of the players this summer.



Here is why.

First, the world was promised it could come to these games — that is false.

On May 2, 2018, President Donald Trump wrote a letter to FIFA proclaiming that “all eligible athletes, officials and fans from all countries around the world would be able to enter the United States without discrimination.” FIFA President Gianni Infantino recently echoed that, saying, “America will welcome the world. Everyone who wants to come here to enjoy, to have fun and to celebrate the game will be able to do that.”

In fact, fans from Haiti and Iran are banned from entering the United States, and those from Algeria, Cape Verde, the Ivory Coast, Senegal and Tunisia have been de facto excluded by Kafkaesque, constantly changing, on-again-off-again impediments, including a $15,000-per-person bond program that was canceled too late for fans to make plans to attend the tournament.

According to a filing by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, fans from 42 countries, including the UK, France, Germany and South Korea, are subject to five-year social media searches and may be arbitrarily denied entry into the United States. Human rights organizations warn these U.S. policies could also result in risks for racial profiling and arrest.

And for those allowed in, what exactly will they be asked to celebrate?


President Donald Trump puts on his FIFA Peace Prize medal awarded to him by FIFA President Gianni Infantino, right, before the draw for the 2026 soccer World Cup at the Kennedy Center in Washington, Friday, Dec. 5, 2025. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

Early on, the Trump administration made threats to move venues from blue to red cities, and FIFA made a calculated decision to win over the president through constant adulation and sycophancy. This led to the surreal creation of the FIFA Peace Prize, which was awarded to President Trump at the FIFA 2026 World Cup group-stage draw in December 2025 at the Kennedy Center.

At the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup — the tournament FIFA uses to test facilities ahead of the World Cup itself — President Trump kept the original championship trophy, forcing the winner, Chelsea, to accept a replica. He also pilfered a medal reserved for the winning players. He awkwardly hovered over the awards ceremony, photo-bombing the champions’ photo and drawing side-eyes from Chelsea star Cole Palmer.

This scene was reminiscent of another ugly moment in the sport. In 1934, when the second FIFA World Cup was held in Italy, the phrase “Mussolini is always right” was plastered across walls throughout the country. The World Cup — known as ‘Mussolini’s World Cup’ — was a propaganda tool for glorifying Mussolini and for making Italy great again. He personally handed the championship trophy to the captain of the victorious Italians, and he delighted in the cheers and fascist salutes from the Italian players and fans.

I would like to think that if I were a soccer fan in Italy in 1934, I would have passed on that World Cup, too.


President Donald Trump holds the FIFA World Cup trophy during an announcement in the Oval Office of the White House, Friday, Aug. 22, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Ugly politics is not the only issue. FIFA is committing a red-card offense by treating fans as mere spectators to be exploited, rather than as partners and participants in creating the atmosphere and spectacle that characterize soccer competitions. Soccer fans are the twelfth player, bringing the chants, the imagery and the passion. Without the fans, especially the Argentines and Moroccans, the 2022 World Cup would have felt like the Disneyland World Cup.

The bright orange Dutch flash mobs, the Japanese Samurai Blue Ultras that entertain and clean up their section after the match, the choreographed celebrations of the Brazilians and the vibrant body painting of the Senegalese are as integral to the World Cup as the players.

FIFA is manipulating and deceiving fans by releasing batches of tickets in an opaque manner to create a sense of scarcity that artificially inflates ticket prices. While FIFA does have a responsibility to generate funds for its operations from the World Cup every four years, which in part are invested in grassroots initiatives around the world to develop the game, this needs to be balanced with an awareness that the most passionate fans of South Korea, Colombia or Germany are stakeholders and irreplaceable performers in the matches that are televised around the world. The matches played in empty stadiums during the COVID pandemic confirmed that truth: Televised games without enthusiastic fans are dreary affairs.

Many of the most enthusiastic fans are working class and effectively excluded by the sky-high prices in 2026 for tickets, parking, transportation and concessions. After an outcry from fans, FIFA created a new category with around 1,000 tickets for each of the 104 matches at $60 each to be allocated to the confederations for distribution to hard-core fans. That is not nearly enough.

Soccer is the people’s game, with a universal language and shared vernacular that cuts through class distinctions and unites people in a community of fervor for the game and faith in one’s team. The Infantino-Trump partnership is debasing it and the 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup.


Kirk Bowman at the 2024 UEFA Women’s Champions League Final at San Mamés Stadium in Bilbao, Spain. (Photo courtesy of Bowman)

And so, I am passing on the World Cup this year. I do not encourage others to make the same choice, nor do I judge those who choose to take part. I submit, however, that the spirit that makes the World Cup so special is now found in the women’s game. The tickets are affordable; Brazil will enthusiastically welcome all the teams and their fans; and the game will be used to applaud incredible players and teams, not politicians. I invite you to join me in 2027 for the beautiful game.

(Kirk Bowman is a professor in the Sam Nunn School of International Affairs at Georgia Tech. He is the author/editor of six books, including Soccer, Globalization and Innovation: The Beautiful Game in the 21st Century. The opinions expressed in this commentary do not necessarily reflect those of Religion News Service.)

Thursday, May 28, 2026

France votes unanimously to abolish Code Noir, a colonial-era slavery law

French lawmakers voted on Thursday to repeal the Code Noir, a law that regulated slavery in the French colonies that was never formally repealed even after the abolition of slavery in 1848. The vote reopened a debate around reparations in a country that has yet to fully come to terms with its history of colonialism.


Issued on: 28/05/2026 - RFI

A memorial to the abolition of slavery in the French city of Nantes. © LOIC VENANCE / AFP

By:RFI
ADVERTISING


The National Assembly voted 254-0 — a rare show of unanimity — to adopt a bill repealing the "Code Noir" or "Black Code", the 1685 decree King Louis XIV signed to govern slaves across France’s colonies.

The law turned human beings into chattel, allowing them to be worked, beaten, sold, raped and murdered.

The French were the third largest slave traders in Europe, after the British and the Portuguese.

Ships departing from French ports between the 17th and 19th centuries forcibly transported more than one million men, women and children from Africa into slavery, many in plantations in its overseas colonies in the Caribbean, according to expert estimates.

France abolished enslaving humans more than 170 years ago, and in 2001 recognised slavery and the slave trade as "crimes against humanity".

But a series of royal decrees from the 17th and 18th centuries that established the legal status of enslaved people in its colonies were never explicitly overturned.

President Emmanuel Macron, who is stepping down next year after his maximum two terms in office, last week threw his support behind repealing these laws.

Lawmakers in the lower house will on Thursday debate a bill to annul the royal edicts, and the Senate is then to have its say at an undetermined date before the law can pass.

'Denial of humanity'

The decrees ruled over the lives of enslaved people in the colonies.

They declared all enslaved people should be Catholics, and banned owners from making them work on Sundays, according to a copy on the French parliament's website.

But they also referred to them as "moveable goods" who could be inherited, outlined brutal punishment including mutilation of the ear for trying to escape, and condemned the children of enslaved people to the same fate as their parents.

Max Mathiasin, a lawmaker from the former colony turned overseas territory of Guadeloupe who is championing the bill, last week said repealing the decrees would be a "powerful symbolic and political gesture".

The Black Code "organised the denial of the humanity of women, men and children reduced to slavery because of their origin and the colour of their skin", he said.

France ended slavery in 1794 under the French Revolution, but Napoleon Bonaparte ordered troops to be sent to Guadeloupe in 1802 to restore the practice.

France then abolished it again in 1848.

But activists say the legacy of slavery endures through inequalities between mainland France and former colonies that are now overseas territories, as well as racism.

Macron last week said the issue of reparations should be addressed, but warned against making "false promises" and announced no specific measures.

Dieudonne Boutrin, an activist from the overseas territory of Martinique who is descended from enslaved people, said annulling the Black Code should have been done ages ago.

"It changes nothing. Black people are still looked at the same way," he said.

"Now we need to go beyond the symbolic," he said, urging a "real reparations programme", including for example more funds for educational projects to transmit history and help battle systemic racism.

'Lasting harm'

Debate in the chamber turned raw.

Steevy Gustave, a lawmaker descended from enslaved people on the Caribbean island of Martinique, told colleagues the repeal was necessary “but no vote alone can repair centuries of shattered lives.”

“We are not descendants of slaves,” he said, bursting into tears. “We are descendants of human beings born free, then reduced to the worst — reduced to slavery.”

Serge Letchimy, an official from Martinique, in an open letter to Macron earlier this month also demanded reparations.

He urged "a law that clearly establishes the principle that the crimes of trafficking and slavery have caused lasting historical, cultural, social, economic and psychological harm".

He referred to a 10-point plan that Caribbean nations have put to European nations, including international debt cancellation, as well as support for healthcare and illiteracy eradication.

Among France's former colonies, Haiti – the poorest country in the Caribbean – stands out as having particularly suffered.

Haiti became the first independent black nation in the Americas in 1804, after enslaved people rebelled against their French masters in what was then the colony of Saint-Domingue.

In 1825, it accepted to pay France a huge sum in "reparations" in exchange for recognising its independence, but it was forced to take out loans with high interest rates from French bankers in order to pay it.

It only managed to pay off this "double debt" in 1952.

Macron last year said that a joint commission of French and Haitian historians would examine this and issue recommendations.

Tuesday, May 26, 2026

Another Kind of World Cup Victory


May 26, 2026

Image by Fauzan Saari.

Who would imagine that an international sporting event will be the next battleground in the fight against authoritarian repression?

Yet that scenario is unfolding right now, and the battleground is the World Cup tournament – soon to begin in cities around the U.S. To understand the dynamics of the situation, consider the concept of state terror, i.e. a regime’s efforts to instill fear as a means of dividing and disempowering a people, thereby tightening its grip on power.

In the past year and a half, the Trump administration has deployed ICE as an instrument of state terror. In assaults on LA, Chicago, Minneapolis, and other cities, ICE agents have engaged in unlawful traffic stops and racial profiling, carried out warrantless raids on homes, and inflicted excessive and lethal force on protesters and bystanders. ICE’s management of detention centers around the country has been characterized by cruelty, violence, and degrading conditions. At least 46 people have died in ICE custody since Donald Trump took office last year.

Markwayne Mullin, the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, made clear that ICE will be present at World Cup venues, including SoFi Stadium near my home in Los Angeles County. Mullin ruled out broad immigration sweeps but not individual apprehensions. At the same time, FIFA, international soccer’s governing body, has required stadium workers to disclose sensitive information (social security numbers, residential addresses, nationality, and country of birth) and to allow the sharing of that information with federal authorities.

Some say that workers, vendors, and visitors have nothing to fear if they’re here legally. But the argument is both specious and disingenuous. It denies the toxic power of racialized scapegoating that Donald Trump ratcheted up over the past 11 years. From the time he announced his first candidacy in 2015, when he declared that Mexico was sending us rapists, drugs, and crime, he has made pronouncements about “shithole countries” like Haiti and African nations, about ways that unauthorized immigrants are “poisoning the blood” of Americans, and about Haitian immigrants stealing and consuming the pets of their citizen neighbors – to name just a few of the lies. Such baseless claims have made many Americans more fearful of immigrants, and – along with rogue immigration enforcement –- have frightened many migrants into the shadows or helped pushed them to self-deport.

Answering the lies requires an expansive bearing of witness: about the cruelty and waste of our present immigration enforcement policies – and about the insatiable need of authoritarians to scapegoat, instill fear, and divide. If a person has lived in, and peacefully contributed to, a community for many years – his or her lack of documentation says much more about the failure of the broader polity than it does about the individual. It speaks to the failure of lawmakers to recognize in law the economic and cultural contributions that immigrants bring to this nation. It declares the failure to set down pathways to citizenship that will liberate even greater contributions when people are fully free.

But bearing witness in and of itself is not enough. As Minnesotans made clear when they forced ICE and CBP (Customs and Border Protection) to retreat from Minneapolis, people power is needed – along with high levels of solidarity, organization, and nonviolent discipline that enable such power.

Solidarity and discipline are needed now at the World Cup games. In LA, for example, there are about 2000 unionized workers at SoFi Stadium – servers, cooks, and bartenders – and they’ve begun to take action through their union, UNITE HERE Local 11. They’ve filed a complaint with California’s Attorney General, citing an intrusion of their privacy and the violation of their rights under the California Consumer Privacy Act. They’ve also threatened to strike unless several demands are met, including assurances that ICE will have no place at the games.

As in Minneapolis, the workers deserve the support of the broader community, a support grounded in an awareness of what’s at stake for them, for the community, and for the nation as a whole. A number of community groups, including faith-based organizations, have already stepped up in support and solidarity.

Were ICE to be forced into retreat once again, that would indeed be a World Cup victory deserved by all.

Andrew Moss is an emeritus professor from the California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, where he taught a course, “War and Peace in Literature,” for 10 years.