Showing posts sorted by date for query DOGS. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query DOGS. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

 

Blends of child and best friend, with power imbalance: How dogs fit into our social networks



Many people view their dog as a family member, friend, or kid, but does the relationship with them really resemble these human relationships?




Eötvös Loránd University

Dog on boat 

image: 

Blends of child and best friend, with power imbalance: how dogs fit into our social networks

view more 

Credit: Photo: Eniko Kubinyi




Many people view their dog as a family member, friend, or kid, but does the relationship with them really resemble these human relationships? Researchers from ELTE Eötvös Loránd University now set out to explore the precise role dogs play in human social networks by comparing human-dog relationships with human-human relationships using 13 relationship scales.

Their study revealed that the owner-dog relationship can be interpreted as a mix of child and best friend relationships, combining positive aspects of the child relationship with the lack of negative aspects of friendship, blended with a high level of control over the dog.  Interestingly, while owners often rate their relationship with their dog as superior to any human bond, the study also found that more support in human relationships correlates with more support in dog-owner bonds, suggesting that dogs complement human relationships rather than compensate for their deficiencies.

Our relationship with dogs has evolved dramatically since domestication. Once primarily working animals, dogs have become cherished companions, often considered ‘substitute children’ in many Western societies. Despite this shift, little is known about the specific social roles dogs fulfill in our network of relationships.

Human social networks consist of different partners who offer varying forms of support. For example, romantic partners provide intimacy and aid, children offer opportunities for nurturing and relationship security, while best friends are sources of low-conflict companionship. The study, recently published in Scientific Reports, examined how dogs compare to these human relationships.

Over 700 dog owners rated 13 relationship characteristics regarding their dogs and four human partners: their child, romantic partner, closest relative, and best friend.

Results showed that owners rated their bond with their dog as the most satisfying and their dog as their best source of companionship. Owners also felt that their dog loved them the most among all partners. Moreover, similar to children, dogs scored high in nurturing and relationship security and, like best friends, had low levels of antagonism and conflict with their owners. However, there is also a greater power imbalance toward the owner in the relationship with dogs than with any human partner.

“Unlike in human relationships, dog owners maintain full control over their dogs as they make most of the decisions, contributing to the high satisfaction owners report. Compared to humans, the relationship with dogs involves few conflicts and minimal negative interactions” The power asymmetry, having control over a living being, is a fundamental aspect of dog ownership for many” - explains senior author Enikő Kubinyi, Head of the Dept. of Ethology at the ELTE and head of MTA-ELTE “Momentum” Companion Animal Research Group. “The results highlight that dogs occupy a unique place in our social world—offering the emotional closeness of a child, the ease of a best friend, and the predictability of a relationship shaped by human control—revealing why our bonds with them are often so deeply fulfilling.”

The study also examined how dog and human relationship ratings relate to one another and found that strong human relationships correlated with stronger bonds with dogs.

“We expected that people with weak human relationships would rely more on their dogs for support, but our results contradict this,” says co-author Dorottya Ujfalussy. “In our sample, people did not seem to use dogs to compensate for the insufficient support in their human relationships.” 

However, the researchers note that their sample consisted of volunteers who were likely more satisfied with their relationships than the average dog owner. The study may therefore not fully capture the experiences of vulnerable individuals who rely more heavily on their dogs for emotional support. 

“Dogs offer different kinds of emotional and social support depending on the needs of their owners,” - explains Borbála Turcsán, first author of the study. “Some people seek companionship and fun, others need trust and stability, and some simply enjoy having someone to care for.”

Instead of placing the dog-owner relationship into the predefined categories traditionally used in such studies—like ‘family member’ or ‘pet’—the researchers introduced a new, multidimensional approach that better captures its complexity. This framework not only helps us understand how dogs fit into our social lives, but may also reveal where people turn to dogs to fill emotional gaps, and why, for many, the bond runs so deep.

Blends of child and best friend, with power imbalance: how dogs fit into our social networks

UH OH!

Researchers find first evidence of potential bed bug insecticide resistance in gene mutation


USE PROPANE HEAT FANS INSTEAD




Virginia Tech





A global infestation of bed bugs after World War II was nearly eradicated in the 1950s with the use of the pesticide dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane, commonly known as DDT, a chemical that has since been banned. Since then, this urban pest has been enjoying a resurgence in populations globally and has displayed resistance to an array of insecticides used for their control.

A study published in the Journal of Medical Entomology detailed how a team of Virginia Tech researchers, led by urban entomologist Warren Booth, discovered a gene mutation that could contribute to that insecticide resistance.  

The findings came as a result of a study Booth set up for graduate student Camille Block as a means to build up her molecular research skills. 

“It was purely a fishing expedition,” said Booth, the Joseph R. and Mary W. Wilson Urban Entomology Associate Professor in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

But Booth had a good idea about where the best fish were swimming and knew where to cast a line.

Specializing in urban pests, Booth was already aware of a gene mutation in the nerve cells of German cockroaches and white flies that confers their resistance to insecticides. Booth suggested that Block analyze one bed bug as a sample from each of the 134 unique populations of bed bugs, which were collected by pest control companies in North America from 2008-22, to see if they had the same cell mutations. Two bugs from two separate populations did. 

“It [the discovery] was literally my last 24 samples,” said Block, who is studying entomology and is an affiliate with the Invasive Species Collaborative. “I’ve never done any kind of molecular work before, so getting all these molecular skills was super important.”

Due to the genetic uniformity within bed bug infestations resulting from extensive inbreeding, one specimen per sample is generally representative of that population. But Booth wanted to make sure Block had actually discovered the mutation, so they examined all specimens in the two identified populations.

“When we went back and screened multiple individuals from the two populations, every one of them had the mutations,” Booth said. “So they were fixed for these mutations, and it’s the same mutation that we find in German cockroaches.”

Through his work with German cockroaches, Booth knows that their resistance to insecticides is from a gene mutation in the cells of the nervous system and these mechanisms are environmentally driven.

“There is a gene that’s known as the Rdl gene. It’s been identified in a lot of other pest species, and it’s associated with resistance to an insecticide called dieldrin,” said Booth, an affiliate of the Fralin Life Sciences Institute. “That mutation is throughout all of the German cockroaches. We’re not finding populations without that mutation, which is kind of amazing.”

According to Booth, fipronil and dieldrin – pesticides that have proven effective against bed bugs in the laboratory – have the same mode of action, so the mutation theoretically enables the pests to be resistant to both pesticides. Dieldrin has been banned since the 1990s, but fipronil is currently used in spot treatments for dog and cat flea control – not to control bed bugs.

Booth suspects that many pet owners who use fipronil spot treatment on their animals allow their dogs or cats to sleep with them, which exposes their bedding to fipronil residue. If any bed bugs came into that environment, they would have been subjected to the fipronil inadvertently and then selected for that mutation in the population.

“We don’t know if that mutation is novel and it popped up after that, or in that time frame, or whether it was occurring in populations 100 years ago,” Booth said. 

The next step is to cast a wider net and look for those mutations in different regions of the world, particularly Europe, as well as different time periods in museum specimens, because bed bugs have been around for over a million years. 

In November 2024, the Booth lab was the first to successfully sequence the entire common bed bug genome.

“This is the first time that the bug genome has been sequenced,” Booth said. “Now that we have that, we can go to these museum specimens.”

Booth pointed out that the problem with museum DNA is it degrades really quickly in the small fragments, but now that researchers have chromosome-level templates, they can take those fragments and align them back to those chromosomes and reconstruct genes and genomes.

Booth points out that his lab works with pest control companies, so their genetic sequencing efforts may help them gain a better understanding of where bed bugs are located globally and how to help in eradicating them.

Now that Block has honed her molecular skills, she is excited to continue her work with urban evolution.

“I love evolution. I think it is so interesting,” Block said. “People feel more connected to these urban species, and I think it’s easier to get people interested in bed bugs as it is something they may have personally experienced.”

Lindsay Miles, a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Entomology, was another Virginia Tech member of Booth’s research team.

Original Study: Doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaf033
Original Study: Doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esae071 

Monday, April 21, 2025

Gaza civil defence describes medic killings as ‘summary executions’


By AFP
April 21, 2025


A video recovered from the phone of one of the slain aid workers, released by the Red Crescent, appeared to contradict the Israeli military's account - Copyright AFP/File

 Filippo MONTEFORTE

Gaza’s civil defence agency on Monday accused the Israeli military of carrying out “summary executions” in the killing of 15 rescue workers last month, rejecting the findings of an internal probe by the army.

The medics and other rescue workers were killed when responding to distress calls near Gaza’s southern city of Rafah early on March 23, days into Israel’s renewed offensive in the Hamas-run territory.

Among those killed were eight Red Crescent staff members, six from the Gaza civil defence rescue agency and one employee of UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, according to the UN humanitarian agency OCHA and Palestinian rescuers.

“The video filmed by one of the paramedics proves that the Israeli occupation’s narrative is false and demonstrates that it carried out summary executions,” Mohammed Al-Mughair, a civil defence official, told AFP, accusing Israel of seeking to “circumvent” its obligations under international law.

Following the shooting, the Red Crescent released a video recovered from the phone of one of the victims. It does not show executions, but it does directly contradict the version of events initially put forward by the Israeli military.

In particular, the video shows clearly that the ambulances were travelling with sirens, flashing lights and headlights on. The military had claimed the ambulances were travelling “suspiciously” and without lights.



– Operational failures –



The incident drew international condemnation, including concern about possible war crimes from UN human rights commissioner Volker Turk.

An Israeli military investigation into the incident released on Sunday “found no evidence to support claims of execution” or “indiscriminate fire” by its troops, but admitted to operational failures and said it was firing a field commander.

It said six of those killed were militants, revising an earlier claim that nine of the men were fighters.

The dead, who were buried in sand by Israeli forces, were only recovered several days after the attack from what the UN human rights agency OCHA described as a “mass grave”.

The Palestine Red Crescent Society denounced the report as “full of lies”.

“It is invalid and unacceptable, as it justifies the killing and shifts responsibility to a personal error in the field command when the truth is quite different,” Nebal Farsakh, spokesperson for the Red Crescent, told AFP.

The Israeli investigation said there were three shooting incidents in the area on that day.

In the first, soldiers shot at what they believed to be a Hamas vehicle.

In the second, around an hour later, troops fired “on suspects emerging from a fire truck and ambulances”, the military said.

The probe determined that the fire in the first two incidents resulted from an “operational misunderstanding by the troops”.

In the third incident, the troops fired at a UN vehicle “due to operational errors in breach of regulations”, the military said.

Israel says ‘misunderstanding’ led to killing of 15 Gaza medics found in mass grave


By Melanie Lidman
April 21, 2025 — AP


Jerusalem: An Israeli investigation into the killings of 15 Palestinian medics last month in Gaza by Israeli forces said it found a chain of “professional failures”, and a deputy commander who was first to open fire has been sacked.

The shootings outraged many in the international community, with some calling the killings a war crime. Medical workers have special protection under international humanitarian law. The International Red Cross/Red Crescent called it the deadliest attack on its personnel in eight years.



The footage shows the convoy of ambulances and a fire truck, clearly marked, with headlights and flashing lights turned on. Supplied by The New York Times.

Israel at first claimed that the medics’ vehicles did not have emergency signals on when troops opened fire but later backtracked.

Cellphone video recovered from one medic contradicted Israel’s initial account. Footage shows the ambulances had lights flashing and logos visible as they pulled up to help another ambulance that earlier came under fire.

The military investigation – released on Sunday, Jerusalem time – found that the deputy battalion commander acted under the incorrect assumption that all the ambulances belonged to Hamas militants.


Emergency crews ‘struck one after another’ as they searched for missing colleagues

It said the deputy commander, operating under “poor night visibility”, felt his troops were under threat when the ambulances sped toward their position and medics rushed out to check the victims. The military said the flashing lights were less visible on night-vision drones and goggles.

The ambulances immediately came under a barrage of gunfire that went on for more than five minutes with brief pauses. Minutes later, soldiers opened fire at a UN car that stopped at the scene.

Eight Red Crescent personnel, six Civil Defence workers and a UN staffer were killed in the shooting before dawn on March 23 by troops conducting operations in Tel al-Sultan, a district of the southern Gaza city of Rafah. Troops bulldozed over the bodies along with their vehicles, burying them in a mass grave. UN and rescue workers were only able to reach the site a week later.

The Israeli military said soldiers buried the bodies to prevent them from being mangled by stray dogs and coyotes until they could be collected, and that the ambulances were moved to allow the route to be used for civilian evacuations later that day.

The investigation found that the decision to crush the ambulances was wrong, but said there was no attempt to conceal the shootings.


Mourners carry the bodies of Red Crescent emergency responders, recovered in Rafah after a March 23 Israeli attack.CREDIT:AP

Major-General Yoav Har-Even, who oversees the military’s investigations, said it notified international organisations later that day and helped rescue workers locate the bodies.

The head of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society has said the men were “targeted at close range”. Night-vision drone footage provided by the military shows soldiers were 20 to 30 metres away from the ambulances.

The deputy commander was the first to open fire, leading the rest of the soldiers to start shooting, Har-Even said. The investigation found the paramedics were killed due to an “operational misunderstanding” by Israeli forces, and that shooting at the UN car was a breach of orders.

The findings asserted that six of those killed were Hamas militants – it did not give their names – and said three other paramedics were originally misidentified as Hamas. The Civil Defence is part of the Hamas-run government.

No paramedic was armed and no weapons were found in any vehicle, Har-Even said.

One survivor was detained for investigation and remains in custody for further questioning. According to the military, soldiers who questioned the survivor thought he identified himself as a Hamas member, which was later refuted.

Har-Even said the deputy commander was fired for giving a not “completely accurate” report to investigators about the firing on a UN vehicle.

The statement on the findings concluded by saying that Israel’s military “regrets the harm caused to uninvolved civilians”.



The site where the 15 bodies were found. The UN described it as a mass grave.CREDIT:X/@_JWHITTALL

“Without accountability, we risk continuing to watch atrocities unfolding, and the norms designed to protect us all, eroding. Too many civilians, including aid workers, have been killed in Gaza. Their stories have not all made the headlines,” Jonathan Whittall, interim head in Gaza of the UN humanitarian office OCHA, said in a statement responding to the findings.

There was no immediate public reaction from the Red Crescent or Civil Defence.

The findings have been turned over the Military Advocate General, which can decide whether to file civil charges. It is meant to be an independent body, with oversight by Israel’s attorney general and Supreme Court.

There are no outside investigations of the killings under way.

Israeli strikes have killed more than 150 emergency responders from the Red Crescent and Civil Defence, most of them while on duty, and more 1000 health workers during the war, according to the UN. The Israeli military rarely investigates such incidents.

Israel has accused Hamas of moving and hiding its fighters inside ambulances and emergency vehicles, as well as in hospitals and other civilian infrastructure, arguing that justifies strikes on them. Medical personnel largely deny the accusations.

Palestinians and international human rights groups have repeatedly accused Israel’s military of failing to properly investigate or whitewashing misconduct by its troops.

Har-Even said the Israeli military was currently investigating 421 incidents in Gaza during the war, with 51 concluded and sent to the Military Advocate General. There was no immediate information on the number of investigations involving potential wrongful deaths or how many times the MAG has pursued criminal charges.

The International Criminal Court, established by the international community as a court of last resort, has accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant of war crimes. Israel, which is not a member of the court, has long asserted that its legal system is capable of investigating the army, and Netanyahu has accused the ICC of antisemitism.

The war in Gaza began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing about 1200 people and abducting 251. Most of the hostages have been released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Hamas currently holds 59 hostages, 24 of them believed to be alive.

Israel’s offensive has since killed over 51,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants.

Frustration has been growing on both sides, with rare public protests against Hamas in Gaza and continued weekly rallies in Israel pressing the government to reach a deal to bring all hostages home.

AP



Israel says Gaza medics’ killing a ‘mistake,’ to dismiss commander


By AFP
April 20, 2025


A video recovered from the cellphone of one of the slain aid workers, released by the Red Crescent, appeared to contradict the Israeli military's account days after the incident - Copyright Palestinian Red Crescent/AFP -


Alice Chancellor with Ruth Eglash in Jerusalem

An Israeli military probe into the killing of 15 Palestinian emergency workers in Gaza admitted Sunday that mistakes led to their deaths and that a field commander would be dismissed.

But the probe found no evidence of “indiscriminate fire” by the troops.

The medics and other rescue workers were killed when responding to distress calls near the southern Gaza city of Rafah early on March 23, just days into Israel’s renewed offensive in the Hamas-run territory.

The incident has drawn international condemnation, including concern about possible war crimes from UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk.

Germany had called for an urgent investigation and “accountability of the perpetrators.”

The probe said six of the dead were Hamas militants, although no weapons were found.

“The examination identified several professional failures, breaches of orders and a failure to fully report the incident,” the summary of the investigation said.

Reserve Major General Yoav Har-Even, who led the investigation, accepted that troops involved in the incident had committed an error.

“We’re saying it was a mistake. We don’t think it’s a daily mistake,” he told journalists when asked if he thought the incident represented a pervasive issue within the Israeli military.

Those killed included eight Red Crescent staff members, six from the Gaza civil defence rescue agency and one employee of UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, according to the UN humanitarian agency OCHA and Palestinian rescuers.

Their bodies were found about a week later, buried in the sand alongside their crushed vehicles near the shooting scene in Rafah’s Tal al-Sultan area.

OCHA described it as a mass grave.

Younis al-Khatib, president of the Palestine Red Crescent in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, has said an autopsy of the victims revealed that “all the martyrs were shot in the upper part of their bodies, with the intent to kill”.

The military rejected his accusation.

“The examination found no evidence to support claims of execution or that of any of the deceased were bound before or after the shooting,” the probe said, amid allegations that some of the bodies had been found handcuffed.

“The troops did not engage in indiscriminate fire but remained alert to respond to real threats identified by them,” it said, adding that six of the 15 were “identified in a retrospective examination as Hamas terrorists”.

It had earlier said nine of those killed were militants.

“The IDF (military) regrets the harm caused to uninvolved civilians,” the probe added, but did not provide evidence that six of the men were militants.

Har-Even acknowledged that no weapons were found on the dead men.



– ‘No attempt to conceal’ –



Days after the incident, the army said its soldiers fired on “terrorists” approaching them in “suspicious vehicles”, with a spokesman later adding that the vehicles had their lights off.

But a video recovered from the cellphone of one of the slain aid workers, released by the Red Crescent, appears to contradict the Israeli military’s account.

The footage shows ambulances travelling with their headlights on and emergency lights flashing.

The military acknowledged operational failure on the part of its troops to fully report the incident, but reiterated their earlier statements that Israeli troops buried the bodies and vehicles “to prevent further harm.”

“There was no attempt to conceal the event,” it said.

“We don’t lie,” military spokesman Effie Defrin said on Sunday.

The military said a deputy commander “will be dismissed from his position due to his responsibilities as the field commander in this incident and for providing an incomplete and inaccurate report during the debrief”.

The military said there were three shooting incidents in the area on that day.



– ‘Breach of orders’ –



In the first, soldiers shot at what they believed to be a Hamas vehicle.

In the second incident, around an hour later, troops fired “on suspects emerging from a fire truck and ambulances very close to the area in which the troops were operating, after perceiving an immediate and tangible threat,” the military said.

“The deputy battalion commander assessed the vehicles as employed by Hamas forces, who arrived to assist the first vehicle’s passengers. Under this impression and sense of threat, he ordered to open fire.”

The third incident saw the troops firing at a UN vehicle “due to operational errors in breach of regulations,” the military said.

The probe determined that the fire in the first two incidents resulted from an “operational misunderstanding by the troops.”

“The third incident involved a breach of orders during a combat setting,” it added.

The UN said in early April that after the team of first responders was killed, other emergency and aid teams were hit one after another over several hours while searching for their missing colleagues.

Mundhir Abed, a medic from the Red Crescent Society who survived the attack, told AFP earlier he was beaten and interrogated by Israeli troops.

Another medic also survived and the military confirmed Sunday he was in its custody.


'Another Day, Another Cover-Up,' Rights Group Says as IDF Releases Report on Medics' Killing

"This report doesn't even attempt to engage with the truth," said the Israeli group Breaking the Silence.




Members of the Palestine Red Crescent and other emergency services pray by the bodies of fellow rescuers killed a week earlier by Israeli forces, during a funeral procession at Nasser hospital in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip on March 31, 2025.
(Photo: Eyad Baba/AFP via Getty Images)

Julia Conley
Apr 20, 2025
COMMON DREAMS

The Israel Defense Forces' report on the killing of 15 paramedics in Gaza last month was "sure to lead to increased demands for an independent investigation," said one journalist for Sky News, which recently released an extensive account of the incident that experts and advocates have called a potential war crime.

The IDF said it had found "several professional failures, breaches of orders, and a failure to fully report the incident" that took place on March 23, when Israeli troops opened fire on a convoy of vehicles that included ambulances, killing the 15 rescue workers.

But officials claimed that there was "no attempt to conceal the event" and the report suggested the firing of a deputy commander for providing an "inaccurate report" and the reprimanding of a commanding officer should satisfy the international outcry over the incident, after which United Nations and Palestinian Red Crescent officials discovered the medics' bodies and their crushed rescue vehicles had been buried in a shallow mass grave.

"Is this meant to be a joke?" said Palestinian writer and poet Mosab Abu Toha after the IDF announced the commanders would be fired and reprimanded. "How is this supposed to help the children and families of these medics? ...These war criminals should be arrested and handed over to the [International Criminal Court] for due legal processing."

The IDF report found that six out of 15 Palestinians killed "were identified in a retrospective examination as Hamas terrorists," but did not produce evidence to support the claim; Sky News, which released its investigation on on Friday, also did not find evidence.

The report also claimed that the army decided to "gather and cover the bodies to prevent further harm and clear the vehicles from the route in preparation for civilian evacuation"—an explanation for the buried bodies and ambulances.

As Common Dreamsreported earlier this month, the IDF's claim that soldiers "did not randomly attack" the convoy but rather fired on suspected "terrorists" in "suspicious vehicles" was refuted by video evidence from the phone of one of the medics who was found in the mass grave—believed to be Refaat Radwan.

The video showed a convoy of clearly marked ambulances and fire truck, with headlights and flashing lights on—contradicting the IDF's claim that the vehicles were driving with their lights off.

Despite the video evidence, the IDF report said there was "no evidence to support claims of execution" and accused those who have made such accusations of "blood libels."

The Sky News report released Friday found that Israel's claim that the medics were not fired at from a close distance was false and that expert analysis of Radwan's cellphone video determined shots had been fired from as close as 12 meters away

Palestinian-American policy analyst Yousef Munayyer said that in the case of the medics' killing, "video evidence exposed [the IDF's] lies forcing this flimsy effort mascarading as accountability so they can sweep it under the rug."

Israel is able to repeatedly attack civilians and aid workers and claim that their deaths were accidental, Munayyer suggested, because "western media is willing to believe as fact initial Israeli narratives around atrocities."

The Israeli probe found "professional failures," said former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth, but the IDF "doesn't seem to have examined the rules of engagement, approved by senior officials, that permit killing before clear identification of a combatant."

The killing of the paramedics underscored the "atmosphere of impunity" in Gaza, said one Israeli policy analyst.

"What we know is that we cannot trust the Israeli [military]. Unless The New York Times would have gotten hold of that video clip, I don't think that we would know the truth," Akiva Eldar told Al Jazeera. "It would be another cover-up."

Human rights lawyer Geoffrey Nice told Al Jazeera that the IDF report "invites many questions that it will be difficult, I suspect, for the [Israeli military] to answer."

"For example, [there is] the proposition that six of these people were Hamas, presumably members of Hamas on active [military] service, not people who might have been associated with Hamas in some way. No documentary evidence at all is identified [for that]," he told the outlet.

Breaking the Silence, a group made up of Israeli veterans of the IDF who speak out against Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories, said the report was "riddled with contradictions, vague phrasing, and selective details."

"We all remember when the IDF claimed that the ambulances emergency lights weren't on—and then we saw the footage proving otherwise. Not every lie has a video to expose it, but this report doesn't even attempt to engage with the truth," said the group.


"Another day, another cover-up," Breaking the Silence added. "More innocent lives taken, with no accountability."




Big Oil Is Abusing the Law to Silence Water Protectors; It Won’t Succeed

What to do? Stand our ground. Make the solutions. And keep working together.


Water Protectors protest the Dakota Access Pipeline on December 4, 2016.
(Photo: Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

Winona Laduke
Apr 21, 2025
Barn Raiser

This story was originally published by Barn Raiser, your independent source for rural and small town news.

The preamble for the next war over water is here. Aggressive corporations are coming after the few remaining pristine places on Mother Earth—mainly on the land of Indigenous people. Nowadays, it’s not just Native people being targeted, it’s our allies.

Last month, two separate court decisions highlighted the repression being leveled on our Water Protector allies.

On March 19, a jury in Mandan, North Dakota, in Morton County, leveled a blistering $660 million verdict against Greenpeace for its part in the Standing Rock resistance against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). Anyone who was at Standing Rock knows that Greenpeace was barely there, but they have a name, and Energy Transfer, the pipeline’s owner, made an example out of them. I was in the courtroom when the verdict came in. It was sickening.

When Energy Transfer sues people for so-called defamation, they send a clear message: If you stand up, you will be punished in a lawsuit.

On March 10, Marian Moore, a Water Protector who had participated at a gathering to pray for healing, had her charges reversed by a Minnesota Court of Appeals. Her story: Marian, 67, a long-human rights advocate and environmentalist, was the daughter of Paul Moore Jr., the Episcopal bishop of New York from 1972 to 1989 who had walked with Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil rights movement. In this century, Marian had been active in opposing Enbridge’s Line 3 pipeline, which crosses northern Minnesota, on its way from Calgary, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin, on lands that are subject to Native treaty rights and through waters full of wild rice, an essential food to the Anishinaabe.

On January 9, 2021, Moore was among the more than 100 Water Protectors who gathered on state Highway 169 for a prayer ceremony near a Line 3 construction site in Aitkin County. For that, she caught three charges, including trespass on critical infrastructure (a gross misdemeanor), unlawful assembly and, rather redundantly, presence at an unlawful assembly (both misdemeanors). I was a witness in her defense.

In November, 2023, an Aitkin County jury found her guilty of gross misdemeanors and sentenced her to six months in county jail, but with a stay of execution for nine months, allowing her to appeal. “I had to not trespass on any Enbridge property and be law-abiding, or I would be in Aitkin County jail for six months,” she explains to me.

Six months seems like a long time for someone who stood on a state highway to pray, looked at a construction site, and left once a dispersal order was given. “I think they targeted me because I was friends with Indigenous people and [was] bringing money to the movement against the pipeline,” says Marian.

Meanwhile out in Morton County, Greenpeace is getting socked with that ridiculous verdict. $660 million is a lot of money for some folks who were barely at Standing Rock. Aitkin County, Minnesota, and Morton County, North Dakota, are trying to teach a lesson; or, more appropriately, through these cases, corporations are trying to stifle resistance and discourage allies.
How Does This happen?

Welcome to the New Order, the one where corporations are now considered legal “persons,” protected by law enforcement and the judicial system as they press the law’s boundaries and extract precious resources.

The entire trial against Greenpeace was shameful.

Here’s how it went: The law firm Gibson Dunn carefully picked Mandan in Morton County, an oil-friendly jurisdiction where Judge James Gion denied most important motions made by Greenpeace. Four motions to change the venue from Mandan were denied. Gion would not let Greenpeace tell the jury of Energy Transfer’s terrible safety record. According to a report by Greenpeace and Waterkeeper Alliance, the Pipeline Hazardous and Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) issued 106 safety violations to Energy Transfer and Sunoco between 2002 and 2018, including failures to conduct corrosion inspections, to maintain pipeline integrity, and to repair unsafe pipelines in a timely manner within five years.

What’s so sad is that the North Dakota jury couldn’t even stand up for the water, the land, and the people.

Greenpeace was not allowed to tell the jury that Energy Transfer’s identical federal lawsuit against Greenpeace was dismissed by a federal judge. The judge effectively limited defense evidence.

Gion would not allow live streaming, so if you wanted to “see justice” you had to go to Mandan. It’s said that justice is blind, and, in North Dakota, justice is literally blind and asleep. I saw jurors asleep while on duty in the court room.

“Greenpeace did not manipulate Standing Rock, but Energy Transfer has manipulated Morton County,” Janet Alkire, chairwoman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, said in a statement shortly after the verdict.

As I drove toward Bismark from my own reservation, White Earth, a verse from the Rolling Stones’ “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” stuck in my head: I went down to the County Courthouse to get my share of abuse. At least that’s how I sing it. I’ve had my share. That’s what it’s like being on trial in the Deep North, especially if you’re a Water Protector.

The chances for a Native person to get justice in North Dakota or northern Minnesota are probably pretty small. Native people represent a third of the people in jail in Becker, Hubbard, and Aitkin counties. Yet, we represent only 5.2% of the population.

Standing Rock Tribal Chairwoman Alkire was appalled at the state of justice in Mandan:
I take offense to the jury verdict… We expect more from North Dakota judges and members of the jury from our neighboring communities… Neither Greenpeace nor anyone else paid or persuaded Standing Rock to oppose DAPL… Energy Transfer’s false and self-serving narrative that Greenpeace manipulated Standing Rock into protesting DAPL is patronizing and disrespectful to our people. We understand that many Morton County residents support the oil industry… But we are your neighbors, and you should not be fooled that easily.

The lawsuit against Greenpeace is called a SLAPP suit, or Strategic Litigation against Public Participation. It is intended to silence opposition. There are anti-SLAPP laws in 35 states, including Minnesota. Fundamentally, this is a question of free speech. When Energy Transfer sues people for so-called defamation, they send a clear message: If you stand up, you will be punished in a lawsuit.

“To me, this is a freedom of speech case and freedom of association case,” attorney Sarah Vogel, a onetime assistant U.S. attorney and former North Dakota agriculture commissioner, told the North Dakota Monitor before the case went to trial. Vogel, who grew up in Mandan, said, “As residents of a small state without a whole lot of power, we’d better be able to speak up. Who knows? I mean, this time, it’s Greenpeace, but who will it be next time?”

The case in Aitkin County was a little different but had some of the same premises. The idea that “outside agitators” came and did not do nice things was a theme. Greenpeace fits that narrative for Energy Transfer, and Marian Moore, who is a striking six feet two inches tall, does not quite look like a local gal.

Trey Cox is Energy Transfer’s lead attorney from Gibson Dunn (the same law firm that brought us the Chevron Donziger verdict). Cox kept referring to Water Protectors as outsiders and paid protesters. One might wonder, where Energy Transfer is from? Certainly not from Mandan. They are from Texas. Where was TigerSwan, the private security company hired by Energy Transfer from? North Carolina. And where was Frost Kennels, the company whose employees unleashed dogs on Water Protectors, from? Ohio. In other words, mercenaries.

In Minnesota, remember that Enbridge is a foreign corporation from Canada, with big swaths of pipeline networks across our north country, including aging pipes and the dirtiest oil in the world that poses a major threat to the Great Lakes, repository of a fifth of the world’s freshwater. Yet, Enbridge received priority policy protection in Minnesota during the Covid-19 pandemic and was allowed to bring in 4,300 people to build Line 3 as a part of “essential industry” in the state.

These companies also want to censure and erase any mentions of their abysmal safety records. Energy Transfer has a multitude of fines for spills, and Enbridge has the two largest oil spills on the U.S. mainland to its name. In the North Dakota trial, Greenpeace could not bring up Energy Transfer’s safety record, while in Aitkin County, the judge did not allow Marian Moore to say “treaty rights” or allude to the Minnesota case where Anishinaabe Water Protectors’ charges were dismissed in September 2023, based on the treaty and cultural beliefs, and “in the interests of justice.”
The Pipeline to Curtail First Amendment Rights

The Trump administration intends to further criminalize Water Protectors, and certainly protests in general. That much is clear. This is on top of the more than 300 anti-protest bills introduced in state legislatures since 2017, according to the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law, 54 of which have been enacted and currently undermine the First Amendment right to freedom of speech and assembly.

Moreover, over the past half-century, a dangerous doctrine of “qualified immunity” has been hatched up, underwritten by the Supreme Court, to limit the ability of individuals to hold police officers accountable for violating their constitutional rights. Qualified immunity basically gives officers expanding impunity to injure, or even kill, civilians like Water Protectors.

In April 2024, North Dakota Federal Judge Daniel Traynor dismissed Sophia Wilansky’s case against North Dakota law enforcement on the grounds that law enforcement had “qualified immunity.”

Greenpeace was inspired by a story called the Rainbow Warrior, where people of all colors would come together to protect Mother Earth.

A blast from an “explosive munition” was leveled at her in the early hours of November 21, 2016. Law enforcement had constructed a barricade across Backwater Bridge on North Dakota Highway 1806 to prevent unarmed Water Protectors, including Wilansky, from using the road. Morton County Deputy Jonathon Moll, had positioned himself on the turret of a Humvee and fired a flashbang grenade from his 12-gauge shotgun, hitting Wilansky, nearly severing her hand and destroying almost all of the arteries, skin, tissue, muscles, nerves, tendons, and bone in her left forearm. “At 21-years-old, I lost the use of my arm because a police officer shot me from a gun turret with an exploding grenade at a protest. My life will never be the same, but I will also not be scared away from fighting for what is right,” Wilansky said in a Civil Liberties Defense Center media release on April 6, 2024. An additional statement read: “The doctrine of Qualified Immunity is repulsive in that it allows police officers to… shoot protestors with anything they want without repercussions.”

Yes, there will be appeals. Marian Moore won on appeal. And a Greenpeace spokesperson told Barn Raiser the nonprofit will appeal the verdict, but the timing and process of the appeal has yet to be determined.

But what’s so sad is that the North Dakota jury couldn’t even stand up for the water, the land, and the people. Instead, that jury gave a Texas oil pipeline company, founded by Trump-supporting billionaire Kelcy Warren, everything it wanted and then some. That was shameful. And, without that appeals court, an Aitkin County jury would have been content to let Marian Moore sit in the slammer.

Marty Garbus is a trial attorney who has represented, among others, Nelson Mandela, Leonard Peltier, Daniel Ellsberg, Lenny Bruce, Elie Wiesel, Cesar Chavez, and Vaclav Havel. Garbus is also a member of the Energy Transfer v. Greenpeace Trial Monitoring Committee, a group that followed the trial day in and day out. Here is what he said when the jury returned its shameful verdict:
In my six decades of legal practice, I have never witnessed a trial as unfair as the one against Greenpeace that just ended in the courts of North Dakota. This is one of the most important cases in American history. The law that can come down in this case can affect any demonstration, religious or political. It’s far bigger than the environmental movement. Yet the court in North Dakota abdicated its sacred duty to conduct a fair and public trial and instead let Energy Transfer run roughshod over the rule of law.

Greenpeace has very strong case on appeal. I believe there is a good chance it ultimately will win both in court and in the court of public opinion.

What to do? Stand our ground. Make the solutions. And keep working together.

In Minnesota, we call ourselves the Home Team, and we are many colors. Marion and thousands of others told their stories and faced a lot of police for the sake of protecting water. I, for one, am grateful to them, and the new work underway by groups like Rise and Repair in Minnesota that does multi-racial organizing work around climate justice.

Weweg bi azhe giiwewag. The snow geese return.

There is greatness in the flocks of birds returning to these lands of water. Each year, they return and remind us of the life that is here, a life which needs water. I am reminded that’s who I work for. Greenpeace was inspired by a story called the Rainbow Warrior, where people of all colors would come together to protect Mother Earth. Critics say the story wasn’t a real prophecy, but I see it happening today. People of all colors coming together to protect Mother Earth is a good story for epic times. Thank you, allies.


Copyright 2024 by Barn Raising Media


Winona Laduke is Anishinaabe, a writer, an economist and a hemp farmer. LaDuke is a leader in cultural-based sustainable development strategies, renewable energy, sustainable food systems and Indigenous rights. She is the owner of Winona's Hemp, which can be found online at winonashemp.com.
Full Bio >

Sunday, April 20, 2025


Is My Dog High? One Problem With Edibles



 April 18, 2025
Facebook

Photo by Elsa Olofsson

The plant Cannabis sativa is an herbaceous flowering annual that was originally native to central and eastern Asia. It has been cultivated throughout recorded history as a source of fiber for fabric and rope, seed oil, animal feed, and medicine. Evidence exists that some ancient cultures recognized the psychoactive properties of the plant. Burned cannabis seeds have been found in the tombs of shamans in Siberia dated to about 500 BC. At about the same time, the Greek historian Herodotus recounted how the nomadic Scythians of Central Asia inhaled smoldering cannabis flowers to become intoxicated. Also, around 500 BC, ancient Hindu healers used the plant to settle stomachs and stop vomiting.

Cannabis in the United States

The history of the cultivation of cannabis in this country begins with early colonists who raised hemp for textiles, paper, sails, and rope. Both George Washington and Thomas Jefferson are reported to have farmed hemp on their plantations. In the mid-1800s, English physicians returning from India began using cannabis to treat a wide variety of conditions ranging from arthritis to migraine headaches. By the latter half of the 19th century, the first accounts of the use of marijuana as a recreational intoxicant can be found in American literature.

As of 2025, federal law in the United States still bans the use, possession, and distribution of marijuana. In 1970, the Controlled Substances Act labeled marijuana, along with other drugs such as LSD and heroin, as a Schedule I drug. This category includes drugs with both a high potential for abuse and without any recognized medical value. As of 2025, 24 states in the United States have legalized recreational marijuana use. As of March 2025, 38 additional states have approved the use of medical marijuana only. Similar legislation for reform is under consideration in several other states.

In 2000, the state of Colorado passed an amendment legalizing the sale and possession of marijuana for physician-approved medical uses. By 2010, there were 717 licensed medical marijuana dispensaries in Colorado and 106,000 registered card-carrying medical marijuana users in the state. In Denver, there are now more marijuana dispensaries than Starbucks coffee outlets. It is reasonable to assume, due to the vast revenue being generated from marijuana sales, that eventually, we can expect to see the nationwide repeal of existing marijuana laws.

Claims of Health Benefits

The use of marijuana has been proposed for a variety of medical conditions. Marijuana enthusiasts have made claims for marijuana treatment for epilepsy, depression, insomnia, PTSD, anxiety, migraines, arthritis, chronic pain, muscle spasms, Parkinson’s disease, and Tourette’s syndrome, to name a few. Marijuana is approved for medical use in many states, though qualifying conditions vary; the most common include cancer, HIV/AIDS, epilepsy, glaucoma, chronic pain, severe nausea, wasting syndrome, muscle spasms, and multiple sclerosis. The use of medical marijuana for various conditions in animals also has been proposed and is controversial.

The claims of the benefits of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the treatment of a wide variety of diseases and conditions in both humans and animals have not been supported by robust clinical evidence. Extensive clinical trials are needed to support or reject claims being made concerning the benefits of marijuana as a medication. So far, neither the government nor the drug companies have adequate incentives to encourage them to undertake or underwrite these much-needed studies. As a result, all that remains for most of the claims made is anecdotal evidence.

Marijuana Comes in Many Forms

Marijuana edibles can be found in dispensaries in a variety of forms. Cookies, brownies, candies, and a vast selection of sweets are popular and readily available. The effects of orally ingested marijuana do not appear as rapidly as signs following smoking and inhaling the drug. However, the effects of orally ingested THC persist much longer than those by inhalation.

Marijuana-containing baked products utilize medical-grade THC butter. Plants are boiled to extract the THC, which is readily absorbed by fats. Butter is then added to the mix to absorb the extracted THC. This THC-sautéed butter, now rich in THC, is used to make food products free of the plant’s crunchy stems, leaves, and flowers. If the process is repeated, the butter can have concentrate THC levels higher than those found in the plants used.

Canines Commonly Affected by Marijuana Intoxication

Dogs and cats are very susceptible to marijuana intoxication, but it is dogs that are more commonly affected. Dogs can be intoxicated by marijuana through inhalation of secondhand smoke; ingestion of seeds, stems, leaves, and flowers; ingestion of edible marijuana products; and/or the ingestion of concentrated THC or hashish oil. The marijuana plant produces psychoactive resins called cannabinoids. The highest concentration of cannabinoids is found in the female flowers of the plant. The primary psychoactive entity is THC.

Secondhand inhalation of marijuana smoke by dogs is certainly possible, but the leading cause of canine marijuana exposure is through the ingestion of edible products. At our busy emergency room, we see one or two dogs daily that have ingested some form of marijuana. It has become such a common occurrence since the law change that our receptionists can recognize the telltale signs of marijuana ingestion. Intoxication resulting from marijuana edibles is primarily a phenomenon seen in dogs. Cats lack the developed taste buds for sweets found in humans and dogs. Dogs are the victims of their taste preferences.

Although the margin of safety following marijuana ingestion has consistently been reported to be very high, the lethal dose is apparently about 3 grams per kilogram of body weight. A 2012 study published in the Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care reported the deaths of two dogs after eating foods made with THC butter. At our practice, we have seen two tiny Yorkie brothers, both weighing less than 5 pounds, succumb to the ingestion of marijuana edibles. They died as a result of respiratory arrest.

Is My Dog High?

Clinical signs in dogs usually begin within 60 minutes following ingestion. In dogs, the majority of THC is metabolized by the liver. After metabolism, 10 to 35 percent is excreted in the urine, and 60 to 90 percent is excreted in the feces. THC is stored in adipose tissue with a biological half-life of about 30 hours. In dogs, 80 percent of the THC is excreted from the body in five days. As a result, the effects of marijuana on dogs last much longer than on human beings.

The precise action of THC upon the nervous system that causes the psychoactive clinical effects of marijuana remains unknown. In humans, THC interrupts memory and cognition, disrupts motor activities, and inhibits pain, nausea, and vomiting. The effects of THC on people are believed to be caused by the alteration of the action of various neurotransmitters in the nervous system. In dogs, ingestion of large amounts of raw marijuana may cause gastrointestinal irritation, resulting in vomiting and diarrhea.

The time of onset of clinical signs depends on the dosage ingested and the route of exposure. Clinical signs of THC poisoning in dogs include incoordination and stumbling, drooling and hypersalivation, depression, disorientation, drop in body temperature, dilated pupils, and slower heart rate. More than 50 percent of affected dogs dribble urine. Dogs may also show tremors. The size of the dog, its age, and any underlying medical conditions it may have also play a role in the duration and severity of the intoxication.

Severely affected dogs may vocalize, become hyperexcitable, and show increased sensitivity to light, sound, and motion. Dogs eating large amounts of marijuana edibles may be unable to rise and appear to be in a stupor. Although most dogs recover completely and no long-term neurologic or cardiovascular effects have been observed, intoxicated dogs may take two to three days to return to normal.

Getting Back to Normal

At present, there is no specific antidote or physiological antagonist for marijuana intoxication. The objectives of treatment in dogs poisoned with the THC from marijuana include prevention of further absorption of the drug and supportive care while they are recovering. Activated charcoal is administered to block further absorption. Any acute anxiety and overstimulation are managed with valium. Dehydrated or cold, hyperthermic dogs may require intravenous fluids. Affected animals are usually hospitalized, and their temperature, pulse, and respiration are closely monitored. Animals who are not severely agitated or debilitated can be treated by vigilant observation and in a quiet, supportive, and protected environment.

Recovery is dose-dependent and may take 24 to 72 hours. Longer recoveries are not uncommon in dogs that have ingested a large amount of edibles. Although dogs exposed to higher dosages require more aggressive and longer treatment, the majority of dogs that have ingested THC recover completely with no long-term adverse effects.

Better Tests Needed

We use urine to test for illicit drugs. THC can be detected in canine urine for several days following exposure. Human drug-screening kits are not infallible, and false negatives can be obtained if the test is run too soon after ingestion of THC. Gas chromatography and mass spectrophotometry tests are more accurate than urine drug-testing kits but may take several days to a week before results are obtained.

What is needed is a more reliable, consistent, rapid, inexpensive, and reproducible cage-side test to confirm marijuana intoxication. Nevertheless, by obtaining a truthful history, doing a sound physical exam, establishing a minimum database with the proper diagnostic tests, and ruling out a list of differential diagnoses of other possible causes, we can identify THC poisoning.

The dose can predict the severity of clinical effects caused by marijuana ingestion, but the exact potency of an edible may be almost impossible to determine. This is because 5 grams of poor-quality marijuana is not necessarily stronger than 2 grams of a more THC-enriched strain.

Poor Labeling Practices

The manufacturers’ labeling procedures themselves can be misleading. Many manufacturers list product strength on the package as 5x, 10x, 20x, etc., where 5x is a typical one-person dose. Some producers say how much raw marijuana is infused by grams in the product. However, actual potency may vary tremendously, even in grams of the raw plant.

Other producers’ labels list “cannabinoids” in grams. Which cannabinoids are included, psychoactive ones or harmless, inert molecules? Marijuana is composed of dozens of cannabinoids, both active and inactive. This is misleading both to the buyer and to emergency room clinicians. Other labels list milligrams of “active” cannabinoids. Again, which ones and how much?

The marijuana growers have stated something along the line of, “Label instructions are rough guidelines and may vary from individual to individual.” This does not seem to be an acceptable explanation for a drug that can have such dramatic and potentially serious effects. As of 2025, there was no uniform system in place to determine the strength of edibles and actual dosage. In addition, there was no reliable system at work to oversee edible marijuana protection. In Colorado, all that is needed to produce and sell edibles to dispensaries is a cooking license, which requires only a one-time inspection.

With such a lax system, there is real potential for food poisoning. Spoiled ingredients, mold, bacterial toxins, spider mites, and pesticides are just a few of the problems the absence of regulation invites. Also, allergens such as nuts are not detected. The industry is in its infancy but needs to make a greater effort regarding labeling, packaging, and ingredient safety.

Studying marijuana intoxication in dogs is essential not just to protect dogs’ health but also because canine poisonings can serve as a sentinel for what could happen in children. Dogs and children are the unintended collateral damage of increasing edible marijuana use. The marijuana industry could do more to improve labeling and product safety, develop uniform standards for identification of the strength of various strains, and regulate the purity of the edibles more strictly.

This adapted excerpt is from It Started With a Turtle: One Man’s Life on a Blue & Green Planet by Kevin Fitzgerald (Archway Publishing, 2024). It is reproduced with permission from Archway Publishing. This adaptation was produced for the Observatory by Earth | Food | Life, a project of the Independent Media Institute. 

Kevin Fitzgerald is a veterinarian, comedian, and conservationist.