US IMPERIALISM THUMBS ITS NOSE AT THE WORLD
For 29th straight year, U.N. calls on U.S. to end 1960 Cuba embargo
The United Nations rebuked the United States on Wednesday for maintaining its economic trade embargo on Cuba. Photo courtesy of Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla/Twitter
June 24 (UPI) -- For a 29th year in a row, the United Nations General Assembly demanded the United States end its economic blockade of Cuba.
The assembly on Wednesday at its headquarters in New York City overwhelming approved a resolution it has approved each year since 1992 urging the United States to drop the six-decade-old blockade it enforces around the Caribbean nation. The only year the resolution wasn't voted on was last year due to the pandemic.
The resolution passed with 184 countries in favor with only the United States and Israel voting against. Columbia, Ukraine and Brazil abstained.
THAT MEANS CANADA VOTED AGAINST THE US AND WITH THE UN
¡184 países contra el bloqueo!
Una vez más, desde Naciones Unidas #ElMundoDiceNo a la agresión y a las políticas fracasadas de EEUU contra Cuba .
Es una gran victoria del pueblo cubano, de la justicia y de la verdad. pic.twitter.com/mJ10ESV4B0— Bruno Rodríguez P (@BrunoRguezP) June 23, 2021
The United States has imposed a trade embargo of economic sanctions on Cuba since 1960 with the intention to isolate the socialist government, according to the Congressional Research Service.
Under the Obama administration, the United States pivoted its foreign policy on the island nation toward engagement, but that changed once President Donald Trump entered the White House as he undid the moves of his predecessor while imposing further sanctions that have been maintained under the current Biden administration.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki in mid-April told reporters that the Biden administration policy on Cuba is governed by support for democracy and human rights, though a "Cuban policy shift ... is currently not among the president's top foreign policy priorities."
Before the countries on Wednesday, Cuban Foreign Affairs Minister Bruno Rodriguez Parrilla described the blockade as a "massive, flagrant and unacceptable violation of the human rights of the Cuban people."
"Like the virus, the blockade asphyxiates and kills, it must stop," he said.
The embargo, he said, has caused Cuba to lose $9.1 billion during the pandemic-hit 2020 when tje U.S. sanctions also made it difficult for Havana to secure needed medical equipment and food.
Many of those who spoke during the discussion voiced strong opposition to the embargo, calling it a violation of the sovereign right of states with some going so far as to call it illegal and illegitimate.
Antonio Rodrigue, the ambassador to the U.N. from Haiti, said while speaking on behalf of Caribbean Community, an organization of 15 Caribbean states, that the embargo was a flagrant violation of the United Nations Charter and international law.
According to minutes of the meeting published by the U.N., he said CARICOM maintains close relations with Cuba but the scope of the embargo is an obstacle to furthering those ties.
Dang Dinh Quy, Vietnam's ambassador to the intergovernmental organization, called the embargo "the most unjust and prolonged system of unilateral sanctions ever imposed against a country in our modern world history."
Having once been under a U.S. trade embargo Vietnam understands the hardship they cause, he said, adding lifting the blockade will not just benefit Cuba and the United State but regional and global peace, stability and development.
Rodney Hunter, the U.S. representative to the body, defended his country's use of sanctions calling them "a legitimate way to achieve foreign policy, national security and other national and international objectives."
He said the United States understands the challenges that Cubans face, which is why it donates billions of dollars a year to the island nation in humanitarian aid.
"The United States opposes this resolution," he said. "We encourage this body to support the Cuban people in their quest to determine their own future."
No comments:
Post a Comment