Sunday, August 17, 2025

Opinion | Trump's efforts to secure a Nobel Peace Prize are Orwellian

Zeeshan Aleem
Sun, August 17, 2025

This summer, President Donald Trump is rolling out the red carpet for Russian President Vladimir Putin and approving of weapon sales to Israel as it commits genocide. He’s also squeezing in time to lobby aggressively for the Nobel Peace Prize.

NBC News reports that “Trump and his aides are intensifying a public campaign to snag the award, citing a string of peace deals while making a case that snubbing him again would be an injustice.” According to NBC News, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has said, unprompted, at three out of her four press briefings in July that Trump deserves the prize. In fact, she’s arguing it’s overdue: “It’s well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,” she said at one presser. Trump has also “posted about the prize a total of seven times on his social media site since his second term began, six of them in June and July,” NBC News reports.

The Nobel Peace Prize is awarded by a five-member body appointed by Norway’s parliament. Trump has reportedly tried to influence the group through talks with the country’s government. A Norwegian news outlet reported Thursday that Trump said that he wanted the Nobel Peace Prize during a July call with Norwegian Finance Minister Jens Stoltenberg to discuss tariffs. (According to NBC News, a White House official “said that the president and Stoltenberg did speak, but could not say that the conversation was focused on the prize. Stoltenberg confirmed in a statement that he spoke to Trump about tariffs but would not go into further details of the call.”)

Trump’s Nobel Prize campaign — and his conviction that he is entitled to one — is of course absurd. Alfred Nobel called in his will for the prize to be awarded to individuals “who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” How would Trump fit the bill?

There is some truth to the Trump administration’s claim that it has played a diplomatic role in mediating the end of conflict between some nations, including between India and Pakistan and between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. However in the case of India and Pakistan, India objects to Trump’s claim that he was responsible for the May ceasefire between India and Pakistan; the Indian government describes the resolution as something that was brokered bilaterally between only India and Pakistan, and has downplayed Trump’s role. And in the case of Rwanda and the DRC, Qatar also played a critical role that the Trump administration has conveniently left out of its narrative.

Even granting that the Trump administration has played a role in conflict resolution between some countries, the general spirit of Trump’s foreign policy has often undermined global “fraternity,” not fostered it. Under the banner of “America First,” Trump has shattered the bonds of economic cooperation by launching global trade wars, has reneged on pivotal agreements with our neighbors, and turned long-standing allies in Europe into rivals.

On a particularly surreal note, one of the mediation agreements that the Trump administration lists in its case for Trump as a “president of peace” is the recent ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Somehow Trump fails to mention that that ceasefire came after the U.S. and Israel bombed Iran. Moreover, those attacks were carried out during negotiations to secure a diplomatic agreement that would’ve brought more safety to the Middle East and served the end of nuclear nonproliferation. A nuclear deal with Iran now remains further from reach than ever.

And on two of the biggest U.S. foreign policy issues of the day, Trump should not be asking for a pat on the back. He should be asking for forgiveness. He has supported Israel as it has killed civilians en masse in Gaza and effectively encouraged its ethnic cleansing project by talking about turning Gaza into an international beach resort. And while Trump’s efforts to help end Russia’s war on Ukraine is, in the abstract, a good thing, his extraordinary deference toward Russia during negotiations reflects a pursuit of an imperialistic, autocrat-friendly “peace” in the global order.

“Trump’s desire to win the Nobel Peace Prize has become something of a joke in foreign capitals,” a former British diplomat told NBC News. “His claims to Canada, Panama, Greenland, etc., as well as tariff wars and the assaults on America’s democratic institutions, incline governments in the opposite direction.”

Trump’s demand for a Nobel Peace Prize while causing global chaos and backing imperialism is yet another stroke of Orwellian audacity from our president. I hope the committee does not repeat its past mistake of pre-emptively awarding one to a U.S. president in an ill-conceived attempt at encouraging good behavior. At a time of rampant corruption and authoritarianism, it’s important for global institutions to protect their credibility and do what they can to stand for the idea of a truly peaceful and just world order.

This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Tim Walz's Response To Trump's Depressing Smithsonian Audit Plans Is Going Viral

Matt Stopera
Sun, August 17, 2025 
HUFFPOST


ABC News reports that Donald Trump is conducting a review of the Smithsonian Museum to make sure it aligns with his views of American History.

x.com
ABC News reports that Donald Trump is conducting a review of the Smithsonian Museum to make sure it aligns with his views of American History.


Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said,

x.com
Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said, "The Smithsonian is supposed to be a global symbol of American strength, culture and prestige. A place for families and children to celebrate American history and greatness. Instead, the exhibits have clearly been taken over by leftwing activists who have used the Smithsonian as yet one platform to endlessly bash America and rewrite / erase our magnificent story. These activists have obscenely defaced this beloved institution. The Trump Administration will proudly and diligently restore the patriotic glory of America and ensure the Smithsonian is a place that once more inspires love and devotion to this nation, especially among our youngest citizens."

Needless to say, people aren't comfortable with this audit!

x.com
Needless to say, people aren't comfortable with this audit!

And now, Tim Walz's response to the news is going viral:


x.com
And now, Tim Walz's response to the news is going viral: "If you're trying to erase history, you're on the wrong side of it."


Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz
"Is he going to add planes to the revolutionary war section?" one person asked.


Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz
"…later this week he plans on personally surveying the museum and will be placing a McDonald’s golden arches 'M' sticker of approval on every piece and or exhibit he approves of…" another person joked.

And this is my personal favorite:

Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz
And this is my personal favorite: "I'm excited for the interactive drinking bleach exhibit."

As this person said


Tim Walz/Facebook: govwalz
As this person said, "He must have read 1984 and got inspired."


I guess we'll have to see what passes the Trump American history test.

Andrew Harnik / Getty Images
I guess we'll have to see what passes the Trump American history test.
British horseracing to go on strike in protest against rise in betting taxes


Associated Press
Sun, August 17, 2025 


LONDON (AP) — British horseracing will stage an unprecedented one-day strike on Sept. 10 to protest a proposed rise in taxes on race betting.

The four scheduled meetings that day — at Carlisle, Uttoxeter, Lingfield and Kempton — will not take place after agreements between the owners of the courses and the British Horseracing Authority, making it the first time the sport in Britain has voluntarily refused to race in modern history.

The BHA set up the “Axe the Racing Tax” campaign in response to proposals to replace the existing three-tax structure of online gambling duties with a single tax, with fears the current 15% duty on racing could be increased to the 21% levied on games of chance

Brant Dunshea, chief executive at the British Horseracing Authority, said the strike intends to “highlight to (the) government the serious consequences of the treasury’s tax proposals which threaten the very future of our sport.”

“British racing is already in a precarious financial position and research has shown that a tax rise on racing could be catastrophic for the sport and the thousands of jobs that rely on it in towns and communities across the country," Dunshea said.

“This is the first time that British racing has chosen not to race due to government proposals. We haven’t taken this decision lightly but in doing so we are urging the government to rethink this tax proposal to protect the future of our sport which is a cherished part of Britain’s heritage and culture."

The British government said it was bringing the “treatment of online betting in line with other forms of online gambling to cut down bureaucracy.”

“It is not about increasing or decreasing rates,” the government said, "and we welcome views from all stakeholders including businesses, trade bodies, the third sector and individuals.”

___

AP sports: https://apnews.com/sports
With the Bayeux Tapestry that tells of their long rivalry, France and Britain are making nice

NICOLAS GARRIGA and JOHN LEICESTER
Sun, August 17, 2025 


FILE - This photo taken Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2019, shows a detail of the 11th century Bayeux tapestry chronicling the Norman conquest of England, in Bayeux, Normandy, France. (AP Photo/Kamil Zihnioglu, File)ASSOCIATED PRESS

FILE - This photo taken Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2019 shows the 11th century Bayeux tapestry chronicling the Norman conquest of England, in Bayeux, Normandy, France. (AP Photo/Kamil Zihnioglu, File)ASSOCIATED PRESS

BAYEUX, France (AP) — For centuries, the storytelling masterpiece has been a source of wonder and fascination. In vivid and gruesome detail, the 70-meter (230-foot) embroidered cloth recounts how a fierce duke from France conquered England in 1066, reshaping British and European history.

The Bayeux Tapestry, with its scenes of sword-wielding knights in ferocious combat and King Harold of England's famous death, pierced by an arrow to an eye, has since the 11th century served as a sobering parable of military might, vengeance, betrayal and the complexity of Anglo-French relations, long seeped with blood and rivalry but also affection and cooperation.

Now, the medieval forerunner of today's comic strips, commissioned as propaganda for the Normandy duke William known as “the Conqueror” after he took the English throne from Harold, is being readied for a new narrative mission.

A homecoming for the tapestry

Next year, the fragile artistic and historic treasure will be gingerly transported from its museum in Bayeux, Normandy, to star in a blockbuster exhibition in London's British Museum, from September 2026 to July 2027.

Its first U.K. outing in almost 1,000 years will testify to the warming latest chapter in ties across the English Channel that chilled with the U.K.'s acrimonous departure from the European Union in 2020. The loan was announced in July when French President Emmanuel Macron became the first EU head of state to pay a state visit to the U.K. since Brexit.

Bayeux Museum curator Antoine Verney says the cross-Channel trip will be a home-coming of sorts for the tapestry, because historians widely believe that it was embroidered in England, using woolen threads on linen canvas, and because William's victory at the Battle of Hastings was such a major juncture in English history, seared into the U.K.'s collective consciousness.

“For the British, the date — the only date — that all of them know is 1066,” Verney said in an interview with The Associated Press.

A trip not without risks


Moving an artwork so unwieldy — made from nine pieces of linen fabric stitched together and showing 626 characters, 37 buildings, 41 ships and 202 horses and mules in a total of 58 scenes — is further complicated by its great age and the wear-and-tear of time.

“There is always a risk. The goal is for those risks to be as carefully calculated as possible,” said Verney, the curator.

Believed to have been commissioned by Bishop Odo, William the Conqueror’s half-brother, to decorate a new cathedral in Bayeux in 1077, the treasure is thought to have remained there, mostly stored in a wooden chest and almost unknown, for seven centuries, surviving the French Revolution, fires and other perils.

Since then, only twice is the embroidery known to have been exhibited outside of the Normandy city: Napoleon Bonaparte had it shown off in Paris' Louvre Museum from late 1803 to early 1804. During World War II, it was displayed again in the Louvre in late 1944, after Allied forces that had landed in Normandy on D-Day, June 6th, of that year had fought onward to Paris and liberated it.

The work, seen by more than 15 million visitors in its Bayeux museum since 1983, “has the unique characteristic of being both monumental and very fragile,” Verney said. “The textile fibers are 900 years old. So they have naturally degraded simply due to age. But at the same time, this is a work that has already traveled extensively and been handled a great deal.”

A renovated museum

During the treasure's stay in the U.K., its museum in Bayeux will be getting a major facelift costing tens of millions of euros (dollars). The doors will close to visitors from Sept. 1 this year, with reopening planned for October 2027, when the embroidery will be re-housed in a new building, encased on an inclined 70-meter long table that Verney said will totally transform the viewing experience.

How, exactly, the treasure will be transported to the U.K. isn't yet clear.

“The studies required to allow its transfer to London and its exhibition at the British Museum are not finished, are under discussion, and are being carried out between the two governments,” Verney said.

But he expressed confidence that it will be in safe hands.

“How can one imagine, in my view, that the British Museum would risk damaging, through the exhibition, this work that is a major element of a shared heritage?” he asked. “I don’t believe that the British could take risks that would endanger this major element of art history and of world heritage.”

___

Leicester reported from Paris.
Australia BlueScope Steel full-year profit tumbles 90% on North America impairment

Operations at BlueScope steelworks, Port Kembla · 

Reuters
Sun, August 17, 2025 

(Reuters) -Australia's BlueScope Steel reported a 90% drop in full-year profit on Monday, after logging an impairment charge for its coated products business and due to weak performance at its operations in North America.

The company's coated products business in its North American division recorded a loss in fiscal 2025, impacted by lower volumes and operational woes and an impairment charge of A$438.9 million.

The North America division's underlying earnings declined 45%, weighed down by weak performance at its North Star and Buildings and Coated Products North America operations.

The company posted net profit after tax of A$83.8 million ($54.6 million) for fiscal 2025, significantly lower than A$805.7 million reported in fiscal 2024.

On an underlying basis, the company's profit declined 51% to A$420.8 million, pulled down by price pressures, lower volumes and higher costs.

BlueScope declared a final dividend of 30 Australian cents per share, in line with last year.

($1 = 1.5361 Australian dollars)

(Reporting by John Biju in Bengaluru; Editing by Chris Reese and Tom Hogue)
ICE Arrests TikTok Influencer Who Documented Immigration Raids at Her Home on Livestream

An onlooker attempted to disrupt the detainment of Leidy Tatiana Mafla-Martinez by towing a police vehicle

Stephanie Kaloi
Sun, August 17, 2025


Police officers in riot gear monitor the crowd during an Anti-ICE demonstration in Los Angeles on August 8, 2025. The protest draws attention to controversial immigration enforcement policies and calls for the abolition of ICE (BENJAMIN HANSON/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images)More


Colombian TikTok influencer Leidy Tatiana Mafla-Martinez was taken into ICE custody while live streaming from her home in Los Angeles. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said Martinez was arrested in connection with a prior DUI.

Newsweek reported Martinez, who is well-known on TikTok for posting videos that document several ICE arrests, was filmed on Friday seated in her Tesla when agents opened her car door and pulled her onto the pavement. She also appeared to experience a medical event during the arrest, and at one point onlookers are heard demanding treatment for her.

The arrest was also briefly interrupted by a man who attempted to tow one of the police cars in the arrest.

“He mocked and videotaped ICE officers chasing after him,” McLaughlin also told Newsweek. “Secretary Noem has been clear: Anyone who seeks to impede law enforcement will be found and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

Martinez was initially transported to White Memorial Hospital and is currently being held in a detention center in downtown Los Angeles.

On Thursday, Los Angeles Rep. Jimmy Gomez accused ICE of staging an empty migrant detention center.

“One person was talking to the Mexican consulate who happened to be there, and the other person was just in the cell with their head down on a table or on the table or something. He was just kind of sitting there,” Gomez said of the center he visited recently.

Gomez also questioned why the center was so empty despite the numerous arrests made recently. Nearly 2,800 people have been taken into ICE custody since early June.

“They’ve been running raids, even over the weekend, and all of a sudden there’s no one there? That’s just completely bizarre,” he told MSNBC’s Jen Psaki.

Deported from US, these social media influencers are now monetizing their misfortune


Lauren Villagran, 
USA TODAY
Sun, August 17, 2025 


Deported and alone, Annie Garcia landed in Mexico with $40 in her pocket, a criminal record in the United States behind her and an unknown future ahead in a country she barely remembered.

Fast forward to the present, to a video shared with her more than half-a-million social media followers in August. Her hair blows in the wind as she speeds on a boat through an emerald sea. She tagged the clip: #LifeAfterDeportation.

Expelled from the United States, young Mexican immigrants like Garcia, 35, are documenting the aftermath of their deportation online. Their videos – raw grief over what they lost in America, surprise and gratitude for what they've found in Mexico – are rapidly gaining them tens of thousands of followers


At least a dozen of these deportees-turned-influencers, Garcia included, have started over in Mexico's west coast beach gem, Puerto Vallarta.


Social media influencer Annie Garcia, who goes by the handle @annigrcx on Instagram.

“If there’s one thing I wish my content could embody it's how much life there is on this side of the border," Garcia wrote June 15 on Instagram. "Our countries aren’t what they were 20 or 30 years ago when our parents left."
Returning to an unfamiliar 'home'

More than 70,000 Mexican nationals were deported from the United States to Mexico in the first six months of 2025, according to Mexico's Interior Ministry.

That's down from the more than 102,000 deported during the same six-month period in 2024, when people were being deported after crossing the border. Now, the people being deported are more likely to have built lives and families in the United States.

With President Donald Trump's aggressive mass deportation campaign underway, Francisco Hernández-Corona feared being detained.

So he self-deported to Mexico, accompanied by his husband. He started vlogging. The 30-something Harvard graduate and former Dreamer had been taken to the United States illegally as a boy, he explained on TikTok. Multiple attempts to legalize his status in the United States failed.

In June, he posted his migration – and self-deportation – stories online.

Between photos of golden sunsets and mouthwatering tacos, he posted in July: "Self-deporting isn't always freedom and joy and new adventures. Sometimes it's pain and nostalgia and anger and sadness. Sometimes you just miss the home that was."
'Life in the pueblo is not easy'

Mexico remains a country of extremes, where stunning vistas and limitless wealth can be found in big cities and beach resorts, while hardship and poverty often overwhelm smaller communities.

Olga Mijangos was deported from Las Vegas in on Christmas Eve 2024, two years after being charged with a DUI. She returned to the Oaxaca state pueblo she had left when she was 5.

Mijangos, 33, has tattoos on her neck, stylized brows and long lashes – all part of her Vegas style.


Social media influencer Olga Mijangos, who goes by @olgaschronicles23 on Instagram.

Back in her hometown, she began posting videos of goats being herded through the streets; the community rodeo; the traditional foods she began cooking. She posted videos from her first job: harvesting and cleaning cucumbers, earning 300 pesos a day, or $15.

"I clearly understand why my mother decided to take us when we were little. Life in the pueblo is not easy," she said in a video of the cucumber harvest. "There is hard-living. There is poverty."


Advertisement


Struggling to make ends meet for her family, including two children with her in Mexico and one in the United States, she moved to Puerto Vallarta where she met Garcia and Hernández-Corona.

They began forming an in-real-life community of deportees-turned-influencers and others who left the U.S. They meet up for dinner at least once a month, and they create content. In their videos, they're having fun, drinks, laughs. But they're also celebrating what binds them to each other and to their parents' migration stories before them: their capacity for reinvention, and their resilience.

"I'm very proud to be Mexican, and I'm learning to love a country I didn't get to grow up in, but I shouldn't have had to leave the home I knew to find peace and freedom," said Hernández-Corona, a clinical psychologist, in a July post on TikTok. "This isn't a blessing. It's resilience."
Spanish skills, savings and support all matter

A lot of their content has the draw of a classic American up-by-their-bootstraps success story, with a modern social media twist: from hardship to sponsorship.

But the reality is that deportees' experience of building a life in Mexico can vary dramatically, depending on their earning capacity, language and cultural skills, and other factors, said Israel Ibarra González, a professor of migration studies at Mexico's Colegio de la Frontera Norte university.

Deportees with savings in U.S. dollars and a college degree, those who speak Spanish and have supportive relatives in Mexico, may have an easier time than those who don't, he said.

Others may face life-threatening risks upon their return, from the violence of organized crime to political persecution or death threats.

"However much violence they've lived with in the United States, it's not the same as going back to a war zone," Ibarra González said, referring to certain Mexican states where drug cartels are actively battling for territorial control.

Wherever they land – with the exception of some cosmopolitan cities – deported Mexicans have faced local prejudices, too. They've often been viewed as criminals, or their deportations as a failure.

"Did I feel a lot of judgment? Absolutely," Mijangos said of her return to Oaxaca. "Even though it’s my roots, I basically came from a different world. I have tattoos. I lived my life a certain way that they don’t. I could feel people talking."

But friends back home in Vegas, and new friends in Mexico, started encouraging her to share her deportation journey. It took her a few weeks to work up the courage. She posted a video of sending her U.S. citizen son to a Mexican school.

It racked up nearly 14 million views and 2 million "likes" on TikTok, she said. Suddenly, TikTok was asking if she wanted to join the app's content creators rewards program.
'Your criminal record doesn't follow you'

By taking their stories online, deported content creators say they are dismantling longstanding taboos around deportation in Mexico, shining a light on their experiences as Mexicans who didn't grow up in Mexico, and on their past mistakes.

Garcia speaks openly on her social media about the financial crimes she committed in her 20s, for which she was charged and convicted, and that ultimately led to her deportation.


Social media influencer Annie Garcia spray paints the word "Dreamer" on a wall in Mexico.

She migrated to the United States when she was 4 years old, "out of necessity," she said. Her mother married an American citizen in Salt Lake City, Utah, and she and her mother both became legal permanent residents.

But when Garcia began acting out as a child, the state intervened. "I was taken from my mother at the age of 12 because I had behavioral issues," she told USA TODAY. "I was separated from my family, and I grew up with other juveniles with behavior (problems)."

As a young single mother, she would steal from her employers when she couldn't pay the bills, she said.

In Mexico she found a clean slate. "Your criminal record doesn't follow you," once you've paid your debt to society in the United States, Garcia tells her followers. "You can pursue higher education. Any debts you had in the U.S. do not follow you here."

As Trump's immigration crackdown widens, Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo has been publicly offering moral support to Mexicans facing deportation. She has called them "heroes and heroines" who "have contributed to the United States their entire lives."

"We're going to keep defending our brothers and sisters there," she said in a June 25 news conference.

'Maybe … things will change'

Garcia's social media accounts have grown so popular that she's earning a living, in part, from content creation. She is doing research on reintegration after deportation for an American university. And she has "tunnel vision," she said, on completing a law degree in Mexico.

The pain of her deportation, and the losses it brought with it, are mostly in the past. Except when she catches news of the immigration raids in the United States.

The memories of her detention, and her separation from her five children, including an infant, remain fresh. It took Garcia more than a year after her 2017 deportation to win custody of her children, to bring them to Mexico.

"It’s very, very triggering to me to see what’s going on up there," she said. "It’s a bittersweet feeling. I feel safe. I feel relief. We’re here. It doesn’t affect us any more. But it feels heartbreaking to see other families living through it.

"When I first started sharing my story my idea was, 'Maybe if I talk about this, things will change'" in the United States, she said.

She kept at it, despite facing hate and trolls online. She kept posting, even after losing two jobs in Mexico for openly discussing her deportation and criminal past on social media.

She kept sharing, thinking, she said: "This is what is going to change things one day: us putting our stories out there."

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Deported from US, these influencers are monetizing their misfortune
Qantas fined $58 million over illegally sacking 1,800 workers during pandemic


Reuters
Sun, August 17, 2025 

SYDNEY (Reuters) -Qantas Airways, Australia’s largest airline, has been fined A$90 million ($58.64 million) for illegally sacking 1,800 ground staff and replacing them with contractors during the COVID-19 pandemic, a court ruled on Monday.

In imposing a penalty close to the maximum available for breaching Australia's workplace laws, Federal Court of Australia Judge Michael Lee said it was to ensure it “could not be perceived as anything like the cost of doing business”.

“My present focus is on achieving real deterrence (including general deterrence to large public companies which might be tempted to ‘get away’ with contravening conduct because the rewards may outweigh the downside risk of effective remedial responses,” Lee said in a summary judgment.

He said A$50 million of the penalty would be paid to the Transport Workers' Union, which brought the case on behalf of the 1,820 staff fired by Qantas during the pandemic.

It comes around nine months after Qantas and the Union agreed on a A$120 million settlement for the sacked workers.

Qantas shares were down 0.13% in early trade.

($1 = 1.5349 Australian dollars)

(Reporting by Christine Chen in Sydney; Editing by Michael Perry)

INDIA


Maharashtra: Cane-Cutting Women are Healthcare Lifelines for Migrant Communities



Abhijeet Gurjar 





In drought-hit Marathwada, women trained as Arogya Sakhis are providing first aid and medical support to thousands of migrant families left behind by the public health system.


The migrant women cane cutting labour workers working in the western part of the Maharashtra state. They have to cut and tie the cane and carry on head to the tractor in harsh conditions (Photo - Abhijeet Gurjar, 101Reporters)

Beed, Maharashtra: “Many women use chumbal, the cloth we tie on our heads to carry sugarcane, as a sanitary pad during our periods,” Sadhana Waghmare (32), a cane-cutting labourer from Maharashtra’s Beed district said. “While on the field, we have no time or safe place to wash or change clothes in the fields, so we continue using the same cloth. This causes itching, swelling and infections. Earlier, we had no one to share this with. Now, because of the Arogya Sakhis, at least someone listens and suggests solutions.”

In 2023, Waghmare was among 20 women trained under the Arogya Sakhi programme, a community health initiative for migrant cane-cutters in drought-prone Marathwada region. Every harvesting season, thousands of families migrate to work in the fields of western Maharashtra and beyond, with little access to healthcare.

The programme – run by Society for Promotion Participative Ecosystem Management (SOPPECOM) and Anusandhan Trust Sathi – was born out of the Covid-19 pandemic, when SOPPECOM distributed notebooks to migrant workers to track their injuries, illnesses and health expenses during the lockdown.

The data showed that basic health training for volunteers could help reduce medical emergencies.

Arogya Sakhis are trained to offer first aid and distribute non-prescription medicines from standardised kits, with supplies provided by the Beed Zilla Parishad. The kits include essentials like paracetamol, oral rehydration salts, antiseptic lotion and cotton dressings.

While the women work as volunteers, they receive a travel allowance of Rs 500 when applicable. To qualify, participants must have studied up to at least Class 7 and be literate. The initial seven-day training covered first aid, menstrual hygiene, and record-keeping, while subsequent batches received a condensed four-day version.

Though many early trainees were cane-cutters with limited education, support from trainers in Pune helped them overcome unfamiliar medical vocabulary. Over time, they gained confidence and began offering health support not just at field sites but also in their home villages.


Sadhana Waghmare, an Arogya Sakhi from Kathoda, showing her record book. She served more than 40 patients in remote migrant farms and returned around 20 patients in the 2024-25 season (Photo - Abhijeet Gurjar)


By the second year, the programme’s impact was visible. Volunteers were also representing their communities in Jana Aarogya Samitis or village health communities with the help of local grassroots groups like Mahila Ustod Sanghatana helped coordinate this outreach. “There were no health services at the migration sites,” said district convener Manisha Tokale. “We realised that if even one woman in each group was trained, she could help others and connect them to care when needed.”

Cycle of neglect

During the migration season, labourers shift in pairs called koyta, typically husband and wife, and are paid Rs 350 to Rs 400 per ton of sugarcane cut. They are expected to meet a daily target of two tons which helps them get Rs 800 a day per pair. And, taking even a single day off, including for medical reasons, invites a penalty of Rs 1,200 from contractors. As a result, many workers continue cutting cane while unwell.

“These contractors are least bothered about the workers’ health or rights,” Ashok Tangade, president of the Beed District Child Welfare Committee said. “The government says India is free of bonded labour, but sectors like sugarcane and brick kilns still practice bandhua majdoori. The contractor, farm owner and sugar factory are all responsible for providing medical facilities, but they shirk these responsibilities completely.”

As a result, Tangade said, labourers are squeezed from both ends: unable to afford medical care and punished if they try to access it. “They work through illness, risking long-term harm. They compromise on nutrition, healthcare, even their children’s education and vaccinations,” he added.

These labourers belong to Marathwada,  a drought-prone region in central Maharashtra, comprising seven districts. The region lies in the rain shadow of the Western Ghats. With poor irrigation and limited industrial development, farming here is usually restricted to a single, rain-fed crop each year. As a result, thousands of families migrate annually to western Maharashtra and to other states such as Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu for sugarcane-cutting work.

This pattern of migration began after the 1972 drought and has continued for over five decades. In many villages, the children of cane-cutters grow up expecting to follow the same path.

From Beed district alone, over 10 lakh people migrate for the harvest season each year. Of them, more than 3 lakh are women, according to civil society estimates.

A voice in the system

Over time, Arogya Sakhis have become important intermediaries between migrant women and the public health system, not just by treating symptoms, but by helping women articulate their needs and push for better access to care.

Volunteers like Waghmare and Kalpana Thorat have repeatedly raised the demand for sanitary pads at Jan Aarogya Samiti meetings, even if the response has been slow. “I have raised the sanitary pad issue with the Sarpanch before every migration season,” said Thorat, a cane-cutter from Pimpalwadi village. “He always promises, but we never receive anything. Even the ASHA worker in our Samiti could not help.”

Despite this, Thorat said she felt empowered to speak up. “It is a major issue for migrant women. I am glad I was able to bring it up in front of the Samiti, which includes the Sarpanch, Community Health Officers, Primary Healthcare Centre nurses, Anganwadi and ASHA workers, and SHG members.”

Her efforts are recognised by others in the community. “Every village should have someone like an Arogya Sakhi,” said Shahnaj Ajbuddin Sayyad, president of the self-help group in Pimpalwadi and a member of the Samiti. “I worked as a cane-cutter for 15 years. The ASHA worker gave us medicine sometimes, but her visits were irregular, and our work was unpredictable. With Arogya Sakhis we have a constant connection.”


The Arogya Sakhis are equipped with a medical kit with medicine, band aids, and other medical supplies (Photo - Abhijeet Gurjar, 101Reporters)


Bridging language and distance

Waghmare recalled the difficulty of seeking care in unfamiliar places during migration. “In Karnataka, my younger daughter was suffering from Unhali, a condition where you need to urinate frequently in summer,” she said. “For the first four hours at the clinic, we couldn’t explain the issue to the doctor, we didn’t speak Kannada, and the doctor didn’t understand Marathi. A translator from a nearby village finally helped.”

In another case, she said, an elderly woman from her village used to travel 10 km to Beed just to get medicine for fever. “Now, for the past two years, she doesn’t need to. She gets the medicines in the village itself,” Waghmare said.

The effectiveness of the Arogya Sakhi training becomes most evident during emergencies. “One fellow labourer’s leg was cut by a metal sheet,” said Thorat. “I was able to stop the bleeding with the first-aid kit. He later got eight stitches from the doctor.” The illustrated manuals and labelled kits, she said, helped her identify the correct medicine for each condition.

“The sharp sugarcane leaves and the koyta often cause hand injuries,” Thorat added. “The Band-Aid strips have been really useful. Paracetamol helps with period pain, otherwise, the contractors don’t allow rest during those days.”

Her work has extended beyond the fields into her village. “Recently, my grandson got a cut on his foot. We were planning to take him to a private clinic, but by evening my son called me. I dressed the wound, and it saved us money,” said Shantabai Pakhare, a 50-year-old villager from Pimpalwadi. “Kalpana has helped us many times, especially when the PHC is closed at night.”

The programme has also led to visible cost savings. “We used to spend Rs 25,000 during harvest season on medical expenses,” said Waghmare. “For the last two years, we’ve saved that money with the help of the Arogya Sakhi kit.”
 

During one migration, she said, she provided medicine to four tolis, about 40 to 50 people. After returning home, another 20 people from her village also benefited from the same kit, which contains paracetamol, Flura, Dome, cotton bandages, wool, Gentian violet antiseptic lotion and other over-the-counter medicines. “I can now treat fever, diarrhoea, dehydration and minor injuries, and do basic bandaging,” she said. “This has helped both my own toli and others at the migration site.”

Changemakers

Arogya Sakhi training hasn’t just improved healthcare access, it has helped cane-cutting women emerge as local health leaders. Many are now pushing for systemic change.

The Mahila Ustod Sanghatana demanded that cane-cutting workers be included in the Jan Aarogya Samiti during the October-April migration season, so healthcare support continues in their villages while they’re away. These demands were raised in women’s assemblies and later passed in Gram Sabhas.

In 2021, SOPPECOM began documenting the Arogya Sakhis’ work. By 2022, it encouraged women to seek representation in the Samitis. In 2023-24, the key demands included Samiti membership and identity cards for migrant women.

The Zilla Parishad initially resisted, citing budget constraints. But health advocates argued that representation would improve access to schemes, health camps and sanitation drives, and bring migrant women into the public health system.

Identity cards, to be issued by local bodies, would formally recognise cane cutters and help them access aid during migration. Signature campaigns and follow-ups were carried out with the Chief Minister’s Office and the District Health Officer. Lists of trained volunteers linked to PHCs were submitted.

Despite early pushback, 28 Arogya Sakhis in Beed and 24 in Hingoli now work at the Gram Panchayat level. According to SOPPECOM, each migrant family saves an estimated Rs 25,000-Rs 30,000 per season on healthcare due to their work.

Ahead of the 2024–25 season, the Beed Zilla Parishad organised refresher training and distributed new kits, which the Arogya Sakhis say lasted them beyond the migration period.

“I’m hopeful that thousands of trained women can work as Fadavarchi ASHA and support the 3 lakh women who migrate from Beed,” said Manisha.

Now, the administration is planning a new initiative: Arogya Mitra. Each migrant group will have a trained volunteer to coordinate with ASHA and Anganwadi workers. Training is expected to begin in August.

Former Zilla Parishad Chief Executive Officer Aditya Jivane said such women can offer first-line care, promote nutrition and immunisation, and help link remote camps to the health system. 

Abhijeet Gurjar is a freelance journalist and a member of 101Reporters, a pan-India network of grassroots reporters. 

 INDIA

Defending Sovereignty in New Trade War


Shirin Akhter , C. Saratchand 







If the Indian government doesn’t opt for diversifying trade, and strategic relationships with the rest of the world, there’s danger of strategic autonomy being decisively undermined.


Image Courtesy:  Pexels

The responses in India to Donald Trump’s unilateral tariff impositions and demands regarding a trade agreement that solely favours US interests have been varied. Cosmopolitan neo-liberals (who often moonlight as neo-fascists and vice versa) tend to frame this response as a matter of policy choice (based on microeconomic cost-benefit analysis): should India continue buying discounted Russian oil (and defence equipment) and risk punitive US tariffs or give in to United States pressure to protect earnings from exports to the US?

Reducing this conflict to a neat calculation of short-term microeconomic costs and benefits obscures the concrete problem at hand. This is not merely about oil (and defence equipment) or tariffs. It is about whether India will retain even a semblance of sovereignty or submit to having a subordinate place under US hegemony.

Whether US tariffs on Indian exports to the US will reduce India's export earnings depends on whether there are alternative suppliers of the commodities in question. If there are no alternative suppliers who can outcompete Indian firms post-tariff, and if the demand for these commodities is relatively inelastic, then India's export earnings from the US will not fall post-tariff. However, if there are alternative suppliers who can outcompete Indian firms post-tariff, then India's export earnings from the US will fall post-tariff.

While higher US duties could erode export earnings to some extent, Indian firms, if supported credibly by the Indian government, can diversify their export destinations to locations other than the US. Currently, over one-fifth of India's exports go to the US.

This trade diversification will require, as a necessary condition, the integration of Indian firms into global production networks in which Chinese firms too are involved. In this regard, it needs to be mentioned that all other BRICS countries have initiated steps in the direction of trade diversification.

The US government is able to wield these threats because of structural vulnerabilities in India’s position in the global economy that owe significantly to the Indian government's strategic short-sightedness. Almost all foreign trade is US dollar-denominated. Among the BRICS countries, the current Indian government has perhaps been the most reluctant to participate in the efforts by BRICS to further de-dollarisation.

Calls to treat the present conjuncture as “another 1991 moment” and push through further sweeping neo-liberal polices betray either wilful amnesia or ideological complicity. The 1991 neo-liberal reforms deepened the country’s dependence on global capital, eroded labour protections, and hollowed out domestic industry in favour of import dependence and speculative flows.

To present further dismantling of land and labour safeguards, or deepening integration into neoliberal trade regimes, as a route to “sovereignty” is to misrepresent the very roots of India’s current strategic vulnerability. Far from insulating India from US coercion, such reforms would lock the economy even more tightly into the structures of US-centred international finance capital and leave working people more exposed to global shocks.

All this creates a leverage multiplier that allows the US government to penalise any policy move by India that it dislikes (at little cost to itself)—from energy or defence partnerships with Russia or Iran or Venezuela to participation in BRICS initiatives to trading in local currencies.

Financial coercion through secondary sanctions, exclusion from US dollar payment systems, or restrictions on correspondent banking would hit far harder than tariffs. By demanding an end to local currency trade, Washington seeks to preserve US dollar hegemony—the monetary foundation of its geopolitical power. India's interests do not lie in the preservation of US dollar hegemony.

If the current Indian government, however, does not opt for this route of diversifying trade, financial and strategic relationships with the rest of the world, then there arises the clear and present danger of India's (already shaky) strategic autonomy being decisively undermined.

Apart from the trade concessions, the deeper danger lies in the permanent concessions the US government seeks through a binding unequal trade agreement. These include intellectual property rules that extend pharmaceutical product (as opposed to process) patents and block compulsory licensing; digital governance provisions that mandate unrestricted one-way data flows and protect source code secrecy to the detriment of India; agricultural concessions opening the door to genetically modified imports and undermining the system of minimum support prices and the public distribution system, and therefore food security and food sovereignty to the detriment of peasants and workers; and procurement rules privileging US firms over domestic industry. Such setbacks, due to capitulation to US hegemony, will permanently shrink India’s policy space and disproportionately impact the working people.

Framing the oil trade question, for instance, as a choice between Russia and alternative suppliers to avoid tariffs ignores a number of issues.

First, there is the long-term solution of accelerating investment in renewable energy and modernising the national grid to gradually end fossil fuel use in a planned manner.

Second, India's agriculture must not become a playground for international corporate agribusiness. If that happens, then to begin with, Indian agricultural land will not only be (directly and indirectly) controlled by international corporate agribusiness, but the resultant increase in labour-displacing technical change will further swell the reserve army of labour.

Besides, when land use and crop composition change in response to metropolitan demand, then, as argued previously, food security and food sovereignty will be decisively undermined, as was the case during the colonial stage of the capitalist system.

The cosmopolitan neo-liberals, as expected, are claiming that the unilateral imposition of secondary sanctions by the US government is actually a golden opportunity to revive the infamous Three Farm Laws that the current Indian government was compelled to withdraw after a protracted struggle of peasants and workers. The democratic movement must exert all its powers to ensure that this hope of the cosmopolitan neo-liberals is thwarted in toto.

Why is the US government using these unilateral secondary sanctions on countries such as India? To begin with, the armed forces of the Zelensky administration in Ukraine are undergoing a process of slow collapse that is accelerating.

The US government, which is the curator of the Zelensky administration, is worried that a large-scale political and military collapse of the Zelensky administration will be an irredeemable strategic setback. This move to impose unilateral secondary sanctions is an act of strategic desperation.

Moreover, while seeking to compel India to cut ties with Russia, the US and EU continue importing Russian commodities, such as uranium and fertilisers besides oil and natural gas. In other words, even while seeking to hurt India, the US government is not willing to make even a show of shouldering even a bit of pain. Besides, the US government is hoping to obtain a face-saving way out of this desperate strategic impasse in Ukraine by entering into direct negotiations with the Russian government.

In case the current Indian government does succumb to US pressure and strategically distances itself from Russia, then an unprecedented strategic setback to Indian foreign policy will emerge. The denizens of the current Indian government must remember that the net consequences of China and Russia not working with India cannot be counterbalanced by the current Indian government's acquiescence to US hegemony for at least two reasons.

First, as the US government is learning from the trajectory of the conflict in Ukraine, dual containment of China and Russia is not possible, nor is a wedge strategy likely to succeed.

Second, as past experience demonstrates time and again, strategic proximity to the US, and therefore strategic detachment from BRICS, is a recipe for further inroads into Indian strategic autonomy.

Defending sovereignty requires more than rejecting specific US government diktats. It means dismantling the underlying conditions that make such demands possible, as previously discussed. This involves expanding BRICS local currency payment systems and bilateral currency swaps; building strategic gold reserves; and reintroducing capital controls to protect domestic policy autonomy from the hegemony of US-centred international finance capital. In this light, BRICS+ must evolve into a platform for international initiatives such as joint energy security, a common digital governance framework, and a pharmaceutical patent pool, while creating multilateral insurance and legal shields against unilateral sanctions.

Resisting tariffs while leaving US dollar dependence and export concentration intact will only invite the next round of strategic coercion by the US government. Defending existing policy space without building new economic structures will keep India strategically vulnerable.

The overcoming of this strategic vulnerability requires the reiteration of two elementary but relevant propositions. First, the foreign policy imperatives of no great power will coincide with the national interests of India. Second, and therefore, it is at best impetuosity to presume that one great power will be more favourably inclined towards Indian national interests when compared to others.

If the current Indian government is unwilling to resist the US government demand for abandonment of strategic autonomy, then it is time for the democratic movement to take the lead in the struggle to reassert India's sovereignty.

Shirin Akhter is Associate Professor at Zakir Husain Delhi College, University of Delhi. C Saratchand is Professor, Department of Economics, Satyawati College, University of Delhi. The views are personal.


Strategic Altruism is Dead: Why India Can no Longer Fantasise About its US Alliance



Keshav Bedi 







India’s future demands resolve, realism, and the discipline to ground its power in its own achievements—not in the borrowed light of another’s convenience.



Image Courtesy: Flickr

There was a time—not far in the past—when the American approach to India was marked not by a ledger of immediate returns but by what authors Robert Blackwill and Ashley Tellis astutely called “strategic altruism”. This was a rare fiction of international diplomacy: Washington, unsettled by China’s rise, wagered that a strong, independent India would help sustain the balance of power in Asia, regardless of whether New Delhi followed Washington’s script in detail.

For two decades, America was content to see India rise—even if India’s markets were protected, its voting record contrarian, and its leaders notoriously reluctant to play “junior partner”. America’s chief demand was that India should strengthen itself and, in so doing, buttress the security of the “liberal international order.”

One could almost have mistaken this for American magnanimity, a virtue seldom seen among empires. All that—like so much else—has now vanished beneath the sharp blade of America’s new whim. President Donald Trump’s tariffs represent a doctrinal break, from strategic patience to strategic impatience, and from magnanimity to a crude arithmetic of “reciprocity.” The result is that today, India’s back is up against the wall, its room for manoeuvre is growing worryingly narrow.

The facts are less forgiving than the dominant rhetoric. America remains India’s largest single export market, accounting for 18% of total merchandise exports, amounting to $86.5 billion in a $4.3 trillion economy. The next largest partner, the United Arab Emirates, takes in less than half that volume.

To dismiss this relationship as a mere trifle — “just 2% of GDP”— is to ignore that India’s export engine sustains nearly 90 million jobs, a significant portion owing to trade with the US, not least of all in labour-intensive industries, such as textiles, apparel, gems and jewellery etc.—all first in line for tariff pain.

These are not abstract numbers: these represent millions at risk of economic displacement, with over half of India’s US- bound exports by value imperilled by the latest American measures. For all the talk of a “global partnership,” the relationship is now reduced to its transactional core.

The American logic is clear: the age of strategic altruism is over. India is now expected simply to “give without asking what we are getting in return”—an argument so often made by pro-US strategists in Delhi. Yet, nothing in Trump years indicates that such obeisance is rewarded: not in investments, nor in diplomatic concessions, nor tangible economic benefit.

A 50% tariff has shattered India’s competitive advantage overnight. Exemptions have been rendered nearly meaningless by the persistent threat of Section 232 investigations—an endless game with rules that shift at the drop of a presidential tweet. In sectors, such as electronics and semiconductors, American scrutiny makes long-term planning almost futile.

If India could claim its place among the world’s leading economic innovators, matters might be different. But the reality is stark. After a decade of stable governance and grand declarations of “Make in India,” our Research & Development and innovation landscape remains listless. High-technology exports, patents, advanced manufacturing—all lag markedly behind China, Korea, and even Vietnam.

Bereft of genuine dynamism, we substitute summits and new corridors for real progress; our research parks brim with numbers rather than results.

There is no clearer illustration of India’s position than the tale of Russian oil. Discounted Urals crude, paraded as a diplomatic victory, brought scant relief to Indian households while delivering windfall profits to a select few. The Ambani Group emerges as among the largest beneficiaries, with contracts inflating corporate balance sheet while pump prices remain indexed to world markets. The 25% US penalty now slapped due to Russian oil purchases underlines the constraints of one-dimensional “victories”—and if cheap oil was a diplomatic coup, why is punishment not counted as a diplomatic blunder?

The lesson is simple: the comfort of great power friendship proves evanescent when pitted against another’s calculations. One must ask, then, if India’s famed “strategic autonomy” was more valuable than admitted by India’s power brokers.

Now, India stands wedged between an American administration conjuring up tactical manoeuvres in place of norms and a Chinese neighbour whose agenda is anything but altruistic. We cannot afford illusions; alliances based on sentiment or showmanship are no substitute for hard, predictable rules. Even as trade with China overtakes that with the US, Beijing, however unpalatable, offers a kind of predictability—an unimpressive virtue, perhaps, but of real value in a turbulent world.

The years have made one lesson clear: wishful thinking makes a poor foundation for strategy. Strategic altruism was always contingent on another’s calculation of advantage— a fact mistaken far too often for selfless friendship. Today, India’s export base, its jobs, and its so-called diplomatic triumphs stand exposed to the cold winds of global reality. Our lack of innovation, reliance on incremental reforms, and reluctance to confront our dependence have left us with precious few options.

For a country once celebrated for the independence of its judgment, there is little dignity in surrendering to another's volatile tactics. If the American embrace has grown conditional, if fortunes can pivot on a stroke of foreign pen, then sentiment must yield to sobriety. The age of comfort is over, and with it, the space for self-deception. India’s future now demands resolve, realism, and the discipline to ground its power in its own achievements—not in the borrowed light of another’s convenience.

The writer has a background in economics from Jamia Millia Islamia University and analytics from Delhi School of Economics. He runs an Instagram page and YouTube channel on economics. The views are personal.