Showing posts sorted by date for query AETHYR. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query AETHYR. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Saturday, March 16, 2024

BEEN SAYING THIS FOR YEARS

New research suggests that our universe has no dark matter


The current theoretical model for the composition of the universe is that it’s made of ‘normal matter,’ ‘dark energy’ and ‘dark matter.’ A new uOttawa study challenges this




UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA

New research suggests that our universe has no dark matter 

IMAGE: 

“THE STUDY'S FINDINGS CONFIRM THAT THE UNIVERSE DOES NOT REQUIRE DARK MATTER TO EXIST”

RAJENDRA GUPTA

— PHYSICS PROFESSOR AT THE FACULTY OF SCIENCE, UOTTAWA

view more 

CREDIT: UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA




The current theoretical model for the composition of the universe is that it’s made of ‘normal matter,’ ‘dark energy’ and ‘dark matter.’ A new uOttawa study challenges this.

A University of Ottawa study published today challenges the current model of the universe by showing that, in fact, it has no room for dark matter.

In cosmology, the term “dark matter” describes all that appears not to interact with light or the electromagnetic field, or that can only be explained through gravitational force. We can’t see it, nor do we know what it’s made of, but it helps us understand how galaxies, planets and stars behave.

Rajendra Gupta, a physics professor at the Faculty of Science, used a combination of the covarying coupling constants (CCC) and “tired light” (TL) theories (the CCC+TL model) to reach this conclusion. This model combines two ideas — about how the forces of nature decrease over cosmic time and about light losing energy when it travels a long distance. It’s been tested and has been shown to match up with several observations, such as about how galaxies are spread out and how light from the early universe has evolved.

This discovery challenges the prevailing understanding of the universe, which suggests that roughly 27% of it is composed of dark matter and less than 5% of ordinary matter, remaining being the dark energy. 

Challenging the need for dark matter in the universe

“The study's findings confirm that our previous work (“JWST early Universe observations and ΛCDM cosmology”) about the age of the universe being 26.7billionyears has allowed us to discover that the universe does not require dark matter to exist,” explains Gupta. “In standard cosmology, the accelerated expansion of the universe is said to be caused by dark energy but is in fact due to the weakening forces of nature as it expands, not due to dark energy.”

“Redshifts” refer to when light is shifted toward the red part of the spectrum. The researcher analyzed data from recent papers on the distribution of galaxies at low redshifts and the angular size of the sound horizon in the literature at high redshift.

“There are several papers that question the existence of dark matter, but mine is the first one, to my knowledge, that eliminates its cosmological existence while being consistent with key cosmological observations that we have had time to confirm,” says Gupta.

By challenging the need for dark matter in the universe and providing evidence for a new cosmological model, this study opens up new avenues for exploring the fundamental properties of the universe.

The study, Testing CCC+TL Cosmology with Observed Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Features,was published in the peer-reviewed Astrophysical Journal.

 

Saturday, July 01, 2023

Euclid space telescope blasts off to explore dark matter


SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket has launched the European Space Agency’s Euclid telescope from Florida. The extraordinary telescope is set to unravel the "dark" or unknown mysteries of the universe.















The Euclid's primary goal is to study dark matter and dark energy
Image: Malcolm Denemark/Florida Today/USA TODAY Network/IMAGO

The European Space Agency’s Euclid space telescope lifted off aboard a SpaceX rocket from Florida on Saturday.

The telescope, which successfully separated from the rocket about an hour after the launch, is set to explore the "dark" or unknown realms of the universe.

Flight controllers in Germany declared success less than an hour into the flight, applauding and shouting "Yes" after they received a signal from the telescope after it separated from the rocket.

"I'm so thrilled, I'm so excited to see now this mission up in space, knowing it is on its way," the European Space Agecy Director General Josef Aschbacher said from the launch site in Florida.

The Euclid telescope now sets off on a monthlong journey to its destination, known as the second Lagrange point (L2) of the solar orbit, where gravity from the sun and Earth balance the orbital motion of a satellite.



There are five so-called "Lagrange Points," according to NASA. L2 is nearly 1 million miles (1.6 million kilometers) away from Earth.

From L2, the telescope will survey galaxies as far away as 10 billion light years from Earth across an immense expanse of the sky beyond our own Milky Way galaxy.


The spacecraft, which weighs 2 tons, is also equipped with instruments designed to measure the intensity and spectrums of infrared light from those galaxies in a way that will precisely determine their distances.
 
Why exploring the "dark" side of the universe matters

The telescope is set to produce the largest and the most accurate map of the universe so far, including the distribution of galaxies spanning the last 10 billion years of cosmic time, explained Elsa Montagnon, the head of Mission Operations Division at NASA.

That gives scientists the ability to comprehensively study the evolution and composition of the universe, Montagnon added during a live broadcast of the launch.

The Euclid mission is set to unravel the mysteries of the dark energy, which together with dark matter comprises 95% of the cosmos, Montagnon said.

Visible stars and galaxies make up less than 5% of the universe, and the Euclid will allow scientists to study the universe as it is.

What to know about dark energy and dark matter

There are two highly important instruments within the telescope that will take images to allow scientists to study the two foundational components of the universe.

One is dark matter, which is an invisible form of matter that makes up most of the universe's mass and creates its underlying structure. Dark matter's gravity drives normal matter (gas and dust) to collect and build up into stars and galaxies.

The other is dark energy, an equally enigmatic force believed to explain the universe's expansion.

Other than that, dark energy is a complete mystery to scientists.

Roughly 68% of the universe is dark energy, while dark matter makes up about 27%. The rest, or everything else ever observed on Earth, adds up to less than 5% of the universe.

rm/wd (AFP, Reuters)



SEE 

BEFORE DARK MATTER OR DARK ENERGY THERE WAS ETHER  


LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Search results for DARK MATTER 



Europe’s space telescope to target universe’s dark mysteries

By AFP
Published July 1, 2023

The Euclid spacecraft, pictured before being sent to Florida, will blast off on a mission to find out more about the 'dark universe' - Copyright AFP/File Valery HACHE

Gianrigo Marletta, with Lucie Aubourg in Washington

Europe’s Euclid space telescope is scheduled to blast off Saturday on the first-ever mission aiming to shed light on two of the universe’s greatest mysteries: dark energy and dark matter.

The launch is planned from Cape Canaveral in Florida at 11:12 am local time (1512 GMT) on a Falcon 9 rocket of the US company SpaceX.

The European Space Agency was forced to turn to billionaire Elon Musk’s firm to launch the mission after Russia pulled its Soyuz rockets in response to sanctions over the war in Ukraine.

After a month-long journey through space, Euclid will join its fellow space telescope James Webb at a stable hovering spot around 1.5 million kilometers (more than 930,000 miles) from Earth called the second Lagrange Point.

From there, Euclid will chart the largest-ever map of the universe, encompassing up to two billion galaxies across more than a third of the sky.

By capturing light that has taken 10 billion years to reach Earth’s vicinity, the map will also offer a new view of the 13.8-billion-year-old universe’s history.

Scientists hope to use this information to address what the Euclid project manager Giuseppe Racca calls a “cosmic embarrassment”: that 95 percent of the universe remains unknown to humanity.

Around 70 percent is thought to be dark energy, the name given to the unknown force that is causing the universe to expand at an accelerated rate.

And 25 percent is dark matter, thought to bind the universe together and make up around 80 percent of its mass.

“Ever since we could see stars we’ve wondered, is the universe infinite? What is it made out of? How does it work?” NASA Euclid project scientist Michael Seiffert told AFP.

“It’s just absolutely amazing that we can take data and actually start to make even a little bit of progress on some of these questions.”

– ‘Dark detective’ –


Euclid consortium member Guadalupe Canas told a press conference that the two-tonne space telescope was a “dark detective” which can reveal more about both elements.

Euclid, which is 4.7 meters (15 feet) tall and 3.5 meters wide, will use two scientific instruments to map the sky.

Its visible light camera will let it measure the shape of galaxies, while its near infrared spectrometer and photometer will allow it to measure how far away they are.

So how will Euclid try to spot things that cannot be seen? By searching for their absence.

The light coming from billions of light years away is slightly distorted by the mass of visible and dark matter along the way, a phenomenon known as weak gravitational lensing.

“By subtracting the visible matter, we can calculate the presence of the dark matter which is in between,” Racca told AFP.

While this may not reveal the true nature of dark matter, scientists hope it will throw up new clues that will help track it down in the future.

For dark energy, French astrophysicist David Elbaz compared the expansion of the universe to blowing up a balloon with lines drawn on it.

By “seeing how fast it inflates,” scientists hope to measure the breath — or dark energy — making it expand.

– ‘Goldmine’ –

A major difference between Euclid and other space telescopes is its wide field of view, which takes in an area equivalent to two full moons.

Project scientist Rene Laureijs said that this wider view means Euclid will be able to “surf the sky and find exotic objects” like black holes that the Webb telescope can then investigate in greater detail.

Beyond dark energy and matter, Euclid’s map of the universe is expected to be a “goldmine for the whole field of astronomy,” said Yannick Mellier, head of the Euclid consortium.

Scientists hope Euclid’s data will help them learn more about the evolution of galaxies, black holes and more.

The first images are expected once scientific operations start in October, with major data releases planned for 2025, 2027 and 2030.

The 1.4 billion euro ($1.5 billion) mission is intended to run until 2029, but could last a little longer if all goes well.

burs-la/ia/bfm/leg

The Euclid telescope: On the trail of dark energy and matter

Esteban Pardo
DW
June 29, 2023

On July 1 a new telescope will begin mapping the distant universe in greater detail than ever seen before, improving our understanding of dark matter and dark energy.


The Euclid space telescope has optical and near-infrared detectors and will map the distribution and evolution of distant galaxies and dark matter.

You've probably heard of dark matter and dark energy, right? They sound like something straight out of a Star Wars movie. Terms like these can sound so foreign to us that we just don't bother thinking about them. That's what often happens in science. Getting our heads around some of its concepts can be very challenging — yes, I'm looking at you, quantum mechanics.

Unraveling these mysteries is one of the main goals of the new Euclid space telescope, which is set for launch on July 1 on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket in Cape Canaveral, Florida, USA. Its mission is to deepen our understanding of dark matter and dark energy. Euclid won't be able to answer the many questions that remain about the dark universe, but it will take a big step on the path to investigating two of its most intriguing components.

Ok, cool, but why should we care? Well, because ultimately Euclid's task is to explore some of the most profound and fundamental questions in cosmic history: How did the universe originate and what is it made of? What are the fundamental physical laws of the universe? Just take a second to pause, look up into the stars, and ask yourself these questions. Let the mind wander.
The building blocks of the universe

"Both dark matter in particular, but also dark energy, ultimately our existence traces back to those," Hans-Walter Rix, astronomer and director of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, in Heidelberg, Germany, told DW.

Dark matter and dark energy provided the right conditions for enough material to come together and form the stars, planets, galaxies, life, you and me. So understanding them is a step closer to understanding where we come from.

This is what makes the mission such an historic one. The Euclid telescope is led by the European Space Agency (ESA) with contributions from NASA. It took more than ten years of development, €1.4 billion and more than 3,500 scientists from 21 countries.

Euclid was originally planned to launch from a Russian Soyuz rocket in 2022, but Russia's invasion of Ukraine called for a change of plans.

This simulation from 2014 shows the distribution of galaxies in the universe and how a kind of web pattern emerges on a very large scale
.Image: Illustris Collaboration/AP Photo/picture alliance

The distant universe in unprecedented detail

Good news for the James Webb Space Telescope — it's getting company. Euclid, like the Webb, will also orbit the second Lagrange point (L2), 1.5 million kilometers (about 930,000 miles) from Earth. This point is a special place in space that moves in synchrony with the Earth around the sun.

The questions Euclid is tasked with addressing are pretty ambitious ones. The primary goal is to create a map. "It is the biggest and most accurate map of the universe, what we are basically aiming to do, that has never been done before," Guadalupe Cañas Herrera, a cosmologist working on the Euclid mission at ESA, told DW.

It takes its name from the Greek mathematician Euclid of Alexandria, who lived in the 3rd century BC and is known as the father of geometry — and the terror of high school students. The mission is named in his honor because better understanding of how everything is distributed in the universe tells us a lot about its geometry.

To make the map, Euclid is going to look at and measure billions of galaxies — yes, that's a thousand million — with extreme precision over a span of at least six years. Euclid is equipped with a visible light sensor and a near-infrared instrument capable of accurately measuring the distance of these galaxies.

"We are aiming to do something really challenging or something that is really ambitious, which is mapping a third of the full sky," said Cañas.
Euclid vs. the James Webb

One third of the sky is huge. Just take a look at the deep field image from the James Webb, down here.

This was the Webb's first picture. It pointed at a galaxy cluster in the center of the image that is so massive that it causes light from background objects to bend, like looking at space through a glass of water. That's why some objects appear distorted or stretched.
Image: NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Webb ERO Production Team

That was just a portion of the sky the size of a grain of sand on your fingertip on a stretched arm, so imagine how many stars and galaxies there are in a third of the whole sky, — and how many planets.

They are both space telescopes, but they have different purposes. Euclid's mirror is 1.2 m in diameter, compared to the Webb's huge 6.5 m. But the James Webb is like a precise pencil that sketches fine details, it looks at a very small portion of the sky with amazing detail. Euclid is more like a brush that can cover big patches of sky quickly.

But don't be fooled by Euclid's size, "Euclid will actually take a very high-resolution picture of the sky that will deliver gorgeous, gorgeous pictures," added Rix.

How the shape of the universe has changed over time

Euclid will be glimpsing into the past. That's because light takes a while to travel through the immensity of space. For example, it takes light eight minutes to travel from the sun to us. So, at larger distances, the farther we look, the earlier we see into our universe.

And these galaxies can be very far away, with their light taking up to 10 billion years to reach us. For reference, the age of the universe is around 13.8 billion years.

The goal here is to have the best understanding to date of where galaxies are in the distant universe up to 10 billion light-years away, but also how the shape of the distant universe has evolved over time.

But to better understand how this can help answer the previously mentioned questions and how all of these is related to dark matter and dark energy, we first need to talk about the dark universe.

The dark universe

Everything we know and see — bacteria, plants, animals, stars, planets, galaxies — is made of atoms that you can pinpoint in the periodic table. Astronomers refer to this as baryonic matter, in case you want to dazzle your cosmologist cousin.

But this visible matter is just a fraction of what the universe is made of — just 5%. The rest is dark matter and dark energy.

We might not know what they are, but there are many different lines of evidence that tell us that for sure they are there.

Dark matter seems to be keeping galaxies together, making the stars inside orbit faster than we would expect them to, and preventing galaxies from falling apart. It doesn't emit or absorb light, but we can also tell it's there by how seemingly empty regions of space bend the light of objects behind it — what's called gravitational lensing. And there's a lot of dark matter, around five times more than ordinary matter.

The idea of dark energy was first mooted in the 1990s, when scientists discovered that, contrary to what they thought, everything in the universe, on a larger scale, is moving apart from everything else at an accelerated rate. Just as your speed increases every second when you press down on the gas pedal, a very distant galaxy is moving away from us faster every second. Dark energy is what we call the unknown driving agent of this accelerating expansion.

A good analogy, and something you can try at home, is to grab a balloon that's just slightly inflated, draw a few dots with a marker on it and then start blowing it up. You'll see every dot getting further apart from all the other dots. That's exactly like what happens in our universe.

We don't experience this expansion in our daily life because our galaxy, for example, is tightly bound by gravity — mostly from dark matter.

This optical illusion happens due to gravitational lensing. There's so much mass on that bright red galaxy at the center that its gravity causes the light of a background blue galaxy to bend, what makes it appear distorted. It is possible to determine the amount of mass needed to have such a distortion and compare it with the mass we can see, if it doesn't add up, it's because there's dark matter too.
Image: ESA/Hubble & NASA


Euclid, dark matter and dark energy

"You are not just mapping where all the stuff you can see is, but we will also map where all the stuff we can't see is," Becky Smethurst, a Royal Astronomical Society Research Fellow at the University of Oxford, told DW.

Euclid will not only map the visible, "ordinary" matter, but also dark matter in the universe. A more detailed map of where dark matter is and how it is distributed can be a huge help in trying to better understand what dark matter is.

About that gravitational lensing mentioned earlier. This occurs when a gravitational field distorts light just like a lens, or a glass of water. The light of very far away galaxies gets distorted — often in a sausage shape. And depending on the level of distortion, gravitational lensing can indirectly tell us how much dark matter there is.

Well, Euclid is going to exploit the phenomenon to look into billions of distorted galaxies and infer the amount and distribution of dark matter there is, effectively creating a gigantic 3D map.

Mapping all these millions of galaxies requires very precise measurements of how distant they are. This is measured by the red shift. The expanding universe stretches light waves, and that can be measured. This way, Euclid is going to provide the most precise measurements ever taken of how the larger cosmic structures have changed over time, effectively tracing the effects of dark energy, which ultimately will tell us much more about what dark energy is and what it is not.

Wednesday, February 15, 2023

1st observational evidence linking black holes to dark energy

Peer-Reviewed Publication

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA

Supermassive black hole 

IMAGE: ARTIST'S IMPRESSION OF A SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE. COSMOLOGICAL COUPLING ALLOWS BLACK HOLES TO GROW IN MASS WITHOUT CONSUMING GAS OR STARS. view more 

CREDIT: UH MĀNOA

Searching through existing data spanning 9 billion years, a team of researchers led by scientists at University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa has uncovered the first evidence of "cosmological coupling" –a newly predicted phenomenon in Einstein's theory of gravity, possible only when black holes are placed inside an evolving universe.

Astrophysicists Duncan Farrah and Kevin Croker led this ambitious study, combining Hawaiʻi's expertise in galaxy evolution and gravity theory with the observation and analysis experience of researchers across nine countries to provide the first insight into what might exist inside real black holes.

"When LIGO heard the first pair of black holes merge in late 2015, everything changed," said Croker. "The signal was in excellent agreement with predictions on paper, but extending those predictions to millions, or billions of years?  Matching that model of black holes to our expanding universe? It wasn't at all clear how to do that."

The team has recently published two papers, one in The Astrophysical Journal and the other in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, that studied supermassive black holes at the hearts of ancient and dormant galaxies.

The first paper found that these black holes gain mass over billions of years in a way that can't easily be explained by standard galaxy and black hole processes, such as mergers or accretion of gas.

The second paper finds that the growth in mass of these black holes matches predictions for black holes that not only cosmologically couple, but also enclose vacuum energy—material that results from squeezing matter as much as possible without breaking Einstein's equations, thus avoiding a singularity.

With singularities absent, the paper then shows that the combined vacuum energy of black holes produced in the deaths of the universe's first stars agrees with the measured quantity of dark energy in our universe.

“We're really saying two things at once: that there's evidence the typical black hole solutions don't work for you on a long, long timescale, and we have the first proposed astrophysical source for dark energy,'' said Farrah, lead author of both papers.

“What that means, though, is not that other people haven't proposed sources for dark energy, but this is the first observational paper where we're not adding anything new to the universe as a source for dark energy: black holes in Einstein's theory of gravity are the dark energy.''

These new measurements, if supported by further evidence, will redefine our understanding of what a black hole is.

Nine billion years ago
In the first study, the team determined how to use existing measurements of black holes to search for cosmological coupling. 

"My interest in this project was really born from a general interest in trying to determine observational evidence that supports a model for black holes that works regardless of how long you look at them," Farrah said. "That's a very, very difficult thing to do in general, because black holes are incredibly small, they're incredibly difficult to observe directly, and they are a long, long way away." 

Black holes are also hard to observe over long timescales. Observations can be made over a few seconds, or tens of years at most—not enough time to detect how a black hole might change throughout the lifetime of the universe. To see how black holes change over a scale of billions of years is a bigger task. 

"You would have to identify a population of black holes and identify their distribution of mass billions of years ago. Then you would have to see the same population, or an ancestrally connected population, at present day and again be able to measure their mass," said co-author Gregory Tarlé, a physicist at University of Michigan. "That's a really difficult thing to do." 

Because galaxies can have life spans of billions of years, and most galaxies contain a supermassive black hole, the team realized that galaxies held the key, but choosing the right types of galaxy was essential. 

"There were many different behaviors for black holes in galaxies measured in the literature, and there wasn't really any consensus," said study co-author Sara Petty, a galaxy expert at NorthWest Research Associates. "We decided that by focusing only on black holes in passively evolving elliptical galaxies, we could help to sort this thing out." 

Elliptical galaxies are enormous and formed early. They are fossils of galaxy assembly. Astronomers believe them to be the final result of galaxy collisions, enormous in size with upwards of trillions of old stars. 

By looking at only elliptical galaxies with no recent activity, the team could argue that any changes in the galaxies' black hole masses couldn't easily be caused by other known processes. Using these populations, the team then examined how the mass of their central black holes changed throughout the past 9 billion years. 

If mass growth of black holes only occurred through accretion or merger, then the masses of these black holes would not be expected to change much at all. However if black holes gain mass by coupling to the expanding universe, then these passively evolving elliptical galaxies might reveal this phenomenon. 

The researchers found that the further back in time they looked, the smaller the black holes were in mass, relative to their masses today. These changes were big: The black holes were anywhere from 7 to 20 times larger today than they were 9 billion years ago—big enough that the researchers suspected cosmological coupling could be the culprit. 

Unlocking black holes 

In the second study, the team investigated whether the growth in black holes measured in the first study could be explained by cosmological coupling alone. 

"Here's a toy analogy. You can think of a coupled black hole like a rubber band, being stretched along with the universe as it expands," said Croker. "As it stretches, its energy increases. Einstein's E = mc2 tells you that mass and energy are proportional, so the black hole mass increases, too." 

How much the mass increases depends on the coupling strength, a variable the researchers call k

"The stiffer the rubber band, the harder it is to stretch, so the more energy when stretched. In a nutshell, that's k," Croker said. 

Because mass growth of black holes from cosmological coupling depends on the size of the universe, and the universe was smaller in the past, the black holes in the first study must be less massive by the correct amount in order for the cosmological coupling explanation to work. 

The team examined five different black hole populations in three different collections of elliptical galaxies, taken from when the universe was roughly one half and one third of its present size. In each comparison, they measured that k was nearly positive 3. 

The first observational link

In 2019, this value was predicted for black holes that contain vacuum energy, instead of a singularity by Croker, then a graduate student, and Joel Weiner, a UH Mānoa mathematics professor. 

The conclusion is profound: Croker and Weiner had already shown that if k is 3, then all black holes in the universe collectively contribute a nearly constant dark energy density, just like measurements of dark energy suggest. 

Black holes come from dead large stars, so if you know how many large stars you are making, you can estimate how many black holes you are making and how much they grow as a result of cosmological coupling. The team used the very latest measurements of the rate of earliest star formation provided by the James Webb Space Telescope and found that the numbers line up. 

According to the researchers, their studies provide a framework for theoretical physicists and astronomers to further test—and for the current generation of dark energy experiments such as the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument and the Dark Energy Survey—to shed light on the idea. 

"If confirmed this would be a remarkable result, pointing the way towards the next generation of black hole solutions," said Farrah.

Croker added, "This measurement, explaining why the universe is accelerating now, gives a beautiful glimpse into the real strength of Einstein's gravity. A chorus of tiny voices spread throughout the universe can work together to steer the entire cosmos. How cool is that?"

  

Researchers studied elliptical galaxies like Messier 59 to determine if the mass of their central black holes changed throughout the past 9 billion years. The smooth distribution of light is billions of stars.

CREDIT

ESA/Hubble & NASA, P. Cote


Caldwell 53 (NGC 3115) is most notable for the supermassive black hole that can be found at its center.

CREDIT

NASA, ESA, and J. Erwin (University of Alabama)

Measurement of coupling strength k by comparing black hole masses in 5 different collections of ancient elliptical galaxies to the black holes in elliptical galaxies today. Measurements cluster around k = 3, implying that black holes contain vacuum energy, instead of a singularity.

CREDIT

Farrah, et al. 2023 [the ApJ Letter]

Thursday, January 12, 2023

Nuclear reactor experiment rules out one dark matter hope

Pierre Celerier and Daniel Lawler
Thu, 12 January 2023 


It was an anomaly detected in the storm of a nuclear reactor so puzzling that physicists hoped it would shine a light on dark matter, one of the universe's greatest mysteries.

However new research has definitively ruled out that this strange measurement signalled the existence of a "sterile neutrino", a hypothetical particle that has long eluded scientists.

Neutrinos are sometimes called "ghost particles" because they barely interact with other matter -- around 100 trillion are estimated to pass through our bodies every second.

Since neutrinos were first theorised in 1930, scientists have been trying to nail down the properties of these shape-shifters, which are one of the most common particles in the universe.

They appear "when the nature of the nucleus of an atom has been changed", physicist David Lhuillier of France's Atomic Energy Commission told AFP.

That could happen when they come together in the furious fusion in the heart of stars like our Sun, or are broken apart in nuclear reactors, he said.

There are three confirmed flavours of neutrino: electron, muon and tau.

However physicists suspect there could be a fourth neutrino, dubbed "sterile" because it does not interact with ordinary matter at all.

In theory, it would only answer to gravity and not the fundamental force of weak interactions, which still hold sway over the other neutrinos.

The sterile neutrino has a place ready for it in theoretical physics, "but there has not yet been a clear demonstration that is exists," he added.

- Dark matter candidate -


So Lhuillier and the rest of the STEREO collaboration, which brings together French and German scientists, set out to find it.

Previous nuclear reactor measurements had found fewer neutrinos than the amount expected by theoretical models, a phenomenon dubbed the "reactor antineutrino anomaly".

It was suggested that the missing neutrinos had changed into the sterile kind, offering a rare chance to prove their existence.

To find out, the STEREO collaboration installed a dedicated detector a few metres away from a nuclear reactor used for research at the Laue–Langevin institute in Grenoble, France.

After four years of observing more than 100,000 neutrinos and two years analysing the data, the verdict was published in the journal Nature on Wednesday.

The anomaly "cannot be explained by sterile neutrinos," Lhuillier said.

But that "does not mean there are none in the universe", he added.

The experiment found that previous predictions of the amount of neutrinos being produced were incorrect.

But it was not a total loss, offering a much clearer picture of neutrinos emitted by nuclear reactors.

This could help not just with future research, but also for monitoring nuclear reactors.

Meanwhile, the search for the sterile neutrino continues. Particle accelerators, which smash atoms, could offer up new leads.

Despite the setback, interest could remain high because sterile neutrinos have been considered a suspect for dark matter, which makes up more than quarter of the universe but remains shrouded in mystery.

Like dark matter, the sterile neutrino does not interact with ordinary matter, making it incredibly difficult to observe.

"It would be a candidate which would explain why we see the effects of dark matter -- and why we cannot see dark matter," Lhuillier said.

LA REVUE GAUCHE - Left Comment: Search results for DARK MATTER 




Sunday, July 24, 2022

Halos and dark matter: A recipe for discovery

No, scientists still don’t know what dark matter is. But MSU scientists helped uncover new physics while looking for it.

Peer-Reviewed Publication

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY

EAST LANSING, Mich. – About three years ago, Wolfgang “Wolfi” Mittig and Yassid Ayyad went looking for the universe’s missing mass, better known as dark matter, in the heart of an atom.

Their expedition didn’t lead them to dark matter, but they still found something that had never been seen before, something that defied explanation. Well, at least an explanation that everyone could agree on. 

“It’s been something like a detective story,” said Mittig, a Hannah Distinguished Professor in Michigan State University’s Department of Physics and Astronomy and a faculty member at the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, or FRIB

“We started out looking for dark matter and we didn’t find it,” he said. “Instead, we found other things that have been challenging for theory to explain.”

So the team got back to work, doing more experiments, gathering more evidence to make their discovery make sense. Mittig, Ayyad and their colleagues bolstered their case at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, or NSCL, at Michigan State University. 

Working at NSCL, the team found a new path to their unexpected destination, which they detailed June 28 in the journal Physical Review Letters. In doing so, they also revealed interesting physics that’s afoot in the ultra-small quantum realm of subatomic particles. 

In particular, the team confirmed that when an atom’s core, or nucleus, is overstuffed with neutrons, it can still find a way to a more stable configuration by spitting out a proton instead.

Shot in the dark

Dark matter is one of the most famous things in the universe that we know the least about. For decades, scientists have known that the cosmos contains more mass than we can see based on the trajectories of stars and galaxies. 

For gravity to keep the celestial objects tethered to their paths, there had to be unseen mass and a lot of it — six times the amount of regular matter that we can observe, measure and characterize. Although scientists are convinced dark matter is out there, they have yet to find where and devise how to detect it directly.

“Finding dark matter is one of the major goals of physics,” said Ayyad,  a nuclear physics researcher at the Galician Institute of High Energy Physics, or IGFAE, of the University of Santiago de Compostela in Spain. 

Speaking in round numbers, scientists have launched about 100 experiments to try to illuminate what exactly dark matter is, Mittig said.

“None of them has succeeded after 20, 30, 40 years of research,” he said.

“But there was a theory, a very hypothetical idea, that you could observe dark matter with a very particular type of nucleus,” said Ayyad, who was previously a detector systems physicist at NSCL.

This theory centered on what it calls a dark decay. It posited that certain unstable nuclei, nuclei that naturally fall apart, could jettison dark matter as they crumbled.

So Ayyad, Mittig and their team designed an experiment that could look for a dark decay, knowing the odds were against them. But the gamble wasn’t as big as it sounds because probing exotic decays also lets researchers better understand the rules and structures of the nuclear and quantum worlds. 

The researchers had a good chance of discovering something new. The question was what that would be.

Help from a halo

When people imagine a nucleus, many may think of a lumpy ball made up of protons and neutrons, Ayyad said. But nuclei can take on strange shapes, including what are known as halo nuclei. 

Beryllium-11 is an example of a halo nuclei. It’s a form, or isotope, of the element beryllium that has four protons and seven neutrons in its nucleus. It keeps 10 of those 11 nuclear particles in a tight central cluster. But one neutron floats far away from that core, loosely bound to the rest of the nucleus, kind of like the moon ringing around the Earth, Ayyad said.

Beryllium-11 is also unstable. After a lifetime of about 13.8 seconds, it falls apart by what’s known as beta decay. One of its neutrons ejects an electron and becomes a proton. This transforms the nucleus into a stable form of the element boron with five protons and six neutrons, boron-11.

But according to that very hypothetical theory, if the neutron that decays is the one in the halo, beryllium-11 could go an entirely different route: It could undergo a dark decay.

In 2019, the researchers launched an experiment at Canada’s national particle accelerator facility, TRIUMF, looking for that very hypothetical decay. And they did find a decay with unexpectedly high probability, but it wasn’t a dark decay.

It looked like the beryllium-11’s loosely bound neutron was ejecting an electron like normal beta decay, yet the beryllium wasn’t following the known decay path to boron. 

The team hypothesized that the high probability of the decay could be explained if a state in boron-11 existed as a doorway to another decay, to beryllium-10 and a proton. For anyone keeping score, that meant the nucleus had once again become beryllium. Only now it had six neutrons instead of seven.

“This happens just because of the halo nucleus,” Ayyad said. “It’s a very exotic type of radioactivity. It was actually the first direct evidence of proton radioactivity from a neutron-rich nucleus.”

But science welcomes scrutiny and skepticism, and the team’s 2019 report was met with a healthy dose of both. That “doorway” state in boron-11 did not seem compatible with most theoretical models. Without a solid theory that made sense of what the team saw, different experts interpreted the team’s data differently and offered up other potential conclusions.

“We had a lot of long discussions,” Mittig said. “It was a good thing.”

As beneficial as the discussions were — and continue to be — Mittig and Ayyad knew they’d have to generate more evidence to support their results and hypothesis. They’d have to design new experiments.

The NSCL experiments

In the team’s 2019 experiment, TRIUMF generated a beam of beryllium-11 nuclei that the team directed into a detection chamber where researchers observed different possible decay routes. That included the beta decay to proton emission process that created beryllium-10.

For the new experiments, which took place in August 2021, the team’s idea was to essentially run the time-reversed reaction. That is, the researchers would start with beryllium-10 nuclei and add a proton. 

Collaborators in Switzerland created a source of beryllium-10, which has a half-life of 1.4 million years, that NSCL could then use to produce radioactive beams with new reaccelerator technology. The technology evaporated and injected the beryllium into an accelerator and made it possible for researchers to make a highly sensitive measurement.

When beryllium-10 absorbed a proton of the right energy, the nucleus entered the same excited state the researchers believed they discovered three years earlier. It would even spit the proton back out, which can be detected as signature of the process.

“The results of the two experiments are very compatible,” Ayyad said.

That wasn’t the only good news. Unbeknownst to the team, an independent group of scientists at Florida State University had devised another way to probe the 2019 result. Ayyad happened to attend a virtual conference where the Florida State team presented its preliminary results, and he was encouraged by what he saw. 

“I took a screenshot of the Zoom meeting and immediately sent it to Wolfi,” he said. “Then we reached out to the Florida State team and worked out a way to support each other.”

The two teams were in touch as they developed their reports, and both scientific publications now appear in the same issue of Physical Review Letters. And the new results are already generating a buzz in the community.

“The work is getting a lot of attention. Wolfi will visit Spain in a few weeks to talk about this,” Ayyad said.

An open case on open quantum systems

Part of the excitement is because the team’s work could provide a new case study for what are known as open quantum systems. It’s an intimidating name, but the concept can be thought of like the old adage, “nothing exists in a vacuum.”

Quantum physics has provided a framework to understand the incredibly tiny components of nature: atoms, molecules and much, much more. This understanding has advanced virtually every realm of physical science, including energy, chemistry and materials science.

Much of that framework, however, was developed considering simplified scenarios. The super small system of interest would be isolated in some way from the ocean of input provided by the world around it. In studying open quantum systems, physicists are venturing away from idealized scenarios and into the complexity of reality.

Open quantum systems are literally everywhere, but finding one that’s tractable enough to learn something from is challenging, especially in matters of the nucleus. Mittig and Ayyad saw potential in their loosely bound nuclei and they knew that NSCL, and now FRIB could help develop it.

NSCL, a National Science Foundation user facility that served the scientific community for decades, hosted the work of Mittig and Ayyad, which is the first published demonstration of the stand-alone reaccelerator technology. FRIB, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science user facility that officially launched on May 2, 2022 is where the work can continue in the future. 

“Open quantum systems are a general phenomenon, but they’re a new idea in nuclear physics,” Ayyad said. “And most of the theorists who are doing the work are at FRIB.”

But this detective story is still in its early chapters. To complete the case, researchers still need more data, more evidence to make full sense of what they’re seeing. That means Ayyad and Mittig are still doing what they do best and investigating.

“We’re going ahead and making new experiments,” said Mittig. “The theme through all of this is that it’s important to have good experiments with strong analysis.”

NSCL was a national user facility funded by the National Science Foundation, supporting the mission of the Nuclear Physics program in the NSF Physics Division.

Michigan State University (MSU) operates the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) as a user facility for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (DOE-SC), supporting the mission of the DOE-SC Office of Nuclear Physics. Hosting what is designed to be the most powerful heavy-ion accelerator, FRIB enables scientists to make discoveries about the properties of rare isotopes in order to better understand the physics of nuclei, nuclear astrophysics, fundamental interactions and applications for society, including in medicine, homeland security and industry.

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States and is working to address some of today’s most pressing challenges. For more information, visit energy.gov/science.

###

Michigan State University has been advancing the common good with uncommon will for more than 165 years. One of the world's leading research universities, MSU pushes the boundaries of discovery to make a better, safer, healthier world for all while providing life-changing opportunities to a diverse and inclusive academic community through more than 200 programs of study in 17 degree-granting colleges.

For MSU news on the Web, go to MSUToday. Follow MSU News on Twitter at twitter.com/MSUnews.