Showing posts sorted by date for query healthcare. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query healthcare. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Op-Ed 

Taking on the Rich Is Possible. Our Illinois Coalition Won a Tax on Tech Giants.

Our campaign won a digital advertising revenue tax that may generate over $1.1 billion annually for the state’s budget.

June 29, 2026

Illinois Revenue Alliance members flood the Illinois State Capitol Rotunda and drop PowerUp banners while legislators are in session on May 27, 2026.SEIU HCII

On June 1, the Illinois legislature passed a tax on the digital advertising revenue of tech companies like Meta, Amazon, and Alphabet (parent company of Google). Big Tech resisted the measure and will likely challenge it in court. Nevertheless, several analyses show the tax may generate $800 million annually, a number that could increase with time as revenues from digital advertising are expected to grow. The number would represent a major increase in Illinois state’s budget, but still only a sliver of the mega-corporations’ runaway profits.

This breakout victory for movement organizations demonstrates how grassroots organizing can fight back against widening wealth gaps, cuts to essential services, ballooning corporate power, and growing authoritarianism. It shows us that long-haul alliances, bold agendas, and collaboration with progressive legislators can seize on a growing consensus that the most powerful corporations — especially Big Tech — have too much power and wealth and must pay their fair share.

How We Started


Our fight to make big corporations and the ultra-rich pay their fair share in Illinois began nearly two decades ago. In the wake of the 2008 financial crash, our three organizations — ONE Northside, Grassroots Collaborative, and The People’s Lobby, with support from national groups like People’s Action — all began to organize (alongside many others) to confront a growing crisis: Corporations and the wealthy were getting richer every year and regularly receiving new corporate tax breaks and bailouts, while budget cuts were devastating our communities.

From 2015 to 2017, our state went through three years of budget disasters triggered in the short term by right-wing billionaire Gov. Bruce Rauner but also made possible by a long history of bipartisan pro-corporate leadership in our state. Our organizations saw the need to respond to these disasters by taking up new campaigns to tax big corporations. We held a series of civil disobedience actions led by faith leaders targeting Governor Rauner’s top donors, occupied the state capitol as the Revenue Truth Squad, and led a 15-day, 200-mile march from Chicago to Springfield, until the state finally passed a budget that included $125 million in new revenue from closing corporate tax loopholes. By 2018, every Democratic candidate for governor made a graduated income tax a key part of their platform to address Illinois’s budget crisis. Gov. JB Pritzker won with a mandate to improve state funding for essential services by taxing the rich. The legislature then put a constitutional amendment on the 2020 ballot to make that possible. Our coalitions joined with other key allies, like the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR) and a broad array of labor unions, to support the Fair Tax ballot referendum. The votes fell short in a tough loss to a billionaire-funded counter-campaign, but legislators who worked closely with our movement like State Sen. Robert Peters then closed $655 million in corporate tax loopholes in 2021. Every year since, we have continued demanding and winning budgets that make big corporations pay more to fund essential services across the state.


Wealth Taxes Will Barely Slow Inequality. So Why Do the Super-Rich Resist Them?
A 2 percent wealth tax is like shaving off a fraction of a spire from a large cathedral, says economist Nancy Folbre. By C.J. Polychroniou , Truthout November 5, 2025



What We Did Differently This Time

Our efforts from 2016 to 2025 together clawed back over $1 billion annually from major corporations. Still, this was short of meeting our communities’ needs or improving our standing as the state with the eighth-most regressive tax code. That revenue helped make possible stronger investments in public schools, health care, and human services after the Rauner budget impasse, but it still left major gaps in education, transit, housing, and care for seniors and people with disabilities. In 2024, our organizations helped launch the Illinois Revenue Alliance (ILRA) along with a core of collaborators from earlier fights and newly engaged groups who recognized the growing need to tax the rich.


Our efforts from 2016 to 2025 together clawed back over $1 billion annually from major corporations.

In 2026, we knew we had to ramp up. The Trump regime attacked our state with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) violence in the streets and budgetary violence through massive cuts to Medicaid, environmental programs, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (or SNAP, formerly known as “food stamps”), and so much more, while giving huge tax cuts to mega-corporations and billionaires supporting the authoritarian agenda.

We were helped by a growing set of co-conspirators in elected office. Over the past 15 years, many groups launched 501(c)(4) organizations like The People’s Lobby, Grassroots Illinois Action, and ONE People’s Campaign to engage more in lobbying and elections. These organizations made progressive taxation a key factor in endorsements, challenging centrist Democrats and replacing them with candidates who wanted to tax the rich. As a result, our campaigns over the past few years have included an increasingly powerful team of legislative allies. Legislators like State Rep. Will Guzzardi, who used to sponsor our bills, such the Retailers’ Discount, are now key budget negotiators. This year, organizers-turned-state lawmakers convened an Affordability and Tax Justice Coalition — led by a number of legislators including State Senators Graciela Guzman and Karina Villa and State Representatives Lindsey LaPointe and Norma Hernandez — and organized with their colleagues to demand every budget makes strides towards transforming our state’s tax system. They helped ensure the digital ads tax was included in the final budget.

We knew we needed to move the broader public narrative, so we came back to the adage that actions are the lifeblood of organizing. Grassroots Collaborative and our national network, PowerSwitch Action, designed PowerUp, a campaign with our members, four other organizations, and two major local unions to train leaders and organizers, and engage in dramatic actions that would captivate public attention around a clear, moral question: Should mega-corporations and the ultra-wealthy pay more in taxes to fund critical public services? We aimed to take actions that could secure concrete victories and undercut the power of the wealthy at the state level, while highlighting their ties to the authoritarian apparatus at the federal level.

Chicago police officers remove protesters affiliated with The People’s Lobby and Chicago Teachers Union from the Amazon distribution center in Chicago’s Bridgeport neighborhood on May 16, 2026. Organizers with PowerUp blocked both entrances of the facility and halted all deliveries for four hours in an effort to disrupt the corporation’s profits and grow support for the digital ads tax in the weeks before the end of the legislative session.  The People’s Lobby

PowerUp held actions on Amazon, Meta, and Google to call attention to how these tech giants are powering and profiting off Donald Trump’s attacks on our communities: All three donated $1 million to Trump’s inauguration, while Amazon’s cloud division provides services used by the Department of Homeland Security and ICE. The People’s Lobby led a nonviolent civil disobedience action with PowerUp allies that shut down an Amazon warehouse for four hours. Twelve people were arrested disrupting blocking delivery trucks while demanding that Illinois tax corporations that benefit from Trump’s agenda and use the revenue to protect Medicaid, SNAP, schools, and other public services threatened by federal cuts. The action made this connection explicit by bringing Medicaid recipients, health care workers, and community members threatened by Trump’s tax cuts to Amazon’s warehouse, where they disrupted deliveries and demanded that Illinois protect essential services by taxing corporations like Amazon and rejecting Trump’s corporate tax agenda. More actions were held at corporate offices and, in the final weeks of the legislative session, tactics shifted to legislators, with visits and marches to their offices and banner drops around their home districts

.
Illinois Revenue Alliance members gather at the state capitol after a rally and march on Tax Day, April 15, 2026. More than 10 organizations traveled to Springfield to call for legislators to adequately fund their programs by taxing corporations and the very rich.
The People’s Lobby

In parallel, ILRA organized massive days of action at the state capitol and grassroots lobbying of legislators. SEIU Healthcare, Chicago Teachers Union, ICIRR, Citizen Action Illinois, and other organizations like ours held lobby days, ran digital ads, and organized weekly phone banks patching constituents through to their lawmakers. Our organizations’ lobbying and government relations staff collaborated daily inside the capitol, working with legislative allies to make sure chamber leaders heard the demand for progressive revenue.

ONE Northside Housing Justice leader Gregory Wilson joins a demonstration outside Amazon’s downtown headquarters on April 13, using Tax Day to call on the corporate giant to pay more in taxes.ONE Northside

Through a coordinated and escalated campaign of nonviolent direct action and lobbying efforts, along with a strong “inside game” by bill sponsors and corporate tax champions State Sen. Robert Peters and State Rep. Norma Hernandez, we secured our biggest victory yet: the passage of the digital ads tax. This measure — proposed initially in 2021 by Action Center on Race and the Economy, which continued to play an important role throughout this effort — became a top ILRA priority starting in 2025. Estimates of how much revenue will be generated by the measure vary, with the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability estimating $800 million, and estimates based on projected revenue for U.S. digital advertising from major tech companies projecting $1.2 billion. These revenues would be gleaned from corporations like Google, Amazon, and Meta (as Facebook is now known) that make hundreds of billions of dollars in digital advertising revenue.

Taking on Authoritarian Forces and Realizing Concrete Wins for Our People


This breakthrough was possible now as it has become increasingly obvious to people that the same forces starving our state of resources are also core pillars of Trump’s authoritarian regime. People see the ultra-wealthy’s assets ballooning, news of trillion-dollar compensation packages for corporate executives, and new rounds of trillion-dollar tax breaks, all while corporate CEOs stand with Trump and masses of people struggle to afford housing and health care. Organizers must continue to connect the dots to show that we can tax extreme wealth and our governments can and must use that revenue to address the needs of the vast majority of Americans. Going on offense with a bigger vision for the kind of world we want to win, and who has the wealth to pay for it, is a key element in fighting authoritarianism.

This breakout victory for movement organizations demonstrates how grassroots organizing can fight back against widening wealth gaps. Long-haul alliances can seize on a growing consensus that the most powerful corporations must pay their fair share.

At the core of our success has been coalitional work that is fueled by trust built over many campaign cycles. It can be tough and messy but is necessary to have any chance of winning. Not many foundations jump to fund campaigns to tax the rich. Our tables have often been unstaffed or understaffed, but our teams put in the hours and scraped together resources that partners could spare, trusting that the collective effort would add up. The breadth of our coalitions created greater collective power, but it left unresolved the question of what new revenue should be spent on. Coalitions should begin that discussion early enough to shape who is at the table and how the campaign speaks to the public, while keeping the initial agreement broad enough to hold diverse partners together. The key choice is whether to dedicate revenue to specific widely felt needs — such as education, public transit, health care, or housing, or leave it available for the general budget. In other states, ballot initiatives were successful when new funding was tied to specific needs like education and public transit. In states where ballot initiatives are available, we would encourage organizers to consider pairing taxes on concentrated wealth or corporate profits with specific, popular public investments.

To be clear, the budget passed by the Illinois General Assembly still did not meet the moment. It fell short on many issues: significant underfunding of public education, no badly needed raises for frontline workers who care for the elderly, and an inadequate safety net for thousands who will lose SNAP and Medicaid benefits due to federal cuts. It will take bolder actions, new alliances, and organizing to build public pressure on decision-makers.

Illinois legislators have become more proactive as a result of our campaigns. In addition to the digital ads tax, legislators passed other measures to bring in needed revenue, such as a social media platform fee, protecting Illinois from one of Trump’s federal tax giveaways, and a tax on cryptocurrency. More of them can see the widening gap in power and wealth and, now that we have called the question, are declaring with their votes that Big Tech corporations — instead of donating to ballrooms and inaugurations and accumulating profits and asset valuations — ought to contribute more to the well-being of Illinois families and to pay their fair share toward schools, health care, food, affordable housing, and all the public services our families deserve.

Our successful fight for the digital ads tax, along other legislative campaigns that fell short this year, taught us that combining forces and strategies; exposing and polarizing around oligarchic villains like Big Tech; drawing the connections between austerity’s legacy in Illinois, the affordability crisis, and Trump’s handouts to the ultra-wealthy; and putting this fight in public view, can disrupt “business as usual” and force lawmakers to take a side. We are doubling down on our efforts, and in order for them to win, more people need to join the fight.



This article is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), and you are free to share and republish under the terms of the license.


Shaddi Zeid

Shaddi is political director with The People’s Lobby. A veteran of the 2016 Bernie and Hillary campaigns, Shaddi has spent 12 years working at the intersection of electoral politics, grassroots organizing, policy, and governing power. His work has spanned presidential campaigns, local elections, city government, criminal justice reform, state budget fights, and progressive revenue. Before joining The People’s Lobby, Shaddi worked in the New York City Mayor’s Office, in policy, and on campaigns across many states.


Hannah Gelder

Hannah has been organizing with ONE Northside since 2008, and currently serves as its director of organizing. She has trained hundreds of community leaders and organizers, led statewide coalitions, and contributed to statewide, citywide and local victories for healthcare access, affordable housing, and progressive tax fights. She is passionate about making sure our communities have the resources we deserve. When she’s not organizing, she’s chasing after her two young children, playing with her dog, or enjoying the outdoors with her partner and family.


Marla Bramble

Marla Bramble joined the Grassroots Collaborative staff as deputy director in 2024 with over 20 years of organizing experience. As a disabled woman, Marla is driven by the vision of a world where we all value one another’s humanity and have the resources to thrive. Marla has built powerful organizing programs and culture with community organizations from the ground up, contributing to the larger political movement in Chicago. Her community organizing experience in Black, Brown, Jewish, and working-class communities has won victories in citywide affordable housing, police accountability, immigration, and economic justice issues in Chicago and Illinois.


CANADIAN, EH 


Venezuelans Just Deported by Trump Among Tens of Thousands Missing After Earthquakes

As the death toll continued to rise, the US Department of Homeland Security said that “when an individual is no longer in ICE custody, ICE is no longer responsible for them.”


Rescuers continue to search for victims at a collapsed building after a pair of earthquakes on June 28, 2026 in Carabellada, La Guaira, Venezuela.
(Photo by Jesus Vargas/Getty Images)


Jessica Corbett
Jun 29, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Tens of thousands of people still haven’t been found after a pair of devastating earthquakes in Venezuela last week—including some Venezuelans who had just been deported from the United States as part of President Donald Trump’s mass deportation push and were being held in a hotel when the temblors hit, The Associated Press revealed Monday.

There were 146 Venezuelans, including 19 women and seven children, on a deportation flight that arrived just hours before the 7.2- and 7.5-magnitude earthquakes, the AP reported, citing a Human Rights First initiative that has tracked thousands of such flights under Trump. They were brought to Hotel Santuario La Llanada in La Guaira, which collapsed because of the quakes.



Thousands Feared Dead After Back-to-Back Earthquakes Devastate Venezuela



Advocates Renew Call for End to US Sanctions After Devastating Venezuela Earthquakes

“Lisbeth Portillo, 58, said she escaped the rubble from the hotel with about 20 other deportees who walked the streets looking for help. They saw people running, some naked and others barefoot as they emerged from the rubble of the building,” according to the outlet.


Another deportee who survived, 24-year-old Jenny Rodriguez, told Telemundo: “I was trapped under the rubble. A colleague who had been on the same flight came by; I managed to free my hand from the debris, grabbed him by the trousers, and begged for help... Thanks to God—and to him—I was able to get out of there.”

Oswadeliz Núñez Ramírez is still “frantically searching for her son,” 28-year-old Daniel Alejandro Núñez Ramírez, who was also on the deportation flight and at the hotel, the Miami Herald reported Monday. A member of the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service who called himself “Jonathan” told her that he had pulled her son from the rubble, but, “skeptical of the official account, his mother has searched every hospital, clinic, and sector of La Guaira and Caracas without success.”

While US Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not respond to the AP’s request for comment, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the agency, told the Herald: “This flight safely reached Venezuela, and all illegal aliens on board were returned home. When an individual is no longer in ICE custody, ICE is no longer responsible for them.”



Venezuelan National Assembly President Jorge Rodríguez said Monday that the earthquake has left at least 1,719 dead, 5,034 injured, and 15,866 displaced from their homes.

UN News noted Monday that the ongoing search and rescue effort involves more than 2,000 workers from over two dozen countries, plus over 160 dogs, and Gianluca Rampolla, the United Nations resident coordinator in Venezuela, “reported that the UN and Venezuelan authorities had agreed to procure 10,000 body bags in anticipation of the death toll rising further.”

Rampolla said that “together with the search and rescue operations, we are focusing, together with the government, on providing emergency healthcare, shelter, food assistance, water and sanitation, and logistical support to ensure not only the storage but also the distribution of all the supplies arriving in the country, as well as protection.”

As of Monday evening, more than 44,000 people remained missing, according to a reunion website for families. As NBC News detailed Monday:
Even as the chances of finding survivors diminished with every passing hour, Venezuelans continued using shovels, ropes, and their bare hands as they dug through mountains of collapsed concrete.

They were joined by a growing number of international rescue teams, who pulled multiple survivors from the wreckage, offering desperate families a rare glimmer of hope.

Among the rescues, teams from the United States, France, and Venezuela pulled a man and his son from the ruins Sunday morning after they had spent four days trapped beneath the rubble.

Organizations including US-based peace group CodePink and the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a Washington, DC-based think tank, have called on the US and allied countries to lift all sanctions against Venezuela in the wake of the earthquakes.

Trump earlier this year directed an illegal invasion of Venezuela, during which US forces killed scores of people and abducted President Nicolás Maduro, then seized control of the South American country’s nationalized oil industry.



Trump just named himself one of the worst people in human history



Jason Miciak
June 21, 2026 
RAW STORY

In one of his most astonishingly oblivious moments, President Donald Trump may have revealed more about himself — his honest, true beliefs regarding his “talents” and place in history — than at any point in his public life. During an interview with Jonathan Swan and Maggie Haberman for their forthcoming book, Trump proudly offered what he called an “expert historian’s” impression of his raw fortitude. As you might guess, Trump bragged he topped a list of history’s most powerful rulers.

Now, that cringe you already feel is more than warranted. Presidents and other leaders are rarely measured by raw power alone. Nixon was an extremely powerful president in many ways, and you know how that played out. But everyone understands that this particular president sees power for power’s sake as the gold standard — the measure of the job. Prepare for that cringe to evolve into rage upon learning of the leaders he “trumps,” so to speak. “Our” president believes he tops a list that includes Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Stalin, Mao, and Hitler.

Sweet Jesus.

With the possible exception, and only to a degree, of Napoleon, every other ruler on that list accrued power by killing people in the sole furtherance of “more power,” and thus killed even more people as both a means of expanding and keeping it. Looked at another way, Trump excitedly showed Swan and Haberman a list he believes puts him atop history’s greatest monsters.

Well, that fits. And it is scary AF.

Because there is nothing wrong with seeking power if it’s in the pursuit of something worthy. Martin Luther King Jr. surely sought every ounce of authority that his gentle hands could hold, but made non-violence his most powerful ally to accrue, well, power. To the extent that the United States even approaches racial equality, at least in written law, we owe it in large part to MLK Jr., who sacrificed his life for it, and that’s pretty damned powerful, especially given his influence extended far beyond this nation’s boundaries. King’s words and message are remembered today at least as much as any American president’s — the most “powerful man in the world.” Gandhi is cut from the same cloth, to use an apt metaphor, and took on an entire empire and subcontinent.

The West defeated Soviet Communism without firing a direct shot, a pretty impressive power move. And yes, part of the “fall” owed itself to an American President in Ronald Reagan, whose main tactic was to militarily spend the U.S.S.R. into oblivion — the Soviets unable to keep up. But Reagan couldn’t have succeeded without the real power of a fairly humble but stubborn and infinitely brave Polish shipyard worker named Lech Wałęsa, and an even more humble Polish Pope in John Paul II, who both stood up to communism on moral grounds, smothering a communist empire unable to keep up.

There is also power over our day-to-day lives that we all but take for granted now. Alan Turing ushered in the idea of “computation,” but Steve Jobs gave the average person the desire to even have one at home, and that was just the first act; he then changed how the world does nearly anything, bringing about the smartphone. Ideally, Steve Jobs’ “power” will infinitely impact your life more than anything Donald Trump ever does… ideally, no guarantee. Elvis Presley forever altered the role music plays in our lives.

Power comes in many forms. Whoever came up with high definition television deserves the Nobel Peace Prize, but I digress.


Given we’re sure that Trump is talking about national leaders, we can circle back to that category and ably come up with many who managed to accrue far more power with far less brutal killing. George Washington founded this nation by fighting a king who wouldn’t peaceably deal with the colonies. Abraham Lincoln almost personally kept this nation together for four years, certainly killing a lot of people in a war that he would have given up everything to avoid except for continued slavery. And FDR not only kept this nation’s head above water during the worst worldwide depression since the Dark Ages, but he also invented modern economic liberalism in America, and then went on to rally a nation to defeat Hitler. That is a pretty powerful guy.


The story gets even Trumpier. He told Swan and Haberman that he got the list at a golf benefit with Gary Player, handed to him as a paper put together by a noted historian. But when Swan and Haberman investigated the matter further, the “report” had been put together by golfer Gary Player’s caddy. But the list's scholarly authority couldn’t matter less. It’s Trump’s reaction to having his name among those names that takes one’s breath away.

We weren’t in the room and thus can’t know how the conversation went, but wouldn’t it have been wonderful to hear Trump’s response to a follow-up: “Mr. President, why would you even want to be on this list? This is essentially a list of ‘worst people in human history.’”


Pity. Because it’s tough to predict how Trump would’ve talked himself around that one, probably something along the lines of, “But see? I’m more powerful than them, and I’m one of the most loved men in…”

It should go without saying that a president should enter that office committed to doing the best he or she can for the American people — do that, and the power takes care of itself. Lincoln saved the Union. FDR brought us Social Security and led us through World War II. Lyndon B. Johnson made us a greater society by bringing in Medicare and Medicaid and signing the Civil Rights Act (and yes, got a lot of Americans killed in Vietnam, duly noted). Ronald Reagan did open up a real dialogue with the U.S.S.R. that helped lead to communism’s downfall (I don’t need a primer on all the horrid things Reagan also did). George W. Bush — for all his innumerable faults — got this nation through the first month after 9/11 with bravery, resolve, and love toward American Muslims, not a single act of vigilantism. Barack Obama made universal healthcare an expected right, perhaps saving millions of lives. Pretty powerful.

If one really wants to get cynical, look to Mitch McConnell, who engineered the process by which we have a Supreme Court that managed to give Trump a free pass with respect to criminality, steal a woman’s right to control her body, and disenfranchise Black Americans in the South. Pretty powerful.


Donald Trump effected the first violent transfer of power in American history, and perhaps therein lies a clue to his “formidability.” Like Khan, Stalin, and Hitler, Donald Trump is out to get all he can personally get in his name as American president, whether it is semi-invading Venezuela, dropping billions in bombs in Iran (killing a school full of little girls), threatening war over Greenland, and this new “thing” with Cuba — and that’s just on the international scale. At home, Trump has organized masked stormtroopers marching around the country, rounding up brown people, changed the structure of Congress, put his name and face on money, and strongly considered suspending habeas corpus to do it, avoiding courts altogether. If there is a secret sauce to Trump’s power, it is that he is constrained only by balancing what he can get away with at no personal cost.

And, to be sure, if you have the most powerful military force ever amassed on the planet and the personal fealty of nearly every Republican in government to back domestic efforts, that affords someone an enormous amount of power. But if Trump has proven anything, it is that he seeks power to improve his fortunes, and only his fortunes. In that respect, he most certainly is right at home with Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan, Hitler, etc.

Last, to the extent one ever needed more concrete evidence as to the danger in mixing self-glorification within a uniquely undereducated man, the fact that Trump is proud to head up this list is Exhibit “A,” and all that would ever be needed to demonstrate that he lacks the emotional IQ to even understand the position he holds. The fact that it didn’t occur to Trump, “What if fifty years from now, someone reads a list about history’s most powerful leaders, and Donald Trump is alongside Stalin, Hitler, and Genghis Khan — is that bad branding?” should scare us all. Not that we weren’t already scared.


Nor are we surprised.

Check that. Some of us are indeed surprised, surprised only in the way Trump continues to find astonishingly original ways to evidence his true weakness. Leaders who seek power as the goal in and of itself are, by definition, some of the most dangerous figures in history. Leaders who dare to dream so powerfully of all that good that can be done if one only had the power are some of history’s most revered leaders, as they selflessly work to get it done. MLK Jr., Nelson Mandela, Susan B. Anthony, Cesar Chavez, Isaac Newton, Carl Jung, St. Francis of Assisi, Shakespeare… The list of history’s most powerful people who never sought “power” itself, merely propounded ideas so powerful they still impact us today, is a list to which one should aspire.

It is doubtful that anyone, even the most hardened MAGA, is surprised by the slot into which Trump most comfortably slid himself. The only somewhat surprising — and worrying thing is his obliviousness as to what it says about him, near and long term.


Indeed, history will have a lot of powerful things to say about Donald J. Trump and, perhaps topping the list, will be that from day one, he sought evermore personal power as both goal and measure.

Pretty weak.

Jason Miciak is a Rawstory Columnist, former editor at Occupy Democrats, political consultant, author, attorney, and single parent girldad, please follow on Bluesky and he can be reached at jasonmiciak@gmail.com

‘Newsom Does Not Want to Tax Billionaires,’ Say Campaigners, ‘But Wants You to Think He Does’

“Pretending to propose his own national solution is clearly a cynical smoke screen to let California billionaires off the hook,” argues the Billionaire Tax Now campaign as it seeks to counter “5 tricks” being deployed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and his allies.



California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference at the Montgomery-Gibbs Executive Airport on February 2, 2026 in San Diego, CA.
(Photo by K.C. Alfred / The San Diego Union-Tribune via Getty Images)


Jon Queally
Jun 27, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Campaigners behind the one-time 5% billionaires wealth tax in California are calling out what they describe as trickery and deception by Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who on Friday released a proposal for a national billionaire’s income tax even as he actively opposes the effort to tax the wealth of billionaires in the state that he and his party currently control.

“Newsom does not want to tax billionaires,” said the Billionaire Tax Now campaign in a statement, “but he wants you to think he does.”

As Common Dreams reported Friday, critics of Newsom warn that the governor thinks “he can fool everyone” with his proposal for a national tax on the income of billionaires while simultaneously opposing a wealth tax headed for a referendum vote in November designed to fill a massive healthcare funding gap in the state created by the budget bill passed by Republicans and signed by President Donald Trump last year.

While the so-called “One, Big Beautiful Bill” offered another windfall tax giveaway to super-wealthy individuals and corporations, it eviscerated funding for healthcare and other key social programs nationwide.

The Friday statement from the coalition behind the campaign, headed by SEIU—United Health Wealth, details “5 tricks” that Newsom has already deployed in order to fool voters about the wealth tax in California while concealing what they say are “his real motivations: to continue giving billionaires tax breaks at the expense of working people.”

According to the group:
TRICK 1: Pretend to take on billionaires while really giving them a pass.
Over his many months of plainly attempting to sink the California billionaire tax, Governor Newsom has made it clear that he is more interested in protecting billionaires than working people. A federal billionaire tax has already been proposed by US Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Ro Khanna—and while you don’t need to be a political insider to know it would require a profound reshaping of Congress to pass that bill, Newsom has nonetheless failed to endorse it.

TRICK 2: Conveniently say that a federal, not state-based solution is the best way forward on this issue—despite having supported state-based policy solutions in the past.
Pretending to propose his own national solution is clearly a cynical smoke screen to let California billionaires off the hook. It’s just a PR tactic to give himself more cover to oppose the California Billionaire Tax. The Governor has supported state-based solutions to federally-created policy problems in the past—just conveniently not this state-based solution, which would involve a 5% tax on about 200 Californian billionaires who hold $2.2 trillion in wealth to save lives and keep hospitals open.

TRICK 3: Attempt to divide support by saying the California Billionaire Tax is bad policy for not fixing every problem in the state.
It’s pretty simple: the California Billionaire Tax is a direct response to the healthcare cuts facing our state, so the funding goes to healthcare. 90% of funds will prevent ER and hospital closures, and 10% will go toward food assistance and public education.

No, the funding will not go toward housing, 911 operators, and other public services the Governor listed out to try to generate additional opposition—just the massive $100 billion healthcare crisis that is putting patient lives at risk. The fact that this measure doesn’t fix every problem in the Governor’s budget is a problem for the Governor, not a problem with the proposal itself.

TRICK 4: Spread misinformation about the California Billionaire Tax’s impact on Planned Parenthood.
The Governor is hoping you don’t know that the massive federal healthcare cuts in Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” gutted funding for California’s Planned Parenthood clinics and that the California Billionaire Tax is the only viable way to generate the funding needed to save this critical reproductive healthcare. Luckily, frontline healthcare workers, including those who work at Planned Parenthood clinics, along with actual Planned Parenthood patients have been hard at work spreading the truth to voters across the state.

TRICK 5: Falsely claim that “one stakeholder” is driving the California Billionaire Tax.
Governor Newsom continues desperately trying to make the California Billionaire Tax sound fringe, when in fact voters consistently support the tax by double-digit margins. The Billionaire Tax Now coalition has a growing army of more than 5,000 volunteers, and submitted over 1.6 million signatures—more than double the number needed to qualify for the ballot. The tax is supported by elected officials including US Senator Bernie Sanders Representative Ro Khanna, and Senator Chris Murphy, and community and labor groups including Teamsters California, AFSCME California, CIR, UNITE HERE Local 11 and Local 30, AFT Local 1521, Oxfam America, Our Revolution, CA, Color of Change, and Democratic Socialists of America–CA. Does that sound like “one stakeholder”?


The launch of Newsom’s proposal for a national income tax, his team acknowledged, comes as the governor considers a run for president in 2028.

Citing the threat of capital flight and billionaires fleeing California for states with friendlier tax codes, Newsom argues that the fight for a tax on the super-rich “belongs at the federal level, where this broken system was created in the first place.”

However, as the campaign behind the state-level tax points out and studies have shown, the mythical threat of the wealthy packing their bags has been shown to be largely that—threats and a myth.

Nadia Rahman, an activist and organizer in San Francisco, was among those urging people not to be duped by the Newsom’s position on the California ballot initiative.

“Do not be fooled,” Rahman warned. “Newsom is an avowed incrementalist pitching a ”national billionaires tax“ to have something to deflect to when he runs for president and is questioned about why he worked so hard to kill the wealth tax in his home state of California in his final act as Governor.”

Monday, June 29, 2026

‘Republicans Created This Crisis on Purpose’: Federal Data Shows ACA Enrollment Plunging

“This coverage collapse was a choice that Congress made. As a result, millions more will end up uninsured, living sicker, dying younger, and being one emergency away from financial ruin.”


House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) speaks during a news conference in the US Capitol on March 17, 2026.
(Photo by Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)


Jake Johnson
Jun 29, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

The Trump administration quietly released data last week showing a sharp decline in the number of Americans enrolled in health insurance on the Affordable Care Act exchanges, a widely predicted outcome caused by congressional Republicans’ refusal to extend subsidies that helped people buy coverage.

The new data, published Friday on the Department of Health and Human Services’ website, shows that 19.2 million people were enrolled in ACA marketplace plans as of February—a decline of more than 5 million since the start of President Donald Trump’s second term.

Last year, Republicans repeatedly blocked Democratic efforts to enact a temporary extension of the enhanced ACA tax credits, whose expiration at the start of 2026 led insurers to jack up premiums, pricing many out of coverage entirely. In focus groups, some Americans facing premium spikes said they would be forced to cut back on groceries or ration their medications to afford coverage.

“This dramatic decrease of millions of Americans losing health insurance is the result of deliberate decisions by the president and congressional leaders—it is what we feared but expected, given the end of the enhanced tax credit and other policies that make it harder to get on and stay on coverage,” said Anthony Wright, executive director of the advocacy group Families USA. “As a result, millions more will end up uninsured, living sicker, dying younger, and being one emergency away from financial ruin.”

Wright dismissed the Trump administration’s attempt to explain away the coverage losses by claiming the numbers show a decline in “phantom” enrollment and fraud, calling that narrative “an insult to every person who became uninsured or underinsured.”

“These results are real for the millions who faced premiums doubling, paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for coverage. The resulting price spikes and coverage losses are real for all who buy coverage as individuals, including gig workers, small business owners, young adults, seniors not quite of Medicare age, and many others,” said Wright. “The consequences are now undeniable: millions dropped from the rolls, and yet another year of double-digit premium increases.”

The lapse of enhanced ACA subsidies—which were established in 2021 during the Biden administration—alongside the roughly $900 billion in Medicaid cuts included in the Republican budget package that Trump signed into law last summer amounts to what analysts, advocates, and Democratic lawmakers say is the largest assault on federal healthcare programs in US history.

“We weren’t being hysterical. We knew this would happen,” said Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.) in response to the new enrollment figures. “When Republicans passed the Big Ugly Bill and cut funding for healthcare, they literally signed away millions of Americans’ ability to afford health insurance. And now it’s happening.”

According to the Congressional Budget Office, around 16 million people across the US could lose health coverage by 2034 due to the Trump-GOP law, and millions of children have lost coverage since last year.

“Trump and Republicans are engineering the most devastating assault on healthcare in history, and today’s numbers prove it,” Leslie Dach, chair of the advocacy group Protect Our Care, said on Friday. “They ripped away the tax credits that helped millions afford coverage, gutted funding to help people enroll, and sabotaged the ACA at every turn. They knew exactly what would happen, they chose to do it anyway, and it’s going to get worse.”

“Among the three million who have lost coverage are parents skipping cancer screenings, patients rationing insulin, and families who are now one medical emergency away from financial ruin,” said Dach. “Republicans created this crisis on purpose, and while Americans pay for it with their health and their lives, billionaires are cashing their tax cut checks.”

The NDAA Proposed Merger of the US and Israeli Military Is Strategically Unwise and Inherently Unconstitutional

Section 219 creates a framework for permanent military integration that weakens American sovereignty, blurs constitutional accountability, and places the nation's independent decision making at risk.

by and | Jun 29, 2026

Reprinted with permission from The Kucinich Report.

This article is Part 2 in a three part series on the proposed merger of U.S and Israeli intelligence, military and biotechnology. Read Part 1 here.

Prior to the American Revolution being fought on battlefields, it was fought as an argument about sovereignty.

Who decides the fate of a nation? Who commands its armies? Who determines when its citizens go to war and when they remain at peace?

The Founders answered those questions with remarkable clarity. In a republic, sovereignty belongs to the people and is exercised through constitutional institutions accountable to them. Section 219 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2027 threatens to undermine the foundational principles of our republic and our constitutional democracy.

Advocates for Section 219 describe it as a strategic partnership, a modernization of military cooperation between the United States and Israel. Yet the language of the provision reaches far beyond cooperation. It calls for the integration of military planning, intelligence sharing, technological development, procurement systems, research capabilities, and strategic operations in ways that blur the distinction between two sovereign nations.

This is not merely a policy question, it is a constitutional one.

America has alliances with many nations. We cooperate with allies. We conduct joint exercises. We share intelligence. However, there is a profound difference between cooperation and integration.

Cooperation preserves independent decision making.

Integration creates pressure toward shared decision making and shared consequences.

The Constitution was deliberately designed to prevent precisely this type of entanglement.

The President serves as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States. Congress possesses the authority to declare war. Together these provisions were meant to ensure that decisions involving American lives, American treasure, and American military power remain accountable to the American people.

Section 219 moves the nation in the opposite direction. It creates permanent structures through which military, intelligence, technological, and strategic functions become increasingly intertwined with those of another government. Even if no formal transfer of command occurs, the practical effect is to make American decision making dependent upon relationships and commitments that exist far beyond the reach of American voters.

There are at least nine reasons why Congress should reject Section 219 of the NDAA:.

  1. IT VIOLATES THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF CLAUSE

Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution designates the President as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States.

Congress cannot constitutionally dilute, share, or transfer command responsibilities through ordinary legislation. The armed forces of the United States must remain exclusively accountable to constitutional authority established by the American people.

  1. IT BYPASSES THE TREATY PROCESS

The Constitution provides a mechanism for creating major international commitments: treaties ratified by two thirds of the Senate.

If Congress believes permanent military integration with any foreign nation is necessary, it should present that proposal openly and subject it to the scrutiny required by the Constitution.

Congress cannot use a spending bill to accomplish what the Constitution requires to be debated and approved through the treaty process.

  1. IT CREATES PROBLEMS OF AUTHORITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY

Foreign officials do not swear an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States.

Yet military integration creates circumstances in which foreign officers, planners, intelligence officials, and strategic personnel may influence decisions affecting American troops, intelligence assets, military technologies, operational planning and decisions to use military force.

The Framers established safeguards to ensure that authority over American military power remained accountable to American institutions and American voters.

Section 219 weakens those safeguards.

  1. IT VIOLATES THE PRINCIPLE OF NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY

Congress cannot delegate core sovereign responsibilities to another government.

The defense of the nation, decisions involving military force, intelligence operations, and national security policy are among the most important powers entrusted to the federal government.

A nation that cannot independently determine matters of war and peace cannot truly be considered sovereign.

  1. IT INCREASES THE RISK OF FUTURE WARS

The Founders understood the danger.

In his Farewell Address, George Washington warned against permanent foreign attachments that could pull the United States into conflicts not of its own choosing. His concern was not isolationism. It was independence.

Our first president understood that foreign entanglements have a way of creating obligations that gradually supersede national interests.

That warning has particular relevance today.

The recent escalation with Iran demonstrates how rapidly regional conflicts can draw the United States toward broader military commitments. Every new layer of institutional integration increases the likelihood that future conflicts involving Israel become, in practical terms, American conflicts as well.

  1. IT RISKS SUBORDINATING AMERICAN INTERESTS TO FOREIGN PRIORITIES

The issue is not whether one supports Israel.

The issue is whether any foreign nation should be granted a permanent place within executive, military, intelligence, technological, and strategic structures that are constitutionally intended to serve the United States alone.

The first responsibility of the United States government is to protect the security and wellbeing of the American people. Foreign policy should be guided by American interests, American laws, and American constitutional principles.

  1. IT THREATENS DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY

When sovereignty is diluted, accountability disappears.

Citizens can no longer identify who is responsible for decisions. Power becomes dispersed through networks, agreements, and institutions beyond public control.

Democracy weakens because the connection between the voter and the decision maker is broken.

The Constitution deliberately places decisions involving war and national defense within institutions accountable to the American people. Section 219 weakens that connection.

  1. IT IMPOSES ENORMOUS FINANCIAL COSTS

The United States has spent decades engaged in costly military interventions throughout the Middle East.

Trillions of dollars have been spent. Thousands of American lives have been lost. Countless civilians have perished. Yet the pressure for deeper involvement continues.

This is especially troubling at a moment when the national debt exceeds forty trillion dollars. Every additional military commitment carries a financial cost. Every escalation requires resources that must ultimately be borrowed, taxed, or diverted from domestic priorities.

Americans struggling with inflation, housing costs, healthcare expenses, and declining infrastructure deserve a government focused first on their security and prosperity.

  1. IT BETRAYS THE SPIRIT OF AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE

The timing could not be more ironic.

As America marks the 250th anniversary of its independence, Congress is considering legislation that undermines our independence.

The Revolution was fought to secure self government. The Constitution was written to preserve it.

Sovereignty is not an outdated concept. It is the foundation of democratic accountability.

The question before us is larger than Israel. Larger than any single administration. Larger than any current conflict.

It is whether the United States will remain a nation whose military power is directed exclusively by constitutional institutions accountable to the American people, or whether we will gradually surrender that independence through permanent foreign integration that the Constitution neither contemplated nor authorizes.

A nation that cannot control its own military decisions cannot claim to be sovereign – and that is a core reason why Section 219 should be rejected.


TAKE ACTION

The merger is timed to be voted on the week of June 29, just before the Fourth of July.

Find your member of Congress: House      Senate

It is urgent that you call your congressional representative today at 202-224-3121 and tell them to Strip Section 219 (House) or Section 1217 (Senate) from the 2027 NDAA.

Congressmen Tom Massie (R-KY) and Ro Khanna (D-CA) will offer an amendment in the House to remove Section 219. Please tell your U.S. Representative: Support the Massie-Khanna Amendment to the NDAA.

Optional telephone script for the House of Representatives:

My name is ______ and I am a constituent. I am calling to urge Representative ______ to support the Massie-Khanna Amendment and to remove Section 219 from the NDAA. Congress should defend American sovereignty, uphold the Constitution, and reject any measure that integrates the executive and military functions of the United States with those of a foreign government. Please pass my message to the Representative. Thank you.

Dennis J. Kucinich served sixteen years in the United States Congress and twice ran for President of the United States on a platform of peace, truth, and constitutional integrity. He led the opposition to the Iraq War and introduced Articles of Impeachment against President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney for misleading the nation into war.