It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Friday, December 02, 2005
Conservative Broadcasting Corporation?
John Bowman the CBC Election Blogger continues to ONLY blog about the Conservatives. His latest blog is about them fixing their security bug on their site, which meant folks couldn't give 'em money. This is news? This is worthy of blogging? I think not. And when he has quoted non Tory blogs, after his bosses noticed his bias, they are about wiat for it....the Conservatives. Hey Mothercorp time to replace JB.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
You're being a bit hard on them, arent you?
I mean, its no secret there are Liberal bloggers out there that have no love for Martin, and there are more then a few Progressives who feel the same way (raise hand).
Sure and I am another one but my point is that this blog is to focused on the Conservatives. Like who cares that their site wasn't secure.Filler article
To be honest Eugene, I think the following, taken from the same site you're lambasting for being too focused on the conservatives and providing filler dross, is not so flattering in my opinion:
"Thursday, Dec. 1, 2005
Conservative website ranks last
For blog readers who do fit into the "tech savvy" stereotype, Michael Watkins offers technical critiques of the parties' official websites. Himself a Conservative, he blasts the party's website for its dependence on Flash, its lack of accessibility for blind users and lack of security.
In fact, as Michael points out, if you attempt to donate money to the CPC, the site will tell you the site is secure when it's not. Your credit card information will go over an insecure web connection.
"There are no excuses for this lack of care," writes Michael."
Are any websites set up for the blind? And you can follow this debate at with JB at CBC vs CTV Blogs
Post a Comment