Sunday, May 04, 2025

 

Making virtual reality more accessible


New tool helps people with limited mobility play VR games like Beat Saber


University of Waterloo

A person in a wheelchair 

image: 

A person in a wheelchair wearing VR googles holding a controller leaning to avoid hazards in the VR game, Beat Saber.

view more 

Credit: University of Waterloo




A team of researchers from the University of Waterloo have created a method that makes virtual reality (VR) more accessible to people with mobility limitations. 

VR games like Beat Saber and Space Pirate Trainer usually require large and dramatic movements, such as raising one’s arms above the head or quickly side-stepping, which can be difficult or impossible for people who use wheelchairs or have limited mobility. To decrease these barriers, the researchers created MotionBlocks, a tool that lets users customize the game’s controls to fit the movements they can do.

“VR games are a lot of fun, and they’re important social spaces, especially for younger generations,” said Johann Wentzel, a recent PhD graduate in Computer Science and the lead author of the research.

“However, VR technology relies on a lot of large movements, which creates a barrier for people who can’t complete them. As soon as you have an application that isn’t accessible to everyone, you’re functionally excluding people with disabilities from these social spaces.” 

The team’s research took place over three phases. First, they invited 10 people with limited mobility to play games, share their frustrations and discuss possible solutions. The Waterloo team then used those testimonials to create MotionBlocks, which modifies how VR game platforms understand controller inputs.

 “It’s a bit like how traditional video games allow you to remap your controls, but our method is much more customizable and works in 3D space,” said Dr. Daniel Vogel, professor at the David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science at Waterloo. 

“You pick a simple shape and tune it so it captures the kind of movements you can make, like a small circular range of motion on a desk. Then, you configure the kind of 3D movement needed in the VR application, like big hemispherical arm swings for BeatSaber. MotionBlocks figures out how to translate your movements to the ones prescribed by the game.”  

Finally, the researchers tested MotionBlocks in collaboration with eight of the study’s participants. The feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with users reporting greater enjoyment, less fatigue, and a feeling that something was finally designed for people with disabilities.

The researchers have no current plans to sell or release MotionBlocks. Instead, they hope it will serve as a proof-of-concept for the VR industry. “I’d like to see a motion accessibility feature like this integrated into every VR system on the market,” Wentzel said. “Everyone deserves to be able to access VR in a way that works for their needs.” 


Diagram of motion primitives, geometric representations of movements in VR applications.

Pictures of control-space motion primitives: (a) Point primitives for 2D wrist rotation; (b) Plane primitives for 2D translation across the lap; (c) Sphere primitives for small 3D head and hand movements; (d) Right-hand sphere primitive mapped to a transfer-space primitive.

Credit

University of Waterloo

The research, “MotionBlocks: Modular Geometric Motion Remapping for More Accessible Upper Body Movement in Virtual Reality,” was presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, held in Japan from April 26 to May 1, 2025. 

 

ED visits for asthma spiked during 2023 Canadian wildfires



Canadian Medical Association Journal





New research in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal

 https://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.241506

 found an increase in asthma-related emergency department (ED) visits across Ontario following heavy smoke in early June 2023.

Canada experienced the most destructive wildfire season to date in 2023, with difficult-to-control fires across the country, including 29 mega-fires. One fire in Quebec, the province’s largest-ever wildfire, extended 1.2 million acres. Smoke from fires blanketed Canada and the United States, causing substantial damage, loss, and displacement.

“The unprecedented wildfires of 2023 are a wake-up call that wildfires — a persistent feature of Canada’s landscape — are becoming more intense and prolonged in a changing climate, affecting millions of people,” writes Dr. Hong Chen, a scientist with Health Canada, ICES, and Public Health Ontario, with coauthors.

In early June, Ontario had some of the world’s worst air quality from wildfires in the neighbouring province of Quebec. To understand the impact on health, researchers conducted a study, analyzing ED visits throughout the period from 8 weeks before a major wildfire event in early June until July 31, 2023, 4 weeks after a second fire that resulted in smoke. The analysis included data from 30 public health units in Ontario, representing 95% of the population. They found daily increases of 11% to 24% in asthma-related emergency department visits over the first episode, continuing up to 6 days after it ended. However, the second period of heavy smoke did not result in an increase in asthma-related ED visits.

“[P]ossible explanations [of the lack of effect during the second episode] include extended protective effects of preventive medications prescribed during the first episode, increased supply and use of medications (e.g., caregiver administration of maintenance medication to children), or improved behavioural adaptations to minimize exposure in keeping with air-quality advisories, such as staying indoors and using air filters.”

As wildfires are a major environmental risk factor around the world and are increasing in frequency and severity, the researchers note that more research is needed to better understand their impact on health and how to mitigate health effects.

“The biggest impact of wildfire smoke is on acute respiratory morbidity, where its effects are consistently greater than those of air pollution from other sources,” writes Dr. Sarah Henderson from the BC Centre for Disease Control, in a related commentary https://www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.250510. “Less clear associations have been shown for a much wider range of acute health outcomes, including cognition, diabetic control, and mental health, among many others.”

Dr. Henderson highlights that wildfire smoke frequently affects air quality in the west and calls for Canada to develop a consistent approach to reducing indoor and outdoor exposures.

Supreme Court Justice Gets Standing Ovation for Breaking Cover to Attack Trump

Tom Sanders
Fri, May 2, 2025 



Photo Illustration by Elizabeth Brockway/The Daily Beast/Getty/Reuters

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson received a standing ovation on Thursday after denouncing the Trump administration’s “relentless attacks” on federal judges, calling them a threat to the rule of law.

“ Across the nation, judges are facing increased threats of not only physical violence, but also professional retaliation just for doing our jobs,” Jackson told a conference of judges in Puerto Rico. “And the attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity.”

Although she did not mention Donald Trump by name, Jackson’s remarks were addressed to “the elephant in the room” following repeated attacks on the judiciary by the president and his allies. Her 18-minute denunciation is the strongest statement yet by any member of the Supreme Court since the start of Trump’s second term.

In March, Trump derided Judge James Boasberg as a “troublemaker” and a “Radical Left Lunatic” after he ruled against the illegal deportation of Venezuelans to El Salvador. House Republicans have sought to impeach at least six judges who blocked key parts of the president’s agenda.

Earlier this month, a Wisconsin County Court judge was arrested by the FBI after allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant evade arrest. Other judges who defied the administration have faced bomb threats and threats of physical violence.

Several judges have faced a slew of “intimidation tactics” designed to send a message that their home addresses are publicly known, including a New Jersey judge who received a pizza addressed to her murdered son.

Top Trump advisor Stephen Miller has also railed against a cabal of “Communist” judges who are determined to keep “terrorists” in the country, while Elon Musk called for judges who defy the president to be impeached in a post on X.


“The attacks are also not isolated incidents,” Jackson told the assembled judges on Thursday night. “That is, they impact more than just individual judges who are being targeted. Rather, the threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government and they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law,” Politico reports.


Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson spoke of the attacks against judges by the Trump administration. / Paul Morigi/Getty Images for The Atlantic

She added: “ A society in which judges are routinely made to fear for their own safety or their own livelihood due to their decisions is one that has substantially departed from the norms of behavior that govern a democratic system.

“Attacks on judicial independence is how countries that are not free, not fair, and not rule of law oriented, operate.”

Jackson received a standing ovation from the room of legal insiders. She pointed to similar attacks on judges who issued controversial rulings during the Civil Rights Movement and the Watergate scandal.

“Other judges have faced challenges like the ones we face today, and have prevailed,” she said.

Jackson is the newest member of the Supreme Court, and was appointed in 2022 after serving as a district court judge for eight years before being promoted to the appeals court.

Following her prepared remarks, Jackson spent the remainder of the event engaged in a discussion about her life and career with a law clerk she once served under.


Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticizes Trump's attacks on judges


Kanishka Singh Reuters
Fri, May 2, 2025 

WASHINGTON, May 1 (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said on Thursday attacks by President Donald Trump and his Republican allies on judges were "not random" and seemed "designed to intimidate the judiciary."

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked Trump in March for urging the impeachment of a federal judge, laying bare tensions between the country's executive and the judiciary as Trump's sweeping assertions of power encounter judicial obstacles.

"The attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity," Jackson said at a judges' conference in Puerto Rico.

Federal judges have said the Trump administration has failed to comply with court orders regarding foreign aid, federal spending and the firing of government workers. The administration disputes it has defied judges but has been critical of orders and judges that have blocked its actions.

"The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law," Jackson said.

Jackson, an appointee of former Democratic President Joe Biden, did not mention Trump by name but spoke about "the elephant in the room."

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor and U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson listen as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during inauguration ceremonies in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Donald Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th president of the United States.More

Her comments were cited in media reports from Politico and the New York Times, with Politico noting that her comments got a standing ovation.

The combative atmosphere under the Trump administration has raised concerns among some legal experts of a potential constitutional crisis.

The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority.

NYPD shared a Palestinian protester's info with ICE. Now it's evidence in her deportation case

JAKE OFFENHARTZ
Fri, May 2, 2025 



FILE - Pro-Palestinian protesters gather near an area where people were being taken into custody near the Columbia University campus in New York, Tuesday, April 30, 2024, after a campus encampment and a campus building, taken over by protesters earlier in the day, were cleared by New York City police. (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle, File)ASSOCIATED PRESS

FILE - Members of the New York Police Department strategic response team move towards an entrance to Columbia University, Tuesday, April 30, 2024, in New York. (AP Photo/Julius Motal, File)ASSOCIATED PRESS

NEW YORK (AP) — New York City’s police department provided federal immigration authorities with an internal record about a Palestinian woman who they arrested at a protest, which the Trump administration is now using as evidence in its bid to deport her, according to court documents obtained by The Associated Press.

The report — shared by the NYPD in March — includes a summary of information in the department’s files about Leqaa Kordia, a New Jersey resident who was arrested at a protest outside Columbia University last spring. It lists her home address, date of birth and an officer’s two-sentence account of the arrest.

Its distribution to federal authorities offers a glimpse into behind-the-scenes cooperation between the NYPD and the Trump administration, and raises questions about the city's compliance with sanctuary laws that prohibit police from assisting with immigration enforcement efforts.

Kordia, 32, was among the earliest people jailed in President Donald Trump’s crackdown on noncitizens who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

She was detained during a voluntary check-in with immigration officials in Newark, New Jersey, on March 13, then flown to an immigration jail in Texas. Her arrest was announced by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security the next day in a statement that cited an expired visa and her role in “pro-Hamas protests.”

It remains unclear how immigration authorities were able to learn about Kordia's presence at the protest near Columbia last April. At the demonstration, police cited Kordia with disorderly conduct. But the charge was dismissed weeks later and the case sealed.

What NYPD shared with ICE


City law generally prohibits police from sharing information about arrests with federal immigration officials, although there are exceptions for criminal investigations.

On March 14, an NYPD officer generated a four-page report on Kordia and shared it with Homeland Security Investigations, a division of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement.

In an emailed statement, an NYPD spokesperson said the department “received a request from a federal agency related to a criminal investigation and shared relevant information in accordance with our sanctuary city policies.”

“The NYPD does not participate in programs that are designed for visa revocation or any civil immigration matter,” the statement added.

The department declined to say what the investigation entailed.

Inquiries to the DHS and ICE were not returned.

Legal experts and civil liberties advocates said the document reflected a worrisome level of information-sharing between the city and the federal government, which has conflated criticism of Israel with support for Hamas, a U.S.-designated terror group.

“The intention of the sanctuary laws is to protect against this kind of collusion and pretextual information sharing,” said Meghna Philip, the director of special litigation at the Legal Aid Society.

“It seems to be a clear violation of the law,” Philip added, “and raises questions about what guardrails, if any, the NYPD has around sharing information with a federal government that is seeking to criminalize speech.”

A low-profile protester


Kordia grew up in Jerusalem and the West Bank, and moved to New Jersey in 2016 with her mother, an American citizen. She studied English at a local exchange program, but let her student visa expire because she believed her application for permanent residency was sufficient to remain in the country legally, according to her attorneys.

Kordia’s case stood out among those ensnared by Trump’s crackdown. She was not an outspoken activist and had not publicly criticized Israel, either in social media posts or newspaper op-eds. She maintained no social media presence and did not appear on any of the public lists maintained by pro-Israel groups that seek to identify people who participate in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. Her name was not mentioned in news reports about the demonstrations.

While the Trump administration identified her as a Columbia student, she has never been affiliated with the university and was not enrolled in any college when she joined a protest in 2024 outside Columbia. Her attorneys said she was peacefully voicing her dissent against Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, which they said has killed over 100 of her relatives.

A spokesperson for the NYPD declined to say when they were first approached by federal authorities or whether the March 14 report was the first time they had shared information about Kordia's arrest record.

Surveillance and interrogations


Beginning in early March, attorneys for Kordia say federal agents began interrogating members of her family and her neighbors. They also subpoenaed records from her MoneyGram account and “established a trace on her WhatsApp messaging account,” her attorneys said in a court filing.

“The investigation revealed nothing except that Ms. Kordia sent a single payment to a Palestinian family member in 2022, which itself is protected First Amendment" rights, the filing states.

At an April 3rd hearing, the federal government pointed to Kordia’s prior arrest for protesting as a reason she should not be released. An immigration judge found no evidence she had acted violently at the protest and agreed to grant Kordia a $20,000 bond, which her family paid.

The government has appealed that decision, keeping her detained for now.

In a petition seeking her release, attorneys for Kordia, a devout Muslim, said she had been denied halal meals since arriving at the jail. As a result, she has lost 49 pounds (22 kilograms) and fainted in the shower, according to facility records shared with her attorneys.

“The government’s entire argument that Ms. Kordia is a danger to the United States rests on a single summons for her participation in a demonstration,” Arthur Ago, her attorney, said. “The only reason she’s confined right now is because of her political viewpoint.”

Mayoral cooperation


New York City Mayor Eric Adams has criticized the city’s sanctuary protections, but insisted his administration had been meticulous about following them.

When asked by the AP last month if the NYPD could turn over information to ICE about a summons issued to a protester, the mayor stressed it could only do so if there was a criminal investigation.

“We're not allowed to collaborate for civil enforcement, period,” Adams said,

“We have no record that this happened,” Adams added at the time.

On Friday, the mayor's office clarified that Adams had been referring to a different instance of a noncitizen who was sought by immigration authorities after being arrested by the NYPD at a protest.

International students in Alabama fearful after researcher with no political ties is detained

SAFIYAH RIDDLE
Fri, May 2, 2025 



This 2024 photo provided by Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani shows her and her fiance, Alireza Doroudi, who was detained by immigration officials in March 2025. (Alireza Doroudi via AP)ASSOCIATED PRESS

This 2024 photo provided by Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani shows her fiance, Alireza Doroudi, who was detained by immigration officials in March 2025. (Courtesy Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani via AP)ASSOCIATED PRESS

This undated photo provided by Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani in May 2025 shows her and her fiance, Alireza Doroudi, who was detained by immigration officials in March 2025. (Courtesy Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani via AP)ASSOCIATED PRESS

This undated photo provided by Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani in May 2025 shows her and her fiance, Alireza Doroudi, who was detained by immigration officials in March 2025. (Courtesy Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani via AP)ASSOCIATED PRESS

This 2024 photo provided by Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani shows her and her fiance, Alireza Doroudi, who was detained by immigration officials in March 2025. (Courtesy Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani via AP)ASSOCIATED PRESS


TUSCALOOSA, Ala. (AP) — Sama Ebrahimi Bajgani and her fiance, Alireza Doroudi, had just spent an evening celebrating the Persian new year at the University of Alabama when seven armed immigration officers came to their apartment before dawn and arrested Doroudi.

In a moment, the young couple's life was upended.

“I was living a normal life until that night. After that nothing is just normal,” Bajgani said.


Details about Doroudi's detention spread through the small Iranian community in Tuscaloosa, where Bajgani and Doroudi are doctoral students. Other Iranian students say they have been informally advised by faculty to “lay low” and “be invisible” — instilling fear among a once vibrant cohort.

Doroudi is among students across the U.S. who have been detained in recent weeks as part of President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown. Bajgani said the couple does not know why Doroudi — who has no criminal record or public political views — faces deportation, adding that Trump’s recent visit to the school made her feel like the university was “ignorant of our crisis.”

One Iranian civil engineering student and close friend to Doroudi said he has lost over 10 pounds (4.5 kilograms) due to stress and depression in the six weeks since Doroudi was detained.

“It’s like all of us are waiting for our turn. It could be every knock, every email could be deportation,” said the student, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of concerns about losing his legal status.

He now avoids unnecessary trips outside. When he was in a car crash last month, he begged the other driver not to call the police, even though he wasn’t at fault, because he didn’t want to draw attention to himself.

‘I stayed with their permission’

Bajgani said Doroudi, 32, is an ambitious mechanical engineering student from Shiraz, Iran.

He entered the United States legally in January 2023 on a student visa. Bajgani said he often worked 60-hour weeks while still making time to run errands for loved ones.

“If someone like him doesn’t get to the place he deserves, there is nothing called the American dream,” she said.

Doroudi's visa was revoked in June 2023, but the embassy didn't provide a reason and ignored his inquiries, Bajgani said. The university told him he could stay as long as he remained a student but that would not be allowed to reenter the U.S. if he left, she said.

He was operating under that guidance when immigration officers came to the couple's door in March.

The University of Alabama didn't comment on Doroudi's case, but said it offers resources to help immigrants on campus comply with federal law. It also offers guidance to students whose visas are revoked.

“Our international students are valued members of our campus community,” university spokesperson Monica Watts said in a statement.


Doroudi told Bajgani he spent three days in a county jail, sleeping on a tile floor and feeling panicked.

He is now in a Louisiana immigration detention facility over 300 miles (480 kilometers) from Tuscaloosa while he awaits a deportation hearing scheduled for next week. At least one other high-profile international student is there.

“I didn’t deserve this. If they had just sent me a letter asking me to appear in court, I would’ve come, because I didn’t do anything illegal. I stayed with their permission,” Doroudi said in a letter he dictated to Bajgani over the phone to provide his perspective to others. “What was the reason for throwing me in jail?”

Trump's immigration crackdown

More than 1,000 international students across the U.S. have had their visas or legal status revoked since late March, according to an Associated Press review of university statements and correspondence with school officials. They included some who protested Israel’s war in Gaza. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has since reversed those revocations, including those of four University of Alabama students.

“University staff closely monitors changes that could affect them and has communicated updates related to new protocols and procedures,” Watts said.

A Louisiana judge who denied Doroudi bond in mid-April said he didn't sufficiently prove that he wasn't a national security threat, Doroudi's lawyer, David Rozas said. Rozas said he was “flabbergasted” because the government hasn't presented evidence that Doroudi is a threat, though that is what the Department of Homeland Security has alleged.

A familiar sense of fear

International students make up over 13% of the statewide University of Alabama graduate program, according to the school’s website. Over 100 Iranian students attend the university, according to an estimate from the Iranian Student Association.

Every year, many gather for a picnic to celebrate Sizdah Bedar, the thirteenth day of the Persian new year, which begins with spring.

This year, the typically festive holiday "felt like a funeral service,” one Iranian doctoral student said. At one point, silence fell over the group as a police car passed.

"It’s becoming too hard to be living here, to be yourself and thrive," said the student, who spoke on condition of anonymity because she fears retaliation.

She has criticized the Iranian regime since arriving in the United States over five years ago, so she suspects she is no longer safe in her home country. Now, she has those same doubts in Alabama.

“All of a sudden it feels like we’re returning back to Iran again,” she said.

____

Riddle is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Trump will unfreeze Maine funding after state’s trans athlete lawsuit. ‘We took him to court and we won,’ says governor


Alex Woodward
Fri, May 2, 2025
INDEPENDENT 




Donald Trump’s administration will unfreeze federal funding for Maine’s child nutrition programs following a legal battle between the state and the president over transgender athletes.

The administration agreed that it will not interfere with the state’s access to Department of Agriculture funding, and in turn, the state will drop its lawsuit against the agency.

The settlement does not constitute an admission of guilt from either party.

In remarks on Friday, Maine’s Democratic Governor Janet Mills hailed the settlement as a “victory” for its state after a “blatantly illegal” threat to block critical funding for school food programs.

“It’s good to feel a victory like this,” she said. “We took him to court and we won.”


Maine Governor Janet Mills called a settlement with the Trump administration over allegations of Title IX violations a ‘victory’ for students in the state (AFP via Getty Images)

The legal battle was sparked after a confrontational meeting at the White House, where the president told Mills to comply with an executive order banning transgender women and girls from women’s sports.

“Are you not going to comply with it?” Trump asked Mills.

“I’m complying with state and federal laws,” she replied.

“We are federal law,” Trump said. “You better do it. You better do it, because you’re not going to get federal funding … Your population doesn’t want men in women’s sports.”

“We’ll see you in court,” Mills replied.

“Good. I’ll see you in court. I’ll look forward to that. That should be a real easy one,” Trump said. “And enjoy your life after, governor, because I don’t think you’ll be in elected politics.”

In the ensuing lawsuit, Attorney General Pam Bondi accused the state of violating Title IX, the 1972 civil rights law prohibiting sex-based discrimination at schools that receive federal funding.

Maine violated the law by “discriminating against women by failing to protect women in women's sports,” according to Bondi’s lawsuit.

“By prioritizing gender identity over biological reality, Maine's policies deprive girl athletes of fair competition, deny them equal athletic opportunities, and expose them to heightened risks of physical injury and psychological harm,” the lawsuit stated.


Mills told Trump ‘we’ll see you in court’ after the president threatened to withhold federal funding to the state if trans athletes in Maine are allowed to participate in women’s sports (AFP via Getty Images)More

In February, Trump signed an executive order to end the “dangerous and unfair participation of men in women’s sports” by directing federal law enforcement agencies to take “immediate action” against schools and associations that “deny women single-sex sports and single-sex locker rooms,” according to a summary from the White House.

During a signing ceremony surrounded by young girls, Trump claimed that the “radical left” had “waged an all-out campaign to erase the very concept of biological sex and replace it with a militant transgender ideology.”


The order followed a sweeping executive order impacting virtually every aspect of public life for trans Americans by erasing “gender” as a concept across federal agencies and effectively denying the existence of transgender, intersex and nonbinary people.

Separate executive orders have targeted access to gender-affirming healthcare for trans people under 19 and have sought to ban trans service members from the U.S. military.

The lawsuit followed a letter to the state from Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins on April 2, which Mills likened to a “ransom note” written by a child in her remarks on Friday.

“A demand letter that was outrageous at the time and remains outrageous today,” she said Friday.

On April 11, District Judge John Woodcock Jr. ordered the USDA to immediately unfreeze any withheld federal funding to the state.

“It’s unfortunate that my office had to resort to federal court just to get USDA to comply with the law and its own regulations,” Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey said in a statement. “But we are pleased that the lawsuit has now been resolved and that Maine will continue to receive funds as directed by Congress to feed children and vulnerable adults.”

Trump’s Justice Department sues Illinois over worker privacy provisions feds say interfere with immigration enforcement


Jeremy Gorner, 
Chicago Tribune
Fri, May 2, 2025





CHICAGO — President Donald Trump’s administration has filed a lawsuit alleging the state of Illinois is undermining federal immigration laws with a measure passed by the General Assembly last year aimed at protecting the privacy of workers who are non-U.S. citizens.

The lawsuit is the latest challenge to Illinois’ progressive immigration policies from Trump’s Justice Department. Earlier this year, the department sued the state and city of Chicago over so-called sanctuary policies that limit the cooperation of local police with federal law enforcement on immigration matters.

The lawsuit filed Thursday challenges amendments the state made to the state’s Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act, which lays out a number of privacy-related workplace requirements including guidelines that govern employers’ use of systems to check workers’ employment eligibility, such as the federal E-Verify program.

The measure was signed into law in August by Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker after being passed by the General Assembly largely along party lines, although three moderate GOP senators, party leader John Curran, Donald DeWitte and Seth Lewis joined Democrats in voting in favor of the measure.

The federal lawsuit alleges that changes made to the state law last year violate the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution, which bars state and local governments from impeding the federal government’s ability to enforce federal laws. The Justice Department accuses the state of Illinois, Attorney General Kwame Raoul and Jane Flanagan, the head of the Illinois Department of Labor, of unlawfully carrying out changes to the E-Verify portion of the privacy and workplace law meant to protect workers without U.S. citizenship. Pritzker was not named as a defendant.

The Justice Department is requesting the court to halt enforcement of the state law’s amendments.

“The United States has preeminent authority to regulate the administrative processes governing Form I-9 (federal employment eligibility verification forms) documentation and inspection, and E-Verify,” the Justice Department wrote. “Illinois therefore has no authority to enforce laws that obstruct or otherwise conflict with federal immigration enforcement efforts by imposing additional regulations, requirements, and possible sanctions on employers that seek to participate in the federal ‘E-Verify’ program.”

Raoul’s office said it was reviewing the lawsuit and had no further comment. A spokesperson for the state’s Labor Department said in an email the agency is “committed to protecting the employment rights of all Illinoisans and upholding federal and state laws” but declined further comment.

Two Chicago Democratic lawmakers who sponsored the amendments issued statements Friday defending the measures and calling the lawsuit “politically-motivated.”

“The Illinois law I sponsored was crafted to provide workers and employers with a clear process. Nothing in that law restricts the use of the e-verify system,” said state Rep. Eva-Dina Delgado. “I have full faith in the judicial process and expect the law will be upheld.”

“States have always maintained the authority to regulate working conditions and employment rights when not in conflict with federal statutes — a fundamental principle that the DOJ seems determined to ignore,” said state Sen. Javier Cervantes. “What our law does is ensure transparency and fairness in employment verification while fully respecting federal authority.”

An employer can use E-Verify to electronically compare the information the employer enters from an employee’s Form I-9, or employment eligibility verification form, to records already available to the Social Security Administration and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The verification check would notify the employer of a mismatch and prompt further action by the employee to confirm employment eligibility.

The amendments to the Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act, which took effect Jan. 1, include a provision that requires employers to let workers know within 72 hours of any inspections being conducted by federal immigration enforcement of Form I-9s or other employment records.

The amendment also states that employers “shall not impose work authorization verification or reverification requirements greater than those required by federal law.” Employers found to be in violation are subject to fines.

The lawsuit takes issue with the civil penalties as well as the advance notice requirements.

US will no longer ‘fly around the world’ to negotiate an end to the Ukraine war

SEMAFOR
Mathias Hammer
Fri, May 2, 2025 




The News

Washington is sounding increasingly pessimistic about the prospects of reaching a peace deal in Ukraine, saying that it is up to Kyiv and Moscow to end the conflict as the US considers stepping away from negotiations.

American officials will no longer “fly around the world” to mediate between Kyiv and Moscow, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said Thursday.

In an interview with Fox News, Vice President JD Vance said that the war was “not going to end any time soon,” stressing that it would be up to Moscow and Kyiv to come up with an agreement to stop the conflict.

SIGNALS

The future of US engagement with the conflict remains unclearSources: Bloomberg, Politico

With US officials warning that they are preparing to back away from negotiations, the future of Washington’s engagement with Kyiv and Moscow remains unclear. The US has said sanctions on Russia will remain in place and administration officials have reportedly prepared a set of options for ratcheting up economic pressure on Russia. Some officials have long believed that successfully negotiating a minerals deal with Ukraine would provide them with the political cover to increase support for Kyiv, a person familiar with the matter told Semafor. But uncertainty persists about what options US President Donald Trump will ultimately choose, and White House officials remain divided about the path forwards, Politico reported.

Russia fears minerals deal will draw Washington and Kyiv closer togetherSources: The Washington Post, Times Radio, The Moscow Times

In Moscow, fears are growing that the minerals deal signed earlier this week — as well as a successful sitdown between Trump and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the Vatican — will spur improving ties between Kyiv and Washington. The deal “worsens the situation for Russia,” a Kremlin-connected political analyst told The Washington Post: “A key reason for tensions between Trump and Zelenskyy has been removed.” The Kremlin still has “a residual concern that Trump might actually at some point turn against them,” Russia expert Keir Giles told Times Radio. To keep courting Trump, Russian officials have reportedly floated ideas ranging from a rare earths deal to assisting Washington’s diplomatic efforts with Iran, and even a possible Trump Tower in Moscow, The Moscow Times reported.

Can Russia and Ukraine negotiate a deal without Washington?
Sources: RIA Novosti, Politico

Both Russia and Ukraine have floated the prospects of direct negotiations, raising the prospects that peace talks could continue even if Washington walks away. “America is trying to mediate,” a Kremlin spokesperson said, but “a peace agreement should be signed with Ukraine, not with America.” Zelenskyy, meanwhile, has said he is willing to negotiate directly with the Kremlin if Russia agrees to a full ceasefire, a significant shift in tone by the Ukrainian leader. “Kyiv and Moscow can do things like prisoner exchanges,” Kurt Volker, former US envoy to Ukraine told Semafor, “but not an actual peace agreement, because [Russian President Vladimir] Putin wants to win, and there’s nothing Ukrainians can do to negotiate Putin away from that position. Putin actually has to feel pressure economically and on the battlefield.”


US withdraws from formal Ukraine peace negotiations

Iona Cleave
Fri, May 2, 2025 


Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky negotiated while at Pope Francis’ funeral - AFP

The United States will no longer mediate peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia after Vladimir Putin refused to sign up to a ceasefire.

The State Department said it is changing “the methodology of how we contribute” to the talks and will no longer “fly around the world at the drop of a hat” for meetings.

“We will continue to help, but we will no longer fly around the world as mediators in meetings,” said Tammy Bruce, a spokesperson.

She added that Kyiv and Moscow must now present “concrete” proposals for ending the war and should meet directly to resolve the conflict.

Washington withdrawing from peace talks came soon after the US signed a minerals deal with Ukraine on more favourable terms for Kyiv, while Donald Trump green-lit his administration’s first round of weapons deliveries to the war-torn country.

In recent days, Mr Trump has softened his stance towards Kyiv amid his growing frustrations towards Vladimir Putin for dragging his feet over attempts to secure a ceasefire.

The Kremlin has expressed a willingness for talks with Kyiv, but this week rejected a US peace proposal because it did not grant international recognition of the territory its forces seized in Ukraine.

Ukraine has repeatedly rejected any formal recognition of Russia’s annexation of its territory, saying that Putin should not be rewarded for his aggression. Moscow’s forces control roughly one fifth of Ukraine, which includes its resource-rich industrial heartlands to the east.

US intelligence briefings overnight also suggested Mr Putin is now in a weakened position and has shifted his war goals to consolidate gains.

JD Vance, the US vice-president, admitted on Thursday that the war will not end “any time soon”.

Echoing the State Department’s comments, Mr Vance said that both sides “know what the other’s terms for peace are” and now it is “up to them to come to an agreement and stop this brutal, brutal conflict”.

“It’s not going anywhere … It’s not going to end any time soon,” he told Fox News.

“For the Ukrainians, yes, of course they are angry that they were invaded, but are we going to continue to lose thousands and thousands of soldiers over a few miles of territory this or that way?” added Mr Vance, who has been critical of Kyiv throughout negotiations.

On Wednesday, the US signed a long-contested rare earth minerals deal with Ukraine, which will give American companies preferential treatment in extracting Ukraine’s vast natural resources.



Ukraine’s parliament is set to hold a vote on May 8 to ratify the accord, which is central to Kyiv’s efforts to mend ties with the White House that had frayed since Mr Trump returned to office.

Volodymyr Zelensky hailed it as a “truly equal” agreement, which is believed to have been far more favourable to Kyiv than earlier demands, and came amid Mr Trump’s recent softening towards Ukraine.

Soon after the deal was signed, the US president approved a fresh delivery of weapons to Ukraine, the first of its kind since Mr Trump took office.

Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, meanwhile told Americans that the war in Ukraine “is not our war”.

Echoing the vice-president’s statements, he said that without a breakthrough, “the president is going to have to make a decision about how much more time we’re going to dedicate to this”.

“I think we know where Ukraine is, and we know where Russia is right now ... They’re closer, but they’re still far apart,” he added in a separate interview with Fox News.
Russia’s frozen funds

Ukraine agreed immediately to the US’s proposal for a 30-day ceasefire last month, while Moscow has stalled in what Kyiv’s allies warn is an attempt to improve Russia’s battlefield position.

On Friday, Europe announced it planned to seize and redistribute about €3 billion (£2.5 billion) of Russia’s frozen funds.

The money would be used to compensate Western investors after Moscow seized cash held in Russia in recent months, three people told Reuters, escalating attempts by both sides to recoup billions in funds affected by the war.

Euroclear will redistribute €3 billion from a pool of €10 billion in cash belonging to Russian entities and individuals hit by the EU sanctions that followed Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022.

The EU changed its sanctions regime late last year, allowing a disbursement to Western investors.

Donald Trump wants Kyiv to swap peace for land. 

Ukrainians say that’s too painful to contemplate

Olena Harmash
Fri, May 2, 2025 
INDEPENDENT


A machine gunner with the 118th Separate Mechanized Brigade's firing team holds an American FIM-92 Stinger man-portable air defense missile system for reconnaissance and destruction of Russian drones (Getty Images)More


Vitali Klitschko, the former heavyweight boxer who is now mayor of Kyiv, ventured last month into hazardous political territory: he delicately suggested in an interview that Ukraine might need to cede land to end its battle against Russia.

After a flood of angry online comments, he walked back his comments, saying on Facebook that "territorial concessions contradict our national interests and we must fight against their implementation until the last".

U.S. President Donald Trump and his negotiators believe the only route to ending the Russian war in Ukraine is for Kyiv to acknowledge in some form that it is not getting back the Ukrainian land Moscow's troops have taken since invading.

But the episode with Klitschko -- along with opinion polling shared exclusively with Reuters -- indicates that, more than three years into the war, most Ukrainians are not willing to cede territory to Russia in exchange for a ceasefire deal.

The state of public opinion helps explain why Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, who is expected to run for re-election, has resisted Trump's pressure to cede territory in ceasefire negotiations.


'SVOBODA'  IS A NEO-FASCIST MOVEMENT

FILE PHOTO: Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko greets servicemen of the Svoboda (Freedom) battalion from the elite Storm Brigade "Rubizh" of the National Guard of Ukraine before an award ceremony for fighters, who have recently returned from the frontline in the Bakhmut area of Donetsk region, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv region, Ukraine April 11, 2024. REUTERS/Gleb Garanich/File Photo (REUTERS)More

A poll from Gradus Research shared with Reuters showed that almost three-quarters of the population did not see territorial concessions as a way to end the war.

"Most respondents believe that Russia's main goal in the war ... is to establish full control over our country," Gradus said in a research note. "Ukrainian territorial concessions are not perceived as a compromise or a guarantee of peace - on the contrary, they can only strengthen the aggressor."

Russia has denied seeking control of Ukraine, but its forces headed directly to Kyiv in their full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 before Ukrainian troops pushed them back from the capital to their current positions in the south and east.

The Ukrainian poll conducted this week indicated that 40% of respondents believed that even in the case of concessions, peace would be only temporary and unsustainable. Another 31% thought that concessions would not lead to peace at all, Gradus said.



In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Russia's President Vladimir Putin attends an Orthodox Easter service at the Christ the Saviour Cathedral in Moscow early on April 20, 2025. (Photo by Ramil SITDIKOV / POOL / AFP)

Russia now de facto controls about 20% of Ukrainian territory, including the Crimean peninsula that it seized and unilaterally annexed in 2014 as well as large parts of four other regions of east and southeast Ukraine.

According to U.S. negotiators, many of Ukraine's European allies, and some Ukrainians when speaking in private, say Ukraine will have to acknowledge loss of territory to end the war.

Ukrainians are exhausted and up against a bigger and stronger enemy. Their attempts to push Russia back on the battlefield have failed since the first year of the war, and their Western partners have not given them enough military aid for it to achieve a decisive victory.

Zelenskiy has acknowledged that Ukraine cannot regain its territories by military force but notes that formally ceding land would run counter to the country's constitution.

Opposition to giving up land has softened as the war has ground on. Data from the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS), showed that in March about 39% supported territorial concessions, compared with just 10% in May 2022.

Yet it also found that in March 50% of Ukrainians rejected the idea of giving up any land to Russia, ever, down from 51% in December.


Advertisement


Data from another pollster - Razumkov Centre -- from a February-March poll showed nearly 82% of respondents were against any formal recognition of the occupied territories.

"The definition of territorial concessions that more than half of the population might accept with a heavy heart is a de facto recognition of the occupation without de-jure recognition," said Anton Hrushetskyi from KIIS, adding that the country would have to receive security guarantees in exchange.

Apart from Klitschko's short-lived intervention, no prominent figures in Ukrainian politics or public life are trying to promote a national conversation about the need to acknowledge the loss of territory.

Evhen Mahda, a political analyst in Kyiv, said a dialogue between the country's leadership and society about giving up land was needed to ensure broad acceptance of a potential deal.

Hegseth says the Pentagon is done 'walking on eggshells.' Women in uniform say it feels like a 'slap in the face.'

ANTI-WOKE IS MISOGYNY, RACISM, HOMOPHOBIA



Kelsey Baker
Sat, May 3, 2025 



Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth signed a memo directing the services to review their equal opportunity complaint procedures, prompting concern from female troops and veterans.Anna Moneymaker/Getty ImagesMore


Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered a review of equal opportunity policies.


Some service members fear the review may undermine progress on harassment and discrimination issues.


But many agree that reforms to the programs are needed.

A rash of changes at the Pentagon has been sparking concern among some female service members. Now, a new memo set to potentially bring more change is causing additional alarm.

Since Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth took over the Pentagon, top female officers have been fired, some women's service histories have been erased, women's leadership programs have been squashed, and an advisory board focused on women in the military has been dismissed.

Last Friday, Hegseth signed a memo directing a review of equal opportunity programs and the processes for reporting and investigating harassment allegations. Hegseth said the moves, which he's dubbed the "no more walking on eggshells" policy, would ensure faster and more impartial investigations.

"Too often at the Defense Department, there are complaints made for certain reasons that can't be verified that have ended people's careers," he said in an accompanying video, calling some complaints "nonsense."

But current and former female service members told Business Insider that they worry potential changes could reverse recent progress in addressing problems like hazing, sexual harassment, racism, and social media misconduct.

Retired Marine Corps Lt. Col. Kate Germano, author of the book "Fight Like a Girl," told BI that "it seems that those who are at the bottom of the pecking order will be the most adversely impacted by the [latest] change — especially women and people of color."

A Marine officer who has led investigations told BI the new memo seems "part and parcel with their effort to weaken participation of underrepresented groups."

"It doesn't seem like a bad thing to prevent spurious complaints," she said, speaking anonymously to avoid retaliation. She previously investigated questionable claims but said that she hates "the idea that you could be punished if your command doesn't agree with you."

'Gutting the program'

The new memo, titled "Restoring Good Order and Discipline Through Balanced Accountability," orders the dismissal of complaints not substantiated by "actionable, credible evidence." Such a change could discredit anonymous complaints or harassment that occurs in private, said Rachel VanLandingham, a law professor at Southwestern Law School and former Air Force JAG.

The Pentagon.Jen Golbeck/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Changes to Department of Defense policies could also have an outsized impact on the lowest enlisted ranks, which make up a large share of historical reports of bias and sex-based discrimination complaints.

Military EO programs are responsible for ensuring personnel are allowed "full and fair opportunity for employment, career advancement and access to programs without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, disability, gender, age, sexual orientation, genetic information or parental status."

"The programs allow personnel to report discrimination and harassment, and that's a good thing," Hegseth said in a DoD news release. "But what's not good is when these programs are weaponized. Some individuals use these programs in bad faith to retaliate against superiors or peers."

Hegseth did not provide data on the scope of false allegations made through the military's EO process, only saying in a video on X that he hears it "all the time."

The secretary has personally faced what he has said were false allegations of sexual assault. In 2020, Hegseth settled a dispute with a woman who said the former TV host sexually assaulted her. No charges were ever filed. During his confirmation hearing, he said that the situation was "fully investigated" and that he was "completely cleared."

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been at the center of numerous shake-ups at the Pentagon in recent months.Omar Marques via Getty Images

EO programs have been scrutinized before. Some critics have said the policies make "character assassination" easy for disgruntled personnel.

"There's things that could be worked on," VanLandingham said. But with this memo, she said, it seems like "they're just gutting the program."

A 2020 investigation by Reuters found that troops file complaints at much lower rates than DoD civilians, suggesting a fear of retaliation among active duty personnel.

VanLandingham said that making a false allegation is an offense that's already covered by the Uniformed Code of Military Justice, which criminalizes false official statements.

Changes to the EO program could create a chilling effect on victims who might fear reporting harassment, she added, highlighting that some troops may avoid submitting complaints for fear of retaliation or being ostracized.

"I would never tell anyone to make an EO complaint, especially now," said a female veteran who previously submitted a complaint alleging sexual harassment and said she later faced retaliation. She spoke on condition of anonymity because she is seeking federal employment. BI reviewed related documentation between her and her command.

"If they don't like you, it's now definitely a way to get rid of you and adversely affect your career," she said.

Another woman, who is on active duty, told BI she fears the changes will discourage troops from filing complaints.

"This feels like a slap in the face," she said.


Unanswered questions

"I guess the biggest question is who decides what is or is not credible information or what is fair," Germano said. She said the military's process for internal investigations is already thorny — such investigations are often done by troops with little to no meaningful investigative experience, often bestowed upon them as a secondary duty.

Casting greater doubt on the legitimacy of claims could make things even trickier, Germano said, explaining decisions may be influenced by the perspectives of the command's senior members, based on their own experiences.

Such biases have likely contributed to patterns of sexual assault investigations that ended favorably for alleged perpetrators who were viewed positively by their leaders, Germano said.


Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has made his image about being a man among the troops.Kenneth D. Aston Jr., US Navy

BI asked the Office of the Secretary of Defense whether eyewitness testimony would be considered credible evidence, and what might happen if harassment occurs privately. The office referred to a Friday statement from acting Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Jules W. Hurst III.

"Protecting MEO and EEO programs and processes is critical to advancing meritocracy and balancing accountability," the statement read. "The comprehensive review will make certain that these programs and processes are timely, efficient, and effective, and that the tools designed to support them are applied in a manner consistent with our mission and values."

The advocacy group Protect Our Defenders said that the new memo "sends a stark and chilling message: report misconduct at your own risk."

"By creating new barriers to justice and threatening retaliation against those who speak up, the Department of Defense is attempting to undo congressionally mandated legal protections — and tip the scales against survivors — with a memo," the group said.