Saturday, July 11, 2026

Trump weighed national emergency to bypass election agency before firing leaders: report

Bennito L. Kelty
July 10, 2026 
RAW STORY


Marty Myers begins to put away the booths used for voting as Michigan polls close, in Kalamazzoo, Michigan, U.S., November 5, 2024. REUTERS/Carlos Osorio/File Photo

The Trump administration plotted ways to bypass an election agency before firing its leaders, according to reporting by Reuters.

According to four anonymous sources who spoke to Reuters, the White House "spent months" mulling ways around Election Assistance Commission guidelines for state voting machines. Earlier this week, Trump fired two Democratic members of the commission and allowed its lone Republican commissioner to resign just months before the midterms.

Some Trump White House officials wanted the EAC to add a proof-of-citizenship requirement for the national mail voter registration form. Others, as far back as last fall, considered whether to declare a national emergency, according to Reuters.

The idea of declaring a national emergency came from a recommendation by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The emergency declaration would be followed by the creation of a federal task force that would compel states to address vulnerabilities in their voting systems, sources told Reuters.

Reuters noted that the report with those recommendations was never published, and the ODNI did not respond to a request for comment. However, two sources told Reuters that complaints about the commission continued since those recommendations came up last fall.

Officials from the Department of Homeland Security, ODNI, and the White House also met with EAC leaders around the same time to discuss flaws in voting machines that they believed "could have contributed to abnormalities in 2020," sources told Reuters.

According to Reuters, the Trump administration has not made it immediately clear why it ousted the last remaining heads of the EAC, but Reuters' sources say that the administration was "frustrated" with how slowly the commissioners were updating voting machine guidelines.

Trump blitzed by Wall Street Journal for 'destroying US jobs and raising prices'

Tom Boggioni
July 10, 2026 
RAW STORY


Donald Trump speaks with members of the media. REUTERS/Anna Rose Layden

President Donald Trump's boast on Truth Social that his tariff war spurred Toyota to move its Tacoma truck manufacturing operations to the U.S. was drowned in derision by the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal this week.

The conservative WSJ board on Thursday rained on Trump's parade by pointing out that the manufacturing move should be celebrated, but, in the larger picture, his tariffs have been a disaster and Americans are still furious.

"The President is right that his tariffs are at work—in destroying U.S. jobs and raising prices," the editors wrote.

"Mr. Trump’s Section 232 national security tariffs on autos and parts have cost $35.2 billion through April of this year, and his steel and aluminum tariffs another $17.5 billion, according to U.S. government data."

Since taking office in January, the U.S. has hemorrhaged roughly 75,000 manufacturing positions. More than one-third evaporated directly from the automotive and related parts sectors—the industries Trump claims to be protecting.

The board argued the administration's tariff experiment has obliterated American manufacturing.

"Mr. Trump and his advisers claim that foreigners pay his border taxes, but the evidence shows that U.S. companies, workers and consumers are picking up most of the tab," the board wrote.

Add to that, they asserted Trump is forcing consumers to balk at buying new cars over economic uncertainty.

"Many are driving clunkers for longer—and paying more for repairs if they break down—or buying used cars," the editorial stated. "New vehicle sales have averaged 15.9 million in the first half of this year, down from the 17 to 18 million in the five years before the pandemic.

"When people buy fewer cars, auto makers don’t need as many workers. His trade oscillations and border taxes are a major reason the economy hasn’t performed as well as during his first term, and why Americans are so unhappy."
JD Vance walloped on Fox Business as analyst groans he 'does not understand' economics


Matthew Chapman
July 10, 2026 
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: U.S. Vice President JD Vance speaks with the media as he arrives at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., May 28, 2026. Matt Rourke/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

Vice President JD Vance took a severe tongue-lashing on Fox Business Friday, as hosts continued to react to his strange recent statements attacking legendary conservative economist Milton Friedman.

"I think JD Vance, on economics, just generally does not understand the role of capitalism and investment and so forth," said analyst Liz Peek, to the approval of her peers Stephen Moore and Larry Kudlow.

Friedman, a Nobel laureate and founding member of the influential "Chicago school" of economics, often faces criticism on the left — but it's rare to see it from a Republican.

Vance gave the remarks during an interview with The Daily Wire.

“Milton Friedman’s ideas made more sense in the 1980s because they were being advocated in a country that still had a very rich and powerful institutional Christianity,” said Vance. “If you look at modern Britain and the result of Margaret Thatcher’s policies, you would say that her policies actually got Britain further away from that ideal and not closer to that ideal. I think that meritocracy can steal from us a sense of what really, really matters.”

Vance added that “American economic policy on the right is now much more Alexander Hamilton than it is Milton Friedman. I think that’s obviously a good thing.”

Moore, himself a former Trump strategist, penned a scathing response to these comments in the Marshall Independent, writing that Vance "sounded much more like a Mitt Romney, big-government RINO than a Trump or Ronald Reagan."


Trump's struggling fair evacuated again in another setback on its final day

Bennito L. Kelty
July 10, 2026 
RAW STORY


Alessandra Buttice, 14, leans against her father as they watch a large screen and listen to U.S. President Donald Trump speak at a Fourth of July rally, at The Great American State Fair, on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 4, 2026. REUTERS/Cheney Orr

Trump's Great American State Fair suffered another evacuation on its closing day, according to an announcement.

In a post on X, Freedom 250, the Trump-backed organization that put together the fair, announced, "The Great American State Fair has been postponed," and requested that participants "please make your way safely and carefully to the nearest exit."

The Great American State Fair, which was hosted on the National Mall, has been panned by critics because of poor attendance. Last week, organizers were forced to suspend the event amid a heat wave. On Thursday, the fair was evacuated due to "severe weather."

The latest disruption came as the National Weather Service in Baltimore/Washington warned that a few storms could bring locally damaging wind gusts and isolated flooding across the D.C. area on Friday afternoon and evening.

Although the event is supposed to wrap up on Friday, July 10, Freedom 250 wrote, "We plan to reopen for the evening concert" despite asking everyone to leave. Organizers did not share why the event was evacuated and postponed.


Op-Ed: The shallow approach to automation vs jobs is proving labour and tech experts right, but it’s messy

DIGITAL JOURNAL
July 7, 2026

Investors are awaiting the release of key US jobs data this week 
– Copyright GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP SCOTT OLSON

Even the theory of automation vs jobs isn’t stacking up. Layoffs and subsequent rehires are making news daily. Frontline managers are finding out that automation creates more unpaid non-core business work in just finding fixes. The simplest description of the hype for the transition to automation is that it’s absurd. Experts in technologies have been saying endlessly that automation simply can’t and shouldn’t do many things on its own.

Labour experts agree. Many critics have said that even the idea that automation instantly replaces jobs simply proves that management knows less than nothing about those jobs. They often only see reports, not the realities of the work.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has spelled out very clearly and patiently the mix of perceptions about automation and the future of work. That future is looking very indecisive right now.

Perceptions vs facts

Carnegie nailed some issues regarding the perceptions of automation very effectively. The fear of replacement could now be called a global psychosis, particularly at the white-collar level. Nor is the role of AI well understood in any practical context regarding actual work roles.

There’s an emerging view of AI as “drop-in remote workers”, according to Carnegie, for example. Given the ongoing somewhat hysterical and hyper-expensive prejudice against human remote workers, it’s interesting to watch this logic suffocate itself in contradictory arguments against itself.

This is a big unsolved cultural problem and the problem, not the solution, is making the decisions on the fly. This myopic worldview clearly lacks practical comprehension, and “ideological executive blindness” based on unrealised and often poorly defined perceived savings is making it worse.

Are people cheaper and better?

The baseline theory that automation saves money by reducing the cost of wages is so wrong and so far off target that it’s excruciatingly absurd. It could also be the exact opposite, and brutally expensive.

To start with:

How is it cheaper to adopt a whole class of major technologies at a much higher initial cost than the fixed costs of existing jobs?

Human jobs can be designed to deliver values on a clear cost-to-outlay basis. Automation starts as a cost, and you have to derive value out of it. 

The most basic operational rules, practices and laws related to automation and labour are barely at the foetal stage. Even China recently enacted laws prohibiting and restricting AI layoffs.

Humans don’t need the sort of 24/7 unquantifiable expenses that automation imposes. Technologies in the workplace inevitably need costly assessments, maintenance, upgrades, at-call SaaS, and eventually replacement in relatively short cycles.

Tech is an ongoing acquisition process with never-ending mixed results in direct and indirect costs.


Technologies become redundant faster than people, particularly in AI.

Then there’s fitting automation into that tactless thing called business reality. Most business tech is a patchwork of various vintages of technology, safe or unsafe to use in the modern business environment. Fraud alone is becoming a tech sector in its own right, let alone spreadsheet blunders.

AI makes and often can’t fix its own mistakes, especially when those mistakes show up on balance sheets and require more outlay. Those mistakes could well be based on situations and issues any experienced person would automatically avoid. Expertise is a real value, not a perceived value.

The net takeaway from this elegant if verbose presentation of the glaringly obvious is that “automation uber alles” is definitely no way to run a hot dog stand. The lack of depth in due diligence evaluation of automation is downright dangerous.


Finding the right fits for real-world applications

Every business, every market, every customer base, every job, and every workplace is different. There simply can’t be a One Size Fits All in automation at any level.

Productivity is a case in point in matching jobs to people. Let’s start with HR. Trying to fit a human being into a job isn’t usual practice. It’s more likely the person will be stuffed into a job with varying degrees of good fit or otherwise. High staff turnover means a lot of bad fits. You couldn’t call it productive in any sense.

There’s now even an AI tool for predicting staff resignations. This somewhat ironic development reflects a need to manage experience, expertise, handling tasks at all levels, and the most basic production fluencies in the workplace. In-house learned capabilities are crucial to smooth workflows.

These almost invisible skill sets dictate real productivity throughout the entire food chain of doing business. Turnover loses those skills and their productive values.

So, losing people is likely to be a net own goal, particularly when you lose all your in-house productive fluencies. Again, automation doesn’t solve these problems. It makes them harder to manage. Good fits for people are the only way any business has ever worked.


It’s not automation or jobs. It’s both.

The emerging picture is very different from the “jobs vs automation” scenario. According to MIT, positive impacts are emerging even in the much-misunderstood world of coding time usage and productivity. Reduced burnout was one of the findings. It also strongly refutes the idea of cost-cutting, particularly for junior-level staff. Training was actually enhanced using generative AI, adding skill values.

The clearest indicators are that automation is reconfiguring work, not merely automating it. The short-term cost-based thinking just doesn’t work. An isolating effect of AI was also seen as a problem, reducing essential collaboration.

There’s another horizon here, and it’s the real story that hasn’t been written yet. Jobs aren’t static things. Tasks change, objectives change, and priorities change. Unknown roles and whole new environments are likely to be the new frontier of work.

__________________________________________________________

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this Op-Ed are those of the author. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the Digital Journal or its members.
OP-ED

New normal of Trump’s America: bigotry, cowardice and blind obedience

 Common Dreams
July 9, 2026


A sign and candles during a vigil after the fatal shooting of Mexican motorist Lorenzo Salgado Araujo by an ICE agent in Houston, Texas, U.S., July 8, 2026. REUTERS/Antranik Tavitian see less

On July 7, an Immigration Customs Enforcement agent shot and killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a Mexican national. According to a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, Araujo “weaponized his vehicle in an attempt to run over an ICE law enforcement officer resulting in our officer firing his weapon in self-defense.” As of the time of this writing, the agency has yet to provide any evidence.

This shooting comes days after a massive surge in ICE arrests. Between June 26 and June 30, 10,000 people were reportedly detained by immigration agents.

This is a tragic story—one that we have seen many times before.

Silverio Villegas González: On September 12, Villegas González, a Mexican national, was shot and killed by an ICE agent. This occurred during the agency’s “Operation Midway Blitz” in the Chicago area.

Araujo was not the first of ICE’s victims. So long as the agency exists, he will not be the last.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) alleged that the ICE agent “was hit by the car and dragged a significant distance. Fearing for his own life, the officer fired his weapon.” DHS further claimed that the agent “sustained multiple injuries.”

These were lies. Bodycam footage collected by Franklin Park police officers show the ICE agent saying he “got dragged a little bit” and describing his own injuries as “nothing major.” Surveillance video shows that Villegas González did not drive toward or hit either agent. Several eyewitnesses further refute DHS’ narrative.

Marimar Martinez: On October 4, Martinez, a US citizen, was shot five times by Border Patrol agent Charles Exum. In a statement, DHS described this as “defensive fire.” They alleged, without evidence, that Martinez and her fellow “domestic terrorists” “ambushed” and “rammed federal agents with their vehicles.” On social media, FBI Director Kash Patel posted a video—from an unrelated incident—of a black SUV aggressively ramming an agent’s truck as “proof” of Martinez’s crime.

These, too, were lies. Bodycam footage shows the agents already had their weapons drawn as one of them turned the steering wheel toward Martinez’s car. One agent can be heard saying, “It’s time to get aggressive.”

Text messages reveal the “big time” support Exum received from then-Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, Border Patrol Chief Michael Banks, and then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in the aftermath of this incident. Hours after the shooting, Bovino even offered to extend Exum’s retirement with CBP “in light of [his] excellent service in Chicago.” He added, “you have much yet left to do!”

In a group chat, Exum bragged about how he “fired 5 rounds and she had 7 holes.”

Renee Nicole Good: On January 7, Noem alleged that Good, a US citizen, “weaponize[d] her vehicle” and “attempted to run” over ICE agent Jonathan Ross. This act of so-called “domestic terrorism” justified Ross’s lethal action.

Once again, more lies. Footage captured on that day definitively showed—from multiple camera angles—that Good was turning away from Ross as he opened fire. He was never in danger.

Six months later, her murder has yet to be properly investigated. This was always the government’s plan. The day after her death, Vice President JD Vance insisted that the officer had “absolute immunity.” A few weeks afterwards, six federal prosecutors resigned over the Justice Department’s reluctance to investigate Ross. An FBI agent who had opened a civil rights investigation into Good’s death also resigned after she was ordered to reclassify it as an investigation into an assault on the ICE agent.

To these names, there are many we can add: Ruben Ray Martinez (shot and killed), Alex Pretti (shot and killed), Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis (shot), Jesus Javier Gomez Islas (shot, left permanently blind in his right eye), Keith Porter Jr. (shot and killed), Carlitos Ricardo Parias (shot).


Trump’s bigotry, Congress’ cowardice, and the Supreme Court’s blind obedience; a government devoid of checks and balances at war with its own people—this is America after 250 years.

This is the new normal of Donald Trump’s America—federal agents flood our neighborhoods. A poorly trained, gun-happy immigration agent kills someone. The administration alleges, without evidence, that the victim was responsible. No proper investigation is conducted. No one is held accountable. A family is torn apart. A community traumatized. Rinse and repeat.

We do not yet know all the details surrounding Araujo’s death. Perhaps we will never.


For now, there are two things we can take as certainties: First, any official narrative put forth by ICE, DHS, or the Trump administration cannot be trusted. They have repeatedly lied to the public, defended their killers, and blamed the victims. In their view, if you are killed by ICE, protest ICE, criticize ICE on social media, or even write a strongly worded email to ICE, then you are the criminal. You are the “domestic terrorist.”

Second, Araujo was not the first of ICE’s victims. So long as the agency exists, he will not be the last. The next victim could be anyone. Regardless of race or legal status, we are all vulnerable to Trump’s taxpayer-funded secret police.

This is the reality that we all find ourselves in—one that is nurtured and sustained by every aspect of the federal government: the Trump administration’s militarized immigration enforcement and crackdown on political dissent; a Congress that continues, despite the deaths, to provide billions to ICE and DHS; and a Supreme Court that gives ICE agents legal immunity to racially profile minorities and that paves the way for DHS to strip noncitizens of their protection status.


Trump’s bigotry, Congress’ cowardice, and the Supreme Court’s blind obedience; a government devoid of checks and balances at war with its own people—this is America after 250 years.

On Facebook, Araujo’s son, Ronaldo Salgado, wrote: “My father has been in this country for nearly 35 years, working in construction to provide for myself, my two brothers, and my mother. He was in the process of obtaining his work permit through the legal process. He was on his way to work, picking up his workers. My father did not deserve this.”

None of ICE’s victims deserved this.

We cannot allow ICE to continue tearing families apart. We cannot continue to suffer politicians and institutions that prioritize war and violence over helping the people they are meant to serve.

Despite the dangers, we must continue to protest ICE. We must advocate for progressive candidates and policies. The situation is bleak, but things will only get worse if we do nothing. The White House will not save us. The Supreme Court will not save us. Congress, as it stands, will not save us. We must save ourselves.



Trump backs off his standoff in dispute over Canadian bridge


Matthew Chapman
July 10, 2026 
RAW STORY


FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump reaches for his phone as he makes an announcement about a trade deal with the U.K., in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 8, 2025. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo

President Donald Trump is quietly backing off an aggressive trade posture against Canada, which some were suspicious was an under-the-table handout to major GOP donors.

According to Politico, "Canada’s Housing and Infrastructure Department and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer announced Friday" that the Gordie Howe International Bridge, a new suspension bridge connecting Detroit to Windsor, Ontario, "will open July 27. A statement from the Canadian government said the agreement was made 'with the support of the United States Government.'"

The bridge has sat closed for months after its completion, because President Donald Trump refused to open it, ostensibly in protest of Canadian trade practices unfair to the United States.

"Trump demanded at the time that the U.S. be given at least half ownership of the bridge, which has been under construction since 2018 and funded by a corporation owned by the Canadian government," said Politico — a contrast to the original agreement, under which "the U.S. and Canada would split toll revenue from the bridge 50/50 after Canada had recouped the amount it spent financing the project."

However, some political observers pointed out that the Gordie Howe Bridge stands to compete with the Ambassador Bridge, a privately owned bridge across the Detroit River under the control of a powerful family of trucking magnates that contributed to Trump's super PAC.

Whitmer cheered the development, saying in a statement, “This bridge is a testament to the enduring partnership between Michigan and Canada and what we can get done when we think big and bet on our shared future together. Thank you to our allies in Canada and to the Michiganders who advocated for years to get this done. Let’s keep working together to build a bright future for Michigan and Canada.”
Vonage brings carrier-backed fraud checks to Canada

Digital Journal Staff
July 6, 2026

Photo by Anna Shvets on Pexels

Fraud teams have spent years asking customers to prove they are not criminals. Vonage is betting Canadian mobile networks can take on more of that work in the background.

The Ericsson-owned company has launched its network-powered fraud prevention tools in Canada, giving enterprises and developers access to SIM Swap Detection and Silent Authentication through Vonage network APIs.

These APIs connect to carrier data through Aduna, a telecom API aggregator, and EnStream, a joint venture between Bell, Rogers, and Telus that provides access to mobile identity and network data.

This is key, because Vonage can use carrier data, including recent SIM changes, instead of forcing every customer through another one-time code. Vonage cites Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre figures showing 33,854 fraud cases and $544 million in losses in Canada in 2025.

CIOs and CISOs now have another control to weigh. Carrier-based checks may help at moments such as account recovery or payment changes, but someone still has to decide where the extra verification belongs.

SIM Swap Detection is designed to flag recent SIM card changes in real time, a common warning sign in account takeover attempts. Vonage says that the tool can improve fraud detection rates by 30% to 40%, based on estimates from prior implementations and fraud benchmarks.

Silent Authentication takes a different route. Instead of sending a one-time passcode, it uses mobile network intelligence to verify the user’s phone number and SIM association through the device’s active mobile data session. Vonage says the tool can fall back to RCS, WhatsApp, SMS, voice, or email when needed.

“As generative AI evolves and fraud tooling is becoming increasingly available, fraudsters are becoming increasingly more sophisticated, outpacing traditional security measures. This makes network-based verification a critical component for modern enterprises,” says Christophe Van de Weyer, president and head of business unit API at Vonage.

Ontario-based Storage Guardian is already using Vonage’s SIM Swap Detection in its incident response offering.

“By integrating Vonage’s network powered solutions into our Incident Response offering we are providing our clients with the tools to ensure seamless, secure communication during critical events,” says Omry Farajun, owner/operator of Storage Guardian.

The governance question now moves to implementation. If network signals become part of identity verification, Canadian technology leaders will need to decide who owns the risk model, who sees the data, and where customer friction is allowed to show up.


Final shots

CIOs now have another authentication option to assess, one that uses carrier data rather than relying only on app-level checks.

CISOs will need to decide where SIM swap detection and silent authentication belong in the fraud control stack.

The practical test is whether these checks reduce account takeover risk without turning every login or recovery flow into a customer support problem.
Inside CSE’s annual read on Canada’s cyber threats

Digital Journal Staff
July 7, 2026

Photo by Mikhail Nilov on Pexels

Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSE) informs government decisions, defends critical systems, and counters threats to the country’s security and economy.

Specifically, CSE (now in its 80th year of service) provides intelligence on foreign signals, cyber security and information assurance, foreign cyber operations, and technical and operational assistance to federal partners.

The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security is part of CSE, and as the public-facing agency, is positioned as the country’s technical authority on cyber security.

The agency’s 2025-2026 Annual Report, released June 29, is a public tally of what it spent the year defending against. It’s also valuable for technology leaders responsible for critical systems in Canadian organizations.

CSE produced 3,976 foreign intelligence reports for the federal government, documenting foreign-based threats and global events. They also acted against 10 of the most significant ransomware groups that sought to harm Canada and its allies, and ran 1,772 supply chain risk assessments to strengthen cyber resilience within the government.

The Cyber Centre responded to more than 3,200 cyber security incidents affecting federal institutions and critical infrastructure over the year. It issued 25 alerts, 995 advisories, and more than 97,000 notifications through the 1,363 organizations subscribed to the National Cyber Threat Notification System (NCTNS).

CSE also pointed to new work on modern secure digital infrastructure, stronger cyber defence capabilities, artificial intelligence, and post-quantum cryptography, funded by Budget 2025’s investment in defence.

“As CSE marks 80 years of service to Canada, we continue to adapt to a security environment, with cyber threats growing in scale and complexity,” said Caroline Xavier, Chief of CSE.

Two key numbers from the report for Canadian organizations are 1,363 (the number of NCTNS subscribers) and 97,000 (how many alerts the system sent).

The system is a free service available to Canadian organizations from any sector, and of any size, and can work in tandem with existing security measures. Subscribers receive notifications on potential system threats, including technical vulnerabilities, system compromises, and malware infections.

For something free and built to catch potentially debilitating attacks, that’s a short subscriber list.
Final ShotsCSE released its 2025-2026 Annual Report, tallying a year of foreign intelligence work, cyber defence, and action against major ransomware groups.
The Cyber Centre responded to more than 3,200 incidents and sent over 97,000 threat notifications through its National Cyber Threat Notification System.
The NCTNS is free and open to any Canadian organization, but only 1,363 have subscribed.
After the AI gold rush, Canadians are deciding what should stay human

Dr. Tim Sandle
DIGITAL  JOURNAL
July 6, 2026

Working in an office. — Image by © Tim Sandle

For the past two years, the dominant narrative around artificial intelligence has been one of rapid adoption. New tools have promised greater productivity, automation, creativity, and convenience. Businesses have invested heavily, governments have launched national AI strategies, and consumers have experimented with everything from chatbots to AI-generated content.

However, rather than asking what AI can do, many people are beginning to ask where AI should stop. A recent survey conducted by Hint App across 12,487 adults in North America (including Canada), Europe, Latin America, Australia, and the UK suggests that a growing number of people are deliberately setting boundaries around their use of artificial intelligence.

According to the survey, 44 percent of respondents have intentionally reduced their use of AI, while 42 percent no longer rely on AI for important personal decisions. Nearly half believe that emotional judgment and meaningful conversations should remain primarily human.

The findings do not suggest an anti-technology backlash; instead, the findings suggest a further step towards digital maturity.

Canada’s AI success story


Canada has been one of the world’s early AI leaders, producing pioneering researchers such as Geoffrey Hinton and helping establish globally recognized AI clusters in Toronto, Montréal, Edmonton, and Waterloo. The country’s new national strategy,

AI for All,” places artificial intelligence at the centre of economic growth, productivity improvements, and public-sector modernization. The federal government argues that AI can improve healthcare, agriculture, manufacturing, transportation, and public services while helping Canadian businesses remain globally competitive.

At the same time, Canadian policymakers have emphasised trust, responsible deployment, transparency, and public confidence as essential elements of future AI adoption. Concerns around privacy, job security, democracy, and human wellbeing feature prominently within the strategy. As AI becomes commonplace, the challenge is no longer convincing people to use it. Instead, the challenge may be determining where its use genuinely adds value.

Research from Toronto Metropolitan University’s Social Media Lab found that approximately two-thirds of Canadians have experimented with generative AI tools. However, only a minority use such tools regularly, and significant concerns remain regarding privacy, ethical risks, misinformation, and critical thinking. The study also found widespread uncertainty about how AI companies collect and manage personal information.

Similarly, KPMG’s Canadian Generative AI Adoption Index found that AI use in Canadian workplaces continues to rise, with many employees reporting productivity gains. Yet the same research identified concerns about technological change, workforce readiness, and the need for greater AI literacy and training.

These findings suggest Canadians are both enthusiastic and cautious

The rise of “AI-free” spaces

One of the most interesting elements of the Hint survey is the emergence of intentionally AI-free periods. Nearly one-third of respondents reported building regular breaks from AI into their lives.

This mirrors broader digital wellbeing movements that previously focused on social media use, smartphone addiction, and screen-time reduction. People increasingly recognise that technologies designed to maximize efficiency do not always improve wellbeing. The question that arises is whether every aspect of life benefits from algorithmic assistance.

For example, many people appear comfortable using AI to summarize documents, generate drafts, organize information, or assist with routine tasks. However, far fewer are comfortable turning to AI for relationship advice, emotional support, family decisions, or matters involving personal identity.

This distinction reflects a growing recognition that some forms of decision-making involve empathy, moral reasoning, lived experience, and interpersonal understanding, areas where humans continue to hold important advantages.

Perhaps the most interesting survey result is that 36 percent of respondents felt that reliance on AI had reduced trust in their own judgment. For decades, technologies have helped humans extend their capabilities. Calculators assist with mathematics. GPS systems guide navigation. Search engines provide access to information. AI represents a further step in that progression. However, AI differs because it increasingly performs cognitive tasks that many people previously considered uniquely human.

When individuals begin outsourcing writing, decision-making, problem-solving, and interpersonal reflection, questions naturally emerge about skill retention and confidence. Canadian researchers and policymakers have increasingly emphasised AI literacy not simply as a technical competency but as a means of enabling citizens to engage critically with AI-generated outputs. The objective is not blind acceptance or rejection, but informed use.

The early years of AI focused on experimentation. Many organisations and individuals rushed to discover what AI could accomplish. Future discussions may focus more on governance, boundaries, and human oversight.
Canada’s AI opportunity may lie beneath the surface: Critical minerals become the next battleground

Dr. Tim Sandle
July 9, 2026
DIGITAL JOURNAL

Rare earth minerals are crucial to the manufacture of magnets used in industries of the future, like wind turbines and electric cars – Copyright AFP Juan Carlos CISNEROS

The artificial intelligence boom is usually discussed in terms of advanced chips, hyperscale data centres, cloud computing and soaring electricity demand. Yet another race is unfolding behind the scenes—one that could prove just as important to the future of AI. It is a race for critical minerals, processing capacity and industrial expertise.

For Canada, a country rich in mineral resources and increasingly active in AI research, this convergence presents a significant economic opportunity. Every AI server, robotics platform, electric vehicle, advanced sensor and defence system depends on minerals such as rare earth elements, gallium, germanium, graphite and other strategically important materials. As AI adoption accelerates, demand for these materials is expected to increase alongside demand for computing infrastructure. At the same time, governments across North America, Europe and Asia are seeking alternatives to supply chains that remain heavily dependent on China.

The result is a new phase in the AI economy where mineral security and technological innovation are becoming increasingly intertwined.


AI is transforming the mineral industry itself

An emerging trend is that AI is not only consuming critical minerals, it is helping to produce them. One example comes from Aclara Resources, which is collaborating with Stanford University’s Mineral-X initiative, Argonne National Laboratory and Virginia Tech to develop AI-driven technologies for rare earth exploration and processing. These efforts include predictive models that identify promising mineral deposits and AI-enabled digital twins that simulate and optimize complex rare earth separation processes.

Argonne National Laboratory notes that advanced computing, process modelling and artificial intelligence can help accelerate the transition from pilot-scale operations to commercial-scale rare earth production. Such digital tools can reduce costs, improve recovery rates and reduce industrial scale-up risks.

This matters because processing rare earth elements is often more challenging than mining them. Developing expertise in refining and separation technology can create long-term competitive advantages beyond simple resource extraction.


Why rare earths matter for AI

Rare earth elements are essential inputs for permanent magnets used in robotics, electric motors, drones, wind turbines and advanced electronics. Elements such as dysprosium and terbium play a particularly important role in high-performance applications.

As AI expands into physical systems including autonomous vehicles, industrial robotics and intelligent manufacturing, the demand for these materials will continue to rise. Governments have become increasingly concerned about supply chain resilience because China continues to dominate significant portions of rare earth mining and, particularly, processing activities. Recent export controls on several critical minerals have heightened concerns among allied nations about long-term supply security.

As a consequence, countries are increasingly seeking to develop domestic mining and processing capacity, or to partner with trusted allies that can provide secure supply chains.

Canada enters this new environment with several advantages. The federal government’s Critical Minerals Strategy identifies critical minerals as foundational to both the green and digital economy. The strategy aims to support exploration, processing, manufacturing and recycling while strengthening Canada’s role in global supply chains.

According to Natural Resources Canada, the country now has 56 active critical mineral mines, 31 processing facilities and more than 170 advanced critical mineral projects. The sector contributed approximately $40 billion to Canada’s GDP and supports around 110,000 jobs directly and indirectly.

Canada has earned an international reputation in artificial intelligence through work conducted at institutions such as the Vector Institute, Mila and the University of Alberta. While much discussion focuses on AI software innovation, Canada could potentially gain a larger advantage by combining AI capabilities with natural resource expertise and advanced manufacturing. Hence, Canada may be uniquely positioned to link two of the world’s most strategic sectors: artificial intelligence and critical minerals.

Historically, Canada has often exported raw materials while capturing less value from downstream processing and manufacturing. The latest developments suggest a different path.

For example, Aclara is developing a vertically integrated rare earth supply chain outside China, including a planned heavy rare earth separation facility in Louisiana. The facility is designed to process materials into high-purity rare earth oxides used in advanced technologies and is expected to strengthen North American supply chain resilience.

The broader lesson for Canada is that future competitiveness may depend less on discovering mineral deposits and more on mastering processing technologies, industrial digitization and supply chain integration. This aligns closely with Canadian policy priorities. The country’s Critical Minerals Strategy explicitly supports innovation, value-added processing, research partnerships and infrastructure development designed to strengthen domestic value chains.

A growing geopolitical opportunity

Recent developments underscore the strategic importance of the sector. Canada and Japan are reportedly exploring deeper cooperation around critical mineral supply chains as both countries seek to reduce vulnerabilities associated with concentrated global supply. Similar partnerships are emerging across the United States, Europe and other allied economies.

Within Canada, investment is also expanding. Teck Resources, Canada Growth Fund and Natural Resources Canada’s Critical Minerals Accelerator recently announced plans supporting expanded production capacity for strategic metals including germanium, gallium and antimony—materials essential for semiconductors, telecommunications and advanced electronics. These developments illustrate how critical minerals have evolved from a mining issue into a national competitiveness issue.
Canada province preparing lawsuit against OpenAI over school shooting

AFP
July 7, 2026

While OpenAI does not expect to be profitable before 2029, the startup’s valuation keeps climbing in funding rounds baffling some financial analysts – Copyright AFP Kirill KUDRYAVTSEV

British Columbia said Tuesday it was preparing a lawsuit against OpenAI over the company’s failure to report violent ChatGPT activity by the person who committed a mass school shooting in the western Canadian province.

OpenAI had banned an account linked to Jesse Van Rootselaar in June 2025, months before the 18-year-old transgender woman killed eight people at her home and a school in the tiny mining town of Tumbler Ridge.

Canadian families impacted by the February shooting have already filed lawsuits against the US tech giant in a California court.

British Columbia said Tuesday it was preparing a separate case, in coordination with the families, and had retained lawyers both in Canada and California.

Provincial Attorney General Niki Sharma told reporters that the province wanted to “hold OpenAI and its decision-makers accountable for their failure to notify law enforcement of the violent prompts made on its ChatGPT platform by the perpetrator prior to the tragedy in Tumbler Ridge.”

“British Columbia has never shied away from taking on powerful corporations when their actions cause harm to people and communities,” she added.

She cautioned that the legal process will “take time,” but said funds derived from a lawsuit would help the community rebuild, including supporting the construction of a new school in Tumbler Ridge.

The province wants to use the court system to “ensure that British Columbians are not left bearing the costs of corporate wrongdoings.”



– Sam Altman apology –



In April, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman apologized to residents of Tumbler Ridge, saying in a public letter that he was “deeply sorry that we did not alert law enforcement to the account that was banned in June.”

“I believe an apology is necessary to recognize the harm and irreversible loss your community has suffered,” Altman wrote.

OpenAI has said that it did not report Van Rootselaar’s account at the time of the suspension because it saw no evidence of an imminent attack.

But it has also said that under updated security guidelines imposed after June 2025, the account would have been reported to police.

Lawyers for the families suing the company in a US federal court in California have alleged that OpenAI chose to stay silent about Van Rootselaar’s account because “reporting one case would mean reporting thousands.”

Their lawsuit also claims that when an account is shut down for dangerous behavior, OpenAI instructs the individual on how to resume usage, including tips on how to circumvent the 30-day suspension period.

Van Rootselaar killed her mother and brother at the family’s home before heading to the local secondary school, where she shot dead five children and a teacher.

She died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound after police entered the building.
US crackdown on top AI fuels open-source surge

AFP
July 8, 2026

Copyright CN-STR/AFP –


The US government’s shock moves to restrict access to top artificial intelligence systems from Anthropic and OpenAI have sparked growing interest in open-source models — especially ones from China.

The de facto bans from an anti-regulation White House blindsided the tech world, which had grown accustomed to AI labs releasing ever more powerful models with nary a worry of government intervention.

The episode has thrust a long-simmering debate to the fore: open versus closed AI.

Most of the best-known AI models — like OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Anthropic’s Claude — are “closed,” meaning the company keeps the underlying code and data locked away.

Users can access the AI via an app or website, mainly through a subscription, but the company controls who gets in and can shut down access at any time.

“Open-source” or “open-weight” models work differently: the developers release the model’s core files for anyone to download, modify and run on their own computers. Once released, no one — not the company, not a government — can take them back.

In early June, the Trump administration ordered Anthropic to block non-Americans from using its most powerful — and closed — models, Mythos 5 and Fable 5.

Faced with the complexity of screening users, the startup simply pulled the models offline entirely.

Shortly after, OpenAI agreed to let the government approve every customer for its newest model, GPT-5.6.

“If everything you need to do has to be on a specific frontier model, that makes whatever you’re building a whole lot less reliable” when it is suddenly unavailable, said Oren Michels, co-founder and CEO of Barndoor AI.

Haitham Mengad, co-founder of Stems Labs, a startup focused on AI-powered music creation, felt the disruption firsthand.

“Fable has been a game-changing model for me. Honestly, when they took it off, it was the first time that I realized… it’s almost like a drug,” he recalled.

The Mythos episode “was a powerful moment” for seeing open source as an alternative, Mengad said.



– ‘Being flexible’ –



Open models were already gaining fans because using closed AI keeps getting more expensive.

Around the same time, China’s Zhipu AI (also known as Z.ai) released GLM-5.2, an open model that performed nearly as well as top offerings from Anthropic and OpenAI on several benchmarks.

“GLM-5.2 is free to download, fine-tune, and run on an enterprise’s own servers, putting pricing pressure on frontier labs at the same time that access looks shaky,” AI analyst Andrew Curran noted.

On OpenRouter, a platform that routes requests across different AI models, Google, Anthropic and OpenAI’s combined share of usage dropped from 55 percent to 33 percent between January and June.

China’s open DeepSeek now leads by a clear margin.

“You want to be as flexible as you can be. Maybe a year and a half ago some large company might say we bought Anthropic or we bought OpenAI, and now no one, no one buys only one,” said Michels.

Among Western companies, France’s Mistral stands largely alone in championing open models. US tech giant Meta, once a vocal open-source advocate, has stepped back from that.

Meanwhile, early suspicions about Chinese AI models as a security threat are fading, at least somewhat.

“I don’t think there’s any risk, to be honest,” said Mengad. The fears are more “psychological, emotional than rational.”

Once you download an open model and run it on your own hardware, the company that made it — Chinese or otherwise — has no access to your data or control over how you use it.

Still, some experts think the government crackdown could also end up coming for open models as they become more powerful.

“If Mythos-level models are considered risky, China will also not want them to be open,” said Ethan Mollick, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania and a leading voice on AI — meaning governments everywhere, not just Washington, may want to keep top-tier AI locked down.
Samsung expects 1,800% leap in quarterly operating profit on AI boom

AFP
July 6, 2026

Frenzied global demand for advanced memory chips has helped South Korean semiconductor giants post record profits – Copyright AFP Jung Yeon-je


South Korean technology giant Samsung Electronics forecast on Tuesday a roughly 19-fold jump in second-quarter operating profit from a year earlier, buoyed by sustained AI-driven demand for memory chips.

The world’s largest memory chipmaker estimated April-June operating profit at 89.4 trillion won ($58.4 billion) — up 1,810 percent on-year, a company statement said.

Frenzied global demand for advanced memory chips used in data centres for artificial intelligence has already helped South Korean semiconductor giants post record profits this year.

The boom has also strengthened workers’ demands for higher pay, and Samsung avoided a major strike in May after reaching an agreement on worker bonuses.

Tuesday’s estimate beat market forecasts by 6.2 percent and marked another quarterly record, according to South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency, citing its own data firm.

Revenue likely rose 129 percent to 171 trillion won, Samsung said. The company is due to release its final earnings report at the end of the month.

Samsung and domestic rival SK hynix are involved in a massive public-private investment of 800 trillion won to build a new semiconductor fabrication hub in the country’s southwest.

Some analysts see potential delays to AI infrastructure investment as the biggest risk to the current memory boom.

But MS Hwang, a research analyst at Counterpoint Research, said he did not see “evidence that the gap between suppliers’ production capacity and customers’ demand is narrowing”.

“While some data centre projects associated with less competitive players may be delayed, it would be an exaggeration to interpret this as a broad slowdown in AI infrastructure investment,” he told AFP.



– Tax windfall –



South Korea’s AI semiconductor boom has also fuelled debate over what the country should do with the increase in tax revenue sparked by the success of Samsung Electronics and SK hynix.

Presidential chief of staff Kang Hoon-sik said Sunday that the tax windfall would help finance large-scale projects around AI and the semiconductor industry.

It would also help to reduce inequality and support young people in accessing housing, founding startups and finding jobs, he added.

A simple jacket bearing the SK hynix logo went viral online earlier this year as a symbol of wealth and success, with parody posts depicting it as a “golden ticket” to luxury boutiques or better dating prospects.

Jobs at Samsung and SK hynix now guarantee “a boost in marriage market value,” Yonhap has reported, citing a rise in their “desirability indices” compiled by matchmaking agency Sunoo — putting them on a par with doctors and lawyers.

Analyst Hwang said Samsung’s Tuesday estimate was a “very reasonable provision”.

“While bonus accruals and losses in the set business may weigh on earnings, memory profits alone are likely to be substantial,” he said.
People ‘disdain’ AI, says director Christopher Nolan

AFP
July 10, 2026 

The public has ‘thoroughly rejected’ AI, says Christopher Nolan
 – Copyright AFP/File CARLOS JASSO


Oscar-winning director Christopher Nolan told AFP he believed the kind of movies he makes — big-budget action films shot mostly on location — would survive the spread of AI, a technology he says many people “disdain”.

The “Oppenheimer” and “The Dark Knight” director is promoting his latest blockbuster, an adaptation of the Greek epic “The Odyssey”.

“The interesting thing with AI is I’ve never seen a technology that’s been so successfully adopted by Wall Street and by investors and by tech companies that the public has so thoroughly rejected,” he told AFP in Paris.

“It’s just sort of an odd thing. Young people in particular, they coined this term ‘AI slop’,” he added. “There’s a sort of disdain for things AI.”

AI has been infused into business applications and online search services, and chatbots such as ChatGPT have been widely adopted, but the technology faces major pushback in the creative industries such as music, cinema and art.

“AI slop” refers to the flood of AI-generated text, video and audio content that has inundated social media in recent years.



– AI claims are ‘nonsense’ –



“The Odyssey” has a reported budget of $250 million, which enabled Nolan to travel to locations throughout the Mediterranean with a stellar cast that includes Matt Damon in the lead role as Odysseus, supported by Zendaya, Tom Holland, Robert Pattinson and Anne Hathaway.

Nolan has been attacked by Elon Musk and other far-right figures for casting black actress Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy, who in Greek mythology was the most beautiful woman in the world.

The British-American director, who once again makes use of spectacular special effects in “The Odyssey”, added that he expected AI to result in some useful “imaging tools”.

“But I think the idea that it replaces human beings wholesale and human creativity, to me it’s a nonsense,” he added.

The AI industry has touted the potential of the technology to replace actors, writers and camera operators — claims that have spread panic in movie-making circles, though also plenty of scepticism.

It was one of the issues behind a huge strike in Hollywood in 2023 that shuttered productions and cost studios billions of dollars.

“The Odyssey” is an Ancient Greek poem believed to have been written by Homer that is considered a cornerstone of Western literature and one of the finest stories ever created.

It recounts the titular hero’s 10-year quest to return home from war and includes some of the most famous Ancient Greek myths, including one-eyed monster Cyclops and the Sirens.
Apple sues OpenAI for stealing trade secrets

AFP
July 10, 2026 

CEO of OpenAI Sam Altman looks on during the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in 2024 – Copyright GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP JUSTIN SULLIVAN

Apple on Friday sued OpenAI, accusing the artificial intelligence company of orchestrating a campaign to steal the iPhone maker’s trade secrets as it tries to develop its own consumer hardware device.

The lawsuit — filed in a federal court in San Jose, California — paints a picture of an aggressive effort by OpenAI to poach Apple employees and extract confidential information to build its own device.

The lawsuit marks a dramatic escalation in tensions between two companies that partnered in 2024 to integrate ChatGPT into Apple’s products.

That relationship has since deteriorated. Bloomberg reported in May that OpenAI was itself considering legal action against Apple, alleging the tech giant had failed to adequately promote the ChatGPT integration.

“At every level, from members of its Technical Staff to its Chief Hardware Officer, and in coordination with business partners, OpenAI has been stealing Apple’s trade secrets and confidential information,” Apple said in the 41-page complaint.

The suit will significantly complicate OpenAI’s plans for a hotly anticipated initial public offering.

The company, valued at roughly $852 billion, has raised more than $180 billion from investors, and expanding into consumer hardware was seen as a major opportunity for growth.

“Significant evidence has emerged suggesting individuals employed by OpenAI wrongfully took Apple’s secret and confidential information regarding our unreleased technologies, processes and products,” the company said in a statement to AFP.

“We will always defend our teams’ hard work and innovations, and we are taking all appropriate steps to do so.”

OpenAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The suit names OpenAI, its hardware subsidiary io Products — the company co-founded by former Apple design chief Jony Ive — and two former Apple employees: Tang Yew Tan, now OpenAI’s chief hardware officer, and engineer Chang Liu.

Apple said it was seeking damages and an injunction barring OpenAI from using its confidential information, calling the lawsuit necessary after OpenAI failed to respond to concerns the company raised in February.



– ‘Show and tell’ –



Tan spent 24 years at Apple, most recently as vice president of product design for the iPhone and Apple Watch, before co-founding io Products, which OpenAI acquired for roughly $6.5 billion in 2025.

Apple alleged that Tan used confidential project code names during OpenAI job interviews to probe candidates about unreleased Apple products. According to the complaint, about 400 employees at OpenAI are former Apple staffers.

Tan also allegedly told Apple employees to bring physical components, such as batteries, circuit boards, and other parts, to interviews for “show and tell” sessions.

Apple described its findings as “the tip of the iceberg,” saying it had limited visibility into what was happening behind OpenAI’s closed doors.

“OpenAI’s nascent hardware business now rests on the shakiest of foundations, rotten to its core by its illegal reliance on misappropriated trade secrets,” the complaint said.
Brazil deforestation hits new low in Amazon

AFP
July 10, 2026 

Illegal mining has been a driver of deforestation in the Amazon Rainforest
 – Copyright AFP Evaristo Sa


Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon fell to its lowest level in a decade in the first half of the year, according to official figures released Friday.

Leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who is seeking re-election in October elections, has promised to eradicate illegal deforestation by 2030.

From January to June, trees were felled across 1,295 square kilometres (500 square miles) — an area almost twice the size of New York City — in the Brazilian portion of the planet’s largest rainforest.

This is the lowest figure since 2016, according to the National Institute for Space Research (INPE), which tracks deforestation via satellite.

It also represents a decrease of 38 percent compared to the same period in 2025.

Deforestation in the Amazon soared under Lula’s far-right predecessor Jair Bolsonaro, peaking in 2022, when an area around 13 times the size of New York City was cleared.

This number was cut in half in 2023, after Lula returned to office pledging to curb Amazon destruction, and has continued to decrease.

The rainforest stores vast amounts of carbon and plays a key role in regulating the climate.

Deforestation also decreased in the Cerrado — a vast, biodiverse savanna south of the Amazon.

An area of 3,142 square kilometers — about twice the size of London — was cleared in the first half of the year, the lowest level since 2021.

Despite progress on deforestation, environmentalists have criticized Lula’s backing of an oil exploration project near the mouth of the Amazon River.

The 80-year-old’s main rival in the presidential election is Bolsonaro’s eldest son Flavio Bolsonaro, who pushed for increased land development and mining on a visit to the Amazonian city of Belem last month.
Volkswagen sales slide further as carmaker weighs mass job cuts

AFP
July 10, 2026 

Volkswagen’s bosses want to drastically cut production capacity and trim its range of models – Copyright AFP Blanca CRUZ

Volkswagen on Friday said that a slide in sales accelerated in the second quarter, as the crisis-hit German auto group reportedly considers cutting up to 100,000 jobs worldwide.

Overall vehicle deliveries fell almost nine percent in the April-June period from a year earlier thanks to plunging demand in China, VW said.

Sales had fallen just four percent in the first quarter.

“The situation in China remains challenging, and we were unable to escape a clearly declining overall market,” said VW executive Marco Schubert in a statement.

This was “despite initial positive momentum from our newly introduced, locally developed electric vehicles there,” he added.

Europe’s largest carmaker has come under intense pressure from US tariffs, slimmer profit margins from electric cars and above all intense competition in China, the world’s largest auto market.

The 10-brand group, which apart from its namesake also includes marques such as Audi and Porsche, is planning to lay off at least 50,000 in Germany by 2030.

But recent media reports have suggested the firm is targeting cuts of up to 100,000 worldwide as well as the closure of four plants in Germany.

Germany’s powerful IG Metall union on Thursday organised protests at VW sites across the country, as management presented their cost-cutting plans to the supervisory board.

There was no major announcement Thursday, with VW simply reiterating previous plans to cut capacity and its model line-up, and analysts said talks would likely take time.

“For now, people are sharpening their swords and firming up their positions,” auto analyst Stefan Bratzel of the Centre of Automotive Management told AFP.

“This is going to drag on for months and months.”



– Slimming down –



Volkswagen executives have repeatedly stressed the need for the company to slim down as collapsing sales in China have started to look less like a blip and more like a new normal.

It is a crisis hitting the whole German car industry — BMW said Friday its second-quarter car sales had fallen almost five percent worldwide, dragged down by a 30.2-percent plunge in China.

Chinese brands are also threatening Volkswagen on its home turf.

The likes of Geely, Xpeng and BYD took a nine percent share of the European market in March, according to automotive intelligence firm Dataforce, up from virtually zero three years ago.

“The Chinese are coming to Europe, also building factories which are highly efficient,” Volkswagen CEO Oliver Blume warned in April. “We cannot compete with underutilised plants.”

But labour representatives and the German state of Lower Saxony — both of whom take a dim view of possible plant closures — together hold more than half the seats on VW’s supervisory board.

This means any major restructuring is uncertain and will be hard fought.

“Fundamentally, Volkswagen is too big, too complex, too expensive and too slow,” auto analyst Bratzel said.
Netflix strikes deals in short-form video push

AFP
July 7, 2026

Netflix is pushing deeper into short-form video with content from BuzzFeed, Penske and other media organizations – Copyright AFP Patrick T. Fallon

Netflix is pushing deeper into the short-form video territory dominated by TikTok and YouTube, striking licensing deals with a slate of major US media publishers to carry bite-sized content on its platform.

The streaming giant has signed agreements with publishers including Penske Media, BuzzFeed Studios, Conde Nast, Hearst Magazines and People Inc. to feature a range of news, lifestyle, celebrity and how-to video programming.

The deal was reported on Tuesday in entertainment news outlet Variety, which is owned by Penske Media and will provide content in the arrangement.

Hearst confirmed the deal with Netflix to AFP, but didn’t provide more details.

The content — spanning episodes from around two minutes to 20 minutes or more — is set to begin rolling out on August 3 for subscribers in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand.

The deals bring recognizable digital and print media brands onto Netflix’s platform, including Vanity Fair, Vogue, Rolling Stone, Bon Appetit, People and Variety.

Popular series covered by the agreements include Vanity Fair’s “Lie Detector,” BuzzFeed’s “30 Questions” and Variety’s “Know Their Lines?”

“Members don’t just want to watch a show or film and move on — they want to keep exploring the stories and personalities they love long after the final credits roll,” said John Derderian, Netflix’s vice president of animation series and kids and family TV.

The publisher push comes as Netflix faces mounting pressure from platforms that have reshaped how audiences consume video.

YouTube surpassed Netflix in average daily viewing time in 2025, according to research firm Digital i cited in TechCrunch. TikTok began closing the gap back in 2024, when US adults were spending nearly as much time on the app as on Netflix, according to eMarketer data.

Netflix acknowledged the competitive threat recently with a product redesign that added a TikTok-style vertical video feed, and has expanded into video games, podcasts and live events.

Internal data reported by Bloomberg showed viewers increasingly abandoning popular shows before a second season — a sign that the streaming giant’s signature binge model may be losing ground to the content habits cultivated by short-form rivals.
It’s coming home: Bayeux tapestry arrives in London in overnight operation

AFP
July 10, 2026 

The Bayeux Tapestry tells the story of the 11th century Norman conquest of England – Copyright AFP/File LOIC VENANCE

In the dead of night on Friday, a large yellow truck led by a police escort made its way through the empty streets of London. Unbeknownst to late night stragglers, it was carrying a 1,000-year-old masterpiece: the Bayeux Tapestry.

The hushed-up, nighttime operation was the result of years of negotiations, tricky logistical planning and multiple technical studies to ensure the integrity of the medieval artwork.

Fears for the safety of the lace-like delicate tapestry, which has been insured by the British government for an eye-watering £800 million (over $1 billion), meant that the date and details of the transfer were kept under wraps until the last moment.

It is believed to be the first time the 68-metre (224-foot) embroidered tapestry has left France in more than 900 years, and the first time it has been moved in over 40 years.

But after two test trips with a full-sized reproduction of the tapestry, the operation appeared a well-oiled machine.

“It’s been a huge amount of work for my colleagues here at the museum and in France. So, I think we’ll all be very relieved to see it arrive safely,” project curator Millie Horton-Insch told AFP as she awaited the tapestry.

The artwork, which chronicles scenes from the 1066 Battle of Hastings and the start of the Norman Conquest of England, was held in a shock-proof and temperature controlled case to protect the delicate embroidery.

The truck carrying the tapestry left its home in northern France on Thursday night, arriving at the British Museum just before 3:00 am (0200 GMT).

As it backed into a gate at the rear of the empty museum, the truck was greeted by a handful of staff and a small media contingent including AFP journalists.

“I’ve never been so excited to see a gate open,” someone said, as others filmed the truck opening up to reveal the metal container.

– ‘Unique’ –

British Museum director Nicholas Cullinan and French ambassador to the UK Helene Duchene posed for photos, as those travelling in the convoy shook hands with museum staff wearing hi-vis vests.

“It’s a unique moment,” Cullinan told AFP after the tapestry arrived.


The truck carrying the tapestry left its home in northern France on Thursday night – Copyright ${image.metadata.node.credit} ${image.metadata.node.creator}

As the hulking metal cage, weighing more than a tonne, was lowered from the truck and wheeled into the museum, the gathering burst into applause.

The tapestry is now expected to remain in its case for a “few days” to acclimitise and “rest after its long journey”, explained Horton-Insch.

“After which it will be unpacked, mounted, a full condition check will take place and then it will be put within its showcase,” in time for the exhibition to open on September 10, said the curator.

The exhibition, which will run until July 2027, has generated record-breaking enthusiasm, with the museum selling out 100,000 tickets for the first four months of the show.

French President Emmanuel Macron, who promised the tapestry in a loan one year ago, hailed what France and Britain “can achieve when they join forces”, in an article in The Times newspaper.

While its exact origins are shrouded in mystery, the tapestry depicting the start of the invasion by William the Conqueror’s Norman army is widely thought to have been made in England before being transferred to Bayeux.

“This is really about bringing two countries with this incredible showcase together to collaborate,” Cullinan said, acknowledging the role of the tapestry as a “supreme work of art within French culture”.

“In some ways, you could say it feels like it’s come home. But then it will be going truly home next year, when it returns back to Bayeux.”

Bayeux tapestry to arrive in London in secret, high-stakes operation


AFP
July 8, 2026

The Bayeux Tapestry depicts the last successful military invasion of England in 1066 – Copyright POOL/AFP LOU BENOIST

The 1,000-year-old Bayeux Tapestry depicting the last successful military invasion of England will arrive in London in the coming days by dead of night and under “police protection”, the UK envoy helping to coordinate the historic transfer told AFP.

But Peter Ricketts, the UK’s Bayeux Tapestry envoy, remained coy about the exact date the “incredibly fragile object” would arrive from its home in northern France for a major exhibition at the British Museum.

“We don’t want any untoward incidents happening. And so that’s why we’re keeping the exact details and date confidential,” said Ricketts, describing the high-security operation around the 11th century work.

“When it’s ready to be exhibited, we want millions of people to see it,” added Ricketts, Britain’s former ambassador to France.

The clandestine arrangements have done little to dampen enthusiasm. Ricketts said he was “not at all surprised” that the British Museum sold a record 100,000 tickets on the first day of sales for the exhibition, set to open on September 10 and run until July 11, 2027.

“Every British child knows the date of 1066, the Battle of Hastings,” when England’s King Harold was defeated by the Norman invader William the Conqueror, depicted in the 68-metre (224-feet) long tapestry, he said.

The battle changed the course of history for England, France and Europe, “but most people don’t know the tapestry, most people haven’t been to Bayeux” to see it, said Ricketts.

Embroidered in wool thread, the tapestry tells its story in words and images, but its origins have remained shrouded in some mystery and much speculation.

This is the first time the tapestry, which usually rests in a museum in Bayeux in northwestern Normandy, will be transported to and displayed in the UK.

For its cross-Channel journey, the tapestry has been “folded up like a curtain” and “put in a very, very high-tech container” with climate and vibration controls to protect the delicate embroidery.

“It will come on a truck, and it will come under the (Channel) tunnel on the shuttle service, and then it will be driven straight to London to the back of the British Museum,” said Ricketts.

The complicated transfer of the tapestry, which was promised by French President Emmanuel Macron in a loan, is the result of more than a year of negotiations for the former ambassador.



– ‘Indelible memory’ –



Despite fears voiced by some over transporting the ancient artwork, Ricketts did not waver.

“I saw the experts working together, the conservators, the people who really know about the risks of moving the object,” said Ricketts, who now sits in the UK’s unelected upper chamber the House of Lords.

“If they had said it’s impossible without damage to the tapestry, nobody would have pressed them on that.

“But their approach was always — let’s work out the way to do this safely, and one by one we overcame all the different issues,” added the tapestry envoy.

As for the insurance, which has valued the tapestry at some £800 million (nearly $1.1 billion) — backed by the UK Treasury — every effort is being made to ensure that it does not have to be used.

“All our work is to ensure that the tapestry goes back to France — and it will go back to France, I promise, safe and sound,” said Ricketts.

“Of course, if there is damage yes, the British taxpayer is on the hook to pay damages. But that just shows how serious we are about ensuring that it goes back in good condition.”

Once in London, the tapestry will be displayed flat, for the first time, in a specially made glass case in a “choreography with I think 80 different conservators — intensely careful, difficult work”.

The British Museum’s exhibition on Tutankhamun — which drew a record 1.69 million visitors in 1972 — transformed the way visitors viewed ancient Egypt.

“I think the tapestry will have the same effect as that for millions of people,” said the envoy, adding it would “leave an indelible memory”.

“I think this will change people’s mind about thinking about the past.”