Showing posts sorted by date for query SMOKING. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query SMOKING. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Saturday, March 07, 2026




Morbid Symptoms: War on Iran and the

Epstein Class


 March 6, 2026

Image by Mohammed Ibrahim.

On Saturday, the United States and Israel launched a coordinated military assault on Iran under the banner of Operation Epic Fury. The operation, involving large-scale air and missile strikes across multiple Iranian targets, marked another significant escalation since the beginning of the Al-Aqsa Flood on October 7, 2023. Critics have since renamed the campaign “Operation Epstein Fury” or “Operation Epstein Files,” arguing that the sudden recourse to war appears designed to divert attention from a political scandal engulfing the presidential administration—one that, in their telling, dwarfs both Watergate and the sordid indiscretions that haunted the presidency of Bill Clinton.

During recent congressional testimony concerning Clinton’s relationship with the deceased financier and convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, Republican Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna told reporters that she believed Epstein “was an intelligence asset running some form of honeypot operation.” For years, rumors have circulated regarding Epstein’s possible connections to intelligence services such as Mossad and the CIA, allegations he treated with a certain flippant irony in private emails with associates and fellow Jewish supremacists. Though many investigators insist that no definitive “smoking gun” has surfaced to prove such intelligence ties, the network of Epstein’s relationships with powerful figures remains undeniable, reaching into Trump’s political orbit as well as into the circles of foreign governments, including Israel.

It is therefore unsurprising that many observers now wonder whether Trump’s attack on Iran functions as a political diversion from the widening Epstein scandal. What is certain is that the president’s political fortunes have declined: his poll numbers have slipped, and Americans have grown increasingly despondent amid a worsening domestic economic climate. In his most recent State of the Union address, Trump—a man who has likely never pushed a grocery cart down a supermarket aisle—derided talk of an “affordability crisis,” having previously dismissed the rising cost of basic goods as a “hoax.” Meanwhile, revanchist attacks on political opponents, the federal invasion of Minnesota, an episode that left two Americans dead and immigrant communities terrorized, and the diminishing returns of white-supremacist rhetoric and policy have done little to arrest his growing unpopularity. The gradual release of additional Epstein files, reportedly implicating an expanding circle of elites and containing tens of thousands references to Trump himself and allegations implicating him in the abuse of women and girls, combined with the conspicuous absence of accountability, has only deepened public distrust toward what many now call the Epstein class—the insulated stratum of wealth and power that governs modern political life.

There is, indeed, a conspiracy. But its central purpose is not merely the concealment of crimes of sexual exploitation, abhorrent though they are. Such atrocities are themselves symptoms—grotesque manifestations of a deeper and more malignant disease. Epstein was but one among many actors, whether intelligence asset or merely a creature of wealth and impunity, who preyed upon the vulnerable while treating ordinary people as pawns in their conquest of power, whether acting on behalf of foreign states or private capital or both.

In this sense, the scandal reveals something larger: the moral pathology of capitalism in its decadent phase and the morbid symptoms of imperial decline. The American war with Iran serves no constituency except those who stand to profit from the destruction of yet another sovereign state that has resisted incorporation into the imperial order. Iran, like Venezuela or Cuba, poses no existential threat to the United States or its people. To strike such nations is not an exhibition of strength but a confession of weakness—a tacit admission that the American project, having exhausted the possibilities of reform at home, can imagine no alternative to crisis except war.

This piece first appeared on Red Scare.

Nick Estes is a citizen of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe. He is a journalist, historian and co-host of the Red Nation Podcast. He is the author of Our History Is the Future: Standing Rock Versus the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance (Verso, 2019).


The Writing On Trump’s War Room Wall

Operation Epstein Amnesia

File:Belshazzar’s feast, by Rembrandt.jpg
Rembrandt’s depiction of the biblical account of King Belshazzar seeing a hand writing the words “mene, mene, tekel, upharsin” on a wall.

Following the war criminality model of the Israeli Defense Forces, the US/Zionist bombing campaign on Iran is engaged in targeting hospitals, schools and private residences, slaughtering all who happen to be on the premises. The tactic, rather than demoralizing civilian populations, galvanizes contempt and the will to resist a foreign aggressor.

Think about it. While I opposed rightwing Christian evangelist’s retrograde (back to the Bronze Age) agendas if the air force of a foreign power bombed their megachurch in my vicinity, I would deem the death-from-above delivering aggressor an existential threat and would find myself, on a provisional basis, in alliance, with my political adversaries.

Every bomb dropped, causing death and destruction, strengthens the Mullah controlled government of Iran.

The true believers in the efficacy of so-called smart bombs are very stupid people.

As an example: a reporter to Secretary Of War(mongering) Pete Hegseth: “As you’ve said, there are a large number of US service members who are in harm’s way right now. What is your prayer for them?”

Hegseth: “First of all, my prayer for them is that I do pray for them… I pray simply for the biblical wisdom to see what is right and the courage to do it.”

How about the biblical admonition regarding “the writing on the wall,” piss-drunk Pete?

The “writing on the wall” episode in the Old Testament is a tale told in the Book of Daniel, 5, in which a disembodied hand of numinous origin, materializes during a feast/orgy held at King Belshazzar’s palace in ancient Babylon.

The hand of divinity scribes four words on the wall of King Belshazzar’s ornate banquet hall: “Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin” (Aramaic: “Numbered, Numbered, Weighed, Divided”).

The Jewish prophet in exile Daniel interprets this as an augury of impending doom i.e., the imminent fall of the Babylonian Empire to the Medes and Persians.

The phrase has become axiomatic for: ignore looming reality at your peril. Withal, just hours before ordering his attack on Iran Trump attended a bacchanal of moneyed class excess at his Belshazzarian palace known as Mar-a-Lago.

At my son’s Hebrew school today, the class discussed the legend of Purim. Of course, the story is ahistorical; to wit, Queen Esther, the archetypal orphan rises to the throne of a great power, as told as dauntless hero figure for her courage and cunning in saving a besieged — threatened with genocide — Jewish people in perilous exile. Then there is Esther’s striking beauty providing a patina of glamour to the blood-drench story of royal court intrigue and denouncement that setting is ancient Persia, now present day Iran.

Today’s storylines remain being told with an equal lack of veracity. Unlike the tidy ending of the biblical yarn, the unpredictable consequences, engendered by the lies that enabled this war, await us.

“Esther and Mordecai,” painted around 1685 by Dutch artist Art de Gelder

A voice within me augurs that in the future the events transpiring in the Levant/Persian Gulf at present will not be celebrated, as, at Purim time, they were in the synagogue of my childhood, with children adorned in costumes of the royal Persian court and the baking of and indulgence in plum cookies and cakes.

The unfolding of events suggest, history will relate the war catalyzing the long overdue collapse of the US as a world-dominating power due to the unsurpassed idiocy and raging hubris of a wannabe US emperor man-infant and the beginning of the end of the Zionist ethno-supremacist state, war criminal enterprise.

So Trump, at Netanyahu’s command, has unloosed the dogs of war, and the snarling pack is peeing on his cackle inflicted leg. How long did Trump and Netanyahu believe they could commit mass murder with impunity? The Gods — i.e., the forces of life that cannot be controlled — strike down the hubristic, and this is particularly true of the God of War.

Israel is being afflicted with a world of hurt. Iranian missiles are raining down on Haifa, Jerusalem, and Tel Aviv. The Iranians have fired only a fraction of their arsenal. Israel has cornered and angered a dog of war with real teeth. This isn’t, as in Gaza, a war waged on women and children sleeping in tents, on emergency room doctors and nurses, on journalists and aid workers.

With Trump, he rained unprovoked death from above upon Venezuelan fishermen but now US soldiers have fallen in his war based on lies. The longer the war goes on, and the more hurt inflicted by Iran — the more Trump is going to long for the days when his biggest trouble was the revelations that remain hidden, for now, in the Epstein files.

Trump is a short con grifter. He lacks the depth, ability to reflect, and possess foresight insofar as apprehending all the variables in play in the dynamics of war. His proclivity, when things get rough, has been to declare victory and turn tail.

His main strength, tactic-wise, has been his cowardice. As a garden variety bully, he had an instinct to only pick a fight with those weaker or had no desire to fight. But as witnessed in Minnesota, when the citizenry, instead of rolling over and exposing their belly, collectively, growled and bared their teeth, Trump and his ICE bully boys turned tail.

The world is now taking note; hence, Trump, the shambling, over-reaching braggart, is the very emblem of US Empire’s undoing.

The current US/Israeli military campaign underway against the nation of Iran, Operation Epstein Amnesia, we are told involves an existential threat from a nation possessed of Weapons of Mass Destruction that poses an immediate danger to the forever blameless, forever innocent people of the US and Israel; hence, we are engaged in a massive bombing campaign upon the citizenry of an ancient civilization in behalf of their liberation.

May be an image of text

Somewhere from the precincts of the distant past, ghosts of memory are being roused and are howling, “bullshit!”

Let’s query the people of Iraq, of Libya, and of Syria on the subject. The latter nation now has a US/Zionist installed government headed by ISIS head-choppers created by the US in their war of aggression against the people of the primary nation. As for Libya, they possess the freedom to be bought and sold in slave markets in public squares.

The US/Israelis just liberated over hundred Iranian school girls from this very life.

Of course the first words that come to mind when thinking of Trump would be: man of peace and good will…but never, on the doorstep of dementia, adult diaper-swaddled grifter, featured player in the Epstein files. The same is true with Trump’s war partner Benjamin Netanyahu…the description would never enter the mind: genocide-prone psychopath, with the eyes of a dead shark, perpetrator of massive crimes against humanity.

Perish such thoughts attempting to trespass, like fentanyl smuggling illegals, into the pristine precincts of our innocent and beautiful minds.

US/Israeli desperation is at the rotten, down to the root, military aggression against Iran. The source of the desperation: Recent polls reveal that large and growing numbers of the US citizenry now support the cause of Palestinians over that of the Israeli oppressors.

Thus Israel’s agenda, its standard operating procedure, is to sow destruction and chaos in the region. In this manner, the Israeli leadership believes their internal weakness will be mitigated by the destabilization of surrounding nations, as was the case with Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, and now Iran.

But the goal is not regime change. There is not a significant number of US ground troops in the Levant/Persian Gulf region, and the killing of Iran’s supreme leader is not going to do the trick. The latter is not only a war crime but will strengthen the resolve of the Iranian citizenry. Then add to the resolve factor: the slaughter of Iranian school girls.

As for Trump, he is a weak man, inflicted by a howling inner emptiness, who, manically, compensates by perpetual preening and clownish boasting about his greatness.

Thus “Trump’s (risible) “Board Of Peace” goes to war. This has to be reality — because a writer of farce would cut the joke for being too on the nose.

File:Vincenzo Camuccini, The Death of Julius Caesar (detail).jpg
Vincenzo Camuccini, The Death of Julius Caesar (detail)

Phil Rockstroh is a poet, lyricist, and essayist. His poems, short fiction, poetry and essays have been published in numerous print publications and anthologies; his political essays have been widely posted on the progressive/left side of the internet.  Read other articles by Phil, or visit Phil's website.

Friday, March 06, 2026

After Strikes on Dubai, UAE May Target Iran's Shadow Fleet Operators

Dubai's skyline (iStock / Tomas Sereda)
Dubai's skyline (iStock / Tomas Sereda)

Published Mar 5, 2026 11:05 PM by The Maritime Executive

The financial and operational networks that undergird Iran's sanctioned oil trade pass through Dubai, where they operate in the shadows in a lightly-regulated market. That may soon become a problem for Tehran. According to the Wall Street Journal, the UAE - growing tired of Iran's missile and drone attacks - has warned the Iranian government that in retaliation, it may start seizing assets linked to these shell companies.

The freewheeling business environment of the UAE's free trade zone system has been a home for sanctioned oil trading for years, both for Iranian and Russian grades. The shadow fleet of tankers that serve gray-market crude is managed in no small part out of Dubai. As an example, one of the most prominent shadow fleet operators to work in the city, Indian shipowner Capt. Jugwinder Singh Brar, has been accused by the U.S. Treasury of working with Yemen's al-Jamal network to move Iranian oil - a double violation of U.S. sanctions. Brar stands accused of using his fleet of small tankers to pick up Iranian oil cargoes, then blending them with other grades to obfuscate the real source. "The Iranian regime relies on its network of unscrupulous shippers and brokers like Brar and his companies to enable its oil sales and finance its destabilizing activities," said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last year. 

Operations like Brar's now-sanctioned network could be a target of opportunity for the UAE, which could use asset seizures to clamp down on Iranian oil smuggling. Iran's kinetic attacks threaten to undermine the Emirates' carefully cultivated reputation for security and stability, the ingredients underpinning the runaway success of Dubai as a luxury destination and financial hub. Iran's drone and missile attacks have created unwanted optics: well-publicized strikes on a hotel, the city's U.S. consulate, and on a tank farm at Fujairah have caused damage to physical infrastructure, but the potential for reputational damage is even more concerning. 

An asset seizure targeting Iran's facilitator network in the UAE could be a devastating blow. The Treasury believes that UAE-based front companies account for about 60 percent of the covert Iranian financial activity that passes through the American banking system, the Journal reports, suggesting a target-rich environment. 

Beyond financial measures, the UAE is contemplating direct action to seize Iranian shadow fleet tankers in Emirati waters, officials told the WSJ - a major escalation for a nation that maintained neutrality between the U.S. and Iran just last week. 


Iranian Bomb Boat Targeted Sonangol Tanker off Kuwait

Sonangol Namibe
Damage to the Sonangol Namibe (social media)

Published Mar 5, 2026 6:23 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

New footage appears to suggest that Iranian forces used a drone boat to attack the tanker Sonangol Namibe off the coast of Kuwait.

The tanker was at anchor about 30 nm to the southeast of Kuwait's Mubarak al Kabeer port on Wednesday night when an explosion occurred on the port side. The hull was penetrated and the ship has taken on water, according to UKMTO. However, there were no injuries, and the blast did not start a fire, according to the security agency.

The vessel was in ballast at the time of the blast, but satellite imaging taken the day after the strike shows a small petroleum slick emanating from the tanker. 

The strike expanded the proven kinetic risk zone to the far northeastern end of the Gulf, confirming the possibility of an Iranian strike at any location within the area. It also showed that the threat picture for shipping will continue to include surface attacks, even though Iran's larger combatant vessels have substantially been eliminated by U.S. forces. 

Iran is a longtime operator of unmanned bomb boats: it began providing the technology to Yemen's Houthi rebel group years before the concept was adopted and developed by Ukraine. Drone boats require a different defense strategy to prevent kinetic strikes, and they are difficult to defeat in swarms, as demonstrated by the Black Sea campaign targeting Russian warships and tankers. 

The strike may have outsize importance for regional energy production. According to local Basra News, Sonangol Namibe was due to call at an Iraqi loading terminal to take on oil. Iraq is so short on shoreside storage space that it has begun to shut in production; A proven threat to tanker tonnage in Iraq has more immediate implications for the global crude oil supply than a similar threat in Saudi Arabia or the UAE, as Iraq's tank farm capacity is low and any production shut-in will take weeks to restart. 


Tanker Hit by Blast Off Kuwait, Hull Breached

Oil slick

Published Mar 4, 2026 11:22 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

The UKMTO has reported an apparent attack on a tanker at a position off the coast of Kuwait, resulting in a hull breach.

The tanker - identified as the Suezmax Sonangol Namibe - was at anchor about 30 nm to the southeast of Kuwait's Mubarak al Kabeer port on Wednesday night. An explosion occurred on the port side, witnessed by the master. A small craft was seen departing the scene. 

The blast penetrated a cargo tank, resulting in a spill of oil in the water, according to UKMTO. In a later statement, the operator said that a ballast tank was breached, but that no oil was spilled. The ship has taken on water as well, according to UKMTO.

No fires have been reported, and the crew are unharmed. Contrary to the initial report, the vessel was in ballast at the time of the blastInvestigations into the circumstances of the attack are under way. 

The apparent attack is materially different from other recent maritime strikes in the region, in several ways. Geographically, it is the furthest point west from the Strait of Hormuz, suggesting that the warlike risk zone fully spans the length of the Arabian Gulf. The presence of a small craft also suggests a hand-placed charge - a limpet mine - which would be consistent with past operations attributed to Iran.  

In June 2019, two vessels were hit by suspected limpet mine attacks in the Gulf of Oman. One of the devices was spotted intact on the hull of the tanker Kokuka Courageous, and it closely resembled a known Iranian device, according to U.S. Central Command. Suspected Iranian operatives removed the device and departed before U.S. forces could arrive. Cmdr. Sean Kido, a dive team leader with CENTCOM, told Reuters at the time that blast damage elsewhere on the Kokuka Courageous was consistent with a limpet mine attack - not an airborne munition. 


Positioning of Unladen Tankers Signals Shipping's Risk-Reward Calculations

Waiting to profit: empty tankers lined up at the Strait of Hormuz starting line off Fujairah, Khor Fakkan and Dibba (MarineTraffic)
Still expecting to profit: empty tankers lined up off Fujairah, Khor Fakkan and Dibba (MarineTraffic)

Published Mar 4, 2026 5:36 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

Shipowners and managers, and ultimately ship masters, have the ultimate responsibility for assessing risk to their vessels and their cargoes. Governments may be keen to persuade operators that the coast is clear, in support of attaining political objectives, but captains always need to be the final arbiter, not the least because lives are at risk.

Hence the behavior of tankers, in particular those with freedom of movement outside the Gulf, gives an indication of how the non-government world is assessing the potential course of the ongoing war with Iran.

If unladen tankers give up holding off Fujairah and Oman, then it is because they assess the risk of loading from terminals on the Gulf of Oman outweighs the reward of record profits to be had from Mideast-to-Asia voyages - or, alternatively, that there is little prospect of the Straits of Hormuz being opened up in the short term. For such tankers, the commercial choice then is to sail away and to find cargoes elsewhere.

From insiders in the oil and gas trading community, it appears that some regard it as too risky to load at present. But most of the unladen tankers off Fujairah and Oman are still sticking around, implying that ship owners and managers consider there is a good prospect of the Iranian grip over the Straits of Hormuz being broken soon. There are for example 17 unladen LNG carriers currently loitering in the Gulf of Oman off Ras al Hadd, numbers not depleted by more than one or two who have given up waiting. This implies there is confidence that the American war plan will move - once local air superiority is achieved - to suppressing the still-active drone threat.

The Iranian threat extends well beyond the immediate Strait of Hormuz area, as it appears that Iran has the wider objective of closing down all oil and gas movements within the region, presumably with the objective of mobilizing oil and gas consuming nations - and China in particular - to press for a cessation of hostilities.

This threat the Gulf nations are having to deal with on their own, with the Americans clearly having their hands full dealing with the primary threat from Iran. But it seems extraordinary that Western nations, and other consumer nations in Asia, do not consider that their national and economic security interests need to be protected and defended from these Iranian attacks. On the contrary, the British Prime Minister, for example, speaking in the House of Commons on March 4, appeared to be only concerned with evacuating British citizens from the area - seemingly unconcerned about the lack of Royal Navy presence in the Gulf or capability to defend other British interests and those of historic and economic partners.


Bandar Abbas Naval Harbor Smoking from Multiple Hits

Iran Bandar Abbas harbor
Bandar Abbas Naval Harbor at 12.00 (UTC) on March 2 (Sentinel-2/CJRC) Yellow: berth of IRINS Kurdestan (K442). Red: berth recently of 2 x Moudge Class frigates. Blue: Berth area of IRINS Zagros (H313) and Hengam Class logistic vessels.

Published Mar 2, 2026 11:34 AM by The Maritime Executive

 

Imagery taken over Bandar Abbas at midday (UTC) on March 2 shows the Naval Harbor wreathed in black smoke. From the smoke pattern and dispersal, it appears that there have been at least three strikes on ships berthed in the harbor.

The heat spots are confirmed in NASA FIRMS imagery, which suggests that the heat spots were initiated perhaps up to 24 hours previously.

 

NASA FIRMS imagery dating from March 1 (FIRMS)

 

The regular Iranian Navy (Nedaja) has consistently moored classes of ships on particular berths in the Naval Harbor, making it easy to predict which ships lie beneath the smoke.  Moreover, clear imagery of the harbor was obtained in the immediate days before the launch of Operation Epic Fury, so that one can make a good guess from which particular ships smoke is belching.

At its normal pier in the outer harbor, still afloat, is IRINS Kurdestan (K442), or possibly IRINS Makran (K441), still on fire at its stern.  

These two converted tankers have given the Nedaja the ability to provide logistic support for long-range deployments, a capability that the Nedaja lost when IRINS Kharg (K431) caught fire and sank in mysterious circumstances off the coast of Jask on June 2, 2021.

The dockside alongside which three Moudge Class frigates were moored several days ago is ablaze along its length. The vessels concerned, therefore, may be IRINS Sabalan (F73), IRINS Sahand (F74), and/or IRINS Jamaran (F76), which had been spotted moored here on February 27. It has been tentatively reported, however, that IRINS Jamaran (F76) was sunk alongside its berth at the Konarak Naval Base in Chah Bahar.

A large area of smoke covers the area where the Moudge Class intelligence collection frigate IRINS Zagros (H313) is normally berthed, which in turn is adjacent to a pier that normally is home to Hengam Class logistic vessels, veteran but heavily used in support of short and medium range deployments.

On the eastern side of the Naval Harbor, the piers which normally house Kaman Class fast attack craft, and Kilo and Fateh Class diesel electric submarines, are not covered by smoke. Potentially targets in this area could have sunk, hiding any indicators of attack beneath the waters of the harbor.

The evident damage apparent in the imagery of the harbor correlates with the statement from President  Donald Trump that nine Iranian Navy ships have been destroyed in Operation Epic Fury. U.S. Central Command on Monday also claimed to have sunk the drone carrier Shahid Bagheri, saying U.S. forces had struck the ship within hours of launching Operation Epic Fury. However, it should be noted that these easy targets were all old ships, which tended to be used for conventional naval operations, rather than the missile-equipped speed boats and fast attack craft used by the IRGC Navy in harassment operations in the Straits of Hormuz.


Jebel Ali Port Resumes Operations as Most Regional Ports Remain Operational

Dubai container port
Jebel Ali, the largest container port in the region, briefly suspended operations (DP World)

Published Mar 2, 2026 5:08 PM by The Maritime Executive


After widespread reports of a possible missile strike and a fire at the Jebel Ali Port in Dubai, operations resumed on Monday. Most ports across the Middle East report operations are continuing despite the efforts by the Iranians to target ports as part of their campaign to disrupt the region.

Videos circulating online showed a smoke cloud rising from the container port in Dubai, creating concerns as Jebel Ali is the largest port in the region. In addition to being a key import and export location, it is a transshipment hub for much of the region. Reports began circulating that operations were suspended.

The Dubai City Defense force confirmed that it was quickly able to bring the fire under control with minimal damage. Officials are asserting that it was debris from a successful intercept of a drone that caused the fire and not a missile or drone strike on the port. Dubai, however, has been one of the areas heavily targeted by the Iranians, with reports of multiple intercepts and strikes, including on hotels and residential buildings.

DP World, which operates the container port, is saying operations were suspended as a precaution, and they undertook a safety review.  As of Sunday evening local time, March 1, it was reporting that all four terminals were operating normally. The Dubai Ports Authority confirmed the operations while saying it was “monitoring developments closely” and would remain in close coordination with the relevant authorities. It said that “enhanced safety and security measures” would remain in place across the Jebel Ali Port.

 

 

Ports in the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Qatar, as well as further afield in Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, Israel, and Cyprus, are also said to be operating normally. Inchcape, one of the leaders in providing port services, compiled a comprehensive report on the status of the port.

Ports in Bahrain have reportedly suspended operations temporarily, while Oman has partial restrictions. This comes after the countries were targeted by the Iranians. The Oman News Agency had earlier reported that two drones had targeted the port area and that one person was injured.

The key LNG terminals have, however, also been closed after their operations came under attack. Citing safety concerns, Qatar Energy said it had suspended operations at its Ras Laffan facility, with Inchcape also reporting that Qatar had suspended processing crew visas at Ras Laffan Port. Severe GPS signal interference was also being reported at Ras Laffan.

While the ports remain mostly operational, ships have stopped transits of the Straits of Hormuz due to the repeated attacks by the Iranians and a suspension of war risk insurance. In addition, many of the major shipping lines are reporting that they have placed restrictions on operations. MSC Mediterranean Shipping reported that it was suspending all bookings of the Middle East, while Ocean Network Express also reported it will temporarily suspend acceptance of new bookings for cargo moving both to and from the Persian Gulf until further notice. Maersk and HAPAG-Lloyd were among the companies that reported their vessels would stop transits in the Persian Gulf region. Maersk reported it was suspending reefer, dangerous/special cargo acceptance in and out of UAE, Oman, Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia, and not taking new bookings, including to parts of the Indian subcontinent. It also said all vessels would divert from the Suez Canal – Red Sea corridor. 

In response to the ongoing missile attacks, U.S. commanders said they were focusing on quickly addressing Iran’s capabilities to strike neighboring facilities. U.S. Central Command reported on Monday, March 2, that because “Iran continues to maliciously launch ballistic missiles, indiscriminately targeting military and civilian locations throughout the region,” its efforts were being increased. It reported overnight that the massive B-1 bombers had been deployed to strike deep inside Iran to degrade Iranian ballistic missile capabilities. The U.S. released videos of mobile missile launchers being targeted and destroyed, while Iran responded with a video of underground bunkers storing large numbers of drones and missiles that it said it would be launching at the American forces and their supporters. 


Cruise Lines Navigate Gulf Conflict Amidst Continued Iranian Strikes

Mein Schiff 4 (file image courtesy VesselFinder / Tobias Elsen)
Mein Schiff 4 (file image courtesy VesselFinder / Tobias Elsen)

Published Mar 1, 2026 10:45 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

Given the centrality of the oil trade to the GCC states, tankers have rightfully received the most attention of any vessel class in the new conflict in the Gulf. But cruising is increasingly popular in the region, and at least half a dozen cruise ships are in the affected area - including some which may be staying longer than expected due to ongoing Iranian strikes. 

One of these vessels is newly homeported in the region. The Saudi cruise ship Aroya Manara (ex name World Dream) is currently moored in Dubai, and independent operator Aroya is deferring plans for a round-trip cruise through the Strait of Hormuz to visit Muscat. 

Many others are temporarily based in the UAE or Qatar. German firm TUI Cruises has two vessels berthed in the area - the Mein Schiff 4 in Abu Dhabi and the Mein Schiff 5 in Doha. Abu Dhabi was attacked by Iran in a missile strike over the weekend, and passengers aboard Mein Schiff 4 were able to see Iranian drones hit the water from on board the vessel. Mein Schiff 5 is scheduled to conduct a series of round-trip cruises in the Gulf, and was slated to depart Doha on Saturday. 

TUI has temporarily suspended sailings for both vessels, but it is unclear when passengers or crew will be able to depart: with airspace restrictions in place, travel in or out of the GCC is currently difficult. 

Shipping giant MSC's cruise division has one vessel currently moored at Doha, MSC Euribia. The ship has about 5,000 passengers on board from its previous voyage, but it will not be departing as planned for its next seven-night cruise in the Arabian Gulf. Instead, it will be staying in port "due to the current situation and the air space closure in the Middle East." 

Privately-held Celestyal Cruises, based in Athens, operates two cruise ships; both are in the Gulf, west of Hormuz. The line said in a statement Sunday that the next departures for Celestyal Journey (departing Doha) and Celestyal Discovery (departing Dubai) have been canceled: both were due to sail on Monday, but the line intends to put passenger and crew safety first in light of current circumstances. Guests of the Journey have the option to stay aboard or to go ashore in Doha, but authorities in Dubai have instructed Celestyal Discovery not to disembark passengers for the time being. The UAE has suspended all flights to and from Dubai amidst ongoing Iranian missile and drone attacks, so passengers would have few options for onward travel.  

Mein Schiff 4 (file image courtesy VesselFinder / Tobias Elsen)